►
Description
Coverage of the Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Cupertino City Council Hybrid Meeting. Part 2 of 2.
A
A
A
Item
number
one
is
the
consideration
of
a
proclamation
recognizing
October
as
domestic
violence
awareness
month
and
from
my
tree.
We
have
bashaka
Chatterjee
and
tejaswi
data
to
accept
our
Proclamation
this
evening,
and
so,
if
you
would,
please
come
up
to
the
diocese
with
us
and
we
will
provide
that
Proclamation
as
well
as
a
couple
of
minutes
to
speak
before
the
presentation
of
proclamation.
B
Good
evening,
mayor
and
everybody
else
in
the
council
and
the
public,
my
name
is
vishaka.
Chatterjee
and
I
have
been
a
resident
of
Cupertino
for
the
last
20
years.
Today,
I
stand
here
as
an
advocate
for
domestic
violence,
victims
and
survivors.
I
represent
my
three
an
organization
that
has
been
serving
domestic
violence,
victims
and
survivors.
B
E
So
I
think
we
are
here
today
essentially
to
accept
the
proclamation,
but
also
to
request
the
city
to
honor
some
of
the
requests
we
have,
that
might
help
it
make
it
more
trauma,
informed
and
accessible
for
survivors,
I,
think
bishaka
kind
of
listed
three
of
the
things
that
would
be
very
useful,
so
I
can
hold
it
for
you.
As
you
read
it.
A
And
thank
you
for
being
here
for
accepting
the
proclamation
for
domestic
violence
awareness
month.
But,
more
importantly,
thank
you
for
everything
that
you
do
in
your
daily
lives
too,
help
the
plight
of
people
suffering
from
this
Scourge,
as
you
very
rightly
called
it
of
domestic
violence.
We
greatly
appreciate
your
work.
A
And
our
second
Proclamation
this
evening
is
a
note
of
appreciation
to
our
code
enforcement
officers
and
I
believe
one
of
our
Code
Enforcement
Officers
is
here
tonight
Monica
Diaz,
to
accept
the
proclamation
for
code
enforcement
officer
appreciation.
Is
it
a
month
or
a
week
that
we
have
I
believe
it's?
It
might
be
a
week
right.
It's
a
week,
so
code
enforcement
officer,
Appreciation
Week
Monica.
Thank
you
for
everything
that
you
do
to
help
keep
our
community
safe.
Is
there
anything
that
you'd
like
to
say
in
on
behalf
of
the
code
enforcement
officers
of
Cupertino.
F
Just
assure
not
to
thank
everyone
for
their
support,
not
just
the
council
and
Mr
Mayor
yourself,
but
our
departments
that
we
work
with
City
attorneys.
Here.
Our
city
managers
here
and
my
department
had
been,
and
my
supervisor
Albert,
as
well
as
my
code
enforcement
officers
team,
which
encompasses
Marvin
Aguilar
and
Jeff
Travis
as
well
as
Dan
Vasquez.
So
thank
thanks
to
everyone
for
making
the
program
successful
and
thank
you
guys
for
the
opportunity.
A
Okay,
item
number
three
were
very
grateful
and
I
know:
I
speak
on
behalf
of
each
and
every
one
of
the
council
members
for
the
work
of
the
Cupertino
Library
foundation
in
supporting
the
efforts
of
the
city
and
the
city
council,
the
staff
to
bring
forward
this
wonderful
expansion
of
the
Cupertino
Library
space.
It's
a
two-floor
space
that
has
meeting
rooms
and
really
activates
the
bottom
floor.
A
Courtyard
and
the
Cupertino
Library
Foundation
went
on
a
fundraising
drive
to
help
supplement
the
efforts
of
the
city
of
Cupertino,
and
so
without
further
Ado
I'd
like
to
ask
our
members
of
the
Cupertino
Library
Foundation
Kirin
version,
as
well
as
Jim
Davis,
to
come
on
up
to
the
dice
I
believe
Kieran
may
have
a
few
words
and
Jim
may
have
a
relatively
large
piece
of
paper
to
provide
to
the
city.
Welcome
Karen
and
Jim.
G
Today,
I'm
here
as
the
president
of
Cupertino
Library
Foundation,
my
name
is
Kiran
varshnia
and
we
are.
We
are
a
non-profit
organization
we
are
advocate
for
the
library
and
for
the
community.
We
provide
creative
and
financial
support
to
the
Cupertino
Library,
so
the
funds
that
we
have
raised-
and
we
are
very
happy
to
hand
over
that
to
the
city
today-
is
for
an
amount
of
229
465
dollars.
G
G
G
I
cannot
leave
this
place
without
saying
thank
you
to
our
Cupertino
librarian
Claire
varicio,
all
the
staff
here
at
Cupertino
Library,
and
also
thank
you
to
Santa
Clara,
County,
Library
District,
for
their
support
and
most
of
all,
I
am
going
to
say.
Thank
you
to
our
page
friends.
All
our
community,
Cupertino
Library
is
the
most
visited
library
in
the
district.
It
has
about
3
000
visitors
a
day,
so
we
want
to
invite
you
all
to
come
and
see
the
new
program
spaces
and
they
are
also
available
for
our
community
for
community
events
and
meetings.
A
A
Okay,
excellent
job
well
done
everyone
and
everyone
that
is
our
ceremonial
matters
and
proclamations.
For
this
evening
we
are
going
to
go
and
transition
to
a
hybrid
meeting.
Now
a
couple
of
our
council
members
will
be
taking
this
meeting
from
a
remote
location
so
that
we
can
have
a
proper
social
distancing
on
the
dice
at
this
time,
and
so
we
will
take
a
15-minute
break.
A
We'll
return
in
15
minutes
to
resume
the
rest
of
our
regular
meeting
thanks
so
much
okay,
hello,
everyone
we're
at
7
15,
starting
up
again
with
the
meeting
we
are
now
at
postponements
and
Orders
of
the
day.
Let
me
check
in
with
our
city
clerk
first
Madam,
City,
Clerk
or
Madam
city
manager.
Are
there
any
postponements
and
Orders
of
the
day
affecting
this
agenda.
A
A
Council,
member
Moore
requests
item,
17
move
to
consent,
I'll
go
buy
a
show
of
hands
for
a
second
and
item
number
17
is
the
review
of
crosswalk
options
across
Rodriguez
Avenue,
and
is
there
a
second
for
that?
If
there's
none
I
will
go
ahead
and
second
that
request
and
let's
go
ahead
and
see
if
there
is
any
a
desire
for
discussion,
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
further.
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
on
the
table.
Madam
city
clerk.
C
A
A
Okay
and
I
will
remind
our
colleagues
and
members
of
the
public
that,
if
you
do
care
to
speak
to
an
item
that
is
on
consent,
we
will
have
an
Omnibus
opportunity
if
that
item
doesn't
get
pulled
from
the
consent
calendar
as
well.
When
we
arrive
at
that
set
of
items
on
our
agenda
this
evening,
the
next
item
or
category
I
should
say
in
our
agenda
is
oral
Communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
Council
on
any
matter
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
council
and
not
on
the
agenda.
A
The
total
time
for
oral
Communications
will
ordinarily
be
limited
to
one
hour.
Individual
speakers
are
limited
to
three
minutes.
I
will
go
to
our
zoom
function
first
and
then
our
live
speakers.
We
have
one
hand
raised
from
the
public
on
Zoom,
that
is
from
Shawnee
kleinhouse
and
now
I
see
San
r.
As
we
stated,
we
will
have
three
minutes
for
each
comment.
A
If
your
hand
is
raised
on
Zoom
or
if
you
have
a
blue
card
in
within
the
time
that
the
first
person
is
done
speaking,
your
your
comment
will
will
be
called
upon
and
if
you
send
an
email
to
city
clerk,
that
is
all
one
word
at
cupertino.org
within
that
time
that
the
first
speaker
is
speaking,
then
you
will
also
be
called
upon.
I
have
two
other
blue
cards
that
have
been
filled
out
in
advance.
J
Good
evening,
mayor
Paul
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Shani
kleinhouse
I'm,
the
environmental
advocate
for
the
Santa
Clara
Valley
Audubon
Society.
In
the
past
few
weeks,
residents
have
been
coming
to
this
forum
to
speak
about
the
golf
course
and
whether
it
should
be
retained
or
returned
to
Nature
this
evening.
J
I
wish
to
provide
some
context
and
historical
perspective
in
2014
after
completing
a
wonderful
model,
Creek
restoration
project,
the
britaino
considered
the
alternative,
public,
Recreation
and
enjoyment
of
the
Stevens
Creek
corridors,
McClellan,
Ranch,
Blackberry,
Farm
golf
course,
and
stalker
Meyer
Orchards,
three
Recreation
intensity,
intensive
Alternatives
were
initially
considered.
All
three
would
have
had
severe
impact
on
the
sensitive
right
beer
and
Corridor
in
the
many
many
residents
who
enjoy
its
beauty,
the
wildlife,
the
birds
and
the
natural
resources
there.
J
J
Looking
at
the
creek
and
the
birds
in
nature,
there
Audubon
did
not
at
the
time
advocate
for
the
elimination
of
the
golf
course
or
proposed
alternative
4
did
not
choose
between
Golf
and
nature.
It
just
looked
too
have
activities
that
were
compatible
with
the
creek
and
not
too
intensive
in
2014.
The
residents
of
Cupertino
echoed
us.
J
We
prefer
the
natural
alternative,
but
we
respect
Community
sentiment
in
your
judgment,
and
we
hope
that
you
find
a
way
to
have
the
golf
course
be
better
for
the
Wildlife
that
are
along
the
creek
and
not
eliminate
an
amenity
that
so
many
people
care
about
just
find
a
way
to
make
it
better.
Thank
you.
A
A
K
Thank
you
city
council,
for
the
time
to
speak
today.
I
wish
to
bring
to
your
request
once
again
the
request
for
additional
pedestrian
Crossing
safety
measures
around
the
schools,
particularly
schools,
without
crossing
guards.
Right
now,
I'd
like
to
request
the
city
council
to
please
commission,
a
study
of
which
schools
do
not
have
crossing
guards
currently
and
see.
K
If
you
can
prioritize
the
edition
of
crossing
guards
at
schools,
I
can
say
for
a
fact
that
there
are
no
crossing
guards
at
Berea
Elementary
and
there
is
quite
a
bit
of
traffic
there
and
congestion
and
parents
trying
to
get
through
to
the
drop
off
and,
as
you
know,
just
last
month
there
was
a
pedestrian
fatality
on
Wolf
Road.
It
was
an
adjacent
Sunnyvale,
but
11
am
there
was
a
pedestrian
fatality
at
bullfin
Inverness
in
case
that
was
not
something
you
were
aware
of
so
I
request
you
to
please
prioritize
this.
K
We
can't
operate
on
timelines
as
usual
that
pushes
this
out
to
the
next
school
year.
Hopefully
you
can
do
everything
he
can
to
get
commissioned
and
staffed
crossing
guards
at
the
schools.
I'd.
Also,
like
the
request
for
The
Pedestrian
activated,
Beacon
lights,
I
know
had
sent
a
mail
about
in
crossing
lights
and
the
traffic
engineer
by
saying
that
is
not
as
reliable
as
the
beacon
lights
and
we
take
Beacon
lights
or
anything
else.
You
know,
frankly,
the
The
Crossings
are
totally
unmanned
and
unprotected
with
no
lights,
and
it
is
unsafe
for
kids
right
now.
K
I
also
want
to
bring
peer
attention
that,
as
these
schools
are
Consolidated,
the
traffic
digestion,
especially
getting
into
a
school
on
the
McLellan
Pub
Stelling
Corridor
as
well
as
Faria,
is
quite
cumbersome
right
now
and
we
could
actually
use
the
help
of
the
county
sheriffs
in
easing
the
traffic
congestion
rather
than
riding
tickets
for
parents.
I
urge
the
city
council
to
walk
by
at
school
drop
hours
and
inspect
the
chaos
around
these
streets
where
we
could
use
help
from
the
sheriffs
is
to
actually
ease
the
traffic.
K
Instead,
the
writing
tickets
and
parents
that
are
trying
to
get
kids
to
school
get
a
ticket
instead,
so
I
urge
the
city
council,
please
help
your
your
constituents
that
are
dropping
kids
to
school
are
not
are
not
candidates
to
be
ticketed.
They
are
to
be
helped
to
make
sure
their
kids
are
safe
in
getting
to
school.
Thank
you
for
your
attention
to
this
matter.
L
Thank
you,
mayor
Darcy,
hi,
I'm,
Jennifer,
Griffin
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
something.
I
I
find
this
whole
thing
about
the
housing
element,
hcd
and
all
of
the
housing
bills
that
the
governor
signed
about
three
weeks
two
weeks
ago,
I
think
they're
all
interrelated
I
I
mentioned
I.
Think
at
a
previous
meeting
in
oral
Communications
that
the
bottom
of
the
text
of
ab2097,
which
is
the
parking
minimums
bill
by
Laura
Friedman,
the
governor
signed.
L
You
know
eight
ten
days
ago
and
ab2011,
which
is
the
Buffy
Wicks,
build
housing
on
any
commercial
strip.
Bill
both
of
these
bills
have
two
to
three
paragraphs.
At
the
end
of
the
bill
in
the
text,
referring
to
other
builds
their
passage
there's
another
bill
that
they
both
refer
to,
which
is
about
the
housing
element,
I
think
it's
23.53
and
I
think
it's
Buffy's
also
but
I'm
beginning
to
wonder
why
a
standalone
bill
is
referring
to
another
bill
inside
of
its
text.
L
Is
there
something
here
that
the
public
is
not
supposed
to
know
about
the
part?
That's
really
concerning
is,
if
you
read
the
bottom
of
this
text,
they
2097
refers
to.
If
2011
passes,
if
a
b
20
40
53,
which
is
the
housing
element
bill
passes,
then
ab2097
will
do
something
and
the
same
on
and
on
with
these
other
bills,
why
I
would
like
to
have
these
politicians
explain
to
the
public
why
these
bills
are
not
Standalone
bills?
L
Why
are
they
referring
to
other
bills
in
their
text
and
I
understand
someone
told
me
that
these
bills
were
signed
as
a
package.
Well,
I'm,
sorry,
the
package
part
of
this
has
been
a
left
to
Discovery
by
the
public
and
I.
Don't
really
feel
comfortable
that
there
has
been
full
transparency
in
what
these
goals
are
supposed
to
be
doing.
I
I
assault
for
a
long
time
that
there
was
some
sort
of
a
secret
agenda.
L
The
fact
that
both
2097
parking,
minimums
and
2011,
that
let's
build
housing
anywhere
in
the
state
on
Commercial,
are,
are
pointing
to
a
housing
element.
Bill
makes
me
really
wonder:
does
that
mean
that
the
housing
element,
whether
a
city
certifies
or
not?
Can
these
bills
be
invoked
in
January
of
20
to
20
seconds
because
they
are
now
legal?
Can
they
be
pulled
in
by
developers
in
the
housing
element?
Mountain
View
was
just
not
certified
by
HCB
San
Francisco
is
not
certified.
I
think
that
we're
being
jerked
around
here,
if
we
don't.
A
M
M
The
project
is
centered
around
sustainability
and
the
goal
is
to
transition
these
city-based
induction
system
to
LED
infrastructure
entirely.
This
boat
satisfies
the
own.
The
city's
own
ordinances
for
dark
sky
lighting
and
generally
over
2500
lights,
will
be
modified
across
the
city,
just
a
brief
background
into
dark
sky
Lighting
in
general,
so
dark
sky
lighting
works
by
directing
the
light
downwards,
instead
of
into
the
atmosphere
around
it,
which
has
been
shown
historically
to
reduce
light
pollution
as
a
whole.
M
This
signifies
a
long-awaited
step
to
to
sustainability
if
the
city
decides
to
move
forward
with
the
project,
and
it
also
signifies
how
the
city
is
willing
to
hold
itself
to
the
same
standards
that
holds
private
institutions,
so
just
a
quick
budgeting
and
financial
analysis
that
I
have
prepared
beforehand.
When
you
talk
about
the
budget
in
this
project,
it's
really
important
to
look
at
both
the
short-term
costs
and
the
long-term
savings.
So
the
total
total
conversion
cost
in
the
short
term
would
be
about
1
million
to
1.3
million
dollars.
M
M
So
here
you
can
see
that
the
maintenance
cost
for
the
existing
system
are
always
a
lot
higher
than
the
maintenance
cost
for
the
new
system,
and
you
save
a
hundred
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
by
converting
additionally,
here's
the
graph
showing
the
break-even
point
in
terms
of
the
long-term
savings,
and
you
can
see
that
in
about
20
years
or
so
you
save
about
two
million
dollars
in
annual
costs.
This
is
another
graph
showing
the
cumulative
opportunity
cost.
M
You
can
see
that
after
25
years
you
can
save
more
than
it'll
cost
you
more
than
250k.
If
you
do
stick
with
the
current
induction
based
lighting
system.
So
in
terms
of
sustainability,
LED
is
a
very
important
step.
It
achieves
energy
energy
savings
by
50
to
70
percent,
greater
than
injection
lighting
and
the
need
for
Action
is
really
apparent.
As
about
15
million
tons
of
CO2
are
generated
per
year
by
unsustainable
outdoor
lighting
according
to
the
National
Geographic.
M
So
in
North,
America,
Alone
LED,
sorry
light
pollution,
increa
is
increasing
steadily
by
about
six
percent
per
year
and
Dark
Star
lighting
actually
helps
to
solve
this
problem.
By
directing
the
light
towards
the
ground
and
shielding
the
top
and
sides
of
the
light,
bulbs,
light
bulb
itself,
so
this
is
just
a
quick
cost
benefit
analysis.
M
According
to
my
findings
as
a
whole,
so
the
costs
are
very
short
term
that
cost
about
one
to
1.3
million,
and
the
project
will
take
about
seven
to
eight
years
to
break.
Even
but
in
the
long
term
you
will
save
about
two
million
dollars
in
terms
of
just
long-term
savings
as
a
whole,
and
this
does
mitigate
the
effects
of
light
pollution
in
Cupertino.
Thank
you.
Thank.
O
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Rick
kittson
I'm,
the
executive
director
for
the
Cupertino
Chamber
of
Commerce.
Our
organization
has
hosted
the
Barrett
Diwali
festival
for
19
years,
most
recently
on
Saturday
October
8th
that
morning,
I
got
a
call
that
Mr,
Steven
Scharf
was
upset
that
he
did
not
have
a
booth
at
Diwali.
Although
there
are
no
records
of
Mr
Sharp
ordering
a
booth,
it
is
understandable
that
he
was
disappointed
since
candidates
always
attend
festivals.
In
Cupertino.
Later
council
member
Kitty
Moore
told
me
that
an
urgent
matter
needed
immediate
attention.
O
This
entire
exchange
was
witnessed
by
A
dia,
TV
reporter
and
also
by
sheriff's
deputies
with
body
cams
and
I'm.
Sorry
that
I
don't
have
that
body.
Cam
footage
available
for
this
meeting
because
of
councilmember
Moore's
insistence
and
City
staff,
which
had
been
put
on
the
spot.
The
deputies
indicated
that
they
would
issue
tickets
unless
all
political
signs
were
removed
from
the
festival.
O
O
P
Okay,
dear
council,
members
and
a
guests
and
I'm
a
member
of
the
Huang
family
and
since
the
beginning-
and
we
ask
a
third
party
neutral
party
and
the
due
process-
and
we
still
haven't-
got
it-
we
have
the
legal
build
up
and
it
was
took
down
and
the
first
one
actually
City.
Actually
a
top
manager
at
Tennessee
was
because
only
a
few
square
foot
off
this.
P
It
was
okay,
but
second
time
was
according
to
the
whatever
the
city
rule
tell
us
to
do,
and
it
was
a
take,
take
down,
took
away
and
even
the
belongings
without
notice,
and
because
we
speak
up
and
there's
also
retaliation.
Now,
even
they
imposing
the
inflated
the
legal
fee
as
well,
and
we
here
again
ask
for
the
due
process,
ask
for
the
new
person-
and
we
can
talk
to
since
we
are
long-term
residents
and
we
haven't
had
any
development
in
the
in
the
place
at
all.
P
And
then
the
only
the
new
build
up
was
taken
away
and
there's
a
no
direct
neighbor
was
do
actually
give
us
pressing
on
it.
It
is
no
build
up
in
the
back
as
well,
and
only
90
some
square
foot,
three
structure
so
again
ask
for
the
Ombudsman
or
any
neutral
person.
We
can
work
out
and
immediate.
This
thing
out
and
I
have
actually
an
interpreter
and
he
he
can
speak
better
than
me
on
basically
the
Sim
stuff
here.
So
that's
that's
him
right
now,
okay,
go
ahead.
Q
Again,
she
also
oversees
her
parents
and
and
I
would
question
whether
there
was
really
any
point
or
benefit
for
the
city
to
be
able
to
continue
this.
And
we
ask
that
if
you
have
some
sort
of
dialogue
with
the
legal
firm
to
find
out,
if
there's
a
much
more
peaceful
way
to
be
able
to
resolve
this,
rather
than
just
simply
continuing
to
go
into.
And.
A
R
Pie
and
Rhoda
fry
just
want
to
comment
briefly
on
the
comments
of
the
preceding
speaker.
I
found
them
to
be
opportunistic,
and
my
understanding
is
that
the
signage
concern
had
to
do
with
signs
posted
on
the
ground,
not
books,
but
anyway,
I
want
to
get
on
to
my
main
topic.
I'm,
going
to
talk
about
elections
and
land
use.
Our
ballots
are
misleading,
Cupertino
voters
and
we
are
waiting
for
a
correction
from
the
County
Registrar
candidates
who
participate
in
voluntary
campaign.
Spending
list
get
a
diamond
next
to
their
name.
R
Three
candidates
who
got
diamonds
did
not
deserve
them.
They
each
raised
around
fifty
thousand
dollars,
some
of
it
coming
from
special
interests.
In
fact,
the
special
interests
collectively
dwarfed
the
entire
campaign
of
other
candidates,
transparency,
an
election
is
Central
to
our
democracy.
This
election
will
ultimately
have
to
do
with
how
our
city
is
developed,
I'm,
not
just
talking
about
the
50
or
so
Acres
of
velco
I'm,
talking
about
Lehigh's
3,
500
Acres
that
are
up
for
grabs
for
new
land
uses.
R
A
number
of
Industries
are
now
considering
the
property
which
is
accessed
by
rail
with
a
sizable
rail
yard
supervisor.
Simidian
has
indicated
that
the
land
use
up
there
would
be
something
less
impactful
than
the
cement
plant
refineries
in
the
East.
Bay
are
less
impactful
than
the
cement
plant.
We
must
be
prepared
to
advocate
for
appropriate
land
use.
Now,
I'll
tell
you
a
cautionary
tale
and
step
back
to
February
1992
at
cupertino's
Planning
Commission,
where
I
was
right
next
door.
Lehigh
then
owned
by
Kaiser
Smith
announced
the
developer's
vision
of
the
century.
R
Of
this
sorry,
the
developer's
vision
of
the
city
of
the
21st
Century,
the
ambitious
plan
would
build
up
to
3
200
homes
served
entirely
by
public
transportation,
eliminating
the
need
for
cars.
Naturally,
this
project
would
necessitate
annexing
the
property
from
an
incorporated
County
to
City
announcement.
All
the
peace
were
in
place
to
make
it
happen.
In
1985,
Corey,
executive
Tom
Lagan
served
on
the
County
Board
of
Supervisors
and
attempted
to
relax
housing
density
on
hillsides.
R
County
Council
said
he
could
vote,
but
the
fpp
citizens
disagreed
around
1990
for
McCrory,
employee
Barb,
karpel,
served
on
our
city
council
and
the
back
bed
board
when
she
ran
for
supervisor
Smitty
an
audited
her
for
taking
too
much
money
from
her
former
employer
and
for
not
reporting
a
contribution
from
assembly.
Jim
Canadian
who
later
became
a
consultant
for
Lehigh.
R
So
now
the
task
at
hand
is
about.
Considering
that
the
county
is
considering
new
use.
Is
there
we
know
the
county
has
not
been
there
for
us.
In
2019,
they
told
us
a
legal
truck
between
the
two
quarries
was
legal.
It
was
not
thanks
to
our
city
council.
We
put
an
end
to
this,
and
this
is
why
transparency
in
elections
and
land
use
are
an
extra
bleak
connected.
A
C
Mayor
I
was
handed
in
email
member
of
the
public
here
from
Ann.
Is
it
and
it
is
as
well
as
dear
mayor
Paul
vice
mayor
Chow,
council,
member
Willie
and
council
member
Moore
I
hope
the
council
will
continue
to
look
into
the
finances
of
the
city
and
get
Cupertino
on
track
and
bring
it
into
the
digital
age.
Regardless
of
the
outcome
of
the
election,
it
is
hard
to
believe
that
the
city
had
Evergreen
contracts
that
went
unexamined
and
verbal
contracts
without
deliverable
deliverables.
C
Until
the
current
council
did
some
investigating
verbal
contracts
and
Evergreen
contracts
are
bad
on
so
many
levels,
things
change
and
contracts
need
to
be
examined
and
adjusted
depending
on
circumstances
and
economics.
I
would
argue
that
this
way
of
doing
business
is
patently
absurd.
Some
argue
that
the
city
no
longer
has
a
good
relationship
with
non-profits,
including
a
former
mayor.
Well,
I
would
probably
want
to
maintain
a
good
relationship
with
the
city
if
I
was
getting
money
for
no
reason.
C
I
am
happy
that
the
gravy
train
is
coming
to
an
end
to
Mayor,
Paul
and
council
member
Willie
I
want
to
express
my
appreciation
for
all
that
you've
done
over
the
last
years
to
improve
our
city.
You
have
been
honest
when
it
was
painful.
You
have
been
spent
time
away
from
your
children.
Listening
to
whining
residents
dealt
with
Messy
Personnel
issues
and
been
pressured
by
Big
Money
interests
all
for
the
common
good.
Thank
you
best
regards
Brooke
ezit.
A
Thank
you,
madam
City
Clerk,
and
thank
you
to
Brooke.
Let's
go
to
our
next
item
on
the
agenda
and
that
should
be
under
reports
by
Council
and
staff.
Item
number
four
is
a
set
of
brief
reports
on
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements,
and
so
I'll
remind
my
colleagues.
These
should
be
about
a
minute.
Each
and
so
I'll
go
buy
a
show
of
hands
on
Zoom,
please
so
that
I
can
have
a
common
frame
of
reference.
S
Thank
you,
mayor,
Paul,
so
very
briefly,
on
October
10th
I
attended
the
finance
and
administrative
community
of
Silicon
Valley
cleaning
energy
is
really
a
community
meeting
that
we
Cruise
the
board
meeting.
So
we
examine
the
finance
reports
and
administrative
practices
so
that
it
is
really
a
very
transparent,
Silicon.
Valley
clean
energy
is
doing
very
well.
S
S
S
It's
planning
for
the
next
seminar,
so
I'm,
hoping
that
every
one
of
you
can
attend
and
the
third
one
is
October.
11Th
I
can't
get
the
Silicon
Valley
foundations
annual
meeting
report.
It
is
really
a
very
good
foundation
that
helps
a
lot
of
non-profit
in
Silicon
Valley
and
some
in
our
own
City
and
I
really
enjoyed
their
report
and
October
13th
I
attended
the
foothill
De
Anza
foundation's
Town
Hall.
That
reported
and
what
the
foothill
Foundation
does
is
very
important
education
in
organization
in
our
community.
So
we
have
a
good
relationship
with
them.
S
T
Follow-Ups
are
definitely
direction
to
count
a
device
taken
council.
Member
Moore
does
apply
even
hardship,
rules
to
other
volunteers
of
council
candidates
yard
signs
not
on
stake
are
not
even
allowed
to
touch
the
ground
not
up,
and
that's
the
information
I
actually
consulted
with
City
attorney
and
city
clerk
and
I
was
confused
about
this
rule.
Also
that
I
want
to
make
it
clear.
D
Yeah,
thank
you,
mayor,
well,
I
kind
of
thought,
I'd
be
the
the
tail
end.
Nobody
has
mentioned
the
Diwali
Festival
on
Saturday
88.
wow.
It
was
so
great
to
see
so
many
people
come
back.
We
had
it
last
year,
but
I.
It
really
didn't
have
the
the
numbers
that
this
year
had
and
the
number
of
booths,
and
so
I
was
really
pretty
energized
by
how
much
it
has
come
back.
I'd
also
like
to
just
mention
you
know
there
was
the
one
resident
talking
about
the
structure.
D
Removal
I
would
just
suggest
that
they
contact
the
City
attorney
and
maybe
the
City
attorney
can
provide
some
more
narrative
to
the
associate
of
the
person.
We
want
to
make
sure
the
residents
do
in
fact
get
to
where
they
can
get
the
answers
that
they
are
seeking.
So
I'll
just
mention
it
in
that
regard.
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
good
for
now.
Thank.
I
Right,
thank
you,
mayor
Paul,
so
on
October,
7th
I,
attended
the
women
in
construction
career
event
and
that
was
put
on
by
the
NorCal
carpenters
union
and
there
I
got
to
operate
a
mobile
crane,
which
was
pretty
exciting
and
I
got
to
check
out
some
Modern
surveying
equipment
and
the
event
is
put
on
to
encourage
women
to
get
into
the
construction
trades,
and
there
was
a
great
turnout
and
I
and
I
wish
them
the
best.
Thank
you.
I
A
I
have
a
few
items
to
report
of
I
think
some
some
interest,
former
mayor
of
Los
Angeles
Antonio
villarregosa,
was
tapped
by
Governor
Newsom
to
reach
out
to
you,
know
various
cities
across
the
state
to
talk
about
the
allocation
of
California
of
the
100
billion
dollars
in
federal
infrastructure
money.
That's
coming
and
so
mayor
Villa
rugosa
invited
a
few
of
us,
including
mayor,
Pat
Burt,
and
you
know
a
few
of
the
other
Mayors
in
this
area
to
have
an
initial
discussion,
and
so
that
was
very
productive.
A
Q
A
Came
of
course,
the
day
before
the
Diwali
Festival,
which
was
mentioned
on
October,
8th
and
I-
think
at
least
one
of
my
colleagues
participated
in
the
double
10
day
ceremony,
which
was
at
the
county
headquarters
and
I
also
attended
the
women
in
trades
event
with
councilmember
Moore
and
I
had
invited
vice
mayor
Chao
as
well.
But
you
know
I
think
scheduling,
conflicts
prevented
that.
D
D
D
I
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Councilmember
Moore
and
I
don't
see
further
hands
right
raised
and
so
I
will
briefly
report
out
that
on
October
6th
we
did
have
our
VTA
board
meeting
on
October
13th.
We
had
the
Santa
Clara
County
cities,
Association
board
meeting.
Unfortunately,
I
had
a
con,
a
conflict,
scheduling
the
board
meeting
and
so
I
think
both
councilmember
Moore
and
vice
mayor
Chao.
Who
is
my
alternate
on
the
cities
Association
board
for
attending
that
in
my
stead,
and
so
I
don't
see
further
hands
raised
at
this
time
and
so
Vice
Marcel.
T
Yeah
I
attended
the
cities
Association
as
alternate
on
initially
I
have
a
conflict
with
another
board
me
meeting
that
I
am
a
member
of,
but
then
I
left
that
board
meeting
in
order
to
join
the
cities
Association
around
the
7
30..
Fortunately,
there
was
an
important
item
of
cities.
Association
is
going
to
form
a
joint
Powers
Authority
and
we
asked
for
a
comparison
table
between
joint
jpa
and
501c3,
and
the
reason
given
for
jpa
was
they
do
a
lot
of
advocacy
which
is
not
allowed
in
50163
and
but
I'm.
T
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Vice
mayor
Chao,
we
are
on
to
item
number
six,
and
this
is
our
report
on
subcommittee
assignments
and
so
I
will
look
to
my
colleagues
to
see.
If
there
are
any
report
outs
on
any
subcommittees
that
we
sit
on
and
council
member
Moore,
your
hand
is
raised.
Did
you
want
to
report
out
on
any
subcommittee
assignments?
A
A
A
I
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
Paul.
So,
as
you
know,
council
member
Willie
and
myself
are
on
the
city
hall
subcommittee.
We
met
on
October
13th
to
go
over
parking
and
space
planning
and
our
next
meeting
will
be
on
the
around
the
27th
I
believe,
but
it
is
regarding
funding
and
recommendation.
So
so
far
are
we've
gone
over
structural
analysis.
The
EOC,
as
we
came
to
us
earlier
in
this
meeting
this
evening
and
we've
talked
about
parking
and
programming.
I
So
the
other
subcommittee
is
the
community
Grant
subcommittee,
which
I'm
on
with
the
vice
mayor
and
the
chair
of
the
parks
and
rec
committee
and
the
vice
chair.
So
it's
a
chair,
Mina
Shu
and
the
vice
chair
of
Sashi
bigur
and
we
met
we've
met
twice.
We
met
on
the
7th
and
the
17th
of
October
and
had
a
very
robust
discussion,
and
we
made
some
recommendations
to
modify
the
grant
program
which
the
parks
and
rec
director
Sanders
will
be
bringing
back
in
a
few
weeks
and
I
want
to
again
congratulate
director
Sanders
for
the
promotion.
I
We
also
recommend
that
sander
I'm
sorry.
We
also
recommend
that
Council
appoint
that
the
same
subcommittee
is
given
the
task
of
reviewing
and
making
recommendations
to
the
festival,
fee
waiver
policy
and
then
bring
those
recommendations
back
before
the
next
list
of
projects
comes
to
council
for
approval
and,
as
we
recall,
the
the
fee,
Festival
waiver
were
approved
within
the
budget,
so
they
came
to
council
back
in
June
for
approval,
so
that
is
our
recommendation
and
I
can
bring
that
up
again
in
a
future
agenda
items
to
have
that
happen
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
Yeah,
hey
I'll
thank
councilman
Moore
for
that
update
on
the
seismic
upgrade
I'll.
Just
add
that
earlier
tonight
we
talked
about
the
Tory
building
in
455,
which
we're
talking
about
moving
the
EOC
out
of
City
Hall
over
to
the
Tory
building.
Since
we
didn't
have
the
public
attending
that
earlier,
one
at
least
letting
them
know
and
what
that
does
for
City
Hall
is
it
reduces
the
structural
requirements
for
the
seismic
upgrade,
and
that
means
dollars
and
cents.
D
You
know
so
great,
but
then
I'll
also
do
a
a
quick
one
that
also
frees
up
a
lot
of
space
now
for
our
city
manager
to
work
with
the
layout
and
the
head
count
for
City
Hall.
So
now
we'll
finish
the
city
hall
seismic
upgrade
and
come
back
with
a
recommendation,
hopefully
at
the
end
of
November,
and
things
are
looking
really
good.
So
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you
again.
Councilman
Moore.
T
So
I
attended
the
mayor's
commission
meeting
with
his
commissioner
this
month
and
so
I
attend
attend
that
by
monthly
Commissioners
all
give
the
feedback
that
they
really
appreciate
the
staff
liaison
that
they
that's
serving
each
commission
that
they
have
been
really
phenomenal
in
providing
information
for
them.
So
thanks
the
older
staff
liaison
for
your
service
with
with
the
commissioners
and
then
on
I
think
we
had
two
meetings
of
community
Grant,
the
subcommittee.
T
We
have
a
recommended
guideline
that
will
be
coming
to
the
council
and
that's
the
committee
then
will
look
at
the
festival
guideline
next
and
I
think
there
was
a
subcommittee
request
to
form
a
subcommittee
for
the
homeless
issue
that
I
would
like
to
make
that
request
and
I
think
we
have
City
planned
and
homeless.
What's
the
status
of
that
and
I
think
we
really
need
to
look
at
cities
on
Outreach
team,
like
some
other
cities
have
on.
Maybe
a
subcommittee
can
first
study
these
options.
Thank
you.
A
V
Thank
you,
mayor
Paul,
several
updates.
The
first
one
is
a
happy
news
and
council
member
Moore
actually
stole
my
thunder,
so
I
am
pleased
to
announce
that
we
officially
promoted
Rochelle,
send
it
to
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Department
director.
After
an
extensive
and
heart
surge.
We
think
I
I
am
confident
that
we
found
the
right
person.
So
please
join
me
in
welcoming
Rochelle
to
the
new
capacity
and
I
couldn't
get
enough
emails
from
the
community
Thanking
us
and
thanking
her
for
her
services.
V
Following
on
that,
Public
Works
has
several
updates.
Public
Works
staff
has
been
doing
a
number
of
Outreach
efforts
regarding
three
CIP
projects.
First
of
them
is
the
revitalizing
Memorial
Park
project
and
then
the
all-inclusive
playground
at
Jellyman
Park,
and
also
the
latest
design
option
for
the
Lawrence
midi,
Park
and
trail.
V
In
addition
to
that,
Public
Works
staffs
has
been,
and
while
we
begin
to
start
the
first
phase
of
the
annual
pavement
project
on
our
streets,
so
I
asked
Public's
patients
and
also
your
understanding
if
any
traffic
delay
or
inconvenience
is
caused
by
the
link
closure
or
getting
a
better
Street.
Out
of
this
wanted
to
report
out
that
the
city's
fraught
waste
and
abuse
hotline
is
now
officially
launched,
All
City
staff
and
city
council.
V
Just
wanted
a
community
to
know
to
know
that
mayor
Paul
and
the
City
team
will
be
discussing
the
matters
and
also
just
meeting
with
the
concerned
residents
tomorrow,
and
also
just
a
few
follow-ups
from
the
previous
meeting
that
the
council
asked
to
have
the
pre-approved
Adu
design,
vendors
and
also
some
homeless
assistant
program
information
to
be
posted
on
City's
website,
and
that
has
been
done
and
in
regard
to
the
home
sharing
program.
I
did
confirm
with
the
planning
staff
that
that
will
be
a
program
identified
and
also
incorporated
into
the
housing
element.
V
A
A
V
You
mayor
Paul,
so
I
took
the
liberty
of
expanding
that
department
updates
to
not
just
on
focusing
on
the
five
departments
that
you
are
usually
encountered
with,
but
also
City
manager's
office
has
many
many
different
functions
so
today,
I
would
like
to
have
Astrid
providing
the
council
and
also
members
of
public
an
overview
of
what
a
city
manager's
office
do
Astrid.
Take
it
away.
W
W
W
So,
to
start
things
off,
here's
the
current
organizational
chart
for
the
city
manager's
office.
This
includes
all
full-time
employees
and
shows
the
current
vacancies
as
well.
As
many
of
you
know,
we
have
had
a
lot
of
turnover
this
past
year,
which
has
been
challenging,
but
the
divisions
continue
to
work
on
their
many
projects
on
a
regular
basis.
We
are
currently
recruiting
for
some
of
these
positions,
including
the
legislative
Aid,
which
was
approved
by
Council
during
the
budget
adoption
process.
W
Next
I
will
be
giving
a
brief
overview
of
each
division,
starting
with
a
city
called
the
clerk's
office
is
responsible
for
maintaining
City
Records
and
serves
as
the
compliance
officer
for
federal
state
and
local
statues,
including
the
political
reform
act,
the
brown
Act
and
the
public
records
act.
The
city
clerk
also
oversees
all
election
proceedings,
including
helping
candidates
meet
qualifications
and
overseeing
campaign
Finance
reporting
with
the
elections
right
around
the
corner.
They
will
be
very
very
busy
with
this
for
the
coming
week.
W
Next,
we
have
the
sustainability
division,
who
recently
completed
the
update
to
The
Climate
action
plan
on
August
16
2022.
Apologies
for
the
title
here.
The
climate
action
plan
serves
as
a
roadmap
for
the
division
activities
and
they
are
currently
work
underway
with
implementing
actions
from
the
climate
action
plan
2.0,
including
an
ordinance
establishing
a
streamlined
permit
process
for
EV
charging
stations,
a
partnership
with
CDD
that
is
up
for
second
reading
later
tonight.
Actually,
the
sustainability
division
also
supports
a
variety
of
projects
with
Public
Work,
incorporating
sustainability
features
into
construction
projects.
W
Next,
we
have
the
Emergency
Management
division,
who's
responsible
for
Emergency,
Operations
and
planning,
which
includes
response,
coordination,
planning
and
training
for
all
hazards.
They
coordinate
the
block
leader
program
and
work
with
other
volunteer
organizations
who
are
part
of
the
citizen
core
program
this
year.
They
have
provided
nine
personal
emergency
preparedness,
trainings
for
City
residents
and
volunteers,
and
have
provided
an
emergency
preparedness
guides
in
six
different
languages
that
are
posted
on
the
city
website.
W
W
And
next
we
have
the
office
of
communications,
which
is
actually
made
up
of
two
divisions,
Communications
and
video.
Their
mission
is
to
give
Cupertino
residents
access,
timely,
engaging
and
important
information
they
reach
out
to
and
communicate
with
residents,
businesses
and
community
members
daily
through
various
platforms,
including
the
scene,
items
of
Interest
press
releases,
email,
notifications,
social
media,
the
city,
Channel,
promotional
videos
and
the
engage
Cupertino
website
just
to
name
a
few.
W
They
also
facilitate
and
execute
various
City
events,
such
as
the
Cupertino
Library
expansion,
gallon
ribbon,
cutting
the
crest
awards
ceremony
and
also
support
other
divisions,
event,
division
events
such
as
the
public
safety
forum
and
the
Earth
and
Arbor
Day
Festival
internally.
They
also
support
All,
City
divisions
and
departments
by
helping
develop
Outreach
and
marketing
plans
for
specific
qualities,
policies
or
programs,
and
also
they
provide
video
and
zoom
support
for
All
City
Council
meetings
and
commissioning
committee
meetings.
W
Next,
we
have
Economic
Development,
which
I
will
briefly
touch
on
since
Nina
gave
such
a
wonderful
presentation
on
her
division
at
the
last
meeting.
She
is
a
strong
advocate
for
the
business
community
and
continues
to
work
on
expanding
City's,
Outreach
efforts
through
surveys
for
cbop
program
and
the
business
connect
newsletter.
We
look
forward
to
seeing
her
bring
forward
these
upcoming
initiatives,
including
the
online
Cupertino
store
and
the
economic
development.
W
Office
which
is
currently
made
up
of
our
city
manager
and
executive
assistant
and
myself
I
work
on
facilitating
the
city
work
program
process
from
its
beginning
stages
to
its
adoption.
Then,
all
the
way
through
the
year
with
quarterly
update,
I,
also
work
on
the
city's
legislative
affairs,
which
includes
working
with
the
legislative,
Review
Committee
and
our
state
lobbyists
to
take
positions
on
state
legislation
and
review
the
legislative
platform.
W
Additionally,
I
tackle
certain
policies
and
procedures
like
the
adoption
of
the
no
smoking
ordinance
from
last
year
to
the
update
of
the
commissioner's
handbook.
This
year,
I
am
working
on
bringing
an
update
on
the
Smoky
ordinance
and
on
developing
the
safe
gun
storage
ordinance,
which
is
part
of
the
fiscal
year.
2223
City
work
program.
W
As
part
of
my
presentation
this
evening,
I
also
wanted
to
briefly
mention
that
the
city
work
program
dashboard
is
currently
updated.
With
information
beginning
from
fourth
quarter
of
fiscal
year
2122,
the
dashboard
can
be
viewed
at
cupertino.org
City
work
program.
I
will
also
be
providing
council
with
a
memo
that
wraps
up
the
fiscal
year,
2122
City
work
program
by
next
week
that
will
also
be
published
on
the
city
work
program
website.
W
W
One
of
the
other
projects
I'm
currently
working
on
from
the
fiscal
year
2223
City
work
program,
is
a
student
internship
program.
This
is
a
program
that
the
mayor
piloted
this
summer,
where
four
High
School
interns
participated
and
volunteered
at
many
City
Event,
including
the
mayor's
cup
challenge,
the
Angel
Island
Excursion
and
the
library
expansion.
Just
to
name
a
few
I
will
be
bringing
a
report
to
council
with
details
of
the
pilot
summer
program
summer,
internship
program
at
the
next
November
1st
city
council
meeting,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
A
U
No,
this
it's
the
city,
manager's
report
that
was
not
and
their
items
discussed
during
the
report
are
not
agendized
items.
They
can't.
There
is
an
opportunity
to
address
those
issues
during
oral
Communications.
So
there's
there
is
legally
speaking,
there
is
not
a
requirement
that
we
reopen
oral
Communications
at
this
time.
A
Okay,
well,
I'll
tell
you
what
to
Our
member
of
the
public
on
this
one
I'm
getting
a
thumbs
up,
but
if
you
know
the
hour
is
Young
at
the
end
of
the
night,
we
do
have
an
item
in
oral
Communications,
and
so
please
feel
free
to
remind
us
at
that
time
and
we'll
open
that
up
for
that
availability.
So
thanks
very
much
for
your
understanding
and
thank
you
Mr
City
attorney.
For
that
clarification.
A
If
there
are
any
people
that
would
like
to
speak
on
any
of
the
items
on
consent,
but
it
is
not
pulled,
and
so
let
me
let
me
go
by
hands
and
I
do
see
a
hand
raised
from
vice
mayor,
Chao
and
actually
before
I
go
to
vice
mayor
ciao.
Let
me
go
to
our
city
clerk,
because
I
believe
Madison
clerk.
There
was
a
request
from
a
member
of
the
public.
Is
that
correct
to
pull
an
item
off
of
the
consent
calendar.
A
T
A
Let's,
let's
clarify
that
at
this
point,
so
within
the
rules
of
procedure,
we're
allowed
to
put
items
that
are
on
the
regular
agenda
as
long
as
it's
not
a
hearing
or
an
ordinance
item
onto
the
consent
that
was
done
for
item
number
17,
and
so
let
me
go
ahead
and
Vice
merchild
makes
an
excellent
point.
The
subject
is
the
consideration
of
reviewing
crosswalk
options
across
Rodriguez
Avenue
in
the
vicinity
of
the
public,
pedestrian
walkway
easement
through
track
9405,
also
known
as
Campo
de
Lozano
subdivision.
A
Sorry
and
the
other
is
the
review
of
the
proposed
language
for
signage
to
be
posted,
and
so
I
just
want
to
remind
the
members
of
the
public
that
if
you
want
to
speak
on
this
item-
and
it's
not
pulled
off
of
the
consent
calendar,
we
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
to
consent.
Generally
and
I
I
hear
my
City
attorney
clearing
his
throat
and
yeah
I.
Think
Chris
wants
to
speak
on
this.
U
U
U
A
Okay,
great
well,
thank
you
for
that
clarification
and
reminder.
City
attorney,
Jensen
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
have
item
14
off
the
consent.
I
will
now
invite
any
public
comment
on
any
item
that
is
on
consent
that
is
not
been
taken
off
and
so
just
to
remind
everyone
that
is
9,
10,
11,
12,
13
and
17,
because
17
has
been
added
to
consent
and
14
has
been
taken
off
and
sold
out
will
be
considered
in
due
order.
A
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
that
would
like
to
speak
to
any
of
those
items
that
are
on
the
consent?
Calendar
and
again,
that's
9
through
13
and
17
I,
see
a
hand
raised
in
the
in
the
chambers,
and
I
also
see
a
hand
raised
on
Zoom,
so
SEMA
linscog
your
hand
is
raised
on
Zoom
I'll
remind
the
members
of
the
public
that,
if
you
raise
your
hand
on
Zoom
or
if
you
hand
in
a
blue
card
by
the
time
that
the
first
person
is
done
speaking,
then
we
will
call
on
you.
A
I
I
have
the
blue
card
from
the
member
of
the
public
here.
So
now
we
have
two
members
of
public
on
Zoom
SEMA,
as
well
as
Irving,
Marcy
and
Jennifer.
Sheeran
has
a
blue
card
in
in
the
council
chambers
and
so
SEMA
welcome.
You'll
have
three
minutes.
Oh
and
I'll
also
remind
our
members
of
the
public.
If
you
want
to
have
three
minutes
or
up
to
three
minutes
rather
of
your
comments
read
into
the
record
by
the
city
clerk,
please
email,
city,
clerk
cupertino.org
during
this
time
that
the
first
person
is
speaking
welcome.
X
X
The
consensus
seems
to
be
also
that
the
signage
that
the
city
has
proposed
meets
everyone's
needs.
So
we
we
support
that
signage,
but
we
would
like
to
ensure
that
the
city
does
go
ahead
and
wait
a
year
and
collect
data
from
the
time
that
the
rigna
creek
trail
opens
and
the
access
path
starts
getting
used
that
we
collect
a
Year's
worth
of
data
to
understand
if
there
is
a
need
for
a
crosswalk
and
if
so,
at
what
location.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Y
A
C
A
N
One
thing
I'd
like
to
say
in
addition
to
what
SEMA
and
hervey
said
is
I
think
we
should
trust
our
staff.
The
staff
are
civil
engineers.
Many
of
them
are
professional
engineers
and,
as
an
electrical
engineer,
myself,
I
know
how
much
training
goes
into
that,
and
so
therefore
I
trust
them
on
matters
when
it
comes
to
you
know,
should
we
get
data?
Should
we
do
things
and
so,
therefore,
to
me,
I
think
that
it's
worthwhile
to
actually
listen
to
them.
N
I
also
think
that
the
side
that
they
propose
is
a
good
idea,
with
one
caveat,
which
is,
it
currently
says,
walk
your
bikes
on
the
trail
and
but
it
doesn't
make
any
note.
The
fact
that
that
pedestrian
Trail,
which
is
always
walked
on
not
bite,
done,
connects
to
another
trail
that
you
are
allowed
to
bike
on.
So
that
would
be
the
only
thing
that
I
would
I
would
mention
regarding
the
sign
but
I,
think
and
I.
N
A
You
Jennifer,
and
that
does
it
for
the
comments
on
the
consent,
calendar
and
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
ask
for
a
motion
from
one
of
my
colleagues
for
consent
items
9
through
13,
as
well
as
17
council.
Member,
more
your
hand
is
raised
so
moved
council
member
of
more
moves,
the
recommended
actions
on
those
items
and
council
member
way
would
you
like
to
Second?
Yes,.
A
I
A
Great
thank
you.
Councilmember
Moore,
I
Echo.
That
sentiment
I
think
that
we're
producing
really
good
results
here,
and
so
you
know,
if
we're
front,
ending
a
lot
of
this
work.
A
lot
of
these
sentiments
that
we
have
positive
things
come
about
as
a
result
of
a
lot
of
you
know
later,
you
know
night
all
the,
although
cutting
off
at
midnight
types
of
deliberations
that
we've
had
so
yeah,
very,
very
grateful
for
all
of
my
colleagues
and
staff's
work
on
on
these
items
so
I
see
vice
mayor.
T
Sure
so
I
think
it's
a
good
thing
that
we
just
I
think
the
staff
on
recommendation
is
very
thoughtful,
that
we
observe
three
locations
in
the
next
year.
So
we
know
the
traffic
but
I
think
it's
a
good
thing
that
we
this
this
was
brought
to
our
attention
because
otherwise
we
wouldn't
know
many
people
will
be
Crossing,
that
street
dangerously
and
now
we
at
least
it's
something
that
we
are
watching
out
for
and
studying
for
so
I
think
it's
important
when
residents
bring
a
concern,
we
don't
ignore.
T
We
address
them
to
to
evaluate
whether
there's
something
we
should
do
or
not.
So
this
is
an
example
of
that
and
yeah,
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
trail
to
be
open,
but
I
think
people
do
need
to
be
concerned
that
okay,
it
is
public
right-of-way,
but
it's
it
is
on
private
property.
Just
like
Rick,
not
quick
Trail.
It
is
on
Water
Valley
Property.
So
we
should
respect
the
property
owners
when
we
use
their
property
for
our
public
benefits.
T
A
C
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Madam
city
clerk,
we're
on
to
item
number
14.,
and
so
that
was
pulled
off
of
consent.
Item
number
14
is
to
consider
the
award
and
authorization
to
the
city
manager
to
execute
a
maintenance
services
contract
with
professional
turf
management.
That's
the
name
of
the
entity,
professional
turf
management
for
the
Blackberry
Farm
Golf,
Course,
Madam
city
manager.
Would
you
care
to
introduce
the
item
or
to
introduce
the
staff
member
who
can
provide
some
commentary?
A
A
Very
briefly,
if
you
could
encapsulate
the
purpose
of
your
request,
I
know.
Vice
mayor
Chow
took
up
and
indicated
that
you
had
provided
an
email,
but
before
we
bring
this
to
staff,
to
help
frame
the
staff
feedback
and
commentary
the
presentation,
if
you
will
we'd
like
to
give
you
an
opportunity
to
explicate
your
purpose
for
polling
or
requesting
the
item,
be
pulled
so
welcome.
Annie,.
Z
Good
evening,
mayor
Paul
vice
mayor
child
council
members.
Thank
you
for
considering
this
item.
My
name
is
Annie
Yang
and
I
am
the
chair
of
the
environmental
action
committee
of
the
Santa
Clara
Valley,
Audubon,
Society
and
I'm
also
a
resident
of
Cupertino.
We
noticed
that
in
the
new
contracts
technical
specifications,
they
don't
include
many
of
the
wildlife
protection
Provisions
that
were
in
the
2016
contract.
Z
We
understand
that
the
council
is
yet
to
decide
the
future
of
Blackberry
Farm
golf
course,
but
regardless
of
the
future
decision,
the
new
maintenance
contract
should
include
protections
for
existing
wildlife
and
for
Stevens
Creek,
which
is
adjacent
to
the
golf
course.
We
detailed
the
specific
sections
that
were
left
out
of
the
current
contract
in
a
letter
to
the
council
that
you
mentioned
and
we
included
our
recommendations
to
enhance
those
sections
as
well.
Z
We
included
a
table
within
that
letter
that
compared
the
two
documents,
along
with
our
recommendations,
and
we
hope
you
can
reference
that
table
if
you
can
so
in
summary.
First,
the
2016
document
includes
specific
actions
that
I
would
ensure
compliance
with
state
regulations
and
protect
terrestrial
and
Aquatic
Life.
These
are
left
out
of
the
2022
document.
For
example,
the
2016
document
denotes
best
practices
for
protecting
Birds
during
nesting
season
requiring
minimal
use
of
outdoor
lighting
and
ways
to
avoid
chemical
runoff.
These
sections
should
be
added
back.
Z
Second,
the
surveys
for
nesting
Birds
they
should
be,
they
should
be
required
prior
to
any
tree
trimming
or
any
trees
on
the
golf
course
during
nesting
season.
Third,
the
section
on
protection
of
Aquatic
Life
should
be
retained
and
updated
with
the
state's
recommendations
on
inappropriate
pesticides
as
well
as
spec,
as
well
as
specific
practices
that
protect
the
creek.
And
finally,
while
both
documents
prohibit
chemical
pesticide
or
fertilizer
runoff,
neither
require
monitoring
nor
testing.
This
should
be
required
to
ensure
runoff
actually
does
not
occur
in
this
sensitive
area.
A
V
V
My
understanding
is
that,
because
of
Staffing
overturned
since
2016,
for
some
reason,
this
section
of
the
RFP
was
omitted,
so
I've
been
informed
that
if
Council
would
consider
making
a
motion
to
include
a
provision
to
ensure
compliance
with
wildlife
and
water
quality
protection,
best
practices,
as
reflected
in
Audubon
society's
comment
into
the
motion
for
approving
a
contract
on
staffed
in
full
support
of
that
I
do
have
my
new
director
Rochelle
sander
online,
to
answer
any
further
questions,
but
we
do
not
anticipate
to
have
a
presentation
for
this
item.
Okay,.
A
C
A
Okay
and
so
I'll
remind
our
members
of
the
public
that
you'll
have
the
time
that
the
first
person
is
speaking
or
three
minutes
whatever's
longer
to
raise
your
hand
on
Zoom
to
hand
in
a
blue
card
live
or
to
send
an
email
to
city
clerk.
All
one
word
at
cupertino.org
to
have
up
to
three
minutes
of
your
commentary,
read
into
the
record
and
so
Luis
sadati
welcome.
You'll
have
three
minutes.
A
H
H
A
A
Well,
while
we're
bringing
it
back
up
to
the
dice,
I,
don't
see
further
unique
hands
raised
here
and
so
Madam
city
clerk
I'll
check
back
in
with
you
in
a
couple
of
minutes
with
regard
to
further
hands
raised
or
I
should
say,
blue
cards
or
our
emails
to
the
city
clerk
email
address.
So
we
do
have
two
members
of
council
that
would
like
to
speak
on
this
or
to
follow
up
with
questions.
I
should
say:
council
member
Moore,
followed
by
council
member
Willie
council
member
Moore.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
Paul,
so
I
would
like
to
hear
the
the
language
that's
suggested
for
the
the
motion
regarding
compliance
with
the
wildlife
I
believe
that
they
were
ordinances.
So
I
would
like
to
hear
that
but
I
had
some
questions
on
this
item,
which
I
think
that
it
could
be
followed
up
with
with
just
a
memo
and
that's
regarding
some
resolutions.
I
found
on
PDF,
Pages,
996
and
997
and
I
can
give
you
those
resolution
numbers
they're
from
2010
I
believe,
but
it
was
10-049.
I
Zero:
five,
zero,
zero,
five,
two
zero,
five,
four
and
zero
five
five
and
those
were
all
regarding
those
were
all
regarding
water
rights
and
the
water
water
rights
being
given
to
the
city
and
where
they
could
pump
water.
So
I
would
like
to
hear
more
about
those
water
rights
and,
if
there's,
if,
if
we
have
some
right
to
have
a
well
or
something
on
the
on
the
Blackberry,
Farm
Golf
Course
for
irrigation,
perhaps
I'm
just
kind
of
curious.
What
happened
to
these
since
I
haven't
seen
this
lately,
and
so
that's
it.
V
I
will
speak
to
the
recommended
provision
to
the
recommendation
is
to
include
basically
to
include
additional
provision
to
ensure
compliance
with
wildlife
and
water
quality
protection,
best
practices
in
response
to
Audubon
society's
comments.
We
could
include
that
in
your
emotion
or
you
could
do
a
a
generic
motion
and
we'll
come
back
to
you
councilors
to
make
sure
that
you're
comfortable
with
the
recommended
motion.
A
A
A
D
I
agree
with
what
we've
heard
from
you
know:
the
public
and
the
city
manager
I
would
toss
out,
though,
that
we
use
the
language
in
the
previous
contract.
You
know
I
always
try
and
minimize
options
for
confusion,
and
if
we
give
staff
direction
that
you
know
adhere
to
what
the
public
comments
were
it.
It
possibly
leads
to
different
language
in
the
contract,
and
now
the
contractor
has
to
go
back
and
somewhat
worry
about.
D
You
know
what
it's
going
to
cost
him
and
and
it's
only
language,
but
if
we
just
adhere
to
the
language
in
the
previous
contract.
As
long
as
the
public
didn't
see
any
problem
with
it,
then
I
think
we
make
it
much
easier
for
the
contractor
where
he
says
bingo
I
know
what
I
know
what
my
costs
are
and
here's
the
result.
So
I
would
just
toss
that
out
as
hopefully
trying
to
make
this
a
little
bit
easier.
Thank.
T
U
I
I
would
recommend
that
counts
that
that,
if
Council
wants
to
move
forward
with
this
contract
and
and
when
we
do
need
a
contract
in
place
to
do
maintenance
that
Council
authorize
staff
to
discuss-
you
know
discuss
this
issue
with
the
the
successful
party
in
the
RFP
and
reach
and
agreement
with
terms
that's
consistent
with
policy
council's
policy
Direction.
Rather
than
coming
back
and
and
bringing
specific
language
for
Council
review,
which
you
know
it
really
isn't.
U
The
role
of
the
council
so
I
would
recommend
that
that
that
Council
give
this
direction,
and
it
could
certainly
incorporate
council
member
Willie's
thoughts
to
to
to
to
to
consider
what
was
used
in
the
the
prior
agreement
as
well.
But
I
I
think
that's
going
to
be
more
efficient
and
it
Crea.
It
would
reduce
the
risk
that
we
get
in
a
situation
where
we
don't
have
an
agreement
that
we
can
execute
before
this.
The
current
term
of
the
contract,
Runs
Out.
T
U
T
Yeah
I
don't
understand.
This
is
a
request
for
proposal.
So
basically
we
are
specifying
what
kind
of
services
we
need
and
then
here
we
will
include
the
protecting
nesting
boards
and
these
other
requirements
from
2016
to
comply
with
State
regulation.
As
they
say,
then,
supposedly
multiple
people
will
bid
on
that.
That.
T
U
T
T
U
U
F
T
T
U
A
Okay,
excellent
yeah,
I
I
had
a
fundamental
legal
question
as
to
how
you
get
another
party.
That's
not
here
to
you
know.
Basically,
you
know
get
empowered
by
the
council
to
to
to
agree
with
our
staff,
but
I
I
think
in
principle
what
we've
described
is
workable.
You
know,
and
you
know
those
Provisions
are
being
adhered
to.
You
know,
of
course,
thank
Audubon
Society
and
their
representative
Annie
for
pointing
that
out
and
I
don't
see
further
hands
raised
or
new
hands
raised,
but
councilmember
your
hand
is
raised.
A
So
let's
go
ahead
and
if,
if
it's
okay
with
everyone,
take
take
a
brief
break
three
minutes
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
have
the
full
Council
available
for
if
we
bring
forward
a
motion-
and
you
know
I'm
making
sure
and
just
in
the
interest
of
full
disclosure
councilmember
will
is
actually
calling
me
a
moment
ago
and
so
I'm,
assuming
that
perhaps
he's
trying
to
notify
us
that
he
needs
to
log
back
in
so
we'll.
Take
a
quick
three
minute
break.
A
It's
8
45
on
the
clock,
we'll
start
again
prompt
at
8
49.
thanks
very
much
we'll
see
you
soon
and
I
see
that
councilmember
Willie
is
on
camera,
and
so
actually
let
me
turn
on
my
zoom
camera
here
and
we
are
on
item
14..
We're
continuing
the
discussion
and,
at
this
point,
I
think
that
we've
had
a
couple
of
rounds
of
comments.
So
I
will,
for
the
purposes
of
further
discussion,
ask
for
a
motion
on
this
item.
14.
Would
anyone
like
to
bring
one
forward
I'll
ask
Vice
merchao?
T
Yes,
yeah
yeah
I
would
like
to
motion
that
we
move
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
direction
to
use
the
2016
contract
with
the
base
so
that
it,
since
there
is
no
reason
to
change
them
and
include
all
the
Environmental
Protection
measures
from
2016
and
in
addition,
at
the
comments
from
on
any
yarn
in
her
email
and
the
comprehensive
table
that
she
provided,
so
that
we
continue
to
protect
the
environment
and
the
wildlife
in
the
golf
course
area,
because
whatever
we
decide
to
do
with
the
area,
we
will
continue
to
protect
the
environment.
Thank.
A
I
Okay,
yes,
I'd
like
to
Second
it
I
am
looking
at
the
technical
Provisions
right
now
from
the
Blackberry
Farm
Golf
Course
Maintenance
in
2016.,
so
the
the
email
from
Annie
did
have
a
footnote
and
she
referenced
the
actual
Pages.
It's
a
it's
five
pages
long
and
it
seems
pretty
reasonable.
There's
one
I
do
have
a
question
contractor
shall
meet
with
staff
and
representatives
annually
to
review
maintenance
activities
relative
to
these
considerations.
I
U
I
Okay,
and
and
through
the
mayor,
if
there's
anything
here
that
because
a
certain
amount
of
time
is
passed
and
perhaps
some
of
the
the
requests
may
have
changed
due
to
science
advances,
will
you
please
give
it
a
look
over
in
in
case
there's
anything
to
to
that
nature?
That
perhaps
we
need
to
have
some
improvements?
I
I
I've
been
concerned
about
what
kind
of
fertilizer
is
used
for
some
time
because
of
the
the
creek
being
right
adjacent
to
to
the
golf
course
and
I
know:
we've
all
heard
about
golf
courses
being
a
potential
source
for
contamination
over
the
Watershed.
So
if
you
could
look
at
that
with
an
eye
towards
protecting
the
environment
and
make
sure
that
we're
doing
the
right
thing,
I'd
appreciate
that.
A
V
AA
I
A
C
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Madam
city
clerk
item
number
15
under
second
reading
of
ordinances,
is
to
consider
the
second
reading
of
Municipal
Code
amendment
to
establish
a
streamlined,
permitting
process
to
electric
vehicle
charging
stations
in
order
to
comply
with
state
laws,
ab1236
and
ab970,
and
so
we
do
have
the
recommended
action.
That's
to
conduct
the
second
reading
of
that
ordinance
and
to
enact
it
I'm.
Assuming
that
there
is
no
staff
report.
Is
that
correct?
Okay?
So
there's
no
staff
report
I
see
council
member
Moore,
you
still
have
your
hand
raised.
A
Do
you
want
to
speak
to
this?
Okay?
Well,
let
me
go
to
you
did
want
to
speak
to
this
okay.
So
let
me
go
to
the
members
of
the
public
first
to
see.
If
anyone
would
like
to
speak
on
this
before
we
ask
the
city
clerk
to
conduct
the
second
reading
and
entertain
a
motion
going
once
going
twice.
I,
don't
see
members
of
the
public
with
any
hands
raised
in
zoom
and
Madam
city
clerk.
Presumably,
given
that
there's
nobody
in
the
council
chamber,
there's
no
blue
cards
is
that
correct.
A
A
A
A
A
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We
are
on
to
public
hearings
and
we
have
one
public
hearing
item.
That's
item
16.
that
is
a
or
at
least
I
should
say.
Yes,
we
do
have
one
public
hearing
item,
that's
an
application
for
tentative
Subdivision
map
and
planning
permits
for
the
development
of
six
single-family
homes
on
the
parcel
located
at
20860,
McClellan
Road,
and
there
are
the
application
numbers
listed
in
our
in
our
agenda,
along
with
the
name
of
the
applicant
and
and
owner,
so
APN
number,
359-20-030
and
so
I'll
take
this
to
our
city
manager.
H
AA
A
AB
AB
Was
a
project
was
proposed
in
October
2021,
which
included
a
rezoning
application,
including
the
permits
that
are
being
powered
by
the
city
council
tonight
upon
a
review
staff
I
found
that
a
mitigated
negative
declaration
would
be
appropriate
for
processing
of
the
environmental
review
for
this
product
for
that
project,
and
that
was
as
such,
a
mitigated.
Negative
Declaration
was
prepared.
This
was
presented
to
the
environmental
Review
Committee
in
May
of
2022,
and
the
environmental
Review
Committee
recommended
that
the
m
d
was
the
appropriate
document
for
that
that
particular
project.
AB
However,
there
was
a
caveat
they
did.
They
did
direct
additional
soil
testing
prior
to
any
Planning
Commission
hearings.
At
that
time.
However,
following
that
the
applicant
invoked
the
right
under
the
housing
accountability
act
to
pursue
a
a
project
that
would
be
General
plan
compliant
and
essentially
that
meant
that
a
rezoning
application
would
not
be
required
for
that
project
and
but,
as
a
voluntary
measure,
he
did
agree
to
comply
with
the
mitigation
measures
that
had
been
identified
in
the
M
D.
AB
So,
as
I
mentioned,
it
did
not
need
rezoning.
This
particular
project
and
the
project
was
now
eligible
for
an
infill
exemption
under
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act.
This
project
was
then
heard
by
the
Planning
Commission
at
its
September
13th
meeting,
and
it
recommended
approval
of
the
project
on
a
3-2
vote
with
Commissioners
Kapil
and
Wong
voting
now
Justice
background.
The
site
is
located
in
the
jollyman
neighborhood
in
it's
basically
located
about
about
a
few
hundred
feet.
Southeast
of
the
intersection
of
McClellan
and
Stelling.
AB
The
site
is
approximately
1.25
Acres.
There
is
an
existing
single-family
home
on
it,
with
a
rather
large
storage
shed
located
behind
it
that
stores
cars
and
boats
Etc.
It
is
fronted
by
McClellan
road
to
the
north
of
the
site,
there's
also
a
private
Street
known
as
Cherryland
Drive,
located
to
the
east
of
it.
AB
So
the
access
for
each
of
those
six
units
would
be
from
Cherryland
drive
and
we'll
go
over
that
in
just
a
minute.
The
uses
on
the
that's
around
the
project
include
single-family
residences
to
the
Northeast
and
south
of
varying
zoning
districts,
ranging
from
R16
to
r110
and
to
the
West.
There
is
a
church
use
that
is
located.
It
is
the
Church
of
the
Nazarene
I
believe.
AB
AB
There
would
be
a
private
street
that
would
be
completed
a
cul-de-sac
that
would
be
completed,
which
is
Fairyland
Rye.
There
would
be
some
on-street
parking
that
would
be
provided
on
that
private
Street,
and
there
would
also
be
a
dedication
along
McClellan
road
that
is
required
for
Frontage
improvements
in
terms
of
analysis,
as
I
mentioned,
because
of
the
housing
accountability
act.
AB
Rezoning
is
not
required
for
this
particular
site
and,
as
a
result
upon
analysis,
we
found
that
the
closest
zoning
District
that
would
accommodate
the
kind
of
development
that
is
proposed
would
be
the
r17.5
essentially,
and
so
we
evaluated
the
Project
based
on
the
R1
7.5
standards,
which
essentially
means
that
the
minimum
lot
size
for
each
of
the
Lots
would
have
to
be
7
500
square
feet.
In
this
case,
the
proposed
project
has
lots
that
range
from
9615
to
approximately
7526.
That's
the
smallest
lot
in
terms
of
lot
width.
AB
The
r17.5
zoning
District
requires
lot
widths
of
no
less
than
60
feet.
In
this
case.
The
lot
widths
range
from
69
feet
down
to
60
feet.
The
proposed
fars
for
each
of
the
homes
is
is
under
45,
which
is
the
maximum
that's
allowed
under
r17.5,
and
the
heights
for
each
of
the
structures
is
also
under
28
feet,
which
is
what
the
R1
7.5
zoning
District
allows.
AB
The
project
complies
with
all
the
city's
parking
regulations
and
and
I'll
go
over
that
in
just
a
minute.
There
are
also
thanks
to
the
dedication
that
is
being
provided,
they're
going
to
be
pedestrian
bicycle
improvements
along
McClellan
Road
at
the
Planning
Commission
hearing.
There
were
several
public
comments
that
were
heard,
including
traffic
impacts
comments
about
on-street
parking.
There
were
some
concerns
about
the
Adu
setbacks
and
layout.
AB
There
was
also
some
support
for
housing
in
the
area.
There
were
some
concerns
from
the
property
owners
that
currently
live
along
Cherryland
Drive.
They
had
some
concerns
about
shared
Ingress
egress,
their
privacy
impacts
of
a
proposed
balcony
on
lot
six.
This
was
also
raised
by
one
of
the
Cherryland
Drive
property
owners
that
particular
balcony
on
lot.
6
is
located
to
the
front
of
that
lot
and
a
fence
height
for
lot.
AB
Six
I
believe
that
was
one
of
the
property
owners
to
the
rear
in
terms
of
site
planning,
as
I
mentioned,
there
would
be
shared
access
at
the
bottom
of
your
screen
is
a
plan.
North
is
really
the
West,
so
Stelling
runs
to
the
right
of
the
screen
here
and
to
the
south
of
the
screen
is
chairland
Drive
the
shared
access
on
that
private
street
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
So
again,
those
are
the
six
slots
that
would
that
are
being
proposed.
AB
That
I
just
wanted
to
go
over
the
parking
requirements
for
the
project.
Each
of
the
homes
is
providing
two
in
garage
parking
spaces
and
three
driveway
spaces
for
a
total
of
five
on-site
parking
spaces,
and
in
addition
to
that,
there
are
six
on-street
parking
spaces
that
are
being
provided.
The
code
requires
a
total
of
six
spaces
per
lot,
which
can
be
in
in
some
combination
or
any
any
combination.
As
long
as
two
are
in
the
garage
and
two
are
on
the
driveway.
AB
AB
AB
There's
notice
in
all
the
noticing
that's
required
for
the
project
has
been
completed.
There
was
a
site
sign.
There
were
legal
ads
and
mailed
notices
in
terms
of
public
comments.
We
we
continue
to
receive
comments
from
the
neighbors
along
chairland
Drive,
including
common
private
Street
obligations.
AB
AB
The
proposed
project
supports
several
general
fund
policies,
including
the
ones
that
are
listed
here,
including
building
design,
attractive
design,
the
location
of
the
buildings
relationship
to
the
site,
lot
sizes,
including
connections.
They
are
providing
support.
They
are
providing
a
project
that
supports
several
of
the
city's
existing
General
plan
goals
and
policies
in
terms
of
the
housing
accountability,
act,
There,
Are
Rules
around
that,
and
so,
as
a
result,
a
project
that
meets
and
complies
with
all
the
city's
objective
standards
and
goals.
AB
AB
Again,
this
is
just
a
reminder
that
you
know
the
city
cannot
require
a
rezoning,
because
the
project
is
consistent
with
the
objective
General
plan
standards
and
criteria
criteria,
but
the
only
reason
that
it
doesn't
that
it
might
be
the
rezone
is
because
the
current
zoning
is
inconsistent
with
the
city's
General
plan.
Designation
and
I
did
want
to
point
out
that,
under
the
city's
current
General
plan
designation,
this
project
can
be
developed
with
six
units.
AB
As
a
result,
this
project
does
not
require
rezoning
and
it
is
consistent
with
the
R1
7.5
zoning
District
standards,
with
that,
the
Planning
Commission
did
recommend
that
the
city
council
find
the
actions
exempt
from
siqua,
approve
the
tentative
map
application
and
approve
the
two-story
permits
and
the
minor
residential
permits
for
the
balconies.
Thank
you.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Pew
I'll
take
this
to
members
of
the
public
at
this
point
to
provide
commentary,
and
so,
let's
move
to
the
zoom
function
before
we
bring
back
Council
for
follow-up
questions
and
deliberation.
Jenny
you're
the
first
person
on
zoom
and
I'll
remind
everyone
that,
at
the
time
that
Jenny
has
concluded
talking
or
three
minutes,
whichever
is
longer,
please
have
your
hand
raised
and
zoom
to
be
recognized
to
speak
on
this
item.
16
and
then
you
also
have
two
other
options.
A
If
you're
live
here
in
the
council
chambers,
you
can
fill
out
a
blue
card
or
you
can
email
city
clerk
cupertino.org.
That's
all
one
word
city
clerk
during
this
time
to
be
recognized
for
public
comment.
Okay,
so
Jenny
you're,
still
the
one
and
only
hand
raised
in
zoom
and
so
welcome.
You'll
have
three
minutes.
L
L
I
will
admit
that
the
public
has
been
deluged
with
a
great
number
of
new
Adu
laws.
In
the
last
three
to
four
years.
The
governor
signed
at
least
I
believe
eight
new
Adu
laws
two
weeks
ago,
eight
weeks
ago,
you
can
understand
that
this
is
very,
very
difficult
for
the
public
to
follow
and
understand
what
the
current
law
is.
I
just
had
a
question.
I
believe
one
of
the
new
Adu
laws
does
allow
adus
up
to
20
feet
high.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
it
could
have
been
16
but
I.
Think
it's
20
feet.
L
Will
a
project
like
this.
If
those
become
law,
as
of
January,
would
someone
be
able
to
ask
for
a
two-story
Adu
on
a
project
like
this
come
January
I
can
understand.
This
project
is
probably
not
going
to
hit
the
dirt
shovel
ready
for
another,
probably
four
months,
but
but
we're
coming
into
January
I.
Are
we
going
to
see
a
situation
where
you
could
have
someone
asking
for
a
two-story
Adu
at
the
back
of
properties,
four
feet
from
property
lines
under
the
power
lines?
L
L
The
other
thing
is
too:
we
want
to
make
sure
that
these
properties
have
strings
in
the
front
like
the
rest
of
the
homes
and
that
the
problem
is
that
a
lot
of
these
homes
are
becoming
so
big
that
we're
at
50
far
other
than
that.
I'm
sure
that
the
city
will
make
sure
that
this
project
goes
through
and
do
they.
A
AB
If
I
may
make
a
side
note,
Mr
Mayor
I
did
want
to
let
the
council
know
that
there
is
a
desk
item
related
to
this
project.
It
was
one
plan
sheet
that
was
provided
as
a
desk
item.
It
will
replace
one
of
the
grading
plan
within
the
tenant
map
within
the
application
packet.
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
C
C
A
I
I
A
You
okay!
Well
let
me
let
me
check
in
with
the
city
attorney
on
this
one,
okay,
so
so
so
Chris
I've
got
a
council
member
who
has
has
emailed
the
city
clerk
with
regard
to
a
couple
of
links
and
right,
I
mean
I,
know
that
for
oral
Communications,
for
instance,
the
council
member,
is
a
member
of
the
public
and
can
speak
on
that,
and
so,
with
regard
to
this
mechanism,
I
think
to
be
consistent.
A
Y
A
I
suppose
that
that
would
make
sense.
Okay,
well,
would
that
be
an
accommodation,
that's
acceptable,
I
I,
think
you
you
do
have
the
right
to.
You
know,
read
during
deliberation,
and
so
that's
a
that's
a
good
point,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
relegate
it
to
that
council
member
Moore,
since
that
would
be
part
of
the
record
as
well
so
Carrie
Brown,
you
are
next
you'll.
Have
three
minutes
welcome.
AC
AC
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
material
I
will
say:
I
am
a
resident
of
Cupertino
I'm,
currently
a
renter
anything
that
can
be
done
to
increase
the
available
housing,
Supply
and
therefore
allow
renters
to
purchase
homes
is,
is
good
for
the
city
overall,
in
this
case,
I
think
it's
especially
good.
The
current
lot
is
an
eyesore
have
been
living
nearby.
The
proposed
site,
there's.
Essentially
it
was
a
junkyard.
AC
There
is
a
shed
on
the
site
which
is
unattractive
and
I'm
glad
to
see
that
work
is
being
done
to
increase
the
housing.
Supply
do
so
attractively,
and
so
I'm
in
full
support
of
this
and
I
recognize
the
change
is
is
is
not
always
easy
for
people
to
understand
or
accept,
but
for
someone
like
myself,
this
kind
of
things
you
make
more
housing
available
is
certainly
needed.
Thank
you
and
I'll
yield
the
rest
of
my
time
back
great.
A
Thank
you
very
much
Carl,
and
so
let's
go
back
to
our
our
panelists
here.
There
was
an
indication
that
a
couple
of
members
of
the
public
who
are
where
the
applicant
would
like
to
provide
a
presentation,
and
so
in
your
zoom
function,
if
you
could
raise
your
hands
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
I
think
the
typical
amount
of
time
we
provide
for
applicant
presentations
is
five
minutes
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
and
so
let
me
go
ahead
and
ask
Kelly
here:
Kelly.
Would
five
minutes
be
sufficient
for
your
presentation.
A
AD
AD
First
of
all,
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
to
staff
to
PO
to
Pew
for
the
the
presentation
just
a
moment
ago.
I
won't
take
more
than
five
minutes.
I
assure
you.
It's
been
a
pleasure
to
work
with
everybody.
Thank
you
so
much
just
a
few
quick
items
to
note
for
the
council
to
consider
before
they
take
a
vote
tonight,
which
is
we
wanted
to
really
accent
how
thorough
we've
reviewed
the
project
all
through
the
different
Environmental
antiqua
Research.
We've
done
a
lot
of
community
outreach.
AD
We
have
a
lot
of
support
from
the
neighborhood,
including
even
people
like
Carl,
who
call
in
and
are
really
pleased
to
see
us
cleaning
up
this
site.
This
does
have
a
lot
of
benefits
for
the
city
of
Cupertino
and
for
the
neighborhood,
in
addition
to
cleaning
up
an
eyesore,
and
we
did
get
a
positive
vote
from
Planning
Commission
as
a
reminder.
As
as
Ms
gauche
said,
we
began
this
back
in
February
of
2021.
AD
We've
been
at
this
for
almost
a
year
and
a
half
now
so
it's
been
a
very
thorough
process,
a
reminder
also
that
every
single,
every
single
third-party
consultant
and
best
practices
expert
that
you
see
on
the
screen
right
now
with
someone
who
represented
the
city's
point
of
view
and
the
Public's
point
of
view
in
that
we
have
our
own
list
of
six
or
seven
consultants
and
engineers,
and-
and
you
know,
biorece
experts
too.
These
are
the
ones
that
represented
the
the
recommendation
for
approval
on
the
city's
behalf.
AD
AD
We
are
still
trying
to
trying
to
respond
as
quickly
as
we
can
to
ongoing
comments
that
occasionally
come
from
our
neighbors
on
Cherryland
we've
definitely
doing
our
best
to
to
accommodate
their
requests.
There
are
a
few
things
that
you
may
hear
about
later,
that
that
we're
simply
complying
with
the
law
and
complying
with
the
city's
obligations,
and
so
we
we
think,
we've
gotten
the
best
possible
project
we
have.
AD
We've
had
a
number
of
public
meetings,
I
won't
ask
you:
I
won't
go
over
them
all
again.
We
do
have
our
own
website
and
we
know
through
analytics
that
we've
had
a
lot
of
people
visiting.
So
we
think
the
information
has
been
abundant
and
has
been
thoroughly
reviewed
embedded
one
way
to
to
demonstrate
this
is
that
we
don't
need
any
exceptions
or
variances
we're
not
asking
for
anything
unusual.
This,
as
your
staff
report,
says,
complies
in
every
possible
way.
So
that's
one
of
the
ways.
AD
We
know
that
we've
done
a
pretty
good
job
of
listening
to
everybody,
because
there's
kind
of
not
much
left
to
look
into.
Of
course,
we're
going
to
be
paying
all
of
our
city
obligation
fees
we'll
be
contributing
to
the
park
in
lieu.
The
school
impact
fees
all
of
our
plan,
check
fees
and
contributing
to
your
below
market
rate
housing
program.
AD
We
have
responded,
as
I
said,
to
all
of
our
all
of
the
concerns
and
questions
that
we've
received
on
a
day-by-day
basis
and
there's
just
a
couple
of
new
ones
that
we
can't
do
anymore
regarding
our
site
plan
regarding
the
grade
and
some
issues
related
to
the
to
the
grade
and
with
that
I
just
want
to
say.
Thank
you
that
I'm
here
to
answer
a
few
questions.
Mr
damaretti
is
also
on
the
line
to
answer
questions.
We
really
appreciate
you
considering
this
tonight.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
appreciate
you
staying
within
the
stated
time
limit
that
you
self-imposed
as
well.
So
let's
take
this
back
to
council
and
I
will
go
by
a
show
of
hands
with
regard
to
follow-up
questions
from
Council
of
either
staff
or
the
applicant
and
I
see
council
member
Willie
has
a
hand
raised
council
member
woolly,
followed
by
councilman
Moore.
D
Yeah
so
very
good
presentation
from
both
the
applicant
and
the
and
Pew,
and
it's
always
good,
to
see
some
renderings
kind
of
be
able
to
try
and
visualize
what
we're
talking
about.
So
the
few
questions
that
I
have.
If
you
can
go
back
to
the
view,
the
plan
view
that
showed
the
parking
and
it
was
stated
that
there's
two
parking
in
the
garage
three
parking
out
front
for
each
and
six
on
street
and
when
I
was
looking
at
that
rendering
it.
D
Unless
it's
not
really
showing
things
the
way
they
are
yeah
perfect.
So
you
know
I
see
the
three
arrows
in
front
of
three
triangles
in
front
of
each
of
the
residences
and
if
that's
the
three
parking
spaces,
if
when
I
look
at
the
street-
and
it
shows
that
there
are
sick
parking
spaces
on
the
street,
if
that's
the
size
of
a
vehicle,
okay,
roughly
and
then
you
put
those
in
the
spot
in
front
of
each
of
the
unit
for
eight.
D
AB
D
D
And
if
you
look
at
the
ones
that
are
parked
on
this
tree
again,
using
that
those
gray
boxes
to
kind
of
represent
the
size
of
vehicles
or
the
for
the
four
houses
that
are
adjacent
to
the
street
parking
at
least
a
lot,
two
three
and
possibly
four
it
sure,
looks
like
it's
gonna,
be
tough
to
get
both
of
those
primary
spot
cars
in
there,
because
you're
kind
of
hitting
the
cars
that
are
parked
on
the
street.
So.
AB
D
AB
D
But
what
I'm
getting
at,
though,
is
that
the
owner
of
this
property,
the
applicant
the
owner
of
this
property,
has
its
Street,
Frontage
and
I'm,
just
looking
at
it
from
the
standpoint
that
the
other
property
owner
had
I
think
dedicated
that
Terry
Lynn
for
access
to
his
properties.
Now
this
property
owner,
that
is
a
budding
that
private
road
is
now
going
to
take
advantage
of
that
private
road
is,
is
that
a
problem.
D
How
about
those
other
people
I
mean?
We
have
the
same
thing
overall
for
Rodriguez,
where
you
know,
property
that
belongs
to
one
entity
is
kind
of
being
used
by
another
entity,
and
so,
if
that,
if
that
Cherryland
Road
actually
came
out
of
the
adjacent
properties
property
and
then
this
property
is
going
to
use
it
again.
This
looks
like
a
great
project,
but
I
want
to
be
sure
that
everybody
is
kept
old.
Yes,.
D
AB
D
AB
Well,
it
would
be
really
hard
to
accommodate
that
because
you
would,
if
the
garage
is
at
a
if
it's
a
side,
loading
entrance,
you
do
need
a
lot
of
backup
space
to
actually
get
out
of
that
garage,
and
so
it
would
not
have
been
very
feasible
with
the
design.
Then
you
won't
have
the
living
space
close
to
the
street.
So
there's
other
General
plan
stuff.
That
kind
of
mess
gets
messed
up.
Yeah.
D
D
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
if
there
was
something
that
we
just
need
to
be
aware
of
and
look
at,
maybe
it
was
the
the
garage
doors
facing
the
street
or
or
maybe
it
was
the
upstairs
balcony.
On
the
lot
number
six
I
mean
what
were
the?
What
were
the
hesitations
from
two
of
the
planning,
commissioner,
because
those
are
our
our
eyes.
AB
D
Okay,
so
it
wasn't
something
like
the
the
the
impact
of
the
poor.
You
know
the
upstairs
porch
overlooking
the
neighbor
privacy
protection
using
the
same
access
work.
Those
are
the
things
that
you
know.
I
I
just
want
to
be
sure.
I,
don't
miss
something
there
that
we
had
a
a
duty
to
be
aware
of
there.
D
I
Thank
you,
and-
and
maybe
these
are
our
questions
for
the
attorney
when
I,
so
the
the
documents
which
I
submitted
are
the
the
initial
study
which
came
to
the
environmental,
Review
Committee,
the
ismnd
and
the
mitigation
monitoring
reporting
documents
and
to
my
recollection
these
did
not
go
to
the
the
Planning
Commission,
so
they
did
not
have
them
for
review.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
and
understand
why
they
didn't
so.
I
In
the
initial
study,
the
appendices
had
appendixes
appendices
a
through
e
and
they
included
the
geotechnical
investigation
and
the
phase
one
and
limited
phase
two
environmental
site
assessment.
But
in
the
reports
which
we
have-
and
this
is
for
the
categorical
exemption
memorandum,
we
only
have
three
appendices:
the
arborist
reports,
the
air
quality
and
greenhouse
gas
modeling
results
and
the
preliminary
stormwater
analysis
and
the
geotechnical
investigation
and
phase
one
and
limited
phase
to
environmental
site
assessments
are
removed.
So
we
we
don't
have
those
to
to
look
at
okay.
I
I
So
I
guess
I'm
concerned
that
the
the
this
that
this
body
is
has
not
been
given
the
soils
reports
to
to
know
about
the
contamination
and
why
more
soil
testing
had
been
requested.
I
also
would
like
there
to
be
a
check
on
the
the
staff
reports
about
the
the
recommendations
from
the
ERC,
because
we
two
of
us
on
I
serve
on
the
ERC.
I
So
I
I'd
like
to
understand
all
that
this.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
project.
It's
got
to
it's
to
understand
this
process
of
of
the
secret
exemption.
When
there's
when
we,
you
had
a
request
for
more
soil
testing,
it
wasn't
it,
it
was
didn't
happen
and,
and-
and
this
like
I
said
this
body
hasn't
been
given
the
reports
to
know
about,
and
that
is
troubling
to
me.
So
I
would
like
to
understand
why
the
reports
weren't
included
for
for
all
of
us
thank.
A
U
And
so
you
know
the
requirements
for
documenting
that
infill
exemption
are
different
than
the
requirements
for
documenting
the
ism
and
D.
You
know,
as
you
pointed
out,
there
are
some
impacts.
You
have
to
look
at
traffic,
noise,
air
quality
and
water
quality,
and
those
were
evaluated
in
the
infill
exemption
memorandum
that
was
provided
to
the
planning
convention,
commission
and
and-
and
you
know,
has
also
been
provided
to
council
their.
U
There
are
other
impacts
that
aren't
evaluated
for
sites
that
qualify
for
the
infill
exception
memorandum
and
and
particularly
with
respect
to
you,
know
hazardous
materials.
This
site
qualifies
because
it
is
not
a
site
that
is
listed
as
a
quotation
list,
so-called
quotasia
list
site
under
the
health
and
safety
code.
So
so
the
the
infill
exemption
memorandum
was
provided
because
it
you
know
it's
staff's
recommendation
and
the
planning
commission's
conclusion
that
it,
you
know
it
fully
documents
the
requirements
to
to
qualify
the
for
the
exemption.
U
You
know
and
supports.
You
know
that
decision
by
with
substantial
evidence,
with
respect
to
some
of
the
the
technical
reports
that
were
not
provided.
You
know,
to
the
extent
that
you
know
they're
even
been
relevant,
given
the
different
standards.
It's
it's
it's
it's!
It's
not
necessarily
common
practice
to
provide
all
of
those
technical
reports
to
a
a
a
a
governing
body
or
an
advisory
body
like
the
Planning
Commission
in
the
course
of
making
this
decision.
U
U
You
know
that
that
whole
history
is
part
of
the
record,
but
you
know
that
was
the
decision
that
that
staff
made
in
presenting
the
information
to
both
the
Planning,
Commission
and
Council,
and
you
know
as
I
think
council
member
Moyers,
are
very
well
aware:
there's
a
balance
between
providing
all
the
information
and
having
a
very
long
agenda
packet.
You
know
so
we're
we're
trying
to
to
do
our
best
to
balance
those
in
interest.
So
if
there's
any
part
of
your
question
that
I
didn't
respond
to
I'm
happy
to
take
follow-up.
I
U
So
so
I
would
point
out
you
know
they're
they
setting
aside
the
fact
that
the
applicant
chose
not
to
go
down
the
ism
and
D
process
the
conditions
of
approval
that
were
incorporated
into
the
ism
and
excuse
me,
the
mitigation
measures
that
were
incorporated
into
the
ism
and
D
will
be
conditions
of
approval
for
that
project,
and
so
that
will
require
an
appropriate
level
of
oversight
from
the
county
department
of
environmental
health.
You
know,
and
that
will
be
determined
based
on
the
environmental,
environmental,
health
review
of
the
site.
M
I
So
the
the
project
applicant
is
required
by
what
aspect
of
this
approval
to
apply
for
regulatory
oversight
for
cleanup,
because
I
want
to
know
how
the
neighbors
will
will
know
the
since
the
it's
not
in
these
in
in
our
agenda
packet.
How
will
they
know
the
extent
of
contamination
and
whether
or
not
if
they
want
to
read
the
reports
from
the
county?
How
is
that
going
to
work
out.
U
U
U
That's
that's
that's
accepted
into
the
the
the
voluntary
oversight
program
because
of
you
know
their
documents
are
available
online
through
through
Geo
Trackers,
so
that
that
provides
a
fair
bit
of
transparency
for
soils
and
other
reports
that
you
know
that
are
prepared
for
proper
properties
that
participate
in
that
program.
I
I
do
not
know
what
the
details
of
the
form
of
public
participation
requirement
would
be.
AB
You
thank
you
so
much
of
course,
and
through
the
mayor,
if
I
may,
the
Cherryland
development
also
went
through
some
soil
cleanup
themselves.
Those
three
lots
that
were
developed
to
the
east
of
the
site.
They
have
to
have
some
significant,
actually
more
soil
cleanup
than
this
particular
case.
I,
believe
so,
and
that
happened
through
the
count
of
Santa
Clara
County
Department
of
Environmental
Health
as
well.
I
You
thank
you
mayor,
so
are
are
these
standard
conditions,
or
is
this
because
I
I
understand
that
when
we
get
into
these
exemptions
that
it
were
outside
of
the
SQL
process
and
it
gets,
it
feels
pretty
ambiguous
and,
as
we
saw
before,
with
with
another
project
that
it
I'm
glad
that
you
have
these
conditions
of
approval,
but
we
didn't
have
them
previously
for
another
large
project
in
the
in
the
city.
So
anyway,
if
you
could
explain
how
that
process
worked
or
did.
F
AB
I
can
go
over
that
just
briefly
with
regard
to
the
particularly
large
project
that
you
were
referring
to,
we
did.
We
did
not
have
adopted
standards
at
the
time
that
would
require
us
to
or
objective
standards
that
would
have
ensured
that
we
could
have
acquired
that
to
happen.
In
this
particular
case,
this
project
actually
did
precede
our
adoption
of
those
standards
that
are
now
in
place.
AB
However,
the
applicant
voluntarily
agreed
to
adhere
to
the
mitigation
measures
that
were
identified
in
the
ism
and
D,
so
the
language
that
you
see
in
the
resolution
is
actually
from
the
mitigation
measures
from
the
ism
and
D.
So
if
you
compared
those
two
documents,
you'll
find
language,
that's
very
similar
now
moving
forward,
though
we
do
have
an
ordinance
which
applies
automatically
to
every
project
that
blocks
in
the
door
for
conditions
of
approval
related
to
soil,
cleanup
and
such
so.
We
do
have
that
in
place.
I
A
Great
thanks
very
much
okay
I,
don't
see
any
other
hands
raised.
Let
me
let
me
follow
up
on
a
quick
question
on
this.
So
I
did
pull
this.
This
is
super
enumerated
1486
of
our
agenda
packet
and
I'm.
Reading
the
last
sentence
in
number
13
under
hazards
and
hazardous
materials,
phase
two
recommendations.
A
It
reads
that
the
applicant
has
complied
with
the
recommendations
shall
be
verified
by
the
city
of
Cupertino,
Community,
Development
Department
and
the
Santa
Clara
County
Environmental
Health
Department
through
their
voluntary
cleanup
program
prior
to
the
issue,
and
so
the
first
grading
and
or
building
permit.
So
can
someone
tell
me
a
little
bit
about
the
voluntary
cleanup
program
of
DEH,
because
once
you
accede
to
it,
then
you're
under
the
jurisdiction
of
DH?
U
Right
yeah,
so
DEH
doesn't
actually
like
calling
it
the
voluntary
cleanup
program
because
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
see
the
program
as
once
you
commit
to
it.
It
does
not
see
the
program
as
voluntary.
It's
agreeing
to
it.
It's
it's
an
agreement
to
enter
into
DEH
oversight
and
then,
once
that
agreement
is
executed,
you
know
DEH
will
review
the
site
and
will
approve
any
necessary
Remediation
in
a
site
management
plan
to
deal
with
contamination
that
might
be
identified
during
development.
A
Right
and
so
the
language
here
definitively
states
that
the
applicant
is
acceding
to
this
program,
and
so
the
voluntary
nature
of
this
is
not
such
that
it
reaches
to
a
future
point
after
this
agreement
is
entered
such
that
the
applicant
can
then
say,
this
is
voluntary.
I
don't
have
to
participate
in
this.
Is
that
correct.
V
A
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
I
wanted
to
provide
that
comfort
and
a
reading
because
a
lot
of
times
you
you
know,
see
these
types
of
language
provisions
and
it's
not
immediately
clear
clear
to
lay
person
and
you
you
don't
want
to
turn
it
into
a
situation
where
people
are
making.
You
know
inappropriate
or
just
clear
outright
wrong.
You
know.
Interpretations
of
the
language
so
greatly
appreciate
that,
and
let
me
go
to
council
member
way
and
followed
by
Vice
merchao
on
our
hands
so
councilmember.
Why
you're
next.
S
S
So
what
she's
concerning
is
because
land
worths
a
lot
of
money
and
she's
trying
to
get
the
owner
to
either
donate
some
money
to
cusd
or
something
so
I,
don't
know
what's
going
on,
but
I
wonder
the
city
probably
should
not
be.
Maybe
this
is
attorney's
question
we
should
not
be
in
between
the
two
owners.
U
So
I
so
I
I
can
I
will
defer
to
planning
or
public
work
staff.
On
sort
of
you
know
the
the
process,
the
city
used
to
to
evaluate
the
the
the
improvements
along
either
the
private
or
the
public
right
of
way.
I
will
respond
to
councilmember
Way's
question
about
cusd
is,
is
you
know
there,
but
there
would
have
to
be
some
Nexus
between
you
know,
impacts
on
school
and
the
property.
S
AB
So
yes,
council,
member
way
when,
when
the
project
was
originally
developed,
they
did
agree
to
provide
reciprocal
inverse
egress
access
to
the
property
to
the
West
in
order
to
facilitate
such
development.
Now,
in
terms
of
their,
you
know,
own
private
Arrangements
on
who
pays
what
you
know.
We
don't
get
involved
in
that
matter
necessarily,
and
so
that
is
a
civil
matter
that
they
need
to
work
out
between
themselves
in
terms
of
the
design
of
the
the
street
and
the
improvements
that
are
along
McClellan.
AB
I
can
say
that
it
has
been
reviewed
by
Public
Works.
They
do
meet
the
standards
of
the
city.
You
know
there
are
some
flexible
standards.
When
there
are
private
streets
there
was
a
certain
kind
of
orientation
or
not
orientation,
but
layout
that
that
the
property
owner
on
the
East
had
proposed
for
the
property
on
the
west.
But
ultimately
that
was
not
how
the
the
property
on
the
west
proposed
it
and
it
is
acceptable
to
the
city
for
how
it
is
being
proposed
right
now.
So
there
is
no.
S
So,
as
far
as
I
can
understand,
it's
between
the
two
Property
Owners
to
resolve,
whatever
they
feel
that
they
need
to
resolve
correct.
Okay,
thank
you
and
my
second
question
and
I
also
did
meet
the
property
owner
yesterday
morning
at
the
property,
because
I
want
to
understand.
What's
the
issue
and
what
you
know,
where
is
there?
Where
is
where
so,
whenever
we
were
checking
I
did
asking:
why
are
you
not
in
our
housing
element?
I
think
he
sort
of?
Has
this
I
don't
know
if
he's
in
line.
S
He
has
these
intentions
that
he's
willing
to
be
in
the
housing
element,
but
at
the
same
time
he
wants
this
project
to
go
through.
So
he
has
choices.
What
what
so
I
told
him
I
I
as
far
as
I
understand,
if
you
in
the
housing
element,
you
know
we,
we
set
a
minimum
density
and
you
have
to
meet
that
minimum
density.
So
can
you
maybe
inform
him
or
inform
us
what
is
an
owner's
choice
he's
in
this
process,
but
he
also
maybe
aren't
interested
in
being
in
a
housing
element.
AB
If
the
property
owner
then
chooses
to
go
through
with
this
project
rather
than
develop
at
a
minimum
density
of
you
know,
whatever
the
council
picks,
so
that
that
would
create
some
sort
of
an
inconsistency
within
the
city's
General
plan.
Essentially
so
yeah
and
and
the
property
owner
would
have
that
option
for
two
years.
You
know
the
city
might
rely
on
that
site
as
at
a
certain
higher
density
potentially
for
a
higher
yield.
AB
But
then,
if
the
property
owner
chose
this
path
forward,
because
this
this
tentative
map
approval
will
be
good
for
two
years
or
you
know
and
then
any
number
of
years.
If
the
state
chooses
to
extend
that
deadline,
then
you
know
he
has
a
long-term
period
of
time
where
he
gets
to
pick
which
option
he
goes
for.
A
U
I
would
just
only
note
that
that
under
hcd's
guidance
for
the
housing
element-
it's
you
know
it's
ju.
It's
consistent
with
that
guidance
to
take
to
treat
a
a
project,
that's
been,
you
know,
proposed
or
inside
titled,
as
developed
at
the
density.
That's
proposed
or
entitled,
as
you
know,
as
opposed
to
you
know
a
hypothetical
Zone
density
and
I
believe
that's
what
the
city
has
done
for
this
project,
this
property
in
the
housing
element
so
certainly
I
think
the
treatment
is
consistent
with
with
hcd
guidance.
A
U
They,
yes,
they
will
count
towards
the
number
of
units
and
and
I
think.
What
I
was
saying
is.
Is
that
it
it
it?
It
is
at
least
more
consistent,
if
not
mandated
by
hcd
Guidance,
to
treat
the
project
as
as
it's
proposed,
and
you
know,
depending
on
what
happens
today,
entitled
as
opposed
to
some
hypothetical
future
project
at
a
different
density
right.
Q
U
Legal
requirements-
yeah
I,
mean
the
pipeline
units
do
count
in
there,
I
mean
there
there's
more
certainty
with
respect
to
pipeline
units
than
with
respect
to
other
units.
Just
because
you
know
you
have
them
they're,
being
pla,
they're,
planned
or
entitled,
or
at
some
phase
in
the
promoting
process.
So
so,
of
course,
there's
a
higher
level
of
certainty
that
those
units
will
actually
be
delivered.
A
Right,
that's
not
just
a
owner
letter
of
interest,
it's
actually
a
full
application,
they're
going
through
a
process,
etc,
etc.
So,
okay,
great
well
I,
do
see
that
the
hands
from
our
applicants
are
now
no
longer
raised.
Let
me
just
give
a
quick
opportunity
for
either
a
local
Kelly.
Did
you
want
to
make
a
comment,
because
I
know
that
you
guys
had
been
referenced
and
so
I
don't
see
your
hands
raised
back
up,
and
so
let
me
go
on.
I
I
see
that
well
elope.
AA
I
think
a
quick
comment
is
if
there
was
a
possibility
of
including
a
range
of
density
for
for
this.
That
includes
the
housing
element,
so
that
would
be
between
5
and
20.
I
would
be
supportive,
because
that
would
give
me
option
to
redo
that
if
we
choose
to
in
future,
so
that's
what
I
stated
the
console
number
babe
enter
was.
The
option
would
be
to
Zone
it
at
5
to
20,
as
recommended
by
The
Joint
Commission
back
in
July
or
September.
A
Okay,
very
good
thanks
very
much
so,
let's
go
to
I
believe
it
was
vice
merchao
that
had
the
next
comment
and
Council
I
forget
who
we
we
had
on
the
floor
was
a
council
member
way.
Did
you
have
the
last
comment
and
you're
okay
with
us
moving?
Okay?
So,
let's
go
on
to
vice
mayor
Chow.
At
this
point
vice
mayor.
T
Thank
you,
the
applicant
for
addressing
the
neighbor's
concerns
they
seems
you
have
tried,
made
a
very
good
effort
to
do
that.
I
just
want
to
ask
for
some
clarification.
I
think
there
were
some
concerns
mentioned
by
public
comments
in
Planning
Commission
about
privacy
impacts
of
proposed
balcony,
especially
on
lot
6..
We
know
that
balcony
usually
is
of
concern
for
our
residents,
so
I
wonder
if
anything
has
been
done
to
address
that
concern,
or
maybe
privacy
screening,
to
address
those
concerns.
Another
thing
is
about
a
fence
height
for
lot.
T
AB
T
AB
AB
The
balcony
on
lot
6
is
located
on
the
front
of
the
property,
so
it
is
located
somewhere
along
this
particular
area
and
the
property
owner
that
is
concerned
about
it
is,
is
located
kind
of
south
east
of
that.
So
there
is,
it
is
a
long
way
off.
We
do
not
have
any
privacy
requirements
for
properties
balconies
that
face
the
front
yard
necessarily,
and
there
is
also
not
much
room
for
planting
along
this
particular
area.
AB
To
you
know,
accommodate
a
concern,
that's
approximately
I
would
say
between
150
and
you
know,
120
feet
away,
so
it
is
a
fairly
far
distance
or
for
to
be
able
to
see
and
to
be
impacted
from
those
views
with
regard
to
the
fence.
I
believe
that
the
property
owner
to
the
West,
the
left
of
this
plan
right
now
now
was
a
concerned
that
the
defense
that
is
proposed
wasn't
tall
enough.
But
the
way
the
fences
are
measured
in
our
city
is
that
it's
measure
actually
measured
from
the
property.
T
AB
So
there
is
a
condition
of
approval
when
the
Cherryland
development
was
approved
to
to
allow
the
Ingress
egress
on
Cherryland
drive
for
this
particular
property
on
the
west.
So
there
is
a
requirement
that
they
have
to
see
through
with
regard
to
the
actual
negotiation
and
and
whatever
else
that
needs
to
occur.
That
needs
to
happen
between
this
particular
applicant
of
chairland
drive
and
that's
what
they're
figuring
out
right
now.
AB
So
this
is
what,
when
planning,
we
sort
of
look
ahead,
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
weren't
multiple
driveways,
that
with
multiple
car
you
know
exits
onto
McClellan,
which
was
going
to
have
a
you
know.
At
that
time,
a
class
4
bike
lane.
There
were
things
that
were
planned
for
it,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
the
points
of
conflict
were
minimized,
and
we
we
understood
that
both
of
these
properties
were
going
to
develop.
T
A
S
S
AB
S
Understand,
okay,
my
second
question
is
I.
Just
heard
I
think
a
lot
talk
about.
He
would
like
to
have
this
project
to
be
a
5
to
20
units
perform
like
agreement
or
something
from
the
city,
but
he's
doing
the
six
units
right
now.
If
in
case
he
changed
his
mind,
he
wants
to
do
a
higher
density.
Will
he
be
allowed
to
do
that?
No.
AB
Not
under
the
current
General
plan,
designation
that
he
has,
he
can
only
build
up
to
five
dwelling
units
to
the
acre,
which
yields
six
units
on
this
property.
He
is
proposing
12
units
on
the
property,
including
the
adus,
also
I,
believe
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
at
that
time
was
potentially
a
minimum
of
21
in
a
sticker,
not
the
minimum
of
five,
so
so
that
this
project
would
then
become
a
legal
non-conforming
project.
S
So
so
his
request
would
not
be
able
to
go
those
that
I
mean
when
I
talked
to
him.
I
think
he's
he's
he
loved.
This
project
would
like
to
go
on,
but
in
case
in
the
future
he
might
want
to
develop
a
different
project.
He
would
have
to
go
to
the
whole
poll
en
Amendment
things
like
that,
yes,
okay
and-
and
so
I
want
to
follow
with
one
more
question.
What
if
he
said,
I
want
I'm,
just
he
wants
to
be
in
the
housing
element,
doesn't
want
to
do
this
anymore.
AB
Can
he
can
certainly
abandon
that
and
if
he
wishes
to
be
a
housing
element
site,
then
you
know
at
this
point.
Of
course
the
council
has
already
acted
on
the
site,
so
it
would
be.
You
know
the
not
necessarily
in
the
draft
housing
element
at
this
point,
but
you
know
it's
something
to
consider
for
sure.
S
A
Z
A
AB
T
Okay
and
then
find
no
question
is
actually
this
table
on
in
the
staff
report.
Thank
you
for
this
really
great
comparison
table
of
the
existing
zoning
and
versus
the
proposed.
So
we
know
that
there's
no
reasoning
necessary.
However,
we
do
know
that
zoning
will
be
changed
from
r110
to
r1-7.5,
although
that's
consistent
with
the
general
plan,
but
doesn't
that
mean
we
do
need
to
change
the
zoning
of
this
site.
U
U
Instructs
cities
to
look
towards
other
other
standards
in
their
zoning
ordinance
that
are
that
are
appropriate
for
the
level
of
density
that's
allowed
in
the
general
plan.
Here
we
do
have
you
know,
standards
for
our
one,
R
1.7,
1-7.5
density
in
our
zoning
ordinance,
and
that
would
that
allows
that
the
the
density
that
is
permissible
under
the
general
plan
and
so
planning
staff
applied
those
development.
T
U
T
T
A
AB
AB
I
AB
As
I
multitask
apologies
for
this
technical
glitch,
but
the
grading
plan
was
updated.
There's
actually
a
few
clouds
on
the
grading
plan
that
indicate
what
was
changed
on
the
plans.
My
understanding
is
that
the
finished
floor
that
is
indicated
for
the
mot
on
the
east
side,
for
the
locks
that
were
on
the
original
Cherryland
development
were
updated,
and
that
is
the
only
change.
There
were
no
changes
necessarily
to
the
grades,
I
believe
so
it
doesn't
make
a
difference
to
the
actual
proposed
project.
I
AB
Have
it
up
right
here
and
which
lot
now?
Oh
you
have
it
up?
Okay,
perfect
it
the
so.
This
is
something
that
a
couple
of
things
about
the
adus.
The
adus
are
not
up
for
consideration
tonight.
Only
because
that's
a
ministerial
review
that
that
they
could
they
could
come
in
without
showing
those
adus
and
have
those
be
approved
as
building
permits.
AB
AB
I
AB
Wall
is
so
there
is
a
kitchen
to
the
left
and
then
the
presumably
it's
a
it's
a
family
living
room,
and
then
there
is
the
bathroom
shoe
in
the
back
along
the
back.
My
understanding
is
that
the
directly
across
from
these
sliding
glass
doors
is
a
laundry
facility
and
then
the
bedroom,
the
door
to
the
bedroom.
So
that's
like
a
foyer
right
there.
Okay,
the.
I
A
Great
thanks
very
much
so
that
doesn't
continue
with
further
hands
and
so
councilmember,
where
your
hand
is
still
up,
did
you
want
to
follow
up
at
this
time?
If
not,
we
do
have
a
motion
on
the
table
for
the
recommended
action
and
a
second
from
Vice
Merchant,
councilmember
more
respectively
and
so
I'll.
Do
it
going
once
and
going
twice,
and
so
let's
go
ahead
and
have
our
city
clerk
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
on
this
motion.
A
A
AA
A
No
worries
thank
you
for
for
for
bringing
that
up,
though,
so
item
number
17
was
part
of
our
consent
calendar
and
we
are
on
back
to
oral
Communications
as
continued
I.
Don't
see
our
member
of
the
public
that
was
here
earlier
indicating
that
she
had
wanted
to
speak
on
the
city
manager,
report
and
so
I'll
go
on
to
our
last
category
of
item
prior
to
adjournment,
and
that
is
the
council
and
staff
comments
and
future
agenda
items.
Let's
go
to
staff
first
and
Pamela.
Is
there
anything?
A
No
okay,
great
and
so
staff
comments
are
concluded?
Now
we
have
Council
comments
or
future
agenda
items.
Let's
go
in
order.
We'll
have
one
bite
at
the
Apple
each
just
to
you
know
kind
of
clarify
that
xante,
so
councilman,
remember:
more
you'll
go
first,
followed
by
council
member
Willie
and
council
member
Moore.
I
D
A
D
Go
ahead
personally
yeah!
So
that's
it!
Now,
a
year
and
a
half
ago
in
April,
when
I
requested
it
that
night,
you
know
a
resident
had
talked
about
other
cities
and
what
their
ordinances
were,
and
that
night
you
had
said:
okay,
John
you're,
going
to
consolidate
those
and
I
did
that's
going
to
be
coming
back
as
part
of
this
I've
provided
that
document
from
April
of
21
to
the
city
manager.
D
Now
what
I'm
asking
for
tonight
is
I'd
like
it
to
go
back
I
would
like
it
to
go
to
the
Planning
Commission,
if
at
all
possible,
so
that
they
can
have
their
set
of
eyes.
You
know
they're
looking
at
it
also
from
a
technical
standpoint,
and
otherwise
it's
going
to
come
straight
to
us
and
we're
not
going
to
have
any
review
by
the
Planning
Commission.
D
A
A
Okay,
so
let's,
let's
think
through
this
I
just
for
for
scheduling
purposes.
If
we
were
to
put
this
on
on
the
November
1st
meeting,
we
could
potentially
get
that
directed
and
then
Planning
Commission
meets
on
the
Tuesdays
that
we
don't
meet
right
and
so
it'd
probably
be
too
late
for
November
8th
two
weeks
after
that
would
be
15,
23rd,
I
I,
don't
know
if
the
Planning
Commission
is
having
a
meeting
on
the
week
of
Thanksgiving,
but
I
guess
technically
it
might
be
able
to.
A
V
A
D
A
T
I
think
about
a
month
ago,
planning
Commissioners
have
requested
that
they
should
they
be
allowed
to
come
in
on
the
small
sale
ordinance
and
the
Council
on
I.
Think
I
did
require
to
the
CTR
attorney
and
then
there
was
I
think
it's
our
Mis
management
of
timeline.
Otherwise
it
would
have
been
possible.
So
I
want
to
point
that
out
and
and
also
I
want
some
clarification,
because
in
the
past
the
council
city,
council
or
school
board
has
been
making
is
responding
to
public
comments
with
short
responses
per
wrong
act.
T
F
A
Well,
okay,
so
we
we
will
go
ahead
and
clarify
that
I
think
we
could
probably
do
that
briefly
in
the
next
meeting.
I
would
imagine
perhaps
even
under
city
managers,
you
know
reports,
but
but
you
know
we
can
go
ahead
and
get
some
public
clarity
as
to
the
scope
of
what's
permissible
and
I
I.
Think
that
is
a
fair,
fair
point
and
without
expounding
on
it
our
City
attorney
was
requesting
to
speak
and
and
Chris
did
you
want
to
follow
on
at
this
time.
A
P
A
T
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor
I
think
we
can
clarify
those
points
without
getting
into
the
substance
of
them
at
this
time,
but
you
know
duly
noted
as
well.
So
thanks
very
much
you
know,
I
I,
just
want
to
encourage
everyone
to
you
know,
be
civil
and
open
out
there.
I
know
that
this
is
a
real
privilege
in
our
you
know,
in
our
system
to
be
able
to
kind
of
vet
a
lot
of
things
over
the
course
of
these
these
months
and
weeks,
and
so
yeah.
A
You
know
be
good
to
each
other
and
I
think
that
we
can
get
to
you
know
a
fantastic
place
and
stay
there
and
you
know
keep
maintaining
the
course
of
positive
actions.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
everyone's
work
here,
city
manager,
who
you
just
turned
on
your
microphone.
Did
you
want
to
make
a
brief
comment
before
we
adjourn
the
meeting.
F
U
V
A
I
H
K
H
A
V
Right,
so
my
understanding
is
that
council,
member
Willie's
request
is
on
5G,
which
we
tentatively
commit
to
bring
it
back
on
December,
6
and
Council.
Vice
mayor
Chow's
request
will
be
handled
by
City
attorney
separately
and
also
individually
with
each
individual
city.
Council
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
on
the
same
page,
oh.
A
You
know
I,
think
Vice.
Versailles
requests
are
similar
to
councilmember
Moore's
request,
in
that
there
was
a
desire
for
that
to
be,
you
know,
made
publicly
known.
Is
that
is
that
fair
I
mean
I,
don't
think
that's
a
privileged
attorney!
You
know
communication
right,
I
mean
that
should
be
something
that
is.
U
A
Sounds
good
all
right!
Thank
you,
okay,
great!
Thank
you
very
much
and
that
definitely
you
know
adds
a
lot
of
clarity
to
oh
and
just
you
know
just
to
kind
of
dot.
The
Iron
Cross
t
on
this
I'll
go
ahead
and
second
anything
that's
requested
of
these.
You
know
several
items
from
from
my
colleagues.
So,
okay!
Well,
thank
you
very
much.
Everyone!
It's
October
18th!
Our
next
regularly
scheduled
council
meeting,
is
on
November,
1st
and
so
I'm.
Sorry
vice
mayor.
T
So
now
that
as
we
are
clarifying
when
or
what
short
responses
are
allowed,
I
hope
also
to
collect,
get
the
clarification
on
the
item
that
currently
council
member
announcements
and
because
announcement
it
used
to
be
that
we
would
talk
about
comments
we
received
from
the
residents
and
when
we
may
not
be
at
during
the
public
meeting.
But
I
would
mention
okay,
here's
what
I
heard
and
then
I
give
a
short
response.
But
I
was
stopped
today.