►
Description
Coverage of the February 7, 2023 Cupertino City Council Teleconference Meeting.
(Live Streamed Version)
A
A
A
A
B
C
D
A
A
I
like
to
do
you
want
to
say
it
I'd
like
to
invite
vice
mayor
Mohan,
to
say
a
few
words.
E
Hi
good
afternoon
or
good
evening
on
behalf
of
Mayor
Ray
and
the
council,
I
just
wanted
to
express
our
sympathies
for
the
thousands
of
people
who
died
in
the
earthquake.
The
last
couple
of
days
particularly
wanted
to
extend
our
sympathies
to
the
Cupertino
residents
of
Turkish
and
Syrian
descent.
A
Thank
you.
Now
we
are
going
to
the
ceremonial
for
our
very
popular
and
Welcome
to
our
council
meeting
Josh
Sello
seven
year,
West
Valley,
Community,
Services
executive
director
he's
done
so
much
for
the
West
Valley
communities
and
had
led
West
Valley
Community
Services
into
Higher
Grounds.
So
we
like
to
give
our
respect
and
congratulations
for
a
new
adventure.
So
Josh.
Please
come
forward.
A
So
Josh
inapprations
of
your
seven
years
of
service
and
dedication
to
the
community
coming
Cupertino
Community,
who
are
serving
at
West
Valley,
Community
Services,
the
city
of
kobachito,
recognizes
appreciate
your
hard
work,
which
has
helped
those
most
in
need,
get
access
to
a
wide
variety
of
needs,
including
food
assistance,
housing,
help
financial
support
and
much
more
and
you
did
it
with
your
heart.
So
thank
you.
Josh
thank.
F
Like
to
say
a
few
words,
I
I
just
want
to
say
it's
been
an
honor
to
serve
this
community.
It
is
a
very
special
place.
This
region
is
a
very
special
place
and
I'm
really
honored
to
have
partnered
with
all
of
you
to
serve
the
needs
of
folks
facing
food
and
housing
insecurity
in
the
West
Valley.
Thank
you
for
all
you
all
do
and
for
all
you
all
do.
This
is
an
incredibly
caring
and
wonderful
community.
F
A
B
A
G
I'm
and
I
said
to
him,
and
I
saw
him
and
I
came
in
and
every
time
else
that
I
see
him
that
I
enjoyed
so
much
working
with
him
on
the
Housing
Commission
and
even
before
that,
because
I
met
him
before
that
when
he
first
came
on
board,
he's
so
impressive,
so
caring
so
kind
and
effective,
and
so
I
I,
add
to
all
of
the
words
that
you
all
said
about
him
I'm,
so
glad
that
we
were
able
to
have
this
time
to
appreciate
him
as
a
city.
So
thank
you
bye-bye.
A
B
Mayor
I
have
for
in-house
I,
have
three
speaker
cards
for
Community
Hall,
one
from
Connie
Cunningham,
followed
by
Jennifer
Griffin,
followed
by
Don
Halsey
and
if,
let's
see
on
Zoom
I
have
four
hands
raised
and
if
they
would
have
their
hands
raised
or
speaker
cards
submitted
by.
Is
it
still
within
five.
B
That
would
be
the
cut
off
all.
G
So
good
evening,
mayor
way
advise
mayor,
Moen
and
council
members.
Food
comes
from
plants
and
animals
not
directly
from
the
store,
just
as
our
water
comes
from
Rivers,
creeks
and
Wells.
The
last
step
is
the
faucets
in
our
homes
to
protect
biodiversity
and
our
water.
We
can
change
our
landscape
or
we
can
change
how
we
landscape
our
property
and
we
can
add
property
dedicated
to
Nature
at
the
previous
Four
City
Council
meetings.
G
G
Palo
Alto
city
council
heard
a
case
on
January
23rd
from
a
homeowner
that
wanted
a
20
feet:
setback
from
a
creek
only
a
20-foot
suit
back,
although
the
average
distance
of
homes
was
over
50
feet
and
the
city
had
guidance
in
place
to
consider
150
feet
as
the
minimum,
with
all
the
rains
and
mudslides
and
damage
to
Homes,
Long,
creeks
and
rivers.
Why
would
the
homeowner
ask
for
a
20-foot
setback?
Fortunately,
Palo
Alto
city
council
authorized
50
feet
not
20
feet
from
the
creek.
G
They
also
directed
staff
to
ride
an
ordinance
that
would
set
the
guidance
for
150
feet
into
legally
binding
rules
for
the
future.
Each
of
us
comes
to
understanding
of
biodiversity
from
different
places.
Mine
grew
through
bird
watching
in
California.
Many
learn
about
the
human
relationship
to
Nature
from
losing
their
home
to
flood
waters
or
mudslides
or
Fires
for
council
members
and
everyone
else
who
hears
these
Council
meetings
I
hope
to
create
an
interest
in
nature
and
how
to
create
policies
that
allow
nature
room
to
breathe
within
our
city
borders.
G
As
we
consider
our
housing
element
recently
submitted
to
hcd
for
review.
I
urge
Council
to
encourage
staff
to
include
biodiversity
in
all
its
plans
to
consider
location
of
native
trees
and
plants
in
all
housing
projects
and
business
projects.
Please
focus
on
infill
locations
that
do
not
encroach
on
dwindling
natural
spaces.
G
B
H
Good
evening
city
council,
it's
nice
to
see
you
all
in
the
new
year.
I
just
wanted
to
talk
tonight
about
history
and
historic
things
in
our
city
and
in
other
places
of
this
beautiful
country.
I've
been
talking
quite
a
bit
about
the
stockelmeyer
home,
as
thank
heavens,
that
it
is
owned
by
Cupertino.
It
is
one
of
the
founders
of
cupertino's
childhood
home
Mr
stockelmeyer
had
the
foresight
to
alert
people
to
try
to
incorporate
Cupertino
at
the
time
when
adjacent
cities
were
looking
to
Annex.
H
The
crossroads
of
Cupertino
I
cannot
begin
to
thank
him
and
remind
everyone
how
grateful
we
should
be
to
him.
Therefore,
it's
time
that
his
family
home
is
fixed
up
and
become
a
history
house
for
Cupertino
Los
Altos
has
a
history
house.
The
doctor's
home
is
from
1900
Saratoga.
Has
history
house
and
I'm
pursuing
looking
at
the
Scott
home
in
Scotts
Valley,
which
is
1855.
H
but
I
challenge
our
millionaires
in
Cupertino
and
the
people
that
run
Facebook
and
Google
to
start
donating,
put
your
money
where
your
mouth
is.
If
you
want
to
live
in,
our
state,
contribute
to
it
contribute
to
the
history,
don't
poop,
who
the
history
of
this
state,
if
you're
living
here
you're
part
of
this
state,
you're
part
of
its
history,
and
you
need
to
go
and
understand
and
give
yourself
an
education
of
what
this
state
is
about.
H
California
is
not
someone's
play
thing,
it
is
got
its
own
history
and
there
are
people
who
have
fought
and
died
and
lived
in
this
state
of
all
different
nationalities.
So
therefore,
I
put
out
a
challenge.
Put
your
money
where
your
mouth
is.
The
Hewlett
and
Packards
have
gone
far
and
above
to
donate
money
for
many
many
different
things.
The
Rockefeller
family
put
Williamsburg
back
up
and
together
in
the
1920s
from
something
that
had
been
down
in
the
dust
for
200
years.
H
I
challenge
people
I
hear
a
lot
of
people
maligning
my
state
and
it
hurts
really
really
bad
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
those
people
that
say
bad
things
about
California
who
actually
live
here.
Don't
get
the
history,
it
is
multinational,
it
is
long
and
it
is
proud
and
we
have
every
right
to
make
sure
that
parts
of
our
state
are
not
crushed
under
massive
Tech
buildings
and
overbuilding.
The
history
of
California
is
every
bit
as
proud
as
the
Mayflower
area
and
Jamestown,
etc,
etc,
etc.
Thank
you.
B
I
Oh
good
good
evening,
mayor
council
persons,
city
manager,
City
attorney
distinguished
visitors
in
the
audience,
I'm
Don
Halsey
I'm
here
to
speak
to
you
again
about
the
biodiversity.
I
So
biodiversity
I'll
start
with
some
context.
This
has
been
talked
about
previously
in
our
last
meeting.
We
added
one's
one
resident
speaker,
who
was
a
golf
player
and
bird
watcher
and
talked
about
bluebirds
red
tail,
hawk
Blue
Heron
at
Blackberry,
Farm,
Golf,
Course,
okay,
another
speaker
asked
the
city
council
to
look
at
each
new
proposal
to
the
city
council
through
the
just
justification
or
lens
of
biodiversity.
Tonight,
let
me
show
you
what
some
scientists
have
already
looked
at
concerning
golf
courses
and
biodiversity.
I
This
is
a
scholarly
study.
You
can
get
it
online
at
the
web
link
there.
If
you
don't
want
to
believe
me,
which
I
encourage
you
to
do,
but
if
you
don't
want
to,
you
can
always
get
that
thread,
link
and
actually
open
up
the
study
and
read
this
in
detail.
This
is
from
Vancouver.
They
did
an
analysis
of
biodiversity
through
looking
at
bird
species
in
this
area.
This
is
Vancouver.
They
had
a
golf
course
here
and
some
nearby
Green
Space
a
golf
course
here
in
red.
You
see
it
and
nearby
Green
Space,
Golf
Course.
I
Here
that's
number
two
and
nearby
green
spaces.
So
let's
see
how
many
birds
we've
got
in
these
things
in
the
first
golf
course,
it
actually
outperformed
the
nearby
green
spaces
that
surprised
me,
but
it
happened.
Okay
in
the
second
Golf
Course
same
thing
happened
in
the
third
Golf
Course
same
thing
happened.
If
you
want
more
biodiversity,
keep
your
golf
courses,
here's
a
second
study.
I
This
came
from
Australia
and
met
in
the
University
of
Melbourne,
asked
about
how
this
can
be
counted
and
assessed,
and
the
first
thing
they
did
is
they
said
well,
look
at
the
golf
courses
and
we'll
look
at
green
spaces
and
we'll
also
look
at
Gardens
like
vegetables
and
flower
gardens
and
count
again
do
that
and
they
counted
Birds,
but
they
also
broadened
the
study
to
look
at
Beetles
bees
bugs
and
other
types
of
things
and
bats.
Okay,
so
they
did
that
and
what
did
they
find
for
birds?
I
I
I
Let's
go
back
up
here,
I've
lost
myself.
These
are
local
codes.
J
Hi
I'll
try
and
be
brief
as
I'm.
The
least
prepared
and
I
wanted
to
thank
the
other
speakers
for
mentioning
California's
history
and
biodiversity.
Of
course,
those
are
things
that
our
community
cares
about.
Mentally
I
was
just
trying
to
wanted
to
make
a
request
of
the
city
council
that
they
make
the
information
regarding
the
development
of
the
Valco
area
more
available
online,
so
that
we
can
have
more
transparency
and
see
what
the
progress
is
going
on.
J
That
I
was
searching
through
the
Cupertino
City's
website
and
I
was
having
a
lot
of
trouble
finding
that.
So,
if
there's
anyone
that
could
maybe
add
a
page
for
that,
that
would
be
great.
Thank
you
very
much.
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
some
of
you
know
this
because
you
already
got
one
some
of
you
don't
know
this,
but
every
few
years
I
give
a
maybe
an
unwanted
gift
to
council
members
and
ask
them
to
read
it
and
if
they
don't
want
to
pass
it
on
to
someone
else
or
keep
it
themselves
that
they
please
donate
to
the
library.
K
So
it's
the
book,
If
You,
Give,
a
Mouse,
a
Cookie
and
the
reason
I
do
this
is
because
I
think
it's
a
simple
message,
simple
way
to
to
spread
a
message
that
about
83
percent
of
the
people
that
ask
what
this
book's
moral
is.
Is
that
you
may
not
make
everyone
happy
if
you
are
concentrating
on
one
person
or
one
thing
to
make
happy,
and
you
start
with
some
some
gesture.
K
K
So
that's
just
another
plug
for
that
and,
interestingly
enough
I,
don't
know
you
Chris
this
morning
at
the
mayor's
coffee
I
mentioned
that
the
website
it'd
be
great
when
you
redo
the
website
or
even
before.
It
makes
more
sense
when
you
redo
it
to
provide
the
public
with
the
opportunity
to
get
tutorials
on
how
to
use
it,
because
it
is
very
convoluted
in
many
ways
some
things
are
simple,
but
it's
overwhelming.
K
If
you
haven't
tried
to
access
information
there
and
you
could
have
different
levels
of
information,
you
could
do
YouTube
things
how
to
find
such
and
such
I
don't
know
it's
just
a
suggestion.
I
gave
this
morning
so
since
that
was
brought
up,
I
thought
I'd
say
it
here
to
all
of
you
and
I
think
that's
all
I'm
gonna
say
right
now.
Thank
you.
L
L
Secondly,
Madame
mayor
you
campaigned
on
the
platform
of
bringing
the
city
together,
as
we
were
so
divided,
but
I
saw
none
of
those
sentiments
on
display
in
the
governance
Workshop
the
other
day,
I
felt
that
council
members
more
and
ciao
were
called
out
in
the
carpet,
and
it
wasn't
a
very
good
look.
L
I
hope
this
doesn't
happen
in
the
future
and
finally,
Madame
mayor
I
wrote
you
in
January,
concerning
a
certain
issue,
didn't
receive
a
response
which
is
fine
because
I
understand
you
were
busy,
but
my
name
was
immediately
added
to
your
mayor's
monthly
PR
newsletter
and
I
feel
that's
really
inappropriate.
I
was
very
offended
and
I'm
hoping
to
be
removed
from
it.
Thank
you.
B
M
Good
evening,
mayor
way
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Ronnie
Fisher
and
I
represent
the
Santa
Clara
Valley
Audubon
Society
and
I
teach
at
De
Anza
College,
both
of
which
are
based
in
Cupertino
I.
Urge
you
to
release
Blackberry
Farm
Golf
Course
to
Nature
as
a
statistics.
Professor
I
know
that
you
can
make
numbers
say
anything
you
want.
Please
look
into
the
details
of
any
study
that
professes
that
sterile,
lawn,
fertilized
and
treated
with
pesticides
is
better
for
wildlife
than
a
harmonious
treatment
of
our
natural
world.
M
Our
bodies
and
souls
need
nature
here
in
an
area
surrounded
by
concrete
glass
and
tarmac.
If
preserving
nature
is
not
politically
feasible,
then
please,
replant
with
plants
when
you
with
native
plants,
when
you
need
to
replace
old
plants
in
the
golf
course
are
insects.
The
one
we
depend
on
for
pollination
for
our
own
food
need
native
plants,
which
are
the
only
plants
which
are
native
caterpillars,
can
survive.
On
the
Harvard
biologist,
Dia
Wilson
wrote
we
should
preserve.
Every
scrap
of
biodiversity
is
priceless.
M
N
Good
evening,
mayor
way
and
city
council
members,
I'm,
Jennifer,
Sheeran
and
I'm
here
tonight,
speaking
only
as
myself,
I
have
a
concern
about
Public
Communication
from
Council
Members.
Our
current
ethics
policy
states
went
quote
when
City
elected,
slash,
appointed
officials
and
staff
are
presenting
their
individual
opinions
and
positions
on
issues
potentially
relevant
to
the
city.
They
must
explicitly
State,
they
do
not
represent
their
body
or
the
city
and
must
not
allow
any
interference
that
they
do.
N
Many
of
our
residents
are
receiving
regular
email
communication
with
the
header
quote
from
the
office
of
Liang
Chao
Cupertino
city
council
member.
This
makes
it
appear.
It
is
an
official
communication
and
many
residents
likely
assume
it
is
only
after
scrolling,
an
email
several
times
to
the
very
bottom.
Is
there
a
bullet
point
that
says
an
italics
quote
representing
myself?
However,
this
is
not
official
communication
and
the
latest
email
States
positions
that
the
city
council
have
not
yet
officially
voted
on.
N
It
also
includes
strongly
encouraging
residents
to
come
argue
for
a
specific
viewpoint
on
the
issues
at
tonight's
council
meeting.
The
email
is
headlined
with
the
leading
question:
are
you
giving
away
your
right
further
bias?
Statements
and
leading
questions
are
in
a
multi-paragraph
discussion
of
agenda
item
15
and
agenda
item
13..
There
is
even
a
falsehood
that
no
action
has
ever
been
taken
in
a
council
study
session
when
our
own
city
manager
said
otherwise
on
January
25th.
N
Now
it's
fine
to
send
out
communication
about
City
events
or
to
encourage
residents
to
come
to
the
council
meetings
in
general.
As
another
speaker
tonight
mentioned
our
mayor.
Does
that
very
thing?
But
it's
not
fine
for
a
city
council
member
to
use
their
official
title
to
Rally
public
support
for
a
particular
Viewpoint
prior
to
a
council
vote.
N
We've
been
told
that
residents
can
raise
these
ethical
issues
in
Council
meetings
and
the
council
will
police
themselves
I.
Ask
that
you
do
this
this
evening
by
requesting
that
all
council
members
going
forward
refrain
from
taking
public
positions
and
trying
to
Rally
resident
support
for
those
positions
in
newsletters,
social
media
or
otherwise,
before
an
issue
has
been
decided
officially
by
the
council.
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
behalf
of
Cupertino
resident.
B
Thank
you
Jennifer
and
mayor
I
just
want
to
check
with
you
per
our
process
after
this
next
speaker,
we
will
reach
30
minutes
on
the
oral
Communications
portion
of
the
meeting,
and
there
is
a
section
at
the
end
of
the
agenda
to
move
the
remaining
speakers.
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
If
you'd
like
to.
B
B
Okay,
though
I
will
allow
Sima
linscog
to
talk,
welcome
Seema,
oh
yeah,
can
you.
P
B
P
Okay,
great
council
member
council
members
mayor
way
and
vice
mayor
Mohan,
thank
you
for
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I'll.
Keep
this
brief
because
I
see
your
you
guys
are
running
out
of
time,
but
I
just
want
to
Echo
what
the
previous
speaker
said.
P
I
received
that
email
from
council
member
ciao
and
I
was
very
confused
because
I
I
had
to
actually
read
it
twice
because
the
email
address
says
Liang,
Chao,
Cupertino,
city,
council,
member
and
the
header
image
says
from
the
office
of
Liang,
Chao,
Cupertino
city,
council
member,
so
just
to
be
clear.
I
I
am
interested
in
hearing
from
council
member
Chao.
I
do
want
to
hear
her
positions
on
things.
P
So
please
don't
take
me
off
your
mailing
list,
but
I
do
agree
that
it
is
very
confusing
to
and
to,
and
it
is
ethically
sketchy
to
take
positions
on
on
things
that
the
council
has
not
voted
on.
Yet
I
would
much
I
I
question
whether
that's
that's
really
approved
in
our
ethics
policy.
P
I'd
had
the
same
thing
with
Jennifer,
where
I
actually
scrolled
all
the
way
through
and
finally
found
at
the
very
bottom
one
line.
That
said,
it's
speaking
for
myself
only
which
felt
really
like
a
disingenuous
fig
Leaf
at
that
point.
After
really
emphasizing
how
much
this
communication
came
as
an
official
communication
from
a
sitting
council
member,
so
you
know
please
do
continue
to
send
emails
to
the
community,
but
you
know,
let's,
let's
consider
the
ethics
of
the
situation
and
try
to.
B
Q
Hello,
this
is
Louise
sagati
and
I'm.
Speaking
for
myself
and
I
just
wanted
to
be
on
a
different
note.
I
wanted
to
make
some
positive
remarks.
I
had
previously
attempted
to
do
that,
but
I
was
cut
off
because
I
ran
out
of
time
and
specifically
I
had
commended
counsel
for
their
different
actions,
and
specifically
each
member,
but
I
was
cut
off
before
I
ran
out
of
time
before
I
was
able
to
move
on,
recommend
the
different
professionals.
Q
City
staff
members
I've
worked
with
through
the
years
and
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Kristen's.
Oh
dear
Square,
arcia.
Q
S-Q-U-E-R-C-I-A,
the
city,
clerk
and
finance
manager,
I
I,
have
found
her
to
be
extremely
professional,
even
when
there's
a
super
timeline
and
I'm.
Throwing
in
all
these
extra
things
through
presentations,
Brian
gathers
the
supervisor
for
a
field
maintaining
our
Field
park
and
our
part,
he
has
been
extremely
professional,
given
been
a
very
generous
of
the
time
in
giving
the
details
and
communication
regarding
What,
the
residents
need
to
do
to
help
maintain
the
field
and
a
big
shout
out
to
Rachelle
Sanders,
our
director
of
Parks
and
Recreation.
Q
She
has
been
fabulous
so
receptive
to
the
needs
of
the
residents
and
has
been
in
her
very
crowded
schedule,
been
making
time
for
us
to
speak
regarding
our
concern,
different
concerns
and
wishes
on
the
parks
and
and
more
on
that
in
future
conversations
I
also
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
our
city
manager,
Pam
Wu
in
the
last
few
meetings,
I'm
really
impressed
with
how
energetic
she
is
and
how
she
really
helps
to
keep
the
meeting
going
along
and
also
a
shout
out
to
the
City
lawyer,
Chris
Jensen,
because
I
think
he's
done
a
really
fabulous
job
in
writing.
Q
Up
the
procedures
manual
and
answering
all
the
different
questions
that
have
been
brought
to
him
throughout
all
these
different
meetings
and
I
really
have
a
I
really
like
it.
When
I
see
that
the
City
Council
meetings
are
proceeding
in
an
orderly
way
like
to
the
point
and
I
I
really
like
how
people
have
been
working
with
the
Chris
and
Pam
and
the
council
people
to
let
the
meetings
run
and
and
really
try
to
limit,
theatrical
grandstanding
and
long-winded
off-the-topic
speeches.
Q
We
need
to
run
our
city
like
at
the
court,
and
people
need
to
speak
to
the
point
and
move
on
to
the
next
question.
So
that
is
that
is
I'm
excited
by
the
professionalism
I
see
in
the
city
staff.
B
R
Airway,
council
members,
my
name
is
Eugene
Lin
and
I'm.
A
Cupertino
resident
of
over
30
years
I
want
to
comment
on
the
Blackberry
Farm
Golf
Course
renovation
I'm
strongly
in
favor
of
restoring
the
land
to
its
natural
habitat.
R
The
benefits
of
restoring
the
land
to
its
natural
habitat
go
beyond
what
they
can
offer
the
residents
of
Cupertino
think
about
the
countless
thousands
of
species
of
animals,
insects,
Etc
that
will
benefit
and
Thrive
for
generations
to
come.
As
a
result,
we
can't
even
begin
to
quantify
that
I'm,
proud
of
cupertino's
climate
action
initiatives
and
hope
that
we
can
continue
being
good
stewards
of
the
environment
by
restoring
Blackberry
Farm
golf
courts
to
its
natural
habitat.
Thank
you.
B
S
B
B
T
Hello:
everyone,
hi
I'm,
Arjun,
Krishna
I,
am
a
junior
in
high
school
right
now
from
Bellarmine
college
preparatory
and
I'm
here
to
speak
also
on
the
restoration
of
the
Blackberry
Farm
Golf
Course.
Many
other
people
today
have
spoken
about
the
environmental
impact
and
the
Water
waste,
as
well
as
people
just
enjoying
having
a
you
know,
more
green
and
open
space
instead
of
the
golf
course,
but
I
think
my
specific
area
of
interest
in
this
entire
Affair
is
the
use
of
pesticides
and
herbicides.
T
I
have
personally
been
working
on
multiple
science
projects
for
the
past
four
years,
and
I've
worked
with
the
Sierra
Club
and
other
Environmental
Protection
organizations
and
I
would
I
just
wanted
to
dedicate
some
time
to
spell
any
notion
that
pesticides
and
herbicides
are
at
all
beneficial
to
maintaining
a
healthy
natural
environment,
primarily
through
the
unintended
effect
of
agricultural
runoff,
especially
in
an
area
like
California,
in
which
rain
is
unpredictable.
T
It
allows
the
amount
of
herbicides
and
pesticides
to
concentrate
into
the
soil
and
when
it
does
rain
or
when
fields
are
irrigated,
as
often
happens
in
a
golf
course.
The
runoff
from
that
water
ends
up
concentrating
these
pollutants
and
creating
massive
problems
for
the
environment
to
contextualize.
This
I
could
give
the
example
of
estriazine
herbicides.
These
herbicides
are
primarily
used
on
destroying
and
killing
weeds.
T
It
attacks
photosynthesis
and
it's
something
commonly
used
to
maintain
golf
courses
as
well
as
Farms,
where
weeds
are
a
problem,
but
the
problem
with
these
esteriazine
herbicides
is
that
they
are
incredibly
dangerous
for
the
native
wildlife
with
fish,
especially
since,
in
the
local
streams
there
are
a
protected
steelhead
trout.
The
irrigation
from
pesticide
runoff
can
end
up,
causing
severe
neural
damage
to
these
fish
and
cause
erratic
swimming.
That
eventually
leads
to
death
by
exhaustion
in
local
amphibious
species.
T
It
can
cause
severe
endocrinological
damage
by
attacking
the
endocrine
axis
of
these
animals
and
for
Birds.
It
cause
birth
defects
as
well
as
in
other
mammals.
T
It
is
because
of
these
problems
that
I
would
be
strongly
for
the
version
of
Blackberry
Farm
Golf
Course
into
natural
land,
because
this
would
be
most
beneficial
for
the
environment
because
of
the
huge
amount
of
ecological
stress
that
herbicides
and
pesticides
put
on
the
environment
and
any
notion
that
the
golf
course
critic
test
in
a
state
of
like
full,
Greenery
and
fully
being
fully
maintained
with
use
of
pesticides
and
herbicides
and
for
that
to
be
beneficial
to
the
environment,
is
based
on
a
false
premise.
So
I
just
like
to
spell
that.
T
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
I
just
wanted
to
be
a
youth
voice.
That
seems
to
be
not
often
as
heard
at
city
council.
Thank
you.
Thank.
U
Good
evening
City
Council
Members,
it
seems
like
Blackberry
Farm
Golf
Course
is
a
big
subject
of
the
night,
so
I'm
going
to
chime
in
as
well
it's
a
playing
field
and
I.
Don't
think
that
we
should
get
rid
of
Playing
Fields,
there's
people
of
all
ages
who
who
use
the
golf
courses
and
I
believe
that
we
can
have
our
cake
and
eat
it
too,
and
have
more
nature
around
that
area.
U
Us
a
couple
of
you
are
new
to
the
city
council.
One
of
the
things
that
was
shown
was
that
the
people
who
are
looking
at
the
water
use
did
not
really
consider
that
we
did
need
to
irrigate
more
areas
and
they
they
at
first
believe,
because
the
golf
course
is
in
a
bowl
and
it
rises
up
to
residentials,
and
there
would
be
a
fire
safety
hazard.
If
there
wasn't
significant
irrigation
out
there
we
can
do.
U
We
can
have
our
cake
and
eat
it
too,
and
I
certainly
hope
that
you
will
consider
that
the
other
thing
is
I'm.
Really.
This
is
about
transparency
is
that
it
used
to
be
where
we
were
many
of
the
many
of
the
amenities
that
ran
as
business
in
the
city
were
in
Enterprise
funds.
So
basically
we
there
would
be
almost
like
a
PS,
a
p
l,
profits
and
loss
statement.
U
So
we
know
how
much
these
amenities
were
costing
or
or
how
much
they
were
making
and
the
senior
center
had
been
in
an
Enterprise
fund
and
it
is
anymore,
so
we
don't
have
any
transparency
there.
The
same
is
true
for
the
pool
picnic
business,
and
that
takes
me
to
another
issue.
U
Is
that
the
whole
thing
about
re-looking
at
the
golf
course
came,
because
there
was
a
major
capital
investment
that
needed
to
happen
there
well
here
and,
and
here
we're
in
the
same
position
where
a
major
capital
investment
needs
to
be
made
at
the
pools,
but
we
have
no
idea
what
they're
costing
and,
interestingly
enough,
the
pools
are
way
closer
to
the
creek
than
the
golf
courses
and
there's
lots
of
chemicals
used
there.
So
I
just
thought
that
was
a
little
confusing.
U
I
also
wanted
to
so
long
story
short.
Please.
We
need
more
transparency.
We
need
to
find
out
how
much
our
amenities
are
costing
us.
Maybe
we're
not
charging
enough
money,
maybe
whatever
so
the
other.
The
other
thing
is
regarding
decisions
being
made
in
public
meetings,
I
attended
the
same
meeting.
U
Somebody
said
that
decisions
had
not
been
made
that
Chris
Jason
had
said
that
my
understanding
was-
and
maybe
he
can
correct
us-
is
that
a
decision
could
be
made
at
a
study
session
as
long
as
it
had
been
noticed,
and
you
know
when
people
got
so
upset
about
it,
I
went
back
in
history
and
I
went
to
all
the
previous
study
sessions
that
have
happened
in
the
last
nine
years.
That
nine
years
is
what
I
could
pull
up
and
not
in
any
of
them
had
a
decision.
V
Good
evening,
mayor
way,
vice
mayor,
Mohan,
council,
members
and
staff
I
have
several
topics
to
talk
about
quickly.
One
is
I
support
the
golf
course
and
as
a
diverse
activity,
biodiversity,
they
can
find
ways
to
not
use
the
herbicides
and
the
pesticides
and
add
more
natural
habit.
V
Also
in
the
January
17th
meeting
a
city
council
meeting,
there
was
a
presentation
on
the
housing
element
and
it
was
stated
that
it
was
going
to
be
turned
in
January
31st,
but
from
what
I
can
tell
it
was
not.
It
didn't
make
the
deadline
and
I
would
like
to
know
why
I
know
that
you
hired
a
new
consultant
and
also
tonight
I
want
to
talk
to
the
people
who
are
watching
tonight,
the
people
that
are
attending
both
in
person
and
on
Zoom
collectively
through
a
series
of
City
Council
meetings
and
incremental
decisions.
V
This
council
is
doing
away
with
the
Public's
access
to
information,
ability
to
speak
ability
to
participate
and
contribute.
It
doesn't
matter
whether
you
believe
in
what
I
believe
or
we
disagree.
It's
our
rights
to
speak
and
have
access
to
that
information.
Democracy
in
your
rights
and
freedom
require
work
on
your
part,
those
people
watching
and
attending.
You
must
educate
yourself
on
the
issues.
V
A
Thank
you,
Mada
City
Kirk.
Now
we
are
moving
into
reports
by
Council
and
staff.
So,
let's
start
with
report
by
brief
report
on
Council
Members
activities
and
brief
announcements.
A
Okay,
so,
let's
start
with
who
wants
to
start
first.
E
Since
the
last
council
meeting
I
attended
the
Cal
cities
conference
in
Sacramento,
several
of
our
council
members
did
that
was
went
on
for
three
days.
I
also
attended
the
Public
Works
special
recognition
event
to
thank
our
employees
for
their
efforts
and
keeping
us
safe
during
the
recent
storms,
I
attended
a
meeting
with
Silicon
Valley
leadership
group
to
discuss
to
introduce
themselves
to
me
and
vice
versa,
and
to
discuss
items
of
mutual
interest.
D
So
I'd
like
to
to
ask
the
staff
to
address
some
of
the
questions
by
the
public
or
regarding
the
email
I
sent
out
I
checked
with
the
CTR
attorney
beforehand.
Would
you
like
to
speak
to
that
now
or
send
the
council
a
memo
to
clarify
because
other
cities,
council
members
from
other
cities,
have
done
similar
things
and
I
asked
you
before.
D
D
W
D
Great,
thank
you
and
I
guess
for
the
public
interest.
When
will
the
golf
course
come
to
the
council?
Is
that
appropriate
to
ask
now.
X
I
believe
this
is
not
item
on
the
agenda.
We
no
Liberty
to
discuss
that
tonight.
D
Not
the
time
of
the
it
will
come
to
the
council.
Okay,.
A
Y
So
I
also
attended
the
Cal
city's
new
mayors
and
council
members
conference
January
18th
through
20th
in
Sacramento,
and
saw
an
excellent
presentation
by
the
city
manager
of
Morgan
Hill
and
Mike
Coleman,
who
co-authored
the
California
guide
to
government
Finance.
One
presenter
said:
there's
a
change
to
SB
35
in
the
works
to
make
it
for
market
rate
housing.
So
we
want
to
keep
tabs
on
that.
Y
January
26
I
started
my
third
year
being
appointed
by
Peninsula
division
president
to
the
Environmental
Quality
policy
committee,
the
Cal
cities,
2023
advocacy
priorities
are
homelessness,
safeguarding
local
revenues,
affordability
of
Housing
and
Public
Safety,
including
mental
health.
The
work
plan
for
the
Environmental
Quality
policy
committee
was
discussed,
which
included
rainwater
capture,
gray,
water
use
and
hazardous
materials
Rising
with
sea
level
rise.
We
also
reviewed
our
neighborhood
voices
land
use
initiative.
Y
We
received
a
presentation
from
The
lvt
Joint
Powers
Authority
Pure
Water
Project
in
Southern
California,
which
is
a
city
which
is
it
for
a
city
that
has
no
groundwater
and
they
bring
in
all
their
water
from
the
state
water
project
and
they
are
developing
a
membrane
ultra
filtration,
reverse,
osmosis
filtration
and
UV
light.
Advanced
oxidation
plant
to
purify
their
tertiary
treated
purple
pipe
water.
They
actually
found
that
they
were
their
tertiary
treated.
Water
was
harming
the
fish
in
a
creek
that
they
were
releasing
it
into.
Y
O
So,
on
January,
the
18th
to
the
20th,
like
most
of
the
rest
of
council
I
attended
the
league
of
California
City's
training
conference
in
Sacramento
thought
it
was
a
very
valuable
set
of
presentations.
I
was
very
grateful
to
be
able
to
meet
a
lot
of
other
electives
from
other
places
that
hadn't
met
before
on
February.
O
The
second
I
joined
the
faculty
Association
of
the
foothill
De
Anza
College
District
at
their
Retreat
to
discuss
the
topic
of
affordable
housing
on
February,
the
5th
I
attended,
the
Honor
Court
of
Eagle
Scout
Aaron
handelsman,
along
with
the
vice
mayor,
where
we
presented
her
a
certificate
of
recognition
on
behalf
of
the
city.
She
is
a
proud
resident
of
the
city
of
Cupertino.
She
is
also
one
of
the
very
first
female
BSA
Eagle
Scouts.
O
It
was
a
wonderful
ceremony
to
attend
and
I
was
grateful
for
the
the
vice
mayor's
presence
there
and
then
just
as
a
matter
of
full
disclosure.
I
have
previously
discussed
this
matter
with
the
the
City
attorney
and
with
the
city
attorney
in
the
city
of
San.
Jose
on
Monday
I
began
a
new
position
working
for
the
vice
mayor
of
the
city
of
San
Jose,
as
her
policy
and
legislative
director,
and
both
City
attorneys
have
vetted
the
issue
for
a
potential
conflict
of
interest
and
find
no
fundamental
conflict
of
interest.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
councilman
from
congratulations
on
your
new
adventure.
So
we,
a
lot
of
us,
went
to
the
Cal
city's
new
mayor
and
new
council
members
Academy,
it's
a
very
valuable
experience
for
us
to
learn
what
other
cities
do,
and
also
networking
with
our
neighborhood
council
members
to
talk
about
that.
I
and
city
manager,
Pamela
attended
the
West
Valley
Mayors
and
city
managers,
monthly
meeting
where
five
cities
Cupertino
Cambo
Saratoga,
Los,
Gatos
and
monasterino.
A
Well,
the
med
city
managers
and
mayor
met
and
we
decided
like
councilmember
Moore,
says
we
are
going
to
work
on
Regional
issues
together
on
Transit
homelessness,
Public,
Safety
and
mental
health.
So
you
know,
together
with
other
cities,
to
work
on
issues
is
really
a
way
to
go
and
also
I
also
attended
a
Cal
City's
penicillin
division,
I'm
on
the
e-board,
and
we
decided
on
our
four
priorities
and
not
no
surprise.
A
The
fourth
priorities
actually
match
a
lot
of
what
councilmember
Moore
said
and
what
we
decided
on
the
West,
Valley
Cities
and
I
did
go
to
our
San
Jose
mayor
Matt,
Mohan
mayhem's
inauguration.
It
is
a
fabulous
event,
and
you
know
he
San
Jose
is
the
biggest
city
in
our
neighborhood,
so
it's
really
too
good
to
make
connections
and
work
with
them
for
Regional,
Transit,
homeless,
homelessness
and
also
environmental
issues.
So
another
thing,
I
think
is
really
interesting.
Is
I
did
host?
My
very
first
coffee
was
mayored
today
at
7
30
to
8
30.
A
We
have
18
participants
and
very
Lively
discussions,
and
the
interesting
fact
is:
we
have
one
member
who
who
will
live
here
for
one
year
and
one
member
who's
lived
here
for
60
years,
so
1
to
60.,
so
it
I
I
love
to
host
my
coffee
meeting
and
so
come
and
have
morning
coffee
chat
chat,
it's
a
very
casual
event,
coffee
and
tea
on
the
mayor,
but
the
rest.
If
you
want
to
have
breakfast,
it's
all
your
own.
Thank
you.
A
Okay.
So
now
we
move
to
report
on
committee
assignments,
so
I
think
some
of
us
attended
our
assigned
committees.
Councilman
Memorial
would
like
to.
Y
Start,
okay
sure
so
on
January
19th
I
gave
the
final
chair
report
to
the
VTA
policy
advisory
committee
on
January
20th
I
attended
the
Valley
Water
Commission
meeting,
which
was
in
person
I
was
elected.
Vice
chair,
we
received
the
Water
Commission
2022
accomplishments
report.
We
received
an
update
on
Valley,
Waters,
drought,
emergency
response
and
progress
on
water
use
reduction,
we're
still
in
a
moderate
drought.
However,
we
have
had
a
23
23
percent
reduction
in
water
savings
over
2019,
which
is
greater
than
the
15
percent
called
for.
Y
The
reason
is
infrastructure
on
February
5th
I
attended
the
Valley
Water
Board
policy
and
planning
committee
to
make
recommendations
regarding
the
water
commission's
purpose
in
areas
for
improvement.
They
had
very
good
attendance
from
the
commission
and
committees.
There
I
repeated
a
recommendation
regarding
the
need
for
increased
onboarding
education
and
educational
improvements,
including
accepting
any
applicant
from
the
Water
Commission,
who
wants
to
attend
the
water,
Ambassador
multi-week
training
course
that
gets
into
the
water
system
in
Greater
detail.
Thank.
E
Mohan
on
January
23rd
I
attended
the
first
audit
committee
meeting
along
with
council
member
fruen,
we
elected
Angela
Chen
as
the
chair
of
the
audit
committee
and
and
myself
as
the
vice
chair,
the
the
audit,
because
we
went
through
the
responsibilities
and
powers
that
the
audit
committee
has.
We
fine-tuned
some
procedures.
E
We
streamlined
some
other
procedures,
but
the
end
result
was
that
the
reports
that
were
coming
through
the
audit
committee
will
still
be
coming
to
city
council
and
they
will
get
the
same
information
that
they
always
had,
which
is
the
the
treasurer's
report
and
the
treasurer's
investment
report.
There
are
what
was
that
yeah
so
so
the
basic
responsibilities
haven't
changed,
but
a
few
internal
processes
have
been
streamlined
for
efficience
for
the
purpose
of
efficiency.
E
I
also
attended
the
Santa
Clara
County
Library
District
to
jpa
board
of
directors.
Meeting
I
was
sort
of
a
pinch
hitting
for
a
council
member
ciao
I'm
glad
to
report
that
the
Santa
Clara
County
Library
District
is
on
solid
footing
financially
and
administratively
and
management
wise.
So
that
was
a
good
meeting
to
attend.
Thank
you.
D
I
attended
the
league
of
California
City's
public
safety
policy
committee
meeting
representing
the
peninsula
League
Peninsula
division.
So
it
seems
that
there
they
adopted
the
priorities
for
Public
Safety,
and
there
is
a
working
group
that
has
been
working
since
last
year
to
look
at
sales
tax
distribution
to
likely
Point
of
Sales
and
there's
this.
This
kind
of
Bill
will
likely
have
significant
impact
on
Cupertino
and
also
on
the
ability
of
cities
to
negotiate
a
sales
tax
discount
with
cooperations.
So
I
think
the
city
should
watch
on
the
development
of
these
kind
of
bills,
closely
yeah.
O
Oh
on
January,
the
19th
I
attended
the
first
VTA
policy
advisory
committee
meeting
of
the
year
we
selected
a
chair,
Rob
Rennie
of
Los
Gatos,
and
a
vice
chair,
Yvonne
Martinez
Beltran
of
Morgan
Hill.
We
received
a
presentation
on
Transit
priorities
and
a
review
of
the
committee
work
plan
on
January
the
23rd
I
attended.
The
audit
committee
meeting,
along
with
the
vice
mayor
and
she's
already
provided
I,
think
a
more
than
adequate
report.
Thank
you.
D
Yes,
sorry
I
made
a
mistake:
I
mixed
up
actually
I
serve
around
two
policy
committees.
One
is
Public
Safety
and
the
update
I
gave
was
from
the
revenue
and
Taxation
Committee
for
Public
Safety
Committee.
They
there
are.
There
are
concerns
about
aggregate
to
the
crimes
that
are
on.
There
was
a
presentation
by
retail
association
and
they
are
looking
into
a
potential
either
ballot
initiative
or
a
bill
that
hopefully,
will
still
provide.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
ciao,
so
just
for
clarification,
I
want
to
clarify
Santa
Clara
county
is:
has
our
cities
Association,
but
Cal
City
also
has
a
cities
Association.
So
when
we
say
Cal
cities,
that's
a
league
that
covers
all
the
cities
in
California
when
we
say
Cal,
City,
Peninsula
division,
that's
Three,
Counties,
Santa,
Clara,
County,
San,
Mateo,
County
and
Santa
Clara
County.
The
one
I'm
going
to
mention
now
is
called
cities
Association
of
Santa
Clara.
A
The
emphasize
is
to
lead
our
cities
into
collaborative
ordinances,
Collective
work
so
that
we
can
work
together
regionally.
So
thank
you,
so
that
is
for
our
city
council's
report.
Now
we're
moving
to
see
the
city
manager.
Oh,
do
we
have
subcommittee
assignments
reports?
No,
okay.
Let's
move
to
city.
X
Managers
report:
thank
you
mayor
way
very
quickly.
A
few
updates
from
me,
so
thank
you.
Council
for
accommodating
a
council
workshop
last
Friday
in
the
library
expansion
room.
The
topic
of
that
day
was
focused
on
Council
governance
and
also
really,
this
is
to
prepare
the
council
for
the
upcoming
continuation
of
the
workshop.
That
is
scheduled
for
March
the
1st
to
discuss
council's
strategic
goals
and
also
to
realign
the
work
program.
X
X
Thirdly,
if
Council
remembered
that
Public
Works
division
traffic
Transportation
division
has
implemented
a
pedestrian
scramble
signal
facing
operation
at
the
McLennan
and
Bob
Road
intersection
on
January
23rd,
this
scramble
allows
pedestrians
to
cross
any
of
the
four
lakes
while
all
vehicles
have
a
red
light
and
are
restricted
from
right
turn
on
red
during
the
school
drop
off
and
pickup
times.
X
However,
we
continue
to
welcome
any
feedback
from
the
members
of
the
public
or
anybody
to
continue
to
make
this
a
successful
operation.
Lastly,
I
want
to
leave
the
council
with
a
bit
of
a
good
news.
About
a
week
ago,
we
were
informed
that
Cupertino
was
featured
in
one
of
the
leading
greenbiz
or
general
publication.
That
Cupertino
is
one
of
the
top
three
cities
in
the
entire
nation,
surpassing
city
of
Orlando
and
city
of
Boston,
in
our
effort
in
sustainability.
X
A
You
merway,
thank
you,
cinnamon,
that's
a
great
compliment
to
our
sustainability
department
and
Cupertino
is
on
top
of
the
nation.
Let's
continue
that
Trend
maybe
get
to
number
one,
sometimes
alrighty.
So,
let's
move
to
consent
agenda.
It's
from
it's
from
6
to
15
to
I
do
believe.
We
have
emails
from
public
and
we
have
concerns
agenda
being
pulled
out.
X
I
believe
city
clerk
has
received
requests
from
both
council
members
and
members
of
the
public.
I
also
understand
that
there
might
be
other
requests
to
pull
additional
items.
A
A
Their
own
items
do
any
council
members
would
like
to
pull
any
consent
agenda.
A
Y
Councilman
Memorial,
thank
you,
so
I
would
like
to
pull
9
10
13,
14
and
15.
19.
A
A
14
and
15.
and
the
email
we
received
from
the
public.
B
So
the
only
number
not
covered
by
council
member
Moore's
request
is
item
16
by
Lisa
Warren.
The
rest
were.
A
So
we
have
proposal
to
put
7
9,
10,
13,
14
and
15.
B
And
mayor
I
do
have
I
just
submitted
two
desk
items
this
evening
for
items
six
and
seven
for
corrections
to
the
draft
minutes.
Yes
and
those
were
posted
for
the
public
as
well
on
the
website.
Next
to
the
agenda.
Okay,.
O
A
For
the
for
the,
because
of
we
like
to
really
get
to
the
items
that
we
need
to
cover,
I
like
to
make
a
motion
to
move
number
15.
A
right
after
right
before
to
right
after
public
hearing
and
also
and
move
the
rest
at
the
end
of
number
18
and
see
how
much
time
we
have
to
go
through
it,
because
we
really
want
to
do
the
business
first.
The
public
hearing
the
letter
back
to
the
the
17
and
18th
first
so
I
like
to
move
that
we
we
do
public
hearing
and
then
do
number
15
and
put
the
rest
of
the
consent.
That's
pulled
out
to
the
after
18..
Do
we
have
a
second
I'll?
Second,
it?
A
G
B
To
new
state
law,
the
it
limits
the
distribution
of
copyrighted
materials
associated
with
the
review
of
development
projects.
So
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
view
plans
that
cannot
otherwise
be
distributed
under
SB
1214
may
make
an
appointment
with
the
planning
division
to
view
the
item
at
City
Hall
by
sending
an
email
to
planning
at
cupertino.org.
The
plans
will
also
be
made
available
digitally
during
tonight's
hearing.
So
they
can
see
me
and
I
will
present
the
I
have
the
plans
on
a
laptop
that
I
can
allow
for
inspection
only.
A
Z
Z
The
sign
exception,
exe
2022003
for
a
sign
exception
at
the
public
storage,
facilia
20565,
Valley,
Green
Drive,
let's
see
here,
okay,
so
again,
the
subject
tonight
is
to
consider
an
appeal
of
the
plan
commission's
decision
to
deny
a
sign
exception
to
allow
three
wall
signs
where
two
are
permitted
and
to
further
allow
two
of
the
three
wall
signs
to
be
oriented
towards
the
freeway
on
two
separate
storage
facility
buildings,
the
applicant
who's
also,
the
appellant
is
David
Ford
from
all
signed
Services
himself
and
another
representative
from
Public
Storage
is
present
tonight.
Z
A
little
bit
of
background
as
the
facility
and
its
location,
Public
Storage
is
currently
on.
A
three
acre
site
was
proved
by
Council.
The
current
building
it
has
was
approved
by
Council
on
June
18
2019
to
demolish
the
existing
public,
the
storage
facility
and
and
develop
a
new
265
671
square
foot
building.
That's
approximately
a
little
Slightly
North
of
40
feet
tall
as
with
most
development
projects
in
the
city,
signage
is
not
included
in
the
original
approvals.
Z
So
the
quest
tonight
and
here's
a
site
plan
which
we
are
allowed
to
show
is
for
two
freeway
oriented
signs
so
again
with
this.
Just
to
give
you
some
perspective
as
to
the
staff
report
and
to
the
community
on
the
site
plan,
if
we
reference
buildings
and
and
sign
numbers,
this
is
what
we're
talking
about
so
building
this,
so
the
facilities
really
just
is
made
up
in
two
buildings:
a
western
building
and
Eastern
Building.
The
building
one
is
the
easternmost
building.
Well.
Building
two
is
the
Western
Building
sign
one?
Z
Is
the
wall
sign?
That's
on
the
Eastern
facade,
that's
not
facing
I-280
sign
2
is
the
is
one
of
the
freeway
oriented
signs
on
building
one
and
sign
three?
Is
a
freeway
oriented
sign
on
building
two.
Z
Sign
one
is:
is
the
52
square
foot
sign
that's
on
the
81
foot
Frontage
it's
internally
facing
and
about
29
of
the
frontage
percentage?
It's
allowed
pretty
much
by
right
by
the
Cupertino
municipal
code
and
it
is
currently
installed
with
the
building
permit
number
there
for
a
reference.
Z
Z
The
municipal
code
does
allow
for
Max
of
two
signs
per
business
under
certain
circumstances,
regardless
of
their
freeway
facing
or
not
those
can
be
if
the
the
business
does
not
have
a
those
include
three
three
things
of
the
business
does
not
have
a
a
ground
sign,
or
it's
fronting
two
separate
streets
or
it's
on
a
building
pad
that's
more
than
five
thousand
square
feet.
Those
are
just
certain
circumstances.
Z
So
the
plan
commission
heard
the
Planning
Commission
was
ultimately
the
the
final
approval
body
unless
appealed
such
as
this
time,
and
so
they
heard
this
item
on
October
11
2022.
They
denied
the
exciting
exception
in
the
unanimous
decision.
5-0,
the
only
primitive
sign
was
on
the
East
Elevation.
Z
As
we
said,
it's
already
up
there
right
now,
a
few
of
the
reasons
why,
as
part
of
their
findings,
that
was
denied
was
the
the
Commissioners
felt
that
it
was
inconsistent
with
the
sign
and
bird
safety
ordinances,
the
potential
for
safety
hazards,
the
motorists
and
potentially
precluding
the
Porsche,
this
portion
of
I-280
being
designated
the
scenic
highway.
As
the
staff
report
described,
this
portion
of
I-280
is
actually
eligible
to
be
a
scenic
highway,
but
not
actually
designated
as
a
Scenic
Highway.
Z
So
the
applicant
filed
the
appeal
on
October
21st
of
2022.
The
basis
of
the
appeal
was
that
the
and
and
there
are
in
and
their
view
was
that
the
the
decision
was
based
on
the
accurate
information
regarding
SQL
requirements,
dark
sky
restrictions
and
i2a
Scenic
Highway
destination
further.
In
their
view,
there
was
no
discussion
by
Commissioners
on
required
findings,
as
outlined,
the
staff
report.
Council's
review
is
was
considered
de
novo,
which
means
that
the
this
application
goes
in
front
of
you
as
you.
Z
You
are
an
approval
body,
not
necessarily
on
the
just
the
appeal
itself
and
what
the
appellant
is
claiming
that
it's
it's
a
brand
new
application
in
front
of
your
eyes.
Z
If
I
said
incorrectly,
see
attorney
can
correct
me,
so
it's
not
exception.
Each
sign
individually
on
their
own
all
comply
in
size,
illumination
per
the
sign
ordinance,
which
is
19
104
wall
signs,
however,
to
Grant
assigned
exception
is
three
findings
that
have
to
be
made
and
and
I
have
on
the
on
the
screen.
The
last
findings
is
finding
C
that
states
that
the
exception
to
be
granted
is
one
that
will
require
the
lease
modification
of
the
prescribed
regulations
in
the
minimum.
Variance
that
accomplished
accomplishes
the
purpose.
Z
We
we
felt
that
staff
had
felt
inconsistent
with
how
it
was
brought
and
presented
a
plan
commission
that,
as
the
application
was
submitted
to
a
city
that
staff
could
not
make
these
fine
cannot
make
this
finding
for
the
two
freeway
oriented
signs,
as
well
as
the
the
the
third
wall
sign
were
normally
only
two
are
permitted.
Z
One
is
that
per
the
sign
ordinance.
A
single
business
is
only
allowed
to
have
two
wall
signs
and
and
also
for
the
sign
ordinance
only
allows
a
single
freeway
or
inside
per
business.
So
what
we,
what
was
felt
by
staff
and
as
well
as
what
the
plan
commissions
to
a
certain
extent,
was
that
this
funding
cannot
meant,
because
it
was
a
greater
variance
of
what
typically
would
would
staff
would
support
or
allow.
Z
So,
in
terms
of
sequa
this,
this
project,
if,
if
approved,
would
be
categorically
exempt
from
the
requirements
of
California
Environmental
Quality
act
per
sections.
15
301,
as
the
existing
facility
as
a
building
is,
is
complete
just
as
an
FY
and
that's
pointing
out
of
the
staff
report.
The
original
project,
the
260
000
square
foot
plus
building,
was
actually
secret
exempt
itself
under
infill
development,
as
well
as
a
project
that
will
qualify
for
streamlining
under
sequel
because
it's
it
met
all
land
use
standards
as
well
as
zoning.
Z
So
the
recommended
action
from
excuse
me.
It's
just
I
should
read
that
the
city
council
I
apologize
adopted
the
proposed
drafted
solution
to
find
the
proposed
actions
are
exempt
from
siqua
and
uphold.
The
appeal
in
part
approve
one
of
the
two
requests
of
freeway
oriented
signs
and
deny
the
requested
side
exception
and
again,
one
of
those
two
in
the
just
to
clarify
one
of
the
two
requested
freely
assigns
that
could
be
up
to
the
city
council,
whether
they
want
to
approve
sign
two
or
sign
three,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
W
Steve
attorney:
it's
it's
your
discretion
mayor
as
to
whether
you
want
to
reserve
questions
for
after
the
the
applicants,
presentation
is
done.
Okay,.
A
So,
what's
the
council's
pleasure,
let's
wait
until
the
application.
Thank
you
John.
So
now
we're
going
to
give
the
Appling
about
less
than
10
minutes,
10
minutes
maximum
for
your
presentation
and
then
we
can
ask
questions
together.
Okay,
thank
you.
AA
AB
Good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
David
Ford
I'm
here
representing
Image
National
as
the
sign
company
working
with
Public
Storage.
We
also
have
Brian
Ulrich
with
Public
Storage
here
who's
going
to
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
overall
project.
AB
We
have
asked
you
to
look
at
our
appeal
of
the
Planning
Commission
or
Planning
Commission
decision,
which
denied
our
sign
exceptions,
we're
asking
that
you
approve
a
sign
exception
for
one
of
the
wall,
signs
that
we
are
proposing
we're
in
agreement
with
the
staff
report
and
after
hearing
comments
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting,
we're
in
agreement
that
two
signs
is
probably
not
necessary.
That
one
sign
would
definitely
serve
the
purposes
for
this
facility.
AB
The
second
time
yeah
perfect,
thank
you.
So
what
we?
The
reason
for
our
appeal,
was
we
felt
like
in
in
the
discussions
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting.
There
were
a
number
of
items
that
were
brought
up
by
the
Commissioners
and
by
the
public
regarding
SQL
requirements,
dark
sky
requirements
and
then
the
potential
designation
of
Highway
280
as
a
Scenic
Highway.
AB
Could
you
go
to
the
next
slide?
Please?
AB
As
was
mentioned,
the
staff
report
signs
are
categorically
exempt
from
SQL
under
section
15
311.
It's
it's.
An
existing
facility
signs
are
also
exempt
from
the
city
of
cupertino's
dark
sky
requirements,
provided
they
meet
the
illumination
requirements
in
the
sign
code,
which
this
does
it
allows
for
250
Lamberts
of
light.
This
is
we're
proposing
88,
so
about
a
little
more
than
a
third
of,
what's
Allowed
by
the
code.
AB
Also
Highway
280
is
currently
not
designated
as
a
Scenic
Highway.
In
order
to
do
that,
the
city
would
have
to
create
a
quarter
protection
plan
and
submit
that
to
Caltrans
I
spoke
with
Caltrans.
They
have
not
received
any
quarter
protection
plan.
I
asked
staff.
If
they
had
been
asked
to
put
that
together,
they
said
they
have
not
been
asked
to
do
that.
So
at
this
time
it's
just
a
potential
designated
Scenic
Highway
and
there's
nothing
to
say
that
adding
this
sign
would
exclude
that
from
being
designated
as
a
highway
in
the
future.
AB
These
next
slides
cover
some
of
the
information
that
was
in
the
staff
report.
Basically
the
location
of
the
property.
It's
it's.
It
is
set
back
370
feet
from
Valley
Green
Drive.
It
does
not
have
a
frontage
on
that
street.
There
are
Office
Buildings
and
a
parking
lot.
So
there's
really
no
visibility
from
that
street.
The
entrance
is
a
private
driveway.
As
noted,
could
you
go
to
the
next
slide?
Please
thank
you.
There's
a
private
driveway
to
the
right,
there's
residential
on
either
side,
so
signs
on
either
end.
AB
AA
AB
Slide
please,
so
this
is
just
our
visibility
study.
We,
you
know,
as
shown
the
staff
report.
These
are
the
two
locations
we
were
proposing
for
the
signs
at
this
point
again,
we're
just
asking
for
one:
you
can
go
through
the
next
slides
next
few
slides
would
be
great.
These
are
just
visibility
studies.
This
is
the
information
we
presented
to
the
Planning
Commission
to
kind
of
show.
AB
All
right
so
we're
basically
asking
that
you
grant
the
sign
exception
to
a
lot
of
the
freeway
facing
sign
the
signed
ordinance
again.
This
is
mentioned.
The
staff
report
does
allow
for
multiple
signs.
Really.
The
only
issue
here
is
that
it's
facing
a
freeway,
not
a
public
Street,
it's
not
detrimental
to
the
public
health
or
welfare
safety,
or
anything
like
that.
The
lighting
is
all
within
restrict.
AB
AC
Good
evening
Council,
can
you
bring
up
the
final
slide
of
that
report
as
well?
Please
well
just
wanted
to
go
back
over
first
of
all,
we're
so
thankful
to
finally
be
constructed
open
for
business
at
the
location.
AC
One
of
the
things
that
we
wanted
to
just
reiterate
with
you
all
is
that
we
we
looked
at
this
as
a
terrific
opportunity
not
only
to
serve
the
immediate
Community
better,
but
in
doing
so
it
caused
us
to
reinvest
in
the
property
over
50
million
dollars
and
as
now
a
in
enhanced
participant
in
the
marketplace,
we
did
also
provide
a
great
Community
benefit,
which
was
a
12-foot
pedestrian
bike
and
easement
dedication,
so
as
a
great
neighbor,
we're
also
looking
to
try
and
reach
the
community
as
well
with
our
limited
accesses,
well
pointed
out
by
David
already
so
I.
AC
Don't
need
to
reiterate
that
piece.
Visibility
is
is
very
minimal
here,
so
what
we're
really
seeking
to
achieve
is
not
just
access
to
the
community
but
visibility
to
those
people
that
might
not
know
that
there
is
a
brand
new
building
that
is
open
and
operating
for
the
benefit.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
tonight.
A
Okay,
thank
you
that
ends
the
presentation.
I'm
going
to
open
up
a
council
questions,
not
deliberation,
but
questions
any
questions
for
John
and
for
the
owners
and
the
representative
of
the
Sign
Company
councilmember,
Moore
or
councilman
Vice.
E
A
O
Yes,
do
you
have
a
particular
preference
in
terms
of
which
of
the
two
signed
locations?
Are
there
that
you
would.
AA
A
Y
Y
Sure,
okay,
yeah,
okay,
so
I
drive
by
this
location
in
the
evening
and
I've
observed
that
it's
quite
bright
because
these
hallways
are
lit
and
you
can't
see
it
in
this
image
because
it's
a
daytime
shot.
But
these
all
of
these
doors
are
a
very
bright
orange
and
I'm
wondering
if
this
is
actually
in
keeping
with
our
bird
safe,
Dark
Skies
ordinance,
because
it
is
so
bright
when,
when
you
go
by
here,
so
I
I
know
that
you
showed
other
location
images,
but
I
find
this
really
really
bright.
Y
Z
Thank
you,
council,
member
Moore.
We
we
can
definitely
look
into
that
at
a
this
week
at
least
and
talk
to
the
applicant
and
look
at
the
original
project
approval
to
see
the
restrictions
on
the
interior,
lighting
and
I'm
sure.
That's
what
you're,
referring
to
the
hallway
lighting
correct.
Y
W
So
the
just
if
I
may,
the
dark
guys
ordinance
applies
to
outdoor
lighting
so
not
not
to
interior
lighting.
Y
Was
there
there
was
something
about
having
the
light
that
would
go
across
the
the
neighbors.
You
know
across
the
property
line,
I
thought
there
was
something
about
that
where
you
actually
don't
want
to
be
Illuminating
past
your
property
line.
K
D
Thank
you
so
so
we
regulate
the
number
of
signs.
The
way
is
there
a
limit
on
the
size
of
the
signs.
D
Z
Z
D
A
D
It
will
be
like
whatever,
like
that's
already
on
the
highway
correct
yeah,
so
I
understand
that
we
are
not
applying
for
scenic
highway
right
now,
but
we
don't
want
to
prevent
this
to
prevent
us
from
applying.
So
I
just
want
to
confirm.
I.
Think
applicants
said
that
this
will
not
affect
the
eligibility
of
this
stretch
of
highway
to
be
eligible
for
Scenic
Highway.
Could?
What
is
that?
Exactly?
Is
the
requirement
Mary.
X
D
A
D
AB
Thank
you
sure
I'll
try
to
provide
some
clarification
so
when
I
contacted
Caltrans
to
find
out
if
they
had
a
quarter
protection
plan
had
been
submitted.
They
said
it
had
not
and
I
said,
would
adding
a
sign
to
this
building
preclude
that
from
being
a
Scenic
Highway?
He
said
we
don't
know
we
wouldn't.
We
would
need
to
see
what
the
quarter
protection
plan
says
and
obviously
the
quarter
production
plan.
If
it's
done
after
this
would
regulate
it
says
like
development
and
all
sorts,
there's,
six
or
seven
I
think
criteria
that
it
would
have
to
limit.
AB
So
what
I
was
saying
is
there's
nothing
to
say
that
it
would
preclude
it,
but
it
may
or
may
not.
You
would
have
to
put
together
this
court
or
protection
plan
submit
it
to
Caltrans.
They
would
then
review
that
to
confirm
if
it
meets
their
criteria
for
scenic
highways,
and
he
said
they
review
each
of
these
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
so
he
didn't
really
want
to
provide,
you
know,
say
for
sure
one
way
or
another
because
he
didn't
know
because
nothing's
been
presented
to
them.
Oh.
D
Y
Questions
councilmember
more!
Yes,
so
do
we
have
any
ability
to
limit
the
size
of
this
of
the
sign?
No.
X
Y
W
There
would
have
to
be
some
reason.
Some
some
reason,
supported
by
substantial
evidence
like
white
Council,
would
deviate
from
you
know
the
the
standards
in
the
missile
code.
Y
Okay,
or
with
the
interior
hallway
lights
that
we
see
to
those
or
well
are
they
are
they
operating?
Is
that
an
operating
hallway
or
is
that
for
appearances,
the
what
we
see?
That's
that's
lit
with
the
orange
doors
that
are
that
are
facing
the
windows.
Are
that
operating
storage
areas.
Z
Y
W
So
that
so
that
this
is
we're
considering
the
sign
ordinance,
the
the
project
is
itself,
is
entitled
and
has
been
constructed.
So
so
we
would,
should
you
know,
what's
before
the
the
council
and
and
what
is
outside
the
scope
of
the
applicants.
Vested
rights
are
the
signs
that
are
under
consideration.
D
D
D
T
D
Would
you
consider
I
mean
thank
you
very
much
to
consider
installing
only
one
of
the
sized
facing
highway
I'm
just
wondering
this
section
of
the
highway
right
now
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
signs.
So
would
you
consider
putting
a
smaller
sign
that
will
still
stand
out
and
have
quite
big
visibility?
AB
Said
I
mean,
if
that's
a
requirement,
we
would
I
think
it.
You
know
obviously
there's
going
to
be
a
certain
point
where
it
doesn't
become.
You
know,
readable
or
easily
recognized
when
you're
going
70
or
75
down
down
the
freeway,
so
I
mean
we
would
certainly
not
say
we
wouldn't
reduce
it.
I
just
don't
know
how
small
you
would
want
it
to
make
it
because
again
this
is
you
know
it's
it's
set
back
pretty
far
from
the
freeway
and
it's
again
it's
it's
higher
up
on
the
building.
AB
So
it's
going
to
have
some
visibility,
but
you
know
what
I,
if
I
say
it's
a
four
foot
letter
that
sounds
really
large,
but
when
it's
up
there
that
high
and
that
far
back
it
doesn't
look
that
big
so
and
I.
Don't
know
I,
don't
remember
what
the
size
of
these
are,
but
if
you
do
have
a
size
restriction
I
mean
we
certainly
would
abide
by
that.
A
Thank
you
sure,
yeah.
Thank
you.
Now,
no
more
console
questions
I'd
like
to
open
to
public
comment.
Please.
B
Yes,
mayor
I
have
in
Community
Hall
I,
have
three
speaker
cards,
one
from
Connie
Cunningham,
one
from
Jennifer
Griffin
and
one
from
Lisa
Warren
and
have
four
hands
raised
now:
five
on
Zoom.
So
as
per
our
current
process,
please
have
your
hands
raised
in
the
first
five
minutes
and
have
your
any
blue
speaker
cards
submitted
as
well
in
the
first
five
minutes.
Welcome
Connie.
G
Vice
mayor
Moen
and
council
members,
I'm
Connie
Cunningham
lived
here
34
years
and
I'm
speaking
for
myself
only
not
as
the
Housing
Commission
one
of
the
first
things,
I
guess,
I'd
ask
because
I
didn't
have
it
on
my
points
here
is
about
the
interior
lights
that
council
member
Moore
was
asking
about.
They
certainly
are
addressed
by
the
dark
skies
and
there
is
something
about
them
emanating
out
and
having
to
be
turned
off
at
certain
time
and
all
that
so
I
don't
know
the
details.
G
G
The
recommended
action
is
to
conduct
a
public
hearing
and
adopt
the
resolution
and
I
disagree
with
that
resolution.
Cupertino
is
a
lovely
city
with
aspirations
to
stay
that
way,
and
indeed
to
become
more
beautiful
while
we
grow
over
the
next
few
decades
with
the
housing
element
to
do
so.
Each
decision
is
critical.
G
Excuse
me
I
urge
the
council
also
to
request
that
staff
rewrite
the
sign
ordinance
to
make
clear
the
requirement
for
reducing
light
pollution
and
light,
trespass,
which
is
mentioned
several
times
within
the
sign
ordinance
as
well
as
within
the
Dark
Skies
ordinance.
Light
trespass
is
a
really
big
deal
and
it
should
be
very
clearly
stated.
I
also
would
urge
that
the
council
request
that
the
that
the
excuse
me
staff
prepare
a
corridor
protection
plan.
If
that
is
what's
required
to
find
out
what
all
is
needed.
G
I
don't
think
that
we
as
a
city
with
all
of
our
various
master
plan
and
stuff,
all
of
the
different
things
that
I
have
read
about
how
we
care
about
nature
I.
Don't
think
that
we
want
to
be
the
piece
that
says:
yeah
we've
got
signs
that
peek
out
peek
out
they're
bright
they're,
distracting
any
distractions
like
that
are
bad
for
motorists
and
can
cause
accidents.
G
Let's
see
how
much
time
oops
okay,
the
ordinance
for
the
signs
says
it
is
to
provide
regulations
of
signed
dimensions
and
quantity
which
allow
for
good
visibility
for
the
public
and
the
needs
of
the
business
while
providing
the
safety
of
the
public
by
minimizing
distraction
to
motorists
and
pedestrians.
That's
right
in
the
sign
ordinance
itself.
It
also
says
that
the
science
color
and
illumination
shall
not
produce
distraction
to
motorists
or
nearby
residents.
Paragraph
C1
states
provide
architectural
and
aesthetic
Harmony.
G
H
A
good
evening,
city,
council,
hi,
I'm,
Jennifer,
Griffin
and
I
did
attend
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
last
fall.
When
this
item
came
up,
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion.
I
will
tell
you
that
at
that
time
we
were
able
to
have.
We
were
able
to
look
at
what
the
science
were
supposed
to
look
like
now.
We
seem
to
have
some
sort
of
a
strange
new
law,
I
I,
wonder
if
the
governor
signed
it
I,
never
heard
about
it
that
we
can't
look
at
what
the
song
what
I
I
mean.
This
is
a
sign.
H
That's
going
on
the
side
of
a
building
next
to
280
and
the
public
is
not
allowed
to
look
at
it.
I
mean
what
kind
of
law
is
that
that's
not
public
storage's
problem,
but
I
can
see
going
forward
that
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
look
at
any
plans
for
anything.
You
know,
even
if
they
got
a
little
pencil
out
and
made
a
little
square
with
a
little
figure
on
it.
That
would
be
helpful.
H
I
I
appreciate
Chris
the
laptop
here,
but
I'm,
not
a
laptop
person,
I'm
a
tablet
person
I,
don't
know.
I'm
gonna
have
to
spend
more
time.
I
guess
I
have
to
make
an
appointment
now
to
come
down
to
the
city
during
pandemic,
so
that
I
can
look
at
plans
of
something
that's
going
to
be
on
the
side
of
280..
When
I
was
a
kid
in
280
was
opened
in
1968
it
was
a
beautiful
Corridor.
My
relatives
from
Virginia
we
took
them
up
there
by
Crystal.
Springs
I
want
280
to
get
that
designation
again.
H
There
is
no
reason
that
we
can't
have
that.
I
will
tell
you
right
now:
I
think
public.
My
husband
had
public
storage
in
South
San
Jose.
Before
we
got
married
and
it's
a
good
system,
the
building
is
visible
somewhat
from
280
a
little
taller
than
I
thought
it
was
going
to
be.
Maybe
we
can
plant
more
trees
there
that
might
help.
Believe
me,
the
nobody
cares
about
the
redwood
trees
along
280.
We
need
to
start
replacing
putting
more
of
them
back
again.
H
I
can't
tell
from
what
what
they're
trying
to
do
here
so
I
think
at
this
point
from
what
everybody
seemed
to
be
really
happy
after
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
I,
don't
I
think
the
applicants
were
too
about.
We
discussed
everything
in
great
detail.
I,
don't
see
at
this
point
for
one
thing,
since
the
public
can't
see
anything
thanks
to
Gavin,
I
I
really
think
we
need
to
stick
with
what
we
approved
in
in
the
fall,
because
it's
and
nobody
can
see
what
they're
trying
to
do.
H
I
don't
want
280
to
look
like
a
neon
sign.
San
Jose's
been
having
problems
where
they
want
to
put
in
moving.
What
are
those
video
things
that
make
people
stop
and
crash
in
traffic
I?
Don't
want
280
to
look
like
that:
I!
Don't
care
if
the
housing
element
wants
to
put
500
000
housing
units
in
Cupertino
I,
don't
want
to
have
Cupertino.
Look
like
some
neon
Vaudeville
out
of
Roger
Rabbit.
Let's,
let's
just
not
do
this
and
then
next
time
we.
B
Thank
you
thank
you,
and
now
we
will
move
to
zoom.
We
have
oh
I'm,
sorry
Lisa,
Lisa
Warren,
one
more
speaker
in
Community
Hall.
K
Hi,
so
I
too
was
at
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
I
thought
the
decision
was
the
right
decision.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
upheld
and
not
changed.
I
can
remind
people
a
lot
of
some
of
you
weren't
here
back
then,
but
when
this
application
came
to
do
the
enlargement
very
big
enlargement
of
the
existing
Public
Storage
at
the
same
spot,
there
were
claims
that,
oh,
my
gosh,
we
need
this
so
bad.
We
need
this
to
be
so
big
and
so
many
units,
because
we
can't
keep
up
with
the
need
for
storage.
K
K
I
also
remember
the
slides,
showing
oh
and
it
won't
be
visible
from
280,
barely
over
the
Treetops
and
visuals,
to
show
that
when
you
saw
councilmember
Moore's
visual,
that's
far
from
true,
then
very
few
people
know
that
and
I
was
there
at
the
Fine
Arts
Commission
meeting
I,
don't
know
a
year
and
a
half
two
years
ago
when
they
were
having
to
discuss
public
art
for
the
project.
K
There
was
not
an
interest
really
by
the
the
owners
of
public
storage
and
applicant
to
to
have
art,
because
there
wasn't
a
great
use
for
it
there.
There
was
no
visibility,
so
it
wasn't
a
good
place
to
put
public
art
at
a
large
expense.
They
did
have
to
and
hopefully
did
give
their
in-lu
fee
for
the
missing
public
art,
which
was
close
to
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
we
should
have
the
Fine,
Arts,
commission
or
arts,
and
culture
now
should
be
able
to
use
elsewhere
and
I
agreed.
K
It
wasn't
good
there,
but
again
we
it
wouldn't
have
visibility,
there's
nowhere.
We
were
going
to
really
put
it
that
it
would
be
visible
so
and
more
signs
and
a
very
slick,
very
slick,
sort
of
drive-by
movie
scene
kind
of
thing
on
Aerials,
if
I
remember
correctly
at
that
time
at
Fine
Arts
that
you
know
this
is
what
it
looks
like,
and
this
is
you
know,
blah
blah
blah.
K
So
I
find
it
somewhat
hypocritical
for
them
to
come
back
and
say
they
need
this
I
I
at
that
time,
I
apologized
sort
of
but
said
you
know
it
would
be
so
much
better
if
your
color
wasn't
this
very
shocking,
very
to
me,
unattractive
dark,
orange
and
I
have
seen
what
councilmember
Moore
sees,
and
it
makes
me
very,
very
sad
and
feel
deceived.
K
So
I
bottom
line
I
say
keep
you
know.
The
planet
commission
did
a
great
job.
There
was
a
lot
of
input
there,
Audubon
Society
others
and.
B
AD
AD
It's
it's
so
hard
to
find
something
and
it
causes
more
traffic
and
confusion,
and
it's
much
safer
to
have
good
signs
that
are
visible.
Every
business
gets
two
signs
and
these
signs
in
themselves
meet
code.
The
they
say.
The
light
issue
is
taken
care
of
that
it's
lower
than
the
then
the
highest
signs
and
it
it's
it
complies
with
the
sign
ordinate.
AD
AD
It's
exempt
from
sequa,
I
I.
Think
it
promotes
safety
by
being
able
to
know
where
it
is.
It
gives
you
you
know
simple.
Direction
This
Way
take
that
exit
instead
of
driving
around
in
circles,
trying
to
find
find
the
place
so
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
the
project,
and
would
that's
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
Thank
you.
B
AE
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
vice
mayor
and
city
council.
My
name
is
Muni
madipatla,
a
kubernet
resident
and
vice
chair
of
Planning
Commission
I'm.
Here
speaking
as
a
resident.
Only
representing
myself
I
request
the
council
to
deny
the
appeal
as
freeway
280
is
a
Scenic
freeway.
We
all
know
that
it
may
not
be
designated,
but
it's
ceiling.
AE
driving
on
freeway
101
feels,
like
you
know,
driving
on
Las
Vegas
strip
with
so
many
lighted
signs
I
guarantee
you
that
every
sign
on
freeway
101
meets
the
code.
This
is
not
about
know
whether
it's
something
meets
the
code
or
not.
This
is
about
now
what
we
want
around
us
right,
let's
not
make
you
know
freeway
280
as
yet
another
Las
Vegas
strip
in
the
Bay
Area.
If
you
accrue
this
appeal,
we
will
open
the
floodgates
for
various
entities
to
do
the
same
along
the
entire
stretch
afternoon.
380.,
let's
not
set
up
bad
precedence.
AE
B
M
Our
organization
asks
you
not
to
allow
any
illuminated
signs
facing
I-280.
In
this
specific
case,
drivers
can
already
see
the
Hallmark
orange
paint
on
the
building,
especially
if
light
is
emanating
from
the
interior
and
especially
if
there
are
lights
on
the
exterior
and
they
can
recognize
the
public
storage.
M
M
M
As
has
been
said
several
times
tonight,
I-280
is
eligible
for
Scenic
Highway,
designation,
electronic
digital
and
illuminated
science
clutter
and
degrade
visual
quality
and
aesthetic
resources
I-280.
In
this
section
has
two
wide
shoulders:
sperms
and
trees
all
intended
to
create
a
visual
buffer
along
the
freeway
and
limit
visual
interference
from
businesses
and
urban
activities.
M
B
AF
AF
There
are
also
Caltrans
requirements
around
landscape
relays
and
I
urge
you
to
look
into
both
the
scenic
highway
implications
of
approving
this,
as
well
as
the
possibility
of
a
landscape
freeway
and
denying
this
permit
deal
so
that
we
may
maintain
the
beauty
of
this
section
of
I280.
It
is
also
concerning
that
we
are
overriding
the
Planning
Commission,
because
it
depends
a
signal
and
a
precedent
that,
in
the
future,
approvals
from
the
Planning
Commission
will
come
back
into
the
city
council
to
be
appealed
and
to
be
overrated.
AF
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
improving
efficiency
of
city
council
processes,
and
here
is
an
example
of
an
inefficiency
where
the
planning
Council
made
an
approval,
and
we
are
now
revisiting
it
and
spending
enormous
time
of
City
Council
on
this
topic.
I
request
you
to
keep
in
mind
the
efficiencies
that
you're
targeting
and
deny
the
appeal
and
maintain
the
beauty
of
I280.
Thank
you.
V
Good
evening,
mayor
way,
vice
mayor,
Mohan,
council,
members
and
staff
I
agree
with
all
the
previous
speakers
that
do
not
want
this
approved
San
R
pointed
out
a
very
good
reason.
V
A
Planning
Commission
time
spent
the
analysis.
The
discussion
I
also
Connie
Cunningham,
said
each
decision
is
critical
and
it
builds
on
itself.
It's
cumulative,
if
you
think
about
it,
on
280,
there's
a
public
storage,
not
that
brand,
but
a
storage
across
the
street
across
280..
Maybe
they
want
to
sign
two.
If
you
approve
this
and
then
right
at
the
intersection
of
85
and
280
there's
another
storage
place,
maybe
they
want
a
sign
and
then
down
the
street
near
the
Blaney
Bridge
is
another
storage
place?
V
Are
we
going
to
have
all
illuminated
signs
if
you
accept
one,
what
it
sets
a
precedent
and
I-280
is
a
beautiful
Highway
until
you
get
down
into
San
Jose,
please
do
not
destroy
this
I,
encourage
you
to
deny
this
approval
this
appeal
and
pursue
the
corridor
protection
plan
through
Caltrans,
after
that,
if
they
want
to
come
back
and
a
sign
is
allowed,
so
be
it
but
get
that
plan
in
place.
First,
before
you
destroy
the
opportunity
to
do
it,
thank.
U
I
agree
with
the
previous
speakers,
with
the
exception
of
Miss
Austin
Public
Storage
has
been
in
Cupertino
for
years
without
signage
on
280,
and
evidently
their
business
has
thrived.
I
do
hope
that
you
watch
the
Planning
Commission.
My
understanding
is
that
any
sign
application
within
660
feet
of
the
freeway
needs
to
go
in
front
of
the
Planning
Commission
per
plan.
The
building
is
46
feet
from
the
property
line
and
we're
looking
at
signs.
That
would
be
a
few
feet
short
of
a
one-car
garage.
That's
super
close
and
really
big.
U
Your
approval
of
this
sign
is
optional,
although
it
does
not.
Finally,
like
dark
sky,
we
care
about
Dark
Skies.
We
all
want
Cupertino
to
be
beautiful,
and
we
want
to
know
that
280
is
eligible
for
Scenic
Highway.
Let's
not
risk
losing
it.
It
would
be
a
distraction
to
drivers
and
would
be
visible
to
homes
across
the
freeway.
The
proposed
signage
will
not
help
you
find
the
building.
U
The
proposed
signage
will
not
help
you
find
the
building,
so
I
want
to
read.
That's
why
I
repeat
it,
because
I
really
want
you
to
hear
that
the
applicant
has
already
shared
that
an
objective
is
to
advertise
and
provide
name
recognition.
We
don't
want
Billboards
in
our
community.
The
Proposal
will
eliminate
the
sign
until
11
pm
well
after
the
office
is
closed
at
a
report
at
7
pm
according
to
the
web,
I,
don't
think
we
can
even
consider
the
building
to
be
complete.
U
U
U
There's
the
I
hope
you
also
read.
The
packets
committee
for
green
Foothills
also
spoke
against
it,
and
even
KQED
had
called
into
I
believe
the
Planning
Commission
Planning
Commission
in
the
city,
because
they
were
interested.
Also
in
the
prospect
of
our
city
choosing
to
defile
our
our
Highway,
that
is
eligible
to
become
a
scenic
highway.
So
getting
back
to
my
closing
remarks,
please
don't
be
known
as
the
city
council
that
defiled
our
community
with
Billboards
I.
Thank
you
very
much
to
deny
this
appeal.
A
I'm
going
to
bring
back
to
the
council
for
discussion,
any
council
members
who
want
to
go
first
or,
as
you
know,
clarification.
Y
I
have
a
question
so
well
what
I
was
reading
just
just
a
comment
on
on
the
the
layout
of
the
materials
that
we
were
given.
It
was
a
little
confusing
because
the
public
storage
presentation
came
before
the
council
presentation
in
the
packet
and
I
just
found
it
a
little
confusing
to
be
able
to
tell
where
the
material
was
coming
from,
because
we
were
given
the
argument
for
the
appeal
from
the
applicant
before
the
staff
report.
I
just
want
to
highlight
that
in
the
future.
Y
Maybe
we
want
to
turn
it
around
the
other
way
and
then
yeah
okay.
So
let
me
I
just
have
a
question
about
another
sign
that
I've
seen
and
I'd
like
to
understand
this.
If
someone
can
prepare
an
answer
for
the
648
square,
footage
of
sign
signage
that
was
already
applied
for
but
I'm
going
to
show
you
something.
Y
So
I
was
just
looking
on
on
Google
Maps
to
see
what
kind
of
signage
is
around
in
the
area.
So
what
would
this
public
storage
sign
count
as
I
mean?
Is
that
part
of
part
of
the
signage
which
they
have.
Y
A
Any
more
questions
discussions
go.
A
Z
I
can't
say
it
really
quick,
so
what
was
actually
approved
was
51
square
feet
of
this
sign.
That's
on
the
Eastern
facade,
the
600
square.
Foot
signage
was
part
of
the
original
building.
Permit
application
that
was
later
revised
to
take
out
all
the
wall,
signs
and
and
that's
square
footage,
also
was
inclusive
of
of
a
stickering
on
the
windows
and
whatnot.
That
was
on
the
ground
floor,
which
is
us
really
subject
to
to
approval
from
for
building
permits.
So
so
what
really
was
approved
was
51
square
feet
of
wall
signage.
D
The
theater
tourney
I
think
so.
If
we,
this
kind
of
sign
is
approved
that
today
and
our
understanding
right
now
from
the
applicant
is
there
won't
be
neon
signs.
There
will
be
moving
signs,
however.
In
case
they
decide
to
install
that
kind
of
neon
or
moving
flashing
lights.
Do
they
need
to
come
back
to
the
city
for
another?
Permit.
D
Okay,
then
now
the
question
is
regarding
our
Authority
today,
so
the
current
ordinance
says
that
any
signing
within
I
think
200
feet
of
the
highway.
W
The
ordinance
was
originally
this:
the
sexed
relevant
section
of
the
ordinance
I'm
just
I'll,
get
you
the
dates
in
just
a
second
was
I'm.
Sorry
here
it
is
original.
It
was
was
adopted
in
2011.
by
the
city
council
at
that
time.
Okay,.
D
So
the
2011
city
council
was
concerned
about
signs
too
close
to
the
highway
and
one
additional
discretionary
approval
level
to
that.
So
I'm
just
curious.
How
many
other
scientists
who
have
been
through
this
process
and
gotten
approved
or
rejected?
Do
we
know.
Z
Since
I've
been
here,
we've
improved
one
freely
already
assigned
that's
the
Cupertino
in
that's
pretty
much
right
across
280
from
this
a
little
bit
more
kitty
corner,
but.
AG
D
Then
we
don't
know
of
any
other
sign
driving
through
I,
guess
that.
W
I
just
like
to
clarify
that
I
mean
they're
two
signs,
so
one
one
is
permitted
right
per
code
and
then
the
second
is
subject
to
the
exception
process.
K
W
The
two
freeway
or
there's
there's
one
side.
There
are
two:
there
are
two
freeway
oriented
signs,
one
is
permitted
per
code
and
the
second
is
would
be
subject
to
it:
approval,
through
the
exception
process
and
and
I.
Think
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
clear
because
the
you
know
this
I
think
the
the
terminology
of
sign
exception
is
is
a
little
bit
fuzzy.
D
X
I'll
try
this
Chris.
Let
me
try.
D
X
There
are
three
signs
being
proposed:
yeah
one
that
is
not
facing.
The
freeway
is
permitted
by.
D
X
Know
which
is
not
a
subject
to
council's
consideration.
There
are
two
right
now
facing
the
freeway.
The
Planning
Commission
denied,
both
the
subject
before
Council
right
today
is
to
uphold
planning
commission's
decision
to
deny
both
or
to
allow
one.
So.
X
Is
a
de
Noble
hearing,
meaning
that
the
council
has
you
can
consider
the
project
as
it
has
never
gone
to
Planning
Commission.
W
D
The
2011
resolution
give
the
discretion
to
approved
additionals
science
or
deny
that
the.
W
D
W
X
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
Flume
or
Council
vice
mayor
I'm,
going
to
give
councilman
former
vice
mayor.
L
O
So
I
think
you
had
mentioned
earlier
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
in
terms
of
the
findings
to
be
made
or
the
evidence
that
has
to
back
up
a
denial
that
would
have
to
be
substantial
evidence.
Yes,.
W
W
E
My
understanding
that,
to
reiterate
it
is
exempt
from
sikha
regulations.
It
is
compliant
with
the
dark
sky
ordinance
which
wasn't
in
existence
when
the
Planning
Commission
made
its
first
decision.
E
Z
So,
just
to
take
an
order
when
the
plan
commission
did
make
its
original
decision
dark
sky
orders
was
adopted
already,
but
commercial
signs
if
they
are
complying
with
the
sign
ordinance,
are
exempt
from
the
Dark
Side
of
the
bird-safe
dark
sky
ordinance
once
something
is
approved,
and
if
this
does
become
a
Scenic
Highway,
you
know
I
I,
don't
believe
the
city
has
the
ability
to
go
back
and
and
undo
a
decision
as
it's
made.
E
Okay,
so
my
only
question
my
last
question
is:
it
is
compliant
with
the
Cupertino
municipal
code
to
have
one
lighted
sign
facing
the
freeway.
X
America,
so
in
a
code
it
says
that
once
you
have
a
a
freeway
phase
sign,
it
is
subject
to
the
planning
commission's
approval
right.
So
that's
why
the
original
sign
exception
went
to
Planning
Commission
approval,
a
Planning
Commission
to
consider
for
an
approval.
The
Planning
Commission
denied
the
exception
and
the
appellant
has
the
right
to
appeal
that
decision
and
that's
before
you
today
correct
I.
A
Z
A
So
if
we
do
think
we
want
to
do
a
Scenic
application,
that
disorders
want
to
sign
out
there
already.
So
it's
okay,
so
I
want
to
understand
the
that
this
is
not
the
first
sign.
That's
going
to
be
like
that.
My
second
question
is,
it
is
illuminated.
A
Is
that
standard
to
eliminate
it?
Do
they
have
signs
that
not
illuminated.
Z
A
A
Okay,
World
science
and
okay,
so
I
I
want
to
understand
I
want
to
balance.
My
comment
is
I
want
to
balance
our
businesses
needs
to
get
visibility
and
also
balance
that
we
want
to
keep
our
you
know,
freeways
or
our
city,
not
so
illuminated
so
so
I
think
it's
been
confirmed.
This
kind
of
Illumination
is
only
one
third
of
our
dark
sky
and
birth
safety,
ordinance.
Y
Y
We
don't
have
images
of
the
Cupertino
hotel
across
the
street
and
I
seem
to
be
the
only
person
on
the
council
who
has
driven
past
this
and
noticed
how
distracting
and
bright
it
is
so
I
personally
have
a
problem
with
approving
it
without
everybody
having
full
information
going
and
doing
a
site
visit,
ensuring
that
the
lights
really
are
following
the
the
dark
sky
ordinance
and
then
seeing
that,
like
I,
said
the
difference
between
this
side
of
the
freeway,
the
south
side
and
the
north
side,
and
we
haven't
heard
any
comments
from
the
neighbors
who
have
that
new
sign
which
is
on
the
East
End
facing
there.
Y
Y
If
it's
been
a
problem
for
them
or
not,
and
I,
also
like
to
hear
how
the
how
the
traffic's
been
going,
because
they
kind
of
shared
a
driveway
space,
as
you
saw
on
that
sign
which
I
presented
so
for
me,
I
would
want
to
have
more
information.
X
D
D
Really
fast,
so
so
we
understand
that
light
will
be
one
third
of
the
Ruby
Nation.
That's
already
in
the
code.
We
don't
need
to
add
that
to
the
conditions
of
approval,
correct
right
and
then
but
I
understand
that
you
are
saying
the
dark
sky
ordinance
doesn't
apply
to
commercial
size,
correct,
so
suppose
we
apply
the
dark
sky
ordinance
to
this
sign.
What
kind
of
limitation
would
be
added
there
and
is
it
possible?
We
add
a
conditions
of
approval,
so
we
allow
the
signs,
but
still
do
our
best
to
comply
with
the
dark
sky
ordinance.
A
Answer
to
that
question,
I
did
close
the
public
hearing
yes
before
the
before
that
and
I
just
want
to
make
one
more
comment
of
the
process
for
flowchart
for
hearing
items
is
what
I'm,
following
through
so
yeah.
That's
just
to
answer
councilman
Memorial's
question:
okay:
let's
take
a
five
minutes
break.
Thank
you!
Mary,
okay,.
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
X
Thank
you
for
the
five
minute
break.
I
will
summarize
some
of
the
questions
that
were
delivered
before
the
break,
while
John
is
frantically
trying
to
post
on
technology
stun
to
help
us
get
in
through
this
section,
so
I
kind
of
want
to
bring
Council
back
to
the
subject
before
you.
So
there
are
three
signs
that
are
being
proposed
by
the
developer.
One
is
facing,
one
is
not
facing
Freeway
and
there
are
two
facing
freeway
per
coat.
X
Those
two
signs
one
is
one
of
them
is
allowed.
However,
it
has
to
be
allowed
through
an
approval
by
the
Planning
Commission,
the
Planning
Commission
denied
that
request,
and
therefore
you're,
looking
at
the
sign
tonight,
I'm
asking
John
to
bring
up
an
elevation,
so
we
could
be
sure
to
understand
which
of
the
signs
that
you
should
be.
Considering.
X
C
X
Z
X
X
So,
while
we're
still
trying
to
pull
it
up,
I
do
want
to.
We
might
counsel
that
all
of
the
signs
should
be
approved
based
on
findings
that
are
listed
in
munico
section
19.104.050.
There
are
three
findings
and
we'll
have
it
up
on
the
screen.
Shortly.
X
Councils
have
to
approve
the
sign
if
the
findings
are
met.
So
if
the
findings
are
met,
you
cannot
deny
the
sign.
I
do
want
to
emphasize
that,
and
we
will
walk
you
through
so
John.
If
we
can
show
perfect
so
sign,
2
and
sign
three
are
what
the
developers
are
proposing
to
install
per
code.
One
of
them
is
allowed
subject
to
approval
by
the
Planning
Commission
in
this
case
city
council.
So
one
of
the
two
will
be
allowed
and
I
think
we
heard
from
the
developer.
X
There's
a
preference
for
the
Westerly
sign
John
between
two
or
three
between
two
or.
D
C
X
So
this
is
the
section
of
the
code.
Finding
a
reads:
the
proposed
sign.
Sorry,
apologize:
I,
don't
read
that
fast,
John.
X
X
You
John
and
finding
C
the
sinus
conformance
with
the
design
criteria
in
section
19.104.220
we're
more
than
happy
to
take
you,
but
staff
has
done
a
careful
job
analysis
to
make
sure
that
the
sign
is
in
conformance
with
the
design
criteria.
So
the
basis
for
Council
to
approve
one
of
the
sign
is,
if
all
of
the
findings
are
met,
council's
decision
should
include
approval
of
the
sign,
so
that
is
one
conclusion
from
before
and
for
council
member
Charles
question
in
regard
to
the
dark
sky:
birth,
safe
or
none.
D
Council,
please,
okay,
so
I
think
yes,
I,
understand
that
this
complies
with
the
code.
We
should
approve
it.
However,
I
think
it's
also
common
when
we
approve
something
we
might
add
some
conditions
of
approval
to
address
Community
concerns,
and
one
of
the
concern
is
the
illumination.
So
I
want
to
check
that.
Is
it
in
the
code
that
the
light
will
be
off
11
o'clock
or
it
right
now.
It's
just
an
overall
promise.
J
D
I
understand,
unfortunately,
the
dark
sky
ordinance
does
not
apply
to
commercial
size.
I,
that's
oversight,
but
if
we
going
forward,
we
hope
I
mean
suppose
it
applies.
What
kind
of
condition
we
might
add?
D
Sorry
I
can
come
back
to
you
if
an
attorney
have
potential
have.
W
So
I
I
would
concur
with
with
with
city
manager,
Wu
I
think
it
would
be
difficult
to
answer
that
question
in
the
abstract.
If,
if
there
were
a
desire
to
look
at
that
by
Council,
we
would
we
would
certainly
research
that.
Y
More
yes,
if
John,
if
you
could
show
me
where
you
pulled
a
B
and
C
up
from
in
the
municipal
code,
sure.
P
D
A
Any
other
council
members
one
may
comment
when
councilman
Morris
doing
some
research,
so
I
I
will
make
a
comment.
I
would
love
to
you
know,
protect
the
birds,
and
this
is
how
I
see
this
thing.
We
already
have
a
new
hotel
signed
there,
and
this
is
in
compliance
with
what
we're
looking
at
are
municipal
codes
and
I
do
believe
that
I
personally
have
not
noticed
computer
Inc,
science
or
I,
just
maybe
I,
just
drive
very
concentrated.
A
Okay,
so
I
have
I'll
be
hesitant
to
deny
this,
even
though
I
do
understand.
You
know
that
we
want
the
birds
to
be
safe,
but
it
is
within
even
is
with.
If,
if
this
is
under
the
birth
safety
and
dark
sky,
it
is
in
compliance
with
that
ordinance.
Right,
yeah.
AA
A
Okay,
so
I
would
hate
to
make
two
just
make
a
decision.
That's
with
already
have
a
precedent
that
you
know
in
has
the
same
similar
signs
and
we're
denying
this
one
just
because
we
we
we
need,
according
to,
if
I
understand
correctly
from
City
Attorney
James
Chris,
that
we
need
to
have
substantial
reason
to
deny
it
do
we
have
substantial
reasons
to
to
to
deny
it
that
that's
my
question.
A
So
we
have
to
decide:
what's
what
is
substantial?
Is
it
going
to
affect
the
births
or
is
it
going,
but
it's
in
compliance
with
the
dark
sky
and
or
safety?
Is
it
too
big,
but
it
is
within
our
Municipal
Code.
So
I
I
personally
can't
find
things.
That's
right.
W
So
again,
I
think
that
that
you
know,
as
as
as
John
and
Pamela
pointed
out,
you
know
that
there
there
has
to
be
both
substantial
evidence
to
deny
it
and
it
has
to.
It
has
to
be
based
on
an
inability
to
make
one
of
the
findings
for
approval
that
that
are
PR
are
listed
in
the
municipal
code.
So
so
so
it
it.
It
has
to
be
related
to
those
findings.
A
Y
That
I
take
issue
with
so
it
does
say.
Although
the
aesthetic
appearance
of
science
is
subjective,
the
city
recognizes
that
certain
basic
design
guidelines
are
needed
in
order
to
maintain
the
city's
high
quality
appearance.
The
following
criteria
shall
be
incorporated
into
the
design
of
signs
C
there's
a
b
c
through
G.
All
signs
shall
be
architecturally
compatible
and
in
harmony
with
the
building
in
which
it
is
principally
associated
by
incorporating
its
colors
material
shapes
and
its
shape
and
design.
The
sign
shall
also
be
compatible
with
the
aesthetic
character
of
the
surrounding
developments
and
neighborhood.
Y
Y
X
So
Mary,
so
these
are
our
findings
and
they
are
subjective
and
I
hear
council
member
Moore's
concern
in
terms
of
compatible
surrounding
development.
It
is
a
subjective
call
in
terms
of
finding
G
the
signs.
Color
illumination
shall
not
produce
destruction
to
motorists
and
I.
Believe
John
earlier
has
stated
that
the
design
and
illumination
is
in
consideration
and
in
compliance
with
the
with
the
city
code.
A
So
I
want
to
say
objectively,
I
have
not
even
noticed
anything
so
my
question
for
councilmember
Morris
before
this
item
came
up.
You
noticed
already,
okay,
so
I
guess
we
have
different
driving
habits,
so
I
I
do
not
see
it.
Y
Through
the
mayor,
I
was
actually
driving
with
with
my
son
to
go
we're
heading
up
the
freeway
and,
and
we
both
commented
on
it.
Okay,.
O
If
there
are
issues
that
we
have
with
science
in
general,
then
we
should
be
revisiting
the
sign
ordinance.
If
there
are
issues
that
we
have
with
the
degree
of
luminosity
and
the
dark
sky
ordinance,
then
we
should
be
revisiting
the
dark
sky
ordinance,
that's
not
what's
before
us
today.
The
question
before
us
today
is
whether
or
not
this
complies
with
the
code.
I
think
that
it
does-
and
you
know
I
would
be
open
to
re-examining
these
ordinances
at
a
later
date.
But
that
is
not
the
discussion
before
us
today.
E
I
think
I've
said
what
I
wanted
to
say,
which
is
that
it's
compliant
with
the
Municipal
Court.
It
doesn't
violate
the
Dark
Skies
ordinance
and
it
is
SQL
component,
okay
and
I'm
not
able
to
find
anything.
D
Z
D
Y
Go
ahead,
I
just
want
to
clarify.
It
sounds
as
though
I'm
the
only
council
member
who
has
seen
this
building
at
night
is
that
correct.
Y
O
A
Any
more
comments,
also
I
just
want
to
make
one
more
qualification
with
Chris
that
we
are
considering
this
Anew
we're
not
according
to
what
planning
Commissioners
recommendation.
W
Yes,
it's
John's
presentation
pointed
out
since
de
Nova
review,
so
so
it
it
it's
it's
it's
as
if
you're
sitting
and
as
the
initial
reviewing
body.
A
E
Yeah
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
one
of
the
two
requested
freeway
signs
and
not
give
an
exemption
for
the
second
sign.
As
requested
by
the
applicant.
A
Thank
you
now
we're
moving
to
number
15
because
we
move
number
15
to
the
above
the
right
after
the
public
hearing.
So
do
we
have
a
presentation
on
15.
W
We
we
do
not
mayor,
so
we
did
could
consider
this
on
the
17th
and
and
we
had
a
a
special
meeting
on
the
on
on
January
25th.
W
The
results
of
the
council
straw
poll
are
reflected
in
the
agenda
packet.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
I
supplement
zinto
memo
was
provided
to
council
earlier
today.
It
just
has
two
very
minor
revisions
to
section
88.3
and
8.9,
and
those
are
Incorporated
in
the
current
staff
recommendation
and
you
know
I'll
I'll.
W
A
Okay,
so
seeing
that
the
staff
doesn't
have
it
with
presentation,
I'm
going
to
open
up
to
public
comment
on
this
item.
Do
we
have
blue
cars.
B
Yes,
mayor,
we
have
so
far.
We
have
five
blue
speaker
cards
for
Community
Hall
and
a
number
of
people
on
Zoom.
So
please
have
your
hands
raised
in
the
next
five
minutes.
Our
blue
speaker
cards,
submitted
before
the
cut
off
the
first
speaker
is
Connie
Cunningham,
followed
by
Jennifer
Griffin,
followed
by
Bill
Wilson,
welcome,
Connie.
G
Again,
mayor
way,
vice
mayor
Moen
and
council
members
and
city
manager
and
City
attorney
as
well
on
this
particular
one.
This
Cupertino
city
council
procedures
manual
will
allow
our
City
Council
meetings
to
be
efficient,
transparent
and
facilitate
City
progress.
G
This
manual
follows
the
Civil
grand
jury
recommendations.
I
enthusiastically
support
this
reform
package.
I
have
attended
many
Council
meetings
over
the
years.
As
I
read
the
reforms,
it
is
clear
how
they
will
one
reduce
staff
workload
that
will
allow
more
work
to
move
forward
on
resident
services,
to
increase
the
amount
of
time
accessible
to
Residents.
To
speak
to
council.
G
G
G
This
is
a
consent
item
that
has
been
discussed
at
two
meetings:
January
17th
and
January
25th
I
urge
you
to
approve
the
draft
resolution.
Adopting
the
Cupertino
city
council
procedures
manual.
Having
this
consent
item
pulled
for
discussion
is
an
illustration
of
the
reasonableness
of
the
rule
for
pooled
consent
items
to
be
discussed
after
regular
order
of
business.
G
There
are
regular.
There
were
regular
order
agenda
items
tonight,
and
anybody
involved
with
them
deserved
the
courtesy
of
being
heard
at
that
meeting,
for
which
it
was
scheduled
at
the
approximate
time.
It
was
scheduled
so
I'm
glad
that
that
happened
tonight
by
moving
it
forward,
and
thank
you
for
this
time
to
comment
good
night.
B
H
Welcome
Jennifer
hi
city
council,
as
usual,
I'm
confused
about
the
order,
I
thought
we
were
doing
then
I
thought
we
were
going
to
do
the
rest
of
the
public
meetings,
because
we
did
one
now
we're
back
on
15,
but
we
didn't
do
14.,
so
I'm
really
confused
in
terms
of
the
agenda
stuff,
so
I'm
going
to
go
prancing
into
15,
because
this
thing
is
consumed
a
great
deal
of
my
time
when
I
would
like
to
be
spending
time
with
my
aging
mother.
H
This
I
understand
people
wanted
to
write
this
booklet
up,
but
it
is
absolutely
completely
unacceptable.
You're
dumping
the
DRC
you're
dumping,
the
ERC.
You
tried
to
prevent
the
public
from
having
any
oral
communication
I'm.
Assuming
that
we're
doing
the
city
council
handbook,
but
I
could
be
wrong
anyway.
I
sent
you
an
email
this
morning.
The
city
council
handbook
is
not
allowing
the
public
to
pull
items
from
the
consent.
Calendar
should
not
be
adopted
tonight,
Tuesday,
February,
7
2023,
under
any
circumstances.
H
If
this
handbook
is
okayed,
anything
could
be
listed
in
the
consent,
calendar
and
then
voted
to
be
approved
by
a
vote
of
the
city
council.
Without
the
public
being
able
to
say
anything
approved,
ten
thousand
housing
units
at
velco
could
be
put
into
the
consent,
calendar
and
the
city
council,
or
any
future
council
could
just
approve
the
project
with
no
input
from
the
public.
This
is
not
efficiency
of
proceeding
things.
H
This
is
streamlining
ministerial,
buy,
right
approval
and
building,
as
dictated
by
the
high
density,
housing
laws,
a
la
SB,
35,
SB,
330,
sb9,
sb10
and
sb50.
That
was
never
passed
because
it
was
fought
down
by
the
people
of
California
doing
their
due
diligence.
I
spent
one
year
fighting
sb50
and
we
broke
it.
So
the
consent
calendar
could
approve
ten
thousand
housing
units
at
velco,
with
no
input
from
the
public.
H
No
one
can
say
anything
about
trees,
cut
down
public
roads,
clogged
with
dust
and
dirt,
and
mud
construction,
noise
going
24
7
for
10
years,
Etc,
something
as
innocent
as
you
can't
pull
items
from
the
consent.
Calendar
anymore
becomes.
Let's
approve
anything
by
way
of
the
consent
calendar
we
see
where
some
things
that
is
so
small
become
something
so
big.
The
consents
calendar
is
no
place
to
be
fighting
SB,
35,
sb9,
sb10
and
330
out.
H
We
thought
that
battle
was
being
carried
out
at
the
state
level,
but
never
in
a
million
years
did
I
think
it
would
go
so
far
as
to
be
thought
out
on
the
agenda
level
in
our
own
City.
The
fight
for
local
control
is
indeed
bound
up
in
our
City's
consent
calendar
and
that
right
should
not
be
conceded
tonight
in
our
city
council
chamber
meeting
under
no
circumstances.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AH
And
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
and
thank
you
for
your
service.
Just
listening
to
your
committee
assignments
and
activities,
it's
obvious
how
much
work
you're
doing
for
our
city,
so
I
just
wanted
to
talk
on
this
item
tonight,
because
I've
had
some
experiences
in
my
16
years
on
the
school
board.
That
I
think
were
germane
to
this
and
I'd
just
like
to
share
those
for
possible
information
on
the
importance
of
having
these
rules.
So
the
Fremont
Union
High
School
District,
had
a
has
a
culture
of
trust
and
collaboration.
AH
That
I
think
is
one
of
his
most
important
assets
and
it's
made
it
possible
to
retain
people
our
superintendent
that
we
put
in
place
in
my
first
board
meeting
in
December
of
2006
retired
last
year
after
15
and
a
half
years
we
have
senior
staff
who've
come
up
through
the
ranks
having
been
with
the
district
for
a
long
time,
and
it's
really
helped
morale,
and
that
feels
like
something
that
was
always
there.
But
it
wasn't
always
there.
In
the
year,
I
was
elected
to
first
time
2006..
AH
There
were
events
that
caused
divisions
among
the
school
board
members
and
there
were
five
great
people,
but
they
weren't
able
to
collaborate
because
of
that.
So
one
of
the
things
that
happened
as
soon
as
we
had
a
new
school
board
member.
There
were
several
things
that
we
did
to
build
trust
and
collaboration,
but
one
of
them
was
to
be
explicit
about
what
our
rules
would
be
and
we
got
those
down.
AH
People
worked
with
them
before
long.
We
didn't
even
need
to
refer
to
them
because
they
became
part
of
the
culture
we
had
them
on
a
placemat
in
front
of
our
position
at
the
Maryland
way.
We'll
remember
this
at
our
bias
and
I.
Think
that
really
helped
us
do
the
work
of
the
district,
so
I'm
glad
to
see
the
city
council
is
looking
at
this,
and
there
were
three
things
in
particular
that
stuck
out
to
me.
AH
One
was
the
values,
the
importance
of
respecting
each
other
and
learning
from
each
other
over
the
years,
I
learned
so
much
from
my
fellow
school
board
members
and
we
came
up
with
better
Solutions
and
any
one
of
us
would
have
on
their
own
on
our
own.
The
other
was
the
role
of
the
city
council
city
council
to
set
Direction
Through
the
and
work
through
the
city
manager
and
let
the
staff
do
their
job
the
way
we
said
it
was
school
board.
AH
Members
don't
run
the
schools,
they
make
sure
the
schools
are
run
well
and
as
part
of
that
in
creating
an
environment
for
the
staff
to
do
their
job.
I
think
it's
important,
as
we
heard
from
the
number
of
things
tonight
to
to
Really,
acknowledge
the
wonderful
job
the
staff
does.
They
work
really
hard
and
the
people
who
are
here
tonight
didn't
just
wake
up
in
the
middle
of
the
day
and
then
come
to
this
meeting.
AH
They
had
a
work
day's
work
and
came
here
and
so
to
sort
of
paraphrase
in
a
crude
way
of
Robert
Frost,
who
said
good
fences
make
good
neighbors
I.
Think
good
rules
make
good
meetings
and
they
really
make
sure
that
everybody
gets
a
chance
to
be
heard
so
I
appreciate
your
taking
up
this
I
hope
you
approve
the
rules
that
you've
discussed
and
move
forward
with
that.
Thank
you
very
much.
AI
Thank
you
so
much
good
evening
members,
it's
an
honor
to
be
here,
I've
been
a
resident
of
Cupertino
for
about
three
decades
and
I
just
wanted
to
share
my
comments
about
this
jewelry
recommendation.
So
the
recent
elections,
the
people
have
spoken
of
people
of
Cupertino
have
spoken
loud
and
clear.
The
newly
elected
officials
are
here
to
make
a
positive
change.
I
strongly
support
the
recent
jury
report
to
have
more
financial
transparency,
respect
the
Cupertino
city
staff
members
and
bring
back
a
strong
city
code
of
ethics
and
conduct
with
accountability
for
every
city.
K
I
want
to
thank
Bill
Wilson
for
his
description
of
things.
I
think
it
was
very
well
said
and
very
well
put
the
problem.
I
see,
is
this
Council
isn't
ready
to
do
that?
This
city,
in
fact,
may
not
be
ready
to
do
that
just
yet,
and
certainly
not
in
A
hurried
fashion,
where
people
are
pushed
into
not
having
enough
time
to
collaborate
and
things
getting
shoved
down
our
throats
I
think
you
heard
some
of
that
toward
the
end
of
your
workshop
last
week.
K
K
We
here
in
Cupertino
should
be
working
on,
emphasizing
the
importance
of
working
with
transparency
and
respect
and
Trust
with
our
own
Community,
our
own
City
Council
Members,
our
own
staff
and
fix
the
small
bubble
before
you
jump
out
and
start
sharing
with
the
big
bubble,
because
as
soon
as
you're
in
that
big
bubble,
the
top
of
your
org
chart,
which
is
at
your
residence,
has
no
chance
to
express
what
they
think.
They
have
no
chance
to
give
public
comment
when
you're,
in
behind
doors
with
other
politicians
deciding
what's
best
for
the
entire
area.
K
K
She
said:
she'd
work
on
it,
we'll
see
and
I
will
give
her
an
opportunity
at
some
point,
whenever
you're
ready
to
tell
me
if
there's
something
about
what
I
do
or
say
that
you
want
to
say
you
didn't
take
that
opportunity
today.
So
I
don't
know.
If
there's
something
you
know,
resident
focus
is
really
something
important:
John
Willy,
that's
what
he
was
known
for.
B
Thank
you,
Thank
you
Lisa,
and
that
is
those
are,
are
the
last
of
our
speakers
that
we
have
in
Community
Hall.
Now
we
moved
to
zoom.
There
are
nine
people
that
have
their
hand
raised
before
the
the
cut
off.
So
we'll
start
with
Rhoda
fry,
followed
by
Leslie
Crowell,
followed
by
Luis
sedati,
welcome,
Rhoda.
U
I
all
I
apologize,
my
hand
was
up
by
accident,
but
since
I've
been
called
anyway,
I
was
really
taken
aback
by
one
of
the
original
statements
which,
which
was
struck
about
limiting
public
comment
to
10
minutes
for
an
entire
council
meeting.
U
U
The
other
thing
that
I
would
have
liked
to
seen-
and
maybe
we
can
see
that
moving
forward
I
know
that
we
can
make
changes
to
this
plan
moving
forward
is
that
there
are
responsibilities
on
staff
side,
and
one
of
those
things
are
is
that
requests
for
public
information
should
be
honored
and
should
be
timely.
I
was
really
concerned
about
a
line
about
going
around
that
a
council
members
should
not
go
around
the
city
manager
to
get
public
information.
Will
council
members
are,
are
people
too,
lest
I?
Look
so
I.
U
Don't
think
that
a
council
member
should
feel
like
they
have
to
go
around
the
city
manager.
I,
think
the
city
manager
in
the
city
in
general
should
provide
the
same
level
or
even
greater
service
to
a
council
member
than
they
would
the
public
I'll
keep
it
short.
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
apologize
I
didn't
mean
to
raise
my
hand,
but
here
I
am
speaking
anyway
good
night.
B
S
B
S
And
then
one
of
our
board
presidents
suggested
that
we
take
almost
a
default
approach
to
the
consent
calendar
that
unless
the
item
had
significant
policy
implications
and
was
more
administrative
and
made
sure
it
would
default
for
the
consent
calendar.
And
then
any
board
member
could
remove
an
item
as
they
saw
fit,
and
the
public
had
a
chance
to
comment
on
everything.
S
Those
who
know
no
quashing
of
public
comment
by
any
means
and
I
think
that
this
made
it
much
easier
for
our
Board
of
Supervisors
to
spend
time
on
the
major
policy
matters
without
spending
hours
and
hours
on
things
that
weren't
nearly
as
sort
of
in
the
80
20
percent
principle.
They
were
not
moving
the
needle,
as
prior
speaker
said,
they
make
the
organization
work
well,
but
they
don't
work
the
organization.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
entertaining
my
comment.
B
Q
Hello,
I
am
Louise
sadati
a
resident
of
Cupertino
for
37
years.
I
would
I'm
speaking
to
ask
you
to
approve
item
15.
the
procedure
spent
manual
tonight.
This
procedures
manual
has
been
discussed
at
length
already
over
two
minutes
for
10
items:
items
for
10
hours,
item
by
item
with
straw
vote
taken
on
the
last
meeting
on
January
25th,
but
the
January
the
15th
was
the
first
study
session.
Videos
of
the
previous
long
meetings
have
been
available
for
any
interested
resident
to
study
at
their
Leisure
and
convenience.
Q
We
do
not
need
to
repeat
everything
again
for
another
eight
to
ten
hours,
so
I'm
hoping
that
Council
will
quickly
approve
this
without
long-winded,
distracting
unnecessary
comment.
We
need
this
procedure,
console
procedures,
manual
approved
which
will
facilitate
efficient
and
transparent
good
governance.
Q
Endless
talking
off
point
distraction
and
theatrical
self-aggrandizing
performances
ad
nauseam
are
not
transparent,
efficient,
nor
in
the
spirit
of
what
is
good
for
the
community
self-aggrandizing
above
hearing
performances,
Denver's
very
repetitive,
long-winded
off
topic.
Speeches
with
missed
information
are
not
impressive,
nor
helpful
to
the
task
at
hand.
Q
Council
meetings
should
be
run
similar
to
court
proceedings,
with
rules
of
conduct,
taking
limited
limited
to
the
topic
at
hand
and
long-winded
theatrics
short
and,
to
the
point
comments
facilitate
good
governance,
efficiency
and
transparently.
We
are
not
an
Opera
Company
where
individual
council
members
can
sing
Arias
about
themselves
how
they
have
been
wronged
or
some
off-topic
comments.
So
please
short
and
to
the
point,
thank
you
very
much.
Please
approve
the
procedure
manual
tonight
efficiently
and
quickly.
Thank
you.
B
AD
Okay,
my
name
is
Donna
Austin
I'm,
a
47
or
eight
year
resident
I've
lived
here
a
long
time
in
this
Valley
I
I
was
so
busy
laughing
at
our
last
speaker,
I
mean
it's
been
an
opera,
it's
been
a
sad
soap
opera
and
it's
too
bad
I
agree
so
much
with
Mr
Wilson.
When
he
said
good
fences
make
good,
neighbors
and
and
good
rules
will
help
us
be
transparent.
Respectful
it'll
give
more
opportunity
for
the
public
to
speak
and
not
hear
these
Arias
going
on
I
totally
approve
of
the
procedure.
Manual.
AD
AD
The
consent
calendar
should
be
things
that
have
gone
through
or
minor,
or
things
that
you
can
look
up
yourself
and
I.
Just
think
that
it's
we're
going
in
the
right
direction
in
a
positive
way.
By
adopting
this
so
I
totally
approve
of
it,
and
thank
you.
B
AJ
Good
evening,
council,
members
and
Madame
mayor,
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
speak
this
evening.
I,
like
Bill
Wilson,
have
spent
almost
two
decades
in
elected
and
appointed
service
at
various
levels
throughout
our
local
community
and
State
I'd
like
to
read
from
the
paper
discussion
paper
itself.
AJ
AJ
The
reason
why
I
point
that
out
is
because
I
think
this
particular
document.
The
procedures
manual,
will
help
align
in
Institute
best
practices
for
the
city,
the
city,
council,
the
city
staff
and
the
residents
to
follow
the
procedure
manual
combines
many
new,
but
not
very
different
procedures
and
in
to
be
put
in
place
that
other
organizations
already
follow.
AJ
I
remember
years
ago,
when
interim
a
city
manager,
Greg
Larson,
started
to
guide
the
city
council
at
that
time
in
a
particular
set
of
procedures
on
best
practices
and
how
to
run
meetings
and
operate
in
meetings
and
frankly,
operate
within
themselves.
You,
council
members,
will
those
council
members
in
in
life
is
better
when
everybody
feels
that
there
is
trust
in
a
working
relationship
between
the
council,
the
staff
and
the
residents
on
a
slightly
related
note,
because
I'm
I'm
going
to
get
off
the
zoom
in
a
moment.
AJ
I
think
this
passing
the
council
procedures
manual,
along
with
the
response
to
the
grand
jury
report
in
item
17,
will
instill
a
lot
of
confidence
in
our
residence
that
the
community,
the
Cupertino
Community,
is
truly
working
towards
becoming
an
operational
least
successful
City.
So
I
appreciate
your
time
this
evening
and
always
in
your
endeavors
and
I
hope
you
pass
the
procedures,
manual
and
item
17
the
response
to
the
grand
jury
report
this
evening.
Thank
you.
B
AK
Thank
you
very
much.
Well,
I've
sat
where
you
are
sitting
for
nine
years
and
I've.
You
know
I
can
sympathize
with
with
all
of
you
on
the
diets.
I
think
in
in
approving
this
plan
that
you've
hashed
over
for
quite
some
hours
previously
and
I
would
recommend
you
do
so.
AK
I
think
one
of
the
guiding
principles
here
is
to
be
respectful
of
the
time
of
your
fellow
council
members
and
the
public
so
in
in
balancing
everybody's
interests
being
thoughtful
about
your
remarks
and
expressing
them
succinctly
is
important
in
order
to
do
that.
AK
I'd
really
suggest
and
I've
I've
seen
models
of
this
that
are
great
and
models,
not
so
great
in
my
time,
not
with
any
of
you
necessarily
but
doing
your
homework
ahead
of
time.
So
reading
your
packet
when
it
comes
out
getting
your
answers
from
staff
in
advance,
if
you
have
questions
get
those
answers
in
advance,
it
allows
you
to
be
more
prepared
and
allows
staff
to
be
more
prepared.
Should
these
questions
come
up
in
public,
they
don't
think
of
everything.
Of
course,
right
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
questions
that
come
up.
AK
That
really
could
have
been
answered
and
settled
in
advance.
Reiterating
some
of
that
for
the
public
is
something
that
staff
can
do
as
they're
presenting,
and
you
can
also
do
but
doing
it
succinctly
and
having
that
those
conversations
Advance
will
really
facilitate
your
meetings
and
I.
You
know
I
understand,
I've,
been
in
situations
where
I
disagree
with
the
consensus.
That's
forming
it
doesn't.
Do
you
any
good
to
spend
half
an
hour
brow
beating
your
colleagues
to
try
to
convince
them.
You
can
simply
take
five
minutes.
AK
Express
Yourself
succinctly,
vote
no
on
the
motion
and-
and
you
know,
go
on
to
live
another
day
and
finally,
I
would
suggest
to
you
in
in
just
observing
things
that
you
can
get
a
lot
more
done.
If
you
think
about
the
form
of
government
that
we
have
here,
which
is
a
council
that
is
primarily
a
policy
setting
body
if
you're
up
at
the
level
of
policy,
you
have
a
lot
more
leverage,
let
the
staff.
Do
the
execution
worry
about
the
details
and
so
forth.
AK
B
N
It's
clear
that
the
previous
procedures
were
not
working
to
these
desired
ends.
Previous
Council
meetings
lasted
until
early
hours
of
the
night.
I
was
there
for
many
of
them,
which
discouraged
the
public
from
speaking
by
waiting
until
after
the
council
member
spoke
and
speaking,
the
having
the
council
member
speak
sometimes
at
excess
of
length.
N
I
was
personally
in
these
meetings
and
I
saw
this,
including
watching
residents
give
up
trying
to
speak
after
waiting
for
hours
because
they
had
to
put
their
kids
to
bed
or
they
had
to
get
up
for
work.
In
the
morning
on
January
25th
I
watched
six
of
the
eight
hour
study
session
on
the
city
council
procedures,
which
was
a
line
by
line
review
of
all
of
these.
N
N
There
are
other
things
that
I'm
concerned
about,
which
is
that
I've
heard
that
the
mayor
can
halt
discussion.
Instead,
when
I
looked
at
the
procedures,
it
is
that
three-fifths
of
the
council
and
call
a
question
to
a
vote
when
it
appears
that
a
council
member
is
filibustering
to
extend
a
meeting
or
discussion
is
clearly
not
progressing.
N
We're
not
always
going
to
agree
on
every
portion
of
the
new
procedures
and
I
I
think
that
Rod
sync
said
that
pretty
well,
but
I
urge
you
tonight
to
approve
these
procedures
without
another
long
debate.
City
democracy
is
not
in
danger
from
these
new
procedures.
Instead,
it's
likely
to
improve
for
all
the
residents.
AG
Good
evening,
mayor
way,
vice
mayor,
Mohan
and
council
members-
I
am
here,
my
name
is
Gene
Bedard
and
I
have
a
long
time.
Cupertino
resident
I
am
here
to
hopefully
view
your
final
approval
of
this
manual.
AG
AG
AG
Calendar
I'm
tired
of
too
many
special
meeting
due
to
lack
of
time
management
by
council
members
and
I'm,
tired
of
a
lot
of
the
negative
press
about
the
behavior
of
Cupertino
city
council
members,
who
don't
seem
to
understand
city
ordinance
or
a
city.
Governance
I
urge
you
to
approve
this
procedure's
manual
tonight.
Yes,
it
may
need
to
be
tweaked
in
the
future,
but
Council
processes
need
to
be
streamlined
immediately
starting
tomorrow.
AG
P
Hi
there,
dear
mayor
wave
vice
mayor,
Mohan
and
council
members,
I'm
speaking
here
only
as
an
individual
resident
of
the
city
I
support
the
proposed
Council
reforms,
because
they're
just
common
sense
for
us
to
have
an
efficiently
run
city
government.
They
lay
out
clear
rules.
They
make
it
easier
for
residents
to
participate
in
the
city
meetings
and
to
voice
their
perspectives.
P
They
expand
citizen
access
to
the
working
of
our
city
government
by
limiting
the
ability
of
council
members
and
other
residents
to
extend
Council
meetings
into
long
late
night
meetings.
I've
sat
through
many
many
of
those
that
went
well
into
very
late
night
and
I've
seen
firsthand
how
this
discourages
participation
from
ordinary
residents.
I've
seen
people
wait
in
the
council
chamber
for
two
three
four
hours
and
then
finally
give
up
and
go
home.
That
is
not
good
participation
and
it's
not
respectful
of
the
time
of
our
residents.
P
These
new
rules
put
checks
and
balances
on
Council
Members
ability
to
have
undue
influence
on
City
matters
and
City
staff,
while
on
Council
and
after
this
step
down
from
Council
as
well,
and
that's
a
very
good
thing
too.
Our
city
staff
has
been
demoralized
and
demotivated
over
the
past
few
years.
They
don't
feel
supported
and
many
have
left
the
city
we
have
tons
of
openings
and
we
have
a
reputation,
makes
it
hard
for
us
to
recruit
good
people.
P
These
reforms
would
protect
our
hard-working
City
staff
and
allow
them
to
do
their
jobs
without
fear
of
recrimination
or
reprisals,
and
that
also
is
a
good
thing.
I
urge
you
to
adopt
the
corporation
Cupertino
city
council
procedures
manual
and
also
approve
the
city's
response
to
the
2022
civil
grand
jury.
The
report
entitled
A
House
Divided.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
thank
you
for
your
service
to
the
city.
A
Thank
you,
madasini
clerk
that
I'm
going
to
bring
this
back
to
the
council.
I
would
like
to
have
permission
from
my
council
members
to
speak.
First
I
want
to
say
actually
the
I
still
have
to
get
used
to
people
calling
me
mayor
way
and
mayor
actually
had
presiding
over
the
meeting.
Has
a
lot
of
I
won't
say
power,
but
ability
to
move
the
agendas
around
already.
For
example,
we
I
just
proposed
that
we
moved
consent.
A
Agendas
have
been
pulled
out
to
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
put
number
15
right
after
the
public
comment
after
the
items,
16.
I
already
have
the
ability
to
do
that.
Why
do
I
want
to,
or
we
want
to
pass
this
because
we
all
need
something
to
follow
and
actually
I
consider
that
more
of
a
limiting
of
the
mayor's
power
or
discretion,
because
now
we
have
a
set
of
rules
to
follow
so
first
I
want
to
make
it
clear.
A
Eventually,
this
is
the
first
step,
because
if
we
all
like
my
colleague
at
Fremont,
Union
High,
School
District,
Bill
Wilson,
said,
if
we
have
a
set
of
rule
to
follow,
then
we
understand
each
other,
then
we
can
work
under
a
framework
to
move
forward
together.
That
doesn't
mean
six
months
later,
when
we
have
hey
this
doesn't
work.
We
can
always
bring
it
back
for
reconsideration.
So
I
really
want
everybody
to
know
that
we're
doing
this
so
that
we
can
be
on
the
same
page.
A
We
can
unite
and
move
forward
in
the
same
direction
and
you
know
adjust
each
other
and
become
a
government
team
that
really
works.
Another
point
I
want
to
make
that,
yes,
we
are
elected
to
govern,
but
we
have
to
follow
laws.
We
have
federal
law,
we
have
state
law,
we
have
Public
Utilities
Commission
laws.
We
have
our
own
Municipal
codes
that
we
need
to
follow.
We
don't
make
laws,
we
make
ordinances
resolutions,
we
make
directions
for
the
city,
but
we
have
to
follow
our
own
Municipal
codes.
A
Our
own
Municipal
Code
says
we
are
a
city
manager,
city
council,
form
of
governance.
That's
what
we
need
to
follow,
so
I
want
I
hope.
People
realize
that
this
is
the
first
step
to
so.
Everybody
has
a
framework
to
work
on,
so
we
can
unite
and
move
forward
together,
but
we
can
adjust.
Nothing
is
fixed
so
now
I'm
going
to
open
up
to
console
input
who
would
like
to
go
first.
E
I
cannot
even
imagine
work
being
an
effective
council
member
if
I
didn't
have
a
set
of
procedures
and
policies
that
I
follow.
So
this
is
something
that
is
going
to
help
every
in
me.
Everyone
in
the
future,
including
me,
to
follow
some
guidelines
and
be
more
effective
at
the
job
we've
been
elected
to
to
do
other
than
that
I
think
we've
discussed
this
for
hours
and
hours,
so
I
would
actually
like
to
just
move
forward
and
adopt
the
city,
Council
procedures
manual,.
A
Y
Member
more
please
I
have
a
question
for
for
Chris,
so
you
mentioned
there
were
some
edits
and
I'm
I'm
unable
to
locate
what
you're
referring
to
or
where,
where
they
were
placed.
So.
W
They're
they're
in
there
was
a
a
supplemental
report
that
was
provided
in
your
supplemental
materials
today,
the
two
edits
I
could
read
them,
they're
very
short
in
section
88.3,
the
last
sentence
it
questions
is
replaced
with
deliberations.
Y
W
And
and
and
so
that
was
just
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
transcription
error
and
then
an
8.9,
the
last
sentence
reads:
all
meetings
shall
be
a
joint
adjourned
at
11,
30
PM.
Unless
by
a
majority
vote
of
the
city
council
in
this
Rule
and
Council,
which
is
the
addition
votes
affirmatively,
they
extend
the
meeting
past
11
30
p.m.
That's
actually
the
second
to
last
sentence
of
section
8.9
and
that
just
that
council
is
added
because
without
it
it's
not
really
a
grammatically
correct
sentence.
W
Y
Instead
of
questions
correct,
yes,
okay,
so
that's
taking
that's
taking
away
a
rosenberg's
Rules
of
Order
which
protects
the
rights
of
the
minority
on
the
council
and
going
to
rosenberg's
Rules
of
Order,
which
were
passed
by
the
council
by
resolution
18-114.
So
that
was
back
in
2018
the
Treatise.
Y
This
Treatise
on
Modern
parliamentary
procedures
built
on
a
foundation
supported
by
the
following
four
pillars
and
I'll
just
move
to
item
four
rules
should
enforce
the
will
of
the
majority,
while
protecting
the
rights
of
the
minority
and
the
ultimate
purpose
of
rules
of
procedure
is
to
encourage
discussion
and
to
facilitate
decision
making
by
the
body.
There's
also
a
couple
other
pillars
that
I
think
the
public
might
appreciate.
Y
Rules
should
be
clear:
Simple
Rules,
lead
to
wider
understanding
and
participation.
Complex
rules
create
two
classes:
those
who
understand
and
participate
and
those
who
do
not
fully
understand
and
do
not
fully
participate
and
rules
should
be
user
friendly.
That
is,
the
rules
must
be
simple
enough,
that
the
public
is
invited
into
the
body
and
feels
that
it
has
participated
in
the
process
and
we've
heard
from
a
number
of
people
who
feel
that
they
are
being
excluded
by
this
process
and
and
I
agree.
Y
I
agree
with
what
they're
saying
so
at
issue
with
8.3
is
that
currently
the
deliberations
would
continue
unless
somebody
calls
the
question
and
calling
the
question
means
that
the
motion
that
was
made
the
deliberations
are
going
to
stop
you're
going
to
immediately
take
a
vote
and
you
need
to
have
a
super
majority
in
this
case.
That
would
be
four
people
a
four
out
of
five
voting
to
end
the
deliberations
and
the
motion
will
be
called
for
a
vote
now.
What
this
proposes
is
that
the
mayor
becomes
four
votes.
One
person
is
worth
four
votes.
Y
The
mayor
may
allow
additional
time
for
deliberations
where
appropriate.
This
rule
shall
displace
any
conflicting
rule
in
the
city's
adopted
rules
of
procedure
which
are
rosenberg's
rules.
So,
instead
of
having
the
required
four
vote
to
end
deliberations,
this
one
rule
here
says
one
person
and
our
our
mayor
is
not
directly
elected.
Our
mayor
is
elected
by
this
Council,
not
by
the
city.
W
Don't
think
so,
so
so
so
so
so
the
the
the
the
rules
as
proposed
that
the
the
the
mayor
would
would
have
the
authority
to
set
time
limits
for
a
debate.
If,
if
there
was
an
objection
to
those
time
limits
there,
you
know
any.
You
know
any
council
member
could
object
to
the
time
limits
and
the
mayor's
ruling
could
be
overruled
by
three
council
members.
It
is
different.
W
You
know
to
to
accounts
a
member
Moore's
point
of
the
default
in
in
rosenberg's
Rules
of
Order,
which
would
require
four
votes
to
to
call
the
question
and
end
debate.
You
know
that
said:
Council
adopted
rosenberg's
Rules
of
Order
it
it
has
the
ability
to
modify
them.
It's
not
unusual
for
jurisdictions
to
adopt
rules
of
procedure,
standard
rules
of
procedure
with
some
minor
modifications,
and
so
it
is
ultimately
up
to
council
to
to
balance
the
the
the
the
interests
at
stake
here.
Y
Through
the
mayor
this,
this
is
not
described
in
this
Council
questions
and
deliberations
and
going
back
to
the
four
pillars.
Rules
should
be
clear,
rules
should
be
user,
friendly
rules
should
enforce
the
will
of
the
majority
while
protecting
the
rights
of
the
minority
and
I.
Don't
think
this
rule
protects
the
rights
of
the
minority,
and
nor
do
we
have
a
situation
where
we've
had
as
council
member
fruen
invented
a
filibuster
problem.
We
do
not
have
a
filibuster
problem.
Y
A
Thank
you
any
more
comments
from
council
member
first
and
councilman,
or.
O
So
yeah
I
emphatically
disagree
with
with
councilmember
Moore's
description
of
the
situation.
This
set
of
rules
guarantees
the
minority
a
certain
amount
of
time
to
speak
right
now.
Under
our
rules
as
they
exist,
the
mayor
could
decide
exactly
how
much
time
we
all
get.
That's
how
it
is.
This
guarantees
you
actual
time,
five
minutes
for
questions
five
minutes
for
deliberations
after
that.
If
you
can't
make
your
case
in
five
minutes,
you
shouldn't
be
able
to
to
be
talking
unless
there
is
a
really
good
reason
to
move
forward,
and
the
mayor
can
allow
that
to
happen.
O
A
majority
of
council
could
allow
that
to
happen
so
that
you
can't
have
a
mayor
who
abuses
it
but
I'm.
Sorry,
we
have
had
plenty
of
meetings
where
people
have
talked
Ad
nauseam
that
should
have
been
wrapped
up
much
much
earlier.
This
forces
us
to
actually
be
concise.
So,
yes,
there
is
a
filibuster,
that's
occurring!
It's
just
slow
grinding.
D
So
I
have
some
question
for
staff.
One
member
of
the
public
brought
up
that
there
has
never
been
any
meeting,
whereas
in
a
study
session
and
action
has
taken
place,
but
the
other
member
refers
to
coming
from
city
manager.
I
think
it
was
referring
to
the
August
29th
2022
housing
element,
I,
think
I
looked
up
that
specific
item.
It
was
not
a
study
session.
Could
we
clarify?
Has
there
ever
been?
Any
statistician
of
action
has
been
taken.
W
D
W
There
certainly
have
been
action
taken
at
study
sessions,
whether
what
you
know
how
you
characterize
that
action
is
very
subjective,
but
there's
been
many
instances
even
since
I've
been
here
that
Council
has
acted
at
a
study
session
anytime
staff
Council
provides
direction
to
staff.
That's
an
action
it.
You
know.
If
we.
D
D
No
January
17th
was
the
very
first
time
a
resolution
was
put
on
as
an
action
for
study
session,
but
that
has
never
happened
before
before
we
had
always
had
discussion
give
direction,
but
the
formal
section
would
action
would
always
come
later.
That's
the
stated
by
the
Berkeley
and
Palo
Alto
Council
procedures
and
I.
All
I'm
asking
is
that's
a
long-standing
practice
of
Cupertino.
Can
you
confirm
that
we.
W
Emotion
is
also
an
action
by
Council,
which
is
is
routinely
done
in
study
sessions.
You
know
that
that
said,
I
think
you
know,
rather
than
sort
of
arguing
about
what
an
action
or
or
lack
of
action
is
I
mean
certainly
I
mean
this
would
be
the
opportunity
if,
if
Council
wishes,
to
prescribe
rules
around
what
a
study
session
is
and
isn't
to
to
do
that
because,
right
now
we
if
we
don't
have
rules
which
is,
is
of
course.
D
Discussion,
could
you
confirm
the
misinformation
public
somehow
understood
that
the
housing
element
item
August
29th
was
an
action
item.
W
X
Has
actually,
this
is
really
not
the
subject
for
this
item.
Y
X
I
hate
to
put
staff
in
a
position
that
we
have
to
come
up
with
the
result
with
the
deformative
answer
right
on
the
spot.
D
X
D
D
D
W
That's
incorrect.
This
is
the
chapter
chapter
2.17.043
regulates
how
the
city
manager
should
treat
requests
for
information
from
Council
it.
It
gives
the
city
manager
discretion
to
manage
those
requests,
be
you
know
to
both
be
respectful
of
Staff
time
and
that's
also
to
be
respectful
of
the
prerogative
of
the
full
Council.
W
If,
if,
if
requests
take
too
much
time
or
multiple
staff
members,
there
are
our
criteria
that
the
city
manager
applies
in
her
discretion
in
that
section
that
dictate
whether
it's
appropriate
to
respond
to
that
request
from
an
individual
council
member
or
to
require
direction
from
Full
Council
before
devoting
staff
time
to
that
work,
and
then
that
that
is
both
to
to
protect
the
city,
manager's
ability
to
manage
her
staff
and
also
to
to
protect
the
prerogative
prerogative
of
the
other.
A
D
A
Y
So,
with
regards
to
item
3.1,
the
mayor
has
historically
taken
council
member
input
on
their
preferred
committees,
and
the
mayor
has
taken
that
into
consideration,
along
with
their
the
individual's
knowledge
and
the
the
rotations,
and
we
did
not
see
that
this
time.
This
item
appears
to
expand
on
the
the
mayor's
power
to.
Y
To
appoint
the
standing
and
ad
hoc
committees
and
subcommittees,
and
we've
also
seen
the
reason
why
you
didn't
have
any
subcommittee
reports
is
because
they
were
basically
all
abolished,
so
I
think
this
ordinarily,
what
you
would
have
if
Council
was
going
to
suggest
a
subcommittee
is
that
you
would
have
the
council
suggest
as
a
whole,
who
would
be
on
that
subcommittee
and
you
would
then
take
a
take
a
vote
on
it,
and
this
is
now
putting
that
in
the
in
the
hands
of
the
mayor,
so
I'm
concerned
about
that
language
for
5.7.
Y
This
city
has
not
been
following
resolution
07-103,
which
is
regarding
the
the
mayor's
fund
and
I
I'm
concerned
about
this
being
kept
in
here
when
we're
not
following
it.
At
this
point,
do
staff
intend
to
have
us
go
back
to
following
this
resolution
in
order
to
remedy
the
situation,
because
it's
it's
what's
being
referred
to,
and
you
just
hold
that
question
and
then,
with
regards
to
item
6.6,
the
the
public
records
act
item
is
many
members
of
the
public
have
spoken
about
this
I
I
find
it
unacceptable.
Y
A
Thank
you
so
I
really
want
to
say,
because
the
mayor's
then
continue
to
come
out.
This
is
actually
not
to
give
mayor
more
power.
You
know,
I
did
if
I
have
to
say.
I
did
took
your
first
priority
into
consideration
already
before
your
second
thing
reached
me.
So
let's
not
talk
about
that.
I'm.
Just
saying
that
these
are
procedures
to
follow,
I,
don't
think
the
Mayors
get
anymore
and
I'm
going
to
be
mayor
just
one
year.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
I'm
going
to
be
mayor
forever.
A
So
I'm
just
going
to
say
it.
We
have
gone
through
item
by
item,
I
have
two
minutes
already
and
it's
eight
and
a
half
hours
you
know
went
through
and
vice
mayor
council
member
ciao.
Thank
you
for
complimenting
me
for
really
listening
to
everybody
when
every
item
take
our
time
to
do
it,
even
though
you
know
we
I
think
we
should,
and
we
have
and
all
the
public
comments
on
each
item
and
we
talk
about
each
item.
A
This
is
something
we
all
follow,
whether
mayor
vice
mayor
council
members
next
mayor,
so
this
is
for
us
to
follow
and
I
do
think
it
doesn't
mean
we
don't
come
back
in
six
months
or
a
year
say:
hey
that
does
not
work,
let's
revisit
it
and
as
for
the
mayor's
fund,
I'm
the
one
who
want
to
follow
it.
So
if
the
previous
Mayors
did
not
follow
you,
we
can
start
to
follow
it.
So
I
have
no
problem
following
that
mayor's
fund
guidelines,
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear.
A
This
really
is
something
that
I
think.
If
we
all
could
do
it
for
a
while
make
sure
you
know
it
do
we
have
better
governance
after
we
follow
this.
This
is
something
that
we
all
can.
You
know
abide
to
and,
like
vice
mayor
Mohan
said
she
would
love
to
have
those
guidelines
for
us
to.
You
know
work
together
so
again,
I
want
to
emphasize.
This
is
something
we
want
to
work
together,
so
we
all
follow
the
same
guidelines.
Thank
you
go
ahead.
Yes,
please.
D
Thank
you
definitely
I
think
we
should
have
guidelines
to
follow.
No
problem,
no
question
about
that
and
definitely
I.
Think
with
council
member
I
mean
mayor
how
we
have
you
are
very
collaborative.
The
problem
is
you:
we
only
have
you
for
one
year.
The
next
mayor
may
be
very
authoritative
and
they
may
utilize
a
lot
of
these
rules
and
not
utilizing
it
in
a
way
that
shuts
down
discussion
so
I'm.
This
is
not
really
against
you,
but
it's
when
we
make
rules.
We
need
to
think
about
worst
case
and
so
I'd
like
to
so.
D
My
question
I'd
like
to
con,
continue
to
establish
background.
That
is
long-standing
practice
for
Cupertino
that
two
council
members
put
down
an
agenda,
but
then
only
we
don't
three
console
members
has
no
right
to
remove
that
agenda
so
that
way
allow
the
minority
to
at
least
discuss
the
item,
and
that
is
going
to
be
removed
by
this
procedure
if
adopted,
and
then
it's
a
long-standing
practice
that
any
member
of
the
public
can
pull
consider
gender
ident
that's
way
before
I
even
attended.
D
My
first
meeting-
it's
been
10
20
years
and
this
long-standing
practice
that
we
follow
common
parliamentary
procedure
and
we
do
not
shut
down
a
discussion
by
a
majority
vote
and
this
is
followed
by
most
cities,
almost
every
city
and
we
do
not
exchange
on
take
action
on
study
sessions.
So
all
I'm
asking
is:
that's
not
change
the
long-standing
practice
practice.
That's
writing
down,
see
how
they
work
in
one
year.
If
it
doesn't
work,
then
we
modify
them.
That's
not
changed
within
what
strings.
The
third
meeting
you
are
attending.
Thank
you.
O
So
I
think
one
of
the
issues
here
is
that
we
have
a
lot
of
long-standing
practices
that
don't
actually
work.
It
doesn't
work
that
we
have
two
people
who
can
set
everything
on
the
agenda
and
we
wind
up
with
six
pages
worth
of
of
items
that
are
to
be
addressed
at
some
future
date
and
time
that
actually
imbues
a
huge
amount
of
power
in
the
city
manager,
because
at
some
point
the
city
manager
is
going
to
have
to
make
a
decision.
O
What
do
I
put
on
this
this
agenda
and
the
mayor
is
going
to
have
to
concur
with
it
in
order
to
make
it
happen.
That's
not
a
good
way
of
governing
a
city,
it's
much
better
to
have
something
actually
written
down.
I
think
it's
also
clear
that,
under
our
current
practice,
since
we
don't
have
any
actual
rules,
that
a
majority
could
right
now
remove
everything
on
the
the
to
be
decided
calendar,
it
is
simply
just
not
been
our
practice.
We've
accumulated
a
huge
number
of
things
that
are
there
all
the
way
back
to
2019.
O
I,
don't
think
that's
a
good
way
of
running
a
city
like
I
said
there
are
some
things
that
are
not
working
right
now.
Having
too
much
discussion
that
is
unfocused
is
something
that
is
not
working
right
now.
This
set
of
rules
will
help
reduce
that
problem,
so
that
we
are
all
forced
to
ask
our
questions
in
advance
be
concise
because
we
have
to
be
economical
with
our
time.
Five
minutes
for
questions
five
minutes
for
discussion
individually
is
gobs
of
time
and
you're
guaranteed
it.
O
At
some
point,
we
have
to
find
a
balance
between
the
right
of
the
majority
to
move
its
will
and
the
right
of
the
minority
to
be
able
to
express
itself.
I
think
that
this
finds
that
balance
and
it
has
to
function
in
a
situation
where
people
sometimes
fundamentally
don't
trust
each
other
I
think
we
can
acknowledge
that.
That
is
a
problem
for
some
of
us
up
here.
O
A
So,
as
I
said,
I
just
gave
everybody
two
minutes
at
my
discretion.
It's
not
my
power,
I
I
believe
we
all
need
to
express
our
opinions.
Okay,
but
right
now,
I
would
like
to
entertain
a
motion
and
a
second
and
follow
with
with
a
little
bit
more
discussions.
Maybe,
okay,
do
we
have
a
motion.
A
Okay,
one
more
minute
for
each
one:
okay,.
Y
With
regards
to
having
a
single
council
member,
be
able
to
a
continued
discussion,
I'd
like
to
bring
up
the
sb9
changes
and
that
we
made
for
for
the
final
ordinance
and
the
reason
I
bring,
that
up
is
because
I
was
a
loan
council
member
looking
at
the
cubic
yardage
that
could
be
moved
on
a
hillside
and
I
sat
here.
I
looked
at
something
which
hadn't
occurred
to
me.
It
was
about
2500
cubic
yards
could
be
moved
soil
and,
as
you
know,
my
background,
civil
engineering
I've
done
grading
plans.
Y
A
So
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
I
think
everybody
has
one
minute.
What
I
would
like
to
say
is
I
want
to
Echo
council
member
child.
It's
you
said
a
couple
of
times.
We
actually
don't
do
it.
We
actually
don't
hold
up.
You
know
forever,
and
so
so
I
want
to
see
both
sides
right.
We
have
a
sort
of
guidelines
to
follow,
but
we
actually
maybe
don't
need
it
so
I
still
I.
My
inclination
is.
We
have
a
lot
of
discussion
on
this.
A
Let's
move
on
because
it's
10
30,
we
are
many
one
half
hours,
DeLay
So,
let's
move
on
and
test
it.
Try
it
see
if
the
public
feels
that
they
they
they
could
could
not
speak
see
if
we
feel
that
we're
being
you
know,
minimized
of
our
input
and
and
then
we
can
come
and
visit
six
months
later
and
really
review.
Are
these
guidelines
working
because
you
agree
that
we
need
to
have
a
guideline.
D
So
every
one
of
the
question
that
I
asked
earlier
are
not
only
long-standing
practice
in
Cupertino,
it's
long-standing
practice
in
almost
every
city.
So
this
Council.
If
you
approve
this
draft
Council
procedure
today,
you
will
go
down
on
record
as
the
first
city
in
medic,
Bay,
California
or
the
entire
state
to
adopt
a
practice.
That's
anti-democratic!
So
I
would
like
to
give
this
Council
a
chance
to
consider
proposal.
I
have
I
have
I'd
like
to
propose
a
substitute
motion
and
each
one.
D
It's
just
one
addressed
the
question
I
have
added
earlier.
So
here
is
my
motion.
I
redlined
the
proposed
agenda
as
a
number
one
adjust
the
issue
where
the
mayor
has
I
think
the
mayor
should
make
a
recommendation
rather
than
a
point
and
then
Rectify,
so
that
addressed
that
issue.
The
mayor
should
make
a
recommendation
and
then
approved
by
the
council
as
our
long-standing
practice.
Second,
edit
remove
the
no
council
member
circumvent
I.
D
Think
the
proposed
language
earlier,
that's
written
by
the
City
attorney
is
clear:
when
there
is
information
that
really
need
the
staff
work,
significant
working
load
bring
it
to
the
council,
let
the
council
decide.
Maybe
there
are
certain
information,
we
don't
know
and
we
need
that
information.
So
that's
not
a
lot.
Let's
not
go
on
the
record
to
allow
us
to
adopt
this
practice.
No
other
city
has
adopted
as
a
city
managed
attorney
mentioned.
D
83
is
remove
this
line
where
any
item
may
be
removed
for
future
agenda
by
a
majority
vote
of
the
council.
The
municipal
code
of
Cupertino
does
not
support
that.
The
current
Municipal
Code
allowed
to
remember
to
put
on
the
agenda
and
edit
four
remove
this
line,
removing
the
item
from
allow
basically
allowing
the
public
member
to
pull
item.
D
That's
a
long-standing
practice
of
Cupertino
when
wrap
things
was
on
the
console
when
Cindy
James
went
on
the
console
when
Gilbert
were
on
the
council,
all
the
people
who
supported
you
guys
and
the
next
edit
remove
these
last
few
lines
which
will
allow
the
mayor
to
shut
down
discussion.
I
have
confirmed
that
with
the
city
attorney
the
current
statement
as
written,
allow
one
the
mayor
whom
we
have
a
a
very
mayor,
not
as
collaborative
as
council
member
as
mayor
way,
if
that's
when
I'm
concerned,
so
I
would
like
to
remove
that
and
add
rosenberg's
rules.
D
As
adopted
English
solution,
number
2018
114
shall
be
followed
where
only
a
super
majority
vote
would
approve
call
to
the
for
the
question
or
to
the
question
to
shut
down
deliberation.
86
I'd
like
to
clarify
our
long-standing
practice
and
also
practice
by
other
cities.
The
study
sessions
are
used
to
conduct
discussions
and
there
might
be
strong
vote
directions,
but
then
there
is
no
formal
procedure.
This
is
copied
from
Palo
Alto
city
council
procedure,
so
this
is
my
motion
with
the
six
edits.
A
A
Okay,
so
we're
going
to
move
into
the
original
motion,
let's
vote
by
light,
please.
Y
Pardon
there's
through
the
mayor
is
there
an
opportunity
for
isn't
there
an
opportunity
for
a
friendly
Amendment
of
the
first.
F
Y
A
For
running
the
management,
okay
attorney.
W
Yes,
there's
one
motion
on
the
table:
the
council
could
make
another
substitute
motion
or
any
council
member.
Y
Y
Okay,
if
council
member
Chao
is
prepared
to
do
another
substitute
motion,
you
may
go
ahead
with
that,
but
for
for
me
for
a
substitute
motion,
I
would
move
that
we
go
to
item
5.7
and
strike
the
last
sentence.
Y
Okay,
no
I'm,
sorry,
not
not
not
the
budget
initiative.
It's
6.6
with
regard
to
the
public
records
act
request,
so
I
would
like
that
final
line
to
be
struck,
because
that
is
a
state
law
allowing
that
and
I
would.
Y
Regarding
the
consent
items,
I
would
remove
the
line
that
says
items
may
be
removed
from
the
consent
calendar
only
by
a
member
of
the
city
council.
We
want
to
be
welcoming
and
friendly
to
the
public.
As
as
we
see
here,
we
don't
have
a
large
amount
of
participation
and.
Y
We
are
really
honoring
their
their
hard
work
that
they've
done
over
the
years.
We've
had
items
pulled
from
consent
and
had
presentations
presented
to
us
and
shown
information
that
that
we
were
unaware
of
and
we're
really
honoring
their
their
work
and
dedication
and
care
about
the
city
allowing
them
to
do
that.
The
example
given
for
the
county
is
they've
got
a
different
agenda.
Y
I
would
also
remove
the
line
that
each
council
member
May
remove
one
item
from
the
consent
calendar
without
providing
notice
before
the
council
meeting
begins.
What
this
rule
will
result
in
can
result
in
is
that
you're
going
to
have
members
of
the
public,
and
it's
already
happening,
because
some
people
thought
this
rule
started
tonight.
You'll
have
members
of
the
public
contacting
the
council
member
saying:
can
you
pull
this
item
and
and
then
we've
got
to
get
these
items
pulled?
Y
You
know
on
on
their
behalf
or
will
simply
say
you
know,
I'm
going
to
pull
all
the
all
the
consent
items
for
for
the
next
meeting,
I'm
just
going
to
pull
them
all
and
then,
when
we
get
to
the
meeting,
I'll
we'll
put
put
them
back
and
that
way
I've
got
to
fail
safe,
so
I
think
when
you
have
rules
that
are
too
restrictive,
people
go
go
around
them.
It's
it's
Human,
Nature,
okay,
so
I
hope
that
substitute
motion
has
been
captured
and.
A
D
D
May
make
another
substitute
motion
so
I
think
the
way
we
have
worked
in
the
past
two
to
four
years
has
been.
We
make
compromises
so
that
we
can
get
more
support
for
the
item
on
the
agenda
rather
than
standing
our
ground
and
say
no,
no,
no!
No!
No
so
I
would
like
to
suggest
on
a
subset
of
what
I
proposed
on
the
in
the
things
that
I
think
is
most
important.
D
That
should
not
change
actually
much
of
what
we
the
practice
we
have
in
mind,
but
it
would
clean
up
on
the
language
the
the
bad
perception
about
the
proposed
proposal.
So
one
is
added
two
where,
because
the
last
paragraph
really
doesn't
change
anything
about
the
process,
I'll
just
highlight
that
the
last
paragraph,
the
last
sentence,
doesn't
change
anything
about
the
process,
because
we
are
already
saying
that
any
such
requests
should
go
to
the
entire
Council.
So
why
add
it?
The
last
one
will
just
say
that
City
manager.
D
Direction,
regarding
request
this
council
member,
should
not
circumvent
city
managers
Direction
regarding
public
records
requests
through
stores
through
filing
a
public
records,
request,
I
think
if
there
is
a
need,
that's
let
the
city
manager
bring
it
to
the
council,
and
then
the
council
can
decide
if
that
public
records
request
will
be
necessary
or
or
more
information
is
needed.
So
this
last
sentence
really
creates
these
negative
relationship
between
Council
and
the
staff.
Someone
is
circumventing
another.
So
would
you
I
hope
that
I
get
support
for
that
and
the
next
one
is
I.
D
D
Y
Yes,
I
will,
second,
that
and
I
appreciate
that
you
with
regards
to
6.6
you're
you're
working
to
ensure
the
the
rights
of
the
council
members
as
as
Citizens
to
to
exercise
their
their
right
with
the
public
records
act.
I
really
appreciate
that,
and
also
with
the
ensuring
the
that
the
rights
of
the
minority
are
respected
and
I.
Think
that's
really
important
and
I
sense.
I
think
it
sends
a
really
good
message.
Y
I
wish
that
you
had
the
the
consent
item
still
in
there,
because
that's
the
one
that
really
really
speaks
to
the
public
and
their
participation
in
the
city.
So.
Y
I'm
seconding
it,
but
if
the
council
member
council
member
Chow,
would
like
to
of
our
own
accord
change
it,
I
would
appreciate
it.
You
want.
D
X
Is
what
is
merely
if
I
may
I
know?
This
is
a
very
important
decision
for
a
council
if
I
can
suggest
either
a
break
and
just
a
reminder
that
we
do
have
two
action
items
and
five
item
that
has
been
poked
from
the
constant
item
as
as
much
as
discussion.
This
needs
just
wanted
to
kind
of
do
a
time
check.
Okay,.
A
Yes,
so
so
we
have
a
motion,
something
motion
and
a
second
do
you
want
add
a
friendly
Amendment
or
not.
Y
I
will
I
will
leave
it
as
it
is.
Okay,
so
so
may
I
say
mayor
understanding
that
I
I,
we
will
have
members
of
the
public
that
are
going
to
be
now
besieging
beseeching
certain
council
members
to
pull
items
for
them,
which
I,
don't
think
is
a
great
way
for
us
to
be
doing
business.
O
A
Okay,
so
let's
take
a
vote.
I
I
do
think
we,
this
has
been
deliberated,
talked
stroll
vote
for
eight
and
a
half
hours,
so
I
I
I
would
like
just
let's
vote
on
The
Substitute
motion,
please,
by
light.
A
D
My
fellow
council
members
were
not
even
compromise
on
something
that
really
is
just
making
this
procedure
menu
more
friendly,
rather
than
making
that
yeah,
I
and
and
I'm
very
disappointed
that
you
are
willing
to
go
down
on
record
on
approved.
Without
any
compromise
and
saying
that
you
are
collaborative
saying
that
you
compromise,
but
then
the
action
doesn't
support
the
words
I'm
very
disappointed
and.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
your
comment.
I
still
want
to
say,
we've
worked
on
this
for
eight
and
a
half
hours,
and
we
did
compromise
on
that
and
let's
try
this
out.
It
doesn't
mean
it
doesn't
work
that
we
don't
come
back
as
councilmember
Freon
said
to
readjust
it.
So
I
will
any
more
comments.
If
not
yes,
councilmember
Moore.
Y
A
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
To
go
through
two
items,
so
I
consulted
with
City
attorney
Jensen,
because
we've
passed
the
our
council
meeting
procedures.
We
can
follow
that
with
this
item
and
give
it
a
test,
and
so
we're
going
to
item
number
17,
consider
approval
of
response
to
2022
civil
grand
jury
of
Santa
Clara
County
report
entitled
A
house
divided.
W
So
we're
here
today
to
discuss
the
grand
jury
report
that
we
received
into
December.
That's
entitled,
A
house
divided
the
Cupertino
city,
council
and
City
staff.
It
was
released
by
the
Santa
Clara
County
Civil
grand
jury
on
December
17th
pursuant
to
the
California
state
law.
The
city
must
respond
to
the
findings
and
recommendations
in
the
report
within
90
days
and
we're
here
to
seek
council's
guidance
on
a
draft
response.
That's
provided
in
your
agenda
packet.
The
proposed
response
focuses
on
the
grand
jury's
findings
and
recommendations.
W
That
is
what
we
are
legally
required
to
respond
to
I.
Think
I
I
want
to
just
briefly
pause
here
to
note
that
that
doesn't
that
with
the
fact
that
we
are
not
responding
to
every
factual
conclusion
in
the
report
means
that
necessarily
all
those
conclusions
are
accurate
or
we
agree
agree
to
them
and
in
particular
you
know
there
was.
There
was
a
a
description
of
a
council
member
inquiry
into
staff
credit
card
usage,
which
is
inaccurate
in
material
respects
and
I.
W
Think
it's
important
to
acknowledge
that,
at
the
same
time
as
acknowledging
that
I
think
it's
important
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
take
some
of
the
things
in
this
report.
That
I
think
resonate
with
me
at
least,
and
to
use
it
as
an
opportunity
to
discuss
those.
You
know
here
amongst
ourselves
and
with
the
members
of
the
public
that
are
present.
W
So
I'm
just
going
to
briefly
go,
go
over
the
grand
jury's
findings
and
recommendations
and
basically
those
focused
on
consomatic
interference
and
mutual
distrust
between
Council
and
staff.
The
failure
to
provide
the
monthly
treasury
reports
to
council,
which
is
also
addressed
in
a
separate
report
that
addressed
cities
throughout
the
county
and
the
city,
has
already
responded
to
various
fiscal
and
risk
management
issues,
City
staff
turnover
and
then
the
city's
ethics
policy.
W
So
the
render
of
this
presentation
is
really
going
to
focus
focus
not
so
much
on
what
the
grand
jury
found,
but
on
this,
what
the
city's
response
has
been
to
date
and
then
what
potential
you
know
potential
and
planned
future
responses
are
to
the
Grand
jury's
findings
so
and
I'm
going
to
start
with
some
of
the
responses
in
the
areas
of
governance.
So
we
attended
the
city
council
Retreat,
focusing
on
government
issues
on
February
3rd.
W
So
you
know
so
all
of
you
have
that
experience
fresh
in
your
mind.
We've
also
undertaken
an
Enterprise
leadership
study,
part
of
our
internal
audit
plan
and
that
study
will
assess
the
effectiveness
of
the
city's
management
and
governance
phrase
work
and
provide
recommendation
to
improve
those
procedures.
And
it's
again
this
January
is
expected
to
be
completed
in
June
of
this
year
and
then
also.
W
We
also
obviously
just
finished
consideration
of
the
council
procedures
manual,
which
is
a
need
separate
and
apart,
I
think
from
anything
in
the
grand
jury
recommendations.
But
it
touches
on
on
on
several
of
the
things
that
are
apparent
in
the
grand
jury's
findings.
W
City
response
has
also
had
responses
to
address
some
of
the
fiscal
risk
management
issues
that
were
identified
in
the
grand
jury's
report.
So
there's
been
a
new
Erp
software
purchased
by
the
city,
since
some
of
those
findings
were
were
some
of
those
concerns
were
raised
and
increased
segregation
of
financial
duties,
there's
been
increased,
stamping
Staffing
to
improve
Financial
controls.
Based
on
on
the
work
of
of
the
audit
committee,
the
city
did
begins
in
the
submission
of
monthly
treasury
reports
to
Council
in
2021.
W
The
city
has
implemented
a
fraud
wasting
review
review
program
that
was
approved
by
Council
in
September,
2022
and
implemented
late
last
year,
and
we
are
in
the
process
of
developing
or
actually
have
you
know,
have
do
have
draft
policies
for
high
risk
areas
identified
by
the
internal
audit,
some
of
which
are
in
draft
form
but
which
have
been
developed
yeah.
So
there
there
are
some
other
planned
actions
that
are
being
carried
out
by
the
city
manager
and
potential
future
actions
that
we
seek
Council
guidance
on.
W
W
It
also,
you
know
we,
its
Council,
has
approved
an
audit,
an
audit
work
plan
and
we'll
continue
to
implement
that
that
plan,
the
the
the
grand
jury
recommends
and
Council
may
consider
revisions
to
the
ethics
policy.
I
think
that's
an
area
where
it
would
be
helpful
to
get
direction
from
Council,
because
that
is
not
ongoing
work
at
this
time
and
then
there's
an
ongoing
Focus
among
the
city
management
team
on
governments
and
developing
clear
policies.
W
You
know
again,
we
we
just
finished
discussing
one
of
those
policies
that
I
think
is
important
to
have
and
and
based
on
your
vote,
we'll
be
revisiting
that
again
in
six
months
to
try
to
make
it
work
better.
So
so
so,
just
to
kind
of
summarize
that
that
a
lot
of
the
policy
and
process
responses
that
are
consistent
with
the
grand
jury's
recommendations
are
really.
You
know,
either
in
the
process
of
being
implemented
by
the
city
manager
or
or
implemented
in
response
to
policy
direction.
W
That
Council
has
provided
at
various
times
so
so
we
are
headed
in
the
right
direction.
You
know
that
said,
I
think
I
I
would
need
to
point
out
that
you
know
there
are
issues
of
council
culture
that
that
are
are
evident
in
some
of
the
grand
jury's
findings
that
you
know
we'll
need
to
address
and
that's
very
difficult
to
address
those
just
through
policy
changes
alone.
W
Although
you
know
we
can
all
do
good
policy
work
on
this
bias,
so
you
know
with
that
I'll
I'll
leave
you
to
for
your
questions
and
direct
liberations,
because
you
know.
Obviously
this
is
an
opportunity
for
Council
to
provide
input
and
I've-
probably
spoken
long
enough.
So
thank
you.
A
So
I
like
to
give
the
council
time
to
ask
questions
of
our
City
attorney
Jensen,
maybe
one
minute
each.
If
you
need
more,
let
me
know
anybody
has
questions
else
or
we
can
open
up
the
public
comments.
W
O
Okay,
so
for
things
like
considering
revisions
to
the
ethics
policy,
what
direction
would
you
need
from
us
in
order
to
move
on
that
from
today
and
be
able
to
include
it
in
your
response?.
W
So
for
purposes
of
the
response
today,
I
I
would
it
would
be
if,
if
that's
a
direction
Council
wants
to
go
in
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
get
a
direction
from
from
Council
to
include
that
policy
initiative
in
the
response
and
with
you
know
intention
for
for
for
for
for
staff
to
pursue
that
and
bring
it
back
to
council.
And
then
you
know
if,
if
I,
if
we
could
I
would
I,
would
recommend
allowing
allowing
me
to
work
with
the
city
manager
to
to
discuss
the
timing
of
that
response.
D
Come
on
first
so,
could
you
clarify.
W
It's
a
confidential
investigation,
the
interviews
are,
are
confidential.
The
conversations
of
of
subjects
that
are
interviews
are
confidential
and
they're
not
allowed
to
disclose
that
with
with
anybody,
including
their
attorney.
So
until
the
report
is
published,
correct
and
then
but
and
then
the
report
is
published,
but
you
know
whatever
process
that
the
grand
jury
used
does
not
is
not
necessarily
disclosed.
D
C
D
W
Yeah
again
I
I
so
again,
I
had
it's
a
confidential
process
and
and
that.
D
Y
So
remember
more,
thank
you.
So
I
appreciate
the
city
attorney's
statement
to
of
clarification
regarding
the
the
incorrect
paragraph
they
had
in
the
report.
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
that
I
believe
was
about
me
and
I
did
provide
a
a
statement
in
the
written
Communications
I.
Don't
know
if
you've
seen
it
but
I'm
curious
about
the
penalties
for
making
false
statements.
Item.
W
Y
Yeah
yeah
I'm
concerned
about
that
one
one,
a
couple
of
things
that
I
thought
were
were
somewhat
confusing,
perhaps
to
the
public
in
finding
three.
The
report
makes
it
sound
like
the
embezzlement
which
ended
around
September
of
2014
was
found
in
2014
I,
don't
know
if,
if
you
caught
that,
that
was
misleading,
the
city
doesn't
correct.
It
I,
don't
know
that
they
should
so
that
the
public
will
understand
that
the
embezzlement
was
found
in
2018
and
I've.
So
I
don't
know.
W
Report
so
so
again,
the
general
approach
that
the
response
took
would
was
to
respond
to
the
findings
and
recommendations.
You
know
and
not
necessarily
to
every
factual
statement
in
the
report.
You
know
that's
that
is
the
requirement
under
the
the
penal
code
and
and
I
think
that's
probably
actually
the
the
most
productive
thing
for
the
city.
As
far
as
framing
the
discussion
about
sort
of
you
know,
what's
in
there
that
we
agree
with,
and
what's
in
there,
that
we
disagree
with.
Y
Okay;
okay,
that
that
makes
sense,
but
there
were
a
number
of
internal
controls
reports
that
came
out
in
2018
and
2019
and
the
the
report.
The
response
is:
isn't
like
you're
saying
it's:
it's
not
correcting
these
these
items.
Okay!
O
Yeah
I've
got
really
one
last
one.
You
know
if
it
would
be
helpful
to
the
nature
of
our
response
and
to
preventing
these
sorts
of
problems
from
arising
again
in
the
future.
O
You,
as
the
City
attorney,
are
empowered
with
enforcing
the
municipal
code.
So
would
it
make
sense
to
report
back
on
violations
of
the
municipal
code
that
you
think
would
be
worth
our
time
to
examine
and
incorporate
into
a
our
later
actions.
A
Okay,
if
there's
no
more
questions
for
our
attorney
Jensen
I'm,
going
to
open
the
public
comment.
B
Yes,
mayor
I
have
three
blue
speaker
cards
for
the
people
that
are
in
Community,
Hall
and
I.
See
three
people
have
their
hands
raised
in
Zoom.
If
you
could
have
your
hands
raised,
anyone
wishing
to
speak
on
the
side-
and
please
have
your
raise
in
the
next
five
minutes,
as
well
as
in
Community
Hall.
So
we
have
Connie
Connie,
Cunningham,
Jennifer,
Griffin
and
hema
kondagi
welcome
Connie.
G
I
do
I,
am
impressed
with
our
attorney's
Jensen
to
to
come
with
the
answers
and
to
show
where
we
have
already
done
some
things
to
get
better
and
that
we
take
when
we
take
exception
and
that
kind
of
thing
so
I
thought
it
was
very,
very
professionally
done
and
I
appreciate
it
and
I
hope
that
we
can
take
care
of
that
this
evening
and
put
it
behind
us.
Thank
you.
H
A
good
evening,
city,
council
I
just
witnessed
something
that
I
never
thought
that
I
would
see
in
23
years,
so
I
won't
go
down
that
road.
I
think
that
the
I've
used
the
term
dog
and
pony
show
before
for
the
housing
element.
The
arena
numbers
I
hate
to
say
this,
but
this
jury
report
really
I
won't
say
what
it
was,
but
it's
very
capricious
it's
very.
H
It
I
understand
that
the
grand
jury
you
know,
but
to
attack
two
of
our
sitting
city,
council
members
and
our
former
mayor.
Where
did
these
people
get
off?
You
know,
I,
don't
think
that
the
public
fully
understands
the
strain
that
elected
officials
go
through.
I
have
gone
through
many
many
things
with
Darcy
with
Kitty
and
with
Liang
and
I
would
tell
you
right
now.
If
we
were
starting
out
with
a
Revolutionary,
War
I
would
follow
these
people
to
the
end
of
the
Earth.
H
We
started
out
fighting
the
housing
element
in
San
Jose
and
that's
why
they're
sitting
in
office?
This
is
what
cities
do.
This
is
what
democracy
is
about.
This
is
why
I
had
family
members
die
in
North
Carolina.
In
1765,
five
people
from
one
family
and
then
we
they
took
up
the
brothers,
took
up
the
fight
with
George
Washington
and
Thomas
Jefferson.
Yes,
you
may
laugh
about
it,
but
it's
my
family,
history
and
I
see
every
evidence
that
we're
going
down
this
road
again.
H
I
I
take
exception
that
someone
would
criticize
people
that
I
believe
in
and
I'll
tell
you
right
now.
There
are
people,
former
mayors
and
city
council
members
of
this
city
that
I
had
great
respect
for
in
the
last
23
years,
and
I
have
lost
all
respect
for
them.
H
I
have
great
respect
for
you.
Our
current
attorney
I
do
but
I
will
tell
you.
Mr
Killian
was
one
of
the
most
Noble
wonderful
attorneys
that
we
had
and
he
would
explain
things
to
us.
We
learned
and
Chris
I
believe
you
are
of
the
same.
Caliber
I
have
no
problem
with
what
you're
doing,
but
the
load
that
has
been
put
on
the
public
by
this
type
of
civil
grand
jury
report.
You
talk
about
dysfunction.
H
We
we
didn't
have
dysfunction
when
Darcy
was
mayor,
nothing,
but
what
I
witnessed
tonight
is
complete
dysfunction
in
one
month.
The
audacity
that
people
that
were
just
elected
are
telling
the
public
that
nothing
that
they
believe
in
is
worth
anything
after
23
years
and
five
years
on,
the
Planning
Commission
I
mean
sorry.
The
Board
of
Supervisors
and
I
was
raised
in
the
county
under
the
Board
of
Supervisors.
Don't
tell
me
that
what
I
believe
is
wrong.
F
B
And
I
do
not
see
Miss
kandarghi
in
the
audience
anymore,
so
I
will
move
to
zoom.
We
have
seven
speakers
with
their
hands
raised
on
Zoom,
we'll
start
with
Louise
sadati,
followed
by
Peggy
Griffin,
followed
by
Donna
Austin
welcome,
Louise.
Q
Hello
night
owls
I
would
like
to
speak
on
item
17.
The
grand
jury
findings.
Please,
the
grand
jury
made
some
recommendation
and
we
really
do
have
to
respect.
Are
our
justice
system
and
our
checks
and
measures,
and
not
second
guess
them.
Civil
grand
juries
is
a
a
process
and
procedure
that
has
existed
to
protect
the
governance
of
all
cities
throughout
the
United
States
and
so
I
would
really
like
you
to
follow
the
recommendations
of
the
grand
jury.
Please
complete
the
processes
and
procedures
that
follow
the
grand
jury.
Q
Q
They
were
found
to
have
been
not
completed
and
and
with
the
inadequate
evidence
of
the
processes
and
procedures
being
made
transparent
and
clear
and
I
think
Sheila,
and
this
new
Council
will
make
that
happen
and
not
have
it
buried
under
multiple
multiple
layers
of
different
committees
and
commissions.
Q
The
brand
jury
findings
were
very
critical
of
the
80
loss
of
high
level
staff
because
of
the
dysfunctional
treatment
by
certain
specific
council
member
and
prior
mayor
increase
of
dras
public
race,
Act
of
requests
from
minimal
single
digit
requests
per
year
to
suddenly
over
20
era,
requests
from
a
single
single
council
member.
It's
very
very
startling,
to
say
the
least.
This
took
up
over
300
hours
of
City
staff,
fight
for
information,
Gardner
that
garnered
nothing
significant.
Q
The
300
hours
could
have
been
used
instead
to
complete
projects
in
the
city
work
plan
when
our
staff
is
so
understaffed,
because
the
best
flight,
the
information
could
have
been
obtained
via
proper
normal
channels
through
the
city
manager,
rather
than
hijacking
the
city
staff's
time
and
availability
through
abusive
use
of
Pras
and
abusing
our
system
of
Civic
city
government.
So
going
around
processes
is
not
a
commendable
procedure.
It's
not
a
commendable
human
behavior,
so
I
would
recommend
that
all
the
council
people
every
one
of
them.
Q
B
V
Evening,
mayor
way,
vice
mayor,
Mohan,
council
members
and
City
attorney,
Jensen
I
would
like
to
thank
City
attorney
Jensen
for
clarifying
that
the
errors
in
the
report
are
not
being
addressed
that
you
are
focusing
on
the
response
required
by
law.
I
also
appreciate
that
you
specifically
clarified
that
the
statement
regarding
council
member
Moore
was
inaccurate.
V
This
process
does
not
allow
for
people
to
see
their
accusers
and
provide
proof
to
contradict
that.
That
said,
I
would
like
I,
have
two
questions,
one
on
page
three:
finding
three
improving
cities,
Financial
Risk
profile,
response
last
bullet.
My
question
is:
did
the
city
present
the
ninth
policy
to
the
internal
auditor
of
moss
Adams
for
review
by
January
31st,
as
it
stated
and
question
two
is
regarding
the
paragraph
after
that
last
bullet
city
is
in
compliance
with
financial
reporting
requirements.
V
V
We
have
no
access
other
than
with
a
public
records
request
and
I.
Don't
think
that
if,
if
a
council
member
has
the
council
member
has
the
right
to
information
to
make
informed
decisions,
and
if
they
ask
for
that
information-
and
they
don't
get
any
response,
then
a
public
records
request
is
the
only
way
they
can
get
that
information,
because
they're
being
they're
not
getting
a
response
in
a
timely
manner.
If
that
can
be
fixed
and
a
response
can
be
handled,
then
that's
okay,
I
watched
the
workshop
I
know.
V
I'm
short
I
think
that
it
was
a
good
idea,
but
the
last
hour
was
the
most
productive
and
I
think
you
should
have
it
every
six
months,
six
weeks,
but
only
that
last
half
hour,
part
where
people
can
talk
and
ask
questions
and
Express
their
frustrations
on
how
to
work
around
it.
That
was
very
productive,
so
every
six
weeks
I
think,
would
benefit
all
of
you.
Thank.
B
AD
AD
Adopting
this
procedures
manual
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction.
I
think
the
code
of
ethics
was
a
vital,
vital
component,
which
I
noticed
we've
adopted
again
I,
remember
asking
at
the
time
when
they
had
gotten
rid
of
it
and
I
I
asked
Darcy
Paul.
He
said.
Oh
it's
because
the
staff
was
insulin
and
I
said
what
does
the
staff
have
to
do
with
the
code
of
ethics,
but
he
was
gone.
I
never
got
that
answer,
but
an
80
loss
of
staff
is
is
the
answer
we
need
respect.
AD
This
is
our
our
government
is
our
governing
is
by
City
Manager.
We
need
to
respect
our
staff
and
their
time
and
respect
each
other.
It
gives
the
public
more
time
to
be
able
to
put
their
input,
give
their
input
so
I
think
we
really
need
to
respond
and
address
and
correct
anything
that
was
incorrect
in
the
report.
B
AK
Thank
you
very
much,
Council
I'm,
I'm
glad
that
the
grand
jury
chose
to
take
up
this
matter.
As
you
know,
our
grand
juries
look
at
problems
in
branches
of
local
government
and
agencies.
Vta
has
had
three
grand
jury
reports.
The
the
Water
Valley
Water
has
had
several
and
I
think
it's
important
to
take
this
seriously.
AK
AK
I
would
suggest
you
change
the
language
to
Simply.
Agree
you'll,
be
stronger
for
having
met
this
a
challenge
with
honesty
and
deliberation
rather
than
trying
to
to
say.
Well,
you
really
disagree
or
you
partially
disagree.
It's
just
not
I
mean
the
findings
of
one
and
two
in
my
experience
are
are,
are,
are,
are
accurate
and,
and
you
present
a
weaker
response
by
denying
that
they're,
not
as
for
the
fiscal
finding.
AK
It's
certainly
the
case
that
it's
most
important
to
note
that
when
we
finally
got
a
system
we
were
able
to
erect
refined
the
variances
and
issues
that
had
come
up.
So
thanks
to
that
I.T
system
that
was
put
in
place,
we
were
able
to
Spotlight
the
fraud
and
and
deal
with
that
so
I
think
that
was
a
an
appropriate
thing.
So,
thanks
for
your
time,
I
I
hope
you.
You
strengthen
this
response.
AL
Hi
good
evening,
Council,
mayor
attorney
and
all
present,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight.
I
I
have
I,
read
the
the
report
and
I
personally
found
it.
It
seemed
like
it
might
be
biased.
AL
Kitty
I
know
Liang
I
helped
him
campaign
and,
like
Jennifer,
said,
I
trust
them
completely,
and
so
I'm
new
to
politics,
City
governance
and
relatively
new
to
the
city
only
been
here
for
eight
nine
years,
but
from
what
I
have
seen
and
read
and
heard
prior
to
Kitty
and
Liang
council
members
and
mayor
Paul,
all
previous
Council
were
not
exactly
resident
friendly,
and
so
it
is
possible
that
the
perhaps
the
staff
or
you
know,
got
used
to
a
certain
modus
operandi,
not
good
or
bad,
just
used
to
it
and
were
were
following
orders
and
when
this
Council
resident
friendly
Council
came
in
and
started
asking
questions
and
looking
and
and
and
and
questioning
and
uncovering
things
like
I
have
previously
stated
Kitty
finding.
AL
So
many
discrepancies
and
reports
that
had
been
you
know
shoved
under
the
rug.
Not
noted
professionals
brought
to
City
Council
meetings,
and
it
just
it
was
quite
I
mean
it
was
amazing.
I
I
I
was
hand
witnessed
several
of
them.
I
couldn't
believe
reading
some
of
the
statements
and
seeing
the
truth
at
the
time.
AL
I'm
not
saying
about
this
Council
because
they've
just
arrived,
but
I
could
see
how
coming
in
would
disrupt
the
staff
that
was
used
to
that,
and
you
know
I
don't
blame
the
staff
if
they
have
to
operate
under
certain
government.
AL
You
know
certain
council
members
and
are
used
to
a
certain
way
and
now
a
new
Resident
friendly
Council
comes
in
and
they're
all
Shake
It
Up
I
think
that
there
have
been
forces
opposing
both
the
city
for
a
long
time
and
I
think
that
this
I
don't
know
who
reported
I,
don't
know
what
happened.
I
do
think
that
it
could
have
been
avoided.
We
had
this
Rift
not
been
there.
AL
It
is
it
possible
that
there
was
outside
forces
influencing
it
possible.
I
have
no
evidence
I'm,
just
throwing
it
out
there,
because
I
know
these
people
and
I
trust
them.
Thank
you.
B
R
AM
The
opportunity
I
would
just
like
to
point
out,
as
a
City
attorney
pointed
out,
the
consideration
of
the
council
procedure
reform
constitutes
part
of
this
response
to
the
grand
jury
report
and,
as
such
I
commend
the
council
members
who
contributed
affirmative
votes
to
the
adoption
of
the
new
city,
Council
procedures
manual
generally
I
would
appreciate
it
if
the
council
can
take
this
matter
seriously
and
in
good
faith
rather
than
trying
to
propose
in
the
validity
of
the
grand
jury's
conclusions.
AM
So,
instead
of
trying
to
fight
a
needless
fight,
it
is
probably
more
important
to
listen
and
treat
the
very
existence
of
these
findings
as
telling
and
really
push
for
a
change
in
culture
and
relationships
within
the
city's
workplace,
rather
than
indulge
in
useless
legal
clarifications
and
conspiracy
theories,
but
yeah
or
thank
you
for
the
time
and
I
appreciate
your
seriousness
in
this
matter.
N
Good
evening
again,
mayor
way
and
City
Council,
Members,
I'm,
Jennifer,
Sheeran
and
I'm
here
tonight,
speaking
only
as
myself
after
reading
the
grand
jury
report
a
month
or
two
ago,
I
was
shocked,
but
not
surprised.
We
need
to
accept
the
findings
and
stop
fighting
it.
Here's
some
of
my
personal
experiences,
which
I've
had
I've,
often
seen
Council
meetings,
which
included
unpleasant
and
disrespectful
questioning
and
comments
towards
staff.
N
I
personally,
would
not
have
wanted
to
consider
applying
for
a
position
with
the
city.
If
I
watch
Council
meetings,
I
could
not
find
a
published
ethics
code
when
I
looked
it
up
last
year
after
being
threatened
on
Nextdoor
by
a
sitting.
Commissioner
I
am
friends
with
the
previous
city
manager,
who
told
me
she
left
because
of
dysfunctional
counsel
actions,
specifically
by
our
former
mayor.
Many
of
our
fantastic
staff
have
left
because
of
council
actions,
some
for
so-called
retirements,
where
they
really
just
quietly
look
for
another
job.
N
Soon
after
in
order
for
us
to
improve,
we
need
to
face
the
mistakes
we
have
made
and
not
make
excuses.
Then
we
can
move
forward.
Name,
calling
like
quote
not
being
resident
friendly,
is
an
excuse
and
it's
unfortunately,
not
even
true,
as
the
city's
response
says,
quote:
distrust
between
staff
and
council
members
has
been
pervasive
and
mutual.
N
We
need
to
fix
this,
but
I
am
optimistic.
I
can
already
tell
that
the
new
council
is
working
on
this
through
new
Council
procedures
and
more
appropriate
communication
to
staff.
I.
Do,
however,
disagree
which
I
think
Rod
sinks
mentioned
about
some
of
the
responses,
in
my
case,
specifically
to
recommendation
4B
the
state
that
the
only
way
council
members
are
police
for
ethical
violations
is
by
answering
to
voters
is
unacceptable.
N
We
residents
should
not
have
to
wait
for
four
years,
as
our
only
vote
on
whether
a
council
member
is
acting
ethically,
we
may
not
or
need,
may
not
need
or
want
an
Ethics
Committee,
but
some
procedures
should
be
in
place
to
recommend
action
on
ethics
issues
for
Council
Members
I.
Ask
that
you
consider
this
for
future
action.
N
O
Five
minutes
please
yeah
I'll
actually
get
given
where
we
are
in
the
evening
and
how
many
things
are
on
consent
still
left
to
be
addressed.
We
have
a
lot
of
Staff
who
are
here
who
have
stuck
around
to
be
able
to
address
those
issues.
I,
don't
think
that
we're
likely
to
get
to
them.
So
I'd
like
to
table
this
discussion
for
the
moment
so
that
we
can
continue
the
matters
that
are
on
the
consent.
Calendar.
O
When
I
say
that
I
want
to
table
it,
I'm
saying
we
will
suspend
this
present
consideration,
we
can
go
and
for
the
sake
of
the
staff,
who
have
stuck
around
to
deal
with
items
that
we're
probably
not
going
to
get
to
continue
those
items
and
then
come
back.
Y
I'll
second,
that
I
have
a
question.
Yes,
please
for
the
City
attorney
through
the
mayor,
I
heard
that
there's
a
different
time
limit
for
a
person
who
is
named
in
in
a
grand
jury
report
to
have
their
response
made
and
that
we're
coming
up
on
that
that
there's
there's
a
different
timeline.
Do
you
know
anything
about.
W
A
A
A
W
D
W
E
W
It
will
come
back
at
a
future
meeting,
it's
being
it's
it.
The
the
motion
that
was
made
was
to
was
took
was
to
continue
it
to
a
date
uncertain.
W
I
I
and.
AM
B
A
A
That's
right,
so
we
are
going
into
item
number
18.
O
So,
as
the
mayor
you
can
reorder
the
the
agenda
and
I
would
move
that
we
reordered
the
agenda
so
that
we
can
address
the
the
consent,
calendar
items
that
have
been
pulled.
A
I
I
actually
would
prefer
to
go
to
the
number
18.
AG
A
X
Thank
you
mayor
wait.
So
we
do
have
the
administrative
service
director
Christina
Alfaro
here
to
answer
any
question
to
kind
of
give
a
little
background.
This
is
a
future
agenda
item
that
was
requested
by
council
member
Moore,
second
by
council
member
Chao.
So
we
have
a
very
brief
staff
report
before
Council.
X
AN
So
please,
a
good
evening,
mayor
city,
council,
Christine
Alfaro,
director
of
administrative
services,
with
a
very
brief
oral
report
for
you
this
evening
on
January
17,
2023
Council
directed
staff
to
follow
up
on
information
regarding
placing
a
future
vacancy
tax
ballot
measure
at
the
upcoming
election.
Before
proceeding
further
with
the
research
on
the
ballot
measure,
City's
role,
potential
tax,
Collections
and
costs,
and
identifying
possible
Consultants
who
can
assist
with
this
effort
staff
request
confirmation
from
city
council
to
determine
if
the
work
should
commence
so.
A
Just
clarification
question:
today's
agenda
is
to
ask
the
council
to
decide
whether
to
direct
staff
or
not
correct
yes
or
no,
so
do
we
have
king
questions
a.
D
X
If
I,
no
so
not
a
consultant,
so
before
extensive
research
is
done
by
staff,
we
would
like
to
affirm
the
decision
by
Council,
not
not
by
not
by
consultant
we'll.
Do
it
in-house.
A
Y
May
I
make
a
comment:
yeah
sure,
okay,
so
I'm
the
person
who
brought
this
up
so
San
Francisco
in
Berkeley
recently
passed
a
vacancy
tax.
Oakland
has
had
one
for
a
few
years
now
so
I
make
a
quick
statement
on
this.
It
is
a
fact
that
residential
real
estate
has
become
commoditized.
Y
Investors
can
leave
properties
vacant
and
have
historically
still
had
gains
on
their
Investments
that
the
state
and
federal
government
do
very
little
to
prevent
or
tax
Global
investing
into
our
real
estate
market
and
consequently,
we
have
residents,
writing
and
telling
us
that
they
know
of
vacant
homes
in
Cupertino.
We
also
have
a
growing
homeless
and
RV
problem
where
the
prior
city
council,
particularly
particularly
council,
member
John,
Willy,
championed
the
homeless
work
program
which
is
in
its
second
year
and
could
be
benefited
by
this
tax.
Y
The
vacancy
tax
in
itself
can
be
a
deterrent
to
encourage
owners
to
rent
or
lease
their
property
and
help
the
housing
shortage,
and
should
it
not
be,
then
the
revenue
will
be
a
benefit
to
help
the
homeless,
build,
affordable
housing
and
preserve,
affordable
housing
based
off
of
the
Oakland
measure
W.
This
is
the
city
attorney's
summary
of
measure
W.
The
proposed
measure
would
establish
a
new
tax
on
real
real
property
that
is
vacant
for
50
or
more
days
in
a
calendar
year.
This
would
be
a
special
tax
that
the
city
can
use
the
res.
Y
The
city
can
use
the
revenue
only
for
purposes
specified
in
the
measure.
The
tax
rate
would
be
6
000
annually
for
vacant,
residential
non-residential
and
undeveloped
properties,
three
thousand
dollars
annually
for
vacant
condominium,
townhouse
and
duplex
units
and
3
000
annually
for
ground
floor
commercial
space
Parcels
in
use
less
than
50
days
in
a
calendar
year,
I
want
to
bring
theirs
up,
because
not
all
cities
are
taxing
the
commercial
part.
That
would
be
something
you
would
need
to
decide
about.
Y
The
city
can
use
the
tax
revenue
only
for
the
following
purposes
to
support
a
variety
of
identified
services
and
programs
for
homeless
people
to
preserve
existing,
affordable
housing
and
produce
new,
affordable
housing
to
provide
code
enforcement
and
cleanup
of
blighted
properties
and
remedy
illegal
dumping
and
to
pay
the
city's
cost
of
administering
the
tax.
Thank.
A
If
not,
I
would
like
to
make
a
comment.
I
did
do
some
research
for
a
size
of
Cupertino
I.
It
turns
out
that
the
tax
is
coming
from
the
vacancy
tax
is
very
minimal
and,
to
put
it
on
a
ballot,
that's
going
to
cost
a
lot
of
money
to
implement.
It
is
going
to
cost
staff
time
and
money
to
implement
it.
I,
don't
think
it
will
work
and
not
now
that
it
won't
pass
that
the
benefit
to
Cupertino
doesn't.
A
E
At
the
at
the
recent
just
a
comment:
I
had
the
recent
League
of
California
cities
in
Sacramento.
There
was
some
discussion
of
this
topic
amongst
other
jurisdictions
and
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
city
manager,
but
the
cost
of
putting
this
for
forward
as
a
referendum
was
in
the
range
of
about
50
to
70
million
and
I
I
I'm.
Not
this
was
just
a
number
that
was
thrown
out
so
I
just
wanted
clarification
or
or
a
correction.
E
If
I
misunderstood
it,
it's
an
expensive
proposition
sure
and
it's
something
that
has
to
be
deliberated
great
detail
and.
X
Proceed
to
the
next
step,
I
believe
this
was
a
quote
provided
by
Christine
Christina
Turner
Morgan
Hill
City
Manager.
She
did
not
specify
whether
or
not
this
is
a
local
Bella
measure
or
state
one,
but
she
did
mention
it's
anywhere
in
between
50
million
to
75
million
dollars
and
she
just
quoted
a
Balor
measure.
A
D
52.70
million,
definitely
it's
for
a
state
major
for
the
city.
Major,
usually
I,
think
that
is
to
two.
It
depends
on.
If
it's
your
it's
a
general
election
and
the
cost
is
not
high,
but
there
is
the
cost
and
I
do
have
concerns
about
it's
a
complication
of
vacancy
text.
But
then
I
have
spoken
to
a
city
manager
that
a
potential
I
would
like
to
explore.
Is
we
want
to
incentivize
people
to
rent
their
home
out,
so
how
about
a
vacancy
registration?
D
That's
a
municipal
code
and
people
are
required
to
register,
and
if
people
find
your
neighbors
have
a
vacant
home,
you
can
report
to
the
city
and
have
them
register
this
way.
We
will
also
know
how
many
vacant
homes
are
there
and
likely
encourage
those
people
to
rent
them
out
so
that
we
can
increase
our
housing
Supply.
A
Okay,
council
member
from
do
you
have
any
input.
O
Yeah
I'd
say
that
I
agree
with
the
fact-related
comment
that
council
member
Chow
made
I
do
recall
the
dollar
figure
for
a
Statewide
initiative
being
somewhere
in
the
50
to
70
million
range
that
that
would
be.
It
would
be
rather
strange
that
a
local
measure
would
be
that
High.
O
That
said,
you
know.
One
of
the
things
that
that
does
concern
me
here
is
whether
we
would
be
able
to
get
past
the
two-thirds
threshold
on
a
that
you
would
need
in
order
to
pass
such
a
tax.
We've
not
seen
many
taxes
do
particularly
well
with
The
Ballot
Box.
Here
you
know.
If
there
are
people
who
would
really
like
to
see
this
move
forward,
it's
a
little
easier
to
do
as
a
member
of
the
public.
A
So
may
I
have
a
motion
to
whether
we
want
the
staff
to
do
research
on
this
or
not.
I
need
a
motion
and
SEC.
Oh
one,
more
minute.
Y
A
A
W
A
Yeah
did
I
make
a
motion
already
the
motion.
Oh
I,
see:
do
we
have
a
second
okay?
So
let's
go
to
public
comment.
B
Yes
Mary,
so
we
have
potentially
two
cards
in-house,
but
Jennifer
Griffin
is
our
first
Speaker
in-house.
B
H
At
least
it
isn't
two
Griffins
anyway
hi
yeah
I
boy.
That's
a
new
one!
I've,
never
seen
anybody
vote
before
the
public
spoke,
but
I
we're
just
we're
in
a
whole
new
dimension.
Here
you
know
I.
We
have
to
do
something
to
reverse
this
brain
dead,
trickle-down
housing
thing
that
has
been
babbled
out
of
Sacramento
for
the
last
well
since
2017,
when
Jerry
Brown
voted
on
the
first
bills.
H
Black
Rock
right
now
is
a
very,
very
aggressive,
Real
Estate
Group
that
is
buying
up
swaths
of
housing,
Southern
California
and
up
here
and
in
other
parts
of
the
country-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
vacant
homes
in
Cupertino.
I
know
that
I
have
friends
who
say:
there's
a
lot
of
big
vacant
homes
in
Mountain,
View,
there's
a
lot
of
vacant
homes
all
over
the
Bay
Area
and
they
just
sit.
They
sit,
and
maybe
they
have
a
gardener.
H
Maybe
a
car
is
stored
there,
but
because
the
Redevelopment
agencies
were
stripped
from
us
by
Jerry
Brown
in
2011
we
have
no
recourse.
Trickle-Down
housing
does
not
work.
You
can
hear
people
debate
it,
but
it
does
not
work.
So,
let's
do
this
I!
You
know
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
we
do
it,
but
to
me
it's
like
we
have
spent
so
much
money
on
the
housing
element,
so
much
harassment
from
the
state
on
the
housing
element.
All
I
hear
is
you
have
to
build
housing,
housing,
housing,
housing.
H
We
had
horrible
problems
during
the
pandemic,
with
our
poor
unhoused
people,
let's
give
them
housing
Let's,
do
let's
tax
empty
homes.
This
is
what
the
state
wants
us
to
do
we're
going
to
do
it.
I
am
you
know,
and
we
will
spend
our
money
to
do
it.
H
I
have
lost
all
respect
for
Jerry
Brown,
who
my
parents
just
adored
and
his
parents,
because
he
got
rid
of
Redevelopment
agencies
and
I,
don't
see
any
other
way
to
crawl.
Our
way
out
of
this
big
fiscal
hole
that
the
state
has
dumped
on
us
with
the
arena
and
the
housing
element
and
we've
spent
a
million
dollars
on
consultants
and
then
hcd
is
still
harassing
us.
H
Let's
do
it
our
way.
Let's
spend
the
money.
I'm
willing,
I
have
no
problem
with
it.
I
could
I
won't
go
there,
but
all
you
have
to
do
is
drive
around
Cupertino
Atherton
Saratoga,
let's
go
after
the
rich
people
and
make
them
pay
dearly
because
trickle-down
housing
works
so
well
anyway.
I
have
24
seconds
so
yeah.
We
need
to
start
looking
at
groups
like
Blackstone
I
I,
don't
want
to
call
them
black
rock,
because
that
was
a
contract,
a
military
contractor,
but
sometimes
I
think
Blackstone
operates
like
a
military
contractor.
H
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
hush
hush
hush,
but
trickle-down
housing
doesn't
work.
Thank.
B
K
K
How
many
in
each
category
of
types
of
housing
how
many
are
vacant?
How
many
are
rentals?
How
many
are
owner
occupied?
How
many
are
short-term
rentals?
Oh
yeah,
yeah,
great
idea,
great
idea,
never
happened.
That's
really
needed
to
be
needs
to
be
done.
It
needs
to
be
done
for
several
reasons:
housing
element
having
that
information,
it
would
have
helped
with
housing
element
decisions.
K
K
I
can
tell
you
that,
there's
among
the
good-looking,
you
may
not
realize
that
they're
vacant
homes
there's
also
red
tagged
properties
that
sit
sit,
sit,
they're,
red
tank
because
they're
they're
danger
and
yet
they're
left
to
sit
and
fall
apart
longer.
There
is
one
I
walk
by
often
that
has
been
red
tagged
at
least
four
years.
K
I,
don't
even
know
what
the
rules
are,
but
I
know
that
can't
be
okay
and
there
are
others
and
others
that
people
know
about
that.
I,
probably
don't
know
about
really
really
need
to
address
it,
who
who
needs
a
red
tag,
property
with
an
out
of
country
or
out
of
state
or
out
of
area
or
no
longer
living
owner
to
just
sit
there
when
it
could
be
used,
as
someone's
home
I
mean.
K
We
keep
hearing
people
wanting
to
fill
this
housing
Gap,
but
not
every
step
that
can
be
taken
is
being
taken
and
I
can
tell
you
because
I
work
in
the
residential
real
estate
world,
even
in
commercial,
you
should
see
the
ads
and
the
way
that
agents
promote
properties.
It
is
sickening.
This
would
be
a
great
investment
property
trust
me
and
you
wouldn't
even
have
to
rent
it.
I
have
seen
those
words
on
MLS,
it
shouldn't
be
legal,
but
somehow
they
get
away
with
it
and
it's
being
done.
G
Good
evening
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members,
I
continue
to
be
distressed
by
the
kind
of
noise
that
is
made
by
some
of
the
people
who
address
the
council
in
such
harsh
tones
screeching
about
how
the
state
is
such
an
abominable
entity.
It
is
the
state,
in
fact
which
has
set
up
goals
for
the
past
four
decades
for
cities
to
meet,
and
it
has
been
the
state
who
has
not
done
anything
when
those
cities
did
not
meet
any
of
those
goals.
So
that's
four
decades.
G
G
When
I
hear
the
screeching
that
goes
on
and
the
raising
of
voices
from
people
who,
in
fact
apparently
don't
have
an
answer
or
they
wouldn't
have
to
holler,
that
is
my
opinion,
because
it's
just
not
useful
I
have
and
I'll
go
back
to
the
set
item.
17.
I
guess
I
was
a
little
remiss
in
not
saying
I
too
have
heard
the
city
council,
B
rate
staff
from
lawyers
to
managers
to
division
heads
down
to
whoever
is
presenting.
G
It
was
horrible,
and
I
should
have
mentioned
that
last
time,
but
just
for
this
period
this
time
the
book
apparently
is
stopping
here
and
I.
Think
it's
a
good
time
for
us
all
to
reconsider
how
much
we
Screech
and
holler
about
answers
that
we
really
don't
understand
to
people
who
are
trying
to
work
through
those
issues,
including
our
staff
and
our
and
our
attorneys,
and
our
council
members
and
the
state.
G
So
I
would
like
to
hear
less
screeching
a
little
bit
more
thoughtful
ideas
about
whether
a
tax
is
appropriate
or
not
and
I
guess
that's
the
last.
Thank.
W
Raised
on
mayor
can
I
point
of
order
before
we
we
move
to
the
zoom,
so
it
is
now
11
58.
W
Our
new
rules
of
procedure
take
effect
in
two
minutes,
at
which
time
Council
will
need
to
to
vote
to
extend
the
meeting
and
decide
whether
to
finish
considering
this
item
and
any
additional
items
that
it
wishes
to
consider
tonight.
So
that.
A
A
A
W
A
Okay,
shall
we
vote
by
late.
B
A
V
Evening,
mayor
way,
vice
mayor,
Moen,
council
members
and
staff
Lisa
Warren
mentioned
the
housing
stock
inventory.
Yes,
knowing
where
we're
at
helps
us
to
know
where
we
need
to
go
so
put
that
on
the
burner.
I
am
in
support
of
having
a
study
session
to
look
into
this
vacancy
tax
for
Cupertino.
If
one
is
considered,
I
would
hope
it
would
apply
both
to
residential
all
types
and
Commercial
and
not
have
very
many
exemptions
but
review
what
works.
And
why?
Because,
maybe
that's
not
a
reasonable
thing
to
ask?
V
For
often
you
hear
a
business
is
left
Cupertino
because
the
owner
of
the
shopping
center
UPS,
the
rent
I've,
also
heard
that
apartment
complexes
around
me
are
vacant
have
vacant
units,
but
they
don't
want
to
lower
the
rent,
because
that
their
current
renters
then
would
ask
for
a
lower
rent,
and
so
they
don't
do
that
and
so
having
a
vacancy
tax
might
encourage
them
to
do
that.
V
At
least
one
house
on
our
block
is
vacant
and
it's
been
vacant
since
it
was
sold,
there's
weeds,
they
occasionally
get
cleared,
but
somebody
could
live
there.
It's
close
to
Apple,
it's
close
to
schools
at
least
looking
into
this
and
seeing
what
works
and
what
doesn't
work
or
whether
it
would
benefit
the
city
or
not,
I
think
would
be
helpful
and
the
money
could
go
towards
homeless
or
subsidizing,
affordable
housing.
Thank
you
very
much.
Please
consider
it.
AD
Okay,
my
name
is
Don
Austin
and
I'm.
All
for
housing.
I
think
we
need
more
and
I'm
really
concerned
with
the
homeless.
AD
But
what
I'm
worried
about
is
taxing
homeowners
houses
I
mean
they
could
be
on
vacation,
they
could
have
had
a
trip
to
Europe,
do
they
get
attacked,
and
then,
where
does
that
tax
go
because
the
person
owns
the
home
they're
getting
taxed
and
they're,
not
in
it,
because
maybe
they're
in
the
hospital
for
extended
period
of
time
or
on
vacation
who's,
spying,
I,
I,
guess:
I'm
worried
about
privacy
too,
yeah
I,
I,
agree:
people
are
just
buying
houses
as
a
it's
different.
AD
If
there
is
an
investment
and
they're
leaving
it
fallow,
but
then
that
should
be
at
the
maybe
at
the
purchase
time.
Are
you
going
to
be
living
in
this
house
and
if
you're
not,
then
we're
taxing
you,
but
people
that
own
a
home
now
for
you,
because
it's
intrusive
for
the
Privacy,
if
they
happen
to
be
gone
on,
a
medical
leave
or
something
is
happening,
why
they
would
pay
a
tax
and
what
would
that
attack
be
used
for?
AD
We
don't
have
enough
houses
for
people
to
afford
to
buy,
they
can't
buy
houses
in
in
our
area
because
they
can't
afford
to
because
they're
so
expensive
and
so
adding
attack
to
people
who
already
own
a
home,
seems
like
it's
gonna,
create
more
problems,
I
know
in
Santa
Cruz
they
had
they
wanted
to.
They
wanted
to
actually
use,
they
had
to
make
them
house
use
the
beach
houses,
all
those
beach
houses
where
people
own
them
and
they
come
on
the
weekends.
AD
You
know
your
neighbors
are
going
to
report
it
here
or
you
know,
what's
going
to
happen
so
I'm
concerned
about
privacy,
I
I
do
think
if
they're
the
tax
that
should
be
done
at
the
purchase
when
they
purchase,
are
you
living
there
and
they
have
to
sign
an
affidavit
or
something
that
they
are
going
to
live
there.
Otherwise,
then
they
could?
You
could
do
the
tax,
but
to
go
around
buying
on
how
many
houses
are
empty
is
a
little
scary
for
me.
I
I
worry
about
that
and
I
I
think.
AD
AM
Hello
I'll
try
to
keep
this
quick
since
it's
so
late.
I
definitely
echoed
Donna's
concerns
about
some
kind
of
Citizen
reporting.
Functionality
just
seems
like
a
great
way
to
fear,
monger
and
kind
of
just
not
a
good
idea.
AM
I'm
not
opposed
to
vacancy
attacks
amongst
the
Myriad
of
other
stronger
housing
policies
such
as
rezoning
reconsideration
of
height
limits,
removal,
parking,
minimums,
other
Chilean,
Municipal
policies.
There
are
just
so
many
more
I
support
the
mayor's
position.
The
cost
benefit
just
really
isn't
here
and
I.
Don't
know
that
the
city
is
the
right
actor
to
bring
such
a
measure
anyways,
as
alluded
to
by
a
council
member,
would
like
to
comment
that
trickle-down
housing
is
really
just
a
made-up
misapplied
term
when
the
car
market
is
short.
AM
No
one
suggests
that
the
first
thing
we
do
is
restrict
the
production
of
cars
or
pursue
a
tax
on
underutilized
cars.
I
would
also
know
that
Blackstone
and
other
Financial
firms
have
literally
pointed
out
in
their
reports
that
they
benefit
from
the
supply
constrained.
Market
I,
don't
love
their
investment
activity,
but
their
ownership
truly
does
represent
a
minuscule
percentage
of
the
housing
stock.
They
actively
benefit
from
low
housing.
AM
Supply
I
urge
the
council
to
review
the
copious
amount
of
research
on
stronger
policies
in
response
to
the
housing
crisis,
rather
than
direct
our
limited
staff
resources
on
the
feasibility
of
putting
out
vacancy
tax
on
the
ballot.
If
we
really
want
to
pursue
our
resources
on
taking
inventory
of
housing
stock
I
would
strongly
suggest
coordinating
with
a
regional
effort
and
support
for
rental
registry,
which
does
a
lot
more
to
help
our
nearly
40
percent
of
renters
in
in
the
city,
which
I
think
are
a
pretty
underappreciated
section
of
the
city
right
now.
AL
Hi
there
good
evening
again
and
I
more
than
support
this.
This
is
the
first
item
I
spoke
to
when
I
first
came
to
a
meeting
a
few
years
ago,
I'm
a
realtor
by
by
trade,
been
a
realtor
for
31
years.
I
know
a
lot
of
people
that
do
not
personally,
my
clients
might
I
say,
but
I
have
gone
to
a
lot
of
properties
that
were
vacant
and
had
been
vacant
for
many
years.
AL
I
know
some
people
that
I
have
in
San
Jose,
30
plus
properties
vacant.
They
just
use
them
as
collateral,
and
you
know
I'm
just
really
surprised
that
people
that
are
really
talking
about
and
so
concerned
about
the
homeless
and
the
housing
issue
and
are
against
something
that
a
lot
of
cities
are
doing
now
and
could
really
benefit
the
homeless.
AL
It's
not
going
to
cost
as
much
I
like
whether
it's
proposed
by
a
member
of
the
public
or
by
the
city
and
the
problem
with
the
member
of
the
public
is
who's
going
to
do
it
and
you
it's
not
something
that
you
can
control
I
do
think,
there's
more
and
more
people
interested
in
this
last
time
there
was
I.
I
was
at
a
meeting
where
I
was
in
a
meeting
a
zoom
meeting
for
sb9,
one
of
the
Senators
had
mentioned.
AL
17
percent
of
California
was
investor
owned,
non-owner
occupied,
not
just
not
just
your
mom
and
papa
I
know
my
clients
have
investment
properties,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
that.
Blackrock
been
big
investment
companies.
They
are
a
significant
number.
They
may
be
minuscule
internationally,
but
they
are
a
big
problem
because
they
do
own
a
lot
of
properties
and
those
are
properties
that
are
no
longer
available
for
resin
for
people
common
folk
to
buy
so
I.
AL
It's
hard
for
me
to
see
my
clients
compete
with
investors
that,
for
you
know,
for
them
it's
nothing
to
go
up
a
hundred
thousand
fifty
thousand
more,
and
for
them
it's
a
lot.
AL
I've
had
people
say
that
you
know
they
own
several
properties
and
just
have
them
in
in
in
somebody
else's
name
their
children's
names
to
hide
that
it's
investment
property,
because
it
was
in
a
city
that
taxed
them
so
I.
This
is
a
very
Progressive.
If
you,
this
council
is
supportive
and
really
interested
I
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity,
Find
Out
minimally,
how
much
and
how
it
could
be
done.
Thank
you.
A
D
D
I
mean:
can
we
say
that's
to
no
more
than
20
hours
staff
time
and
then
then
this
staff
can
define
a
scope.
That
is
that.
A
Okay,
other
question
comments
because
remember
more.
A
Y
Okay,
I
I
really
appreciate
the
members
of
the
public
who
are
in
the
real
estate
industry
and
no
know
that
this
is
a
huge
issue.
Y
The
city
I
believe,
should
follow
the
Oakland
plan
and
use
the
tax
revenue
to
support
the
homeless
in
Cupertino,
which
is,
as
we've
noticed,
a
growing
problem
and
it
it's.
It
would
be
excellent
if
we
could
also
use
it
for
the
homeless
work
program
which
council,
member
Willie
began,
preserve
existing,
affordable
housing
and
produce
new,
affordable
housing.
Y
A
E
Mary
I
do
have
spoken
to
some
people
in
the
real
estate
business
and
the
message
I'm
getting
is
that
this
is
not
the
climate
is
not
conducive
to
any
form
any
kind
of
attacks
at
this
time.
My
other
concern
is
that
we
have
some
pretty
huge
issues
that
we
need
to
be
deliberating
on
and
to
be
focusing
on
for
the
next
several
months
and
I'd,
rather
that
we
and
the
staff
focus
on
that,
rather
than
take
on
something
entirely
new
and
entirely
different
council
member
ciao.
D
Actually,
I
would
like
to
propose
on
a
substitute
motion
that
could
I
think
one.
Member
of
the
public
here
mentioned
a
rental
registry
and
I
would
like
to
see
a
vacancy
registry
also,
so
that
way
take
some
stock
of
the
landscape,
and
then
we
have
more
information
on
whether
it's
even
worthwhile
to
pursue
this.
So
I
would
like
to
motion
that
we,
the
staff,
can
bring
a
study
session
on
potential
registry,
either
rental
or
just
focus
on
vacancy.
Is
that.
A
B
Is
to
direct
staff
to
provide
the
data
to
potentially
out
of
measure
on
the
2024
general
election
ballot.
D
Yeah
I
mean
I
secreted
that
to
have
a
discussion,
but
I
do
have
I
looked
into
various
vacancy
texts
already
and
they
are
complicated,
but
many
of
them
have
exemptions
like
vacation.
Just
out
of
Hospital
renovating
house.
There
are
always
exemptions
for
those
situations,
so
that's
not
a
concern,
but
in
terms
of
the
cost
that's
and
whether
it's
worthwhile
for
Cupertino.
D
That's
my
concern
so
I
think
the
first
step
would
be:
let's
find
out
how
many
American
homes
are
there
maybe
do
a
vacant
home
registration
and
then
the
intention
is
to
incentivize
people
to
think
about
renting.
So
maybe
just
by
the
requirement
of
registration
would
incentivize
them
to
think
about
renting.
A
Y
Well,
through
the
mayor,
I
prefer
that
that
was
done
as
council
member
ciao.
If
that
was
done
as
a
friendly
Amendment
to
have
that
data
be
provided
because
I
I
feel
that
we're
basically
we're
making
a
decision
without
actual
data
here
and
there,
and
there
are
loud
voices
who
don't
want
to
have
attacks
on
their
empty.
A
D
You
feel
there
is
no
support
for
studying
vacant
texts
right
now.
That's
why
I'm
making.
D
F
A
W
C
A
Substitute
motion:
first:
if
there's
no,
the
sub-emotion
is
to
put
a
study
session
on
whatever
they.
A
Yes,
so
now
we
have
an
original
motion,
any
discussions.
O
Yeah
and
just
Echo
the
the
Prudential
concerns
about
whether
you
know
something
would
pass
I
just
don't
think
that
the
climate
is
right
for
it.
I
think
that
the
threshold
is
very
high,
I'd
be
happy
to
work
with
somebody
else
to
Champion
a
you
know,
an
initiative
that
is
generated
by
the
people.
That
way
it
only
has
to
pass
at
50
percent
it'd
also
be
open
in
future
to
some
sort
of
study
of
what
our
housing
stock
is,
but
I
think
we
should
handle
that
through
a
regular
agenda.
Setting.
A
So
I
like
to
make
a
subsidy
motion
to
not
have
a
study
session
on
this
on
the
vacancy
test.
It
it's
as
Shang.
One
of
the
speakers
said
we
have
a
lot
of
other
things.
We
need
to
do
to
increase
our
housing
stock
and
vice
mayor
Mohan
says
we
have
housing
elements.
A
lot
of
things
to
do.
I
do
think
at
this
time
to
have
staff
staff
put
time
into
study
this
vacancy
tax,
which
I
I
really
don't
think
it's
going
to
generate
enough
money
to
build.
A
Even
you
know,
affordable
housing
and
in
ours
in
our
in
our
atmosphere.
As
council
member
from
says,
it's
going
to
be
very
hard,
so
I
am
making
a
certain
motion
to
not
go
ahead
with
the
study
session.
Do
we
have
a
second
I'll?
Second
it?
So
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
on
accepting
motion
discussions
or.
D
W
D
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that,
whether
it's
two-thirds,
Vote
or
majority
vote,
depending
on
how
the
ballot
major
is
structured,
the
Berkeley
vacancy
tax,
major
and
I-
think
San
Francisco.
One
Also
are
both
majority
vote
major
they.
They
did
not
require
two-thirds
majority.
Okay,
so.
Y
On
the
substitute
motion,
I
would
like
to
make
one
statement
about
this.
I
I
think
it's
unfortunate
that
we
won't
even
have
data
come
to
the
city
council
to
have
a
a
robust
discussion
on
this
item
when
we
have
heard
the
support
from
the
public.
Thank
you.
A
Get
do
not
to
not
proceed
with.
W
One
so
by
by
so
all
unless
Council
votes
to
extend
the
meeting
again.
The
motion
is
that
the
meeting
is
adjourned
by
rule
and
all
items
will
be
continued
to
the
next
regular
meeting.
Okay,.