►
Description
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/92227?handle=78F40E4616F64C41B657BFE8CC4C0850
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/92226?handle=6D76AD5E4DCC45FA9AF75B1D0D1B2A9B
Minutes PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/94024?handle=1B38A79B55414958935E305061785E28
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes
a. Approval of the Budget Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes - June 23, 2020
3. New Business
a. Working Session - Finalize the Budget Advisory Committee Annual Report - All Members (Report presented to City Council on Monday, August 10, 2020)
b. Election of Chair and Vice Chair 2-14-6: - Appointment of Officers and Adoption of Rules. A. The Committee shall organize, adopt administrative rules and procedures and elect from its members such off...
4. Member's Choice
5. Adjournment
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/92227?handle=78F40E4616F64C41B657BFE8CC4C0850
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/92226?handle=6D76AD5E4DCC45FA9AF75B1D0D1B2A9B
Minutes PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/94024?handle=1B38A79B55414958935E305061785E28
A
A
E
A
A
Yeah,
so
I'm
in
favor
of
just
diving
in
and
we're
doing,
report
joel
thanks
for
going
in
and
working
on
the
formatting
and
revisions
and
incorporating
changes.
How
do
you
guys
want
to
do
this?
Do
you
do
you
have
a
list
of
items
you
want
to
go
through?
Do
you
just
want
to
go
through
paragraph
by
paragraph
joel?
What
do
you
have
in
mind.
D
B
D
D
A
D
A
D
E
D
D
A
Yeah
and
forgive
me
if
we
didn't-
you
know
explicitly
speak
to
this
or
if
this
is
a
change
from
a
discussion
that
we
had
before.
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
bring
in
events
closer
to
the
3400
block
of
broadway.
I
think
when
it
comes
to
a
summer
concert
again,
this
is
pre-coveted
summer
concerts
outdoors
people
co-mingling.
A
A
D
A
D
A
B
E
My
question
is,
you
know,
there's
a
highlighted
section
about
a
question
about
attendance
being
justifying
the
cost
of
the
event
which
I
think
was
part
of
the
concern
was
maybe,
if
we
moved
the
venue
to
a
place
that
would
also
boost
more
revenue,
would
that
make
it
more
worthwhile?
Is
there
a
way
to
hone
in
on
that
of
maybe
make
or
cost
analysis,
or
is
there
anything
that
we
think
is
useful
to
talk
about
with
concerts
if
it
doesn't
include,
maybe
moving
the
venue.
D
A
Yeah,
actually
can
we
back
up
to
the
christmas
parade
and
tree
lighting.
I
know
there's
no
actual
comments
in
our
google
doc,
but
I
just
wanted
to
verbally
share
this
comment
is
I
think
this
you
know
we
talk
about.
We
have
the
statement,
as
with
other
events,
increased
food
and
beverage
and
craft
vendor
engagement
are
encouraged.
I
mean
this
is
just
one
other
example
of
how
allowing
you
know
easing
the
way
for
food
trucks
to
you
know,
participate
in
our
local
economy
is
really
going
to
benefit.
A
D
A
Yeah,
so
my
two
sense
is:
I
think
this
is
an
example
of
something
that's
not
broken.
Therefore
it
doesn't
need
to
be
fixed
and
I
think
the
city's
been
really
adaptive
to
yeah
to
come
in
coming
up
with
creative
ways
to
keep
our
community
in
that
area
and
socializing
in
that
area,
and
this
was
one
of
my
bullet
points
at
the
end
of
the
document.
So
I
just
really
don't
know
what
we
have
to
say
about
the
block
party
other
than
it's
worked
out.
D
A
D
A
E
B
D
E
B
A
B
F
D
F
The
I
would
say,
probably
the
most
significant
change
would
be
a
specific
recommendation
to
to
spend
on
parks,
but
other
than
that.
The
spirit
of
last
year's
recommendation
fits
hand
in
hand
with
this
year's.
It's
more
of
a
renewed
concern
that
money
is
sitting
in
an
account
continuing
to
grow,
while
it
is
losing
value
and
not
being
utilized
for
the
purposes
for
which
it
was
collected.
B
F
So
I
felt
kind
of
like
the
subject
of
ratcheting
and
sliding
reserves
wasn't
fully
understood
last
year
and
I
took
a
stab
at
explaining
it
slightly
better
this
year.
I'm
not
sure
if
I
actually
accomplished
that
or
not,
but
the
idea
that
there
are
specific
targets
and
specific
triggers
that
float
on
a
year-to-year
basis
based
upon
how
the
economy
does
versus
the
projections
was
really
what
I
was
trying
to
capture.
B
F
D
F
No,
so
infrastructure
can
be
any
number
of
things,
but
one
of
the
biggest
infrastructure
challenges
right
now
is
enterprise
funds
and
council
is
aimed
at
moving
general
fund
money
to
and
enterprise
funds.
I
don't
agree
with
that.
We
have
general
fund
infrastructure
items
like
parks,
irrigation,
and
you
know
just
general
parks,
design,
capital
expenditures
that
come
out
of
the
general
fund
that
general
fund
money
should
support
when
we
divert
general
fund
money
to
enterprise
funds.
F
A
I'm
I
like
the
idea
of
specifically
speaking
to
improving
parks,
namely
cushing
park.
I
really
don't
have
any
strong
opinions
about
this
section,
one
way
or
another
or
strong
edits,
just
the
one
typo
in
the
second
pair
section
b,
scroll
down,
stop
even
if
inglewood
used
a
portion
of
the
reserve
above
policy
right
there.
That's
all
that
was
my
minor
typo
that
I
found.
F
It's
just
how
we
phrase
it
it's
the
best
description
I
can
think
of.
We
set
a
target
policy
of
the
two
months
sure
and
we
are
consistently
operating
in
defiance
of
that,
and
I
view
it
as
equally
bad
to
be
operating
above
that
target
as
it
would
be
to
operate
below
that,
which
is
the
purpose
of
the
proposal
to
ratchet
its
slide.
Then
we
have
a
set
policy
target
that
we're
always
meeting,
and
if
we
fail
to
meet
policy,
then
there's
something
structurally
that
we're
doing
incorrectly,
that
we
need
to
change.
D
F
F
So
my
my
concern
with
that
to
flesh
that
out
a
little
bit
more
is
not
only
do
we
face
the
10
percent
requirement,
but
based
on
the
revenues
that
these
enterprises
are
bringing
in
that
10
is,
is
really
just
a
drop
in
the
bucket.
So
it's
basically
to
sum
it
up
a
political
move
to
transfer
money
from
the
general
fund
to
the
enterprise
fund.
Look
at
us
we're
doing
something,
and
I
don't
agree
with
that.
I
think
that
we
should
have
a
purpose
for
our
dollars
beyond
the
political
appearance.
F
D
F
F
Yeah-
and
maybe
we
should
there's
probably
a
way
for
us
to
clarify
that-
maybe
we
refer
to
it
as
a
direct
transfer
as
opposed
to
a
loan.
So
we're
saying
we're
not
opposed
to
leveraging
this
money
for
an
enterprise
so
that
it's
in
a
better
position
to
draw
bonds
or
raise
fees
in
the
future,
so
that
it
can
support
itself
in
the
interim
bridge
money,
but
just
giving
it
as
a
gift
to
an
enterprise.
That's
supposed
to
be
fee
supported,
really
rubs
me
the
wrong
way
and.
F
A
I
mean
what
hits
home
for
me
and
I
this
doesn't
light
a
fire
in
my
belly,
the
same
way
it
does
for
steve,
but
the
two
statements
that
really
stand
out
to
me
that
I
think
really
speak
to
my
feelings
toward
this.
Are
we
believe
that
enterprise
prize
fund
should
do
what
they
are
designed
to
do,
support
themselves
with
fees
charged
for
service
and
then
later
we
believe
general
fund
money
should
serve
the
purpose
for
which
it
was
collected.
General
operations,
police
library,
fire
and
parks,
rather
than
fee
fee
based
enterprises.
E
F
What
I
suggested
in
last
year's
cycle
was
actually
a
rebate
from
the
general
fund,
so
it's
kind
of
like
a
hands-off
transfer.
So
you
know
the
city
sends
utility
bills
and
what
the
city
would
do
in
this
case,
rather
than
transferring
money
directly
to
the
enterprise,
it
will
just
issue
a
sort
of
a
quote-unquote
tax
rebate
or
a
you
know:
citizen
rebate
on
the
utility
bill
across
the
board
to
all
ratepayers
out
of
that
surplus,
but
that
got
even
less
wind
than
the
ratcheting
and
sliding
reserves.
So
I
don't
think
that's
a
very
popular
idea.
D
A
D
B
D
D
Well,
moving
on
to's
next
point
was
using
a
portion
of
the
remaining
preservative
policy
for
parks
improvements.
I
think
I
may
have
been
out
of
town
when
you
guys
have
the
visit
from
well.
No,
I
was
here
for
the
parks,
wrecking
library
person
yeah.
I
I
don't
know
much
about
cushing
park.
I
guess
that's.
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
was
that
did
that
come
from
one
of
our
presentations.
F
Not
exactly
that's
more
something
that
I
personally
have
kind
of
had
feelings
about.
I've
visited
cushing
park
once
cushing
park
is
in
the
city
center
area.
It's
it
could
be
a
real
gym,
it's
right
off
the
light
rail
it.
It's
very
you
know
just
a
block
away
from
the
city
center
and
it
has
a
water
feature
and
a
skate
park.
F
But
it's
not
you
know
it's
a
design
from
the
60s
or
70s,
so
it
hasn't,
it
doesn't
have
those
modern
design,
features
that
reduce
problems
in
public
areas
and-
and
so
my
visit
there
was-
was
not
very
much
fun.
I
was
in
a
shelter,
you
know
kind
of
just
hanging
out
reading
a
book
smoking
a
cigar-
and
you
know
20
feet
away
from
here.
A
couple
of
I
don't
know,
presumably
homeless,
guys
exchanging.
F
F
F
I
know
other
people
may
have
different
ideas.
I
know
that
the
parks
department
in
particular
would
very
much
like
to
upgrade
the
irrigation
systems
across
all
of
our
parks
and,
and
that
has
one
big
drawback
of
being
an
improvement
that
the
citizens
can't
see.
So
I
did
mention
that.
But
if
you
look,
if
you
rotate
around
on
that
view,
a
little
bit
joel
you'll
see
the
shelters
that
I'm
making
reference
to
you
they're
angled
in
such
a
way
that
you
can't
see
them
from
dartmouth
or
from
uladi.
D
F
D
E
So,
for
me,
the
paragraph
right
above
this
one
where
it
talks
about
using
surplus
for
park
improvements,
I'm
great
with
that.
My
only
thought
about
the
entire
paragraph
on
cushing
is
simply
that
we,
because
it
wasn't
something
that
was
presented
in
the
committee
and
because
it's
more
anecdotal
from
sir
I
know
like,
I
think,
suzanne.
I
also
would
love
to
see
this
you
mentioned
cushion
as
well,
but
I
don't
think
I
have
enough
information
to
know
the
status
of
all
the
other
parks
and
kind
of
evaluates.
E
This
makes
sense
for
us,
as
a
committee
to
recommend
one
over
all
of
the
others.
Is
there
may
be
an
opportunity
to
adjust
the
language
to
say
you
know
one
possibility
might
include
cushing
park
instead
of
making
such
a
strong
statement.
If
this
is
the
one
we
would
recommend
just
without
more
data,
I
think
it
might
be
a
little
hard
to
make
such
a
strong
statement.
Does
that
make
sense.
F
F
A
Yeah,
I
really
like
what
you
had
to
say
chelsea,
so
I
think
proposing
that
we
use
reserves
to
support
park.
Improvements
is
on
par
with
what
we've
heard
from
community.
I
think
you
know
in
terms
of
which
parks
need
improvements
and
which
parks
don't
like
my
neighborhood
park
was
recently
improved.
So
it
wouldn't
really
be
fair
to
speak
to
my
neighborhood
park
because
it's
my
neighborhood
park,
but
steve's
right
there
was
a
you
know,
a
laundry
list
of
parks
and
specific
improvements
on
that
master
plan.
A
So
as
long
as
this
is
aligned
with
that,
I'm
okay,
I
really
like
what
chelsea
suggests
about
using
it
more
of
as
an
example
and
kind
of
leaving
it
up
to
the
parks
department
figure
out
where
those
funds
can
be
allocated
best
but
yeah
and
what
I
know
of
cushing
park.
I
don't
spend
a
lot
of
time
there,
I've
driven
by
there.
A
D
B
F
D
D
F
Well,
the
best
practice
is
the
16.7
period,
but
they're
not
following
that.
So
I
wanted
to
give
them
some
structure
that
they
could
follow
so
that
they
have
a
way
to
adjust
automatically
in
a
you
know,
year-over-year
surplus.
The
problem
here
is
that
we
have
a
policy
that's
in
place
and
council
year
after
year
after
year
is
not
following
that
policy.
F
D
F
Go
ahead
I'll,
just
reiterate
that
that
the
spirit
of
the
proposal
is
to
have
a
written
policy
that
makes
sense
and
that
can
be
met
right
now.
We
have
a
written
policy,
that's
regularly
not
being
met.
If
we
plan
to
adjust
the
reserves
year
after
year
in
in
surpluses
or
deficits,
then
the
reserves
are
actually
serving
the
purpose
right
now,
it's
just
a
number
62.7.
F
This
plan
allows
us
to
have
to
maintain
a
reserve.
That's
large
enough
to
sort
of
flatten.
You
know
ebbs
and
flows
so
that
we
can
have
a
stable
budget
year
after
year.
That's
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
trying
to
get
at
you
know
currently,
if,
if
we
have
a
terrible
year
and
we
drop
below
16.7
we're
breaking
policy.
E
At
this
point,
I'm
happy
to
take
another
24
hours,
but
probably
more
in
support
of
what
we
proposed
last
year
was
the
same
concept
of
the
ratcheting
effect.
I
think
it's
the
fifty
percent,
I
just
I'm
not
comfortable
with
something
that
we've
described
as
an
arbitrary
number,
and
I
understand
that
the
feeling
of
the
number
already
is
arbitrary,
but
I
think,
if
we're
going
to
make
a
proposal,
I'd
like
to
have
a
little
bit
more
substance
behind
that.
F
Yeah,
no,
I
like
the
objection,
I
think.
If
we
analyze
ebb
and
flow
over
the
past
years,
we
could
probably
hit
a
number
that
makes
more
sense.
Obviously,
when
you're
drawing
from
savings,
you
have
a
tendency
to
deplete
them
faster
than
your
growing
reserves
generally,
especially
if
you're
only
growing
your
reserves
half
as
fast
as
you're,
drawing
from
them
in
a
deficit
year.
But
I
think
if
we
analyze
past
drops
and
there
there
was
a
20-year
chart
that
I
did.
E
F
E
D
B
D
F
D
D
A
D
F
D
E
D
E
D
A
D
A
No,
it
I
hear
it
two-drill,
I
think
here
you're,
fine,
so
there's
essentially
two
parts
to
this
so
part,
one
part,
two
a
part,
two,
a
b
and
c.
So
the
first
part
is
the
body
cams,
and
a
lot
of
this
is
it's
going
to
happen
anyway.
What
we're
advising
is
a
certain
approach
to
funding
it
so-
and
I
am
behind
on
council
meetings
also.
A
So
if
there's
been
discussion
on
this
recently,
I'm
not
informed
but
chief
collins,
presented
to
council
beginning
of
june,
talked
about
two
funding
options
for
implementing
police
cameras
and
the
technology
to
support
them
and
the
administrative
staff
that
was
necessary
to
support
them.
So
what
we're
proposing
we're
in
favor
of
the
first
of
the
two
options
that
he
proposed
we
listed
the
dollar
amounts
here.
The
cloud-based
solution
when
chelsea
and
I
met
were
very
much
in
favor
of
the
three
fte
required
for
the
technical
support.
A
D
That
makes
sense
to
me.
I
chelsea
had
put
a
note
in
there
about
whether
there
was
a
about
this
being
an
unfunded
mandate,
and
I
know
that
there
wasn't
any
funding
attached
to
this
year's
field,
but
I
really
feel
like
there
was
a
state
grant
program
within
the
last
two
years
for
body
camera
purchases,
but
it's
also
possible.
That's
run
out
of
money,
so
I'm
sure
that
the
chief
would
know
chief
collins
would
know
more
about
it
than
I
do.
A
Yeah
and
as
far
as
cost
sharing
I
mean-
I
don't
know,
sheridan's
finances,
I
just
know
they
have
their
own
police
department.
It's
a
very
small
city.
I
find
it
hard
to
believe
that
they're
going
to
be
able
to
independently
finance
you
know,
finance
the
implicit
implementation
of
these
police
cams
as
it's
required
in
in
the
senate
bill.
F
D
B
E
F
D
F
So
expert
on
law
enforcement,
but
I
do
watch
police
videos
from
time
to
time
different
angles
also
dash
cams
activate
at
different
times
like
when
the
lights
and
sirens
are
on,
as
opposed
to
a
body
cam,
which
would
basically
just
capture
a
picture
of
a
steering
wheel
for
the
entire
pursuit.
A
dash
cam
can
capture
photos
a
video
of
a
pursuit
or
of
a
dui
suspect
or
other
things
like
that.
Yeah.
A
Am
I
going
to
reach
for
first?
So
with
this
dash
cam
thing,
I
hear
you.
I
feel
like,
as
we
sit
here
today
on
july
28th
as
a
group,
we're
not
informed
enough
about
dash
cams,
as
we
are
about
the
body,
worn
cameras,
so
I
mean
we
could
add
one
sentence
in
there
if
budget
allows
and
if
the
police
department
asks
for
it.
Please
support
the
implementation
of
dash
cams.
We
shouldn't
have
the
numbers
or
any
information
about
it,
so
does
that
require
additional
fte?
Does
it
require
a
unique
set
of
technology?
D
Well,
I'm
looking
at
the
the
fiscal
note
that
chelsea
just
shared
in
the
chat
and
it's
not
statute,
but
the
fiscal
note
says
that,
beginning
july
1
2023
these
officers
must
wear
an
activated
body
warrant
or
a
dash
cam
camera
dashboard
as
applicable.
So
there
will
be
based
on
the
language
and
the
fiscal
note.
It
seems
like
a
mandate
for
better.
A
D
D
A
I
think
in
our
current
social
climate,
it's
important
to
highlight
the
importance
of
community
policing.
I
think,
with
the
city's
strategic
plan
in
mind
and
themes
around
enhancing
the
vibrancy
of
our
downtown
area.
It's
really
important
that
we
support
maintain
if
not
expand
the
zone.
Team
stevie
talked
about
cushing
park.
A
Impact
team
is
gonna,
play
a
role
there
and
I
need
to
complete
this
paragraph
about
all
health,
but,
objectively
speaking,
when
the
chief
told
me
that
the
return
on
investment
is
350
000,
I
found
that
to
be
pretty
notable.
So
it's
good
for
the
city's
finances,
and
it's
also
good
for
for
the
community
and
the
people
who
interact
with
our
police
officers
so
well
I'll
bust
out
some
language
here.
But
those
are
the
three
specific
areas
and
then
this
area,
that's
highlighted,
joel.
A
A
A
D
B
A
B
F
This
might
be
a
case
for
the
old
ward
tact.
If,
if
we're
replying
to
perceived
attacks
with
this
line,
maybe
we
should
address
those
perceived
attacks
and
just
say
you
know:
well,
there
have
been
taught
while
there
has
been
widespread
talk
in
various
communities
about
defunding
the
police
and
then
finish
with
the
sentence,
because
it
just
kind
of
hangs
there
lingers
randomly
as
if
we're
addressing
something
that
doesn't
really
fit
with
anything
else.
Right
now.
Okay,.
E
I
think
what
we've
written
every
all
the
paragraphs
preceding
this
statement
and
you
know
clearly
states
how
we
think
that
the
city
could
evaluate
the
police
department's
budget.
I
do
wonder
if
this
maybe
gets
a
little
political
in
a
way
that
may
be
unnecessary
for
this
forum.
Do
we
need
to
make
this
statement
in
a
way
that
it
isn't
already
made
in
the
previous
paragraph.
D
A
D
You
have
whatever
discussion
about
you
know
whatever
you
want
to
have,
but
I
just
I
don't
want
to
shoot
warner's
and,
if
comes
like
an
amazing
opportunity
such
that
you
know
somehow,
there's
an
organization
through
arapahoe
county
is
going
to
start.
You
know
answering
calls
with
social
workers
as
a
primary
things
like
that.
If
we
have
an
opportunity
for
such
a
thing,
I
don't
want.
D
A
Don't
apologize,
it's
okay
and
then
finally,
we
should
draft
a
strong
summary
conclusion
statement,
so
these
were
just
some
ideas
that
I
came
up
with.
If
you
guys
can
add
to
this
great
and
then,
if
someone
wants
to
draft
the
conclusion,
great
I'll,
try
to
you
know,
jump
in
there
as
well
and
draft
something,
but
I
think
it
it's
nice
to
speak
to
some
good
decisions
that
have
been
made,
especially
in
recent
months.
D
F
D
B
F
B
A
D
F
D
E
I
don't
know
how
good
of
a
chair
I
will
be.
I
know
oftentimes.
Unfortunately,
my
job
has
prevented
me
from
being,
as
engaged
as
I
would
prefer,
but
I'm
also
happy
to
help
out
in
any
way
that
I
can
also
would
note
that
it
says
you
can't
serve
more
than
two
consecutive
terms,
so
steve
there's
still
an
opening
for.