►
From YouTube: Dearborn Heights City Council Study Session 12-05-18
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
We
received
this
an
email
form
and
I
tried
to
read
through
it,
and
it's
gonna
go
over
my
head,
so
I
stopped
reading
it
so
I
wouldn't
get
confused
and
figured
that
we
would
have
people
here
to
give
us
a
overview
of
this
and
what
it
means
and
how
we
go
about
doing
it.
So
I'm
going
to
call
on
the
administration
here.
C
Martin
is
gonna,
make
the
presentation.
A
real,
quick
executive
summary
is
that
we
have
no
idea
as
to
whether
or
not
the
state
proved
our
plan.
It's
a
very
good
plan,
it's
actually
anchored.
So
a
lot
of
the
data
that
you
received
is
data
that
we
authorized
the
council
authorized
last
week.
So
we
didn't
get
the
data
to
support,
but
the
key
is
if
the
actuary
said
that
and
how
we
devise
this
is.
C
We
would
assume
that
we
would
continue
on
a
pay-as-you-go
basis,
but
at
the
same
time
the
state
is
requiring
us
to
be
at
40
percent
funding
within
30
years
for
healthcare.
The
actuaries
said
we'll
assume
you're
going
to
continue
your
pay-as-you-go
and
then
will
will
tell
you
what
you
need
to
put
in
a
trust
and
it'll
be
two
different
trusts,
one
for
police
and
fire
and
one
for
everybody
else
and
that's
what
they
did
so
they'll
take
you
through.
C
But
basically
the
number
is
1.5
million
dollar
contribution,
1
million
would
come
from
for
police
and
fire
would
be
in
public
act
or
would
be
to
act.
345
millage.
You
know
how
much
to
get
to
1
million.
How
much
of
the
mill
that
is
I
was
gonna?
Ask
John
and
I
forgot
to
ask
them
rightly
Oh
John
how
much
to
get
1
million.
D
C
So
1
mil
and
what
what
you
will
be
asked
to
do
is
to
make
the
commitment
and
we
receive
the
legal
opinion
that
says
we
can
fund
police
and
fire
through
the
act.
345
millage
the
legacy
portion.
We
had
to
get
that
clarified,
and
so
that
would
be
next
spring.
You
would
add
one
mill
to
the
funding
and
that
would
go
for
police
and
fire
for
the
general
government.
C
It's
a
half,
a
million
I
believe
that
that
can
be
taken
out
of
current
operations
and
because
little
audit
we
received
last
week
we
added
two
million
dollars
to
fund
balance
and
so
a
half
a
million
is
extremely
doable
and
viable
so
and
we're
at
our
taxing
millage
limits.
So
we
really
couldn't
go
from
our
taxes,
but
it
means
we
don't
have
to
cut.
We
can
go
ahead,
so
that's
kind
of
the
overview
councilman.
B
C
B
That
part
I
understand
so
at
the
controversy
this
year
obviously
was
3.1
million
versus
the
eight
point,
five
million
that
we
had.
There
was
a
little
controversy
that
the
actuary
said:
3.1
million
dollars,
and
then
it
came
out
eight
because
of
the
of
the
health
care
costs,
and
all
of
that
we
had
that
little
controversy
earlier
this
year,
well
whatever-
and
that
was
all
resolved
okay.
So
it
takes
us
five
million
dollars
a
year
for
a
health
care
to
go
into
that
fund
for
the
police
and
fire.
B
No
1
million,
1
million
I,
know
I'm
talking
about
in
general,
the
act
345
this
past
year.
Our
our
total
in
total
was
eight
and
a
half
million
three
point
one
four,
but
dad
also
includes
pension
yeah.
Well,
that's,
okay,
so
pension,
but
we're
just
talking
healthcare.
Now,
okay,
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear
that
it's
gonna
be
1
million
for
health
care
for
the
retiree
and.
C
It
would
be
the
same
1
million
going
forward
every
every
year.
So
once
the
increase
happened
this
year,
it
wouldn't
be
like
another
million,
but
it
would
be
that
millage
would
stay
at
I,
get
us
an
additional
Milken
yeah.
You
should
be
aware
that
these
numbers
are
going
to
fluctuate,
as
we
like
five
years
from
now
may
not
be
a
million
dollars.
C
One
of
the
things
I
may
actually
give
in
Martin's
presentation,
but
one
of
the
things
that's
important
is
the
state
gave
us
what
the
assumption
should
be
so
that
was
baked
into
the
actuary.
So
one
of
the
things
you're
going
to
find
out
is
that
the
audit
was
done
on
a
Gatsby
75
basis,
and
that
was
you
remember
that
number
169
million
debts
in
there.
Okay,
using
the
state
assumptions
which
we
have
to
use
for
this
report.
C
The
liability
dropped
to
111
million,
and
so
you
can
see
that
based
upon
what
you
make
assumptions,
you
can
really
change
the
liability
dramatically.
But
the
state
told
us
what
we
had
to
use,
and
so
these
numbers
that
the
actuary
presented
are
based
upon
the
state
numbers
and
how
did
it
drop
so
much
because
of
the
assumption.
So
if
you,
for
instance
like
if
you
assume
that
you're
gonna
earn
7%
interest
on
the
reason.
E
A
G
Sure
I
believe
you
have
the
response:
the
corrective
action
plan
in
front
of
you
that
was
submitted
to
the
state.
My
focus
was
gonna,
be
on
that
I
do
have
some
comments
so
that
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
with
the
night
heart
evaluation.
But
so,
in
summary,
the
mayor
is
correct
of
the
liability
that
decreased
drastically
as
a
result
of
using
the
state's
assumptions.
So
we
met
with
nine
heart
actuaries
yesterday
and
talked
over
overall
liability
and
where
we're
at
right
now
in
order
to
be
able
to
submit
the
corrective
action
plan.
G
So
the
liability
was
about
169
million
dollars
for
the
financial
statement
purposes
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
dates
that
are
used.
That
liability
was
of
as
of
I,
believe
12:30
1:17,
its
169
million
dollars
changing
some
of
the
given
that
were
required
by
the
state
changing
some
of
the
timing.
The
liability
drops
to
111
million
dollars
again,
it's
the
best
estimate
as
of
right
now,
so
that
liability
can
fluctuate
year
over
year.
If
the
state
changes
some
of
the
requirements
of
the
discount
rates
to
be
used
rates
of
return.
G
Things
like
that
that
liability
can
change
your
over
year
again
that
it's,
unfortunately
there's
a
lot
of
moving
parts
that
are
going
to
be
expected
over
the
future
years
if
the
overall
benefits
are
changed
for
future
retirees
or
for
future
employees,
or
anything
like
that
again.
That
plays
a
role
in
the
liability
as
well.
So
there's
a
lot
of
moving
parts
as
of
right
now
the
actuary
was
looking
at
calculations,
for
what
does
the
city
need
to
do
in
order
to
get
to
the
40
percent
funding
in
30
years?
G
So
that's
the
mandate
by
the
state
in
order
to
get
to
that
30
years
or
in
40
percent
in
30
years.
What
does
the
city
need
to
do
to
get
us
there
so
step?
One
is
going
to
be
set
up
the
trust
funds.
The
two
trust
will
need
to
be
kept
separate
because
of
the
X
345
millage
one's
gonna
be
for
police
and
fire,
and
one
it's
going
to
be
for
all
other
employees,
so
keeping
those
separate
the
one
and
a
half
million
dollars.
G
Some
of
those
liabilities
isn't
a
third
of
becoming
do
in
the
future
that
one
in
the
half
million
dollars
gonna
build
up
over
a
thirty-year
period,
including
investment
returns
that
are
projected
right
now
over
that
30-year
period,
you're
gonna
get
to
approximately
forty
one
percent
funded
level.
This
is
gonna,
get
you
where
you
need
to
be
based
on
the
liability
right
now,
if
four
five
years
from
now
that
liability
of
111
million
dollars
changes
to
a
hundred
million
dollars,
you
don't
have
to
fund
it
quite
as
much
for
the
prepayment.
G
If
it
changes
to
120
million,
you
might
have
to
put
a
little
bit
more
in.
It
depends
also
on
the
rates
of
return
if
investments
are
doing
better
than
the
projected
I
believe
it's
seven
percent,
that's
in
the
actuary
report.
If
it
ends
up
being
nine
percent,
you
won't
have
to
necessarily
fund
as
much
if
it's
a
little
bit
lower
again.
You'll
have
to
make
up
the
difference
in
order
to
get
to
that
forty
percent.
C
Submitted
you'll
have
it
on
your
agenda
and
you'll,
give
us
authorization
to
submit
it
and
then
we'll
see
if
the
state
agrees
or
we'll
have
suggestions
for
us.
But
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
we
wanted
to
use
plan
Tran
because
they're
doing
other
communities
and
they
have
seen
what
has
been
submitted.
So
we
got
the
benefit
of
some
of
the
other
communities
that
they're
working
with
and
we're
able
to
draw.
They
drew
on
some
of
those
to
include
in
our
particular
proposal,
and
hopefully
the
state
will
accept
them.
G
Hopefully
the
one
comment
I
do
have
to
make
is
the
state
has
been
rejecting
a
lot
of
the
plans
a
lot
of
times
to
require
additional
information.
We
do
give
an
additional
45
day
period
after
their
review,
in
order
to
be
able
to
resubmit
another
proposal
for
the
corrective
action
plan.
So
even
if
it's
rejected
it
does
I
mean
gloom
is
upon
us
or
anything
like
that.
It's
just
a
matter
of
explaining
some
of
the
items
and
some
of
the
assumptions
that
have
been
made
in
order
to
be
able
to
get
to
that
forty
percent.
G
A
C
Negotiation
forth
patiently,
what
happened?
I
found
out
that
when
the
legislation
was
adopted
and
the
legislation
came
from
a
task
force
that
Governor
Snyder
appointed
the
reunion
people,
there
were
management
people.
In
fact,
I
think
there
was
the
a
firefighter
from
the
state
office.
That
was
one
of
the
members,
so
they
came
up
with
a
recommendation
for
the
legislature.
The
legislature
did
not
include
in
the
legislation
any
penalties.
C
F
F
A
couple
questions
Martin
first,
well
how
long
we
have
been
in
this
particular
type
of
situation,
this
situation
where
we
were
behind
like
there
and
then
the
secondary
question.
1A
is
how
many
cities
do
you
know
that
you
know
of
or
approximation
or
even
percentage.
There
are
in
a
pay-as-you-go
program
because
it
seems
like
a
lot
of
them
are
from
some
of
the
minimal
research
that
I've
done
on
this.
This
is
a
lot
of
them
that
do
it.
You
know
in
a
pay-as-you-go
type
of
system.
F
G
As
long
so
you've
never
pre-funded
the
liability,
okay,
technically
so
there's
communities
out
there
and
I
don't
know
the
exact
percentages.
There
are
communities
out
there
that
have
been
doing
the
x-ray
lleol
recommended
contributions.
So
what
that
means
is
you'll,
essentially
pay-as-you-go.
Plus
you
put
a
little
bit
of
money
aside
every
year
to
keep
growing
that
fund,
just
like
you've
done
in
with
a
pension
system
in
order
to
get
to
the
funded
level
20
30
40
years
from
now,
the
OPA
never
had
that
requirement
here
or
anywhere
else
in
the
state.
G
It
was
purely
voluntary,
some
communities
so
like
for
pension,
it's
required,
so
every
community
has
been
funded
and
if
you're
not
funding
the
actual
required
contribution,
then
it
needs
to
be
reported
to
the
state
and
there's
other
penalties
and
things
like
that
from
the
Oh
Bev
there's
never
been
such
a
law
with
such
a
rule.
There
still
is
that
so
a
lot
of
the
terms
were
basically
used
for
both
pension
and
OPA.
G
The
AR
see
the
annual
required
contribution
was
also
used
for
a
peb
which
is
not
accurate,
because
it
was
always
more
of
a
recommended
recommendation
versus
a
requirement
which
is
gonna
change
going
forward.
However,
it's
not
really
a
requirement,
so
that's
why
the
city
never
really
funded
before
it
could
have
been
just
availability
of
funds
could
have
been
a
lot
of
different
factors,
but
the
city
never
pre-funded
the
liability
as
a
percentage
for
other
communities
that
have
not
a
pre
funded
I.
Don't
know
the
exact
I
know
that
I
have
well.
G
The
communities
that
I
work
with
closely
I
would
say,
20%
or
so
are
fully
funded,
which
is
pretty
much
unheard
of
one
community
doesn't
even
have
open
because
doesn't
offer
to
the
retirees
and
I
would
say
the
other
two
are
kind
of
split.
Some
are
pays,
you
go,
the
other
half
are
probably
between
thirty
and
fifty
percent
funded.
This
kind
of
ranges
all
across
the
board,
so
Dearborn
Heights,
is
definitely
not
unique.
From
the
perspective
that
you've.
B
G
B
H
H
H
I
You
chair,
Councilwoman,
Hicks
Clayton.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'm.
Looking
at
the
municipal
stability
board,
their
corrective
action
plan,
development,
best
practices
and
strategies,
I,
imagine
that's
incorporated
into
the
action
plan
that
we're
looking
at
my
questioning.
You
mentioned
it
councilman
Muscat
about
the
Medicare
as
primary
insurance
for
retirees,
65
and
older.
Also,
it
mentions
to
implement
a
cap
on
employer
retiree
health
care,
cost,
raising
the
eligibility
age
for
retiree
health
care
and
there's
several
other
points
here
on
page
three,
can
you
speak
to
that
some
of
those
items?
What
do
you.
G
C
Everything's
negotiable.
The
emphasis
on
these
particular
contracts
was
to
get
everybody
in
basically
the
same
health
care
plant,
and
that
was
the
recommendation
from
your
unit
that,
and
we
worked
very
hard
in
fact,
Elizabeth
probably
would
not
want
to
go
through
those
meetings
again.
I
know
that
those
I
said
in
on
when
you
deal
with
health
care,
employees
start
to
shake
and
retirees,
and
so
we
incorporated
into
the
contracts.
But
you
know
we're
getting
this
signal
here:
I've
had
people
and
the
council
come
up
and
say
we're
Union
people.
C
We
don't
believe
and
I've
philosophically
believe
that
we
should
be
providing
health
care
and
pensions
in
those
legacy
costs
to
our
employees
and
so
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
it.
But
when
we
get
negotiations,
some
of
those
things
are
complete
deal-breakers
that
we
cannot
force
on
Union
numbers,
some
of
those
items
that
you're
indicating,
and
so
we
have
been
working
in
the
direction
of
significant
savings.
But
it's
got
to
be
a
mutual
thing
with
the
Union
in
the
city.
Okay,.
E
Guess,
I
I
don't
want
to
ask
the
wrong
question
or
the
way
I'm
and
let's
say
the
best
way,
to
ask
that
question.
Okay,
so
with
for
the
unfunded
liabilities,
you
have
some
employees
that
work
for
the
city,
I've
been
retired,
they're
back
to
working
for
the
city,
so
if
they're
not
paying
into
that,
so
that's
gonna
increase
our
unfunded
liability.
Is
that
correct,
so
I.
E
H
H
C
E
G
J
We're
basing
this
on
a
7
percent
return
and
you
say
said
something
about:
if
we
don't
get
7
percent,
we've
got
to
make
it
up.
What's
the
plan
I'm
making
up
the
difference?
Basically,.
G
What
would
happen
is
if,
let's
just
say,
the
new
rules
are
say
6%
the
actuary
will
come
up
with
a
new
valuation.
Is
okay.
What's
the
liability
at
that
point
which
the
liability
should
be
similar,
but
then
okay,
what
kind
of
assets
do
you
have
to
have
in
the
trusts
in
order
to
get
to
that
forty
percent
funding
down
the
line?
G
J
K
D
E
D
J
D
Yeah
well
they've
explained
that
so
a
million
dollars
of
it
sounds
like
it's
gonna
come
from
the
equity,
forty
five
and
then
you
know
the
half.
A
million
is
gonna
come
from
the
general
operation,
and
then
you
do
have
the
two
million
dollars
that
you
guys
have
kind
of
somewhat
earmark
and
that
partially
you
know
you
could
tap
into
to
help.
Make
that
five
hundred
thousand
contribution
that
isn't
part
of
the
345
millage
right.
D
You're
handcuffing
yourself,
unneeded
ly
and
you're
gonna
take
you
know
cash
flow
that
we
could
use,
possibly
for
other
operations
out
of
our
hands,
and
then
we
make
constantly
could
push
us
back
into
the
bowring
situation.
And
so,
if
you
kind
of
say
well,
you
know
we're
gonna
use.
You
know
250,000
from
that
and
250,000
for
my
current
operations.
And
then
you
don't
let
us
you
know,
because
otherwise,
if
you
put
the
two
laying
in
again
when
we
get
to
June
30th,
we
may
not
have
the
cash
and.
B
C
Give
you
an
idea,
let's
say
that
we
assumed
the
7%
which
we
have
to
buy,
what
the
state's
mandating.
Let's
take
the
million
dollars.
Well,
we
only
earn
6%,
that's
$10,000
difference
so
the
next
year.
If
we
ended
up
having
to
put
a
million
$10,000,
it's
not
all
that
significant,
the
1%,
because
that's
what
we
would
be
saying,
we're
gonna
earn
7%
on
the
million
and
if
we
only
got
six
percent,
that's
$10,000
difference.
Ok,.
K
C
Health
care,
correct
that
is
factored
into
the
actuarial.
We
made.
We
made
sure
that
all
those
numbers
were
in
there
so
you're
to
the
extent
that,
because
not
all
the
unions
have
that
provision
in
there
and
that
something
that
have
to
be
negotiated,
but
those
that
do
are
already
debts
incorporated
in
the
number
quite
General,
Motors
Motors,
said
I
think
was
pre-bankruptcy
no
more
retired.
J
C
Did
we
didn't
put
anything
we
I,
don't
think
the
state
was
looking
for
okay,
Dearborn
Heights,
you
know
you
could
put
in
there
and
change
the
number
drastically
and
say
we're
only
going
to
provide
health
care
for
the
first
twenty
five
years.
Well,
nothing's
negotiated
the
state
did
not
want
you
to
put
in
some
kind
of
assumption
that
has
to
be
negotiated
has
to
it
could
or
could
not
come
so
we
dealt
with.
B
C
B
No,
but
again
what
I'm
saying
is
your
people
that
you
have
now
and
people
buying
seniority
you
buy
five
six
years
worth
of
seniority
or
whatever
we
allow
and
people
start
retiring
at
49
and
45
instead
of
retiring
at
62
or
60
hour
liability,
our
local
goes
way
up.
Doesn't
it
does
it
not
want
people
retire
early?
Only
if
you
replace,
if
they're
still
drawing
out
of
the
fund
earlier,
then
someone
would
be
if
they
were
continuously
working.
B
So
regardless
you're
still
going
to
be
paying
out
more
for
someone
at
retiring
at
45
as
of
to
62
or
65,
because
most
people
in
the
world
retire
after
X
amount
of
years
of
service,
like
say
30
years
and
you're
you're,
probably
in
your
50s
or
your
60s.
It
said
when
you're
able
to
buy
five
extra
here
seniority
and
retire
five
years
before
you
normally
would
you're
putting
five
years
stress
on
that
plan.
It's
a
younger
person.
B
C
D
C
B
G
I
can
add
a
retiree,
so
the
retirement
fund
technically
doesn't
pay
the
healthcare
costs
because
there
is
no
retirement
Portico,
the
pension
would,
but
the
retirement
fund
wouldn't
have
for
the
oppa,
but
not
so
right
now
you
have
zero
in
the
trust,
so
you're
on
a
pay-as-you-go.
So
if
somebody
retires
today
versus
five
years
from
now,
no
matter
what
you're
paying
their
health
care,
if
they're
an
employee
or
they're
retired.
So
from
that
perspective,
it's
cash
neutral.
G
Unless
the
city
hires
a
replacement
employees,
the
city
hires,
a
replacement
employee,
now
you're
paying
the
retiree
who
he
or
she
retired
early,
let's
just
say,
and
then
you're
also
paying
someone
else's
health
care.
They
just
hired
a
replacement.
Now
with
the
replacement,
employee,
doesn't
qualify
for
health
care
or
you
didn't
replace
the
retiree.
Technically,
the
city
is
not
out
any
cash.
From
that
perspective,.
A
I
You
magic
I
want
to
go
back
to
act,
345,
which
is
our
Police
and
Fire
pension.
Part
of
the
retiree
system,
where
health
care
is
a
separate
piece
and
needs
to
be
duly
noted
and
recorded
under
a
trust
fund.
The
1/15
I
believe
it
is,
but
treasurer
Riley
did
you.
You
talked
about
cash
flow.
I'm
sure
you
are
referring
to
inter
fund
loans
from
that
fund
am
I,
correct,
I,
miss
okay,
absolutely
yes,
they're.
I
To
make
sure,
because
that
is
a
restricted
fund,
as
we
all
know,
and
of
course,
the
public
act
345
as
well
as
there's
more
Act
number
314
of
1965
is
very
restrictive
on
how
that
money
can
be
invested
and
how
it's
used
and
can
be
used.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
was
accurately
reported
and
clarified
here.
Thank
you.
F
G
G
My
concern
would
be
managing
the
liability
down
the
road
so
right
now
it's
a
hundred
eleven
million
dollars
making
sure
that
the
city
makes
the
right
adjustments
for
future
hirings
future
benefits
things
like
that
in
order
to
make
sure
that
that
lie
both
as
an
increase
exponentially
over
the
years,
because
as
people
live
longer,
which
is
a
wonderful
thing,
but
as
people
live
longer
that
liabilities
gonna
keep
going
up
right
now,
there's
an
assumption
of
individuals
living
so
many
years.
Now,
if
all
of
a
sudden,
everybody
lives
five
years
longer.
Well,
that
liability
exponentially
increases.
B
G
From
that
perspective,
yes,
that
the
to
answer
that
you're
still
providing
health
care
for
a
certain
period
of
time,
you're
still
providing
health
care
up
to
the
point
that
the
person
dies.
So
if
the
person
retires
early,
it's
still,
the
healthcare
is
still
provided
over
the
same
exact
amount
of
time.
It's
only
if,
instead
of
90
years
old,
a
person
passes
in
ninety
five
at
ninety
five,
then
you're
extending
the
payment
term
over
an
extra
five
years.
B
H
Which
contract,
where
you
are,
what
age
you
are
at
your
medicare-eligible?
There
are
some
nuances
in
terms
of
public
lands,
our
use,
if
you're
free,
Medicare
versus
post
Medicare.
Absolutely
there
are
contribution,
increases
for
those
of
us
who
are
active
employees,
something
to
create
150.
We
paid
based
on
what
plan
we
buy.
H
B
It's
pretty
much
so
you
know
it's
got
to
be
it
nuts,
you
have
more.
Liability
has
to
be
exactly
the
same,
but
when
you're
telling
me
here
are
there
there's
liability
increases
when
you
retire?
Okay,
so
it's
got
to
be
the
exact
same
thing.
You
can't
say:
I
got
a
dime
here
and
a
quarter
here
and
they're
the
same
they're,
not
it's
different.
B
B
B
C
H
H
H
J
H
H
C
H
F
Odell,
okay,
I
know
it's
gonna
be
on
the
agenda,
but
we
were
just
given
this
stuff
right
here
just
today,
so
provided
there's
no
new
issues
or
concerns
in
this
cuz.
Obviously
there's
no.
We
read
this
in
five
minutes
and
understand
it.
Was
this
all
a
part
of
the
gist
application
only
that
was
sent
to
the
state
so.
A
A
H
F
B
The
other
question
it
comes
to
my
mind
is
once
we
found
out
about.
We
had
to
report
this
to
the
state,
and
it's
been
months
ago,
I
mean
months
ago
and
say
from
I
can't
I'm
not
saying
this
to
be
mean
or
whatnot.
Why
wasn't
this
done
at
least
a
month
ago?
I
mean
I,
remember,
Dearborn
doing
something
a
month
month
and
a
half
ago.
H
Talk
about
last
week,
the
audit,
the
Gatsby
75
number,
was
tweets
significantly
based
on
the
rates
that
came
in
in
September
October,
which
are
effective
for
January,
because
we
have
a
fundamental
shift
of
our
health
care
plans
for
active
employees
in
2018.
It
was
such
a
ship
that
it
actually
changed
our
rates
significantly
like
for
the
better.
You
know
for
the
better
for
the
city
and
actually
for
the
employee.
We
then
asked
nine
her
to
incorporate
those
new
rates
that
they
were
given.
They
were
given
the
data
your
collapse
made.
We
knew
we
needed
this.
H
We
had
a
wait
till
June
30th
to
provide
knighthoods
our
actuarial
for
the
healthcare,
the
most
current
data,
which
regards
around
playful.
As
mr.
Wentzel
pointed
out,
we're
hiring
people
every
month.
We
wanted
to
give
them
a
good
number
to
start,
then
in
September
or
October,
which
integrates
candidate
and
lower,
who
said
business
worth
looking
at
we've
boarded
to
Neihardt
we
worked
at
it.
Then
we
really
look
at
the
payments,
every
payment
that
we
paid
for
retiree
health
care,
because
that
is
very
much
on
your
inner
inner.
Are
our
auditors
radar,
so
one
Friday?
H
We
cashed
it
all
out,
we
work
with
nine
hours
and
then
Monday
morning
the
auditors
came
back
in,
we
made
sure
the
solid
number
and
they
they
redid
their
models.
And
then
we
got
a
draft.
We
went
through
it
again.
You'll
see
the
final
copy
for
the
Gasman
we
signed
yesterday,
because
we
italians
graph
and
then
we
needed
that
number
in
order
to
do
so
to
figure
out
with
1.5
member.
So
we
do
it.
155
million
number
to
get
to
the
next
model,
and
so
it's
been
a
domino
effect.
You
know
some
of
it.
B
What
I
you
know
in
the
whole
process,
I
see
this
whole
thing
right
here.
That
needs
to
be
read
and
I,
don't
know
if
I
could
read
it
all
and
comprehend
it
all.
I
guess
I'm
saying
that
we
have
to
trust
you
people
that
this
is
the
best
possible
plan
for
us
to
vote
on,
because
now
you
know
in
a
week,
I
got
a
I
got
a
say,
yay
or
nay
yeah,
and
it's
very
difficult
for
me
to
do
that,
and
it
may
have
been
difficult
for
me
to
do
it.
H
C
Martin
I
think
years
for
15
we
had
a
conference
call
with
the
ex
were
down
in
Indianapolis.
It
was
the
first
real
opportunity.
I
had
to
look
at
all
these
particular
numbers,
and
so
I
spent
most
of
the
morning
and
last
night
and
took
this
thing
with
you:
the
lunch
to
try
to
understand
but
I.
The
big
thing
I
was
happy
about.
I
was
afraid
we
were
gonna.
C
Have
we
were
gonna,
come
back
and
talk
about
three
or
four
million
dollars,
and
then
that
would
have
had
a
particularly
hard
influence
on
the
community
and
the
taxpayers.
So
when
the
number
came
in
significantly
less
I
was
very
happy,
but
a
lot
of
the
detail
is
the
difficulty
is,
unless
you
have
this
very
strong
statistical
and
financial
background,
I,
don't
think
you
can
look
at
those
details.
A
common
person
understand.
H
D
G
One
thing
from
the
perspective:
if
you
do
have
any
follow-up
questions,
feel
free
to
give
me
a
call
or
email
me
I'm
definitely
available
anytime.
You
need
me
one
comment
as
far
as
the
plan
itself,
the
corrective
action
plan,
basically
in
a
nutshell,
it's
the
million
and
a
half
per
year
that
the
city
is
going
to
contribute
into
a
trust.
G
So
you
need
to
set
up
the
trust,
trust
for
police
and
fire
as
well
as
general,
and
then
you
need
to
start
funding
at
the
million
and
a
half
the
actuarial
valuation
was
performed
by
Neihart
and
basically,
what
shook
out
in
order
to
get
to
the
forty
percent,
you
need
to
get
put
the
1.5
million
dollars
per
year.
That's
what
the
actuary
calculated
okay.
So
the
best
plan
of
action
is
the
million
and
a
half
as
of
right.
C
G
So
last
week,
when
we
presented
the
financial
statement,
audit,
the
CDBG
funds,
a
deficit
of
about
four
thousand
dollars,
I,
believe
it's
just
the
timing
of
when
reimbursements
were
submitted
to
be
paid
back
to
the
city
and
when
they
were
received
so
there's
four
thousand
dollars
more
than
the
city
paid
that
hasn't
the
city
hasn't
received
it.
Yet
the
reverse
band
has
been
submitted,
I
believe
about
a
week
or
two
ago,
so
the
city
is
receiving
the
funds,
but
essentially
the
deficit.
G
C
E
E
E
Naptime
or
an
audit,
he
said
he
had
somebody
come
in
from
the
state
of
the
state
from
government
and
they
did
an
audit.
So
how
come
that
wasn't
that
caught
at
that
time?
So
then
I'm
not
not
your
question.
I'm!
Sorry,
that's
an
administration
question,
because
that
that's
was.
That
was
the
statement
that
was
made
to
us
by
the
cdbg
director
that
the
that
they
actually
came
in
and
audited
that
there
was
no
issues.
There
was
not
nothing
mention
about
the
deficit.
I
believe
that
was
about
a
month
and
half
ago.
Yes,.
G
G
So
if
the
fund
itself
ends
up
in
a
negative
balance
because
you've
paid
more
because
you
haven't
asked
for
those
reimbursements,
yet
it's
more
of
a
timing
issue
HUD
would
not
catch
that
from
that
perspective,
because
they
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you're
spending
money
appropriately
and
that
you
have
the
right
controls
in
place
to
make
sure
that
you're
spending
money
appropriately.
Okay,.
M
E
L
L
C
C
Well
from
that
concern
and
the
fact
that
we
have
we
received
money
from
the
cable
companies
that
is
called
pegged
money
and
I
can't
remember
what
peg
is
an
acronym
for,
but
it
can
only
be
spent
for
cable
related
activities,
and
so
what
we
wanted
to
do
was
kind
of
buy
equipment
upgrade
and
then
cm
came.
We
we
had
a
coffee
together
a
few
months
ago
and
she
had
an
idea
that
would
really
make
our
particular
programming
and
the
cable
TV
really
significantly
improving
it
and
make
it
very
dynamic.
C
And
so
we've
asked
her
to
be
here
because
she'll
be
able
to
give
you
that
presentation
and
really
what
we
need
to
do
is
hire
most
likely,
an
architect
that
has
knowledge
about
cable,
TV
and
just
about
everything.
That's
there
from
equipment
rise.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
Stan
would
probably
have
to
get
tossed
out
and
we
would
go
to
a
more
high
High
Definition
programming
and
a
better
sound
and
everything
else,
and
that's
so
it
kind
of
grew
but
with
having
a
million
dollars
and
we're
not
sure
we
need
to
spend
all
million.
N
I
was
just
when
counsel
had
this
a
couple
times
on
the
one
time
it
wasn't
voted
on
the
second
time
it
was
referred
to
a
study
session.
So
that's
why
I
requested
a
study
session
on
C
Homme
on.
Obviously
it
can
talk
in
detail
what
the
vision
is,
but,
like
the
mayor
said,
we
have
eight
hundred
ninety
thousand
eight
hundred
ninety
thousand
thirteen
dollars
that
is
dedicated
to
PEG
funds.
It's
it's
just
the
peg
funds
in
in
your
pack.
You
got
from
public
OH.
N
If
you
look
at
that
last
page
that
very
last
page,
you
can
see
that
eight
hundred
ninety
thousand
right
there
on
this
last
page,
is
taken
from
the
audit.
Where
you
see
the
unassigned
liabilities,
two
million
about
half
way
up
right
here
is
eight
hundred
ninety
thousand
dollars.
This
is
dedicated.
This
isn't
like
the
budget.
C
N
N
So
this
this
is
the
money
that
we're
talking
about.
This
money
can
only
be
used
for
equipments
to
do
upgrades.
It
can't
be
used
for
C
on
salary
for
stands,
salary,
anything
else
for
utilities,
the
salary
I'm,
sorry
for
for
the
small
amount,
Shion
charging
us
for
all
our
great
services
on
this
is
just
dedicated
for
equipment
on
I'm
trying
to
answer
some
budget
questions,
so
it
doesn't
have
to
be
cm.
Christie,
C,
I'm
Christie,
because
she'll
go
into
the
detail
and
what
we're
looking
at.
N
The
other
thing
that
on
council
might
be
looking
at
too
is.
There
is
a
lot
of
money.
We
get
a
larger
fund
amount
of
money
that
we
get
every
year
and
that's
from
AT&T,
Wow
and
Comcast,
and
that's
in
your
actual
budget
that
you
pass
and
that's
under
it's
like
I
can
give
you
a
count
numbers
if
you
want,
but
it's
a
little
over
a
million
dollars
and
that's
cable,
comcast,
cable,
cable,
k8ttie
and
that's
used
for
other
general
government
expenses.
This
is
dedicated
and
can
only
be
used
for
equipment.
B
B
N
N
B
N
B
Talking
for
transparency
reasons,
we
never
get
to
see
what
funds
we
have
that's
restricted.
All
I
see
you
do
hang
on
hang
on
in
our
budget.
When
I
see
the
budget
every
April
it
comes
out,
we
get
cable,
fun,
cable
and
slash
peg
funds.
I
can
show
you
in
the
budget,
and
last
year
was
in
2015
was
a
million
65
six
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars,
and
the
expenditures
was
ninety
seven
thousand
six
hundred
and
six
dollars.
This
is
right
off
the
budget.
B
N
N
B
Correct
you
got
to
go
hunting
for
this
in
the
audit,
so
when
I
add
up
all
the
numbers.
Over
the
years
we've
collected
thirteen
million
eight
hundred
ninety-two
thousand
and
eighty
seven
dollars
that's
more
than
that.
Okay,
that's
what
we
come
up
with.
So
how
do
we
as
a
council
decipher
what
we
get
for
peg
when
all
the
budget
tells
us?
We
received
thirteen
billion
eight
hundred
ninety-two
thousand
dollars
all.
B
Now,
how
does
a
councilmember
do?
I
know
what
peg
funds
we
have
if
it's
not
it's
in
the
audit
I
mean
okay,
it's
in
the
audit,
but
it's
not
in
the
budget
to
be
in
the
budget.
I'm
talking
about
I
wanna
know
where
all
the
money
is
because
you're
in
the
budget,
it
says
what
money
we
get
from.
The
cable
fund
should.
B
B
N
L
B
And
when
the
when
it
came
out
in
April
that
we
needed
eight
hundred
some
thousand
dollars
to
do
to
rework
the
studio
we
all
looked
at
while
that's
a
lot
of
money
and
then
at
that
time,
Bob
bang
crack
was
here.
He
brought
us
that
number
and
it
was
told
we
can't
afford
it.
We
don't
have
any
money
for
it,
then,
all
of
a
sudden
three
to
three
months
later
we
have
eight
hundred
and
ninety
thousand
dollars
because
the
money
was
restricted.
That's
the
first
time,
I
heard
restricted
funds
and
that's
when
I
started.
B
Looking
up
this
stuff,
okay
and
looking
back
in
previous
budgets
and
trying
to
figure
out
where
all
this
restricted
money
goes
and
how
you,
how
you
do
it
and
I
asked
the
question:
what
checks
we
get?
We
get
paid
quarterly
one
check
from
all
the
cable
companies.
So
how
do
you
take
that
money
and
separate
it
into
peg
funds
if
Linda.
B
I,
because
I
there's
no
way
in
the
world,
I'm
gonna
say
that
you
know
and
we
see
fun.
We
have
an
N
in
the
budget.
We
have
fund
total
expenses
and
over
in
14
years,
a
million
four
hundred
and
forty
seven
thousand
0
95
that
we
spent
out
of
that
13,
almost
14
million
dollars,
and
if
we
spent
that
money
on
our
studio
there's
no
way
we'd
be
in
that
shape
that
we're
in
right
now.
N
C
B
B
N
C
B
B
It's
work,
they
said
because
there
should
be
a
lot
more
money
in
there.
No
no
way
I'm
looking
at
it,
because
back
back
back
in
19
or
excuse
me
mm
OH,
2
3,
we
had
a
balanced
fund
of
180
thousand
nine
hundred
eighteen
dollars,
then
okay
and
then
in
the
last
fourteen
years
it's
really
grown
a
tremendous
amount
and
back
in
what.
B
C
B
F
All
right
so
I
agree
with
Councilman
Muscat
in
regards
to
I
mean
you
mentioned.
We
can't
have
it
on
a
budget
and
I
understand,
because
it's
not
a
part
of
the
general
fund,
but
at
the
same
time
with
Davis
appendix
we
can
have
it
as
an
attachment,
so
that
us,
as
council
people
can
know
what
restricted
funds
that
there
is
in
this
particular
case,
you
got
eight
hundred
and
ninety
thousand
right
now
coming
in
from
Peck
money,
and
you
mentioned
I
think
every
year.
But
you
know
a
large
figure
comes
in.
Is
that
correct?
No.
F
G
F
N
Correct
amount
that
council,
chair
I,
just
just
really
quick,
we
were
looking
to
have
an
architect
come
in
and
say
this
is
what
it's
going
to
cost
to
upgrade
here
and
the
on
and
the
cable
studio.
We
asked
to
go
out
for
beds
to
get
an
architect
to
come
in.
At
that
point.
I
really
think.
In
all
honesty,
we
go
out
for
bids.
Get
an
architect.
The
architect
comes
back
in
the
architect
is
going
to
be
2000.
The
architects
gonna
be
5000
at
that
point,
I
think
you
can
discuss
the
other
things.
N
I
A
woman
who
was
Clayton
first
of
all,
I
would
like
to
hear
what
cm
has
to
say.
Think
and
then
I'd
like
to
you
know,
let's
entertain
and
talk
about
going
out
for
bids
I
think
that's
fair
and
reasonable,
but
I'm
going
to
tell
you
what
I'd
like
to
also
request
is
when
I'm
and
I've
mentioned
this
at
the
during
the
audit
or
when
we
reviewed
the
audit.
I
These
are
certain
funds
down
here
and
what
you
see
on
the
government
funds
balance
sheet,
those
remaining
leftover
funds
at
the
end
of
June,
30th,
2018
and
every
single
year.
These
are
restricted
funds.
For
example,
you
look
at
the
PEG
money,
I
think
we
need
to
go
back
through
the
years
and
talk
about
where
we
see
that
money
going
their
knee
and
I
was
told.
There's
it's
wrapped
in,
like
X
345
is
wrapped
into
the
beginning
of
for
next
year.
I
I
The
ends
the
beginning,
the
ends
and
seeing
exactly
where
that
money
is
going,
because
we
don't
that
we
see
the
end
and
there's
a
balance.
Is
there
there's
a
half
a
million
or
more
on
several
of
these
lines,
and
we
need
to
see
where
that
money
goes.
So
with
that
being
said,
I
would
love
to
hear
what
CM
has
decided
tonight
and
then
that's
all
I
have
to
say:
okay.
D
So
I'm
working
with
Mario's,
we
have
a
call
tomorrow
with
Standard
and
Poor's,
and
we
need
some
questions
answered.
So
I
was
to
talk
to
him
about
the
peg,
so
he
said
in
the
peg
account
that
Linda
gave
him
a
schedule.
So
when
you
talk
to
the
Comptroller
there'll
be
more
detail,
but
basically
other
than
1%
from
the
cable
revenues.
I
was
about
160
thousand
dollars
the
cable
department
costed
about
a
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
to
operate,
which
left
about
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
increase
the
peg
in
this
current
year.
D
B
We
get
an
extra
money.
Well,
we
can
talk
about
what
she
wants,
and
that
was
not
to
derail
this
not
to
derail
this.
It's
for
my
information
to
see
how
the
peg
money
is
calculated.
Now
we
can
have
another
meeting
on
that,
but
we
can
continue
I
agree.
We
continue
with
what
you
want
to
do.
We
have
to
because
I
mean,
what's
the
sense
of
being
here,
if
we're
not
going
to
go
through
this.
O
P
I
just
interviewed
our
US
attorney
for
the
Eastern
District
that
brand-new
one
that
came
in
and
and
I
wanted
to
share
this
with
you,
because
this
was
an
experience
that
I
had
when
he
came
in.
You
know,
and
we
brought
him
into
the
room
that
we
usually
use
and
then
into
the
studio.
I
thought
we
have
all
these
amazing
people
that
are
coming
in
and
there's
so
many
different
ideas
that
we
can.
We
can
actually
implement
for
this
particular
studio
and
having
these
funds.
We
really
need
to
upstage
our
city
in
terms
of
Dearborn
Heights.
P
P
N
A
Well,
you
know,
I
have
a
thought.
You
know
we
have
a
city-owned
building.
The
police
department
has
a
lot
of
empty
space
wire.
If
we're
gonna
build
a
whole
new
studio,
why
don't
we
just
relocate
it.
N
N
N
N
N
I
E
Mean
there
should
be
like
two
proposals,
one
to
upgrade
the
equipment.
First,
you
know
before
we
even
look
at
expansion,
especially
I
mean
for
the
study
session,
we're
talking
about
issues
we
have
with
funding,
increasing
taxes,
increasing
water
rates
and
all
that
stuff,
I
think
before
we
my
opinion
before
we
proceed
with
any
huge
funding
like
this
here,
I
mean
I
can
understand
why
I
have
to
upgrade
the
equipment,
the
cameras,
but
the.
P
Problem
with
that
would
be
that
if
we
wanted
to
upgrade
the
equipment
yeah,
you
know
the
the
where
we're
gonna
upgrade
it
and
the
design
of
where
it's
going
to
be
would
all
depend
on
the
entire
design
of
the
studio.
So
one
thing
is,
is
is
hook
to
the
other
and
then
from
one
of
my
understanding
again
is
this
money
is
allocated
exclusively
for
the
studio
and
for
an
upgrade
of
the
student.
E
C
P
We
want
to
be
proud
of
our
space
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
say
you
know
come
into
our
green
room
and
you
know
having
the
live
studio
audiences
and
you
know
having
individual
as
well
as
yourselves.
You
know,
coming
in
and
having
town
hall
meetings
to
be
able
to
discuss
things
and
to
ask
questions
and
to
go
back
and
forth
and
really
make
it
a
mainstay
and
in
an
area
for
communication
and
transparency.
P
B
Guess
what
I
guess
in
my
skin?
It
comes
down
to
this
for
me
and
what
I'm
a
little
upset
about.
We've
been
sitting
on
eight
hundred
and
ninety
thousand
dollars
and
for
the
past
few
years,
that's
all
we've
heard
from
citizens
on
how
bad
sound
on
how
cable
was
back
and
we've
even
been
told
we
can't
buy.
B
We
have
to
buy
parts
from
eBay,
more
cameras,
tapes
that
we
have
to
retake
over
and
over
and
over
again,
we've
been
sitting
on
eight
hundred
and
ninety
thousand
dollars,
or
there
abouts
and
we
haven't
bought
a
thing
and
now
all
the
sudden
somebody
comes
up,
let's
just
redo
the
whole
thing
and
spend
all
the
money.
That's
what
irritates
me
when
all
along
we
should
have
been
going
along
and
fixing
this
stuff
not
buy
it
parts
off
eBay
and
all
of
a
sudden.
Now,
let's
go
buy
at
all.
Well,
that's!
What's
upsetting.
B
Councilman,
three
or
four
years
now,
five
years
six
years
we've
been
hearing
complaints
of
people
coming
here
to
this
room,
saying
I
can't
hear
anything.
The
the
sound
system,
even
at
the
City
Council
meeting,
was
horrible.
Now,
all
of
a
sudden,
we're
gonna
do
it.
Why
weren't
we
doing
this
little
at
a
time
as
we're
going
on.
There's
no
question
that
it's
gonna
get
done,
but
again,
prayers.
C
B
P
N
N
N
This
would
be
it
actually:
it's
not
just
upgrading
this
equipment,
but
give
you
a
room
separate
first
and
Angela
to
actually
have
cameras,
stationary
cameras.
They
have
a
better
sound
quality
and
well.
The
carpet
might
come
out
of
a
different
budget.
There
is
other
things
that
would
be
coming
out.
That
would
bring
this
up,
so
the
20
20th
century.
E
N
N
Part
of
it
would
be
for
this,
but
most
of
the
it
would
be
for
this
this
video
and
it
would
be
lengthy
on
what
we're
looking
first
day
they
are.
It
was
looked
at
maybe
about
six
or
seven
years
ago
it
was
looked
at
and
it
was
like
two
million
dollar
yourself,
ridiculous
on
I
think
with
see
I'm
actually
talking
to
people
she
knows
of
her
connections.
It
came
into
a
much
more
reasonable
number
and
and
to
actually
have
something
that
that
you
weren't,
like
this
I
had
at
the
game.
It'd
be
nice.
N
N
A
F
Yeah
just
a
couple
of
observations.
First
of
all,
I
I
don't
have
comcast,
cable,
myself
and
I
happen
to
be
at
my
parents,
and
they
happen
to
have
the
council
meeting
on
boy.
That's
like
from
when
I
was
like
a
little
kid
channel,
20
with
respect
to
channel
20.
It's
pretty
bad
right
now,
because
I
always
see
it
on
YouTube
when
we
get
the
emails
and
Lee
Seok
looks
okay,
but
it's
on
YouTube,
okay.
F
But
when
you
watch
on
TV,
because
you
guys
had
mentioned
the
quality's
pretty
bad
honestly,
I
don't
know,
I
bet
it
was
until
I
was
having
lunch
at
my
mom's
and
it
were
flipping
channels
like
whoa.
This
is
like
really
bad.
It's
like
a
black
and
white
movie
yeah,
so
it
the
quality
is
definitely
not
there.
F
F
Money's
there
already
and
it's
not
from
us,
and
we
could
only
use
it
for
this
I
would
say:
let's
do
this,
but,
more
importantly,
there's
no
harm
in
getting
estimates
done
none.
So
let's
get
estimates
down
find
out
if
it's
five
hundred
thousand.
We
could
do
this
if
we
find
out
it's
eight
million,
it's
a
debt
issue,
but
in
all
the
three
things
to
me
it's
a
easy.
Yes,
but.
B
B
G
A
E
Still
our
responsibility
as
councilman
Muscat
mentioned
that
we
have
to
even
know
yeah.
We
know
we
have
the
money,
but
there's
stuff
that
is
in
question.
It
still
has
to
be
answered.
Obviously
my
question
is:
during
the
budget
meeting
we
discussed,
we
asked
for
additional
money
for
the
cameras
where's,
the
money.
I,
don't
have
the
budget
in
front
of
me.
Obviously,
I
didn't
know
where
we're
gonna
go
back
to
it
or
refer
to
it,
but
what
money
was
allocated
for
the
cable
or
for
the
cameras?
It's
like
in
the
budget
meeting.
A
I
P
J
I
O
B
B
A
P
A
I
guess
I
got
a
question:
I've
done
a
lot
of
construction
and
I'd
done
a
lot
of
remodeling
I've
never
been
charged
for
an
estimate
on
what
it
would
cost
to
do.
Different
dough
they're
designing
it.
Yes,.
D
L
C
F
Just
carry
is
something
like
just
throwing
out
there,
some
something
like
channel
7,
channel,
4,
channel,
2
etcetera.
They
continuously
change
their
Studios,
obviously,
for
them
being
so
big,
they
want
something.
That's
big
fancy-schmancy,
maybe
look
into
possible.
If
maybe
they
could
donate
at
some
sort
of
tax
deductible
or
some,
maybe
some
you
know
some
of
their
older
studios,
I'm
sure
they
keep
them
or
maybe
they
donate
them
or
what-have-you,
just
as
an
option.
Well,.
P
C
C
If
you
get
a
chance
to
go
there
now,
there's
like
a
newsroom
that
all
these
people
are
screaming
and
hollering
each
other,
and
we
got
to
get
this
out
for
5:30
and
6
o'clock
and
all
that
goes
on.
But
the
actual
studios,
where
you
see
the
weatherman
and
the
sports
guy
and
stuff,
are
not
as
big
as
this
table.
I
I'm
amazed
and.
P
C
L
M
O
E
O
M
M
C
C
P
P
P
M
Just
need
to
know
where
your
salary
coming
from
is
it
coming
from
the
peg
or
coming
from
franchisee.
The
franchisee
is
5%
the
mayor
or
the
administration
can
spend
it
and
the
general
budget
the
way
they
like
the
1%
is
very
restricted,
specifically
as
they
mentioned
for
building
for
equipment,
no
salaries,
no
benefit
can
be
paid
out
of
it.
Now.
Act
345
is
restricted
and
it
is
mentioned
in
the
budget.
M
Why
peg
is
not
mentioned
like
act
345,
it
is
mentioned
in
2017,
2018
and
plant
Maran
as
restricted
and
the
amount
is
there
this
year,
2018
2019.
It's
not
mentioned
it's
mentioned,
and
their
general
fund
from
cables,
and
you
guys
can
go
back
and
read.
Plant
moraine
you'll
find
what
I'm
saying
before
you
spend
any
money.
M
M
Sixty-Five
suppose
approximately
1%
from
the
total
revenue,
like
the
5
percent,
comes
to
around
177
thousand
dollars
a
year.
If
you
go
back
like
my
friend
Dre
mentioned,
there
was
hundred
in
eighty
thousand
dollars
in
the
fund.
In
2003
2004
when
the
mayor
took
over
and
if
we
calculate
there
is
more
money
and
that
fund
over
2.3
million
dollars,
it's
supposed
to
be
there
I
might
be
mistaken,
but
I
urge
you
to
go
back
to
the
budget
which
was
submitted
to
the
state
by
the
administration.
M
And
if
you
go
to
see
what
are
the
expenses
from
the
budget
which
are
allowed
under
pag,
they
will
not
exceed
100
in
$20,000.
There
is
no
new
building.
There
is
no
new
equipment.
I
was
sitting
here
several
times
when
Bob
bankrupt,
said
I,
don't
have
money
to
buy
tapes,
I
have
to
tape
over
the
old
tapes.
That's
why
the
audio
was
bad.
M
All
the
sudden
having
sent
Becky
was
eight
hundred
and
ninety
thousand
dollars
I
urge
you
you're
responsible
for
this
money
to
ask
the
controller
I
ask
John,
and
the
1%
was
mentioned
that
we
received
one
check
for
the
total
amount.
I
did
little
calculation
and
I
separated
from
the
one
point:
six
five
million
dollars,
I
divided
it
by
the
six
percent
to
get
six
portion.
I
came
up
with
177
when
I
calculated
everything.
M
A
K
Choose
me:
my
name
is
Steve
Dalkowski
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
allowed
to
speak
I'm,
not
a
resident
I'm.
A
visitor
I
live
in
Durban
right
now,
I'm
a
college
student
Henry
Ford.
They
went
back
to
college
in
the
culinary
program
and
I
hear
the
banter
going
back
and
forth
for
his
burning
desire
to
spend
eight
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
because
you
have
it.
One
of
the
things
you
might
want
to
consider
is
contacting
human
afford
college.
K
They
have
a
facility
right
here
on
Ann
Arbor
trail,
it's
called
a
very
center.
They
have
excess
space.
You
have
Eaton
Center
and
South
Deborah
Knights.
They
have
a
lot
of
space.
Don't
be
limited
in
your
thinking.
Think
think,
in
a
way
that
will
help
your
community
without
just
squandering
this
eight
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars,
but
I
think
you
should
make
use
of
the
resources
of
Henry
Ford
College.
So
most
people
don't
know,
but
they
have
a
classroom
that
is
wired
for
video
pool
kitchen.
You
could
produce.
K
You
know
cooking
programs
right
at
Henry,
Ford
college
and
show
them
on
your
system.
It
wouldn't
cost
you
anything
and
build
a
relationship
with
that
school,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
students
coming
from
this
community
going
over
there,
because
they're,
my
fellow
students,
but
I,
would
suggest
you
think
of
in
terms
of
barycentre.
N
Just
because
somebody's
made
a
comment
about
the
numbers,
don't
like
what
you're
talking
about
is
1%
of
that
John
Riley
got
up
here
and
said
it
was
160,000
here
from
that
the
cable
studio
does
use
the
operation.
The
rest
of
that
money,
which
he
said
is
about
fifty
thousand,
goes
into
the
restricted
fund,
which
then
can
only
be
used
for
equipment.
It's
not
added
together
every
year.
It's
that
additional
50,000
is.