►
Description
Coverage of the October 19, 2021 Cupertino City Council Teleconference Meeting.
(Live Streamed Version)
A
E
C
C
C
C
But
there's
more,
we
actually,
we
actually
have
created
a
plaque
for
you,
boris
and
unfortunately
we
can't
get
all
those
words
into
a
plaque.
But
let
me
let
at
home
know
what
that
plaque
says.
It
says
the
city
of
cupertino,
boris
stanley
day
on
october,
19
2021
with
much
gratitude
for
your
role,
as
quote
midwife,
end
quote,
which
is
your
description
in
the
incorporation
of
the
city
of
cupertino
in
1955
from
the
city
of
cupertino.
F
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
the
council
and
you
for
your
guidance
in
this
situation
and
I'd
like
to
put
my
thoughts
as
to
the
function
of
approximation.
So
my
head
doesn't
get
too
big,
oh
sure,
when
the
the
city
of
cupertino
election
was
over,
there's
a
tendency
by
everybody
to
give
short
names
to
situations
and
one
of
those
that
cropped
up
with
what
you
just
mentioned.
F
That
similarly
happened
here,
the
corporation
for
a
national
person.
The
gestation
period
is
nine
months.
For
somebody
like
this
corporation
event,
it
was
two
years
but
like
any
parent
knows,
that's
just
the
beginning,
and
it's
not.
Somebody
else
has
to
do
the
heavy
lifting
in
producing
an
adult
child
into
a
mature
grown
individual.
F
What
you're
doing
really
is
one
of
the
principles
of
democracy
that
is
is
the
small
guy
has
a
chance
to
make
a
difference,
and
I
think
that
happened
here
and
I
happen
to
be,
incidentally
there
at
the
right
time,
perhaps
in
the
right
situation,
and
I
see
that
the
result
of
this
is
a
great
city.
You
took
us
on
a
tour,
I
can't
believe
what's
happened
and
we
end
up
with
something
that
has
a
fairly
sophisticated
city,
but
still
humble
and
not
chloe.
F
And
I
was
with
you
your
permission
to
have
somebody
else
to
add.
I
want
to
thank
the
council
again.
I
want
to
thank
you
and
your
guidance
and
this,
but
I'd
asked
whether
or
not
we
could
have
a
minute
or
so
if
somebody
had
a
question
of
me
that
they
had
that
they'd
like
to
answer
whether
it's
a
personal
or
just
inquisitive
or
sure,
or
even
if
they
have
some
disagreement
as
to
what
I've
said
or
what
we've
done.
C
H
H
F
Well,
that's
why
I'm
glad
you're
the
city
councilman,
that's
a
that's
a
heck
of
a
question
pretty
all-inclusive.
I
suppose
that's
one
reason
you
were
elected
because
you
seem
to
have
the
talent
of
john
of
deciding
things.
Having
situations
come
before
you
that
you
have
to
pass
on
what
the
mechanics
are
of
making
those
decisions
are
they're,
mostly
instinctive,
also
a
product
of
your
experience,
also
the
objectives
that
you
think
might
be
accomplished
by
what
you
face,
the
all
the
things
that
are
acquired
when,
when
there's
leadership
involved.
A
F
C
H
I
Die
well,
I
want
to
say
hello
and
of
course
doing
this
proclamation
for
my
husband
has
made
him
very,
very
happy,
and
we
thank
you
for
that
and
we
came
all
the
way.
I
don't
know
how
many
miles
it
is
I'll.
Ask
the
pilots
that
brought
us
from
florida
to
be
here
tonight
for
this,
but
we
came
a
long
way
and
we're
happy.
We
did
and
thank
you
very
much
thank.
C
And
but
but
I
will
say
if
any
members
of
the
public
are
interested
in
meeting
boris
and
isabel,
we
do
have
a
historical
society
event
happening
at
quinlan
center,
this
friday
at
7
p.m,
and
the
new
exhibit
that
they're
soft
unveiling
is
the
beginnings
of
cupertino
so
who
more
appropriate
to
be
there
than
boris
and
isabel.
So,
thank
you
very
much.
C
J
Okay,
great,
thank
you
this.
What
an
honor!
I
am
so
pleased
that
that
you
all
were
able
to
come
out
from
florida
and
come
back
to
see
cupertino.
Now
we
love
our
city.
We
thank
you
so
much
for
taking
the
time
back
in
the
days
when
everything
was
orchard,
land
to
incorporate,
help
incorporate
cupertino,
and
we
will
do
everything
possible
to
make
sure
that
your
legacy
continues
in
our
beautiful
city,
because
we
adore
cupertino.
J
We
know
it's
lovely
history
and
we
are
so
proud
of
the
city
that
it's
become
and
it's
people
like
you
that
have
taken
you
and
your
lovely
wife
that
have
taken
the
time
to
make
sure
that
the
foundations
of
this
city
are
as
strong
and
wonderful
as
it
is
now.
Thank
you
so
much
what
a
delight
and
have
a
wonderful,
a
time
here
in
cupertino.
A
C
F
You
for
your
gracious
remarks,
there's
a
emotional
part
of
this
to
me,
because
I
had
a
disappointment
way
back
66
years
ago
and
a
little
sadness
that
from
the
efforts
of
me
and
others,
of
course,
but
in
this
particular
case
we're
talking
about
borah
stanley
on
proclamation
day,
and
it's
so
great
that
somehow
this
was
resurrected
and
I
appreciate
it
so
much
hey
everyone.
Let's
give.
A
C
I
I
C
L
Well,
thank
you
so
much
what
a
treat
to
be
here
and
to
follow
that
really
motivating
and
adorable
sorry,
but
at
95.
If
that's
a
sign
of
what
city
government
can
do
for
your
cognition
and
your
passion,
I'm
sticking
with
city
government,
that's
a
fabulous
testament
to
those
guys.
So
I'm
pleased
to
be
here.
M
L
So
I
the
the
helen
putnam
award,
is
it's
just
a
lovely
thing,
it's
in
it's
in
line
with
what
I
think
is
is
happening
tonight,
which
is
celebrating
some
of
the
milestones
that
your
city
has
accomplished.
In
particular,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
recognize
council
members
mayor.
I
saw
you
in
sacramento
at
the
league
of
con
league
of
california
city's
event.
This
year
I
saw
council
member
moore
ling.
L
You
were
there
as
well
and
of
course,
councilmember
way,
who
is
now
part
of
the
peninsula
division,
executive
committee,
meaning
time
and
meetings
and
more
taxing
on
her
already
tight
schedule,
but
it's
a
way
of
participating
in
the
division
at
large.
So
thank
you
for
your
service.
I
have
a
brief
presentation.
This
shouldn't
be
more
than
about
a
minute
and
then
there's
a
30
second
video.
L
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
this
was
shared
with
2
000
local
electeds
around
the
state,
when
your
city
was
recognized
for
your
work
with
the
youth
commission
and
for
incorporating,
I
guess
it's
pizza
and
politics,
but
we'll
get
to
that.
Just
briefly,
let
me
share
my
screen
on
the
presentation,
which
is
the
helen
putnam
award.
L
This
is
this
program
that
our
officers
and
the
league
do
for
cities
around
the
state
to
continue
to
recognize
best
practices
and
to
improve
the
systems
we
we
engage.
Our
cities
with
these
are
the
current
members
of
the
peninsula
division
and
I'm
thrilled.
We
have
a
council
member
way
on
us
on
our
division
this
year
there
is
others
that
are
playing
roles,
active
roles,
council,
member
moore,
I
know
you're
on
a
pretty
serious
council,
a
task
force
right
now
and
others
are
contributing
in
other
ways
and
policy
committees.
L
But
the
work
is,
I'm
really
never
done,
but
let's
get
to
the
fun
part,
which
is
this
recognition
of
the
ruth
reeling
award.
I'm
going
to
play
a
short
video
here
and
it
really
is
only
30
seconds,
but
it's
really
fun
and
it
was
shared
with
the
entire
league
of
california
cities
at
annual
conference
this
year.
So
if
the
technology
works
and
the
screen
share
works,
we
should
be
in
business.
L
Congratulations,
you
have
given
voiced
to
young
people
and
given
voice
to
the
participatory
process
that
is
really
inspiring.
There
are
other
cities
around
the
state
that
saw
this
and
commented.
How
can
we
get
that
in
our
city?
So
you
may
get
some
inquiries.
I
just
want
to
give
another
30
seconds
on
what
the
helen
putnam
award
is.
Helen
putnam,
of
course,
was
elected
president
of
the
league,
california,
cities
in
1978.
L
L
C
C
But
I
would
also
like
to
symbolically
provide
this
award
to
our
former
teen
commissioner
and
a
person
that
I
recently
saw
because
she
won
a
crest
award
for
cupertino
recognized
as
extra
steps
taken,
and
I
realized
that
we
were
going
to
have
this
meeting
and
that
we
would
have
boris
here
so
hopefully
in
a
symbolic
transition
back
to
live
meetings
or
some
hybrid
form
we
can
bring.
You
live
kelly
tong,
so
welcome
kelly
and
here's
that
award
and
kelly's
proud
parents
are
here
as
well
to
tape
this.
N
N
N
I
am
proud
of
the
cupertino
saratoga
and
campbell
youth
and
teen
commissions
for
planning,
organizing
and
implementing
a
virtual
version
of
the
pizza
and
politics.
Despite
the
challenges
and
difficulties
presented
by
copenhagen,
pizza
and
politics
has
helped
teens
understand
the
importance
of
voting
in
the
diverse
political
viewpoints
of
different
candidates.
N
C
All
right,
thank
you
kelly
big
hand
for
all
the
teams
and
everyone
that
has
bookended
our
our
history.
We
have
such
hope
for
the
future
and
we're
able
to
honor
the
past,
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
put
this
to
balance
out
and
thanks
very
much
our
our
recognition
of
war
stanley
today
so
there's
the
helen
putnam
award
we'll
go
ahead
and
commence
with
the
rest
of
the
agenda
now
before.
C
C
C
J
C
J
And
that
was
siri
all
right.
Welcome,
siri,
yes
hi!
This
is
jennifer
griffin.
I
am
just
so
inspired
to
see
one
of
the
gentlemen
and
his
wife,
who
were
here
at
the
founding
of
cupertino
and
with
the
putnam
award.
What
inspiration
for
our
youth,
our
future,
I
will
say
again.
I
am
so
convinced
that
the
cities
in
california
are
so
vitally
important
to
the
state
cities
were
here
before
california
became
a
state
in
1850.
J
They
were
here
with
the
there
were
cities
that
were
here
that
were
from
the
original
inhabitants
of
the
state.
Many
many
thousands
of
years
ago,
when
the
spanish
period
began,
mexico
period
began.
There
were
cities
that
had
been
established
and
that
have
transferred
into
california
and
have
become
part
of
the
united
states.
J
J
And
I
am
so
concerned
that
our
leadership
in
sacramento
and
even
in
washington
dc,
that
there
is
a
council
culture
for
our
cities,
and
I
am
more
adamant
too,
with
the
founders
of
our
city,
that
we
make
sure
that
cupertino
is
still
here
and
as
strong
and
vital
of
force.
200
years
from
now-
and
I
commit
the
rest
of
my
life
to
doing
that.
Thank
you
so
much.
C
O
O
O
Another
thing
I
have
concerns
about
is
the
term
architectural
features
and
developments
commercial
development,
homes
too,
because
fireplaces
chimneys
go
into
that.
But
I
had
concerns
that
developers
take
advantage
of
that
term
and
the
fact
that
there's
very
little
enforcement-
if
they
don't
follow
the
rules-
and
there
are
specific
instances
of
that
kirsten-
has
some
pictures
of
some
at
main
street
if
she
wants
to
put
them
up
or
if
she
wants
to
share
them
with
you
later.
Oh
thanks
kirsten.
O
O
Well,
you
want
me
to
okay,
let
me
cure
some
while
you're
trying
to
do
that.
I'll
keep
going
and
another
thing
I
want
to
remind
everyone
or
inform
the
newer
people
is
if,
if
it's
going
to
be
insisted
on
using
the
term
community
benefit
in
the
future
in
any
document
or
any
negotiation,
despite
the
fact
that
this
buzzword
was
stricken
from
the
general
plan
years
ago,
it
just
needs
to
be
known
that
it's
very
important
to
include
the
entire
community
at
what
the
benefit
is
supposed
to
be
and
force
what
it
is.
O
C
O
M
Okay,
perfect
so
hi
everyone,
my
name
is
tara
and
I'm
part
of
the
menstrual
equality
committee.
So
next
slide,
please
thank
you.
So,
just
a
little
bit
about
us
we're
a
group
of
six
seniors
who
currently
attend
cupertino
high
school
and
for
our
ap
government
class.
We
wanted
to
identify
a
problem
in
our
community
to
work
on
something
that
we've
noticed.
That
is
that
our
school
currently
provides
free
pads,
which
is
a
project
initiated
by
a
student
and
currently
continued
through
the
school
budget,
because
this
is
currently
a
cupertino
high
school
specific
program.
M
M
M
M
M
In
order
to
increase
the
accessibility
of
menstrual
products,
we
believe
it
is
important
to
reach
out
to
as
many
communities
as
possible.
One
possible
way
is
to
provide
menstrual
products
in
public
restrooms.
This
would
this
would
allow
us
allow
those
who
need
menstrual
products,
a
fixed
place
to
acquire
them
from
that
can
be
easily
obtained,
so
some
places
we
believe,
will
greatly
benefit
from
menstrual
products
are
restrooms
found
in
parks,
as
well
as
those
in
quinlan
community
center.
Another
potential
place
is
the
bathrooms
in
main
street,
which
are
privately
owned
by
sand
hill
construction.
M
M
We
have
a
solution
to
this
in
order
to
ensure
menstrual
products
are
secure.
There
are
a
variety
of
potential
dispensers.
One
possible
option
is
the
company
varigos
varigos
provides
touchless
dispensers
to
provide
menstrual
products
in
a
safe
and
sanitary
manner.
It
costs
three
hundred
dollars
per
machine
per
month,
which
covers
both
the
cost
of
maintenance
and
the
menstrual
product
supply.
M
C
Tara
very
well
done.
It
was
really
an
honor
to
work
with
you
and
your
team
when
you
reached
out
to
council
and
councilmember
moore,
was
able
to
indicate
and
find
out
that
ab367
in
fact
was
in
front
of
the
governor
at
that
time
and
we
turned
over
a
very
quick
letter
from
my
office,
and
I
think
that
it's
just
such
an
exemplary
way
of
showing
that
the
system
really
works.
You
know
everything
I
think
is
converging
upon
this
point
from
this
meeting
up
to
this
time.
C
So
so,
thank
you
very
much
for
what
you
do.
We
will
certainly
keep
a
serious
effort
to
make
sure
that
this
implementation
is
very
successful
in
cupertino,
so
we'll
go
and
move
on
to
reports
by
council
and
staff
at
this
time.
Right
now,
we're
at
item
number
three
brief
reports
on
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements.
C
So
this
will
be
announcements
of
anything
that
has
taken
place
of
note
since
our
october
5th
meeting
that
each
council
member
wishes
to
share
with
the
public,
we
have
approximately
a
minute
each
that's
one
minute
to
provide
some
of
those
updates.
Would
anyone
like
to
provide
those
updates?
First
on
our
city
council
I'll
go
buy
a
show
of
hands,
I
don't
see
any
hands
up
so
I'll,
go
ahead
and
call
council
member
way
who
has
her
hand
up
followed
by
vice
mayor
ciao,
councilman,
councilmember,
moore.
E
P
Hi
so
last
thursday
the
cupertino
european
district
decided
to
close
three
schools
in
our
area,
regnert
meyerholz
and
john
muir,
and
then
they
will
expand
the
chinese
language
emerging
program
to
its
own
site
at
muir,
and
then
there
are
some
resident
inquiries
on
one
about
solar
panel.
Streamlining
and
the
city
already
has
an
online
process
to
apply
for
solar
panel
and
the
normal
turnaround.
Time
is
24
hours.
This
is
the
response
from
the
staff
and
then
the
sunlight
is
inquired
about
city
hall.
P
Seismic
study,
the
city,
actually
has
a
comprehensive
archive
of
the
past
consideration
of
the
civic
center.
Just
google
cooperatino.org
civic
center
you'll
find
the
archive
of
meetings
next
lehigh
cement
on
the
county
lawsuit
with
the
court
ruled
in
favor
of
the
county
by
sustaining
the
county.
Still
more.
That
means,
if
lehigh
will
require,
will
require
use,
permit
or
investing
determination
before
it
exports
aggregate
and
for
lehigh
information,
google
cooperatino.org
lehigh
summit.
H
Great
the
topics
I'd
like
to
briefly
cover
so
far
with
I
attended
the
homeless
jobs
program,
which
is
part
of
our
work
program,
which
was
between
staff
and
west
valley,
community
services,
and
let
the
community
know
that
they
have
reached
out
to
the
homeless.
They
are
hoping
to
have
two
homeless
people
on
that
work
program
by
mid
to
late
november,
great
also
attended,
as
councilman
way
said,
the
rolling
hills
50th
anniversary.
H
It
was
great
to
see
our
youth
run
a
meeting
similar
to
our
council
meetings
by
themselves
with
no
adult
interaction
needed.
It
was
great
50th
anniversary
4-h.
The
experiences
they're
giving
to
kids
hands-on
can't
be
over
estimated,
the
value
the
resident
that
talked
about
the
planning
items
of
privacy,
screening
deck
sizes,
the
architectural
features
I
agree
wholeheartedly.
We
need
to
study
those
make
sure
that
we
get
those
things
well
defined
so
that
they
don't
get
taken
advantage
of.
They
should
be
held
to
what
the
council
approves
and
that's
it.
H
Q
Q
There
was
something
mentioned
by
seth
miller
from
the
peninsula
division.
I
have
been
accepted
to
the
california
cities
aca
7
subcommittee
from
the
environmental
quality
policy
committee,
and
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
is
making
a
recommendation
to
the
league
of
california
cities
regarding
aca
7.
and
on
october
14th.
I
attended
the
vta
ribbon
cutting
ceremony
in
gilroy
for
the
rapid
568
line,
which
will
be
a
supplemental
route
substituting
for
or
in
addition
to
a
route
that
has
over
90
stops
between
gilroy
and
darydon.
Q
C
Great,
thank
you
councilmember
moore,
so,
as
you
can
all
see
that
we've
had
a
very
full
docket
between
the
last
meeting
and
now.
In
fact,
there
were
a
couple
of
days
where
we
were
overlapping
and
it
was
really
nice
to
see
some
council
members
go
to
one
event
and
another
council
member
or
go
to
other
events.
C
So
what
I'll
add
to
that
is,
I
did
have
a
library,
joint
powers,
authority
meeting
where
I
represent
cupertino
on
the
district
that
that
manages
our
library
system
and
I'm
on
the
finance
committee.
There,
the
finances
for
the
library
system,
similar
to
our
city
they're,
looking
very
good
for
the
most
part,
and
I
would
say
that
one
notable
item
to
report
is
that
they
are
allocating
essentially
a
full-time
equivalent
for
support
services.
C
You
know
efforts,
and
so
we
are
also
looking
on
the
jpo,
the
jpa
board
of
library,
of
trying
to
outreach
to
the
population
that
might
need
some
social
services.
In
the
libraries
and
so
right
now,
this
is
essentially
going
to
be
divided
theoretically
between
milpitas
and
gilroy.
But
if
we
see
in
other
branches
the
needs
just
know
that
the
mechanism
is
there
and
so
in
cupertino
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me.
C
I'd
also
like
to
report
that
we've
been
going
over
a
number
of
events
for
mr
stanley
over
the
course
of
this
week
and
again
we
have
the
historical
society.
Soft
opening
of
the
exhibit
everyone's
welcome.
That'll
be
7
p.m.
This
this
friday
evening,
and
so
outside
of
that
I
did
have
one
more
item
that
I
wanted
to
describe,
but
I'm
kind
of
blanking
on
it
right
now
and
hoping
that
if
I
talk
long
enough
I'll
actually
remember
it,
but
unfortunately
that's
not
happening.
C
P
P
They
they
have
an
announcement
that
there
will
be
a
valley,
water,
drought
summit
on
october
23rd,
but
there
were
some
other
presentations,
but
the
main
issue
is
cities.
Association
will
be,
they
will
change
the
structure
to
be
from
unincorporated
to
join
the
powers
attorney
general
joint
powers
authority.
P
They
are
working
on
the
document
once
the
document
is
all
finished,
probably
in
three
months.
They
will
then
bring
it
to
the
console
for
approval.
Personally,
I
have
a
concern.
Why
do
I
even
need
to
move
to
joint
power
authority,
but
I
wasn't
on
the
board
last
year.
So
that's
something
other
council
members
you
might,
let's
not.
P
C
H
H
Q
Okay,
I'll
make
this
really
quick.
On
october
14th,
I
chaired
the
vta
pack,
where
we
discussed
the
transit
opportunity
development
policy
at
length
and
that
topic
is
going
to
be
coming
back
to
that
committee
to
be
discussed
some
more,
in
particular,
the
jobs
to
housing
ratio,
I'm
also
on
the
legislative
review
committee.
I
just
want
to
mention
that
sb
792
was
vetoed.
Q
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I
actually
inadvertently
reported
that
on
my
jpa
library,
committee
assignment
and
so
I'll.
Just
keep
it
at
that.
So
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
item
number
five,
that
is
a
city
manager,
update
and
that
started
out
as
a
covet
update.
But
now
it's
more
of
a
generalized
update
from
the
city
manager
regarding
not
just
emergency
response
efforts,
but
also
other
business.
R
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
members
of
the
council,
I'll
try
to
keep
this
brief,
as
you
have
done.
First,
going
back
to
the
second
ceremonial
item,
I
got
my
start
in
city
government
serving
on
a
team
commission.
So
I
always
that
touches
the
heart
and
in
particular,
while
the
helen
putnam
awards
are
a
series
of
awards
done
for
all
sorts
of
city
services.
R
Moving
on
in
terms
of
the
public
speaker,
I
did
want
to
report
that
your
staff
is
already
working
on
the
menstrual
products
for
city
facilities
and
city
parks.
We
are
getting
price
estimates
now.
We
will
include
the
vending
opportunity
provided
by
the
committee
representative
today.
My
plan
is
to
fund
those
out
of
the
manager's
discretionary
fund
for
the
balance
of
this
year
and
then
to
bring
it
forward
to
council
as
a
budget
package
for
your
consideration
for
ongoing
service
in
future
years.
So
that's
why
we
are
pursuing
that
for
council
requests.
R
Also,
I've
been
asked
to
report
every
council
meeting
on
items
on
the
council
work
program,
and
so
I
did
want
to
report
that
one
item
on
your
work
program
for
this
year.
It
was
a
lower
priority,
but
staff
has
achieved.
It
nonetheless
was
the
dogs
off
lease
program
at
jolimon
park,
staff
reported
on
the
three
success
of
a
pilot
to
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
and
both
the
parks
and
rec
creation.
R
Director
and
myself
met
separately
with
representatives
of
the
dog
doctors,
community
and
we've
moved
forward
with
a
new
administrative
policy
to
allow
dogs
off
leash
on
an
ongoing
basis
at
charliman
park
and
we'll
be
reporting
back
periodically
on
there.
So
there's
one
item
checked
off
on
the
councilwork
program
for
this
year
and
we
will
be
doing
a
fuller
update
on
all
the
council
work
program
items
at
your
next
meeting
on
november
2nd
and
that
is
coming
forward
on
the
quarterly
basis
as
requested
looking
ahead.
We
also
have
something
to
celebrate
today
via
cupertino
restarted
today.
R
Serving
the
residents
of
cupertino
mass
are
required
for
all
passengers
and
the
driver
just
given.
We
are
still
in
a
coveted
effect.
These
service
hours
are
monday
through
friday,
7
a.m,
to
7
p.m,
as
well
as
saturday
9
00
a.m
to
5
p.m.
The
fee
pairs
are
four
dollars
per
trip,
but
there
are
discounted
pairs
available
for
weekly
monthly
and
other
needs.
You
can
get
more
information
both
on
the
city's
website
and
it
will
be
the
cover
story
of
the
november
scene
going
out
in
just
a
couple
weeks.
R
So
I'll
look
forward
to
that
parks
and
recreation
has
a
couple
great
events.
I
I
had
to
announce
the
nightmare
if
you'll
spare
another
moment
which
is
we
have
halloween
is
before
us
and
of
course,
we've
announced
previously
the
programs
doing
for
the
youth
of
our
community,
but
we
also
have
a
pumpkin
decorating
contest
for
seniors.
R
You
can
sign
up
as
individuals
or
it
can
be
grandparents
and
their
grandkids,
and
this
is
an
inaugural
program
that
we're
doing
for
the
first
time
and
you
can
carve
your
pumpkins
decorate
your
pumpkins
draw
or
paint
on
your
pumpkins.
All
you
have
to
do
is
submit
your
entries
by
halloween
day
and
I
think
that's
a
exciting
way
to
cross
our
community
boundaries
and
to
involve
youth,
grandparents
and
grandkids.
R
Together,
you
can
find
information
on
our
website
or
register
at
regforwreck.org,
which
is
our
online
portal.
I
did
want
to
mention
one
other
item
that
has
a
deadline
of
halloween
october
31st
at
5
pm
and
that's
to
apply
to
be
cupertino's,
22,
21,
22,
poet,
laureate,
and
so
that's.
The
annual
advocate
for
poetry
for
the
city
of
cupertino
and
the
application
deadline
again
is
halloween
to
make
it
easy
to
remember.
R
R
In
terms
of
county
statistics,
our
seven
day
average
continues
to
drop,
which
is
good
for
cupertino.
We
only
had
nine
new
cases
over
the
last
week
and
that's
a
a
low
mark
for
us
and
we
remain
the
city
with
the
lowest
case
rate
for
a
hundred
thousand
in
santa
clara
county
and
testing
continues
sponsored
by
the
county
at
our
senior
center,
and
the
easiest
way
to
remember
is
they'll,
be
on
the
first
and
third
mondays
for
november
and
december
at
the
senior
center,
and
we
had
355
tests
administered
yesterday.
So
it's
clearly
a
service.
R
C
R
Absolutely
I
almost
proactively
did
that,
but
I
was
worried
I
was
going
on
too
long.
I
am
doing
a
review
of
code
enforcement
working
with
your
other
city
staff.
We've
already
relocated
our
two
code
enforcement
officers
from
the
sheriff's
office
back
to
city
hall.
Just
so
there's
a
better
coordination
and
communication
of
code
enforcement
needs
throughout
our
community
and
we're
now
reviewing
a
number
of
practices
that
I've
seen.
Other
cities
use
to
free
up
bandwidth
or
increase
code
enforcement
like
almost
every
city
in
california,
since
prop
13,
we
only
do
complaint
base
code
enforcement.
R
My
assessment
is
cupertino
is
relatively
well
staffed
because
we
have
two
and
a
half
code
enforcement
officers,
including
weekend
coverage
plus
we
have
a
separate
zoning
code
enforcement
officer,
so
we're
relatively
well
staffed
compared
to
other
cities
that
I've
managed
and
worked
with
in
northern
california.
So
what
I'm
really
focusing
on
is
some
of
our
systems.
What
can
we
do
to
make
the
work
throughput
even
stronger
and
better?
R
We're
also
looking
at
some
of
the
larger,
more
intractable
problems
that
have
persisted
for
years,
and
how
can
we
take
more
assertive
actions
to
make
sure
we
don't
have
long-standing,
problematic
properties
that
are
negatively
impacting
their
surrounding
neighbors.
So
this
is
a
comprehensive
review
that
I
hope
to
bring
a
report
on
to
you
before
the
end
of
my
tenure
as
your
interim
city
manager,
okay,.
P
P
Q
But
I
was
just
wondering
if
3-1-1
allows
for
anonymous
reporting,
or
must
you
provide
a
name,
because
some
people
might
not
want
to
use
that
if
they
need
to
provide
their
name,
email
address
and
phone
number.
If
the
city
has
all
of
that,
because
when
you
go
to
code
enforcement
here
you
have
that
anonymity
in
reporting.
R
You
know
I
cannot
answer
that
I'll
rather
report.
Well,
actually
I
just
got
the
answer.
Yes,
anonymous
is
okay,
the
beauty
of
technology,
so
you
can
report
anonymously.
Of
course,
we
can't
do
any
follow-up
with
the
person
who
files
anonymously,
but
for
many
of
the
cases
we
also
can't
do
follow-up
as
well.
If
there
are
privacy
considerations
involved.
C
Q
Okay,
mayor
paul,
I'm
not
sure
that
I
necessarily
want
to
pull
the
items,
but
under
item
10
there
is
an
hdl
payment
of
12,
000
and
under
item
13,
there's
an
hdl
payment
of
twenty
three
thousand
dollars.
I
would
like
to
have
an
explanation
of
those,
but
I
I
in
the
interest
of
time
I'm
not
really
wanting
to
pull
them.
So
if
there's
some
way
that
I
can
work
around
that,
I
will.
C
Q
C
It
won't
take
too
long
to
get
those
get
those
get
those
taken
care
of.
If
it's
just
a
quick
answer,
so
can
I
have
a
motion
for
items
six
through
nine,
eleven,
twelve
and
fourteen
councilmember
moore,
so
moved
and
councilmember
way?
Second,
is
there
any
care
for
discussion
on
these
seeing
our
hands
raised?
Madam
city
clerk,
would
you
please
vote
us
on
items
six
through
nine,
eleven,
twelve
and
fourteen
of
the
consent
calendar.
D
C
R
Thank
you,
councilmember
moore
and
members
of
council.
Both
of
these
hdl
payments
are
for
balances
due
under
their
existing
contracts,
so
they're
not
for
expenditures
beyond
the
existing
contract,
and
that
was
the
information
I
received
from
our
staff
and
both
our
director
of
administrative
services
and
our
director
of
community
development
are
available
if
additional
details
are
required,
but
they're,
not
the
issue
that
was
brought
up
to
council
last
spring
about
amending
the
contract
for
greater
expenses.
That
issue
is
going
to
your
audit
committee
next
monday.
R
C
C
C
C
C
19.56.030
19.56.030,
f
and
so
forth.
I
believe
we'll
be
reading
this
again
through
the
city
clerk
as
the
second
reading.
Would
anyone
like
to
on
staff
present
any
information
on
this
item?
I'm
happy
to
go
on
to
our
council
to
see
if
there
are
any
questions
with
regard
to
second
reading
of
this
item
before
we
do
that,
if
there
are
none,
then
I
would
be
happy
to
open
it
up
to
the
public
for
any
comments,
given
that
this
is
second
reading
all
right.
C
C
A
C
J
J
I
am
all
the
more
concerned
that
the
city
has
city
and
cities
across
the
state,
because
they're
trying
sacramento
is
trying
to
do
a
cancel
culture
on
the
cities,
and
I
don't
think
that
that's
appropriate,
because
people
live
in
cities,
but
I
think
that
the
density
bonus
situation
that
was
taken
along
with
this
ordinance.
The
city
has
worked
on
it
to
its
due
diligence.
J
We
have
to
protect
ourselves.
Land
that
is
up.
Zoned
is
worth
more
money.
I
think
that
is
the
sole
intent
of
this
housing
push
from
sacramento.
I
believe
the
governor
was
not
informed
correctly
and
that's
why
he
signed
all
these
bills.
I'm
sure
hoping
that's
the
case,
but
I
do
think
that
the
city
has
taken
its
time
to
make
sure
that
this
ordinance
has
been
worked
out
as
carefully
as
it
has.
People
will
criticize
the
city,
but
I
do
not
want
cancer
culture
for
cupertino
in
this
state.
Thank
you.
C
C
C
C
C
Okay,
great,
thank
you
very
much.
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
from
council
and
so
I'll
take
it
to
the
members
of
the
public
again.
This
is
a
second
reading
of
an
ordinance
regarding
a
mandate
for
organic
waste
disposal,
reduction
per
state
requirement,
and
so
I
don't
see
any
members
of
the
public
with
their
hands
raised.
Madam
city
clerk,
would
you
please
conduct
the
second
reading
of
this
ordinance
on
item
16.
D
This
is
the
second
reading
and
enactment
of
ordinance
number
21-2231,
an
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
cupertino,
amending
city
code
to
repeal
section
6.24.037,
adopt
a
new
section,
6.24.037
adopt
a
new
section,
6.24.038
and
amend
sections.
6.24.0106
point
two:
four
point:
zero:
two:
zero.
Six
point:
two
four
point:
zero:
six:
zero!
Six
point:
two
four
point:
two:
four:
zero
and
nine
point:
one:
six
point:
zero:
three:
zero
to
mandate:
organic
waste,
disposable
reduction;.
P
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
A
C
T
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Vice
mayor
and
council
members,
I've
been
food
director
of
development
with
me
tonight
is
pugosh
our
planning
manager.
We
also
have
some
consultants
with
us
as
well,
and
thank
you
members
of
mayor
for
the
introduction
of
the
item.
This
is
a
long
time
coming.
It
took
us
about
a
couple
years,
there's
a
pretty
big
list
of
objective
standards.
We
started
this
effort
a
couple
years
ago,
looking
at
the
code
and
ways
to
improve
our
general
plan.
T
The
commission
also
and
council
invited
the
members
of
public
for
to
inquire
about
just
aerials
and
general
plan
and
zoning
ordinance.
That
could
be
further
clarified
and
we
also
have
gone
to
plane.
Commission
last
last
month
in
september,
received
some
comments
and
endorsement
from
the
planning
commission.
T
S
C
S
Perfect
all
right,
oh
yeah,
good
evening,
council.
I
am
sorry,
I'm
gonna
apologize
in
advance
for
a
fairly
long
presentation
only
because
it's
such
a
needy
topic
and
I'm
sure
there
will
be
a
lot
of
questions
about
it
as
well.
So
I
will
stop
in
the
middle
after
I
go
through
what
would
be
general
plan
amendments
that
are
proposed
following
that
I'll
continue
at
the
council's
pleasure
to
present
some
municipal
code
amendments
that
are
also
being
proposed
as
environmental
protection
standards.
S
There
have
been
certain
changes
in
state
law
that
require
their
housing
developments,
which
comply
to
objective
standards
immune
in
some
cases
in
the
city's
general
plan
and
zoning
and
in
fiscal
year.
1920.
A
work
program
item
was
added
to
update
the
general
plan
and
zoning
to
include
objective
standards
as
deemed
required
in
that
process.
S
The
city
attorney's
office
identified
some
suppressing
items
that
needed
to
be
updated,
including
some
prior
updates
to
the
parkland
dedication
ordinance
and
the
planned
development
zones
chapters
those
were
completed
at
the
end
of
2019.,
following
that
in
2020
there
were
some
additional
updates
that
were
identified,
I'm
sorry
not
in
2020.
still
in
2019,
some
additional
updates
were
identified
and
in
the
scene.
At
the
same
time,
the
planning
commission,
the
city
council,
invited
the
public
to
suggest
areas
that
could
be
clarified
further.
S
There
were
quite
a
number
of
large
items
that
were
collected
and
these
items
were
presented
in
september
2019
to
the
city
council.
At
that
time
the
city
council
authorized.
The
staff
depends
on
certain
items
identified
by
staff
and
the
city
attorney
to
prepare
those
amendments,
and,
additionally,
on
october,
1st
2019,
the
city
council
delegated
the
task
of
prioritizing
those,
the
bulk
of
the
items
to
the
city
manager
and
the
city
attorney's
office,
in
conjunction
with
planning
department
staff.
S
It
should
also
be
noted
as
background
information
that
sp
330
was
also
enacted
in
september
2019,
which
essentially
essentially
stated
that
there
could
be
no
reduction
in
the
intensity
of
housing
development
on
some
properties
without
a
corresponding
or
similar
increase
in
intensity
elsewhere
in
the
city.
I
just
wanted
to
give
that
background
to
give
context
on
how
these
items
were
prioritized.
S
All
of
the
items
were
then
prioritized.
As
I
mentioned,
there
were
quite
a
number
of
items.
They
were
meaty
topics.
There
was
some
research
that
was
involved,
and
these
were
all
prioritized
by
the
end
of
2020..
It
basically
prioritized
the
items
as
being
new
with
completion
items
which
are
being
presented
tonight
for
council
to
look
at.
There
were
current
work
program
items
that
were
already
underway,
one
of
which
has
already
been
completed
related
to
the
dark
sky.
S
S
S
With
that,
I'm
just
going
to
jump
into
the
general
plan
amendments
that
were
that
are
being
proposed.
I
would
like
to
point
out:
there
are
no
changes
to
heights
or
densities
that
are
allowed
currently,
so
the
edits
on
this
page
in
this
figure
are
only
to
clarify
existing
densities
and
existing
heights.
The
the
edits
are
in
two
areas:
one
is
to
the
footnotes
and
then
the
other
one
is
to
the
text
boxes
for
the
special
areas
or
the
gates
or
gateways
or
nodes,
I'm
just
going
to
zoom
in
on
the
footnotes.
S
Additionally,
there
were
other
clarifications
made
where
you
know
just
to
make
sure
that
there
are
cross
references,
because
we
do
have
land
use
plans
or
conceptual
zoning
plans
or
other
guidelines
that
we've
adopted
already
for
setbacks
and
heights
adjacent
to
residential
areas.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
would
be
no
conflict
between
the
general
plan
and
an
adopted
plan.
So
we
wanted
to
reference
those
plans
in
this
language
which
we
have
done
with
the
second
edit
there.
Finally,
the
last
edit
is
another
repeat
of
that
first
edit.
S
That
was
made
in
the
first
world
point
there
with
regard
to
the
text
boxes
again,
there
have
been
no
changes
really
to
the
allowed
densities
or
reduction
or
an
increase
to
the
allowed
densities.
These
are
just
simply
clarifications
in
the
language
to
make
sure
that
the
city's
ongoing
intent
is
clarified
with
regard
to
densities
and
heights,
and
so
those
were
made
specifically
in
these
six
text
boxes
that
are
colored,
and
then
this
one
node
box
in
blue
just
to
make
sure
that
the
language
is
as
clear
as
can
be
for
applicants
and
for
the
city.
S
Additionally,
there
are
two
other
edits
in
chapter
three
one
is
in
policy
lu-1.1.
We
realized
that
there
was
no
reference
in
the
text
of
figure
lu-2
with
regard
to
density.
So
we
wanted
to
add
a
clarification
about
that
and
then
also
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
were
some
nested
policies
in
in
whole.
Lu13,
the
intent
was
always
to
have
goals
lu-14
through
area
18
be
nested
policies
to
goal
lu13,
and
so
there
was
some
clarifying
language
added
to
the
general
plan.
S
C
H
Yeah
hi
pewd.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
presentation.
If
you
could
go
back
to
the
slide
that
talked
about
encroachments,
keep
going
keep
going
there.
You
go
that
one
architecture
at
the
very
end.
You
know
at
the
very
last
line.
Architectural
features
that
do
not
include
usable
area
may
encroach
into
the
slope
line.
H
C
Q
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
and
it's
it.
My
question
does
pertain
to
this
particular
slide
here,
and
it's
really
why.
Why
are
we
inserting
this
line?
Architectural
features
that
do
not
include
usable
area
may
encroach
into
the
slope
line
when
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
very
objective
standard.
It
seems
pretty
subjective,
you've
got
the
word,
may
I
don't
know
how
much
it
may
encroach
and
it
repeats
twice.
S
S
If
council
may
recall
we,
when
it
was
discussed
at
the
prior
meeting,
there
were
comments
from
the
council
about
how
there
would
be
no.
You
know
there
may
be,
may
not
be
concerned
if
there
was
a
balcony
that
encroached
into
the
slope
line,
for
example,
or
if
there
was
a
chimney
feature
that
encroached
into
the
slope
line,
or
you
know
a
small
window
pop
out,
or
things
like
that,
and
so
based
on
those
comments.
S
Q
Q
Okay,
and
could
we
actually
be
increasing
a
density
in
this
table
if
we,
if
we
select
to
do
that
at
this
time,
I'm
wondering
if
we
have
a
lower
density
than
what
we
think
we
might
need
to
have
to
accommodate
our
arena
numbers?
Could
some
of
these
actually
be
increased
to
accommodate
that,
and
also
the
height?
Is
that
something
we
could
do
at
this
time?
Can
you.
Q
Looking
at
south
fans
a
special
area
with
a
maximum
height
of
only
30
feet
and
let's
see
it,
looks
like
a
density
south
of
highway,
85
only
5
to
15
units
per
acre
and
that
number
seems
super
low
because
sp9
is
now
taking.
You
know
an
8,
1
8
acre
lot.
Your
density
can
go
apparently
up
to,
I
think
at
least
four,
but
possibly
six
units
so
for
one
acre.
Q
S
So
that
was
the
intent
of
the
council
from
the
councils
from
the
past
in
terms
of
the
lower
densities
in
the
south
vienza
area
and
the
lower
heights.
That
is
something
that
the
city
will
probably
be
looking
at
when
it
redoes
its
housing
element.
But
that
is
not
something
that
was
evaluated
with
this
particular
general
plan
amendment,
and
I
don't
believe
that
that
can
be
amended
at
this
time
because
it
has
not
been
noticed
or
you
know,
evaluated.
Q
C
P
Okay,
yeah
so
yeah.
This
is
on
this
same
slide,
since
we
are
trying
to
make
objective
standards
for
projects
that
could
be
streamlined
without
any
discretionary
approval.
That
means
this
any
architectural
feature
should
not
exceed
slope
line.
If
they
would
like
any
of
the
architecture,
feature
to
exist,
look
lying.
The
project
should
go
through
the
discretionary
approval
process.
That
should
be
what
we
are
doing
here
and
therefore
we
should
strike
this
and
specifically
point
maybe,
or
do
it
we
need
to
conjure
up.
P
Our
architectural
features
should
be
below
the
slow
plan
to
be
clear,
then
that's
clear
in
objective
step.
Maybe
we
should,
I
think,
to
be
objective
and
clear.
We
should
specify
here.
Architecture
features
should
be
below
slope
line
and
and
architectural
features
above
slope
line
require
discretionary
approval.
Something
like
that
is
that
legally,
is
that
legal
on
mr
city
attorney.
G
P
Okay,
good-
and
this
doesn't
affect
the
density
right
and
since
especially
if
balcony
is
considered
architectural
feature,
that's
actually
a
usable
area.
So
it's
it
gets
fuzzy,
whether
architecture
official
for
something
is
considered
a
feature
or
not.
Therefore,
it
requires
discretionary
approval,
yeah
and
then
the
second
is
the
third
bullet,
also
that
we
say
in
the
last
sentence
in
any
adopted
design
guideline.
This
will
be
established
under
project
review,
but
when
there
is
no
project
review,
then
that
means
there
is
no
standard.
P
But
this
is
when,
where
slope
lines
are
not,
space
is
not
established.
So
we
are
saying
when
slope
lines
are
not
established
in
any
of
the
plane,
it
will
be
established
under
project.
You
can
always
say
when
slope
lines
are
not
established,
the
project
require
review
or
how
do
we,
or
maybe
we
should
settle
in
with
them
when
slope
line
is
not
established,
it
needs
to
be
one
to
one
for
example.
So
we
need
to
set
us
objective
standard.
Otherwise
it
could
be
a
hundred
to
one.
S
S
So
those
are
the
two
main
areas
where
there
are
no
setback
and
height
limits
everywhere
else
that
we
reviewed,
based
on
our
conceptual
zoning
plans
or
land
use
plans
that
we
have.
There
are
setback
and
height
limitations
that
are
spelled
out
with
regard
to
the
apple
infinite,
loot
campus,
I
do
not
believe
residential
uses
are
allowed
at
the
apple,
the
infinite
loop
campus,
so
that
is
not
a
streamlined
parcel,
so
you
can't
really
develop
a
streamlined
project
on
that
site.
S
P
S
That
was
not
the
city,
attorney's
assessment
and
the
disposition
table
that
was
put
together
was
upon
the
advice
of
the
city
attorney,
and
so
there
are.
There
were
certain
concerns
related
to
sbq
30,
and
we
were
advised
that
that
happened
at
a
later
time,
in
conjunction
with
the
housing
mining
company.
P
G
Yeah,
just
just
just
just
to
clarify
vice
mayor
chow,
so
there
there
was
a
concern
with
with
potential
down
zoning
sb30
doesn't
prevent
us
from
changing
the
zoning
indefinitely,
but
it
does
that
does
require
corresponding
changes.
So
there's
no
net
increase
in
density,
so
the
choice
choice
here
was
made
to
make
what
are
really
clarifying
changes
and
not
changes
that
possibly
change
density.
B
S
S
There
was
a
conscious
decision
to
ensure
that
if
there
was
a
streamlined
development
most
of
these
sites,
where
there
are
no
setback-to-pipe
ratios,
potentially
avoiding
residential
uses,
those
were
fine
development,
zoning
districts
and
so
the
plan
development.
Zoning
district
essentially
states
that,
if
you
are
bringing
in
a
discretionary
approval
in
a
plan
development,
zoning
district,
it
has
to
meet
our
r3
zoning
requirements
and
there
are
setback.
Requirements
spelled
out
in
the
arctic
zone
requirements
and,
as
a
result,
any
discretionary
project
would
have
to
make
their
project
be
like
an
r3
project.
S
K
P
R3
zone,
okay,
so
that
so
it's
specified
there.
Yes,
so
can
we
clarify
it
here,
then
that
if
it's
not
specified
in
the
plant
development
ordinance,
it's
specified,
it
has
to
meet
earth,
r3,
zoning
or
or
it
could
be
established
during
project
review,
which
means,
if
it's
discretionary
approval,
then
they
may
not
need
to
comply
with
all
three.
They
can
have
other.
S
A
G
Yeah,
so
so
I
I
think
what
pew
is
saying
is
that
that
a
project
would
need
to
comply
with
objective
zoning
standards
so
separate,
and
apart
from
anything,
that's
in
the
general
plan,
the
project
would
have
to
comply
with
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
zoning
ordinance.
It
includes
the
are
the
r3
provisions
the
zoning
coordinates
would
apply.
I.
P
G
S
S
Okay,
I
did
want
to
point
out
that
just
going
back
to
the
architectural
features,
I
know
vicente
charlie
said
that
you
could
consider
architectural
features
encroaching
into
the
slope
line
as
a
discretionary
item,
but
if
we
specify
clearly
in
the
general
plan
that
architectural
features
cannot
encroach
that,
we
cannot
allow
that
without
a
general
plan
amendment
for
each
project
as
they
come
in.
So
I
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that.
P
So,
if
waste,
I
think
all
I'm
asking
is:
if
there
is
encroachment,
it
will
need
discretionary
approval,
so
it
needs
to
go
through
the
review
and
planning
commission
so
how
that
can
be
specified.
I
don't
think
that
needs
a
general
plain
amendment,
but
we
need
to
state
in
a
certain
way
that
if
you
want
to
encroach,
we
want
to
review
it.
How
is
what's
the
use
right.
S
S
P
S
P
S
P
S
On
the
land
use
map,
we
have
ranges:
for
example,
certain
home
developments
are
10
to
20
minutes
per
acre.
There
are
some
areas
that
are
20
to
35
growing
units
quicker.
We
also
have
actually
all
single-family
residential
is
one
to
five
to
one
units
per
acre.
So
the
general
plan,
the
land
use
map-
does
have
the
incidence
ranges
on
it.
A
Q
S
S
Yes,
and
if,
if
it
is
required
as
an
environmental
mitigation,
for
example,
because
of
how
the
project
ends
up
being,
then
yes,
it
it
it
could.
It
depends
on
where
the
the
curb
line,
I'm
trying
to
explain
this
so
so
when
you
come
to
an
intersection
and
if
you
need
to
have
a
right
turn
pocket,
for
example,
the
curb
line,
usually
where
we
look
at
it
is
where
the
main
line
is
and
not
where
you
where
you
would
put
in
a
right
turn,
for
example.
S
S
Q
Q
C
C
S
L
S
All
right,
so
moving
on
to
the
municipal
code
amendments
again,
staff
is
recommending
that
a
new
chapter,
17.04
environmental
protection
standards,
standard
protections,
the
requirements
be
added.
It
starts
with
the
definitions
that
are
applicable
to
that
chapter
with
regard
to
applicability
of
all
these
requirements.
Essentially,
it
has
been
proposed
that
all
projects
that
involve
a
subdivision,
construction,
ground,
disturbing
activities
or
tree
removals
be
subject
to
these
requirements.
S
S
Okay,
this
chapter
can
be
seen
as
though
divided
into
two
pieces.
One
are
things
that
are
required
prior
to
project
approval
and
the
other
things
are
requirements
that
are
prior
to
permit
issuance.
So,
with
regard
regard
to
the
requirements
that
are
required
prior
to
project
approval,
we
kind
of
divided
them
up
by
area
of
I
hate
to
use
the
word
impact
but
area
that
is
being
affected.
For
example,
if
it's
air
quality,
you
would
prepare
an
operational
health
risk
assessment
if
the
project
exceeds
certain
thresholds.
S
Again,
now
moving
on
to
the
requirements
that
are
prior
to
permit
issuance
with
regard
to
air
quality,
this
is
an
ongoing
requirement
that
we
have
about
controlling
dust
during
construction,
basically
is
to
implement
backbench
requirements,
there's
also
a
requirement
to
control
construction
exhaust
if
you're
considered
a
large
project.
A
large
project
is
something
that
is
on
greater
than
one
acre
or
that
involves
more
than
two
months
of
construction.
S
S
With
regard
to
hazardous
materials,
if
there
is
soil
remediation
that
is
required,
as
indicated
by
the
base
2
esa,
then
you
know
there's
cleanup
that
would
be
required
through
an
appropriate
agency,
and
there
is
language
in
the
proposed
municipal
code
about
which
agency
they
can
utilize,
there's
also
regarding
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
energy,
there's
a
requirement
that
the
they
complete
the
climate
action
plan.
There's
a
development
project,
consistency
checklist
that
being
completed
and
provided
with
their
application,
biological
resources,
essentially,
birds.
S
There
are
federal
and
state
requirements
about
protecting
nesting,
birds
and
board
eggs
during
construction,
and
so
it's
essentially
try
to
avoid
the
nesting
season.
But
if
you
can't
avoid
nesting
season
nesting
season
during
construction,
then
you
have
to
conduct
an
initial
pre-construction
survey
to
identify
whether
they're
in
nests
in
the
trees
that
might
be
impacted
by
your
construction.
S
There's
also
requirements
about
special
status
use
impact
during
construction.
If
a
building
is
not
secure
and
has
been
vacant
for
a
while,
then
bats
can
actually
roost
in
there
and
so
very
similar
requirements
to
nesting
birds
about
getting
a
biologist,
making
sure
that
if
there
is
a
if
there
are
boosting
bats,
found,
conduct
follow-up
surveys,
there's
official
requirements.
If
the
maternity
roost
is
found-
and
essentially
you
know
whether
it's
birds
or
bats,
you
have
to
follow
the
recommendations
of
the
biologist
if
the
nest
of
either
kind
is
found.
S
Cultural
resources
within
the
city,
it's
divided
into
areas
with
known
or
no
known,
cultural
resources.
If
there
are
no
known
cultural
resources,
then
the
contractor,
the
main
contractor
has
to
provide
materials
to
the
construction,
crew
and
contractors
with
information
on
how
what
site
indicators
could
be,
and
then
laws
pertaining
to
cultural
resources.
S
And
then
there
are
instructions
identified
if
cultural
resources
are
found
on
the
site
with
regard
to
areas
that
have
known
cultural
resources,
those
are
identified
in
the
general
planning
ir
and
essentially
for
those
areas.
You
retain
a
qualified
archaeologist
to
prepare
a
report
on
whether
there
are
how
the
proposed
project
impact
the
cultural
resource.
S
If
something
can
be
done,
how
it
can
be
if
it
cannot
be
constructed
without
impacting
it,
then
you
know
they
have
to
consult
a
tribal
representative.
They
have
to
file
a
report
with
the
california
historical
resource
information
system
and
with
the
city
they
have
to
determine
whether
the
resource
is
eligible
to
be
listed
in
the
register
of
historical
resources
and
basically
identify
ways
to
minimize
effects
to
that
particular
resource.
S
Among
other
cultural
resources,
there
are
human
remains
of
native
american
burials.
There
are
state
requirements
related
to
that
and
any
project
would
have
to
comply
with
those
requirements
and
those
are
written
into
the
proposed
municipal
with
regard
to
hydrology
and
water
quality.
Basically,
the
main
thing
to
do
is
control
stormwater,
runoff
contamination,
and
there
is
a
reference
to
the
city's
existing
requirements
relating
to
stormwater
pollution
prevention
and
watershed
product
protection.
S
With
regard
to
noise
and
vibration,
there
are
some
noticing
and
science
site
signage
requirements
prior
to
start
of
an
activity.
Essentially,
applicants
must
prepare
and
submit
a
construction
noise
plan
to
comply
with
our
already
adopted
standards.
With
regard
to
vibrations,
the
notices
must
be
sent
out
to
within
300
feet
of
the
project
site
and
there
are
requirements
to
conduct
a
pre-construction
surveys
and
then,
after
use
of
the
vibration
surveys,
to
make
sure
that
there
are
no
impacts
to
the
sensitive
receptors.
S
S
Rather,
I
should
say
the
pupuccino
century
districts
had
certain
agreement
with
santa
clara
sanitary
district
and
other
sanitary
districts
about
how
much
peak
wet
weather
flow
can
be
during
when
there
is
wet
weather,
and
so
there's
just
references
to
how
those
can
be
reduced.
Or
how
that
can
you
know
by
reducing
inflow
or
infiltration
within
the
csds
system,
and
also
to
encourage
people
to
increase
onsite
water,
reuse,
just
gray
water
or
to
reduce
water
usage.
S
Any
violations
of
any
of
these
requirements
or
violations
of
the
municipal
code
and
moving
on
to
the
secret
review.
There
was
an
addendum
prepared
to
the
2014
general
finally
ir
which
indicated
there
were
no
subsequent
environmental
reviews
required,
because
there
are
no
substantial
changes
to
the
project.
S
C
S
S
There's
a
question
about
vehicle
miles:
traveled:
what?
If
the
project
does
not
comply
with
the
city's
vmt
standards?
What
options
are
available?
There
are
any
number
of
project
improvements
that
will
help
a
project
the
vmt
standard.
These
include
providing
bike
lanes
providing
bus
passes.
These
are
just
some
options
that
will
help
reduce
vmt.
S
What
kinds
of
equipment
will
cause
vibration?
It
seems
that
almost
all
projects
will
need
to
use
some
kind
of
equipment
that
will
cause
vibrations.
So
this
item
covers
almost
all
projects.
What
about
cost
and
length
of
time
to
comply?
There's
actually
specific
equipment
that
are
considered
vibration
generating
these
include
things
like
all.
All
equipment
causes
some
vibration,
but
some
are
actually
damaging
to
buildings
and
other
structures.
S
S
We
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
construction
workers
would
be
provided
with
materials
that
help
them
identify
indicators
of
cultural
resources,
and
this
training
would
be
provided
by
the
contractor
to
the
construction
crews
to
make
sure
they
they
understand
how
to
identify
basic
archaeological
site
indicators,
etc.
With
regard
to
paleontological
resource
resources,
there
was
a
question
about
whether
every
project
would
have
to
retain
a
qualified
paleontologist.
S
The
answer
is
basically
that
only
areas
that
are
only
projects
that
are
in
areas
with
known
cultural
resources
would
have
to
retain
a
qualified
paleontologist
with
regard
to
utilities
and
service
systems.
There
was
a
question
about
who
are
the
experts
experts
that
provide
the
reports
related
to
utilities
and
service
systems.
S
S
There
was
also
a
question
about
written
approval
from
the
appropriate
water
service
in
general.
The
utility
provider
does
provide
these.
You
know
letters
to
say
that
they
will
serve
or
they
can
serve
a
project.
In
particular,
there
was
a
question
about
the
general
plan
amendments.
How
many
of
these
refinements
are
new
and
or
upgraded
requirements?
S
There
was
a
thought
that,
though
there
are
no
changes
to
the
intensity
or
density
of
development.
Does
this
add
costs
by
requiring
these
refinements
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
there
are
no
new
or
upgraded
requirements?
The
general
plan
amendments
are
simply
clarifications
to
clarify
the
city's
prior
intent
and
does
not
add
cost
to
the
project.
S
S
The
changes
also
do
not
involve
any
changes
to
the
height
density,
florida
ratio
or
how
development
or
how
much
development
can
occur
on
a
property,
and
so
again
these
are
just
clarifications,
and
none
of
these
proposed
changes
result
in
new
or
more
severe
environmental
impacts
than
those
already
studied
in
the
2014
general,
and
there
are-
and
I
had
my
recommended
action.
I
already
stated
that
before
with
that,
I
conclude
my
presentation:
okay,.
C
P
P
S
It
is
my
understanding
that
the
public
works
transportation
department
is
working
on
some
sort
of,
or
maybe
working
on,
something
related
to
a
level
of
service.
At
this
point,
that
is
not
being
considered
with
this
particular
municipal
code
amendment,
but
any
anything
that
the
council
adopts
can
be
inserted
into
this
particular
after
in
the
future,
as
in
one
council.
This.
S
S
These
are
just
environmental
protection
standards
that
the
city
is
choosing
to
adopt
with
regard
to
how
much
reduction
they
see
in
bmt,
by
providing
bus
passes
or
by
providing
bike
lanes,
and
things
like
that
that
is,
that
has
to
be
based
in
certain
scientific
data,
and
I
know
that
is
built
into
vmt
tools
and
and
studies
that
have
already
occurred.
So
those
are
pretty
specified
in
past
studies.
P
S
Discretionary,
so
how
much
reduction
one
sees
in
bmt
by
providing
bus
passes
or
by
providing
bike
lanes
have
been
studied
extensively
and
those
reductions
are
what
they
would
see
in
their
vmt
study.
It's
not
as
though
they
can
claim
a
much
higher
reduction
by
providing
the
bus
classes,
but
they
certainly
have
a
many
options
to
pick
from.
Yes.
In
order
to.
S
P
That's
still
very
discretionary.
Okay,
we
started
guarding
the.
I
think
we
had
an
issue
with
our
only
streamlined
project
that
it
was
on
the
court
easy
list
or
it's
not,
and
there
was
a
confusion
so
with
what
we
are
proposing.
You
are
proposing
here
clarify
that
for
future
projects.
We
know
exactly
what
so
the
you
are
requiring
more
report.
Will
they
be
need
to
be
submitted
before
they
propose
a
project
or
is
that
would
that
be
after.
S
Q
Thank
you,
amer
paul
this.
This
might
take
us
a
second
to
pull
up,
but
the
there
was
a
map
that
was
referenced.
The
bay
area,
air
quality
management,
district
planning,
healthy
places
map.
If,
if
somebody
could
pull
that
up,
I
would
appreciate
it
and
and
there's
there's
a
couple
of
reasons
why
one
is
that
there
was
a
valco
specific
plan
which
did
show
that
there
were
air
quality
impacts
along
wolf
road
and
that
map
does
not
indicate
it.
Q
So
I'm
concerned
about
that,
because
it's
a
a
senior
living
area,
assisted
living
area
and
now
we're
finding
out
that
when
we
had,
we
approved
it
after
this
they
would
have
had
the
merv
13
automatically
required.
I
think
so.
I'm
a
little
surprised
that
this
didn't
pop
up
before
so
the
two
two
things
is
that
I'm
concerned
about
the
the
wolf
road
air
quality
issue
and
that
it's
it's
not
including
this
so
is.
Did
I
stall
enough
to
get
the
map
up.
Q
Well,
just
take
my
word
forward.
All
the
major
all
the
major
members
are
in
that
implement
best
practices
for
the
air
quality
because
they
were
impacted
either
from
the
freeway
stevens
creek
boulevard
or
the
85
through
the
city.
That's
the
first
part.
I've
only
got
five
minutes,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
quickly.
Q
So
the
issue
I
take
is
that
we
now
have
new
significant
different
information
about
the
development
of
that
site.
So
you've
got
three
times
as
many
residential
units
and
to
me
that
seems
to
throw
us
into
the
category
of
needing
a
supplement
to
the
eir,
not
just
this
addendum,
but
having
to
do
some
actual
serious
updates,
and
I
was
wondering
if
the
attorney
could
comment
on
that.
Thank
you.
G
G
However,
when
you
look
citywide,
the
eir
did
consider,
impacts
that
are
are
consistent
with
with
what
we're
seeing
and
so
there
isn't
any
new
information
that
that
would
really
indicate
that
there
is
a
more
severe
or
different
environmental
impact
that
was
studied
in
the
eir
and
that
that's
the
standard
for
preparing
a
supplemental
eir
instead
of
an
addendum
there's
also
a
case
law
that
that
implies
that
there,
but
there's
required
to
be
a
nexus
between
the
changes
to
the
project
and
the
new
information.
And
you
know.
G
There
could
not
be
a
significant
impact
to
the
environment,
so
both
of
those
exemptions,
either
at
least
collectively,
would
cover
the
project.
So
staff
took
a
more
conservative
approach
by
preparing
an
addendum
here,
but
I
I
do
believe
that
the
project
is
exempt
from
sql
as
well,
and
and
council
could
could
take
a
building,
suspenders
approach
to
sql
compliance
and
that's
what
we're
recommending.
G
Yes,
I
I
think
that
we
are
are
on
sound
legal
ground.
It
would
take
obviously
additional
money,
hiring
a
consultant
and
as
well
as
time,
to
prepare
a
supplemental
eir.
The
addendum
is
a
streamlined
process,
so
I
think
we're
on
sound
legal
ground
both
with
respect
to
the
addendum
and
with
respect
to
the
exemptions.
Q
Okay,
okay,
I
do
find
it
a
bit
confusing
because
they
studied
800
residential
units
at
that
location
and
now
they're
at
2402,
which
were
never
studied
and
you've
added
the
30
acre
green
roof,
which
was
never
a
part
of
the
the
general
plan
but
you're
certain
that
we're
on
a
good
legal
ground
despite
a
triple
increase
there.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you.
H
S
I
can
try
to
with
regard
to
deck
sizes,
and
possibly
that
is
something
that
we
could.
We
could
consider
with
any
sb9
updates,
considering
all
lots
could
be
sub
split
and
subdivided,
and
but
with
regard
to
an
r1
ordinance
updates
in
general.
That
is
not
on
the
work
program
at
this
time,
and
it
could
be
something
that
the
council
could
prioritize
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
H
S
S
S
H
That's
my
memory
is
that
there
were
three
different
categories
and
back
in
that
time
there
was
no
sp9,
and
so
ones
that
are,
you
know,
perhaps
not
being
covered
tonight.
I
would
have
expected
them
to
be
covered.
You
know,
under
the
work
plan
you
know,
based
on
the
original,
the
original
verbiage
from
city
staff
about
you
know,
there
were
three
categories
of
changes
based
on
complexity.
S
So
that
was
the
original
suggestion
from
staff,
and
then
the
council
authorized
the
city
manager
and
the
city
attorney
to
go
forward
and
re-prioritize
all
the
items
that
were
on
the
list
and
that's
where
we
came
out
with
the
six
categories,
which
was
you
know,
things
that
could
be
completed
now,
which
is
what
was
being
presented
tonight,
things
that
have
already
been
completed
or
moving
forward.
So
the
six
categories
that
I
originally
talked
about
at
the
beginning
of
this
presentation.
S
There
are
a
number
of
items
that
need
to
be
considered
with
the
housing
element
update
because
of
concerns
related
to
spp30
and
other
state
laws
and
there's
many
items
that
have
already
been
completed
that
is
identified
in
attachment
c.
There
are
some
items
that
are,
you
know,
ongoing
work
program,
items
that
include
design
standards.
That
is
a
project
that
is
ongoing.
S
H
Yeah,
so
I
mean,
if
I
point
out
to
just
we'll
point
to
just
one
of
the
topics
that
you
brought
up
the
design
standards
I
mean
yeah.
I
think
some
of
our
concerns
were
you
know
the
objectiveness
of
some
of
the
design
standards,
and
so
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
us
to
know
you
know
what
is
or
is
not.
I
mean
if
tonight's,
the
end
all
other
than
for
sb9
or
other
than
the
housing
element
I
mean
even
with
those
maybe
more
the
housing
element.
H
We
should
know
what
is
being
looked
at.
You
know
the
list
so
that
we
could
identify.
Did
we
capture
it?
Is
staff
capturing
everything
if
they're
not
capturing
everything
and
at
the
next
review
or
housing
element.
I'd
really
like
to
be
sure
that
we're
not
going
to
be
scratching
our
head
and
saying
what
happened
to
these
other
items.
H
S
That
the
work
program
is
already
adopted
by
the
council,
and
so
that
is
certainly
you
know
available
online.
We
also
have
that
list
is
available
in
attachment
c.
When
we
talk
to
our
planning
consultant
as
we
are
evaluating
our
housing
element,
we
will
be
going
through
all
the
items
that
are
identified
in
that
list
that
are
identified
as
consider
in
conjunction
with
the
housing
element
update.
S
So
we
will
be
going
through
that
list
and
considering
whether
there
are
any
changes
we
can
make
to
our
standards
or
any
of
our
policies
with
regard
to
all
the
items
that
are
identified
in
that
list.
So
with
regard
to
you
know
your
concerns
about
single
family
decks
in
general.
That
is
not
an
objective
standard
concern
from
a
streamlining
perspective,
member
willie.
That
is
a
you
know.
That
is
something
that
is
discretionary
at
the
at
the
council's,
or
you
know
discretion
if
there
are
certain
concerns
related
to
that.
S
R
Thank
you
very
much
pew.
Thank
you,
councilman
willie,
for
raising
the
questions.
We
will
be
back
in
at
your
next
meeting
with
an
update
of
the
work
program
for
the
city
council.
If
there's
specific
issues
you'd
like
addressed
as
we
fulfill
that
work
program,
we
can
pursue
those
based
on
council
direction
at
that
time,
or
we
can
add
them
to
future
work
programs.
R
I
did
want
to
reiterate
that
sb9
was
dropped
in
city's
laps
unexpectedly
by
the
legislature
and
governor,
so
we
are
moving
that
up
the
priority
list
and
bringing
that
as
well
to
your
next
council
meeting
in
terms
of
the
issues
before
you
tonight.
We
have
a
set
of
amendments
and
adjustments
that
have
been
unanimously
recommended
by
the
planning
commission
that
we
ask
you
to
focus
on
given
the
constraints
of
the
brown
act
and
that
further
work
be
considered
in
the
work
program.
Discussion
coming
forward.
H
E
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
Maybe
can
be
answered
really
quick
and
maybe
just
a
general
comment.
So
I
is
the
all
the
inspections,
orders
and
surveys
that
has
to
order
these
are
for
non-residential
project
and
residential
project
of
formal
unit
units.
All
right
is
this
correct.
E
S
S
E
I
see
so
back
to
council
member
willie's
question
so
if
it's
a
sb9
project
that
they
split
the
lot
into
two
two
areas,
so
that's
this
is
all
covered
correct!
Oh
okay!
So
that's
my
first
question.
The
second
one
is
all
this
really
and
you
know
environmental
standard
environmental
protection
requirements.
Are
they
state
required
or
are
they
specific?
Are
city
required.
S
B
E
E
E
It
might
defer
a
lot
of
smaller
family
project
that
they
just
don't
want
to
do
it
or
they
feel
that
it's
too
much
thing
and
they
might
push
them
to
sell
it
to
a
bigger
developer,
and
is
that
something
that
could
happen?
Is
this
too?
My
sense?
Is
there
a
lot
of
reports
a
lot
of
things
they
need
to
do?
Are
these
really
customary
their
state
federal
required?
It's
not
like
too
much
for
them
to
comply.
S
It's
pretty
standard,
you
know.
An
esa
report,
for
example,
is
generally
prepared
when
property
sells
is
my
understanding
when
there's
property
transfer
generally
banks
and
other
entities
require
asa
phase
one
report,
and
so
you
know
it's
not
something
that
is
out
of
ordinary
for
cities
to
require
in
development.
E
B
Yeah,
a
health
risk
assessment
is
really
just
looking
at
what
are
the
there
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
you
could
look
at,
but
it's
primarily
looking
at
like
air
particulate
matter
and
again,
my
area
of
expertise
is
sequoia,
so
we're
usually
concerned
about
in
sql
the
impact
of
the
project
on
the
environment.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
diesel,
particulate
matter
or
other
air
pollutants
are
not
causing
harm
to
a
neighboring
use.
B
So
the
health
risk
assessment
is
try
to
determine
what
equipment's
going
to
be
used.
How
much
grading
is
going
to
occur
like
what
is
going
to
be
the
disturbance,
that's
going
to
cause
that
pollution?
So
that's
the
health
risk
assessment.
There's
two
kinds
of
health
risk
assessment,
though
there's
a
construction
one
which
would
be
sql
oriented,
is
the
project
gonna
cause
it
on
the
environment.
B
What's
in
what's
presented
here
is
also
the
operational.
So
this
is
something
that
you
wouldn't
get
in
a
sql
document.
It's
whether
the
project
itself
is
going
if
the
environment
is
going
to
affect
the
the
project-
and
this
goes
back
to
kind
of
like
the
healthy.
The
map
that
kitty
was
talking
about
councilmember,
moore.
E
B
It
it
depends,
there's
criteria
that
you
have
to
meet
the
standards
for
so
we've
tried
to
spell
out
some
of
that
criteria.
You
have
to
be
within
a
certain
proximity.
You
have
to
use
a
certain
type
of
equipment-
okay,
so
it's
not
just
you
don't
just
have
to
blanket
like
do
one.
You
have
to
check
the
check
the
list.
E
So
I'm
sorry
question
my
question
is
say:
if
I'm
a
homeowner
and
I
bought
a
piece
of
land
and
I
want
to
rebuild
a
home,
I
look
at
all
these.
Are
they?
If
I
say
I
asked
come
to
the
city
ask?
Well,
I
don't
know
where
to
get
a
house
risk
assessment.
I
don't
know
how
to
get
a.
You
know:
construction
management
plan.
The
city
will
be
able
to
provide
me
with
resources,
so
I
can
go
get
them.
S
So
in
general,
I
do
want
to
again
reiterate
if
you're
a
single
family,
home
and
you're
replacing
a
single
family
home
there
are
some
of
these
reports
that
you
don't
have
to
do.
A
construction
management
plan
is
something
a
contractor
can
pull
together
fairly
easily.
These
are
fairly
standard
requirements.
S
C
All
right,
thanks,
spouse
from
our
way
we're
pretty
much
exhausted
of
time
all
around
I'll.
Get
to
you
vice
versa,
but
be
brief
in
your
follow-ups.
I
have
a
a
very,
very
straightforward
question.
So,
as
I
had
mentioned
earlier,
I
was
following
you
know
the
the
progress
of
some
of
the
concerns
that
council
member
willie
had
over
a
particular
project,
and
I
think
another
council
member
pointed
out
that
that
was
shown
in
a
photograph
earlier
in
public
comment
tonight.
T
No
yeah,
mr
mayor
benford,
church
community.
I
can
respond
to
that
very
quickly
that
hasn't
that
hasn't
occurred
in
recent
past.
I
can't
speak
to
how
it
may
have
occurred
for
a
project.
I
think
it's
different
staffing
back.
Then
we
have
a
different
planning
manager
now,
so
I
can't
really
speak
to
how
it
actually
happen.
I
can
only
speak
to
it
that
hasn't
happened
in
more
recent
years.
C
Well,
so
so
give
us
a
sense
inside
the
department
how
the
compliance
is
being
enforced
in
a
way
that
perhaps
it
wasn't
you
know,
are
we
using
the
same
checklist?
Are
we
using
the
same?
You
know,
mechanisms
of
ensuring
that
compliance.
I
I
mean
the
personnel
has
changed,
but
I'm
not
really
certain.
If
that
really
speaks
to
how
we're
perhaps
approaching
you
know
particular
particular
tools
that
we're
using,
because
I
don't
think
we
have
that
much
transparency
as
to
how
this
compliance
process
is,
is
being
insured.
T
Sure
I
can
respond
to
that
as
well
apologize.
It
wasn't
clear
enough.
I
wasn't
blaming
on
just
personal
change.
I
think,
with
personal
change
and
leadership
change
you
have.
Policies
are
changing
as
well.
We
have
developed
checklists
internally
to
ensure
that
projects
are
reviewed
on
a
consistent
basis,
so
implemented
fairly
to
all
the
projects,
same
district
and
the
same
requirements.
T
T
Sure
and
when
a
project
is
assigned
to
a
planner
planner
will
utilize
that
that
checklist
verify
the
project
against
a
checklist.
A
checklist
then
gets
confirmed
and
evaluated
by
the
planning
manager
to
make
sure
that
we
have
double
survives
on
the
evaluation
of
the
project,
so
that
is
a
new
process,
new
ish
of
the
last
four
or
five
years
or
so.
So
that's
that's
something!
That's
that's
different!
T
C
T
C
T
Too,
is
is
been
a
helpful
tourism
electronic
review,
so
we
we've
had
the
electronic
submittals,
so
that
makes
the
revaluation
of
plans
and
verification
those
things
a
lot
quicker,
not
easier
and
accessible
both
in
the
office
and
also
on
site
in
terms
of
conditions,
approval
on
the
planning
and
building
side
of
things
we
both
have.
We
have
a
staff
that
does
inspection.
Obviously,
you
have
billing
inspectors.
T
C
We
have
a
definition
of
an
architectural
feature
who
is
ensuring
more
compliance,
who's
going
out
there
and
examining
the
actual
site
and
going
okay
this?
This
was
a
satisfactory
architectural
feature
and
you,
you
indicated
an
internal
review
of
some
decision,
that's
made,
but
but
how
does
that?
How
does
that
operate
and
is
it
operating
differently
now
than
it
was
say
four
or
five
years
ago?.
T
C
Oh
so
so
greg.
I
I
see
that
one
of
the
red
lines
on
slide
page
seven
actually
has
two
sentences
where
they
state
they're,
adding
quote
architectural
features
that
do
not
include
usable
area
may
encroach
into
the
slope
line.
My
questions
are
directly
relevant
to
those
changes,
so
I'm
not
sure
why
this
wouldn't
be
subject
to
the
purview
of
our
our
of
our
questions
regarding
this.
G
C
S
So
I
was,
as
I
was
mentioning
just
to
wrap
up.
We
were
just
we
do
be
planning
final
inspections
and
to
verify
that
the
space
that
was
proposed
as
another
that
would
be
proposed
in
an
architectural
feature
would
not
would
continue
to
be
one.
But
again,
I
would
like
to
also
point
out
that,
with
this
change,
we
are
actually
allowing
architectural
features
to
to
go
into
the
slope
line,
whereas
earlier
it
talked
only
about
the
primary
bulk
and
it
didn't
necessarily
identify
that
only
architectural
features
could
encroach.
C
S
We
also
define
usable
area,
and
so
again,
if
it
is
things
like
a
chimney,
if
it
is
like
a
little
the
window,
which
is
not
usable
not
like
an
extension
of
floor
area
or
if
it
is
truly
just
like
a
little
juliet
balcony
or
things
like
that.
That
truly
do
add.
Architectural
in
crystal
building
are
what
is
considered
architectural
features
and
not
spaces
where
you
could
actually
put
a
desk
or
a
nook
or
things
like
that.
P
G
P
G
G
P
And
that's:
okay!
I
don't
have
much
time.
Please
give
me
an
update
on
what
our
current
standard
for
preliminary
application
and
the
question
is.
There
is
one
slide
that
says
we
are
adding
strongly
to
encourage
santa
clara
county
with
to
communicate
with
affected
neighborhoods,
so
adding
strongly
versus
just
encourage
encourage.
What
do
we
expect
that
they
will
do
differently.
P
S
I
can
try
to
attempt
to
answer
that
in
terms
of
that
particular
proposed
language.
It
did
come
from
a
member
of
the
public.
We
kind
of
ran
with
what
that
member
of
the
public
wished
for
this
particular
general
plan
strategy
to
say:
if
the
council
wishes
to
you
know,
add
any
more
qualifiers
or
any
other
direction
it
could.
But
we
we're
trying
to
defer
to
that
particular
public.
S
P
S
P
Forms
great,
thank
you
last
question.
So
attachment
c
is
a
list
of
the.
I
think
the
list
we
had
and
they
separated
into
five
categories.
Could
we
get
an
update
of
the
status
for
each
of
these
items?
I
and
my
understanding
is
what
we
are
doing
today
is
part
of
this
immediate
completion
and
the
next
category.
P
Current
work
program
items
refer
to
not
this
year's
work
program,
but
2021
work
program
from
last
year.
So
I'm
really
confused.
Are
these
done
no
or
not?
So
maybe
you
can
give
me
an
update
later
and
this
completed.
That's
fine
and
then
we
have
housing
elements,
part
that
it
says
fy2223,
but
probably
that's
your
typo
down
now.
Okay,
that's
fine!
P
So
should
maybe
I'm
thinking
there
are
possible
work
program,
I'm
thinking.
Maybe
the
city
council
should
have
a
study
session
to
go
through
this
and
prioritize
again
because
this
is
kind
of
from
before,
and
we
have
two
new
council
members
here
right
so
yeah
sorry,
don't
know
you
can
answer.
So
I'm
I'm
down
here.
Yeah.
S
With
regard
to
the
current
work
program
items,
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
the
everything
that's
labeled
design
guidelines-
you
know
that
is
an
ongoing
work
program
item
from
the
fiscal
year,
2021
that
is
rolled
into
this
year
that
has
not
completed
we.
The
council
approved
the
contract
in
april
this
year,
so
that
work
is
ongoing
density
bonus,
stuff.
We
have
to
reevaluate
those,
you
know,
requests
and
suggestions
to
make
sure
we
don't
run
afoul
of
current
state
law
or
any
other
requirements.
S
The
other,
the
heart
of
the
city,
work,
work
program
item
is
on
hold
of
sorts
because
we're
waiting
to
see
what
happens
with
the
housing
element-
and
we
might
you
know
we
might
have
to
reevaluate
how
to
update
all
that
we
have
to
with
regard
to
that,
and
then
we
also
you
know
there
is
the
council:
has
a
work
program
item
update
at
its
next
meeting,
so
I'm
sure
we
can
talk
more
about
it.
Then.
C
Q
S
Q
Q
Okay,
okay,
that's
fine,
and
what
about
the
the
air
quality
monitors
and
I
have
a
kind
of
a
more
specific
type
of
question
for
terry
mccracken,
and
maybe
these
both
will
go
to
terry.
Can
we
ask
for
having
air
quality
monitors
around
these
these
larger
construction
sites,
and
then
I'm
just
wondering
as
a
process?
Let's
say
we
have
a
an
active
dry,
cleaner,
that's
there
that
has
just
recently
closed
and
that's
that's
a
project.
That's
that
is
subject
to
these
new
rules.
Q
Q
Q
B
Okay,
let's
see
if
I
can
break
these
down,
I
think
the
the
what
you're
asking
about
like
the
dry
cleaning,
that
the
phase
one
would
recognize
that
and
then
they
would
recommend
the
phase
two
all
of
phase
one.
The
phase
one
is
really
just
a
very
sophisticated
existing
conditions
report.
It
just
tells
you
what's
there
and
it
runs.
B
You
know
the
the
searches
through
all
the
different
databases,
and
so
it
should
recognize
that
use
and
then
recognize
because
of
that
use,
here's
what
needs
to
be
done
to
clean
it
up,
and
so
then
you
probably
need
to
do
some
kind
of
sampling,
because-
and
that
might
maybe
answered
both
your
questions,
I'm
not
sure
because
it
should
pull
up.
If
something
was
there
15
years
ago
or
30
years
ago,
that
the
records
go
back
pretty
far.
B
You
know
the
phase
one
it
really.
The
cost
is
dependent
on
the
size
and
the
type
of
use.
So
let's
say
it
was
just
the
the
the
dry
cleaning
that
was
going
to
be.
You
know
changed
to
a
different
use.
Now
it's
going
to
be
a
daycare,
it
would
be
a
very
nominal
fee
like
we
would
run
like
place.
Works
would
run
a
report
like
that,
for
maybe
a
thousand
you
know
time
labor
research,
but
if
you
had
to
do
something
like
I
don't
know
about
comal
and
do
a
phase
one.
Q
Okay
and
going
back
to
the
first
question,
is
there
some
way
that
we
can
require
air
quality
monitors
on
the
perimeter
of
large
sites
and,
what's
the
for,
with
regards
to
demolition
and
fugitive
deaths
to
what's
the,
if
you
did
have
it,
would
it
just
be
giving
you
a
reading,
saying
yeah?
It's
really
dusty
out
here,
sorry
to
hear
that
or
does
it
have
any
teeth
associated
with
it.
B
That's
a
really
good
question.
I
would
have
to
go
back
and
actually
ask
one
of
our
experts.
We
haven't
ever
required
air
quality
monitors
like
the
one
you're
talking
about
like
what
we
see
in
purple-
purple
air,
for
example,
if
you're
familiar
with
that
one,
but
I
think
it
might
do
exactly
what
you
just
said:
it's
dusty
during
grading
and
so
you're
picking
up
dust,
and
so
but
it
might
be
your
trigger
to
actually
you
know
water,
the
site,
but
I
think
it's
a
really
good
question
I
I
will
get
back.
Q
C
Right,
thank
you,
councilmember
moore.
Let's
go
on
to
our
members
of
the
public
before
we
bring
it
back
to
council
for
follow-up
comments.
We
have
two
hands
raised
right
now.
Those
are
from
lisa
warren
and
peggy
griffin
I'll
remind
our
members
of
the
public
that
you'll
need
to
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time.
The
first
person
concludes
speaking,
and
so
everyone
will
have
up
to
three
minutes
to
speak.
Lisa
welcome.
O
Thank
you
so
this
this
attachment
c
and
the
comment
and
the
it's
from
2019
from
what
I
gathered
with
pew's
presentation,
and
so
when
it
says,
staff
and
city
attorney's
office,
we're
not
talking
about
the
city
attorney
nor
the
city
manager
that
we
currently
have,
and
I
just
I'm
hoping
that
they
both
weighed
in
on
this
and
because
in
that
two
years,
plus
there's
been
a
lot
of
things
that
happen.
That
may
make
these
comments
change
so
I'll.
Just
trust.
I
hope
that
that
has
happened.
O
I
want
to
say
objective
standards
are
moving
targets,
they
will
be,
they
are,
and
it
will
never
not
be
the
way
our
governor
etc
are
behaving.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there
is
some
mechanism
to
quote
unquote
legally
appropriately
continue
this
conversation
and
whatever
gets
passed
tonight
it
it
should
include
language.
It
says
that
we
also
allow
for
future
changes,
because
you
can't
hit
a
brick
wall
and
not
be
able
to
make
changes
in
the
future.
O
O
People
want
their
privacy
so
not
to
include
the
public
and
have
input
from
them,
and
I
can
give
you
lots
of
input
on
privacy
planning
problem,
that's
already
in
place,
and
so
can
the
planning
commission
from
a
few
years
back
and
yada
yada
yada.
So
please
make
it
a
community
workshop
and
then
a
study
session
if
need
read.
I
think
arctic
architectural
features
the
line
if
it's
not
going
to
be
stricken
and
it
needs
kept
in
there.
O
In
my
opinion,
it
should
say
slope
line
and
setbacks.
There's
no
reason
not
to
include
setbacks,
because
nothing
should
be
encroaching
in
a
setback
either.
If
you
don't
put
in
this
specifically
someone's
going
to
wiggle
around
bike
lanes
traffic
count,
I
think
logan
level
of
service.
You
know
you
really
need
to
see
if
these
bike
lanes
that
are
being
spent
lots
of
money
on
are
even
being
used
because
in
mind.
O
C
J
Thank
you,
mayor
darcy.
Yes,
lots
of
griffins.
Oh
that's
good!
We're
we're
concerned
anyway,
thank
you
to
the
staff
you
guys
are
like
having
to
slug
through
this.
You
know
it.
I
can
tell
you
after
21
years
and
five
years
in
the
county.
This
stuff
is
some
of
the
most
just
mind-boggling,
mind-boggling
mind-blowing.
J
How
do
we
plan?
How
do
we
deal
with
this?
How
do
we
protect
the
city
with
all
of
these
housing
bills?
Sb
330.
we're
talking
about
a
major
dead
bill
that
came
out.
This
is
a
stupid
bill.
I
don't
know
whether
this
I
can't
remember
whether
this
was
jerry
brown
that
signed
it
or
gavin
signed
it,
but
I
mean
yeah.
Okay,
it's
like
it's
the
bill
that
never
ends.
You
can
only
have
three
meetings.
You
can
you
know
now
I
forgot
what
the
other
thing
is.
J
I
think
that's
why
we
didn't
have
this
because
it
was
given
to
us.
While
we
were
planning
this
then
so
the
city
should
be
able
to
say
we
can
we're
we're
okaying
this
tonight.
Our
legislation,
we're
okaying
our
thing
tonight,
but
we
have
the
right
to
rewrite
it,
because
the
state
is
rewriting
all
these
bills
over
and
over
again
1174
with
mr
grayson,
that's
like
an
addendum
to
sb-35.
J
Let's,
let's
learn
from
the
way
our
legislator
and
our
governor
is
acting.
I
have
notes
all
over
the
place.
I
have
concerns,
I'm
glad
that
lisa
brought
up
the
architectural
features.
I
you
know
sb9
and
10.
They
are
going
to
be
bombs
on
this
city
you're.
I
am
terrified
at
what's
going
to
happen
to
the
neighborhoods
and
I'm
mad.
We
have
not
had
been
able
to
talk
to
any
of
the
legislators
about
it.
J
I'm
not
voting
for
this
governor
again,
I
hope
there's
another
democrat
that
comes
up,
but
I'm
angry
about
what
has
been
taken.
We've
been
taken
advantage
of
our
neighborhoods
are
under
assault
and
we're
not
allowed
to
say
anything
well
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
the
city
has
to
protect
itself.
We
have
to
write
our
own
legislation
because
believe
me,
whoever's
run
in
sacramento
is
not
they
don't
want
to
share.
They
don't
want
to
talk
to
us.
They're
cancelled
culture,
cupertino
the
public
and
local
control,
so
yeah.
J
If
we
have
to
rewrite
this
stuff
in
two
weeks
because
of
all
the
bills
and
wait
until
ab1401,
where
you
cannot
drive
a
car-
and
I
I
suppose
the
next
thing
will
be-
is
that
you
can't
go
to
school
after
you're,
12
years
old,
like
the
taliban,
so
yeah,
we
have
to
protect
ourselves
because
I
have
zero
credibility
with
this
current
government.
Thank
you
staff.
Thank
you.
Everybody.
K
K
K
K
K
I
also
would
like
to
thank
the
city
attorney,
the
city
manager
and
the
staff
for
the
continued
work
to
ensure
the
remaining
items
are
completed.
Clear,
objective
plans
and
laws
benefit
everyone
and
make
your
work
easier
when
you
have
to
apply
them.
So,
thank
you
all
for
your
work
and
please
keep
doing
it
good
night.
C
P
However,
I
have
some
additional
amendment
besides
that
so
stafford
recommendation
plus
strike,
the
architectural
features
that
do
not
include
usable
area
may
encroach
into
the
slope
line
from
both
places
in
the
figure
lu
to
footnote
a
second
on
the
same
footnote.
It
says
when
the
stop
line
is
not
established.
This
will
be
established
during
project
review.
I'd
like
to
revise
this
to
say,
project
review
shall
be
required
when
it's
not
established.
C
And
it
says
where
slope
lines
or
other
other
apple
will
heighten
setback
limits
for
projects
adjacent
in
residential
areas.
Yeah
there's
some
there's
some
grammatical
issues
it
should
be
are
not
established
in
a
specific
plan,
conceptual
zoning,
our
language
plan
and
any
adopted
design
guidelines-
comma
this
is
actually
should
be.
These
will
be
established
during
project
review.
Are
you
saying
that
you
want
to
add
to
that
sentence?.
A
C
A
A
P
S
I
don't
think
state
law
will
allow
us
to
set
that
standard.
Vice
mayor,
a
child.
If
there
is
no
standard,
there
would
be
no
standard,
but,
like
I
mentioned,
if
most
of
the
city
is
planned,
development
and
they
would
have
to
if
they
were
a
streamlined
project,
adhered
to
the
r3
requirements
that
have
setbacks
already.
P
P
P
P
This
part
is
from
the
general
plan
for
the
urban
village
item
8.
It
says
for
urban
village
development
mixed
use,
we
need
the
neighborhood
buffers,
setbacks,
landscaping
and
building
transitions
to
buffer
a
barton
in
single-family
residential
areas.
So
I
believe,
I
think
we
we
so
this
is
just
one
of
them
that
I
find
out
now.
I
think
we
probably
have
some
languages-
that's
not
objective
now,
but
it's
there
to
say
we
want
a
smooth
transition.
P
S
So
again,
if
somebody
came
in
with
a
discretion
with
a
streamlined
project,
they
would
have
to
comply
with
r3
standards,
no
matter
what
the
zone
means.
That
is
what
our
zoning
code
says
and
that
our
three
zoning
ordinance
has
setbacks
established
already,
and
I
think
the
city
attorney
might
have
something
to
add.
G
Yeah
only
to
sort
of
bring
the
focus
back
to
this
specific
question,
so
I
there
there
would
be
no
problem
making
your
proposed
change
to
the
general
plan.
Vice
mayor
chao,
if
there
were
a
situation
where
it
conflicts
with
state
law,
which
I
think
would
be
relatively
rare,
given
some
of
the
the
discussion
that
you
just
had
with
pew,
then
of
course
you
know
we
would
have
to
apply
state
law,
but
there's
no,
no
reason
legal.
A
C
Q
Thank
you,
mayor
paul.
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
her
motion
vice
mayor,
your
motion,
mentions
the
resolution.
Did
I
also
hear
the
ordinance
in
that
motion
as
well
yeah,
both
so
that
you
have
okay
and
I
did
not
have
any
changes
with
the
merv
13
filtration.
Given
the
way
the
the
map
is
at
back,
med.
Q
C
P
C
C
E
Q
P
Q
C
C
P
C
Okay,
this
is
what
I'm
going
to
do
at
this
point.
Vice
versa,
I'm
going
to
ask
the
city
clerk
to
conduct
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-2232
at
this
time
and
I'll
ask
you
to
reintroduce
the
motion
in
accordance
with
the
language
that
we
we
use,
madam
city
clerk.
If
you
could
conduct
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-2232,
please.
C
P
P
G
C
D
C
C
Okay,
great,
thank
you
very
much
we're
on
to
the
non-enumerated
items
on
our
agenda.
These
are
ordinances
and
action
items
of
which
there
are
none
for
new
ordinances.
Oral
communications
have
concluded.
We
now
have
council
on
staff
comments
and
future
agenda
items.
Let
us
start
with
our
city
manager.
C
C
Q
Well,
I
I
actually
have
have
just
two
two
quick
comments:
one
I
thought
it
was
pretty
exciting
to
see
the
ab
367
pass
through
and
and
having
these
the
student
students
have
such
a
quick
turnaround.
I
think
that
was
really
exciting
and
second,
I
know
the
the
city
council
had
assigned
the
planning
commission
to
go
through
the
general
plan
objective
standards
a
couple
of
years
ago.
I
it's
to
me.
Q
C
P
P
P
What
do
we
mean
by
that,
and
also,
if
possible,
I
think
we
should
have
standard
for
setback
and
slope
for
neighborhood
streets,
even
if
it
might
not,
it
might
interfere
with
sp
330
then
at
least
it
should
be
in
the
code
and
maybe
for
before
2025
a
project
could
take
exception
on
that,
and
then
another
thing
is
another.
One
is
a
new
item
that
we
all
know
that
the
april
park
apple
park,
property
parcel
property
tax.
P
So
it's
a
huge
gap
between
the
two
district
and
as
the
number
of
students
goes
down
in
both
districts,
their
number
goes
up
a
lot.
We
don't
go
up
much,
so
the
gap
gets
bigger
and
bigger.
So
I
think
this
is
a
good
time
for
us
to
request,
possibly
redistricting,
so
that
we
can
bring
that
parcel
into
cusd.
P
I
understand
this
might
be
a
school
district
issue,
but
I
think
our
school
district
is
financially
limited
and
I
would
like
the
cupertino
maybe
to
do
some
initial
study
on
the
city.
I
mean
of
cupertino
to
do
some
initial
study
on
what
needs
to
be
done,
because
if
we
can
bring
that
back
into
it
will
benefit
our
residents
and
then,
if
it's
feasible,
maybe
we
can
bring
direct
cities
manager
to
talk
to
the
superintendent
of
cusd
to
support
their
their
action
in
case
they
they.
They
would
like
to
proceed.
C
G
P
Q
Yes,
I
would
like
to
hear
some
comments
about
the
the
feasibility
of
having
that
change.
When
you
look
at
the
apple
campus,
the
headquarters
is
assessed
at
832
000,
that's
the
the
spaceship
part
and
then
south
of
that
is
675.,
but
I
think
procedurally,
it's
a
million.
I'm
I'm
off
one.
It's
832
million
versus
the
675.
Q
Now
I
I
support
it
I,
but
I
would
like
to
know
if
it's,
if
there's
the
feasibility
from
staff
of
spending
our
time
on
this,
because
I
think
it
would
be
challenging
to
ask
for
for
the
funding
shift,
but
if
it's
possible
I'd
love
to
hear
it.
So
I
I
certainly
like
to
hear
some
information
about
this
I'll
indicate
some
interest
there.
H
M
H
C
Yeah,
thank
you,
councilmember
willie,
all
right,
so
we'll
we'll
leave
it
at
that.
I
see
the
support
for
it.
I'll
I'll
speak
with
our
city
manager
and
city
attorney
assistant
city
manager
tomorrow,
and
come
back
with
what
some
of
these
feasibilities
are
for
our
our
scheduling
going
forward
into
the
foreseeable
future.
C
So
at
this
point
we
are
at
the
end
of
our
our
agenda.
Thank
you
very
much.
It's
been
a
a
very
good
meeting.
I
I
thank
staff.
I
know
that
this
is
you
know
a
set
of
items
that
were
a
long
time
in
their
development,
and
you
know
appreciate
all
the
work.
That's
been
done.
Obviously,
a
number
of
people
you
know
elected
appointed
and
in
the
community.
Our
community
members
have
just
done
so
much.
C
C
We
are
continuing
to
conduct
our
city
manager
interviews,
which
will
continue
this
weekend.
I
think
that
process
is
going
well
overall.
Our
next
meeting,
I
believe,
is
on
november
2nd.
Is
that
correct,
okay
thumbs
up
from
st
matrix
great,
so
I'll
adjourn
this
meeting
of
the
regular
city
council
meetings
of
the
city
of
cupertino
until
november
2nd
2021
thanks
very
much
and
everyone
have
a
happy
halloween,
take
care.