►
From YouTube: Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission Special Meeting - January 20, 2022 (Live Streamed Version)
Description
Coverage of the January 20, 2022 Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission Teleconference Special Meeting.
A
A
B
C
D
D
B
C
F
G
I
Thank
you,
hi
everyone.
We
are
the
cupertino
youth
activity
board
and,
first
of
all,
we'd
like
to
thank
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
for
the
opportunity
to
share
this
information
with
all
of
you,
we'd
like
to
start
off
by
quickly
introducing
ourselves.
My
name
is
ishita
vimula,
I'm
a
junior
at
cupertino,
high
school
and
I'm
the
president
of
the
youth
activity
board.
K
I
J
From
june
26
to
july,
3rd
of
2021
yap
hosted
the
award-winning
hacker
britino
for
its
fifth
year
in
response
to
the
kova
19
pandemic.
The
event
was
held
virtually
with
all
ceremonies
taking
place
as
webinars
new
and
experienced
coders
13
to
18
years
of
age
were
invited
to
test
their
abilities
and
creativity
as
they
addressed
a
secret
theme,
social
justice.
L
Mobatino
made
a
strong
return
this
year
and
was
yab's
first
in-person
event.
Since
the
start
of
the
kovid19
pandemic.
On
october,
8th
over
200
students
visited
the
cupertino
civic
center
to
socialize,
connect
with
local
mental
health
resources,
participate
in
safe
recreation
activities
and
enjoy
complementary
boba
from
teaspoon.
I
On
saturday
november
20th,
the
yab,
together
with
the
teen
commission,
attended
the
youth
advisory
committee,
yak
social,
an
event
where
youth
commissions
and
teen
leadership
groups
from
the
bay
area
can
network
exchange
ideas
and
prepare
for
the
yak
attack
youth
leadership
conference
over
90
teens
across
12
cities
visited
memorial
park
and
connected
with
their
counterparts
from
around
the
bay
area
to
socialize,
share
project
ideas
and
prepare
for
the
bi-annual
conference
in
march.
2022.
J
To
support
students
preparing
for
their
midterm
exams,
the
cupertino
yab
collaborated
with
city
staff
to
host
the
cupertino
cafe
and
open
community
hall
as
a
space
for
teens
to
study
for
their
midterm
exams.
Local
kitchens
in
cupertino
donated
coffee
and
snacks
for
all,
studying
students
and
flex
college
prep
provided
complimentary
tutoring
for
ap
english
math
and
science
courses
over
60
students
were
in
attendance
and
we're
hoping
to
host
another
cupertino
cafe
in
may
2022
for
final
exams.
K
L
Together
with
the
teen
commission
and
14
bay
area,
youth
commissions
and
leadership
groups,
the
yab
will
be
attending
the
bi-annual
yak
attack
on
march
26
2022
at
the
los
altos
community
center.
This
year's
march
madness
theme
and
activities
were
selected
at
the
yak
social
hosted
by
the
city
of
cupertino
in
november
and
will
guide
the
event.
Students
will
be
able
to
attend
workshops
focused
on
leadership,
skills,
networking
tips,
social
media
engagement
and
further
connect
with
their
counterparts
around
the
bay
area.
I
We
are
also
hoping
to
host
a
spring
cupertino
cafe
in
time
for
final
exams.
Finally,
in
summer,
we
will
be
hosting
the
sixth
year
of
hack
cupertino
and
are
planning
to
host
a
teen
movie
night
for
cupertino
teens.
We
like
to
thank
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
for
their
time
and
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
share
our
events
with
you.
C
C
I
have
one-
and
that
has
to
do
oh,
go
paul,
get
back
to
you
and
that
has
to
do
with
one
of
the
activities
that
our
commission
put
together
last
year
was
the
labyrinth
quest
and
we
had
sent
that
out
in
a
communication
to
the
schools,
and
we
were
hoping
that
that
the
youth
activity
board
could
have
been
helping
promote
that.
So
I
was
wondering,
were
you
aware
of
that?
Did
you
do
anything
to
promote
the
labyrinth
class.
C
E
I
I
Yeah,
oh
yes,
thank
you.
Last
year,
yeah
we
had
our
partnered
event
with
saratoga
and
campbell,
and
it
was
focused
around
kindness
this
week
this
year
we
are
planning
on
something
similar,
but
it's
not
exactly
the
same
event.
So
what
we
are
planning
is
the
south
bay
fun
fest,
which
is
going
to
be
held
in
may,
and
it's
like
a
carnival
type
event
where
teens
can
come
to
not
only
have
fun,
but
we're
also
planning
a
mental
health
and
kindness
theme
around
that
as
well.
E
Excellent
wait
and
I
have
one
more
question
this
is.
I
know
you
have
done
so
many
programs
so
far
in
this
circumstances,
and
also
you
plan
to
have
few
more
coming
up.
Have
you
faced
any
challenges
with
the
current
social
distancing?
And
I
know
there
is
a
conference
coming
up.
You
said
in
march,
so
what
are
the
precautions
you
are
taking
it
or
is
there
anything
you
need
additional
help
or
or
you
have
faced
any
challenges.
I
One
of
the
challenges
that
we
faced
in
I
think
december
of
2020.
We
were
planning
an
event
where
teens
can
drive
through
the
cupertino
library
id
area
and
pick
up
boxes
that
are
like
self-care
related
and
it
held
like
a
lot
of
goods
for
people
to
use
like
hot
cocoa
notebooks
things
like
that.
But
I
think
that
was
when
we
entered
into
the
purple
tier
zone
for
kovid,
so
we
had
to
actually
cancel
that
event
completely.
So
that
was
definitely
one
of
the
challenges
we
faced,
but
we
ended
up.
H
J
J
To
add
on
to
our
future
really
quickly
for
the
events
so
far
of
this
year,
when
they're
in
person
and
we've
made
sure
that
participants
had
their
mask
on
and
remain
socially
distanced,
and
I
think,
as
we
move
forward
into
more
events
in
the
future,
we're
very
aware
of
like
what
the
current
pandemic
is
like.
So
we'll
make
sure
to
keep
this
in
mind.
E
F
L
Yeah,
thank
you
for
that.
So
we
believe
that
the
commission
can
assist
in
a
couple
of
ways
like
liking
and
sharing
our
yap
post
when
they
get
posted
on
the
city's
instagram,
subscribing
to
the
teen
category
in
the
city's
e-notification,
sharing
our
yeah
events
and
opportunities
with
your
networks
and,
if,
like
you,
are
par,
your
parent
and
part
of
the
parent
chat
or
pta
sharing.
Our
events
with
more
parents
is
also
helpful,
so
essentially
just
like
helping
us
gain
more
a
larger
audience
for
our
events.
F
Excellent
and
then
my
second
question
is
kind
of
piggybacking
on
that,
which
is,
we
have
a
variety
of
programming
that
you
know
both
we
and
the
department
put
together
what
are
kind
of
easy
ways
of
engaging
yeah
when
we're
putting
together
those
events.
What
are
just
you
know,
good
ways
of
getting
in
touch.
What
are
ways
that
we
can
collaborate
more.
M
H
A
H
C
F
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
say
excellent
work.
You
guys
are
really
crushing
it
and
you
know
compared
to
when
I
was
attending
cupertino.
There
are
so
many
more
activities
going
on
so
way
to
you
know
way
to
go.
I
think
what
you
all
are
doing
is
really
amazing
and
then,
if
I
could
just
give
one
little
one
piece
of
feedback
which
is
continue
to
engage
with
the
seniors.
I
know
you
guys
have
done
projects
in
the
past
connecting
with
them,
but
the
senior
advisory
board
is
also
really
active.
F
So
there
might
be
some
partnerships
there
as
well,
but
I
think
you
know
everything
you
guys
are
doing
is
is
fantastic.
It's
a
really
big.
It's
a
big
task
that
you
take
on
and
you
execute
it
phenomenally.
Well,
so
well
done
and
I'm
excited
to
see
you
guys
continue
in
your
civic
path
and
remember
you
don't
have
to
only
be
on
the
app
you
can
also
join
other
commissions
as
seats
become
available.
You
don't
need
to
be
just
done
yet
you
can
be
on
any
commission
in
the
entire
city.
E
Yeah
great,
so
I
just
want
to
again
recover
what
commission
tampa
said.
This
is
this
is
great,
and
I
I
I
don't
think
that
if,
if
there's
no
covet
word
there,
I
think
people
will
say
well,
it's
all
normal,
that's
how
I
think
you
kind
of
adjusted
to
it
and
then
made
so
many
programs
which,
like
it,
keeps
on
coming.
I
thought
maybe
one
and
two,
then
you
will
stop,
but
it
looks
like
it's
keep
on.
So
it's
good
to
see
it.
E
E
Anyone
doing
that
like
so
that
it
is
on
everyone
face,
so
will
be
good
once
you
finish
everything
and
then,
if
there
is
no
specific
names
attached
to
it
and
then,
if
it
is
okay,
it
will
be
good
to
share
all
those
dreams
in
general
with
us
in
general.
I
think
that
would
be
an
awesome
one.
This
is
a
positive
one
in
this
kind
of
situations.
This
is
needed.
E
I'm
sure
that
everyone
will
have
a
dream
and
if
you're
capturing
in
a
beautiful
way
and
then
let
let
the
tree
gets
completely
full,
it's
not
a
fall
season.
It
is
going
to
be
a
spring
kind
of
let's
make
it
in
that
way,
and
then
I
would
love
to
see
that
one.
That's
that's
an
amazing
idea,
really
very
good
job.
I
appreciate
it.
N
Yeah,
thank
you
for
the
nice
presentation.
Yeah
there's
a
lot
of
fantastic
activities
and
I
really
hope
yeah
in
the
future.
We
can
help
you
to
promote
the
your
program
or,
if
you
need
any
help,
and
we
can
collaborate
together-
and
I
just
checked
the
use
activity
board
page
on
cupertino
website,
because
I
want
to
share
the
information
with-
maybe
my
friends
and
my
kids,
but
it
looks
like
the
submit
online
application
link
linked
to
a
expired
survey.
So
maybe
someone
can
fix
it.
N
C
Okay,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
echo
the
other
commissioners
admiration
for
the
work
that
you're
doing
and
our
thanks
and
keep
up
the
good
work.
We
love
to
see
our
youth,
and
I
know
commissioner
tombe
says
you
know
when
she
was
growing
up
that
wasn't
so
long
ago
and
we've
seen
her
grow
up
before
our
eyes
on
this
commission
for
the
last
eight
years.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
the
presentation
that
was
very
useful.
J
I
O
There
that
actually
worked
hi
everybody,
madam
chairperson
and
commissioners.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight.
I'm
called
in
tonight
to
congratulate
commissioner
tom
bay,
I'm
reaching
your
eight
year
term
limit
on
parks
and
rec
nisha.
It
was
fantastic.
It
was
a
pleasure
working
with
you
back
in
your
first
years
on
the
commission,
I've
had
the
opportunity
of
working
with
many
citizens
on
a
number
of
different
city
organizations,
but
I
thank
you
in
particular
for
your
impactful
contributions
in
highlighting
the
perspectives
of
the
inclusion
and
equity
that
happened
all
the
time.
O
It's
great
to
have
that.
To
have
the
wider
viewpoint.
You
know
the
heart
of
change
comes
from.
Creating
awareness
and
you've
really
brought
many
new
viewpoints
over
the
years.
The
second
part
of
change
is
showing
up
and
you've,
given
so
generously
of
your
time
toward
the
benefit
of
our
city,
and
I
really
emphasize
our
here,
because
you
always
have
as
well
you're
a
great
model
for
public
participation,
and
I
hope
you
continue
to
stay
engaged
with
the
city
in
the
future.
We've
all
benefited
from
your
contributions
and
look
forward
to
more.
O
I
want
to
thank
everybody
on
the
commission
for
your
service.
The
positivity
and
support
that
you
offer
to
the
community
is
really
really
important,
maybe
more
important
now
than
ever
than
any
other
time,
and
now
a
typically
I'll
stop
talking.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
talk
tonight.
C
P
Hi
there
everyone
it's
really
delightful,
to
see
a
lot
of
familiar
faces,
but
I'm
really
here
to
to
speak
to
nisha
and
to
thank
her.
Thank
you,
nisha
for
your
eight
years
of
service
on
the
parks
and
rec
commission,
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
it
was
really
a
pleasure
serving
with
you
back
in
the
day.
H
C
There
is
thank
you
so
much.
I
actually
received
another
input
for
oral
communications
and
this
is
from
menache
bianni
who
could
not
participate
with
us
tonight,
but
she
also
has
a
message
for
commissioner
tom
bay
and
her
message
is
nisha.
Congratulations
on
completing
two
terms
as
a
park
and
rec,
commissioner
and
being
the
chair
for
multiple
years.
C
It
was
great
knowing
and
working
with
you
on
the
commission.
I
want
to
commend
you
for
the
hard
work,
dedication
and
leadership
you
showed,
while
on
the
commission,
the
community
as
a
whole
benefited
from
all
your
efforts.
Best
wishes
for
future
endeavors,
so
that
was
from
monoxi,
so
we'll
see
if
we
can
get
nisha
to
cry
sometimes.
D
C
C
Okay,
well,
thank
you.
Moving
on
to
old
business
subject
is
commission
of
proposals
for
the
fiscal
year
2223
city
work
program.
This
was
an
item
that
we
had
started
at
our
last
meeting
and
but
we
did
not
complete
it,
and
so
we
will
hopefully
complete
it
tonight,
director
mcgreeny.
Would
you
like
to
take
over
yeah.
G
G
So
normally,
when
we
have
a
special
meeting,
we
don't
a
normal
protocol
is
that
we
don't
normally
include
the
minutes
from
the
previous
meeting
that
we
do
that
at
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting,
and
I
lost
sight
of
the
fact
that
it
would
actually
be
beneficial
to
include
the
minutes
from
the
last
meeting.
With
this
meeting,
and
so
unfortunately,
we
didn't
find
out
in
a
timely
fashion
in
order
to
post
it
under
the
24-hour
posting.
C
Okay,
so
just
to
reiterate,
we
can
go
through
commissioners
have
questions.
I
am
going
to
go
ahead
and
open
up
for
additional
public
comment
tonight,
even
though
we
had
public
comment
at
our
last
meeting,
we
did
not
officially
continue
the
item
and
say.
Public
comment
was
closed
at
our
last
meeting.
So
in
the
interest
of
allowing
the
public
to
comment,
we
will
have
public
comment
tonight
as
well.
So
why
don't
we
go
ahead
into
the
commissioner
question
portion
of
this
item?
If
you.
F
F
Okay,
great
and
then
one
of
the
other
things
is
that
historically,
if
something
has
been
is
not
completed
on
a
previous
work
plan,
it
automatically
gets
moved
to
the
work
plan.
As
I
understand
it,
the
memorial
park
park,
improvements
in
lawrence
midi
are
exceptions
due
to
the
size,
which
is
why
they're
being
factored
in.
Is
that
still
correct.
G
So
I
think
what
we
had
discussed
last
time
is
that
these
will
be
incorporated
into
the
work
program
for
next
year
and
that
should
just
be
taken
into
consideration
when
proffering
the
five.
My
advice
would
be
to
include
it
in
the
five,
but
if
you
don't
decide
to
do
that,
we
can
certainly
give
five
more
and
that
is
under
your
decision
making
tonight.
I
just
thought
it
was
helpful
to
give
that
information,
because
there
are
already
yeah.
F
G
I'm
sorry
I
clicked
it,
it
just
didn't
go
off.
Are
you
referring
to
the
ragnar
elementary
yeah?
Okay?
So
I
got
a
little
bit
more
information
about
this
item.
I
followed
up
with
public
work
staff
after
our
meeting
and
my
understanding
from
the
closure
of
eaton
school
is
that
considering
it
was
still
part
of
the
jua
and
that
they
did
work
with
us,
even
though
it
was
leased
out
for
another
purpose
to
another
charter
school
that
we
still
manage
the
fields.
So
I
I
would
assume
that
it
would
be.
D
F
G
So
I
wouldn't
anticipate
that
it
would
get
rolled
over
and
if
it,
if
it
did
it,
I
I
wouldn't
even
suggest
that
it
get
put
on
the
work
program,
because
it
would
definitely
be
done
within
two
or
three
months
of
past
the
deadline,
if
it
did
need
an
extension,
so
it
wouldn't
need
to
necessarily
go
to
the
whole
fiscal
year.
So
that's
why
that's
not
included
here.
E
Right,
thank
you,
chair
director,
a
couple
of
quick
questions,
maybe
just
for
clarification
so
that
we
started
on
the
baseline
for
today's
discussion
and
the
last
time
we
discussed
many
things
about
carryover
or
not,
and
we
did
it
so
again.
I
just
see
that
the
top
two
x
extra
large
projects
has
2
000
plus
hours
on
each
one
of
them
right.
That
means
4,
000
plus
hours.
G
Yeah,
so
it's
it's
an
interesting
conversation
to
have,
and
actually
our
interim
city
manager
kind
of,
went
over
this
with
the
council
when
they
had
a
discussion
about
the
city
work
program
and
what
is
interesting
about
city
work
program
items
is
that
usually
the
upper
management
is
managing
those
projects
and
those
programs
and
that
general
operations
kind
of
fall
to
other
staff.
So
you
know
it
doesn't
leave
a
whole
lot
of
extra
bandwidth
to
have
extra
projects.
G
However,
you
know
we're
happy
to
you
know,
tackle
anything
that
we
possibly
can
and
just
kind
of,
and
that's
the
great
thing
about
the
work
program.
Is
they
we
update
council
quarterly,
so
we
can
say
hey
you
know
we
haven't
had
enough
time
to
address
this,
and
we've
had
to
extend
some
deadlines,
but
I
think
that
the
way
that
the
city
work
program
is
structured
for
the
quarterly
updates
helps
us
stay
on
top
of
things
and
better.
G
You
know
be
better
about
tracking
them
and
more
realistic
about
what
are
we
able
to
get
done
and
what
aren't
we
able
to
get
done?
So
I
think
that,
right
now,
with
these
two
projects
with
memorial
park
and
lawrence
mitty,
the
the
hardest
part
for
these
two
projects
right
now
is
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
outreach
that
needs
to
happen
and
a
lot
of
that
falls
on
park
and
rec
to
coordinate,
even
though
they're
cip
projects.
G
E
Okay,
great
so
again
the
rational
begin.
My
that
question
is:
if
you
have
these
two,
if
you
include
it
then
do
we
still
need
to
put
five
or
three
that
that
was
my
question.
Maybe
I'm
still
not
completely
clear
on
it.
We
can
do
it.
So
I'm
trying
to
understand
if
we
include
these
two,
should
we
still
give
three
more
assuming
that
we
include
this,
we
should
give
three
more.
G
G
G
G
C
G
Yeah,
I
think
that
the
majority
of
projects
of
these
types
require
coordination
and
outreach,
so
I
think
that
that's
and
we
would
have
to
put
together
there
was
really
no
template
that
was
put
together
in
order
to
roll
out
this
first
dola.
So
I
think
that
there
there
is
some
work,
that's
already
been
done,
which
is
great,
and
so
you
know
that's
a
starting
point,
but
I
still
think
that
there's
a
fair
amount
of
work
that
needs
to
be
done
from
the
outreach
standpoint.
F
So
just
one
more
question:
the
housing
commission,
one
of
the
things
the
housing
commission
is
tasked
with,
is
the
the
new
software
that
they
have
to
help
citizens
determine
where
they
want
to
expand
or
where
citizens
would
like
to
see
build
happen.
Are
we
at
all
working
with
them?
If
so,
in
what
capacity?
Because
they're
like
in
the
beginning
of
the
design
phase,
and
normally
these
kinds
of
things
end
up
in
parks
and
rec
after
the
fact,
rather
than
in
the
design
phase.
So
I
was
just
wondering.
G
That
so
you're
referring
to
the
housing
element.
Okay,
so
we
are
actually
having
a
presentation
to
the
senior
advisory
council
on
monday
about
the
housing
element,
and
we
are
definitely
in
you
know,
talks
with
staff
from
the
community
development
community
development
department.
But
yes,
definitely
something
we
need
to
focus
on
at
the
get-go
and
be
more
involved
and
understand.
G
M
C
F
Yeah
one
more
question:
slash
clarification,
clarification
question
chair
the
next
segment
after
questions
is
an
opportunity
for
public
comment.
Am
I
correct
in
my
understanding
that
that
is
the
only
time
the
public
can
make
a
comment
on
this
agenda
item
for
this
meeting?
They
can
go
to
city
council
so
for
this
meeting.
C
Yes
right
for
this
meeting
so
so
this
is
their
opportunity.
They
had
an
opportunity
at
the
last
meeting.
We
are
opening
this
item
for
public
comment
again
at
this
meeting,
and
we
expect
to
complete
our
discussion
with
our
recommendation
after
public
comment
tonight
and
send
it
off
to
city
council,
and
then
it
will
be,
it
will
be
moved
to
city
council
and
the
public
can
go
ahead
and
continue
to
their
their
lobbying
and
advocacy
work
with
the
council.
C
C
Okay,
if
there
are
no
other
questions
right
now
for
the
director,
I
will
open
it
up
for
public
comment.
If
you
would
like
to
make
a
comment
on
this
item
tonight,
please
raise
your
hand.
Now
I
see
that
we
have
one
two
three,
four,
five,
six
members
of
the
public
right
now
we
only
have
two
hands
raised.
I
did
get
an
email
from
mary
ellen
michelle
that
she
would
like
to
seed
her
time
to
louise
and
mary
ellen.
C
D
C
C
C
Q
Q
The
jolliben
bill
of
work
was
completed
only
because
it
was
already
on
the
parks
and
rec
work
program
from
the
previous
year.
If
new
dolas
are
not
given
a
high
priority
by
the
commissioners
for
recommendation
to
city
council
for
the
2022
to
2023
city
work
program,
this
will
mean,
despite
fervent
community
pleas
for
support,
there
will
be
no
work
done
on
any
new
dolis
for
two
years.
Q
More
dollars
need
to
be
formed
throughout
cupuccino
to
enable
nearby
residents
to
walk
their
dogs
to
and
from
a
closed
stola
rather
than
driving
to
a
distant
dola.
This
complies
with
the
cupertino's
policy
of
encouraging
residents
to
walk
as
well
as
improves
residents
mental
health
by
giving
them
an
outdoor
opportunity
for
in
community
engagement.
Q
Next,
the
staff
report
of
proposed
prioritization
states
only
one
new
dola
per
year.
This
has
never
been
previously
discussed,
nor
proposed
no
other
project
that
that
was
presented
has
been
assigned.
A
limit
of
one
most
dollars
can
be
done
in
the
same
year
for
under
2
000
city
staff
hours.
The
upper
limit
for
a
large
project,
as
defined
by
the
staff
and
staff,
has
already
classified
the
dola
project
as
a
large
project.
Q
Q
Q
Dola's
and
labyrinths
are
the
only
two
projects
on
the
current
list
of
priorities
that
have
significant
driven
support
and
outreach
behind
them.
Since
dola
and
the
labyrinth
are
both
community
driven
projects,
there
is
a
natural
synergy
in
combining
them
into
one
project.
This
leads
to
my
final
and
most
important
point.
Q
D
R
Yeah
all
right,
hey
good
evening,
sorry
parks
and
recreation
commissioners,
as
well
as
director
for
sparks
and
recreation
department.
I
am,
as
you
might
expect
here,
to
kind
of
re-emphasize
that
dola
is
very
near
and
dear
to
many
community
members.
You
will
be
amazed
at
the
numbers
of
people
who
are
using
our
official
dollar,
but
you
will
also
be
surprised
at
the
number
of
unofficial
dollars
going
around
in
the
city
if
you
were
to
take
a
visit
to
the
parks
during
the
evening
hours.
R
The
reality
is,
I
am
already
spearheading
another
unofficial
dola
in
memorial
park
and
we
have
at
least
two
other
similar
ones
going
on.
Our
goal
is
not
to
remain
unofficial
for
two
years.
Our
goal
is
not
to
be
breaking
the
law
for
two
more
years.
Our
goal
is
to
just
make
the
community
happier
and
be
able
to
partake
in
something
that
they're
passionately
involved
in
in
a
legal
and
safe
manner.
R
The
dollar
at
jolliben
park
still
remains
the
one,
and
only
one
that
is
approved
for
official
use,
but
dogs
are
not
limited
to
just
this
one
area
and
we
have
had
a
huge
increase
in
dog
population
in
general.
They've
been
actually
helping
a
lot
of
people
during
covered
times
right.
I've
seen
people
adopt
dogs
left
right
and
center,
and
and
I've
had
my
own
means
who
adopted
a
cat
because
she
could
not
adopt
a
dog.
R
She
went
through
a
fair
amount
of
personal
turmoil
last
year
where
she
lost
her
father,
my
brother
and
she
was
going
through
mental
depression
and
it
pretty
much
turned
her
around
to
adopt
a
cat.
She
honestly
wanted
to
adopt
a
dog,
but
that's
just
besides
the
point.
I
want
to
just
put
it
out
there
as
a
personal
incident
right.
That
kind
of
gives
you
an
overview
of
how
important
it
is
and
how
passionate
it
is.
Coming
back
to
the
topic,
this
is
a
grassroots
driven
community
driven
project.
Make
it
a
priority.
R
Do
not
make
us
wait
two
years,
do
not
do
it
at
the
slow
pace
of
one
dollar
a
year.
You
do
need
to
expand.
I
don't
know
about
the
number
of
hours
I
don't
know
about
how
long
it
takes,
but
if
the
community
is
so
passionately
asking
sending
emails
and
requesting
and
pleading
for
something
like
this,
I
do
not
see
why
the
city
is
not
hearing
us.
I
don't
get
it.
C
A
F
F
F
C
That
those
did
get
to
us.
I
think
the
fact
that
we
have
already
discussed
this
one
and
put
forward
some
some
thought
on
it,
and
we
even
even
saw
where
was
the
initial
motivation
and
support,
and
I
don't
think
I
think
in
those
minutes
you
listed
a
number
of
different
items,
but
you
didn't
show
the
level
of
support
as
we
had
expressed
it.
Although
you
know
it's
not,
it
wasn't
a
final
tally,
but
the
item
that
got
the
most
support
was
the
labyrinth.
C
The
next
one
was
dola's
and
behind
that
was
working
to
make
sure
we
do
whatever
we
can
to
continue
to
use
ragnar's
field.
So
those
were
the
top
three
that
we
had
discussed
at
our
last
meeting.
So
I
did
want
to
make
sure
that
we
refreshed
everyone's
memory
about
that
and-
and
you
know
the
fact
that
there
was
substantial
support
from
the
full
commission
for
those
particular
items.
Commissioner
gopal.
E
E
So
when
I
look
at
it,
if
I
remember
last
time
the
dollar
one
right
now,
it's
been
qualified
into
a
large
project
compared
to
the
other
one,
which
is
the
material
the
one
with
the
coordination
that
we
say
is
a
medium
so
because
that's
the
first
time
we
are
starting
or
we
are
actively
going
to
work
on
it,
whereas
the
dollar,
if
I
remember
correctly,
we
talked
about
it,
saying
that
it's
already
done.
We
have
a
template.
We
have
a
framework.
E
We
are
going
to
utilize
the
public
who
currently
just
spoke
about
it
there
and
our
our
effort
would
be
just
giving
the
framework
make
sure
that
they
operate
within.
I
just
monitor
kind
of
rather
than
we
do
a
lot
of
outreach
activity
so
based
on
those
comments,
whatever
I
thought
it
would
fall
either
in
a
small
or
a
medium
cannot
become
just
looking
at
that
number
of
hours
and
right
now
I
see
as
a
large
close
to
2000
hours
compared
to
the
other
ones
we
have
on
a
one.
E
So
that's
what
it
is
kind
of
surprising
to
you
at
this
point.
Maybe
there
may
be
a
reason
behind
it,
I'm
a
director
so
because,
if
you
have
to
prioritize
any
of
these
projects,
I
think
we
will
be
mindful
of
the
staff
hours
and
I'm
sure
that
we
don't
want
to
pack
with
extra
large
large
large,
all
of
them,
so
that's
definitely
not
going
to
be.
G
Sure,
yeah,
absolutely
so,
just
as
was
handled
with
the
dola
at
park.
There's
notification
that
needs
to
go
out
to
the
community,
the
surrounding
community,
to
let
them
know
that,
there's
a
trial
going
on
and
to
notify
them,
there's
also
signage.
That
needs
to
be
posted
at
the
park
to
alert
all
park
users
of
what's
happening
and
what
is
happening
where
and
so
again
it's
a
lot
of
coordination
with
the
public
works
department
and
the
grounds
crew,
as
well
as
communications
department.
G
We
have
to
facilitate
calls
and
information
from
residents,
so
it
seems
like
it's
a
low
amount
of
work,
but
it's
actually
heavily
involved
in
the
outreach
portion,
not
just
from
understanding
where
these
need
to
be
rolled
out,
but
communicating
with
the
public
that
they
are
being
rolled
out.
Collecting
that
information
just
like
louise
had
indicated.
G
Not
all
parks
are
the
same
and
there
are
different
requirements
and
different
things
that
need
to
be
addressed
in
different
parks,
and
so
I
think
that
all
of
that
needs
to
be
taken
into
consideration
when
we're
talking
about
standardizing
we're
not
saying
this
is
the
cookie
cutter.
This
is
what
works
for
every
park,
because
we
certainly
agree
that
won't
work
but
figuring
out
the
framework
of
how
to
roll
this
out
in
order
to
be
able
to
facilitate
more
dollas
in
the
city,
because
that's
certainly
we
hear
it
loud
and
clear.
G
E
Okay,
yeah,
maybe
as
part
of
the
discussion
I
think
chair,
we
will
talk
about
when
we
do
it,
but
I
think
this
particular
one
I'm
trying
to
see
opportunities
for
us
to
collaborate
and
pull
in
more
community
support
or
the
tasks
whatever
we
said.
That
is
there
a
way
that
we
can
include
the
community
so
that
they
can
they're
ready
to
do
it.
E
Many
things
and
these
are
possible
so
that
we
can
reduce
the
only
concern
is
it
is
a
large
project
means
it
is
going
to
weigh
in
compared
to
the
other
projects
period,
even
though,
yes,
we
wanted
to
do
it
when
it
comes
to
the
large
size
of
it,
with
the
two
extra
largest
and
and
this
even
if
it
stands
in
the
top
three,
I'm
not
sure
whether
this
will
fit
into
the
existing
staff
hours.
That's
the
only
concern
I
have,
especially
when
it
is
in
the
large
item.
C
C
How
do
we
leverage
and
bring
the
community
and
say
give
us
the
proposal
similar
to
what
we
did
at
jolly
man,
and-
and
I
don't
want
to
define
it
here-
clearly,
that's
not
what
we
should
do,
but
we
should
be
looking
at
it
as
this
should
be
a
smaller
project,
and
that
is
the
goal.
Is
that
it
should
be
smaller
in
scope.
It
should
be
bringing
input
from
the
community
where
community
members
want
it
and
and
then
assessing
a
particular
area,
and
then
doing
you
know
the
notification
whatever.
C
That
is,
you
know,
a
hundred
person
hours
a
week
of
community
enjoyment
that
is
being
derived
from
one
dola,
and
so
I
think
the
upside
of
putting
in
those
hours
is
definitely
balanced
with
the
way
the
community
is
responding.
I'd
also
like
to
highlight
that
who's,
who,
where
have
we
seen
community
input
on
priorities
for
us,
and
we
have
seen
again
and
again
and
again
that
the
dola
people
have
submitted
emails.
They've
had
meetings
with
staff,
they've
had
meetings
with
commissioners.
C
They
have
come
to
our
commission
meetings,
they
have
sent
emails,
multiple
one.
They
have
spoken
at
our
meetings
and
do
we
see
that
kind
of
enthusiasm
for
any
other
project?
I
think
it
is
a
very
high
important
item
for
the
community
and
I
think
that's
our
role
as
the
commission
is
to
reflect
the
community
desires.
C
So
I'm
looking
very
strongly
to
make
sure
that
that
is
a
high
priority
from
this
commission
that
the
the
council
hears
that
from
us
and
that
somehow
we
find
a
way
with
staff
to
to
not
make
it
be
a
huge
project,
a
large
project,
but
to
minimize
the
time
and
to
to
find
I'm
not
saying
cut
corners.
But
I'm
saying
to
make
it
be
as
efficient
as
possible
and
it,
and
that
may
be
looking
very
specifically
at
a
particular
proposal
or
whatever.
So
that's
my
comments
on
the
the
dola
commissioner
tom
day.
F
F
Do
you
want
to
include
the
other
two
just
cause
in
my
head?
That's
how
I'm
going
to
stack
rank
stuff
if
we're
not
including
those
first,
two,
the
two
big
ones
memorial
park
and
lauren
smitty,
then
my
five
will
be
basically
the
rest
of
the
five.
But
if
we
are
including
those
two
and
we're
doing
five,
then
my
stack
rank
is
going
to
be
different.
So
I
just
want
to
know
kind
of
get
a
feel
from
the
from
the
two
of
you.
F
E
Yeah
so
we
talked
about
it
again,
I
think
we're
going
back.
I
agree
time,
commission
time
beyond
that,
because
since
it
is
extra
large
extra
large
project
by
including
it
I'm
sure
it's
going
to
take
away
many
things
if
you're,
including
it
I'm
any
anyway,
it's
okay.
If
we
include
it
we'll,
we
will
give
anyways
till
five
right.
I
think
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
will
provide
a
five
assuming
to
those
two,
it's
all
in
progress
and
I'm
not
sure
what
the
priority
will
put
it.
E
I
may
not
put
the
number
one
number
to
priority:
if
we
don't
put
it,
will
it
really
honk,
assuming
that
a
lot
of
things
are
in
progress
and
halting
some
other
things
which
is
in
progress
has
a
much
more
detrimental
effect
than
doing
the
other
one
start
right,
because
somehow
things
you
should
continue,
but
so
that's
the
part,
I'm
not
clear.
What
are
those
two
ex-large
projects?
E
It
is
an
operational
right
now
it's
in
motion,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
put
it
in
the
bottom
most,
because,
if
I
put
as
a
bottom
most
I'm
not
sure
the
city
council
will
come
back
and
say:
oh
yeah
stop
one
of
those
things.
Let's
do
it
later
kind
of.
I
doubt
so.
Invariably
those
two
will
go
back
to
the
top
again,
and
that
means
we
end
up
with
anyway.
Three
so
including
of
those
two
will
will
last
well
as
to
eliminate
the
other
twos
to
getting
into
the
list.
That's
all
I'm
thinking!
E
E
So
my
thing
is
that
take
the
rest,
one
prioritize
five
and
give
a
top
three
within
that,
and
I
I
think,
I'm
sure
that
it
will
go
as
extra
large
should
continue.
Then
they
will
pick
the
top
three.
That's
what
I'm
thinking
so
that
would
be
my
thing,
exclude
those
two
and
prioritize
five
and
within
that,
as
director
asked
give
the
top
three.
That
would
be
my
input,
but
I'm
open
for
any
other
comments
from
chair
and
then
we
can
work
through
it.
I
don't
want
to
put
this
as
a
big
challenge.
Okay,.
C
But
to
give
our
top
three
of
other
things.
We
want
to
get
done
because
we
know
those
big
things
are
going
to
get
done
and
they're
going
to
and
we're
real
and
we
want
to
work
on
them.
We
want
staff
to
work
on
them,
so
we
don't
want
to
minimize
them,
but
we
don't
want
those
to
overwhelm
other
things
and
we
should
be
able
to
do
big
things
and
little
things
it
seems
to
me.
Sometimes.
C
G
G
This
is
not
a
normal
year
for
us,
and
so
normally
I
would
say
you
know
you
could
do
five
projects
of
any
of
these
scopes
that
you're
putting
together
and
offering
for
this
upcoming
fiscal
year.
I
would
just
say
it's
an
anomaly
how
many
things
we
have
that
we're
working
on
with
the
cip
group
and
large
community
parks,
jolly
men,
lawrence
mitty
and
memorial
park
all
require
a
lot
of
effort
to
coordinate
sports
teams
that
use
those
parks,
use
sports
organizations,
festivals
that
use
the
parks,
logistics
signage.
G
I
mean
there's
just
so
much
that
goes
into
it.
I
can't
I
know
I'm
putting
it
all
in
the
bucket
of
community
outreach,
but
it's
notifications.
It's
coordination
with
public
works,
it's
coordination
with
communications,
and
so
it's
not
normal,
but
I
would
just
take
that
into
consideration
when
you're
making
these
decisions.
So
I
I
try
to
always
come
from
a
place
of
yes,
I'm
not.
I
never
want
to
come
from
a
place
of
no.
G
I
think
all
of
these
things
are
important
and
I
think
we
should
be
working
on
all
of
these
at
some
point
in
time
and
whatever
we
can
fit
in,
we
will
certainly
try
to
do
whether
it's
on
the
work
program
or
not,
for
example,
a
facility
use
agreement
if
push
comes
to
shove
and
regnart
is
closed.
We're
certainly
going
to
work
with
the
school
district
to
ensure
that
the
jua
is
updated
or
that
we
are
negotiating
for
the
field
use.
G
So
I
don't
want
you
to
waste
your
vote
on
that,
because
I
think
it
will
happen,
no
matter
what,
whether
it's
on
the
work
program
or
not,
and
I
don't
want
to
say
waste,
but
I
would
definitely
focus
on
what
you
think
is
the
most
important
for
this
fiscal
year
for
their
consideration,
because
there
will
be
a
lot
of
other
things
that
are
coming
from
other
commissions
for
their
consideration
as
well.
So
just
trying
to
be
mindful
of
that.
G
C
D
C
Priorities
we
might
be
able
to
put
forward
and
whether
the
two
extra
large
projects
that
we
know
will
be
ongoing
should
be
part
of
our
prioritization
of
three
or
five
items
and
the
discussion
that
we've
been
having
is
you
know
we
really.
So
there
are
some
people
who
want
to
give
five.
We
expect
that
those
two
will
be
will
be
required.
My
suggestion
was
to
separate
out
those
two
that
we
know
were
important.
C
So
though,
so
the
council
doesn't
say:
oh
those
are
the
top
two
and
the
others
are
less
important
for
for
the
commission,
we
know
we
will
be
working
on
those
two
particular
things
and
and
possibly
have
three
additional
ones.
We
could
potentially
have
five
other
ones
if
we
ignore
them
completely,
but
maybe
a
compromise
position
is
to
have
five
that
includes
those
two
extra-large
ones,
but
to
keep
them
sort
of
separate
and
to
identify
our
three
top
priorities
away
from
those
two
extra-large
projects.
C
We
also
did
hear
from
the
public
a
number
of
very
passionate
speakers,
all
in
favor,
of
ensuring
that
dolas
are
on
our
priority,
with
the
concern
that,
if
they
are
not
that
additional
progress
won't
happen
and-
and
so
they
were,
they
were
very
passionate
about
that
and
I
did
make
the
comment
of
the
commission's
role
as
listening
to
community
members
and
the
community
members
that
we
have
heard
from
the
loudest
and
very
polite
always
but
consistently
month
after
month
year
after
year
has
been
the
dola
users.
And
so
so.
C
E
Yeah,
I
think
after
I
listening
to
you
now,
which
you
nicely
summarized,
and
what
director
mentioned,
that
a
lot
of
things
are
happening
which
we
may
not
have
a
preview
into
it.
I
think
I'll
try
to
again
I'll
recommend
again
it's
my
recommendation.
Of
course
we
will
go
with
it.
Definitely
we
we
should
separate
those
two
as
you
originally
proposed.
So
let's
keep
that
in
the
other
we
have
only
five
and
then
we
can
stack
rank
them,
but
we
will
pick
the
top
three.
E
E
So
if
we
could
just
tack,
rank
the
other
five
and
then
only
we'll
give
the
top
three,
because
it's
there's
no
need
for
because
only
five
is
left
without
totally
seven.
If
you
separate
these
two,
you
have
only
five
and
then
we
just
stack
rank
them
and
pick
the
top
three
and
we
will
draw
the
line
there
and
if
at
all,
if
magically,
if
they
have
more
time,
then
they
can
go
to
the
fourth
and
fifth.
But
I
like
that
that
I
would
like
to
go
with
that
approach
too.
So
I'm
fully
aligned
with
it.
C
Okay,
the
the
other
comment
just
for
vice
chair.
I
did
review
the
way
the
support
that
was
voiced
at
our
last
meeting
on
the
items
for
labyrinth
projects
that
received
support
from
all
of
the
commissioners.
All
five
the
dollar
received
support
from
four
the
regnar
field,
use
received,
support
from
three
and
then
mental
health
received
support
from
two,
and
I
think
part
of
that
was
that
we
see
that
there
are
other
opportunities
that
mental
health
well-being
will
be
incorporated
in
certain
ways.
C
The
long-term
plan
received
one
vote
of
support
and
the
dashboard
did
not
get
eddie
so
so
that
was
the
support
that
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
reviewed
that
we
expressed
in
our
last
meeting
that
that
was
not
intended
to
be
a
final
decision.
It
was
intended
to
be
a
springboard
for
discussion.
Commissioner
tombe
yeah.
F
So,
just
speaking
to
speaking
to
that,
I'm
fine
with
facts
ranking.
I
want
to
revisit
the
long-term
strategic
plan
item
we
spent
six
years
and
literally
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
to
create
our
parks
and
recreation
system
master
plan.
And
last
year
we
had
said
we
would
divide
it
up
into
short
term
and
long
term
and
we
only
got
to
the
short
term
part.
But
it's
been
marked
as
something
that
we've
completed
because
we've
gone
through.
F
But
we
have
to
look
at
the
big
picture
and
there's
so
many
residents
who
put
their
time
and
energy
into
responding
to
all
these
surveys
that
we
did
for
the
parks
and
recreation
master
plan,
and
now
I
feel
like
we've
kind
of
especially
with
gail,
not
being
here,
we've
kind
of
deviated
from
that.
So
I
would
just
say
it
would
be
a
like
really
critical
part
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
getting
lost
in
one-off
projects,
but
we
actually
have
a
strategic
plan,
a
long-term
strategic
plan
for
these
parks
and
then
decide
like
hey.
F
We
might
not
do
it
right
now.
This
might
be
a
five-year
from
now
project,
but
we
know
that
in
you
know,
2027
we're
gonna
start
working
on
the
healing
garden
in
this
particular
park,
or
we
are
going
to
install
you
know
two
basketball
courts
in
this
particular
park.
We
don't
have
time
for
it
now.
We
don't
have
funding
for
it
now,
but
we're
going
to
plan
out
where
these
things
will
go
so
that
it's
not
just
these
short
incremental
things.
F
I
just
want
to
make
sure,
because
we
haven't
even
started
talking
about
the
aquatic
like
what
lapland
was
one
of
the
top
rated
things
that
people
wanted
in
the
master
plan:
basketball
courts.
We
had
just
so
many
things,
and
now
I
you
know
I
feel
like
dola
also
falls.
It
falls
under
that
which
is
that
it's
so
important
that
we
look
at
it
comprehensively
and
not
just
individual
parks
at
a
time.
F
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
just
like
to
advocate
for
with
the
long-term
strategic
plan
because
it
did
get
lost.
Last
year
we
had
some
meetings
about
the
short-term
strategic
plan,
and
then
we
had
like
three
two
agenda
items,
but
we
never
actually
got
to
the
long-term
part
and
because
we
have
so
much
on
our
plate.
F
N
A
N
Heard
all
the
speakers
you
know,
support
dolan
park
yeah,
and
I
know
that
the
community
really
in
front
of
it
yes
and
for
the
yeah.
I
remember
in
our
last
meeting.
We
voted
for
these
projects
and
the
first
three
is
the
labyrinth
program
or
similar
nature
play
project
and
the
dollar
and
the
field
use
agreement
of
regular
elementary
school.
N
N
We
can
do
that
in
short
term
and
the
tool
called
lowest
vote.
One
is
a
mental
health
or
partnership
with
west
valley
and
the
other
long-term
street
strategic
plan.
These
two
looks
like
they
are
not
so
specific
as
the
other
three
they're
most
like
some
long-term
one,
and
maybe
if
we
want
to
work
on
the
mental
health
project,
maybe
we
need
to
get
it
more
specific
and
then
we
can
really
work
on
it.
N
So
I'm
thinking
maybe
in
our
recommendation,
we
can
put
the
three
projects
with
highest
votes
in
addition
to
the
two
major
projects,
because
they
are
very
specific.
We
can
start
to
do
that
this
year
and
the
other
two
that's
also
some
very
good
idea.
I
really
like
the
idea,
like
the
healing
garden
and
those
programs,
and
I
think
they
are
also
aligned
with.
I
remember
our
city
council-
mentioned-
maybe
add
more
inclusive
playground
elements
in
more
than
one
park
those
elements
they
also
help
with
mental
health.
N
C
E
So
the
only
challenge
I
have
in
the
long
term
which
I
commissioned
you
said
I
totally
agree
on
it,
but
since
it's
all
clubbed
together,
I
understood
it's
large
only
because
when
I
look
into
it,
if
you
have
to
do
all
of
them
in
the
long
term
strategic
plan
in
it
it'll
be
extra
extra
large
like
definitely
if
you
could
start
doing
it,
but
it
is
grouped
as
it
is.
Just
efforts
is
only
large,
but
I'm
sure
that
it
has
many
many
sub
projects
within
the
long
term
strategic
plan.
E
I
assume
some
of
them
got
peeled
off
from
that,
like
dollar,
as
you
said,
and
others
are
coming
out,
and
then
it
gets
more
wise
and
then
more
support
and
we
are
doing
it
it
could.
It
would
be
great
if,
if
I
just
parse
those
long-term
strategic
plan
items
into
separate
line
items
kind
of,
then
it
will
be
helpful
for
us
right
now.
We
are
in
a
flux,
given
the
current
staff
load
and
others
at
the
director
mentioned.
E
You
know,
that's
what
I
feel
it
unless
otherwise,
if
it
is
listed
out
like
dollar,
and
then
you
have
a
healing
garden
and
kind
of
a
separate
line
item
that
would
have
helped
that's,
why
I'm
finding
it
very
difficult
to
say
that
oh
yeah,
it
is
just
for
the
sake
of
adding
in
the
three
lineup.
Let's
put
it
there,
I'm
sure
that
the
staff
will
come
back
and
say
that's
a
really
really
large
project,
because
we
do
not
know
within
that
which
you
want
to
prioritize.
They
will
come
back.
E
So
I'm
getting
into
the
dialogue
of
that.
It
is
clumped
everything
into
one
and
that's
what
the
challenge
it
is.
I
would
I
would
love
to
have
it
if
it
is
separated
out.
I
love
the
healing
garden
and
other
things,
even
the
all
inclusive
plans.
So
that's
the
real
real
pain
for
me
to
I
want
to
help
and
I
want
to
put
in
there,
but
I
couldn't
because
I
know
that
it
is
impossible
and
it's
a
large
project,
one.
It's
only
large
project
which
I'm
doubtful
how
we
are
going
to
achieve
it.
E
G
Yeah
so
my
my
feedback
on
how
we
came
to
this
project
size
and
the
time
associated.
When
we
talk
about
estimated
time
for
prioritization
process,
we
think
that
we
can
go
through
all
the
different
opportunities.
I
think
there
are
22
that
are
suggested
in
the
master
plan
and
we
can
prioritize
what
ones
are
are
the
most
important?
Is
it
an
aquatics
facility
upgrade?
Is
it
you
know
inclusive
elements
and
parks?
G
Because
of
all
the
data
analysis-
and
you
know
we
have
one
man
analyst
for
this
department
and
there
is
constant
information
that
needs
to
be
brought
to
council
and
staff
as
well
about
you
know,
statistics
on
field
use
and
all
kinds
of
things,
and
so
it
is
very
labor
intensive
to
have
these
kind
of
inde
happy
to
do
it.
But
that
is
how
I
looked
at
managing
that
particular
one.
I
think
getting
more
into
specifics
about
the
projects
associated
with
those
priorities
would
be
like
the
second
year
of
that
process.
G
E
E
So
you
want
to
plan
and
process,
hopefully
the
next
year
situation
improves,
and
I
think
we
know
what
to
pick
up
right
away
so
that
that
we
can
do
it.
Okay,
now
that
that
makes
it
clear,
so
other
things
are
ready
to
execute
this
one
is
hey.
I
need
to
plan
before
even
I
get
into
execution.
So
if
that's
the
work,
that's
a
large
work,
then
I
can
buy
that
kind
of
an
effort
estimate
and
then
I
would
I
know.
Oh,
I
can
make
a
call
on
this
one.
Thank
you
director
for
clarifying
it.
C
So
just
a
further
question
on
that.
So
do
you
is
this
something
that
that
is
ongoing,
that
you're
addressing
the
master
plan?
You
know.
I
know
that
gail
sees
was
really
a
key
employee
in
that
in
that
role,
and
maybe
you
can
correct
me
if,
if
there's
other
staff,
that
is
doing
that
or
are
you
looking
to
hire
additional
staff?
Can
you
just
sort
of
give
us
a
insight
into
that.
G
Yeah,
absolutely
I
mean
we
are
constantly
referring
to
the
master
plan
and
it
is
our
road
map.
We
don't
do
anything
without
looking
at
what
has
been
prioritized
at
those
parks
and,
quite
frankly,
there
are
a
lot
of
suggestions
per
park
about
what
things
can
be
done
in
the
short
in
the
long
term,
within
the
master
plan.
And
so
we
refer
to
that
before
kind
of
making
any
kind
of
moves,
but
would
be
very
helpful
to
know
what
your
priorities
are
as
far
as
those
different
opportunities
go.
G
Certainly
we're
adding
different
recreational
opportunities
right
with
pickleball
and
outdoor
table
tennis
we're
implementing
a
full-size
basketball
court
at
wilson,
we're
doing
a
community
garden
at
wilson,
we're
doing
inclusive
play
elements
at
our
equipment
replacement
at
the
creekside
location.
In
addition
to
the
all-inclusive
playground,
I
think
there
are
going
to
be
opportunities
for
the
community
to
weigh
in
on
what
their
priorities
are
when
it
comes
to
lawrence
mitty
and
what
will
be
designed
there
as
well
as
what
is
a
priority
to
be
done
at
memorial
park.
G
But
all
that
we
will
take
all
the
information
that
we
have
in
that
document.
As
a
starting
point
to
have
those
discussions
and
that's
how
we've
been
utilizing,
the
and
the
dolas
are
are
in
there
as
well.
You
know
opportunities
to
collaborate
with
the
school
district
in
different
ways.
You
know
field
uses
in
there
and
so
we've
actually
made
a
whole
lot
of
progress.
G
If
you
look
at
the
document
that
we
put
together,
but
I
I
realize
that
you
want
to
keep
making
progress,
and
so
obviously
so
do
we
and
that's
you
know
if
we
can
prioritize
what
the
different
opportunities
are
for
the
commission.
That
would
be
helpful
to
strategize
about
what
future
cip
projects
we
are
able
to
either
qualify
for
grants.
That
kind
of
thing,
so
it's
definitely
a
planning
tool,
definitely
something
we
want
to
do
again.
G
C
C
So
if
we
look
at
this,
just
take
the
one
at
the
top
standardize
the
process
to
create
dola
trial
programs,
expand,
increase
and
implement
more
dola
programs
throughout
the
city.
I
think
so
that
there
was
some
concern
that
that
is
trying
to
make
it
cookie
cutter
and
define
what
a
dollar
is,
and
so
maybe
we
need
to
to
modify
the
description,
the
objective
so
that
it
it's
more
clear.
A
C
You
know
input
and
so
that
if
a
group
has
an
opportunity
that
they
come
forward,
just
like
the
jolly
man
group
did
I
mean
when
we
did
this
it.
It
worked
so
smoothly
because
we
didn't
try
to
bite
off
the
whole
city
at
once,
and
so,
as
a
group
comes
forward,
evaluate
and
propose-
and
you
know,
support
doulas
as
they
come
for
as
they're
proposed
to
the
city,
something
along
that
line,
and
then
I'm
not
sure
what
the
what
the
limitation.
C
Here,
the
value
is
of
no
more
than
one
year,
depending
on
outreach
and
proposed
locations.
It
seems
like
that's
going
to
be
a
a
function
of
of
what
staff
can
do
and
if
we
can
make
it
more
streamlined,
then
maybe
we
can
do
more
and
we'll
learn
as
we
go
and
and
hopefully
be
able
to
to.
You
know,
respond
more
commissioner
gopal.
E
Yeah,
I
I
agree
chair,
but
I
think
there
is
one
reason
why
we
put
a
standardized,
maybe
standardized
the
process
may
not
be
the
right
word.
We
discussed
that
we
need
to
provide
a
framework
because
we
learned
a
lot
through
this
exercise
and
jolly
man
so
based
on
the
inputs,
we
both
the
community
and
the
our
city
staff
and
us
we
learned
it
what's
working,
what's
not
working
all
those
trials
throughout
our
b,
we
learned
it,
but
those
lessons
learned
should
be
made
available
to
others,
because
there
are
many,
many
people
will
come.
E
So
that's
what
we
thought
we
would
provide
a
kind
of
a
framework
in
that
they
can.
They
can
just
to
go
ahead
and
collaborate
in
within
the
framework.
It's
a
god
rails.
We
need
to
provide
them
and
say
these
are
the
ways
and
still
we
will
require.
We
will
wait
for
the
request,
but
they
need
to
make
sure
that
there
is
a
framework
within
it.
E
Otherwise,
the
staff
has
to
go
through
the
same
problem
and
they
may
have
to
go
through
the
same
issue,
because
maybe
some
of
the
dollar
leaders
here
are
talking
about
one
or
two.
But
what
happens
if
somebody
else
from
the
completely
other
one
leads
it?
They
will
start
all
over
and
we
need
to
tell
them
or
teach
them
and
bring
them
awareness
that
oh
this
work,
they
didn't
work.
Man
tried
it
kind
of.
E
So
that's
why
we
thought
cities
should
provide
a
framework,
a
governance
model
within
which
they
can
operate,
but
without
which
it
is
going
to
be
again
all
over
starting
over.
That's
what
the
reason
we
put
in
there.
It
may
not
be
a
standard
process.
We
would
just
put
it
there
but
provide
a
framework
within
that
they
can
operate,
and
it
is
not
a
rigid
one.
E
F
My
that
was,
I'm
gonna,
echo
that
so
I
don't
wanna
repeat
it.
I
think,
having
no
more
than
one
per
year
depending
on
outreach,
because
if
we,
if
it
if
it
is
a
large
time
commitment,
we
can
have
three
things.
You
know
three
dollar
new
dollas
next
year,
then
maybe
the
next.
You
know
the
following
year.
We
don't
do
as
many
dollars
because
we
have
other
you
know
priorities,
so
I
don't
want
to
commit
to
it
necessarily
being
like.
F
I
I
don't
want
to
commit
to
saying
like
no
more
than
one
per
year.
I
think
we
can
have
like
two,
but
I
also
want
to
be
mindful
that
it
shouldn't
exceed.
Maybe
it
doesn't
exceed
more
than
two
or
it
doesn't
exceed
more
than
three
just
because
it
does
take
a
lot
of
staff
time
to
go
through
their
liability
issues.
Here
that,
like
we,
can
have
the
community
report
out,
but
there's
still
gonna
be
a
level
of
staff
involvement
that
we're
gonna
have
to
have
so
maybe
putting
a
cap
on
it.
F
I
do
think
it
could
be
a
multi-year
project,
but
yeah.
That
would
just
be
my
hesitation
with
that
with
removing
the
one
per
year,
because
then,
if
you
know
every
other
park
in
cupertino
comes
forward
with
the
same,
you
know
the
same
pattern
and
they're
like
okay.
We
did
all
the
check
marks.
That's
going
to
take
up
all
staff
time
if
it
becomes
a
part
of
the
work
program
without
that
kind
of
caveat,
so.
F
F
C
So
I
guess
looking
at
this,
do
we
want
to
you
know,
decide
which
are
our
top
three
apart
from
the
the
extra
large
ones
and
then
work
on
what
they
actually
say
and
make
sure
that
that
we're
comfortable
with
that?
Does
that
sound
like
a
good
okay,
I
see
a
thumbs
up
there,
no
nisha!
What?
How
would
you
like
to
proceed.
C
M
C
Rank
these,
let's
see,
we've
got
one
two
three
four
five,
I
would
say
if
we
do
three
votes
and
that
will
focus
us
if
we
get
we
get
five
votes
then
and
then
they're
all
on
there.
So
it's
too
many
and
and
four
may
not
focus
that's
enough.
So
I
think
if
we
do
three
votes
and
then
let's
see
where
we
are
with
that.
C
So,
let's
just
review
what
they
are:
there's
the
dola
there's
mental
health
partnerships.
There's
labyrinth
programs
they're
similar
nature,
play
long-term
strategic
plan
and
field
use
at
regnart
elementary
okay.
So
let's
see
how
many
hands
for
enable
additional
villas
that
you
can't
see
me,
though
one
two
three,
four
okay,
we
got
four
for
that.
One
keep
track
of
your
own
votes;
okay,
how
many
for
mental
health
partnerships
with
west
valley,
community
colleges,
valley,
community
services,
sorry,
okay,
none,
labyrinth,
programs
or
similar,
I'm
going
to
put
my
hand
up
for
that.
C
One
okay,
so
let
me
I'll
just
give
a
little
justification
why
I
I've
moved
from
the
field
use
agreement
at
regnart
off
of
that.
I
still
think
it's
important,
but
the
director
has
convinced
me
that
those
discussions
will
happen,
and
so
I'm
delighted
that
that
will
happen,
and
I,
and
so
I
feel
confident
that
that
is
that.
That
will
be
that
that
will
happen
and
we
just
need
to
make
sure
we
stay
focused
on
it
and
it
doesn't
get
away
from
us
and
the
mental
health
and
partnerships.
E
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
add
a
similar
one,
the
mental
health,
even
though
why,
last
time,
I
voted
this
time,
based
on
what
I
heard
from
the
youth
activity
board
or
the
teens
they
already
working
with
the
palo
alto.
I
think
this
would
be
a
best
project
for
them
to
carry
forward
because
they're
already
connecting
the
dots
and
they're
trying
to
do
it,
bring
the
positivity
and
a
lot
of
those
things.
So
it
would
be
an
awesome
opportunity
for
them.
E
So
I
think
this
would
be
a
good
one
for
that's
why
I
didn't
put
it
on
it.
Rather,
I
just
went
on
the
other
one.
That's
my
rational
early,
even
though
I
voted
on
the
materials
earlier,
but
listening
to
them
this
morning.
Right
now
this
in
this
meeting
with
what
the
teens
and
they
came
up
with,
I
think
they
have
a
pretty
good
way
and
all
these
things
should
start
with
you
and
that's
a
rational
behind
me
just
putting
it
down
compared
to
the
other.
C
D
D
E
E
So
that's
the
reason
I
wanted
to
have
some
time
spent
on
the
long-term
strategic
plan
on
the
prioritizing
planning
on
it
and
do
the
community
engagement
as
one
project
within
community
engaging
it
quickly
and
the
one
on
really
working
on
the
long
term.
That's
my
rational
behind
picking
one
of
those
top
two
and
the
other
one
just
wanted
to
make
it.
Why
did
I
pick
it
up.
C
N
Oh
just
now
I
voted
for
dola
and
labyrinth
or
other
nature
play
project.
But
now
I
think
yeah
I
I
changed
my
mind.
I
think
yeah,
the
long-term
strategic
plan
may
be
more
important
because,
yes,
we
have,
we
already
have
the
master
plan
and
we
include
so
many
things
in
it,
but
maybe
how
to
yeah
how
to
make
it
work
that
then
that
may
be
very
important
for
our
commission
and
we
need
to
listen
to
the
community
and
try
to.
N
Make
sure
we
try
is
more
important
and
we
can
make
the
master
plan
be
more
specific
and
yeah,
so
I
agree
that
we
should
focus
it
this
year
as
soon
as
possible
and
yeah.
I
really
like
the
nature
play
projects
but
yeah.
I
I'm
kind
of
agreeing
with
global
indonesia.
It's
a
long-term
plan.
We
need
to.
You
know,
pay
attention
to
that
yeah.
So
I
want
to
change
my
world.
Yes,.
C
C
Well,
I
think
we
can
do
labyrinth.
I
think
we
will
do
aberrant,
so
I'm
okay
with
having
it
be
third,
but
I
mean
we.
We
need
to
find
a
way
to
maintain
the
labyrinth
that
we
have
but
and
possibly
go
forward,
but
I
think
going
forward.
We
can
incorporate
those
into
play.
You
know
our
park
planning
as
we're
doing
upgrades
there,
and
I
see
the
director
shaking
her
head
like
she's
in
agreement.
I
like
that
and-
and
we
do
have
the
short-term
thing
of
how
do
we
maintain
these
other
two?
E
Yeah,
so,
just
to
add
on
to
the
last
comment,
you
made
a
commission
of
the
chair.
The
labyrinth
program.
Maintenance
challenge
is
what
you
said
again
we're
not
to
discuss
in
detail,
but
I
I
think
these
are
all
once
it
is
there
in
play
and
it
will
be
maintained
and
it
will
be
part
of
the
regular
program
by
the
part
staff
and
they
will
do
it
kind
of
looks
like
if
it
is
one-off,
then
it
is
a
problem
and
that's
what?
E
E
E
If
it
is
just
a
one-time
project,
then
yes
wait
and
then
go
because
I
know
this
started
with
mayor,
giving
some
fund
okay,
let's
do
something
with
that,
but
it
looks
like
and
we
saw
the
benefit
and
we
thought,
let's
put
it
there
and
we'll
continue,
but
unless
there
is
a
commitment-
and
there
is
a
plan
within
the
parking
park,
recreation
department
and
the
director
level-
oh
yeah,
it's
great.
Let's
continue
then
yeah.
It
won't
be
maintained
because
it's
a
one-time
project.
E
C
C
G
To
come,
I
was
just
gonna
echo
what
you
were
about
to
say:
I
would
try
and
be
a
little
bit
less
specific
and
a
little
bit
more
generic
and
like
engaging
the
community,
and
so
that
allows
for
more
flexibility
and
getting
in
engaging
the
community.
That's
interested
in
this
type
of
thing
so
gives
you
a
little
bit
more
flexibility.
That
would
be
my
input.
G
G
G
C
C
G
F
I
think
that
there's
like,
like
the
director
had
said,
there's
actually
an
outline
of
like
the
22
main
things
that
were
in
the
prioritization.
I
don't
want
it
to
necessarily
be
explicitly
limited
to
that,
but
I
think
that
that's
the
place
that
we
should
start
since.
That's
where
all
the
work
was
done
in
the
first
place,
so
maybe
we
can
say
create
a
prioritization
and
implementation
list
of
you
know
top
22
projects
listed
in
the
project,
recreation
system,
master
plan
and
then
the
remainder
can
be.
F
G
E
You
already
kind
of
you're
reading
my
mind,
so
that's
a
that's
a
trouble
now,
so
I
was
about
to
go
that
you're
not
implementing
it
there.
So
we
are
creating
priorities
to
enable
implementation
in
the
upcoming
years
and
again
when
it
comes
to
implementation
the
upcoming
year.
Second,
we
will
go
on
to
prioritize
within
whatever
you
come
up
with
or
the
22.,
so
it
has
to
be
called
out
clearly.
Otherwise
it
will
be
considered
as
you're
prioritizing
and
implementing
few,
and
that's
not
the
case.
E
So
that's
why
I
think
you
made
it
very
clear
in
the
first
and
now
you
reinstated
that
this
is
mainly
prioritizing
all
those
within
the
22
to
be
ready
for
us
to
implement
in
the
upcoming
years
whenever
we
have
time
kind
of
right.
So
I
think
that's
the
message
you
want
to
send
it
because
the
council
reads
it
and
says:
yes,
that's
great,
go
ahead
and
do
it
and
then
I
think
it
is
going
to
be
really
tough
task
for
fire
contract
staff.
See
that
okay,
I
have
to
create
and
looks
like.
E
I
need
to
show
some
implementation,
some
implementation.
Otherwise,
you
will
fail
in
what
you
committed
for,
so
I
don't
want
to
put
pressure
on
that.
So
that's
what
I
was
about
to
say
that
removing
that
implementation,
but
get
ready
for
the
upcoming
years.
So
I
think
it's
you
already
got
the
message.
F
Public
works
has
a
10-year
spreadsheet
that
they
look
at
for
all
parks
along
with
and
then
10
years
out
from
wherever
we
are
and
they
work
on
that
every
year,
so
they
actually
know
hey
we're
going
to
need
to
improve
this
park
playground
at
this
time.
You
know
seven
years
from
now
or
this
irrigation
system
at
this
time,
when
you
get
the
money
and
city
council
approval
to
make.
D
F
Changes
so
they
actually
have
that
plan.
What
we
need
to
do
is
like
input
our
elements
into
that
after
we've
prioritized
it
and
so
that
that
would
only
might
be
my
only
I
don't
know
how
to
phrase
it
like
create
a
prioritization
list
of
the
top
of
the
22
opportunities
listed
in
parking
recreation
system,
master
plan
with
tentative.
You
know
timeline
or
with
a
recommendation
for
timeline
or
something
so
that
we
can
go
to
city
council
and
say:
hey.
Look.
We
spent
six
years
collecting
information,
we've
put.
A
F
I
gave
you
gave
this
to
you
guys
for
the
short
of
it
for
making
these
big
changes
and
I'm
like
you're
not
going
to
get
big
changes
in
200
000,
especially
in
cupertino
like
that's,
not
gonna
happen,
so
just
giving
them
kind
of
a
heads
up,
I
think,
is
important.
So
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
call
that
out
as
long
as
that's
kind
of
understood
in
in
this.
If
it
is,
then
that's
fine.
G
Yeah,
can
I
just
make
one
more
recommendation.
I
would
actually
exclude
some
of
the
specifics,
because
I
think
that
it
will
steer
us
off
path
or
create
certain
expectations
about
certain
things
and
that
we
wouldn't
necessarily
be
doing
so.
I
would
I
mean
yes,
we're
going
to
look
at.
You,
know
the
healing
gardens
and
we're
going
to
look
at
expanding
park
amenities
as
well
as
field
use
agreements,
because
that's
that's
all
incorporated
into
the
22
opportunities.
G
C
What,
if
we
like
didn't,
say
specifically,
you
know
ragnar
I
mean
the
22
opportunities
are
already
defined
right,
those
those
are
there.
So
I
guess
I
agree.
We
don't
need
specifics
as
long
as
we
as
commissioners
know
and
and
keep
in
the
front
of
our
minds
boy.
Does
that
make
it
simpler
that
we
have
some
priorities
that
that
that
have
been
suggested
and
and
we
don't
want
to
lose
sight
of
the
mental
health
healing
gardens
the
you
know,
ragnar
et
cetera
well
and.
G
Sorry
through
the
chair-
my
apologies-
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
it's
also.
You
know
there
are
so
many
items
that
we
have
to
go
through
and
explain
and
the
simpler
they
are
and
the
more
concisely
they're
articulated
the
easier
they
are
to
absorb
and
kind
of
be
able
to
make
a
decision
on.
So
I
think
this
actually
is
great,
because
it
is
so
concise
and
specific
and
easy
to
understand,
and
I
think
that
we'll
be
able
to
explain
it
quite
quite
easily.
C
You
know
where
there
are
groups
that
have
been
established,
and
you
know
we
they're
out
there
and
they
want
to
come
into
the
fold
and
be
legal
and
they
have
their
own
idea
of
how
they
will
work,
how
they
do
work
in
their
parks,
whether
it's
you
know
afternoon
hours
or
morning
hours
or
what
part
of
the
park.
And
so
I
would
like
to
somehow
encourage
that
so
that
it's
coming
to
us
and
that
and
that
we're
not
the
staff,
is
not
having
to
just
go
out
in
a
and
blanket
evaluate
these
things.
G
Understood,
however,
I
would
like
some
direction
on
how
we
prioritize
the
inquiries
and
how
we
tackle,
because
it
again
operationally
it's
a
large
endeavor,
and
you
know
we
can't
do
it
at
every
single
park,
and
there
is,
you
know,
based
on
the
information
that
you're
getting
through
email,
and
you
know
oral
comment.
It's
not
just
gonna
be
at
one
park
that
people
are
interested
in
starting
this.
G
This
is
an
item
that
again,
a
lot
of
community
members
are
interested
in,
so
we
get
a
lot
of
emails
and
correspondence
about
it
and
managing
that
is
part
of
staff
hours
as
well,
and
so
I
would
just
be
mindful
of
that,
and
and
that's
why,
that
we've
put
it
together
this
way,
I
don't
disagree
with
commissioner
tom
bay's
initial
point
that
you
know.
Maybe
it's
not
just
one
per
year.
I
think
what
we
were
trying
to
do
is
again
set
ourselves
up
for
success,
so
at
least
one.
G
If
this
I
would
assume
this
would
be
number
one
as
well.
So
at
least,
if
we
could,
you
know
roll
that
out
at
one
at
least
one
park,
certainly
if
we
could
do
more,
we
would.
But
again,
I
just
want
you
to
be
mindful
of
the
other
projects
that
we
have
going
on.
That's
not
to
say
that
we
couldn't
do
more
in
future
years
or
do
even
exponentially
more
once
we
have
the
feedback
and
input.
C
Yeah,
so
part
of
my
thought
is,
I
thought
that's
where
we
were
now
that
we've
done
jolliben,
so
so
I
do
want
to
take
often
no
more
than
one
per
year.
I
think
that
there's
no
way
we're
going
to
do
every
park,
so
we
will
do
whatever
you
know.
We
can.
We
can
manage,
and
I
guess
my
other
question
is:
do
we
have
to
do
trials,
I
mean,
will
they
be
trials?
C
C
F
Don't
think
that
we
should
limit
to
one
per
year.
I
think
we
should
remove
that.
Maybe
we
put
in
a
cap
just
to
protect
staff
time.
However,
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
keep
trials
only
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
One
size
of
park
makes
a
really
big
difference,
so
jolly
man
is
a
very
large
park
and
it
can
house
or
host
different
things
on
different
corners.
There
are
much
smaller
parks
around
latino
and
I
would
hesitate
to
create
an
off-leash
area
in
a
park.
F
That's
very,
very,
very
small
that
might
have
you
know
small,
like
a
small
kid's
playground
or
something
that
there's
not
enough
physical
distance
between
the
two.
So
that's
the
only
reason
I
would
like
to
to
keep
a
dollar
trial
in
the
process,
but
the
reason
last
time
I
had
said
standardized
is
so
that
we
don't
get
into
the
same
pickle
that
we
got
into
this
at
this
time,
which
was
like
okay.
F
We
do
it
for
like
eight
months
and
then
like
five
more
months
and
then
a
couple
more
months
and
just
creating
a
standard
and
being
like.
Okay.
If
it
gets
x,
number
of
complaints,
it's
the
trial,
automatically
closes
and
a
park
will
not
be
improved
or
approved,
or
you
know
if
it
gets
no
complaints
within
a
six-month
trial,
then
it's
automatically
instated
just
create
it
so
that
there's
less
ambiguity
and
there's
more
like
clear
direction.
F
That's
that
was
my
intent
last
time
when
I
said
standardize
the
process,
so
everybody
knows
what
to
expect
and
when
something
will
actually
go
through
versus
not,
but
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
include
here
is
you
know:
community
community
requested
so
instead
of
saying,
expand
and
increase,
expand,
increase
and
implement.
We
can
say
like
respond
to
community
driven
community
driven
interests
in
implementing
a
traditional
dog
parks
or
an
additional
dollar.
Sorry,
not
bad
parts.
E
Yeah,
so
what
I
was
thinking
of
the
trial,
I
think
kamshantam
already
put
it,
I
think,
a
trial.
In
my
thing,
I
think
it
is
important
because
again
every
situation
in
every
park
and
every
environment
with
the
people,
I
think
it's
different.
I
also
feel
like
I
think,
having
capping
with
the
two
means,
like
people
will
be
forced
to
have.
Oh,
my
god.
We
need
to
get
to
so
that's
like
if
it
is
a
large
project
just
for
even
one.
I
know
that
director
and
staff
when
they
evaluate
it.
E
E
E
We
can
do
a
kind
of
a
put
it
not
not
in
parallel,
but
one
trial
starts,
maybe
after
three
months
or
six
months,
whatever
the
other
trial
starts,
so
that
at
least
we
will
have
an
opportunity.
The
staff
will
have
an
opportunity.
Let
it
go
trials
are
we
know
that
we
just
observe
monitor?
Do
it?
That's
all
we
do
when
I
say,
monitor
the
feedback.
We
don't
do
any
major
work
and
the
time
then
the
other
one
gets
ready.
Then
we
should
be
able
to
implement.
E
N
I
just
have
some
questions.
I
want
to
make
it
to
clarify
the
time
frame
of
this
project,
so
I
remember
our
director
said
so
before
the
journeyman
dollar
trial
finished,
it's
impossible
to
start
other
dollar
trial.
So
I'm
thinking
just
as
commissioner
governor
gopal
said,
we
need
some
framework
on
how
to
start
how
to
do
the
next
trial,
maybe
before
jolly
man's
park.
Dola
trial
ends.
N
N
N
C
It
is,
it
is
a
chicken
in
the
egg,
but
I
mean
if
we,
if
we
try
to
do
it
ourselves,
then
we
may
be
doing
a
whole
lot
of
work
where
there's
not
an
interest,
so
it
maybe
it's
respond
to
community-driven
dollar
proposals.
Yeah,
respond
and
evaluate
community-driven
dola
proposals
so
that
it's
still
in
this
in
our
in
our
control
that
we're
evaluating
the
feasibility
of
these
dolas
at
particular
park
and
but
but
we're
really
responding
and
deciding,
and
maybe
someone
comes
forward
and
they
go.
D
E
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
where
the
the
frame,
the
governance
or
the
the
framework
helps
if
we
say
that,
okay
for
the
size
of
it
and
anything
whatever
we
learned
from
it,
and
we
know
that
the
docs
run
around,
and
so
we
need
that
space
kind
of
we
know
approximately
what
size
and
what
it
is
kind
of.
At
least
we
can
do
some
guidelines
so
that
whoever
the
the
community
looks
into
it.
E
C
Is
that
is
that
covered
by
the
standardized
process,
so
I
mean
there's
a
there's
a
form
and
it
it.
It
defines
some
of
the
criteria
that
we
would
expect.
I
mean,
and
it
has
the
questions
of
what
part
of
the
park,
what
are
the
hours,
what
you
know
what
size
dogs
are
you
looking
at
what
you
know
we
recommend
and
we
put
on
there,
recommend
a
certain
area
size
for
large
dogs
or
small
dogs.
D
C
C
Before
you
do
that,
I
think
we
still
want
to
take
this
no
more
than
one
per
year
off.
Do
we
want
to
say
one
trial
at
a
time,
because
that
that
sort
of
sets
the
expectation
that
we
won't
be
doing
a
ton
of
trials
at
once
all
over
the
place,
but
as
we
go
through
we'll
and
that's
probably
slower
than
I
think
the
public
would
want.
I'm
sure
they'd
like
us
to
do
four
or
five
of
them
at
once,
but.
C
G
C
C
B
C
B
A
C
F
Yes,
okay,
so
I
move
to
add
or
recommend
to
city
council
the
addition
of
the
aforementioned
three
projects
in
the
following
sorry,
the
aforementioned
five
projects,
in
with
the
ranking
of
number
one
for
enable
additional
dollar
locations,
number
two
long-term
strategic
plan,
number
three
labyrinth
program
or
similar
and
the
other
two
carryovers
from
the
previous
year
in
no
particular
order.
Lauren
smitty
and
rail
park,
improvements
on
to
the
city
work
plan
for
20
2022-2023.
D
C
C
C
E
F
E
E
D
B
F
D
C
G
F
C
E
Thank
you
chair.
I
think
a
lot
of
people
said
I
think,
kamshan
tambe,
it's
doesn't
matter.
I
think
it
looks
like,
as
chairs
tanak
said,
looks
like
many
of
us
have
seen
you
grow
through
this
commission
itself,
and
I'm
I
mean
I
like
you
to
be
with
you
for
the
last
four
years
or
three
years
I
would
say,
but
saw
you
in
action.
Irrespective
of
what
experience
we
have,
what
levels
we
are
in
it.
E
I
think
your
candid
attitude
and
and
greeting
the
audience
when
we
were
really
when
we
were
looked
like
long
long
time
ago,
when
we
were
on
the
podium
when
we
really
dies
when
you
really
greet
everyone
and
ask
them
to
participate
more,
come
and
do
it
inviting
them
that,
even
though
there
are
10
people
on
it,
you
just
appreciate
all
their
inputs.
There
kind
of
those
are,
the
things
are
engaging
very
much
and
which
are
the
things
I
watched
and
I
tried
to
replicate.
E
I
I
tried
to
copy
and
then
because
good
things,
always
you
can
copy
from
anyone,
doesn't
matter
what
experience
what
level
they
are
in,
so
really
really
appreciate
all
your
candidness
and
then
what
you
contribute
and
the
passion
towards
and
then
putting
a
candid
question
doesn't
matter
whether
you
you
put
your
thoughts,
it's
there's!
No,
judgmental
calls
you
put
your
thoughts
in
it
for
anything.
I
know
we
get
a
lot
of
arguments
in
many
of
them,
but
that's
for
the
good
things
for
the
community
benefit
right.
E
It's
nothing
to
do
with
personally,
but
I
think
you
support
and
what
you
did
it.
So
I
absolutely
I
I
adore
your
leadership
so
far.
I'm
sure
that
you,
we
will
see
you
in
many
other
places
too.
I
don't
think
that
this
will
and
I
don't
think
that
you
will
go
and
we
won't
let
you
even
if
you
wanted
to
disappear,
so
really
thankful
to
be
with
us
and
helping
us
even
teaching
us
some
more
things
which
I
will
learn
so
wish
you
all
the
very
best
nothing.
You
will
go
new
heights.
N
Now
I
just
want
to
say
I
feel
so
lucky
I
have
an
opportunity
to
work
with
nisha
for
the
last
three
years
and
you're
always
so
energetic
with
so
many
creative
ideas
and
you're
devoted
to
this
commission's
job,
and
I
learned
I
learned
a
lot
from
you
and
I
still
remember
my
first
year
here.
I
didn't
understand
a
lot
of
rules
and
during
our
discussion,
nisha
was
chair
at
that
time
and
she
explained
a
lot
of
things
to
our
new
commissioner.
N
G
G
I
still
actually
vice
chair
shoe,
I'm
learning
things
from
commissioner
tom
bae
about
the
rules
that
brown
brown
act,
things
she's
very
knowledgeable.
I
might
have
her
come
back
and
teach
a
course
for
liaisons.
But
honestly
I
I
really
appreciate
your
perspective.
I
appreciate
the
way
that
you
deliver
the
information
with
respect
you
all
are
so
respectful
to
each
other
whether
you
agree
or
disagree.
G
Appreciate
that-
and
you
know
I
I
think
that
you
always
think
a
little
out
of
the
box,
and
I
think
it's
partially
because
you
don't
hashtag
sports,
which
I
love
when
you
say
that,
and
I
will
miss
the
most
but
really
just
hope
to
see
you
involved
in
all
the
great
things
that
are
upcoming,
just
because
you're
not
gonna,
be
on
this
commission
you're,
a
part
of
the
parks
and
recreation
family
forever.
So
I
look
forward
to
seeing
you
in
person
very
soon.
D
C
F
Thank
you,
and
I
mean
I
don't
know
where
to
begin
on
eight
years
and
I'm
really
sad.
We
can't
have
our
commissioner
dinner
this
year,
but
hopefully
maybe
we
can
do
something
in
the
summer,
even
if
it's
just
us,
but
you
know,
thank
you
all
so
so
much.
It's
been
such
a
wild.
Eight
years
with
a
number
of
city
councils,
three
city
managers,
five
parks
and
recreations
directors.
F
F
It's
it's
been
just
a
real
honor
and
I'm
not
really
going
anywhere
just
because
I'm
not
on
this
you'll
still
see
me
I'll,
be
like
that
one
attendee
in
the
corner,
although
we
have
three
today
so
hey,
you
guys,
should
apply
for
being
on
a
commission,
always
plugging
always
always
plugging
for
a
joining
commission.
But
thank
you
all
so
much
and
I'll
probably
go
cry
after
this
but
yeah.
Thank
you.
It's
truly
been
an
honor
to
serve
for
actually
almost
a
third
of
my
life.