►
From YouTube: Special Meeting Dearborn Heights City Council : 07/24/19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
E
A
A
Resolution
in
ordinance
knowing
okay
sure
all
right.
Next,
we
have
ordinance
and
resolution.
This
is
council
chairwoman,
Malinowski
Maxwell
and
council
Pro
Tem
bazi
resolution
to
authorize
the
retention
of
at
least
two
wheel:
Schank
PLC,
a
special
legal
counsel
of
counsel
to
the
copper
to
the
corporation
council
and
to
authorize
the
firm
to
file
actions
necessary
and
agreement.
Madam.
E
F
Of
the
questions
that
I
had
in
resolution
and
I
just
like
to
bring
it
up
again
he's
in
there
we
had
on
there
I'll
play
it
specifically
at
the
end
of
its
as
resolved.
It's
the
Durban
Heights
City
Council
reaffirms
they
all
prior.
That's
key
word.
Prior
actions
taken
by
the
firm
Orton,
Wes,
tawil
and
shank
PLC
are
authorized
actions
on
behalf
of
the
City
Council
and
shall
be
compensated
at
another
keyword
upon
ratification
of
the
attached
retainer
agreement.
F
G
Chair
Huntsman,
concen,
I
agree
with
Councilman
of
dull
and
then
also
what's
always
important,
is
that
the
council
get
a
detailed
monthly
billing
and
that
we
all
see
the
billing
and
that
we
have
to
approve
payment
of
the
billing.
It's
some
discussion
of
whether
or
not
that
has
to
be
done
in
closed
session,
but
that
has
to
be
in
here
that
all
the
everybody
will
see
the
billing
and
that
we
have
to
prove
the
monthly
billing.
I
am.
A
F
Sorry
I
forgot
to
finish
the
rest
of
it.
In
addition
of
the
filled
our
corporation
counsel,
this
particular
firm
Ultimates,
the
wheel
and
shank,
is
being
hired
as
special
counsel
to
our
corporation
counsel,
I
suggested
in
and
would
like
to
have
it
included
where
our
corporation
counsel
would
look
over,
not
only
the
resolution,
but
also
a
retainer
agreement,
just
to
make
sure
that
we
are
okay
as
far
as
legalese
are
concerned,
so
I'd
like
to
make
any
type
of
approval
I'd
like
to
motion
any
type
of
approvals,
subject
to
final
corporation
of
and
revisions,
magic.
D
D
A
Because,
well,
we
had
I,
my
thought
was
to
though
he
will
review
this.
We
know
the
mayor
is
probably
going
to
veto
it
and
it
will
come
with
some
kind
of
opinion
letter
from
corporate
counsel
Miyake
and
in
there
we
would
get
his
opinion
in
regards
to
this
of
what
he
thinks
about
it
and
so
not
to
delay
any
more
time.
F
F
A
H
F
A
I
Madam
chair
Matthew,
shank
from
at
West
Whelan
shank,
just
a
couple
points
of
clarification.
The
first
is
there's
21
days
to
appeal,
but
that
clock
started
on
the
17th
so
where
we
said
today,
there's
14
days
left
in
that
appeal.
It
was
my
understanding
that
the
retainer
agreement
was
on
the
agenda
for
last
night,
so
it
would
have
been
submitted
prior
to
this,
and
so
it's
possible
that
there
might
already
be
review
that's
taken
place
before
it
was
on
last
night's
agenda.
H
H
H
I
On
that
point,
the
final
resolve
clause
in
the
resolution
says
that
each
action
authorized
by
this
resolution
shall
be
interpreted
to
be
suppli
separately
and
independently
authorized
by
the
council
in
the
event
that
any
action
is
subsequently
determined
to
be
invalid.
I
wonder
if
mr.
Miyake
could
see
a
way
in
which
the
mayor
could
issue
a
partial
veto
of
one
item
and
the
council
could
decide
from
there
whether
or
not
to
proceed
with
the
remaining
resolve
clauses,
as
opposed
to
it
being
split
into
four
or
five
different
resolutions.
Actually,
he.
H
Doesn't
he
has
the
ability
to
veto
a
an
action
of
the
body
as
a
whole?
He
doesn't
have
you
know
a
right
to
like
a
line-item
veto
in
this
situation.
That's
why
I'm
suggesting
that
this
might
be
a
better
way
to
end
up
doing
things.
He
may
veto
it
any
way
she
may
still,
and
you
would
have
to
rely
on
mr.
Schenk
and
his
firm
with
regard
to
discussion
specifically
regarding
that
action.
H
I've
basically
made
sure
that
I'm
not
involved
in
that
lawsuit
other
than
to
be
available
to
discuss
things
or
to
provide
information
if
I'm
directed
or
requested
to
do
so.
But
my
recommendation
would
be
probably
to
do
it
as
two
motions
they're
both
being
adopted
at
the
same
time
here,
and
that
might
actually
alleviate
some
of
the
issues
it
because
you
do
have
a
time
frame.
H
It
is
21
days
from
the
17th
and
then,
if
the
mayor
vetoes
one
or
both,
then
you're
not
going
to
end
up
having
a
problem
based
on
my
review
or
me,
giving
you
Leary,
because
I
might
review
say
that
there's
a
problem
and
then
you
have
to
end
up
potentially
coming
back
and
altering
things
with
regard
to
the
resolution.
Well,.
H
A
E
I
I
understood
the
suggestion
for
mr.
miyagi,
it's
essentially
to
maintain
all
of
the
same,
whereas
clauses
and
to
break
the
four.
The
five
resolved
would
actually
be
four
resolved
clauses
in
two
separate
resolutions,
and
so
I
do
have
copies
of
the
resolution
we
could
strike
through,
so
that
the
council
could
adopt
four
separate
resolutions
as
evening
related
to
the
first
being
to
approve
the
retainer
agreement
of
July
18th.
The
second
would
be
related
to
the
reaffirming
the
prior
actions.
H
If
I'm
a
council
chair,
it
actually
be
my
recommendation
be
easier
than
that.
You
could
end
up
approving
this
resolution
and
then
approving
a
separate
motion
that
essentially
is
worded
the
same
as
the
second
from
last
paragraph
in
the
resolution,
the
one
which
says
that
your
firm
is
directed
to
file
an
appeal
serve
things
it
would
be
redundant,
but
on
the
other
hand,
it
would
end
up
dealing
with
the
issue
that
we
have
here
in
terms
of
my
review,
as
well
as
the
idea
of
preserving
appeal
you
gotta
be
redundant
of
it.
F
So
what
if
we
were
to
give
you
just
a
hypothetical
day,
do
three
whatever
and
then
we
have
another
special
meeting
which
in
this
case,
if
there's
no
changes,
we
could
approve
it
subject
to
no
revisions
by
the
corporation
council.
But
if
there
is
revisions
by
the
corporation
council,
we
have
another
special
meeting
which
would
be
in
and
out
in
five
minutes.
Ten
minutes.
A
A
H
H
Well,
the
mayor
it
directs
me
to
do
so,
then
I
will
end
up
preparing
the
veto
and
I
will
include.
If
that's
what
you
want
me
to
do
and
if,
but
ultimately
his
veto
is
his
veto,
he
might
say:
I,
don't
like
these
reasons
that
gary
has
included
and
in
the
strap.
But
you
know
my
tendency
is
to
believe
that
he
would
normally
do
so,
but
I
could
also
do
something
separately.
That
basically
says
these
are
the
problems
I
see
with
this.
A
A
I
B
A
We're
all
here
tonight,
I
say
we
just
vote
on
this
and
move
forward,
and
there
is
something
wrong:
we'll
come
back
and
we'll
correct
it.
If
Council,
it's
fine,
something
major
wrong,
that's
going
to
cause
us
a
problem.
I
have
no
problem.
Coming
back
and
correcting
a
you
know,
a
section
or
two
of
this
just
so
we
can
move
forward
at
this
point,
we're
all
seven
here.
This
is
our
second
night
here
we
were
here
to
11
o'clock
last
night
and
you
know
people
have
it's
summertime.
You
know
my.
I
Point,
madam
chair,
is
that
you
don't
have
a
regular
meeting
between
now
and
the
deadline.
So
if
there
was
a
veto
over
the
appeal
without
amending
your
regular
meeting
schedule,
because
the
Charter
says
that
you
can
override
a
veto
at
a
regular
meeting
of
the
City
Council,
and
so
you
would
need
to
amend
your
regular
meeting
schedule
in
order
to
ensure
or
that
you
could
override
a
veto
within
the
21
day.
Time
frame,
that's
established
by
the
courts.
A
I
F
B
I
don't
know
when
I
can
first
of
all
I
don't
know
when
I
could
get
the
ad
in
the
paper
they
have
their
deadlines.
Secondly,
I
just
want
to
advise
madam
chair
that
we
have
an
election
coming
up
and
I
got
a
kind
of
a
full
dance
card
going
on.
I
have
classes
next
week,
even
in
the
evening.
Turning
poll
workers,
so
council.
C
H
So
but
but
the
issue
is
not
if
we
can
do
it
with
anything
in
terms
of
a
notice
when
state
law
doesn't
otherwise
require
us
to
end
up
doing
it
so
for
exam
for
certain
zoning
things,
you
still
have
to
end
up
going
about
things
in
terms
of
a
traditional
notification.
You
can't
end
up
relying
just
posting
it
on
the
city
website.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
the
same
thing
with
regard
to
the
calendar,
why
can't.
H
Timeframe
to
end
up
with
mr.
shank,
as
is
explained,
is
that
your
time
frame
with
regard
to
taking
the
appeal
is
going
to
expire
before
the
next
regular
meetings
of
the
mayor
vetoes.
Then,
there's
a
concern
with
regard
to
being
able
to
override
the
veto
within
the
time
frame
to
end
up
filing
the
claim
of
appeal.
Is
that
correct
mr.
Schine,
correct.
I
A
I
Six
point
four
of
the
Charter
says:
the
council
shall
meet
not
less
than
twice
each
month
in
the
council
chambers
at
times
and
dates
to
be
determined
by
the
council
at
the
first
meeting
thereof
after
the
regular
city
election
in
April.
If
any
time
set
for
the
whole
thing
falls
on
a
holiday,
then
it
moves
to
the
next
secular
day,
which
is
not
a
holiday.
So
by
saying
not
less
than
twice
each.
The
council
could
add
an
additional
regular
meeting
for
the
month
of
August,
say
so
that
you
could
meet
once
prior
to
the
deadline.
I
G
A
A
A
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
vote
on
this.
This
is
the
relized,
the
resolution
of
the
Dearborn
Heights
City
Council,
to
authorize
the
retention
of
at
Moyes
two
wheel,
Schank
PLC,
a
special
legal
counsel
of
counsel
to
the
corporation
counsel
and
to
authorize
the
firm
to
file
necessary
actions.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye.
Those
opposed
no.
E
D
I
C
I
make
a
motion
that
the
law
firm
of
op-,
Tweel
and
Schenck
PLC
is
directed
to
file
an
appeal
of
the
courts,
July
17th
to
19th
decision
in
a
matter
of
Dearborn
Heights
City
Council
versus
Daniel
s,
pleco
case
number,
one:
nine,
zero,
zero,
seven,
two:
four:
zero,
a
W
to
preserve
the
City
Council's
authority.
In
the
event,
the
mayor
again
refuses
to
sign
the
revised
retainer
agreement
and
be
hit.
C
A
A
F
C
B
A
D
C
D
D
C
A
A
B
H
D
H
The
language
who
takes
into
account
the
fact
that
if
there
is
some
notice
provision
that
supersedes
local
work
further,
that
we
can't
override
what
state
law
requires.
That's
why
this
draft
way
it
was
sold.
So
what
the
what
the
clerk
is
is
indicating
is
that
we
don't
necessarily
know
right
off
the
top
of
our
heads.
What's
going
to
be
required,
because
we,
nor,
through
this
process,
I.
A
D
B
Just
would
like
to
answer
Councilman
muskets
concerns
here.
I
was
a
driving
force
behind
that
there
was
a
charter
amendment
and
we
did
that
to
save
money,
because
we
were
publishing
minutes
to
the
tune
of
several
hundred
dollars
and
we
we
wrote
it
and
the
council
wrote
it
in
such
a
way
as
anything
as
required
by
the
Charter
can't
be
put
on
the
internet
at
the
paper
or
both,
but
it
was
only
things
required
by
the
Charter.
This
is
a
different
instance.
B
This
is
not
this
open
meetings
and
the
need
to
post
is
not
a
charter
issue.
It's
a
legal
issue
and
I
won't
just
want
to
explain
to
you
that
we
are
required
by
law
to
post
certain
legal
postings
for
the
election,
and
we
cannot
use
our
charter
amendment
to
say
we're
putting
it
online
we're
saving
the
money.
So
that's
why
I'm
just
cautioning
you
that
that
this
said
I
can't
guarantee
I
will
never
guarantee
you
something.
C
F
I
Just
pulling
up
the
Open
Meetings
out
and
I
think
we
might
have
an
answer.
It's
fifteen
point,
two:
six:
five
public
notice
of
regular
meetings
and
change
in
the
schedule
of
regular
meetings,
subsection
three.
If
there's
a
change
in
the
schedule
of
regular
meetings
of
a
public
body,
there
shall
be
posted
within
three
days
after
the
meeting
at
which
the
change
is
made,
a
public
notice
stating
the
new
date
time
and
place
of
the
regular
meetings.
I
F
E
G
F
I
A
E
I
If
I
could
read
a
potential
resolution
for
council
where,
as
council
wishes
to
amend
its
regular
meeting
schedule
to
add
a
third
regular
meeting
to
the
month
of
july
2019,
now,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that,
pursuant
to
section
6.4
of
the
Charter
Council
will
amend
its
regular
meeting
scheduled
to
hold
an
additional
regular
meeting
on
Tuesday
July
30th
2019
at
six
o'clock
looks
like
a
and
B
it
finally
resolved.
That
notice
shall
be
provided
with
no
less
than
three
days
notice.
I
make
that
motion.
A
A
C
E
J
Would
love
to
see
this
body
vote
in
seven
on
this
issue
and
I
would
like
to
see
mr.
may
at
key
be
involved
100%
and
he
is
on
board
because
when
he's
on
board
and
everything
is
really
voted,
seven
and
approved
was
the
whole
council
and
legal
department
I,
don't
think
the
mayor
will
have
any
choice
but
to
sign
it
so
I
hope
we
work
toward
that.
Thank
you.
Thank.