►
From YouTube: 10/22/2019 - Study Session: Smoking Ordinance H-19-06
Description
This is the Dearborn Heights Study Session regarding the Smoking Ordinance H-19-06 taking place on Tuesday, October 22nd 2019.
A
C
E
F
E
A
C
No
email
was
received,
so
it's
probably
best
to
just
address
these
one
at
a
time
then,
because
it
wouldn't
make
sense,
iris
it'll
go
through
all
of
them
all
at
once.
So
if
you
don't
mind,
do
you
mind
if
we
just
address
them
one
at
a
time
I
know
we
have
the
attorney
with
us
here
to
help
us
clarify
some
of
the
stuff
and
come
to
some
sort
of
a
resolution
you
comfortable.
That
is.
C
D
A
G
D
G
We
heard
each
one
then
we
can
go
through
them.
My
big
thing
was:
is
an
application
fees?
We
don't
charge
anybody
for
an
application
fee
now
correct
anybody,
any
other
businesses
right,
so
that
would
be
kind
of
a
discriminatory
thing
if
we
went
with
this
and
I
believe.
That's
part
of
the
intention
that
you're
bringing
up
also
correct.
F
G
A
C
Madam
chair
there's
some
look,
it's
a
long
movie,
so
I
would
I
would
like
to
suggest.
Let's
just
keep
the
same.
It's
all
other
businesses,
I'm
sure
for
every
other
business
other
than
hookah
lounges.
There's
a
set
pattern
that
we
have
that
correct.
It's
the
same
thing
for
all
other
businesses
that
correct
I'm.
Sorry.
F
C
Under
$100
correct
statement,
okay,
so
I
would
like
to
suggest
that
we
not
have
an
application
fee
of
1500
as
per
the
original
email
way
back
when
in
September
and
have
an
application
fee
of
let's.
Let's,
because
I
would
suggest,
because
it's
a
new
ordinance
and
we
may
have
a
little
bit
more
work
to
do,
let's
just
make
it
$75,
which
is
very
reasonable
and
renewal
fees
right
here.
This
suggestion
original
suggestion,
the
email
was
250
dollars.
What
is
the
current
renewal
fees
for
most
businesses
of
similar
type
or
none?
There
are
no.
F
D
So
I
think
again
the
application
fees
not
a
good
idea
because
it
gets
into
some
gray
area
and
possibly
discriminatory.
You
already
said
you
have
a
fee
schedule
right
and
there's
already
smoking
hookah
lounges
that
are
part
of
that
fee
schedule.
So
why?
Wouldn't
that
not
just
carry
over
in
this
case,
I
think
it'd
be
wise.
Just
default.
You
already
have
a
fee
Scott.
What
is
the
fee
schedule
at
this
I
think
you
should
apply
it.
D
E
A
F
C
It's
probably
good
idea,
man
chair,
maybe
for
the
clerk
to
come
up
here.
So
let's
wait
to
be
on
the
microphone.
If
you
don't
mind
mr.
Clark,
but
if,
if
manager,
sure
councilman
Abdallah,
if
there's
already
a
set
fee
for
a
current
Huckel
licenses,
you
already
have
one
in
place:
correct,
yes,
for
the
ones
that
have
been
there
yes
and
for
any
hookah
like
any
hookah
lounge
that
started
hypothetically
two
years
ago,
five
years
ago
or
seven
years
ago,
you
have
it
set
fee
already
in
place.
E
I
G
You
know
and
I
believe
the
intent
is
to
deter
young
adults,
kids
from
smoking,
the
hookah
but
again
I
think
there's
rules
and
regulations
that
the
hookah
bar
owners
are
are
watching
for
that
sort
of
stuff.
At
least
I
hope
they
are
just
like
people
that
sell
cigarettes
they're
getting
a
lot
of
trouble
selling
to
minors.
I
agree
with
it
with
the
councilman
about
keeping
the
same
schedule
as
we've
had
in
the
past
and
I
looked
over
all
the
documents
and
as
much
as
I
like
ordinances
for
certain
things.
I'm
gonna
fall
back
on
mr.
G
A
E
E
It's
been
super
vetoed
and
that's
what
we
have
to
go
by
right
now,
because
obviously
the
application
never
went
through
so
the
fees
under
8,
6,
7,
there's
nothing
in
here
that
says
anything
about
fees,
so
we
have
not
established
the
fee.
So
that's
again,
that's
whatever
was
determined
or
whatever,
whatever
you
guys
are
doing
right
now.
It's
fine!
Obviously,
because
it's
not
addressed
in
this
section,
there's
no
fees
and
ordinance.
B
C
A
C
Oh
God
in
the
ordinance
under
8,
6
7.
It
says
any
person
required
to
obtain
a
license.
Pursuant
to
this,
article
shall
pay
a
non-refundable
application
fee
at
the
time
of
the
application
or
renewal
of
the
application
established
by
the
resolution
of
the
City
Council.
So
with
that
being
the
case,
we
could
yeah
there's
no
set
fee
as
a
medicine.
You
can't
set
a
feet
great.
We
just
keep
it
whatever
it's
been
and
I
think
we
just
move
forward.
It
should
be
fine.
F
Sure
in
865
it
says
a
tender
of
the
correct
smoking
license
application
fee,
as
established
by
resolution
adopted
by
the
City
Council.
So
there's
one
reference
there
to
a
application
fee.
Councilman
Abdallah
just
pointed
out
a
second
reference
to
an
application
fee
which
now
the
Honorable
Council
has
decided
would
be
inappropriate.
Does
that
need
to
be
addressed
in
the
ordinance
Mr
Clarke?
Or
could
we
leave
that
in
there
and
just
buy
resolution
say
there
will
be
no
application
fees
for
ordinance?
F
D
F
C
F
F
B
I'm
gonna
disagree
from
as
long
as
I've
said
at
this
table.
I
believe
the
amendment
though
the
ordinance
has
to
be
amended.
I,
don't
think
there
is
any
disagreement
among
set,
but
I
think
otherwise.
You've
got
an
ordinance,
it's
calling
for
something
that
doesn't
exist.
We
don't
want
it
to
exist
and
that's
a
problem.
B
Ten,
fifteen
years
from
now,
somebody
will
sit
at
the
table
and
say:
hey
you're,
not
following
the
law
here.
Mr.
clerk
calls
for
an
application.
Fein
you're
not
collected
I,
think
you've
got
to
go
back
and
amend
it
and
take
out
the
language,
so
it's
not
in
there
or
otherwise
they
think
you're
creating
problems
for
the
future.
My
opinion
and.
J
Two
years
from
now
you
might
say
that
there
is
so
much
work
that
has
to
go
into
a
new
application
on
background
checks,
you're
spending
a
lot
of
time
doing
that
we
got
to
recruit
that
money.
Somehow,
maybe
at
that
point
you've
had
some
experience.
You
say
we
better
charge
an
application
fee
at
that
point
and
it's
allowed
in
the
organs
I'm.
C
About
the
suggestion
that
we,
since
there
is
what
the
ordinance
is-
and
we
have
to
respect
that,
there's
an
ordinance
in
place
right
now,
we
make
the
application
fee
$1.
That
would
follow
the
rules
of
the
application
I'm
on
side
of
the
ordinance
and
we
are
allowed
to
charge
something
correct
and
we
just
make
it
$1
and
I
can't
see
any
business
that
would
object
to
$1.
At
this
point,.
J
C
K
C
G
Now,
but
that
again,
this
is
only
pertaining
to
hookah
bars,
though
smoking
lounges
cigar
bars
whatever
it's
smoking
lounges,
so
the
other
businesses
now
don't
have
to
pay.
The
dollar
I
understand
that,
but
again
we
have
one
in
an
ordinance
just
for
one
certain
business
and
not
all
businesses.
How
does
that
hurt
us?
Mr.
attorney.
G
C
B
A
C
How
about
this
one
counselor?
What
if
we
changed
all
of
them
to
have
their
business
license?
Let's
use
a
hypothetical
$50.
So
that's
why
it's
even
across
the
board
and
we
save
from
henceforward.
We
have
$10
for
the
ones,
that's
50
and
for
ones
that
75
we
change
it.
Henceforward
we
have
a
ten
dollar
application
fee
on
all
business
licenses
in
that
fee
would
be
subtracted
from
traditional
business
license.
So
if
the
business
license
was
85
now
you
have
a
ten
dollar
application
fee
and
then
$75
for
the
rest.
C
J
E
I
mean
obviously,
we
still
need
that
applications
to
roll
with
the
ordinance,
and
that
still
has
to
go
in
front
of
us.
So
we
can
put
that
in
the
application.
The
fee
actually
goes
into
the
application,
since
the
application
is
going
to
go
with
the
organizer
paperwork
for
a
dollar.
No,
no,
no,
no!
We!
We
still
have
to
go
through
that,
but
the
ordinance
requires
you
to
do
a
few
things,
so
we
just
have
to
go
through
some
steps.
Is
this
I?
Don't
know
if
you
guys
with
read
through
that?
G
Think
it
would
be,
the
easiest
thing
to
do
is
to
strike
the
application
from
the
ordinance
and
then
by
resolution
say
we're
going
to
charge
an
application
fee
of
$1
to
all
the
businesses
on
now
on,
and
in
that
way
we
can
raise
it
as
we
go
along
and
we
see
fit,
we
can
raise
it
any
time,
we're
take
it
away
anytime
by
resolution.
This
way
it's
out
of
the
ordinance
and
it
makes
everybody
happy.
Okay,.
F
Yeah,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
With
all
due
respect,
you're
gonna
create
a
nightmare
for
the
clerk's
office.
I
will
have
to
change
every
single
fee
schedule.
I
have
to
go
on
into
computer
and
redesigned
a
business
license
for
it
to
reflect
that
there
is
no
an
application
fee.
You
see
the
business
licenses
as
they
come
out
and
you
see
it
has.
You
know
I'm
going
to
use,
say
the
state
posts.
For
example,
it
has
a
banquet
hall
that
has
if
they
have
any
machines,
they
have
a
tag
for
the
machines.
F
F
Don't
know
why
you
4
/
7
I,
got
to
be
honest
with
your
first
seven
businesses,
why
you
wouldn't
want
to
affect
the
other
842
businesses
in
the
city
or
whatever
right
and
give
them
an
application
fee
where
they
never
had.
One
I'll
have
people
at
my
window
saying
what's
this
application
fee,
while
you
charge
me
that
so
I
know
I'm
paying
more,
even
though
they
might
not
be
so
I
would
I
would
ask
you
to
really
consider
before
you.
You
instituted
something
like
that
once
again,
folks,
you
know
this
isn't
my
wishes.
F
Okay
and
I
want
to
make
this
perfectly
clear,
because
there's
people
out
there
that
you
know
and
I
wrote
in
my
letter
and
I'm
going
to
read
it.
So
it's
on
the
record
in
closing
I
would
like
to
offer
the
following
thoughts:
the
City
Clerk's
office
and
the
city
clerk
do
not
have
a
personal
interest
in
writing
the
enactment
or
enforcement
of
this
or
any
other
ordinance
passed
by
this
honorable
body.
Our
only
interest
is
in
maintaining
a
fair
and
consistent
application
of
any
function
required
of
the
City
Clerk's
office.
F
Such
practices
established
and
maintains
the
integrity
of
the
City
Clerk's
office
and
the
city
of
Dearborn
Heights,
since
the
passes
are
just
and
against
so
my
questions
and
concerns
of
this
ordinance
are
based
solely
upon
a
fair
and
consistent
application
for
all
stakeholders
in
the
city
of
Dearborn
Heights.
But
that's
the
purpose
we're
here
for,
and
you
know
we
could
talk
about
we'll,
give
a
dollar
fee
and
I'm
not
being
critical
or
we
can.
You
know
that.
That's
what's
fear
is
fear.
We
haven't
established
practice
for
862
businesses.
F
Why
have
an
application
fee
now,
just
let
them
apply
like
any
other
business
I
mean
there's
we're
talking
about
seven
businesses
in
the
city.
Let
them
apply
we'll,
go
through
the
application
process.
Clear
up
these
other
ambiguities
that
I've
mentioned
to
you
and
away
we
go.
That
was
the
purpose
of
this
meeting.
Thank
you.
Mister
yeah,.
A
F
May
I
say:
I,
don't
think
we're
gonna
get
a
resolution
tonight
unless
you
want
to
go
to
each
one
of
these
in
and
clarify
this
up.
That's
the
reason
for
the
study
session,
so
we
can
do
it
once
and
for
all
correctly.
Instead
of
rushing
to
something
I
want
to
agree
with
our
attorney
mr.
Clark.
At
this
point,
I
would
prefer,
for
the
reasons
of
this
I
would
prefer
not
to
amend
the
ordinance.
It's
costly
folks,
because
these
ordinances
cost
money
we're
going
to
have
to
codify
it
and
so
forth,
and
so
on.
J
There's
always
the
shakedown
period.
It
has
really
worked
in
what's
wrong
with
it.
What's
right
with
it,
maybe
six
months
down
the
road
there's
other
things
in
here.
Do
you
want
to
tweak
tweak
them
all
at
the
same
time,
by
fight
just
in
your
way,
rather
than
doing
it
every
time,
there's
a
problem
that
would
be
my
suggestion.
J
I
think
the
application
fee
as
other
communities
they're
using
it
in
relation
to
the
smoking
colleges
you're
spending
a
lot
of
time
doing
these
background
checks,
as
your
ordinance
requires
that
that
takes
hours
and
that's
what
the
application
fee
units
mister
concept
right
there.
Of
course,
I've
said
that
your
fear
feeds
should
not
be
designed
to
hinder
or
dispute.
The
application
is
designed
only
to
provide
services
for
sponsors.
J
There's
no
other
reason:
you
don't
set
a
5,000
dollar
application
fee
just
to
recoup
the
money
spend
by
doing
the
background,
checks
and
other
stuff,
so
that
that's
the
purpose,
maybe
down
the
road
you'll
want
to
do
that.
Maybe
you'll
find
that
you're
spending
a
lot
of
time.
Doing
these
background
checks.
F
Application
review
section,
eight
point:
six:
six:
the
city
clerk
shall
forward
a
copy
of
the
application
to
police
building
zoning
fire
for
review.
What
are
they
renewing?
That's
all.
It
says
how
about
the
ordinance
department
should
they
be
included
in
review
I'm,
just
quoting
the
the
ordinance
is
so
folks.
So
should
someone
develop
a
checklist
as
we
do
for
the
liquor
license,
review
and
the
checklist
be
returned
to
the
city
clerk?
E
You
know
we
go
back
so
when
we
started
this
ordinance,
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get.
Whoever
comes
in
to
the
city
of
Dearborn
Heights
wants
to
open,
especially
a
hookah
lounge.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
criminal
records.
We
definitely
don't
want
nobody
else's
problem.
You
know,
if
there's
a
problem
with
another
city,
that
person
was
rejected,
I,
don't
care
who
that
person
is
who
comes
into
Dearborn
Heights?
Okay,
they
won't
hide
the
saying,
okay,
you
know
what
you
guys
can
come
open
any
business
in
there.
E
Nice
we'll
accept
you,
even
though
other
cities
are
rejecting
that
particular
busy.
We
created
this
ordinance
to
make
sure
any
any
any
person
who's
going
to
come
in
does
not
have
an
issue
in
another
city
and
if
the
police
department
gets
that
it
gets
the
application
and
that's
why
we
created
this
application
and
again
the
council
has
to
approve
it.
We
want
to
make
sure
all
the
items
are
addressed
for
the
ordinance
and,
as
you
mentioned,
the
ordinance
departments
got
to
make
sure
that
the
business
has
the
proper.
E
I
I
I
E
This
is
the
application
that
you
forward
it
it's
similar
to
the
ones
that
we
created.
It
does
have
something
on
here
about
whoever's
operating
the
business
you
know,
does
not
have
convictions
or
anything
like
that.
So
obviously
the
police
department
will
just
verify
that.
That's
that's
what
needs
to
be
done
and
again
a
lot
of
cities
are
actually
all
we're.
Trying
to
do
here
is
trying
to
be
proactive
to
make
sure
to
prevent
what
other
cities
have
problems
with.
E
A
lot
of
lot
of
citizens
has
had
issues
with
certain
hookah
lounges
or
certain
hookah
owners,
with
not
abiding
by
anything.
It
was
like
free-for-all.
They
can
open
to
any
hours
of
the
night.
You
know,
there's
shootings,
there's
drugs,
there's
alcohol
and
again
we're
just
trying
to
be
proactive,
have
something
we
got
to
make
sure
all
these
whoever's
gonna
come
and
operate
this
kind
of
business
in
our
city.
They
have
to
abide
by
the
rules.
Other
cities
have
had
issues
and
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
make
sure
that
this
not
happened
in
our
city.
E
I,
don't
know
why
so
difficult
to
do
this?
Obviously
our
attorney
he's
not
here.
He
said
it
was
a
conflict
of
interest
that
he
actually
introduced
this
ordinance,
yet
he
hires
another
attorney,
which
is
it?
Does
it
still
conflicted?
So
if
we
have
to
go
through
this
item
by
item
I
think
the
City
Council
needs
to
bring
an
attorney.
If
there's
any
objections
to
the
ordinance,
you
know
we,
you
know
created
this
ordinance,
it
was
passed,
it
was
vetoed,
we
super
vetoed
it
and
it's
still,
you
know
I
mean
it's.
E
It's
a
law
right
now
by
the
city
and
again
we're
trying
to
make
sure
that
not
no
issues
happen
in
our
city,
so
I,
don't
know
why
it's
so
difficult
to
go
in
there
create
an
application
to
make
sure
I
can
make
you
a
checklist.
I
mean
if
you
guys
leave
that
checklist
I
can
create.
I
can
pave
I
can
pay
for
an
attorney
fees
to
do
a
checklist,
as
other
cities
have
done,
I
mean
there's,
probably
20
30
cities
just
surrounding
Michigan.
E
That
has
the
same
issues
and
they
were
proactive
by
going
in
there
and
creating
something
to
make
sure
the
residents
are
not
at
risk
and
we're
saying
here.
That
is
it's
ridiculous
that
we've
been
discussing.
This
I
mean
we
have
an
ordinance,
let's
create
an
application,
don't
side
with
the
ordinance
and
just
pass
it
major
consumer.
C
C
But
what,
if
we
were
to
do
it
a
little
bit
more
at
this
particular
point,
maybe
have
all
the
different
departments
and
I
agree
personally
that
the
building
department,
the
fire
department,
ordinance
department
and
police
department
should
give
approval
on
anybody
based
on
what
this
ordinance
based
on
it
passing.
So
what
if,
at
this
particular
point,
we
just
have
them
sign
off
like
just
like.
C
Then
obviously,
we
discussed
it
with
the
department
heads
and
amongst
ourselves
and
make
the
necessary
changes
as
we
move
forward
because,
like
the
Eternity
mentioned,
they'll
probably
be
some
changes
in
the
next
five
six
months
as
stuff
comes
up.
Would
that
be
something
that
would
suffice
for
what
you
want
to
do?
Here's.
F
What
I'd
like
to
say
and
was
not
being
redundant
I
think
I
articulated
it
very
well.
In
my
letter,
let
me
say
what
I
want
to
address
council
and
ANSI
Council
and
Bazzi
is
talking
like
I'm
an
adversary
here
like
I,
don't
know
what
the
problem
is.
I,
don't
know
what
you
don't
understand:
I'm,
not
your
adversary,
I'm,
not
against
your
ordinance
I'm,
not
for
your
ordinance
I'm.
F
We
already
had
the
first
night
that
it
was
introduced
and
when
it
was
had
talks
of
lawsuits
and
whatever
my
concern
is
to
administer
it
in
a
manner
that
seems
fair
to
all
people.
It's
never
always
going
to
be
fair
to
all
people,
because
somebody's
going
to
perceive
something
different
than
somebody
else,
but
that
we
administer
it
in
the
most
legal
manner
that
we
can.
That
limits
the
exposure
of
the
city.
Okay,
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
trying
to
be
your
adversary.
You
don't
understand.
F
F
Is
my
question
is
for
which
the
Russians
medals
and
for
pawnshops
we
have
the
police
department,
do
a
background
check
which
the
people
pay
for
this
will
address.
What
mr.
Clarkson
does
that
correct?
Chief
for
ice
cream,
vendors
and
trucks?
We
have
a
night
shift
which
they
pay
for
and
they
bring
in.
So
if
you
would
have
read
my
letter,
the
difficulty
is
there
is
no
difficulty.
What
do
we
want
to
do?
Do
we
want
to
do
the
iChat,
or
do
we
want
to
do
that?
F
These
are
all
the
clarifications
I
need,
but
your
acting
is
them
I'm
your
adversary
and
I'm?
Not
all
I
want
to
do
is
since
the
clock
is
ticking.
You
know
a
business
came
to
my
window
and
they
said
we
got
180
days
whether
the
Honorable
bouncer
counsel,
realizes
it
or
not.
You
put
onus,
is
on
our
existing
smoking
lounges
that
they
have
to
comply
and
they
have
to
be
with
the
state
by
January
31st.
F
Are
there
any
smoking
establishment
to
31st
okay?
So
you
put
owners
as
on
these
businesses
they're
here
to
try
to
establish
what
their
need
to
do.
I
was
on
the
phone
with
mr.
Blaine
Crossman
from
the
housing
he,
and
this
was
all
things
with
all
due
respect.
It
should
have
been
done
before
this
ordinance
was
introduced
and
passed.
Now.
Let
me
finish
what
I
want
to
say:
okay,
you're
saying:
how
do
we
do?
This
are
okay?
How
did
we
do
I
asked
that
is
ordinance
and
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
be
fun
about
this
I.
F
Ask
that
this
ordinance
not
be
introduced
before
it
was
introduced.
Did
I,
not
councilman.
Bazzi
did
I,
not
ask
you
not
to
introduce
it
that
there
were
too
many
questions
and
too
many
owners
has
put
on
the
City
Clerk's
office
and
there
were
legalities
in
there
and
that
we
needed
to
talk
to
an
attorney
about
that,
but
you
saw
fit
to
introduce.
Let
me
finish:
you
saw
fit
to
introduce
it.
You
saw
fit
to
introduce
it
anyway.
F
So
now,
here
we
are
after
the
fact
trying
to
figure
out
what
we
should
do
when
we
introduce
the
liquor
license
ordinance.
How
do
we
introduce
it?
The
attorney
wrote
it.
Okay,
the
council
redit,
the
council.
Read
it
a
second
time
the
council
passed
it
the
attorney
who
just
happened
to
step
in
a
room
and
I
met.
We
both
did
our
homework.
It
took
us
several
hours
together,
but
us
doing
our
homework
separately
to
come
up
with
the
liquor
license
checklist
to
come
up
with
the
application
to
come
up
with
the
rest
of
the
stuff.
F
So
we
were
doing
things
legally.
What
has
happened
to
the
City
Clerk's
office
is
that
you
passed
this
and
now
what
do
you
do?
That's
why
I
have
all
these
questions?
Okay,
one
last
thing:
if
you
don't
mind,
madam
chair
sure,
sorry
that
I
offered
to
several
members
of
the
council
that
maybe
you
want
to
put
a
moratorium
on
this.
F
At
least
for
the
existing
businesses
on
their
things,
so
they
don't
occur.
Any
problems
with
the
state
of
Michigan
did
I
not
did
I
say
that
to
some
of
you.
So
that's
where
we
are
right
now
so
councilman
Bazzi
I'm,
not
your
adversary,
please
don't
say
like
it's
so
simple,
I
don't
understand
what
the
problem
is,
because
it
is
that
simple,
sir.
D
I
just
making
notes
I
agree
with
a
moratorium.
I
mean
we
have
existing
businesses
that
are
now
on
a
time
line.
That
is,
you
know
it's.
It's
not
fair
to
the
existing
businesses
at
all
really,
and
it's
just
got
to
get
resolved
and
the
moratorium
is
gonna
assist
those
businesses
I
want
to
see
that
happen.
Mr.
C
And
we
clarified
for
the
moratorium,
because
there's
two
different
issues:
there's
one
issue
for
new
licensees
and
another
issue
that
the
clerk
is
concerned
about
which
I
understand
is
concern
about
current
licensees
and
you're.
Absolutely
right.
Thank
you
in
a
situation
where
you
know
they're
hustling
Hamptons,
so
we've
already
addressed
the
application
situation.
Can
we
just
put
a
moratorium
for
90
days
for
the
existing
current
businesses
and
different
heights
that
have
smoking
lounges.
D
C
C
J
E
D
E
C
J
G
E
Again,
I'm
confused,
obviously
mr.
Miyagi,
he
said
that
if
he
has
a
conflict
of
interest
with
this
resolution,
with
this
ordinance
so
by
him,
I'm
sorry
I
mean
I'm
not
being
no
offense
for
anybody,
but
by
him
appointing
another
attorney.
So
I
don't
know
how
you
would
be
not
also
conflicted
since
II
brought.
You
aren't
for
this
for
this
ordinance.
You
know
actually
I
mean
I.
E
J
Make
a
difference,
and
mr.
Miyagi
I've
been
doing
this
for
38
years.
I
know:
I,
don't
see
it
if
you
won't
be
hurt.
Mr.
Bansi,
if
you
want
some
other
attorney
to
do
it
be
happy
to
write
a
resolution
for
you
put
in
something
about
a
moratorium
preview
again
this
application
and
we
can
even
do
checklists
if
you
want
but
I,
think
the
ordinance
talks
about
what
really
needs
to
be
done.
It
has
to
be
cold
compliant.
The
talks
about
disqualifying
criminal
actors,
which
Police
Department
nation,
is
all
here
and
I.
E
A
L
The
conflict
is
what's
known
as
an
issue
conflict.
It's
not
based
I
mean
having
a
client
or
anyone
else.
It's
based
on
the
idea
that,
in
a
public
statement
that
this
ordinance
is
invalid
and
mr.
Roberts
made
the
same
statement
so
I
can
both
administer
something
and
be
in
a
position
where
I'm
supposed
to
defend
something.
I've
already
said.
Is
that
problematic?
So
that's
why
mr.
Clark
was
contacted
and
he
also
does
a
lot
of
our
depend
on
our
ma.
K
F
G
F
C
F
That
what
you
very
do
mr.
Clark
is
to
go
through,
and
I
can
I
ask
for,
say
one
more
thing.
Man
I'm
sure
sure-
and
this
is
probably
I
believe
that
we
have
to
with
the
resolution,
be
written
in
such
a
manner
that
our
existing
businesses
will
not
be
affected
by
that
January
31st
state
mandate.
If
the
council
does
not
come
to
an
agreement
before
then,
and
they
have
ample
time
to
do
their
renewal
fee,
their
renewal
paperwork
not
fee.
Excuse
me
in
the
resolution,
their.
E
D
A
M
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Steve
George
from
in
a
local
attorney,
I
represent
some
local
hookah
lounges
and
there
I'm
just
a
little
confused,
because
I'm
gonna
have
to
consult
my
clients
on
this.
It
appears
that
there's
possibly
gonna
be
a
moratorium.
Does
that
mean
that
the
moratorium
would
put
a
freeze
on
the
applying
the
ordinance
to
the
existing
businesses?
That's.
A
M
So
my
understanding
is
because
I
work
on
these
applications
at
the
state
level,
the
city
has
to
provide
the
state
with
a
copy
of
the
actual
license.
That's
going
to
be
issued
to
these
businesses.
That
copy
is
then
incorporated
into
the
renewal
at
the
state
level.
Those
applications
are
being
prepared
and
have
actually
they
have
to
be
submitted
by
January
31st
880
days
on
this
ordinance
actually
runs
to
January
6,
not
January
31st,
so
January
6
is
180
days.
M
So,
if
there's
going
to
be
some
tolling
of
this
ordinance,
you
we
have
to
be
concerned
about
the
license,
that's
going
to
be
issued
when
it
can
get
to
the
state
and
then
having
the
state
incorporated
into
this
application.
If,
if
there's,
if
there's
a
shortening
of
that
period
of
time,
it's
gonna
be
problematic
with
the
state,
because
they're
gonna,
because
they're
gonna
want
to
see
that
the
license
is
already
been
established
by
the
city
and
then
it's
gonna
have
they're.
M
Gonna
have
to
provide
a
copy
that
license
to
the
to
the
state,
so
I
guess
we
I
just
would
like
us
to
keep
in
mind
that
there's
that
component
of
it
to
that,
there's
that
state
license
that
or
they
actually
the
license.
That's
going
to
be
incorporated
into
the
application
process
with
the
state
that
we
have
to
provide
or
the
city
has
to
provide
the
state
and
that's
what
mr.
Pressman
is
gonna
want
to
see.
Okay,.
A
M
Mr.
Chrisman
knows
about
this,
so
he
we
have
to
notify.
Now,
as
a
group,
we
had
blood
mr.
kretzmann
know
that
this
ordinance
is
not
going
to
be
applied
for
this
upcoming
year,
so
it
won't
be
part
of
this,
a
renewal
process.
That's
the
key
here
so
yeah.
If
it
runs
past
the
renewal,
that's
fine,
but
he's
expecting
a
license,
because
I've
already
had
conversations
with
him,
because
I've
been
wondering
if
I've
been
monitoring
whether
this
the
city's
provided
a
license
to
the
state.
M
Yet
because
these
applications
will
be
coming
soon
for
our
my
clients
to
prepare
and
he's-
and
he
says
he
doesn't
have
anything
yet
from
the
city,
so
I
mean
there
has
to
be
some
word,
that's
given
to
mr.
craftsman.
So
when
you
knows
that
it's
not
going
to
be
part
of
this
application,
you
know
the
2020
may
be
2021
all.