►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment and Appeals 08 Jun 2016
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Six
members
present,
therefore
5
affirmative
votes
are
required
to
grant
the
variance
to
appeal
opening
the
meeting
at
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
An
appeals
board
is
authorized
to
grant
or
deny
variance
by
part
three
sections
60
of
the
Inglewood
city
charter.
Anyone
aggrieved
by
a
decision
rendered
by
this
board
may
appeal
that
decision
to
a
court
of
record.
However,
such
appeal
must
be
made
within
30
days
of
the
Board's
decision.
A
The
variance
is
effective
at
the
end
of
the
appeal
building
permits
for
construction
associated
with
an
approve
area
swill
not
be
issued
until
the
appeal
period
is
ended.
Building
permits
must
be
obtained
and
construction,
but
gun
within
180
days
of
the
variances
effective
date
will
open
a
public
hearing
for
each
case.
Staff
will
give
an
overview.
Alpha
can
all
have
a
chance
to
give
us
any
additional
information.
Anyone
present
can
speak
for
against
and
we'll
follow
up
with
staff
close
the
meeting
the
public
meeting
and
we'll
discuss
and
vote
will
you
please
take
role.
D
D
It
is
to
develop
15
townhomes.
However,
the
townhomes
are
not
at
all
in
consideration
for
a
variance
right
now
when
they
are
developed,
they'll
meets
all
requirements
set
back
park
in
landscaping.
They'll
meet
all
that
the
this
variance
is
strictly
for
the
reduction
of
commercial
space
from
50.1
to
0%
mm.
This
is
located
at
35,
95
and
35
75
South
Cherokee.
D
The
following
slides
here
are
basically
an
indication.
The
next
two
are
ilcs,
which
are
improvement,
location
certificates
of
what's
existing
there
now
right
now,
there's
two
single-family
homes
and
the
next
few
slides
are
variations
of
concepts
of
the
15
units.
But
again
those
are
not
up
for
discussion
tonight.
It's
strictly
the
commercial
space,
but
does
anybody
have
any
questions
for
me.
F
E
E
A
A
G
You're,
not
you're,
off
the
the
corridor,
you're
not
with
really
within
the
corridor
and
for
whatever
reason
you
have
this
sort
of
finger
of
MU
b1
stretching
down
Cherokee
and
it's
there
is
some
commercial
right
off
of
of
Hampton,
which
I
think
makes
sense.
But
as
you
continue
down
the
block
and
certainly
across
from
the
park
you're
really
out
of
the
sightlines
and
like
a
local
trip,
you
know
traffic
his
ability,
that's
required.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
F
G
G
Decision
we
haven't
yet
we're
still
working
on
it.
We've
subsequently
working
on
plans
that
have
you
were
larger
units,
so
we're
trying
to
this.
You
know.
Well,
we
think
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
develop
product
here,
that's
maybe
slightly
smaller,
more
affordable.
We
also
want
to
strike
a
balance
between
going
too
far
making
it
too
small.
G
So
we
have
begun
to
study
10
to
12
units
larger
having
rows
which
you
Center
in
those
units,
as
opposed
to
the
ones
before
you,
which
don't
have
anything
any
living
space
on
the
ground
floor.
The
units
of
the
plan
study
now
has
a
living
space
on
the
ground
floor
would
include
a
bedroom.
These
larger
units
or
likely
would
support
families
children
as
opposed
to
not
to
say
that
a
family
would
buy
a
2-bedroom
unit,
which
is.
G
H
My
feeling
is
that
it
would
be
much
better
to
have
a
solely
residential
area
and
I'm
told
that
they
may
have
their
own
garages.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
true,
so
that
would
be
very
helpful
because
it
will
eliminate
the
problem
with
parking
and
you're,
really
not
in
an
area
where
you're
going
to
get
any
traffic
going
by
other
than
on
foot.
F
H
It
were
a
business
because
most
people,
you
know,
there's
the
townhomes
across
the
street
on
the
other
side
of
Cherokee
and
there's
residential
on
our
side
and
then
there's
the
park.
So
it
really
seems
to
me
that
it's
more
of
a
residential
area,
so
I'm
in
complete
agreement
with
doing
away
with
the
business
portion.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
H
H
J
J
A
K
K
In
the
house
I'm
just
thinking
of
the
house
next
to
us,
they
didn't
want
to
sell
okay
and
they
rented
and
I,
don't
think
they're
going
to
want
a
business
next
to
them.
You
have
dogs
in
that
yard
and
stuff
that
are
can
different
things
next
door
to
them
and
then
on
the
other
side
of
them
is
an
apartment
building
which
is
residential.
K
A
D
I
would
just
like
to
say
that,
based
on
this
aerial,
because
it
does
give
a
pretty
good
perception
of
how
there
is
such
a
residential,
neighborhood
and
staff
does
believe
that
this
variance
should
pass
based
on
the
fact
that
this
would
be
a
very
hard
location
for
retail.
To
succeed.
Who.
D
F
D
C
I'll
move
that
case
var
2016:
zero,
zero,
nine,
three
five,
seven
five
South
Cherokee
Street
be
granted
a
variance
to
reduce
the
required
ground-floor
commercial
space
from
the
required
50.1%
to
zero
percent
to
develop
fifteen
townhomes
I'll.
Also
move
that
case
var
2016
ten
at
thirty
five
95
South
Cherokee
Street
be
granted
a
variance
to
reduce
the
required
ground-floor
commercial
space
from
the
required
50.1%
to
zero
percent
to
develop
the
fifteen
townhomes
I.
A
L
A
I
All
and
and
the
area
around
there's
residential
I've
been
in
that
area.
It's
I
think
that
it
makes
the
most
sense,
especially
if
it's
developed
properly,
which
I'm
hoping
it
will
be
to
have
some
bigger
units
and
take
advantage
of
the
park.
That
may
be
the
bigger
units
kind
of
kids
they
could
enjoy
the
park,
but
to.
F
I
A
B
B
I
I
and
I
agree
with
you.
I
think
that
there's
a
zoning
issue,
but
just
like
the
one
that
we
previously
had
I,
think
these
lots
are
right
at
the
corner
and
before
we
carve
it
out,
because
the
law
was
right
at
the
corner
and
to
me
this
one
makes
more
sense
because
again
it's
in
the
residential
area
and
and
again.
K
I
F
E
And
I
think
it's
the
Christian
Science
reading
room
building
replacement,
that's
it
more
in
the
core
of
downtown
solved
this
issue
by
having
live,
work,
Wellings
and
that's
more
of
a
core
downtown
area,
and
that
seems
like
a
way
to
solve
it.
There
I
see
this
as
a
much
different
area
than
that
yeah
I
think
especially.
E
B
Yes,
I
think
the
first
criterion
is
met
just
by
the
uniqueness
of
location
within
the
city
here
and
the
surrounding
areas,
so
that
criterion
is
met.
It
is
unique.
Second,
try
to
criteria
about.
Is
it
consistent
with
the
intent
of
the
zone?
District
I,
believe
so?
Certainly,
everything
around
that
was
with
with
this
intent
so
and.
E
D
D
D
I
A
couple
briefly
and
I
will
try
to
keep
this
I
and
I
think
it
was
miss,
stated
in
staffs
report
that
the
intent
of
the
zone
I'm
sorry
yeah
a
few
on
that.
It's
number
two
under
the
second
criteria,
that
the
intent
of
the
zone
district
is
to
have
an
accessory
structure.
That's
no
more
than
a
thousand
square
feet
on
a
typical
lot.
I
think
that's
for
a
garage
only
because
then
you
can
also
have
can't
you
a
storage
shed,
that's
150
and
then
another
accessory
structure.
That's
200
right.
I
D
D
What
did
I
do
open,
never
mind.
Sorry,
there
isn't
really
any
other
place
to
put
this
big
garage
without
apparently
there's
a
large
tree
here,
and
without
really,
if
you're
going
to
sideload
off
the
alley
without
having
a
large
driveway
going
all
the
way
through
your
your
backyard
and
taking
down
they're,
not
totally.
D
I
And
I
think
that
it's
noted,
which
is
an
interesting
point
in
staffs
report,
that
additionally
originally
what
they
wanted
to
do,
was
attach
the
the
structure
to
have
all
one
at
all
one
structure
which
then
the
existing
garage
could
be
turned
into
a
studio
of
sorts
and
then
you
would
have
an
attached
garage.
But
if
you
do
that
because
the
house
is
set
back
so
far,
there's
a
20
foot
setback
and
back
the
lot
and
then
they
would
bust
that
so
I
think
that's
how
we
got
here.
I
A
D
D
B
F
D
A
N
A
N
N
N
Yes,
our
setback
here
is
that's
legal,
but
if
we
connect
here
somehow,
then
this
becomes
part
of
the
house
and
we
have
to
have
one
more
foot.
It's
I
believe
it's
seven
foot
instead
of
six
feet,
so
we're
kind
of
maybe
we
could
come
before
you
folks
and
get
that
adjusted,
but
that
would
require
a
variance
as
well
and.
N
Here
this
line
seven
and
a
half
feet
either
side,
our
neighbor's
house,
and,
by
the
way,
one
quick
note,
the
neighbor
who
we
had
it
was
a
renter
who
signed
the
without
objection.
I
was
on
the
phone
with
the
owner
of
the
house
and
she
wasn't
able.
We
couldn't
get
the
paper
to
her
in
time
and
everything.
That's
what
she
said.
She
called
her
tenants
and
you,
okay,
I'm,
fine,
which
we
didn't
note
that
was
the
tenant
signing
before
the
owner.
Thank.
N
N
F
N
Yes,
it
shows
that
here
see,
there's
a
set
back
there,
here's
the
existing
and
the
notches
back
and
continues
we
just
wanted.
We
don't
want
to
make
this
look
like
it's
a
farm
building
or
you
know
a
giant
giant
shed
trying
to
be
sensitive
to
the
appearance
and
for
the
sake
of
the
neighbors
as
well.
Of
course,.
A
A
F
I
D
I
D
I
I
B
I
C
F
C
D
Actually,
this
couldn't
be
considered
an
accessory
structure,
a
garage
because
it's
over
the
200
square
feet
I
mean
it
couldn't
be
considered
as
a
storage
shed
or
an
accessory
structure,
because
it's
over
the
150
requirement
or
the
storage
shed
and
it's
over
the
200
square
foot
for
the
accessory
structure.
But.
I
D
D
I
I
I
F
A
I
I
Again,
I
I
mean
I
think
although
this
is
a
little
tricky
I
think
part
of
the
issue
is
that
20
foot
setback
because
the
house
was
built
in
1954
and
it's
setback
so
far.
It
there's
no
room
to
put
an
attached
garage
back
there
unless
you
get
a
variance
on
the
20
foot,
I,
just
it's
84
square
feet.
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
grant
this
for
the
simple
reason
that
it's
an
older
home
across
the
street.
There
was
a
scrape
and
that
house
is
about
on
the
same
size.
Lot
it's
a
fairly
big
house.
F
I
B
I
I
think
it's
as
mr.
Frieden
said,
I
think
it's
extremely
unique
with
the
alley
on
the
side.
The
way
the
house
is
set
back
in
essence,
it
hamstrings
you
a
little
bit
yep
and
the
easement,
because
now
that
pushes
the
garage
up
I
mean
again
I
think
it's
false
to
say
that
we're
actually
granting
a
thousand
eighty
four
square
foot
garage,
because
that's
not
what
we're
doing,
even
though
that's
under
code,
that's
kind
of
how
it
comes
out,
but
I
I
just
can't
picture
it.
In
my
mind
that
way
right,
it's.
I
I
think
it's
consistent
with
the
zone
district
regulations.
I,
don't
think
it'll
impair
the
use
of
the
neighborhood,
especially
that
neighborhood
is
changing
so
rapidly
and
there's
a
lot
of
bigger
homes
going
in
there.
Zero
lot
line
homes.
So
it's
nice
to
see
actually
an
older
home
sticking
around
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
self-imposed
because
they
didn't
build
the
interest.
Ling
Li,
designed
poorly.
I
B
I
voted,
yes,
I
believe
the
site
is
very
unique
as
far
as
placement
of
the
house
and
the
existing
garage
and
the
utility
easements
I
also
think
it's
consistent
with
the
intent
of
the
zone
district.
There's
not
going
to
be
any
public
safety
issues
there.
It
will
not
permanently
impaired
the
development
of
adjacent
conforming
uses,
and
it's
not
self-imposed
it's.
What's
already
there
and
they're
having
to
deal
with
it.
C
E
A
A
I
I
Yeah
I
mean
if,
if
Google
Maps
would
work
just
as
well:
okay,
perfect
yeah
I.
Just
on
this
one,
the
last
case
I
thought
it
was
interesting
because
it
there
was
a
big
house
next
door.
I
noticed
when
I
looked
at
the
house,
but
it
wasn't
on
the
aerial
yeah,
because
there's
been
so
many
scrapes
and
he
puts
her
out
of
it.
So
if
there's
any
way
that
that
could.
A
Board
members
I
know:
we've
we've
wondered
about
how
to
raise
the
profile
of
these
of
the
retail
50%
1%
requirement
and
wondered
if
there's
some
I
know
miss
Purdy,
even
others
of
us
wonder
what
the
best
way
to
raise
that
you
know
get
the
attention
of
City
Council
on
addressing.
Not
as
should
we
I
mean.
Should
we
write
a
letter
should
we.
D
D
A
L
Yes,
actually
they're
done
well,
Brooke
is
done
with
his
portion
of
it.
Yes,
so
now
all
we're
gonna
do
is
get
it
I
think
more
in
a
position
for
planning
and
zoning
to
approve
and
then
from
there
it
would
go
to
council
because
he
went
through
all
of
the
changes
with
them.
The
last
two
meetings
and
there
weren't
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
discussion,
so
it
sounded
to
me
like
Brooke,
was
going
to
clean
it
up.
You
know
he.
L
All
the
sections
that
were
going
to
be
removed,
put
in
some
red
lines
or
red.
You
know
just
some
notes
in
red
he's
gonna,
take
that
out
and
then
bring
it
back
to
show
them
the
finished
product
and
I
think
from
there.
It
would
go
to
council.
I
can't
tell
you
you
know
when,
but
it's
it's
I,
don't
see
a
big
issue
with
it.
It's
it's
merely
a
sign
code,
we're
just
changing
it.
L
I
mean
we
we
have
to,
and
so
I
would
hope
that
council
could
get
through
that
relatively
quickly,
maybe
august-september,
if
not
sooner
but
I.
You
know
we're
already
in
mid.
June
and
July
is
gonna,
be
crazy,
so
I'm
thinking,
August
September
then,
but
in
fact
pansy
won't
have
to
do
anything
more
once
they
move
it
to
Council.
So.