►
Description
Coverage of the Cupertino City Council Teleconference Meeting, recorded on Tuesday, December 7, 2021. Part 3 of 3.
A
Kudos
and
thanks
to
councilmember
way,
there's
no
getting
items
faster,
we're
items
11
through
13..
These
are
reports
by
council
and
staff.
I
apologize
for
inadvertently
and
perhaps
subliminally
optimistically
jumping
consent
calendar.
I
would
like
to
encourage
everyone
to
be
extremely
brief.
You
know
it
is
late
and
I
know
that
a
lot
of
time
has
elapsed
since
our
november
16th
meeting.
But
let
me
get
us
started
on
item
number
11
with
brief
reports
on
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements.
You
know
obviously
a
lot
of
activities.
A
The
one
I
would
like
to
make
quick
note
of
is
that
I
was
invited
by
de
anza
college
as
well
as
the
new
startup
company
neuro,
which
is
a
electronic
self-driving
delivery
company.
You
might
have
seen
their
ads
on.
I
think
domino's
pizza
or
something
like
that
to
speak
over
at
the
ends
of
college,
about
their
new
program
that
they're
working
in
conjunction
with
each
other
to
try
to
deliver
internships
for
their
students
at
this
new
new
startup,
and
this
you
know
fantastically
interesting
concept
of
transportation.
A
So
I
spoke
there.
Council,
member
moore
was
there
vice
mayor.
Chao
was
on
our
way,
but
you
know-
and
I
relayed
this
to
those
attending
and
everyone
wore
a
mask.
It
was
indoors
that
her
battery
had
actually
died,
which
is
interesting
since,
of
course,
neuro
is
a
battery
electric
battery
operated.
You
know
vehicle
delivery
system,
and
so
it
was.
A
It
was
really
a
great
opportunity
and
very
refreshing
to
see-
and
in
my
remarks
I
essentially
said
you
know
a
lot
of
people
wonder
what
makes
our
area
work
and
it's
precisely
this
kind
of
stuff
that
people
don't
normally
see
that
make
the
area
work
where
it's
very
compassionate,
you
think
about.
You
know
bringing
everyone
along
and
providing
opportunities
for.
A
So
that's
my
my
report
on
item
number
eleven.
Would
anyone
else
from
council
like
to
provide
their
brief
reports
and
I
don't
actually
see
hands
right
and
so
now
I
do.
Council,
member
moore,
followed
by
council
member
away.
B
Okay,
I'll
try
to
be
fast.
So
on
november
17th
I
attended
the
cal
city's
aca
7
working
group
and
we
voted
to
have
a
no
position,
not
a
no
but
no
position
on
ac
a7
and
the
and
the
initiative,
but
to
send
the
items
back
to
the
respective
committees.
On
the
december
2nd.
I
also
attended
the
neuro
program
on
the
third.
B
I
think
we
had
a
full
house
for
the
tree
lighting
ceremony
and
that
was
awesome
event
and
great
to
be
outdoors
and
in
having
it
again
and
on
the
fourth.
Several
of
us
were
attending
siwa
diwali
for
the
food
donation.
Perhaps
council
member
away,
wants
to
provide
a
little
more
information
about
that
and
then
for
an
announcement
that
we
received
an
email
from
housing,
trust
silicon
valley,
the
board
of
supervisors
increased
the
loan
amount
for
the
first,
first-time
homebuyer
buyers
loan
to
1.1
million.
B
C
Thank
you
I'll,
be
fast
too.
On
november
12
29th,
I
attended
the
cal
city's
peninsula
division
board
retreat
and
we
set
the
2022
priorities
and
I
look
forward
to
our
city
to
work
collaborate
with
all
the
cities.
In
you
know
three
counties
and
december
3rd.
I
attended
webinar
hosted
by
the
california
senators
dave
cortese
and
george
becky
backer
on
the
history
and
impact
of
california
housing
crisis.
C
This
is
one
of
three
webinars,
so
I
would
like
to
invite
our
council
members
to
actually,
I
think,
council
member
moore
was
there
and
on
the
third
I
attended
the
chambers,
legislative
action
committee
meeting
and
they're
talking
about
information
on
footy
or
the
answer:
college
trustee
area
maps,
information
which
is
pretty
important
to
us
too,
because
they
are
in
our
area
and
the
tree
lighting,
I'm
not
going
to
emphasize
that
all
fiverr
was
there
was
really
great
and
we
have
a
few
kids
there
too,
and
the
sabbath
diwali
it's
three
of
us
were
there.
C
C
Maybe
maybe
mayor
paul,
remember
how
many
pounds
of
food
they
received
a
lot
of
food
and
on
the
floors
we
attended.
I
attended
a
month
as
the
high
school
fbi
is
a
shark
tank
event
hosted
by
the
royal
club
cupertino.
So
next
time
I'll
invite
all
of
you.
Our
kids,
are
truly
truly
bright
and
I
think
that's
it.
D
Yeah
I'll
just
follow
up
with
some
of
the
same
comments:
the
siwa
diwali
donation.
Absolutely
great.
At
this
point
you
know
each
year
the
holidays
are
so
important
that
we
do
need
to
be
eating
out
and
and
helping
the
humorous
side
once
a
while,
we
get
to
say
something
humorous
at
the
tree
lighting,
my
eight-year-old.
D
Let
me
know
that
that
was
not
real
santa,
that
it
was
a
fake
beard.
Oh,
oh
I
I
guess
we
have
to
tell
them
santa
does
santa
does
have
helpers.
Well,
then,
on
to
more
serious
stuff,
the
silicon
valley,
regional
interoperability,
authority
meeting
and
previously
we
had
talked
about
jamming
instances
and
there
was
another
one.
So
there
are
still
some
some
concerns
out
there.
D
Once
again
it
was
caught
and
tracked
down,
but
still
there
are
concerns
out
there.
So
I
will
I'll
I'll
just
mention,
though,
to
the
residents
we
are
still
getting
email
from
like
that
spoke
during
a
public
comment:
the
concerns
about
the
school.
I
share
your
concerns.
I
have
three
small
kids
and
I
share
your
concerns
and
I'll
be
reaching
out
and
letting
the
cusd
board
know.
D
I
share
your
concern:
how
will
it
you
know
impact
that
or
or
help
I
don't
know,
but
I
do
feel
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
that
we
do
have
these
concerns
and
perhaps
during
this
pandemic,
things
should
be
looked
at
a
second
time,
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councilman.
E
Is
summer
okay,
then
I
yeah
I
attended
the
light.
The
luxury
lighting
also
find,
I
think,
600
people
signed
up.
It's
such
a
great
event,
it's
great
to
see
so
many
people
came
out
after
the
pandemic.
The
center
arrived
in
a
fire
truck
and
then
I
stayed
and
watched
a
lot
of
kids
line
up,
even
though
they
cannot
sit
down
santa's
lap.
They
get
to
talk
from
a
distance,
but
still
many
people
lined
up
and
waited
for
a
long
time
to
talk
to
santa
the
city.
E
Just
hosts
a
lot
thanks
the
parks
and
rec
staff
members.
They
have
really
put
in
a
lot
of
effort
every
year
and
the
choir
from
home
state
high.
Oh
yeah,
amazing
event.
I'm
sorry
that
I
missed
the
neuro
and
the
siwa
diwali
festival,
but
then
I'm
reaching
out
to
the
organizers,
I'm
hoping
to
visit
their
company
to
see
how
they
operate
and
yeah,
and
then
a
lot
of
community
members
are
helping
with
donation
food
for
the
food
drive
thanks
a
lot.
A
Okay,
great,
let's
go
on
to
committee
assignments
and
I'll
just
remind
everyone.
This
is
for
our
pre-assigned
committees,
anything
from
november
16th
that
we'd
like
to
report
out
on
just
keep
cognizant
of
the
time.
You
know
and
please
try
to
create
a
concise
summary,
so
council
member
way.
C
All
right,
really
brief
november
11th
2
p.m.
I
attended
the
cubicle
disaster
council
meeting
and
the
information
are
very
good
and
and
also
on
december,
7th
the
city
of
cupertino
cusd
strategic
partner
partnership
meeting,
because
I
am
the
school
board
liaison
for
the
city
and
it
is
really
a
good
meeting
and
we
are
recommended
that
we
meet
more
regularly
and
so
that
we
can
collaborate
more
with
cusd.
E
Hi
I
attended
the
same
meeting
and
we
got
a
lot
of
each.
The
staff
gave
each
other
a
very
good
update
on.
We
haven't
met
for
the
entire
year,
so
this
is
the
first
time
it's
true
that
if
we
hadn't
met
earlier,
maybe
we
could
have
talked
asked
questions
about
the
school
closure,
the
data.
Why
is
that
necessary?
Earlier?
E
B
Hey,
thank
you,
mayor
paul.
This
is
not
so
much
as
an
announcement
or
or
telling
where
I've
been,
but
I've
got
a
question
for
tomorrow,
because
the
the
vta
tac
is
meeting,
and
I'm
wondering
who
will
be
our
representative
for
that.
If
I
could
hear
it
find
out
that
information,
so
I
can
connect
with
that
staff.
Member,
because
the
following
day
we
have
the
the
vta
pack
at
four.
A
Still
be
roger
he's,
I
think,
he's
retiring
at
the
end
of
the
calendar
year.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you.
You
know,
I
don't
want
to
speak,
for
somebody
else
is
that
correct?
I
do
see
the
interim.
I.
F
A
Great
all
right,
so
speaking
of
vta,
you
know
my
my
one
report
out
on
committee
assignments
has
to
do
with
that,
and
you
know
obviously
they're
they're
dealing
with
a
lot
of
various
issues,
especially
near
the
end
of
the
year
like
we
are.
I
am
heartened
to
report
that
the
transit
oriented
developments
did
see
a
bit
of
progress,
both
council
member
moore
and
myself.
A
We
play
integral
roles
in
vta
she's
on
the
pac,
the
policy
advisory
committee
as
the
chair,
I'm
of
course
on
the
board
one
of
the
12
board
members,
but
you
know
the
the
tods
they've
been
applying
for
measure.
A
money
to
you
know,
try
to
build
some
of
their
developments
to
help
support
a
particular
transit
stops
in
mainly
the
eastern
part
of
the
county,
which
you
know,
I
think,
is
a
good
thing
to
build
out
the
transit
system.
A
But
at
the
same
time,
measure
a
was,
you
know
meant
for
the
largely
the
unhoused,
and
you
know
the
affordability
of
housing
issue,
but
I
just
wanted
to
remind
them.
Last
time
we
met
that.
You
know
we
should
be
thinking
about
supportive
housing
for
the
unhoused
as
well.
As
you
know,
supportive
services,
and
so
I'm
heartened
to
report
that
the
two
transit-oriented
developments
that
they
considered
last
time
they
did
specifically
carve
out
regular
units.
A
It
is
referred
back
to
the
pack
early
in
the
calendar
year
next
year
for
input
from
all
the
cities,
because
the
pac,
of
course,
is
represented
by
each
of
the
cities
in
the
in
the
county,
so
that
I
think
that
serves
a
really
critical
function
within
vta,
because
of
course,
vta.
The
board
itself
is
pretty
san
jose
and
county
dominated
so
that'll
be
my
report
out.
Finally,
did
I
miss
anybody?
I
don't
think
I
did,
but
did
I
miss
anybody
on
committee
assignments?
A
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
at
this
point.
So,
let's
go
on
to
item
number
13,
which
is
our
city
manager
update
mr
larson,
for
your
final
city
manager.
Update.
Do
you
have
anything.
F
Following
up
on
councilman
willie's
comment:
cupertino's
own
santa's
helpers
will
be
resuming
santa
visit
this
year
for
the
next
two
weekends
for
families
who
would
like
a
visit
from
santa.
F
I
did
want
to
highlight
that
the
most
important
issue
facing
the
council
and
the
new
city
manager
and
city
staff
next
year
will
be
the
housing
element
which
will
be
a
challenging
and
difficult
process
given
state
requirements
and
we're
kicking
off
our
public
engagement
program,
a
very
aggressive
one,
which
starts
this
thursday
from
6
to
8
p.m.
This
first
one
will
be
a
virtual
engagement
with
the
public
who
wants
to
participate
and
we
are
looking
for
live
ones
next
year,
as
the
kova
dynamic
allows
us
to
do
so.
F
Moving
to
the
covet
uprey
update
I'll
keep
this
very
short.
First,
we
have
the
omnivariant
rising
up
on
us
as
well
as
concern
about
what
happens
over
the
holidays
and
that
summarizes
the
national
and
international
statewide
state
of
the
pandemic.
F
F
The
city
may
want
to
revisit
what
is
our
reopening
platform
for
the
future,
but
the
good
news
is
cupertino
remains
the
highest
vaccinated
rate.
Excuse
me
continues
to
have
the
lowest
case
rate
per
100
000
in
the
county,
so
that
good
news
remains
and
I
just
need
to
share.
I
actually
went
and
was
a
customer
of
the
county's
testing
that
is
done
at
the
senior
center
yesterday
and
our
ten
citizen
corps
volunteers
that
work
there
are
incredible.
It
is
well
organized
it's
easy.
It
takes
five
minutes
ten
max
to
get
through
everybody's
wearing
smiles.
F
I
also
wanted
to
let
the
council
know
that
at
the
work
program
update,
I
had
submitted
a
staff
report
that
included
a
number
of
work
impact
items
on
your
city
staff
that
had
to
be
recognized
and
acknowledged.
We
had
two
members
of
the
public
at
least
two.
It
may
have
been
three
or
four
cite
that
list
in
my
staff
report
in
their
own
communications
to
council
that
I
responded
to
in
per
council
and
resident
request.
F
We
will
be
posting
my
responses
to
those
items
on
the
city
website
tomorrow,
instead
of
my
reading
through
them
tonight.
My
last
report
was
that
the
council
will
remember
that
when
I
provided
a
comprehensive
update
on
valco
on
september
7th,
the
council
requested,
I
believe
it
was
councilman
willie
that
we
have
periodic
updates
to
the
valco
project.
I
then
conducted
my
first
oral
update
on
the
valco
project
on
september
21st,
and
I
did
want
to
provide
tonight
my
final
update
on
the
valco
project
as
your
city
manager.
F
Over
90
percent
is
dedicated
to
retail
commercial
and
market-based
housing.
The
biggest
project
delays
are
due
to
the
long-standing
toxic
contamination
on
the
site.
Since
I
last
spoke
about
valco,
the
developer
has
submitted
a
first
draft
of
the
conceptual
site
model
model
to
identify
the
extent
and
sources
of
the
contamination.
F
The
county,
which
has
regulatory
authority
over
the
toxic
contamination,
has
responded
to
that
first
draft
and
needs
considerable
additional
information
submitted
by
december
20th.
After
the
developer
completes
that
additional
work
to
the
county's
satisfaction,
then
the
developer
will
begin
working
on
a
site
management
plan
for
county
review
and
approval.
F
I
expect
that
any
cleanup
work
if
it's
required
will
not
start
for
several
months,
depending
on
how
quickly
the
developer
chooses
to
act
because
of
the
importance
of
monitoring
the
cleanup
process.
Two
city
staff
members
are
now
immediate
subscribers
to
the
state's
geotracker
website,
which
is
the
formal
authority
on
the
cleanup
process.
F
F
Despite
the
contaminant
delays,
two
ministerial
permits
for
small
portions
of
the
site
on
the
west
side
have
been
released
and
will
be
posted
on
the
city's
website
this
week.
However,
any
soil
disturbances
are
not
allowed
until
the
county
believes
the
contaminant
issues
have
been
resolved
to
the
county's
satisfaction.
A
Thank
you
very
much
greg.
I
do
see
a
couple
of
hands
raised,
one
from
the
public
and
one
from
vice
mayor
chao.
So
let's
just
be
very
brief
about
this
video.
If
you
could
set
a
minute,
I'm
just
gonna
apply
that
to
both
comments
here.
Peggy
did
you
want
to
speak
on
the
city
manager's
report?
I
see
your
hand
is
raised.
G
Yes,
I
I
just
very
brief
I'd
like
to
thank
city
manager,
greg
larson
for
stepping
in
and
doing
a
fantastic
job
as
our
city
manager.
You've
helped
us
move
forward
and
we
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
A
Great
thank
you
peggy,
and
next
vice
mayor
channel.
E
E
F
I
will
try
to
do
that
tomorrow.
I
know
at
a
minimum
we'll
be
posting
the
additional
information
we
have
this
week,
and
I
just
will
note
that
this
was
not
agendized
for
further
discussion.
I
viewed
the
vice
mayor's
comment
as
simply
a
procedural
one
that
I'm
responding
to,
and
I
will
address
tomorrow,
but
thank
you.
A
A
So
let's
go
ahead
and
start
with
this.
I
don't
see
any
members
of
the
public
hands
race
either.
So,
let's
start
this
item,
madam
city
clerk,
would
you
conduct
the
second
reading
of
of
this
ordinance
at
this
point.
H
H
2.74.075
and
new
chapter
2.110,
two
amending
sections.
One
point:
one:
two
point:
zero:
one:
zero.
Two
point:
four:
eight
point:
zero:
two:
zero:
two
point:
six:
zero
point:
zero:
five:
zero:
two
point:
six:
eight
point:
zero:
five:
zero.
Two
point:
seven:
four:
point:
zero:
four:
zero:
two
point:
eight:
zero
point:
zero:
nine:
zero!
Two
point:
eight
six:
point:
zero:
seven:
zero!
Two
point:
nine:
two:
point:
zero:
nine:
zero.
Three
point:
two:
three
point:
zero:
six:
zero.
Eight
point:
zero:
six
point:
zero:
three:
zero!
Fourteen
point:
zero!
H
Four
point:
one:
two:
five
fourteen
point:
one:
eight
point:
zero:
nine:
zero!
Sixteen
point:
five.
Two
point:
zero.
Four:
three.
Sixteen
point:
five:
two
point:
zero:
five:
three:
eighteen
point:
zero:
four
point:
zero:
two:
zero
nineteen
point:
one:
zero:
two
point:
zero:
three:
zero
and
nineteen
point:
one:
zero:
four
point:
two:
two:
zero
and
table
nineteen
point:
one:
two:
four
point:
zero:
four:
zero
and
three
repealing
section:
eighteen
11.08.020.
A
Thank
you,
madam
city
clerk
and
I'll
go
back
to
the
members
of
the
public.
We
still
don't
have
any
hands
raised
and
so
we'll
move
back
to
city
council.
I
would
like
to
ask
for
a
motion
from
city
council
that
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-2234
be
conducted
and
that
the
city
clerk's
reading
constitute
the
only
reading
thereof
and
that
city
council
passed
the
second
reading
as
well
as
enact
the
ordinance.
Would
anyone
like
to
make
that
motion
vice
mayor
ciao,
your
hand
is
raised
first.
A
J
I
did
just
want
to
note
for
the
record
that
there
is,
there
was
a
supplemental
submission
and
it
corrects
typographical
errors
in
section
2.480202.
A
Okay,
let
me
go
back
to
vice
mayor
vice
mayor.
Can
you
please
confirm
that
your
motion
encompasses
what
city
attorney
jensen
just
described.
E
A
Okay,
great
vice
council
member
willie,
would
you
like
to
second
vice
mayor
challa's
motion.
D
A
A
The
subject
is
to
consider
modifications
to
the
approved
westport
development
project,
which
include
adjusting
unit
mix
in
the
assistant
I'd
rather
living
facility,
which
is
building
one
to
123,
assisted
living
unit,
e5
memory
care
rooms,
reclassification
of
approximately
8
000
square,
feet
of
public
dining
area
to
private
dining,
reducing
the
underground
parking
to
reflect
adjustments
and
uses
and
reduction
of
massing
on
the
top
floor
to
accommodate
a
sixth
floor,
aqua
therapy
pool
with
the
application
numbers,
as
provided
in
the
agenda
and
one
moment.
Please.
A
And-
and
that
is
the
subject,
would
anyone
from
staff
like
to
introduce
this
with
a
presentation
I
see
our
director
of
community
development
and
planning
in
the
other
order,
rather
planning
and
community
development
benfoo
has
turned
on
his
camera.
We
have
jean
martier
as
well
senior
planner
from
that
department.
L
Thank
you
ben
food,
director
of
community
development.
Thank
you
for
the
introduction.
Mr
mayor,
you
basically
outlined
the
proposed
modifications
and
changes
that
the
applicant
has
proposed
for
tonight.
L
I
had
an
introduction,
but
I
think
in
in
consideration
of
time
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
hand
it
off
to
john
mateer
to
present
he
has
some
slides
we'll
go
through
those
pretty
quickly.
Basically,
the
the
application
was
approved
by
council
august
last
year.
2020
and
the
applicant
is
now
back
making
some
adjustments
as
outlined
by
the
mayor
with
that
john.
Would
you
continue
our
presentation?
Please.
M
A
M
I
had
some
audio
issues
this
week,
so
I'm
glad
that's
been
resolved.
Thank
you
again,
ben
for
the
introduction.
This
is
I'm
john
martier
senior
planner
with
community
development
department.
I've
been
the
city's
project
manager
for
this
application
since
pretty
much
2018
when
they
first
applied.
So
yes,
as
introduced
and
read
by
the
mayor,
what
the
about
the
modification,
the
subject
of
the
modification
go
through
that
a
little
background
of
what
was
approved
and
what
is
the
base
of
the
project.
M
M
You'll
hear
some
terminology
as
building
one
building,
two
row
house
of
town
homes.
So
this
is
a
quick
overview
on
this
slide
just
to
familiarize
everyone
which
and
orient
them
as
to
what
we're
talking
about
so
building
one
is
the
approved
131
unit,
senior
mixed
use
and
27
memory
care
room
building
or,
as
the
assistant
living
facility
building
2
is
a
48
unit,
bmr
senior
mixed
use
building.
M
So
since
this
was
approved
in
august
of
2020,
the
applicant
has
the
developers
have
come
in
to
modify
the
project
in
two
separate
occasions.
The
first
was
with
the
director's
minor
modification,
and
that
was
a
prudent
june
29th
of
of
this
year.
Essentially,
this
was
revised,
the
underground
garage
layout
to
limit
the
footprint
to
under
the
building
one
and
add
additional
subterranean
level.
M
M
So
the
current
project
provisions
to
the
westbourne
project
is
to
reclassify
8,
000
square
foot,
ground
floor
dining
facility
to
be
limited
residents
of
building
one
and
their
guests.
This
is
along
the
sickle
portion
of
the
building,
one
which
is
facing
mary
avenue,
adjusting
the
unit
mix,
adding
more
two-bedroom
units,
reducing
studio
units,
adding
eight
memory
care
rooms,
while
decreasing
the
unit
account
by
eight
reducing
parking
space
count
by
63
spaces
to
account
for
the
dining
facility
being
open
only
to
residents
in
the
guests.
M
Further
revisions
have
to
do
with
some
minor
physical
modifications
to
the
exterior
building
one.
This
includes
the
accommodating
six
four
aqua
sixth
floor.
Excuse
me:
aqua
therapy
pool
some
other
minor
changes
to
building
and
lowering
the
retail
sealing
from
20
feet
to
approximately
16
feet,
relocating
memory
care
terrace
from
the
eastern
side
of
the
single
portion
of
the
building
to
the
western
side,
as
well
as
increase
the
depth
of
single
portion
building
along
mary
avenue
by
5.5
feet
the
approval
authority.
M
This
was
referred
to
council
directly
by
the
director,
as
as
pursuant
to
municipal
code
chapter
1912.,.
M
So
originally,
this
project
was
approved
the
hardest
exception
for
for
limiting
for
the
limited
amount
of
retail
along
stevens
creek
boulevard.
As
you
may
recall,
75
percent
of
the
of
all
building
frontage
along
stevens
creek
boulevard
should
be
dedicated
to
direct
retailing
of
services
or
goods
to
the
public
and
with
no
more
than
50
of
the
with
excuse
me,
with
with
a
minimum
of
50
percent
of
the
rear
of
those
buildings.
M
Being
the
same.
The
approval
back
in
august
2020
provided
60
of
the
front
along
stevens
creek
boulevard,
approximately
25
percent
of
the
rear
buildings
to
direct
retail
and
goods
and
services
which
equated
about
20
000
square
feet.
If
you
included
the
portions
along
mary
avenue
what
the
fi
council
I
found
at
the
time
that
the
busy
boulevard
would
be
challenging
the
lease,
particularly
because
it's
adjacent
to
the
85
on-ramp.
M
Further,
that
the
same
square
footage,
retail
provided
20
000
square
feet
is
what
would
have
been
needed
to
meet
the
heart
of
state
specific,
the
heart
of
the
city,
retail
standard
of
twenty
thousand
three
hundred
thirty
square
feet.
Visibility
because
of
its
location
by
pedestrian
motors
would
be
difficult.
M
So
it
would
be
best
to
cluster
the
retail
space
around
the
corner
of
mary
avenue,
stevens
creek
boulevard.
To
be
more
successful,
however,
the
applicants
come
back
to
say
that
well,
the
dining
room
that
was
that
would
be
accessible
to
the
public
as
previously
approved.
M
It
would
be
contradictory
to
state
law
and
for
other
reasons,
namely
that
all
employees
and
volunteers
that
work
with
a
sisterly
facility
must
undergo
thorough
criminal
background
checks
and
that
any
any
member
of
the
public
going
in
there
that's
not
either
a
guest
or
actual
resident
facility
we'll
need
to
go
through
the
same.
The
state
places
extra
protocols
and
procedures
on
assistive
living
communities
and
their
staff
for
safety
residents,
and
this
facility
would
provide
three
meals
per
day
as
part
of
the
the
services
provided
to
the
assistant
living
facility.
M
In
order
to
supervise
you
know
outside
outside,
outside
members
of
public
to
come
in,
there
would
be
an
impossible
task
for
or
an
added
task
for
those
employees
of
the
facility.
M
Again,
the
the
applicants
are
here
and
they
could
probably
better
describe
the
challenges
have
having
open
dining
facility
and
in
the
in
the
issues
that
would
run
counter
to
state
law
better
than
I
than
I
could.
M
So
here
is
a
a
floor
plan
to
show
on
the
left
what
was
approved
in
august
2020
and
on
the
right.
What
is
for
post,
as
you
can
see,
the
the
loss
of
the
proposed
retail
along
mary
avenue.
However,
the
applicant
has
added
retail
along
stevens
creek
frontage,
where,
before
it
was
only
95
to
say
of
the
building
front,
building
one
frontage
along
stevens
creek
would
be
dedicated
to
retail.
M
Now,
as
you
see
in
the
the
red
circle,
the
applications
converted
400
square
feet
of
previously
approved
lobby
space
into
dedication
to
retail,
to
retail
use
right
there,
so
going
from
95
approximately
95
to
100
percent
of
the
frontage
of
building
one
being
dedicated
to
retail.
M
M
As
you
can
see
right
here,
one
of
the
findings-
that's
that
city
council,
had
to
make
for
general
crap
joan
plan
conformance
with
the
below
market
rate
manual,
was
that
there
had
to
be
some
type
of
there
had
to
be
a
degree
of
comparability
between
the
assisted
living
units.
The
mark,
essentially
the
market
rate
units
in
those
of
the
bmr
building.
M
M
Mix
and
sizes
were
essentially
equal
to
those
of
the
building.
Two,
however,
the
proposed
the
proposed
building
one
mix
is
slightly
off
so
going
from
20
studios
to
down
to
10
one
bedroom
from
56
to
61
and
from
two-bedroom
from
24
to
29,
so
we
have
an
increase
of
percentages
from
of
of
the
of
the
unit
count
from
going
up
for
the
one-bedroom
bedroom
and
the
amount
of
studios
going
down
considerably
and
again,
the
applicant
has
stated
in
their
application.
M
This
is
in
response
to
market
demand,
and
so
part
of
the
decision
of
council
tonight
and
I'll
go
in
this
little
but
further
later
is
is
to
see
if
this
is
still
in
the
view
of
council
comparable
to
what
the
unit
mix
is
of
the
bmr
building,
and
this
is
the
direct
language
from
the
bmr
manual
in
terms
of
the
bmr
standard
for
comparability.
Underlined
is
what
I
had
just
been
discussing.
The
unit
type
number
of
bedrooms
per
unit.
M
M
Parking
for
buildings,
one
and
two
was
255-
is
now
gone
down
to
192
and
that
amount
of
unit
has,
though
those
amount
of
space
have
been
provided
with
the
exception.
That
of
the
of
the
senior
units
in
building
in
building
one
40
of
80
of
those
spaces
would
be,
for
those
spaces
would
be,
would
be
serviced
by
stackers,
so
80
spaces
would
have
to
be
run
and
operated
by
by
a
valet
service,
as
well
as
a
parking
service
that
residents
would
not
be
allowed
to
operate.
M
You
know
so
those
who
have
acknowledged
in
those
stackers
that
would
have
to
operate
themselves.
One
of
the
things
there's
a
clarification
of
parking
and
the
parking
analysis
in
the
staff
report.
The
tool
required
for
for
both
things,
one
and
two
is
192.,
so
they,
the
applicant,
is
actually
providing
192
equal
to
what
is
being
required.
M
So
there
is
no
overage
of
of
parking
stalls
between
those
two.
Those
two
buildings
really
quick.
The
parking
analysis
right
here
so
just
to
show
you
what
was
approved
for
the
dir
originally
back
in
june.
We
see
that
the
light
gray
outline
is
what
was
approved
in
in
august.
The
show
what
was
approved
in
june
was
a
dark
gray.
M
Essentially
was
a
consolidation
of
the
underground
parking
all
under
building
one,
instead
of
going
single
levels
will
prove
to
be
double
level
underground,
and
this
no
no
parking
at
that
time
no
park,
no
reduction
parking
was
proposed,
and
again
this
was
done
with
the
intent
that
this
would
speed
up
the
and
again
this
was
done
with
with
kt
urban
and
also
in
conjunction
with
the
developers
of
the
bmr
building
to
speed
up
the
not
only
speed
up
the
the
project
by
three
months
or
more,
but
also
to
to
reduce
costs
on
the
the
development
building
too,
by
changing
the
type
of
foundation
to
slab
on
grade
four
for
building
two,
and
so
the
the
current
proposal
is
on
your
right,
which
shows
the
blue
parking
space
dedicated
to
building
two
with
the
stackers
over
here
stacking
parking
space
over
here
identified
with
the
letter
s-
and
this
is
excuse
me-
and
this
is
an
example
of
what
the
stackers
would
look
like.
M
M
So
we
can
see
the
entitled
sixth
floor,
which
shows
what
was
that
there's
no
pool
and
then
the
proposed
floor
plan
with
the
pool
on
the
on
the
the
western
portion
of
the
of
the
floor.
What
we
see
here
is
again
the
a
decrease
in
the
massing
along
this
area
of
the
building
as
well.
M
We
can
see
the
depth
over
here.
We
have
some
questions
about
this.
What
it
would
look
like
so
currently
was
approved
is
a
63.5
feet
width
over
here
and
on
this
side
you
have
69
feet.
You
can
also
see
where
the
memory
care
terrace
is
proposed
to
be
moved
from
the
western
portion.
I'm
sorry
from
the
east
portion
of
the
sickle
part
of
the
building
to
the
west
facing
inward,
rather
than
outward
towards
mary.
M
Common
open
space,
just
like
some
more
clarifications
of
the
choir
with
with
a
total
of
259
units
throughout
the
whole
development,
including
the
townhome
row
houses,
the
harvesting
would
require
about
38
850
square
feet
of
common
open
space.
What
is
entitled
is
about
44
945
square
feet
and
what
is
proposed
is
about
400,
sorry,
44
464..
M
There
is
a
slight
loss
of
common
open
space
with
the
expansion
of
the
widening
of
the
sickle
portion
of
building
one,
but
then
that's
mostly
going
to
be
within
the
the
common
green
area
that
that's
surrounded
by
building
one
and
again
environmental
review
that
there's
you
know,
staff
have
found,
there's
no
made
with
the
proposal.
There's
no
major
change
to
the
eir
that
was
that
was
approved
in
august
2020..
M
So
there's
four
resolutions
attached
to
this
staff
report.
Three
of
them
were
approving
of
the
of
the
on
the
modification.
One
was
for
denial,
so
staff
gave
some
recommendations
in
terms
of
if
the
council
were
to
deny
the
proposed
modifications
of
the
westport
project.
M
We
gave
some
some
ways
to
find
for
the
denial,
and
one
is
that
fee
that
that
the
modifications
are
inconsistent
with
the
bmr
manual
standard
for
comparability
as
a
blow
marker
at
units
and
building
two
are
of
a
different
mix
of
those
of
building
one,
and
that
the
restaurant
retail
provided
along
mary
avenue
exception
from
the
hoc
retail
standard
involved.
Lease
modification
or
deviation
from
development
regulations
per
described
in
this
chapter
necessary
to
accomplish
reasonable
use
of
the
parcel.
M
However,
the
staff
report
also
noted
that
if,
if
the
council
were
to
find
the
modifications
consistent
with
or
wanted
to
prove
the
project-
and
there
are
some
some
ways
to
find
that
the
project
can
be
approved
and
that
this
is
consists
that
the
the
council
does
still
find,
even
with
the
unit
mix,
changes
that
it's
still
consistent
with
the
bmr
mayo
standard
comparability
and
that
the
hsc
exception
for
original
project
was
approved
because
development
frontage
is
adjacent
to
the
on
rep
of
highway
85
and
that
the
commercial
component
is
not
required
to
be
located
along
the
secondary
streets
of
mary
avenue
that
that
alone
could
have
been
grounds
enough
to
find
that
that
the
hardest
issue,
the
harder
city
exception,
could
have
been
granted
in
that
case
alone.
M
Next
step
that
the
city
council
decision
will
be
final,
let's
reconsider
within
10
days
of
the
decision
and
try
to
be
as
brief
as
possible.
So
that
concludes
my
presentation.
A
Thank
you,
john
greatly
appreciated,
so
in
the
interest
of
some
efficiency.
Let's
go
to
some
comments
from
the
public.
I
have
three
hands
raised
at
this
point.
They
are
from
donna
austin,
jennifer,
griffin
and
peggy
griffin.
A
Joseph
way
has
also
raised
his
hand
at
this
time,
as
well
as
richard
adler
and
connie
connie,
and
so
I'm
going
to
ask
that
our
speakers
keep
their
comments.
Succinct,
we'll
go
ahead
and
provide
the
three
minutes.
A
O
Yes,
mayor
darcy,
paul
and
vice
mayor
li
liang,
chan,
chao.
I
congratulate
you
on
your
new
or
continued
service
to
our
community
and
I
think
that
this
westport
development
is
going
to
be
one
of
your
could
be
one
of
your
legacies
and
great
for
pr.
It's
a
wonderful
wonderful
project.
O
60
of
cupertino
people
are
over
60
years
old
and
we
have
there
is
no
housing
or
no
provision
for
the
older
people
here
and
keep
I
shouldn't
say
older.
I
should
say
younger,
maybe,
but
I
urge
the
city
council
to
approve
the
atria
project.
It's
very
special.
It's
designed
for
special
needs
that
seniors
would
have
within
the
housing
where
they
could
be
part
of
it.
O
The
synergy
of
being
part
of
the
whole
community
is
what's
wonderful
there
and
the
access
to
all
of
the
community
benefits
the
westport
and
related
atria
projects
is
so
wonderful
to
me
as
a
senior
and
important
to
the
quality
of
life.
I've
lived
in
cupertino
and
I
love
it,
and
I
would
like
to
continue
living
here
when
my
husband
and
I
need
that
extra
care
that
special
need.
Then
it
would
be
wonderful
to
have
this
kind
of
place
to
go.
O
I
love
the
integration
of
this
plan
and
its
synergy
with
the
whole
community,
and
I
just
hope
I
live
long
enough
for
this
project
to
be
approved
in
particular
of
concern
is
the
memory
units
there's.
There
are
18
memory
units
at
the
forum
and
23
at
sunnyview.
O
There
are
no
memory
units
at
chateau,
cupertino
and
there's
no
place
to
go
for
permanent
housing
for
people
that
need
memory
care,
and
this
would
be
such
a
wonderful
asset
tonight.
The
atria
is
proposing
to
add
eight
vitally
needed
memory
care
units
to
the
project
from
27
to
35..
Please
please.
Please
approve
this
change
that
is
so
important
to
us
as
seniors.
O
This
is
so
vital
to
our
senior
care
and
would
benefit
by
this
addition
to
the
cupertino
housing
needs.
So
I
that's.
All
I
can
say
is
that
I
love
it
and
I
hope
you
will
approve
it
with
these
changes
that
are
vital
because
they're
part
of
atria's
and
and
law
the
law
too.
So
it
really
is
a
great
project.
A
Appreciate
it,
our
additional
speakers
now
that
donna
is
done
speaking,
are
our
list
from
previous,
as
well
as
jb
and
stephen
scharf.
Our
next
speaker
is
jennifer
griffin,
welcome,
jennifer.
P
P
Now,
especially
since
people
have
been
trying
to
shop
in
town-
and
you
know
just
because
something
is
on
the
off
ramp
in
front
of
the
oaks,
I'm
going
to
call
it
the
oaks,
because
that's
basically
what
it
was
for
the
last
50
years
doesn't
mean
that
people
don't
see
and
that
there
is
retail
there.
It's
always
been
like
that
at
this
shopping
center.
So
I'm,
what
exactly
are
we
doing
with
the
retail
on
stevens
creek
boulevard?
I
mean
myself
as
a
shopper.
P
I
don't
really
like
to
be
told
that
I
that
I
won't
shop
at
a
site
because
it's
on
stephens
creek
boulevard-
I
mean
I,
I
know
the
area
believe
me,
okay.
The
other
question
I
had
is
what
is
going
on
with
these
stackers.
I
I
think
these
are
very,
very
dangerous
types
of
stacking
for
car.
I
would
not.
I
would
not
park
my
car
in
one
of
these
and
we
are
we
expecting
seniors
to
be
parking
on
these.
P
P
P
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
any
amenities
that
are
in
these
separate
buildings
are
the
same.
I'm
very
very
concerned
that
we're
excluding
one
group,
the
bmr
people
are
going
to
get
something
cheap
and
shoddy,
and
everybody
else
is
going
to
be.
You
know
fancy
lancy
or
whatever
yeah
sorry,
I
you
know,
I
just
think,
there's
so
much
going
on
in
this
project
that
we
have
to
make
sure
that
we
examine
everything
and
I
I
am
really
really
upset
about
the
loss
of
retail,
especially
at
this
site.
P
If
you
can
impress
me
please
do
it.
Thank
you.
G
Good
evening,
mayor
paul
council,
members
and
staff
I'd
like
to
thank
gian
for
his
report
and
details
detailed
presentation,
I
request
that
you
deny
this
change
for
reasons
described
in
the
staff
report.
Giving
up
almost
50
percent
of
the
minuscule
retail
the
approved
project
has
is
unacceptable.
It's
public.
G
It
was
sold
to
the
public
and
the
council
as
a
restaurant,
not
a
dining
facility.
The
removal
of
almost
eight
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
hurts
residents
of
the
bmr,
the
townhouses
row
houses
and
surrounding
community
and
our
city,
not
to
mention
putting
another
nail
in
the
coffin
of
public
trust.
G
G
When
they
start
they
can
start
with
not
increasing
the
size
of
their
units,
which
they
do
in
this
proposal
over
1236
square
feet,
500
open
space,
736
square
feet
of
units
is
additional
space,
they've
added
and
it
makes
the
comparability
of
bmr
to
market
rate
units
not
comparable,
as
required
by
our
city,
bmr
regulations
parking.
I
also
want
to
bring
up
the
undisclosed
change
to
the
bmr
parking.
The
staff
report
and
the
city
website
has
no
mention
of
a
director's
minor
modification
change
to
the
bmr
parking
moving.
G
G
A
I'm
getting
a
message
on
my
window,
stating
that
allow
to
talk
is
not
available
because
joseph
is
using
an
older
version
of
zoom.
You
need
to
promote
joseph
way
to
a
panelist
to
talk
so
joseph.
To
give
your
remarks,
I
need
to
promote
you
to
a
panelist,
which
I
will
do
now
and
you
don't
need
to
turn
on
your
camera
just
hold
on
for
seconds.
While
we
allow
you
to
to
talk
okay,
so
joseph,
please,
let
me
your
microphone
and
you
may
begin
your
comments.
N
Yes,
actually,
I
would
like
to
defer
to
richard
alder
and
also
gene
bedford.
We
three
of
us
are
representing
age-friendly
cupertino
task
force
so.
A
Okay,
I'll
put
you
back
in
the
in
the
attendees,
then
okay,
so
at
this
point,
we'll
consolidate
the
time
of
richard
adler
as
well
as
joseph
way,
and
I
think
it
was
was
it
gene
badord
who
was
the
third
person,
I'm
assuming
that
is
jb,
and
so
the
remaining
speakers
can
lower
their
hands
and
let
me
ask
richard:
are
you
going
to
be
providing
the
presentation.
A
And
so
if
video
can
go
ahead
and
I
know
we
have
an
equation
for
calculating
the
time-
it's
not
quite
nine
minutes.
But
let
me
just
ask
that
the
speakers
keep
their
comments,
concise
and
video.
You
can
go
ahead
and
set
it
at
the
nine
and
richard
welcome.
A
Richard
we're
not
actually
hearing
you,
you
might
need
to
unmute
your
device.
Q
Okay,
well,
I
will
go
ahead
then,
and
I
am
jb
the
the
way
the
zoom
thing
worked.
It
only
got
my
initials
good
evening.
My
name
is
gene
bedord
and
I've
lived
in
cupertino
for
30
years.
I'm
president
of
the
cupertino
senior
center
advisory
council,
but
tonight,
I'm
speaking
as
a
citizen
member
of
the
age-friendly
cupertino
task
force
next
slide.
Q
Q
Now
the
needs
of
older
adults
change
over
time.
Loss
of
a
spouse
can
suddenly
turn
a
functioning
two-person
household
into
a
single-person
household
with
more
elder
care
needs.
One
spouse
may
move
to
memory
care,
leaving
the
well
spouse
as
a
single-person
household
adriath
meets
that
need
slide.
Three.
Q
Q
Furthermore,
most
of
those
units
require
buying
into
a
life
community
a
ccrc.
Where
are
the
memory
units
where's,
the
rental
assisted
living,
not
in
cupertino
until
the
westport
atria
project
slide?
Four,
the
upcoming
year
will
be
challenging
for
our
city
as
it
develops
the
housing
element
for
the
next
eight
years.
Q
Q
A
Okay,
and
so
I
believe
that
the
remaining
time
was
yielded
to
richard
adler,
who
I
don't
see
with
a
hand
raised
so
we'll
go
back
to
richard.
If
he
comes
back
on,
I
actually
do
see
his
hand
raised
now.
Richard
welcome
back.
A
Unfortunately,
we
we
still
can't
hear
you
richard.
So,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
those
technical
issues
resolved
at
this
point,
I'll
go
ahead
and
call
on
connie.
Cunningham
welcome
connie.
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
S
Great,
thank
you.
I'm
speaking
only
for
myself
and
I
would
like
to
say
in
2021
I
did
become
an
official
senior
and
I
agree
with
the
other
speakers.
S
S
S
A
A
T
If
you
would
just
go
to
the
last
slide,
I
I
you
know
it
is
certainly
true,
and
I
think
gene
really
made
the
point
well,
that
you
know
the
the
number
of
there's
a
substantial
number
of
seniors
in
cupertino
already
that
number
is
growing
and
that
the
demand
for
senior
housing
in
cupertino
is
substantially
larger
than
the
supply
and
continues
to
grow.
In
particular,
the
need
is
great
for
more
memory
care
capacity.
So
I
think
the
increase
in
the
number
of
memory
care
units
is
important.
T
It
is
also
true.
I
think
that
senior
housing
generally
has
been
responding
to
a
demand
for
larger
living
units.
The
forum,
for
example,
up
in
at
near
rancho
san
antonio
recently
added
24
what
they
call
villas,
which
are
substantially
larger
dwelling
units
than
any
of
the
existing,
and
the
reason
they
did,
that
was
to
respond
to
the
market
need
and
to
keep
themselves
competitive.
T
So
I
think
it's
really
responding
to
a
real
need.
Let
me
finally
just
talk
to
the
issue
of
the
dining
facility.
This
is
an
assisted
living
community.
That
means
that
a
large
portion
of
the
residents
who
will
live
in
this
facility
will
be
frail
or
have
some
disability,
and
so
getting
all
of
the
residents
into
the
dining
room.
T
Getting
them
fed
and
getting
them
out
and
then
back
to
their
units
is,
is
not
a
simple
undertaking,
and
I
think
not
only
legally,
but
just
practically
trying
to
run
an
assisted
living,
congregate,
dining
room
at
the
same
time
that
you
were
running
a
public
restaurant
just
seems
to
me
to
be
incompatible
with
the
needs.
This
is
this:
isn't
just
housing
for
older
people.
It
is
a
an
assisted
living
community,
which
is
a
very
distinctive
product,
and
I
think
the
fact
that
atria
has
done
this.
T
I
think
something
like
400
times
all
over
the
u.s,
that
they
really
understand
the
the
requirements
and
the
practical
needs
for
supporting
a
population.
Like
this.
I
think
that
the
combination
of
the
h3
assisted
living,
the
independent,
the
independent
below
market
rate
units
plus
the
senior
center
and
the
anza
college
across
the
street
will
create
a
new
kind
of
senior
neighborhood
for
cupertino.
That
really
will
add
to
the
quality
of
the
options
in
the
city.
T
A
Hey,
thank
you
richard.
Let's
bring
this
back
up
to
council
at
this
point,
I
will
ask
for
any
council
comments
I'll
do
a
quick
time
check,
let's
go
ahead
and
have
a
first
round
of
comments
from
council
I'll,
let
you
know
when
you're
you're
going
on
three
minutes
and
let's
have
a
round
prior
to
entertaining
promotion
at
this
point.
A
D
Okay,
yeah
both
the
the
top
view
showing
where
the
stackers
are
and
then
the
view
of
the
stagger.
So
we
start
with
this
one,
so
who's
going
to
be
using
these
stackers.
Is
it
going
to
be
the
seniors,
or
is
it
only
going
to
be
for
non-seniors.
M
D
So
all
the
stackers
then
get
operated
by
some
type
of
employee,
correct,
okay,
I'll
stop
at
that
point
right
now,
because
that
definitely
terrifies
a
concerning
point.
You
know
where
seniors,
who
are
already
frail
and
having
walkers
and
trying
to
get
around
and
in
and
out
of
cars
in
this
type
of
configuration
yeah.
So,
okay
I'll
pass
it
back.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
councilmember
willie.
Next,
we
have
councilmember
way.
I
do
see
a
hand
from
one
of
the
applicants,
and
this
is
a
representative
atria.
Did
you
want
to
speak,
sir?
I
I
apologize
if
I'm
getting
your
last
name.
Incorrect,
matt
woody.
U
Sorry,
can
you
hear
me
yes,.
U
I
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
be
given
a
chance
to
present.
We
have
a
presentation
that
we
were
hoping
to
address
some
of
the
questions
that
were
raised,
including
the
one
that
was
just
raised
or
if
you
prefer
to
go
through
the
other
questions
we
can
present
afterwards.
But
I
do
have
a
response
to
councilman
willie's
question.
A
Okay,
that
sounds
good.
Well,
let
me
go
through
the
round
with
council
comments
at
this
point,
since
we're
one
down
four
to
go
and
we'll
provide
you
your
amount
of
time
and
about
how
long
would
you
need
for
your
presentation.
U
Well,
we
can
make
it
as
short
or
as
long
as
you
like,
I
was
told
we
would
have
10
minutes.
I
mean.
A
It's
okay,
okay!
So
let's
go
through
those
initial
council
comments,
and
so
I
don't
see
okay
so
councilmember
way,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
I
I
don't
see
what
page
that
the
the
density
bonus
units
have
been
labeled
on.
I
don't
see
the
density
bonus
table.
If
somebody
could
point
that
out
to
me,
so
we
can
see
how
many
density
bonus
units
the
project
qualifies
for
now
versus
previously
how
many
density
bonus
units
were
not
used
in
the
project.
B
I'd
like
to
have
that
table
provided
for
us,
and
I
want
it
clarified
for
for
the
council.
B
So
it
looks
like
what
happened
was
that
there
was
a
project
change
that
went
to
just
the
city
staff
back
in
june
of
this
year
and
that
removed
the
which,
what
you
could
call
an
amenity
or
a
benefit
to
the
below
market
rate
building,
and
so
the
seniors
previously
had
parking
in
their
subterranean
garage
with
their
own
elevators
that
they
could
go
up
because
it
was
it
was
in
it.
B
The
garage
went
under
the
entire
entirety
of
both
buildings,
so
they
had
this
benefit
there
at
the
which
was
comparable
for
both
the
seniors
at
the
bmr
building
and
the
seniors
at
the
market
rate
building.
Well
that
went
away
through
us
through
a
modification.
The
staff
approved-
and
this
didn't
go
to
the
design
review
committee
for
any
architectural
review
to
see
if
there
were
changes
to
parking
and
it
didn't
go
to
the
planning
commission
to
discuss.
It
was
done
by
staff
and
then,
when
the
report,
the
staff
report
went
to
the
city
planning
commission.
B
It
said
no
changes
for
the
to
the
parking,
so
there
was
no
way
for
them
to
have
any
discussion
about
it
because
it
wasn't
being
told
to
them.
And
then,
when
it
came
to
the
city
council,
we
were
told
in
the
table
that
there
were
no
changes
to
parking.
So
now
I
see
that
we
have
below
market
rate
unit
parking
over
in
the
market
rate
subterranean
garage.
So
that
is
that's
a
big
change,
but
the
first
thing
I
really
want
to
know.
B
I
want
to
make
sure
that
city
council
has
that
square,
that
everybody
understands
it
and
this.
What
I
want
to
also
know
is
the
density
bonus
units
that
are,
they
are
actually
qualified
to
have,
because
it
looks
like
it's
38.75
percent
of
the
base
units
and
I'm
coming
up
with
94
density
bonus
units,
and
I
think
that
only
16
are
being
used
for
the
project
and
by
our
municipal
code.
Those
are
supposed
to
be
labeled
on
the
plan,
and
I
would
like
to
know
where
those
are.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you
councilmember
moore.
That
was
actually
exactly
three
minutes.
Next,
we
have
so
our
interim
city
manager.
Larson,
has
a
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
make
I'm
hungry.
F
There
was
no
other
discussion
in
that
table
of
any
other
parking
components
and
both
the
planning,
commission
and
the
council
were
notified
of
the
director's
minor
modification
to
move
one
level
of
underground
parking
from
one
building
to
another
building.
So
both
the
planning,
commission
and
council
were
notified
of
that.
So
I'll.
Let
the
staff
or
the
applicant
respond
to
the
density
bonus
question.
A
U
Mayor
paul
council
members,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
give
you
some
additional
information
beyond
what
staff
has
already
presented.
You've
heard
from
members
of
the
senior
community
that
we
have
been
working
with
over
the
last
year
and
I'd
like
to
just
start
out.
If
we
can
put
our
screen
share
up,
my
colleague,
cascade
zach,
will
share
her
screen
and
there's
a
couple
of
key
slides.
That
we'd
like
to
include
is
that
possible
that
while
I'm
talking,
she
can
share
her
screen.
A
She
should
be
able
to
as
an
analyst
all
right.
U
Well,
anyway,
while
she's
trying
to
put
that
up,
let
me
say
that,
a
year
ago,
when
the
project,
the
master
plan
for
cooper,
westport
cupertino,
was
processed
and
approved
by
the
council,
we
had
not
yet
finalized
our
business
relationship
with
kt
urban.
The
master
plan
developer
as
soon
as
we
did
get
involved
later.
U
Last
year
and
early
into
this
year,
we
began
working
with
the
members
of
the
senior
community,
including
age,
friendly
cupertino,
and
a
number
of
the
changes
that
you
have
been
presented
today,
derived
from
feedback
that
we
got
from
members
of
the
senior
community,
who
potentially
would
be
the
residents
that
this
project
is
serving
next
slide.
Please,
just
very
briefly,
I
am
a
principal
in
the
related
companies
of
california,
and
I
am
with
my
colleague
mark
alexander
from
atria.
U
We
have
partnered
on
this
and
a
number
of
other
projects
around
the
country,
we're
very
experienced
developers
of
multi-family
housing
having
built
over
17
000
units
in
california,
of
which
twelve
thousand
are
affordable.
We
are
arguably
one
of
the
largest
affordable
housing
developers
in
the
country,
so
we're
very
familiar
with
the
bmr
requirements
for
financing.
U
If
the
is
interested
next
slide,
please,
as
was
commented
on
atria,
is
one
of
the
largest,
if
not
the
largest
operators
of
senior
assisted
living
in
the
country
with
over
400
communities,
and
we
are
pleased
to
have
mark
alexander
here
to
speak
to
some
of
the
operational
needs
of
this
building,
which
are
very
different
than
a
traditional
multi-family
building,
as
I
think
has
been
preliminarily
expressed
next
slide,
please.
U
So
I
just
want
to
set
the
tone
for
why
these
modifications
have
come
before
the
council.
This
evening
I
mentioned
that
when
the
project
was
approved,
we
were
just
starting
to
get
involved
with
the
design
of
the
building.
We,
the
building,
had
previously
been
planned
as
a
condominium
building
and
we've
maintained
the
exterior
and
massing
and
architecture
of
that
building
without
any
significant
changes,
but
the
interior
of
it
functions
quite
differently.
U
U
Legally
and
we've
provided
the
council
a
a
letter
from
our
outside
counter
from
atria's
outside
counsel,
explaining
that
the
department
of
social
services
regulates
these
assisted
living
facilities
in
california
and
legally,
we
could
not
operate
the
dining
room
as
a
public
dining
room.
That
letter
is
attached
to
this
presentation
from
that
derives
the
reduction
in
parking
again.
These
were
not
decisions
made
by
us
to
make
the
building
cheaper,
less
operationally
pragmatic
in
any
way,
but
to
make
the
building
possible.
U
Because,
frankly,
the
way
the
building
was
approved
last
year
would
not
have
been
legally
possible
to
operate.
But
maybe,
more
importantly
than
all
of
that
is
the
fact
that
we
have
a
philosophy.
An
atria
has
a
philosophy
of
wanting
to
integrate
our
building
and
our
residents
into
the
larger
community
in
which
the
site
is
located
and
really
there
is
no
better
site
in
the
south
bay
than
this
site.
U
For
that,
for
the
reasons
that
we'll
go
through
in
a
minute
as
part
of
our
effort
to
make
the
building
better,
not
worse,
we've
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
to
our
immediate
neighbors
at
the
ends
of
college
and
the
senior
center.
And,
as
I
mentioned,
the
age
friendly,
cupertino
task
force,
and
one
of
the
comments
that
came
out
which
you'll
see
on
the
next
slide
is
the
ability
to
draw
the
public
into
the
central
green
of
the
westport
project.
U
But
it's
also
true
that
the
ten
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
that
faces
stephens
creek
and
around
the
corner
to
mary
avenue
will
really
be
very
useful
retail
to
bring
the
public
into
the
central
green,
which
is
really
the
ideal
place
to
integrate
our
residents.
The
townhouse
and
row
house
residents,
the
apartment
residents
above
us
and
members
of
the
larger
community
in
the
senior
center
next
slide.
Please.
U
The
green
arrows
attempt
to
show
how
the
public
at
large
would
flow
through
the
retail
in
the
stephens
creek
portion
of
our
building
on
the
ground
floor
into
the
central
green
from
the
townhouses
and
the
bmr
building
across
the
street,
which
is
a
relatively
modest
40
or
50
foot
wide
street
and
from
the
senior
center
on
the
other
side
of
mary
avenue,
into
our
retail,
along
stevens
creek
and
into
and
through
the
building
into
the
green
next
slide.
Please.
U
Now
I
think
this
slide
really
tells
in
more
detail
addresses
some
of
the
questions
that
were
raised.
We
have
added
not
subtracted,
but
added
features
since
last
summer,
when
the
project,
the
master
plan,
was
approved.
The
first
thing
we've
done
as
a
staff
member
mentioned
is:
we've
increased
the
amount
of
retail
facing
onto
stephens,
creek
and
mary
avenue,
so
we
now
exceed
the
code
requirements
harder
of
the
city
requirements
both
on
the
stevens
creek
side
and
also
on
the
central
green
side.
U
Yes,
the
piece
that
was
in
blue
on
the
slide
on
the
left
as
a
in
theory,
publicly
owned
a
publicly
accessible
dining
room,
is
now
no
longer
publicly
accessible,
but
that's
because
it
legally
cannot
be.
However,
all
of
the
retail
along
stevens
creek,
and
we
believe
a
good
portion
of
it
could
be
food
and
beverage
would
have
the
ability
to
have
outside
al
fresco,
dining
on
the
central,
green
and
also
along
the
landscaped
area,
on
the
mary
avenue
side
of
the
project
adjacent
to
what
we
would
expect
to
be
a
cafe.
U
U
U
Parking
is
reduced,
but
still
meets
the
code
and
it's
reduced
because
the
dining
room
was
previously
considered
to
be
open
to
the
public
now
will
be
used
by
the
residents
whose
parking
requirements
have
been
accounted
for
already
in
the
parking
requirements
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
shows
what
you've
already
seen
from
staff,
where
the
parking
would
go
with
respect
to
the
stackers.
I
want
to
address
a
question
that
was
raised.
U
The
residents
and
their
visitors
will
be
provided
parking.
One
hundred
percent
provided
by
a
valet
employed
by
by
the
operation
of
the
building
the
retail
parking
will
be
on
the
street
next
slide.
Please,
so
anybody
coming
to
the
center
to
shop
will
be
parked
self-parked
on
the
street
in
the
space
is
shown
in
orange.
Space
is
shown
in
blue
here
and
on
the
previous
slide
are
the
spaces
for
the
bmr
building
and
again
the
decision
to
move
that
parking
from
under
the
bmr
building
to
our
building
was
not
initiated
by
us.
U
We've
agreed
to
accommodate
that
and
my
understanding
was.
It
was
a
way
to
make
the
bmr
building
more
affordable
to
build
next
slide.
Please,
in
the
short
time
that
I
have
left
I'd
just
like
to
speak
to
the
other
two
issues
that
were
raised
here
about
unit
mix,
changing
again
to
build
a
building
like
this
for
the
next
30
40
50
years
to
serve
the
residents
of
cupertino.
U
It
would
only
make
sense
to
build
what
the
market
demands
and
the
market
demands
have
changed
over
many
years
as
been
as
members
of
age.
Family
cupertino
have
pointed
out,
both
with
respect
to
the
size
of
the
units,
the
desire
for
more
two-bedroom
units
and
the
type
of
units
memory
care,
both
of
which
are
under-supplied
in
the
south
bay
and
specifically
in
cupertino.
U
A
Okay,
thank
you
matt
and
mark.
Let's
go
ahead
and
bring
this
back
to
council
for
any
further
questions
or
comments.
A
A
D
A
A
Well,
I'm
calling
for
a
motion.
If
no
one
brings
forward
emotion,
then
we'll
have
another
round
of
commentary.
I
A
Okay,
very
good,
so
the
order
was
vice
mayor
ciao,
followed
by
council
member
willie
and
councilman
roy
vice
mayor
ciao.
E
Okay,
so
I'll
share
something
just
the
staff
mentioned:
oh
I'm,
muted,
right
yeah,
so
the
staff
mentioned
a
notice.
It's
sent
to
the
council
and
planning
commission
about
the
my
director's
minor
modification
on
july
1st.
I
looked
it
up.
This
was
in
my
email
from
this
description.
E
From
from
this
description
to
consolidate
under
building
one,
what's
building
one
of
the
west
mount
project
anyway,
from
the
description
I
couldn't
tell
what
is
this
consolidation
and
I
click
on
the
link.
It
goes
to
some
page
that
doesn't
lead
me
anywhere.
E
That's
the
notification
we
got
so
what
we
have
here
is
I
try
to
figure
out.
Okay,
what
exactly
is
required
under
the
heart
of
the
city,
75
of
the
frontage
of
the
entire
project,
so
the
atria
part
is
not
one
project.
It's
part
of
the
entire
westport
project,
75
percent
frontage,
is
about
the
red
part.
E
That's
split
between
building
one
and
two,
but
it's
a
part
of
it
should
be
the
frontage
of
the
town
homes
around
houses,
but
then
they
are
all
now
concentrated
on
the
two
building
on
the
right
and
since
some
cannot
be
so
100
percent
of
building
two
and
building
one
are
frontage,
but
that
doesn't
mean
it
complies
with
the
code
because
it's
supposed
to
be
75
of
the
entire
project
as
a
result
on
part
of
the
retail
was
put
along
mary
and
according
to
the
staff,
the
total
square,
footage
of
the
red
part
and
the
red
part
and
the
and
the
approved
web
by
moving
it
to
the
merry
is
compatible
to
the
actual
requirement.
E
So
the
blue
one
is
required
to
comply
with
the
heart
of
the
city,
so
the
atria
project
alone,
even
though
100
frontiers
along
stephens
creek,
is
retail.
It
does
not
comply
with
the
code
because
you
are
not
a
stand-alone
project
and
as
a
stand-alone
project
you
are
supposed
to
include
the
15
bmr
units
which
built
into
the
sun
include.
So
it
does
not
comply
with
the
code,
and
so
I
so
I
looked
at
okay.
E
E
It
mentioned
restaurant,
slash,
dining,
maybe,
but
then,
from
the
approved
plan
you
can
see
very
clearly
the
restaurant,
the
coffee,
the
retail,
are
retail
for
the
public,
and
you
can
see
that
the
lobby
of
the
senior
building
is
there
and
then
they're
supposed
to
take
the
elevator
to
the
second
floor
and
that's
assisted
living.
E
It
always
mentioned
they
go
for
the
retail
commercial
space,
and
then
it
mentions
specifically
that
the
corner
of
mary
avenue
at
stephens
creek
provide
this
very
promising
corner
of
inviting
mate
on
viable
retail,
because
people
can
see
from
memorial
park.
There
is
retail
that
would
draw
them
to
the
corner
and
then
draw
them
to
the
retail
on
the
stephen's
creek.
But
if
you
remove
the
marriage
card
that
might
make
the
stevens
quick
section
of
the
retail
not
reasonable
by
public,
so
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
well
what
solution
is
there?
E
Because
I
would
really,
I
really
want
to
have
a
senior
housing
project
and
I
to
understand
this
is
something
the
community
really
need.
So
I
looked
at
the
amenity
space.
That's
provided
this
project
has
amenities
space
on
the
second
floor,
about
40
4
600
square
feet
of
space
for
the
the
memory
care
unit.
They
have
dining
and
kitchen
and
community,
and
then
this
on
the
sixth
floor
on
the
right
is
the
sixth
floor
amenity
space
for
the
atria
building.
E
That's
about
twelve
thousand
square
feet!
Minus!
Oh,
that's
a
proof!
One!
Sorry!
This
is
a
proved
one
and
on
the
right
is
the
approved
one
on
the
left
is
the
bmr
building,
as
you
can
compare,
there
is
a
very
a
disparity
of
administer
space
available
for
the
bmr
and
then
the
the
atria
building,
and
so
I
looked
at
the
approved
one
in
the
proof.
This.
A
Is
a
modified
one,
your
comments
have
or
they're
kind
of
they're
pushing
five
minutes
at
this
point.
Do
you
okay,
so.
E
Then
I'll
I'll
top
this
and
save
the
rest
for
the
other
I'll
end
here.
So
I'm
proposing
this
is
a
modified
plan.
On
the
sixth
floor,
they
have
added
actually
extra
immunity
space,
but
then
I
see
there
is
a
library
and
two
lounge
area
these
two
area,
this
this
three
area
at
together
would
be
about
four
thousand
square
feet.
I
think
so
I
I
wonder
how
come
you
can.
E
I
think
the
dining
facility
can
be
placed
on
the
sixth
floor
with
the
rest
of
the
amenities
of
the
building,
and
that
still
make
this
a
really
top
of
the
line
building
with
theater
spa
fitness
wellness
and
a
ton
of
other
things.
There
is
really,
I
don't
see
a
need
for
taking
away
8
000
square
feet
from
the
retail
to
to
become
a
tiny.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor
ciao,
we
have
hands
raised
all
across
the
board
right
now,
they're
from
council
member
way,
councilmember
willie,
greg,
councilmember,
moore
and
matt
woody.
I
let
me
start
with
the
applicant
here
since
there
seems
to
be
some
commentary
directed
to
the
the
plan.
A
Matt
did
you
want
to
speak
to
the
vice
mayor's
comments?
A
moment
ago,.
U
Yes,
yes,
yes,
I
would
well
only
to
point
out
that
a
couple
of
things,
first
of
all,
with
all
due
respect,
we
are
not
in
a
position
to
have
a
building
that
is
very
complicated
to
operate,
be
redesigned
in
a
through
zoom
in
five
minutes,
and
there
are
very
specific
practical
realities
to
serving
this
particular
type
of
resident,
one
of
which,
which
is
the
reason
that
the
restaurant
cannot
be
on
the
sixth
floor,
is
that
the
kitchen
which
has
to
serve
the
restaurants
and
also
has
to
serve
the
residents,
also
has
to
serve
the
residents
on
the
second
floor
in
memory
care
and
also
has
to
be
accessible
from
the
ground
floor
loading.
U
If
the
city
does
the
research,
as
I'm
sure
they
have
done
and
council
members,
we've
tried
to
reach
out
to
and
provide
as
much
information
as
we
can
knows
that
between
our
company
related
in
atria,
we
build
very
high
quality
buildings
and
we
intend
to
do
the
same
here,
but
we
are
not
in
a
position
to
redesign
the
building
over
zoom
in
a
public
hearing.
I'm
sorry
to
say.
A
Okay,
so
I
have
hands
raised
from
well.
Let
me
go
to
our
city
staff
greg.
Did
you
want
to
make
a
comment
at
this
point.
F
Yes,
mr
mayor,
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
a
couple
points
and
I
look
forward
to
the
further
council
discussion
and
direction.
First,
the
link
that
was
sent
to
the
council
and
planning
commission
on
july
first
was
active
and
operating
for
the
two
weeks
of
the
appeal
period
that
was
open
to
the
planning,
commission
and
council.
However,
the
link
to
the
same
documents
on
the
project
website
has
remained
operating
ever
since
and
was
re-emailed
to
the
council.
A
A
So
so
at
this
point
let
me
let
me
go
back
to
council.
Let's
see
if
we
can
wrap
some
comments
at
this
time
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
the
well
chris.
First
of
all,
do
you
have
something
that
you
want
to
point
out
from
a
legal
perspective.
J
Yeah
I
I
do
just
want
to
clarify
you
know
what
what
what
what
the
decision
is
before
council
and
and
what's
you
know
not
before
council,
so
there
is
there
there
is.
There
is
the
question
of
whether
a
modified
heart
of
the
city
exception
should
be
approved,
because
there
has
been
a
change
to
what
was
formerly
configured
as
a
retail
space
to
be
a
dining
area
that
won't
have
public
access.
So
that's
before
council
there
there
there
is
a
change
to
parking.
J
That's
before
council,
the
the
overall
affordability
level
of
the
project
or
the
density
bonus,
determination
or
not
before
so,
and
I
just
want
one
to
make
sure
that
that
was
clear.
You
know
what
what
what
the
decision
is
today.
So
thank
you.
Marilyn.
A
Thanks,
thank
you
for
that
yeah.
Thank
you
for
pointing
that
out.
First,
all
right,
I
you
know.
Let
me
let
me
see
if
the
other
applicant
representative
mark
tracini
did
you
want
to
say
something
before
we
bring
it
back
to
council
members,
willie
and
moore.
V
I
do
mr
mayor
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time,
and
I
appreciate
the
council's
questions
thus
far
this
evening.
I'd
like
to
address
councilmember,
moore's
question
first,
and
that
had
to
do
with
the
modification
of
the
parking
for
the
senior
affordable
senior
building.
That
was
a
directive
by
pacific
community
of
pacific
companies.
V
To
do
two
things.
One
is
to
speed
the
the
the
construction
time
frame
up
by
not
having
to
build
below
great
parking.
Two.
It
was
to
facilitate
getting
their
approval
this
year
from
the
state
with
the
ability
to
break
ground
in
january
of
this
coming
year.
So
the
project
has
been
fully
approved,
funded
construction
funding
in
place.
V
We
will
be
donating
the
land
to
pacific
companies
with
parcel
c
with
the
granting
of
parcel
c
to
pacific
companies,
and
they
will
be
in
the
position
of
starting
construction
without
having
a
senior
operator
assistedly
living
operator
identified
and
fully
funded.
We
didn't
know
what
time
frame,
nor
did
pacific
companies
know
what
time
frame.
Building
number
one
would
be
built
as
matt
widdius
suggested.
V
V
V
I
made
the
wrong
assumption
with
the
architect
and
design
team
to
show
it
as
a
restaurant,
not
knowing
that
it
could
not
be
open
to
the
public.
Kt
urban
has
never
built
an
assisted
living
project
in
the
33
years
that
we've
been
together
as
kt
urban
in
cupertino,
so
I'll
take
the
responsibility
for
that.
It
wasn't
to
try
to
show
somebody
more
retail
than
what
we
intended
to
build.
It
was
shown
as
a
restaurant
area
to
be
used
by
the
assisted
living
facility,
and
it
was
clear
cleared
that
evening
to
me
and
I'm
unfortunate.
V
It
wasn't
clear
to
some
others
on
whether
or
not
that
discussion
was
had,
but
it
was
had,
and
we
have
the
the
actual
description
of
that
public
hearing
transcribed
very
clearly
that
that
was
discussed
in
this
case.
Atria
and
related
will
not
build
the
project,
if
required,
to
build
a
restaurant
in
that
location.
V
V
The
parking
that
they
have
provided,
which
is
surface
parking,
is
a
much
greater
distance
than
what
we're
showing
here
on
the
parking
between
building
number
one
and
building
number
two.
It
works
for
them.
They've
been
in
that
facility
for
two
years,
it's
a
wonderfully
run
facility,
but
it's
a
surface
park
facility
building
number
two
will
be
built
and
when
it
is
built,
it
will
not
have
parking
underneath
it.
So
if
we
don't
approve
building
number
one
tonight
with
atrium
related
kt
urban
will
have
that
site
and
decide
what
it
is.
V
It
will
want
to
build
on
a
go
forward
basis,
but
it
won't
include
parking
under
building
number
two,
because
that
building
will
be
underway
and
be
completed.
My
estimate
will
be
completed
in
18
months.
So
that's
what
I
wanted
to
mention
tonight.
It
isn't
a
payton
switch.
It's
a
beautifully
designed
project.
V
D
D
Acceptance
of
six
stories
straight
up
at
the
sidewalk,
even
on
el
camino,
we
don't
see
that,
but
that's
okay,
the
overall
package
and
I
want
to
say
again
again:
we
approved
it
and
I
do
respect
matt
witt
engineer
to
engineer
you.
You
don't
make
these
massive
changes
in
a
zoom
meeting.
Why
are
we
here?
Making
these
massive
changes
in
a
zoom
movie.
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
Hey,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
so
I
don't
see
chris,
but
I
do
disagree
with
our
our
city
attorney
that
this
that
about
not
revisiting
density
bonus
on
this
project,
because
the
the
number
of
units
has
changed,
and
so
we
have
a
base
density.
We
have
the
the
qualified
density
bonus
of
38
little
over
38
percent.
I'm
getting
94
density
bonus
units
per
our
municipal
code,
we're
supposed
to
have
those
density
bonus
units
labeled.
B
I
also
don't
understand
what
the
affordability
is
beyond
the
very
low
income
units
which
they
use
to
qualify
for
the
density
bonus
units
because
there's
still
a
handful
of
affordable
units
left
over.
I
don't
know
what
affordability
those
are
at
and
it's
you
know
it's
deeply
troubling
for
our
community
when
we
have
huge
arena
numbers
which
need
to
be
met
and
we
have
a
developer
who
is
using
density
bonus
law
to
it
was
my
understanding
to
to
reduce
the
parking
standards
for
the
bmr
units.
This
this
most
recent
go
around
to
0.5
per
unit.
B
That
looked
like
a
reduction,
it's
hard
for
me
to
even
tell
I
no
offense
to
staff,
but
this
is
very
difficult
plan
set
and
group
of
documents
to
to
go
through
now.
I've
gone
back
to
understand
how
we
were
supposed
to
have
divined
the
underground
parking
changes
and
I'm
looking
at
the
the
september
7th
2021
set
of
plans,
and
we
approved
a
vesting
tentative
map
which
showed
the
original
dashed
line
for
the
parking
garage
showing
under
both
buildings.
B
That's
what
we
approved
and
then
there
is
no
underground
line
shown
on
the
final
map
which
we
approved.
So
if
you,
if
staff
is
trying
to
tell
city
council
and
the
planning
commission
that
a
link
in
a
june
email
is
in,
is
an
approval
and
the
way
by
the
way,
those
those
director
minor
modifications
show
up
to
us
in
our
outlook.
Emails
is
that
we
only
see
the
words
directors,
minor
modification
and
a
couple
of
letters
of
the
next
of
the
next
item.
B
So
there's
no
actual
flagging
to
us
about
it
and,
as
the
vice
mayor
said,
it
was
for
the
westmont
project,
which
I
am
unfamiliar
with.
Okay,
so
I
I
I
I'm
just
flabbergasted
so
we
approved
a
vesting
tentative
map
with
a
full-sized
parking
garage
line
shown
and
then
we've
approved
a
final
map.
So
to
me,
that's
what
we
thought
we
were
going
to
get.
B
B
C
Okay,
so
one
clarification
I
like
to
make
it
is
when
I
approve
that
building
one
a
building,
two
modification,
I
knew
exactly
that
the
parking
is
the
underground
parking
is
not
there.
I
saw
that
language
and
I
we
asked
the
questions
I
actually
asked.
Why
do
we
need
to?
You
know,
get
rid
of
the
underground
parking
and
the
answer
was
they
have
to
because
of
financing.
They
have
to
break
ground
and
then
they,
if
they
do
the
underground
parking,
they
could
not
break
ground.
C
So
I
don't
know
what
why
my
fellow
council
members
did
not
know
about
it,
but
I
didn't
know
about
it.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that,
and
the
second
is
we're
talking
about
a
project
that
do
we
want
it
or
not,
because
I
did
every
time
I
you
know.
If
a
developer
approaches
me,
they
want
to
explain
things,
so
I
would
also
accept
it.
I
would
ask
detailed
questions,
so
I
did
meet
with
had
a
half
an
hour
presentation
yesterday
morning.
C
I
believe,
okay
and
I
asked
a
lot
of
questions
and
so
that
I
want
to
be
clear
what
where,
where
the
changes
are.
So
I
am
actually
really
okay
with
having
a
more
two
bedroom
apart,
two
units
in
the
assisted
living
and
also
have
less
have
more
memory
care
because
that's
a
need
and
they
did
talk
to
residents
who
are
seniors.
Okay,
who
really
knows
what
seniors
need
in
our
cuputino
area?
And
I
understand
the
ratio.
Compatible
ratio
has
changed
because
of
this,
but
the
48
units
of
bmr
units
have
not
changed.
C
So
I
I
am
okay
with
that.
I
believe
it's
a
change
is
beneficial
to
cupertino's
seniors
and
the
bmi
unionist
has
not
changed
so
I'm
okay
with
that
racial
disparity,
because
unless
we
wanted
to
change
back
last
memory,
carry
unionist
original
plan,
which
is
not
good
for
our
community,
and
I
do
trust
agents-
is
a
very
there's.
Some
research,
very
reliable,
very
good
assistance
living
facility
and
they
will
provide
first
grade
facility
for
our
seniors.
C
I
I
I
am
concerned
about
the
the
retail,
the
losing
of
8
000
square,
footage
of
retail
or
7200
around
that
range
for
the
restaurant.
So
I
did
ask
them
how
you
can
compensate
for
that
for
that
and
I
believe
what
my
answer
was
answer.
Like
they
are
going
to
open
up
the
central
lung
for
outdoor
dining
facilities,
so
that
would
add
back
some
retail.
You
know
dining
retail
spaces.
I
I
didn't
quite
get
confirmation
tonight,
but
that's
when
I
asked
the
questions
that
you
know.
C
We
really
don't
want
to
lose
so
much
retail
on
on
this
facility,
especially
seniors,
want
to
you,
know,
mingle
and
then
people
who
live
in
the
condominiums
town
homes,
mama
mingo.
C
You
know
in
the
great
long
in
a
big
long
and
what
I
asked
they
said,
they're
going
to
add
back
more
retail
on
the
central
lawn
so
and
and
they
are
going
to
work
with
the
senior
centers
so
that
they
can
walk
away
through
the
buildings
they're
going
to
make
that
work,
even
though
they
you
know
somehow
they're
gonna
make
that
work,
so
so
that
I
think
that's
the
part
we
can
kind
of
say
they're
trying
to
accommodate.
C
I
do
know
that
we
need
to
trust
a
company
that
knows
how
to
do
assist
living
and
we
can't
be.
You
know
mandating
you
do
this
and
that,
and
I
don't
understand
how
the
business
I'm
not
saying
that
this
is
a
hundred
percent
great
product.
It's
a
great
project.
If
you
look
at
what
they
talk
to
our
seniors
group,
the
senior
group
in
our
community
likes
this
and
knows
that
it
is
needed.
So
I
I
get
it
we.
I
I
wasn't
on
council
when
this
plan
was
approved.
C
So,
but
if
you
look
at
the
overall
plan
to
me,
it
is
a
needed
project
for
our
seniors
and
we
have
below
market
rate.
It's
going
to
be,
it's
approved,
it's
going
to
be
billed
and
then
this
assists
living
with
memory
care
is
really
what
cupertino
needs
and
overall
I
believe
it's
still
a
pretty
good
project
for
our
community.
It
satisfied
our
needs.
You
know,
maybe
because
I
wasn't
unoriginal
approving
council,
so
I
maybe
was
not
that
disappointed,
because
I'm
looking
at
the
new
project
so
that
that
is
my
take.
C
A
Okay,
thank
you
councilmember
way.
I'm
gonna
reiterate
the
request
for
a
motion
at
this
point,
so
vice
mayor
ciao,
your
hand
is
raised,
as
is
council
member
morse,
who
just
lowered
her
hand
vice
mayor
chow.
Will
you
put
forward
a
motion
for
us
to
continue
further
discussion.
A
A
A
E
First,
I'd
like
to
I
didn't
meet
with
atria
and
last
monday
and
asked
for
a
lot
of
information.
I'd
like
to
thank
them
for
providing
me
a
lot
of
information,
for
example,
and
I'd
like
to
know
what
whether
there
are
other
facilities
also
provided
a
dining
facility
that
large
and
it's
actually
true
there.
San
francisco
and
san
jose
facilities
also
have
dining
and
even
private
dining
rooms,
that's
comparable
to
what
they
are
proposing
here,
maybe
a
little
smaller
but
comparable,
and
I
I
asked
for
other
information.
They
were
very
forthcoming
with
information.
E
I'd
like
to
thank
them
for
that.
I
really
really
really
hope.
I
can
approve
this
project,
but
then
the
more
I
look
into
it.
The
more
I'm
concerned
and
I'd
like
to
thank
mark
mark
toussini.
He
I
feel
that
he's
pretty
straightforward
and
that
he
really
honestly
didn't
know-
and
I
it's
really
converts
comforting
to
know
that
the
bmr
building
will
be
built
first
before
the
town
house
and
the
row
houses,
and
he
will
honor
that
that's
in
the
conditions
of
approval
and
that's
really
comforting
to
know
that.
E
However,
I'm
struggling
with
the
the
how
who
would
whether
this
let
me
share
my
screen
so
I'm
trying
to
decide
whether
what
would
be
the
price
range,
because
I
feel
like
people
propose,
the
project
will
approve
them
and
then
they
come
back
say
we
need
the
bigger
units,
but
bigger
units
means
more
expensive
units
too
and
then
I'm
concerned
are
they?
Would
cupertino
residents
be
able
to
afford
these
units
or
are
they?
Are
we
building
units
where
menlo
park
and
alto
people
will
come
here
to
live?
But
then
cupertino
residents
will
be
priced
out.
E
E
E
E
It's
just
going
to
be
even
the
san
jose
one,
which
is
smaller
than
the
approved
and
smaller
than
the
modified.
They
are
starting
at
5,
000,
8,
000,
11,
000
and
the
more
bigger
the
units,
the
newer
it
is,
it's
going
to
be
more
expensive
and
more
amenity.
Space
also
means
the
price
will
go
up
and
this
is
not
affordable.
This
is
a
luxury
senior
housing,
yeah
senior
housing
is
in
demand,
but
people
who
can
afford
very
luxurious
senior
living
probably
can
have
a
lot
of
options.
E
So
then
it's
mentioned
that
all
the
I
proposed
to
to
move
the
dining
facility
to
the
sixth
floor.
It's
it
said
all
the
memory
care
unit
on
second
floor
also
need
kitchen,
but
I'm
sorry.
This
is
the
modified
plant
on
the
second
floor
memory
care
unit.
They
do
have
dining
and
kitchen
and
the
other
activity
area
all
for
4
600
square
feet,
which
I
mentioned
earlier.
So
they
have
a
kitchen
on
the
second
floor.
E
They
don't
need
to
share
the
kitchen
on
the
sixth
floor,
where
the
amenities
and
also,
I
wonder,
what's
each
year's
contribution
for
bmr
components,
so
they
are
willing
to
build
the
ground
floor
retail
and
if
they
were
a
standalone
project,
they
are
supposed
to
provide
15
bmr,
but
the
the
earlier
version
of
the
project
actually
had
a
few
bmr
units
on
in
the
second
building
waste
and
in
the
building
one
with
market
rate.
But
then
we
are
told
a
market
rate
and
bmr
cannot
mix
for
senior
somehow
it
doesn't
work.
E
So
this
another
virgin,
all
the
bmi
is
squeezed
into
building
two.
So
building
one
has
only
market
rate.
Now,
then,
my
question
is:
what's
the
contribution
of
the
market
rate
developer
to
the
bmr
units,
because
if
I
calculate
the
number
of
units
for
15
bmr
to
be
provided,
that's
about
41
of
the
entire
bmr
building.
That
means
atria
should
be
providing
41
percent
of
the
funding
for
the
bmr
building.
Are
they
providing
that?
I'm
not
sure?
And
so.
A
Why
don't
you
stop
there
vice
mayor
and
give
the
applicant
a
chance
to
to
to
address
your
commentary,
and
I
note
that
greg
also
has
raised
so
mark
alexander
from
the
the
applicant
side?
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
the
vice
mayor's
comments?
There.
W
Yes,
thank
you,
mayor
paul
and
vice
mayor
ciao
spoke
to
you
actually
a
few
days
ago.
So
a
couple
of
couple
comments
I'll
make
on
on
some
of
the
information
that
was
just
thrown
up
on
the
screen
relative
to
just
market
rates.
W
Our
market
rates
are
two
things
predominantly
not
just
in
in
the
bay
area,
but
anywhere
we
operate
or
a
function
of
obviously
supply,
but
also
the
housing
values,
and
I
I
would
you
just
tell
you
from
my
experience,
having
been
with
the
company
almost
24
years
and
literally
been
in
hundreds
of
of
communities
of
our
communities
and
competitive
communities
that
you
know
cooper,
t
cupertino
has
as
you
all.
W
As
you
all
know,
I
don't
have
to
tell
you,
but
has
has
one
of
the
highest
housing
values
in
anywhere
in
the
country,
and
those
rates
are
a
function
of
housing
values
effectively.
W
That's
that's
generally
how
most
people
pay
for
assisted
living
is
the
is
the
home
equity
that
they've
created
over
time
on
a
separate
just
comment
on
bmr,
so
I
I
will
just
draw
a
quick
analogy
to
a
project
that
we
did
not
very
far
away
in
foster
city
with
the
city
of
foster
city
actually
was
the
last
sort
of
you
know
undeveloped,
parcel
in
foster
city.
W
It
was
a
mixed-use
master
plan
focused
on
seniors
and
it's
it's
turned
out
extremely
well,
but
one
of
the
things
that
is
very
comparable
here
is
the
the
building
that
there
was
a
separate
senior
focused,
bmr
building,
which
is
exactly
what
this
project
has
and
there.
Yes,
there
was
retail
and
there
is
retail
in
in
those
in
our
building
on
as
well
as
in
the
bmr
building,
so
it
all
works
together.
I
think
is
the
is
my
way
of
for
responding
to
the
you
know.
Bmr.
I
W
W
You
know,
programming
with
de
anza
the
fact
that
we
can
actually
create
such
a
good
connection
with
the
city.
It's
it's
just
an
ideal
spot,
and
you
know
I
think,
just
because
there
is
not
a
retail
component
on
that
specific
square
footage.
To
me,
I
understand
that's
a
very
important
to
to
the
city
commissioners,
but
our
our
residents,
you
know
dining
isn't,
is
a
hugely
important
part
of
their
their.
You
know
what
they're
paying
for.
W
I
think
it
would
be
a
very
big
detriment
to
our
residents
and
and
having
had
my
own
experience
with
my
own,
my
mother,
living
in
assisted
living
for
over
10
years.
You
know
having
a
dining
room
up
in
in
higher
in
a
community,
it
segregates
the
residents
from
really
day-to-day
life
and
that's
the
opposite
of
what
what
we
want
to
do.
W
So
I
I
feel
strongly
that
that
it's
a
better
location
and-
and
obviously
you
all
know
what
we've
already
we've
already
said
about
the
just
the
dss
regulations,
which
is
the
governing
body
for
assisted
living,
just
the
requirements
that
we
part
of
what
we
have
to
do
is
provide
dining
for
for
everyone,
and
we
we
want
to
have
lots
of
good
visitors
and
guests
for
our
residents.
W
We,
we
are
very
committed
to
the
communities
that
we
operate
in,
look
forward
to
programming
and
partnering
with
with
with
the
senior
center
indiana
and
other
organizations.
I
think
what
we're
asking
for
actually
is.
You
know
that
the
it's
a
it's
a
function
of
what
the
market
is
looking
for,
there's
only
27
two
bedrooms
in
cupertino
we're
adding
a
few
more
two
bedrooms
and
the
memory
care
we've
already
all
talked
about
the
the
under
supply
in
the
market.
W
So
this,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
just
balance
in
what
mark
tracini
said
and
what
the
reality
is.
Is
we
came
into
this
late?
Certainly
it's
unfortunate
that
that
happened
that
there
was
a
you
know,
difference
of
of
of
this
dining
facility
being
open
to
the
public,
but
there
certainly
is
not
a
baiting
switch,
and
I
wanted
you
for
council
member
more.
We
are
committed
to
you
know
that
central
green
would
be
absolutely
open
and
we
will
we
will.
F
Yes,
thank
you,
and
I
think
it
unexpectedly
follows
perfectly
on
mr
alexander's
comment.
F
I
came
to
this
city
with
about
a
third
of
my
career
in
land
use,
development
and
environmental
protection
and
preservation,
a
third
of
my
career
directly
in
politics,
working
for
elected
officials
and
a
third
of
my
career
in
city
management,
and
I
see
that
we're
devolving
away
from
a
policy
discussion
into
facts
and
details
and
designing
from
the
dais
or
staff
bashing
or
applicant
bashing
and
the
like,
and
I
think
we're
missing
the
real
policy
issues
that
are
before
the
council.
F
The
other
extreme
is
to
say
this
is
too
different
than
what
we
saw
before
for
whatever
series
of
reasons,
and
we
want
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board,
potentially
with
a
different
applicant
and
a
different
operator.
Because
who
knows,
if
you
know
they've
already
said,
they're
not
willing
to
tweak
from
the
desk
and
who
knows
what
will
come
back
when
for
this
project?
F
You
know,
conditions
that
make
the
public
green
public
space
that
guarantees
that
the
retail
along
stephens
creek
boulevard
can
use
that
space
in
the
back
for
seating
and
tables
to
make
it
energizable
space
that
meets
the
public
need,
are
there
opportunities,
and
is
that
really
the
core
public
issue
that
the
council
should
be
exploring
now,
rather
than
attacking
the
applicant
attacking
maintenance
with
attacking
whether
it
said
westport
in
the
subject
line
or
in
the
body
of
the
memo?
Those
are
secondary
issues
that
are
irrelevant
to
the
policy
issues
before
the
council.
F
Do
you
want
the
project
to
go
forward?
Do
you
want
the
project
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board,
or
is
there
some
place
in
the
middle
that
you
can
meet
your
policy
need
of
ensuring
the
public
access
you
want
for
this
project?
That
seems
to
me
to
be
the
core
question,
and
only
you
can
answer
it.
I'll
be
quiet.
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
go
on
to
councilmember
moore.
B
Okay
yeah
thank
you,
mayor
paul
for
for
bringing
back
to
council
for
for
discussion,
and
I'm
I'm
wondering
how
open
the
the
remainder
of
this
discussion
is.
B
I
actually
think
this
should
probably
have
gone
to
planning
and
I
would
actually
prefer
that
it
goes
back
to
planning
and
have
them
make
comments
about
it
before
it
returns
to
us.
I'm
getting
you
know,
I
get
the
requests
from
the
the
press
from
the
mercury
news
wanting
to
talk
about
how
we're
anti-housing
for
this
project.
B
They
could
have
337
units
on
it
with
the
amount
of
affordable
bmr
that
they
have
instead,
the
last
time
we
had
267
units
now
we're
down
to
259
units.
B
B
I
believe
it
was
at
the
forum
and
their
dining
facility
is
on
the
second
floor
and
and
that's
a
very
large
facility
up
there,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
that
I
that
I'm
in
agreement
with
the
argument
to
not
have
that
on
the
second
floor-
and
it's
always
troubled
me
that
so
few
of
the
density
bonus
units
were
utilized
in
this
project
and
so
much
height
was
requested
and
that
so
much
height.
Because
I
didn't.
I
didn't
approve
this
project.
It
came
to
the
previous
city
council.
B
So
what
I
approved
was
a
tentative
map
which
had
a
parking
layout
that
I'm
the
one
that
I
prefer.
So
I
I
didn't
approve
that
previous
project.
I
felt
that
more
height
was
being
requested
and
stacked
against
mary,
and
I
and
I've
always
questioned
if
that
was
really
a
legitimate
use
of
of
the
the
height
waiver,
because
you
had
the
low
townhouses
to
the
west,
and
it
has
also
always
troubled
me
that
we
didn't
get
dispersal
into
the
townhouses.
B
With
regards
to
our
dispersal
requirements-
and
so
I
question
what
what
we're
doing
to
the
the
48
senior
units
without
the
parking
in
the
basement,
underground
parking
like
the
market
rate
units
have-
and
I
and
I'm
not
a
fan
of
the
stacker
units
as
well,
but
but
if
we're
being
questioned
about
if
we're
anti-housing,
it
seems
as
though
we're
allowing
the
developer
on
this
particular
project
to
use
density,
bonus
law
and
not
take
the
density
bonus
units.
B
D
D
An
attorney
a
phd,
a
licensed
civil
licensed
engineer,
another
licensed
civil
engineer,
what
we're
bringing
the
the
true
essence
of
why
the
residents
put
us
on
this
city
council
to
to
make
sure
that
were
were
listening
to
the
community.
D
And
I
think
we're
open
to
even
more
changes
engineering
it
constantly
evolved,
but
it
needs
to
evolve
in
a
fair
way,
and
so
I
I
would
hope
that
when
changes
come
back
it,
it
truly
does
look
like
a
fair
exchange.
We
have
64
000
residents
in
cupertino
and
they
deserve
to
be
a
part
of
these
discussions.
D
D
Well,
what
here
we
we
went
and
visited
santa
clara
square
and
we
talked
to
the
developer
there
and
he
had
out-of-the-box
thinking
where
he
said
that
for
saratoga
square
santa
clara
square,
they
didn't
want
the
bmr
units
to
be
in
that
high-tech
environment
there.
So
they
bought
another
piece
of
land
and
then
had
that
developed
as
the
year
their
below
market
rate
units
by
a
different
developer.
D
E
E
So
how
come
the
number
of
units
wasn't
doubled
or
we
were
struggling
with
whether
to
bring
a
project
that
was
almost
double
the
heights
initially
with
like
five
extra
units
out
of
and
but
eventually
we
really
want
to
put
to
approve
the
project.
So
we
made
a
lot
of
concession.
These
are
a
list
of
concessions.
We
made
45
feet
high.
We
allowed
it
to
almost
double
to
almost
80
feet
for
both
buildings
yeah,
it's
a
long
memory.
E
I
wish
the
higher
building
could
be
in
the
back,
but
developer
preferred
it
that
way,
and
then
the
slope
set
back.
We
allowed
that
to
be
almost
double
also
and
the
bmr
menu
especially
require
that
to
be
inclusionary
so
that
the
bmr
wristers
don't
feel
they.
They
are
cons.
They
are
living
in
a
poor
community,
so
but
then
because
they
they
want
to
put
only
produce
senior
bmr.
They
have
to
be
separate
and
therefore
we
couldn't
get
15
bmi
units
in
townhome
and
the
row
houses.
E
We
should
have
that
we
didn't
get
15
vmware
units
from
building
and
the
atria
building.
We
should
have
that
and
now
all
the
senior
bmi
is
concentrated
in
building
two
and
then
we
find
out
they
don't
even
get
their
underground
parking.
So
to
summarize,
what
would
motivate
this
kind?
We
really
we
are
profiting
the
project
with
all
good
intention.
We,
with
a
lot
of
we
gave
a
lot
of
room
so
that
we
can
approve
it,
and
now
we
got
a
lot
more
push
to
and
everything
that
they
request
will
make
their
project
more
profitable.
E
But
they
are
also
taking
away
things
from
cupertino
residents
yeah.
It
will
improve
the
quality
of
life
of
the
residents
in
atria
building,
but
then
is
taking
away
quality
of
life
of
the
residence
earth
in
that
area
and
all
of
cupertino
residents,
8
000
square
feet
of
restaurant
is
turned
into
private
dining.
That
means
more
higher
monthly
fee
for
a
for-profit
senior
housing
project
and
less
restaurant
space
for
us
and
plus
ceiling
height
for
the
ground
floor.
E
That
again
will
make
the
housing
more
expensive,
but
unless
affordable
for
property
nearest
them,
and
then
they
are
reducing
the
number
of
units
that
actually
count
for
rena
and
an
underground
parking,
of
course,
that
maybe
that's
required
by
requested
by
bmr
unit
developer,
but
still
that's
very
inconvenient
to
imagine
that
they
need
to
walk
from
in
initially
they
just
need
to
the
right
elevator
to
their
floor.
E
E
There
is
no
balance
with
this
request
and,
like
you
said
this,
this
location
is
ideal
for
senior
residents.
Senior
center
is
right.
Next,
you
will
have
the
under
college
a
really
big
park
memorial
park
next
to
it
and
the
sports
center.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor,
we
we
did
have
a
hand
raised
from
councilmember
more
a
moment
ago.
You
know
at
this
point
we
don't
have
further
council
comments
or
councilmember
moore
you've
raised
your
hand
again.
Did
you
want
to
want
to
wrap
oh
and
council
member
way,
you
did
have
your
hand
raised
previously
and
it's
up
again.
So
let's
go
to
council
member
way,
because
you
know
just
just
in
terms
of
the
and
then
we'll
go
to
council
member
more.
C
Okay,
so
my
comment
is
because
I
think
council,
member
maury
and
I
weren't
in
the
original
approval
process,
I'm
looking
at
this
as
a
new
project.
Okay,
because
and
if
we
say
we
listen
to
the
residents,
our
residents
have
spoken,
our
senior
residents
have
spoken.
They
they.
They
think
this
is
a
great
project,
it's
what
our
community
needs
and
I
I
what
the
15
percent
that
vice
mayor
charles
wanted
adrian
to
provide.
C
I
believe
this
is
a
whole
westport
project
that's
approved
and
the
low-income
housing
project
is
concentrated
on
the
48
units
and
the
concession.
If
I
understood
it,
when
the
original
council
approved
it,
those
concessions
were
by
law
that
the
developer
has
a
right
to
ask
for
concessions.
Waivers
for
density.
Bonus.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
not
wrong,
is
that
correct?
So
I
don't
think
adrian
needs
to
provide
that
15,
low-income
housing,
because
it's
the
whole
project
is
considered
as
westport.
C
So
that's
my
understanding
of
I'm
looking
at
this
as
a
brand
new
project.
Okay-
and
it
is
a
really
good
project
for
our
seniors-
have
spoken.
They
they
love,
they
like
to
have
it
and
you
know
our
arena.
We
might
have
lost
eight
units,
but
the
memory
care
units.
It
says
it's
needed.
I
guess
the
applicant
can
go
back
to
the
original
say.
Well,
you
know
we
don't
provide
the
actual
two
bedrooms.
We
don't
prevent
extra.
Two
memory
cares,
but
if
you
ask
our
senior
community,
they
think
that's
what
we
need,
okay,
as
in
cupertino.
C
C
So
to
me,
it's
a
new
brand
new
project
and
if
we're
concerned
about
more
retails,
like
interior
city
manager,
rex
said
we
can
say,
hey
you
gotta
guarantee
that
the
central
areas,
restaurants,
how
many
aerial
spaces
open
up
for
retail
okay,
so
we
can
put
condition
to
it.
If
we're
concerned
about
parking,
you
know,
maybe
we
can
say
put
back
so
many
how
many
parking
spaces.
C
As
for
the
stack
parking,
I
do
believe
atrion
is
very
experienced
for
seniors
and
their
visitors
to
just
park
the
car
in
the
front
and
go
go
visit
their
go
inside
so
that
they
have
valet
service.
I
believe,
that's,
probably
a
good
service
for
assist
living.
So
I'm
not
concerned
about
that,
because
atria
knows
how
to
manage
this.
C
So
to
me
it
is
a
good
project,
but
if
you
want
to
tweet
it
and
say
we
want
to
request
this,
make
sure
that
retail
is
there
at
open
loan
and
how
many,
how
many
square
footage
of
it
is
included,
or
we
can
say,
hey
put
back
some
of
the
parking
you
know
getting
more
parking.
I
don't
think
we
could
go
back
to
have
underground
parking
on
building
too.
I
I
think
we
already
it's
it's
according
to
mark.
It's
already
ready
to
go
that
that
financing
is
approved,
that
that
uni.
C
That
building
too
is
ready
to
be
built.
Correct
me
if
that's,
not
correct,
okay,
so
that's
my
I'm
looking
at
a
brand
new
project
and
I
do
believe
if
we
like
to
get
a
couple
requests
in
there
so
that
it's
satisfied.
You
know
some
residents
or
you
know
our
council's
previous
council-
will
approve
it.
C
B
Okay,
so
what
what
were
the
original
number
of
parking
spaces
provided
for
the
below
market
rate
units.
M
John
worked
here
I
would
say
it's.
M
That
hasn't
been
changed
at
all
in
terms
of
their
their
the
amount
of
parking
that's
provided
to
them.
B
Them
visually,
where
they're
located,
there's
there's
26,
but
two
of
them
are
ev
spaces
which
would
have
a
limitation
on
how
long
you
would
leave
your
vehicle
there.
B
B
B
It
would
be
the
one
two
three
four
five,
six,
seven,
eight
nine
ten
eleven,
the
twelfth
space
from
the
the
the
west
side
on
the
on
the
the
bottom
part
you'll
see
the
ada
stall
is
up
against
the
elevator
shaft
and
I'm
concerned
that
that
that
parking
will
be
very
difficult
for
someone
to
get
someone
assist
someone
out
of
the
the
passenger
seat
in
the
front
of
their
vehicle
and
also
I'm.
B
I
have
been
concerned
just
looking
at
the
number
of
ada
spaces
on
this
project
that
there
are
perhaps
not
enough
given
the
senior
population
and
and
disability
so
with
that
having
the
seniors,
in
particular,
with
the
bmr
units
needing
to
be
fit
to
to
make
all
this
emotion
to
the
other
building.
I
know
we've
had
some
of
the
the
developers
saying
how
their
family
members
are
older
and
they're
they're
all
fit.
B
But
you
know
some
of
us
have
family
that
are
wheelchair-bound
or
have,
or
are
handicapped
and
disabled,
and
they
would
have
a
problem
with
this.
I
I
brought
it
up
to
a
member
of
my
family.
I
said
you
know
how
would
it
be
for
you
to
need
to
park
in
the
underground
garage
next
door,
with
your
groceries,
bring
them
over
to
an
elevator,
go
up
the
elevator
go
across
across
the
street,
get
to
your
next
building,
opening
the
doors
get
up
the
elevator
there
and
get
to
to
your
unit.
B
How
would
you
like
that-
and
I
can't
repeat
what
he
said,
but
he
didn't
like
it.
So
to
me
this.
This
is
a
real,
a
real
sticking
point.
I
you
know.
I
appreciate
the
developer
wanting
to
save
money
on
this,
but
I've
got
a
real
problem
and
it's
it's
not
it's
not
going
away.
A
Okay,
so
we
we've
had
a
number
of
rounds
of
discussion
here.
I
think
that
we
probably
should
wrap
this
we're
we're
nearing
the
midnight
hour
and
it
doesn't
look
like
we're
going
to
be
able
to
get
to
our
our
final
substantive
item
before
then,
and
mr
city
attorney
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
we
can
still
consider
item
31
on
december
21st
correct.
J
Yes,
it
it
it
it,
it
will
leave
us
without
any
any
wiggle
room.
You
know,
because
I
don't
think
we'll
have
a
meeting
after
the
21st,
but
that's,
but
we.
A
Could
definitely
consider
it
on
the
21st
right?
Okay,
great,
so
you
know
at
this
point
I
I
think
you
know
with
with
leaving
my
council,
I
do
see
a
couple
of
representatives
from
the
applicant
would
like
to
speak.
I
you
know
I'll
just
take
a
poll
of
council,
because
I
know
we're
in
discussion
and
I'll
I'll
see
if
we
close
this
out
to
try
to
take
a
vote.
Let's
start
with
vice
mayor
chow.
A
Are
you
okay
with
mark
trossini
and
matt
woody,
giving
us
some
follow-on
comments
at
this
point.
E
Yeah,
can
I
first
thank
the
staff
first,
I
keep
forgetting
that,
and
I
I
mean
the
west
port
on
web
page
is
the
most
comprehensive
of
all
our
project
and
3d
staff
has
done
a
great
job
of
trying
to
put
everything
there,
even
though
the
the
minor
modification
might
have
been
missed,
but
then
they
did
try
to
to
put
a
lot
of
information
out
on
the
tables
and
everything,
and
thank
thanks
a
lot
and
I
did
not
actually
notice
this
waste
month
until
I
put
it
on
the
screen.
E
E
That's
my
yeah
and
I
think
staff
does
already
tried
a
lot
and
the
staff
report
is
very
comprehensive,
with
tables
of
parking
spaces
tables
of
the
different
unit
sites.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you
vice
mayor
and
council
member
willie.
Are
you
okay
with
the
applicants
yeah,
I
think
yeah
vice
mayor
you've
already
said:
yes,
yeah.
A
Yeah
you're
nodding:
okay,
I'm
going
to
take
that
as
a
yes
customer
way.
Yes,
I'm
playing
with
it
as
well,
so
mark
matt,
please
feel
free
to
give
us
some.
You
know
final
thoughts
and
comments.
V
V
It
wasn't
our
idea
with
specific
companies
saying
we
need
this
modification
in
order
to
expedite
our
project
in
order
to
meet
the
tight
time
frames
that
we
have,
and
we
work
with
them
to
do
that
with
your
with
your
staff,
an
appreciative
of
your
director
taking
the
initiative
to
provide
that
approval
timely
so
that
specific
companies
could
obtained
their
state
financing
and,
as
I
state
they
have
now
obtained
their
construction
financing.
V
V
But
pacific
companies
manages
over
200
facilities
and
and
in
with
their
expertise,
I'm
sure
they're
going
to
be
very
sensitive
to
their
residents
as
far
as
their
residence
needs.
So
perhaps
they
may
want
to
look
at
some
ballet
operation
themselves
as
far
as
their
own
parking
that
that
could
be
a
solution.
If
there's
a
concern
from
residents
that
it's
a
long
walk
for
them
to
be
able
to
get
to
their
to
their
unit.
I
can't
speak
for
them.
I
don't
have
them
on
the
phone
tonight
or
at
this
hearing.
V
Matt
whitias
suggested
that
his
company
is
prepared
and
will
have
professional
valet
service
for
their
residents.
So
I
think
it
would
be
very
simple
for
pacific
companies
to
tap
into
that
valet
service
and
assist
the
residents
in
building
number
two.
So
I
wanted
to
make
that
very
clear.
I
also
want
to
answer
council
members,
charles
question,
and
I
and
I
sent
a
letter
to
the
council
members
earlier
today,
describing
the
the
work
and
the
relationship
between
kt,
urban
and
pacific
companies
and
what
the
cost
is
associated
to
the
entire
project.
V
Then
each
member
of
the
of
the
team
building
the
project
out
related
will
be
responsible
for
their
construction.
Pacific
companies
will
be
responsible
for
theirs,
and
the
town
homes
will
be
responsible
for
their
portion
of
the
construction.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
very
clear.
That's
how
this
is
working
out
so.
A
All
right,
let's
well,
let's
provide
some
time
here.
V
A
Thank
you
mark
our
wrap
up.
Matt
matt
woody.
U
Yes,
I'll,
be
brief.
Thank
you,
mayor
paul.
Let
me
just
say
we
are
involved.
If
any
of
you
know
our
company,
we
are
involved
with
a
lot
of
very
large
complicated
mixed-use
projects.
U
This
is
not
a
very
large
one,
but
it
is
definitely
a
complicated
one,
and
I
really
want
to
say
how
much
I
appreciate
each
of
the
council
members
raising
what
are
issues
important
to
them
as
you've
all
heard
they're
different,
some
overlap,
but
but
some
quite
different,
and
let
me
just
say,
lastly,
that
we've
come
to
you
with
a
plan
that
we
think
will
be
absolutely
the
finest
assisted
living
project
in
the
bay
area,
if
not
in
california,
whether
it
could
be
done
less
expensively
as
councilwoman
chow
has
suggested.
U
I
don't
know
what
I
can
tell
you
is
we're
not
interested
in
doing
it
less
nicely,
and
what
we
have
proposed
to
you
is
something
that
we've
spent
the
better
part
of
a
more
than
a
year
now,
since
it
was
approved
in
august
of
2020,
studying
ways
to
try
to
accomplish
what
all
of
you
are
suggesting,
which
is
essentially
to
produce
what
was
approved
and
for
us
that's
not
possible
whether
you
accept
why
it's
not
possible
or
not.
U
That's
certainly
your
prerogative,
but
we
are
not
in
a
position
to
do
some
of
the
things
that
some
of
you
have
suggested.
We
ought
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
boards
and
do
I'm
not
saying
somebody
else
wouldn't
do
it
and
we
hesitate
to
be
in
a
position
where
we
have
to
say
to
an
elected
group
of
officials
very
well
thought
officials
as
yourselves
that
we
can't
make
changes.
U
But
we
are
not
in
a
position
to
redesign
this
building
from
scratch
and
if
that's,
what
the
council
deems
is
the
most
beneficial
for
the
city,
then
I
I
suspect,
that's
what
you'll
do
and
we'll
have
to
move
on
to
something
else,
but
we
certainly
hope
that
we
can
find
a
way
to
deliver
this
facility
for
the
benefit
of
the
people
that
you
heard
from
tonight.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
A
I'm
a
bit
heartened
by
one
of
the
comments
made
by
made
by
mark
in
this
last
go-around
with
regard
to
the
valley
parking.
That's
something
that
you
know
we
haven't
heard
in
terms
of
the
atria
facility,
possibly
be
being
extended
to
the
residents
of
the
bmr
units,
and
you
know,
with
regard
to
parking
that
you
know
it
is
certainly
less
convenient
to.
You
know,
have
your
parking
not
underground
within
the
same
building,
so
I
I
would
be
interested
in
hearing
some
kind
of
commitment
there.
A
It
wasn't
some
kind
of
plan
to
you
know,
divest
the
community
of
you
know
this
many
square
feet
of
retail
amenity,
but
I'm
also
hearing
the
underlying
message
from
some
of
my
fellow
council
members
with
regard
to
something
being
taken
away
from
the
the
city
at
large
and
not
necessarily
being
returned
in
kind.
A
A
I
think
the
rest
of
the
community
would
as
well
if
that
wasn't
made,
and
so,
if
you
have
retail
directly
joining
that
space,
I
mean
I
don't
really
see
it
as
much
of
a
concession
or
a
net
benefit
for
the
public
to
get
an
assertion
of
something
that
seems
like
a
logical
cohesion
of
of
space
and
adjoining
usage
of
that
space
with
respect
to
retail.
A
So
you
know
I
just
I
just
wonder
what
we
can
be
doing
to
be
made
whole,
and
you
know
I
happen
upon
upon
a
monetary
you
know
fix,
and
I
know
that
it's
not
something
that
we
end
up
being
able
to.
You
know
quantify.
A
You
know
that
that
readily,
but
it
does
seem
like
the
vice
mayor,
has
some
really
good
points
with
regard
to
a
lot
of
these
changes
being
made
to,
and
I
think
we're
all
in
agreement
to
make
this
more
economically
viable
is
the
fact
that
this
market
is
very
high
with
regard
to
housing
costs,
and
you
know,
but
at
the
same
time
anything
that
makes
it
more
attractive
and
marketable
is,
is
gonna
end
up
generating
more
revenue,
which,
of
course,
you
know
you're
in
a
for-profit
business.
A
We
understand
that,
but
of
course
there
is
that
bmr
component
of
it.
So
there's
that
you
know
pushback
from
there,
but
but
what
can
we
be
doing
to
help
alleviate
some
of
the
loss
of
the
the
retail?
Here?
A
I
I
I
don't
know
what
our
tools
are
with
regard
to
being
able
to
ask
for
perhaps
a
per
percentage
of
you
know
added
revenues
as
a
result
of
this.
What
goes
in
my
mind,
is
you
know
we
have
recently,
you
know
created
a
you
know,
cupertino
available
transit
program,
essentially
by
outsourcing
to
a
third
party
to
be
a
shuttle.
Perhaps
a
percentage
of
you
know
you
know
revenues
brought
in
could
be
allocated
towards
that.
A
You
know
I
I
I
don't
even
want
to
name
a
number,
but
if
you
made
me
I
would
say
something:
like
you
know:
half
the
million
dollars
a
year
ongoing
would
be
you
know
pretty
pretty
attractive
to
our
community
if
it
was
subsidizing,
an
internal
transit
solution
that
we're
not
really
readily
serviced
by
otherwise.
A
A
You
know
and
understanding
legalities
and
requirements
are
there,
but
at
the
same
time
this
wasn't
what
we
bargained
for
in
the
first
place
in
terms
of
having
8
000
square
feet
of
retail
in
a
plan
that
you
know
is
originally
in
its
entirety,
retail
throughout
the
seven
acres.
So
you
know
that
those
are
my
thoughts
I
mean
I'm
still
inclined
towards
the
project.
I
think
it's
an
important
project.
A
I
hear
what
you're
saying
when
studios
are
converted
to
bedrooms,
but
at
the
same
time,
if
it
makes
it
more
likely
that
people
aging
in
place
will
then
go
ahead
and
you
know
sell
off
their.
You
know
pretty
high
value
residential.
You
know
home
and
make
way.
For
you
know,
perhaps
younger
families
to
you
know,
have
a
more
suitable
usage
of
that
that
that
existing
space
like
single
family
units,
then
you
know,
I
think
it
actually
cuts
for
that.
You
know,
and
I
get
the
economics
of
it.
A
It
is
very
expensive,
which
is
why
we
look
at
the
bmr
units.
It
is
progress
that
we
have
bmr
units
on
site
that
are
being
developed
and
delivered
by.
You
know.
I
guess
the
same
development
suite
if
you
will,
if
not
necessarily
the
exact
same
developer,
it
would
have
been
nice
to
have
pacific
here
frankly
today,
because
that
is
a
priority.
I
know
that's
a
stated
priority
of
our
council
to
make
sure
that
we're
truly
dealing
with
the
more
intractable
parts
of
the
housing
crisis
and
not
using
it.
A
You
know,
as
an
as
an
opportunity
to
you,
know,
try
to
ultimately
derive
some
measure
of
self-gain.
You
know
I
I
really
do
stand
behind
the
sincerity
of
our
our
council
and
community
and
trying
to
you
know,
truly
alleviate
some
of
the
pressures
and
tensions
here
and
the
bmr
units
they
really
do
represent.
You
know
our
ability
to
do
that
these.
These
are
not
interspersed
like
they
require
in
our
bmr
manual,
but
at
the
same
time,
it's
not
something
where
we're
being
handed
a
bucket
of
money
and
being
asked
to
go
find.
A
You
know,
you
know
a
separate
entity
to
help
develop
it
as
well
as
putting
aside
a
pot
of
money
with
an
indefinite
horizon
with
regard
to
delivery
of
the
space.
So
you
know
all
in
all.
You
know.
I
still
think
that
the
project
is
good
one.
I
I
hear
the
concerns
with
regard
to
what's
been
happening,
and
I
wonder
what
we
can
be
possibly
doing.
A
I
I
am
hearing
time,
though
you
know
time
seems
to
be
a
factor
on
both
ends,
but
I
think
it
would
benefit
the
project
as
it
exists
to
you
know,
be
a
bit
more
vetted
in
thinking
through
what
some
of
the
trade-offs
could
potentially
be
in
in
benefit
of
the
public.
So
so
that's
where
I'm
looking
at
it.
A
At
this
point
I
mean
I,
I
I
hear
what
everyone's
saying
about
you
know
kind
of
going
a
little
bit
in
excess
within
the
purview
of
the
stated
scope
of
the
discussion,
but
I
think
these
are
all
important
points,
but
at
the
same
time,
when
we're
talking
about
things
that
become
were
concessions
in
terms
of
an
invocation
of
a
density
bonus
law,
for
instance,
I
I'm
not
saying
we
should
necessarily
set
those
aside.
A
Those
are
definitely
you
know
important
factors
to
you
know
be
aware
of,
but
in
consideration
of
what's
happening
right
here,
I
think
we're
looking
at
the
8
000
squares.
I
think
we're
looking
at
what's
happening
in
parking
and
trying
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
can
we
be
doing
in
order
to
be
making
the
community
a
large
hole
for
what's
being
asked
here?
So
so
those
are
my
ideas
of
what
we
could
be
potentially
thinking
about,
but
I
think
you
know
some
benefit
of
time.
A
I
you
know
I'm
kind
of
leaning
towards
the
idea
of
you
know.
We
do
have
the
planning
commission,
but
we
would
potentially
have
an
option.
You
know
we
said
it
december
7th.
You
know
we
have
another
council
meeting
on
december
21st.
What
could?
Potentially
you
know,
staff
in
the
applicant
come
back
at
us
with
yeah.
You
know,
there's,
obviously
not
enough
time
to
bring
this
to
the
planning
commission
next
week
and
then
bring
it
back
to
us
the
the
following
week.
You
know
staff
can
correct
me.
If
I'm
not
not
correct
about
that.
A
I
know
we
have
a
scheduled
planning
commission
meeting
on
tuesday,
but
you
know
that
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
you
know
thinking
on
this
project.
A
I
do
see
two
hands
raised
from
vice
mayor
chao
and
council,
member
moore.
I'm
in
earnest
about
our
midnight
cut-offs
at
this
point
we're
four
minutes
too,
and
so
you
know
vice
mayor,
chow
and
councilmember
moore.
I
think
kind
of
expounding
us
to
you
know,
comments
and
points
at
this
point.
Let's,
let's
not
do
that:
let's
try
to
figure
out
procedurally,
where
we
stand
and
and
how
we
should.
A
You
know,
move
forth
with
this
with
this
item,
so
vice
mayor
chad,
you
look
like
you're
thinking,
so
I'll
go
to
council
number
four.
Did
you
have.
A
I
would
like
to
provide
an
opportunity
for
a
couple
of
weeks
to
try
to
address
some
of
those
points
as
we've
provided
in
our
comments.
You
know
if
we
can
come
back
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
I
would
be
happy
to
table
the
motion
that
we
currently
have
and
consider
it
again
on
december
21st.
A
So
that
is
something
that
I'd
be
happy
to
entertain
with
a
question
as
to
what
else
could
potentially
be
done,
I
don't
yeah
like
I
said.
I
don't
think
that
there's
enough
time
to
stop
by
planning
commission
on
the
way
to
the
21st
back
to
council,
and
I
didn't
hear
staff
or
interjecting
or
raising
their
hand.
That's.
J
That's
correct
mayor,
yes,
the
the
next
next
planning
commission
that
could
be
noticed
for
is
not
until
january.
I
A
Basically,
before
the
end
of
the
year
be
looking
at
coming
back
to
council
in
a
couple
of
weeks,.
E
I
think
that
the
I
I
didn't
raise
the
concern
about
parking,
because
I,
since
if
the
dmr
developer
pacifica
requested
it,
I
trust
that
they,
they
probably
don't
want
to
reduce
the
cost
of
their
project
so
that
they
don't
have
to
do
the
excavation,
and
I
don't
think
the
valid
parking
might
not
work,
because
the
drop-off
for
ballot
will
be
at
the
entrance
which
will
be
around
mary
and
then
even
if
they
they
will
have
to
walk
all
the
way
from
mary
to
building
two.
That's
a
very
long
walk
too.
E
It
could
be
an
option,
but
it's
not
a
very
good
option
and
also
to
me
that
the
removal
of
the
8
000
square
feet
of
retail.
It's
a
deal
killer
for
the
project.
The
reason
is
retail.
E
If
you
look
at
the
parking
over,
the
parking
are
along
for
retailers
along
mary
and
if
the,
if
the
retail
is
only
on
stevens
creek,
that
retail
is
not
going
to
get
business
because
there
are
no
parking
around
it
and
the
way
a
retail
shopping.
Mall
work
works
is
when
there
is
a
flow
of
retail
that
you
connect
from
the
parking
to
the
other
retail.
Then
you
can
attract
people
to
walk
from
one
tail
to
one
to
the
next.
But
then,
if
you
in
the
middle,
you
are
it's
a
private
facility.
No
one
can
access.
E
E
A
Okay,
I'm
not
hearing
a
possibility
for
that
happening,
so
let
me
go
to
customer
more
councilman
ward.
B
B
The
dining
area
can't
be
moved
to
the
second
floor,
and
I
am
still
unconvinced
that
the
developer
is
unable
to
find
a
way
to
pay
for
the
subterranean
parking
under
the
bmr
building.
B
Also
with
regards
to
the
entire
project
and
the
and
the
we
don't
know
how
to
we
don't
know
how
to
build
this
type
of
thing.
We
haven't
done
it
before.
I
do
find
that
a
little
bit
disconcerting,
given
that
gosh
related
california
we're
looking
at
a
seven
billion
dollar
asset,
company
and
and
and
torcini
and
very
very
well-known
done,
a
lot
of
buildings
able
to
hire
consultants.
B
So
I'm
a
little
bit
surprised
that,
at
their
at
their
stage
in
the
game
that
they
had
trouble
pulling
this
off.
So
I
I
have
a
little
disbelief
in
it,
but
so
those
are
my
offerings
I'd
like
to
see
it
come
back,
and
I
think
that
that
more
can
be
offered
to
to
make
this
work.
For
the
community
customer
way.
C
Just
real
quickly,
just
one
comment:
the
veranda
cost
us,
I
don't
know
four
or
five
years
to
build
an
800
000
per
unit
and
that's
18
units
we're
getting
48
units
of
low
income
housing
and
I
senior
housing.
I
think
it's
much
needed
and
I
I
don't
know
if
atria's
timeline
can
wait
for
us
to
decide.
So
I
guess
we
should
ask
the
atria
whether
they
could
come
back
and
I
I
don't
think
we
are
in
the
position
of
telling
them
where
to
put
a
restaurant
because
they
are.
This
is
their
business.
C
So
either
we
take
the
whole
package
or
you
know
we
work
on
maybe
adding
more
retail
somewhere
on
the
property
to
satisfy.
You
know
the
original
comment,
and
so
I
look
at
this
as
a
new
project
and
I
look
at
it
as
we
get
48
units
of
bmr
and
a
good
senior
assist
living
with
memory
care
and
ada
raw
homes,
which
is
much
needed
for
our
community.
I
see
it
as
a
pretty
good
project
because
I
wasn't
on
the
original
approval,
so
I
guess
wasn't
as
disappointed
as
what's
being
offered.
A
J
I
just
thought
it
is
as
to
how
to
proceed.
I
I
believe
there
is
a
motion
on
the
table
that
has
been
seconded,
so
I
think
the
option
is
to
vote
on
that
that
motion
or
to
make
a
substitute
motion,
and
I
don't
know
whether
the
intent
was
to
make
a
substitute
motion
to
continue
the
hearing
till
the
21st,
but
I
I
think
those
pretty,
I
think.
Procedurally,
those
are
the.
A
J
A
Okay,
well,
I
I
think
that
this
would
probably
be
a
better
option
in
terms
of
keeping
some
potential
options
open
than
than
taking
a
vote
on
the
motion
on
the
table
at
this
point,
so
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
invite
that
substitute
question
from
anybody
that
would
care
to
make
it
that
we
that
we,
that
the
motion
be
that
this
item
be
continued
until
december
21st
at
a
regular
council
meeting
vice
mayor
chow.
Would
you
like
to
make
that
motion.
E
E
I
don't
understand
that
why
I
mean
there
must
be
a
way
to
move
the
dining
facility
to
the
sixth
floor
of
the
building,
where
there
is
space
to
accommodate
them.
Okay,
let.
E
I'd
like
to
move
that
they
consider
this
option
and
bring
back
for
us
to
consider
on
the
21st,
and
if
that's,
maybe
it's
a
preliminary
answer
on
whether
that's
feasible
for
them
or
not,
then
I'm
willing
to
consider.
I
really
want
this
project
to
work,
but
the
ground
floor.
Retail
is
essential
for
this
site
since
we
already
lost
an
entire
site
of
shopping,
mall,
12,
20,
000
square
feet
is
already
a
big
reduction
and
that's
make
it
work.
Okay,.
A
E
Sorry
so
my
I
moved
that
to
give
direction
for
the
applicant
to
come
back
with
a
modified
proposal
to
place
the
dining
facility
at
a
different
location
in
the
building,
so
that
the
ground
floor
retail
portion
is
not
modified
from
the
approved
project.
A
Okay,
is
there
a
second
for
vice
mayor
child's
motion,
councilmember
moore,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
B
I
I
would
like
to
add
a
friendly
amendment
to
it.
Do
I
have
to
second
and
then
make
my
friendly
amendment,
or
may
I
just
string
it
all
together,
I'll.
B
E
A
Okay,
so
vice
mayor,
you
accepted
council
member
moore's,
friendly
amendment
and
council
member
moore
you're
going
to
go
ahead
and
second
that
motion
now.
I
second
it
okay.
So
that's
the
substitute
motion,
and
so
I
don't
see
any
further
hands
raised
in
any
event,
councilman
wade,
you
do
have
your
hand
raised
so
I'll
call
you
after
I
make
my
brief
comment
here.
C
A
You
know,
and
I
would
expect
that
you
know,
given
the
benefit
of
a
couple
of
weeks,
there
could
be
the
ability
to
speak
to
other
comments
that
were
made,
but
that's
those
are
specific
items
that
were
captured
in
the
motion
I
understand,
but
from
the
way
I
see
it,
we
would
be
continuing
this
item
until
december
21st,
and
that
would
be
the
key
component
of
this
and
that's
why
I
would
be
voting
for
this
council
member
way.
C
Yes,
I
just
have
a
question
on
a
motion.
These
questions
are
really
specific,
like
put
the
restaurant
in
the
sixth
floor
and
things
like
that,
it
are
we
open
to
them
coming
back
with
other
suggestions
that
could
be
accepted,
or
we
have
to
put
it
on
the
sixth
floor
on
the
restaurant.
A
I
H
I
have
substitute
motion
to
provide
direction
for
the
applicant
to
come
back
with
the
modified
proposal
to
place
the
dining
facility
at
a
different
location
so
that
the
ground
retail
is
not
modified
for
the
project
and
more
added
a
friendly
amendment
to
explore
potential
for
one
of
the
row
or
townhouses
to
be
affordable
as
bmr
for
sale
or
for
rent
and
that
the
subterranean
garage
option
be.
H
I
may
have
missed
this
part,
be
explored
and
come
back
for
council
consideration
on
december
21st.
Okay,.
J
Yeah,
I
just,
I
think,
just
stephanie's
clarification
if
you
know
if,
if
if
the
applicant
is
not
willing
to
agree
to
one
or
more
of
those
changes,
you
know
what
what
is
council's
direction
to
staff
to
bring
back
on
december
21st.
A
E
A
Right
motion
motion
on
the
table:
there's
a
second-
I
don't
see
further
hands
raised.
This
would
be
to
effectuate
that
action.
That
would
that
that
would
that
would
have
us
revisit
this
item
on
december
21st.
So,
madam
city
clerk,
would
you
please
take
a
roll
call
vote.
K
A
A
Okay
and
so
for
the
remainder
of
our
for
for
the
remainder
of
our
agenda,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
table
item
31
until
december
21st,
we're
past
our
midnight
cutoff
and
with
regard
to
the
the
follow-ons
here.
A
Let's
just
go
ahead
and
let's
just
go
ahead
with
no,
there
are
no
more
oral
communications.
The
council
and
staff
comments
future
agenda
items.
I
would,
I
would
just
ask
that
we,
you
know
we
have
plenty
to
consider
before
the
end
of
the
calendar
year.
We
have
a
new
city
manager
coming
in,
and
so
I
would
ask
that
we
we
forego
those
right
now,
unless
there
are
very
brief
comments
that
are
not
future
agenda
item
related
at
this
time,
do
we
have
any
from
either
council
members
or
staff.
A
F
F
A
And
you
know,
I
assure
you,
you
and
the
arrest
of
staff
absolutely
are
a
part
of
the
same
team.
I
know
that
every
one
of
our
council
members
feels
the
same
way.
Perhaps
it's
not
evinced
in
a
way.
That's
going.
You
know
universally
communicated,
but
I
know
that
we're
all
working
together.
You
know
you
look
at
the
bird
safe,
dark
skies
ordinance,
that's
just
one
example
of
something
that
can
come
back
multiple
times
and
basically
be
a
real
trendsetter.
A
So
you
know
I
stand
behind
our
work
and
the
quality
that
we
put
into
it.
Councilmember
moore,
you
had
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
have
anything
to
say
you're
shaking
your
head
now,
thank
you
for
pointing
at
your
wrist
an
indication
of
the
time,
and
so
with
respect
to
the
rest
of
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
I
apologize
to
everyone
I
had
committed
to
you
know
12
midnight
to
conclude
it's
just
shy
of
12
15
right
now
and
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
in
my
first
first
meeting
of
this
term
adjourn
our
meeting
on
december
8th
very
early
in
the
morning.
2021.
A
Yes,
I.
H
For
the
interruption,
were
you
going
to
adjourn
a
specific
make,
a
specific
adjournment
for
in
memory.
A
Absolutely
thank
you,
so
I
I
wanted
to
with
thanks
to
the
city
clerk
for
pointing
this
out.
We
we
had
a
very
very
sad
event
occur
recently
from
a
member
of
our
family
from
a
member
of
our
staff
family.
It
was
the
passing
of
edwin
gutierrez.
A
Edwin
primarily
trim
city
street
trees,
did
planting
and
operated
the
aerial
bucket.
Recently,
mr
has
transferred
to
the
streets
division.
He
was
well
respected
and
always
willing
to
assist
others.
He
will
be
missed
by
all,
and
we
express
our
deepest
condolences
to
the
family
and
friends
of
mr
edwin
gutierrez
from
the
city
of
cupertino.
A
He
provided
the
cupertino
community
with
outstanding
service,
and
so
after
a
moment
of
silence,
I
would
like
to
have
us
adjourn
this
meeting
in
memory
of
edwin
gutierrez.