►
From YouTube: Vallco Charrette Closing Presentation - April 13, 2018
Description
The April 2018 charrette is the first of two design charrettes for the Vallco project. It is a multi-day opportunity for the Cupertino Community to collaborate with a multi-disciplinary team to craft a vision for the Vallco Special Area. This Closing Presentation to the April charrette was recorded April 13, 2018 at the Cupertino Community Hall. (45 min.)
A
Good
evening,
everyone,
members
of
the
community,
my
fellow
council
member
vice
mayor
rod,
sinks,
councilmember
Savita,
fighting
often
and
our
consultants
from
optic
os--,
as
well
as
our
economic
consultant
that
have
come
out
this
evening
and
been
with
us
throughout
the
week,
we're
at
the
very
end
of
the
first
Charette,
and
it's
been
a
quite
extraordinary
week.
It
seems
like
somewhere
mid
week
we
turned
a
bit
of
a
corner
of
visualizing
the
possibilities
that
we
could
be
looking
at
in
the
Valco
space
and
I
just
want
to
reiterate
the
thank
yous.
A
It's
been
a
very
educational
process
and
our
goals
in
this
entire
time
was
to
make
sure
that
we
actually
have
true
community
engagement.
That's
substantive
and,
of
course,
one
of
the
most
fundamental
elements
of
making
sure
that
happens
is
that
we
have
good
educational
backgrounds
that
aren't
really
coming
from
a
particular
perspective
because,
of
course,
a
lot
of
times
when
we
say
well,
let's,
let's
educate
the
other
person.
We're
trying
to
you
know
push
a
particular
side,
but
our
consultants,
led
by
Bill,
Leonard's
and
Dan
Pawlik,
have
been
very
excellent.
A
We
specifically
found
them
for
the
purpose
of
being
able
to
meld
design
with
community
engagement.
We
have
an
economic
analyst,
who's
engaged
us
over
the
week
been
Sigmund,
and
now
we
have
a
couple
of
proposals
that
were
ultimately
the
amalgamation
of
this
process.
So
thank
you
for
coming
out
tonight
without
any
further
delay.
I'll
give
you
Bill
Leonard's.
B
Okay,
we're
really
excited
to
be
at
this
point.
Most
of
you
want
to
get
to
the
designs.
We've
been
talking
a
lot
over
the
past
few
months,
but
what
we
really
like
to
do
is
what
we
call
inquiry
by
design.
So
what
you're
going
to
see
tonight
is
a
work
in
progress.
I
underlined
that
a
work
in
progress-
these
are
draft
ideas
that
you're
seeing
for
the
first
time
and
we're
going
to
keep
moving
with
you
as
these
things
progress.
Some
things
will
get
right.
Some
things
will
get
wrong
and
that's
the
way
it
works.
B
So,
okay,
let's
remember
when
we're
together
to
respect
each
other
to
put
our
glasses
on
when
we
can't
read
yes,
let's
listen
actively
and
respectfully
and
balanced
are
speaking
times
avoid
dominating
the
discussion.
We
have
some
people
with
a
lot
of
passions
who
want
to
talk
a
lot
and
have
a
lot
of
ideas,
but
we
want
to
try
and
let
everyone
be
involved
and
critique
ideas,
not
people
and,
let's
stay
on
the
topic.
We'll
have
a
very
good
meeting.
C
Good
evening,
I
do
just
want
to
reiterate,
as
I
jump
into
this
presentation.
What
bill
mentioned
is
that
these
these,
these
ideas
are
definitely
a
work
in
progress.
We've
we've
only
been
working
on
this
for
what
four
days
now,
the
the
digital
tools
of
today
make
things
look
much
more
complete
and
finished
than
they
might
be.
C
So
this
first
shred
enabled
us
to
get
some
ideas
out
there
over
the
course
of
this
four
and
a
half
days,
and
then,
at
the
end
of
the
May,
we're
coming
back
and
we're
gonna
work
with
you
to
refine
these
the
ideas
even
further,
so
I
just
wanted
to
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
move
through
this
and
right.
This
is
right.
The
conversation
that
we've
been
having
over
the
course
of
this
week,
the
the
reality
of
the
situation,
I
think
one
of
the
things
ways
we
framed
this.
C
The
importance
of
this
week,
early
on
in
the
process,
is
that
we
know
a
lot
of
people
probably
said.
Well.
Why
continue
with
a
specific
plan?
Why
continue
with
this
process?
Now
that
the
SB
35
submittals
in
and
we've
we've
actually
had
some
good
conversations
with
with
you
all
about
the
fact
that
this
is
you
as
the
community?
C
C
So
we
don't
have
anybody
falling
off
the
stage
and
we're
going
to
stick
around
and
let
you
ask
the
team
members
questions
about
some
of
these
ideas
that
are
on
the
boards,
and
we
also
want
to
invite
you
over
to
the
studio
just
across
the
courtyard
here,
because
there's
actually
a
3d
model
there
that
we've
actually
masked
out
one
of
the
schemes
and
you'll
see
some
photos
of
it.
But
it's
it's
really
great
to
see
it
in
person
so
so
about
75
people
attended
the
opening
presentation.
It
looks
like
we're
about
there
tonight.
C
Approximately
a
hundred
and
fifty
people
walked
through
the
open
studio
over
the
course
of
the
week
felt
that
we
had
a
pretty
decent
stream
of
people
through
the
studio
studio,
and
then
you
know
between
25
to
30
people
at
each
of
the
three
brown-bag
lunches
on
economics,
one
on
transportation
and
the
other
on
form
based
coding.
So
you
know
right:
it's.
The
participation
was
pretty
good,
we're
hoping
to
actually
have
more
people
come
to
the
second
Charette.
So
we
do
we're
gonna
we're
gonna.
C
Do
our
job
to
try
to
get
the
word
out
more
broadly,
and
we
do
encourage
you
to
reach
out
to
your
colleagues,
friends,
neighbors
business
affiliates
and
please
do
invite
them
to
come
to
that
second
Charette.
So
right,
Monday
night
Monday
evening
from
6
to
7:30,
we
started
with
the
kickoff
presentation
in
the
breakouts
on
Monday
and
Tuesday.
If
you
drop
by
the
studio,
what
you
saw
is
the
team
started
rolling
up
their
sleeves.
C
At
6
o'clock
on
Wednesday,
the
team
had
whittled
down
those
dozens
of
concepts
down
to
three
different
alternatives,
and
for
those
of
you
who
attended
on
that
Wednesday
sort
of
pinup
session
in
the
studio,
we
actually
walked
the
audience
through
those
three
different
alternatives
and
the
different
elements
of
those
alternatives
and
I
thought.
That
was
that
this
a
the
studio
was
a
little
bit
tight.
The
the
model
takes
up
a
good
chunk
of
the
studio,
but
I
thought
it
was
a
really
good
dialogue
that
we
had
on
Wednesday
and
got
once
again.
C
The
the
project
website
I've
actually
seen
them
playing
in
the
vestibule
on
the
on
the
TV
over
the
course
of
the
last
several
days,
and
so
I
just
I
do
encourage
you
to
take
a
look
at
those.
If
you
haven't
already,
then
the
open
studio
conversations
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
real
benefits
of
the
Charette
process.
C
As
we
bring
our
team
here,
we
set
up
our
design
studio
where
you
bring
our
computers,
we're
bring
bring
our
drawing
utensils
and
it's
a
really
active,
vibrant,
energetic
environment,
and
it
enables
us
to
make
some
really
good
progress
over
the
course
of
a
few
days
in
act
with
you
and
and
get
more
feedback
loops
from
you
and
interact
with
our
multidisciplinary
team
and
get
some
feedback
loops
completed
with
them
as
well.
Over
the
course
of
the
week
we
did
every
day
we
actually
downloaded
quite
a
bit
of
content
onto
the
project
website.
C
If
you're
signed
up
for
the
email
every
morning
you
probably
I
noticed
I
was
getting
that
email
I'm.
Looking
through
that
list
of
stuff
I
think
that
was
great
to
see.
I
know
there
were
some
comments
early
on
in
the
process
that
the
website
was
a
little
bit
stale
in
terms
of
content,
so
I
would
say:
there's
probably
plenty
of
content
on
there
to
keep
you
busy
for
a
few
weeks
anyway,
until
we
get
to
that
next
shredder
at
least
start
thinking
more
specifically
about
that,
just
to
start
off
before
I
dive
into
so
tonight.
C
We've
actually,
we've
focused
down
the
three
large
alternatives
into
four
sorry:
two
primary
alternatives
that
each
have
two
different
sub
options
under
them.
So
it's
four
total
options,
but
two
primary
themes
that
they
fit
underneath,
but
before
I
jump
into
those
I
think
it's
really
important
to
mention
that
there's
a
lot
of
shared
elements
and
a
lot
of
shared
themes
between
the
two
schemes,
so
I
just
wanted
to
go
over
those
as
a
starting
point.
C
Sorry
I
do
want
to
mention
behind
me
to
your
left
is.
This
is,
is
somewhat
of
a
chronological
sort
of
process
that
happened
in
the
studio
with
the
really
the
rougher
sort
of
planned
drawings
on
trace
paper,
or
you
might
see
several
layers
taped
on
one
another
that
we
integrated
over
the
course
of
the
week,
and
then
these
boards,
here
with
the
brightly
colored
drawings,
are
the
ones
that
we've
generated
in
the
last
day
and
a
half
to
clearly
represent
the
two
different
alternatives
that
all
talk
with
you
about
tonight.
C
So
the
first
one
is
a
pretty
basic
one:
it's
making
the
streets
more
pedestrian
and
bicycle
friendly
and
that's
a
concept.
That's
shared
across
the
two
schemes.
I
think
it's
it's
a
pretty
basic
concept,
but
I
just
wanted
to
continue
to
reinforce
it.
We
heard
a
lot
about
Connick
importance
of
connectivity,
walkability
bikeability,
and
so
that
is
a
theme
that's
shared
across
the
different
schemes.
Just
as
one
example,
we
are
looking
at
wolf,
road
and
thinking
about
how
can
you
make
even
wolf
road,
much
more
inviting
a
street
to
walk
along?
C
How
do
you
make
it?
The
type
of
street
that
a
business
would
actually
want
to
front
on
to,
as
opposed
to
back
on
too,
if
you've
ever
been
to
like
Santana
Row,
for
example,
they
kind
of
everything's
really
internalized
and
they
gave
up
on
the
outside
streets
and
turn
their
backs
to
those
outside
streets.
So
we're
thinking
much
better
idea
to
create
a
gateway
and
sort
of
an
identity
to
the
project
that
Orient's
on
to
those
external
streets
as
well.
C
So
one
of
the
ideas
here
is
that
we
can
introduce
a
local
travel
lane
on
the
western
side
so
that,
if
you've
ever
been
to
Paris
or
Barcelona
any
of
the
cities
that
have
these
multi-way
boulevards
or
the
Octavia
Boulevard
in
San
Francisco,
where
they
tore
down
the
freeway,
it
has
that
local
travel
lane
and
it
still
has
through
traffic
going
in
the
middle.
So
it's
a
great
way
to
create
a
beautiful
street
that
people
will
walk
along.
Business,
won't
worry
done
without
impacting
the
flow
of
traffic
through
the
area.
C
The
second
key
concept
is
very
thoughtful
transitions
into
the
neighborhoods
right.
This
is
something
that
we've
heard
over
the
course
of
this.
This
project-
and
it's
an
important
aspect
for
the
for
the
neighborhoods
in
particular
I,
just
want
to
say
that
there's
absolutely
no
intent
in
this
process
to
take
the
wall
down
unless
the
community,
that's
something
that
the
community
really
supports
and
pushes
for
or
and
we're
also
protecting
those
rows
of
trees
along
that
edge.
C
So
you
know
I'm
hoping
that
if
that's
not
done
initially
that
that
such
a
great
place
is
developed
here
that
you
all
think
twice
about
wanting
that
o
punched
opening
through
there
to
enable
you
to
walk
to
the
really
great
amenities
that
are
in
this
project
area,
but
I
think
for
now
you
know,
we've
actually
heard
varying
viewpoints,
but
right
now
we're
just
saying:
okay!
Well,
let's
let
the
community
decide
what
they
want
to
do
that.
C
This
is
just
a
view
and
you'll
you'll
see
this
in
when
you
go,
take
a
look
at
the
model
in
the
in
the
studio.
The
idea
is
that
there's
a
very
careful
and
thoughtful
transition
from
the
biggest
buildings
that
are
mostly
happening
at
the
north-east
corner
and
scaling
down
as
you
move
across
the
site
to
basically
the
west
in
the
southwest.
Basically,
so
this
is
actually
a
view.
C
The
majority
of
our
schemes,
if
not
I,
think
all
the
schemes
actually
have
three
to
four
stories
at
that
immediate
western
edge,
and
we
can
still
achieve
the
program
by
scaling
up
the
buildings
as
you
progress
away
from
that
neighborhood.
So
this
is
just
a
view
of
that
scale
of
the
development,
the
residential,
the
new
housing.
That's
closest
to
that
new
of
the
Blaney
neighborhood
and
sorry,
that's
a
view
with
that
housing
fronting
on
to
the
perimeter
road.
C
And
what
I'd
say
about
that-
and
this
is
a
conversation
that
we
need
to
continue
to
have-
is
the
trade-off
one
of
the
trade-offs
for
thinking
about
the
desire
for
more
at-grade,
open
space
is
that
we
are
likely
going
to
need
to
bump
up
the
buildings
at
some
other
part
of
the
project
in
exchange
for
that
area
being
coming
open
space.
So
that's
a
good
dialogue
for
us
to
have,
as
we
work
our
way
through
this
process
right.
C
There's
a
series
of
programmatic
elements:
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
sound
like
a
broken
record
here,
but
I
just
want
to
reinforce
that
right.
There's
things
that
the
community
said
we
absolutely
want
that
are
existing
that
I'm.
Even
the
SB
35
proposal,
oates
wait,
I'm,
not
even
sure
of
that,
but
the
rate
they've
been
a
constant
theme
here
that
the
skating
rink,
the
bowling
alleys
and
you
want
a
movie
theater,
so
we're
integrating
those
uses.
Now
what
I'll
say
is
right.
C
A
lot
of
this
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
back-and-forth
between
now
and
the
second
shred
at
the
second
shred
and
after
the
second
shred,
our
team
working
with
the
Sandhill
team,
to
like
figure
out
viability
and
community's
desires
and
sort
of
you
all
prioritizing
which
of
the
benefits
you
would
like
to
sort
of
exchange
for
elements
within
the
plan.
So
we
rightfully
so
we
didn't
talk
enough
about
housing
in
the
kickoff
presentation,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure.
C
Obviously,
housing
is
a
major
component
of
this
these
alternatives,
and
so
we
definitely
not
ignoring
it.
Some
creative
things,
thoughts
that
have
come
up
over
the
course
of
the
week
as
several
people
brought
up
the
idea
of
well.
How
does
Co
housing
integrate
into
the
project
area?
What
that
is,
is
it's
a
you
might
have
a
shared
courtyard
where
you
get
a
group
of
your
friends
together
and
you
purchase
a
series
of
housing
units
with
the
shared
space,
maybe
a
shared
kitchen,
maybe
ultimately
with
shared
medical
care.
C
So
you
know
those
are
the
sorts
of
things
we
we're
not
thinking
that
carefully
about
program
right
now,
but
those
are
ideas
that
we'd
like
to
sort
of
continue
to
move
forward
with
right.
This
percentage
of
affordable,
50%
of
the
housing
and
SB
35
scheme
would
be
affordable
at
different
levels.
That's
actually
a
pretty
neat
thing
to
have
50
percent
of
housing
affordable.
C
Where
will
the
affordability
sort
of
dial
and
as
there's
a
back-and-forth
in
thinking
about
overall
program,
public
amenities,
and
so
that's
going
to
be
something
that's
going
to
be
talked
about
very
closely
and
carefully,
and
quite
often
over
the
course
of
the
remainder
of
this
process.
Right,
there's
then,
there's
a
this
came
up.
Several
people
like
what
about
affordability
for
groups
that
have
not
been
discussed
today
and
I
just
think.
C
It's
really
affordability
at
a
broad
in
a
broad
spectrum,
I
sort
of
from
the
upper
level
to
the
most
lower
levels,
and
so
we'll
continue
to
be
talking
about
that
right.
The
high-rise
housing,
that's
right!
It's
it's
I,
think
it
sort
of
makes
people
a
little
bit
anxious
it's
something
new
for
your
community.
C
If
you,
the
the
SB
thirty-five
proposal,
is
showing
multiple
high-rise
residential
towers,
I
think
the
ultimate
question
is
going
to
be
well,
it's
if
they're
happening,
but
probably
more
so,
where
they're
happening
and
in
sort
of
a
negotiation
forth
of
public
amenity
versus
size
versus
location
versus
the
number
of
them.
So
just
I
want
to
put
that
on
the
table.
There's
you
know,
there's
no
decisions
being
made.
C
I
want
to
just
be
really
open
and
transparent
that
those
high,
the
high-rise
residential
towers,
are
on
the
table,
they're
being
discussed
and
they're
likely
part
of
that
that
program,
so
there's
other
things
right,
I'm
sure
we've
missed
some,
but
that's
we're
gonna
keep
thinking
about
this.
We
want
to
keep
youth
you
giving
us
thoughts
about
this.
Other
ideas
will
continue
to
be
thinking
about
right.
There's,
multiple
entities,
multiple
community
members,
multiple
organizations
have
brought
up
this
idea
of
an
Innovation
Center
or
an
innovation
hub.
C
The
great
school
programs
you
have
here
that
are
all
so
fokin
already
focusing
on
these
innovation
ideas
and
then
may
I
deal
ii,
obviously
pulling
the
local
businesses
that
can
support
that
and
actually
play
a
really
pull
important
part
of
that
so
and
it's
everything
providing
makerspace
shared
space,
independent
space,
maybe
even
on-site
housing,
for
maybe
you
have
fellows
that,
come
in
and
participate
in
those
programs.
So
I
think
it's
a
really
interesting
idea
and
I
think
it's
something
that
we
just
will
continue
to
explore
and
understand
the
viability
of
as
we
move
forward.
C
Other
thoughts,
senior
ecosystem
right.
That's
I,
thought
that
was
a
pretty
interesting
concept.
It
could
be
senior
cohousing,
it
could
be
medical
services,
it
could
be
any
sort
of
support,
networks
or
right
I,
think
we
were
talking
with
the
school
districts
and
they're
thinking
about
opening
more
preschools.
So
why
not
have
the
seniors
that
live
in
the
we
actually
be
a
support
system,
maybe
even
a
volunteer
system
for
those
preschools
to
have
that
social
interaction.
C
Thinking
creatively
about
a
broader
range
of
office
uses
I'll
say
that
this
is
a
community
and-
and
rightfully
so
is
the
second
we
say
office.
You
know
who
everybody
thinks
about
right,
there's
one
user
that
everybody
thinks
about
and
we're
not
at
a
tending
point
right
now,
but
there's
been
a
lot
of
creative
ideas
that
have
come
up
from
you
all
about
different
ways
to
define
and
think
about
office.
Is
it
medical
offices?
Is
it
I
mean
just
it's
not
it's
it's
more
of
what
Steve
ought
and
said.
C
It's
the
outward
facing
office
type,
it's
not
the
internal
facing,
so
it's
types
of
uses
that
might
even
be
on
the
ground
floor,
but
they're
interacting
with
the
people
that
the
pedestrians
in
the
environment,
so
we're
gonna,
think
creatively
about
what
could
some
of
those
uses
be
adult
education
right
that
keeps
coming
up
the
school
district
brought
it
up?
It's
been
part
of
the
conversation.
We
just
want
to
keep
it
through.
C
You
know
what
we
wanted
to
throw
out
the
idea
of
a
potential
eco
district.
You
know:
could
you
achieve
some
of
the
goals
of
the
community
in
terms
of
sustainability
by
thinking
about
this
area
as
an
echo
district,
we're
not
going
to
push
it
and
prioritize
it
if
it's
not
a
priority
for
the
community,
but
we
think
it's
actually
a
really
interesting
idea
to
consider
and
then
you'll
see
on
some
of
the
photo
boards
a
couple
of
different
community
members
and
what
I
thought
was
really
interesting
is
to
community
members
with
disparate
viewpoints.
C
On
of
this
project
actually
said,
have
you
seen
that
vertical
forest
building
that
was
built
in
Milan?
It's
about
a
15
story,
residential
building
that
has
these
really
beautiful,
deep
terraces
that
have
gardens
and
trees
planted
on
them?
So
it's
providing
access
to
nature
for
the
residents
that
live
in
those
spaces,
so
we
just
we've
said
well,
let's
put
it
up
on
our
ideas
board
and
think
about
that.
C
Once
again,
there
are
work-in-progress.
These
are,
you
know,
we're
actually
pretty
excited
at
the
progress
we've
made,
but
there's
more
food
feedback
loops
loops
to
happen.
So
the
first
of
the
alternatives
is
what
we're
just
calling
internal
Square.
We
just
kept
the
names
really
basic.
We
just
want
to
just
they
are
what
they
are.
C
C
The
building
on
your
upper
right.
That's
at
that
diagonal.
You
know,
we've
heard
a
lot
about.
Is
there
an
opportunity
to
integrate
a
new
City
Hall?
Is
there
an
opportunity
to
integrate
a
new
Performing
Arts
Theatre?
So
we
took
that
program
and
said
hey.
This
is
one
way
and
one
great
opportunity
to
define
that
upper
edge
of
this
new
public
square,
and
the
other
edges
would
be
defined
by
that
ground-floor
retail.
That
would
activate
the
space,
and
this
is
just
a
quick
aerial
view.
C
It's
actually
a
pretty
substantial
space,
so
it
could
be
programmed
in
many
different
ways
based
on
what
the
community
wants.
On
your
right
hand,
side,
there's
just
a
representation
of
a
band
shell
and
there
could
be
a
large
outdoor
amphitheater
that
could
be
programmed.
You
know,
as
often
as
possible
to
activate
that
new
space.
On
your
left
hand,
side
is
just
a
simple.
You
know:
representation
of
a
really
well
designed
cutting-edge
landscape
pavilion.
There
could
be
space
in
there
that
hosts
the
Innovation
Center.
C
Sorry
on
the
right-hand
side,
sorry
I
apologize
and
flipped
around
here,
so
that
that
circle,
the
big
circle
and
there's
a
little
rectangle
in
it
and
so
and
what
you
see
on
the
lower
portion
of
this
or
just
the
placeholders
for
that
potential,
City
Hall
and
that
potential
Performing
Arts
Center
and
we've
looked
at
several
Performing
Arts
Center's,
there's
a
great
one
in
Mountain,
View,
there's
a
great
one
in
Livermore.
You
know
this.
We
don't
we
don't
know
how
big
the
Livermore
one
is
about.
C
Five
hundred
people
I
think
the
Mountain
View
one
holds
about
six
hundred
if
I'm
correct,
if
I'm
correct,
but
you
know
it
could
be
a
little
bit
bigger
as
this
progresses,
not
sure.
Yet
no
need
to
think
about
that.
We
let
you
know
we
studied
these
spaces
and
their
their
sizes
and
and
the
quality
okay.
So
this
is
a
view
looking
down
Veljko
Parkway.
C
So
this
is
just
giving
you
a
sense
of
scale
character
right
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
what
that
would
could
potentially
look
and
feel
like
then
there's
a
subset
within
this
scheme
which
simply
says
on
the
right
sort
of
the
western
edge
of
this
project,
we're
introducing
a
large
linear
green
space,
and
this
is
what
I
mentioned
earlier.
This
is
just
saying
what,
if,
because
we
wanted
to
study
that
scenario
and
the
rest
of
the
scheme
stays
exactly
the
same.
C
There's
just
a
different
interface
with
that
opens
that,
with
the
introduction
of
that
open
space
on
the
western
edge
okay,
so
here's
a
slightly
different
variation
of
that
image.
Looking
down
Valco
Parkway
with
a
you
know:
10
15,
whatever
storey
high
right
residential
building,
and
so
we
wanted
to
introduce
this
in
saying
that
that
might
be
one
of
the
trade-offs
right.
If
you
want
that
large
open
space
along
the
western
edge,
you
know
or
UK,
with
a
trade-off
of
getting
taller
buildings
in
certain
locations.
C
So
that's
a
conversation
we're
gonna
have
we
need
to
have
okay,
so,
okay,
so
we've
had
questions
about
program
right,
and
so
we
have
been
hastily
over
the
course
the
last
day
and
a
half
sort
of
putting
building
footprints
into
those
frameworks
the
street
and
walk
frameworks,
and
have
generated
several
program
alternatives
within
those
frameworks.
Now,
once
again,
this
is
a
work
in
progress.
C
We're
gonna
study
many
more
of
these,
but
this
was
our
first
pass
at
sort
of
getting
some
numbers
out
there
and
showing
that
we
could
actually
as
a
starting-point,
accommodate
a
program
that
is
equivalent
to
the
SB
35
program
within
this
network,
this
street
and
block
network
that
we're
proposing
in
these
two
schemes.
So
that
was
the
starting
point,
so
you
can
see
here
we're
at
approximately
four
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
and
entertainment,
we're
at
about
1.8
million
of
office
in
this
scheme.
C
2400
housing
units
about
65,000
square
foot
of
the
Civic
space,
for
that
City
Hall
may
be
supporting
education
uses
and
we're
at
about
5
acres.
This
is
the
scheme
without
the
western
green,
about
5
acres
of
open
space,
and
so
what
I'll
say
is
that,
according
to
the
current
city
requirements,
the
the
project
would
actually
be
required
to
provide
about
13
acres
of
open
space
so
that
so
the
trade-off
would
be.
You
know
that
one
option
is
for
the
the
project
actually
paying
in
luffy.
C
C
That's
a
great
question:
I,
don't
remember
so
so
we'll
answer
well,
we'll
answer
that
what
I'll
say
is:
let's
grab
the
answer.
That's
a
great
question:
I
have
to
admit
I'm
a
little
bit
tired
and
we
will
definitely
be
talked
about.
San
important
part
and
I
should
remember
that,
but
I
I
have
forgotten,
and
so
the
second
alternative
that
we
did
for
each
of
these
different
frameworks
was
lowering
the
office
space
in
the
project
and
basically
so
the
the
retail
program
stayed
the
same.
C
The
office
program
came
down
to
about
1.3
million
square
foot
of
office,
and
so
this
one
so
actually
no
I'm.
So
this
is
the
the
the
residential
is
actually
staying
the
same,
but
the
affordability
requirement
is
coming
down
in
terms
of
the
percentages
is
coming
down,
and
so
those
are
the
sorts
of
numbers
we're
going
to
have
to
work
with
EPS
and
work
with
Sandhill
over
the
course
of
this
project
and
understand
sort
of
where
those
are
gonna
land
in
terms
of
percentages
and
even
the
breakdown
of
that
affordable
housing
as
well.
C
Civic
stayed
the
same
and
what's
gonna
I
just
mention
that
this
is
this.
Is
about
five
acres
of
provided
open
space,
so
there'd
have
to
be
a
payment
of
in
luffy
to
mitigate
or
tub
make
they
fill
the
gap
between
the
required
open
space
and
the
provided
open
space.
So
in
the
scheme
which
we're
calling
the
1b
scheme
here,
which
introduces
that
western
green
once
again,
it's
the
at
the
SP
35
program
and
and
we're
just
showing
this
because
the
program
stays
the
same.
C
C
So
the
second
alternative
that
we
moved
forward
we're
calling
this
the
edge
Plaza
and
in
this
scheme.
So
this
was
an
early
sketch
of
this.
It's
thinking
about
right,
along
Wolf
Road,
where
veljko
Parkway
meets
it.
Let's
think
about
some
large
we're
calling
it
a
retail
pavilion,
but
at
some
signature,
entertainment,
retail
building,
that's
solely
retail
and
entertainment.
That's
very
iconic
that
becomes
the
the
core
component
of
the
retail
entertainment
part
of
the
project,
so
this
was
just
an
early
sketch
of
that,
and
so
you
see
here
the
irregular
the
irregular
building.
C
This
is
Wolf
Road
going
north
south
that
a
regular
block
in
the
middle,
just
above
that
square,
is
that
retail
entertainment
block
and
you
would
have
ground-floor
retail
surrounding
that
with
either
office
or
residential
above
right
now
we're
thinking
of
it.
Our
first
pass
was
residential
above,
but
there
could
be
a
mix
of
both
office
and
residential.
C
C
Defining
a
program,
we're
designing
a
defining
a
direction
and
ultimately
the
property
owner
would
work
with
their
architect
to
do
the
actual
development
plan
and
design
that
building,
but
we're
defining
the
parameters
for
that
concept,
and
so
we
looked
at
the
spaces,
and
so
this
is
that
same
view,
looking
down
Belko
Parkway
so
at
currently
where
the
AMC
theater
is
and
on
your
left-hand
side
there,
you
can
see
just
this.
It's
you
know
a
very
contemporary
signature,
retail
entertainment
food
destination.
C
Once
again,
we
have
the
alternative
with
the
western
green
on
this
scheme
as
well
and
I
just
want
to
mention.
So
what
we
did
here
is
it's
it's.
If
you
look
straight
down
this
sidewalk
we've
introduced
a
taller
building
there,
so
that's
a
pretty
logical
location
for
a
taller
residential
building
in
the
scheme
where
you
have
that
large
western
green.
So
we
just
wanted
to
introduce
that
and
have
a
conversation
about
it.
C
Sorry,
that's
looking
West,
where
you're
on
Valco
Parkway
see
the
existing
building
on
the
on
you
right
with
Stein's,
restaurant,
sorry,
left
and
then
on
on
on
your
right-hand
side
is
where
the
parking
structure
is
and
then
you
would
basically
be
seeing
the
AMC
sign
right
in
front
of
you
in
the
current
condition.
So.
C
So
so
we
can,
we
can
sort
of
orient
you
when
you
come
up
to
the
boards.
We
can
give
you
a
little
bit
better
orientation
to
that
as
we
go
through
this.
So
once
again
we
took
those
schemes.
We
took
a
first
quick
pass
at
at
integrating
that
program
into
them.
Once
again,
we
started
with
that
SP
35
number.
As
a
starting
point.
You
know
a
little
under
five
hundred
thousand-square-foot
of
entertainment
and
retail.
C
So
it's
a
little
bit
short
of
the
thirteen
required,
so
once
again
would
would
need
sort
of
to
figure
out
a
way
to
make
that
up
and
then
the
lowering
the
office
to
just
a
little
under
1.3
retail
stays
about
the
same
at
about
four
hundred
and
thirty,
six
thousand
twenty
four
hundred
units
and
forty
five
of
Civic
space
and
the
eight
point:
six
acres
of
open
space,
so
I'm
I'm,
just
gonna
sort
of
we're
gonna.
We
can
talk
about
these
numbers,
it's
just
it's!
C
C
Terms
of
next
steps,
we
know
that
these
alternatives
need
to
be
very
carefully
assessed
and
that's
really
the
primary
reason.
We
sort
of
move
forward
with
a
two-stage
rep
process,
because
we
got
to
a
milestone.
We
kind
of
take
these
back
and
have
Ben
and
Hugh
sort
of
take
those
back
to
their
studios
and
assess
them
for
transportation
impacts.
How
do
we
start
thinking
about
transportation,
demand
management
strategies
and
Ben
starts
sharpening
the
pencils
with
his
Excel
spreadsheet
and
thinks
about
sort
of
the
program
mix
viability.
C
We
have
conversations
with
the
property
owners
with
the
city
and
sort
of
bring
that
information
back
to
you.
Also.
We
can
do
this
in
another
round.
I
would
like
to
let
Hugh
come
up
and
he
wanted
to
just
say
a
few
things
about
notice
how
many
slides,
but
he
wanted
to
say
a
few
things
about
sort
of
next
steps
in
terms
of
transportation
and
transportation,
demand
management
strategy.
D
I'll
just
say
a
couple
words,
and-
and
we
can
will
be
here
after-
is
happy
to
chat
with
folks,
more
I'm
going
to
see
many
of
you
again
here.
You
know
I
think
as
we
look
at
this
one
of
the
great
things
coming
out
of
this
for
us
thinking
about
the
transportation
question
is
now
we
start
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
handle
on
what
that
program
looks
like,
and
we
can
start
to
answer
the
question.
You
know
what
type
of
different
strategies
can
use
to
manage.
D
The
trips
that
will
be
generated
by
this
will
also
have
a
better
understanding
of
how
many
trips
will
be
generated
by
this.
As
you
start
to
lock
in
a
kind
of
specific
number
for
office
and
for
a
housing
I
mean
there
are
different
strategies
and
I
think
when
I
talked
to
folks
on
Tuesday,
you
know
they're
different
strategies
that
you
can
use
and
approaches,
and
those
strategies
include
a
mix
of
you
know.
Obviously,
land
use
strategies
using
providing
the
kind
of
mixed-use
approach.
D
That's
being
used
here
does
have
sort
of
some
benefits
in
and
of
itself
to
get
people
reducing
certain
kinds
of
trips,
but
then
other
things
like
parking.
We
talked
a
lot
about
and
you
know
the
relationship
between
parking
cost
and
supply,
and
you
know
how
much
people
travel
by
single
occupant
vehicle
and
then
other
strategies
that
are
more
kind
of
the
incentives
so
providing
support
for
transit
or
biking
and
walking
and
other
things
like
that.
And
as
we
look
at
those
you
know,
there's
a
pretty
wide
range
of
what's
possible.
D
But
now
we
get
to
start
to
kind
of
narrow
in
on
what
that
means.
You
know
if
we're
talking
about
just
the
most
basic
strategies
for
a
program
like
this
we're,
probably
in
a
very
small
percentage
reduction,
maybe
in
the
five
to
ten
percent
range
and
as
we
start
to
build
in
kind
of
part
strategies,
you
get
to
a
more
substantial
potential
reduction.
D
You
know
where
we
can
get
into
25
or
30%
reduction
in
trips,
and
so
you
know
we'll
want
to
kind
of
take
all
that
work
assemble
what
we
think
the
best
kind
of
package
of
investments
that
sort
of
matches
each
one
of
these
and
that'll
be
great
to
share
with
you,
I
think
when
we
get
into
the
second
shred
so
other
than
that
I
think.
That's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
C
Basically,
the
idea
here
is
right:
we've
got
a
couple
of
feedback
loops
for
me
before
the
Shred.
We've
done
several
feedback
loops
at
this
rent
and
the
idea
is
right.
We'll
have
we're
still
digesting.
We
had
hundreds
of
post-it
notes
on
the
photo
boards,
a
lot
of
blue
dots
of
photos
that
people
liked
images.
People
liked
so
Erin
and
Bill
did
a
great
job
of
starting
to
digest.
C
That
information
actually
was
a
lot
and
will
continue
to
digest
that,
and
let
that
inform
us
as
we
come
into
the
the
second
shred
but
may
21st
through
25th,
is
the
date
of
that
second
shred.
So
it's
it's
five
weeks
from
now.
So
it's
going
to
come
upon
us
pretty
quickly,
but
I
appreciate
you
coming
tonight.
We're
gonna
shift
our
oh,
yes,
okay!
Oh
yes,.
B
B
It
takes
us
a
long
time
to
first
we
have
to
sleep,
and
then
it
takes
us
a
long
time
to
get
this
processed.
So
in
the
Charette
way.
What
we're
going
to
do
is
do
keep
doing
what
we
did
last
Wednesday
we're
going
to
invite
you
up
to
get
up
close
to
these
things.
We're
going
to
be
here
talking
to
you
as
long
as
you
want
to
talk,
so
the
team
I
want
them
to
come
up.
We're
gonna,
post
them
so
give
us
a
sec.