►
Description
Coverage of the Tuesday, December 6, 2022 Cupertino City Council Hybrid Meeting. Part 2 of 2.
A
Welcome
back
everyone,
we
are
on
the
item
on
our
agenda,
that
is
beneath
second
reading
of
ordinances,
which
have
no
items
tonight
we
are
in
a
study
session.
Item
number
13
is
to
consider
directing
staff
to
prepare
a
city
ordinance
to
govern
the
permitting
of
small
cell
facilities
within
the
public
right-of-way,
and
we
have
from
our
staff
Chad
Mosley
assistant,
director
of
Public
Works.
To
present
the
staff
report
welcome
Chad.
B
Does
everybody
see
that
we
can
see
it
pretty
good
good
evening,
mayor
and
members
of
council
I'm,
Chad,
Mosley
assistant,
director
of
Public,
Works
and
city
engineer?
As
you
know,
there's
been
fairly
consistent
interest
in
the
installation
of
small
Wireless
facilities
within
Cupertino,
and
this
at
times
has
caused
concern
with
residents.
B
These
concerns
are
important
to
us
and
we
prioritize
them.
You
know
attempting
to
balance
the
responses
to
those
concerns
with
our
legal
Authority.
Tonight
we
want
to
review
what
the
city
has
been
doing
to
explore
opportunities
to
revise
our
standards.
B
We
can
be
limited
by
federal,
federal
and
state
law
and
in
some
aspects,
but
we
want
to
step
back
from
from
those
and
take
this
opportunity
just
to
hear
concerns
and
suggested
Solutions
we'll
use
the
conversation
tonight
to
guide
modifications
to
the
draft
ordinance
provided
in
the
packet
with
Council
Direction,
we'll
bring
that
ordinance
back
at
a
future
meeting
for
consideration
and
a
first
reading
tonight
we
are
requesting
that
Council
consider
directing
staff
to
proceed
with
the
preparation
of
a
final
ordinance
and
regulations
for
governing
small
cell
facilities
in
the
right
of
way.
B
We
would
also
like
your
thoughts
and
input
on
the
draft,
ordinance
and
regulations
and,
more
specifically,
some
of
the
key
points
that
the
draft
ordinance
and
right
excuse
me.
Sorry
that
the
draft
ordinance
and
regulations
that
we
will
look
at
further
detail
later
in
this
presentation,
we'll
collect
and
review
this
input
to
incorporate
any
revisions
that
are
permissible
by
law
into
the
final
ordinance
and
regulations.
There
is
no
need
to
vote
on
your
ideas
and
inputs.
B
We
will
consider
all
your
suggestions
once
the
revision
is
complete,
we'll
bring
the
ordinance
and
regulations
back
to
council
for
adoption,
we'll
also
provide
responses
to
any
items
that
were
not
Incorporated
and
the
reason
these
items
could
not
be
included
with
this
presentation.
I'll
provide
some
of
the
overarching
information
on
what
cities
have
the
authority
to
do
and
where
federal
and
state
regulations
have
limited
City's
Authority.
B
That
will
provide
an
overview
of
what
Cupertino
has
done
to
better
serve
residents
and
I
will
discuss
proposed
revisions
to
the
city,
installation
preferences
for
small
Wireless
facilities,
as
well
as
other
items
included
in
the
draft
ordinance
and
regulations
which
we
would
believe
will
help
better
serve.
The
community.
B
A
federal
and
state
regulations
have
given
local
governments
the
authority
to
establish
aesthetic
standards
for
these
facilities
and
to
make
and
to
manage
facility
placements
to
ensure
Public
Safety
and
to
coordinate
the
use
of
the
right-of-way
to
manage
the
aesthetic
impacts
of
these
facilities.
A
local
government
is
permitted
to
set
reasonable
design
standards,
such
as
requiring
screening
of
facilities
and
having
equipment
coloring
match.
The
existing
Pole
Cupertino
has
established
a
design
standard
for
these
facilities,
and
we
have
required
Wireless
providers
to
install
facilities
that
match
the
standard.
B
The
draft
ordinance
and
regulations
include
additional
Provisions
that
further
strengthen
the
city's
permitting
process.
These
Provisions
were
selected
and
carefully
balanced
to
serve
the
community,
while
also
ensuring
ongoing
compliance
with
federal
and
state
regulations
in
order
to
help
keep
the
city
of
Cupertino
out
of
an
awesome.
B
The
city's
authority
to
regulate
Aesthetics
is
balanced
against
state
and
federal
laws
and
regulations
that
limit
the
scope
of
local
government
action
regarding
Wireless
facilities
and
small
sales,
in
particular
in
September
26
2018
Federal,
Communications
Committee.
In
order
placed
even
stricter
limits
on
local
regulation.
B
B
Cities
are
not
permitted
to
regulate
placements
of
small
Wireless
facilities
based
on
concerns
over
the
health
effects
of
these
facilities
and
may
not
create
regulations
that
have
the
effect
of
inhibiting
a
carrier
from
improving
the
quality
of
their
service.
One
such
prohibition
would
be
to
establish
an
unreasonable
space.
B
The
FCC
states
that
minimum
spacing
requirement
for
small
Wireless
facilities
that
has
the
effect
of
materially
inhibiting
wireless
service
would
be
considered
an
effective
prohibition
of
service.
The
draft
ordinance
does
have
a
preferred
spacing
distance,
but
is
it
is
specifically
focused
on
facilities
owned
by
the
same
character,
a
carrier.
B
This
is
to
ensure
that
no
single
carrier
can
establish
a
monogamous
within
a
set
area.
The
FCC
has
also
set
short
shot
clocks
for
review
and
permitting
of
small
Wireless
facility
applications
that
shot
clock
consists
of
a
90-day
period
for
attack
a
small
cell
facility
to
a
new
or
replacement
structure.
B
B
One
Avenue
of
Outreach
is
through
the
city's
requirement
for
mailed
notifications,
which
are
sent
to
Property
Owners
situated
near
a
proposed
small
cell
facility.
The
notification
provides
information
about
a
proposed
facility
and
includes
a
photo
simulation
of
the
equipment,
as
well
as
contact
information
where
residents
can
provide
input
to
the
applicant
in
the
city.
B
The
city
is
set
aside,
a
21-day
period
in
which
permitting
activities
are
halted
to
allow
property
owners
and
residents.
An
opportunity
to
provide
input
on.
The
proposed
facility
should
be
noted
that,
while
permitting
activities
are
halted,
the
FCC
designated
90-day
shot
clock
continues
to
run
during
this
period.
B
Correspondents
from
residence
is
logged
and
reviewed
and
responded
to
and
the
City
Works
to
address
any
issues
and
concerns
where
possible
and
where
permissible
by
federal
law.
As
stated
previously,
this
notification
period
is
the
longest
of
any
cities
in
the
surrounding
area.
The
mailed
notifications
have
been
the
city's
most
successful
approach
to
alerting
residents
installations,
and
the
information
provided
by
residents
has
at
times
resulted
in
the
city
being
able
to
implement
certain
revisions
to
proposed
facilities.
B
In
some
instances,
the
city
has
been
able
to
work
with
providers
to
have
facilities
relocated
to
better
address
aesthetic
impacts
pointed
out
by
residents.
Well,
this
is
not
always
possible.
It
does
highlight
that
Resident
input
is
important
and
the
city
does
work
within
its
limits
to
address
these
concerns.
B
The
second
area
in
which
Cupertino
has
worked
to
serve
the
community
is
through
the
establishment
of
aesthetic
standards.
Federal
Regulations
do
permit
cities
to
establish
reasonable
aesthetic
design
standards
for
small
Wireless
facilities,
but
this
in
mind
in
2016,
the
city
council
had
requested
that
all
small
Wireless
facilities
have
a
generally
homogeneous
appearance
to
reduce
mismatched
and
ad
hoc
designs.
B
The
city
has
also
established
spacing
requirements
for
small
Wireless
facilities.
The
current
requirement
has
established
a
500
foot,
minimum
distance
between
facilities
installed
by
the
same
character
or
a
carrier.
This
enables
the
city
to
manage
the
build
outs
of
various
providers
and
to
help
ensure
a
single
provider
is
not
able
to
monopolize
Wireless
services,
but
then
with
any
pockets
of
the
city,
better
manage
Network,
build
outs
and
the
visual
impacts
from
small
Wireless
facilities.
The
city
is
proposing
to
expand
the
minimum
spacing
to
750
feet.
B
We
believe
this
enhancement
will
still
enable
providers
to
create
the
Network
Services
they
desire,
while
better
ensuring
no
single
carrier
can
monopolize
service.
Finally,
the
city
has
established
site
preference
standards
which
create
three
tiers,
that
prioritize
installation
of
new
wireless
facilities
in
commercial
areas
before
residential
areas
when
a
provider's
service
needs
can
be
met
at
both
locations.
B
B
Two
which
are
the
less
preferred
locations
include
all
areas
within
residential
zoning
districts
in
Category,
3
bird
locations
include
those
street
lights
within
20,
feet
of
occupied
structures,
100
feet
from
school
structures
and
public
playgrounds,
feed
from
signals.
The
cities,
the
city's
guidelines,
do
not
permit
installation
of
small
cell
facilities
in
Category
3
sites.
If
there
are
non-category
three
sites
available
within
500,
unless
carriers
can
show
that
there
are
no
other
feasible
locations
within
500
feet
that
meet
their
service
needs.
B
Those
lawsuits
asserted
that
Los
Altos
small
cell
regulations
amounted
to
an
unlawful
ban
on
wireless
services
in
the
vast
majority
of
the
city.
Although
both
carriers
presented
the
city
with
information
explaining
why
the
sites
in
question
were
necessary
to
meet
their
service
needs,
the
city
council
found
that
the
information
was
insufficient
to
accept
to
establish
that
a
denial
would
violate
the
law
city
of
Los
Altos,
revised
its
Wireless
ordinance
in
June
of
2022.
B
These
revisions
no
longer
ban
small
cell
facilities
near
schools
or
in
residential
areas,
but
establish
a
tier
of
preferred
and
less
preferred
locations
similar
to
those
used
by
the
city
of
Cupertino.
After
the
revisions
to
the
Los
Altos
ordinance
were
made,
the
judge
dismissed
the
lawsuit
reasoning
that
the
revised
ordinance
rendered
the
carrier's
complaints
moved.
B
B
B
B
B
B
The
draft
regulations
provide
more
in-depth
information
regarding
requirements
and
permitting
procedures.
The
substantive
modifications
from
the
city's
existing
guidelines
are
focused
within
the
regulations
and
include
the
following
provisions.
It
establishes
specific
application
requirements,
including
requirements
to
evaluate
alternative
locations
for
proposed
small
Wireless
facilities
and
to
prepare
an
RF
compliance
report
for
each
facility.
B
B
It
authorizes
the
peer
review
of
applicant
submittals
at
the
expense
of
the
applicant.
The
regulations
established
standard
conditions
of
approval
and
establish
citing
and
placement
preferences
for
small
Wireless
facilities,
with
mixed
use
and
non-residential
districts
being
the
most
preferred
locations.
B
Like
your
input
and
suggestions
on
the
provisions
contained
within
the
draft
ordinance
and
regulations
that
were
prepared
for
this
meeting,
we
will
collect
your
input
tonight.
We
will
review
this
information
and
we'll
Implement
revisions
to
our
permitting
process
where
permissible
within
the
regulatory
framework,
NF
Council
does
vote
to
prepare
a
final
ordinance
and
regulations.
We
will
then,
when
the
revisions
process
is
complete,
will
bring
the
ordinance
and
regulations
back
to
council
for
adoption.
A
Chad
much
appreciated
and
we
will
go
on
to
our
members
of
the
public.
If
you
have
any
comments
or
questions
to
share
here,
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
call
on
you
we'll
go
by
order
of
zoom
and
then
blue
cards
followed
by
any
emails
that
come
in
in
these
first
few
minutes.
A
First,
three
minutes
I
should
say
to
city
council
cupertino.org
I,
see
one
member
of
the
public
with
a
hand
raised
on
Zoom
that
is
vencott
ranganathan
and
we
have
Jennifer
Griffin
as
a
blue
card
now
I
have
San
r
as
well
on
zoom,
and
so
once
again
by
the
time,
the
first
person
is
done
speaking
or
three
minutes.
Whatever
is
longer,
please
have
your
hand
raised
or
a
blue
card
in,
or
an
email
into
city
clerk
cupertino.org
to
be
heard
in
public
comment
on
this
item
number
13.
C
C
Good
evening
Council,
so
this
is
I've
been
a
president
of
Cupertino
for
more
than
12
years
and
in
the
area
for
nearly
three
decades,
I
have
been
raising
this
5G
related
issue
and
the
god
both
I
got
asked,
got
written
this
included
by
Chad,
also
who
have
exchanged
some
industry.
C
The
I'm
happy
that
the
there
is
a
draft
regulation
that
is
being
proposed.
That
has
some
better
control
from
the
city,
but
still
I
see
that
there
are
some
places
where
it
could
be.
It
could
go
a
little
bit
more.
For
example,
there
is
no
need
for
a
tower.
We
have
refined.
If
we,
if
we
go
every
a
small
hundred
feet,
then
the
number
of
towers
per
that
we
need
in
the
city
would
be
cut
down
to
one
sport.
C
So
we
need
to
take
into
consideration
the
type
of
drilling
unit.
That
is
closest
to
the
pole.
You
know
if
it
is
a
garage
with
no
access
that
may
be
another
one
or
if
there
is
a
and
then
if
there
isn't
another
option
for
the
carrier
within
a
hundred
feet
or
150
feet.
For
example,
in
my
case,
there
is
a
Perimeter
Road
which
can
provide
similar
access.
C
D
C
Yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
convey
that
you
know
the
setback
requirements.
Etc
are
better
taken
care
of
in
the
final
ordinance,
as
I
said,
there
are
alternate
areas
to
use.
Please
consider
them
before
you
know
taking
the
location
so
that
the
carriers
propose,
because
even
least
my
location
is
a
least
preferred
one,
but
still
it
was
being
used.
So
that's
what
I
wanted
to
say,
even
though
there
were
additional
options
available.
C
E
Okay,
thank
you
for
staying
late
on
your
last
council
meeting.
I.
Do
want
to
thank
Chad
mostly
for
an
excellent
job
in
pulling
this
ordinance
together
and
presenting
it
in
a
manner
that
everyone
can
clearly
understand.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
this
area
of
Cupertino
has
a
number
of
tech
professionals
working
in
a
hybrid
environment
right
now
working
from
home
and
as
we
continue
to
build
out
new
mixed
use,
retail
Construction
in
the
corridor
of
Stevens,
Creek
and
other
areas.
E
The
amount
of
consumption
capacity
is
going
to
increase
on
these
on
these
carriers
and
as
people
continue
to
work
from
home,
the
load
continues
to
increase.
As
the
previous
speaker,
wake
up
was
probably
experiencing.
Firsthand
lack
of
signal
is
going
to
be
a
major
factor
for
people
working
from
home,
so
the
double
whammy
here
is
going
to
be.
Offices
are
sinking
in
space.
E
People
are
asked
to
work
from
Edge
offices,
which
means
they're
in
agile
offices
and
having
to
visit
when
needed,
but
otherwise
assume
they're
working
from
home
and
continuing
to
see
added
capacity
of
residential
units
added
capacity
of
people
working
remotely
and,
at
the
same
time,
a
lack
of
adequate
facilities
or
bike
infrastructure
could
impact
the
ability
to
work
from
the
area,
so
I
would
I
would
urge
the
history
Council
to
and
the
future
city
council
as
well
to
look
at
the
lessons
learned
from
Los
Altos.
E
If
you
go
into
the
Los
Altos
Library,
you
can't
even
get
signal
out
there.
Certainly
please
take
a
look
at
what
Los
Angeles
has
learned
from
this.
We
do
not
want
to
have
the
city
soon
by
some
of
these
carriers,
so
hopefully
you
can
select
the
right
balance
in
protecting
residents
from
the
harmful
radiations
that
are
expected
from
this
fight
unit,
but
at
the
same
time
provide
adequate
facilities.
The
staff
needs
for
these
hybrid
professionals
working
from
here.
Finally,
I
just
want
to
add
it
is
a.
E
I
think
we're
just
making
the
case
for
for
liking
the
right
balance
here,
so
I'll
stop
there
and
yield
the
respect
that.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
G
Sorry
I
need
why
notification
mail
changed
long,
500
eat
to
300
feet
this
time
and
I
thought
it
was
500
feet
or
the
resident,
and
the
second
question
is
I
wasn't
organized.
Yet
another
thing
is
placing
door
hunger
that
is
only
400
feet
resident.
G
Why
not
300
or
500
beat
Resident
the
same
as
a
notification
letter
and
then
another
one
is
I
would
like
ask
a
chat
to
keep
the
same
date
a
period
of
time,
21
days
after
resident
receive
the
notification
email,
because
that
is
counted.
G
The
date
of
the
letter
was
made
not
when
residents
receipts
so
already
take
a
couple
days
and
a
couple
days.
We
respond
our
study
or
research
or
talk
to
my
neighbors.
So
even
though
it
is
longest
date,
it
said
that
Cupertino
had
the
longest
comment
period.
Please
keep
21
days
and
another
one
is
most
small
cell
towers
on
Verizon.
G
Why
all
most
of
Verizon,
because
permitted
small
cell
tower
are
93
Verizon
and
only
15
are
in
tea
and
the
poem
activated
or
31
000
no
18t
and
it
looks
like
a
Verizon-
is
building
many
cell
tower
as
possible.
They
could
get
the
light.
Pole
and
then
even
Verizon,
activating
activated
cell
tower
does
not
have
the
activation
report.
G
31
Verizon,
activate
the
small
cell,
but
11
Tower
does
not
have
activation
report.
Did
a
city
already
approve
without
activation
report,
or
they
don't
or
Verizon
does
not
tested
the
rfm
emission
and
provide
an
activation
report?
And
then
another
question
is
why
it's
small
cell
tower
are
not
in
the
west
side
of
highway.
85.
all
concentrate
to
the
east
side,
only
eight
cell
tower
in
the
west,
because
without
fiber
optics
code
thank.
H
Thank
you
for
the
nice
presentation.
I've
been
was
at
the
City
Council
meetings
when
this
first
went
floating
by
and
I'm
kind
of
familiar
with
some
of
the
issues
Los
Altos
has
been
having
I'll
tell
you
right
now.
The
transition
from
3G
to
5G
or
3
to
4
to
5G
has
been
really
rough.
We
just
had
to
convert
my
mother's
phone.
She
still
had
the
3G.
Verizon
was
basically
told
us.
H
H
My
husband's
actually
got
off
of
Verizon
because
he
was
having
software
problems
with
his
phone
he's
on
a
different
carrier.
Now
I've
actually
got
my
mother's
phone
with
me
right
now,
because
she
can't
figure
out
how
to
use
it
and
that's
a
Verizon
phone.
So
the
other
thing
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
statement.
I
understand
when
we're
going
from
I
think
3G
was
a
range
of
tall
cell
towers
that
were
spread
around,
particularly
for
Verizon
around
the
Bay
Area
in
this
area.
H
Now
we're
going
to
a
deployment
of
many
small
facilities
around
a
city
on
light
poles
on
telephone
poles.
God
knows
where
else,
and
it
is
disruptive
for
the
public.
You
know
you
have
a
lot
of
I'm
going
to
say
right
now
we
have
a
slew
of
housing
bills
that
are
already
disrupting
our
neighborhoods
cut
down
our
trees.
Putting
in
fences
you're
going
to
have
subdivide
a
4,
000
square
foot
lot
into
10
housing
complexes.
H
Are
we
going
to
be
throwing
the
the
5G
or
4G
mini
Towers
on
top
of
these
new
eight-story
adus
that
are
stuck
at
the
people's
backyard
and
and
spreading
cancer
problems
around
okay?
We'll
won't
go
there,
but
also
too
last
may
we
went
to
Florida
all
right.
We
we
went
to
Tampa
Bay
and
had
just
been
at
St
Pete's.
You
had
one
heck
of
a
hurricane
that
hit
areas
south
of
Tampa
Bay
that
had
not
ever
had
a
direct
hit
of
a
hurricane
I
can
tell
you
now.
H
If
they
had
hit
Tampa,
it
would
have
been
an
absolute
disaster
as
it
was.
Those
areas
that
were
south
of
Tampa
were
completely
devastated.
They
lost
any
cell
phone
towers,
so
when
you
have
Duke,
Energy
was
pulled
down
from
Virginia
and
they
were
ready
to
go.
I
have
a
you
know
several
friends
and
family
members
in
Florida,
but
when
you
have
a
disaster,
what
is
our
plan
when
we
have
a
massive
earthquake
happening
and
we
are
going
to
lose
all
these
many
many
cell
phone
towers?
I,
don't
hear
anybody
talking.
A
Thank
you,
Jennifer,
okay,
we're
back
to
the
dice
at
this
time.
We
have
some
follow-up
questions.
If
my
colleagues
are
I,
have
them
for
staff
and
I'll
go
buy
a
show
of
hands
here.
Currently
I
don't
have
a
hands
up
on
follow-ups.
Now,
council
member
Willie,
followed
by
council
member
way.
So
we'll
start
with
council
member
Willie.
I
Yeah
a
couple
questions,
so
my
first
question
is:
you
know:
on
the
one
hand,
you
know
Chad
said
going
they're
proposing
to
increase
the
distance
between
cells
from
500
to
700
feet,
but
the
question
I've
got
is
what
data
do
you
have
for
the
from
the
supplier
for
the
500
foot
distance?
What
data
do
you
have
from
the
supplier
for
the
750?
I
A
Okay,
let's
bring
it
back
to
Chad,
so
I
think
the
question
was
directed
at
you
and
so
let's.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I,
don't
have
any
specific
data
on
this.
This
information
is
basically
been
pulled
in
from
various
conversations
with
RF
Engineers,
as
well
as
with
providers.
My
understanding
is
in
a
Des.
You
know
flat
desert.
B
These
things
can
propagate
up
to
a
mile,
but
as
soon
as
you
are
in
a
more
dense
situation
or
an
urban
situation
where
you
have
trees
houses,
a
lot
of
the
the
newer
frequencies
being
used
for
cellular
propagation
are
obstructed
by
any
kind
of
hard
object,
including
the
leaves
of
a
tree
so
again
not
having
any
specific
hard
data
on
how?
Oh
because
each
location
is
a
different
situation,
you
put
one
of
these.
You
know
next
to
a
tree.
B
It's
not
going
to
propagate
that
signal
very
well
in
the
direction
of
the
tree,
but
it
could
go
in
the
other
direction.
The
kind
of
rule
of
thumb
is
in
an
urban,
depending
on
the
frequency.
B
I
You
know
so
we've
heard
over.
You
know
over
the
last
four
years,
I've
heard
from
so
many
residents
about
the
concerns,
but
it's
still
only
a
small
portion
of
the
overall
Community,
but
we've
heard
about
their
concerns.
So
I
I
truly
do
believe
that
we
need
to
actually
be
basing
our
decisions
on
real
data.
I
Sometimes
we
have
to
extrapolate
a
little
bit.
Sometimes
we
got
to
ask
to
go
and
get
that
data,
but
if
we're
making
decisions
based
on
well,
750
is
better
than
500..
You
know,
I,
just
don't
see
the
the
science
behind
that
you
know.
I'll
correlate
it
to
something
like
speed
limits.
The
state
sets
speed
limits
and
that's
based
on
reaction
time
and
breaking
time
and
obstacles
going
around
corners.
They
don't
just
arbitrarily
say
well.
I
This
should
be
a
25
mile,
an
hour
Zone,
and
this
should
be
a
50
mile,
an
hour
Zone,
it's
inside
a
residential
kids
can
come
out
between
cars,
stopping
distance
reaction
time
bingo
that
sets
the
the
speeds
so
I'm
a
little
bit
disappointed
that
we
are
of
you
know
great
that
we're
going
from
500
to
750,
but
we're
doing
it
without
some
some
data.
That
could
in
fact
say
that
a
thousand
or
1200
is
good
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
we
put
any
criteria.
I
B
Thank
you,
and
just
to
quickly
respond
to
that
I
hear
you
we'll
look
to
see
what
kind
of
data
can
be
required
for
these
applications
and
and
will
provide
a
response
to
that
when
we
bring
this
item
back,
but
thank
you
for
your
input.
A
J
You
mayor
Paul,
this
question
is
for
assistant
director,
mostly
and
also
maybe
our
City
attorney
Jensen
I
just
opened
the
email
this
afternoon
regarding
the
letter
or
the
email
that
Verizon
sent
us
from.
Maybe
your
attorney's
office,
McKenzie
Alberton
LLP,
all
the
items
that
they
raised,
I,
don't
think
we
incorporate
into
the
staff,
but
I
didn't
have
time
to
incorporate
or
evaluate
it
so
I.
J
Would
the
question
is:
do
you
need
time
to
evaluate-
and
maybe
attorney
Jensen
needs
to
evaluate
and
maybe
provide
that
input
to
us
next
time
or
you
know
when
we
approve
the
ordinance.
B
Yeah
and
I
can
answer
that
when
we
did
look
at
the
letter,
there
were
some
good
points
in
there.
We
will
evaluate
each
of
those
items
that
were
provided
and
if
we
need
to
make
adjustments
accordingly,
based
on
Federal
Regulations,
we'll
do
that
I
think.
Additionally,
we
can
try
and
provide
responses
to
each
of
those
outside
bringing
back
our
responses
to
the
input
tonight
at
that
future
council
meeting,
when
we
bring
potentially
a
runner's
back.
K
Thank
you
Chad
for
the
report,
particularly
the
visuals
I,
was
wondering
if
you
could
bring
back
the
images
of
the
the
the
wood
telephone
poles
to
look
at
that,
and
then
you
had
another
image
showing
facilities
strung
on
the
upper
wires.
Okay,
so
could
you
describe
from
left
to
right
what
we're
looking
at?
What
has
to
what
represents
a
small
cell
and
and
we're
allowed
to
comment
on
on
the
Aesthetics,
so
it's
right
and
so
with
regards
to
Aesthetics,
because
this
is
a
question
time
now.
B
Sorry
about
that
no
worries
it's
hard
to
share
a
screen
and
work
on
Zoom.
At
the
same
time,
give
me
one
second
to
pull
this
back
up.
L
B
That
I
think
the
best
get
them
to
look
at
here.
Did
you
see
my
screen
with
the
photos.
B
What's
considered
the
small
cell
here
is
this
equipment
down
here
in
the
pole,
which
is
very
similar
to
what
you
see
here.
This
is
actually
one
of
the
more
streamlined
versions
of
a
small
cell
on
a
wooden
Pole.
B
It
also
includes
this
extension
at
the
top,
which
typically
extends
these
up
anywhere
around
10
to
12
feet
from
the
top
of
a
utility
pole.
So
you're
you've
got
your
typical
35
to
50
foot.
Their
tickets
are
typically
50
foot
utility
poles
you're,
adding
an
additional
10
to
12
feet
on
that
these
two
on
the
left
and
on
the
right
honestly,
these
were
kind
of
some
first
generation,
small
cells,
they're,
really
clunky
and
back
in
2016.
B
A
lot
of
cities
said
the
same
thing,
and
then
you
saw
this
kind
of
more
streamlined
design
where,
instead
of
having
a
big
clunky
thing,
stick
out
from
the
pole,
they
kind
of
broke
it
up
into
four
parts
and
spread
it
further
horizontally
on
the
pole.
So
it's
closer,
but
all
of
this
equipment
here,
which
is
kind
of
shown
down
here
as
well
as
this
extension.
These
are
all
part
of
a
small
cell
on
a
utility
pole.
K
Okay,
so
so
Chad
with
regards
to
what
would
be
useful
commentary
regarding
the
Aesthetics,
because
I
I
I
have
some
descriptive
words
for
these.
K
Items
so
I'm
wondering
what
is
what
for
for
us
to
be
providing
for
input
would
be
useful,
starting
with
this
one
and
then
I
wanted
to
look
at
the
the
wires
that
you
had.
B
Second
I
mean,
to
a
certain
extent,
we've
been
steering
the
providers
away
from
these.
We,
you
know
Verizon,
wanted
to
put
some
of
these
in.
We
actually
created
a
settlement
agreement
that
kind
of
steers
them
back
to
City
polls,
which
are
the
more
streamlined
version
with
respect
to
you
know
any
kind
of
facility
that
could
be
that
maybe
located
on
a
utility
pole
we'd
be
looking
to
try
and
minimize
the
offsets
from
the
pole
so
that
it
would
be.
B
You
know,
kind
of
tucked
in
closer
to
the
pole,
as
opposed
to
sticking
out
so
far.
Additionally,
I
think
there
are
certain
volume
requirements
that
would
have
to
be
applied
to
that.
Again,
we've
been
successful
in
steering
these
installations
to
our
street
light
poles.
We
have
Master
license
agreements
set
up
with
various
providers
which
allow
us
to
kind
of
focus
them
on
what
we
believe
are
aesthetically
Superior
options,
and
that
would
be
our
our
city
street
light
facility,
which
kind
of
houses
these
things
in
that
shroud
of
the
top.
K
Okay,
and
and
through
the
mayor,
we
do
have
neighborhoods
where
there
are
limited
street
lights
and
so
that
all
all
they
have
really
are.
Are
these
telephone,
poles
and
so
I
I,
don't
know
if
the
the
residents
would
be
aware
that
they
could
have
a
collection
of
of
boxes
strung
on
on
their
poles,
which
would
their
because
they're
somewhat
unusual
visually
unusual
and
there's
a
lot
of
shapes
objects
that
draw
the
eye
that
they
they
they.
K
They
have
a
a
really
big
impact
visually,
and
so
we
do
have
neighborhoods
where
this
would
be
the
only
solution
or
or
what
are
you
suggesting
that,
particularly
in
a
neighborhood
which
has
all
the
lighting,
for
instance,
that
the
that
the
residents
want
they
like
the
Dark,
Skies
ordinance,
for
example,
and
they
don't
want
to
have
more
street
lights,
then
what
do
you
do
for
that?
Neighborhood?
That
only
has
the
the
telephone
poles
are.
They
are
they
essentially
stuck
with
the
collection
of
boxes
on
on
the
pole,.
B
Cupertino
has
been
successful
in
having
carriers
install
new
street
light
poles
to
offset
the
street
lights
that
are
on
the
wooden
poles.
So
we've
tried
to
place
those
new
streetlight
poles
that
space.
You
know,
according
to
our
our
150
foot,
spacing
guidelines
for
for
street
lights,
and
then
they,
you
know
they
have
installed
those
the
small
cells
on
a
city
street
light
pole,
which
again
the
city
has
indicated
it's
aesthetically
Superior
than
the
the
boxes
on
the
side
of
the
the
utility
pulse.
K
Okay,
so
that
essentially,
a
neighborhood
that
was
wanting
to
continue
and
with
the
dark
sky
ordinance
would
basically
be
stuck
with
a
street
light.
They
didn't
want
in
or
or
this
option,
and
my
other
question
was:
if
we
could,
please
see
the
the
the
units.
B
Was
just
going
to
indicate
that
you
know?
Theoretically,
the
FCC
has
given
providers
the
right
to
put
in
a
standalone
poll
to
facilitate
their
needs.
We've
been
trying
to
steer
away
from
just
random
polls
in
the
right-of-way,
so
there
is
that
option
as
well,
but
I
I
will
pull
up.
This
ran
mounted
equipment.
B
B
Do
you
see
my
screen.
K
But
why
did
I
want
to
see
this
well
for
Aesthetics
reasons,
so,
in
with
regards
to
the
Strand
mounted
equipment
again?
What
kind
of
aesthetic
comments,
because
that
that's
where
we
were
left
that
we
could
provide
our
commentary
on
what
types
of
comments
would
would
be
beneficial.
B
Again
so
again,
this
is
similar
to
the
utility
poles,
where
basically,
we've
been
successful
in
steering
providers
away
from
these
types
of
installations
and
focused
them
on
again
the
aesthetically
Superior
street
lights
option
The
Strand
mounted
equipment
is
tier.
Seven.
This
is
our
least
preferred
option.
We
don't
want
these
big
boxes
kind
of
hanging
from
the
wires.
We
do
not
think
that
looks
good,
and
so
we
put
this
at
the
lowest
tier
tier
six.
Second
lowest
are
the
wooden
utility
poles
and
then
from
there
we're
using
street
lights
within
the
various
residents.
B
So
we're
trying
to
steer
away
from
these
less
aesthetically
pleasing
options.
Again,
we've
been
successful
in
directing
these
things
away
from
that,
and
when
it
comes
to
the
Aesthetics
we
can
really
allow
it
would
be
more
about
volume,
as
opposed
to
anything
else.
We
may
be
able
to
have
some
shrouds,
but
there's
again
it's
a
box
on
wires
and
you
can
put
some
shrouding
on
it.
It's
not
going
to
make
it
look
any
better.
It's
going
to
make
it
a
bigger
box
on
the
wires
that
may
have
a
smooth
surface.
K
Okay,
thank
you,
and
probably
the
last
comment.
I
have
at
this
point
is
that
there
were
a
number
of
of
items
in
that
attorney's
letter
that
we
were
given
on
on
behalf
of
Verizon
I
believe
which
were
aesthetic
related
and
so
I
I
just
want
to
I
I
I'm.
K
Hearing
that
there's
a
there
are
other
people
out
there
that
are
are
not
happy
with
the
Aesthetics
of
particularly
what
you
just
showed
for
for
these
various
options,
and
you
know:
I've
been
a
California
landscape
painter
for
for
30
years
now,
so
I
I'm
I'm
particularly
sensitive
to
these.
These
visuals,
but
I
think
that
if
you
pull
many
people
you're
going
to
find
that
you'll
have
some
similar
opinions
about
about
the
appearance
and
that
and
those
opinions
will
be
equally
strong.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
councilman
Moore
Chris,
you
were
turning
on.
Your
microphones
are
a
comment
you
want
to
make.
D
Yes,
I'll
just
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
to
point
council
member
Moore
to
the
the
regulations
and
7A
does
have
the
locational
preferences
that
we're
recommending
where
wooden
utility,
poles
and
strand
Mountain
Equipment
are
the
lowest
preferences.
They
can't
be
prohibited
outright
if
there's
no
other
option
and
then
in
Section
8.
D
There
are
specific
aesthetic
standards
for
both
pole
mounted
installations
and
strand
mounted
where
they're
required
and
those
are
really
borrowed
from
the
kind
of
best
practices
regulations
that
you
know
have
been
developed
in
other
jurisdictions
and
so
that
that's
the
derivation
of
those
so
and
you'll.
So
so,
if
you're
looking
for
how
we're
trying
to
impose
some
reasonable
aesthetic
requirements
on
those
types
of
facilities,
you
can,
you
can
refer
to
those
provisions
of
the
regulations.
Okay,.
K
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
so
so
Chad
with
regard
to
the
the
ability
to
put
a
poll
specifically
in
there
just
for
this
purpose.
Where
does
that
fall
in
the
priorities
you
know
are
we
are
we
preferring
that
over
the
wooden
telephone
poles?
A
You
know
I'm
thinking
about
these
rural
neighborhoods
right
where
you
don't
necessarily
have
light
poles
I
mean.
Can
you
just
kind
of
walk
us
through
that
kind
of
scenario?
Where
you
have
you
know
kind
of
a
scarcity
of
light
poles
and
you
do
have
telephone
poles
that
are
wooden.
I
mean
how
does
that
kind
of
process
work
out
when
you're,
you
know
working
with
a
carrier
who
wants
to
put
a
facility
in
there
or
a
number
of
them.
B
So
we've
typically
tried
to
steer
them
to
new
street
light
poles
in
areas
where
they've
wanted
to
put
these
small
Wireless
facilities
on
utility
poles.
B
It
takes
one
or
two
new
street
light
poles
to
provide
the
same
coverage
because
a
lot
of
these
wooden
utility
poles-
they
are
they're
in
the
air,
so
they've
got
better.
You
know
visual,
like
they
can
reach
out.
Okay,
so
sometimes
it'll
take
two
or
three
street
light
poles
to
cover
one
of
these
in
all
honesty,
but
we've
basically
steered
them
toward
these
shorter
street
light.
Poles.
A
Okay,
let
me
stop
you
there.
So
are
there
areas
of
our
city
right
now
where
they
cannot
put
those
street
light
poles
in,
or
is
that
not
is
that?
Is
that
not
the
landscape
that
we
have
right
now
with
regard
to
Streetlight
poles,
so.
B
So
there
are
a
couple
of
areas
within
the
city
that
have
established
like
a
semi-rural
designation.
Yes,
where
three
light
poles
are
not
permitted
and
in
those
areas,
if
there
was
a
spot,
that
was
the
only
location
that
could
be
placed,
we
would
have
to
probably
work
towards
putting
it
on
one
of
these
wooden
utility,
poles.
Okay,.
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Or
after
are
you
talking
about
just
the
Standalone
pole?
Yes,
I,
don't
necessarily
know
that
I
have
those
prioritized
in
our
definitive
list
and
and
if
you
have
a
recommendation
on
where
that
should
be
prioritized.
B
A
Not
have
not
okay
notification.
Radiuses!
You
had
a
slide
up
there
that
looked
like
Palo
Alto
had
600
feet,
whereas
we
were
at
300
feet,
I
think
it
was,
and
there
was
a
question
from
or
a
couple
of
questions
from
a
member
of
the
public
that
was
asking
about
notification.
Vis-A-Vis
things
like
door,
hangers
right,
I
think
she
mentioned
it
was
100
feet.
Why
not
take
it
up
to
300
or
500
feet
that
we
have
so
so,
let's
just
take
this
in
in
order.
Why
not
a
uniform
notification
radius?
G
B
Yeah,
and
so
with
respect
to
the
door
hangers,
we
typically
require
a
hundred
feet
and
those
are
really
done
just
to
kind
of
notify
the
adjacent
residents
who
are
really
going
to
be
impacted
by
the
construction
people
who
may
lose
parking
in
front
of
their
house
for
a
day,
while
construction
activity
activities
happening
really.
M
B
To
notify
those
immediately
impacted
by
construction
activities
with
respect
to
the
the
500
foot,
we
originally
had
had
a
300
foot
notification.
B
Council
had
requested
in
previous
study
sessions
to
look
at
enhancing
that
radius,
and
so
we
did
an
answer
to
500
feet,
but
it
has
come
to
my
attention
that
we
need
to
keep
these
notifications
consistent
with
other
noticing
processes,
and
so
much
of
the
city's
noticing
for
development
projects
and
other
permitting
activities
is
300
feet.
So
we
need
to
bring
that
back
to
300
feet
to
be
consistent.
That's
an
FCC
requirement
to
be
consistent
with
other,
permitting
activities.
I.
D
See
yeah
so
so
I
mean
the
the
basic
requirement
is
that
the
the
regulations
be
reasonable
and
non-discriminatory?
So
it's
difficult
to
argue
that
300
feet
is
what
we
use
for
land
use
permits.
A
A
D
So
I
I
know
that
that
the
land
use
noticing
procedures
have
been
changed
over
time.
I,
don't
know
the
details
of
that
I
mean
that
that
would
be
obviously
something.
You
know
that
that
council
could
provide
Direction
on
something.
A
Right
so
before
we
go
to
council
member
Morgan
on
questions
I'm
going
to
stop
by
vice
merchao,
since
we
haven't
heard
from
from
Leong
on
questions
and
so
we're
on
questions
and
so
and
I'll
check
in
with
councilmember
Moore.
Very
briefly
before
we
go
to
pure
commentary
I'm
going
to
ask
that
we
bring
forward
a
motion
for
further
discussion
if
I
smart
did
you
have
questions
at
this
time,
questions
yeah.
N
B
That's
correct:
we're
not
proposing
any
modification
to
the
21
Day
noticing
period,
we're
continuing
to
do
that.
We've
got
to
process
for
permitting
that
allows
for
that
long
notification
period
and
we
can
continue
to
do
that.
So,
yes,
21
days
is
staying
the
same.
N
B
Correct
it's
typically
two
or
three
days,
so
it
does
take
a
little
while
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
we
have
the
21
Day
noticing
period
where
permitting
is
halted.
The
city
listens
to
every
resident,
even
if
they
comment
30
days
after.
If
there's
something
we
can
address,
we've
worked
with
the
providers
to
try
to
address
that
the
21
days
just
helps
us
to
kind
of
focus
on
the
input
from
the
that
point.
B
N
Thank
you
yeah.
Thank
you,
the
staff
for
for
actively
listening
to
the
resident
and
trying
to
address
their
concerns.
I
know
this
is
tough.
B
B
N
J
N
B
We
have
just
just
for
your
information.
We
we
with
the
regulations
we
are
requiring
that
they
print
on
the
cover
of
the
envelope
and
bold
noticeable
letters
that
this
is
information
regarding
a
wireless
facility.
This
is
a
new
requirement
that
we're
proposing
with
these
ordinance
and
regulations,
so
that
people
can
see
right
there
in
the
cupboard.
This
is
not
junk
mail.
This
is
about
a
new
wireless
facility.
A
D
Oh
yeah,
no,
so
chat
chat,
Chad
hit
on
the
comment
that
I
wanted
to
make
that
if
you'll
see
that
section
4i
of
the
regulations
that
concern
attempts
to
address
the
concern
that
the
vice
mayor
rate
Rose
raised
set,
you
know
the
envelope
has
to
have
new
wireless
facility
information
printed
on
the
front,
and
then
that
was
specifically
added
to
address
concerns
that
you
know.
We
had
previously
heard
about
this
kind
of
communication
being
discarded
as
junk
mail.
N
So
and
then
another
is
for
regular
development
project.
There
is
usually
a
big
sign
posted
on
the
project
site,
so
it's
more
visible
for
people
Beyond
these
letters.
So
how
come?
There
is
again
a
disparity
between
regular
development
projects
and
the
small
cell,
where
we
don't
require
the
same
size
of
size
or
at
least
bigger
sign
than
the
eight
by
eleven
right
now.
B
You
know
with
respect
to
a
larger
sign.
We
thought
the
eight
and
a
half
by
eleven
would
be
appropriate.
A
larger
sign
hung
in
a
poll
we
may
need
to
have
structural
calculations
done
because
you're
you're
adding
a
wind
load
to
that
that
all
typically
you
want
to
have
that
sign
up
high
enough
so
that
you're
not
obstructing
sight
lines
for
vehicles.
You
know
if
a
kid
were
to
run
out
in
the
road
behind
one
of
those
signs.
B
We
want
vehicles
to
be
able
to
see
pedestrians
and,
what's
going
on
at
the
road
level,
so
we'd
put
that
up
at
a
higher
level
at
higher
elevation,
because
it's
a
larger
sign
there
could
be
a
wind
load
associated
with
that.
So
we
may
have
to
require
structural
calculations
to
have
the
sign
placed,
and
this
was
one
reason
we
went
with
a
smaller
sign
because
we're
trying
to
keep
we're
trying
to
you
know
not
overly
burden.
B
The
the
permitting
process
we
think
eight
and
a
half
by
eleven
at
a
reasonable
elevation,
would
at
least
alert
people.
This
is
the
poll
we're
talking
about
when
it
comes
to
that
notice.
I
got
it's
this
one
here,
it's
got
a
it's
got.
This
posting
on
it
I
know
what
pole
it
is
and
I
think
it
would
just
help
them
to
see
that
by
having
it
there,
what.
N
Does
what
the
sign
say
does
it
have
big
letters
saying
what
that
sign
is
about
or
it's
sometimes
these
are
very
tiny
letters.
No
one
really
know
unless
you
go
up
and
close
and
it's
still
very
hard
to
see
when
you're
on
the
street.
B
B
N
B
So
I'll
do
my
best
to
answer
this
right
now.
Originally
Verizon
has
been
the
most
active
at
T
has
been
somewhat
silent,
doing
a
permit
here
and
there
Verizon
made
a
concerted
effort
to
come
in
and
and
build
kind
of
a
robust,
Network,
I
think,
to
a
certain
extent,
Verizon's
looking
to
expand
their
5G
Home
Service,
which
is
a
home
internet
service
and
as
opposed
to
like
Comcast,
where
you've
got
a
physical
cable
coming
to
the
house.
B
They're
hoping
they
can
provide
a
competitive
internet
service
by
just
providing
this
5G
signal
of
all
of
the
permitted
small
cells.
All
the
cells
Wireless
facilities
that
Verizon's
done
not
all
of
them
have
their
fiber
backhaul
yet,
and
they
require
fiber
optic
backhaul
to
provide
the
information
that
they
transmit
and
so
they're
installing
a
small
cell.
But
if
it
doesn't
have
fiber
backhaul,
they
haven't
turned
that
on
yet
and
if
they
haven't
turned
it
on,
there's,
there's
no
RF
to
measure.
N
Yeah
I
think
you
understand
me
when
in
our
pre-meeting
already
and
that
as
the
question
that
whether
they
are
paying
on
the
rental
fee
as
soon
as
it's
approved,
even
it's
not
activated,
if
you
can
answer
so
for
the
public,
spend
the.
B
Correct
as
soon
as
we
issue
the
permit
for
these
facilities,
the
rent
begins.
B
N
Thank
you,
that's
good
to
know.
Last
question
is
regarding
new
light
falls,
I
think
I
according
to
right.
Now,
it's
not
in
the
seven
tiers
I
actually
like
that,
because
that
means,
if
there
is
a
better
location,
that's
in
a
commercial
area
and
a
provider
could
choose
to
install
a
new
light
for
in
the
tier
one
location
when
tier
two
might
not
have
be
favorable
right.
So
if
we
put
that
into
tier
five
that
actually
remove
that
potential,
better
alternative
right,
I.
B
Think,
mayor
Paul
was
talking
about
a
stand-alone
poll
with
no
street
light
on
it.
Just
a
pole
with
a
wireless
facility,
not
a
new
street
lights.
New
street
lights
are
not
necessarily
in
tier
V.
We
actually
have,
in
certain
cases,
installed
new
street
lights
in
more
perforations
in
order
to
pull
a
facility
away
from
a
less
preferred
location.
Oh.
B
Correct
we
we've
done,
we
did
one
on
Miller
Avenue
and
a
couple
of
other
locations.
We've
been
able,
we've
been
successful
in
pulling
it
away
from
less
preferred
locations.
N
Okay
and
then
another
question
is
that,
regarding
this
new
light
post,
some
people
like
to
have
a
brighter
sky
at
night,
but
some
people
really
prefer
it
to
be
darker.
So
do
we
require
a
new
neighborhood
input
when
we
install
a
new
light?
So
that's
one
question
and
then
another
is
if
a
neighborhood
doesn't
want
to
have
too
many
street
light.
What's
the
process
for
them
to
appeal
to
the
city,
to
remove
a
straight.
B
B
Respect
to
you
know
an
appeal
for
a
new
street
lights:
I'm,
not
sure
that
I
necessarily
an
answer
for
that
one
at
this
point
in
time,
but
that
could
be
something
we'd
look
into
I.
N
Mean
you
know
to
remove
a
state
like
a
straight
line,
because
they
think
it's
too
bright.
B
B
We
have,
in
certain
situations,
installed
Shields
or
directed
street
lights,
more
downward
to
provide
that
visual
enhancement
for
pedestrians
and
kind
of
keep
that
glare
off
of
private
residences.
So
we've
done
certain
things
to
direct
light
better
to
ensure
that
we're
providing
safety
and
trying
to
meet
the
the
concerns
that
residents
have
regarding.
A
Okay,
so
Chad,
can
you
define
fiber?
Was
it
backfill,
you
said,
or
was
it
back
something
else,
yeah.
A
B
Small
cell
facilities,
the
data
that
they
that
they
transmit
comes
from
fiber
optics,
so
site
has
to
have
a
fiber
optic
service
trenched
to
the
light,
so
that
that
serves
the
data
for
the
small
cell
and
they
call
that
the
fiber
op.
Oh.
B
B
Currently,
there
are
various
providers
or
carriers
that
are
installing
fiber
optic.
I
know
crown
castle
is
doing
a
lot
of
fiber
optic
installation
ATT.
Did
it
a
large
install
a
few
years
ago
with
their
gigafiber
Verizon's
even
doing
some
small
projects,
and
so
some
of
that
fiber
is
being
installed,
as
we
speak.
A
No,
what
I'm
asking
is:
is
there
a
potential
benefit
to
the
city
with
regard
to
so
much
of
this,
this
backhaul
being
installed,
because
when,
when
this
came
around
the
first
time
and
I
might
be
the
only
person
on
Council
that
was
here,
there
was
discussion,
or
at
least
some
kind
of
speculation
that
the
city
could
be
using
this
infrastructure
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
as
well.
Is
that
still
part
of
the
set
of
conversations
that
you're
having
yes.
B
So
originally,
what
we
were
looking
to
do
is
try
and
co-locate
for
lack
of
a
better
word.
When
somebody
came
in
and
put
in
conduit,
we
were
going
to
try
and
work
with
them
to
have
a
parallel
conduit
installed
for
the
city.
We
were
actually
successful
in
a
couple
of
situations
having
you
know,
having
some
parallel
conduit
installed
for
the
city
and
early
fiber
optic
expansion
and
then,
as
seems
to
be
the
case
with
a
lot
of
these
things,
the
federal
government
stepped
in
and
said.
We
could
no
longer
do
that.
B
We
rented
our
ability
to
require
condo
would
be
installed
for
us
at
that
time.
A
That's
lovely
okay,
councilman
Moore!
You
had
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
propose
a
motion
at
this
time
so
that
we
could
have
any
further
discussion
if
desired.
P
A
K
Of
the
the
things
that
I
there's
a
there's,
some
inconsistency
between
I
believe
it's
a
yeah,
it's
a
between
attachment,
C
and
the
proposed
ordinance,
and
it
would
be
the
proposed
ordinance
on
PDF
147
that
under
Section
7
location
standards,
item
two
locations
within
residential
districts
or
along
or
on
or
along
arterial
or
main
streets,
you
need
to
strike
or
main
streets
for
item
three
locations
within
residential
districts
on
or
along
major
or
minor
collector
streets.
K
Major
streets
should
be
one
line,
and
then
the
following
line
would
be
locations
along
minor
collector
streets
and
then
the
next
item
would
be
locations
within
residential
districts,
and
this
is
consistent.
These
changes
would
be
consistent
with
your
attachment,
which
references
the
the
general
plan.
So
if
you
go
to
the
general
plan,
figure
lu2
Community
form
diagram,
that's
where
all
the
these
different
streets
are
mapped
out,
and
so
they
show
where
your
boulevards
in
parenthesis
in
parentheses,
arterials
are
your
Avenues,
which
are,
in
parentheses,
major
collectors.
Your
Avenues,
in
parentheses,
minor
collectors.
Q
K
I
think
people
might
want
to
actually
really
see
this
map
when
it
comes
back
to
us.
So
they
know
what
where
each
one
of
these
these
streets
are
so
I
I
would
like
to
see
section
7
cleaned
up
in
the
way
I
just
described
it
and
then
PDF
173
of
the
packet
item.
3C
I
would
like
the
least
preferred
item
distance
to
be
changed
to
25
feet
from
20
feet
so
I
would.
K
My
motion
would
be
to
make
make
the
modifications,
as
as
just
described,
of
the
the
draft
ordinance
attachment
a
when
it
comes
back
and
also
address
the
the
concerns
based
on
the
comments
that
you've
heard
tonight
that
were
raised
in
the
attorney's
letter
from
Verizon
McKenzie
and
albatron
LLP
dated
December
5th
2022.,
okay,.
A
So
you
have
three
sets
of
modifications
to
the
staff
recommendation.
I
believe
one
was
on
page
147.
You
said,
starting
in
section
seven
one's
on
page
173
with
regard
to
category
three
I
believe
it
is
3C
you're
referencing.
You
want
20
feet
to
be
changed,
25
feet
and
then
also
with
regard
to
a
correspondence
from
a
member
of
the
private
sector
through
their
legal
representative.
A
K
A
Make
it
conform
with
your
request
to
increase
the
20
25
feet?
Okay,
so
so
that's
part
of
your.
Your
second
request.
Vice
mayor
Chow,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
oh
I'm?
Sorry
Chad.
Did
you
have
a
comment
on.
A
Okay,
great
vice
versa,
did
you
want
to
second
that
motion
for
the
purpose
of
further
discussion
at
this
time.
B
And,
and
let
me
interrupt
real
quickly,
I
mean
sure
tonight.
All
we're
voting
on
is
whether
or
not
to
proceed
with
an
ordinance
and
regulations
right
and
from
that
we're
just
taking
your
inputs,
like
the
input
that
councilman
Moore
just
gave
me
we're
going
to
evaluate
this
and
incorporate
it
into
the
ordinance
as
appropriate,
and
if
we
can't
we'll
provide
a
reason.
Why
so
I
don't
think,
there's
any
need
to
amend
the
action
or
just
just
give
us
the
input
and
we'll
do
what
we
can
to
incorporate
it.
A
Understood
well,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
Chad
that
that's.
That
is
much
appreciated,
I'm
sure,
and
you
know
just
to
kind
of
reiterate
your
point
I
think
if
you
will,
this
would
take
it
through
the
regular
ordinance
process,
of
course,
but
let's
hear
what
yeah
vice
versa
has
as
a
friendly
Amendment
to
see
if
it
can
be,
you
know
handled
at
this
time,
so
Vice
Michelle.
What's
your
proposed
friendly.
N
I'd
like
to
see
thank
you
for
adding
signs
on
the
post.
I
would
like
to
see
options
to
be
brought
back
to
have
bigger
signs
if
you
could
have
two
sheets
of
a
by
11
and
the
top
should
have
big
letters
on
what
this
notice
is.
The
bottom
sheet
is
more
detailed,
so
there
are
options
that
you
can
make
the
the
sign
more
visible
to
be
more
in
line
with
other
debug
development
permits.
N
I
understand
there
are
limitations
for
this
particular
permit
because
of
light
bulb
and
then
I
hope
to
see
images
of
the
envelope
in
when
it's
all
brought
back.
So
I
can
know
what
it
looks
like
and
the
public
can
know
what
to
look
for
and
if
the
images
could
be
posted
on
the
5G
website.
That
will
be
even
better,
so
we
know
what
they
are
and
yeah
I
hope
that
the
city
can
really
consider
it
pending
the
notification
in
general
to
500
feet
that
was
actually
for
other
development
projects.
N
People
have
already
said
that,
but
I
guess
that
should
be
proposed
at
the
future
agenda
item
but
I
hope
that's
included
in
the
meeting
minutes
for
on
this
item.
Also
yeah.
A
Thank
you,
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Vice
Michelle
and
councilmember
Moore
light
pole,
notices,
envelope,
images
and
potential
direction
to
increase
notice
radius
to
500
feet
are
those
items
that
you
would
be
willing
to
add
to
your
motion
as
a
friendly
Amendment.
K
K
D
Well
we'd
be
adapting
an
ordinance
that
that
you
know
both
allows
and
requires
the
applicant
to
do
that.
You
know
so
I
think,
if,
if,
if
the
desire
were
to
make
the
notices,
larger
I
think
that
would
you
know
require
input
from
Public
Works
just
to
make
sure
that
it
was
feasible
and
didn't
cause
any
problems
with
our
our
light
bulbs
and
other
infrastructure.
K
A
And
and
within
the
feasibility,
as
of
course
vetted
by
our
legal
staff,
but
vice
mayor,
presumably
you
will
accept
as
the
second
or
your
own
friendly
amendment.
Is
that
correct,
yeah.
N
A
You,
okay,
great
council,
member
Willie.
You
have
your
hand
raised.
I
So
mine
would
be
another
friendly,
Amendment
and
so
I'm.
Looking
at
the
section,
7
B,
which
pertains
to
the
spacing
you
know
saying,
500
feet
shall
be
now
750
feet,
but
I
you
know
without
actual
data.
I
would
like
to
actually
see
it
larger
than
750..
I
Of
course,
more
is
better
and
but
okay,
where
we're
at
now
I'd
say
a
minimum
of
a
thousand
feet
and
not
being
something
that's
going
to
prevent
the
provider
from
being
able
to
get
a
lesser
distance,
but
he'd
have
to
do
some
measurements
and
provide
the
data
and
to
me
that
I
I
really
believe
that
you
know
the
provider
should
welcome
that.
Just
like
the
auto
manufacturers
have
to
do
safety
tests
emission
tests,
it's
part
of
the
cost
of
doing
business
and
they're,
promoting
a
better
product,
they're,
promoting
a
more.
I
A
K
Okay,
well
through
the
through
the
mayor,
I
am
I,
have
a
question
for
Chris.
So
once
we've
we
we've,
provided
our
input
and
and
staff
starts
working
on
on
the
ordinance
and
looking
through
the
letter
from
the
other
attorneys
will
will
probably
be
provided
I'm
going
to
assume
some
some
legal
advice
about
what
we've
arrived
at
and
and
at
some
point
right.
Yeah.
D
So
so
there
you
so
you
have
received,
you
know
a
confidential
Memo
from
my
office,
but
we
will
be
reviewing
the
the
comments
we
received
from
Verizon
I
suspect
we'll
be
discussing
it
with
with
Verizon's
Council,
and
then
there
will
be
additional
guidance
provided
before
any
ordinance
comes
back
for
a
first
reading.
K
Okay,
so
I'll
I'll
accept
the
that
friendly
Amendment
and
understanding
that
we'll
be
receiving
advice
again
about
this
okay.
Thank
you.
A
N
So
so
this
is
amendment
to
say
that
we
would
like
to
consider
a
distance
between
small
sales
from
this
inventor
to
be
a
thousand
feet
and
require
justification.
To
have
a
distance
of
750
feet
in
the
potential
final
ordinance
is
that
we
would
like
staff
to
study
this
possibility
to
bring
it
back.
I
I
think
it's
sufficient,
but
I
would
just
think
that
it
could
be
more
general.
You
know
if
they
want
less
than
a
thousand,
whether
it's
750
they
might
wind
up,
saying
oops
we're
right
up
against
a
huge,
huge
three-story,
four-story
building
and
maybe
they'll
save
500
feet
so
I
would
just
leave
it
pretty
open
there.
A
thousand
is
going
to
be
the
preference
for
our
community's
sake
and
anything
less.
They
simply
need
to
go
and
do
some
measurements
and
come
back
and
show
us
that
a
thousand
isn't
strong
enough
signal.
A
A
The
clarification
councilmember,
Willie
and
I,
just
let
me
check
in
with
the
movement
councilman
Moore-
is
that
consistent
with
what
you
agree
to
as
the
as
the
movement
to
accept
as
councilmember
Willie's
friendly
Amendment.
K
A
Was
actually
I
was
seeing
a
head
nod
from
Chad
when
councilmember
Willie
was
making
that
description,
but
was
that
consistent
with
what
staff
is
willing
to
deliver
or
I'm
sorry
able
to
accommodate.
D
B
D
Good
Chris
yeah
I
mean
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
will
evaluate.
You
know
both
the
technical
aspects
and
then
sort
of
you
know
the
legal
aspects
of
what
we
can
actually
require
kinds
of
submissions.
We
can
actually
require
to
substantiate
that.
A
More
well
I
think
the
issue
is
clearly
on
the
record.
Now,
let's
bring
it
back
to
vice
mayor
Chao,
Vice
merchao.
Having
had
that
clarification,
are
you
willing
now
to
Second
councilmember.
A
Very
good
I
see
a
new
hand
raised
from
council
member
way
so
we'll
go
to
you.
First
hung
followed
by
councilman.
J
So
the
agenda
says
the
council
to
provide
a
list
of
recommended
modifications
to
the
regulations
listed
in
the
staff
report.
So
are
we
making
a
motion
to
provide
this
list?
Yes,.
A
The
the
motion
had
a
core
list.
Vice
mayor
Chao
made
a
friendly
Amendment
and
so
modified
that
core
list
councilmember
Willie
made
another
friendly
Amendment,
and
so
yes,
that
that
that
motion
itself
right
now,
that's
on
the
table
has
has
a
list
of
these
various
items.
J
Okay,
understood
so
it's
not
like
the
staff
have
to
come
up
with
what
we
are
emotion.
It's
just
a
list
for
them
to
recommend
the
list
for
them
to
work
on
and
they'll
come
back
with
it.
That's.
A
Correct
these
are
follow-up
tasks.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you.
Okay,
thank
you
councilman
way,
and
then
we
move
on
to
council
member
Moore
that
was
artifactual.
Okay,
so
I
don't
see
any
further
hands
raised.
We
have
a
motion
on
the
table,
Madam
city
clerk.
Will
you
please
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
council.
I
A
Great
well,
thank
you
very
much
folks.
We
are
on
to
our
last
item.
That's
enumerated
of
the
evening
before
we
get
to
that.
Let's
take
a
a
brief
Break
I'll
hold
us
to
1103,
that's
less
than
five
minutes.
It
says
10
58
right
now,
10
59
and
so
let's
stretch
the
legs
and
we'll
see
you
in
approximately
four
minutes
thanks
and
we
are
going
to
start
up
again.
We
are
on
item
number
14.
A
The
agenda
item
is
a
public
hearing
and
that
public
hearing
is
to
consider
approval
of
a
proposed
development
that
will
include
41,
41
268
square
feet,
approximately
of
commercial
space
and
206
residential
condominium
units,
and
the
common
address
is
the
location
of
10145
North,
De,
Anza,
Boulevard
and
10118
bandley
drive
I,
see
that
our
presenter
from
staff
tonight
is
Jean
martyr,
senior,
planner
and
so
Jean.
Take
it
away.
L
Thank
you,
mayor
Paul,
and
let
me
just
quickly
share
my
screen.
Can
everyone
see
that,
yes,
it
is
visible
awesome.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
introduction
mayor,
Paul
again,
I'm
John,
martir,
Senior
planner,
with
the
Community
Development,
Department
and
I
will
try
to
make
this
presentation
as
brief
as
possible.
L
So
again,
as
mayor
Paul
had
already
read,
this
is
an
application
for
the
Marina
Food
site
and
for
this
mixed-use
development
the
applications
include
the
denim
to
mitigated
negative
declaration
that
was
approved
back
in
2016,
as
well
as
development
permit
architectural
site
approval,
Lexington
of
map
and
treatable
permit.
L
As
you
can
see,
the
project
location
is,
is
a
combination
of
two
separate
sites,
the
Marina
Foods
Plaza
site,
which
is
a
larger
parcel
and
the
manual
Gourmet
site,
which
is
surrounded
by
a
variety
of
uses
which
include
offices,
office,
uses.
L
And
mid
density
to
low
density,
residential
uses
on
the
North
West
and
Northeast
respectively,
and
this
side
is
located
within
the
hardest
specific
plan.
It
went
to
the
north
Crossroads
node.
L
This
is
a
priority
housing
site.
In
regards
to
the
current
General
plan,
it
was
allocated
200
units
based
on
85
capacity,
and
this
came
in
as
SB
330
application
earlier
this
year,
a
little
bit
of
project
data.
This
is
again
a
mixed-use
development
comprising
of
three
buildings:
A
B
and
C,
with
underground
garage
and
removal
permit
for
9
to
remove
and
again
a
message
on
a
map
merge
those
two
Parcels,
the
marina
site,
as
well
as
the
main
intercourse
site
just
for
frame
reference.
L
As
we
discussed
the
project,
here's
a
site
plan
building
A's
in
the
Northeast,
pretty
much
where
the
Marine
Corps
the
Mandarin
Gourmet
is
located.
Building
B
is
a
north
side
of
the
marina
Plaza
shopping
center.
While
excuse
me,
Building
C
is
on
The
Middle
of
the
of
the
site
with
fan
with
Alves
the
north.
Failing
to
the
West
stands
at
the
East
and
Stevens
Creek
to
the
South.
L
It
was
again
it
was
a
prior
approval
in
2016
that
included
188
Apartments
22
000
square
feet
of
commercial
space,
120
Cube
hotel,
as
well
as
a
five-year
da
which
which
terminated
on
September
20th
2021.
L
So
a
quick
comparison
of
the
prior
approval
with
the
current
project
proposed,
you
see
that
it's
almost
a
double
the
amount
of
commercial.
With
this
per
proposal
no
Hotel,
instead
of
188
Apartments,
we
have
206
Condominiums.
Instead
of
16
very
low
income
units,
we
have
36
median
and
moderate
incoming
units.
L
L
This
is
a
density
bonus
project
with
waivers
being
requested
and
because
they
are
following
the
csbmr
manual,
with
a
20
of
the
project
being
being
a
BMR
10
percent
18
18
years
being
moderate
income
and
eight
and
ten
percent
or
18
USB
media
income.
They
are
allowed
a
50
bonus,
so
27
units
on
top
of
the
179
base
density
or.
C
L
Units
so
again,
did
you
qualify
for
waivers
as
they
are
dead
sea
bonus
project
again
waivers
are
again
exceptions
to
any
ejective
standard
of
that
can
physically
preclude
a
development
of
the
project.
That's
a
density
requested.
So
the
first
waiver
is
for
the
high
of
the
structures.
Those
are
for
just
two
of
the
buildings:
building
a
building
C
building
a
is
requesting
to
go
to
the
58
feet
in
six
inches
at
the
barricaded
roof
line
above
the
45
feet.
L
That
is
allowed
for
the
general
plan
and
Building
C
is
55
feet
at
different
point
where
Building
B
is
at
44
feet.
As
you
can
see,
here's
the
section
of
buildings,
a
is
C.
The
hashed
green
shows
the
areas
of
the
buildings
which
are
above
the
45
foot
line
and
the
45
foot
line
is
displayed
on
that
red
line
going
in
a
second.
L
Foreign
setback
side
setbacks
in
the
Heart
of
the
City
a
specific
plan.
The
minimum
of
the
bare
minimum
is
10
feet
or
half
the
height
of
the
building.
L
L
Here's
the
a
site
plan
showing
where
the
building's
setback
would
encroach
into
the
the
proposed
buildings.
If
they
were
to
be
adhered
to,
you
can
see
that
building
a
is
right
there
and
you
see
that
the
hashed
area
shows
the
potential
loss
units.
If,
if
the
site
setback
would
were
to
be
adhered
to,
I'd
say
anything
with
Building
C.
L
L
L
So
the
justification
from
the
applicant
is
that
if
the
height
waiver
is
accepted,
30
years
would
be
if
the
highway,
if
the
height
limit
were
to
be
adhered
to,
30
years
will
be
lost
same
with
the
side
step
back
waiver.
Possibly
30
units
would
be
lost,
the
bind
between
buildings
and
C,
as
well
as
the
height
waiver
and
the
common
open
space.
You
could
potentially
lose
five
units
if,
if
the
applicant
were
to
adhere
to
it,.
L
So,
findings
for
denial
of
a
wave
or
instead
of
a
concession-
and
you
know
the
first
stuff
that
center
of
a
concession
would
have
an
adverse
impact
and
the
real
populist
and
historic
California
registered
historic
resources.
It's
my
historic
resource
that
the
waiver
of
concession
would
have
a
specific
adverse
impact
on
public
health,
safety,
other
political
environment
and
there's
no
feasible
method
to
satisfactorily
mitigate
or
avoid
a
specific
adverse
impact
without
running
the
product,
an
affordable
to
low,
moderate
income.
Households
and
again
you
know
the
addendum
to
the
original
mitigated.
L
Negative
declaration
found
that
there
are
no
significant
impacts,
but
this
revised
proposal
from
the
one
in
2016
and
at
the
waiver
instead
of
such
as
contrary
to
state
federal
law
as
state
of
Staff
report
and
on
the
record
you
know,
staff
has
found
that
this
that
the
waivers
are
not
contrary
to
state
of
federal
law.
L
Our
BMR
manual
is
very
specific
about
unit
comparability.
As
note
in
the
disciple
I'm,
sorry
in
the
in
the
project
plan
sets
the
the
BMR
units
are
dispersed
throughout
the
three
buildings
and,
on
average,
meet
the
the
same.
Bedroom
counts
as
well
as
gross
area
square
footage
as
the
market
rate
unit.
L
They
are
asking
for
a
parking
reduction
in
accordance
with
the
cities.
Nc
bonus
ordinance,
even
with
the
request
for
parking
reduction.
They
are
proposing
more
than
what
would
be
typically
required
with
the
product
reduction
for
the
for
the
residential
portion,
and
they
are
proposing
almost
no
I
shouldn't
say
almost
twice
as
much
but
they're
proposing
quite
a
bit
more
than
what's
required
for
the
retail
portion
as
well.
For
example,
fire
space
is
166
bases
they
provide
260.
L
Two
movement
replacement
again
for
the
92
trees
that
they
are
removing.
They
are
replacing
it
with
120
140
on
site,
with
48
off
site.
They
again
are
are
going
above
and
beyond
what
the
code
requires,
where
the
goal
requires.
122
24
inch
boxes
there
and
placing
those
amounts
with
120.4
inch
blocks,
as
well
as
20
36
inch
spawn
series.
L
The
best
in
tentative
map
is
a
combination
of
the
two
Parcels
with
a
206
Condominiums,
which
we
included
with
the
final
map,
and
each
in
the
vesting
Time
map
will
have
reciprocal
easements
between
the
between
the
areas.
Well,
architectural
design.
I
will
let
the
applicant
speak
more
to
this,
but
just
just
a
brief,
high-level
overview
of
the
architecture
on
the
site.
L
All
three
buildings
match
and
are
consistent
with
each
other,
as
you
see,
there's
a
modern
design
very
angular,
very
neat
designed
to
these
buildings,
almost
like
power,
freaking
temporary
design
with
a
mixture
of
materials.
As
you
know,
if
you
went
through
the
project
plans
that
you
can
see
through
the
material
boards
what
type
of
materials
they
were
using
very
durable,
high
quality,
this
see
this
view.
This
3D
model
is
showing
a
view
looking
South
on
South
Danza
towards
the
intersection
of
Stevens
Creek
Boulevard
in
South
Tampa.
L
This
view
is
looking
along
the
elves,
probably
most
likely
from
across
a
perspective
from
the
Aloft
Hotel,
and
this
is
the
Center
Square
as
as
shown
on
the
site.
This
is
the
perspective
within
that
environmental
review.
Mitigate
negative
Declaration
was
approved
by
Council
in
2016..
L
L
R
L
And
d,
so
again
because
of
the
scope
of
this
project
being
two-thirds
residential
as
a
mixed
use
project,
this
desk
qualifies
for
guidance
and
mandates
under
the
housing
accountability
act.
It
does
limit
the
city's
ability
to
deny
and
post
certain
conditions
of
on
Housing
Development
where
the
project
complies
without
objective.
You
know
plans
donating
some
division.
L
The
city
May
disapprove
the
project
if
the
project
will
have
specific
adverse
impact
on
public
health
or
safety,
unless
the
project
is
disapproved
or
approved
upon
the
condition
of
the
project
we
developed
at
a
lower
density
and
again,
we
have
found,
through
the
m
d
addendum
that
there
most
likely
would
not
be
any
significant
impact
and
that
there's
no
feasible
method
to
satisfactly
mitigate
or
the
adverse
impact
that
exists
again.
Mod
addendum
that
does
not
show
that
there'd
be
any
more
a
significant
impact.
L
With
this
project,
significant
Outreach
was
conducted
by
the
applicant
and
again
the
applicants
here
that
they
can
discuss
more
in
general,
but
there
were
at
least
five
five
specific
Outreach
efforts
to
the
community
by
the
applicant.
L
They
did
act
conditions
at
this
that
the
applicant
present
to
city
council
landscape
Health
that
utilizes
native
trees,
shrubs
in
our
ground,
cover
that
condition.
21
of
the
draft
development
permit
resolution
memorialized
the
applicant's
proposal
for
community
room
located
on
the
ground
floor
of
Building
B
to
be
open
to
501c3
organizations
that
are
registered
specifically
in
the
city
you
know,
and
that
providations
of
building
permits
the
applicant's
shell
permit
best
practices
to
manage
indoor
air
pollution.
L
There
was
a
request
that
the
applicant
consider
applying,
for
you
know,
plan
amendment
to
allow
an
added
floor,
Building
B,
to
allow
for
additional,
affordable
units,
and
they
can
discuss
more
that
when
they
give
their
presentation
conclusion.
Staff
recommends
approval
of
the
project,
because
the
project
and
conditions
of
approval
address
and
surge
related
to
propose
development
and
all
the
findings
for
approval
of
those
projects.
Consistent
with
chapters
1418
1828
56
19156-9468
of
the
CFC
can
be
made
concerning
development's
height,
so
I,
step
back
from
common
open
space.
L
Waivers
Evanston
record
demonstrated
that
the
project
with
the
standards
for
granting
waivers
under
the
state
density
bonus
law.
One
quick
modification
that
came
up
after
the
after
the
publishing
of
the
staff
report
was
to
that
condition,
21
to
further
refine
it
and
that
bullet
regarding
the
community
room
should
read
the
community
room
located
on
the
ground
floor
of
Building
B,
as
designed
proposed
by
the
applicant,
shall
be
open
for
the
for
the
use
by
501c3
organizations
registered
in
the
city.
L
You
know
the
underlying
ital
size
portion
is
what
we
would
like
staff
is
recommend
to
be
out
of
that
condition
of
approval,
provided,
however,
that
this
condition
shall
not
prevent
the
Homer
Association
from
establishing
reasonable
policies
for
teachers
for
the
use
of
room,
thus
giving
the
HOA
in
their
ccnr's
more
control,
who
they
can
allow
to
to
use.
The
bathroom
next
step
is
City.
Council's
decision
will
be
final
unless
to
reconsider
within
10
days
of
the
decision,
the
applicant
May
apply
for
Ability
permits
at
that
time.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
A
A
The
applicant
then
has
up
to
10
minutes
to
provide
their
presentation,
and
then
we
open
it
up
to
members
of
the
public
with
any
comments
or
questions
we'll
bring
it
back
to
the
applicant
for
some
responses
if
they
wish
to
respond
to
members
of
the
public
as
well
as
Council
questions,
we
will
close
the
hearing
and
then
Council
will
make
a
decision
upon
this
public
hearing
item
and
so
welcome
and
I
understand.
You
are
here
to
represent
the
applicant
and
provide
your
presentation.
Thank.
S
S
The
project
tonight
is
different
from
our
original
approval
and
then
it
offers
home
ownership
and
ownership
of
the
business
units.
That's
one
of
the
major
changes.
It
also
are
larger
units,
because
what
we've
found
is
we
see
empty
nesters
who
want
to
stay
in
the
community?
They
want
to
downsize
from
a
3,
000
square
foot
house,
but
one
bedroom
units
don't
cut
it.
So
you'll
see
in
our
proposal
that
we
have
two
and
three
bedroom
units
with
dens
larger
up
to
1600
square
feet.
S
We've
really
strived
to
to
make
the
project
eco-friendly
we're
very
close
and
we're
confident
will
be
gold
Leed
certified
by
the
time
we
apply
for
the
building
permit
right
now
we're
two
points
short
of
that
with
silver.
But
many
of
the
the
point
system
depends
on
your
final
building
permit
and
so
we're
we're
looking
to
get
to
gold
we're
also
going
to
put
in
photovoltaic
solar
throughout
the
project
on
the
roof
that
will
lower
energy
usage
and
all
the
common
area
lighting.
S
So
we're
very
excited
about
that
and
we
have
a
lot
of
open
space
and
we'll
talk
about
that
as
we
go
through
this
John
in
his
presentation
already
pointed
out
a
number
of
the
features
different
from
our
original
proposal.
We
have
206
units
as
opposed
to
188
and
their
ownership
units,
they're
larger
units,
more
BMR
units
and
an
important
factor.
We
have
double
the
amount
of
retail
here
that
we
had
from
the
original
proposal.
S
This
is
very
close
to
the
amount
of
retail
on
the
site
now,
so
we
want
to
keep
the
retail
component
keep
that
activity
level,
but
still
offer
the
the
residences
just
to
Benchmark,
where
we're
at
these
are
photos
of
the
key
intersections
and
Alves
owls
right
now
has
no
pedestrian
activity
whatsoever
to
speak
of
and
our
proposal,
which
you'll
see,
will
really
activate
Alves,
as
well
as
continue
the
impact
from
the
other
two
streets.
S
S
These
are
the
two
key
corners
looking
from
the
Apple
Cafe
and
we
had
a
great
meeting
with
the
Apple
folks
to
present
our
project
and
their
first
question
was:
what's
it
going
to
look
like
from
from
our
Cafe,
and
they
were
very
pleased
with
the
view
that
you
see
here
and
then
we
have
the
Paseo
looking
back
the
other
way
towards
the
Apple
building
on
these
two
views
on
the
lower
part
of
this
slide,
the
plaza,
which
is
really
the
focal
point
for
gathering
for
tenants.
S
There'll,
be
seating
places
where
all
of
the
the
retail
restaurants
for
the
most
part
and
will
show
that
have
outdoor
dining
areas.
So
we
can
really
have
an
active
outside
area
and
the
plaza
kind
of
anchors.
This
for
the
whole
project,
in
between
the
three
buildings.
S
I
mentioned
we
were
eco-friendly.
We
have
208
EV,
ready
charging
spaces
that
are
in
the
garage
and
they'll
be
54
spaces
at
street
level.
For
retail,
we
have
over
parked
the
bike
parking
to
where
we
have
more
than
what
is
required,
both
class
one
and
class
2..
As
I
mentioned,
we
have
the
photovoltaic
solar
and
we're
going
for
the
gold
certification
on
the
lead,
and
then
we
have
an
extensive
green
roof
area
to
offset
some
of
the
storm
water
treatment
which
we
can
see
later.
S
This
is
a
shot
of
the
garage
just
really
going
through.
All
the
my
green
on
the
label
is
not
exactly
the
green,
that's
in
the
slides,
but
those
are
the
EV
charging
spaces
throughout
the
garage.
S
They'll
be
EV
ready.
This
is
the
ground
floor
of
the
retail
and
we
have
a
community
room
plus
we're
going
to
design
it
in
such
a
way
that
it's
adjacent
to
one
of
the
lobbies.
You
can
slide
the
glass
door,
collapsible
glass
doors
back,
open
that
up
it'll
be
about
1500
square
feet.
You
can
use
it
for
you,
know:
art
presentations.
We
see
we
got
great
feedback
from
the
sisters.
Sister
city
groups
to
use
there
or
the
Historical
Society.
S
So
this
is
just
one
of
the
attributes
we
wanted
to
offer
to
the
community.
The
spaces
with
the
Stars
are
the
areas
that
are
designated
as
potential
restaurant
spaces
with
outdoor
seating,
and
then
you
know
we
have
more
than
required
parking,
because
we
know
that's
an
important
factor
to
have
a
successful
retail
project.
S
This
just
is
a
sample
of
one
of
the
floors
to
show
the
disbursement
of
the
BMR
units
throughout
yellow
is
the
market
rate.
Green
shows
the
moderate
income
in
blue
and
they
are
equally
scattered
throughout
the
entire
project,
and
you
see
the
sizes
sizes
listed
there
for
the
various
units.
S
The
density
bonus
John
really
went
through
that
I
I
would
say
that
if
you
look
at
the
first
one,
where
we're
looking
on
the
side
setback,
the
adjacent
adjacent
property
line
is
basically
a
concrete
blocked
wall
and
an
entrance
to
the
parking
underground
structure.
So
there's
not
a
lot
of
impact
occurring
there
because
of
the
side
set
back.
The
other
setback
on
Building
C
is
adjacent
to
parking
area
as
well.
Commercial
parking
area-
and
this
just
again
shows
the
units
that
we
would
lose
if
we
were
not
granted
those
waivers
the
open
space.
S
S
This
is
the
landscape
portion.
I'll
just
quickly
highlight
this.
We
talked
about
the
trees,
we're
removing
94,
non-native
trees
and
replacing
them
with
184
native
trees.
Each
of
the
Center
buildings
have
a
courtyard
with
Landscaping
areas
for
the
residents
to
gather
Bocce
courts,
these
kind
of
amenities
these
are
just
for
the
residents.
This
is
really
one
level
above
the
retail.
S
The
roofs
have
buildings,
A
and
C
have
roof
garden
areas
for
the
tenants
to
use,
and
the
green
area
represents
our
green
roof,
storm
water
and
just
a
green
area
that
we've
placed
on
each
of
the
three
buildings
some
of
the
treatments
throughout
the
project
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
a
lot
of
detail,
because
this
is
not
my
forte,
but
I
do
want
to
mention
about
our
sister
city
and
art
program.
We've
we've
worked
with
the
four
sister
city
groups
and
we
really
want
to
focus
on
making
this
an
art
walk
throughout
the
project.
S
Naturally,
the
two
corners
at
bandley
and
De
Anza
will
have
major
focal
pieces
for
artwork,
but
we
have
a
budget
of
about
1.7
million,
give
or
take
for
our
contribution,
and
so,
in
addition
to
those
two
corners,
we
want
to
scatter
throughout
the
project
focal
points
about
the
history
of
the
sister
city,
as
well
as
some
artwork
from
each
of
the
sister
city
somehow
tied
in,
and
so
those
can
be
a
with
directory.
You
can
wander
through
and
really
learn
about
those
groups
and
Association
and
their
history.
S
This
is
just
some
of
the
plant
palette.
John
did
mention.
Also
we
had
extensive
community
outreach.
We
had
five
meetings
we
mailed
to
over
2
000
residences.
We
had
attendance
at
all
four
of
the
meetings,
in
addition
to
the
sister
city
and
everybody
was
very
supportive
of
like
the
idea
of
the
community
room
and
we
did
receive
I.
Think
it's
in
your
packet
about
15
letters
of
support
from
the
public.
S
S
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
Greg
and
we
will
go
to
members
of
the
public
with
comments
at
this
time
and
I
see
two
hands
raised
in
Zoom.
They
are
from
Lisa
Warren
and
Peggy
Griffin,
and
now
we
have
Gene
bedord
as
well
on
Zoom
I
have
two
thank
you
very
much.
A
Madam
clerk,
two
blue
cards,
four
members
of
the
public
that
are
here
from
Ben
Shai
and
Jennifer
Griffin
and
I'll
remind
everyone
that,
if
your
hand
is
raised
on
Zoom
or
if
your
blue
card
is
submitted
or
if
you
send
an
email
to
city
clerk
at
cupertino.org
within
the
first
three
minutes
or
the
first
person
is
speaking
whatever's
longer,
we
will
go
ahead
and
call
on
you
for
public
comment
here
on
the
zoom
function.
I
also
have
Dennis
Cunningham.
Now
at
this
point,
and
so
we'll
start
with
Lisa
Warren
Lisa
welcome.
P
Thank
you,
so
I
am
basically
in
support
of
this
project.
I
think
it's
better
than
the
last
one.
By
far
and
I
commented
during
Planning
Commission
on
a
few
things,
some
of
them
were
later
explained
by
the
the
team
and
that
I
don't
need
to
repeat,
but
I
have
two
that
I
think
are
really
important:
I'm
glad
that
Planning
Commission
requested
and
it's
it
was
documented
that
there'd
be
a
better
representation
of
using
native
plants
and
what
that
would
look
like
and
I.
P
If
there
was
a
concern
from
myself
and
others
about
an
oak
tree
and
I
don't
have
the
name
of
it.
Sorry,
right
now
it's
left
my
brain,
a
specific
oak
tree
that
was
going
to
be
used
and
that
was
questioned
by
a
couple
people
and
as
I.
Remember
it.
The
landscape.
Architect
said
you
know
he
was
using
trees
off
the
city's
list,
but
I
think
the
city's
list
has
room
for
her.
Improvement
I've
said
that
over
and
over
and
I
really
wish,
we
could
address
that
and
I
know.
P
There's
been
some
trees
added
that
I'm
questioning
in
my
own
neighborhood.
That
I
see
so
just
make
sure
the
trees
are
appropriate
and
then
the
other
thing
which
is
a
big
deal
to
me
is
there,
should
be
the
ability
for
the
ccnrs
on
this
development
to
indicate
a
limited
amount
of
units
that
could
be
for
rent.
They
will
be
purchase
units.
So
what
that
means
is
the
HOAs
could
require
a
limited
number
of
units
that
can
be
non-owner,
occupied
and
I.
Think
that's
really
important.
P
Many
many
purchases
of
large
dollar
amounts
are
made
and
the
people
who
purchased
never
live
in
them
and
in
many
cases
never
even
saw
them
so
I
think
it's
important
to
have
the
owner
do
what
they
can
to
make
this
really
be
owner
occupied,
because
that's
what
we
need
and
not
less
vacant
or
just
rented
out
and
during
the
PC
meeting
they
didn't
indicate
they
would
look
into
that.
So
they
they
got
my
message
and
I
and
I
hope
that
they're
able
to
do
you
know.
A
Hey,
thank
you
very
much,
Lisa
I'll
check.
In
now
we
don't
have
further
hands
raised
on
zoom,
and
so
that
is
the
list.
There
are
there
any
further
blue
cards
from
the
public
and
live
Madam
city
clerk?
No.
F
F
A
Okay,
so
that
will
be
our
list
again:
I'll
remind
people
Peggy,
Griffin,
Gene,
Bedard
I
did
have
okay,
so
Dennis
Cunningham
is
raised
again
in
Zoom,
Ben
Shai
and
then
Jennifer
Griffin
live
Peggy
you're.
Next
welcome.
Q
Good
evening,
I
am
in
support
of
this
project.
I
do
and
I
find
a
couple
aspects
refreshing
to
have
owner
ownership
of
business
units,
so
many
of
our
businesses
have
had
to
leave
Cupertino
because
the
rent
went
up
and
had
they
been
able
to
own
their
unit.
Q
Following
on
Lisa's
suggestion,
I
think
that
both
the
business
units
and
the
Condominiums
should
have
and
should
require
owner
occupied,
because
this
would
prevent
investors
from
buying
them
and
then
renting
them
out
where
the
rent
goes
up
every
year
and
also
it
prevents
large
organizations
from
gobbling
up
a
large
portion
of
the
condominiums
for
their
their
use.
And
then
we
don't
have
ownership
and
residents
living
in
Cupertino,
so
I
think
that's
a
really
important
thing
to
put
in
otherwise.
Q
And
if,
if
the
oak
is
a
coastal
Oak,
it's
horrible
to
have
on
a
pedestrian
walkway
in
in
front
of
Lawson,
there
are
two
or
three
of
these
things
and
they
grow
down
and
poked
you
in
the
eye.
When
you
walk
they're,
not
they
just
don't
grow.
Naturally,
up
and
out
of
The
Pedestrian
walkway,
so
if
it's
that
kind
of
Oak
change
it
to
something
else
anyway,
thank
you.
M
Good
evening,
mayor
Paul
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Jane
bedord
and
I'm,
a
resident
of
Cupertino
I'm
here
to
urge
you
to
approve
this
application
for
the
marina
Plaza
project,
I've,
attended
the
open
houses
for
the
project
and
had
an
opportunity
to
provide
input
for
the
design.
This
development
is
particularly
senior
friendly.
These
are
single
floor
housing
units
without
stairs
which
makes
them
accessible
for
Wheelchairs
and
walkers
the
ground
level.
Retail
will
include
restaurants
and
coffee
shops
readily
accessible
to
Residents,
without
requiring
transportation,
thus
encouraging
independent.
M
This
project
is
also
within
walking
distance
of
our
local
YMCA,
which
encourages
senior
Fitness.
In
addition,
the
design
includes
bike
friendly
Transportation,
including
bike
lockers.
This
housing
builds
a
major
Gap
in
senior
housing
in
Cupertino.
Many
of
us
live
in
large
family
homes,
three
thousand
square
feet
and
larger
and
would
like
to
downsize
we're.
Looking
for
two
to
three
bedroom
units
seniors
are
not
interested
in
one
bedroom
units.
After
living
in
larger
houses,
we
want
to
stay
in
the
community
close
to
friends
and
medical
providers.
M
A
Thank
you,
Gene.
If
you
could
hold
your
applause
appreciate.
Our
next
speaker
is
Dennis
Cunningham
and
we
will
Dennis.
You
have
two
hands
raised,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
unmute
your
first
hand
on
Zoom
and
see
if
that
works.
A
T
A
Okay-
let's,
let's
do
this,
maybe
maybe
if
you
can
try
to
unmute
your
other
device
to
see
if
that
might
work
a
little
bit
better,
let's
go
ahead
and
try
that
how
does
that
work.
T
I'm,
sorry
about
that,
my
name
is
Bonnie
Cunningham
and
I
am
a
member
of
the
Housing
Commission.
T
That's
speaking
on
my
own
on
this
I
agree
with
the
previous
speaker,
Gene
bedor,
who
spoke
very
eloquently
on
the
senior
aspect
of
this
particular
development,
I,
like
it
very
much
for
many
of
the
reasons
given
separately
from
the
housing
aspect
of
it,
which
I
like
I,
said
I
like
very
much
I,
have
also
spoken
with
the
with
the
applicant
in
regards
to
the
the
the
plant
palette
and
look
forward
to
working
with
them
on
that.
T
But
even
that
I
see
that
the
applicant
has
done
a
very,
very
fine
job
of
working
towards
what
the
city
would
like
to
see
as
far
as
native
plantings
and
encourage
that
they
are
also
working
towards
the
I
mean
have
satisfied
the
requirements
for
the
bird
say
and
Dark
Skies
ordinances
in
town.
So
a
very
fine
application
and
I
urge
you
to
approve
this.
Thank
you.
A
U
U
U
First,
it
will
provide
a
lot
of
retail
shops.
Second,
it
will
provide
a
lot
of
house
for
the
Community,
especially
most
important,
is
they
provide
them
below
Market
housing
I
realized
there
among
36
units
out
of
the
206
unit.
Those
housing
are
affordable,
housing
for
those
households.
They
are
on
the
long
waiting
list,
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
see
the
new
change,
the
new
appearance
I
believe
it
will
become
very
pretty
and
also
beneficial
to
the
city,
to
the
community
to
the
retailer
and
affordable,
affordable
housing.
H
Thank
you,
city,
council.
It's
a
very
thorough
presentation.
You
all
did
it
as
quickly
as
you
could
I've
been
following
this
since
the
2014-2015
2016.
lots
of
meetings
about
it.
Marina
is
a
very,
very
important
grocery
store.
Complex
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
lose
the
large
retail
grocery
store.
H
This
looks
like
a
really
nice
project.
I
appreciate
all
the
effort
that's
gone
into
it
I'm,
just
gonna
throw
in
there.
Everybody
has
been
talking
about
senior
housing.
These
are
larger
units
you're
going
to
have
people
with
children
coming
in
there
and
pets.
These
are
owner
occupied.
Where
are
the
children
going
to
play?
What
schools
are
they
going
to?
How
are
they
going
to
get
to
those
schools?
You've
got
major
roads,
Sunnyvale
Saratoga
and
Stevens
Creek
I'm
a
bit
concerned
about
children
going
how
what
I
nobody's
talked
about
the
school
districts.
H
I,
don't
know
the
elementary
the
high
school
I'm
assuming
might
be
Monte
Vista
and
the
junior
high
would
be
probably
what
Kennedy
or
so.
But
where
are
these
children
to
be
going
to
to
school,
I
I
am
not
a
fan
of
SB
330.
I
was
very
upset
when
Nancy
Skinner
got
it
passed
in
our
legislation
because
it
limited
the
amount
of
meetings
that
the
public
could
have.
So
yes,
okay,
this
is
a
3
30
project.
H
It
appears
to
be,
but
it
appears
that
there's
adequate
public
input
I
really
think
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
the
heights
down.
Yes,
it's
10
feet,
but
it's
10
feet
that
we
all
see
when
we
drive
around
the
city,
I
I'm,
going
to
tell
you
right
now
this
this
project
looks
very
nice,
but
I
am
especially
since
the
what
they
are
putting
up
next
to
Winchester
Mystery
House
on
280
I
am
so
tired
of
these
blocks
of
apartment
complexes
that
are
filling
up
the
sky.
H
You
can't
see
the
hills
you
drive
up.
280
and
all
you
see
are
these
things
that
look
like
New
York
City,
this
project,
I
hate
to
say
it
looks
very
Santana
row-ish.
Let's
try
to
break
up
some
of
the
massing
of
these
buildings.
H
H
S
I'm
gonna
let
Jesse
Markham
speak
to
some
of
the
landscape
issues
and
then
I'll
address
a
few
of
the
other
comments.
R
Okay,
welcome
Jesse.
Thank
you.
There
was
a
couple
comments
on
the
oak
trees
I'll
note
that
the
city
has
directed
us
which
trees
to
plant
on
the
streets.
So
we
are
simply
going
by
what
the
city
is
asking
us
we'll
be
happy
to
work
with
the
city
and
and
have
any
other
suggestions
to
to
modify
tree
species.
A
S
S
S
N
A
Great
so,
let's
open
it
up
to
city
council
being
cognizant
of
the
time.
I
don't
want
to
put
unrealistic
constraints
here,
but
we're
at
10
to
midnight.
And
so
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
to
open
it
up
to
questions
if
we
have
them
and
then
after
questions
to
request
a
motion,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
call
on
council
member
Moore,
who
has
the
first
hand
raised.
K
Okay,
I'll
I'll
try
to
go
through
this
pretty
quickly
on
PDF
208
of
the
packet
there's,
a
25
contribution
for
Stevens
Creek
Boulevard
in
bandley
and
I
was
wondering
why
it's
just
a
25
contribution
and
not
paying
for
the
whole
thing.
That's
one
question
a
comment:
I
appreciate
the
view
from
Apple
Cafe,
but
they
actually
have
a
lot
of
trees
in
the
way
so
you're,
showing
it
more
clearly
than
they
would
actually
see.
They
have
a
lot
of
things,
obscuring
the
view
so
yeah.
So
hats
off.
It's
a
good
good
view
of
that.
K
Let's
see
there
was
a
on
PDF
186.
There's
a
statement
about
open
space
shortfall
of
634
square
feet
and
I
would
like
to
have
that
clarified
and
PDF
204.
K
The
open
for
use
by
the
501c3
I'm
concerned
about
the
hours
and
and
whatever
method
of
determination
would
be
made
for
which
organization
would
have
it
I
think,
while
I
appreciate
the
the
offering
in
in
the
in
the
plans,
I
think
it's
complicated
to
do
and
there's
multiple
501
c3s,
so
I
I,
just
don't
know
how
how
you're
going
to
plan
for
that
and
and
how
to
make
that
more
solid
in
the
approval
and,
lastly,
the
Fine
Arts
and
culture
commission,
we've
we've
renamed
it
and
added
a
little
to
their
purpose.
K
And
maybe
this
is
a
question
for
our
City
attorney.
We
because
we
have
like
a
main
intersection
that
will
have
some
aren't
approved
for
it
and
at
1.7
million
dollars
and
having
such
a
visible
location,
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
there's
some
way
we
could
have
the
final
approval
brought
to
city
council
for
for
the
intersection,
if
it
is
just
on
De,
Anza
Boulevard,
but
I'd
like
to.
If
there's
some
way
that
we
can
see
it
because
it's
very
expensive
and
I.
K
You
know
we
can
leave
the
the
Fine
Arts
and
Cultural
commission
to
make
the
decisions
on
the
internal
parts
of
the
project,
but
the
the
more
public-facing
ones
I
was
wondering.
If
there's
some
way,
we
could
have
a
say
in
that.
So
I
hope
someone
is
able
to
collect
all
those
questions.
I
can
repeat
them
if
I
need
to.
L
Thank
you,
councilmember
Moore
I
can
attempt
to
answer
a
few
of
them.
You
know
in
terms
of
oh
excuse
me
in
terms
of
the
contribution
for
the
the
bandley
upgrades
we
do
have
assistant
director
of,
of
course,
Chad
Mills
I
hear
that
I
clarified
what
better
than
I
can
the
shortfall
of
the
common
open
space?
For
that
that's
one
of
the
waivers
that
they're
asking
for
the
applicant's
requesting
the
waiver
for
that
that
was
the
residential
common
open
space
requirement.
L
That's
in
the
Heart
of
the
City
specific
plan,
that's
the
150
per
unit!
L
So
what
what
are
the
one
of
the
justifications
for
that
waiver,
as
as
we
discussed
in
the
presentation
and
staff
report,
was
that
there's
a
potential
loss
of
five
units
if
they
were
to
adhere
strictly
to
that
open
space
for
firemen
in
terms
of
the
art
piece?
Maybe
you
can
see
drink
away
on
this
one
I'm,
assuming
that
the
city
council
could
have
a
preference
or
a
location
for
art
pieces
as
a
condition
of
approval?
L
I,
don't
know
if
that's
what
the
previous
city
council
for
this,
but
I
mean
that's
a
suggestion
that
I
would
make.
If
there's
something
that
you
would
like
to
see
as
part
of
that.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
John
Let's,
let's
go
on
to
Chad
for
I
guess
the
cost
of
the
intersection
inquiry
yeah.
B
Just
a
brief
information
on
that,
the
marina
project
is
located
in
the
North
East
quadrant
of
that
intersection,
so
they
kind
of
front
25
percent
of
that
intersection
and
additionally,
because
of
their
trip
counts.
This
is
a
voluntary
contribution
and
we
asked
them
if
they
could
help
provide
some
some
money
to
help
upgrade
that
intersection.
They
said
sure
we'll
cover
25
percent.
A
Okay
and
then
I
I'm,
trying
to
get
to
your
your
questions
here,
councilman
Moore
before
I
get
back
to
you.
So
with
regard
to
the
determination
of
how
the
space
is
going
to
be
used,
that
is
indicated
to
be
allocated
for
non-profit
usage,
in
terms
of
which
nonprofits
and
the
hours
can
anyone
speak
to
that
and
I'm
sorry
Chris.
D
Are
you
yeah
indicating
that
you
want
to
yeah
yeah?
Thank
you
so
yeah,
so
so
I
mean
the
the
condition
of
approval
is
relatively
specific.
It
says
it
has
to
be.
You
know,
Cupertino
based
501c3
organizations
that
rent
the
room,
the
requested
modification,
would
make
it
clear
that
that
the
applicant
can
impose
you
know
Regional
reasonable,
time-place
manner,
restrictions
on
the
use
of
the
room,
which
is
you
know,
similar
to
what
the
city
would
do
with
its
own
meeting
rooms
for
allowing
Public,
Access
yeah.
A
D
Basically
incorporates
language
making
clear
that
they,
you
know
they
they
can
impose.
The
homeowners
association
can
impose
reasonable
conditions
on
the
use
of
the
room.
D
I
I
think
that's
an
appropriate
level
of
detail
for
the
city,
because
I
think,
if,
if
we
got
into
specifying
who
could
use
the
room
and
and
when
they
could
use
the
room,
I
think
it
would
potentially
raise
First
Amendment
concerns
that
that
that
I
don't
think
we
would
necessarily
want
to
raise
you
know
and
then,
with
respect
to
the
Fine
Arts
commission,
the
Fine
Arts
commission
is
approval
Authority
for
the
the
public
art.
D
If,
if
there
are
any,
you
know,
recommendations
Council
wishes
to
make
at
this
time,
I
mean
I.
Think
you
know
that
would
be
within
the
scope
of
what's
agendized
today.
A
Okay,
all
right
so
following
up
on
the
last
Point
any
decision
made
by
the
Fine
Arts
commission,
even
though
it
is
codified.
That
is
revealable
though
correct,
but.
D
A
A
Council-
okay,
all
right
all
right,
we'll
go
back
to
council
member
Moore,
but
again
keeping
in
mind
the
the
the
the
time
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
give
other
people
follow-ups
as
well
council.
Member
Moore
did
you
I
have
follow
ones
at
this
time.
I
Great
I
think
not
having
many
questions
is
a
real
good
sign.
So
I
don't
have
many
questions,
I
think
their
best
helped
by
Gian
in
the
sense
that
the
3D
renderings
that
he
has
at
the
end
of
his
PowerPoint
are
the
same
ones
that
are
in
the
developers,
and
so
if
we
could
start
there,
if
John
could
bring
up
like
that.
First
one
architectural
design.
A
I
Yeah
and
so
more
or
less
I'm
going
to
be
looking
at.
You
know
the
the
amount
of
setback
and
conceivably
the
the
building
plane,
and
so,
if
you
just
quickly
well
on
this
one,
it
kind
of
looks
like
from
this
view.
It's
got
like
the
35
foot
of
setback.
There
not
sure
if
John
can
answer
that
in
this
View.
I
Do
the
first
to
Fourth
floors
all
fit.
You
know
in
the
building
plane
requirements.
L
So
within
the
crossroads
node
of
the
part
of
the
city
specific
plan,
there
is
no
well
actually
I'm,
sorry
within
General
plan
as
well.
There's
no
building
plan
requirement.
I
Okay,
so
now,
just
maybe
real
quick
go
to
the
next
picture
so
that
we
can
then
have
that
in
our
memory
and
there
you
go
same
type
thing.
I
You
know
pretty
much
straight
up
at
the
sidewalk,
but
it
looks
like
about
the
35
foot
now,
if
you
could
go
back
to
the
first
pick
in
the
first
plan
view
in
your
PowerPoint,
the
one
that
said,
building
a
Building
B
Building
C,
but
before
you
put
the
building
a
b
and
c
on
the
picture
on
top
of
it
there
you
go
yeah.
So
now
the
green
area,
there
is
I,
think
what
we're
talking
about
that
it's
got.
I
Wow
a
good
exterior,
30
foot,
35
foot
setback
on
three
of
those
sides
am
I
correct.
There.
I
Right
and
and
then
what
I'm
now
what
I'm
trying
to
understand
here
is
the
purple
area
versus
the
gray
area.
You
know
it
looks
like
the
gray
area
is
the
surface
parking,
but
is
there
really
that
much
or
is
that
building
height
and
purple
buildings,
the
retail
around
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
this
picture
is
describing
the
the
images
that
we
just
previously
saw.
L
Sure
so
what
we
have
is
almost
I
guess
you
call
it
Podium
slash
wrap
at
the
buildings
where
you
have
the
parking
in
the
middle
of
the
building,
and
this
is
again
this
is
the
first
level
of
of
the
site
plan.
So,
above
above
this
level,
is
for
the
starting
the
second
floor.
You
would
have
the
common
open
space
above
this
parking.
L
You
know
where
you
see
this
right
here
would
be.
This
parking
will
be
masked
by
it
by
some
type
of
decorative
wall
to
not
so
you
wouldn't
see
the
parking
at
all.
On
this
first
level,
Building
B
does
a
probably
a
better
job
of
surrounding
the
whole
bottom
floor,
with
three
tail
over
here
and
then
Building
C,
similar
to
building
a
you,
have
a
a
Podium
type
of
parking
where
the
these
look
exposed
these
walls
over.
Here
you
see
my
cursor
by
the
way
council
member.
I
Well,
you're
you're
heading
definitely
in
the
right
direction,
so
you're
saying
that
this
is
more
or
less
the
lower
first
or
second
floor,
and
so
then
I
guess
we'll
to
answer
my
question.
The
perimeter
of
each
of
these
three
is
really
complete:
building
up
above
the
second
floor,
so
three,
four
five
and
yeah
three
four
and
fifth
on
the
other.
Two
are
all
entirely
apartment
units.
I
L
The
the
the
the
plaza
with
the
the
yeah
that'll.
I
Be
right
here:
okay,
so
so
one
Plaza
area
there
and
ground
floor
walkable
in
fact,
is
there
even
a
yeah
ground
floor
walkable
area
between
these
three
structures
in?
If
you
will
and
I'll
just
say,
each
one
is
a
complete
structure
and
not
really
looking
like
that
in
this
view,
but
it
three
structures
so
more
or
less
that's
my
questions
and
so
then
I'll
be
I.
Think
finished
until
we
come
back
with
our
comments.
Okay,.
A
I
Down
at
the
down
at
the
surface
level,
you
know
what
we
were
kind
of,
seeing
with
the
plaza
that
surface
level
is
walkable
throughout
the
three
building
complex
welcoming
people
to
kind
of
walk
access.
The
retail
and
you
know
intermingle
with
people
and
stuff.
L
Absolutely,
and
not
only
that
you
know
all
these
I
mean
it
has
to
follow
federal
laws
in
terms
of
ADA.
You
know
the
Americans,
with
accessibility,
exact
marriage
with
Disabilities
Act.
Excuse
me,
so
every
this
whole
inner
connections
between
the
buildings
have
to
be
accessible
for
for
those
with
disabilities.
So.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
We
have
vice
mayor
Chow
next
and
that's
followed
by
councilmember
way
and
I'll.
Do
it
and
check
we're
at
1205
right
now,
I'll
go
by
you
know,
individually,
checking
in
with
council
members.
Are
we
all
okay
with
adding
another
15
minutes
towards
my
stated
midnight
goal?
Okay,
so
I
see
councilman
away
nodding
the
head
councilman
away,
Willie,
councilmember,
Moore
and
vice
mayor
ciao,
okay,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
check
in
with
vice
mayor
Chao,
vice
mayor
ciao,
you
have
questions
at
this
time.
N
I
think
first
I
should
disclose
that
I
have
met
with
the
consultant
Amy
Chen
for
this
project
and
she
indicated
at
the
time
she
registered
as
lobbyist
for
the
city
and
I
think
for
this
project.
It
was
a
few
months
ago.
I
saw
some
preliminary
plan
and
yeah
so
I.
There
are
just
many
many
things
about
the
project.
It's
good,
so
I
I
don't
spend
time
to
enumerate
that
so
I'll
start
with
some
questions.
N
A
So
with
regard
the
retail
condos,
I'm
sorry
was
that
John
go
ahead.
L
Yeah,
so
it's
yes,
there
wasn't
mentioned
in
the
in
the
staff
report,
but
I
I
do
believe
that
the
applicant
is
is
requesting
that
the
the
retail
units
are
also
ownership
as
well
in
a
con
condominium
fashion.
L
L
O
O
Yes,
I
can
so
I
mean
the
way
that
this
is
handled
legally.
Is
that
that
there's
you're
being
asked
to
approve
a
Subdivision
map
for
condo
purposes,
including
commercial
condo
purposes,
and
then
the
next
legal
step
would
be
for
the
applicant
to
prepare
what
will
be
a
recorded
condo
plan
and
that
will
allow
the
individual
units
to
be
sold
separately.
But
that's
that's
a
separate
step
from
where
we're
at
right
now
process-wise.
A
And
we
have
a
speaker
at
the
dice
right
now.
Greg
did
you
want.
S
N
I
I
really
like
that
the
business
is
condo
units,
but
so
sounds
like
there
is
not
really
a
binding
language
in
the
conditions
of
approval
right
now
right
now,
it's
just
an
stay
2010
right.
N
May
thank.
V
A
And
I
I
see
yeah.
D
D
Yes,
so
so
the
the
the
tentative
map
that's
council
is
approving,
does
not
at
that.
You
know
at
this
time
have
condom
condominium,
retail
retail
Condominiums
subdivided
that
does
not
preclude
a
future
subdivision
to
create
retail
Condominiums,
which
you
know
the
the
applicant
has
stated
that
they
they
intend
to
do,
and
you
know
we'll
we'll
we'll
we
will
figure
out
what
process
needs
to
be
done
to
do
that
at
that
time.
But
that's
that's
not
what's
before
the
council
tonight,
okay,.
N
D
N
The
same
thing
is
for
residential
condo
right,
but
so
there
is
not
nothing
really
binding
about.
D
That's
correct
the
fact
that
the
developer
is
recording
a
residential
condo
map
does
not
necessarily
mean
that
that
the
developer
intends
to
sell
all
the
units
separately.
But
that's
that
you
know
that
that's
the
business
model
that
they've
stated
that
they're
pursuing
here
and
so
I
mean
we
don't
at
least
I.
Don't
have
any
reason
to
think
that
that's
not
correct.
N
Okay,
that's
fine!
So
what's
the
duration
of
the
development
agreement,
so
the
last
number
one
was
five
years
but
I
remember
for
Hampton
it
was
15
years.
So
it's.
D
Done
there
is
no
development
agreement
for
this
project.
This
is
just
an
approval
of
of
the
entitlements
that
are
before
Council.
It.
D
L
N
N
Also,
that's
longer,
without
that
it's
a
standard
is
two
years
correct.
Okay,
so
we
hope
that
they
all
predict
the
process.
Okay,
and
so
how
about
the
question
for
a
school
district.
L
So
for
elementary
schools,
I
believe
it's
Garden
Gate
that
the
that
the
those
that
school
age
chill
students
would
go
to
and
for
high
schools,
I'm
embarrassed
I,
don't
know.
I
I
would
think.
L
Top
three
months
it
could
be
Homestead
I,
believe
it
wouldn't
be
Cupertino,
High
or
maybe
Monte
Vista
I
apologize
I,
don't
know
that
just
quickly
which
high
school.
V
Vice
versa,
we
can
follow
up
with
the
school
district
to
clarify
right.
Okay,.
N
Yeah,
that's
fine
and
so
I
think
the
Planning
Commission
is
recommending
a
potential
of
adding
one
extra
floor
or
for
building
the
deal
with
okay
accommodate
more
affordable
unit
with
the
applicant.
Possibly
comment
on
that
is
that
a
possibility.
S
S
Yes,
at
the
playing
commission
that
was
brought
up
and
we
have
had
initial
internal
discussions.
We
think
that's
a
very
positive
step,
but
we
need
to
do
some
more
analysis
and
then
bring
it
back
and
talk
to
staff
about
how
we
would
accomplish
that.
The
I
just
know
off
the
top
of
my
head.
We
would
have
a
possibility
of
about
28
more
units
to
add
if
we
add
the
additional
floor,
but
that
would
further
exacerbate
the
opens.
S
The
common
area
open
space
requirement
to
some
degree,
so
we
would
be
asking
for
some
waivers
on
that
score,
but
bottom
line
is
very
positive
possibility
and
we
want
to
pursue
that
once
we
get
through
tonight.
Okay,.
S
A
At
12,
15.
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
check
in
with
council
with
regard
to
another
15
minutes
of
Iceberg
shower.
Are
you
okay,
with
prolonging
this
another
15
yeah
council
member
Willie,
nod
council
member
Moore,
councilman
away?
Okay,
nods?
Okay,
please
proceed
and
keep
in
mind
our
time
constraints,
I'm.
R
A
You're
kind
of
pushing
the
limit
of
how
long
everyone
else
had
it
yeah
go
ahead.
So.
N
We
could
find
a
way
and
I
really
like
the
project
and
on
this
35
Acres
certified
unit
units
per
acre
is
the
current
density
in
the
housing
element,
and
then
they
are
applying
density.
Bonus.
I
would
like
to
see
a
similar
project
in
Bob
road.
We
saw
that
the
employees
high
school
students,
the
residents
there
could
benefit
from
this
type
of
development.
Thank
you.
J
Just
a
couple
of
really
quick
clarifications,
so
all
the
this
is
a
new
development,
so
the
ordinance
we
have
on
the
electric
building
and
the
dark
sky
or
safety
ordinances.
Those
who
are
all
being
observed
right,
correct.
Thank
you.
I
I
Okay,
but
if
you
could
throw
that
that
picture
up
there,
because
I
I
think
it's
important
to
to
convey
you
know
what
I
think
we,
as
city
council,
should
be
looking
for
when
we're
faced
with
things
that
aren't
truly
in
line
with
the
general
plan.
Make
sure
that
we
ask
the
pertinent
questions
for
the
communities
sake
if
you're
able
to
actually.
I
Yeah,
so
so
only
building
a
well
when
you
go
to
the
next
one
there,
but
don't
go
there
yet
so
building
a
was
the
10
feet
and
then
Building
C,
then
just
going
from
27
to
22
feet
right.
Okay!
So
then,
when
you
go
to
the
paid
to
the
next
page
and
again,
what
I'm
trying
to
get
at
here
is
making
sure
that
we're
asking
the
questions
that
the
community
would
be
looking
for.
L
L
Parking
garage,
Subterranean,
yeah.
I
L
I
Okay,
yeah,
okay
and
so
to
me,
that's
very
really
important
for
the
community
to
understand
that
wow
yeah,
it's
up
against
the
wall
and
so
the
the
setback
at
that
point.
What
is
the
setback
here
for
building
a
on
that
side?
I
really
like
the
other
sides,
the
35
feet
great
and
that
kind
of
reduces
the
the
anxiety,
but
still
we
should
have
a
number
there
so
that
set
back
there
for
a
is.
A
I
And
that
was
my
main
focus,
and
so
then
the
other
one
is
a
much
smaller
going
from
27
and
a
half
to
22
and
a
half
setback,
so
yeah,
livable,
I,
think
and
so
again
the
main
point
I
I
wouldn't
want
us
to
get
through
this
approve
all
this
and
having
missed
some
of
the
important
things
for
the
communities
sake
that
we
really
should
be
looking
at
anything
that
varies
from
the
so-called
General
plan,
which
the
city
knows
is
that
that
represents
what
we
hope
the
city
conforms
to
by
all
these
projects
and
when
it
doesn't,
we
should
identify
and
make
sure
so
great,
so
I'm
just
on
to
comments
at
that
point.
A
A
The
item-
okay,
vice
mayor
child
moves,
the
recommended
actions
for
the
adoption
of
the
four
resolutions
22-146
through
149.
Is
there
a
second
to
this
motion?
I
see
councilmember
way
and
vice
mayor?
Well,
not
vice
mayor,
but
councilmember
Willie,
let's
check
in
with
councilmember
way.
Did
you
want
to
second?
The
motion,
you
put
your
hand
down
just
now.
Did
you.
J
I
Sorry,
thank
you
councilman
way.
Yes,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
second
this
one
and
I
would
say
why
in
comments.
Okay,.
A
Great
and
thank
you
councilman
Roy,
very
gracious
of
you,
so
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
on
the
table,
and
we
have
vice
mayor
Chao
and
council
member
Willie
with
hands
raised.
Vice
merchao.
N
And
for
comment,
I
I
think
this
is
really
really
a
nice
project
with
a
lot
of
great
features
on
extra
bike
parking
and
it's
just
EV
charge
plenty
of
EV
Chargers,
yes
and
then
the
community
room
and
and
the
art
feature
to
to
introduce
the
sister
city
history
and
characteristics
that
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
this
project.
I
know
some
people
are
concerned
about
height
I.
Think
in
this
location.
N
60
feet
makes
sense,
even
though
it's
beyond
the
current
General
plan,
45
feet
and
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
setback,
I
wish
they
said
that
could
be
better.
But
overall
it's
a
great
project.
I
have
some
small
requests.
That's
a
kind.
I
would
like
to
kindly
ask
it's
not
part
of
the
motion
that
I
hope
to
see
pollinating
and
insect
Gardens,
so
we
can
improve
biodiversity
and
I.
Don't
know
if
there
are
any
water
features
planned.
N
I
Great
thank
you
mayor
and
so
I
concur
with
vice
mayor
I.
Think
this
really
is
a
good
project.
The
comments
that
I
think
are
are
important
and
I'll
start
with
you
know.
We
we
have
to
realize
density
is
definitely
here
for
going
forward.
That
being
said,
I
think
there
really
are
ways
to
accommodate
the
density
and
yet
still
retain
as
much
of
the
look
and
feel
of
the
and
character
of
the
community
and
I
I.
I
Think
this
project
has
really
tried
to
to
do
that
from
the
renderings
that
we've
seen
and
and
the
questions
that
we've
asked.
I
I
really
do
appreciate
how
the
the
owner,
the
developer,
have
really
I
feel
focused
more
on
a
a
project
that
fits
the
community
as
opposed
to
just
trying
to
maximize
the
profits
at
the
expense
of
the
community,
and
so
for
that
I
really
want
that
message
to
I
hope
be
a
living
Legacy.
That
staff
will
be
trying
to
communicate
that
to
Future
developers.
I
Well,
you
know
so
that
we
get
more
of
of
what
fits
with
the
community.
I
am
happy
about
the
amount
of
retail.
If
we
do
it
as
a
percentage
of
the
housing,
it
really
actually
is
more
than
what
velco
is
going
to
wind
up
with
per
my
calculations,
the
amount
of
parking
that
is
available.
I
Yes,
you
know
as
much
as
we
hear
that
we're
going
to
get
away
from
from
personal
Transportation
I
just
don't
see
that
we,
we
really
are
a
very
mobile
society
and
so
the
parking
when
we
talk
about
adding
an
extra
floor,
another
28
units,
while
that
does
affect
the
open
space,
it
will
also
affect
the
parking
you
know
I
mean:
where
are
the
vehicles
for
those
units
going
to
be
residing
the
fact
that
there's
not
office
on
this?
To
me?
He
really
really
is
an
important
aspect.
I
Yes,
the
higher
densities,
the
more
height
the
reduced
setbacks,
building
planes,
but
trying
as
hard
as
you
can
to
adhere
to
those
characters
that
really
do
make
this
community
what
it
is
and
with
that
being
said,
thank
you
for
bringing
us
a
good
project.
I,
look
forward
to
to
seeing
this
when
it's
when
it's
part
of
our
community.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
K
K
We
just
don't
see
that
and
it's
it's
just
an
absolute
joy
to
see
this
in
this
project
and
that
you
worked
on
retail
retention,
yeah
I
think
I'll
I'll
leave
it
with
that
I
look
forward
to
seeing
what
art
you
have
you've
got
a
big
budget
to
work
with,
and
you
you
know
that
we're
concerned
about
how
it's
going
to
look
from
De,
Anza
and
I,
like
the
exterior
design
as
well.
I.
Think
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
pretty
exciting
project,
so.
J
No,
it
is
a
very,
very
good
project.
Okay,.
N
N
The
general
plans
then
the
other
verses,
the
proposed
one,
it's
very
easy
to
read,
and
then
I
especially
like
to
thank
the
staff
for
marking
the
density
bonus
units
and
then
the
the
line
that
that
goes
beyond
the
the
limit
I
requested
for
those
for
Westport,
and
it
wasn't
provided
and
I
think
this
time
the
staff
did
follow
the
municipal
code
and
ask
for
all
these
in
order
to
justify
The
increased
height.
So
I
really
thank
the
staff
for
and
doing
all
these
make
this
a
really
complete
presentation.
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much.
Vice
merchao
and
council
member
I
noticed
your
your
hand
is
raised
again.
Did
you
want
to
make
a
follow-on
comment.
K
Yeah
there
was
one
part
that
I
forgot
to
mention
in
the
packet.
There
were
so
many
pages
of
your
Outreach
that
you
had
done
and
I
I,
don't
know
that
we've
seen
that
before,
but
I
really
appreciated
it
and
I
was
reading
through
and
I
I
was
I
found.
It
very
interesting
and
I
also
felt
a
little
sad
because
you
had
made
so
much
effort
and
so
few
people
seemed
to
show
up,
but
that
that
happens
all
right.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
very
much
very
briefly.
I
want
to
thank
the
applicant
for
working
very
well
with
the
community
and
with
the
Council
on
this
I
think
out
of
all
the
projects
that
were
looking
to
entitle
in
the
last
several
years.
Yours
impressed
me
the
most
in
terms
of
the
sincerity
of
the
interaction
and
the
responsiveness
to
the
various
needs
of
the
community,
so
I
thought
I
thought
that
was
very
excellent.
I
think
it's
a
good
project.
A
I
want
to
make
note
very
briefly
that
Cupertino
entitled
several
projects
for
its
current
and
housing
element
and
I'm
deeply
pleased
to
be
able
to
be
considering
this
last
one
for
a
set
of
entitlements,
and
you
know
taking
the
206
units
here,
adding
them
to
the
600
over
at
the
Irvine
companies
Hamptons
project
and
the
200
and
plus
I
think
it's
270
something
over
at
the
Oaks
Shopping
Center.
Someone
correct
me
if
I'm
not
quite
getting
the
precise
number.
That
gets
us
well
over
our
requirement
of
entitlement
for
this
housing
element.
A
So
I'm
very
pleased
to
be
able
to
work
with
this
applicant
to
deliver
us
to
that
final
piece
of
the
housing
element
and
irrespective
of
what
else
you
hear
with
regard
to
cupertino's
reputation,
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
we
entitled
sites
in
good
faith
and
we've
been
working
throughout
this
process
and
the
set
of
years
with
the
applicants
to
make
sure
that
we
have
solid
projects
and
for
all
the
reasons
that
our
colleagues
have
articulated.
Here.
A
F
Member
Moore
aye
councilmember
way,
council
member
Willie.
I
A
Thank
you
very
much
Madam
city
clerk.
We
are
now
at
12,
32
I
will
go
ahead
and
ask
for
a
leave
for
another
few
minutes
from
my
colleagues
Vice
merchao.
Are
you
okay
with
that
to
finish
off
our
Council
and
staff
comments.
N
A
And
we'll
just
ask
everyone
to
be
brief:
if
so,
council
member
Willie,
are
you
all
right
and
council
member
Moore
thumbs
up
and
councilmember
way?
Yes
and
I'm
all
right
with
that
as
well?
So
let's
go
to
council
and
staff
comments
and
future
agenda
items
Madam
city
clerk.
Did
you
have
any
staff
comments
at
this
time.
V
A
You,
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
very
much.
Let's
go
to
any
Council
comments
or
future
agenda
items.
Do
we
have
any
hands
raised?
Okay,
well,
I
actually
do
I'm
gonna
go
ahead.
I
took
the
opportunity
to
to
write
down
my
request
here,
so
this
will
be
my
last
future
agenda
item
and
I'll.
Ask
for
a
second,
because,
although
as
mayor
I
would
have
the
ability
to
play
something
on
a
future
agenda,
this
is
my
last
regularly
scheduled
meeting
and
I.
A
Don't
plan
to
call
any
special
meetings
in
this
regard.
So
I'd
like
to
ask
for
a
second
for
staff
to
return
to
council
with
recommendations
regarding
shelter.
Solutions
for
the
unhoused
in
particular
I
would
like
staff
to
return
for
a
study
session
asking
for
input
from
Council
on
the
factors
affecting
whether
the
city
of
Cupertino
should
declare
a
shelter
crisis
under
government
code.
Section
8698.2.
This
study
session
would
also
include
this
and
other
options.
A
The
city
has
to
ensure
the
creation
of
temporary
shelters
and
the
funding
for
ongoing
Supportive
Services
for
the
people
in
these
temporary
shelters
for
up
to
80
individual
units
within
our
city,
state
government
code,
section
8698.2
allows
for
funding
opportunities
in
this
regard.
If
a
jurisdiction
declares
a
shelter
crisis
with
regard
to
the
number
of
units
at
a
location,
there
may
turn
out
to
be
a
different,
optimal
number,
and
that
should
certainly
be
one
focus
of
the
study
session.
A
My
hope
is
that
by
socializing
and
integrating
these
units
within
a
given
area,
we
create
an
example
for
how
to
approach
the
issue,
one
that
can
be
examined
and
replicated
by
other
jurisdictions
such
that
the
scope
of
the
housing
crisis
on
its
most
Stark
and
real
terms
can
be
diminished
and
eventually
eliminated.
I'm.
Simply
asking
for
a
second
from
my
fellow
council
members
and
I
do
see
your
hand
raised
council
member
Willie.
However,
you
do
not
represent
continuity
like
myself,
and
so
I
will
ask
another
one
of
our
colleagues
council.
A
A
Right,
I'll,
second,
it
okay!
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
and
apologies
to
John.
Thank
you
very
much.
Is
there
any
other
Council
comment
or
future
action
and
for
council
member
Willie
of
your
handwriting.
I
Yeah
I'm
actually
happy
to
just
make
it
a
comment.
Mayor
Paul,
thank
you,
so
much
I
believe
I
truly
believe
we
all
have
a
responsibility
to
do
as
much
as
we
can
in
the
social
area
that
there
are
so
many
people
that
are
not
as
fortunate
as
we
are
and
we
do
need
to
be
reaching
out
and
helping
and
by
what
you
have
described
there.
I
think
that
is
an
excellent.
You
know
way
for
the
city
to
be
moving
in
that
direction.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
N
Yeah
so
I
think
the
city
has
a
plan
to
end
the
homeless.
That
plan
is
being
ongoing,
I
hope
that
come
back
sometime
and
it
might
consider
this
proposal
and
for
future
agenda
item
I'd
like
to
propose
that
way,
clarifying
the
municipal
code
on
economical
development
committee
in
terms
of
the
terms
of
office
for
commission,
representative
and
council
members,
because
that
was
not
meant
to
be
four
years
so
I
hope
that
we
can
clarify
that.
N
And
another
thing
is
someone
brought
up
that
about
the
conditions
approve
of
approval
for
Main
Street
regarding
the
retail
percentage,
I
hope
that
issue
could
come
back
to
the
council.
So
we
can
understand
that
more
and
if
any
multiplication
is
necessary,
I
hope
the
council
and
the
public
can
can
have
some
input
on
that.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Vice
mayor
Chao,
and
let
me
see
if
I
understood
you
correctly
did
you
say:
commission
approval
for
the
Main
Street
restaurant.
A
Okay,
got
it
understood,
I'm,
sorry,
I,
simply
unders
misunderstood
that
word:
okay
and
Madam
city
manager,
as
is
your
want.
Did
you
want
to
ask
to
see
if
there
was
a
second
for
this?
Yes,.
V
Okay
and
and
Mary
Paul,
if
I
may
so
these
are
more
informational
items
than
study
session.
I'm
wondering
if
counsel
is,
is
flexible,
what's
possibly
informational
memo
to
counsel
first
as
a
base
and
a
foundation
and
if
necessary,
then
we'll
bring
it
back
for
study
session.
Okay,.
A
A
A
Okay
for
okay:
let's
go
to
back
to
Vice
versao
with
regard
to
the
conditions
of
approval
for
the
Main
Street
requirements
for
retail.
Did
you
are
you,
okay,
with
a.
N
An
information:
what's
the
timeline
on
that?
That's
an
item
that
has
the
significant
Community
interest.
If
we
get
a
memo,
then
we
still
think
it
needs
to
have
an
item
on
the
console
agenda.
Do
I
have
to
propose
it
in
the
next
council
meeting
and
then
it
comes
in
the
following
council
meeting
and
then
what's
the
timeline
on
that
I
don't
know:
okay,.
R
N
A
Think
we
need
to
keep
with
the
parameters
of
what
you're
requesting.
Do
you
want
to
study
session?
Do
you
want
an
informational
memorandum?
I
I
know
you're
asking
for
some
specifics,
but
that's
logistically
related,
and
so
let's
go
ahead
and
keep
it
in
terms
of
the
substance
of
the
request
here:
okay,.
N
Thank
you.
Agenda
are
not
just
sent
to
the
council
member.
A
Okay
sounds
good
kitty.
Councilmember
Moore
did
you
want
to
Second
the
request
by
vice
mayor
child?
The
second
request.
K
Yes,
yeah:
this
is
an
item
that
I
started
working
with
staff
and
the
former
city
manager
many
months
ago,
so
I
already
kind
of
know
what
the
answer
is,
but
yeah
it
should
come
back
as
an
informational
item.
Okay,.
A
Sounds
good
well,
vice
mayor,
you
still
have
your
hand
raised,
but
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
close
this
out
if
we
are
and
actually
councilmember
more
your
hand
just
raised
as
well
on
Zoom,
but
we'll
go
ahead
and
thank
everyone.
I
appreciate
everyone's
efforts.
It's
you
know
been
a
great
couple
of
terms:
good
night
director
and
acting
assistant
city
manager,
morally,
as
the
exit
Community
Hall.
So
thank
you.
A
Everyone
and
our
meeting
of
the
first
regular
meeting
of
Cupertino
city
council
of
December
2022
is
hereby
adjourned.
Have
a
great
night.