►
From YouTube: Cupertino City Council Meeting - June 21, 2022 (Part 1)
Description
Coverage of the Tuesday, June 21, 2022 Cupertino City Council Meeting (Part 1 of 2)
A
B
A
C
D
E
Today,
we
would
like
to
request
council
feedback
on
the
public
review
draft
climate
action
plan
2.0.
Your
feedback
today
will
give
the
project
team
time
to
make
any
adjustments
before
council
adoption
in
early
august,
and
I
have
a
short
presentation
on
the
project
to
date
and
the
draft
plan
content.
E
E
E
This
waterfall
chart
summarizes
the
road
map
and
the
greenhouse
gas
reductions
from
state
laws
and
from
each
of
the
sections
in
the
draft
plan,
the
red
reduction
bars
that
you
see
give
you
a
sense
of
the
relative
impact
of
the
different
sections
of
the
cap
in
reducing
emissions.
So
you
can
see
that
the
cleaning
the
air
and
community
excuse
me
connecting
communities
are
the
largest
bars.
E
E
E
We
can
remove
carbon
from
the
air
and
protect
cupertino's
natural
beauty
by
working
with
natural
systems
and
increasing
treat.
The
cap
also
includes
measures
designed
to
strengthen
our
capacity
to
adapt
to
a
changing
climate
and
the
caps
adaptation
strategy
will
be
updated
to
align
with
the
county
of
santa
clara's
adaptation
plan,
which
is
currently
in
development.
E
E
E
E
F
F
There
has
been
so
much
time
and
effort
put
into
fighting
some
of
the
high
density
housing
bills
that
I
I
get
really
frustrated.
When
I
see
inclusion
of
things
like
in
the
transportation
section,
we
have
almost
verbatim
word
for
word:
ab2097
from
assembly
member,
laura
friedman
from
glendale,
which
is
trying
to
put
in
parking
minimums
for
the
city
she's
trying
to
do
it
for
the
whole
state.
F
This
is
a
replay
of
ab1401,
which
I
personally
spent
hours
a
year
ago,
trying
to
make
sure
that
it
did
not
pass.
We
were
successful
but
bless
her
heart.
She
reintroduced
it
one
day
after
the
other
one
went
away
in
the
assembly,
and
people
now
are
spending
hours
trying
to
kill
this
bill.
I
I'm,
I
guess
it
makes
me
cross
when
I
see
things
like
this
in
the
trans
when
in
cupertino's
own
sustainability
report.
F
F
This
cupertino
has
parts
I
spent
the
last
six
weeks
parting,
my
mother,
back
and
forth
to
the
hospital
in
a
car
the
90
year
old
woman
cannot
go
on
a
bicycle.
She
is
very
ill.
This
is
what
is
left
out
of
reality
land.
When
we
start
talking
when
we're
pushing
the
bicycle
limit,
I
am
beginning
to
think
that
people
that
exclusively
ride
bicycles
do
not
take
care
of
family
members.
All
they
can
do
is
spend
90
percent
of
their
time
joy
riding
on
their
bicycles
all
over
the
county.
F
Now
I
know
that
that
is
really
not
correct,
but
I
I
think
that
I
it.
It
is
getting
very,
very
irritating
to
me
to
be
called
insulted
by
every
hindi
action,
yinbi
law,
to
be
told
that
I
am
supposed
to
ride
a
bicycle.
I
am
a
grown
adult.
I
have
a
bachelor's
degree
in
biochemistry
and
I
own
a
home,
which
I
sacrifice
to
keep
I
can.
I
will
not
be
told
that
I
will
ride
a
bicycle
this.
F
This
has
to
be
reiterated,
and
this
is
why
people
are
spending
good
time
and
money
and
donations
with
groups
like
livable
california,
fighting
balder
roll
by
laura
friedman.
This
is
the
example
of
stuff
they
don't.
The
public
doesn't
get
to
vote
on
this
san
jose
city.
Last
tuesday,
entire
city
council
members
voted
to
reduce
parking
in
their
city.
I
think
that.
A
So
thank
you,
jennifer
and
I
forgot
to
say
that
whoever
wants
to
speak.
Please
raise
your
hand
before
the
first
speaker
finished
speaking,
but
now
things
I
didn't
say
that
so
I'll
extend
the
time
till
the
second
speaker
finish
speaking,
you
can
also
send
an
email
to
the
city
clerk
to
be
read
as
the
public
comment
and
then
after
the
online
comment,
we
will
go
to
the
in-person
comment.
Next
is
denishill
destro
and
then
jen
and
then
peggy
griffin,
and
then
I
see
connie
cunningham.
Thank
you.
G
G
Name
is
daschle
leeds,
I'm
the
conservation
organizer
for
the
sierra
club,
bloomer
prieta
chapter
just
like
to
thank
andre
gilley
and
all
the
other.
You
know
staff
and
consultants
that
have
worked
on
this
climate
action
plan
draft.
I
think
it
is
absolutely
excellent
and
we're
in
strong
support
we
did
send
in
some
communications
in
mid-may.
G
You
can
find
those
in
the
link
d,
additional
written
communications
received
on
the
agenda
and
we're
pdf
page
12,
and
that
is
our
letter.
I
just
like
to
highlight
a
couple
really
quick
things
from
that
letter
that
we'd
love
to
see
implemented
in
the
climate
action
plan
draft
and
I'll
start
with
amending
action,
ww
1.2
to
include
updating
the
municipal
board
code,
sorry
to
implement
valley
waters,
model
water,
efficient,
new
development,
ordinance,
we've
listed
out
some
of
the
elements
of
the
ordinance
in
there.
G
This
is
a
model
ordinance
that
valley
water
is
provided,
and
they
will
also
be
providing
support.
Cities
that
wish
to
implement
this.
This
would
be
great
just
to
fold
into
the
cap
measures.
Additionally,
we
would
love
to
see.
Cupertino
include
something
like
an
end
of
flow
date
that
corresponds
with
their
greenhouse
gas
reduction
goals.
G
H
H
We
are
in
a
rural,
we
have
a
rural
overlay
on
our
in
our
area
and
it
requires
a
certain
percentage
of
the
front
yard
not
paid
or
hardscaped,
so
maybe
in
r1s
in
other
areas.
You
could
consider
this
as
far
as
trees.
Please
encourage
trees
and
shrubbery
that
help
reduce
the
carbon
footprint.
More
palm
trees
are
low
on
that
list.
H
Use
incentives
to
encourage
the
selection
of
of
the
preferred
trees.
I'd
like
to
see
that
and
also
to
address
tree
removal.
It
appears
to
me,
like
commercial
businesses
are
allowed
to
remove
trees,
but
residents
are
punished
for
removing
trees,
and
I
think,
if
a
tree
takes
that
long
to
grow,
there
should
be
some
value
to
it,
that's
more
than
just
the
homeowner
or
the
business,
but
the
community
also
sent
a
list
of
corrections
or
changes
in
an
email
and
one
of
the
particular
ones
I
want
to
draw
attention
to
is
under
transportation.
I
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
vice
mayor,
ciao
and
council
members.
I
am
very
pleased
to
be
here
this
evening
and
I
too
want
to
thank
you
thanks
to
the
the
folks
who
have
prepared
this
cat
plan
for
all
of
their
work
on.
It
is
really
an
excellent
effort.
I
do
have
comments
about
it,
but
that
is
not
to
to
take
away
from
the
efforts
that
have
gone
into
it,
and
I
very
much
appreciate
it.
I
The
questions
that
I
having
are
a
lot
about
housing
on
page
36,
it
states
that
title
24
is
expected
to
reduce
emissions
due
to
reduced
electricity
and
natural
gas
consumption
in
new
residential
housing
units.
There
is
a
difference
in
how
people
interpret
new,
so
you
need
to
define
that
does
this
include
remodels
that
create
a
complete
new
house,
or
does
it
only
count
new
homes
that
add
to
housing
stock
of
the
city?
Cupertino
does
not
have
too
many
of
that
in
the
second
batch
there.
I
Another
question
I
have
is
that
our
city
has
a
goal
of
over
4
500
new
homes
in
the
next
eight
years,
and
a
housing
element
that
is
in
the
planning
stages.
Does
this
cap
take
that
planning
into
consideration
for
its
goals?
I
saw
that
you
had
you
know
business
as
usual,
and
then
you
had
estimates
for
the
future,
but
I
don't
know
if
it
takes
into
account
this
housing
element,
which
is
a
very
big
change.
Another
question
I
have
is
that
I
noted
that
funding
and
equity
are
separate
pillars.
I
Therefore,
I
noted
that
not
all
the
equity
actions
have
a
clear
source
funding
identified.
This
is
a
serious
omission,
since
funding
is
critical
to
making
these
changes
work
and
certainly
in
today's
environment,
a
lot
of
funding
coming
for
helping
affordable
homes
is
from
grants
and
other
kinds
of
things
from
county
state
general.
I
The
statement
in
there
is
that,
though,
through
alignment
with
the
california
environmental
quality
act,
this
cap
can
help
facilitate
local
development
that
will
enhance
human-centered
economic
corridors
and
the
availability
of
affordable
housing,
and
that
a
key
co-benefit
of
a
comprehensive
and
updated
cap
is
the
promotion
of
thoughtful
development
that
will
complement
the
city's
environmental
goals.
This
is
achieved
by
creating
a
clear
pathway
for
new
development,
so
it
can
align
with
cupertino's
greenhouse
gas
reduction
plan.
I
I
so
urge
the
council
to
curve
carefully
consider
how
this
cap
will
help
the
city
plan
for
new
housing
in
the
housing
element.
This
is
like
the
perfect
segway
of
thought
process
going
on
about
how
to
save
energy
and
also
to
plan
for
our
future
climate
and
housing
really
go
together,
hand
in
hand,
thank
you
so
much
and
for
your
efforts
on
this
plan.
J
I
hope
that
these
will
continue
and
grow
in
quantity,
as
well
as
advocacy
and
awareness
that
comes
forward
with
these
projects
and
yeah.
I
really
like
how
there's
an
urban
forest
management
part
of
the
cap
2.0,
but
one
issue
that
I've
realized
that
can't
be
as
easily
come.
Combatted
due
to
restrictions
is
the
known
invasive
plants
and
weeds
that
are
allowed
to
be
sold
in
private
nurseries
and
are
still
grown
on
private
properties,
which
oftentimes
damages
surrounding
plants.
J
I
think
increased
education
and
awareness
on
this
issue
of
the
lack
of
native
and
drought-tolerant
plants
in
the
area
are
all
the
more
important.
So
I
think
the
cap
2.0
should
continue
these
efforts.
I
hope
you
take
these
statements
into
consideration
when
finalizing
the
cap
2.0
to
help
make
cupertino
a
great
role
model
as
a
climate
leader
for
surrounding
cities.
A
Okay,
great,
thank
you
so
now,
coming
back
to
the
council
yeah,
thank
you,
the
staff
for
a
great
report.
I
especially
like
that
in
the
staff
report
you
have
a
list
of
tabling
events
in
various
festivals
farmers
market
main
street,
so
this
is
great
outreach
effort
by
the
sustainability
team.
So,
let's
open
it
up
to
the
council
member,
I
see
councilmember
willy
has
his
hand
up
early
very
early
on
so
I'll.
Go
to
you.
First.
K
Oh,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor,
the
the
hand
raised
originally
was,
I
thought
we
were
going
to
do
council
questions
before
the
public
comment,
but
that's
okay,
so
the
andre
and
the
lead.
Thank
you
so
much
for
for
working
on
this
climate
change
is
is
really
at
a
a
tipping
point,
and
so
we
need
to
be
making
this
progress.
What
I
would
hope
for
tonight
is
you
know,
residents
that
are
here
trying
to
help
them
understand
what
we're
really
talking
about
in
terms
of
changes.
K
K
K
D
Yes,
councilmember
willie.
This
is
andre
de
vort
inability,
vision
manager.
I
thank
you
for
those
comments,
maybe
just
a
really
brief
step
backwards
in
you
know
how
we
intend
the
climate
action
plan
to
be
used
and
how
we
have
used
the
previous
climate
action
plan
in
setting
up
priorities
for
for
programs
and
other
various
activities.
D
D
Our
climate
action
plan
in
2015
asked
us
to
move
towards
a
cleaner
source
of
the
energy
renewable
energy
that
actually
initiated
a
set
of
steps
that
led
us
to
join
together
with
our
13
neighbor
neighboring
cities
to
create
silicon
valley,
clean
energy,
that's
the
single
largest
impact
that
we
had
on
emissions
locally.
So
that's
just
one
example
of
a
policy
change
that
was
created
through
consideration
climate
action
plan.
D
So
that's
the
way
we
use
the
cap,
that's
the
way
we
intend
to
use
the
updated
cap
2.0,
and
you
mentioned
a
number
of
challenges
that
we
face-
that
we
really
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
Electrification
of
buildings
is
going
to
be
an
immense
challenge,
not
only
from
a
technical
standpoint
but
again
education,
funding,
equity.
These
are
all
pillars
that
we
attempted
to
build
in
to
the
climate
action
plan.
2.0.
D
In
fact,
you'll
notice
that
under
each
of
these
measures,
is
more
specific
actions
that
will
be
under
consideration
those
actions
we
try
to
touch
upon
each
of
those
what
we
call
pillars
in
order
to
accomplish
that.
That
measure,
which
is
the
the
headline
target
you
see
so
hopefully
that
gives
a
little
more
clarity
on
how
the
cap
is
intended
to
be
used,
and
the
addresses
from
your
comment.
K
Yeah
so
kind
of
just
a
couple
more
comments
again.
The
picture
I
think
helps
helps
to
get
the
cross.
So
if
we
can
get
the
the
picture
back
up
there,
I'm
I'm
pretty
passionate
about
this.
You
know
I
be
the
cupertino
rep
on
the
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
board,
the
representative
of
cupertino
and
I'm
kinda,
dealing
with
this
each
month
at
our
meetings
and
the
one
that
I'll
kind
of
bring
up
is
the
electrification
sounds.
You
know
great,
but
it's
more
of
a
challenge
than
you
would
normally
expect
on
the
surface.
K
It's
the
existing
buildings,
houses
that
are
going
to
be
the
real
challenge,
and
what
I
keep
you
know
trying
to
remind
us
on
that
committee
is
that
you
know
one
of
the
thoughts
is
replace
on
wear
out,
replace
on
wear
out
for
the
water
heater
for
the
dryer
or
the
cooktop
things
like
that.
But
those
appliances
with
the
high
demand
on
those
are
essentially
going
to
require
220..
K
You
can't
just
go
and
plug
a
cord
into
a
110
and
think
that
you
over
when
the
water
heater
wears
out
the
the
water
heater
serviceman
is
gonna
push
for
a
replacement
in
gas.
He
pops
it
in
he's
done
and
he's
gone.
The
minute
you
say
oh
I'd
like
to
have
it
switched
over
to
a
heat
pump
and
it's
going
to
need
220.
K
K
So
I'd
like
to
you
know
kind
of
put
this
out
to
our
climate
action
plan
that
I
see
that
as
being
just
huge,
the
number
of
houses,
the
number
of
water
heaters,
the
number
of
furnaces
is
just
huge
and
being
able
to
take
advantage
of
that
and
not
have
them
replaced
with
gas.
I
truly
believe
we
have
to
help
the
residents
be
pre-wired
for
that,
and
I'm
not
sure
how
we'll
be
able
to
make
that
happen.
It
takes
money,
possibly
grants
or
things
of
that
nature.
K
A
L
Thank
you
vice
mayor
and
thank
you,
andre
and
gilly,
for
the
reporting
and
for
all
of
your
work
that
you've
done
on
this
project.
So
far,
I'd
like
to
hear
a
little
bit
more
about
what
it
means
for
this
to
be
a
sequa
qualified
plan
in
the
future
and
if
well,
we'll
start
with
that,
and
then
I
have
a
couple
of
other
questions.
Thank
you.
Excuse
me.
D
Thank
you,
councilmember
moore,
I'll,
I'll,
explain
it
in
a
broad
sense
and
if
there's
any
anything,
more
technical,
I'll
ask
our
consulting
team
to
to
fill
in
who
are
the
real
experts
in
sql,
but
it
really
begins
with
the
general
plan.
General
plan
identifies
a
a
number
of
policies
to
pursue
when
it
comes
to
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
environmental
protection.
These
are
all
contained
in
the
environmental
protection
element
of
the
general
plan
and
there's
some
specific
language
in
there.
D
That
asks
us
to
create
what
is
called
a
qualified
climate
action
plan
and
just
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
to
understand
what
that
means
and
how
that's
used
in
cities
across
the
state
is
a
climate
action
plan
is,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
really
a
policy
road
map.
It's
not
in
itself
changing
the
environment,
but
it's
really
pushing
putting
us
in
a
direction
of
path
with
a
series
of
targets
and
goals.
D
L
I
do
have
some
questions
regarding
the
be2
measure,
which
is
on
page
27,
and
it's
it's
showing
I'll.
Just
read
it
electrify
existing
residential
buildings
to
reduce
annual
residential
natural
gas
units
usage.
I
should
say
from
129
therms
per
person
in
2018
to
at
most
71
therms
per
person
in
20,
30
and
16
therms
per
person
in
2040.
L
So
it
just
seems
like
it's
less
strict
on
on
the
commercial
buildings,
if
I'm
understanding
that
correctly-
and
with
regards
to
that,
if
I'm
understanding
that
properly,
I'm
wondering
what's
the
philosophy
behind
that
and
can
we
also
think
of
commercial
natural
gas
usage
as
being
from
generally
from
like
eight,
until
five
or
seven
until
six
in
the
in
the
evening?
So
I'm
wondering
why
or
how
these
this
therm
usage
is
being
shown
like
that.
D
First-Year
question
about
the
climate
action
checklist:
we
have
not
prepared
that
checklist,
yet,
hopefully
we
would
wait
until
the
council
has
largely
approved
of
the
plan.
That's
the
starting
place
and
the
checklist
is
really
just
related
back
to
the
plan
in
a
in
a
more
simplistic
format,
so
that
would
be
prepared
once
the
the
cap
process
has
gone
through
its
course.
Your
next
question
about
measure
bbeq,
the
residential
electric
electrification
actions
I'll
speak
again
at
high
level
about
this
one.
M
D
A
need
to
address
existing
buildings,
as
I
we've
sort
of
what
you
call
rip
the
band-aid
off
when
it
comes
to
new
construction.
That's
by
virtue
of
our
reach
code
that
addresses
new
construction
requires
those
the
all-electric
with
a
few
exceptions.
So
existing
buildings
remains
this
big
elephant
in
the
room.
D
How
much
of
that
do,
we
think,
could
be
actionably
reduced,
easily
reduced
given
constraints
of
time
money,
consumer
will
existing
technology.
So
all
of
these
factors
are
considered
in
the
development
of
those
specific
targets
and
sort
of
a
stacked
ring.
So
that's
how
you
that's
how
we
came
up
with
those
specific
targets
and
split
between
residential
and
commercial.
D
I
will
say
that
electrifying
residential
homes,
while
not
easy,
is
typically
a
bit
easier
than
a
variety
of
commercial
buildings
out
there
that
we
have
in
the
city
of
cupertino,
and
so
there
you'll
you'll
see
the
discrepancy
of
what
we
think
is
easily
done
within
this
short
time
frame,
and
I
believe
you
had
a
third
question
as
well
about
forgive
me.
The
transportation
measures.
L
L
I
found
that
heating
with
that
is
it's
a
lot
more
expensive
than
than
the
radiant
floor
heating,
which
is
with
natural
gas.
So
I'm
hoping
that
there's
some
information
for
how
people
can
convert
to
electric
in
so
I'm
in
an
eichler
type
home
in
in
in
a
cost-effective
way.
That
would
be
really
helpful.
L
L
D
Let's
remember
more
I'll,
take
those
each
and
turn
I
believe
our
transportation
mode
shares
is
rather
low.
It's
probably
in
the
single
digits.
I
have
our
team
looking
that
up
here
in
the
documents,
probably
one
of
the
tendencies,
it
is
incredibly
ambitious
to
to
try
to
get
to
a
double-digit,
transit
mode
share
in
california,
and
so
with
that
being
said,
what
we
heard
from
the
public
is
that
the
that
this
should
be
an
ambitious
plan.
D
We
should
set
high
targets
if
we're,
if
we're
still
able
to
also
address
those
questions
of
affordability,
fairness,
quality
of
life
and
come
up
with
funding,
so
really
one
of
the
one
of
the
ideas
around
setting
an
aggressive
target
like
this
is
really
to
set
ourselves
up,
as
in
a
leadership
position
that
tends
to
attract
funding,
attract
pilot
programs
that
can
start
to
make
headway
against
against
this
really
big
challenge,
which
is
which
is
twofold.
With
cars
number
one
cars
are
very
polluting.
D
D
D
So
our
work
program
does
include
a
electrification
study
or
master
plan
effort.
That's
something
that
staff
will
get
underway
with
as
the
new
fiscal
year
begins.
That
will
really
include
a
few
things.
We'll
have
a
public
outreach,
we'll
have
a
very
detailed
effect.
We'll
look
at
funding
costs
to
operate
will
will
adding
a
heat
pump,
add
cost
to
somebody's
home.
D
If
so,
then
we
need
to
think
of
a
way
to
either
offset
that
cost
the
resident
or
otherwise
you
know
phase
in
these
kind
of
upgrades
over
time,
so
that
we're
not
creating
the
new
burden,
so
that
will
really
be
dug
into
you
in
a
lot
of
detail
next
fiscal
year
regarding
solar
on
facilities.
I
completely
agree
again.
This
is
an
item
that
the
the
cap
doesn't
really
address
when
it
comes
to
municipal
facilities.
D
We're
working
with
the
public
works
division
on
a
number
of
vip
project
that
will
explore
solar
on
our
existing
facilities,
as
well
as
battery
storage,
we've
been
given
a
grant
from
svce
to
explore
things
like
battery
storage
for
emergency
power
generation
and
whatnot.
We
do
plan
to
become
a
little
more
sophisticated
in
our
strategy
around
how
we,
how
we
treat
existing
facilities
projects
and
exploring
those
whenever
we
can
regarding
native
plants,
the
there's
a.
G
D
Underway
already
around
native
and
drought,
plantings
and
those
are
pretty
much
built
upon
in
in
the
cap
measures
around
water.
I
I
will
take
back
that
that
feedback,
though,
that
I'm
hearing
from
you
and
from
members
of
the
public
that
maybe
there's
a
way
to
emphasize
more
of
the
climate
adapted
plantings
or
you
know,
native
type,
plantings
that
also
have
ecological
benefit.
That's
some
feedback
that
we
can
take
back
and-
and
let's
see,
if
there's
an
action
that
we
can
include
that
wording.
So
it's
more
specific.
D
But
again,
all
of
these
actions
will
be
coming
back
to
the
council
coming
back
to
commissions
at
various
points
throughout
the
implementation
phase,
so
that
we
will
have
a
lot
more
detailed
discussion
about
specifics
when
it
comes
to
plan
and
those
types
of
matters.
I
hope
that
address
your
comments.
A
N
An
action
plan
without
real
actions
are
just
a
dream,
so
I
dug
into
the
plans-
and
I
really
appreciate-
because
I
can
see
that
education
is
part
of
it
and
support
that's
divided
into
technical
support
and
funding.
Support
are
mentioned
in
a
lot
of
places,
for
example,
consider
working
with
regional
partners
to
maintain
a
database
of
qualified
contractors
and
consultants
for
electrification
retrofits.
You
know
if
I
I
am
a
resident,
and
I
want
to
electrify
my
home.
N
I
don't
know
what
to
do,
but
this
technical
support
is
very,
very
important,
and
so
there
are
a
lot
of
technical
support
actions
in
this,
and
I
want
to
follow
up
with
andre's
statements,
which
is
this
is
a
plan
and
to
come
up
with
detailed
actions
is
going
to
come
up
according
to
the
plan
and
we,
as
council
will
set
up
ambitious
goals
and
our
staff
with
their
expertise.
We
come
up
with
plans,
so
I
can
see
three
areas
of
what
we're
gonna
do:
electrification,
water
and
transit.
N
If
we
can
have
funding
support
our
residents,
our
commercial
buildings,
to
electrify
our
old
buildings,
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
action
items
in
this
plan
that
are
really
good,
I'm
not
going
to
mend
all
of
it,
but
on
the
three
parts-
electrification,
water
and
transit-
and
I
like
a
lot
of
the
good
recommendations.
I
know
details
will
come
later.
N
I
do
believe
he
mentioned
this
and
vice
mayor
and
john,
I
just
toured
valley
waters
facility,
their
advanced
water
purification
center,
and
we
received
a
recommendation
report,
and
this
is
just
in
time
because
valley,
water
actually
is
providing
a
water
efficient.
New
development,
ordinance
with
17
individual
measures
in
total
and
the
city
doesn't
have
to
adopt
all
of
them,
but
valley
water
will
provide
technical
assistance.
So
you
know,
regional
partnership
is
really
really
important,
and
this
is
very,
very
major.
N
Part
of
climate
action
plan
is
water,
so
we
need
to
work
with
other
cities
and
work
with
regional
organizations
in
our
region
to
develop
real
action
items
and
as
for
transportation,
I
do
believe-
and
I
think
it
is
in
our
agenda-
I
do
believe
working
with
our
local
other
cities
to
develop.
Transit
plans
throughout
the
region
is
a
very
important
part.
N
One
thing
I've
heard
from
the
comments
which
I
do
think
we
could
expand
at
is
to
tie
our
housing
element
to
our
climate
action
plan,
because
you
know
it
has
everything
to
do
with
electrification
everything
to
do
with
saving
water
everything
to
do
with
develop
public
transit.
So
I
don't
know
how
we
can
tie
it
together,
but
I
do
believe
that's
an
area.
Maybe
more
detailed
plans
come
up
when
we
have
our
housing
element.
General
plan
amendments,
so
I
want
to
commend
the
staff
and
the
sustainability
commission
to
come
up
with
a
really
good
draft.
N
Today
we're
getting
input
and
when
we
come
up
with
the
final
draft,
then
we'll
come
up
with
action
items
every
year
and
I'm
very
excited
about
this,
and
I
think
cupertino
city
is
one
of
the
leaders
in
the
region
for
climbing
action
action
items
and
we
have
very
active
youth
group
and
community
members
who
really
would
is
watching
what
we
do.
As
for
councilmember
moore's
comment
about
our
city
facilities,
I
do
agree.
We
need
to
be
a
leader
in
this
and
every
our
city
facilities
need
to
lead.
N
So
when
we
do
remodeling
or
rebuild,
we
will
put
our
100
effort
into
our
city
facilities
to
be
climate
action
and
to
be
a
model
of
climate
action,
and
I
do
want
to
mention
sunnyvale
city's,
a
new
city
hall.
I
think
that
is
a
really
good
model
for
us
to
look
at
it.
So
that's
it
thanks
nice
to
meet
you
ciao.
N
A
A
First
is
they
would
like
to
include
some
language
with
coordination
with
our
local
k-12
school
districts,
to
encourage
students
to
with
student
transportation
to
school
pick
up
and
drop
off
on.
Another
thing
is
addition
of
an
action
to
encourage
local
businesses
to
label
vegetarian
and
vegan
food
and
for
restaurants
to
offer
vegan
and
vegetarian
options.
A
So
I'm
not
sure
the
second
one
is
suitable
for
climate
action
plan,
but
I
think
I
would
like
to
consider
that
and
then
I
would
like.
I
think
one
of
the
public
mentioned
concerns
that,
as
we
convert
a
lot
of
the
longs
to
permeable
surface,
we
might
be
losing
ground
water
and
but
we
do
need
ground
water
to
fill
up
the
aquifer
so
that
we
can
restore
them.
A
And
then
another
thing
is,
I
think,
as
we
do
this
climate
action
plan,
we
need
to
consider
that
the
the
earth
is
a
full
ecological
system,
so
we
should
include
the
pollination
plants
and
any
of
the
planting
that
does
provide
positive
impact
to
the
to
the
ecology,
the
animals
in
our
environment
and
yeah.
I
agree
that
the
city
probably
should
put
in
more
effort
trying
to
get
some
grant
funding
to
install
solar
panels
on
city
buildings
and
even
parking
lots
and-
and
then
I
the
last,
but
I
think
it's
the
most
important.
A
I
do
have
a
concern
about
the
tr-2
goal.
Yes,
I
understand
we
are
trying
to
be
more
aggressive,
but
the
goal
still
has
to
be
justifiable,
and
so
I
would
like
to
see
some
numbers
to
justify
this.
This
goal,
and
we
we
know
that
in
los
angeles
county,
where
they
they
invested,
I
think
a
few
billion
dollars
in
their
transit
system
as
a
after
all,
that's
done
their
ridership
in
fact
dropped.
A
So
it's
and
then
in
terms
of
transit.
We
also
understand
from
the
2014
environmental
impact
report
report
for
the
general
plan
that
80
of
cupertino
residents
go
out
of
cupertino
to
work
and
about
80
percent
of
cupertino
workers
come
from
elsewhere.
Cupertino
alone
will
not
be
able
to
provide
a
transit
structure
to
achieve
the
goals.
So
what
external
factors
we
have
to
depend
on?
What
kind
of
funding
sources
and
external
projects
we
need
to
even
achieve
this
goal.
A
A
A
A
So
when
we
talk
about
oh,
we
need
to
remove
parking,
but
reality
is
family.
People
with
families
do
need
cars,
which
is
going
to
be
electric
most
likely
a
hundred
percent
electric
in
the
future,
so
parking
reduction
in
parking
it
does
not
really
achieve.
The
climate
goal
is
a
big
question
and,
as
we
see
in
big
cities,
when
you
don't
have
parking,
people
are
going
to
circle
around
to
find
parking.
That's
going
to
emit
more
green
gas
emission
if
it's
not
the
electric
car
so
and
so
that
it's
a
big
issue
with
for
cupertino.
A
A
L
Am
I
to
understand
that
this
is
going
to
allow
a
developer
to
go
to
the
greenhouse
gas
portion
of
the
checklist
and
be
able
to
check
off
less
than
significant
with
mitigation
incorporated?
Is
that
is
that
essentially,
the
idea
behind
this
and
and
I'd
I'd,
like
the
the
climate
action
plan,
to
include
a
little
bit
more
information
about
the
sequa
issue,
to
explain
it
better
to
the
public?
L
D
D
O
O
L
That's
kind
of
my
concern
is
that
there
there
could
be
a
logical
size
of
a
project
which
would
be
so
big
that
it,
even
if
they
followed
all
of
these
recommendations,
that
they
would
still
have
those
significant
impacts.
So
I
was
wondering
if
you
had
considered
that
and-
and
you
can
probably
guess
you
know-
guess
the
project
that
I'm
thinking
about.
So
I'm
wondering
if
that
was
considered.
D
P
P
That
is
basically
a
tool
that
studies,
staff
and
utilize
and
provide
applicants
or
themselves
if
it's
a
municipal
project
to
go
through
and
do
a
consistency,
analysis
against,
but
it
is
still
up
to
the
city
they
have.
The
city
still
has
the
latitude
to
require
a
typical
quantitative
geographic
analysis
for
larger
projects,
especially
if
they
would
have
potentially
larger
amounts
of
time
fill
or
other
items
that
would
be
of
concern
and
wanted
to
see
that
quantitative
analysis
in
terms
of
the
city's
opinion
of
that.
A
Okay,
it's
already
6
40.,
so
I
guess
we
should
try
and
wrap
this
up.
I
do
have
watched
one
short
comment
and
a
final
question
on
the
I
hope
to
see
a
stronger
language
with
tree
preservation,
because
we
have
seen
trees
removed
in
big
numbers.
When
we
have
development
projects
and
like
one
resident
says
for
common
residents,
they
are,
they
have
to
pay
a
few
thousand
dollars
to
replace,
remove
a
tree
so
that
there
seems
to
be
a
big
inequity
for
this
issue
that
I
hope
to
be.
A
D
D
M
A
Actually,
I
think
I
would
prefer
that
we
have
another
study
session,
because
I
would
I
really
appreciate
the
comments
from
other
council
members
and
I
would
also
like
answers.
I
will.
I
would
like
to
hear
their
questions
and
answers
too.
So
I
think
another
study
session
makes
more
sense
and
also
I
understand
that
we
each
mentioned
something,
but
a
lot
of
things.
Council,
member,
more
mentioned
or
way
mentioned
or
really
mentioned-
I
agree
with,
but
I
won't
have
time
to
concur
with
each
one
of
them.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
so
now
it's
oral
communications
for
any
member
of
the
public
who
wish
to
address
any
issue.
That's
not
on
the
agenda
of
today.
You
may
speak
for
three
minutes.
Now
we
will.
The
instruction
is
is
on
the
agenda.
We
will
first
take
virtual
public
comment
and
then
go
to
the
blue
cards
for
those
who
attend
in
person.
F
Thank
you
vice
mayor
you're,
doing
a
fantastic
job.
These
are
exciting
times
with
our
hybrid.
There
is
an
item
I
sent
this
letter
to
the
city
council.
I
think
this
was
on
june
16th
and
many
people
have
thought
for
a
long
time
that
sp9
and
sb10
were
predatory
bills.
They
were
written
with
a
hidden
agenda.
F
F
San
diego
has
a
voter
backed
initiative
from
1972,
which
prohibits
buildings
taller
than
30
feet
in
the
coastal
areas
west
of
highway
1..
This
includes
beach
areas
as
far
north
north
as
la
jolla,
sb9
and
sb10
included
references
to
building
and
beach
coastal
areas
and
eliminating
voter
backed
initiatives
when
they
were
first
introduced.
It
was
believed
at
this
that
time
that
these
bills
were
written,
that
they
were
targeting
the
coastal
beach
zone
of
san
diego,
and
they
were
trying
to
eliminate
his
voter
back
initiative
in
san
diego.
F
It
has
been
proposed
that
these
high-density
housing
bills
are
written
to
spot
zone,
the
laws
in
certain
areas
of
california,
and
then
the
bills
get
passed
and
they
affect
the
whole
state
disguising
the
fact
that
they
were
originally
intended
for
one
or
two
areas,
such
as
what
is
happening
in
san
diego's
coastal
area.
On
june,
10th
hcd
gave
a
builder
permission
to
build
a
60-foot
high
building
in
the
30-foot
coastal
zone
area,
and
I
quote,
hcd
said
the
coastal
zone
of
san
diego
violated
state
density,
housing
law
and
it
was
void.
F
This
ruling
by
hcd
is
a
clear-cut
violation
of
local
control
laws
and
voter-backed
initiative.
This
means
that
hcd
can
declare
any
building
law
in
the
state
void
and
impose
its
own
rule.
The
very
high
density
housing
laws
that
hcd
is
using
to
declare
it.
Marshall,
housing
law
on
state
and
local
housing
law
was
something
that
they
passed
one
year
or
two
years
ago,
and
the
public
never
got.
The
vote
on.
F
Sb9
and
sb10
were
drained
up
paid
for
introduced
the
california
legislator
and
passed
by
that
same
legislator
and
the
governor
without
the
public
once
being
able
to
weigh
in
and
vote
on
either
one
of
these
bills.
Now
we
have
hcd
ordering
that
existing
county
postal
laws
in
san
diego
are
thrown
down
and
void
because
the
of
laws
we
the
public,
never
got
to
vote
on
being
made
law,
give
me
a
break
whose
putin
bill
are
we
living
in
now
hcd
or
backers
of
sp90spn?
F
A
N
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
a
couple
activities,
silicon
valley,
clean
energy,
as
mentioned
by
councilmember,
that
he
is
a
representative.
I
am
alternate.
They
are
having
a
series
of
training
for
alternatives
and
directors,
because
we
need
to
continue
to
learn
what
is
the
change
in
greek
and,
what's
in
the
future,
in
order
to
be
able
to
support
silicon
valley,
clean
energy,
to
have
that
financial
stability
and
also
to
advance
clean
energy.
N
So
I
attended
one
of
the
very
first
workshop
and
really
learned
a
lot,
and
I
do
believe
council
members
need
to
be
educated
on
a
lot
of
issues
in
order
to
make
any
policy
changes.
So
I'm
very
glad
to
have
attended
that
and
they're
going
to
come
up
with
more
workshops
and
anybody's
interested
I'll.
Let
everybody
know,
and
the
second
one
is
I,
as
one
of
the
representatives
representing
santa
clara
county
on
the
cal
city's
peninsula
division.
N
We
have
exec
board
meeting
and
we
are
going
to
host
a
climate
action
seminar
for
all
our
county
city,
county
city,
council
members
for
county
of
center
of
san
francisco
san
mateo
and
santa
clara,
and
we
would
like
to
invite
our
staff
to
come
with
us
too.
Maybe
a
suspending
commissioner.
So
when
that
comes
up
I'll,
let
everybody
know
thank
you.
L
More
first,
okay,
all
right
all
right!
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
so
I
know
I
agree
with
education
being
very
important.
I
am
actually
in
my
last
week
of
a
three-month
course
on
industrial
ecology,
es62d
from
de
anza
college's
environmental
studies
program.
It's
an
online
course,
which
I
highly
recommend
and
prior
to
that
I
took
their
seqa
eir
course,
which
goes
cover
to
cover
through
the
entire
secret
desk
book
and
from
the
environmental
studies
62
d
course.
L
I
would
like
to
recommend
residents
go
to
valleywater.org
forward,
slash
watersavings
org,
and
they
actually
have
some
free
items
to
help
you
conserve
water
and
their
landscape
rebate
program.
I
serve
on
the
next
item,
serve
on
the
environmental
quality
policy
committee
for
cal
cities,
which
met
june
10th
and
had
several
informational
items,
including
a
building
electrification
and
an
update
on
the
plastics
initiative,
and
that
there's
been
some
progress
with
sb
54
likely
due
to
the
concern
the
plastics
industry
has
over
that
plastics
initiative.
L
If
sp
54
is
modified
adequately,
it
would
be
up
to
the
plastics
initiative
proponents
to
remove
that
initiative,
and
I
personally
would
like
to
see
it
on
the
ballot
in
november.
Lastly,
on
june
10th
I
was
happy
to
attend
the
cupertino
lgbtqi
plus
flag,
raising
ceremony
and,
along
with
a
council
members
willie
and
the
vice
mayor,
and
there
I
introduced
thomas
kingery
of
the
avenidas
rainbow
collective
avenida's,
rainbow
collective
is
a
local
community-based
non-profit,
which
specifically
supports
and
celebrates
older
adults
as
they
discover
and
learn
about
themselves
and
their
community.
K
A
Thank
you
so
for
me
on
the
10th,
I
also
attended
the
cupertino
pride
month
celebration
out
here
in
the
city,
civic
plaza
and
met
thomas
kingery
from
vin,
nidas
in
which
is
a
senior
center
in
palo
alto,
but
he
told
me
that
they
also
received
funding
from
the
county
to
provide
social
work
services,
which
would
would
also
include
cupertino.
So
I
have
invited
him
for
a
chat
tomorrow
at
two
o'clock
at
senior
center
to
under
to
learn
more
about
how
they
might
serve
cupertino
residents
on
the
11th.
A
I
also
attended
the
angel
island
immigration
center
trip
with
a
historical
society,
really
learned
a
lot,
and
this
immigration
center
was
going
to
be
destroyed
until
they
find
out
that
there
are
chinese
poems
carved
on
the
walls.
As
a
result,
they
decided
to
reserve
it
and
even
provide
san
francisco
even
provided
funding
to
restore
the
building
and
plus
there
is
a
non-profit
that
raised
a
lot
of
funding
to
preserve
it.
It's
really
worth
the
trip
on
the
18th.
I
also
attended
a
her
story.
A
Two
exhibition
at
miopitas
library,
it's,
I
think,
councilmember
moore,
were
there
too.
It's
starts.
It's
a
collection
of
stories
about
legal
cases
fought
by
chinese
or
american
women
throughout
the
history
to
not
only
for
their
cases
a
lot
of
times
change
laws
to
really
form
the
laws
that
we
see
today
so
and
then
on
the
18th.
I
also
went
to
the
memorial
park
for
relay
for
life.
Unfortunately,
this
year
not
many
people
participate.
I
wish
next
year
we
could
do
more
publicity
for
that
event.
A
N
Way.
Okay,
thank
you
vice
mayor.
So
as
a
representative
on
the
valley,
water
board,
we
did
with
maison
chao
went
to
the
advanced
water
purification
center,
but
I
do
want
to
report
two
things
that
came
out
of
that
tour.
One
is
you
know,
as
policy
makers,
we
make
things
happen
and
we
make
projects
happen
in
the
future.
N
We
are
looking
for
20
30
years
of
beneficial
to
our
next
generation,
so
the
four
major
capital
projects
that
valley
water
is
doing
right
now
for
the
next
generations
is
first,
it's
a
purified
water
project
and
anderson
den
seismic
retrofit
project,
south
san
francisco
bay,
shoreline
project
and
pacheco
reservoir
extension
project.
These
are
millions
and
billions
of
dollars
of
project
that
invested
into
the
future,
and
I
do
believe
valley.
Water
has
that
foresight
to
benefit
our
next
generations.
N
The
second
one
I've
mentioned
that
already
is
valley.
Water
is
has
a
model
for
new
development,
water,
efficient
ordinances
that
they
would
provide
technical
support
for
our
staff
and
for
the
city
council.
So
I
look
forward
to
working
with
valley
water
to
develop
those
new
ordinances
so
that
we
can
really
conserve
water
in
cupertino.
Thank
you
vice
mayor.
K
Yeah,
thank
you
vice
mayor,
so
I'll
report
on
the
month's
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
events.
So
my
number
one
priority
with
sunnyva
silicon
valley,
clean
energy,
is
to
constantly
increase
the
renewable
energy
contracts,
getting
essentially
in
the
direction
of
you
know
a
hundred
percent
renewable,
whether
it's
2035
or
2040.
K
You
know
trying
to
get
there
so
in
this
last
month,
silicon
valley,
clean
energy,
signed
two
new
power
contracts
for
geothermal
and
one
is
with
a
they
called
ormat
and
one
one
company
is
open.
Mountain
energy,
and
so
the
combined
two
projects
are
gonna,
be
adding
18.5
megawatt
to
the
siliconal
valley,
clean
energy
power
that
they
will
be
supplying
to
the
customers.
K
Hopefully
most
of
us
are
there.
So
to
me
that
really
is
achieving
the
the
primary
focus.
They
do
have
videos
for
residents
to
look
at
on
things
they
can
do
for
electrification,
cooktops
and
water
heaters.
As
I
had
said
during
our
study
session,
it's
going
to
be
a
challenge
to
get
existing
structure.
K
L
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you
vice
mayor,
so
I
chair
the
cep.
The
housing
element
strategic
advisory
committee.
We
were
scheduled
for
a
two-hour
meeting
yesterday,
which
was
canceled
and
as
soon
as
it
is
rescheduled
we'll
let
the
public
know-
and
I
have
volunteered
to
run
a
tent
and
conduct
outreach,
but
we
have
not
been
given
the
materials
that
we
would
need,
and
the
meeting
yesterday
was
to
have
had
information
on
surveys
and
meeting
in
a
box.
L
The
consultant
had
indicated
over
a
month
ago
that
the
website
would
be
updated,
but
it
is.
We
have
not
had
a
full
update
of
that
website
and
we
had
to
the
consultant
had
to
push
back
their
second
community
outreach
meeting
because
they
did
not
have
staffing
and
at
the
last
cep
meeting
we
were
told
by
emc
the
consultant
that
the
planning
commission
would
review
site
selection
a
third
time
on
june
28th.
Thus
far
site
selection
went
to
the
planning
commission
on
april
26th.
L
It
was
supposed
to
go
to
city
council
next,
however,
on
not
being
scheduled
for
the
counseling
council.
The
planning
commission,
chair
scharf
requested
a
return
to
them,
which
it
did
may
24th
and
then
it
is
was
stated
by
emc
at
the
cep.
Meeting
may
16th
that
site
selection
would
be
returning
to
the
planning
commission
june
28th,
and
I've
asked
that
this
be
a
joint
planning
and
council
meeting
to
get
council
up
to
speed,
and
I
have
not
yet
heard
back.
If
that's
going
to
happen.
L
I
chair
the
environmental
review
committee,
which
met
on
june
16th
2022
and
on
june
16th.
The
erc
recommended
that
a
mitigated
negative
declaration
was
the
appropriate
sql
document
for
the
I-280
trail
and
noted
that
the
mnd
has
an
alternative
alignment
at
the
blaney
bend
which
can
provide
for
a
straighter
alignment
but
at
an
increased
cost.
On
friday
june
17th
I
provided
the
vta
policy
advisory
committee
report
to
the
vta
board
of
directors,
which
was
regarding
the
june
9th
2022
policy
advisory
committee,
which
I
chair.
We
had
various
points
so
I'll
try
to
be
brief.
L
Here
we
requested
that
two
items
be
added
to
the
pac
work
plan
for
future
meetings.
One
was
a
discussion
of
the
potential
use
of
vta
owned
surplus
land
for
transitional
housing
and
second,
a
presentation
of
vta's
2016
measure
b,
annual
report
on
fiscal
year
2021,
and
it's
been
almost
a
year
since
that
fiscal
year
ended,
and
we
are
still
waiting
on
that
report.
L
A
Thank
you,
councilman,
member
moore,
so
thank
you
for
the
great
update
on
cep.
One
more
thing
we
were
hoping
to
review
was
a
survey
that
could
be
sent
an
easier
low-cost
way
for
us
to
maybe
send
out
to,
for
example,
school
union
employees
or
other
service
employees
whom
we
have
not
outreached
to
and
other
harder
to
reach
population.
K
Yeah,
I
don't
have
a
report
but
I'll
make
the
comment
that
we're
still
waiting
for
the
mayor
to
assign
the
subcommittee
for
the
city,
hall,
city,
annex
structural
evaluation
and
options
since
the
mayor's
not
joining
us
tonight.
I
think
it
won't
be
decided
tonight,
but
the
sooner
that
we
do
get
a
subcommittee
assigned
we'll
be
able
to
move
forward
with
that.
So
thank
you.
Vice
mayor.
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
think
of
we
do
have
a
subcommittee
for
historical
societies
in
other
historical
buildings,
but
then
that's
on
the
agenda
tonight,
so
we
will
hear
that
later
and
then
I
also
realized
that,
from
after
we
bring
to
the
tonight's
agenda,
I
find
that
we
actually
have
another
subcommittee.
We
have
not
conducted
meetings.
Is
a
subcommittee
to
look
at
the
restructuring
of
audit
committee
to
maybe
re-examine
its
roles.
A
That
subcommittee
has
me
and
the
and
the
mayor
on
that,
and
we
have
not
met
and
another
thing.
I
think
we
have
the
farmers
market
subcommittee.
That's
me
and
the
councilmember
willi
the
latest
update
we
have
from
the
anzac
college.
Is
they
finally
worked
out
their
issues
with
the
union
and
other
many
many
issues?
They
tried
to
work
out,
but
then
they
have
a
agreement,
finally
ready
for
the
market
to
sign,
but
unfortunately
they
were
really
trying
to
push
to
be
able
to
waive
all
the
fees.
A
However,
eventually
they
will
still
need
to
charge
over
1300
per
sunday
for
police
and
custodial
so
for
this
farmers
market.
This
on
this
amount
of
dollar
per
week
is
will
be
prohibitive.
So
we
will
need
to
figure,
continue
to
work
with
the
enzyme
and
maybe
look
at
other
options.
So
right
now,
there's
contract
will
be
extended
to
the
end
of
the
july
and
we
will
likely
have
this
item
on
the
council
agenda
for
another
look.
A
K
C
Thank
you
vice
merchant
two
items
tonight,
one
of
them
has
a
couple
subsets
so,
and
this
is
really
nice.
One
is
saturday
june
25th
from
10
to
12
p.m.
There
will
be
a
pop-up
event
at
the
jolly
man
park
regarding
the
proposed
all-inclusive
playground.
This
event
is
to
solicit
feedback
from
the
public
about
the
all-inclusive
playground,
wednesday,
the
29th
of
june,
from
6
to
7
30
p.m.
There
will
be
a
virtual
community
meeting
the
first
of
two
regarding
the
all-inclusive
playground
to
solicit
feedback
and
input
again
from
the
community
about
this
new
all-inclusive
playground.
C
Finally,
thursday
july
7th
from
5
to
8
pm
the
cip,
the
capital
improvement
program
staff
will
have
a
pop-up
event
at
the
memorial
park
during
the
concert
series
to
gather
and
solicit
more
input
from
the
community.
Oh,
this
one
was
input
from
the
community
on
the
blackberry
farm
golf
course,
the
other
one-
and
this
is
really
going
to
be
a
fun
one.
I
haven't
had
it
for
a
year
or
two,
the
fourth
of
july
celebration.
The
city
is
excited
to
bring
back
a
full
day
of
activities.
C
This
independence
day
celebrate
the
fourth
of
july,
with
a
pancake
breakfast
flag,
grazing
children's
activities,
a
small
parade
concert,
swimming
and
fireworks,
show
for
locations
and
a
complete
schedule
of
all
the
activities.
Please
go
to
cupertino.org
4th
of
july
for
all
the
fun
events.
Thank
you.
L
A
A
A
O
N
N
A
A
A
L
Vice
mayor,
if
I
may
so
items
10
through
14,
my
request
actually
is
that
we
would
table
them
until
they
have
gone
to
the
audit
committee,
along
with
the
monthly
treasurer's
report
and
then
return
as
a
entire
package
to
to
council.
It's
part
of
our
adjustment
to
having
the
monthly
treasurer's
report,
and
there
are
some
questions
that
have
already
arisen
regarding
some
of
the
accounts
payable
items.
L
So
the
audit
committee
meets
on
june
27th,
so
this
I've
already
requested
that
it
be
these
items
be
placed
on
that
agenda
and
then
the
idea
is
that,
as
a
that,
all
of
these
items
will
come
together
next
time.
The
next
regular
regularly
scheduled
meeting
with
the
whole
monthly
treasurer's
report,
rather
than
having
these
piecemeal
and
before
the
audit
committee
has
a
chance
to
look
at
them.
B
A
L
Q
A
M
N
R
C
R
R
So
again,
it's
my
pleasure
to
speak
to
you
tonight
about
the
asella
maintenance
contract.
This
is
for
subscription
licensing
for
land
management.
So
this
is
the
seller's
core
services
that
are
provided
to
the
city.
I
don't
want
to
re,
read
the
slides
for
you,
but,
as
you
can
see,
there's
a
plethora
of
services
that
are
provided
to
the
city
through
this
software
application.
R
R
The
most
important
thing
in
this
is
it's
a
one-stop
shop
for
permitting
and
land
management
system
for
the
city.
It
is
online.
It
allows
our
residents
to
be
able
to
actually
go
through
a
lot
of
the
probating
processes
online,
if
not
totally
for
some
applications,
they
never
have
to
come
into
city
hall.
They
submit
everything
electronically.
R
R
A
seller
generated
five
million
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
with
fees
over
the
past
year.
You
will
note
that
in
the
staff
report
there's
an
extra
zero
there,
it
wasn't
54
million,
it
was
only
5.4
million,
but
still
it's
a
healthy
bit
and
the
seller
is
integrated
with
all
of
our
back
ends
from
the
financial
system,
to
our
geographic
information
system,
to
our
plan
check
and
our
finally,
our
to
our
laser
fish
digital
record.
R
R
L
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
report
bill
and
I-
and
I
think
it
does
kind
of
sound
like
this
program,
was-
was
part
of
how
the
the
article
about
the
the
good
performance
of
cupertino
during
the
covid,
the
start
of
the
covid
pandemic
came
about.
Is
that
correct?
It
is
correct,
okay,
excellent,
so
I
was
wondering
about
the
5.4
million
in
fees.
What
that
actually
means
in
practice,
so.
R
Everyone
that
put
in
for
a
permit
or
plan
review,
or
any
of
that
have
to
pay
a
fee
by
based
on
our
fee
schedule
and
a
seller
collects
all
of
that.
In
the
background,
when
you
pay
online,
where
there's
a
payment
from
through
the
cashier
for
a
seller,
it
collects
that
information,
and
then
we
pass
that
on
into
our
financial
system,
which
is
new
world
and
the
information
that
I
got.
The
5.4
actually
came
from
the
financial
system
saying
this
is
what
came
over
from
a
sella.
L
R
That
is
correct.
So
what
the
way
the
process
works
is.
We
know
the
fees
going
to
council
beforehand.
We
test
those
all
out
for
a
couple
weeks
before
the
fee
schedule
actually
goes
into
effect
and
based
on
council
direction
when
that
date,
certain
is
defined
and
we're
ready
to
rock
and
roll
and
put
it
into
production.
L
A
H
Good
evening,
council,
members
and
and
staff
I
have
questions
to
with
this
system,
does
it
incorporate
or
can
you
incorporate
development
agreements
so
that
they
can
be
compliant
upon
issuance
of
permits
and
also
continued
compliance
by
reissuance
of
permits?
You
know
several
years
later.
That's
one
question
development
agreements
and
the
other
is
zoning
overlays
in
our
area
we
have
a
zoning
overlay
and
we've
had
issues
with
inspections,
not
enforcing
overlay
requirements
and
municipal
code
having
to
be
called
for
overlay
issues.
R
Those
questions
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
the
question
so
on
the
first
part
of
the
development.
Yes
and
any
requirements
from
the
development
side
are
put
into
a
sell-off
so
that
all
of
those
requirements
are
to
go
through
and
then
zoning
requirements.
Zoning
is
part
of
the
acela
as
well.
It's
it's
tied
into
the
system,
so
there
is
some
work
from
the
planning
folks
and
from
the
building
folks
when
they
go
through
that
to
make
sure
that
the
zoning
code
is
met.
R
A
K
Thank
you,
so
thank
you
bill
and
I
think
you
know
I'm
not
confused,
but
I'm
not
sure
the
community
quite
grassy.
You
know
when,
when
you
were
doing
your
powerpoint,
you
know
you
said
that
this
software,
this
acceleus
generated,
generated
5.4
million
dollars
and
I
think,
to
a
lot
of
people.
That
would
somehow
mean
that
you
know
we've
purchased
something
and
we're
making
money
off
of
of
using
it,
but
in
reality
that
5.4
million
represents
the
fees
for
project
that
the
city
is
entitled
to
with
or
without
accelius.
K
And
so
again
that
to
me
is
the
important
point
to
the
community.
The
5.4
million
dollars
is
developer
fees
that
the
city
is
entitled
to
without
excellence,
conceivably,
they
would
be
coming
to
the
plan
check
counter
and
turning
in
their
check
and
and
then
they
go
into
the
finance
department,
and
so
I
I
just
want
to
be
sure.
Our
community
understands
that
you
know
this
is
a
a
paid
type
software,
and
that,
then,
am
I
correct
in
what
I
just
said.
R
K
Then
then
it
goes
to
the
question
again.
I
don't
think
I'm
confused.
I
think
you
were
pretty
clear,
so
you
bought
this
in
2017
for
a
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
so
just
under
200
000,
and
to
use
that
software
to
collect
the
fees
and
current
is
it's
going
to
be
a
1.26
million?
Oh
wait
a
minute,
that's
a
lot,
but
that
is
for
a
five
year
license,
so
it
went
from
170
in
2017
to
maybe
240
000
in
2022.
K
So
you
know
kind
of
a
typical
inflationary
increase
that
kind
of
makes
sense.
But
then
I
would
go
one
one
more
question
and
that
we're
paying
a
licensing
fee
as
opposed
to
a
transaction
fee
like
so
that
when
we're
owed
the
5.4
million
dollars,
we
get
the
full
5.4
million
dollars.
Excellius
is
not
skimming
off.
You
know
five
percent
like
a
credit
card
or
paypal
and
we're
just
making
this
one-time
payment
to
them.
R
Councilmember,
will
you
are
correct
again,
it
is
not
transaction
based.
It
is
subscription
based
on
license
count,
so
the
increase
in
fee
not
only
has
to
do
with
the
uplift
that
they
do
from
an
annual
perspective.
We
also
have
added
additional
licenses
as
well
as
products.
That's
within
a
sella,
for
example,
we
have
an
enhanced
reporting
module
that
we
bought
for
them
for
about
thirty
thousand
dollars,
that's
included
in
that
fee,
so
we
continually
enhance
the
product
and
of
course,
as
you
move
forward
and
enhancing
products,
sometimes
you
have
to
pay
additional
money.
R
The
mayor,
I'm
sorry,
I
I
might
have
confused
a
little
bit,
so
the
licensing
is
user-based
license.
So
it's
the
number
of
staff
that
are
using
the
seller
flap.
So
we
have
82
staff
using
the
seller
platform.
Today
we
did
put
it
in
a
10
contingency.
Expecting
that
you
know
more
staff
will
be
using
it.
For
example,
some
of
the
staff
that
are
part
of
the
new
hires
they
will
be
using
a
sell-off.
R
So
we
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
to
come
back
every
year
and
tell
you
hey
we're
adding
you
know
two
thousand
dollars
for
this
project.
For
you
know
we
have
enough
contingency
in
there
to
discover
all
those
stuff,
okay
and
then,
as
council
member
willie
said,
this
is
a
five
year
agreement,
so
that
costs
five.
A
So
it's
based
on
the
number
of
user
accounts
that
makes
sense.
I
I
suppose
this
will
reduce
staff
time
on
that
will
pay
for
itself.
However,
I
also
understand
the
feast
city
charge
have
to
be
only
for
recovery
of
cost.
We
cannot
make
money
out
of
on
these
licensing
and
permitting
fees.
So
if
this
software
is
helping
us
to
reduce
staff
time,
would
we
in
the
future
might
be
able
to
reduce
those
fees
by
using
this
software.
R
Based
on
the
projection
of
the
work
that
we
have
in
front
of
us,
that's
not
going
to
be
any
times
two,
but
if
we
get
more
and
more
permits
happening
and
things
going,
we
thought
covet
we'd
actually
see
a
downturn.
We
didn't
see
it
down
anything.
We
saw
an
upturn,
especially
in
residential,
permitting
for
people
putting
in
you
know
remodeling
or
things
like
that,
but
we
do
not
see
that
the
work
will
will
slow
down.
What
this
allows
us
to
do
is
just
be
more
effective
with
the
existing
staff
that
we
have
right
now.
R
A
Well,
I
think
the
number
of
requests
to
increasing
means-
usually
that
means
the
cost-
actually
goes
down
per
case.
But
then
you
are
saying
we
won't
see
that
anytime
soon,
not
because
a
lot
of
these
still
need
a
lot
of
staff
time
to
process
right.
So
we,
the
software,
also
helps
but
really
won't
be
reducing
staffing
cost.
A
R
A
A
A
B
S
A
F
Yes,
thank
you
vice
mayor.
I
thank
you
for
looking
at
this
item.
I
appreciate
public
works,
giving
a
report
on
it.
I'm
familiar
with
this
item
because
I
followed
it
through
the
planning.
I
think
it
was
planning
and
city
council
again,
and
you
know
I
I'm
I'm
aware
of
what
this
study
is,
but
the
city
council
of
san
jose
did
something
last
tuesday.
It
really
made
me
concerned
of
how
the
this
money
is
going
to
be
used
and
san
jose
sort
of
dominating
this.
F
So
last
tuesday,
at
san
jose
city
council,
meeting
all
of
their
city
council
members
voted
to
reduce
parking
in
the
city
of
san
jose.
I
may
have
said
that
broadly,
but
I
I
I'm
very
very
concerned
about
this,
because
I
don't
think
the
public
was
was.
I
read
some
reports
on
it.
The
public
is
not
happy
with
this
decision.
F
I
don't
think
the
public
was
asked,
but
every
single
city
council
member
in
san
jose
voted
to
work
on
reducing
parking
in
the
city
of
san
jose.
Well,
I
am
very
very
concerned
about
this.
I
sent
a
letter
to
an
email
to
you
all.
I
am
concerned
about
the
intent
of
this
west
san
jose
stevens
creek,
boulevard
vision
study.
F
As
I
have
said,
san
jose
city
council
voted
in
unison
to
ban
parking
across
the
city
on
the
13th,
I'm
very
concerned
about
cupertino
donating
money
for
this
study.
If
the
intent
is
to
reduce
traffic
lanes
on
stevens
creek
boulevard.
I
think
the
intent
of
this
study
is
to
eliminate
cars
on
stevens
creek
boulevard,
and
that
is
not
a
good
option
for
cupertino.
We
have
cars
and
we
use
cars.
I
don't
think
it's
being
factored
in
in
this
big
san
jose
dominated
study.
F
I
don't
think
it's
appropriate
for
cupertino
to
donate
money
to
the
study
of
san
jose
city
council
is
sending
the
signal
that
they
don't
signal
that
they
don't
like
cars
by
voting,
as
they
did
last
week
to
eliminate
parking
in
their
city.
Cupertino
does
not
want
to
eliminate
parking
in
cupertino.
Why
should
we
spend
150k
on
a
study
from
san
jose?
It
will
just
say:
eliminate
cars
and
parking
is
the
solution.
The
150k
can
be
spent
to
fix
up
stockholmer
house
or
provide
meals
to
the
homeless
people
at
the
280
off-ramps.
F
I
know
this
is
a
very
important
study,
but
I
am
not
convinced
that
dara
dawn
is
going
to
be
a
bow
for
the
city
of
san
jose.
I
don't
stevens
creek
boulevard.
We
have
our
own
issues,
a
part
of
the
city,
I
don't
want
street
trees
cutting
down
and
frankly,
we
don't,
if
they're,
trying
to
eliminate
lanes
of
car
lanes
on
stevens,
creek
boulevard,
we're
going
to
be
down
to
one
lane
in
each
direction
and
I
don't
with
valvco
roaring
up
and
other
buildings
going
on.
I
just
can't
see
this
being
a
viable
option.
F
I
don't
I
understand
that
this
is
a
multi-jurisdictional
different
cities
etc.
But
I
really
think
that
san
jose
city
council
should
vary
very,
should
think
about
the
message
they're
sending
when
they
make
when
they
make
decisions
like
that
they're
getting
a
new
mayor
next
year,
and
what
are
we
supposed
to
think
about
this?
That's
all
my
statement
is
that
I,
I
think
this
money
could
be
better
used
or
maybe
city
of
san
jose
can
make
a
make
and
tell
us
if
they're
trying
to
eliminate
parking
in
their
city.
F
K
K
At
any
rate,
a
little
bit
of
history
to
my
memory
is
it.
This
came
us
a
couple
years
ago
back
when
rod
sinks
was
still
on
the
city
council
and
we
voted
at
that
time
not
to
participate,
because
we
thought
that
san
jose
was
going
to
be
the
elephant
in
the
room
and
yet
we're
contributing,
but
yet
not
really
significant
in
the
discussion.
K
Since
then,
though,
you
know
transportation,
traffic
and
everything
even
through
the
pandemic,
you
know
has
continued
to
be
an
issue
that
you
know.
I
think
we
all
say
does
need
to
be
worked
on,
whether
we
do
it
city
by
city
or
we
do
it
in
a
coordinated
way.
That
being
said,
you
know
so
chappie
joan
reached
out
to
me.
You
know
probably
a
year
and
a
half
ago
and
made
his
pitch
for
please.
K
That
being
said,
the
primary
contention,
I
think,
when
we
had
this
a
couple
years
ago,
was
the
concept
that
san
jose,
you
know
one
of
their
serious
options,
I
believe,
is
a
brt
line,
removing
one
lane
of
traffic
for
a
bus,
rapid
transit
only
lane
which
really
wouldn't
work
in
cupertino
as
our
resident.
You
know,
just
I
think
correctly
said
our
community
and
our
vice
mayor
previously
80
of
the
people
in
cupertino
have
to
get
out.
K
K
Our
lanes
are,
you
know,
kind
of
narrow
when
a
vta
bus
stops
on
stevens
creek.
A
few
cars
will
go
around
it,
but
a
significant
number
of
them
do
not
feel
safe
going
over
that
white
line
to
go
around
the
bus,
and
so
perhaps
we
can
make
recesses
like
I've
seen
in
other
cities,
principally
san
jose,
that
their
bus
stops
actually
do
have
a
slight
recess
to
make
enough
room
for
the
brew
traffic
to
go.
So
those
would
be
the
types
of
things
that
I
would
hope.
K
K
And
now
the
question
comes
back
to
chris,
so
we
we
contribute
one
one
point
or
one
154
thousand
dollars
who
in
cupertino
is
going
to
be
sitting
in
this
team
and
being
sure
that
they're
bringing
forth
by
all
means
I'm
big
on
options,
big
on
options.
You
know
I.
I
won't
shy
away
from
different
options,
but
realistically
whoever
is
going
to
be
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
64
000
residents,
they
really
need
to
be
sure
they
understand
the
64
000
resident
chris.
How
is
that
going
to
happen?
S
Thank
you,
council
members,
so
we'll
we'll
really
have
two
groups.
There
will
be
one
that
is
a
staff-led
group
that
I
participate
in
on
frequent
meetings
that
will
take
place
throughout
the
entire
study,
which
is
estimated
to
be
19
months,
and
then
there
will
be
a
group
of
elected
officials
from
each
jurisdiction
also
during
the
course
of
the
project,
and
there
will
be
robust
community
outreach
through
the
whole
project
and
many
many
opportunities
for
cupertino
residents
to
weigh
in
on
any
ideas
or
concepts
presented.
K
Great
then
I'll
leave
it
with
great.
I
fully
trust
your
your
ability
to
run
that
staff
portion
of
it.
I
would
simply
want
to
say
that
please
don't
hesitate
to
come
back
to
city
council;
it
maybe
doesn't
need
to
be
a
full-fledged
study
session,
but
come
back
to
us
and
say
hey.
These
are
the
ideas
that
were
floated.
How
does
the
city
council
feel
that
this
community
is
going
to
feel
about
these
things?
K
Do
this
because
that
doesn't
necessarily
you
know
we
usually
get
the
residents
that
are
going
to
be
most
likely
to
take
this
alternative
transportation
as
opposed
to
the
ones
that
are
the
balance
of
the
64
000,
and
I
think
we
really
have
to
be
aware
of
being
equitable
to
all
the
residents
in
cupertino
for
something
that
is
going
to
be.
This
this
much
in
in
everybody's
ballpark,
so
I'll
just
say
that
take
it
away
and
help
us
thanks:
okay,.
N
Thank
you
vice
mayor
thanks
council
member
willie
for
the
detailed
history-
and
I
do
remember
we
talk
about
this
and
we
have
actually
extended
the
study
to
all
the
way
to
foothill
boulevard
instead
of
stopping
at
the
anza
boulevard.
I
do
believe
we
are
it's
important
for
us
to
be
in
the
study.
We
are
not
donating
money.
This
is
part
of
our
our
study
too,
because
the
transportation
needs
to
come
from
daredevil
station
all
the
way
to
foothill.
N
A
A
L
So
one
of
the
things
that
I
had
brought
up
was
how
the
residents
really
appreciate
and
want
to
maintain
the
the
look
and
feel
of
the
the
corridor
with
with
the
trees
and
the
setbacks,
and
that
there
was
some
interest
in
actually
having
underground
transit,
which
is
which
is
very
expensive.
To
my
recollection.
In
their
presentation,
there
was
actually
a
photograph
of
the
protected
bike
lane
on
in
front
of
main
street
cupertino,
showing
the
the
beautiful
landscaping
there
as
well,
and
it
was
highlighted
as
a
a
very
attractive
example.
L
We
don't
have
the
advantages
that
san
jose
does
with
regards
to
having
this
space
with
on
street
parking,
which
you
notice
as
soon
as
you
go
down,
stephens
creek
boulevard
and
get
into
the
san
jose
area.
They've
got
on-street
parking
and
they
also
have
the
center
median
to
work
with.
So,
if
they're
going
to
be
having
dedicated
lanes,
they've
already
got
some
of
that
space
already
there
and
also,
if
they,
if
they're,
going
to
be
adding
protective
bike
lanes
along
stevens
creek,
they
have.
L
They
have
those
options,
whereas,
as
we
know,
along
stevens
creek
boulevard,
we
don't
have.
We
don't
have
any
on-street
parking
and
we
also
have
some
very
limited
space
in
the
center
median
and
it's
a
lot
of
the
center
median
where
it
does
get
wider.
We
have
landscaped
out
so
we've
got
full-size
trees
in
in
that
area.
So
all
of
this
was
communicated
along
with
the
outreach
challenges
which
they
are
going
to
have
because,
for
instance,
we
have
the
1201
bmr
units
coming
in
at
the
valco
site.
So
how
do
you?
L
How
do
you
do
outreach
for
a
future
population,
and
and
also
there
does
need
to
be
outreach
for
the
senior
community
coming
in
at
the
westport
location
and
for
the
students
at
danza
college,
which
is
they're
going
back
in
person
in-person
learning
there?
So
all
of
these
all
of
these
items
were
have
been
communicated
and
they
probably
also
bring
up
their
original
rfi,
which
san
jose
conducted.
They
had
about
19
different.
L
Companies
make
suggestions,
and
some
of
them
were
very
forward
thinking
by
graduate
students,
but
you
had
options
ranging
from
underground
tunneling
by
the
boring
company,
which
would
have
electric
vehicles,
potentially
in
it
above
ground,
monorail
and
sky
rail,
which
is
interesting,
a
very
kind
of
future
future
thinking.
Also,
the
glideways
company
had
made
a
proposal
and,
and
there
were
other
elevated
transit
options
which
were
suggested.
All
of
these
are
very
very
expensive.
So
I
I
don't
personally
know
what.
L
Ultimately
the
group
is
looking
looking
towards,
but
this
is
to
it's
my
understanding
this,
that
they
took
option
b,
which
is
to
room
it
was
to
remove
all
the
formal
design
and
replace
it
with
illustrative
concepts
to
support
engagement
process
and
discussions
for
the
corridor.
So
it's
not
really
a
set
design
but
to
provide
options
and
get
feedback
from
from
the
community.
A
Yeah,
thank
you
so
yeah.
I
think
I
I
have
confirmed
that
agreement
does
talk
about
it
from
stephens
creek
boulevard
between
between
foothill
boulevard
and
dearden
station
would
all
be
considered,
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
extend
the
transit
corridor
to
foothill
chris.
Could
you
please
confirm
on?
I
think
there
were
some
other
concerns
mentioned
that
by
either
this
council
and
even
the
previous
council,
even
in
2018,
that
we
don't
want
to
only
consider
the
bus
rapid
transit
option.
A
L
L
We,
we
are
actually
number
two
yeah
so
at
about
58
million
dollars
and
if
you
consider
what
our
transit
looks
like
for
the
the
second
place,
if
you
will
cities
behind
san
jose,
sunnyvale
has
has
real
transit
and
and
actually
so
does
campbell.
With
the
the
light
rail
line
there,
but
cupertino
we
for
the
amount
of
sales
tax
revenue
that
we're
generating.
We
really
don't
have
the
the
transit
one
one
would
expect,
especially
with
having
the
apple
headquarters
here.
A
L
Yes,
I
move
that
we
authorize
the
city
manager
to
execute
a
funding
agreement
between
the
city
of
cupertino
and
the
city
of
san
jose
for
the
stevens
creek
court
or
vision
study
and
adopt
resolution
number
22-076,
approving
budget
modification,
21
22-191
in
the
amount
of
154
079
for
the
city
of
cupertino's
contribution
toward
the
stevens
creek
corridor.
Vision,
study
an
amount
that
includes
a
10
percent
contingency.