►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - February 1, 2022
Description
[add description in place of this text; keep the text below]
If you like our service of making these videos available on Youtube, please click the "Like" button! If you want to know when the next video is available, click on the SUBSCRIBE button!
Thank you,
The City Channel
B
A
happy
lunar
new
year?
This
is
a
working
day
for
us,
though
this
is
our
special
meeting
prior
to
the
regularly
scheduled
council
meeting,
if
you're
here,
for
that,
you
don't
have
to
go
to
a
different
link,
but
we
do
have
a
special
meeting
study
session
prior
to
that,
madam
city
clerk,
could
you
please
take
the
roll
call
for
the
special
meeting
at
5
30.
A
Here,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
city
clerk
and,
as
I
stated,
we
have
a
study
session
at
5
30
this
evening
and
the
subject
of
the
study
session
is
going
to
be
to
discuss
the
awarded
pda
planning,
grant
funds
from
the
association
of
bay
area
governments
and
the
metropolitan
transportation
commission,
also
known
as
abag
mtc.
One
consolidated
organization.
Now
for
the
heart
of
the
city,
specific
plan
update
in
conjunction
with
the
housing
element
update
and
to
kick
this
off.
D
E
Thank
you,
mr
troupe,
and
thank
you,
mr
mayor,
for
the
introduction
with
me
tonight
eric
paveda
project
manager
for
this
particular
effort
here.
We
also
have
a
number
of
staff
planning
staff
on
hand
as
well
to
help
answer
any
questions
that
the
council
of
the
public
may
have
I'll
just
hand
this
off
to
erica.
She
has
a
pretty
good,
detailed
presentation
that
includes
some
background
information
on
the
grant
itself
and
then
the
what
we're
asking
the
council
to
help
us
determine
and,
of
course,
we're
available
for
questions.
Thank
you
with
that.
Erica.
G
G
G
The
heart
of
the
city
specific
plan
was
first
adopted
in
1995
with
the
purpose
of
guiding
future
development
in
the
special
area.
The
hsc
is
considered
the
most
important
commercial
corridor
in
the
city
and
spans
approximately
596
acres
and,
more
recently,
as
part
of
the
2019-2020
city
work
program.
G
Council
directed
staff
to
amend
the
hsc
specific
plan
to
clarify
setbacks
on
corner
lots,
review
street
tree
requirements,
update
sections
like
transit
corridors
and
consider
minimum
retail
percentages,
also
in
2019.
In
response
to
a
call
for
letters
of
interest
and
in
anticipation
of
the
six
cycle,
housing
element
update.
G
G
G
B
G
So
should
council
decide
to
move
forward
with
accepting
this
funding,
we
have
two
options
for
consultant
selection
option.
One
is
to
issue
a
new
request
for
proposals
for
the
work.
However,
there
appears
to
be
no
grant
or
city
conditions
requiring
a
new
rfp
to
be
issued.
Option
two
is
to
work
with
the
existing
housing
element.
Update,
consultant,
emc
planning
group
staff
is
recommending
the
second
option
due
to
the
fact
that
there
is
much
overlap
in
scope
of
work
for
both
efforts,
including
public
engagement,
analysis
rezoning
and
required
environmental
studies.
G
G
G
Council
previously
awarded
a
consultant
agreement
for
the
housing
element
update
to
emc
for
seven
hundred
forty
eight
thousand
forty
dollars
and
also
approved
a
total
project
budget
of
one
million,
sixty
nine
thousand
two
hundred
forty
eight
dollars
for
all
work
related
to
the
housing
element.
Update.
G
G
So
staff
is
first
requesting
council's
direction
on
whether
to
accept
the
awarded
funds
and
proceed
with
an
update
to
the
hoc
specific
plan
and
if
council
does
choose
to
accept
the
funding,
we
are
then
hoping
to
get
further
clarification
as
to
whether
council
would
like
staff
to
issue
a
new
rfp
for
the
consultant,
search
or
conduct.
The
specific
plan
update
in
conjunction
with
the
housing
element
with
emc
as
the
lead
consultant
and
depending
on
council's
direction.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
erica.
Thank
you
ben
thank
you
for
seeing
manager
for
introducing
this.
Let's
just
go
to
our
members
of
the
public
prior
to
council
questions
and
feedback
in
an
effort
to
be
efficient
about
it,
but
also
to
hear
from
our
members
of
the
public.
First,
as
with
all
items
this
year,
please
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time
the
first
person
from
public
is
done
speaking
and
that
is
jennifer
griffin
only
jennifer's
hand
is
raised
at
this
point,
and
so
I'll
remind
you.
I
New
years
to
everyone,
I
am,
I
reviewed
this
item
and
I
have
a
great
deal
of
respect
for
our
city
staff
for
our
emc
group
that
we're
working
with
for
our
city,
council
and
our
city
and
the
resident
I
I
know
there
are
things
that
are
troubling
about
it's,
not
so
much
the
review
of
the
heart
of
the
city.
It's
just
things
that
have
happened
since
2019.
I
I
have
spent
personally
a
great
deal
of
my
time
in
the
last
number
of
years,
protecting
heart
of
the
city,
making
sure
that
nothing
has
happened
to
make
sure
that
our
trees
aren't
cut
down.
We
don't
become
like
parts
of
san
jose,
etc
due
respect
to
san
jose,
but
I
will
tell
you
right
now:
I
do
not
trust
personally
mtc
or
abeg.
They
have
shown
themselves
to
be
a
hostile
entity
since
sb9
and
sb10.
I
I
We
ran
into
this
with
san
jose's
urban
village
advisory
committee
several
years
ago,
and
it
was
a
complete
it
just
it
was
bogus.
Okay,
I'm
going
to
use
that
word.
I
I'm.
I.
I
think
that
it's
better
in
the
current
state,
with
the
drama
going
on
with
the
numbers
of
the
housing
element
that
we
have
two
separate
consultant
groups
handling
these
two
different
items.
I
We
have
the
housing
element
going
on
for
whatever
purposes
and
we
have
emc
and
that's
you
know
we're
working
toward
that,
but
I
don't
think
at
this
point:
we
should
accept
money
from
mtc
or
a
bag
because
they
are
associated
with
plan
bay
area
2050,
which
I
do
not
trust
anyway.
I
don't
want
to
get
rid
of
los.
I
don't
like
a
lot
of
the
propaganda,
that's
coming
out
of
abag
and
ntc,
and
I
don't
like
the
strings
that
they
are
giving
us
that
we
have
to
jump
through.
I
We
can't
settle
this
in
one
year
and
I'm
not
willing
to
surrender
the
city's
heart
of
the
city
to
a
group
like
abag
and
ntc,
who
have
proven
themselves
to
be
untrustworthy,
and
I
I
have
enough
drama
with
with
the
housing
element,
but
I
I
do
not
want
us
to
accept
many
with
strings
attached.
We
will
not
be
beholden
to
groups
such
as
mtc
if
they're
pushing
planned
bay
area.
Thank
you.
A
J
J
J
J
The
the
last
thing
is
stakeholders.
I've
heard
that
the
number
of
stakeholders
is
about
10
10
is
not
a
good
number.
You
have
three
or
four
people
absent.
You
get
a
very
concentrated
view,
so
I
think
that
not
extending
this
contract
would
be
the
wiser
thing.
I
also
agree
with
jennifer
griffin.
There
are
too
many
couple
questions.
What
happens
if
you
don't
accept
the
grant?
J
J
A
Thank
you,
lisa.
Let's
bring
this
back
to
council
at
this
time,
so
we've
had
the
presentation
from
staff
we've
heard
from
members
of
the
public.
Do
we
have
any
questions
from
council?
I
do
see
two
hands
race
and
so
keeping
note
of
time
we're
just
under
an
hour
until
our
regular
meeting
is
scheduled
to
begin,
and
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
allocate
five
minutes
at
this
point
for
each
of
our
council
members
for
questions
and
I'll.
Let
you
know
by
one
minute
increments.
L
A
L
I
I'll
hold
it
as
a
comment,
but
I
think
personally,
I
can't
I
can't
support
extending
their
contract
and
giving
them
more
money
without
understanding
what
their
performance
is
like
right
now,
that's
one
part,
and
then
the
other
part
is
what
are
the?
What
are
the
downsides
of
agreeing
to
accept
money
from
mtc
a
bag?
I
you
know
are
those
valid
concerns
about
being
beholden
to
them
and
and
what?
What
are
the
potential
negative
consequences
for
us
in
our
flexibility?
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
M
M
M
I
guess
my
my
idea
of
a
stakeholder
group
would
be
a
much
wider
interview
of
residents,
maybe
one
or
two
hours,
each
with
a
group
sort
of
like
what
welcome
a
specific
plan
did,
but
now
it's
a
different
kind
of
thing.
So
I'm
a
little
disappointed
in
that
and
then
hearing
that
only
seven
people
provide
comment.
It's
concerning.
I
do
have
some
questions,
so
I
I
see
that
the
heart
of
the
city
is
listed
in
the
world.
20
19
20
work
program.
M
What
we
have
done
on
that
work
program
item,
because
applying
for
gwen
in
2021
is
no
excuse
for
not
doing
anything
for
the
prior
two
years.
So
did
we
already
done
something?
I'm
because
curious,
I
think
in
2019
we
said
we
want
to
clarify
the
setback,
clarify
the
retail
percentage
and
then
the
tree
selection
and
other
things.
So
what
did
we
do
since
then?.
A
E
Yeah,
mr
mayor,
if
I
can
take
an
initial
step
at
it
in
terms
of
what
happened
2021,
I
think,
if
you
recall,
we,
we
had
more
program
updates
back
then
as
well,
where,
where
due
to
a
police
team
manager,
but
then
back
then
discussed
about
sort
of
covering
impacts
and
and
that's
what
this
item
was
not
acted
on
and
subsequently
was
not
prioritized
in
a
subsequent
program,
so
that
that
explains
that
particular
question
yeah.
I
know
vice
mayor
yeah,
yeah
other
questions.
M
M
E
Absolutely
I'll
have
erica
speak
about
restrictions,
but
it's
it's
kind
of
use
it
or
or
not
right.
So
we
don't
have
to
accept
the
grant.
It's
not
a
requirement,
it's
something
that
staff
proactively
went
out
and
applied
for
and
understand
that.
There's
some
interest
from
council
early
on
to
do
something
about
this
plan.
So
it
wasn't
something.
That's
that
we've
been
told
that
we
have
to,
and
if
we
don't
do
it,
then
then
we
don't
get
the
money
back.
We
don't
take
the
grant.
M
N
M
So,
for
example,
if
we
add
a
retail
percentage
and
it
might
be
necessary
to
tie
it
with
housing
element
because
it
might
be
perceived
as
reducing
the
amount
of
residential
that
can
be
applied
to
the
housing
element
right,
so
it
it
probably
should
have
been
done
as
part
of
the
housing
element
anyway.
I'll
start.
O
I
can
try
to
address
this
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
the
housing
element.
The
way
that
sv330
works
is
that
only
if
you're
reducing
the
density
or
intensity
of
residential
uses
will
the
city
be,
I
guess,
dinged
in
a
way
for
establishing
a
retail
percentage,
but
our
requirements
already
require
certain.
O
You
know
it
talks
about
in
the
hardest
city,
at
least
75
percent
of
the
buildings
that
front
stephens,
creek
shall
have
retail
and
at
least
or
consumer
facing
uses,
foot
traffic
uses
and
the
similarity
for
the
back
of
those
buildings
you
need
to
have
50
of
those
buildings
be
foot
traffic
uses.
So
I
don't
think
that
if,
if
the
council
were
to
establish
a
clear
percentage,
whether
that
could
be
considered
an
sp
330
violation,
but
maybe
chris
can
also
opine
on
that.
P
Yeah,
thank
you
yeah.
So
I
think
what
pugh
said
is
correct.
Is
you
know?
Sp
330
essentially
prohibits
a
net
down
zoning
for
residential
use,
the
expectation
because
of
the
additional
units
that
we
need
to
accommodate
in
arenas
that
then
be
a
significant
net,
upzoning
citywide,
and
so
I
think
you
know
any
modification
or
clarification
of
the
the
retail
requirements.
P
A
You
very
much
pew
mr
city
attorney
speaking
of
330,
that's
where
my
time
sits
after
seating
over
about
90
seconds
to
vice
mayor.
So
let's
go
on
to,
and
I
would
like
to
ask
a
couple
of
questions.
So,
let's
go
on
to
council,
member
willie
and
then
councilmember
way
and
then
I'll
ask
some
of
my
questions
and
then
we'll
cycle
back
to
those
two
stuff
time:
council,
member
willie.
Q
Yeah
so
I'll
start
by
saying,
I
really
agree
with
our
other
council
and
the
community
that
have
concerns
about
what
are
the
details
behind
this
I'll
next
go
to
when
we're
talking
about
heart
of
the
city,
which
this
is
focused
on.
I'd
really
like
to
see
the
heart
of
the
city
map
so
that
we
truly
understand
what
is
being
looked
at
for
this
grant
money,
can
staff
scramble
and
try
and
pull
up
a
picture?
I
think
it's
for
both
our
clear
understanding,
but
also
for
the
community.
Okay.
Hopefully
they
can
be
doing
that.
Q
Q
A
O
A
O
Q
Yeah,
so
I'll
go
back
to
trying
to
trying
to
describe
why
I
see
a
big
deficiency
between
that
verbiage
and
the
picture
of
the
hoc
that
picture
of
the
hoc
conveys
to
the
community
and
us
what
is
this
composition
currently
consisting
of?
And
then,
when
you
talk
about
the
specifics
about
housing
versus
jobs,
maybe
a
vmt
reduction
things
of
that.
Q
How
that
would
impact
these
areas,
because,
just
with
verbiage
like
that,
do
we
really
expect
the
community
that
are
not
planners
to
be
able
to
understand
this?
So
I'll
leave
it
at
that
that
I
think
there
can
be
significant
improvements
in
the
delivery
and
I'll
leave.
My
last
comment
that
I
also
share
the
council's
concern
that,
where
is
the
planning
commission?
Q
These
things
are
crucial
to
our
community
and
the
com
planning
commission
is
our
connection
to
the
community
one
very
important
connection,
and
for
them
not
to
even
have
information
for
us
at
this
juncture.
I
I
see
that
as
a
big
deficiency.
So
how
much
time
do
we
have?
Can
we
bring
this
back
to
consider
the
400
000
when
we
have
more
of
an
understanding
of
what
it
would
tie?
Our
hands
to
and
what
it
would
do
for
the
community
I'd
like
to
to
know
that
before
we
vote.
Thank
you
all
right.
A
Thank
you,
councilman,
william
I'll,
stop
your
time
there
I'll
start
my
time
before
I
go
to
council
member
way,
because
I
did
have
a
an
immediate
follow-up
to
that
last
comment:
question
of
yours.
So
what
are
the
deadlines
here
for
our
state
city
staff?
What
are
we
looking
at
in
terms
of
when
we
would
need
to
act
to
keep
our
options
open
with
regard
to
this
grant
funding
award.
G
Or
I'll
answer
that
so
there's
no
set
deadline
for
when
to
accept
the
award.
However,
we
have
been
in
talks
with
mtc
and
abag
just
giving
them
updates.
They
do
know
about
our
study
session
tonight
and
I
believe
that
they
are
hoping
that
we
are
able
to
move
forward
but,
like
I
said,
there's
no
set
deadline
at
this
time.
A
R
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
so
I
was
reading
it.
It
says
this
grant
is
requiring
our
city
to
do
the
equity
assessment,
affordable
housing
and
jobs,
assessment,
mobility,
assessment,
community
assessment,
service
infrastructure
assessment,
resilience,
climate
adaptation
assessment
and
also
have
two
advisory
committees
as
a
community
advisory
committee
and
a
technical
advisory
committee.
So
my
question
to
the
staff
is:
if
we
don't
accept
this
grant
and
we
still
have
to
do
our
housing
elements
and
our
heart
of
the
city,
you
know
work
plan.
R
Do
we
still
have
to
do
some
of
these
assessments?
I
don't
see
this
grant
as
to
constrain
our
city
or
that
we
have
to
do
anything,
but
it
provides
us
assessments
so
that
we
can
use
those
to
move
forward
with
our
housing
elements
and
other
general
amendments.
If
we
want
to
do
that
is,
am
I
interpreting
it
correctly.
O
Yeah,
I
think
so
I
mean
I
know
that
the
city
is
also
considering
maybe
doing
a
retail
assessment
city-wide
and
so
potentially
some
of
this,
the
the
money
that
is
going
to
be
used
for
retail
assessment
for
the
heart
of
the
city.
Could
you
know,
be
a
portion
of
the
funding
for
the
overall
city
plan
for
retail
uses,
potentially,
so
it
does
feed
into
it.
It
does
inform
the
process.
All
of
these
reports
will
inform
the
visioning
process
for
the
city
and
and
also
what
the
market
needs
are
etc.
R
Okay,
so
the
so,
I
think
the
community's
concern
is
that,
where
some,
if
we
accept
the
money,
somehow
we're
tied,
we
have
to
do
something
required
of
the
in
you
know
a
bag
or
an
mtc.
I
don't
see
that
I
see.
I
see
this
a
grant
to
help
municipalities
to
do
assessments
so
that
we
have
more
information
to
make
decisions.
A
A
It
does
sound
to
me
that
if
we've
been
awarded
the
four
hundred
thousand
dollars-
and
we
haven't
been
given
an
indication
that
this
is
going
to
you
know,
expire
at
any
time
in
the
foreseeable
future,
there
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
deadline
directly
in
front
of
us
this
evening.
I'd
like
that
reiterated,
and
I
would
like
to
know.
A
What
what
the
the
potential
options
are
for
us
going
down
the
line
if
we
at
this
time,
don't
decide
to
automatically
provide
the
this
grant
funding
to
an
existing
vendor?
So
can
someone
from
our
staff
speak
to
that
and
just
elaborate
upon
you
know
what
what
the
possibilities
are
from
your
own
perspective,
of
being
able
to
apply
this
in
the
future,
because
well,
eric
I'll
mention
a
comment
that
you
made
specifically,
you
said
something
online
at
this
time.
A
G
I
A
But
it
didn't
indicate
okay.
Well,
you
know
I.
I
guess
that
would
be
my
follow-up
request
that
we
get
a
little
bit
more
clarity
on
that.
Okay.
So
I'm
pretty
much
out
of
time
at
this
point,
so
our
city
attorney
does
seem
to
have
a
microphone
off.
Can
I
can
I
borrow
a
minute
from
somebody.
You
know
I
see
three
hands
raised.
I
don't
want
to
volunteer
anyone's
time,
but
thank
you.
Councilmember
moore.
A
P
Yeah,
so
so
the
only
information
additional
information
I
can
provide
is
that
once
we
enter
into
an
agreement
with
mtc,
we
would
have
10
years
to
spend
the
funds
we.
You
know
we
don't
have
that
agreement.
Yet
I
I
do
not
know
what.
Whether
there
is
a
deadline
for
actually
entering
into
the
agreement.
G
A
L
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul.
I
guess
first
question:
did
this
go
to
the
planning
commission
I
if
it
did
not,
I
and
actually,
even
if
it
did
I'd
like
to
kick
it
back
there
and
and
because
they
right
now
are
the
experts
on
the
housing
element
process.
They
know
more
information
about
it
than
we
do
and
I
think
we
should
send
it
back
and
and
get
an
update
that
way.
I
I
do
want
to
take
issue
with
calling
stevens
creek
boulevard,
a
transit
corridor,
sure
it's
a
transit
corridor.
L
It
has
a
bus,
though
it's
just
a
bus,
transit
corridor.
It's
been
called
quality
transit
because
it
has
a
15
minute
frequency
and
we've
been
putting
in
bike
lanes
trying
to
improve
the
transit.
There
is
going
to
be
a
challenge.
We
don't
have
any
parking
on
the
sides
of
the
street,
we've
been
putting
in
protected
bike
lanes,
which
even
eliminates
some
of
our
our
options,
and
so
I
take
issue
with
that.
One
of
the
slides
says
that
a
ant
mtc
a
bag
wants
to
increase
housing
and
jobs.
L
L
I
don't
understand
that,
and
with
regards
to
the
retail
assessment
citywide,
I
don't
recall
that
that
directive
from
council-
I
do
appreciate
it.
I
think
it
isn't
needed,
but
I
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
that.
And,
lastly,
if
this
grant
was
awarded
in
spring
of
2021,
why
did
it
take
a
year
to
come
to
us
to
be
discussed,
but
going
back
to
the
start?
I
would
like
this
kick
back
to
the
planning
commission.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
moore,
your
time.
It's
just
about
one
more
minute
remaining
and
did
you
did
you
want
to
provide
that
to
vice
mart
ciao
to
follow
up,
and
you
know,
point
well
taken.
You
know
we
can
add
a
few
more
minutes,
for
you
know
people,
but
I
I'd
like
to
kind
of
get
through
our
questions
at
this
point.
L
M
M
A
Oh
yeah,
we
don't
really
have
a
time
for
a
response
on
that.
Unless
you
know
okay,
you
know
so
so,
let's
go
on
to
councilman
willie.
You
have
about
a
half
minute
left,
although
I
I
guess
I
could
check
in
with
councilmember
way
you
have
about
two
and
a
half
minutes
left.
Did
you
want
to
write
a
little
bit
of
time
to
vice
mayor
ciao,
to
ask
staff
to
respond
to
her
inquiry
there?
Sure,
okay,
great
so
steph?
Could
you
respond
to
vice
mayor
ciao's,
comment
question
at
this
point.
O
It
is
possible
that
there
might
be
some
housing
element
sites
in
that
area
and
that's
why
we're
thinking
that
there
might
be
some
zoning
or
general
plan
amendments
required
in
that
in
in
that
area.
Of
course,
nothing's
been
decided.
We
don't
know
what
the
sites
are.
We're,
of
course,
going
to
go
to
planning,
commission
and
city
council
before
proceeding
on
any
of
that.
M
O
Only
for
the
very
specific
general
planner
zoning
amendments
that
will
be
required
related
to
the
housing
element
sites,
but
the
heart
of
the
city.
Specific
plan
update
for
the
as
envisioned
under
the
this
particular
grant
might
go
above
and
beyond
with
the
sites
that
are
covered
under
the
housing
element
and
apologies.
I
didn't
understand
the
question
earlier.
M
O
I
don't
think
I
I
wouldn't
think
about
it
as
a
restriction
as
much
as
a
requirement
of
the
process.
They're,
basically
saying
that
you're
required
to
do
these
studies
in
order
to
make
an
informed
decision,
and
those
are
the
studies
that
they're
asking
for
and
then
they're
also
saying.
Well,
you
need
some
technical
advice,
as
a
result
of
which
we
want
the
technical
advisory
committee,
and
we
also
want
some
input
from
the
citizens
in
at
large.
M
A
Let's,
let's
put
this
down
here,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
preserve
about
half
a
minute
for
councilmember
way.
Thank
you
for
your
allocation
of
time
and
let's
go
on
to
council
member
willie
councilman
willie.
You
also
had
about
half
a
minute
left.
Did
you
want
to
ask
another
quick
follow-up
question
or
a
comment
at
this
time.
A
So
great
that,
so
that's
your
time
I'll.
I
promise
to
bring
this
back
to
council
for
another
round.
Actually,
I'm
going
to
use
my
remaining
six
seconds
here.
It's
not
a
question
just
quick
comment.
I
would
in
fact
support
referring
this
to
our
planning
commission
at
this
time,
council.
Member
way
you
have
about
half
a
minute
left.
Did
you
want
to
ask
a
question,
or
I
don't
know.
R
It's
I
I
really
want
to
ask
this
question.
There
is
no,
I
don't
see
a
downside,
accepting
the
400
000
grand,
whether
we
want
to
use
it
with
the
current
company
or
not.
I
think
that
could
be
a
discussion,
but
I
just
don't
see
the
downside
I
mean
it's
asking
us
to
have
citizens
groups
is
asking
us
to
do
more
research
and
do
more
assessment.
R
I
think
the
goal
is
to
for
the
city
to
be
making
phone
decisions,
and
so
it
I
I
see
that
it
will
save
us
money,
because
on
some
of
the
studies
we
might
have
to
spend
our
own
money
to
do
it.
So
I
don't
see
the
downside
of
it.
I
think
maybe
the
issue
is
whether
we
should
go
with
this
company
or
wait
until
something
else.
So
I'm
okay
for
the
planning,
the
commission
to
check
it
out,
but
I
would
be
it
would
be
very.
A
A
Thank
you
customer
give
you
a
little
bit
more
time
because
of
your
generosity
with
your
time
earlier,
but
okay,
you
know,
I
I
think,
I'm
hearing
some
potential
consensus
direction
here.
I
I
do
hear
agreeability
to
refer
this
to
planning
commission,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
start
a
three
minute
timer
here.
A
It
almost
looks,
like
you
know,
we're
we're
creating
a
bit
of
a
a
qualitative
statement
with
regard
to
where
our
preferences
are
in
terms
of
allocations,
and
I
know
that
none
of
us
really
want
to
do
that.
We
don't
want
to
make
it
seem
like
it's
some
kind
of
foregone
conclusion.
We
want
to
be
fair
to
every
you
know,
person
in
the
city,
irrespective
of
where
they
live.
A
A
So
let
me
go
to
councilman
moore,
who
has
a
hand
raised
councilmember
moore
first
off.
Did
you
want
to
set
forward
motion
for
direction,
and
you
know
I
I
take
it
and
staff
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
that
if
there
is
no
direction
that
essentially
this
doesn't
get
accepted
and
we
don't
move
forward.
You
know
with
this
particular
item,
but
I'm
sure
that
we'll
get
an
update
in
the
future
per
you
know
my
prior
question
as
to
what
will
happen
to
grant
funding.
A
L
I
would
agree
to
send
this
back
to
the
planning
commission.
I
would
like
to
decouple
this
part
of
the
city
specific
plan
from
the
housing
element
and
and
look
at
it
as
a
separate
process.
I
think
what
happens
when
you
pile
it
on
to
the
the
current
one.
You
end
up
having
a
de
facto
overweighting
of
that
particular
corridor,
and
I
what
I'm
not
hearing
is
what
sounds
like
wisdom
for
our
future,
because
they're
telling
us
to
increase
jobs
in
a
in
a
corridor
which
is
already
very
jobs,
heavy
and
residential
deficient.
L
So
I
have
a
problem
with
that,
so
I
would
like
to
send
it
back
to
pc
the
planning
commission
for
for
their
feedback.
I'd
like
to
hear
about
the
housing
element
process,
what
they
their
their
comments,
are.
We
we
should
have
perhaps
have
received
that
already,
but
I
want
to
hear
how
it's
going
and
and
what
their
thoughts
are
on
on
decoupling
the
process
and
who
they
think
we
should
have
as
a
consultant.
A
M
M
I
actually
the
guidance
document
doesn't
really
say
you
have
to
increase
jobs,
it
just
says:
increase
jobs,
slash
housing,
the
community
can
decide.
We
don't
want
to
increase
jobs,
it's
okay,
so
I
I
think
we
should
actually
should
accept
the
grant,
but
I
I
think
this
is
a
little
too
late
to
start
assessment.
If
we
had
done
that
last
spring,
we
could
do
an
assessment
and
now
we
can
start
planning
and
then
it
might
make
sense
to
couple
that
with
housing
element.
But
right
now
the
timing
doesn't
make
sense.
M
M
M
A
Okay,
thank
you
vice
mayor
ciao,
I
don't
see
a
further
hand
raised
this
time.
Although
kelson
are
more
you,
you
do
have
your
hand
raised.
Let
me
let
me
interject
here,
as
I
have
a
bit
of
time
or
actually
let
me
check
in
council,
remember,
wooly
or
councilmember
way
did
either.
One
of
you
have
a
comment
to
speak
to
the
motion.
That's
on
the
table
councilmember
way.
R
I
I
do
have
a
question
because
I
look
at
the
timing:
the
housing
element
we
need
to
do
before
january
2023,
but
this
has
more
time.
So
all
the
assessment
don't
need
to
be
done.
At
the
same
time,
we
can
pick
what
we
need
for
the
housing
element
and
way
to
do.
The
others
is
that
am
I
interpreting
it
correctly?
That's
a
question
for
the
staff.
A
Okay,
that's
that's
good
question.
Thank
you
very
much.
So
let
me
customer,
why
did
you
have
anything
else?
Or
can
I
make
a
comment?
Okay,
great,
so
I'll
make
a
quick
comment
before
we
go
to
calculate
more
yeah.
You
know
again.
I
agree
with
the
motion.
That's
on
the
table
right
now
I'll
go
ahead
and
support
that
I
don't
think
we're
under
any
heavy
time
intensive
crunch.
You
know
I.
I
think
that
it
would
be
better
to
make
a
determination
based
upon
hopefully
broad-based
input
that
we're
getting
throughout
the
city.
A
You
know
I.
I
hope
that
the
effort
to
reach
out
to
the
entirety
of
our
population
and
the
focus
on
equity,
you
know,
stays
there
and
I
think
that
we
should
make
that
determination
as
to
you
know
where
these
sites
are.
You
know
ultimately
allocated,
and
you
know
if,
if
this
funding
is
available
to
help
us
with
the
part
of
the
city's
specific
plan
later
great,
it
sounds
like
the
money
will
still
be
there.
Okay,
so
let's
go
to
councilmember
moore.
L
L
I'm,
I'm
concerned
that
we
haven't
been
transparent
with
regards
to
what's
looking
like
particular
neighborhoods
within
the
city,
are
going
to
be
up
zoned
and
that
if
you
only
have
seven
individuals
who
are
pushing
for
that
and
the
people
who
actually
live
in
those
neighborhoods
haven't
been
informed
that
you
know
within
the
next
year,
city
council
might
upzone
your
neighborhood
did
you
know
this
was
going
to
happen
and
they
go.
No.
L
I
think
we've
got
a
real
problem,
so
I
think
we
we
need
to
be
a
lot
more
forthcoming
and
transparent
about
what
we're
doing
and
by
we
in
this
case
it's
our
consultants
that
need
to
let
the
residents
know
that
this
is
what
is,
is
happening
and
and
to
to
be
fair
to
them.
So
I
think
equities
are
really
interesting
word.
What
does
it
mean
when
it
applies
to
this?
Thank
you.
A
Q
Q
This
train
is
going
down
the
track
and
we're
we're
putting
more
fuel
in
the
engine
without
the
information
to
the
community
on
how
well
it's
going
that
it
is
being
equitably
spread
out
through
the
whole
city,
and
so
I
I
think
we
need
to
bring
it
back
to
us.
I
support
the
motion
on
the
table.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
L
Okay,
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
perhaps
comment
on
the
on
the
vice
mayor's
suggestion
and
I
think,
looking
at
some
of
the
requirements
that
there
seemed
to
be
from
mtc
abag
that
if
we
were
to,
if
this,
if
staff
were
to
circulate
a
a
a
the
request
that
they
would
have
to
put
in
the
a-bag
requirements
for
the
cac
and
the
tac.
L
A
A
A
I
believe
that
there
are
other
points
that
have
been
made
to
try
to
preserve
our
options
and
make
sure
that
you
know
we
get
some
clarity
as
to
the
timing
of
the
availability
of
these
funds,
but
also
you
know
to
apply
this
in
a
manner
that
doesn't
make
it.
You
know
appear
to
be
a
predetermination
as
to
where,
where
the
site
selection
looks
like
on
the
housing
element,
work
so
yeah.
No,
I
I
see
you
know,
staff.
You
know
pew
you're
shaking
your
head,
so
that's
that's
great.
A
I
mean
it's
good
to
know
that
you
know
we're
all
on
the
same
page
there
and
we're
trying
to
you
know
be
fair
to
everyone
in
the
community.
So
you
know
I'll
just
invite
that
question
before
we
vote,
because
it
does
sound
like
we
all
have
an
appetite
to
to
have
the
utility
of
that
funding.
I
will
note
this.
This
is
the
first
time
this
has
been
visited
upon
council.
A
Since
the
fund
grant
funding
was
was
awarded
and
as
a
matter
of
first
impression,
I
think
there
is
that
appetite
to
utilize
it,
but
to
utilize
it
in
a
manner
that
perhaps
isn't
directly
tied
midstream
to
you
know.
I
know
it's
700
000
something,
but
the
totality
of
the
allocated
monies
we're
almost
a
million
dollars.
A
E
Yes,
mr
mayor,
I
would
just
say
that
we've
heard
we've
heard
that
council
london
killed
claire
and
we
will
continue
to
coordinate
with
with
abac
mtc
and
and
get
some
of
these
clear
clarity
sorted
out
and
then
go
through
the
planning
commission.
When
we
come
back
and
get
more
recommendations
before
we
bring
back
to
you.
A
Yeah
and
there's
no
harm
in
providing
the
city
manager
with
occasional
updates
to
let
us
know
you
know
what's
coming
down
the
pipeline
because
of
course,
that
informational
they
can
be,
you
know,
can
be
provided
to
council
along
the
way.
So
you
know
on
on
an
individualized
basis.
Of
course,
without
creating
a
you
know,
a
group
communication,
councilmember
moore
and
then
vice
mayor
ciao.
Let's
go
ahead
and
wrap
this,
as
there
is
guidance
in
this
motion
and
on
the
table.
L
M
So
the
guidance
document
does
say
there
is
a
required
minimum
of
three
community
meetings:
three
technical
meetings
and
language
translation
for
population
of
10
or
more
so
these
are
things
probably
we
won't
do
for
a
minor
update
of
the
specific
plan.
So
I
wonder
if
we
can
use
the
funding
for
a
new
specific
plan,
for
maybe
the
monta
visa
area
on
the
buff
road
and
the
error.
That
area
probably
need
a
new
specific
way.
M
A
R
L
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul.
I
just
want
to
express
my
appreciation
for
the
comments
from
the
vice
mayor,
because
I
think
I
I
personally
would
like
to
hear
some
recommendations
regarding
the
mona
vista
special
area
and,
if
there's
any
other
specific
plans
that
we
should
be
looking
at
to
update
at
this
time
and
and
get
that
rolling
along
with
the
heart
of
the
city.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
H
A
A
A
Here,
thank
you,
member
city
clerk.
We
start
off
our
meeting
with
ceremonial
items
and
presentations
and
this
evening
I'm
particularly
moved
and
happy
to
be
able
to
provide
our
ceremonial
matter
number
one.
This
is
a
reissued
proclamation
to
paul
heyer,
who
was
initially
provided
this
proclamation
in
1991
and
I
do
see
paul
has
joined
us.
A
Okay,
great,
thank
you
paul.
So,
as
I
stated,
I
received
an
email.
The
day
after
our
last
council
meeting
on
january
19th
and
paul
wrote
to
me
mayor
darcy,
I
was
born
in
the
bay
area
and
raised
in
cupertino.
I
attended
both
cupertino
high
school
as
well
as
d'anza
college.
I
graduated
from
cupertino
high
in
1988
and
I
enlisted
in
the
marine
corps.
Due
to
the
time
period.
A
on
page
two.
It
lists
my
name
concerning
ceremonial
matters.
I
just
so
happened
to
be
on
leave
at
the
time
visiting
family
in
cupertino
and
returned
from
the
war
mayor,
barb
koppel,
invited
me
to
city
hall
and
presented
a
proclamation
for
my
service
in
the
gulf
war,
see
attached
pictures
of
the
proclamation.
A
A
A
As
you
can
see,
it's
quite
different
from
our
format
currently,
but
you
do
see
the
morion
helmet
at
the
top
for
city
of
cupertino
proclamation,
sure
enough
it
it
was,
you
know,
significantly
weathered
the
seal
of
our
city,
and
we
still
have
this
issue
with
our
current
seal.
The
sticker.
You
know
peeled
off,
and
so
you
know
I
was
I
was.
S
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
mayor.
I
mean,
I
think
I
conveyed
it
in
the
email
that
you
know
in
our
exchange
and
the
way
it
was
handled.
I
know
the
city
of
cupino
is
in
good
hands
and,
and
it
sounds
like
it's
in
good
hands
with
the
council
as
well.
So
I
really
appreciate
that
and-
and
it's
going
to
be
a
treasure
for
my
family
they're.
Actually
here
they
just
can't
get
visible
on
camera,
but
thank
you
so
much.
A
Absolutely
very
very
pleased
to
do
it
on
behalf
of
council
and
our
community.
Thank
you
once
again
for
the
service
and
thank
you
for
reaching
out
at
this
point,
we're
going
to
ask
that
council
take
a
quick
zoom
photo
with
you,
and
so
our
other
members.
If
you
could,
please
cut
your
cameras
and
it'll,
ask
the
video
division
to
put
up
the
placeholder
that
they
have
for
indicating
that
this
is
a
proclamation
in
your
honor.
A
A
It
was
really
interesting
to
hear
that
connection
as
well.
So
thank
you
so
much
again-
and
you
know-
have
a
have
a
great
rest
of
your
year
2022.
and
we
might
see
you
you
mentioned
that
you'll
be
possibly
around
for
the
july
4th
celebration.
So
hopefully
you
know
things
open
up
back
again
at
that
point
and
we'll
you
know
perhaps
be
able
to
meet
in
person.
A
Thanks,
sir
okay,
our
second
item
on
tonight's
agenda
is
ceremonial
matter.
Number
two,
that's
item
two.
This
is
the
recognition
of
our
fine
arts,
commission,
artists
award
winners,
and
I
believe
that
the
chair
of
our
fine
arts
commission
is
here
today
to
provide
a
presentation
with
regard
to
those
award
winners.
Welcome
chair
chasm,
ceti
of
the
fine
arts
commission.
T
Thank
you
mayor
good
evening,
dear
city
council
members,
my
name
is
sudha
kasam
city,
I'm
the
fine
arts
commissioner
chair
and
I'm
immensely
proud
to
be
presenting
2021
artist
awards
today.
One
of
the
goals
for
our
fine
arts
commission
is
to
foster
and
encourage
artistic
expression
and
achievement
in
the
fields
of
visual
and
performing
arts
while
preserving
and
advancing
the
arts
for
the
benefit
of
the
citizens
of
our
cupertino
each
year.
The
commission
presents
awards
to
deserving
artists
in
recognition
of
local
talent
in
these
fields.
T
This
evening
is
very
special
to
me
and
all
of
us
we
have
three
categories.
The
distinguished
artist
award
recognizes
the
established
artist
having
a
substantial
body
of
work
that
display
merit
and
excellence.
The
next
category
is
emerging
artist
award
to
encourage
and
recognize
demonstrations
of
artistic
promise.
The
young
artist
award
is
present
to
deserving
young
artists
within
the
age
group
from
6
to
14
years.
We
have
received
huge
number
of
applications
this
year
and
it
was
our
pleasure
to
see
such
talent
in
our
community
so
without
any
further
delay.
T
I'm
pretty
excited
to
announce
the
winners.
So,
first
category
young
artist
group,
a
group
a
is
for
artist
agents
six
to
ten
years
old
and
our
silver
winner
is
audrey.
Lynn,
audrey
is
10
years
old
and
goes
to
mudrak
portal
elementary
school,
big
round
of
applause
to
audrey,
and
that's
her
beautiful
work.
Next
to
her
picture,
our
next
gold
winner,
young
artist
group,
a
is
sanvika
mishra
sanvika
is
10
years
old
and
entered
a
musical
piece
called
save.
The
earth
here
is
a
preview
of
her
beautiful
artistic
works.
T
T
T
T
T
T
Our
emerging
artist,
platinum
winner,
is
eric
yoon
eric
creates
art
based
on
events
that
occur
around
the
world,
which
is
very
much
necessary
in
today's
times.
Inspired
by
the
news
and
personal
experiences,
eric
hopes
to
provide
viewers
to
consider
some
of
the
serious
issues
that
our
world
is
currently
facing
and
being
in
the
comm
being
in
when
we
were
judging
his
artwork,
we
were
truly
blown
away
with
what
he
has
created.
That's
eric's
work
right
next
to
his
picture.
T
The
next
category
is
distinguished
artist
and
we
are
extremely
proud
to
present
kalpana
adesara,
as
our
distinguished
artist
winner,
kalpana
has
been
an
active
member
of
fine
arts
league
of
cupino
and
currently
saves
serves
as
the
co-publicity
chair.
Knowing
how
important
art
was
her
for
personal
development
kalpana
made
it
a
point
to
share
her
learnings
with
others.
In
her
community,
kanpuna
became
an
avid
teacher
who
teaches
in
cupertino
union
school
district
but
also
runs
her
own
individual
art
studio
to
teach
youth.
T
She
also
saves,
as
a
serves
as
a
volunteer
art
teacher
for
many
many
organizations.
Thank
you
kalpana
for
serving
the
community.
So
that
concludes
our
presentation.
Big!
Congratulations
once
again
to
our
winners.
We
will
have
a
display
of
their
artwork
on
the
library
very
soon.
Please
do
look
for
them
and
a
big
thank
you
to
my
fellow
commissioners
and
our
liaison
rachel
and
last,
but
not
the
least
our
city
council
members
for
all
the
support.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you
very
much
cheer
chasm
seti
and
indeed
I
joined
my
fellow
council
members
and
their
applause
for
all
the
hard
work
of
the
the
award
winners
as
well
as
the
commission.
At
this
point,
we'll
take
a
quick
group
shot,
and
so
I
did
notice
that
one
of
the
members
that
you
one
one
of
the
recipients
say
you
were
mentioning
trick.
Assembly
was
actually
in
the
attendees.
A
So
if
you
are
an
award
winner
that
was
just
named,
please
feel
free
to
raise
your
hand
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
ask
you
to
turn
on
your
camera.
If
you're
already
a
panelist
and
oh
you're
you're
a
good
couple.
So
so
we
can,
you
know,
get
you
in
the
group
shot
and
if
you
happen
to
be
an
attendee,
please
feel
free
to
raise
your
hand
as
well,
because
I
know
that
not
all
always
the
names
match
with
who
is
on.
A
Please
feel
free
to
turn
on
your
camera
once
you
are
into
the
panelist
area
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
take
that
that
group
shot
with
council
of
the
award
winners
as
well
as
our
representative
from
the
fine
arts
commission,
and
I
don't
see
the
additional
photo
so
samvika
did
you
want
to
turn
your
turn
your
video
on
to
there
you
go
a
little
bit
of
backlighting,
but
at
least
you
have
the
name
so
congrat,
wonderful,
okay!
So
we'll
wait.
A
A
A
There
any
postponements
orders
of
the
day
requested
from
our
members
of
the
council
here:
okay,
seeing
no
hands
raised
on
that,
let
us
go
to
oral
communications.
Oral
communications
is
for
any
matter
that
members
of
the
public
would
like
to
speak
about.
That
is
not
on
our
agenda
and
so
you'll
be
provided
three
minutes
to
speak
on
any
item
that
is
not
agendized.
Council
cannot
take
action
on
it.
However,
we
can
direct
our
city
staff
to
follow
up
shortly
after
communications
is
concluded.
A
I
see
a
member
of
our
public
peggy
griffin
with
a
hand
raised,
and
so
furthermore,
I
will
ask
our
members
of
the
public
if
you
wish
to
speak
in
oral
communications.
Please
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time
our
first
speaker,
peggy
griffin,
is
concluded
speaking
and
so
we
will
now
begin.
The
oral
communications
welcome
peggy.
J
A
A
The
next
three
items
are
under
reports
by
council
and
staff.
Item
number
three
is
a
set
of
brief
reports
on
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements.
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
bearing
with,
as
I
was
reading
the
correspondence
from
paul
heyer,
I'm
gonna.
Let
that
be
my
report
out
from
january
18th,
since
our
last
meeting.
R
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
I
attended
the
new
mayors
and
council
members
academy
by
cal
cities
and
there
are
quite
a
few
good
sessions,
it's
good
review
because
I'm
still
putting
you
as
a
one-year-old
council
member.
So
it
was
a
good
session
for
me
to
attend
and
also
I
attended
the
s.
Silicon
valley,
clean
energy.
R
They
presented
a
reach
code,
information
meeting
of
to
me
and
another
council
member
and
that's
really
a
very
informed
informational
and
also
a
couple
of
other
housing
elements:
seminars,
that's
hosted
by
cal
city's
peninsula
division
and
also
by
the
league
of
women
voters
of
cultural
sunnyvale.
So
housing
elements
going
on,
so
I'm
paying
attention
to
that.
Thank
you.
A
R
Okay,
so
I
can
attended
two
committees:
one
is
well
I
was
representing
last
year
too,
is
the
valley,
water,
commission,
and
we
talk
about
the
shortage
of
water
where
it
comes
from,
so
you
know
we're
still
in
the
very
extreme
drought.
So
there's
a
lot
of
good
discussions
in
there
and
then
one
of
the
new
committees
that
I
signed
and
got
a
meeting
is
the
silicon
valley,
regional,
interoperative
authority
board
of
directors
is
totally
new
to
me.
R
A
Thank
you
very
much
councilman
way,
I'm
I'm
really
glad
that
people
are
getting
that
cross-referenced
experience.
It's
good
to
have
a
you
know,
relatively
deep
bench
for
knowledge
and
interactivity
within
our
agencies
through
cupertino.
So
thanks
for
that
update,
let's
go
on
to
councilmember
whitley.
Q
Yeah
thank
thank
you
mayor,
so
on
the
21st
I
met
with
the
silicon
valley,
clean
energy,
about
the
reach
codes
for
this
coming
year.
Reach
codes,
2.0
climate
change.
You
know
it's
something
we
just
can't
avoid
anymore,
and
so
we
did
the
reach
codes
1.0,
which
dealt
with
new
construction
and
making
them
electrified
rather
than
using
gas
sources.
Q
Well,
2.0
is
now
hopefully
going
to
be
offering
advantages
for
existing
dwellings,
so
the
reason
to
just
bring
it
up
here
is:
let
people
know
that
you
know
we
all
need
to
be
looking
at
ways
that
we
can
reduce
our
carbon
footprint,
because
you
have
the
concerns
that
we've
got
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
M
M
The
way
I
joined
the
first
library
jpa
meeting,
they
accepted
a
five-year
fiscal
forecast
plan
and
a
three-year
tech
plan
technology
plan,
and
then
they
also
have
a
10-year
cip
plan.
With
the
funding
allocated
for
this
forthcoming
project,
I
thought
they
are
very
good
at
on
making
these
multi-year
plans
and
the
library
this
month.
I
think
it's
january,
it's
coming
back
with
full
service.
Finally,
and
in
the
past
two
years,
the
library
staff
has
been
helping
with
the
pandemic
effort.
M
L
I
was
on
the
audit
committee,
along
with
mayor
paul,
some
of
the
things
we
went
over
included
the
the
roles
of
the
committee
and
how
we
need
to
be
accepting
the
monthly
treasurer's
report,
which
the
city
council
should
also
be
getting
a
copy
of,
so
that
should
be
forthcoming
in
within
our
next
meeting
or
two.
We
went
over
the
the
quarterly
treasurer's
report
and
the
acfr
is
underway,
but
not
yet
completed,
we'll
be
receiving
that
within
probably
a
month
or
two.
Thank
you.
M
Sorry
two
items
I
forgot
to
mention
in
the
we
talked
about
in
the
legislative
review
committee.
One
is,
we
will
schedule
a
visit
with
legislators
in
late
february
things
we
were
not
able
to
do
last
year
and
in
terms
of
redistricting
that
many
people
probably
want
to
know
our
standard
district
is
now
merged
into
josh,
becker's
district
and
our
assembly
district
is
a
new
one,
because
that's
with
sunnyvale
and
the
cintavera.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
vice
mayor
ciao.
For
that
brief
follow-up,
I
I
will
say
that
I'm
on
the
board
of
the
valley
transportation
authority
until
the
end
of
next
year,
when,
when
I
or
this
year,
I
should
say
when
I,
when
I
turn
out
of
office,
I'm
also
vice
chair
of
one
of
their
committees.
They
call
it
sstpo
for
short,
that's
safety,
security
and
transit
planning
and
operations.
A
We
met
had
a
good
set
of
discussions
there
that
I
think
some
of
the
was
going
to
is
going
to
be
referred
to
the
board
meeting
for
vta
that
occurs
next
thursday.
So,
if
you're
interested,
you
know,
there's
a
replete
amount
of
information
available
on
the
vta
website
over
that
discussion
and
then,
with
regard
to
the
audit
committee.
Yes
I'll,
just
reiterate
that
I
am
now
part
of
the
audit
committee
for
cupertino.
A
We
have
two
representatives
from
our
city
council,
this
year's
councilmember,
moore
and
myself
and
happy
to
take
the
years
of
experience
that
I
have
on
council
in
my
last
10
or
11
months
here
and
hopefully
close
the
loop
on
some
of
these.
You
know
financially
related
items
and
I
did
have
one
other
item:
oh
yes,
the
west
valley,
mayors
and
managers
meeting
so
west
valley,
mayors
comprised
of
the
mayors
of
the
five
west
valley,
cities
of
campbell,
monsterino
saratoga
us
as
well
as
los
gatos.
A
They
meet
on
a
monthly
basis,
and
so
this
last
the
this
last
meeting.
They
primarily
talked
about
the
housing
element
in
terms
of
coordinating
the
meetings
the
the
chair
of
that
meeting
rotates
throughout
the
cities.
So
this
year
the
chair
is
tina.
Walia
of
saratoga
and
saratoga
is
talking
about
the
housing
element
in
in
full
fervor,
as
I'm
sure
many,
if
not
all,
of
our
cities
are
are
doing,
and
so
that
that
comprised
the
majority
of
discussion.
A
With
regard
to
wvmm
meeting,
I
will
say
very
briefly,
and
I
want
to
thank
the
community.
I
want
to
thank
my
fellow
council
members
for
bearing
with
on
this
year's
state
of
the
city.
I
know
that
when
I
was
first
mayor
in
2018,
I
moved
the
state
of
the
city
back,
you
know
it
had
gotten
pushed
back
to
you
know
fairly.
You
know
far
into
the
spring
back
to
you
know
the
first
wednesday
in
january.
Initially
we
were
planning
on
having
that
again.
A
You
know
this
past
saturday
and
as
as
these
types
of
things
go,
you
know
in
planning
you
tr,
you
have
to
at
minimal
plan
about
two
and
a
half
to
three
weeks
in
advance,
and
so
we
started
doing
that
in
order
to
have
tabling
from
various
agencies
and
have
an
outdoor
speech.
But
unfortunately,
what
ended
up
happening
was
that
that
was
precisely
the
time
that
omicron
hit,
and
so
you
know
we
really
had
to
kind
of
take
a
bit
of
a
turn.
A
But
we
did
have
an
outdoor
presentation
of
that
speech
on
saturday
production
and
you
know
wrapping
it
up
has
been
completed.
I
expect
it
to
be
released
to
the
public
later
this
week
and
I
think
my
fellow
council
members
for
for
burying
with
us
there,
because
in
order
to
have
it
kind
of
minimized
in
terms
of
not
having
very
large
crowds,
we
weren't
able
to
notice
it
as
a
public
meeting
and
so
we're
releasing
it
formally.
A
You
know
sometime
this
week,
and
so
you
know
thank
you
for
my
fellow
council
members,
for
you
know
being
there
at
a
very
unusual
and
strange
time
in
in
our
history
and
in
everyone's
history
and
making
that
flexible
accommodation
for
this.
So
looking
forward
to
rolling
that
out
and
without
any
further
delay
on
this,
let's
go
on
to
consent.
Calendar
consent
calendar
this
evening
is
items
number
six
through
10..
I
do
see
a
member
of
our
city
council
the
hand
raised
council
member
moore.
L
A
D
A
D
D
The
other
update
I
had
was
just
going
back
for
our
normal
covet
updates.
So
as
of
yesterday,
the
31st
at
6
pm
on
january
31st
2022
the
county
of
santa
clara,
distributed
free,
at-home
antigen
tests
to
all
patients
who
signed
up
and
received
an
appointment
for
pcr
testing
at
the
cupertino
senior
center.
So
that
was
good.
D
Some
local
data,
it's
encouraging
is
the
seven
day
rolling
average
has
dropped
from
just
over
6
500
cases
two
weeks
ago
to
now
we're
down
to
approximately
3100
cases
as
of
today.
So
it's
you
know
a
little
more
than
half
of
a
drop,
so
we're
hoping
that's
an
encouraging
trend
and
we
keep
seeing
that
drop
down
to
you
know
down
to
the
300s
like
it
was
at
one
point:
hospitalizations
have
also
begun
to
decline
in
santa
clara
county
icu
beds,
which
are
critical.
They
do
remain
very
stable.
D
We
remain
right.
Around
84
percent
of
the
county's
total
population
has
been
fully
vaccinated
that
meets
one
of
the
metrics
to
remove
the
county-wide
face
mandate.
However,
the
other
one
of
the
other
metrics
is
we're
still
in
the
red
tier.
So
we
you
know
we
have
one
piece,
but
we
need
the
other
piece
and
we're
working
towards
that
cupertino.
There
are
approximately
350
new
cases
reported
this
week.
D
B
D
Testings
county
santa
clara
will
continue
the
covid
19
pcr
testing
at
the
cupertino
senior
center
testing
on
the
31st
yesterday
resulted
in
504
tests
administered.
This
was
the
first
decline
since
november,
so
it
didn't
have
quite
as
many
come
out,
but
that's
still
quite
a
few.
For
one
day
we
had
15
citizen
core,
volunteer,
staffing
and
supplemented
the
clinical
services.
D
D
A
L
I
just
have
a
question
I
I
noticed
there
were
about
regarding
the
valco
project,
the
valkosp35
project.
There
were
about
nine
emails
to
santa
clara
county
department
of
environmental
health,
and
I
was
wondering
if
the
city
manager
could
make
a
comment
on
on
those
and
and
let
the
the
public
know
perhaps
provide
some
assurances.
I
think
that
might
help.
Thank
you.
D
P
Yeah,
I'm
happy
to
do
that,
jim
thanks.
So
so
so
so
you
know,
as
I
think
most
people
here
are
aware,
the
the
bellco
site
is
being
in
environmental
investigation
and
remediation
is
being
supervised
by
the
santa
clara
county
department
of
environmental
health
under
the
that
that
department's
site
cleanup
oversight
program.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
very
much
city
attorney
and
I
I
think
that's
a
fair
question,
given
the
fact
that
this
is
a
ministerial
process
and
we're
asking
for
essentially
an
update
as
an
extension
of
the
city,
manager's
update.
So
let's
go
and
you
know
I
do
see
a
member
of
the
public
with
a
hand
raised.
Let
me
ask
the
member
of
public:
did
you
want
to
speak
on
one
of
these
items
or
on
on
the
next
item
for
consent?
Calendar
welcome
gene
bador,
just
a
quick
check
in.
A
Item
nine,
okay,
let
me
oh
got
it!
So
that's
one
of
the
consent:
yeah,
okay!
So
we'll
go
we'll
get
back
to
you!
Gene
when
we
get
to
item
nine
thanks
very
much,
and
so
let's
go
ahead
and
entertain
a
motion
for
items.
I
believe
six
seven
and
ten
on
the
consent
calendar
at
this
point,
because
items
eight
and
nine
were
pulled.
Would
anyone
like
to
bring
forth
that
motion?
If
not
I'll
go
ahead
and
so
move?
Can
I
have
a
second
council
member
willie?
A
Oh
you
just
go
ahead
and
vocalize
that
by
unmuting
your
your
microphone
councilman,
sorry
about
that!
Yes,
all!
Second,
okay,
great!
I
don't
see
further
hands
raised,
and
so,
madam
city
clerk,
would
you
please
conduct
the
roll
call
vote
on
items.
Six,
seven
and
ten
of
consent
calendar
as
agendized
and
recommended.
H
A
Okay,
great:
let's
go
to
item
number
eight,
that's
the
consideration
of
accounts
payable
for
the
period
ending
december
20th,
2021
and
councilman
moore.
You
pulled
the
item
and
you
also
initially
pulled
the
item
in
our
prior
meeting.
Would
you
like
to
refresh
the
public
recollection
as
to
the
purpose
of
the
polling
and
the
follow-up
that
had
been
requested
on
this.
L
Okay
sure
sure,
mayor
paul,
so
item
eight
was
regarding
the
chamber
of
commerce
accounts
payable
of
eight
eight
thousand
dollars,
and
I
was
wondering
if
there
was
a
contract
associated
with
it,
what
the
the
funds
are
for
and
because
it
was
said
first
installment
I
had
no
way
of
knowing,
if
that
was
the
first
of
a
thousand
or
the
first
of
four
or
or
anything
I
had
there's
like
no
information,
so
I
was
looking
for
some
assistance
and
and
background.
Thank
you
very
much.
Councilman.
A
V
Welcome
katie
hi
honorable
mayor
and
council
members
good
evening,
kate,
namara,
deputy
city
manager,
that's
a
great
question,
so
it
is
the
first
of
two
installments.
There
is
not
a
contract
there,
it's
kind
of
a
misnomer
that
they
label
it.
That
way.
We,
but,
however,
we
are
pursuing
a
written
scope
of
work
so
that
we
can
memorialize
what
do
we
get
for
this
kind
of
partnership
between
the
city
and
the
chamber
so
that
we're
actively
working
on
that
since
it's
come
since
economic
development
has
come
into
the
city
manager's
office.
V
V
V
M
V
L
Hey
thank
you
mayor
paul,
I'm
actually
wondering
if
perhaps
we
should
again
not
approve
this,
because
we
have
too
many
questions
and
I'm
kind
of
wanting
to
see
10
years.
That's
160,
000,
I'd
like
to
to
know
where
that
investment
into
the
chamber
actually
went
so
I'm.
I
really
appreciate
vice
mayor
ciao's
questions
and
it's
causing
me
to
have
even
more
apprehension
about
moving
this.
This
item
along.
Thank
you.
D
N
A
L
A
Fair
enough
would
anyone
else
like
to
speak
to
that,
if
not
we'll,
go
ahead
and
table
this
item
until
it
comes
back
with
follow-ups?
Okay,
let's
go
ahead
on
to
item
number
nine.
This
is
the
consideration
of
accounts
payable
for
the
period
ending
january.
Third,
two
thousand
twenty
two
councilmember
moore
same
with
item
number
eight,
as
with
item
number
nine,
you
initially
pulled
this
and
had
a
question
and
follow-ups.
Would
you
like
to
remind
the
public
as
to
that
question
follows.
L
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
so
at
issue.
Here
we
have
a
very
high
water
bill
at
this
time.
It
was
about
fifty
three
thousand
dollars
to
my
recollection,
and
my
concern
was
because
we
have
some
kind
of
mandates
to
reduce
our
water
consumption
that
we're
not.
The
city
is
not
allowed
to
be
watering
during
times
of
measurable
precipitation
or
within
48
hours
afterwards.
So
my
question
was
whether
or
not
I
was
looking
at
a
reduction
in
that
bill.
That
would
be
reflective
of
the
city
having
retrofitted
their
rainwater
detection.
L
I
looked
at
the
staff
report
which
has
been
provided
here.
My
question
is
already
I'm
seeing
how
many
of
these
units
were
installed,
but
I
do
not
know
out
of
how
many
in
totality
that
that
need
to
be
done.
So
I
can't
I
have
no
sense
of
how
our
progress
is
going
towards
meeting
this
requirement
without
knowing
how
many
they've
got
to
go
okay,
so
I
would
like
to
hear
the
staff
report
on
it.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
W
Sure,
good
evening,
audible,
mayor
and
members
of
the
city
council
in
regards
to
the
irrigation
controller,
there
are
total
45
controllers
that
have
been
replaced
within
the
the
trees
and
right
away,
divisions
and
and
within
the
grounds
division.
You
know
that
irrigates,
the
the
school
grounds
and
turf
their
engagement
controllers
are
still
just
starting
to
be
implemented.
W
So
there
is
a
total
need
for
21
irrigation
controllers
to
irrigate
city
parks,
as
well
as
nine
controllers
to
irrigate
the
the
school
just
the
school
sites
as
well,
so
those
are
still
pending
to
be
installed
and
staff
is
looking
into
installing
those
locations.
You
know
within
this
fiscal
year
and
and
next.
A
A
W
So
there
are
two
different
divisions
you
know
in
that
are
installing
these
irrigation
controllers.
So,
within
the
trees
and
right-of-way
divisions,
there
are
total
45
irrigation
controllers.
That's
been
already
installed
within
the
grounds
division
you
there
will
be
a
need
for
30,
a
total
of
30
controllers.
D
W
E
D
Yes,
please,
I
think,
for
councilmember
moore,
so
the
first
set
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
jimmy,
but
the
first
set
have
been
completed.
It's
the
second
piece
that
we're
working
on
them
right
now.
We
know
how
many
there
are
it's
that
30
and
we're
in
the
process
of
finishing
that,
but
the
others
have
been
completed.
That.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
great
thanks
very
much.
Let's
go
to
a
member
of
the
public
and,
as
with
any
item,
there
are
three
minutes
to
speak
on
the
item
and
if
you
have
any
comments,
please
raise
your
hand
by
the
time.
The
the
first
speaker
is
done
that
speaker's
gene
bedouin
with
the
hand
raised
welcome
back
gene.
U
U
U
U
I
don't
remember
seeing
this
rather
substantial
item
in
the
approved
budget
for
this
fiscal
year
or
even
the
last.
Please
provide
answers
and,
more
importantly,
provide
transparency
for
expenditures
of
taxpayer
dollars.
There
is
a
cost
to
litigation,
and
residents
are
entitled
to
know
how
this
city
council
is
spending
their
hard-earned
money.
Thank
you
for
this
information.
A
Thank
you,
gene
and
let's
bring
this
back
to
our
staff.
You
know
I
I
I
don't
know
whether
it's
appropriate
to
comment
on
you
know.
Particular
speculations,
I
think,
is
the
best
way
to
describe
the
you
know
the
characterization
of
the
last
public
comment.
But
let
me
refer
this
to
the
city
attorney.
I'm
not
sure
where
you
know
the
the
accuracy
of
the
information
is,
but
did
you
want
to
speak
to
some
of
the
questions
or
allegations
raised
by
the
the
the
commenter.
P
So
so
yeah
so
so
I
I
mean
I
do
think
that
that
that
the
costs
are
transparent,
they're
included
in
the
accounts
payable
for
the
city,
which
is
obviously
a
public
document
that
the
council
and
all
members
of
the
public
have
access
to.
There
are
certain
details
in
there
that
are,
of
course,
attorney-client
privilege,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
that
the
overall
expenditure
of
the
city
on
legal
fees
is
is
transparent
and
accounted
for.
P
P
So
I
I
I
I
I
would
be
reluctant
to
get
into
a
discussion
of
of
confidential
attorney.
Client
communications
in
a
public
setting.
You
know,
but
you
know,
but
miss
bedard
is-
is
correct-
that
that
also
in
window
has
primarily
advised
the
city
regarding
balco.
Again
we
can't
get
in
the
details
of
those
in
a
private
public
setting.
A
P
I
don't
think
there's
been
a
clear
trend
over
time.
You
know
they
they
they've
gone
up
and
down
in
different
different
years,
based
on
you
know
the
the
vagaries
of
litigation,
that's
not
uncommon,
with
legal
expenses,
I
believe
you
know
again
due
in
large
part
to
the
the
restructuring,
the
city
off
city,
attorney's
office.
I
am
anticipating
that
our
office
will
that
your
expenditures
on
the
city
attorney's
office
will
be
lower
this
year
than
last
year.
Thank.
M
A
A
M
A
L
Yes,
okay
and
I
do
think
that
the
vice
the
vice
mayor's
issue
might
be
a
great
future
agenda
item.
So
I'm
looking
at
the
15
000
al
shire
white,
winder
llp,
and
I
see
that
there
is
8
900
approximately
for
valco
legal
review
and
that
was
in
december
and
then
some
other
legal
services
rendered-
and
I
I
I
guess
probably
the
best
place
for
me
to
bring
this
up-
is
also
future
agenda
items.
L
L
How
much
time
have
we
ended
up
having
these
legal
reviews
take
and
how
much
how
much
money
has
been
spent
on
it?
And
I
think
that
it's
something
that
this
the
city
should
you
know
let
the
public
know
and
other
cities
know
as
well
that
having
a
ministerial
project
with
when
it's
when
it's
massive
has
all
these
moving
parts
in
it
that
you,
you
might
be
very
surprised
for,
for
what
it
ends
up
costing.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
more
about
it.
M
And
then
there
were
letters
of
challenging
the
mitigation
fees
and
that's
posted
on
the
website
too,
and
if
the
city
doesn't
defend
ourselves,
the
way
they
they
are
might
be
asking
for
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
of
reduction
of
fees.
They
they
owe
the
city
and
if
we
don't
defend
the
city,
that's
we
are
not
protecting
our
residents,
our
best
interest,
so
those
are.
But
a
lot
of
these
are
ongoing
discussions
that
we
cannot
disclose
the
details
to
the
public.
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor
ciao
yeah.
So
let
me
let
me
go
to
council
and
ask
whether
there
is
a
motion
on
the
table
with
regard
to
item
nine,
that's
adopting
a
resolution
by
default
relating
to
the
accounts
payable
ending
january
3rd
or
or
is
there
follow-up
to
request
that
we
come
back
on
this
item?
Councilmember
moore.
A
Okay,
I'll
go
ahead
and
second
that-
and
you
know
I
agree-
I
agree
that
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know,
and
I
think
that
what
I
will
say
is
that
collectively
among
our
council
and
our
city
staff,
I
would
be
shocked
if
anybody
could
do
it
in
a
more
streamlined
and
efficient
effective
way.
You
know-
and
that
goes
by
cost
effectiveness
as
well
as
overall
efficacy.
A
So
you
know
I
would
welcome
the
open
discussion,
because
you
know,
frankly,
I
think
a
lot
of
the
procedure
and
the
aspersions
and
the
maneuverings
have
been.
You
know
a
bit
ill-advised
and
I
just
think
rather
gratuitous,
so
you
know
I.
I
would
very
much
welcome
the
light
of
day
to
be
placed
upon
a
lot
of
the
process
here
and
I
think
it
would
actually
benefit
the
public
quite
a
bit.
So,
okay
with
that,
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
for
further
discussion.
A
B
A
A
I
don't
think
I
need
a
motion
to
reconsider
item
eight
because
we
actually
moved
on
from
it.
So
I
will
in
mr
city
attorney.
Please
feel
free
to
correct
me
if
that
is
procedurally
incorrect,
but
I'll
go
back
to
item
number
eight
right
now
miss
vice
mayor
ciao.
You
stated
that
you
wanted
to
bring
forward
a
motion
at
this
time.
With
regard
to
item
eight
and
city
attorney
jensen,
did
you
have
a
follow-on
to
my
procedural
request?
P
P
What
I
was
was
going
to
suggest
is
I
I
I
understand
that
vice
mayor
chao
is
interested
in
a
broader
discussion,
apart
from
approval
of
accounts
payable,
I'm
not
sure
that
would
be
right
for
a
motion,
because
it's
not
agendized
but
consistent
with
council
member
moore's
comment
earlier.
That's
certainly
an
appropriate
topic
for
future
agenda
items,
which
you
know
we
will
be
considering
at
the
end
of
this
meeting.
A
M
So
I
thought
if
we
separate
the
approval
of
the
check
for
chamber
from
the
rest
of
the
item
today
in
our
approval
and
then
the
check
would
come
back
with
an
agenda
item
on
the
partnership
with
chamber
that
probably
will
serve
the
purpose.
Also,
maybe
more
have
in
mind,
and
also,
I
think
my
intent
is.
I
think
we
see
it.
It
serves
the
city
better.
If
we
have
a
positive
relationship
with
the
chamber.
M
B
A
It
out
and
and
councilmember
moore
did
say
that
she
did
not
believe
it
was
advisable
to
do
so
because
she
wanted
to
follow
up.
So
you
know
I
I
don't
see
anyone's
hand
raised
at
this
point,
and
I
don't
hear
emotion
from
you.
I'm
not
sure
if
a
motion
you
know
along
those
lines
would
be
seconded,
and
you
know,
given
the
city
attorney's
advice
that
we
visit
this
in
future
agenda
items
and
what
appears
to
be
a
lack
of
counsel
to
move
forward
with
your
suggestion
I
would
I
would.
H
M
Versa,
I
have
a
question
so
if
we
leave
it
as
this,
this
item
would
come
back
as
accounts
payable.
It
still
doesn't
say
chamber
of
commerce,
and
we
won't
actually
be
able
to
have
that
discussion
about
partnership
with
chamber
of
commerce
next
meeting,
then
why
do
we
do
it
with
this
chat
or
would
are
we
going
to
have
the
discussion
on
the
partnership
first
and
then
we'll
have
the
item
on
the
to
vehicle.
A
Yeah,
let's
deal
with
that
in
future
agenda
items
of
vice
merchant,
and
so
you
know
I,
I
think
that's
a
it's
a
fair
question,
fair
point,
but
the
appropriate
time
to
raise
it.
Let's
just
go
ahead
and
put
that
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
so
that
we
can,
you
know,
dispose
of
this
so
that
it's
not
considered.
A
A
Okay,
so
we're
down
to
second
reading
of
ordinances.
Item
number
11
is
the
consideration
of
a
second
reading,
an
enactment
of
an
ordinance
approving
the
rezoning
of
two
parcels.
These
deal
with
the
canyon
crossing
development,
and
so
let
us
go
ahead.
This
is
a
second
reading
of
that
that
ordinance,
I
don't
see,
hands
raised,
and
so
madam
city
clerk.
A
Well,
let
me
go
to
the
members
of
the
public.
This
should
be.
You
know
fairly
self-explanatory
as
agendized.
It
is
a
second
reading.
I
don't
see
any
members
of
the
public
with
their
hands
raised
and
so
I'll
go
back
to
the
the
council
vice
mayor
ciao
did
you
have
a
question
or
a
comment
with
regard
to
this
item?
Number
11.
A
H
C
A
A
Thanks
very
much
we're
on
item
number
12..
This
is
similar
to
item
number
11,
but
with
a
different
development.
It
is
the
beta
brothers
site,
and
it's
also
the
second
reading
and
enactment
I'll,
go
ahead
and
ask
if
any
members
of
the
public
have
any
comments.
With
regard
to
item
number
12.,
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised,
and
so
let
us
bring
it
back
to
council.
Q
I
I
was
going
to
just
add
a
comment.
I
mean,
I
just
a
comment
that
both
the
previous
item
in
this
one.
I
think
it
clearly
demonstrates
that
this
this
community
is
definitely
in
favor
of
building
the
much
needed
housing
and
I
hope
I
hope
those
that
are
beyond
our
borders
realize
that
we
are
here
doing
this.
Thank
you.
A
C
This
is
the
second
reading
and
enactment
of
ordinance
number
22-2237,
an
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
cupertino,
approving
the
rezoning
of
three
parcels
from
planned
development.
Zoning
with
general
commercial
uses,
pcg
to
plan
development,
zoning
with
general
commercial
and
residential
uses,
p
cg
res.
R
A
B
A
Okay,
very
good,
well
we're
at
752,
and
you
know
if
anyone
would
like
a
break,
please
feel
free
to
so
state
councilman
way.
You
have
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
break
briefly
before
we
went
to
on
to
our
public
hearings?
Hands
not
raised
anymore,
okay,
you're,
good,
okay.
So
we're
at
public
hearings
right
now.
Item
number
13
is
the
consideration
of
an
amendment
to
the
fiscal
year,
21
to
22
fee
schedule.
A
O
O
Just
as
background
for
this
project,
this
particular
item,
I
wanted
to
remind
you
everybody
that
the
council
adopted
an
interim
ordinance
to
implement
sb9
requirements
here
in
cupertino
on
december
21
2021.
As
part
of
that
interim
ordinance,
the
council
established
a
miscellaneous
ministerial
permit
and
the
authority
to
adopt
fees.
O
The
applicants
wishing
to
use
the
sb9
ministerial
processes
must
apply
for
this
particular
permit
and
pay
the
fee
associated
with
it,
and
this
fee
is
intended
to
recover
the
city's
reasonable
costs
for
any
time
that
is
spent
to
review
plans
and
or
manage
the
project
in
general.
The
process
for
review
of
these
ministerial
permits
is
similar
to
those
of
our
two-story
discretionary
permits.
It
does
require
coordination
with
other
city
departments
noticing
to
neighbors
verifying
whether
the
site
notification
site
notices
up,
etc.
All
of
that
still
remain.
It
also
allows
a
it.
O
Won't
call
it
a
comment
period,
but
still
allow
some
time
between
the
city
making
a
decision
and
that
site
notice
going
up
so
communication
with
neighbors
and
interested
parties
is
also
required
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
staff
time
that
is
estimated
for
review
of
such
projects.
We
estimated
approximately
13
hours
of
staff
time
would
be
required,
which
would
include
application
intake,
two
iterations
of
review
of
plans,
ongoing
coordination
with
applicants
and
architects,
communication
with
neighbors
finalizing
approval
documents,
etc,
etc,
and
for
that
a
fee
of
3926
is
proposed.
O
So
this
is
also
at
the
current
city's
staff,
hourly
rate
for
the
planning
division,
and
I
guess
with
that
I
conclude
my
presentation
with
staff's
recommended
action,
which
is
to
amend
the
adopted
schedule
c
for
planning
fees
for
the
current
fiscal
year,
and
this
fee
schedule
will
go
into
effect.
60
days
from
adoption
of
the
resolution,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Okay,
thank
you
pew.
Let's
go
on
to
our
members
of
the
public
with
their
hands
raised.
We
have
jennifer
griffin
and
I'll
repeat
by
the
time
that
jennifer
has
her
comments
concluded.
Please
have
your
hand
raised
if
you'd
like
to
speak
on
this
item.
Number
13.
welcome.
Jennifer
you'll
have
three
minutes.
I
Thank
you
vice
mayor.
I
think
that
this
bee
is
appropriate
because
no
one
had
any
way
of
knowing
or
foretelling
what
sb9
and
10
would
be
doing
to
the
city.
They
were
just
kind
of
like
lumped
on
us
with
no
warning
the
public.
The
city
councils
had
no
way
of
protesting
asking
questions.
It's
like
the
governor
said,
take
it
or
lump
it,
you
know
dump
these
on
us.
I
Well,
I
think
that
this
is
appropriate,
because
I,
as
a
member
of
this
state,
I
think
sb9
and
10
just
sent
this
state
into
total
soviet
control.
I
have
lost
all
faith
in
my
upper
politicians
in
this
state.
I
feel
like
we're
going
into
some
sort
of
a
like
you.
You
have
no
right
to
ask.
We
will
just
tell
you
what
to
do
so.
I
If
we're
talking
about
the
hours
that
this,
our
poor
city
staff,
are
having
to
deal
with
sp9
and
10,
let's
go
into
the
area
of
yes,
they
don't
want
to
notify
the
neighbors,
but
you
can't
build
a
house
without
telling
the
neighbors
about
it
and
splitting
the
lot.
Let's
get
real
here,
the
neighbors
are
going
to
have
to
hire
surveyors
they're,
going
to
be
going
to
the
county
they're
going
to
be
going
to
the
assessor.
They
will
demand
story
polls
that
is
going
to
take
up
city
staff
time
and
the
legal
fees
too.
I
You
know
whoever
wrote
these
bogus
bills
were
like
in
la
la
land.
They
had
no
basis
in
reality,
no
planning
no
background
in
real
real
estate
law.
The
neighbors
are
going
to
be
asking
questions
and
the
staff
have
to
answer
the
questions.
You
know
the
the
the
lalas
that
wrote,
sb,
nine
and
ten
think
that
the
state
has
no
right
to
ask
questions.
I
Well,
I'm
sorry,
it
doesn't
work
that
way,
so
the
staff
are
gonna,
be
loaded
with
neighbors
questions
and
I
think,
let's,
let's
roll
it
on
to
whoever
is
benefiting
financially
from
sb9
and
sb10
the
adus.
The
lot
split,
the
that
whoever
these
units
are
going
to
be
sold
to
yeah,
take
it
and
lump
it.
You
were
the
ones
that
dumped
this
on
us,
you
guys
pay
for
it,
and
I
can
tell
you
right
now.
If
you
want
to
charge
ten
thousand
dollars
go
ahead
and
do
it
thank.
A
J
J
A
L
L
O
O
So
the
amount
of
time
that
staff
has
to
expand
in
terms
of
talking
and
coordinating
with
the
neighbors
and
or
the
applicant
it'll
be
pretty
much
pretty
similar
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
time,
and
this
is
really
an
average.
So
on
some
applications
we
expect
that
we'll
probably
spend
more
time
on
others.
We
may
spend
a
little
less,
but
on
average
we
anticipate
we
will
spend
about
the
same
amount
of
time.
L
Through
the
mayor,
may
I
continue
okay,
thank
you
so
so
pew
you.
That
means
you've.
Can
you
consider
that
some
of
your
applications
are
going
to
be
for
two
stories
and
some
are
going
to
be
for
single
story?
That's
how
you
derive
this
cost
and
then
I
want
to
make
sure
if
they
are
looking
at
a
at
a
parcel
map
splitting
the
lot.
That
seems
like
that's
a
separate
issue
and
okay,
so
that
still
gets
the
same
parcel
map.
Yes,
okay,
perfect!
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Councilman
moore
at
this
point
I
don't
see
any
further
hands
raised
from
council,
and
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
ask
for
a
motion
to
adopt
resolution
number
22-023,
as
described
in
our
agenda
for
this
evening,
and
I
see
councilman
memorial
with
the
hand
raised
so
moved.
Is
there
a
second
for
this
motion?
Vice
mayor
chow,.
O
A
Thank
you,
okay,
great
thanks
very
much
so
no
further
hands
being
raised.
We
will
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
again.
The
motion
is
to
adopt
resolution
number
22-023
amending
the
adopted
fiscal
year,
21-22
fee
schedule,
c,
planning
fees
to
add
a
miscellaneous
ministerial
permit
fee
pursuant
to
emergency
ordinance
number
21-2235
regarding
the
ministerial
processing
of
up
to
two
unit
projects
pursuant
to
senate
bill
9.,
madam
city
clerk,
would
you
please
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
council.
M
A
A
A
The
interim
ordinance
was
22-2238
related
to
sb9
that
provides
for
ministerial
approval
up
to
two
units
and
or
a
lot
spit
split
in
a
in
a
residential
single
family
zone,
and
I
see,
I
think
you
you
still
have
your
camera
on.
Did
you
have
the
task
of
providing
the
the
staff
presentation
on
this
as
well
great
and
just
unmute
your
microphone
and
we'll
take
it
away.
O
Yes,
mr
mayor
lucky
me
so
here
to
present
the
item
on
related
to
extending
the
urgency
ordinance
that
the
council
adopted
in
december.
It
is
again
as
background
sp9
allows
the
minister
approval
of
a
duplex,
whether
it's
attached
or
detached
on
an
existing
single
family
on
a
property
that
is
zoned
for
single
family
uses
and
also
allows
the
subdivision
of
or
an
urban
lot
split
of,
an
existing
property
that
is
zoned
for
single
family
uses
and
also
then
build
a
duplex
on
each
of
those
two
two
new
lots.
O
O
It
is
necessary
to
allow
the
time
to
develop
the
regular
ordinance
that
we
wish
to
bring
forward.
It
is
expected
that
we
will
be
presenting
a
regular
ordinance
in
spring
or
early
summer
of
2022
to
find
commission
city
council
based
on
what
we
continue
to
hear
with
regard
to
our
existing
standards.
An
ordinance
adopted
to
implement
sb9
is
not
considered
a
project
under
sql
and
therefore
it
is
categorically
exempt.
A
Thanks
very
much
pvu,
let's
go
on
to
our
member
public
with
hand
raised
at
this
point
and
so
jennifer
griffin.
You
have
your
hand
raised
I'll,
remind
the
other
members
of
the
public
here
that
if
you
want
to
speak
on
this
item,
number
14,
please
have
your
hand
raised
before.
Jennifer
concludes
speaking
and
you'll
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
Welcome
jennifer.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
darcy.
Yes,
thank
you
to
our
dear
staff
for
trying
to
roll
forward
with
the
bizarre
demands
that
are
coming
down
from
our
state
level.
I
feel
like
this
state
has
gone
through
the
rabbit
hole
down
in
you
know,
alice
in
wonderland
and
we
we
don't
even
know
who's
controller
driving
the
state.
The
city
has
to
do
what
the
city
has
to
do
to
protect
itself,
and
I
fully
recommend
that
this
emergency
ordinance
get
extended.
I
I
have
never
in
my
life
run
into
such
irrational,
stupid
laws
that
elected
officials
at
our
state
level
would
expect
that
the
public
would
have
no
comment
on.
I
am
absolutely
appalled
that
our
state
level
representatives
would
foist
something
like
this
on
us
during
covid
without
any
thought.
Okay,
yes,
you're
gonna
have
neighbors
complaining
upset
moving.
I
The
the
hours
of
consternation
for
neighbors
and
officials
is
absolutely
the
stupidest
form
of
government.
I
have
ever
heard
of
right
now
they
are
trying
to
do
the
same
bills
in
washington
state
as
sp
9
and
sb10.
Wake
up
washington
state
oregon
is
already
embroiled
in
hb
2001,
which
is
their
sp,
9
and
10..
What
the
heck
is
going
on.
Is
it
texas,
next
arizona,
virginia
florida,
oklahoma
maine?
I
Who
are
these
people?
What
do
they
want
and
and
they
don't
they
don't
want
anybody
in
this
country
to
question
them?
Because
if
you
question
them,
you
get
shot
down
immediately.
So
yeah.
We
got
a
lot
of
problems
in
this
country,
but
we
don't
need
the
problems
from
nine
and
ten
to
cause
disruption
in
our
homes
and
across
our
country
and
state.
Thank
you.
J
Good
evening,
council
and
staff,
I
would
encourage
you
to
extend
this
amend
of
this
ordinance
to
give
staff
time
to
fine
tune
it.
I
have,
I
have
input
for
the
fine
tuning,
but
I
don't
think
it's
appropriate
here.
I
think
they
need
time
to
look
at
it
and
see
what
happens
and
how
things
develop.
So
I
encourage
you
to
give
them
that
time
and
continue
to
keep
this
an
orderly
process.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you.
I
agree
both
the
previous
speakers.
I
I
hope
that
you
haven't
changed
your
mind
from
when
you
first
adopted
this
interim
ordinance
and
knew
this
was
coming,
and
the
plan
was
at
that
time.
According
to
all
of
you,
I
believe
to
go
ahead
and
do
this
extension
and
give
staff
time
and
yourselves
time
and
the
community
time
to
tweak
or
not
tweak
what
you've
already
got.
So
please
do
extend
it.
Thank
you.
A
A
C
Nineteen
19.08.030.19
one
two
point:
zero:
three:
zero.
Nineteen
point:
one
two
point:
one:
one:
zero.
Nineteen
point:
two:
eight
point:
zero.
Four:
zero.
Nineteen
point:
two
eight
point:
zero:
five:
zero.
Nineteen
point:
two
eight
point:
one:
one:
zero.
Nineteen
point:
two
eight
point:
one:
five:
zero:
two
19.28.170
19.40.050.
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
very
much.
Madam
state
clerk
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
reiterate
under
the
recommended
action.
This
is
a
two-parter.
The
second
part
was
just
read
by
the
city
clerk
for
the
one
and
only
reading
of
the
ordinance
and
the
the
first
part
was
that
the
proposed
action
is
exempt
from
sequa
councilmember
moore.
I
I
take
it
that
that
was
your
comment
with
your
hand
raised
madam
city
clerk.
If
you
could
please
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
for
the
motion
that
is
on
the
table.
A
R
A
M
O
Right
so
we
are
anticipating,
as
we
kind
of
continue
to
get
requests
from
applicants
and
people
that
wish
to
subdivide.
We
are
kind
of
looking
to
see
how
the
proposed
regulations
are.
You
know
working
in
essence
and,
yes,
we
will
be
reaching
out
to
the
public
for
their
input.
We
I
mean
this
is
the
draft
ordinance
so
to
speak
for
the
regular
ordinance.
So
if
anybody,
including
ms
griffin,
has
any
comments
on
the
draft
ordinance,
you
know
we're
happy
to
take
that
and
put
in
even
now.
M
M
I
understand
that
that,
for
this
one
interim
inter
ordinance,
it
was,
I
was
being
more
a
bit
more
conservative.
For
example,
we
didn't
allow
basement,
which
I
would
be
willing
to
consider
for
the
prominent
and
then
possible
condo
converging
and
so
those
I
hope
that
people
will
provide
comment
on
those
kind
of
additional
things
we
should
allow,
and
also,
I
I
think,
lost,
split
and
duplex
are
actually
a
gentle
way
for
cupertino
to
grow.
M
So
I
do
wish
that
way
to
consider
discretionary
approval
process
for
this
kind
of
thing,
and
then,
if
people
can
provide
comments
on
what
to
allow,
for
example,
to
allow
is
this
restricted,
affordable
housing,
maybe
without
the
primary
residence
requirement,
and
whether
we
should
or
should
not
allow
this
kind
of
thing
and
for
a
discretionary
process?
That
would
be
good
to
know.
Thank
you.
B
A
H
A
Great
we're
on
the
ordinances
and
action
items.
I
will
take
a
a
five
minute
break
for
us
at
this
point.
It's
8
17.,
let's
reconvene
at
8,
23.
right,
we'll
see
in
a
few
okay,
everyone,
let's
go
ahead
and
start
back
up
again
on
our
agenda.
This
is
under
ordinances
and
action
items.
We
are
now
on
item
15.
The
subject
is
a
consideration
of
a
notice
of
intent
to
vacate
a
public
pedestrian
walkway
easement
through
tract
9405.
A
X
X
X
The
public
walkway
is
in
question
is
situated
within
the
campo
de
lozano
subdivision,
near
20138
rodriguez
avenue.
The
subdivision
is
situated
immediately
north
of
the
regnar
creek
trail
and
between
blaney
avenue
and
torrey
avenue.
The
cupertino
civic
center
is
located
at
the
lower
left
corner
of
the
image
presented
here.
X
The
granting
of
the
easement
and
installation
of
the
walkway
was
a
condition
of
approval
for
the
development
when
it
was
constructed
in
2002.,
the
portion
of
regner,
creek,
trail
adjacent
to
the
property
was
constructed
with
the
development
and
has
been
open
to
the
public
for
use.
Since
that
time,
the
trail
continues
continued
eastward
from
the
developments
and
connected
with
the
sidewalk
and
the
hummel
lane
located
on
the
right
side
of
this
image.
X
X
X
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
chad.
I
will
go
ahead
and
turn
this
over
to
members
of
the
public
for
any
commentary.
Prior
to
our
questions
from
council,
I
see
that
lisa
warren
from
the
public
has
a
hand
raised,
and
so
I'll
remind
everyone
that
you'll
have
to
have
your
hand
raised
before.
Lisa
concludes
speaking
and
you'll
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
Welcome
lisa.
K
A
Thank
you
very
much
lisa.
We
do
not
have
any
further
hands
raised
from
members
of
the
public
and
so
I'll
bring
this
back
to
city
council.
If
there
are
any
questions
of
staff
for
the
presentation
or
other
questions
related
to
this
item
or
any
comments
at
this
time,
we'll
entertain
those
prior
to
asking
for
a
motion.
Council
member
moore
your
hand
is
raised,
followed
by
vice
mayor
ciao,
councilmember,
moore.
L
Thank
you,
mayor,
paul,
my
questions
for
for
chad
and
I
was
wondering
if
you
would
be
able
to
pull
the
map
back
up,
and
you
mentioned
some
other
access
points.
I
don't.
I
don't
think
they
would
all
be-
are
going
to
show
up
on
the
map
that
you
have,
but
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
just
mention
where
the
other
access
points
are.
X
X
M
B
X
M
So,
where
is
the
retina
trail
finished?
Her
taste
trends
will
likely
be
able
to
access
either
from
the
entrance
near
the
city
hall
or
at
the
blaney
avenue,
and
this
midpoint
access
if
it
exists,
actually
it
might
encourage
stray
walking
from
the
complex
in
the
north.
Maybe
removing
this
easement
will
discourage
jaywalking,
so
they
will
be
using
either
planning
entrance
or
the
or
the
the
east
and
the
west
entrance
of
the
trail
right.
X
X
X
Typically,
you
provide
a
platinum
legal
for
any
kind
of
vacation
document
in
this
case,
because
this
easement's
already
well
mapped
with
the
subdivision
of
the
for
the
subdivision
map
the
trackmanic
formula
subdivision.
I
should
say
it
should
be
fairly
easy
to
to
craft
an
exhibit
for
that
and
and
move
this
process
forward
without
having
to
hire
a
surveyor.
X
I
don't
know
how
much
time
staff
time
has
been
invested
all
already,
but
it's
already
been
fairly
considerable,
with
the
amount
of
outreach
and
coordination
done.
This
is
also
and
we're
spending
time
here
tonight
as
well.
So
when
this
is
all
said
and
done,
I'm
sure
we
will
have
exhausted
at
least
what
the
fee
schedule
indicates.
L
X
L
Okay,
so,
but
is
it?
Is
it
actually
illegal
for
them
to
cross
technically
illegal
for
them
to
cross
anywhere
on
the
north
side
of
rodriguez
within
this
entire
strip?
There's
no
crosswalk,
it
just
seems
like
a
really
long
stretch
to
to
have
to
not
have
a
crosswalk.
So
I
was
if
one
is,
that
is
that
true,
if
somebody
were
to
cross
say
at
the
bend
there
that
that
would
be
jaywalking
and
illegal,
and
then,
if
that's
the
case,
it
seems
like.
A
L
A
H
A
Great
thanks
very
much
so
we
are
on
to
our
next
item
oral
communications,
madam
city
clerk.
I
I
noticed
that
there
was
an
email
that
came
in
at
seven
o'clock
p.m.
I
I
think,
I'm
within
my
discretion,
given
the
fact
that
this
was
so
close
to
the
beginning
of
our
meeting.
I
don't
know
precisely
whether
this
came
in
in
time
for
oral
communications,
although
it
probably
would
have
been
right
around
that
time.
A
Frankly,
because
our
first
couple
of
items,
I
think
probably
did
take
more
than
15
minutes
when
I
think
about
the
fine
arts,
commission
presentation
for
the
fine
arts
award
winners,
and
so
there
is
a
request
to
have
that
read
into
the
public
record
for
oral
communications,
and
so
madam
city
clerk,
if
you
also
have
that
email,
you
read
that
into
the
record.
Please.
C
Yes,
mr
mayor,
thank
you
honorable
mayor
paul
and
city
council
members.
Last
week
I
watched
the
housing
element
study
session
during
the
cupertino
planning
commission
meeting.
I
do
not
live
in
cupertino.
I
live
across
the
border
in
west
san
jose,
but
I
am
concerned
about
the
housing
element
in
cupertino
because
it
affects
west
san
jose.
Santa
clara
county
has
23
active
superfund
sites,
most
of
any
county
in
america.
It
looks
like
there
should
be
a
24th
super
fun
fight
site
in
cupertino
at
the
old
falco
mall.
It
gets
worse
every
month.
C
Please
address
the
issue
of
how
future
housing
element
sites
will
be
pre-screened
for
toxic
contamination.
So
the
city
does
not
experience
a
repeat
of
the
fiasco
of
alco.
The
city
should
also
do
soil
testing
at
the
westport
site.
Cupertino
dodged
the
bullet
by
discovering
the
balco
contamination,
the
property
owner
that
the
property
owner
tried
to
hide
prior
to
construction
beginning
building
on
contaminated
land
would
be
as
bad
as
what
happened
with
the
sinking
millennium
tower
in
san
francisco,
costing
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
to
remediate.
C
I
drove
down
wolf
road
this
morning
and
witnessed
the
excavation
taking
place
to
remove
contaminated
soil.
I
wonder
where
all
this
toxic
soil
will
be
dumped.
Cupertino
is
extremely
fortunate
that
the
santa
clara
county
department
of
environmental
health
has
been
diligently
working
to
ensure
that
the
site
contamination
at
the
belkwood
site
is
remediated.
This
is
despite
county
officials
coming
under
enormous
pressure
by
lobbyists
for
the
property
owner
to
direct
the
department
of
environmental
health
to
not
do
their
job
in
an
honest,
unbiased
and
thorough
manner.
C
Please
ensure
that
the
city
creates
a
housing
element
that
meets
our
reena
using
sites
that
are
safe
for
housing.
No
housing,
regardless
of
cost
or
income
level
of
the
occupants,
should
be
at
risk
for
toxic
contamination.
We
do
not
want
another
hinckley
or
love
canal
in
our
county
sincerely
richard
sandoval,
west
san
jose
resident.
A
Okay
and
mostly
clerk,
I
was
keeping
track
of
time.
You
were
within
that
three
minutes,
so
thanks
very
much
we'll
go
on
to
our
next
item
on
the
agenda,
that
is,
council
and
staff,
comments
and
future
agenda
items
I'll
I'll.
Take
the
comments
a
couple
of
minutes
each
please
from
council
member
willie,
followed
by
council
member
moore
councilmember
and
I
do
see
a
hand
raised
from
our
city
attorney.
So
I
am
also
I'm
sorry
item
16.
What
am
I
thinking?
A
I'm
so
sorry,
I
I'm
so
very
very
sorry,
item
16,
okay,
so
we'll
take
the
continued
oral
communications
out
of
order.
I
I
duly
apologize
for
that.
I
item
number
16
is
considering
adopting
the
proposed
2022
legislative
platform,
and
so
do
we
have
a
member
of
staff
that
would
like
to
introduce
this
item.
I
see
that
our
our
deputy
city
manager,
katie
nomura,
has
a
video
on
and
so
katie.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
this
item.
V
Y
Y
The
legislative
platform
authorizes
the
legislative
review
committee
to
take
positions
based
on
the
items
that
are
contained
in
the
platform
approved
by
council.
If
bills
fall
outside
of
the
items
that
are
contained
within
the
legislative
platform,
those
will
be
considered
referred
to
the
full
council
for
consideration.
A
C
F
F
Y
Sorry
about
that,
the
this
the
slide
that's
in
front
of
the
background
slide,
which
essentially
incorporates
that
which
I
just
mentioned
on
the
on
the
usage
of
the
platform
carly.
If
we
can
move
to
the
next
slide,
please
the
the
the
notable
changes
in
this
year's
platform
include
amending
language
in
to
support
legislation
that
positively
addresses
housing
shortages,
as
well
as
the
root
causes
of
housing
shortages.
There's
also
been
additional
language
to
oppose
additional
state
powers
to
overturn
local
planning
decisions
which
is
compounding
on
the
existing
local
decision-making
authority.
Y
Y
Other
other
notable
changes
within
the
document
include
monitoring
legislation
both
at
the
state
and
federal
levels
related
to
drone
usage
regulations.
This
would
both
be
in
recreational
and
more
governmental
official
capacities
supporting
supporting
policies
and
funding
for
electrification
of
residential
homes
within
the
suitability.
Portions
of
the
platform.
Y
Also
language
was
included
to
support
legislation
and
or
funding
to
provide
free
or
reduced
price
access
to
public
transit
for
low-income
individuals,
monitoring,
organized
retail
theft
and
law
enforcement
response
to
public,
so
excuse
me
should
probably
break
this
up.
Providing
relate
moderating
legislation
related
to
retail
theft,
as
well
as
law
enforcement
responses
to
public
protest
legislation.
Y
I
think,
given
the
strong
number
large
number
of
occurrences
we
saw
last
year
on
organized
retail
thefts,
there
will
be
some
additional
legislation
which
may
cover
a
variety
of
different
ways,
so
this
will
provide
the
lrc
an
opportunity
to
gauge
that
legislation
and
then,
lastly,
supporting
financial
counseling
for
homeless
individuals
and
support
for
those
that
are
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless
and
then.
Finally,
the
recommended
action
would
be
for
the
council
to
propose.
Y
A
Thanks
very
much
we'll
go
on
to
our
members
of
the
public
before
we
bring
you
back
to
council
for
follow-ups
and
questions
as
well
as
any
potential
deliberation
or
emotion.
I
remind
our
members
of
the
of
the
public
that
you'll
need
to
have
your
hand
raised
before
the
first
member
of
the
public
is
concluded.
Speaking
you'll
have
three
minutes
each
right
now
I
have
three
hands
raised
and
they
are
for
lisa
warren
peggy,
griffin
and
jennifer
griffin.
Welcome
lisa.
J
Good
evening,
council
and
staff-
I
don't
know
how
you
say
this,
but
our
governor
seems
to
have
a
surplus
of
funds
and
yet
no
money.
None
of
this
money
seems
to
be
going
towards
a
pot
for
affordable
housing,
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
appropriate
place
to
put
it.
But
to
advocate
that
some
of
these
surplus
funds
goes
either
into
a
redevelopment.
J
A
I
Thank
you,
mayor
darcy,
hi,
I'm
jennifer
griffin
and
that's
interesting,
peggy's
comment.
You
know
we
could
bring
redevelopment
agencies
back
again.
Jerry
got
rid
of
them
a
number
of
years
ago
and
then
we've
fallen
into
this.
I
don't
know
sb9
sb10
alice
in
wonderland
area
anyway.
The
other
thing
is
too:
I
we
have
because
of
the
realignments
of
our
assembly
and
senate
districts.
I
These
are
the
realignments
of
the
boundaries
due
to
the
census
etc,
and
I
think
it's
really
important.
I
mean
I
didn't
even
realize
that
we
had
a
new
senate
district
because
of
these
boundary
realignments,
and
I
know
people
have
been
working
very,
very
hard
on
it.
But
you
know
this
is
a
fact
of
life.
I
mean
these
become,
I
believe,
as
of
next
january.
I
A
Thank
you,
jennifer
and
we'll
bring
this
back
to
council.
Are
there
any
questions
with
regard
to
this
item
of
either
staff
or
our
outside
consultant?
At
this
time
I
don't
see
hands
raised.
I
will
go
ahead
and
entertain
a
motion
to
accept,
what's
proposed
as
our
current
terms
of
legislative
platform
for
2022
council
member.
More,
would
you
like
to
still
move.
A
M
Also
answering
the
question
from
the
community
member
so
right
now
there
is
an
item
that
we
do:
support
legislation
to
give
a
fund
state
to
provide
state
funding
for
construction
or
for
affordable
housing,
including
extremely
low
income,
very
low
income,
low
income
and
moderate
income
housing
that
we
already
have.
But
I
noticed
that
we
don't
have
an
item
to
support
ownership,
housing
which
I
think
our
community
probably
would
like
to
see.
So
maybe
funding
for
down
payment
assistance,
those
kind
of
programs
that
help
people
to
become
homeowners.
L
Thank
you
vice
mayor
there
there
is,
there
is
an
opportunity
for
measure
a
home
home
loans
for
first-time
buyers
and
that
that
could
be
something
that
maybe
council
could
talk
about
in
the
future.
I
one
of
the
one
of
the
lrc
meetings
included
the
legislative
platform
from
two
other
cities,
and
I
just
I
am
so
impressed
with
the
the
legislative
platform
that
we
have
here
and
that
it's
been
worked
on
over
the
past
couple
of
years.
It
is
really
comprehensive.
L
It's
very
thoughtful
and
each
year
it
it
just
has
little
little
changes
to
it,
which
are
are
really
important,
and
so
I
hope
that
everyone's
gotten
a
chance
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
then,
if
you
were
to
look
at
some
of
our
surrounding
cities,
platforms
to
to
compare,
I
think
you'll
be
very
impressed
with
the
work
that
the
council's
been
doing
over
the
past
couple
of
years.
Thank
you.
H
A
D
A
Sounds
good,
thank
you
very
much
city
manager,
and
so
let's
go
on
to
our
city
council.
I
see
a
hand
raised
from
council
member
moore
councilman
moore.
Do
you
have
any
comments
or
future
agenda
items
prior
to
prior
to
our
journey?
This
meeting
this
evening
and
I'll
just
give
a
reminder.
This
is
a
brief
couple
of
minutes.
A
Follow
up
from
you
know,
items
that
you
might
have
heard
and
follow
up
to
a
meeting
or
other
comments
at
this
time,
but
you
know
I
just
want
to
make
this
very
clear:
let's
not
have
any
kind
of
deliberation
or
extended.
You
know
proposal
of
a
discussion
on
any
particular
item
since
we're
not
talking
about
agendized
items
here
so
councilmember
moore.
L
Q
M
Hi,
so,
regarding
the
partnership
with
chamber,
I
would
like
to
find
out
what's
our
current
partnership.
What
do
we
have
in
terms
of
legislative
action
committee
they
have
and
other
partnership,
and
also,
I
would
like
to
see
what
other
cities
are
doing,
for
example,
santa
clara
their
citizen
cities.
Their
visitor
center
is
at
the
chamber
of
commerce,
I
think,
and
in
many
other
cities
too.
M
A
Great
well,
thank
you
very
much
vice
mayor
yeah,
and
so
by
way
of
just
reference
to
staff.
This
precise
issue
actually
has
come
up
on
on
the
chamber
question,
so
I
would
advise
you
to
look
about
10
years
back.
That
was
actually
an
agenda's
item,
and
so
it's
probably
good
to
revisit
at
this
point.
So,
okay,
so
without
any
further
comments
from
our
council,
I
would
like
to
thank
everyone
this
evening.
A
We
will
hopefully
proceed
for
the
remaining
months
of
our
our
current
term
in
2022
in
the
same
kind
of
manner
we've
been
doing.
I
note
the
time
is
right
before
nine
o'clock,
and
so
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
for
a
great
discussion
all
around
and
for
getting
a
lot
done.
We'll
see
you
at
our
next
regular
council
meeting
of
the
cupertino
city
council,
that's
february,
15th
2002.
For
now
the
february
1st
2022
city
council
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you
very
much
and
have
a
great
day.