►
Description
Coverage of the January 11, 2022 Cupertino Planning Commission Teleconference Meeting.
A
A
All
right,
happy
new
year
welcome
everybody
to
the
city
of
cupertino's
planning,
commission
meeting
tuesday
january
11
2022.
as
folks
know,
in
accordance
with
the
government
code,
this
will
be
a
teleconference
meeting
without
a
physical
location
to
help
stop
the
spread
of
coven
19.
If
you're
trying
to
communicate
email
comments
by
5
pm
on
tuesday.
As
you
know,
you
can
email
comments
during
the
times
for
public
comment
and
the
staff
will
be
looking
at
that.
You
can
do
that.
A
B
Commissioner
kapil
yeah,
commissioner
maripotla.
Yes,
commissioner
of
sex
senate.
C
D
D
A
Okay
with
that
we'll
go
to
our
first
item,
which
is
the
approval
of
the
december
14
planning
commission
minutes.
If
you
get
a
moment,
take
a
look
at
the
draft
minutes
and
if
there
are
any
comments,
please
provide
them.
B
Thank
you
so
I
did
catch
earlier
today
and
I
do
apologize
that
I
didn't
catch
this
previously
for
vote.
I'm
sorry
for
item
number
two
for
the
city
work
program
proposals
I
do
have
in
the
votes,
commissioner
kapil.
As
in
I
when
in
fact
he
was
absent,
but
I
have
that
listed
twice
so
I
do
need
to
strike
his
name
from
the
vote
and
other
than
that.
That's
the
only
change
that
I
need
to
make.
A
Okay,
let's
call
call
to
vote
sarah.
These
are
the
honors.
B
Thank
you,
commissioner,
appeal.
C
C
C
D
A
Wonderful,
noting
that
we
have
no
old
business,
let's
go
to
a
new
business
item;
number
two
discuss
potential
city
work
program,
proposals
for
fiscal
year,
2022
to
2023,
recommended
action,
recommend
potential
city,
work
program,
proposals
for
fiscal
year,
2022
to
2023
and
identifying
the
top
three
proposals
limited
to
no
more
than
five
planning
manager.
Pew
gosh-
I
guess
you'll
lead
the
discussion
and
we'll
send
it
over
to
you.
So.
A
Oh
wait,
my
fault,
I'm
reading
the
wrong
thing,
I'm
bringing
the
minutes,
let's
go
to
the
oral
communications
and
let's
go
to
minutes
or
communications
first
for
anybody
who
wants
to
join
in
and
speak
on
a
topic
that
is
not
on
the
agenda
but
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
commission.
Speakers
are
limited
to
three
minutes,
so
in
most
cases,
state
law
will
prevent
the
commission
from
making
any
decisions
with
respect
to
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
A
Okay,
I
don't
think
we
have
any
yet,
but
if
anybody
wants
to
add
anything,
here's
your
last
chance
to
raise
your
hand
bottom
right
on
zoom.
You
can
hit
raise
hand
if
not
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
two.
So.
E
As
good
evening
planning
commission
happy
new
year
as
the
commission
is
aware
that
we
do
this
on
an
annual
basis
in
terms
of
going
over
the
policies
and
strategies
in
the
general
plan
and
review
the
work
that
the
city
has
done
so
far
in
implementation
of
the
general
plan,
policies
and
strategies,
and
this
is
required
by
state
law.
It
has
to
be.
A
report
has
to
be
provided
to
the
city
council,
the
legislative
body
by
april
first
of
every
year,
and
so
we
start
with
the
planning
commission.
E
We
kind
of
kind
of
you
know
gently
try
to
tread
the
waters
a
lot
late
last
year
for
this
particular
year's
update,
and
this
is
the
first
draft
where
you
will
see
the
edits
that,
were
you
know
that
we
started
to
make
to
the
to
the
document
and
for
the
commission
to
provide
any
feedback
on
that
on
the
comments
that
are
in,
I
think
it's
column
ill
or
the
last
column,
on
the
right
for
the
commission
to
go
through
and
decide
whether
they
want
to
make
any
edits
to
it
or
not
before
it's
presented
to
the
city
council.
E
In
addition
to
this,
of
course,
there
is
a
housing
element,
not
a
housing
element
update,
but
a
a
report
that
is
generally
on
forms
that
are
prepared
by
the
htd
and
that
report
will
be
presented
at
a
later
date.
In
the
meantime,
we
start
with
this,
because
this
is
a
much
larger
document.
E
So
I'm
happy
to
kind
of
present,
like
we've
done
in
the
past,
share
my
screen
and
the
commission
can
make
their
comments
as
we
go
through
or,
however,
the
commission
wishes
to
do
this.
A
Yeah
sounds
good.
I
think
we
can
do
that,
go
page
by
page
and
start
that
process
and,
let's
start
with
the
first
set,
and
if
you
can
kind
of.
A
Up,
yes,
I
think,
starting
with
land
use,
one
one.
E
E
E
We
made
some
edits
to
policy
lu
1.4,
which
talked
about
encouraging
parcel
assembly
and
discouraging
personalization,
particularly
in
field
development
occurs,
except
that
we
all
know
that
sb9
was
implemented
in
late
last
year
by
the
state,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
the
acknowledge
that
the
council
has
adopted
an
urgency
ordinance
to
allow
partialization
within
the
neighborhoods,
as
required
by
sb9,
and
also
allow
the
development
of
duplexes
in
the
single
family
zoning
areas
and
that
a
regular
ordinance
will
be
presented
for
both
the
planning
commission
and
the
city
council's
consideration
in
2022.
E
Moving
forward
from
that,
I
think
the
next
change
is
really
in
policy.
Lu
3.2,
where
it
talks
about
how
figure
lu2
is
where
the
maximum
heights
and
setback
ratios
are
specified
in
the
community
form
diagram,
and
this
link
updated
language,
acknowledges
that
there
were
changes
made
in
october
2021
to
figure
lu2
to
clarify
that
language
as
part
of
the
objective
standards
exercise
that
the
city
went
through
for
the
last
couple
of
years.
E
The
historic
preservation
for
heritage
trees,
this
policy
led
6.7,
just
a
little
note,
has
been
added
that
the
heritage
tree
list
may
need
to
be
updated.
That
was
adopted
by
ordnance
quite
a
number
of
years
ago.
I
want
to
say
in
the
90s,
however,
there
have
been
several
trees
that
have
been
removed
over
the
years
due
to
disease
or
natural
causes,
and
so
that
list
does
need
to
be
amended
to
keep
it
current.
H
F
So,
usually,
you
know
I'm
sure
now
you're
fully
aware
that
our
residents
and
the
community
are
not
pretty.
You
know
green
friendly,
and
you
know
tree
sensitive
right.
So
so,
whenever
we
mark
a
tree
for
removal
or
whatever,
there's
always,
you
know
uproar
in
the
community
right,
they
think
you
know
we
are,
you
know
removing
prematurely
or
know
without
a
proper
root
cause
or
whatever
right.
So
so
is
there
something
that
we
can
do
to
help
them
better
understand
that
I
had
to
deal
with
some
of
that.
F
You
know
like
on
next
door
as
a
president,
you
know
on
some
trade
removal
that
we
did
on
the
memorial
park
right
behind.
You
know
quinlan
center
right,
like
there
are
a
lot
of
noise
being
made,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
people
chimed
in
and
you
know
I
jumped
in
as
well.
F
E
You
know
in
terms
of
tree
removals.
There
are.
There
are
findings
that
staff
has
to
make
before
a
tree
can
be
removed,
except
in
r1
zoning
districts,
where
I
think
the
code
pretty
much
allows
removal
of
a
tree
for
any
reason,
really
depending
there's
a
certain
threshold,
above
which
you
have
to
provide
an
arborist
report
and
things
like
that
below
a
certain
threshold.
E
You
can
just
remove
a
tree
as
long
as
you're
replanting
it
and
replacing
it.
So
there
are
two
types
of
tree
removals.
In
essence,
you
know
if
a
tree
is
larger
than
a
certain
size.
Of
course
we
there
has
to
be
abbreviation
for
removal
of
it,
so
that
we
communicate
those
reports.
You
know
when
that
comes
in.
We
certainly
do
communicate
those
reports
and
make
sure
that
you
know
that
the
arbus
report
is
peer
and
so
to
justify
the
findings.
Yeah.
F
So
my
question
is
not
so
much
are
we
justified
in
the
moving
or
not,
I'm
sure,
no
we're
doing
all
the
right
things,
but
I
think
you
know
we
are
falling
short
on.
You
know
communicating
to
the
users
like,
for
example,
we
might
be.
You
know
having
all
the
information
on
our
website,
but
people
don't
go
to
the
website
and
they
just
see
a
sign
on
the
tree.
That
says
you
know
this
is
marked
for
removal,
but
they
don't
know
why
it's
smart
for
the
removal.
E
Correct
and
the
purpose
of
that
notice
is
to
invite
that
comment
is
to
encourage
people
to
contact
the
planning
department
and
the
planners
to
get
that
information.
We
do
provide
that
notice
and
the
code.
A
lot
requires
us
to
do
adjacent
noticing
as
well
to
let
people
know
that
there
are
certain
trees
that
are
being
removed.
E
You
you
have,
you
know
the
information
is
available
at
city
hall,
I'm
not
sure
you
know
we
mail
those
letters
to
individual
letters
to
adjacent
property
owners
as
required
by
the
code,
and
so
I'm
you
know
short
of
knocking
on
people's
doors.
You
know,
I
don't
think
that
there
is
much
more
that
we
can
do
to.
You
know
to
encourage
people
to
contact
us,
but
the
whole
premise
of
the
notice
is
to
encourage
people
to
contact
the
planning
department
and
the
planners
working
on
it
to
make
sure
they
can
get
all
that
information.
F
Right
so
I'm
not
asking
for
no
additional
notice
of
knocking
on
the
doors
right,
I'm
sure.
Now
we
are
sending
those
mailers,
probably
the
people
that
are
making
noise,
not
necessarily
the
people
that
live
there.
If
people
know
visiting
are
passing
by
and
all
that
stuff
right.
So
so,
if,
if
you
can
provide
the
information
where
people
are
seeing
it
right,
then
there
is
no
need
for
them
to
go,
dig
up
and
you
know
make
noise
and
all
that
right.
E
I
mean
something,
certainly
that
will
need
more
thought
to
be
put
into
it.
You
know
on
the
on
this
spot
right
now,
I'm
kind
of
trying
to
think
about
you
know
what
can
we
do,
but
it's
certainly
something
that
we
can
think
about
more.
Additionally,
I
mean
right
now
we're
doing
everything
that
the
code
requires
us
to
do
you
know:
can
we
go
beyond
the
code,
we'll
have
to
think
to
see
what
we
can
accomplish
short
of
you
know
over.
You
know
committing
ourselves
on
resources
as
well.
G
H
G
Something
or
where
the
reason
for,
in
a
short
summary
form,
is
provided
and
without
too
much
of
a
hassle
of
calling
planning
commission
and
going
through
two
three
levels
of
indirection,
to
figure
out
the
reasons
we'll
lose
the
interest
of
the
person
who
is
trying
to
object
to
it
rather
than
go
and
seek
the
summary
using
accessing
a
url
or
something
and
just
get
the
answers.
I
mean
most
of
the
time
when
you
provide
two
three
levels
of
indirection.
The
the
interest
is
lost
completely.
E
A
I
think
I
mean
if
you
look
at
the
tree
ordinance
and
if
you
look
at
on-site
right
on
tree
protection
tree
mold,
there's
some
things
that
are
pretty
clear
as
to
what's
being
done.
If
we
go
back
into
the
cmc
or
something
in
terms
of
the
ordinances,
if
there's
something
we
want
to
change,
we
should
you
know,
definitely
make
a
suggestion
or
put
that
onto
the
agenda
at
that
point
in
time.
E
So
the
next
one
was
related
to
cultural
resources
and
about
public
art
work.
There's
a
note.
That's
been
added
that
in
2021
the
fine
arts
commission
approved
the
acceptance
of
inlu
fees
for
public
art
for
this
public
storage
development
because
they
requested
that,
instead
of
actually
placing
public
heart
on
the
property
because
they
felt
there
weren't
good
spots
for
that
where
it
would
be
visible.
E
It
talked
about
considering
locations
for
high
sales
tax
producing
retail
uses,
and
we
had
a
note
about
several
attempts
being
made
to
identify
a
suitable
location
for
costco
and
cupertino
and
that
one
has
not
been
identified.
I
literally
just
read
an
article
about
30
minutes
before
this
meeting.
That
said,
there's
a
new
costco,
that's
going
in
at
westgate
west.
E
So
I
think
we'll
have
to
make
some
amendments
to
this
particular
one,
because
I'm
not
sure
that
costco
will
want
to
be
have
another
location
fairly
close
to
one
that
they're
already
proposing.
E
Additionally,
in
the
next
one,
there
is
some
text
added
about
the
small
business
saturdays,
which
is
was
apparently
a
partnership
between
the
city
chamber
and
the
library
to
bring
attention
to
the
benefits
of
small
businesses
in
the
community
see
there
have
been
some
changes
in
the
next
strategy:
l,
u
9.1.3,
and
I
have
to
figure
out
what
the
change
was
really,
except
that
I
know
some
text
has
been
edited,
but
I
see
there's
no
bold
text
here,
but
I
think
basically
saying
that
there's
continuous
dialogue
with
the
business
community
to
make
sure
that
we
can
you
know,
encourage
new
businesses
and
routine
existing
businesses
so
that
we
can
strengthen
our
economic
base.
E
The
next
updates
are
really
in
the
policy
10.4
lu
10.4.
Regarding
our
urban
service
area.
Is
the
commission
is
aware
the
city
has
been
working
to
acquire
property
at
the
lawrence
committee
for
the
lawrence
mini
park
at
the
eastern
border
of
this
border
of
the
city
near
entering
canada.
That
property
has
been
acquired.
However,
annexation
has
not
been
completed.
Those
proceedings
are
ongoing.
E
It
is
my
understanding
that
the
city
of
san
jose
will
be
acting
on
a
resolution
or
something
that
lafco
needs
in
order
for
that
annexation
to
move
forward
later
this
month,.
E
Yes,
so
the
city
of
cupertino
will
be
annexing
property
from
the
city
of
san
jose
in
order
to
accommodate
the
lawrence
mini
park,
got
it
okay,
yeah
and
my
understanding
is
the
city
of
san
jose
will
be
acting
upon
that
at
their
meeting
later
this
month,
and
once
that
happens,
then
you
know
we
can
actually
submit
paperwork
to
the
lafco
to
actually
complete
the
formal
formalize,
the
annexation
proceedings,
and
so
when
that
happens,
you
know,
of
course
the
city
will
then
move
forward
into
a
next
stage
for
the
lawrence
committee
park,
but
in
general,
what
what
has
happened
in
2021,
because
this
is
a
report
for
2021-
is
that
you
know
annexation.
E
Proceedings
have
been
ongoing.
There's
been
a
lot
of
back
and
forth
in
terms
of
how
to
annex
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
and
then
the
negotiation,
not
negotiations,
but
the
collaboration
with
the
city
of
san
jose.
E
Let's
see
next
update,
is
in
policy
12
point
lu,
12.1
regarding
establishing
maintaining
build
building
and
development
standards
for
hillsides
to
ensure
hillside
protection.
Again,
this
has
been
updated
to
reflect
the
urgency
ordinance
related
to
sb9
that
was
adopted
in
late
2021.
E
It
is
also
expected
that
those
policies
pertaining
to
hillside
protection
will
be
carried
forward
into
a
regular
ordinance
that
will
be
presented
for
the
commission
and
council's
consideration
in
2022,
similar
notes
regarding
strategy,
lu
12.1
about
building
regulations
and
development
review.
E
These
policies,
you
know,
implemented
through
the
urgency
ordinance
currently,
which
will
be
expected
to
be
carried
through
in
the
regular
ordinance.
E
The
next
strategy
is
about
applying
a
slope
density
formula
to
very
load
and
intensity,
residential
development
of
the
hills.
We're
looking
at
strategy
lu1212
again
just
making
a
note
that
this
particular
policy
would
not
apply
to
sb9
subdivisions,
because
state
law
trumps
whatever
we
have
applied
as
a
slope
density
for
our
hillsides.
E
E
F
Just
so
that,
for
my
benefit,
are
you
saying
you
know
the
the
steep
slopes
and
you
know
the
places
you
know
where
we
have
previously
declined?
You
know
approvals
because
you
know
they
don't
they're
not
safe
under
various
reasons
and
all
that
by
saying
you
know,
sb9
could
war
ride
and
uproot
projects
in
those
areas
right.
E
But
we
still
do
have
objective
standards
in
terms
of
how
development
that
development
could
occur.
For
example,
in
the
urgency
ordinance
we
have
adopted
regulations
that
say
you
can't
build
a
new
driveway.
So
if
you
have
an
existing
driveway,
you
have
to
utilize
that
driveway
in
order
to
access
any
new
part,
any
new
building
pad,
or
things
like
that,
so
that
we
can
limit
the
amount
of
development
that
happens
up
there
or
that
the
building
pad
that
you
can
come
up
with
needs
to
be
on
the
flattest.
E
You
know
least
deep
part
of
the
property
closest
to
the
driveway
so
that
we
can
limit
how
much
grading
occurs
and
then
grading
quantities
are
also
limited.
So
so
there
are
checks
and
balances,
but
yes,
in
general,
subdivisions
are
allowed,
despite
the
city's
best
judgment
on
that.
At
this
point,
pursuant
to
sb9.
A
Got
it
and
at
what
point
do
we
want
to
take
a
break
to
allow
public
comment
and
read
any
comments
related
to
that?
I
just
wanted.
E
A
Let's
take
a
break
here:
let's,
let's
stop
here
and
see
if
there's
any
kind
of
public
comment
and
see
where
we
are
okay,
all
right
going
to
public
comment,
commenting
if
anyone
has
a
hand
raised
or
any
kind
of
specific
comments-
and
I
know
it's
something
we
want
to
read
as
well
cyra.
I
believe
so
we
do
that.
So,
let's,
let's
do
the.
Let's
take
the
first
comment
from
jenny,
griffin
and
then
we'll
read
the
note
that
was
sent
to
us,
I
think,
by
email
as
well.
A
I
Yes,
happy
new
year
to
everybody
and
happy
new
year
again
to
parts
of
our
wonderful
city:
yes
hi,
I'm
jennifer
griffin
and
I
appreciate
the
staff
going
through
all
of
these
items.
You
know
I'll
tell
you
right
now.
Last
year
was
a
very
challenging
year
with
the
sb9
and
sb10
caused
me
a
great
deal
of
the
thinking
about
my
state
oregon,
washington,
what's
happening
in
washington,
d.c
and
I'm
not
very
happy
with
the
state
of
california.
Right
now
in
sacramento,
I'm
happy
that
cupertino
took
the
emergency
ordinance.
I
I
am
very,
very
concerned
about
our
hillside.
Building,
I'm
glad
you
all
were
talking
about
the.
I
think
it
was
lu,
12.1.4
that
pew
had
up,
which
was
talking
about
the
the
slope
density
formulas
and
how
sb9
can
override
them.
Maybe
sb10,
I'm
very
concerned.
You
know
we
had
a
6.2
earthquake
in
ferndale
about
two
weeks
ago.
My
mother
felt
it
in
aptos.
I
I
am
very
very
concerned
that
you
can
have
movement
in
these
hillsides
when
you
have
a
half
acre
minimum
on
a
hillside
lot
or
you
have
a
one
acre
minimum
or
a
five
acre
minimum.
There
are
many
areas
in
santa
cruz
that
have
five
acre
minimum
because
the
areas
will
slide.
I
I
do
not
think
that
the
people
that
rode,
sb9
and
sb10
have
any
experience
with
with
land
slippage,
during
earthquakes
or
with
heavy
rains
and
I'm
very
very
concerned
about
the
fire
damage
areas.
Believe
me,
I
I
my
experience
with
some
of
these
people
that
wrote,
sb9
and
sb10
is
that
they
have
zero
experience
with
what
happens
in
california
and
the
reason
why
there
are
5
10,
20
areas
of
density
that
you
cannot
split
is
because
there
were
people
that
have
lived
there
for
50
to
75
years.
I
That
put
those
minimums
in
because
the
land
will
slide.
I
know
of
three
instances.
One
of
them
is
my
aunt's
house.
One
of
her
homes
in
santa
cruz
was
destroyed
in
the
1989
earthquake.
She
had
sold
it,
but
it
has
been
abandoned
on
a
hillside
in
santa
cruz,
and
I
know
of
two
other
properties
that
the
houses
were
twisted
and
torqued
in
1989.
I
So
I
have
no,
I
I
don't
think
these
people
in
sacramento
that
have
rammed
nine
and
ten
in
have
been
in
this
long
enough
to
understand
what
happens,
but
we
need
to
protect
hillsides
and
I
think
cupertino
is
doing
a
good
job.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
A
Jennifer,
okay,
any
comments
so
far
from
the
commissioners
as
well
as
we'll
go
back
to
too
we'll
go
to
the
re,
the
comments
to
be
read
as
well.
I
think
I
don't
from
the
right
area.
Sorry
do.
E
Chair,
I
can
help
with
that.
If
I
think
that
that
would
have
been
comments
for
policy-
l-
u
26,
I
won't
just
say.
A
G
Yeah,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
lu3.2,
so
the
the
setbacks
and
the
height
are
still
in.
Only
the
language
of
clarification
has
been
changed.
Is
that
the
only
change
right
so
in
terms
of
real.
E
Yes,
so
the
the
numbers
themselves
have
not
changed.
Thank.
G
E
So
we
can
keep
moving
here.
We
were
in
the
hillside,
section.
Okay,
I
think
the
the
next
one
was
also
related
to
hillside.
You
know
about
following
natural
contours,
etc,
etc.
The
note
adds
the
same
thing
that
those
policies
are
also
implemented
with
the
city's
urgency,
ordinance
related
to
sb9
and
it's
expected
to
carry
through
in
any
regular
ordinance
the
future.
E
It
makes
no
changes
to
the
actual
city's
work
program.
The
next
amendment
was
in
policy.
13,
6
lu136,
just
an
update
to
specify
that
specific
and
objective
design
guidelines
are
being
developed
for
mixed-use
design
for
mixed-use
projects.
There's
a
specific
work
program
that
it
related
to
that
that's
ongoing.
E
Next
update
was
in
the
west
stevens
creek
boulevard,
sub-area
of
the
heart
of
the
city
policy,
lu,
14
5.
It
talks
about
the
oaks
gateway
actually,
which
is
a
gateway
for
retail
and
shopping.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
the
planning
commission
is
aware
that
the
development
project
modification
and
I
need
to
correct
my
spellings
there-
a
development
project
modification
was
approved
in
december
2021
by
the
council
and
that
the
project,
description
and
plans
are
available
online
at
those
cities.
E
E
No
worries
moving
forward.
I
think
the
next
update
is
in
the
civic
center
sub-area,
just
a
note
to
say
that
the
library
construction
is
underway
currently
and
then
for
the
next
one
related
to
the
central
stevens
creek
boulevard,
sub
area
there
is
there
was
there
were
some
notes
about.
You
know
which
parcels
were
developed.
This
is
related
to
all
the
projects
that
were
in
the
south.
Actually,
let
me
see
it's
in
the
south
of
valco
specific
plan.
H
E
And
just
wanted
the
commission
to
be
aware
that
there
is
one
project
on
one
of
the
apple
parses,
long
balco
parkway,
that
is
currently
under
review
and
will
be.
You
know,
available
for
the
planning
commission's
review
later
this
year.
Some
point.
E
Moving
jumping
forward
to
the
north
de
anza
special
area,
there
was
a
thought
at
one
point
to
make
some
amendments
to
the
north
deanza
conceptual
plan
as
part
of
the
objective
standards
work
program
item,
however,
because
the
housing
element
work
program
item
is
moving
forward,
it
is
expected
that
if
there
are
any
changes
that
they
would
be
considered
with
the
housing
element
update
instead
of
a
standalone
project
related
to
the
north,
the
anza
conceptual
plan
area.
E
So
there
are
changes
made
to
all
of
those
policies
in
the
northeast
conceptual
planning
area.
Related
to
that.
E
Is
in
policy
lu,
27.1
again,
this
is.
There
was
a
note
from
the
planning
commission
at
the
last
a
general
plan,
animal
review
about
considering
adding
language
about
addressing
possible
future
streets,
state
laws,
and
I
think
this
was
to
in
in
consideration
of
sb9
or
the
adoption
of
sb9
or
sb9
related
type
of
housing
bills,
and
so
we
have
incorporated
that
already
into
objective
standards
in
the
uni
code.
So
we
don't
necessarily
need
anything
in
the
general
plan
related
to
that.
At
this
point,.
H
E
A
Yeah,
let's
do
that,
let's
read
the
comments:
okay,
we'll
open
it
back
up
to
any
conversations
and
feedback
from
the
public.
Let's
read
the
comment
from
us
from
the
email.
B
Okay,
so
this
is
from
peggy
griffin,
which
says
dear
planning,
commissioners
and
staff
in
2021.
A
serious
mistake
was
made
regarding
the
approval
of
a
project,
bada
brothers
property-
that,
from
all
intents
and
our
general
plan,
was
misinterpreted
to
allow
the
complete
loss
of
retail
on
a
site
that
was
a
neighborhood
commercial
center.
This
should
never
have
happened,
and
yet
it
did.
If
you
do
anything
in
2022,
it
should
be
to
improve
all
the
objective
standards
for
land
use,
designations
with
commercial
and
residential,
so
that
staff
doesn't
interpret
them
to
mean
zero
commercial.
B
Commercial
centers
should
remain
predominantly
commercial
centers,
so
we
do
not
lose
any
more
retail
and
do
not
exasperate
the
retail
deserts
and
inequities
and
access
that
are
growing.
As
housing
density
increases
we
need
places
we
can
walk
to
for
basic
dle
needs.
Example
of
improving
a
standard
page
three
strategy:
l
dash
1.3.1
number
one
states-
all
mixed-use
areas
with
commercial
zoning
will
require
retail
as
a
substantial
component
make
this
objective
by
replacing
with
all
mixed-use
areas
with
commercial
zoning
shall
require
retail
to
be
a
minimum
of
75
of
total
square
footage.
B
A
Okay,
thank
you
there,
commissioner,
I
think
you've
got
a
comment
there.
That's,
but
let's
see,
if
there's
anything
else
from
the
public
first
see
anyone
want
to
add
to
that.
Okay,
commissioner,
kapil,
are
you
still
up
or
your
hand
is
back
down
so.
G
Yeah
I
mean
what
is
the
mixed
use
guideline
at
this
point
in
the
mind
of
the
staff
of
the
planning
commission.
What
does
it
entail
in
terms
of
commercial
versus
the
other
areas
in
terms
of
percentage-wise
more
quantitatively,
diagnostic.
E
A
E
I'm
I'm
not
arguing
that
chair
wong.
E
All
I'm
saying
is
right
now,
there's
no
objective
standard
in
terms
of
how
much,
except
that
it's
a
part
of
the
city's
specific
plan
area,
there
is
a
there's,
a
percentage
that
says
that
at
least
75
percent
of
the
frontage
of
a
building
that
front
stevens,
creek
boulevard
and
at
least
50
of
the
rear
of
the
building
shall
be
occupied
by
uses
that
are
sales
tax,
generating
or
or
essentially
that
our
sales
tax
generating
doesn't
quite
come
out
and
say
that
which
means
that
it
could
be
a
bank.
E
So
there
is
a
is
a
a
pretty
generic
expression
that
is
used
in
the
heart
of
the
city,
specific
plan
area,
but
the
commission
and
the
council
is
allowed
to
make
exceptions
to
that
on
a
case-by-case
basis
and
applicants
of
housing
developments
which
most
mixed-use
projects
are,
are
allowed
under
state
law
to
apply
for
density,
bonus,
waivers
and
incentives,
which
could
include
a
waiver
from
that
particular
standard
as
well.
G
G
E
Yes,
I
can
go
into
that
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
density
bonus
if
the
city,
so
the
city
has
a
bmr
affordability
requirement
to
set
aside.
As
you
know,
the
minute
the
city
has
makes
that
requirement
that
project
becomes
eligible
to
become
a
density
bonus
project,
whether
they
include
density,
bonus
units
or
not.
E
So,
for
example,
if
I
have
a
10
unit
project
and
I
have
to
set
aside
two
units
as
affordable,
I
become
eligible
to
get
additional
market
rate
units
above
the
10
units
that
I
originally
would
have
gotten
and
the
minute
I
become
eligible
for
that.
I
also
become
eligible
for
unlimited
waivers.
That
is,
if
there
is
a
development
standard
that
the
city
has
and
my
project
can't
meet
it.
E
I
can
ask
for
what
is
considered
a
waiver
for
that,
and
that
could
be
any
number
in
addition
to
that,
depending
on
how
much
affordable
housing
I'm
providing
I
and
at
what
affordability
level
I
am
providing
that
housing
at.
I
am
also
as
a
developer
eligible
for
certain
things
called
incentives
they
could
be
up
to.
I
believe
four
incentives
if
at
least
eighty
percent
of
my
project
is
affordable
or
something
like
that.
So
so
there's
certain
there's
a
table.
That's
in
our
municip,
that's
in
state
law.
Essentially
it's
not
just
about
unicode.
E
So
as
a
result,
yes,
those
things
are
pretty
broad
in
terms
of
what
they
can
ask
for,
and
I
think
the
city
attorney
can
correct
me
if
I'm.
J
Wrong,
no,
that's
a
good
that
that's
a
good
summary.
It's
the
the
the
amount
of
density
bonus
a
project
is
entitled
to.
It
is
tied
to
the
number
of
lower,
very
low
income
units
that
the
project
builds.
J
As
you
pointed
out,
projects
that
meet
our
our
the
affordable
standards
in
our
bmr
program
are
going
to
be
eligible
for
some
kind
of
density
bonus
if
they,
if
they
build
those
units
on
site,
and
so
a
significant
percentage
of
mixed
use
and
multi-family
projects
are
most,
if
not
all,
are
going
to
be
eligible
for
density
bonus.
If
they
choose
to
pursue
that.
D
Oh,
I
something
that
the
city
attorney
mentioned.
You
know
if,
if
they
choose
to
build
those
units
on
site,
I
believe
you
know,
I
don't
think
in
cupertino.
We
have
any
option
to
not
build
those
on
site.
We
don't
have
any
allowance
for
in
luffy's
or
for
building
those
units
in
a
different
place.
Unless
state
law
is
allowing
that
does
that
trump,
our
inclusionary
housing
policy.
E
Chris,
this
is
one
thing
that
I
wanted
to
say.
Our
bmr
program
actually
does
allow
the
developer
the
option
to
propose
as
an
alternative,
the
payment
of
inlu
fees.
We
don't
encourage
that
necessarily,
but
if
a
developer
doesn't
necessarily
want
to
build
the
bmr
units
on
site,
they
could
potentially
provide
it
in
a
different
location
if
they
so
proposed,
and
that
would
be
up
to
the
planning
commission,
the
city
council,
to
accept.
D
J
Right
either
either
way
it
has
to
be
approved.
There
are
for
for
rental
projects.
The
city
is
required
to
to
offer
some
kind
of
alternative
to
on-site
and
the
you
know
the
process
that
puget's
described
is
what
we
would
use
to
comply
with
that.
But,
as
you
said,
we
don't
we
don't.
We
don't
encourage
it,
and
and
because
the
build
building
on
site
does
confer
a
lot
of
benefits
on
the
developer.
Under
the
density
bonus
ordinance,
there
is
some
additional
incentive
to
use
that
preferred
approach.
D
Yeah,
you
would
think
anyway,
although
in
my
speaking
with
some
of
the
developers
of
our
housing
element
projects,
they
would
forego
the
density
bonus
if
they
could
not
have
to
build
the
bmr
on
site.
So
yes,
there's
a
big
advantage
in
that,
but
not
something
that
they
necessarily
want
to
take
advantage
of.
D
D
A
Problem
commission
montepali.
F
Yeah,
so
I
want
to
go
back
to
you
know
big
difference,
comment
and
also
know,
commissioner
sanjeev's
question
about.
You
know
mixed-use
projects
right,
so
you
know
I
don't
know
if
we
have
these
standards,
but
if
not,
you
know,
maybe
it's
something
that
not
to
establish.
If
I
mean
there's
a
reason
why
you
know
various
properties,
you
know
within
the
city
have
been
zoned
certain
way
like
you
know,
office
use
or
you
know,
retail
and
commercial,
and
you
know
the
residential
and
all
that
right.
F
So
that's
because
you
know
we
wanted
city
to
have
a
balance
right.
You
know,
you
know
all
kind
of
uses,
but
given
that
you
know
mixed
use
is
kind
of
you
know
nebulous
where
you
know
it
can
be
anything
like.
If
you
don't
have
you
know
pro
certain
standards
and
expectations,
then
people
are
going
to
gravitate
towards
you
know
what
the
most
profitable
for
them
like
the
developers
right.
So
we
have
seen
that
in
the
welcome
project.
You
know
unbelievable
amount
of
you
know,
office
space
now
office
space
is
not
required.
F
You
know
people
are
moving
out
or
whatever
right.
So
I
I
wouldn't
be
surprised
if
they
converted,
you
know,
residential
or
whatever
right
so,
and
I
saw
a
scientific
mercury
news
article
today
about
you,
know
marina
project.
You
know
changing
from
what
it
was
approved.
Like
you
know,
the
hotel
is
getting
dropped
and
you
know
the
housing
is
going
to
be
all
you
know
for
ownership
housing,
not
no
rentals,
because
you
know
they
can
sell
for
a
much
higher
price.
F
A
F
Not
have
retail
that
retail,
it's
that
bad
right,
so
so
we've
got
to
have
a
standards
for
mixed
use.
Otherwise
you
know
developers
are
going
to
gravitate
towards
you
know,
what's
most
attractive
to
them
at
that
point
right,
and
we
have
seen
that
in
various
examples
right
so
that
I
just
gave
you
so
so
so
what
are
we
doing?
You
know
to
establish
the
basic
standards,
for
if
the
property
is
you
know
originally
zoned
for
certain
use
and
if
it's
becoming
a
mixed
use,
you
know.
Do
we
have
standards
where
you
know
it's
mostly.
F
A
Yeah
I
mean
the
question:
is
whether
should
we
have
objective
standards
for
that
kind
of
development
of
mixed
use
and
what
that
means?
But
when
we
go
back
to
the
original
comment
from
peggy
griffin,
the
the
point
was
that
a
a
standard
that
was
set
was
clearly
ignored
and
in
anything
with
a
ministerial
review.
If
we
are
not
clear
about
the
objective
standards
that
could
happen
again,
and
I
think
that
was
the
point
right
and
hopefully
the
objective
standards
that
are
being
proposed
like
when
it
is
a
mixed-use
development.
Retail
does
not
get.
A
You
know,
ignored.
Part
of
the
reason
for
that
I
mean
going
forward,
is
that
you
won't
have
a
tax
base
right.
If
you
keep
doing
that
in
a
commercial
tax
base
right
or
for
example,
we
get
a
lot
of
after-school
programs,
you
won't
have
any
tax
base
either
because
those
are
services
which
are
not
taxable
right.
So
so
that's
why
some
of
those
conditions
were
put
into
place
in
terms
of
what
the
balance
is
and
then,
of
course,
heart
of
the
city
with
the
frontage
for
retail.
A
You
know
whoever
is
chair
and
you
know
whatever
programs
we
push
through,
I
mean
we
should
make
sure
that
it's
clear
there,
it's
not
something
we
can
do
right
right
away,
but
it's
something
that
if
council
is
trying
to
get
put
through
as
their
initiative
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
occur.
I
think
that
comment
was
more
applicable
to
making
sure
you
know
we.
Those
objective
standards,
apply
to
that
and
also
on
our
end,
to
make
sure
that
any
kind
of
ministerial
review
goes
through
objective
standards.
A
To
avoid
that
situation,
people
can
run
rush
out
on
us.
So,
okay,
I
think
I
had
one
comment,
but
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
has
anything
else
to
add.
Let
me
see,
I'm
gonna
pull
it
up
here.
A
On
neighborhood
guidelines,
just
like
we
have
fairgrove
and
other
types
of
you
know
zones
in
neighborhoods.
I
have
a
just
a
question
general
to
to
staff
like
how
do
we
it's
not
on
it's,
not
an
action
item
today?
How
does
it
become
an
action
item,
so
we
can
preserve
the
character
of
certain
neighborhoods
right
like
like?
What's
in
mcclellan
or
what's
in
fair
grove
or
what's
in
you
know,
even
rancho
riconado,
which
which
has
some
funky
rv
parking
side
driveways,
or
something
like
that.
You
know
so.
E
So
if,
if
a
neighborhood
a
whole
neighborhood
comes
out
and
says
that
they
wish
to
have
certain
funky,
driveway
carport
side,
loading
thing
that
they
want
to
retain
in
their
neighborhood
and
preserve
and
encourage
they
can
approach
the
city,
council
and
city
council
basically
gives
us
direction
in
terms
of
you
know
here
are
the
project
parameters
or
here's.
What
the
neighborhood
wants-
and
you
know,
create
some
sort
of
a
zoning
overlay
to
allow
to
continue
to
allow
these
things
and
that's
precisely
what
happened
at
the
fairgrove.
E
That's
precisely
what
happened
at
the
r1a
zoning
district,
which
is
the
agricultural
rural
r1
zoning
district.
That
is
also
what
happened
with
regard
to
the
single
story,
overlay
zoning
that
was
incorporated
in
the
municipal
code.
E
However,
no
one
has
so
far
taken
advantage
of
the
single
story-
overlay
you
know
designation,
but
that
was
that
did
happen
at
the
behest
of
the
community
wanting
to
wanting
an
option
or
a
path
forward
to
do
that,
so
those
are
already
in
place,
the
ones
that
I
just
mentioned,
and
so
in
the
event
that
something
happens
where
council
gives
staff
direction
about
a
special
side
load
cardboard
thing,
then
we
would
work
on
that.
But
at
this
point
it's
not
an
action
item
because
we
don't
have
any
of
such
requests.
A
Got
it
okay,
I'll
leave
a
I'll
lead,
a
revolution
to
make
sure
rv
parking
side
garages
cutouts
are
available
for
streets,
so
all
right
cool.
I
don't
know
how
that
works.
Commissioner,
kapil.
G
Yeah
we
just
zoned
zeroing
on
the
mix
use
again,
I
I
did
see
when
we
haven't
covered
as
yet
on,
but
this
is
on
31
this
he
2.3.2.
G
G
E
Applies
to
any
anything
that
proposes
any
development
that
proposes
any
kind
of
housing
any
number.
So
if
you
provide
whether
you
provide
one
unit
or
you
provide
a
hundred,
you
have
to
meet
the
city's
bmr
program.
E
G
E
So
that
that
you
raise
a
very
interesting
question,
you
know
in
terms
of
the
housing
mitigation
fee
itself,
like
I
said,
if
you're
a
project
with
less
than
seven
units.
So
if
you're
a
project
between
one
and
six
units,
the
city
has
a
housing
mitigation
fee
adopted
it's
based
on
a
per
square
footage
basis
by
then
we
did
a
nexus
study
several
years
ago,
which
was
updated
in
2020.
E
But
if
you're
more
than
seven
units
you,
your
basic
thing
that
you
have
to
do
is
you
have
to
set
aside
units
as
below
market
rate,
but
if
you're
a
rental
project,
there
is
an
option
for
you
to
propose
an
alternative
in
which
they
would
propose
some
sort
of
a
fee
that
fee
would
that's
a
negotiable
fee.
E
I
guess
in
a
sense,
because
that's
not
based
on
the
fee
schedule,
that's
a
proposal
that
they
have
to
make
and
that's
a
proposal
that
the
city
has
to
consider,
and
I
guess
there
might
be
some
room
to
figure
out
what
that
fee
should
be.
But
I
think
the
city
attorney
might
have
something
to
add
to
that.
G
Yeah
one
additional
question
is
that
that
how
often
that
happens
here.
E
It
hasn't
happened
as
far
as
I
know
that
we
did
have
a
time
when
we
were
unable
to
implement
our
bmr
program,
because
there
was
a
lawsuit
that
was
determined
that
we
could
not
require
bmr
units
in
rental
developments,
and
so
during
that
time
we
had
to
accept
in
lieu
fees
for
the
developments
but
aside
from
them,
but
I
think
it
was
2016
or
17
that
there
was
a
fix
to
that.
There
was
a
lot
to
change
the
law
and
we
can
now
require
bmr
units.
J
G
A
A
E
Sorry
I
keep
having
to
move
my
okay
here
we
go
so
we
have
our
first
housing
element.
Policy
is
with
regard
to
allocate
the
arena
allocation
and
there
are
no
updates
in
this,
except
that
the
housing
element
is
an
update,
is
anticipated
to
well
it's
commenced
already
and
we
are
required
to
complete
it
by
that
needs
to
be
updated.
That's
actually
january
2023,
so
I
do
need
to
make
that
correction,
but
that
needs
to
happen
in
fairly
short
order.
E
Our
current
the
city's
current
arena
is
45-88
units
and
we
do
probably
have
to
take
into
consideration
some
additional
buffer
in
order
to
account
for
state
law
requirements
related
to
no
net
loss
in
the
event
that
sites
do
not
develop
at
the
affordability
levels
that
we
expect
them
to
develop.
There's
changes
to
state
law,
it's
a
little
complicated,
but
essentially
we
have
to
make
sure
that
at
any
given
time,
we
have
enough
number
of
sites
available
at
that
affordability
level
to
accommodate
our
full
requirement
at
that
affordability
level.
E
So
it's
a
little
bit
like
playing
chess
without
really
knowing
what's
going
on,
but
we
will
have
to
figure
that
out.
The
next
thing
is
adus.
We
are
continuing
to
implement
our
accessory
dwelling
unit
ordinance,
which
is
also
a
product
of
changes
to
state
law.
E
We
have
permitted,
I
believe,
74
adus
through
2021,
but
that
number
is
still
being
verified
and
then
just
an
update
to
the
notes
with
regard
to
pre-approved
edu's.
This
was
a
work
program
item
and
that
is
has
been
launched
and
we're
looking
to
make
sure
that
we
have
some
manufactured
adus
available
as
part
of
this
pre-approved
adu
program,
so
that
people
can
go
ahead
and
skip
review
of
that
pre
prefab
unit,
because
it's
already
been
plan
checked
by
our
building
division
so
that
we
can
expedite
issuance
of
those
adu
permits.
A
You
know
edu's
just
so.
Everyone
has
clarities
too
it's
just
more
for
educational
purposes,
so
I
can
put
an
adu
in
then
split.
My
lot
in
an
sb9
project
to
put
four
additional
units.
Can
I
add
four
more
adus
three
more
edus
to
each
one
of
those
split
lots.
I
don't
know
if
I
have
any
room,
maybe
I'll
go
deep
and
build
something
like
three
stories
underground,
but
but
I
mean
technically,
I
could
right.
E
J
Yeah
you
so
you're
you're
limit,
we're
allowed
to
and
and
the
ordinance
we
adopted
does
limit
the
ability
to
place
an
adu
on
a
property
that
has
been
split.
Have
a
ministerial
loss,
has
a
ministerial
occupant
under
sb9
and
then
is
developed
with
a
ministerial
permit
under
sb9,
so
there's
a
maximum
of
of
four
units
that
can
be
developed
through
that
process.
So
you
can't
you
can't
you
can't
build
a
duplex,
two
duplexes
and
then
add
an
adu
to
each
of
those
duplexes.
A
If
you
put
the
adu
in
you're
not
going
to
put
another,
you
can't
release,
you
have
to
get
rid
of
it.
If
you're
going
to
split
the
lot.
J
E
E
The
hamptons
they
have
a
10-year
da
that
was
approved
in
2016,
so
they
still
have
four
years
left
on
it,
the
hamptons,
sorry,
the
marina
foods.
Actually,
that's
an
error
over
there
that
I
need
to
correct.
I
had
a
five-year
da
that
has
expired,
as
commissioner
marikatla
rightly
pointed
out,
they
are
hoping
to
come
in
with
a
modification
of
the
project
with
exactly
what
he
described.
They
want
to
drop
the
hotel
convert.
E
What
were
residential
units
into
condominiums,
I
think,
have
fewer
more
units
on
the
site
and
use
density,
bonus
law,
as
well
as
my
understanding,
but
we're
still
trying
to
figure
all
that
out.
We
haven't
received
an
application,
yet
it
is
anticipated.
D
I
have
a
question
on
that,
because
the
da
expired
it's
essentially
a
new
project,
so
correct
for
for
sale.
They
will
now
have
to
do
20.
Bmr.
Is
that
correct.
I
D
E
E
A
Is
there
any
way,
just
just
so,
just
just
so
clarification
since
we
got
chris
here
as
well
that
we
can
require
the
developer
to
build
those
units
first
before
anything
else,
so
that
we
know
that
it's
been
built
and
they
don't
weasel
their
way
out
of
these
things
like
when
they
make
commitments
for
these
kind
of
things
like
if
we're
truly
in
the
interest
of
housing,
let's
make
sure
that
those
things
get
built,
and
you
know,
income
affordability.
Is
it.
J
Yeah,
so
so,
specifically,
to
give
a
concrete
example
with
the
velco
project
we
are
in
the
just
our
beginning
discussions
with
the
the
the
property
owner.
You
know
with
the
bmr
agreements
for
that
project
and
the
phasing
of
the
bmr
development
is
going
to
be
one
of
the
things
versus
the
market
rate.
Development
is
going
to
be
one
of
the
things
that
we
need
to
incorporate
into
those
bmr
agreements.
So
so
we,
you
know
we
try
to
do
that
through
conditions
of
approval
and
then
subsequent
approvals
of
things
like
bmr
agreements.
J
But
yes,
yes,
I
mean.
The
idea
of,
of
course,
is
is
to
make
sure
that
affordable
housing
commitments
are
built
and
followed
through
and
are
not.
You
know
not
not
delayed
till
until
after
the
market
rate
projects
are
complete.
D
So
chris
they
could,
you
know
it
would
be
okay
if
they
built
it
they
in
any
order.
They
just
can't
get
an
occupancy
permit
until
another.
J
D
D
J
From
a
program
and
have
tenants
within
so
it's
effectively
part
of
the
development
process.
D
And
digressing
a
little
bit
what
recently
happened
at
westport
with
the
parcels
being
sold
to
different
companies
that
doesn't
stop
the
city
from
its
original
policy
that
you
know
they
can't
just
build
the
market
rate
and
then
build
the
bmr
some
undetermined
time
in
the
future.
J
That's
correct
both
the
benefits
and
the
requirements
of
the
permits
that
are
issued
right
run
with
the
land,
so
those
that
are
binding.
C
Yeah,
unfortunately,
I
need
to
drop
off
before
another
event.
I
was
scheduled
to
I'll
try
to
join
back
once
it's
done
if
it's
still
around
by
8
30.,
no.
A
Problem,
thank
you
for
letting
us
know
we
still
have
quorum,
so
we
should
get
in
good
place
all
right
all
right.
What
are
we
on
now?
He
2.3,
and
what
else
is
next
here
ag
2.3.3,
is
that
where
we
are.
E
E
The
next
one
is
233,
there's
just
been
updates
to
the
amount
of
funding
that
was,
you
know,
assigned
to
landlord
counseling
and
dispute
resolution
services,
so
just
updates
to
the
figures
and
numbers
in
these
following
policies
and
strategies
with
regard
to
our
bmr
ahf
funds
or
cdbg
funds.
How
they've
been
used
in
the
current
years?
E
There
will
be
more
detail
on
the
and
the
housing
update
that
might
be
pro
that
will
be
provided
and
the
housing
manager
will
be
there.
Who
will
be
able
to
speak
more
firmly
on
how
that
money
was
spent
or
was
utilized
than
I
can,
but
in
general
the
next
one
is
strategy.
237.
G
So,
as
per
this
that
any
office
industrial
housing
mitigation
program,
so
what
about
those
which
are
already
existing?
Are
they
already
paying
for
it
or
are
they
just
trying
to
clarify
here
like
on
the
main
street
offices
are
built
for
apple
and
other
companies,
so
are
they
paying
for
this
mitigation
fee?
At
this
moment,.
E
E
This
was
adopted
as
part
of
the
last
housing
element
cycle.
These
policies
were
put
into
place
in
2014,
however,
these
might
have
been
holdovers
or
carryovers
from
the
housing
element
before
that
we've
had
our
office
industrial
housing
mitigation
program.
Since
I
want
to
say
2004
when
I
first
joined,
I
think
that
was
the
first
year
that
I
saw,
or
maybe
the
fees
I
think
we've
had
this
program
since
the
mid
90s
and
the
fees
were
updated
in
2004.
G
I
see
okay,
so
this
is
a
basically
mrc.
Is
that
right
because
they
are
at
this
point,
the
the
lot
of
developments
have
happened
since
2004
onwards,
so
another.
E
E
There
was
a
237
at
the
top
of
page
34,
just
some
amendments.
Oh
am
I
no
just
some
amendments
related
to
the
project
modification
for
the
oaks
which
use
the
density
bonus
program.
Let's
see
again,
some
updates
related
to
how
cdbg
money
was
spent
on
together
silicon
valley
and
the
vista
village
renovation.
E
Just
updates
related
to
that.
Let's
see
another
update
related
to
how
money
was
spent
in
strategy.
He
five
one.
Two.
E
Moving
on
to
he611
same
thing,
how
funds
were
spent
to
support
our
the
housing
needs
or
persons
with
needs?
Moving
on
to
the
mobility
section?
Let's
see
there
are
really
no
updates.
I
don't
believe
in
this
section,
except
for
that.
The
in
policy
m42,
which
is
about
the
local
transportation
services,
the
via
trans,
the
shuttle
service
was
stopped
in
was
suspended
in
2020
into
2021,
and
I
think
the
service
resumed
in
late
21.
A
I
do
have
a
question.
Sorry,
an
two.
I
think,
if
you
look
at
the
general
plan
policy
strategy
tax,
is
that
level
of
service
e
plus
for
stevens,
creek
and
stelling,
not
lod
just
wanted
to
make
sure
sorry,
it's
just
in
my
notes.
E
G
Yeah,
just
for
my,
I
was
also
look
at
this
one,
that
policy
and
dash
1.2.
What
is
the
e
plus
means
actually.
E
Actually,
measures
the
amount
of
delay
that
happens
as
you
sit
in
traffic
or
at
traffic
signals,
and
so,
but
that
is
an
old
way
of
measuring
how
how
traffic
flows
essentially,
and
so
while
this
is
here,
I
know
that
there
are,
as
you
know,
you
know,
sequa
has
required
us
to
move
from
los
as
a
sql
threshold
to
vmt,
which
is
vehicle
miles
traveled,
which
is
a
different
way
of
measuring
how
projects
or
there's
impacts
on
the
environment
from
a
project,
and
so
we
have
adopted
policies
related
to
vmt.
E
My
understanding
is
that
there
is
going
to
be
a
vmt.
What
do
they
call
it?
A
vmt
inventory
that
needs
to
happen
before
the
city
can
adopt
los
thresholds,
so
I
I
know
that
something
is
going
on
in
the
transportation
division
surrounding
that
I
just
don't
have
the
details
of
it,
but
I
know
that
there
is
something
afoot
with
regard
to
a
vmt
inventory
before
they
can
actually
revisit
los
angeles.
A
G
Yeah
there
is
a
typo
looks
like
here.
Lod,
it
says:
is
that
a
right
one
or
loss.
G
E
Yes,
there
is
a
reason
why
these
are
called
out.
So,
as
you
can
see,
the
first
bullet
point
there
actually
says
major
intersections
should
have
an
los
of
d,
which
is
actually
higher
than
an
l.
Os
of
e
plus.
The
three
that
are
called
out
separately
are
what
are
considered
cmp
intersections
or
congestion
management
plan
intersections.
E
So
we
don't
necessarily
control
those
or
while
we
control
those.
I
think
that
los
standard
is
set
by
the
vta,
who
is
our
congestion
management
agency,
and
so
we
have
to.
We
have
to
comply
with
whatever
their
standards
are
and
their
standards
for
these
three
particular
intersections
are
is
e
plus,
which
is
a
lower
standard.
Then
our
you
know,
particularly
for
stevens,
creek
and
wolf.
As
you
pointed
out,
our
standard
is
d.
E
However,
again,
all
of
this
needs
to
be
revisited
and
reworked,
because
I
understand
that
even
the
vta
has
updated
their
thresholds
because
they're
no
longer
looking
at
los
they're
looking
at
bmt
too.
So
I
think
they've
also
revisited,
and
I
think
that
they're
making
changes
to
these
three
intersections
as
well.
So
we
have
to
do
something
about
this
policy
and
I
know
the
transportation
division
is
working
on
it.
I
just
don't
have
the
details
of
what's
going
on.
H
E
Let's
see
yes,
the
next
one
is
related
to.
E
E
Oh,
no,
no!
No!
No!
So
this
is
the
the
actual
vmt.
We
just
talked
about
this.
The
vmt
thresholds
that
you
know
I
was
talking
about
how
the
state
has
changed,
how
we
have
to
evaluate
impacts,
transportation
impacts
in
the
sql
world,
and
so
we've
already
adopted
those
thresholds,
and
so
this
updated
text
reflects
that
that
we
did
that
in
early
2021.
E
The
next
one
is
related
to
greenhouse
gas
emission
at
policy
m
8.6
we
are.
G
E
So
the
hydrogen
fueling
dispenser
is
different
from
the
ev
charging
stations,
the
hydrogen
fueling
dispenser.
It
was
approved
at
a
gas
station
at
the
corner
of
bob
and
stevens
creek.
That
was
a
private
project,
but
I
think
they
received
grant
funding
from
the
state
because
the
state
wanted
to
expand
the
hydrogen
fueling
stations
across
the
state,
and
so
that
was
a
it
was
a
private
project
but
kind
of
supported
with
state
grants,
but
had
nothing
to
do
with
the
city
other
than
the
city.
E
Had
the
approval
land
use
authority
on
approving
that
those
hydrogen-fueling
dispensers
the
ev
charging
network
is
really.
I
think
it
would
be
in
the
public
right
away.
Possibly
I
think
so
it
it
it's
really
or
on
city
property,
or
I
don't
know
where
they're
going
to
go
and
that's
probably
part
of
the
outreach
process
that
will
occur
in
2022.
E
You
can
lobby
for
it.
The
next
one
is
policy
m10
2,
and
this
is
about
the
tiff.
We
do
have
a
current
tiff.
There
was
a
process
to
update
that
tiff.
However,
I
think
that
has
been
suspended,
and
so
we
updated
this
particular
language
in
this
section.
Regarding
that,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
when
that
might
occur
again,
but
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
occur
any
time
soon.
E
A
A
Okay,
see
if
there's
any
public
comment,
we've
got
four
people.
You
know
adamantly
watching
your
pay
attention.
If
you've
got
questions
and
comments,
please
definitely
jump
on
in
raise
your
hand
we'll
give
you
three
minutes.
If
you
want
to
add
your
two
cents,
all
right
going
once
going
twice
all
right,
we'll
move
on
so
commissioners,
I
will
suggest
that
we
take
a
break
at
8
30,
so
a
little
bit
break
in
between.
A
E
Okay,
moving
on
to
sustainability,
so
we
have
updates
here,
there's
just
updates
to
say
you
know:
we've
adopted
all
electric
reach
codes.
We
also
in
2021
the
council
authorized
waiving
fees
for
certain
landscaping,
projects
that
conserve
water
that
include
park,
planning
fees,
I'm
I'm
not
sure
whether
it
includes
building
permit
fees,
but
it
might
particularly,
if
you're,
a
project
that
conserves
water.
E
If
it's
a
landscape
replacement
project
in
2021,
I
think
the
council
gave
direction
to
draft
a
climate
action
plan
which
would
bring
the
city
to
carbon
neutral
by
2040
or
earlier.
So
that's
going
to
happen
this
year
and
I
think
there's
some
text
in
here
about
what
the
council
has
authorized
or
what
steps
have
been
taken
that
haven't
taken
so
far.
A
And
just
this
is
for
chris
as
well
asking
for
a
friend
if
we
were
trying
to
bring
back
our
natural
gas
range
we've
eliminated
those
by
2023.
If
I
remember
in
terms
of
hookups
or
gas
hookups,
if
somebody
wanted
to
bring
that
back,
how
would
they
do
that
is
that
is
that?
Would
they
have
to
change
this
part
of
the
of
kind
of
our
our
plan?
A
Codes
we've
banned
gas
ranges,
and
you
know
I've
got
a
constituent
of
saying
what,
as
they're
remodeling
their
homes
they're
like.
Oh,
my
god,
I
got
to
get
this
done
before
2023.,
so.
J
Yeah,
so
that
I
mean
that
that
is,
that
is
the
city
council
decision.
You
know
the
reach
codes
are
our
locally
adopted
building
codes
so
that
that's
you
know
that
will
be
adopted
by
color
by
council
on
a
state
statewide.
You
know
the
buildings.
Building
standards
are
going
through
another
revision
cycle,
and
so
I
think
you
know
you'll
expect
the
statewide
standards
to
start
catching
up
with
some
of
the
requirements
of
reach
codes.
H
J
The
state
goes
through
its
next
next
building
building
code
revision
cycle.
So
if
if
at
that
point
it's
adopted
as
a
state
building
standard
of
course,
then
you
know
we
don't
have
any
control
over
it.
We
have
to.
We
have
to
comply
with
it.
A
J
A
E
E
Yes,
the
next
staff.
You
are
also
really
related
to
the
cap
update
process.
You
know
I
should
mention
at
this
point.
I
think
there
is
some
outreach
going
on
related
to
the
cap
at
the
city's
engaged
cupertino
website,
so
please
feel
free
to
go
in
and
provide
your
input,
including
the
one
that
you
mentioned.
Chair
wong.
There
is,
you
know,
related
to
the
there's.
Some
policies
related
climate
hazards
assessment,
and
so
our
cap
will
support
the
county-wide
climate
hazards
assessment.
E
Let's
see
the
next
one
is
es211
about
an
energy
sustainability,
and
there
is
some
language
in
here
about
updating
the
environmental
purchasing
policy
and
also
to
evaluate
codes
at
the
next
statewide
code
cycle,
beginning
in
2022.
As
I
understand
it,
there's
also
sustainable
infrastructure
was
approved
in
the
city's
cip
investments
and
therefore
there
will
be
a
comprehensive
set
of
energy
efficiency
and
decarbonization
measures
that
will
be
studied
and
proposed
as
part
of
the
cip,
again
some
language
about
the
epp,
the
environmental
purchasing
policy
being
addressed
in
this
upcoming
fiscal
year.
G
E
Sorry,
commissioner
kapil,
I
did
not
understand
the
question.
G
So
you
have
this
recognization
measures
right
as
part
of
this,
the
previous
measure,
and
so
I
was
just
wondering
those
measures
are
in
place
or
they
have
yet
to
be
identified.
It
is,
it
is
mentioned,
as
part
of
I
guess,
es
2.1.2.
E
Correct
so
there
are,
you
know
as
part
of
the
city's
cap.
There
will
be
policies
adopted.
I
know
that
there
was
dr
their
draft
policies
that
were
presented
to
council
responses
like
that
and
they're
actually
developing
some
of
those
policies
right
now,
because
the
cap
is
being
developed
right
now
and
all
of
those
will
kind
of
trickle
down
and
feed,
and
you
know,
inform
these
decisions
in
terms
of
how
can
we
achieve
best
achieve
our?
You
know
goals.
E
So,
yes,
some
of
it
is
being
developed.
We
already
have
a
cap,
so
any
any
you
know,
decisions
that
are
made
have
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
city's
existing
cap.
So
we
have,
I
think,
this
sustainability
division
will
be
looking
at
all
of
those
very
carefully
before
proposing
making
any
proposals
as
part
of
the
cip.
H
E
So
the
epp
is
the
environmental
purchasing
policy
and
so
that
that
is
what
is
going
to
happen
this
year,
but
the
cip
was
already
approved
in
the
last
fiscal
year.
So
that's
going
to
move
forward
on
separate
track.
G
Okay,
do
you
have
some
examples
of
that,
or
I
mean
just
just
curious:
what
kind
of
measures.
G
A
E
So
I
believe
that
there
is,
they
were
able
to
reduce
emissions
from
power
supplies
with
plans
to
reduce
consumption
of
gas
as
soon
as
possible,
and,
secondly,
that
the
state
of
california
has
created
a
new
incentive
program
for
replacing
gas
equipment
with
electric
equipment,
and
I
believe
it's
called
the
tech
program.
E
So
you
I
think
you
can
find
out
more
at
bay,
ran
and
pg
e.
I
think
those
are
the
two
agencies
that
are
providing
these
incentives.
Oops.
A
E
Energy
sustainability
about
urban
forests.
One
of
the
draft
measures
in
the
climate
action
plan
is
to
create
an
urban
tree
canopy
plant,
which
will
inform
strategies
to
sequester
carbon
in
the
urban
forest
and
soils.
So
we'll
see
how
that
kind
of
pans
out
to
see
if
that
might
have
an
impact
on
our
protective
tree
ordinance.
So
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
movement
in
the
whole
cap
world.
E
Again
a
note
about
alternative
modes
of
transport,
the
via
shuttle
has
been
initiated
in
2021,
again
after
being
suspended
for
cobid
moving
on
to
our
air
quality
section
es411
about
toxic
air.
Contaminants
did
add
a
note
in
here
about
the
adoption
of
our
environmental
protection
standards
also
for
dust
control.
So
those
two.
If
the
commission
recalls,
in
addition
to
our
general
plan
amendment,
we
also
adopted
an
ordinance
about
invent
environmental
protection
standards,
so
that
will
all
help
us
meet
these
goals.
A
E
So
the
the
issue
with
the
toxic
soils
was
a
kind
of
addressed
in
the
ordinance,
because
somebody
any
person
that
does
that
kind
of
digging
or
development
on
property
does
have
to
prepare
phase
one
esa
reports
and
phase
2
esa
reports,
which
involve
a
lot
more
detailed
review
of
the
of
the
soils
and
then,
depending
on
what
is
found
in
those
reports,
they
would
be
referred
to
an
agency
for
review
and
oversight
by
that
agency.
I
understand.
A
Hypothetically,
I
don't
want
to
rehash
history,
but
hypothetically
you
know,
depending
which
core
boards
you
actually
take.
You
might
not
see
anything,
and
so
that's
that's
that's
why
I
was
just
asking
about
the
monitoring
there's,
no
constant
monitoring
on
construction
sites.
At
the
moment.
Vice
chair
scharf,
you
have
a
hands
up
so
go
ahead.
I.
D
Do
so
is
there
anything
regarding
indoor
air
quality
for
new
development
in
terms
of
airflow?
I
know
that
a
lot
of
buildings,
multi
residential
buildings
have
had
issues
where
during
covid,
where
the
air
exchange
is
not
sufficient
or
where
adjacent
units
kind
of
share
the
air
and
are
not
it's
not
vented
to
the
outside.
Are
we
doing
anything
in
terms
of
air
quality
in
new
developments,
I
see
es
4.2
for
existing
developments,
but
do
we.
E
Yeah,
so,
with
regard
to
new
developments,
we
do
have
some
requirements
in
that
environmental
protection
standards
chapter
about
cert
developments
in
certain
areas
that
are
identified
by
bachmed,
as
I
think,
there's
certain
names
for
them,
but
there's
certain
categories
of
areas
where
I
think
it
says,
implement
best
practices
or
something
there's
one
area,
that's
called
implement
best
practices,
and
I
think
that
is
kind
of
pretty
much.
You
know
along
the
freeways,
so
you
have
to
do
higher
filtration.
E
I
think
these
number
of
13
filters-
or
things
like
that
that
you
have
to
put
in
but
in
terms
of
covid
related,
you
know
I
don't
want
to
use
the
word
mitigations,
but
covid
related
issues
that
need
to
be
hashed
out.
We
look
to
the
building
code
for
that.
This
is
more
about
the
effects
of
the
environment
on
the
project
rather
than
you
know,
indoor
shared
air
circulation
things
for
that.
We
look
to
the
building
code.
D
Okay,
well,
I
hope
we
can
also
work
on
the
building
code
before
some
of
these
new
developments
come
to
fruition,
because
you
know
once
they're
built,
you
can't
go
back
and
fix
the
air
exchange
quality.
It
has
to
be
done.
You
know,
you
know
when
it's
built.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
Yeah,
I'm
a
vice
chair
sure.
If
there's
a
there
are
codes
for
like
the
american
society
of
heating,
refrigerating
air
conditioning
engineers,
ashrae
and
cdc
actually
have
best
practice
guidelines
for
covet
19
and
indoor
air
quality.
So
it
might
be
something
in
the
future
if
you're
actually
researching
that
it's
something
I've
looked
into
so.
D
Right,
I
mean
just
just
so:
it's
a
requirement,
not
something
that
you
know
whatever
trade
agency
for
hvac
thinks
is
a
good
idea,
because
you
know
that
you
know
a
lot
of
property
owners
will
build
as
cheap
as
possible.
D
A
E
F
Okay,
it's
like
a
google
like
app
so
just
book
it
and
I
tried
to
use
it
once,
but
then
it
didn't
work
out.
So
I
kind
of
did
something
else,
but.
A
Okay,
no
wrong.
My
goal
is
to
ride
every
vta
bus
line
this
year,
probably
by
myself,
but
hey
what
the
heck.
Let
me
get
my
tax
dollars
worth
all
right.
Keep
going.
E
Next
would
be
es425;
this
is
with
regard
to
local
air
quality
monitoring
that
was
just
discussed.
My
understanding
is
that
sustainability
division
is
partnering
with
I.t
for
some
sort
of
monitoring
and
that
they're
also
developing
a
series
of
educational
resources.
E
And
let's
see
the
next
one
is
in
es532
about
minimizing
lawn
areas
in
the
hillsides
again.
This
is
implemented
to
the
municipal
code
and
we're
also
carrying
this
forward
with
the
newly
adopted
urgency
ordinance
related
to
sb9
and
would
also
be
carried
forward
in
any
future.
Regular
ordinance
related
to
that.
E
There
was
a
water
shortage,
declared
emergency
condition
in
santa
clara
county.
In
june
last
year,
the
board
of
directors
called
for
15,
mandatory
reduction
compared
to
2019
and
cupertino
between
july
and
september,
successfully
reduced
water
consumption
at
the
municipal
facilities
by
16
compared
to
2019,
which
resulted
in
a
conservation
of
8
million
gallons
of
water,
so
kudos
to
our
public
works
and
other
teams
for
doing
that.
With
regard
to
policy
es
7101,
there
was
a
in
terms
of
outreach.
D
Oh
pew,
I
saw
in
one
thing
it
mentioned
the
cupertino
courier.
I
don't
think
that's
being
published
anymore.
Is
it.
E
The
next
strategy
is
es71166
again.
Regarding
the
dashboard
we've
produced
a
series
of
internal
water
use
dashboards.
E
You
know
there
were
regular
meetings
that
happened
with
staff,
including
facilities,
ground
staff,
all
kinds
of
divisions
met
together
and
they
looked
at
these
things
and
looked
at
trends
for
how
water
was
being
used
and
that's
what
actually
helped
with
reducing
water
usage
at
the
municipal
facilities,
by
that
eight
million
gallons
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
G
H
G
Water
saving
of
eight
gallons
or
whatever
it
says
internal,
so
internal
water
use
dashboards,
so
yeah.
E
So
municipal
water
use,
so
how
was
water
used
at
the
city
facilities
at
you
know
the
the
golf
course
the
you
know
any
of
the
city's
facilities.
A
E
A
lot
of
it,
I
think,
came
from
the
the
stuff
that
happens
at
the
the
golf
course.
That's
our
biggest
water
use.
I
think.
B
E
I
think
I
think
they're
still
in
the
process
of
developing
the
strategic
plan,
but
I
got
to
find
out
more
information,
but
that
text
has
been
strong.
I
guess
it
has
been
adopted,
there's
a
strategic
technology
plan
which
is
available
online.
So
I
think
this
is
this
was
old
language.
It
was
adopted
in
2020,
so
we're
looking
at
2021..
E
So
that's
just
the
reason
why
that
was
deleted.
It's
just
that
it's
available
now
it
was
adopted
in
2020,
but
it's
now
available.
Next
is
infrastructure,
eight
one
about
reducing
waste.
E
A
Yeah
there's
a
methane
reduction
requirement
of
getting
organic
waste
put
somewhere
else
instead
of
landfills
doing
methane
capture.
So,
okay,.
J
Let's
yeah
so
council
adopted
an
ordinance
to
implement
the
organic
waste
provisions
and
we're
in
the
process
of
entering
into
contracts
for
for
use
of
the
compost
in
particular,
so
that
that
that's,
that
is
being
implemented.
E
252,
it
basically
is
about
the
rancho,
rinconada
recreation
and
park
district.
I
think
that
is
the
rrpd.
E
So,
in
march
of
last
year,
the
council
reviewed
that
work
program
item
that
was
on
there
and
the
united
st
delayed
consideration
of
the
annexation
of
the
district
until
the
district
itself
completed
its
visioning
process
and
outreach
process
and
their
board
of
directors
made
a
formal
recommendation
on
whether
the
city
should
act,
acquire
or
or
and
or
annex
them,
and
it
will
also
allow
the
city
to
conduct
additional
engagement
for
oh
gosh.
What
was
that?
Oh
for
any
aquatics
facilities
for
long-term
planning
for
any
aquatics
facilities
in
the
city.
A
E
And
so
that
was
the
council's
decision
in
may
of
march
of
2021.
J
E
About
the
community
gardens,
which
is
the
next
one
down
from
that
on
page
85,
there's
a
design
that
is
currently
underway
for
a
community
garden
at
wilson
park
is
my
understanding,
I
think
we're
it's.
E
A
Well,
I
guess
nobody
was
doing
anything
last
year.
Didn't
look
busy
at
all,
so
just
kidding
being
sarcastic
lots
of
programs
lots
of
stuff
going
on
there
so
good
to
know
any
other
questions
from
the
commission
before
we
turn
it
over
to
the
public
for
any
input
or
comments
from
from
their
end.
G
Gesture
question:
I
I
forgot,
which
item
was
that
that
the
intent
of
that
item
was
to
share
the
resources
when
not
in
use
in
school
for
public?
Well,
can
you
turn
on
it?
It's
it's.
What
it's
one
of
those
I.
E
Can
explain
that
so
we
do
have
a
bunch
of
joint
use
agreements
with
the
school
districts
for
the
use
of
their
fields,
and
so
that
is
the
purpose
of
that
particular
policy.
It's
two.
G
Yeah
is
that
just
for
the
fields
or
the
other,
like
polls
and
other
things,.
E
No,
it's
only
for
the
for
the
fields,
because
the
schools
I
mean
they
have
their
own
capital
improvements
and
other
things,
and,
of
course,
if
this
city
and
the
school
were
to
enter
into
a
joint
juice
agreement
for
use
of
any
of
that
for
public
purposes.
A
Okay,
any
other
comments,
questions
in
the
gpa
review
and
your
report
sorry
gpa.
A
A
We'll
bring
it
back
in
we'll
bring
break
up,
there's
apparently
no
comments,
hopefully
no
one's
asleep.
If
you
are
that's
okay,
we
totally
understand,
but
yes,
commission
can
feel
back
to
you.
What
do
we
have.
G
A
J
Yeah,
yeah
and
and
yeah,
and
so
I
mean
we
with
the
new
city
manager.
We
do
need
to
have
that
discussion
with
him
about
timing
for
moving
that
forward,
but
I
believe
we'll
be
prepared
to
move
it
forward.
A
Got
it?
Okay
got
some
standards
there,
all
right
cool
all
right,
so
I
guess
I
mean.
Are
there
any
other
comments
or
changes
that
we
are
going
to
make
and
then
chris?
How
do
we
actually
make
the
motion
for
this?
Do
we
just
we
don't
do
anything,
we're
just
providing
direction?
There's
nothing
we
have
to
prove
right.
Is
that
correct?
There's
no
votes
to
be
taken
here.
J
Yeah,
I
don't
believe
that
that
the
commission
is
is
requested
to
take
any
action.
I
I
think
you
know,
staff
has
has
taken
the
input
and
will
incorporate
it,
and
you
know
I'll
just
put
a
few
as
to
you
know
the
process
for
bringing
this
back
to
the
planning
commission.
If
any.
A
Okay,
tremendous
all
right,
any
other
comments,
pew
from
your
team.
Anybody
else
anything
you
want
to
add.
A
Okay,
all
right
with
that,
we
can
move
on
to
item
number
three
and
then
we'll
probably
return
early.
If
we
do
this
properly,
all
right
move
to
item
number
three
subject:
2022
mayor's
meetings
with
commissioners
recommended
action,
appoint
representatives
for
the
monthly
mayor's
meetings
with
commissioners.
I
would
suggest
a
process
where
we
throw
out
a
date
and
someone
says
yes
and
they
put
it
on
their
calendar.
I
think
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
if
that's
correct,
that'll
make
it
easier
and
sarah
are
you
leaving
leaving
that
process
so.
B
Yes,
I
can,
and
let
me
share
my
screen.
A
Okay,
cool
we'll
put
you
to
put
the
calendars,
and
we
will
just
do
that.
We'll
just
alternate
if
anybody
has
a
certain
date
that
they
want
to
go
to
if
they're
on
a
vacation,
we
can
kind
of
do
that
and
just
for
those
listening,
it's
the
mayor's
monthly
meeting
where
he
gets
together
with
like
in
this
case
he
gets
together
with
his
commissioners
and
all
the
different
commissions
get
together.
A
We
send
a
representative
to
give
updates
on
what's
been
going
on
in
the
past
four
weeks,
so
any
projects
any
plans,
things
that
we
pass
a
good
opportunity
to
share
information
with
other
commissioners
and
and
let
them
know
what's
going
on
and
that's
a
good
chance
to
kind
of
let
the
mayor
know
what's
happening
as
well.
So
all
right,
we
got
the
dates,
so
yeah
we'll
just
go
down
the
line
who
wants
to
sign
up
for
tomorrow.
A
A
A
I
can
easily
take
february
9th
if
somebody
wants
doesn't
want
that
date
so
happy
to
do
that.
Let's
see
what
march
9th
looks
like
anyway,.
D
F
Okay,
so
I
can
do
june.
A
F
A
All
right,
we
got
two
extra
months.
If
anybody
wants
to
jump
in
again,
I'm
happy
to
do
november
9th.
If
nobody
wants
it
and
then
december
14th
does
that
meeting
ever
happen?
Yeah?
I
guess
it
does.
A
Fine
I'll
do
december,
you
can
have
more.
Hopefully
you
can
have
november.
B
We
do
have
one
more
for
january,
11
2023,
which
would
fall
before
the
next
planning
commission
meeting
actually.
B
And
we
will
be
discussing
these
at
the
next
meeting,
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
save
this
document
and
make
sure
to
get
the
sent
out
to
the
commissioners.
Once
everything's
decided
at
the
next
meeting.
A
Well,
thank
you
for
keeping
us
organized
and
planned
in
the
head,
so
this
is
great
super
efficient,
great
job
team,
okay,.
B
That
is
correct.
It's
still
five
to
six
unless
it
changes
by
the
month.
F
So
I
just
block
my
calendar
for
those
two
dates
june,
8th
and
so
I'll.
Just
look
for
meeting
invites
okay.
Thank
you.
E
You're.
Welcome
yes,
and
I
did
commissioner
madipatla
forward
you
the
information
for
tomorrow's
meeting.
A
E
Sure
so
I
actually
did
have
an
announcement
to
make
for
the
public
at
large
due
to
the
staffing
challenges
due
to
the
spread
of
the
omicron
variant.
The
public
counter
has
been
closed
for
in-person
appointments
staff
continues
to
be
available
for
virtual
appointments.
E
We
do
have
the
bookings
calendar
available
online,
so
please
feel
free
to
make
your
appointments
there.
You
will
get
a
teams
link
which
will
be
used
and
you
do
not
have
to
have
the
teams
application
on
your
computer
in
order
to
use
that
link
so
feel
free
to
call
or
to
schedule
an
appointment
virtually,
and
that
applies
to
all
divisions,
planning,
building
and
public
works,
including
finance.
I
believe.
A
Hugh
is
it
true
that
a
phone
call
in
actually
just
gets
redirected
someone's
play
actual
place
of
work,
not
necessarily
the
office
and
the
buildings
in
the
city,
etc?.
E
We
actually
have
soft
phones
that
so
they'll
bring
on
our
laptops.
They.
E
E
Weeks,
sorry,
next,
yes,
next
meeting,
which
will
be
on
let's
make
this
very
clear
on
january
25th,
and
so
there
will
be
also
the
selection
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair
and
alternates
for
the
drc
representatives
to
the
environmental
review
committee-
and
let
me
see,
I
think
those
are
the
only
two
cyra
am
I
missing
anything
drc
and
erc
correct.
B
That's
correct
and
there's
also
economic
development,
which,
as
of
this
meeting,
is
still
to
be
determined,
but
in
the
event
that
the
meetings
are
restructured,
we
will
at
least
have
a
representative
for
me
correct.
So.
E
Just
selecting
representatives
in
the
event
that
there
are
there
is
an
economic
development
committee
meeting.
So
all
that
will
happen
at
the
next
meeting.
A
I
encourage
you
guys
to
nominate
yourselves
so
definitely
that
out
there.
Okay
anything
else
from
the
commissioners.
A
A
And
just
a
funky
question:
I'm
on
the
agenda
planning
meeting
because
that's
the
then
the
last
meeting
for
the
chair
at
that
point
in
time.
Is
that
correct?
Okay?
So
if
there's
any
other
agenda
items
that
we
want
to
put
on
there?
Okay,
so
all
right!
Well
with
that,
since
there's
nothing
else
here,
I
will
then
adjourn
the
city
of
cupertino's
planning,
commission
meeting
for
january
11th,
2022
and
thanks
everybody
for
joining
so.