►
From YouTube: 10/22/2019 - Study Session: FEMA Mitigation Grant
Description
Dearborn Heights Study Session regarding the FEMA Mitigation Grant taking place on Tuesday, October 22nd 2019.
A
C
Okay,
councilman
bazi.
What
we
need
do
we
need
to
actually
FOIA
the
records
from
the
state,
because
all
the
stuff
that
I've
looked
at
again,
it
looks
conflicted
between
what
was
submitted
to
this
or
to
FEMA
versus
what
was
what
was
sent
to
the
actual
residents.
So
we
actually
need
what
was
submitted
to
the
FEMA
or
to
the
state
or
the
federal
government
as
how
much
we
paid
the
residents
as
of
right.
Now
we
don't
have
anything
I'm
working
on
a
FOIA
to
the
state,
see
if
I.
A
C
A
E
E
Was
notified
of
the
study
session
when
the
City
Council
agenda
came
out,
nobody
from
Council
asked
me
for
anything
when
Council
did
ask
me
for
items:
councilman
Titan,
it's
Clayton.
He
asked
me
for
items
in
the
past
from
the
summer,
the
same
with
on
councilman
bazi
I,
provided
that
the
two
questions
that
were
asked
at
the
last
meeting
was:
why
was
there
an
appraisal
or
an
amended
appraisal?
This
this
smoking,
gun
and
I
have
the
answer
with
answers
from
the
state
for
both
of
these
questions.
A
B
Recognized
I
think
some
of
that
may
be
my
fault,
because
I
made
the
statement
without
asking
for
the
information
I
made
a
statement
like
we
need
to
have
this
information,
but
I
never
asked
for
it.
So
some
of
it
is
my
my
fault
that
line
I
know
you
have
it
there,
but
I'm
saying
it
in
my
possession.
Let's
put
it
that
way.
So
it's
somewhat
my
fault
and
I
apologize
for
that.
B
E
Your
second
backup
is,
you
know,
the
state
has
a
mitigation
officer,
leave
it
in
November
of
2014.
It
explains
what
the
building
replacement
value
is.
There
was
multiple
discussions
with
the
damn
current
Council,
which
did
not
include
problem
in
months
all
on
council
and
Bazzi
or
councilman
Denise
Malinowski,
but
did
include
lease.
It
did
include
the
rest
on
there
was
explained,
then
that
does
BRV
is
used
for
the
damages,
for
the
flood
damages
discuss
that
and
pretty
much
put
that
number
in
I,
then
he
had
to
provide
a
number
for
the
grant.
E
A
number
of
placeholder
I'm
not
getting
an
appraisal
because
I
didn't
get
the
grant.
This
grant
took
two
years
before
we
were
awarded
a
grant.
I
had
to
put
a
number
in
the
grant.
The
number
is
tomato
is
between
the
BRV
on
trulia
and
a
couple
other
on
the
realtor
sites.
I
was
explained,
I
could
get
that
number
from
anywhere.
I
was
also
told
I
could
do
two
times
the
SCV
I
knew
Dearborn.
E
F
F
E
For
the
audience
is,
if
you
took
your
current
house
whether
it
was
built
in
1984
yesterday
and
you
took
it
all
down
completely
down
and
you
rebuilt
it
exactly
the
same
same
on
the
same
finishes,
the
same
everything
you're
never
gonna
get
that,
but
that
that's
a
number
that
you
can
put
in
and
on.
There
was
this
big
discussion.
Why
it?
Why
would
I
use
the
vrv?
E
Well,
why
use
the
BRV
is
because
the
state
instructed
me
to
use
the
BRV
is
to
complete
the
application,
and
that's
on
the
the
question
to
that
I
handed
out
to
council
question
one
on
long
courtroom,
studying
of
why
there
was
a
different
on
the
same
appraisal
that
was
amended.
If
you
look
at
your
little
packet,
I
put
out
on
there,
I
kind
of
label
them
a
and
then
back
the
gun
on.
So
there
was
an
email
from
the
same
enemy
state,
Hazard
Mitigation
office,
maybe
I'll
back
up.
First,
we
were
awarded
the
grant.
E
We
went
out
for
on
a
proposal
to
get
appraisals
appraiser,
we
hired
the
lowest
appraiser.
We
prepared
him
by
the
standards
and
we
open
it
up
for
residents
to
start
getting
appraisal.
There
was
four
homes
that
started
on
the
process,
there's
actually
five,
but
there
was
four
that
were
the
first
four
that
went
on
and
on
they
went
to
the
state
of
Michigan.
The
first
home
was
approved.
Two
three
four
three
zero
Hanover
was
approved.
There
wasn't
an
issue.
It
was
under
three
times.
Yes,
cv.
E
The
rest
of
the
properties
were
held
up
because
a
couple
of
them
were
over
three
times
the
SCV,
the
state
equalized
value
they
on
and
in
your
little
packet,
when
the
state
Hazard
Mitigation
officer
realized
that
they
were
over
three
times.
Yes,
Evie.
The
state
police
had
an
administrative
desk
review
where
they
hired
their
own
person,
their
own
appraiser.
To
look
through
this
and
come
up
with
some
of
the
issues
that
they
had.
E
These
issues
came
back
and
they
stated
in
an
email
in
August,
18
2016
that
there
was
various
amounts
deducted
from
each
of
the
properties
for
being
in
a
floodplain.
But
two
three
three
four
zero
wasn't
didn't,
have
anything
to
dust
it
on
so
I
sent
that
out
and
appraised.
You
know
their
praise,
her
came
back
and
that's
a
C
and
he
made
the
adjustments
and
the
amendments
to
the
appraisals
that
addressed
the
state
concerns.
E
Then,
in
attachment
D,
the
state
of
Michigan
on
approve
the
adjusted
amended
appraisals
on
a
promotion,
16
309,
the
City
Council
approved
among
other
properties.
The
purchase
agreement
for
this
property
I'm
also
included,
is
the
purchase
agreement
dated
2016,
which
the
homeowner
sign
and
agreed
to
the
property
I'm.
Lastly,
I'm
the
date
of
actual
closing,
the
homeowner
also
has
to
agree
to
a
lot
of
voluntary
participation
on
that
says,
he's
agreeing
to
them
out
and
that
we're
in
no
way
forcing
them
to
sell,
sell
the
property
at
any
time.
E
B
B
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
what
what
I
believe
is.
The
crux
of
this
whole
thing:
people
are
saying
that
we
paid
X
amount
of
dollars
for
the
house
and
we
reported
a
different
amount
of
money
to
the
state
and
that's
what
I
want
to
see.
We
also
had
complaints
that,
at
time
of
closing
people
were
asked
to
take
a
lower
amount
at
the
day
of
closing.
Well,
I've
heard
that
too
much
I'm
just
saying,
and
this
is
why
I.
E
E
But
if
I
can
explain
how
that's
not
the
title
company
actually
sends
everything
there.
Our
purchase
agreements
are
the
same
exact
amount.
That's
done
at
the
closing
that
the
title
company
takes
and
the
money
that
we
get
from
the
state
I
don't
take.
The
money
is
wired
to
the
treasurer's
office
for
the
exact
purchase
price
of
the
property
yeah.
B
Well,
I
understand
how
the
process
works,
I've
bought
and
sold
houses
before
sir
mr.
Abdulla
will
tell
us
that's
true
too,
but
what
I'm
being
told
is
that,
the
day
of
closing,
when
you
go
into
clothes,
that
the
numbers
changed
and
I
don't
understand
how
that
could
happen?
Okay,
so
what
I
want
to
see
with
my
own
eyes
are
what
we
paid
for
the
house
and
I
want
to
see
a
document
from
the
state
saying
what
we
did
pay
for
the
house.
What
we
reported
to
the
state,
that's
all
I'm
concerned
with
and.
E
You
saying
that
it
might
have
okay,
so
when
we
on
the
day
of
closing
there's
the
title
company
that
goes
back
and
forth
with
the
homeowners
and
with
the
city,
we
get
a
final
water
bill,
they
see
if
they
owe
anything
for
a
mortgage
and
they
deduct
all
that
we
paid
the
transfer
taxes
on
all
the
council
motions
include
the
closing
fees.
That's.
B
E
That's
where
and
that's
where
the
timeline
and
that's
what
I
have
approvals
from
the
state.
It's
a
little
letter
from
the
state
that
says
the
city
of
Durham
when
I
business
is
approved
for
this
amount
for
this
property
and
I
have
that
for
every
single
property
they
don't
the.
What
you're
looking
at
is
the
actual
application,
which
is
a
different
number,
but
they
have
the
exact
number
that
we
paid,
which
is
the
same
as
the
purchase
agreement
that
the
council
approved,
which
is
I.
E
E
B
E
F
To
me,
okay,
so
some
I'm,
just
gonna
talk
about
the
elephant
room
I'ma
talk.
Direct
accusation
is
the
resident
was
given
similar.
What
counseling,
where
he
must
get
was
just
saying
the
the
resident
was
given
hypothetically
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
it
was
reported
to
the
state
that
you
gave
the
resident
and
I'm
gonna
use
hypothetical
numbers
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
Can
you
provide
us
as
a
council
on
all
the
properties,
what
was
reported
to
the
state?
F
Specifically
not
the
BRV,
because
I
do
understand
it,
brv
on
any
property
worth
hypothetically
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
This
is
based
on
my
business.
One
hundred
thousand
dollars
today
on
our
property
on
I,
don't
know
whatever
kinloch.
If
it's
worth
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
that's
what
it
market
value
would
be.
But
if
you
were
to
rebuild
it
yeah,
it
might
be.
One
hundred
and
sixty
two
right
I
get
that
so
I
get
how
the
BRV
is
gonna,
be
higher
than
what
the
actual
final
appraisal
and
sales
price
says.
I
get
that.
F
G
Well,
I
mean
if
some
did
that,
because
I
was
gonna
say
that
there's
got
to
be
a
paper
trail
right.
So
when
you
close,
when
you
ever
closing,
you
have
the
title,
you
have
the
paperwork,
you
know
what
checks
the
amounts
are
issued.
All
of
that
can
be
verified,
but
yeah,
and
you
have
all
that
back.
There's
always
a
paper
trail
and
I.
Think
if
that's
just
presented
on
the
questions
that
council
members
have
which
properties
this
can
all
be
resolved,
I
would.
E
Appreciate
it
and
I
would
like
to
go
a
step
further,
that
certain
council
people
are
considering
me
or
saying
I'm
shady
in
not
there's
a
lot
of
residents
that
really
benefited
from
this.
There
are
some
people
that
didn't
have
another
option,
but
there's
a
lot
of
people
that,
to
this
day,
are
calling
me
to
continue
with
these
grants,
and
these
grants
are
a
lot
of
work.
This
is
not.
This
is
something
that
I
sought
out
to
do.
This
is
something
that
one
of
the
residents
here,
who
was
more
vocal
mr.
Brown
kept
saying,
buy.
E
My
house
and
I
sought
out
with
the
state,
so
I
would
really
appreciate
when
council
does
get
all
the
information
just
like
I
said
before
I.
Don't
need
a
public
apology,
but
I
would
like
it
to
come
back
to
a
city
council
meeting
on
the
same
venue
and
say
you
know
what
we
got.
These
documents
were
satisfied
with.
That
I
would
like
that
I
know
certain
counts
of
people
called
FEMA.
I
know
certain
people
called
certain
County
people
called
the
state
and
they
were
given
the
same
answers
I'm,
giving
a
day.
E
I
I'm
not
gonna,
sit
there
and
go
back
and
forth
and
play
rogue,
but
there
there's
a
lot
of
times
that
city
employees
get
beat
up
over
stuff
and
it
gets
all
resolved.
And
then
it's
moved
down
to
the
next
issue
and
people
don't
know
what
happened
and
there's
still
other
people
who
might
turn
in
and
say.
Oh
what
did
happen.
What
didn't
happen
with
this?
Is
there
still
a
question
out
there.
I
have
no
problem
providing
that
all,
but
I
would
ask
that.
Ok,.
E
C
Well,
yes,
I
did
call
FEMA,
that's
why,
after
when
I,
when
I
asked
for
the
original
appraisals,
some
residents
got
a
hold
of
me,
they
told
me
that
these
houses-
this
is
how
much
money
they
got
for
these
homes.
Okay,
I
wanted
a
document.
It
was
uploaded
to
a
website
when
I
went
to
it.
It
was
gone.
It
disappeared
from
the
website,
so
I
talked
to
a
few
residents.
Luckily,
those
residents
have
already
uploaded
that
document.
So
obviously
that
document,
when
that
question
was
raised,
the
document
disappeared
from
the
website.
It's.
C
A
H
E
C
The
reason
why
they
probably
contacted
you
because
I
was
concerned
when
residence
brings
something
to
Oregons
talk
for
us
to
address
it's
our
job,
to
look
into
the
matter
and
that's
what
I
did
we
won
in
their
try
to
find
all
the
stuff
that
was
discussed?
I
couldn't
find
it
so
luckily,
some
of
the
residents
already
uploaded
that
document.
So
then
I
asked
you
for
an
appraisal.
I
looked
at
the
appraisal
and
I
had
a
broker
actually
look
at
these
appraisers
appraisals
for
the
different
homes,
and
they
did
not
make
sense
to
me.
C
C
Again,
there
was
different
appraisals
that
were
submitted
and
that's
what
I
asked
and
that's
what
councilman
Muscat
is
asking.
We
need
to
know
exactly
what
was
submitted
to
this
state.
You
said:
okay,
if
we
give
them
this
this
okay,
let's
say
$100,000,
we
need
to
see
okay,
we
did
pay
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
this
particular
house.
This
is
what
we
submitted
to
the
state
and
here's
the
appraisal
to
match
what
we
submitted
to
the
state.
Okay,
that's
what
we
need.
We've
been
discussing
it
for
a
while.
C
C
There's
a
big
gap
between
there's
a
house
that
was
paid
ninety
six
thousand
dollars
for
a
particular
home
and
again
we
show
an
estate
document
that
we
paid
132
the
restaurant
there's
another
house
was
like
200,
something
we
say:
we
paid
that
resident
again,
that's
what
we
show
the
state
yeah
again,
that's
what
we
need.
That's
what
counts
when
Muscat
is
asking.
That's
all
we
need
this
week.
E
E
A
I
That
was
part
of
what
we
described
the
last
time.
The
problem
was
is
that
we
were
looking
at
the
BRV
of
136
111,
for
example,
and
then
the
property
actually
sold
for,
if
I
recall
correctly,
ninety
or
ninety
six
thousand
dollars,
so
there's
a
$40,000
discrepancy,
and
that
was
one
of
the
issues
that
was
originally
raised.
So
there
are
basically
four
things
that
need
to
be
looked
at.
There's
a
discrepancy
regarding
the
brv,
which
I
think
has
been
explained.
I
The
document
that
you
have
here,
at
least
this
is
as
much
as
I
was
able
to
print
out
of
what
ms
Laszlo
ended
up
sending
over
to
me
shows
that
you
have
these
four
different
columns,
including
the
vrv.
So
it
explains
how
that
misunderstanding
could
end
up
being
explained
as
being
look
you're
looking
at
the
BRV,
this
document,
namely
the
document
that
you
were
given,
was
part
of
the
application,
but
the
application
was
to
give
values
it
wasn't
to
give
what
the
city
was
to
receive.
I
Specifically
back,
the
city
was
never
going
to
end
up
receiving
any
value
here.
It
was
going
to
only
receive
value
based
on
what
it
was:
gonna
pay,
the
property
owner
based
on
an
appraisal
that
was
accepted
by
the
state
police
and
by
FEMA.
So
going
back
over
to
what
was
submitted
to
the
state
in
terms
of
the
grant.
Application
misses
the
whole
point
of
the
process.
It
takes
the
totally
out
of
context.
I
The
point
is:
is
that
what
the
city
ended
up,
giving
were
different
values
for
different
values,
for
each
one
of
these
properties,
to
give
a
magnitude
for
the
state
to
see
that
there
was
a
point
in
us
asking
for
an
overall
amount
with
respect
to
the
grant,
then
so
that
takes
here,
one
discrepancy,
the
other
one.
The
missing
documents
on
the
City
Council
with
regard
to
the
city
council
packet
as
Laszlo
and
I
spoke
about
the
and
not
trying
to
you
know
in
any
way
upset
you
in
his
last
low.
I
But
when
we
talked
about
it,
it
was
I
think
she
feels
less
defensive
if
she
said
look
that
was.
That
was
something
that
was
when
we
did
all
the
computer
upgrade
stuff.
These
things
ended
up
coming
off
in
terms
of
the
them
being
part
of
city
council
packets.
That
was
something
that
ended
up
coming
off
of
the
website.
At
that
point,
it
wasn't
something
that
was
taken
down
by
the
administration
if
it
was
taken
down,
it
was
taken
down
because
of
upgrades
with
regard
to
the
city
website.
Could.
A
Okay,
now
this
was
within
the
last
six
months.
I
was
in
the
middle
of
looking
it
up,
I
saved
it
as
a
favor
of
my
computer
and
brought
it
up
twice
and
on
the
third
time,
I
googled
it
on
the
internet,
and
it
came
up
so
I
made
it
a
favorite,
favorite
and
I
went
in
two
days
in
a
row
the
third
day.
It
said
there
was
a
problem
with
the
site
and
then
it
never
came
up
after
that.
I
But
if
it
is
the
same
document,
essentially
you
just
got
handed
out,
then
we
understand
where
the
discrepancy
is
with
regard
to
the
BRV
versus
how
much
was
was
paid
and
the
other
difference
that
I
want
to
be
clear
about
and
I
don't
know,
and
some
of
us
would
depend
on
who
you've
got.
The
information
from
is
the
difference
between
the
purchase
price
and
cash
in
hand.
I
mean
I.
I
And
then
you
can
see
if
someone
sits
here
and
says
well,
I
didn't
get
$1,000
well,
you
ended
up
having
a
lien
against
your
property
for
whatever
it
might
be,
and
that's
why
you
didn't
get
the
full
amount
and
then
we
can
end
up
putting
this
issue
to
bed
and
that's
that
would
be
my
recommendation.
Okay,.
A
E
E
K
Month
was
Harriet
Street
Dave.
Did
you
listen
to
the
same
thing?
I
just
listened
to,
because
that's
the
most
incoherent
thing
when
it
comes
to
real
estate
that
I've
ever
heard
in
my
life
I
have
no
idea
what
you're
talking
about
nothing,
you
said
made
sense
as
far
as
value
or
real
estate.
I
did
look
over
the
appraisals
and
I
had
mutual
friends
of
ours
at
our
appraisers
look
over
them
and
the
first
thing
they
said
was
it's
completely
off.
There's,
probably
almost
everything
in
there
was
a
violation.
K
All
right,
you
might
want
to
talk
to
these
same
people
or
bring
them
here
to
talk
to
him,
but,
like
I,
said
I,
don't
think
she's
a
realtor
I,
don't
think
she's
an
appraiser
I,
don't
think
she's
a
loan
officer,
I,
don't
think
she's
an
attorney,
but
yet
she's
answering
every
question.
Every
one
of
these
people
should
answer,
but.
A
K
K
A
L
A
Ma'am,
this
is
the
wrong
time
to
ask
that
question.
At
the
end
of
our
city
council
meeting.
We
do
have
public
comment.
This
is
on
a
study
session
only
and
it
has
to
do
with
mitigation
grant
and
I
apologize.
I'll
see
you
before
the
meeting
starts
and
I'll.
Let
you
know
exactly
where
you
can
come
up
and
ask
your
question.
You
need
address.
A
M
E
A
M
Ahead
document
area
shows
otherwise,
but
okay,
something
come
after
that
it
comes
to
cheer
okay,
cuz
I
thought
was
my
time
to
speak.
Madam
chair,
yes,
it
is.
The
other
thing
was
the
part
of
the
construction
along
that
that
corridor
there
for
FEMA
was
the
kerbs
had
be
replaced.
I
brought
this
up
last
year.
The
mayor
at
that
time
said
that
he
would
have
this
horrible
job,
then
on
the
curbs
by
the
contractor
had
would
have
replaced
in
the
spring
of
this
year.
It's
now
the
fall.
Those
curbs
have
not
been
replaced.
M
That's
all
government
money,
our
federal
government
money
and
those
curbs
are
still
a
disaster
and
I
asked
with
water,
drainage
and
water.
Runoff
they're
still
not
replaced.
What
is
the
mayor's
response?
Is
he
gonna
hold
this
contractor
responsible?
What
are
we
going
to
do?
Those
are
our
FEMA
dollars
waste.
Okay,
thank.
D
B
To
piggyback
on
that,
I
do
remember
that
we
I
think
we've
got.
We
had
to
change
demolition
companies
because
they
were
gonna.
Do
the
curbs
in
my
correct
I,
believe
that
was
one
of
the
cases
that
was
told
to
us
about
changing
companies
because
they
were
going
to
do
the
actual
curb
work,
because
the
other
company
was
not
gonna
do
know.
J
Troy
Brown
two
three
four
formerly
from
two
three
four,
two
zero
Hanover
I-
think
to
put
it
in
the
context
for
mr.
miyagi
to
context.
Madam
chair
has
always
been
about
accountability
and
it's
always
been
about
the
money
and
why
we
on
Hanover
and
that
the
rest
of
the
flooded
plains
were
not
represented
properly
and
yes,
miss
lassos
credit.
J
We
were
compensated
for
our
homes,
but
we
never
looked
at
as
the
council
did
at
that
time.
We
never.
We
never
looked
at
the
and
compared
the
documentation,
and
once
you
compare
the
documentation,
you
recognize
right
away.
The
first
thing
that
says
comparable
one
was
a
foreclosed
house,
my
property
I
just
bought
a
house
and
there's
no
way
that
they
would
ever
use
a
foreclosed
house
in
in
my
in
my
assessment
and
my
appraisal,
there's
no
way
it's
illegal
and
and
yet
that's
that's
there,
that's
there
and
so
the
context.
J
The
context
that
I
want
to
bring
forward
is
it's
always
been
about
where's
the
money
coming
from.
If
there
was
a
third
and
some
report,
a
20%
match,
where
did
that
money
come
from
I,
always
suspected
that
the
enterprise
one,
which
is
the
water
fund,
has
never
been
properly
accounted
for?
I
went
back
to
the
CSO
Vaughn
and
I
found,
at
least
at
least
3.8
million
dollars
has
never
been
accounted
for,
and
this
is
same
thing
here
and
so
I'm
I'm
I
have
no
skin
in
the
game
anymore.
J
Madam
chair
and
I'm
not
saying
that
I
do
and
I
am
thankful
that
I,
don't
because
I
can't
really
respect
that
government.
That's
not
for
the
people
by
the
people
and
that's
what
we
have
still
a
fear
all
the
way
since
the
since
the
flood
its
we,
we
have
a
body,
that's
not
holding
the
administration
accountable
to
the
financial
responsibility,
and
so
for
me,
the
only
thing
I
want
to
say
is
continue
to
get
the
documentation
and
continue
to
follow
the
trail,
because
it's
not
right
and
something
is
not
right.
J
H
H
I
I
A
H
H
H
Sorry,
ma'am
I
interrupt
you
for
the
cook
minute.
Please
it
says
exactly
the
product
is
acquisition
and
demolition
of
fifteen
flood
prone
homes.
The
specified
15
properties
only
started
from
the
twenty
three
four
one:
zero
going
to
twenty-three
five
thirty
and
over.
Then
you
get
that
there's
also
one
home
at
fifty
three
sixty
medicine
that
has
a
total
of
four
parcels
on
that
property.
Alternate
homes
were
chosen
on
the
first
block
of
the
north
side
of
Hanover
west
of
Telegraph,
because
the
city
is
only
interested
in
owner
occupancy
homes
west
of
Telegraph.
H
These
homes
are
not
continuous,
so
technically
this
whole
grand
that
will
have
been
debated
for
almost
about
two
years
and
now,
all
of
a
sudden,
we
got
a
miracle.
Everybody
got
answers
for
when
everybody
was
meal
for
the
whole
entire
time.
This
spring
was
specified
to
buy
these
fifteen
houses
only
okay
and
that
share
from
the
city
was
seven
hundred
fourteen
thousand
dollars.
They
got
a
total
of
two
million
eight
hundred
fifty-three
thousand
dollars
to
buy
these
houses
by
themselves
if
they
wanted
to
debate
just
like
mr.
H
H
A
F
F
A
H
F
F
H
And
they
were
completely
redone
after
the
fourth
of
2014.
We
come
back
and
put
up
these
comparable
properties,
they're
completely
unlivable
propers.
You
can
look
at
the
pictures,
it's
quite
a
bit
funny
how
come
they
did
not
give
them
the
price
that
we
could
see
him
on
Zillow
over
there.
It's
a
praise
for
163
on
Zillow.
F
I
just
got
a
question
for
you,
though.
The
appraisals
that
you
have
here,
because
I
remember
at
the
time,
lose
two
different
appraisals
that
we
had
weighed
the
first
initial
appraisals
that
were
done
by
one
appraisal
company
and
they
were.
They
came
back
state-level
from
the
state
police
and
said
these
were
not
good
enough.
So
I
should
clarify
I'm,
not
arguing
I'm,
just
trying
to
clarify
these
appraisals.
You've
shown
us
here
are
the
second
appraisal
correct.
Those
are.
H
I
have
personally
spoken
to
the
state
of
Michigan
and
female
myself,
and
the
real
answer
was.
We
gave
the
city
the
money
you
got
to
come
back
and
talk
to
the
city.
You
guys
gonna
finish
up
with
the
city:
okay,
they're
completely
out
of
it.
They
are
awarded
the
grant
to
the
city,
so
the
city
are
the
one
who
would
who
were
supposed
to
finish
up
that
project.
Okay,
thank
you.
At
the
same
time,
since
you
guys
were
talking
about
closing
and
mrs.
H
Lazarus
was
claiming
everything
was
done
through
a
title
company
type,
the
copy,
we're
doing
everything-
that's
absolutely
unbelievable,
we're
coming
to
that
city
at
the
city
to
close
and
guess
what
they
didn't
even
have
a
final
watering.
The
city
could
not
even
get
it
their
own,
find
a
water
meeting
at
the
same
time
where
they
were
trying
to
do
their
meaning
to
approach
us
that
this
program
is
going
to
be
going
on.
Miss
Laster
herself
said
it
at
the
library.
H
If
she,
if
she
doesn't
remember
if
she
doesn't
remember,
I,
can
remind
you
that
if
we
don't
go
with
these
grants,
right
now,
they'll
be
willing
to
go
with
the
eminent
domain.
We
will
be
forced
to
believe
in
these
houses.
Absolutely
nothing,
not
possibly
a
dollar.
So
if
she
doesn't
remind
me,
I
remember
that
she
probably
misses
all.
I
This
is
just
really
to
address
some
of
the
points
that
were
raised.
Mr.
parish
said
something
about
the
wildflowers.
The
document
that
he
had
again
was
an
estimate.
It
was
part
of
the
grant
application.
It
wasn't
necessarily
what
ended
up
ultimately
being
approved
in
terms
of
that
specific
expenditure.
If
you
look
at
the
grant
application
you'll
see
that
there
are
things
about
legal
fees.
For
me,
I
not
do
the
bulk
of
legal
work.
With
regard
to
this,
it
was
all
done
by
an
entirely
different,
firm,
well
I.
I
The
line
items
in
there
were
not
meant
to
end
up
being
something
set
in
stone
that
we're
gonna
end
up
being
approved,
specifically,
especially
when
it
came
to
the
property.
The
state
was
not
going
to
give
us
whatever
value
we
put
down
here
unless
it
was
confirmed
by
FEMA,
and
that
gets
it
to
the
other
point.
In
other
words,
what
was
submitted?
A
I
I
F
There's
a
dish
volume
that
we're
gonna
need.
We
will
need
something
based
on
the
potential
accusation:
we'll
need
something
from
a
state
that
shows
how
much
was
turned
in
by
our
city
to
the
state
as
far
as
how
much
the
amount
that
was
paid
to
the
resident
okay,
because
there's
a
discrepancy
here
between
the
amount
that-
and
this
is
what
some
of
the
residents
are,
accusing
their
MOT-
that
they
received
in
their
pockets.
For
as
a
check
now,
there
may
be
a
little
bit
of
a
difference.
I
realize
between
water
escrow
order.
I
A
N
N
G
N
A
H
O
What
I
want
to
know
from
this
project
is:
what
did
the
city
receive
exactly
from
the
state?
What
did
we
pay
exactly
out
and
how
much
was
the
portion
of
the
city
which
was
paid
toward
this
project?
We
supposed
to
pay
out
of
the
water
fund,
33%
or
one-third
of
the
amount
which
the
state
wait.
This
is
the
issue.
O
And
there
is
a
second
thing:
$11,900
for
administrative
fee
who
received
that
money
and
at
what
rate
was
it
at
$38
and
some
an
hour
or
that
person
who
worked,
making
less
money
and
charged
38,
basically
making
more
money
than
they
supposed
to
be,
especially
if
they
are
appointees
and
they
are
salaried
employees?
Those
are
the
two
issues
which
I
have
concerned
about
and
I
would
like
you
to
ask
for
those
numbers
to
see
if
this
city
did
not
pay
their
portion,
which
they
supposed
to
pay
by
the
agreement.
Thank
thank.