►
Description
Coverage of the Cupertino City Council Teleconference Meeting, recorded on Tuesday, December 21, 2021. Part 2 of 2.
A
I
don't
actually
see
a
majority
of
council
back
councilman
way.
I
see
you,
okay,
great
all
right.
We
are
on
to
the
section
of
our
agenda
that
has
to
do
with
public
hearings.
That
would
be
item
number
24.
before
we
begin
this
item.
However,
I'd
like
to
formalize
for
this
upcoming
year,
our
procedure
for
when
council
asks
its
questions
similar
to
our
prior
item.
However,
this
is
a
public
hearing
which
does
have
a
flowchart
in
the
second
page
of
our
agendas.
A
It's
the
first
two
pages
are
non-enumerated,
so
I'm
talking
about
the
second
non-enumerated
page
before
the
page
that
says
page
one
on
the
bottom
of
it
there's
a
flowchart
for
public
hearings,
and
so
I
I
would
like
to
move
at
this
point,
that
for
public
hearings,
council
questions
of
staff
and
the
applicant
or
appellant
will
follow
all
of
the
following
in
this
order.
A
First
staff,
presentations
or
reports,
then
second
applicant
or
appellant
presentations,
and
then
third
public
comment
and
then
fourth
any
response
by
the
applicant
or
a
plan
appellant
to
public
comment,
at
which
point
staff
could
also
follow
up
on
public
comments
and
questions.
That
is
my
motion.
May
I
have
a
second
for
that
motion
and
so
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
from
council
council
member
moore.
B
Could
you
clarify
is
this
for
just
for
this
particular
item
or
are
you
trying
to
have
this
implemented
for
future
items
as
well,
because
this
is
a
little
bit
different
from
some
of
the
suggestions
that
I
had
received
and
guidance.
So
I'm
wondering
how
how
far
you
want
to
have
this
be
applicable.
A
Okay,
so
I
would
I
would
okay.
So
first
of
all,
I
would
just
say
that
this
is
just
a
motion
to
clarify
the
procedures
of
our
public
hearings,
and
our
public
hearings
are
flowcharted
on
the
second
page,
and
so
that
would
be
what
I
would
like
to
have
be
our
procedure
for
this
year.
A
A
You
know,
I
won't
say
a
virtually
endless
exercise,
but
I
want
to
be
able
to
create
a
process
that
gets
all
of
the
concerns
out
there,
but
also
is
optimally
efficient,
you're
looking
very
skeptical,
so
I'm
going
to
go
on
to
vice
mayor
ciao,
to
see
if
I
can
get
a
second
for
the
motion
that
I've
placed
on
the
table.
Vice.
A
You'd
like
to
second
it
please,
please
do,
but
vice
mayor,
I'm
not
seeing
you.
I.
B
A
A
I
I
was,
if
I
I
was
advised
by
our
our
legal
counsel,
that
this
would
be
the
appropriate
manner
in
which
to
put
this.
This
is
for.
C
A
Well,
that's
a
great
question.
That's
a
great
question.
Let
me
clarify
this
okay,
so
first
it
would
be
staff
presentation
all
right
and
then
it
would
be
applicant
presentation
and
then
it
would
be
comments
by
members
of
the
public
and
then
it
would
go
back
for
for
the
applicant
as
well
as
staff,
to
follow
up
on
public
comments
and
then
at
that
point
is
when
council
would
be
able
to
ask
questions
after
the
council
questions,
then
it
would
be
our
deliberative
process
and
so
after
those
council
questions
that
is
the
close
of
the
public
hearing.
A
What
I
want
to
avoid
is,
while
we're
deliberating
having
this
back
and
forth
exchange
with
essentially
members
of
the
public
and
our
staff,
but
I
think
that
if
you
realize
that
the
questions
at
the
end
for
for
council,
after
all,
the
presentations
have
been
made
and
after
the
public
has
had
a
chance
to
put
in
their
input
and
get
responded
to
by
the
applicant
and
the
staff,
that
is
a
better
process
to
begin
our
questions,
because
all
that
information
is
then
out
there.
Okay.
A
So
then,
our
questions
can
go
through
those
rounds
of
questions
with
staff
and
the
applicant,
and
then,
following
that,
we
begin
our
deliberative
process
with
motions.
Okay,
so
then
motion
motion
practice
is
essentially
something
that
closes
off
the
public
hearing.
That's
not
that's
not
any
different,
it's
just
something
that
hasn't
been
adhered
to
in
practice,
because
when
we're
deliberating,
it
should
be
closing
off
the
public
hearing.
Unless
staff-
or
in
this
case
the
applicant
is
invited
to
you,
know,
have
a
conversation
with
us
during
that
deliberative
process.
C
So
then,
this
flow
chart
seems
to
have
one.
The
missing
part
is
when
the
council
gets
to
ask
questions.
So
during
our
deliberation,
if
we
have
more
questions,
we
still
get
to
ask
staff
and
advocate
right.
That's.
A
Correct
you
know
I'm,
basically,
all
I'm
doing
is
moving
council
questions
to
after
when
the
when
the
applicant
and
staff
have
had
an
opportunity
to
respond
to
public
comments
and
questions.
I.
A
Okay,
well,
that's
fair!
Let
me
let
me
respond
to
that.
So
you'll
notice,
what
what
I
was
doing
for
our
immediately
prior
item.
I
made
a
check-in
after
the
second
public
comment
to
staff
to
make
sure
that
staff
was
tracking
those
questions
so
that
they
got
to
those
after
the
public
comment
was
was
concluded
and
I
will
do
the
same
thing
in
this
process.
A
What
I
want
to
avoid
is
you
know,
council
starting
to
ask
questions
during
the
presentations
and
then
going
off
on
a
deliberative
process
and
then
that
that
just
unnecessarily
prolongs
the
entirety
of
the
item.
So
so
I,
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
information
in
front
of
us.
Ask
the
questions
and
then
have
the
deliberative
process
begin.
B
Okay,
so
when
I
not
that
this
is
well,
perhaps
it
is
pertinent
on
the
on
the
planning
commission.
The
guidance
that
I
received
was
that
you
would
have
this
staff
report.
The
applicant
would
provide
their
report
and
then
the
the
the
commission
would
ask
their
clarifying
questions.
B
It
was
not
for
deliberation
and
then
you
would
go
to
the
public
and-
and
I
was
given
a
report
on
how
to
how
to
conduct
the
meetings
in
that
manner,
but
I
I
sometimes
the
the
the
commission-
or
in
this
case
the
council,
can
get
to
the
point
with
some
of
their
questions,
if
we're
being
disciplined
about
it
and
we're
not
veering
off
into
deliberation.
B
As
you
mentioned,
we
can
get
to
the
point
on
some
of
these
questions
that
we
really
need
to
have
answers
to
more
more
quickly
and
perhaps
head
off
some
of
the
members
of
the
public
in
there
and
the
way
they're
asking
questions
in
a
in
a
in
a
timely
manner.
So
I
I
I
wish
that
you,
you
didn't
see
it
that
we
need
to
move
to
public
comment
and
not
have
the
the
council
asked
questions
after
the
applicant
provides
their
presentation,
but
I
do
understand
what
you're
up
against.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
very
much
for
that.
Councilman
moore,
and
I
would
just
ask
that
we
we
try
it
this
way
and
also
add
that
we
have
been
doing
it
this
way
for
the
last
several
meetings,
it's
just
something
that
I
haven't.
A
You
know
I
don't
want
to
say
codified,
but
have
been
set
into
emotion,
but
given
the
fact
that
this
is
the
beginning
of
the
new
mayoral
term,
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
expectations
were
there
yeah
and
the
reality
of
the
situation
is
that
once
any
of
us
start
asking
questions
that
just
tends
to
go
down
a
line
where
deliberation
happens
and
it
just
becomes
a
very
prolonged
process
from
the
outset
and
again,
there
will
be
that
opportunity
for
those
questions
to
be
asked
when
council
has
those
questions,
but
thank
you
very
much
for
your
comments.
A
Let's
see,
if
this
can
you
know
move
forward
and
madam
city
clerk,
would
you
please
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
for
this
motion?
That's
on
the
table.
D
A
A
Thanks
very
much
everyone,
and
so
we're
on
to
item
number
24..
That
is
the
public
hearing
for
this
evening.
Item
24
is
consideration
of
modifications
to
the
approved
westport
development
project
and
as
described
in
our
agenda,
may
we
please
have
the
staff
report
at
this
time.
E
Thank
you,
mr
paul.
I
will
introduce
john
martier
senior
planner
from
community
development.
F
Yes,
thank
you
diane
and
mayor
and
council
for
the
introduction-
and
yes,
we
are
this-
I
am,
I
will
be
presenting
the
staff
report
for
the
the
project.
As
a
mayor
already
read
the
subject
of
the
project.
I'll
just
dive
right
in
this
is
a
continuation
from
the
item
on
december
7th
and
again
council.
I
continue
the
item
to
today.
I
december
20
21
2020,
with
a
direction
on
three
points
of
the
for
the
application.
F
One
is
a
place
of
dying
facility,
a
different
location,
the
building,
so
the
ground
for
a
retail
porsche
can
be
maintained.
I
explored
potential
for
one,
a
town,
home
or
row
houses
to
be
a
bmr
unit
and
the
third
option.
The
third
direction
was
to
explore
extending
the
subterranean
garage
on
the
back
under
building
two
so
project
data
table,
as
was
including
the
staff
report
really
quick.
Just
you
see
three
columns
here,
one,
the
first
one
was
approved
in
august
2020
for
the
original
project.
F
F
A
couple
of
the
significant
changes,
though
one
is
that
the
well
one
is
that
the
the
retail
was
returned
to
17
600
square
feet
for
building
one
for
a
combined,
20
000
square
feet
of
throughout
the
the
project.
F
The
the
applicant
was
able
to
redesign
the
bottom
floor
to
accommodate
the
seventeen
thousand
square.
Seventy
thousand
six
hundred
square
feet
as
we'll
go
over
the
in
the
next
few
slides
and
that
also
returned
to
they
added
about
30
parking
spaces
back
to
the
overall
count
for
the
total
party
parking
supply
to
be
179.
F
So
the
addition
of
retail,
so
the
applicant
was
able
to
add
3
500
square
feet
of
retail
to
the
sickle
portion
of
the
of
the
building,
which
is
facing
mary
avenue,
which
moved
the
parking
ramp
to
be
not
facing
on
the
mary
avenue
side
of
the
building,
but
rather
under
the
the
the
central
green.
F
What
this
also
did
was
approximately
there's
the
proxy
square
footage
facing
stevens
creek
is
14
100
square
feet,
which
is
an
addition
of
4100
square
feet
of
retail,
from
what
the
approved
project
was
and
instead
of
reducing
parking
account
by
32.
So
the
renew
reduced
part
account
for
the
original
approval
in
august
is
32
and
72,
as
was
presented
earlier
this
month
again.
F
As
you
can
see,
this
was
the
loading
dock
and
parking
access
on
the
on
the
upper
part
of
the
sickle
portion
of
the
building
facing
mary
avenue
and,
as
you
can
see
the
as
presented
earlier
this
month,
the
the
the
restaurant
that
was
facing
mayor
avenue
is
now
proposed
to
be
again.
It
continues
to
be
proposed
to
be
a
private
dining
for
the
residents
of
building
one.
F
However,
the
applicant
was
able
to
redesign
the
bottom
floor
to
accommodate
3
500
square
feet
of
retail
on
the
northern
part
portion
of
this
sickle
cycle
portion
of
the
building
facing
mary
avenue,
reducing
the
size
of
loading
dock
and
the
trash
enclosure
area
and
moving
the
the
entrance
to
the
garage
under
the
central
green.
F
Do
was
the
the
applicant
was
also
also.
F
F
One
of
the
other
issues
that
was
brought
up
on
december,
7th
and
and
discussed
in
our
staff
report
was
the
the
continued
issue
of
the
comparability
between
the
bmr
unit
mix
and
sizes
and
the
building
one
unimixed
sizes
of
the
assisted
living
facility.
No
change
has
been
proposed
from
the
december
7th
meeting.
F
Again,
you
know
the
bmr
manual
does
just
this
slide.
Just
reiterates
that
bmr
manuals,
comparable
comparability
and
the
underlying
portion
that
the
unit
type
number
of
vectors
per
unit
are
part
of
that
comparability,
and
this
is
at
the
discretion
of
council
again
the
building
one
physical
modifications
not
much
has
changed.
F
F
What's
being
proposed,
is
now
71.5
feet
and
again,
how
does
it
affect
the
common
open
space?
Well,
what's
required
in
terms
of
the
heart
of
the
city.
Specific
plan
would
be
38
850
square
feet.
What
was
the
title?
Originally
was
44
945
square
feet
and
was
proposed
again.
It's
just
a
reduction
of
about
845
square
feet.
I'm
still
well
above,
what's
required
for
the
harvest
city
specific
plant,
again
the
environmental
review.
This
is
there's
no
major
changes
as
anticipated
from
what
the
original
eir
had
analyzed
again.
F
As
similar
to
and
consistent
with
the
december
7th
presentation
you
know,
staff
gave
the
council
two
options.
One
is
to
deny
the
project
based
on
certain
findings.
The
other
was
to
approve
the
project
based
on
certain
findings.
Again,
this
is
on
the
sole
discretion
of
council.
A
Okay,
thank
you
john
and
from
the
applicant.
Can
someone
let
us
know
who
will
be
speaking
and
just
for
you
know
just
just,
for
we
are
understanding
about
how
long
the
applicant's
presentation
is
going
to
be.
H
Can
you
hear
me
this
is
matt
witty
from
related
atria,
yes,
myself
and
and
mark
alexander,
also
from
atria
related
we'll
be
speaking,
we'll
be
as
brief
as
we
can.
I
think
john
martare
gave
a
pretty
good
summation
of
the
issues,
but
a
couple
of
nuances
that
we'd
like
to
bring
to
the
attention
of
the
council.
So
next
slide
please.
So
when
we
appeared
two
weeks
ago,
we
heard
some
very
specific
concerns
raised
by
several
council
members.
H
We've
had
the
opportunity
to
engage
with
some
council
members
to
further
explore
how
we
might
address
those
issues
and
we're
very
pleased
to
say
that
we
think
we've
made
the
building
and
the
project
significantly
better
by
incorporating
a
number
of
revisions
to
what
you
saw
two
weeks
ago
and
really
think
that
the
project
at
this
point
could
become
a
very,
very
important
and
exciting
addition
to
the
city.
H
So
one
of
the
issues
that
was
raised
was
the
question
of
the
ground
floor
of
the
building
being
more
community
oriented,
more
collaborative
with
adjoining
uses,
and
what
this
diagram
here
shows
with
the
green
arrows.
I
think
some
of
you
have
seen
this
before
is
how
the
project
will
attract
people
from
outside
the
project
into
the
central
green.
H
H
H
First
of
all
comments
about
the
importance
of
retail
and
retaining
the
original
20
000
square
feet
that
was
entitled
in
2020.
What
we
are
proposing
at
this
point
does
exactly
that,
but
how
it
does
it,
I
think,
is
very
important.
H
Of
course,
we've
designed
the
retail
in
such
a
way
that
it
can
be
subdivided
into
smaller
spaces,
and
we
think
that
that
is
exactly
what
the
community
wants
and
needs
is.
A
variety
of
retail
and
the
most
important
thing
in
this
retail
challenged
era
to
attracting
a
variety
of
tenants
is
flexibility,
and
so
what
you
see
here
is
a
17
600
square
feet
of
the
20
000
square
feet.
H
The
other
2400
is
in
building
two
which
we
have
no
control
over,
but
it's
part
of
the
of
the
project
and
we've
broken
it
down
into
essentially
three
different
blocks.
That
can
then
be
further
subdivided
importantly,
this
paseo
will
allow
the
retail
along
stevens
creek
to
be
not
as
deep
as
it
otherwise
would
be,
and
deep
retail
is
harder
to
lease.
H
An
additional
benefit
is
that
this
retail
can
be
broken
into
smaller
spaces,
some
of
which
will
orient
onto
the
green,
some
of
which
will
orient
out
to
stevens
creek
or
in
theory.
It
could
be
one
larger
piece
on
the
corner.
It
orients
both
ways,
but
importantly,
it
will
activate
both
the
stephens
creek
frontage
along
the
sidewalk
and
the
stevens
creek
face
on
the
north.
H
I
want
to
talk
about
a
very
important
other
addition,
which
is
up
here
on
the
north
quadrant
along
the
sickle,
where
we've
added
3,
500
square
feet
of
retail
and
one
of
the
retail
uses
that
we
think
would
be
very
additive
to
this
project
is
a
medical
or
rehabilitation
type,
retail
use
that
would
attract
seniors
and
others
from
outside
the
project.
H
We've
shown
here
outdoor
dining
in
front
of
our
dining,
our
residents
dining,
and
we
hope
that
will
draw
some
of
our
residents
the
more
mobile
residents
to
be
outside
from
time
to
time,
but
we
also
have
outdoor
dining
on
the
north
side
of
the
retail,
and
this
is
an
ideal
opportunity
to
integrate
energy
or
multi-generation
residents
of
cupertino,
and
one
of
our,
as
you
may
recall,
from
my
last
presentation,
one
of
our
fundamental
operating
objectives
is
to
is
to
not
isolate
our
residents
and
so
one
of
the
reasons
we've
insisted
on
keeping
our
residential
dying
on
the
ground
floor
as
opposed
to
moving
it
elsewhere
in
the
building
is.
H
This
is
really
the
only
way
to
prevent
those
residents
from
being
isolated
this
this
green
central
green
could
also
be
used
for
children
that
are
coming
perhaps
to
visit
their
grandparents
or
perhaps
they're
just
members
of
the
community
at
large.
Yes,
there
is
a
large
memorial
park
nearby,
but
within
this
central
green
space
we
would
hope
to
have
some,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
it
will
be
designed,
but
some
sort
of
opportunity
for
small
children
to
to
play
while
their
parents
are
having
lunch
or
having
a
coffee.
H
Or
what
have
you
next
slide?
Please
now
another
issue
that
was
raised
is
this
question
of
how
the
senior
center
visitors
can
access
the
central
green
and
importantly,
the
suggestion
had
previously
been
made
that
the
best
way
for
that
to
happen
is
what
is
shown
here
in
the
yellow
line,
essentially
going
out
the
back
of
the
senior
center
through.
I
H
H
K
Thanks
matt
and
thanks
for
having
us
mayor
and
council
members
yeah,
I
think
we
we've
talked
recently
with
president
lloyd
holmes
and
the
vice
president
instruction,
christina
espinosa
peeb
at
deans
of
college
and
really
believe,
there's
a
lot
of
great
programming
opportunities
between
the
two.
You
know
between
our
assisted
living
community
and
between
deanza,
whether
that's
through
internships
through
actually
certifications
and
obviously
permanent
job
placement.
K
But
we
we
it's
not
we.
We
talked
a
lot
about
nursing
and
gerontology
nursing
specifically,
but
there
actually
are
quite
a
few
other
programs
at
the
college
that
likely
would
be
potential
either
internships
or
job
placement
opportunities,
whether
that
be
in
building
engineering
or
building
operations.
K
So
I
think
you
know
we
we
feel
like
there's
a
great
synergy
between
what
were
what
we
have
done
in
other
communities,
but
also
what
this
site
provides
with
the
access
to
the
senior
center
and
and
and
and
bringing
in
it's
a
real
activity.
The
a
new
hub
that
can
be
activated
across
generations
is
pretty
special,
so
we
feel
we
feel
really
good
about
that
and
have
had
a
great
conversation
like
to
like
to
continue
that
conversation.
If
this
project
gets
approved
so.
H
Continuing
on
with
some
of
the
other
changes
that
we've
considered
there
was,
there
have
been
some
suggestions
made
by
some
in
the
community
about
the
use.
Let's
go
back
to
the
prior
slide,
please
cascade
about
the
use
of
the
central
green
for
other
functions,
and
we
very
much
see
this
space
as
a
communal
space
beyond
just
the
benefit
of
those
in
the
westport
cupertino
project.
H
One
suggestion
was
potentially
for
a
farmers
market
and
while
it's
somewhat
limited
in
size,
I
think
that
is
a
very
reasonable
and
legitimate
potential
use
and,
to
the
extent
that
it
could
be
made
to
work
there.
I
think
it
would
typically
happen
on
weekends.
H
The
parking
for
that
could
potentially
occur
at
the
end
of
college,
which
is
not
as
active
on
weekends
and
again
we're
looking
for
ways
to
integrate
and
draw
in
the
community
to
different
parts
of
our
project
where
we
can,
while
at
the
same
time
respecting
the
legal
and
regulatory
constraints
that
are
imposed
on
a
building
of
this
type.
Again,
I'd
like
to
defer
to
mark
alexander
just
briefly
to
walk
the
public
and
the
county.
The
council,
through
you,
know
what
this
particular
building
is
designed
to
accomplish,
who
it's
designed
for
and
how
it
operates.
K
Yeah,
I
think
it's
it
thanks.
Matt
again,
just
assisted
living
is
licensed
by
the
department
of
social
services
and
california
will
be
licensed
as
a
as
a
residential
center
for
the
elderly
and-
and
you
know,
basic
services.
You
know
what's
neat
about
this
entire
development.
Is
you
have
the
senior
housing
bmr
housing
right
across
the
way,
but
we
have
what
our
product
is
very
different,
because
we
have
our
basic
services,
are
that's
included
in
your
rent?
Are
three
meals
a
day,
including
snacks
housekeeping,
including
personal
laundry
and
linens
transportation?
K
That's
another
great
benefit
of
our
project
as
we
yeah
our
our
services
include
scheduled
transportation
to
all
local
appointments,
which
also
means
our
our
use
is
a
low
impact
use
as
it
relates
to
to
parking
and
traffic,
because
most
of
our
residents
use.
K
And
actually,
typically,
between
five,
maybe
ten
percent
on
is
on
the
high
side.
Have
cars
actually
use
them?
We,
you
know
again
basic
services.
It
also
includes
security.
It
includes
24-hour
emergency
alert
services.
It
includes
obviously
upkeep
housekeeping
maintenance
utilities
are
included.
So
it's
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
full
package
and
suite
of
services
and
perhaps
the
most
important,
and
why
we
were
so
insistent
on
keeping
the
dining
on
the
first
floor.
K
Is
social
engagement
and-
and
you
know,
people
you
know
one
of
our
mottos
is
people
belong
together
which
has
been
harder
and
covered,
but
it's
just.
It's
only
shown
us
more
since
we've
been
growing,
actually
postcode,
our
company's
been
growing
all
across
all
across
the
country,
because
people
really
do
belong
together
as
opposed
to
being
alone
in
our
opinion
and
doing
that
in
social
settings
and
doing
it
in
intergenerational
settings.
K
We
believe
it's
just
a
you
know,
a
recipe
for
for
a
better
life
and
that's
why
we
think
this
this
this
community
and
this
site
and
what's
being
proposed,
is
really
an
outstanding
opportunity
for,
for
us
to
help
help
make
seniors
lives
better,
but
also
for
the
city
of
cupertino
and
and
and
to
to
have
a
something
they
can
be
proud
of,
as
well
as
offer
lots
of
great
jobs
and
lots
of
in
a
new
hub
of
activity.
H
A
site
couple
of
other
points,
I'd
like
to
make
mayor
paul
and
council
members
that
were
raised
last
week.
The
question
had
come
up.
Why
are
we?
Why
was
the
parking
under
the
bmr
building
removed
and,
as
I
pointed
out
last
week,
this
was
we
had
nothing
to
do
with
that
decision
and
that
ship
has
sailed.
That
transaction
has
concluded
and
I
understand
pacific
communities
has
pulled
billing
permits.
H
H
Other
thing
I
did
want
to
point
out
is,
as
you
see
highlighted
in
red:
there
are
a
number
of
spaces
surface
spaces
parked
right
in
front
of
the
bmr
building,
and
one
suggestion
we've
made
to
mike
is
that
these
spaces
have
a
time
limit
on
them
of,
say,
30
minutes,
so
that
they're
not
taken
up
by
residents
as
permanent
parking,
who
should
be
parking
in
our
garage,
but
rather
are
available
to
crop
off
and
load
and
unload.
And
so
that's
the
suggestion
I
think
he's
taken
under
advisement
mike.
H
I
don't
know
if
you're
on
the
call,
but
if
you
are
please
feel
free
to
comment
on
your
experience
with
senior
affordable
parking
requirements.
L
L
So
the
main
reason
for
that
probably
seven
or
eight
months
ago
was
that
the
primary
source
of
financing,
which
is
the
federal
tax
credit
to
the
tax
rate
allocation
committee,
requires
that
we
pull
full
building
permits
within
180
days
of
receiving
an
allocation.
L
And
so
you
know,
as
you
guys,
you
know,
we
visited
a
number
of
times
and
visited
with
staff
and
planning,
commission
and
city
council
and
went
through
the
parking
plan.
You
know
at
length
to
to
move
it
out
from
underneath
to
allow
for
that
possibility.
Take
place
should
we
be
awarded,
and
you
know
we
have
been
awarded
as
you
know,
and
we
received
our
financing
and
we've
closed
our
financing.
Just
last
week,
roughly
40
million
dollars
and
we've
pulled
full
building
permits.
L
So
we
anticipate
breaking
ground
next
week,
the
following
week
at
the
latest,
but
we
were
very
comfortable
with
that
decision.
L
To
move
the
parking
out
from
underneath
us
and
just
you
know,
roughly
192,
to
200
feet
away,
because
the
seniors
now
have
covered
parking,
secure
parking
and
out
to
the
vast
majority
of
our
senior
projects
we
have
probably
40
or
50
of
them,
and
we
have
17
000
units
or
at
grade
parking,
so
you
know
for
them
to
have
covered
parking.
You
know,
albeit
you
know,
200
feet
away
is,
is
really
a
great
deal
for
them.
It's
great
for
us,
it's
good
from
a
management
standpoint.
So
so
we're
very
comfortable
with
that.
L
You
know
from
an
operational
standpoint
and
it's
it's
certainly
an
event.
We
view
that
as
an
amenity
and
so
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
But
that's
it's
a
you
know
it's
certainly
it's
an
amenity
in
our
view
and
we're
happy
to
report
that
we
are
breaking
ground
in
a
week
or
two.
H
Thank
you
mike
one
other
point
that
was
raised
and
will
be
done.
Mayor
paul
with
our
presentation
had
to
do
with
the
unit
mix,
and
if
we
go
to
that
slide,
there
nothing's
really
changed
there.
H
The
only
negative
of
that
is
that
those
memory
care
units
do
not
count
as
residential
units
because
they
don't
have
full
kitchens,
and
so
there
are
eight
less
units
that
would
be
available
to
contribute
towards
the
city's
arena
requirements
and
while
that
is
not
desirable,
the
ratio
of
eight
essentially
apartments
ate
less
apartments.
What
the
city
or
the
code
would
consider
residential
units
against.
H
You
know
a
much
much
much
larger
denominator
versus
adding
eight
memory
care
units
to
a
market
that
is
dramatically
undersupplied
and
is
not
going
to
be.
Those
units
are
not
going
to
be
produced
anywhere
else
in
cupertino
in
the
foreseeable
future.
H
We
think
that's
a
trade-off
worth
making
and
then
the
other
issue
had
to
do
with
the
unit
mix
itself,
and
while
it
is
true
that
the
the
proposed
unit
mix
in
our
building
has
varied
slightly
from
what
was
proposed
a
year
or
so
ago,
that's
been
done
solely
because
of
the
feedback
we've
had
from
the
market
and
from
the
community,
and
there
are
many
members
of
the
senior
community
that
we've
engaged
with
and
some
of
them,
I
think,
may
be
available
tonight
to
talk
about
the
reasons
why
two
bedroom
units
aren't
are
in
such
demand
and,
frankly,
in
short
supply.
H
A
Okay,
thank
you,
everyone
from
staff
and
the
applicant
at
this
point,
I'm
going
to
move
it
over
to
the
public
for
any
comments
or
questions
that
they
may
have.
I
will
remind
members
of
the
public
that
you
will
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
You'll
need
to
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time
that
the
first
public
commenter
is
done.
A
I
will
remind
our
staff,
as
well
as
applicant
representatives,
to
be
taking
down
questions
and
if
you
want
to
respond
to
comments
from
the
public
as
well,
you'll
have
that
opportunity
to
do
so
after
the
final
member
of
the
public
is
done.
Speaking
right
now,
I
have
four
hands
raised
from
the
public.
They
are
from
andrew
wong,
richard
adler,
gene
badord
connie
cunningham
and,
as
I
was
speaking
david
stearns
as
well
raised
his
hand,
and
so
each
of
you
will
have
three
minutes
joseph
way
as
well.
At
this
point,
andrew
welcome
and
you
may
begin.
M
Hi,
thank
you
mayor
for
introducing
me.
I
want
to
ask
what
are
the
sort
of
landscaping
design
choices
that
you're
going
to
make
in
the
green
area?
I
see
there's
a
map
and
there's
not
really
much
detail
on
it,
but
I
was
wondering
like
has
this
been
planned?
Is
there
like
who
do
I
go
to
to
find
out
like
what
what
trevor,
what
trees
are
being
used
to
plant
over
there.
A
Okay,
thank
you
andrew
I'm
sure
that
staff
and
the
applicants
have
made
note
of
your
question
and
we'll
address
this
after
our
final
speaker
from
the
public.
So,
in
addition
to
the
speakers
that
we
had
that
I
indicated
before,
we
now
have
two
additional
ones.
They
are
peggy
griffin
and
janet
van
zoren,
we'll
be
concluding
our
speakers
this
evening.
Our
next
speaker
is
richard
adler.
Welcome
richard.
N
Hi,
can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
well,
very
good
thanks.
My
name
is
richard
adler
and
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
I'm
chairman
of
age,
friendly
cupertino
back
in
2018,
the
city
of
cupertino,
with
the
support
from
the
city
applied
to
the
world
health
organization
to
be
officially
designated
as
an
age-friendly
city,
and
we
did
receive
that
designation.
N
Now.
What
that
means
to
be
designated
as
age
friendly
doesn't
mean.
The
city
has
reached
the
goal
of
being
completely
age
friendly,
but
rather
the
city
has
committed
itself
to
a
goal
of
working
toward
becoming
more
age
friendly
by
identifying
the
needs
of
the
city's
older
residents
and
working
conscientiously
to
address
those
needs
and
as
required
by
that
application
process.
N
My
belief
is
that
the
this
proposed
atria
project
and
and
the
below
market
rate
combined
represent
the
first
major
addition
to
senior
housing
in
cupertino
in
many
years.
There
are
three
large
senior
housing
facilities
in
the
city
now,
there's
sunnyview
in
the
forum,
which
are
ccrc's
and
shadow
cupertino,
which
offers
rental
apartments.
N
N
Now
I
understand
the
council
has
been
concerned
with
the
retail
issue
and
the
retail
space.
That's
going
to
be
included
with
this
project
and
it's
a
real
issue,
but
I
really
have
not
ever
heard
that
cupertino
was
suffering
from
a
serious
shortage
of
retail,
but
it
is
suffering
from
a
a
really
felt
shortage
of
senior
housing.
I
think
this
project
really
addresses
that
need,
and
I
hope
that
the
city
council
will
seek
to
approve
this
project.
Thank
you.
O
O
O
O
O
I
do
have
an
ask
for
the
city.
The
front
of
the
senior
center
needs
to
be
activated,
so
seniors
can
cross
the
street
safely
at
the
stoplight
instead
of
mid-block
a
major
safety
hazard.
This
needs
to
be
addressed
as
a
cip
project
or
in
the
memorial
park.
Master
plan
urge
you
to
approve
this
new
and
significantly
improved
project
which
meets
the
needs
of
seniors
in
our
community.
O
P
Oh
good
evening,
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members,
I
am
connie
cunningham
a
34-year
resident,
I'm
sir,
currently
serving
as
chair
of
the
housing
commission.
Speaking
for
myself,
only,
I
am
supportive
of
this
modification
by
atria
to
westport
cupertino
westport
atria
moves
cupertino
toward
its
senior
strategy,
which
is
one
of
cupertino's
top
10
priority
items
on
the
fy
2021-22
city
work
program.
P
This
project
provides
a
much
needed
number
of
homes
of
differing
income
levels,
ages
and
health
needs,
267
total
with
88
market
rate,
rowhouse,
townhomes,
48
below
market
rate
senior
apartments
and
158
other
senior
homes.
The
48
senior
below
market
rate
rental
homes
are
a
significant
addition
to
the
mix
of
homes
available
to
seniors.
P
P
The
first
step
of
that
work
program
item
was
to
issue
the
online
senior
resource
availability
survey,
otherwise
known
as
the
senior
survey
that
went
live
in
october
and
closed
recently,
significant
resources
were
invested
in
this
survey.
I'm
impressed
by
westport's
responses
to
council
questions
from
december
7th
7th.
The
retail
is
increased,
surface
parking
is
increased
and
the
height
is
reduced
for
building
one
westport
project
as
a
whole
creates
an
intergenerational
neighborhood.
P
P
I'm
pleased
to
see
that
the
westport
design
includes
a
big
improvement
for
safety
for
seniors
crossing
from
the
senior
center
to
dining
and
stores.
It
is
shorter
and
more
visible
to
drivers
than
the
crosswalk
on
the
curb
farther
north
on
mary
avenue,
and
there
is
such
a
definite
synergy
with
the
ends
of
college
de
anza
provides
lifelong
learning
for
all
residents,
while
westport
offers
coffee
shops
and
places
to
relax
for
students.
P
I
like
this
design
for
an
interconnected
community,
all
ages
of
people
using
the
central
green,
the
cafes,
the
stores,
the
adjacent
senior
center
in
de
anza.
It
can
be
accessed
on
foot
on
bicycle
by
car
or
by
bus.
It
is
a
thoughtful
design
that
creates
an
interconnected
neighborhood
in
the
heart
of
the
city.
P
A
Q
Okay,
hi,
my
name
is
joseph
way
and
I
live
in
cupertino
since
1996
and
I
moved
my
family
to
boston
after
extensive
search
because
of
the
location
of
cupertino
school
system
and
the
in
the
city.
That's
why
we
chose
to
cupertino.
Another
reason
is
that
my
parents
decided
to
retire
from
hong
kong
and
they
chose
the
city
of
mountain
view
where
they
lived,
where
my
mother
still
lived
until
today,
and
my
dad
passed
away
about
nine
years
ago
at
the
age
of
90..
Q
Unfortunately,
we
have
to
move
my
mother-in-law
to
mountain
view
to
existing
living
as
there's
no
availability
for
assisted
living
available
in
cupertino
in
such
a
short
amount
of
time
that
well,
we
need
to
the
to
find
a
place
for
her
and
my
wife-
and
I
also
prefer
to
age
at
home
in
cupertino,
but
our
experience
with
caring
for
our
parents
taught
us
that
eventually,
we
will
also
see
senior
housing
with
different
level
of
services
and
in
reality
people
are
living
longer
all
over
the
world
and
cupertino
is
no
different.
Q
So
I
urge
the
city
to
stop
thinking
much
further
down
the
road.
I
know
the
the
issue
of
aging.
It
does
not
wait
so
some
of
the
solutions.
We
cannot
wait
for
a
perfect
solution
to
implement
so
but
right
now
we
have
a
situation
where
we,
you
know
we
all
have
parents
or
grandparents
that
we
need
to
find
solution
to
care
for
them
and
eventually
now
10
20
years
down
the
road.
I'm
also
looking
out
for
myself.
So
that's
my
statement
for
tonight.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
attention.
A
Let
me
go
ahead
and
you
richard
so
david.
I
have
unmuted
you,
but
I'm
not
oh,
how
about
now.
R
Yes,
now
we
go
I'll,
be
darned,
the
mysteries
of
an
ipad,
hey
I've
been
living
in
cupertino
for
over
40
years,
living
at
the
forum
ranch
of
san
antonio
for
the
last
six,
where
I've
been
a
board
member
and
I'm
also
a
member
of
age
friendly
cupertino.
R
R
I
like
the
senior
housing
component
a
lot,
especially
I
like
the
memory
care
and
assisted
living
in
the
atrium
building
at
the
forum
we
recently
enlarged
our
memory
care
and
our
assisted
living
because
of
the
census
of
our
own
people.
Here
we
got
500
people
who
are
entering
at
a
low
a
later
age
than
we
expected
them
to
30
years
ago
and
as
a
result,
we
need
more
memory,
care
and
assisted
living.
R
The
city
population
is
aging,
as
several
people
mention
tonight,
and
older
people
need
assistance
and,
unfortunately
memory
care-
and
I
know
gee
too
many
friends-
you
know
living
in
cupertino
in
los
altos
and
surrounding
cities
who
are
trying
to
age
in
place
not
doing
the
best
job
and
when
it's
a
couple
and
one
of
the
members
gets
memory
problems
or
has
an
accident.
S
Good
evening,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
city
council
and
the
westport
group
for
returning
the
agreed
upon
20
000
square
feet
of
retail
and
adjusting
the
parking.
S
I
have
two
questions
here
below
you
see
the
plan
and
there's
something
called
a
wandering
garden,
and
I
think
that
with
the
wandering
garden
and
also
the
increased
width
that
the
public
space
has
significantly
been
reduced.
So
I'd
like
somebody
to
explain
this
wandering
garden,
is
it
on
the
ground
floor?
Is
it
above
do?
Is
it
publicly
accessible
also?
S
S
I
do.
I
do
not
think
the
bmr
units
are
compatible
comparable.
So
if
you
approve
this
project,
please
be
clear
in
your
resolution
that
it's
not
comparable,
so
future
projects
can
have
a
heads
up.
I
do
like
this
compromise
solution
and
I
would
agree
that
this
should
proceed,
but
I'd
like
my
answers.
My
questions
answered.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
peggy.
Our
next
and
last
speaker
is
janet
van
zoran
with
apologies,
stephen
scharf.
You
simply
didn't
get
the
hand
up
quickly
enough
and
so
janet
welcome.
G
A
Thank
you
janet
and
you
win
the
award
for
concise
public
comment
of
the
evening
thus
far,
and
so
let's
go
ahead
and
bring
it
back
to
our
staff
as
well
as
the
applicant
representatives
and,
as
I
stated
from
the
outset
of
this
item,
let's
go
ahead
and
ask
staff
and
the
applicant
to
respond
to
some
of
the
questions
and
as
needed,
follow-up
to
the
comments
by
the
members
of
the
public.
A
A
All
right,
let
let
me
go
first
and
then
we
won't
talk
over
each
other.
R
A
So
matt
woody
had
his
hand
raised.
We
we
had
the
applicant
representatives
as
well
as
a
few
from
from
staff.
So
why
don't
we
do
this?
Why
don't
we?
Why
don't
we
visit
staff
first,
perhaps
some
of
those
questions
can
be
clarified.
Would
anyone
from
staff
like
to
address
any
of
the
public
comments
at
this
point.
F
Sure
I
could
I
can
go
through
a
few
of
them.
If
you
don't
mind,
there's
there's
a
comment
from
the
member
of
the
public.
The
first
one,
I
believe,
was
about
the
landscaping
in
the
middle,
the
central
green,
the
the
the
original
intended
landscape
green
has
not
changed
since
august
2020
against
landscape
greens,
one
of
the
few
areas
of
the
westport
development,
which
will
have
turf
as
which
which
staff
was
under
pressure,
would
be
kind
of
a
seating
area,
a
gathering
area
and
whatnot.
F
A
lot
of
the
trees
in
that
area
are
proposed
to
be
date
palms
and
with
a
mix
of
drought,
tolerant
plantings
along
the
edges
of
the
building.
Of
course,
the
the
front
of
the
building
alongside
boulevard
is
going
to
be
consistent
with
the
hard
state
specific
plan,
with
with
kind
of
like
an
oak
with
coastline,
folks,
with
the
public
right
away
and
on
the
on
the
frontage
of
the
buildings
as
well.
F
A
I
mean
if
you
can
get
those
questions
answered
from
staff.
You
know
we'll
just
go
sequentially.
If
anyone
else
has
comment
from
staff
and
then
we'll
go
over
to
the
applicant
to
follow
up
for
public
comments
and
questions.
F
Sure
you
know
my
understanding
about
the
wandering
garden
was
that
it's
as
stated
it's
above
the
the
central
green
which
would
which
would
substitute
for
the
the
memory
care
balcony
that
that
opens
up
the
private
open
space
for
them
again.
The
applicant
can
clarify
if
I've,
if
I've
interpreted
that
correctly
or
not
so
in
that
case,
it's
not,
I
don't
believe
it's
taken
away
from
the
central
green.
Rather
it's
it's
kind
of
a
privately
accessible
just
to
the
memory
care
units.
F
On
the
second
floor,
in
terms
of
the
the
continuing
to
modify
that
was
probably
just
semantics
with
the
staff
report,
there
has
been
no
indication
that,
after
this
modification
of
the
applicant
will
propose
any
further
modifications
to
the
project.
So
you
know
if,
if,
if
that
was
anything
that
was
misleading
the
public,
I
do
apologize
for
my
bad
english
writing
that
was
not
intended
so
and
I
believe
that's
the
the
last
con
question
from
the
I
miss.
F
A
No
thank
you
that
was
that
was
quite
comprehensive,
based
upon
my
own
notes
as
well.
Does
anyone
from
staff
have
anything
to
add
to
what
john
mertier
was
stating
in
follow-up
to
the
public
comments?
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
at
this
point,
so
let
me
go
to
our
applicant
representatives.
A
K
Mayor
paul,
I
just
just
confirming
what
jian
said
regarding
the
wandering
guarding
that's
just
a
a
moniker
that
we
use
for
a
secured
outdoor
space
for
our
memory
care
residents.
It
is
on
the
second
floor
and
it's
it
will
be
off
of
kind
of
their
their
main
living
and
activity
area,
and
that's
at
that
particular
location
makes
more
sense.
K
It
actually
will
provide
some
nice
shade
as
well
for
for
those
residents
dining
below,
but
it's
it's
it's
exclusively
for
the
use
of
the
memory
care
residents,
and
so
I
was
just
confirming
what
gian
said.
A
Okay,
understood
anyone
else
from
the
applicant
like
to
follow
up
on
items
from
our
members
of
the
public,
okay,
seeing
nobody.
I
will
now
open
this
up
to
the
council,
and
this
will
be
the
portion
where
we
will
be
asking
questions
of
staff
as
well
as
the
applicant.
A
I
will
repeat,
this
is
not.
This
is
not
a
portion
where
the
hearing
is
closed.
The
hearing
is
still
open,
but
we've
had
the
opportunity
to
hear
the
presentations
as
well
as
members
of
the
public
and
the
follow-ons
from
our
staff
and
the
representatives
from
the
applicant,
and
so
now
we
have
this
opportunity
to
have
our
council
questions
raised
and
so
keeping
track
of
time.
It's
1109
right
now.
A
I
think
we're
having
a
good
robust
item
at
this
point,
but
I
will
try
to
keep
us
on
track
timewise
without
getting
draconian
about
it.
Councilmember
willie,
you
have
a
hand
raised
four
questions.
T
So
I
do
have
a
question
I'll
temper.
It
first,
though,
that
I
do
like
the
improvements
that
I'm
seeing
the
question
that
I've
got
is
kind
of
a
carryover
from
the
previous
one.
It's
about
the
hydraulic,
lift
parking,
that's
on
the
underneath
of
the
main
building
there,
and
what
percentage
of
the
parking
is
going
to
be
using
this
new
style
of
parking.
T
Think
matt
matt's,
probably
the
best
one.
F
F
A
And
matt,
if
you're
speaking,
you'll
need
to
unmute
your
yourself.
H
Yes,
sorry,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
so
councilman
willie
you're
correct
that
the
stackers
as
we
call
them
the
lift
the
hydraulic,
lift
parking
section
of
the
garage
will
be
manned
by
a
valet,
and
the
use
of
that
state
of
those
spaces
is
primarily
for
the
benefit
of
the
residents,
their
guests
and
the
staff.
H
And
so
the
way
this
will
work
is
that
anybody
using
that
portion
of
the
garage
will
drop
their
car
off
in
front
of
the
building
in
the
drop
off
zone
off
of
mary
avenue.
A
valet
will
then
take
the
car
down
into
the
garage
and
park
it,
and
when
that
person
wants
their
car
back,
they'll
tell
the
valet
and
they'll
come
get
it
and
they'll
be
driven
and
dropped
off
where
they
left
it
in
front
of
the
building,
so
the
stackers
are
not
being
used
by
individuals.
H
H
I'll
have
to
defer
to
one
of
my
colleagues
to
answer
that
question.
I
don't
know
off
top
my
head,
but
can
you
can
you
pull
up
a
slide.
F
I
believe
the
stackers
are
76
of
the
spaces,
I'm
sorry,
there's
76
stackers
spaces
in
terms
of
just
so
that
would
be
33
spaces
with
which
would
accommodate
76
cars
to
be
parked
with
with
the
80
residential
required
spaces
for
the
the
other,
four
would
be
handicapped,
which
are
non-stacker,
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
that
point.
H
So
I
I
think
you're
right
what
this
what's
this
drawing
shows
john,
is
and
councilman
willie
is
that
the
white
spaces
are
the
stackers.
The
blue
space
spaces
are
the
bmr
south
park
spaces
and
the
orange
spaces
are
also
south
park
spaces
and
the
the
whole
concept
of
this
is
that
very
few
of
our
residents
drive.
H
T
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
thank
you!
Councilman
wooley
and
just
as
a
time
check
that
was
about
five
minutes
I'll
allocate
the
roughly
the
same
amount
for
councils
for
question
for
this
first
round.
I
want
this
to
be
a
complete
discussion.
We
have
vice
mayor
chow,
followed
by
council
member
moore,
just
a
quick
time
check.
It's
11
15
right
now,
followed
by
council's
member
way.
Vice
mayor
ciao,.
C
Okay,
so
I'll
share
my
screen,
this
is,
I
believe,
is
the
second
floor.
So
the
first
floor
is
retail.
The
second.
A
C
So
so
this
mc
terrace
is
the
part
where
you
are
saying
it's
a
wandering
garden
for
the
memory
care
unit
right
and
then
underneath
will
be
the
outdoor
dining
area
on
in
the.
In
the
first
floor
I
mean
this
is
so
so
this
this
part,
that's
wandering
garden
is
actually
you
are
saying
it.
There
will
be
a
shade
for
the.
H
C
Good
design,
so
I
am
confused.
There
is
the
retail
because
the
plane
set
says
retail
on
the
top.
The
new
corner
is
3
000
square
foot,
but
the
staff
report
mentioned
the
35
step
presentations
at
3,
500
square
foot
and
I
think
atria
also
mentioned
3
500
square
foot.
So
it's
that
part
3000
or
3500.
H
C
H
With
all
due
respect,
I
honestly
don't
know,
but
you
know
I
understand
the
objective
and
will
do
everything
humanly
possible
to
make
the
spaces
subdividable,
because
that
was
a
recommendation
by
some
of
the
other
council
members
and
we'll
try
to
show
you
how
it
is
exactly
fourteen
thousand
one
hundred.
But
I
don't
know
looking
at
your
groin,
I
can't
say:
okay,
it's
possible,
that
the
paseo
took
some
of
that
square
footage.
C
Okay
yeah
thank
you
for
making
the
effort
for
to
provide
as
much
retail
yeah.
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor
chao,
so
we're
right
under
about
a
couple
of
those
original
five
minutes
left
we'll
have
council
member
moore,
followed
by
council
member
way.
B
Actually,
if,
if
vice
mayor
could
continue
to
screen
share,
I
believe
that's
who's.
Sharing
right
now
that
the
floor
plan
vice
mayor
ciao,
can
you
yeah?
Yes?
Actually,
that's
perfect,
okay,
so
my
first
question
has
to
deal
with
the
ada
parking
requirements,
so
the
retail
that
you
have
on
the
north
side,
the
3
000
square
feet,
does
not
have
adjacent
ada
parking
stalls
and
yet
you're
trying
to
make
that
senior
medical
facilities.
B
So
the
the
shortest
path
is
all
the
way
down
to
the
eevee
van
parking
to
the
east
is
so
I
don't
think
we
should
be
trying
to
design
this
during
zoom,
but
I'm
seeing
an
issue
there
with
regards
to
ada
parking,
and
I
don't
know
how
that
how
you're
going
to
remedy
that
there's
also
some
issues
with
regards
to
the
application
requirements.
B
B1
I'd
like
to
know
where
the
summary
table
they're,
referencing
is
and
for
the
site
plan.
I
don't
see
how
the
the
density
bonus
units
have
been
labeled
and
tabulated
for
for
me
to
be
able
to
follow
where,
where
those
units
are
so
that
parts
seems
incomplete.
So
I'm
wondering
why
this
hasn't
been
sent
to
the
planning
commission,
particularly
with
regards
to
the
parking
the
municipal
code,
section
19.125,.
B
C
seems
to
indicate
that
there
need
to
be
findings
and
exceptions
made
that
that
is
in
the
purview
of
the
the
planning
commission
and
given
the
number
of
changes
here,
I'd
like
staff
to
let
us
know
if
we
are
able
to
send
this
to
the
planning
commission
to
review
since
the
changes
are
so
extensive.
And,
lastly,
we
had
a
tentative
map
showing
underground
parking
underneath
the
bmr
building
and
the
the
senior
market
rate
units.
B
So
how
do
we
now
alter
our
final
map
to
show
the
the
easements
that
are
needed
for
the
senior
parking,
which
is
the
senior
bmr
parking
which
needs
to
be
accessed
in
the
separate
building?
I'm
going
to
assume
you
need
an
ingress,
egress
kind
of
easement
there
to
to
go
with
the
property.
So
mostly,
I
need
to
know
why
why
this
shouldn't
go
to
the
planning
commission
and
and
what
are
our
rights
to?
B
A
Okay,
great,
that's
exactly
half
here
five
minutes,
so
let
me
start
with
staff
same
order
post
public
comment.
Please
attempt
to
answer
as
many
of
councilmember
moore's
questions
as
you
can
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
applicant
for
follow-up
to
that.
Chris,
you
have
your
microphone
on.
So
did
you.
U
Yeah,
so
I
I
couldn't
answer
some
of
the
questions,
I
think
so,
with
respect
to
any
changes
to
the
subdivision
map.
You
know
any
reciprocal
easements
between
the
parcels
wouldn't
necessarily
be
public
access,
easements.
That
would
require
a
modification
of
the
final
map.
U
So
this
with
respect
to
the
planning
commission's
role,
the
director
under
the
code
has
discretion
to
refer
a
project
to
a
higher
body
by
the
director
of
community
development,
and
in
this
case
the
decision
was
referred
to
to
the
city
council.
U
The
planning
commission
could
instruct
the
community
development
debt
director
to
refer
this
matter
to
the
planning
commission
for
further
deliberations.
That
is
within
your
discretion.
U
Yes,
I
did
thank
you
for
correcting
me
actually
and
then
with
respect
to
the
questions
regarding
ada
parking.
I
think
perhaps
the
the
applicant
theme
is
best
placed
that
answer,
how
they're
addressing
those
questions.
A
Okay,
I
take
it,
no
one
else
from
the
staff
matt.
What
do
you
have
your
hand
raised?
Did
you
want
to.
F
A
councilmember
moore's
comments
about
the
you
know:
the
identification
density
bonus
units
on
sheets-
oh
gosh,
825,
and
let
me
share
my
screen
really
quick.
They
did
actually
did
at
the
request
of
staff,
refer
to
density
bonus
units
on
this
sheet.
These
sheets
right
here,
all
60,
there's,
I
believe,
there's
20
22
units
all
together
density,
bonus
units.
So
all
16
and
level
6
are
considered
density,
bonus
units
and
607
front
facing
until
level
5
are
considered.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
genre
tier
that
does
leave
the
question
regarding
the
ada
parking
units.
Would
anyone
from
the
applicant
like
to
take
that
on
or
sure.
H
Sure,
yeah
yeah
very
quickly.
We
don't
know
what
the
use
of
that
3
500
square
feet
is
going
to
be.
I
suggested
that,
among
the
uses
that
we
think
would
be
good
could
be
medical
uses
and
if,
in
fact,
it
ended
up
being
a
rehabilitation
facility,
we
of
course
would
locate
the
ada
parking
adjacent
to
it.
But
it's
premature,
we
don't
know
in
the
17
600
square
feet
who's
going
to
go
where
at
this
point
and
obviously
we'll
meet
whatever
requirements
that
that
particular
use
dictates.
A
Respect
more
since
this
is
your
question
very
brief.
Follow-Up,
your
hand
is
back
up.
Did
you
want
to
follow
up
on
that.
B
B
U
I
I
guess
I
should
also
we're
sorry
to
jump
in.
I
should
also
just
clarify
that
that
accessible
parking
is
regulated
under
the
building
code
under
chapter
11,
a
of
the
building
code,
and
so.
I
U
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Well,
let's,
in
the
interest
of
time
you
know
I
went
ahead
and
allocated
a
minute
over
for
that
quick
follow-up,
but
let's
go
to
council
member
way,
who's
been
patiently
waiting
and
so
councilmember
white
questions
of
the
applicant
or
staff.
V
Yes,
thank
you,
mayor
paul.
I
have
met
with
city
staff
and
applicant
to
understand
a
lot
of
things,
so
I
asked
my
questions,
but
I
do
want
to
repeat
this
question.
The
central
lung
is
a
very
essential
part
of
this
building
so
that
this
project,
because
it
integrates
outside
use
and
the
answer
college
students,
are
senior
students
so
who
exactly
is
managing
the
central
loan?
That's
my
first
question.
You
know
how
do
we
get
approval
for
outside
use?
For
example,
if
we
want
to
do
a
high
school
foundations
fundraiser
there?
V
How
do
we
go
apply
that?
My
second
question
is
you
know
we
do.
Thank
you
very
much
for
bringing
back
this
17
500
or
600
square
footage
of
retail,
but
in
addition
to
that,
the
central
loans
outside
dining-
that's
in
addition
to
the
retail
and
do
we
have
a
positive
guarantee
that
that's
going
to
happen
because
outside
gaming
is
really
very
preferable
right
now.
So
that's
my
two
questions.
A
H
Yes,
so,
first
of
all,
with
respect
to
who
is
going
to
be
responsible
for
the
ongoing
maintenance
and
and
governance
and
management
of
the
central
green,
an
organization
has
been
created
between
the
three
different
owners
within
westport
cupertino.
That
would
be
the
hoa
the
aba
townhomes
pacific
communities
as
the
owner
of
the
48
bmr
units
and
related
atria
building
one.
We
are
the
manager
of
that
enemy,
but
all
three
parties
are
responsible
for
their
pro
rata
share
of
ongoing
fees.
H
So
if
there
was
a
request
to
utilize
that
for
a
particular
function,
it
would
come
to
the
organization
that
we've
created
legal
organization
that
we've
created
and
whoever's
managing
the
building
for
us
would
probably
be
the
designated
manager
of
that
organization.
And
that's
who
you
would
make
your
request
to
the
the
second.
I
don't
recall
the
second
question.
Councilman
way,
if
you
could
just
repeat.
V
H
Yeah,
yes,
yes,
thank
you.
It
is
in
addition
to
that.
It's
not
included
none
of
the.
If
you
look
at
the
plan,
there
are
tables
shown
in
front
of
the
resident,
dining
and
also
in
front
of
the
retail.
None
of
that
square
footage
is
included
in
the
17
600,
so
any
outdoor
dining
would
be.
In
addition-
and
it
is,
you
know,
can
it
be
guaranteed?
H
Well,
that's
that
that's
always
a
function
of
who's,
running
these
restaurants
or
cafes,
or
what
have
you
and
there's
also
the
outdoor
dining
on
the
mary
avenue
side
of
the
building
that
one
of
the
members
of
age
friendly
cupertino,
mentioned
it's
very
much
in
our
intent
to
have
as
much
outdoor
dining
as
possible,
but
we've
also
heard
that
there's
a
desire
to
have
a
non-restaurant
non-food
and
beverage
convenience
stores
and
some
other
types
of
uses
here.
So
I
think
ultimately
the
market
will
dictate,
but
it
is
very
much
within
our
goal.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
mayor
council.
Member
way,
we
have
approximately
a
little
less
than
a
minute
45
for
you.
I
I
have
my
four
minutes,
but
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
seed
it
over
to
follow-ups
from
council
vice
mayor
chao.
You
also
have
about
the
same
amount
of
time
as
councilmember
way,
so
just
trying
to
keep
us
on
track.
We're
at
11
30
right
now,
I'd
like
to
us
to
get
to
an
introduced
motion
within
the
next
five
or
so
minutes.
A
Councilmember
moore,
you
have
a
hand
raised,
and
I'm
going
to
exceed
part
of
my
time
over
to
you
for
those
follow-ups.
Okay,.
B
Thank
you
mayor
paul,
so
when
I'm
thank
you
for
pointing
out
the
the
sentences
for
with
regarding
the
density
bonus
unit,
so
the
additional
height
was
not
exactly
needed
for
the
density
bonus
units
because
there's
14
about
14
000
square
feet
of
amenity
space.
On
the
sixth
level,
it
looks
like
between
the
spa
wellness
center
fitness
yoga,
lockers
theater.
B
In
a
form
of
a
question,
so
I
I
am
I'm
curious
about
the
need
for
the
extra
height
when
I'm
looking
at
a
base
a
base
project,
especially
given
that
the
there
are
no
bmrs
in
the
scene.
B
No
density
bonus
units
in
the
senior
bmr
building,
which
to
me
is
an
indicator
that
the
additional
height
was
not
required
to
for
the
density
bonus
in
that
building
and
then
seeing
the
14
000
square
feet
of
amenities
space
up
on
the
sixth
level,
I'm
wondering
why
how
it's
justified
the
additional
height
was
needed
there,
and
this
is
a
question
for
chris
regarding
the
the
concession
or
the
waiver
for
extra
height.
A
Okay,
city
attorney
jensen.
How
would
you
like
to
address
this
question.
U
In
august,
2020
council
made
the
determination
that
the
waiver
for
height
was
all
allowed
and
required
to
be
allowed
under
the
density
bonus
law
that
I
don't
think,
there's
any
occasion
to
revisit
that
decision
at
this
time,
and
you
know
because
the
applicant
has
provided
the
number
of
very
low
income
units
required
to
obtain
a
density
bonus.
They
they're,
you
know,
they're
entitled
to
waivers
with
the
criteria,
are
met
and
they're
entitled
to
a
certain
number
of
concessions
based
on
the
provision
of
those
units.
Okay,.
B
A
B
Okay,
so
I
would
like
to
know
why
we
are
not
seeing
the
94
density
bonus
units
that
the
project's
entitled
to
being
utilized,
especially
given
our
need
to
have
meet
these
these
huge
arena
numbers.
Can
anyone
give
me
a
reason
why
why
the
project
isn't
excluding
them.
A
Well,
since
this
is
my
time
I'll
go
ahead
and
interject,
I
think
chris
gave
a
pretty
good
answer
right.
I
mean
the
the
vli
units
are
the
crux
of
the
density
bonus
and
it's
not
required
that
all
of
the
density
bonus
units
be
invoked
in
terms
of
the
rest
of
the
units
that
the
applicant
have
the
ability
to
make.
I
mean
whether
that's
good
policy,
whether
that's
good
legislation.
A
I
think
that's
a
different
question
right
I
mean,
but
I
I
think
chris
gave
the
the
heart
of
the
answer
right,
because
the
the
legislation
and
the
allowances
are
focused
upon
those
vli
units,
okay,
so
matthew.
What
do
you
have
your
hand
raised?
Did
you
want
to
follow
up
on
any
point
there,
or
is
that
just
an
artifact.
A
Okay,
so
I
don't
see
any
further
hands
raised
from
our
council
at
this
point.
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
ask
that
we
entertain
a
motion
for
for
discussion
and
before
we
do
that,
I
will
formally
close
the
public
hearing.
A
May
I
have
a
motion
for
the
purposes
of
voting
or
for
discussion
on
this
item
from
council
at
this
time.
Vice
mayor,
ciao,.
C
Approve
adopt
the
following
resolutions
to
approve
the
project
modification
one
resolution
number
21-117,
we're
proving
the
heart
of
the
city
exception,
2
resolution
number
21-1,
approving
the
modified
development
permit
three
resolution
number
21-118,
approving
the
architectural
and
the
site;
approval
permit.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
second
for
this
motion.
Council
member,
more
your
hand
is
raised.
Second,
okay,
we
have
a
motion
on
the
table.
I
see
that
vice
merchant
still
has
a
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
your
motion.
C
Yes,
okay,
okay,
so
I
I
do
wish
to
approve
this
project.
However,
I
am
still
struggling
a
little
bit
because
yeah,
I'm
really
happy
that
at
least
we
have
almost
all
the
same.
The
same
amount
of
retail
and
the
applicant
has
made
the
commitment
to
provide
as
much.
C
However,
compared
with
the
approved
project,
we
do
we
still
get
less
height
in
the
ground
floor,
and
then
we
still
get
third
still
enlarge
the
unit
size
and
college
corridor
and
then,
which
makes
the
project
on
high-end
doctors
units
and
plus
we
have
reduced
number
of
rena
when
they
have
added
a
five
more
extra
two
bedrooms
and
reduce
the
14
steel.
Deals
that
reduce
the
number
of
arena
units
which
we
really
need
and
underground
parking
is
improved,
but
still
is
in
a
separate
building
and
the
way
bmr
is
still
not
inclusionary.
C
Every
request
is:
will
help
the
applicant
to
make
a
better,
more
expensive
project,
more
more
luck,
journalists
for
for
the
residents
to
afford,
so
residents
are
asking.
What
do
we
give
in
in
return
there?
There's
there
has
to
be
a
give
and
take
so
one
idea
that
I
would
like
to
propose.
I
is,
I
think
the
cupertino
really
needs
space
for
non-profit
organizations
and
we
need
meeting
spaces
for
the
community.
C
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
a
good
alternative,
but
maybe
the
the
top
end
of
the
retail
thirty,
three
thousand
or
thirty
five
hundred
square
feet.
What
if
that's
provided
as
a
community
space
for
non-profit
and
and
a
meeting
room
with
the
free
rent
for
for
the
community?
C
C
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
vice
mayor
ciao
and
just
on
a
time
check,
you're
at
about
two
minutes,
40
seconds
in,
and
so
let
me
just
give
us
about
three
minutes
each
here
councilmember.
Why
did
you
have
follow-on
comments
at
this
time?.
V
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
I
like
to
follow
up
with
vice
mayor's
comments.
I,
if,
if
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
the
the
drive
for
more
two
bedrooms
and
more
memory
care,
is
driven
by
senior
needs,
it's
really
not
to
make
it
more
luxurious
or
less
affordable
for
people.
If
correct
me,
if
that's
wrong,
because
according
to
what
I've
heard
from
our
seniors
in
the
community,
this
is
what
they
need,
so
the
atrium
can
definitely
change
it
back
to
the
original
plan,
but
that
doesn't
fit
our
needs.
V
So
I
would
like
to
make
that
clear
that
if
that's
what
our
seniors
are
driven,
that's
what
has
happened.
So
I
really
don't
think
it's,
because
the
atrium
is
going
to
make
more
money
or
is
more
luxurious.
So
I
like
to
make
that
point.
Maybe
somebody
can
follow
up
with
that
and
the
second
I
I
do
believe
our
senior
has
spoken.
This
is
a
really
good
project
for
our
seniors.
This
is
what
we
really
need.
V
So
if
we
hang
out
on
those
eight
units,
I
just
feel
that
that
this
this
project
is
going.
The
48
units
of
low-income
housing
are
breaking
ground.
So
we
really
need
to
get
this
going,
so
I
I
do
believe
the
developers
have
really
accommodated
our
request.
So
so
just
just
see
if
the
change
of
units
at
two
more
two
bedroom
has
more
memory
care,
is
that
driven
by
our
seniors.
A
Okay,
thank
you
councilmember
way,
you're
at
a
minute
and
a
half.
Let
me
let
me
go
ahead
and
sorry,
I'm
alternating
between
two
computers
here
I'll
I'll
start.
My
time
on
this,
I
I
think.
Let
me
just
give
some
comments
here.
You
know
I
I
think
we
actually
probably
can't
really
get
to
the
point
where
we're
converting
three
thousand
or
parts
of
three
thousand
or
three
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet
of
retail
over
to
non-profit
meeting
space.
A
I
I
think
we
could
put
the
question
out
there
in
you
know
the
applicant
could
take
it
under
advisement
and
hopefully
you
know
be
able
to
work
with
staff.
If
you
know,
for
example,
five
to
six
hundred
square
feet
could
be
carved
out,
and
you
know,
and
hopefully
in
good
faith
it
could
be
pursued.
I
I
don't
think
it's
a
bad
idea.
A
I
just
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
the
kind
of
you
know
right
right,
sort
of
timing
to
consider
it
in
terms
of
the
other
parts
of
it
I
mean
we're,
not.
A
I
don't
think
we're
really
getting
what
we
asked
for
in
terms
of
the
last
december
7th
meeting,
but
I
think
it's
become
a
better
project
for
the
public
and,
to
that
extent
I'm
appreciative
of
the
applicant's
efforts,
but
I'm
also
not
you
know,
looking
with
rose-colored
glasses
with
regard
to
what
they're
doing
when
it
comes
to
you
know,
pursuing
you
know,
profit-driven
enterprise,
I
mean
one
thing.
A
You
know
one
lingering
issue
that
I
have
in
terms
of
voting
on
the
motion
on
the
on
the
dice,
which
I
will
be
doing
you
know
if
we
bring
it
to
a
vote,
is,
is
the
notion
that
by
invoking
the
idea
that
the
market
drives
more
two-bedroom
units
over
studios,
they
can
thereby
change
their
their
essentially
for-profit
part
of
this
plan.
A
You
know
I
I
do
hear
what
my
colleagues
have
said
with
regard
to
giving
short
shrift
to
the
bmr
units,
because
that
logic
should
be
equally
applicable
to
the
bmr
units
as
well.
But
I
have
been
told
by
my
staff
that
it
is
very
difficult,
if
not
impossible,
to
take
building
two
and
and
make
those
adjustments.
We
could
potentially
just
not
allow
the
conversion
from
from
studio
to
two
to
two
excuse
me
from
studio
to
two-bedroom
in
building
one
in
basically
the
the
profit
center,
so
to
speak.
A
So
so
I
I'm
a
bit
discomfited
by
you
know
that
kind
of
you
know
approach,
and
you
know
treatment
of
the
bmr
side
of
things.
I
I
think
you
know
if
you
really
took
an
honest
look
at
it.
I
won't
say
it's
an
afterthought,
but
it
is
a
constant
conversation.
You
know
to
put
it,
you
know,
politely
in
terms
of
getting
inclusionary
zoning,
not
getting
to
a
point
where
there's
litigation
palmer
versus
you
know.
A
I
think
it
was
la
county-
was
about
inclusionary
zoning,
for
you
know,
rental
housing
units
there
was
litigation
up
here
for
owner
occupied.
You
know
this
is
all
part
of
that
spectrum
of
a
conversation.
It's
not
ideal
in
terms
of
the
whole
policy
of
inclusionary
interspersing.
You
know
within
your
your
other
units,
but
it
is
a
significant
amount,
but
but
you
know
that
that
one
lingering
part
is
is
what
kind
of
gives
me
some
pause
with
regard
to
saying.
A
Well,
we
can
do
it
to
the
for-profit
stuff,
but
you're
not
necessarily
going
to
convert
some
studios
over
two-bedroom
or
even
give
you
any
kind
of
market
analysis,
as
so
whether
bmr
residents
have
that
sort
of
you
know
same
consideration.
A
So,
but
I
you
know
if
this
comes
to
a
vote,
I
will
be
voting
for
the
motion
on
the
table
with
the
idea
that
this
has
you
know
incrementally
improved
over
time
as
a
as
a
project
space.
I
don't
see
further
hands
raised
at
this
time.
Are
there
any
other
follow-on
comments
for
council,
so
council,
member
moore,
followed
by
council
member
willie.
B
Hey,
thank
you.
You
know.
I
really
do
hope
that
the
danza
students
are
find
employment
at
this
facility.
I
had
asked
in
the
last
meeting
for
a
single
bmr
townhouse,
and
I
I
want
to
reiterate
this
there.
There
are
88,
townhouses
and
row
houses.
B
If
we
had
followed
our
bmr
manual,
we
would
have
had
18
of
those
be
affordable,
bmr
units
affordable
to
families,
and
if
we
look
at
what
happened
at
falco,
we
ended
up
with
no
family,
affordable
units,
and
it's
repeating
here-
and
I
am
I'm
genuinely
disappointed
about
that-
and
I
think
if
it
is
not
part
of
our,
if
we're
not
required
to
have
the
sentence
in
our
municipal
code
that
allows
the
developer
to
not
take
the
maximum
density
bonus
units
that
they
qualify
for
I'd
like
to
to
see
if
our
attorney
can
find
out.
B
T
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
So
the
important
comments,
then,
that
I'd
like
to
make
this
evening.
You
know
we
previously
approved
this
gosh
what
8
12
12
months
ago,
and
we
really
wrestled
that
night,
where
it's
a
part
of
the
community
and
how
do
we
get
the
best
project
for
all
the
community
and
we
really
wrestled
and
we
approved
it.
You
know
five
to
zero
and
then
the
project
came
back
with
some
of
the
more
beneficial
parts
for
the
community
being
significantly
reduced.
T
Disappointment
of
a
lot
of
the
community
seniors,
but
we're
here
to
represent
the
whole
community
and
we
did
continue
it
and
the
developer
came
back
and,
as
he
said
tonight,
they
have
made
the
project
significantly
better.
T
T
T
You
know
a
a
central
green
that
will
likely
have
some
de
anza
college
student
youth
coming
and
enjoying
this
space
that
shared
with
the
senior
population,
the
families
in
the
row
and
townhouses
bringing
their
younger
kids
over
into
this
area.
Where
the
atria
applicant
said.
That's
what
helps
the
longevity
of
these
seniors
and.
T
A
You
councilmember,
william
vice
mayor
ciao.
I
I
don't
know
whose
time
I
would
lend
councilmember
away.
You
have
about
a
minute
and
a
half.
Did
you
want
to
provide
some
time
for
high.
V
C
So
first
I
echo
councilman
moore's
frustration
that
there
should
be
15
percent
of
bmr
for
townhouse
in
the
row
houses.
This
is
something
we
raised
before.
We
approved
the
project,
but
that
wasn't
raised
fast
enough.
The
staff
already
allowed
them
to
provide
100
senior
bmr
and
that
issue
should
have
been
raised
within
30
days
in
terms
of
the
compliance
with
general
plan.
C
We
also
don't
have
any
data,
whether
what
kind
of
senior
units
our
residents
need.
I
shared
this
price
level.
Pricing
level
of
different
senior
projects
we
have,
and
this
one
is
at
the
the
unit
size
is
bigger
than
the
most
luxurious
one
in
san
francisco.
So
we
would
be
looking
at
a
very
luxurious
price.
A
C
Know-
and
I
hope
that
in
the
future
a
few
residents
who
speak
at
the
council
meeting
doesn't
represent
all
the
council
members
and
all
the
residents.
I
do
hope
that
in
the
future
there
will
be
some
kind
of
survey
of
what
we
our
residents
actually
need
in
terms
of
size
and
unit
type.
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
you
know.
Let
me
just
wrap
this
before
we
take
a
vote
on
the
motion
on
the
table
by
thanking
everyone
for
being
involved.
I
I
think
we've
had
a
fantastic
discussion
and,
frankly,
you
know
each
and
every
comment
and
point
of
pushback
has
actually
created
improvement
points
on
this
project.
You
know
I've
been
with
this
all
the
way
through
when
acquisition
by
the
current
property
owner
took
place,
and
you
know
it's
been
quite
a
quite
quite
a
change
from
what
was
originally
put
in
there.
A
So
with
that,
let
me
go
ahead
and
ask
our
our
our
I'm
sorry,
I'm
blanking
on
the
vocabulary,
our
city
clerk,
to
please
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
with
regard
to
the
motion
that
is
on
the
table.
A
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
city
clerk,
all
right
great
discussion
and
let
me
go
ahead
and
bring
us
over
to
the
next
item
on
our
agenda.
That
was
the
final
substantive
item.
We
have
oral
communications
continued,
those
were
completed.
We
have
council
and
staff
comments
and
future
agenda
items.
I
would
like
to
just
remind
everybody
we're
at
11
53,
it's
near
the
end
of
calendar
year
2021..
A
We
have
a
brand
new
city
manager
permanent
coming
in
on
january
3rd,
and
so
you
know
if
we
want
to
begin
a
new,
we
have
a
very
healthy
work
plan
ahead
of
us.
A
I
I
will
say
just
very
briefly
that
within
the
new
city
managers
contract-
and
this
was
part
of
the
discussion
process-
there
are
monthly
performance
evaluations,
so
council
will
be
meeting
with
our
new
city
manager
on
the
first
mondays
of
the
month
as
part
of
its
dedicated
representation
of
the
public
at
8
a.m.
On
the
first
mondays
for
an
hour
to
you,
know,
go
over
that
and
so
you'll
see
a
notice
for
january
3rd,
the
first
day
that
jim
troop
starts.
A
I
believe
that
we
are
trying
to
go
ahead
and
have
a
special
meeting
on
january
13th
a
weekend
three
days
after
that
on
the
following
thursday.
We
don't
have
a
regularly
scheduled
meeting
on
january,
4th
we've
canceled
that
in
order
to
get
those
items
that
were
postponed
on
today's
agenda
out
of
the
way
before
our
january
18th
meeting,
which
is
the
only
regularly
scheduled
meeting
and
so
before,
we
go
to
council
for
any
of
these
comments.
A
A
Okay,
great,
thank
you
very
much
diane,
and
so
my
fellow
city
council
members
with
all
that
is
preface
let
us
go
to
council
member
willie.
T
So
for
future
agenda
items
two,
although
maybe
they
can
be
combined
into
one
so
for
westport
staff,
allowed
all
the
parking
under
the
bmr
to
be
removed
without
consulting
us,
not
ten
percent,
not
twenty
percent,
but
one
hundred
percent.
I
would
like
us
to
have
a
study
session
or
something
where
we
give
direction.
As
to
the
authority,
that's
granted
to
staff's.
T
T
A
Councilmember,
thank
you
very
much
so
noted.
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
be
fair
to
the
other
members
of
the
council
and
grant
equal
time
before
midnight.
Here.
I
promise
you.
I
will
follow
up
with
our
acting
city
manager,
as
well
as
our
permanent
city
manager,
councilmember,
moore
and
councilmember
you'll
need
to
unmute
your
mic.
B
I
never
do
that.
Okay,
thank
you,
mayor,
paul
and
happy
winter
solstice
to
everyone.
I
agree
with
council
member
willie
for
both
of
those
items
and
I'm
hoping
if
somebody
will
also
agree
that
we
need
to
look
at
the
line
in
our
density
bonus
ordinance
which
allows
to
not
have
all
the
density
bonus
units
used,
because
you
could
have
a
project
taking
a
waiver
with
only
adding
one
density
bonus
unit
and
as
this
project
first
came
to
us,
it
only
had
five
density
bonus
units.
B
So
I
would
be
especially
in
light
of
our
need
for
meeting
the
arena
numbers.
A
Thank
you
councilmember.
I
promise
I
will
follow
up
on
that
as
well.
I
don't
see
any
other
hands
raised
from
council
at
this
time
and
so
on
behalf
of
our
city
council.
Let
me
just
bid
everyone
in
our
community
and
outward
a
happy
new
year,
happy
holidays
as
well
as
hope.
You
have
a
wonderful
2022..
A
This
concludes
the
final
meeting
of
the
cupertino
city
council
in
2021.
The
meeting
is
adjourned.
We
bid
you
a
good
night.