►
From YouTube: City Council Regular 06 Feb 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
You
and
just
for
the
record
council
member
Russell
has
advised
me
that
her
daughter,
unfortunately,
is
dealing
with
some
health
issues,
so
she
needed
to
travel
in
order
to
be
by
her
side.
I'd
ask
that
we
keep
her
in
our
thoughts
and
prayers
as
we
move
forward.
Moving
on
to
agenda
item
five,
that
is
consideration
of
minutes
of
previous
session
I,
would
entertain
a
motion
at
this
time.
F
A
You
moving
on
to
agenda
item
six.
This
is
recognition
of
scheduled
public
comment.
The
deadline
to
sign
up
to
speak
for
scheduled
public
comment
is
Wednesday
prior
to
our
meetings
through
the
city
manager's
office.
Only
those
who
meet
the
deadline
can
speak
in
this
section.
This
is
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
address
City
Council.
There
is
an
expectation
that
the
presentation
will
be
conducted
in
a
respectful
manner.
Council
may
ask
questions
for
clarification
at
the
end
of
the
statement.
However,
there
will
not
be
any
dialogue.
Please
limit
your
presentation
to
five
minutes.
A
Our
first
speaker
this
evening
is
Mark
Swanson
Inglewood
resident
here
to
address
council
regarding
code
enforcement,
as
mr.
Swanson
here
tonight
did
not
seeing
him
this
evening,
we're
to
move
on
to
our
second
speaker
that
is
Jason
Zachary
Englewood
resident
here
to
address
council
regarding
decorum
beavin.
Mr.
Zachary
good
is
here
tonight.
G
My
name
is:
Jason,
sorry
I'm,
a
proud,
Englewood
community
member
and
have
lived
here
for
the
last
12
years.
There
are
so
many
great
things
going
on
in
this
city:
I've,
never
seen
as
much
energy
and
community
spirit
here
before
right
now,
and
is
this
reason
among
others
that
I
am
making
a
desperate
plea
for
the
unity
on
the
City
Council?
G
My
experience
leads
me
to
believe
that
each
council
member
sits
in
a
position
where
they
feel
they're
right,
I'd
like
to
remind
everyone
that
many
times
being
right
is
far
less
important
than
doing
right
for
Englewood.
In
this
case,
as
our
elected
officials,
you
are
the
face
of
the
city
and
are
asked
to
model
the
behavior
we
expect
out
of
the
best
of
our
citizens.
I
was
very
disappointed
to
watch
video.
The
previous
council
meeting,
where
most
members
did
not
demonstrate
this
type
of
behavior.
G
You
as
a
council,
have
a
tremendous
opportunity
to
lead
at
a
moment
when
Englewood
has
a
number
of
powerful
forces
in
its
favor.
Now
is
the
time
to
think
bigger
about
what
our
unique
and
incredible
community
can
be.
Please
help
our
city
manager,
Eric,
Keck
and
the
rest
of
our
amazing
community
realizing
more
or
realize
more
of
the
potential
it
holds
instead
of
letting
personal
agendas
obstruct
the
process.
I
look
forward
to
council
collaboration
focused
on
common
goals
to
benefit
all
of
Englewood.
Thank.
A
H
A
I
I
could
even
counsel
the
recent
motion
by
counsel
was
very
concerning
in
this
regard.
There's
been
all
this
focus
among
counsel
that
the
mayor
serves
a
will
of
the
council.
More
importantly,
Council
serves
the
will
of
his
constituents,
and
some
of
you
seem
to
understand
this
more
than
others,
which
is
very
concerning
as
well
and
interesting
ly.
Enough
fom
Joe
is
one
of
the
best,
if
not
the
best
example
of
this.
So
as
much
as
many
of
you
on
this
group
want
to
keep
the
issues
private
they're,
not
that's.
I
Why
there's
open
meeting
and
open
record
laws
the
only
reasons
that
were
really
stated
to
try
to
oust
mayor
Jefferson
was
the
state
of
the
city
address
and
how
meetings
are
handled
and
other
than
that
it
was
opposition
and
defensive
stance
or
just
your
silence,
I
implore.
Those
of
you
who
have
not
spoken
to
state
your
position
now
the
public
deserves
it.
They
deserve
to
know
where
you
stand
on.
I
This
I've
got
a
saying
that
I
live
by
and
it
says
it's
not
personal,
its
business
and
I
think
that's
very
important
for
you
guys
as
well
once
again,
not
necessarily
seeing
Matt
do
all
of
you.
The
mayor
is
really
an
anchor
and
a
symbol
of
the
city.
If
you
will
so
uprooting,
this
really
violates
the
integrity
and
the
trust
on
the
city
as
a
whole.
I
I
can
think
of
another
city
anchor
or
symbol
that
was
uprooted,
and
that
was
two
years
ago
when
you
guys
would
like
to
dear
rid
of
the
fire
department,
and
if
you
haven't
notice,
the
citizens
haven't
stopped
talking
about
it.
So
just
imagine
if
you
went
through
with
this,
what
would
happen
with
less
than
eight
months
until
the
re-election
of
the
mayor
I'm,
not
sure
why
now
we
need
to
create
turmoil,
it
seems
incredibly
unnecessary.
I
So
I
implore,
you
be
thoughtful
and
conscious
about
the
decisions
you
make.
The
the
attempted
coup
that
was
had
here
was
none
of
these
I
look
forward
to
seeing
all
of
you
work
together
to
support
the
will
of
the
constituents
and
not
just
your
own
agenda.
That's
not
why
you're
here
remember
you're
up
there,
because
all
of
us
voted
you
in.
Don't
forget
that.
Please
thank.
A
You
Thank
You
Lucy,
if
any
questions
from
Council
for
you,
mr.
Lucca
Miller,
seeing
none
I'll
come
in
or
I'll.
Thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking
this
evening.
Our
next
speaker
is
Casandra
luck.
Miller
Inglewood
resident
will
address
Council
regarding
the
attempted
removal
of
the
mayor
good
evening,
mrs.
lucky
Miller.
J
So
Cassandra,
like
Camila
im2,
8,
5,
6,
South
Lincoln
Street
I,
wanted
to
discuss
the
attempt
at
replacing
Jose
mayor
of
Englewood
I
believe
that
there
was
not
enough
just
cause
or
evidence
with
what
I've
seen
so
far
to
have
that
sort
of
an
maneuver
made.
But
what
really
disturbed
me
more
so
was
how
the
issue
was
conducted
itself.
I
think
that
it
was
done
in
a
way
that
wasn't
exactly
logical
and
moral.
It
was
just
such
a
sudden
thing
to
be
done.
J
I
would
expect
that
if
something
so
big
is
uprooting,
the
mayor
would
be
done
that
you
would
see
something
that
was
previously
mentioned
in
the
public
meeting
or
written
saying
Joe.
This
is
the
issues
that
we're
having.
We
want
you
to
do
a
B
and
C
by
blank
date
or
we're
going
to
have
to
go
ahead
and
do
a
vote
on
this
I.
J
You
really
have
to
be
able
to
have
more
time
to
deliberate
and
have
knowledge
of
it
and
time
for
reparations
to
be
made
and
not
in
just
you
know,
private
conversations,
but
something
that's
announced
publicly
so
that
everybody
knows
ahead
of
time,
and
so
it
kind
of
after
that
meeting
I
felt
a
little
bit
of
trust
mistrust,
because
it's
just
disturbing
to
think
well
how
much
communication
on
other
matters
is
potentially
not
occurring.
What
kinds
of
things
do
parts
of
council
know
and
not
know
if
they're
not
all
talking
to
each
other?
J
What
need
is
there
to
be
so
brash
about
important
decisions
and
when
you're
thinking
of
acting
on
anything
in
the
city?
Why
is
there
not
a
bunch
of
really
compelling
evidence
that
you
can
stand
behind
before
you
decide
to
make
any
kind
of
a
decision
in
the
city?
I
know
that
the
mayor
serves
with
the
will
of
council,
but
I
know
that
council
serves
the
public,
and
so
everything
that
council
does
is
public
and
it
should
be
known
with
council
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
J
The
mayor's
definitely
part
of
our
city
image
and
it
kind
of
creates
a
feeling
of
insecurity
if
we
could
just
play
like
musical
mares
instead
of
musical
chairs
with
them.
It
makes
us
look
like
we're
not
very
good
at
making
decisions
or
that
there
is
a
lot
of
fighting
amongst
ourselves
that
we're
not
handling
ourselves.
Well,
so
I
feel
like
unless
it
really
had
to
be
done.
It
has
to
be
planned
out
and
executed
very
carefully.
J
That
says,
why
worry
about
a
speck
in
your
friends
eye
when
you
have
a
log
in
your
own
hypocrite
I,
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
starting
to
think
with
ourselves
before
we
point
the
finger
at
other
people
and
that
we're
just
very
delivering
careful
and
all
the
decisions
that
we
make.
In
conclusion,
thank.
A
You
mrs.
Luke,
oh
my.
Let
me
see
if
council
has
any
questions
for
you
this
evening,
seeing
none
all
thank
you
for
coming
in
speaking
this
evening.
Our
next
speaker
is
Gavin.
Luca
Miller
in
good
rezident
will
address
counsel
regarding
the
attempted
removal
of
the
mayor
good
evening.
Mr.
Lacombe
Miller.
K
A
A
L
Good
evening
Cohan
Dickerson
2835
South
Pennsylvania
to
start
I
would
like
to
apologize
to
mr.
Tillett,
from
my
presence
at
the
seminar
which
she
felt
single-handedly
prevented
it
from
being
productive,
I
loved
the
seminar
and
I
am
sorry.
You
didn't
get
anything
out
of
it
and
to
mr.
Yates.
You
can
do
what
you
want
to
do,
but
it
is
not
particularly
level-headed.
L
L
Why
are
you
worrying
about
the
speck
in
somebody
else's
eye
before
you
get
rid
of
the
beam
out
of
your
own
police?
Note
that
if
those
of
you
who
hold
no
townhall
meetings
regularly,
even
at
all
on
any
issue
before
the
city,
if
you
did,
maybe
you
would
learn
how
your
constituents
felt
and
therefore
reduce
criticism
and
bolster
support
for
re-election.
For
example,
title
7
was
brought
forth
the
council
by
one
of
jealous
constituents
revealing
problems
that
negatively
affect
the
lives
of
citizens
and
especially
that
person's
family.
To
that
issue,
because
mr.
L
comer
said
around
August
2016,
there
were
approximately
a
hundred
sex
offenders
and
50
approximately
were
identified
as
subject
to
eviction.
I
did
a
quarter
request,
which
turned
into
many
Cora
quest
and
clarifications
I,
finally
got
a
spreadsheet
and
some
memos.
The
data
has
some
significant
errors,
but
the
following
is
inescapable.
L
Conclusion
and
I
will
provide
to
you
all
the
information
that
I
received
from
them
as
soon
as
I
get
it
set
and
clear
51
were
listed
as
registered
with
one
note:
it
is
being
cleared
whatever
that
2:32
had
convictions
prior
to
the
end
of
2006
and
presumably
offenses
committed
before
September
18
2006
of
the
remaining
18.
There
was
registration
almost
every
year
after
22
2006
and
even
one
on
November
of
2016.
L
It
is
hard
to
tell
from
the
data
provided,
but
knowing
some
of
the
registrants,
at
least
to
have
been
long-term
residents
or
and/or
homeowners
in
Inglewood
prior
to
conviction
and
registration
5.
There
are
no
sexually
violent
predators
registered
in
Inglewood
6
per
another
memo
from
police,
21
listed
or
subject
to
eviction,
though,
from
the
data
that
is
not
substantiated.
L
Only
mr.
brach
Howsam
was
called
and
told
he
would
be
getting
a
letter
of
eviction.
Only
mr.
Brockhouse,
you
are
making
a
revision
to
title
7
that
will
accomplish
nothing
at
least
not
for
mr.
brach
housen
or
any
resident
of
Inglewood.
It
is
manifestly
unfair
to
evict
anyone
who
has
been
allowed
to
establish
residence,
whether
1
month,
1
year,
10
years
or
20
years
in
Inglewood,
with
no
other
basis
than
a
bad,
unfounded
ordinance
being
enforced.
Long
after
residency
was
established.
I
have
found
personal
healing
and
researching
this
issue
and
getting
to
know
mr.
L
Brockhaus
and
and
others
in
his
same
circumstances,
I
have
joined
Susan,
Walker
and
other
advocates
in
this
fight
for
justice.
Title
7
needs
to
be
repealed,
if
only
because
it
is
misused
to
punish
ex
post
facto
if
the
judges
have
not
restricted
the
residences
of
sex
offenders,
why
do
four
or
five
of
you
think
it
necessary?
Much
of
the
vitriol
and
disrespect
that
has
been
running
around
this
city
stems
from
this
issue.
I
pray.
You
all
consider
the
facts
and
reject
your
biases
and
anger
and
fear.
L
Opposition
is
a
good
thing
to
make
sure
all
views
are
considered.
In
all
facts
weighed,
there
is
not
substantial
reason
to
keep
Title
7
in
any
form
nor
to
try
to
unseat
the
mayor,
especially
when
four
of
you
get
to
control
the
vote.
So
you
do
what
you
please,
regardless
of
the
mayor,
any
opposition
or
any
criticism.
A
soft
answer
turns
away
wrath.
Mayor
Jefferson
is
particularly
good
at
that
I
for
one
was
quite
proud.
He
walked
out
in
the
face
of
such
disrespect.
L
What
he
said
in
the
process
was
accurate,
not
disrespectful,
consider
all
the
times
the
majority
had
broken
decorum,
disrespected
other
council
members
and
citizens.
The
one
time
the
mayor
showed
anger
is
a
very
good
thing.
Dealing
with
three
of
you
is
like
herding
cats.
You
gave
him
little
choice.
I.
Imagine
that
if
Mother
Teresa
had
to
put
up
with
the
majority
on
this
council,
she
would
have
cursed
like
a
sailor.
Patience
and
fair
dealing
has
its
limits.
L
A
M
Well,
she
sure,
good
evening,
mayor
Jefferson
Council
in
our
city
manager,
my
name
is
Ida
Mae
nickel
I
live
at
47
40,
south
lepen
Street
I'll
probably
be
leaving
a
little
bit
of
my
comment
out
because
I'll
go
over.
If
I
read
it
all,
there
is
much
turmoil
in
the
last
few
years
with
the
loss
of
our
city,
our
city's
financial
reserves
losing
a
fire
department
and
infrastructure
to
be
replaced
and
many
other
incidents
have
shaken
our
city.
M
I
quote
from
a
small
portion
of
Michael
Norton's
writing
in
the
January
19
edition
of
the
Ingold
Herald.
Look
for
your
inner
calm
during
stressful
times,
both
large
and
small.
The
smallest
incidents
can
throw
us
into
a
tirade.
We
get
so
binded
by
the
perceived
crisis
of
the
moment.
In
the
situation
we
lose
our
tempers
fly
off
the
handle
and
say
things
we
will
probably
regret
later.
In
any
case,
it's
not
what
happens
to
us
or
around
us.
It
is
how
we
respond
to
what
is
happening
to
us.
M
Mr.
Norton
wrote
a
wonderful
article
of
wisdom,
I
just
briefly
of
what
I
mentioned,
and
it's
the
wisdom
for
all
and
I
recommend
that
everybody
look
back
at
the
Herald
and
read
that
article
I
personally
believe
that
in
our
every
change
in
society,
our
core
values
and
principles,
we
stand
for
do
matter,
I
believe
they're,
a
member
of
our
Council
city
staff,
employees
and
us.
The
citizens
of
this
community
have
a
responsibility
to
strive
for
excellent
and
respect
for
each
other.
M
When
you
disagree,
because
our
personal
convictions
on
every
side
can
obstruct
work,
that
needs
to
be
done
in
our
city
and
using
your
own
skills.
Do
not
let
the
convictions
that
are
different.
Allow
you
to
not
work
together.
Now,
let's
see
some
of
the
positive
things
that
is
happening
in
our
city.
Our
fire
department
is
better
now
than
it
was
before
in
our
young.
Men
are
coming
back
to
Englewood
to
work
mr.
Keck
and
our
new
city,
our
new
theater
manager,
has
implanted
implanted
a
new
management,
skill
or
new
man.
M
It's
a
new
management
style
and
programs.
Along
with
our
staff,
our
City
Council.
Our
employees
have
benefited
our
city
immensely
in
the
last
few
years.
Our
council
and
city
manager
have
a
vision
for
saving
our
Englewood
history,
which
will
bring
much
value
to
our
city.
We
have
many
new
families
moving
into
Englewood
and
they
will
be
able
to
learn
our
historic
legacy.
I
go
to
some
of
the
chamber,
camber
gem
chamber
commerce
meetings,
and
it
is
amazing
the
number
of
businesses
that
are
moving
back
into
England
Randy
pianist
director.
M
The
council
has
worked
hard,
bringing
the
chamber
up.
Mr.
Keck
and
staff
are
working
hard,
and
there
are
many
positive
things
happening
in
our
city
that
we
can
be
very
proud
of
so
Thank
You,
council
members,
staff
and
employers
and
for
all
the
work
and
effort
you
do
in
the
city's
behalf.
I
would
like
to
share
with
you
the
values
that
have
served
as
a
source
of
strength
for
the
Avon
Company,
which
still
do
today
a
Vaughn's
values
date
back
to
its
founding
1886
1886
and
grew
from
birth.
M
Belief
is
a
cornerstone
of
empowering
associates
to
assume
responsibilities
and
to
be
the
very
best
they
can
be
believe
in
someone
and
show
it,
and
that
person
will
move
mountains
to
prove
your
right.
Integrity
should
be
the
hallmark
of
every
associate
in
setting
and
observing
the
highest
ethical
standards
and
doing
the
right
thing
will
fulfill
a
duty
of
care
not
only
to
our
representatives
and
customers
in
the
communities
we
serve,
but
to
our
colleagues
at
ourselves.
Respect
helped
us
to
value
differences,
to
appreciate
each
person,
each
person
for
her
or
his
unique
qualities
through
SPECT.
M
We
bring
our
full
potential
to
each
person.
Trust
means
we
want
to
live
and
work
in
an
environment
where
communications
are
open,
where
people
feel
free
to
take
risks
to
share
their
points
of
view
and
to
speak
the
truth
as
they
see
it,
trust
people
to
do
the
right
thing
and
help
them
to
understand
your
underlying
your
underlining
reasoning
and
philosophy,
and
they
won't
disappoint.
M
A
N
Kathleen
Bailey
Inglewood
citizen
of
26
years
I,
stand
here
tonight
to
speak
out
an
outrage
at
the
unprecedented
attempt
to
remove
and
replace
Joe
Jefferson.
As
mayor
last
City
Council
meeting,
whether
mayor
Jefferson
agrees
or
disagrees
with
councilmembers
or
citizens
bringing
forward
their
issues
or
concerns,
Mayor
Jefferson
has
consistently
and
professionally
extended
time
and
deference
to
all.
He
is
boomin
one
of
the
few
consistently
positive
professional
faces
representing
our
city
at
our
City
Council
members
meetings.
N
If
it
were
not
for
the
astute
action
of
Councilwoman
Russell
mayor
Jefferson
would
have
been
stripped
of
his
mayoral
position
by
Gillette,
Olson,
Yates
and
Martinez,
with
a
4
to
3
vote
as
they
blindsided
Jefferson
with
an
attempted
coup
at
the
end
of
last
City
Council
meeting.
Otherwise
I
would
be
seeing
tonight
mayor,
Jill
it
and
Mayor
Pro,
Tem,
Olson
and
city
management
and
department.
Heads
would
now
have
to
staunch
the
aggressive
yes
men
as
the
leading
face
at
City
Council.
N
In
addition
to
their
already
existing
majority
vote
mayor
Jefferson,
stunned
outrage
at
this
cowardly
blindside
was
justified.
The
silent,
the
seniors
council
members,
Rick,
Gillette
and
Linda
Olson
mistakenly
believed
that
by
being
strategically
silent,
why
they
let
their
junior
members,
Yates
and
Martinez,
initiate
the
coup
that
they
could
easily
misleading
with
citizens.
To
believe
that
they
were
just
that.
N
Sadly,
under
the
pressure
mayor,
Jefferson
then
did
not
allow
Councilwoman,
Russell
or
or
Barrentine
to
express
their
strong
valid
concerns
about
this
attempted
coup,
thereby
silencing
the
voices
of
the
Inglewood
citizens
who
voted
for
Russell
and
voted
for
Barrentine
to
represent
them.
This
was
the
exact
goal
of
this
coup
attempt
this
just
say
yes
and
don't
ask
questions.
N
Rubber-Stamp
governance
practiced
by
councilmembers,
Rick,
Dillon
and
Linda
Olsen,
since
2009,
and
now
also
by
Yates
and
Martinez,
is
exactly
why
utility
director,
Stu
fond
and
Tom
Brennan
knew
they
could
violate
the
health
and
safety
code
act
and
Engle
was
Owney
GOP
regulations
and
just
arbitrarily
stockpile
hazardous
material,
honor,
Allen,
water,
filtration
plant
site
in
total
disregard
to
Health
and
Safety,
and
with
no
concern
for
any
challenge
or
any
question
from
City
Council.
This
just
say:
yes,
don't
ask
questions.
Governance
is
why
our
budget
is
driving
towards
bankruptcy.
N
Why
developers
are
set
to
make
millions
why
existing
infrastructure
lags
why
contracts
are
hastily
made
rather
than
thoroughly
often
leave
in
Inglewood
unprotected,
and
why
the
marijuana
industry
was
in
complete
control,
establishing
their
own
city
ordinance
and
setting
their
own
maximum
percentage
sales
tax
they
will
ever
have
to
pay
on
their
own
City
on
their
own
millions
and
future
profits.
This
just
say:
yes,
don't
ask
questions.
N
Governance
is
why
our
average
English
citizens,
in
our
average
Inglewood
homes,
were
allowed
to
be
declared
and
identified
as
a
deterrent
to
the
goals
set
out
in
management
and
councils
beloved
comprehensive
plan.
Just
look
up
at
this
dais
and
says
it
city
management
at
the
left.
All
of
you
are
the
public
face
of
our
city,
and
you,
council,
are
our
sole
governing
body.
Real
governing
is
never
easy
and
it
is
not
done.
Councilman
Jill
it
on
next
door.
A
O
My
name
is
Helene
home
I
live
at
333,
South
maked
street
number,
706
Angola
Colorado
I
want
to
congratulate
the
previous
speaker.
She
hit
every
point
beautifully.
She
sees
the
picture.
I
was
not
only
appalled
by
the
attempt
to
remove
our
current
mirror.
I
was
embarrassed,
all
of
you
sitting
there
and
making
judgments
that
will
leave
that
present
and
future
generations
of
Englewood,
acting
without
the
knowledge
of
proper
procedures
and
lacking
common
courtesy
and
respect
that
you
claim
you
need
to
attract
new
businesses
and
residents.
O
Do
you
really
believe
people
will
spend
thousands
of
dollars
in
the
community
where
the
governing
body
is
immature
and
vindictive
to
vary
the
various
member
who
helped
them
get
in
office?
That
loyalty
for
those
who
do
not
know
whom
I
am
referring
to
I
met
Steve
Yates
and
Rick
Gillick
at
an
e-tag
organization
which,
by
the
way,
was
started
by
Loretta
Barrington
and
Matt
Crabtree,
both
Laurette
and
Matt,
along
with
other
members
of
ACOG,
helped
Beverly
Cummings
and
myself
established,
saved
Englewood
Parks
and
get
the
petition
on
the
ballot.
So
mr.
O
Geller,
you
recommended
to
place
a
library
on
parkland,
it's
not
possible
without
a
vote
of
the
people.
Where
were
you
contrary
to
what
Linda
Olson
had
to
say
concerning
her
trust
in
the
department
employees
to
handle
matters?
They
are
employees
and
do
not
have
voting
authority.
We,
the
people
of
Inglewood,
did
not
hire
them.
However,
we
elected
you
to
be
our
governing
bodies
and
we
are
trusting
in
you,
however,
shakily
to
make
the
right
judgments
based
on
complete
information.
O
O
O
All
of
the
as
at
this
time,
I
am
demanding
an
open
apology
to
Mayor
Joe
Jefferson
to
fellow
council
members
and
to
the
citizens
of
anga.
Would
this
issue
was
brought
up
in
an
open,
City
Council
I
do
not
accept
any
type
of
attempted
apology
in
an
in
a
private
session
study
session.
It
was
brought
up
in
open,
City
Council
and
it
needs
to
be
addressed
in
open,
City
Council's
and
put
to
rest.
O
A
P
It's
my
understanding
that
council
will
be
conducting
a
first
reading
of
a
proposed
modification
to
the
current
sex
offender
residency
restrictions.
It
is
also
my
understanding.
The
proposed
modification
seeks
to
change
the
prohibited
distance
from
2,000
feet
to
1,000
feet,
I'm,
not
sure
who
council
is
intending
to
placate
with
such
a
modification.
P
However,
when
the
time
comes
to
vote,
I
heard
counsel
to
reject
the
modification
primarily
for
the
following
two
reasons:
one:
there
is
no
evidence,
scientific
or
otherwise,
that
sex
offender
residency
restrictions,
whatever
the
distance
make
anyone
safer
and
two
sex
offender
residency
restrictions,
serve
no
positive
purpose
and,
in
fact,
end
up
doing
more
harm
than
good
in
place
of
the
proposed
modification.
Irons.
I
urge
council
to
eliminate
entirely
the
sex
offender
residency
restriction
ordinance.
P
We
know
now
that
the
sex
offender
residency
restriction
restriction
issue
has
been
argued
in
the
courts.
However,
there
was
no
clear
resolution:
on
the
one
hand
the
Colorado
Supreme
Court
found
there
is
no
conflict
between
state
law
and
Inga
woods,
ordinance
34.
However,
the
dissenting
opinion
went
on
to
state
in
part
and
I'll
quote
various
parts
of
the
dissenting
opinion.
One
such
a
ban
would
impede
the
state's
comprehensive
regulatory
scheme
for
sex
vendors
to
the
domino
effect.
P
Consideration
flagged
by
the
district
court
has
caused
for
alarm
and
underscores
the
conflict
attendant
to
ordinances
like
Engel
woods
3,
while
Inca
would
understand,
understandably
may
think.
The
best
option
for
its
citizens
in
dealing
with
sex
offenders
is
to
simply
banish
them.
The
state
of
Colorado
does
not
have
that
opinion
for
most
sex
offenders
will
at
some
point
return
to
the
community
and
there
must
be
a
place
for
them
to
live.
The
state
therefore
has
established
an
elaborate
framework
of
laws
to
address
that
inevitable
return.
P
5
ordinance
34
hinders
the
state's
comprehensive
system
and,
finally,
the
conclusion
of
the
dissenting
opinion
is
that
ordinance,
34
and
local
sex
offender
residency
bans
in
general,
materially
impede
and
therefore
operationally
can
foot
with
the
state's
sex
offender
scheme.
Well,
just
because
Inglewood
can
impose
sex
offender,
residency
restrictions
doesn't
mean
they
should
it
behooves
council
to
adopt
and
embrace
the
philosophy
of
the
car
out.
General
Colorado
generally
is
general
assembly.
Here's
what
they
say
in
the
preamble
to
16
11.7
101
in
the
Colorado
Revised
Statutes.
P
The
Colorado
Supreme
Court
said
you
can,
but
it
also
went
into
great
detail
to
describe
how
ordinance
34
flies
in
the
face
of
Colorado
statutes
regarding
sex
offender
management,
accountability,
Colorado
has
a
systematic
process
of
evidence-based
practices.
Evidence-Based
practices
to
manage
this
population
Englewood
sex
offender,
residency
restrictions
are
based
on
emotion
and
we're
created
ten
years
ago.
Out
of
fear,
anger
and
panic,
there
is
no
need
for
Englewood
to
be
an
island
here,
embrace
what
the
state
of
Colorado
has
established.
P
P
A
C
P
A
Q
Q
Of
government,
the
politicians
in
Washington
fight
with
each
other
has
other
state,
and
even
here
in
our
city
home,
sometimes
it's
really
hard
to
get
the
work
done
with
all
the
distractions
and
the
commotion
got
me
to
thinking.
Has
this
happened
before
I
found
out
that
in
our
city
it
has
happened
before
again,
disclaimer
I'm
not
recommending
this
solution
for
Englewood
in
2017
Englewood
is
a
rough
and
tough
place
in
the
early
1900's.
It
was
described
in
the
newspapers
as
seven
saloons,
a
grocery
store
in
to
sporting
houses.
Q
Saloons
and
road
houses
flourished
a
saloon
called
bars
opened
on
the
3400
block
of
South
Broadway,
a
gambling
den
called
the
Idlewild
to
operate
it
on
Hampton,
a
half
block
east
of
Broadway.
The
sheriff
ordered
the
doors
closed
on
Sundays
after
he
was
pressured
by
community
groups,
but
he
allowed
the
back
doors
to
be
kept
open,
so
activities
could
continue.
As
usual.
There
were
shootings
and
knifings
happening
happening
regularly.
Fancy
women
walked
the
streets
gamblers
and
sharpies
separated
the
Fort
Logan
soldiers
from
their
pay.
Q
Soapy
Smith
played
the
shell
game
on
Broadway,
public
drunkenness
and
brawls
were
common.
Some
of
the
working
women
were
injured.
The
newspaper
called
the
area,
the
Bowery
of
the
West
after
the
section
in
New
York
City,
one
of
the
Colorado
historians
called
us
a
since
bourbon
many
of
the
citizens
felt
that
Englewood
should
not
continue
to
be
one
of
the
roughest
places
in
Colorado.
They
decided
to
hold
an
election
and
create
a
new
City.
Englewood
was
incorrectly
incorporated
in
May
of
1903.
Q
The
group
that
wanted
to
keep
things
the
same
called
themselves.
The
citizens
party,
their
candidate,
was
Tom
Skerritt
at
the
founder
of
our
city.
They
found
that
gambling
houses
and
bars
and
brothels
were
very
entertaining
and
profitable.
They
wanted
no
rules
at
all.
The
group
that
wanted
to
clean
things
up
was
called
the
good
government
ticket.
Their
candidate
was
Jacob
Jones.
He
wanted
to
clean
up
the
city
and
make
it
family-friendly.
He
was
a
prohibitionist.
Q
The
feelings
were
running
high
on
both
sides.
As
the
election
approached
on
the
day
of
the
vote,
Inglewood
called
Fort
Logan
to
send
over
some
MPs
to
make
sure
that
the
soldiers
did
not
interfere
with
the
voting.
Voters
were
challenged,
fraud
was
alleged.
Voter
intimidation
was
a
gang-up
Jones
won
by
five
votes
157
to
152.
Q
Then
they
had
their
first
city
council
meeting
the
opposition
disrupted
things
as
much
as
they
could.
At
that
first
meeting
they
made
accusations
and
criticized
and
complained
and
made
threats.
The
new
government
began
passing
laws
that
first
day
the
bars
would
close
on
Sunday.
No
women
would
be
allowed
to
frequent
the
bars
the
sheriff
was
higher
than
the
jail
built
about
a
month
later,
when
mirror
Jones
was
meeting
with
the
Denver
Water
Department
one
person
got
up
and
talked
so
much
that
nothing
got
done.
Q
A
R
My
name
is
Susan
Walker
I
live
at
275,
south
J
Street
in
Denver
and
I
direct
an
organization
called
Coalition
for
sexual
offense,
restoration,
I,
must
say.
I
also
was
abhorrent
of
what
happened
when
I
turned
my
computer
on
late
at
night
after
the
I
believe
it
was
the
last
City
Council
meeting
and
saw
the
the
outcry
against
mayor,
Jefferson
and
I.
R
R
Ironically,
some
of
these
men
owned
homes
of
their
own
others
had
families
who
were
willing
to
take
them
in
many,
had
jobs
and
could
pay
rent,
but
they
were
sex
offenders
forced
into
homelessness
by
a
complex
web
of
zoning,
ordinance
prohibiting
them
from
living
within
2,500
feet
of
a
school
part,
playground,
daycare
or
school
bus
stop
in
Miami's
densely
populated
metropolitan
area.
Few
residential
dwellings
were
compliant
with
the
law.
What
began
with
good
intentions
quickly
escalated
into
a
crisis
that
continues
today.
R
R
A
domino
effect
can
quickly
result
when
neighboring
towns
pass
comparable
legislation
in
order
to
prevent
exiled
sex
offenders
from
migrating
to
their
neighborhoods
people
say
other
cities
already
have
them,
and
if
we
fail
to
act,
then
we
put
a
big
target
on
ourselves
as
being
a
desire
desirable
place
for
sex
offenders
to
reside
this
picking
excerpts
out
of
this,
because
it's
it's
so
good.
The
legacy
of
any
felony
conviction
often
includes
employment
obstacles,
denial
of
public
benefits,
including
housing,
decreased
educational
opportunities,
estrangement
from
family
and
friends
and
disenfranchisement.
R
The
unique
stigma
of
the
registered
sex
offender
status,
however,
coupled
with
residence
restrictions,
can
obstruct
community
reentry
even
more
profoundly.
By
the
way,
there
are
five
pages
of
references
on
this
paper.
Five
pages
well
documented
importantly,
new
longitudinal
research
has
found
that
sex
offense
recidivism
risk
read
declined
significantly
over
the
years
that
individuals
remain
in
the
community
sex
offense
free.
In
fact,
low-risk
sex
offenders
commit
new
sex
crimes
at
rates
below
the
general
criminal
offenders,
in
other
words,
criminals
with
no
sex
crime.
History
are
reinforced
of
sequential
offense,
more
often
than
low-risk
convicted
sex
offenders.
R
R
Youngsters
are
more
likely
to
be
molested
by
a
trusted
person
who
is
acquainted
with
them
and
their
families.
All
sex
offenders
do
not
pose
the
same
degree
of
risk
and
even
among
those
with
minor
victims,
less
than
half
meet
the
criteria
for
the
diagnosis
of
pedophilia,
which
requires
an
enduring
primary
or
exclusive
sexual
interest.
R
A
S
Ferriss
and
I
live
in
England
masters,
fair
enough.
Thank
you,
sir
ten
years
you
know
took
us
to
get
you
guys
up
here.
No,
we
fought
against
some
pretty
evil
forces
in
Englewood
to
be
able
to
get
this
done.
We're
proud
of
you
guys.
Okay,
all
of
you
really
been
a
long
time
coming,
but
we
do
have
a
few
issues
here
on
the
3400
block
of
a
coma
there.
S
S
Thinking
about
the
long
term
use
of
for
the
people
in
England
when
we're
getting
messed
around
with
that
kind
of
money
on
that
little
bit
of
property
that
we
have
in
this
city
now
the
people
on
the
other
side
of
Broadway
are
losing
their
parking
place
for
the
restaurants
and
the
businesses,
and
that's
it's
just
okay
and
no
big
deal.
It's
very
upsetting
I
can't
believe
this
I,
don't
like
speaking
in
public
I,
don't
like
coming
down
here.
You
guys.
S
We
worked
a
long
time
to
get
you
guys
in
here
and
we're
real
happy
with
you.
Okay,
we
need
to
get
this
stuff
going
though
you
know
what
we
see
now
is
is
a
turning
in
the
economy
and
all
these
these
plans
have
been
laid
out
for
10
years
in
advance,
and
all
this
stuff
are
possibly
coming
to
an
end,
we'd
like
to
find
out
what
the
rental
rate
is
on
a
new
barn
that
to
build
up
at
the
top
of
our
flood
used
to
be.
S
You
know
if
they're
having
a
problems
renting
it
right
now,
are
your
decisions
that
you're
making
now
going
to
do
the
same
thing
for
the
rest
of
the
city
of
Englewood.
That
happened
right
down
the
street
down
here:
I
just
drove
up
and
down
the
streets
down
here
to
see
all
the
vacant
places
about
it
about
a
third
are
still
vacant
now
years
and
years
ago
they
built
this
Walmart
complex
in
the
big
place,
it's
next
door
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff.
All
these
grandiose
plans.
S
Ten
years
later,
then
a
third
of
these
places
are
still
for
rent
and
we
need
to
start
looking
at
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
more
fiscal
responsibility
for
the
future.
And
if
a
committee
is
deciding
this
stuff
in
five
years,
so
they're
gonna
be
out
working
a
different
job
and
have
no
dog
in
this
fight
or
a
horse
in
this
race
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
So
this
is
what's
going
to
happen
to
the
long
term
of
Inglot.
Is
somebody
purposely
trying
to
bankrupt
this
city?
S
This
stuff
is
ugly
bad
and
we're
not
happy
with
this
stuff.
Are
we
gonna
end
up
with
low
income?
Is
it's
going
to
be
all
section
8
housing?
They
say
no
right
now,
but
who's
gonna
back
that
up,
you
know,
are
you
gonna
put
in
a
whole
block
full,
low-income
housing,
where
nobody
has
any
parking?
Everybody
hangs
around
out
in
the
alley
drinking
beer
all
day,
long
smoking
a
little
crack
that
it's
that
what
the
long-term
plans
for
englidh
are
really
unhappy
with
this
stuff.
S
If
you
guys
need
help,
if
these
guys
are
screwing
us
on
that
property
over
there,
let
us
know
we'll
get
all
the
city
into
it.
People
together
will
come
down
here
and
fill
that
place
up
with
trash
or
whatever
we
need
to
do.
You
know
that
one
thing
is,
you
know:
we've
been
real
good
in
this
country
for
a
real
long
time,
and
now
we
got
a
little
bit
of
taste
of
freedom
with
Donald
Trump,
okay,
we're
not
giving
it
up,
and
we
almost
we
almost
put
the
most
evil
individual.
T
S
The
way
and
I
know
all
these
in
real
intelligent
people
that
run
all
these
committees
and
all
this
stuff
really
great.
But
you
have
to
look
at
the
track
record
of
how
these
people
have
run
the
city
of
England
across
the
street
from
a
shop
at
the
3300
block
of
Broadway,
there
used
to
be
a
whole
block
full
of
businesses.
A
bunch
of
committees
got
together,
tore
all
those
blocks
down,
built
a
two-story
barn
over
there.
S
What
an
eyesore
I
had
to
spend
a
million
dollars,
making
a
wheelchair-accessible,
and
then
they
gave
it
to
King
Soopers
to
tear
it
down.
I'm
sorry,
but
you
guys
the
track
record
with
you
geniuses.
It's
not
good,
I'm,
sorry,
but
it's
out
there
in
front
of
us.
Okay,
that's
the
way
it
is.
You
know
we
have.
We
lost
the
fire
department.
S
A
U
Good
evening
my
name
is
Stephen
Ward
I
reside
at
46,
20,
South,
Delaware
Street
and
before
I,
get
into
my
comments
on
counsels
performance
tonight,
I'd
like
to
publicly
thank
the
members
of
the
Denver
Fire
Department
and
Denver
Health
at
the
end
of
December.
We
had
a
medical
emergency
in
my
house
and
from
the
time
that
I
picked
up
the
phone
to
the
time
the
ambulance
arrived.
Excuse
me,
I'm,
getting
a
little
broken
up.
U
It's
very
emotional
took
about
three
minutes
and,
while
I
still
would
prefer
the
full
local
control
that
Engle
had
had
before
I
was
satisfied
with
the
services
that
Denver
provided
and
I.
Don't
think
anybody
could
argue
that
less
than
three
minutes
is
anything
other
than
excellent
performance.
I'm
grateful
that
they
were
there
and
I'm
thankful
for
the
prompt
response,
and
fortunately,
catastrophe
was
avoided
for
anyone,
except
for
my
wife's
health
insurer.
U
Conduct
I
strongly
encourage
this
council
to
schedule
time
to
read
through
the
Charter
together,
starting
with
article
three,
which
covers
the
legislative
body
charter,
paragraph
24,
presiding
officer,
says
after
each
general
municipal
election,
the
council
shall
select
or
elect
rather
from
their
own
number,
a
mayor
who
will
be
the
presiding
officer
entitled
to
vote.
You
shall
have
no
veto
power
and
shall
serve
at
the
will
of
the
council.
You
shall
be
recognized
as
a
head
of
city
government
for
all
ceremonial
purposes
and
shall
execute
and
authenticate
legal
instruments
requiring
his
signature.
U
As
such
official
end
quote,
moving
on
from
the
Charter
to
the
Municipal
Code,
we
find
the
laws
governing
council
and
council
behavior.
Those
are
in
title
1,
chapter
5
of
the
Englewood
Municipal
Code.
Well,
five
members
of
the
council
shall
constitute
a
quorum
at
any
regular
or
special
meeting
thereof.
U
U
A
member
once
recognized
shall
not
be
interrupted
when
speaking
unless
it
we
to
call
him
to
order
or
herein
otherwise
provided
if
a
member,
while
speaking,
we
call
to
order,
he
shall
see
speaking
until
the
question
of
order
be
determined
and
if
in
order
shall
be
permitted
to
proceed
in
quote
I
watched
the
video
of
the
last
meeting.
I
saw
one
council
member,
interrupt
another
council
member
simply
to
call
the
member
who
had
the
floor.
I
quote
coward.
U
Well,
I.
Don't
think
that
being
a
coward
violates
the
city's
Charter
Englewood
Municipal
Code
I
know
that
violating
councils
decorum
and
interrupting
a
member
who
has
the
floor
are
both
outright
violations
of
the
ordinances
that
every
member
of
this
council
took
an
oath
to
support
further
in
the
manner
of
addressing
the
council.
Also
in
title
in
Chapter
five
call
it
all
remarks
shall
be
addressed
to
the
council
as
a
body
and
not
to
any
member
thereof.
It
is
the
presiding.
U
That's
at
the
end
of
the
quote:
it's
the
presiding
official,
the
presiding
officials
duty
to
uphold
this
requirement
because
it's
part
of
our
city's
law.
If
members
of
the
council
disagree,
you
can
pass
an
ordinance
to
change
that
requirement.
Note
that
the
same
section
of
law
also
requires
everyone
who
addresses
council
to
state
their
address.
U
So
in
closing,
I'd
like
to
thank
you
all
for
your
time
tonight
and
for
listening
to
my
five
minutes
as
a
homeowner,
a
resident
in
Englewood
I
have
no
intent
to
leave
until
I
went
Powerball
and
I
remain
hopeful
as
such
that
seven
members
of
this
council
can
all
put
your
differences
aside.
Forgive
any
past
transgressions
perceived
or
actual
and
learn
to
work
together
until
and
beyond
the
next
council
election.
C
U
For
the
purpose
of
clarity,
councilmember
Barrentine,
the
section
of
the
England
Municipal
Code-
is
1
5
2
9,
that's
the
full
reference
addressing
the
council.
Thank
you.
Any.
A
Further
questions
for
mr.
Ward
seeing
none
I'll,
thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking
this
evening,
we
move
on
to
agenda
item
7.
That
is
recognition
of
unscheduled
public
comment.
Speakers
must
sign
up
for
the
unscheduled
public
comment
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
This
is
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
address
council.
There
is
an
expectation
that
the
presentation
will
be
conducted
in
respectful
manner.
Council
may
ask
questions
for
clarification
at
the
end
of
the
presentation,
but
there
may
not
be
any
dialogue.
A
V
V
Some
may
think
of
those
who
have
committed
a
sexual
offense
as
not
like
us,
they're
different
they're.
Worse,
they
have
bad
values,
are
they're
predators
or
they're.
Pedophiles
I,
probably
felt
that
way.
Myself
and
I
would
probably
have
chosen
not
to
have
these
people
I
had
them.
In
my
neighborhood
before
2003
2003
was
the
year
that
my
son
was
charged
and
adjudicated
for
a
sexual
offense
on
a
minor.
V
The
offense
occurred
on
an
overnight
with
the
girl's
mother,
with
whom
my
son
was
having
a
relationship
because
the
event
began
in
the
evening
and
ended
the
next
morning.
He
was
charged
and
sentenced
to
two
crimes
rather
than
one
as
it
occurred
on
two
different
dates.
It's
called
a
pattern
and
he
was
given
a
double
sentence.
Instead
of
eight
years
in
prison,
he
was
given
16
years.
V
V
V
I
can't
say
how
difficult
meeting
these
many
requirements
may
have
been
had
not
been
allowed
to
live
with
us
his
family
in
Arvada.
He
was
indigent.
His
list
of
friends
were
short
his
goal
to
continue
that
lifestyle
is
his
life.
Most
people
who
commit
sex
offenses
are
not
the
stereotypical
monsters.
We
envisioned.
Research
shows
that
reaches
the
recidivism
rate
is
very
low.
There's
no
evidence
that
moving
them
out
of
a
certain
city
or
jurisdictions
keep
children
safer.
There
are
simply
no
basis
for
residency
restrictions.
A
T
Triplet
48:10
South
Fox
Street
in
the
summer
of
1988,
my
parents
moved
the
family
to
Inglewood.
I,
have
to
admit
I
had
a
bias
against
Inglewood,
because
that
was
the
summer
before
my
freshman
year.
So
here
I
am
a
freshman.
Getting
ready
to
go
into
high
school
and
I
have
to
leave
the
high
school
that
I
thought.
I
was
going
to
attend
all
the
friends
that
I
was
gonna,
have
the
community
and
go
to
Inglewood
I
had
never
even
heard
of
Inglewood
High
School.
So
to
me,
I
was
mad.
T
I
was
upset,
I
was
angry,
I
had
zero
pride
in
England,
because
I
knew
nothing
about
Inglewood.
My
freshman
year
continued
that
way.
The
whole
year
I
hated
englidh
I
was
miserable.
I
was
angry.
I
was
upset
at
zero
pride
in
Inglewood.
During
my
sophomore
year.
A
teacher
took
some
special
interest
in
me.
She
showed
me
what
Inglewood
had
to
offer
and
Inglewood
has
a
lot
to
offer
over
the
course
of
the
next
three
years.
I
gained
a
lot
of
pride
in
England.
I
was
proud
to
be
a
citizen
of
England.
T
As
a
matter
of
fact,
in
1992
I
was
a
high
school
mascot.
Why?
Because
I
had
pride
in
Inglewood
I
can
only
imagine
how
difficult
your
jobs
as
council
and
mayor
are
I
realize
that
you
have
lives
outside
of
this.
You
have
jobs.
You
have
families,
you
have
other
obligations.
I
can
only
imagine
how
difficult
it
is
to
find
time
to
give
for
everything.
That's
here,
unfortunately,
I
would
have
to
say
that
over
the
last
eight
months
that
I've
been
attending
council
meetings,
I'm
very
disappointed
at
the
fact
that
I
see
zero
progress.
T
T
A
W
I
think
Englewood
has
a
ton
of
really
good
things
going
for
it
and
I
think
it's
very
important
for
us
to
have
leadership.
They
can
up
steer
us
in
that
direction.
So
we
can
have
a
successful
future.
I
know.
Jo
will
continue
to
lead
in
a
professional
and
responsible
manner,
and
he
has
my
full
support
and
I'm
excited
to
see
what
the
future
has
in
store
behind
his
leadership
and
I.
W
Just
think
that
it's
important
reiterating
a
lot
of
the
comments
have
already
been
said
that
everyone
from
council
people
with
the
city
to
constituents
that
we
can
all
work
together
and
not
have
small
little
things
that
that
can
blow
up
and
really
hinder,
Englewood,
advancing
and
continuing
to
move
forward.
Thank
you
thank.
A
X
My
name
is
Diana
Brock
Heusen
I
live
at
48
Kim
South
Fox
Street
in
Englewood
Colorado
I
wanted
to
talk
about
that
1,000,
but
just
to
see
just
didn't
seem
roll
that
you
guys
are
going
to
talk
about
later.
I
think
something's
wrong
with
it,
because
I
know
that
you've
mentioned
that
you're
really
worried
about
your
friends,
children,
your
neighbors
children,
your
own
children,
your
grandchildren,
I'm
concerned
about
them
too.
X
So
I
thought
about
the
1,000
distance
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
gonna
work,
so
we've
got
the
two
thousand,
which
is
where
we're
at
now.
So
maybe
that's
where
we
should
leave
it,
but
my
boys
were
sexually
abused
at
boys
club
when
they
were
young.
Would
that
distancing
rule
have
protected
them?
I,
don't
think
so.
So
maybe
that's
not
good
enough.
Maybe
we
need
to
banish
them
from
Englewood
altogether.
X
Maybe
that
would
be
the
answer
if
they
weren't
even
here
anymore,
but
what
if
they
have
to
go
to
a
hospital
there's
children
there
they
have
to
shop
at
grocery
stores,
there's
children
there
there's
so
many
other
places,
Boy
Scouts,
Girl,
Scouts,
gosh
it
right
now.
I
can't
think
of
mine.
I
have
written
down
a
lot
of
things.
I,
just
don't
want
to
look
at
it.
I
just
want
you
to
know
that
they're
people,
they're
human
they've,
went
through
hard
times
and
they're
being
monitored.
X
They've
went
through
therapy,
they
went
through
probation,
they
went
through
the
ankle
bracelets.
They
went
through
probation
people,
police
coming
to
our
home
and
being
able
to
go
through
our
house
24
hours
a
day
anytime.
They
want
to
to
make
sure
that
these
guys
are
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
be
doing.
I,
don't
know
if
anybody's
told
you
that
or
not,
but
it's
a
part
of
it
and
there's
a
lot
more.
That's
a
part
of
it.
X
A
Y
Y
A
Z
As
mayor
said,
I'm
Ripert,
Epona's
I
live
at
six
nine,
nine,
seven
Raab
Street
in
Arvada
and
I've,
been
before
you
I
think.
Before
a
couple
of
times
and
I'm
speaking
about
the
the
ordinance
the
residency
restrictions
at
first
I
was
going
to
open
with
I.
Think
the
value
that
we
all
share,
be
we
old
are
young,
black,
are
white,
red
or
blue
or
independent
is
the
value
of
safety.
Safety
is
paramount
for
families,
for
communities
and
for
our
nation.
Z
So
it
was
a
little
distressing
to
hear
some
of
your
constituents
talk
about
issues
where
they
felt
that
you're
not
considering
the
safety
of
the
citizens
of
Englewood.
But
safety
is
what
I
want
to
talk
about.
Any
kind
of
footage
restriction
is
arbitrary
and
not
based
on
any
research.
You've
received
a
lot
of
research
and
studies
that
that
indicate
that
setting
residency
restrictions
do
not
make
your
community
safer
when
in
fact,
you.
Z
Data
from
your
neighbors,
who
have
been
convicted
of
a
sex
crime,
paid
their
debt
and
reintegrated
into
Englewood
for
years
with
no
new
sex
crime,
that's
pretty
good
data,
I
would
say
so.
In
fact,
you
have
an
ordinance
that
provides
a
fake
security
blanket
for
your
citizens,
that's
not
fair
to
them,
and
by
doing
so,
you
have,
as
public
servants
and
neighbors
forced
your
neighbors
to
flee
their
city
limits,
abandon
their
social
network
that
is
critical
to
their
reintegration,
so
please
repeal
any
residency
restrictions.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
AB
Gideon
council,
brian
brausen,
48:10,
south
walk
street
I
got
some
questions
in
regard
to
what
you're
going
to
read
into
record
tonight
with
the
1000
foot
residency
restriction.
So
does
that
stop
a
registered
sex
offender
from
working
at
a
daycare
from
working
next
door
to
a
daycare?
Does
it
stop
a
sex
offender
from
walking
along
the
sidewalk
by
a
schoolyard?
AB
AB
AB
He
does
temporary
jobs
works
for
a
temp
service.
His
assignment
that
day
was
out
of
school.
He
went:
did
your
magic
circles
protect
that?
Did
your
magic
circles
stop
him
from
going
to
that
school?
No!
Did
anybody
even
know?
No,
you
know
how
God
discovered
his
peers,
his
parole
officer,
his
treatment
program.
That's
how
it
was
discovered.
That's
where
the
intervention
came.
No
Magic
Circle
was
there
to
protect
that
school.
AB
AB
AB
AB
A
You
mr.
burrows,
let's
see
if
council
has
any
questions
for
you
this
evening,
seeing
none
all
thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking
tonight.
Our
next
speaker
is
Pat
Harris
here
to
speak,
also
about
magic
circles
or
ordinance.
34,
title
7
and
on
deck
is
sorry.
You've
had
the
same
as
the
above
and
the
above
person
to
scratch.
Their
issue
out
so
and
on
deck
is
violet
pierced
hi.
AC
I'm
Pat
Harris
I
live
at
63
16
South
Benton
Way
in
Littleton.
Housing
is
important
for
everybody,
not
just
those
of
us
who've,
just
not
been
convicted
of
a
sex.
Offense
and
I
was
thinking
about
mrs.
Brock
house
and
saying
that
her
sons
were
molested
at
a
boys
club.
Should
we
get
rid
of
the
boys
clubs,
so
you
know
I
think
we
need
to
consider
the
fact
that
this
sort
of
safety
and
for
these
people
to
succeed
they
need
to
have
that
opportunity.
AC
You
make
a
much
safer
community
if
you
get
people
in
housing
living
with
their
families,
with
the
support
around
them
their
friends.
A
lot
of
these
people
are
very
lonely
and
I
when
they're
by
themselves.
I
think
they're.
If
danger
is
a
problem
they're
more
dangerous
if
they
don't
have
anyone,
but
if
they
they
live
in
community
they're
gonna
be
a
lot
safer
for
you
and
for
all
of
us.
Thank
you.
A
AA
I
live
at
42
43
East
Cadiz
in
Centennial
I
was
interested
in
your
residency
restrictions
because
I
work
in
the
area
of
adoptions
and
I
think
residency
restrictions
are
a
slippery
slope.
The
agency
that
I
work
with
has
contracts
with
Haiti
and
Liberia
for
placing
children
for
adoption
I
think
it
was
that
brought
my
concern.
I
can
only
confirm
so
much
of
the
information
that's
been
given
already
I.
Think
John
Oden
heimer
gave
a
number
of
statistics
that
I
I
think
are
very
valid.
AA
A
AD
Hi
I'm
Daniel
Mannion
I
live
on
the
3200
block
of
South
Washington
Street
in
district
1
I've
been
as
a
citizen
of
Inglewood
for
14
years.
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
comment
tonight
on
what
happened
during
the
councilmembers
choice
portion
of
the
meeting
that
took
place
on
January
17
2017
I
wanted
to
state
how
disappointed
I
am
as
a
citizen
of
Englewood
in
the
lack
of
professionalism
and
appears
to
me
unwarranted
actions
taken
by
councilmembers,
Yates
and
Martinez.
AD
During
the
meeting
where
councilmember
Yates
brought
to
the
floor,
a
vote
to
potentially
unseat
the
current
Mayor
Joe
Jefferson
I
was
present
during
that
meeting
and
the
study
session
a
week
later,
and
it
still
seems
very
unclear
to
me
why
such
an
extreme
and
unprecedented
action
was
considered
necessary
by
the
councilmember
Yates
and
quickly
supported
by
councilmember
Martinez.
Without
much
to
go
on.
It
seems
to
be
more
of
a
battle
of
personalities
over
any
direct
decisions
made
by
the
mayor
himself.
AD
Yates
and
Martinez
have
brought
up
in
private
I,
also
know
that
sometimes
disagreements
may
go
longer
than
many
wish
and
all
fairness
I'd
rather
see
the
council
take
time
to
make
good
decisions
and
review
all
the
information
available
over
erring
on
the
side
of
expedience
overall
I'm
hopeful
that
council
can
find
common
grounds
and
respect
each
other
enough
to
do
work
together
to
do
good
work
together
and
make
decisions
that
are
good
for
the
citizens
of
Englewood
I
know
their
job
isn't
easy,
but
the
job
you
signed
up
for
further.
This
is
a
job.
AD
Many
citizens
like
myself
and
trusted
our
votes
with
I,
know
I
entrusted
my
vote
with
several
of
you
that
reside
on
Council,
including
one
of
the
members,
have
supported
gate
to
motion.
I
really
do
appreciate
all
the
hard
work
that
you
do
and
hope
that
that
hard
work
can
be
funneled
into
funneled
into
a
more
productive,
positive
relationship
with
each
other.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
the
opportunity
to
share
my
thoughts
tonight.
Thank.
A
AE
8
6
out
the
comer
street
and
I
met
with
you
guys.
Our
group
met
a
few
months
ago
and
since
then
we
have
grown
to
105
members
now
I
feel
passionate
about
this
issue.
So
we
come
before
you
again
and
I
give
you
an
update,
and
so,
since
we
talked
to
you
last,
we
have
continued
as
I
said,
to
work
on
these
issues.
We
have
taken
workshops
with
Colorado
immigration,
immigrant
rights
coalition,
otherwise
known
as
circ
and
together
Colorado.
We
have
been
in
particular
working
with
Brendan
green
from
cert
who
met
with
us
privately.
AE
It
is
really
evident
that
many
people
now
are
afraid
and
Families
continue
to
be
torn
apart.
Unfortunately,
their
endangerment
starts
at
the
local
level,
with
local
authorities
sending
information
to
Immigration
and
Customs
Enforcement,
FBI
and
homeland
security.
The
sharing
of
information,
it's
not
actually
legal,
legally
required,
I
mean
at
the
local
level
according
to
circ
and
other
sources.
AE
The
powers
this
is
a
Tenth
Amendment
of
the
US
Constitution.
The
power
is
not
delegated
by
the
United
States
of
by
the
Constitution,
nor
prohibited
by
it
to
the
states
are
reserved
to
the
States
respectively
or
to
the
people
which
is
us.
While
our
group
continues
to
work
on
these
issues,
we
hope
that
you
might
to
think
about
how
we
can
work
together,
rooting
ourselves
in
compassion
and
humanity
to
keep
families
together,
where
possible
and
protect
immigrants
from
unfair
treatment,
such
as
inappropriate
detentions
and
deportations.
AE
The
Human
Rights
Watch
2009
report
Forrest
apart
estimates
that
20%
of
those
removed
were
a
longtime
legal
residents
and
majority
of
their
crimes
were
minor,
nonviolent
offenses,
often
starting
at
with
just
a
traffic
stop
as
Martin
Luther
King
jr.
said.
We
are
called
to
speak
for
the
weak
for
the
voiceless,
for
the
victims
of
our
nation
and
for
those
it
calls
enemy
for
no
document
from
human
hands
can
make
these
humans
any
less
our
brothers
and
sisters.
That's
all
I
had
to
say
thank.
AF
AE
AE
How
it,
what
we
think
is
that
is
kind
of
it's
a
double
sentence,
so
we
don't
believe
that,
yes,
you
just
let
criminals
do
whatever
and
then
they
you
know
everybody
lives.
Happily,
ever
after
they
and
there's
no
recourse,
there's
no
punishment.
We
don't
say
that
we're
saying
that
we
don't
we
don't
want
people
unduly
deported
or-
and
we
don't
want
people
to
live
in
fear
and
if
people,
sir,
if
people
do
a
crime,
what
happens
then
we
want
them
to
serve
their
time.
AE
What
happens,
though,
is
that
then
they
are,
they
are
have
a
double
sentence,
so
they
they
do
do
their
time.
Let's
say
they've
been
here
a
long
time
they
have
family,
they
have
kids
who's,
going
to
take
care
of
that
family
after
they
get
out
of
jail.
It
I
said
we
feel,
like
that's
a
double
punishment.
A
AG
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Kelly
Reynolds
I
live
at
1,300
Pennsylvania
Street
in
Denver
and
I'm
employed
with
the
Colorado
Department
of
Public
Safety
I'm,
the
staff
researcher
for
the
domestic
violence
offender
management
board
in
the
sex
offender
management
board.
However,
I'm
not
here
representing
them
tonight,
I'm
here
speaking
as
a
private
citizen,
I've
reviewed
both
what
John,
Oden,
himer
and
Michelle
gang
have
previously
presented
to
you,
and
so
some
of
this
might
seem
repetitive
in
a
way.
AG
I
know
that
you've
received
a
lot
of
the
research,
but
I
do
encourage
you
to
reach
out
to
me
after
this.
If
there
is
any
other
research
that
you
were
looking
for,
I
have
most
of
it.
Residency
restrictions
are
created
under
the
guise
of
promoting
public
safety,
while
on
paper,
residency
restrictions
may
appear
to
promote
public
safety.
Research
suggests
that
they
actually
do
the
opposite.
Hübner
adalah
found
that
residency
restrictions
have
little
to
no
effect
over
the
rate
of
sex
offender
recidivism
and
the
overall
effects
of
residency
restrictions
are
weakened
and
consistent
across
studies.
AG
Further
residency
restrictions
are
based
on
the
assumption
that
sex
offenders
will
offend
against
an
individual.
That
is
not
known
to
them,
which
we
know
is
not
true.
In
reality,
60%
of
sex
offenses
are
committed
by
someone
that
the
victim
knows
who
is
not
a
family
member.
So
someone
in
a
trusted
position
a
coach,
a
teacher,
a
babysitter,
a
daycare
provider,
someone
that's
close
to
the
victim,
30
percent
may
be
perpetrated
by
a
family
member
which
leaves
the
10
percent
that
may
be
perpetrated
by
a
stranger.
AG
So
the
stranger
danger-
that's
been
kind
of
promoted
through
federal
policy
is
not
as
prevalent
as
it
is
made
to
seem
at
both
individual
and
community
levels.
Research
suggests
that
there
are
collateral
consequences
related
to
the
implementation
of
residency
restrictions,
most
of
which
impact
the
housing
availability
to
offenders.
Research
is
particularly
clear
about
the
impact
of
these
collateral
consequences,
as
sex
offenders
with
stable
housing,
employment
and
positive
social
supports
are
much
more
much
less
likely
to
commit
a
new
sexual
offense
or
a
new
non-sexual
offense
when
residency
restrictions
are
imposed.
AG
These
strong
community
and
social
supports
strong
community
and
social
ties
are
broken
just
destabilizing.
The
offender
I
understand
that
tonight
I
understand
that
tonight
you're
considering
changing
the
residency
restriction
from
a
2,000
foot
area
to
a
1,000
foot.
This
change
in
distance
will
not
have
any
effect
on
the
years
of
research
which
supports
a
negative
efficacy
of
residency
restrictions.
There
is
no
research
that
suggests
benefits
of
residency
restrictions
that
have
been
made
by
moving
this
a
thousand
feet
closer.
It
is
not
a
compromise.
AG
It
is
not
a
departure
from
the
original
ordinance
with
a
residency
restriction
of
a
thousand
feet.
Offenders
who
still
face
dismal
housing
options,
alienation
and
potential
lack
of
social
support.
As
a
City
Council,
you
have
an
opportunity
to
make
a
decision
that
will
community
safety
for
Englewood
by
getting
rid
of
ordinance
34.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
AG
E
You
know
anymore,
my
another
question:
are
you
if
we,
if
we
pass
it
in
first
reading
tonight,
it
means
we
go
to
a
studies,
I
mean
a
public
hearing.
Will
you
be
here
that
night
to
present
again,
do
you
as
February
21st,
February
I,
believe
so?
Yes,
I
can
be
here.
Okay,
maybe
we
can
talk
afterwards
because
there's
some
things
I'd
like
to
have
on
the
record,
then
that
may
you
might
be
able
to
present
as
well
great.
AG
B
A
H
Jeremiah
Wilson,
we
opened
positive
vibes,
December
5th
I,
said
3398
South
Broadway,
when
we
came
in
today
just
to
introduce
ourselves
and
pledge
our
support.
So
far,
this
season
very
welcoming
and
they've,
been
very
resourceful
and
helping
us
gets
us
that
our
business
set
up
and
so
just
want
to
say,
hello,
introduce
ourselves
and
also
we
admire
the
passion
from
the
citizens
and
you
guys
as
well.
It
kind
of
excites
us.
So.
Thank
you
very
much.
E
H
C
H
The
corporation's
were
moving
in
and
we
were
having.
We
were
noticing
that
a
lot
of
the
small
businesses
were
going
out
of
business.
We
started
the
movement,
basically
support
your
local
stop
local.
You
know
spend
time
at
local
venues
and
things
like
that,
and
we
noticed
over
the
years
that
really
made
a
difference.
H
H
Our
biggest
thing
is
this:
if
we
run
a
business
in
a
city,
we're
collecting
resources
and
we
want
to
give
some
of
those
resources
back,
and
so
we
give
our
time
and
our
energy
to
make
our
community
a
better
place
to
live.
We
moved
to
Englewood,
we
plan
on
spending,
10
plus
15
20
years
I'm
living
here
and
running
a
business
here,
and
so
we're
just
excited
to
be
here.
It's
been
very
welcoming
and
yeah.
H
H
Out,
we've
got
a
hundred
plus
feet
of
a
building,
basically
there,
and
so
we
got
was
dug
from
the
Historical
Society
because
we
wanted
to
do
like
a
timeline
of
our
building.
We
have
a
hundred-year-old
building,
and
so
we
want
to
do
like
basically
a
mural
on
the
wall
from
the
beginning
stages
of
that
building
in
the
history
it's
gone
through
to
today,
and
so
that's
what
we
got
with
Doug
to
get
that
going
plan.
AI
On
doing
a
support,
your
local
anything
Englewood
version
and
I
already
have
the
logo
for
that
one
as
well
I
mean
actually
uses
the
Englewood
logo
as
the
oh
and
local.
So
it
looks
like
Englewood
Colorado,
so
we
want
to
get
that
started
and
start
kind
of
like
developing
the
idea
in
the
metro
area.
So
they
have
an
idea
to
come
down
here.
We
got
some
pink
big
plans
too.
So
thank.
A
You
well
welcome
to
the
city
of
Englewood
and
have
we
gotten
your
contact
information
from
the
city
manager's
office.
I
know
that
you
know
in
our
previous
discussion
about
some
events
making
and
some
things
with
your
guys's
plans
with
some
of
the
first
Friday
events.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
city
manager's
office
contacted
you
to
work
with
our
consultant
on
events.
Maybe
you
can
coordinate
or
just
giving
your
number
after
the
meeting
yeah.
Thank
you
or.
AJ
Good
evening
my
name
is
Carolyn
Turner
and
I
live
at
7508
Winfred
in
Parker
Colorado
I'll
start
by
saying
I
talked
to
one
of
the
council.
Women
in
Parker
and
I
asked
her
if
they
were
thinking
of
doing
any
residency
restrictions,
and
she
kind
of
looked
at
me
like
I
was
nuts
said.
Absolutely
not
we're
not
doing
anything
like
that.
So
I
think
you
guys
are
kind
of
on
an
island.
AJ
Think
I
think
you've
heard
all
the
reasons
why
it
doesn't
work
to
have
residency
restrictions.
I
can
go
over
them
again.
One
would
be
that
people
who
come
out
of
prison
they've
had
a
sex
offense
about
ninety
eight
of
them
never
reoffended,
and
we
got
a
number
of
what
that
2%
might
be.
It
was
five
people
of
those
five
three
of
them
was
because
they
had
not
registered
one
was
a
computer
and
the
other
was
a
non-invasive
I.
Don't.
AJ
But
so
these
people
are
not
scary,
all
they've
served
their
time.
They
just
want
to
go
back
to
life
and
get
a
life
back
and
they're,
never
gonna
reoffending
in
almost
all
of
them.
So
I
would
just
suggest
that
you
don't
want
the
headlines
to
say:
Inglewood
causes
homelessness
because
that's
what
these
residency
restrictions
do
and
the
newspapers
may
pick
up
on
that
and
say:
Inglewood
causes
homelessness.
You
know,
and
the
governor's
got
how
many
councils
going
to
try
and
help
homelessness,
so
this
is
very
counter
to
that.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
AK
Good
evening,
mr.
mayor
town,
council
members,
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
address
the
council
tonight.
My
name
is
Craig
Roth
and
I
live
in
unincorporated
Boulder
County
Colorado
I'm
a
volunteer
member
of
Koch
cosa,
which
is
circles
of
support
and
accountability,
a
volunteer
organization
that
works
with
long-term
sex
offenders
to
reunite
them
to
reintegrate
them
into
society
successfully
and
ensure
there
are
no
more
victims.
AK
AK
They
are
men
struggling
to
reintegrate
back
into
society
and
take
care
of
their
families.
5
feet,
10
feet,
500
feet.
A
thousand
feet
are
all
arbitrary
distances.
Do
not
make
anyone
less
safe
or
safer.
What
they
do
is
restrict
the
constitutional
rights
of
offenders
to
live
where
they
choose
to
live.
The
Ninth
Amendment
to
the
Constitution
states
that
there
are
other
rights
that
may
exist
aside
from
the
ones
explicitly
mentioned
in
the
US
Constitution,
and
even
though
they
are
not
listed,
it
does
not
mean
they
cannot
be.
It
does
not
mean
they
can
be
violated.
AK
Councilmember
Stephen
Eight's
you've
made
two
very
disturbing
statements
in
the
last
in
town
council
meetings
or
study
sessions
that
I'd
attended.
Your
first
comment
was
on
October
3rd
2016
at
one
hour,
35
minutes
on
the
record
when
you
said
when
a
person
when
has
a
person,
truly
paid
their
debt
to
society.
On
your
second
comment:
I,
don't
have
the
actual
words,
but
anyone
can
review
the
tape
meetings
to
discover
what
you
say:
I
believe
it
went
something
like
this.
How
do
we
decide
who
to
let
in
and
who
to
keep
out
mr.
AK
Yates
and
to
you,
the
town
council,
the
city
of
Englewood,
I,
say
this?
Your
job
is
not
to
punish
your
job
is
not
to
decide
who
can
and
cannot
live
in
their
community,
and
your
job
is
not
to
restrict
the
rights
in
any
way
of
any
citizen
of
our
United
States.
Your
job
is
to
ensure
that
the
rights
guaranteed
in
the
Constitution
of
the
United
States
are
available
to
all
people.
A
Thank
You
mr.
roughs
evening
counsel
has
any
questions
for
you
this
evening,
seeing
none
I'll,
thank
you
for
coming
in
down
and
speaking
to
us.
That
is
the
conclusion
of
unscheduled
public
comment.
I'm
moving
on
to
council
response
to
public
comment
when
anybody
like
to
kick
us
off
I
do
have
a
few
comments.
I
would
like
to
make
first
on
the
immigration
issue.
Let's
see
mr.
A
A
You
know
they
asked
me
if
we
were
a
sanctuary
city
and
what
our
current
policy
was
and
I
replied
saying,
although
we're
not
considered
a
formal
sanctuary,
city
I
understand
that
we
do
not
inquire
about
people's
immigration
status
while
doing
normal
police
work.
However,
other
agencies
do
when
these
folks
are
in
the
court
system
for
other
crimes.
A
I've
been
working
to
try
to
get
some
more
clarity
on
our
internal
policy
here
on
these
items
and
saw
a
good
statement
recently
from
of
policy
from
the
I
believe
it
was
the
Metro
Chiefs
or
the
statewide
Chiefs
Thank
You
Colorado
Association
of
Chiefs.
We
shared
that
with
police
and
I
hope
that
our
chief
can
make
a
similar
statement
regarding
our
own
internal
policy
very
soon,
so
we
can
get
some
more
clarity
and
where
we
are
on
this
issue,
to
get
it
in
writing
and
see
if
it
needs
improvement.
A
I'll
try
to
send
these
statements
as
soon
as
I
receive
them.
You
know
I
apologize
mr.
Keck.
If
you
could
send
that
statement
to
me
again,
I
tried
to
find
it
in
my
email
to
provide
to
this
member,
but
I
was
unable
to
do
so.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
resetting
it,
perhaps
the
council
as
a
whole.
We
can
all
get
an
idea
of
what
that
statement
was.
Yes,.
AL
This
letter
actually
was
adopted
by
our
police
chief,
who
sits
on
the
Colorado
Association
of
Chiefs
of
Police,
as
the
members
of
the
Colorado
Association
of
Chiefs
of
Police
have
recently
received
numerous
inquiries
regarding
regarding
how
our
police
agencies
work
with
federal
immigration
authorities
and
whether
or
not
we
anticipate
any
changes
to
our
procedures
regarding
immigration
enforcement.
Although
our
member
Chiefs
represent
dozens
of
diverse
Colorado
communities
with
varied
political
opinions
and
priorities,
we
are
in
agreement
that
immigrants
as
a
federal
responsibility
and
that
it
is
not
our
role
to
assist
with
deportation
efforts.
AL
Getting
involved
in
immigration
enforcement
would
be
outside
of
our
responsibility
and
mission.
It
would
have
a
chilling
effect
on
the
willingness
of
individuals
to
report
crime
or
assist
with
our
investigation
of
crime.
That
stance
most
assuredly
should
not
be
interpreted
to
mean
that
we
provide
sanctuary
to
those
who
are
violating
immigration
law.
Our
member
agencies
continue
to
comply
with
any
and
all
requirements
mandated
by
Immigration
and
Customs
Enforcement
to
include
working
where
their
county's
jails
to
share
information
on
the
national
origin
of
all
arrestees,
who
are
jailed.
AL
We
provide
logistical
support
whenever
asked
to
all
of
our
federal
partners
who
may
be
conducting
lawful
operations
of
any
kind
within
our
communities.
Additionally,
we
strongly
support
the
efforts
of
ice
to
arrest,
detain
and
deport
undocumented
individuals
who
have
committed
felony
crimes.
The
officers
under
our
command
do
not,
however,
check
the
immigration
status
of
individuals
with
whom
they
routinely
come
in
contact.
Nor
does
ice
expect
them
to
do
so
to
conduct
such
checks
or
sweeps
would
negatively
impact
the
willingness
of
individuals
to
cooperate
with
local
police.
AL
Moreover,
there
is
no
constitutional
requirement
for
citizens
to
provide
proof
of
immigration
status
when
contacted
by
police
officers
and
therefore
it
would
be
inappropriate
for
our
officers
to
make
such
inquiries
reports
the
results
of
such
inquiries
to
ice.
Very
simply,
the
members
of
the
Colorado
Association
of
Chiefs
of
Police
and
the
police
agencies
that
we
represent
comply
with
the
US,
Constitution
and
all
binding
statutory
and
case
law
on
this
topic.
Thank
you
for
that.
AL
I
had
I
just
had
a
conversation
with
chief
Collins
about
this
matter
the
other
day,
and
he's
indicated
that
again
he
participated
with
the
writing
of
this
statement
with
that,
the
organization,
the
Colorado
Association
of
Chiefs
of
Police
and
such
that
he
believed
this
would
be
sufficient.
However,
if
Council
directed
him
to
do
something
good
to
go
even
further,
you
know
within
the
bounds
of
what's
been
written
here.
He
would
he
would
work
upon
that.
Thank
you.
A
Would
like
to
move
on
to
folks
who
came
and
spoke
regarding
the
residency
restrictions
and
the
issue
that
we're
taking
up
tonight
on
first
reading
to
reduce
the
restriction
from
2,000
feet
to
1,000
feet.
I
would
like
to
remind
everybody
I
think,
as
other
members
have
already
that
we
have
set
this
for
public
hearing
on
February
21st.
A
A
You
city
clerk's
office
would
probably
be
the
most
appropriate
place
so
that
we
can
make
your
opinions
or
comments
as
part
of
the
record.
You
know,
I
will
say
that
you
know,
while
I
view
the
1,000
feet
is
less
restrictive.
You
know
I,
generally,
concur
with
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
are
made,
that
it
does
seem
arbitrary
and
and
not
sure
that
it
really
makes
our
community
much
safer
and
so
I'll
be
listening
very
closely
to
consider
how
to
vote
on
that
on
second
reading.
A
You
know
whether
that
improvement
makes
some
sense,
or
you
know
whether
I
would
just
support
a
repeal.
Finally,
on
the
mayoral
issue,
I
appreciate
everyone
who
came
and
spoke
this
evening.
You
know
at
this
time.
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
you
know
similar
as
we
talked
about
in
our
last
study
session.
A
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
I'm
committed
to
working
with
every
member
of
council
business
or
resident
for
the
best
interest
of
Englewood
I
believe
we
truly
are
getting
good
work
done
for
the
community,
despite
some
issues
and
I'm,
confident
that
we
can
work
through
these
issues
and
many
other
issues
in
the
future
councilmember
Yates.
Would
you
be
comfortable
taking
this
issue
now?
Perhaps
we
could
remove
this
and
move
on
with
the
rest
of
our
business
for
the
night.
Take.
I
AH
Let's
start
with
a
couple
of
things
here,
you
know
a
lot
of
folks
were
concerned
that
this
was
kind
of
a
rash
decision
on
my
part
to
call
for
a
vote
on
this.
This
is
a
discussion
and,
frankly,
I
wasn't
going
to
err
councils
dirty
laundry,
because
it
is
a
discussion.
That's
happened
among
all
of
Council.
All
of
Council
has
been
aware
of
these
discussions
for
over
a
year,
so
anyone
that
says
that
they
were
not
aware
of
it
frankly
are
not
telling
the
truth.
AH
AH
Everything
is
up
for
discussion
at
any
point
in
time,
grandstanding
happens
quite
frequently
when
people
don't
have
when
they
don't
like
what
another
council
member
is
saying,
they
bring
it
up
multiple
times
they
just
keep
on
hammering
and
hammering
it
and
hammering
it
up
here
we
do
need
to
follow
a
certain
water.
Certain
procedure-
and
we
do
have
counsel-
we
do
have
the
the
counsel
manual
of
city.
Excuse
me,
policies
of
policy
manual
of
City,
Council,
sorry,
and
that
kind
of
explains
how
we
do
this
when
it
comes
to
what
we
follow.
AH
It
is
not
Robert's
Rules
of
Order.
It
is
this
manual,
you
know.
So
when
you
guys
come
up
and
you
talk
to
us-
we're
not
supposed
to
lecture
to
you
or
tell
you
what
we
think
at
that
point
in
time,
we're
supposed
to
ask
a
question:
we
wait
until
this
time
period.
If
we
want
to
make
a
comment
back
if
we
keep
things
in
order,
my
hope
is
that
we
can
start
working
through
some
of
these
issues.
AH
You
know
with
ordinance
34
we
could
it's
been
on
the
table
for
a
very
long
time
with
our
about
the
variety
of
things
it
just
has
not
been
taken
care
of.
So
that's
my
real
intention.
It's
brought
it
up
to
the
front.
A
lot
of
people
have
gotten
upset.
A
lot
of
people
have
criticized
me
for
it.
Frankly,
only
one
person
has
came
to
me.
AH
AH
AH
So
that's
the
biggest
part
right
there.
Joe
and
I
have
had
some
discussions
on
how
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
forward
and
try
to
resolve
some
of
these
issues.
I
am
going
to
be
taking
a
class
on
how
to
conduct
meetings
and
the
proper
process
for
meetings
and
I.
Don't
know
if
Joe's
planning
on
doing
that
or
not
but
I
will
I
was
criticized
last
week
for
apologizing
for
not
informing
Council
at
a
council
meeting
what
was
impossible
for
me
to
apologize
for
not
informing
the
rest
of
the
city.
AH
So
I
meet
my
apology,
hindsight.
Maybe
I
should
have
said
something
more
to
the
community
about.
What's
going
on
and
I
apologize
for
that
aspect,
there
are
some
things
that
we'll
discuss
later
in
the
meeting
about
process
I've
had
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
residents
have
also
made
the
comment
that
the
apology
goes
both
directions.
AH
We
we
had
a
resident
here
that
came
up
and
talked
about
you
know
what
do
we
do
within
a
quorum?
This
sections
within
the
municipal
code,
it's
1,
5
2
for
his
past
in
1985,
and
it
has
to
deal
with
quorum
and
it
says
5
members
of
council
shall
continue
a
quorum
at
any
regular,
regular
or
special
meeting
thereof
in
the
absence
of
a
quorum,
the
presiding
officer
shall,
at
the
insistence
of
any
three
members,
present
compel
the
attendance
of
absent
members,
which.
AH
AH
B
AN
Right,
thank
you,
everyone
for
coming
tonight
and
thank
you
for
everyone
who
has
personally
reached
out
to
me
regarding
the
motion
that
took
place
last
council
meeting
we've
struggled
with
issues
on
this
council
since
our
very
first
meeting
together,
I'm
sure
some
of
you
are
aware.
These
issues
have
been
boiling
over
and
they've
been
kind
of
hindering
our
progress
to
move
forward
and
to
work
together
during
the
last
motion.
I
should
have
provided
more
information
as
to
my
thought
process
for
supporting
that
motion.
AN
AN
Think
we
have
a
really
good
opportunity
here
now
to
kind
of
start
again
and
start
fresh
and
continue
to
do
everything
we
can
and
commit
to
each
other
that
we
are
in
this
together
and
we're
gonna
do
whatever
it
takes
from
each
member
to
move
forward
to
work
together
and
do
what
we're
here
to
do,
which
is
make
decisions
for
the
city,
everyone
who
came
speak
about
organs.
34.
Thank
you.
I
know.
AN
Charles,
thank
you
for
coming
forward
with
your
immigration
question
and
if
the
information
provided
tonight,
if
you
need
additional
information,
let
us
know,
and
if
there
are
specific
things
you
would
like
us
to
research
or
kind
of
take
some
kind
of
action
on.
Let
let
us
know
specifically
and
we'll
kind
of
work
through
that,
together
into
the
new
business
owners
that
came,
welcome
and
thanks
for
joining
our
community.
C
I
hope
I'm
never
put
in
a
position
like
I
was
the
last
council
meeting
we
have
seen
this
council
needs
to
make
sure
that
they
understand
what
the
policies
and
procedures
are
in
the
Charter,
and
there
has
been
some,
in
my
opinion,
severe
misinterpretations
of
what
the
Charter
is
depending
on
somebody's
own
personal
agenda
and
how
they
wish
it
to
be.
What
we've
agreed
to
do
is
go
ahead
and
wait
for
the
new
City
Attorney.
C
Hopefully
she
comes
eventually
to
go
ahead
and
go
over
our
policies
and
procedures
and
how
we're
going
to
implement
what
we
as
a
council,
see
as
interference
direction
that
the
part
of
the
Charter
that
they're
reading
is
under
the
mayor
calling
or
the
city
manager
calling
a
special
meeting
and
compelling
there
is
nothing
in
the
Charter
that
requires
me
to
be
at
or
to
stay.
At
a
meeting
council
member
Olson
has
left
a
meeting
council
member
giladhiz
left
a
meeting.
Councilmember
Yates
is
left
a
meeting,
so
there's
nothing
that
could.
C
A
C
We've
already
decided
to
go
ahead
and
have
that
process.
When
the
city
attorney
comes,
we
can't
have
the
policies
and
procedures
and
put
that
onus
on
the
employees
to
go
ahead
and
direct.
How
Council
does
that
we
are
the
boss
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
setting
good
leadership
and
good
direction.
C
It's
unfortunate,
I,
don't
think
it's
unfortunate.
What
councilmember
Yates
said
about
that
that
all
of
council
knew
what
was
going
on
I,
don't
think
any
of
you
that
could
watch
that
tape
and
believe
that
councilmember
Russell,
myself
or
councilmember
the
mayor,
Joe
Jefferson,
knew
what
was
going
on
I,
don't
even
know
why.
That
needs
to
be
stated
that
way.
C
I
am,
however,
very
disappointed
that,
when
asked
as
promised
so
that
we
could
move
the
old
business
and
close
out
the
old
business
from
that
council
meeting
and
move
forward
that,
when
asked
to
remove
that
motion,
the
council
member
Yates
decided
not
to
do
it,
I
believe
we
should
have
done
that
prior
to
any
new
business
being
done
and
I
think
it's.
It's
discouraging
I
appreciate
the
new
businesses
that
have
come.
You
guys
are
doing
some
amazing
things
and
you're
already
branching
out
into
so
many.
C
If
you
already
know
Doug
Cohen
you're
already
and
in
good
stead
to
be
doing
this
I
share
some
of
mr.
Farris
I
share
some
of
your
concerns
on
what's
going
on,
and
some
of
that
I
would
like
to
get
some
additional
information
and
provide
you
with
some
additional
information
on.
What's
going
on,
I
think
we
can
kind
of
fill
in
some
of
the
blanks
and
figure
out
what
we're
doing
athlete
and
a
li
I
greatly
appreciate
your
concern.
C
You
have
attended
meetings
consistently
for
what
close
to
a
year
now
going
on
and
I
thought
it
was
well
spoken
and
I
appreciate
your
your
sharing,
what
you,
what
you
had
There
I,
hope
that
we
can
move
forward
and
that
this
doesn't
turn
into
what
I
think
that
last
study
session
was
justification
for
actions
of
this
council,
but
that
we
move
on
that.
We
work
together
that
we
learn
to
respect
each
other,
that
we
learn
how
to
agree
to
disagree
and
that
we'll
see
how
the
next
seven
months
ago.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AF
Joe's
cracks
me
up.
Everybody
loves
to
see
a
train
wreck,
but
you
know
just
I,
don't
know
if
you're
like
me,
but
I
see
a
car
accident,
a
gock
and
and
that's
kind
of
sort
of
been
what's
been
happening.
You
know
we
we
have
been
struggling
for.
You
know,
since
the
2015
election
with
you
know,
trying
to
get
some
things
together
and
try
to
move
some
things
forward.
However,
I
will
say
this
council
has
done
a
lot
of
work.
AF
We've
done
a
lot
of
great
things,
and
if
you
look
back
on
our
past
things
that
we
voted
on,
we
voted
on
some
amazing
stuff.
We
voted
on.
You
know
how
we're
gonna
afford
our
police
department.
We
voted
on
how
we're
gonna
be
in
the
community.
You
know
everybody
wants
to
focus
on
the
one
or
two
negative
things,
but
there's
hundreds
of
wonderful
things
that
have
been
going
on
that
this
community
has
a
right
to
be
proud
of,
and
I'm
excited
to
be
part
of
that.
You
know.
I
hope
that
we
can
remember
I.
AF
Someone
said
nothing's
moving
well
there's
tons
of
moving
forward
and
if
anybody
would
like
to
take
a
few
moments,
I'll
show
you
all
the
great
stuff.
That's
been
done,
so
you
know
we
seem
to
highlight
the
negative,
but
rarely
talk
about
the
positive.
What
I'm
going
to
tell
you
there's
a
bunch
of
positive
going
on.
Regarding
the
last,
you
know
a
few
weeks
there
I'm
amazed
at
some
of
the
comments
that
people
will
make.
You
know
some
people
criticize
you
for
saying
nothing
and
then
they'll
criticize
you
for
saying
something.
AF
You
know
the
end
if
you
do
damned,
if
you
don't
kind
of
thing
so
you
know
I've
tried
to
keep
my
calm,
it's
somewhat
minimal
and
then,
when
you
get
compelled,
please
say
something,
then
you
get.
Could
you
know
it's
so
where
we're
trying
to
work
through
this,
and
you
know,
I
I,
know
that
this
is
very
difficult.
One
of
the
things
that
a
couple
of
couple
issues
that
came
up
I
just
definitely
want
to
clarify.
As
mayor
pretend,
my
job
is,
if
the
mayor
leaves
I
become
the
mayor,
hope
that
doesn't
happen.
AF
We've
never
had
that
happen.
Until
last
time,
one
of
the
things
that
has
to
happen,
if
there's
a
motion,
we're
supposed
to
make
sure
that
there
was
enough
buttons
pushed
we're
done
with
that
vote.
So
some
of
you
saw
me
asked
the
city
clerk.
If,
if
we
had
the
boats
and
some
people
construed
that
as
to
something
else
and
you're
welcome
to
construe
it,
however,
you
want,
but
you
know
we're
required
to
make
sure
that
our
business
is
finished.
So
what
happened
is
because
I
wasn't
finished,
we're
going
to
finish
it
tonight
and
I.
AF
Think
it's
going
to
be
a
positive
outcome.
Mayor
and
I
have
we've
had
numerous
chats
and
talks
there,
there's
no
secret
of
things
that
he
and
I
have
talked
about
together
that
you
know.
I've
listened
to
his
struggles,
he's
listened
to
mine
and
we
know
that
there's
been
some
common
issues
going
on
that
we
both
would
agree,
say
we'd
like
to
see
different.
You
know
we.
We
hope
that
our
city
is
a
proud
city
that
can
look
and
say
you
know
what
our
our
government
really
does
have
the
best
interests
at
hand.
AF
You
know,
and
I
would
say
that
even
people
I
disagree
with
I
believe
that
deep
in
their
heart
really
want
to
do
the
best
for
our
city.
We
just
have
to
figure
out
how
we
can
do
it
a
little
more
way
that
is
more
professional
and
I.
Think
that
we're
going
to
get
there
but
I'm
excited
about
what's
happening
even
tonight,
with
issues
that
we're
going
to
be
putting
people
on
boards.
AF
Those
of
you
who
weren't
involved
in
our
recent
board
process,
so
we
had
so
many
applicants
for
our
boards
of
commission,
so
it
had
to
go
to
two
days
now.
For
me,
I
I
was
ill
and
hospitalized
those
times
so
I
got
to
miss
those
two
days.
I
wasn't
here,
but
I
know
that
they
struggled
for
hours
and
hours
and
hours
trying
to
get
great
people
to
serve
our
city
and
I'm.
AF
AF
So,
if
you'd
like
to
know
more
about
what's
going
on,
let
us
know
if
you've
ever
seen
any
of
my
writings
I
invite
people
to
call
me
directly
write
to
my
cell
phone
anytime
any
day
or
email
me
directly
and
I'll
gladly
meet
with
you.
There's
some
people
I've
met.
You
know
with
personally
we've
had
great
conversations
so
I
continue
that
offer
with
me
and
I
would
ask
if
you
have
an
issue
with
any
council
member.
AF
AF
E
It's
important
to
hear
these
things
that
we've
all
said,
I
think
some
assumptions
are
made
by
the
public
as
well
as
by
us
with
one
another,
and
one
of
the
assumptions
that
many
of
you
made
was
that
those
of
us
that
were
silent
or
silent
on
purpose.
We
got
silenced,
as
the
meeting
ended.
I
had
my
little
light
on
here
to
speak.
Wasn't
that
called
on
and
I
think
several
others
were
as
well.
E
I
would
have
gladly
have
said
what
I
wanted
to
say
that
night
I
think
it
would
be
better
given
where
we
are
at
this
point
to
take
the
stand
that
miss
Martinez
did
as
well.
I
think
it
has
been
a
toxic
group
for
quite
a
number
of
months.
It
has
spilled
over
in
many
ways.
I
have
to
remark
that
I
think
tonight.
E
The
comments
that
many
of
you
made
that
are
passionate
and
really
deeply
seated
in
your
hearts
and
minds
that
you
want
to
see
us
work
on
you
did
it
with
civility
tonight
to
some
level
that
I
hope
that
we
can
continue.
There
have
been
nights
where
that
has
not
happened
as
easily
and
tempers
flare
and
and
nothing
happens,
and
that's
the
role
of
us
up
here
to
make
sure
we
have
some
decorum
and
respect
for
one
another
as
well.
So
my
thinking
about
mr.
E
Triplett
made
a
great
comment
about
wanting
to
have
pride
for
the
city
and
I
think
there
is
I
for
one
want
to
see
that
as
well.
I
have
no
ulterior
motives
and
being
up
here
that
than
to
serve
the
city.
That
truly,
is
why
I'm
here
the
citizens
decided
you're
gone
tomorrow.
That's
fine
I
did
what
I
was
supposed
to
do,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
we
need
support
from
you
to
be
respectful
and
to
be
respected
and
I.
Think
that
would
help
us
to
create
a
new
culture.
E
This
council
unfortunately
started
out
and
its
very
first
night
with
the
decision
that
was
made
behind
back.
So
some
of
us
that
we
didn't
know
was
coming
either
and
no
apology
was
ever
made
and
we
never
got
beyond
that.
In
some
ways
we
repeated
some
of
that
over
time.
I
think
some
conversations
have
happened
that
have
been
really
clear
about.
What's
the,
what
are
the
issues
going
on
here
and
yet
nothing's
changed
and
so
I
think
perhaps
the
courageous
decision
was
for
mr.
Yates
and
miss
Martinez
to
actually
bring
it
up.
E
I
thought
it
was
a
very
inviting
conversation
that
he
proposed
to
us
to
have
a
conversation
up
here
and
talk
about
it.
It
got
circumvented
as
something
we
could
have
come
to
a
different
end
that
evening
than
the
one
we
did
so
I'm,
hoping
that,
by
the
end
of
the
meeting,
we
will
set
out
a
new
direction
for
how
we're
going
to
work
with
one
another.
Are
we
going
to
hold
each
other,
accountable
and
I?
Think
all
of
us
have
to
be
in
that
game?
E
AH
AH
The
the
interesting
thing
is,
is
that
the
person
that
it
was
accusing
me
of
that
has
left
twice
losing
quorum
for
Council,
just
up
and
left,
and
that
sort
of
stuff
just
just
has
to
stop,
and
in
fact
I
was
informed
that
the
first
time
that
that
she
served
on
council
that
she
did
that
also.
So
this
is
a
very
normal
tactic
that
has
been
used
and
I
really
would
greatly
appreciate
that
we
follow
our
own
procedures
and
if
we
have
discourse
that
we
discuss
about
it
instead
of
stomping
out
of
the
room.
C
C
We
need
to
be
transparent
about
what
we're
doing
I,
don't
think
that
the
suggestions
and
the
concerns
of
issues
being
brought
up
to
staff
and
questions
being
brought
up
to
staff
are
appropriate
to
be
handled
behind
closed
doors.
You
receive
our
packet
material
and
you
may
have
the
same
questions
that
we're
raising
or
you
may
have
brought
a
question
to
me,
and
somebody
else
may
end
up
with
that
same
question.
C
This
has
to
be
an
open
public
process,
we're
not
here
to
protect
staff
or
make
the
city
look
good,
we're
here
to
go
ahead
and
conduct
business
as
transparently
as
open
as
possible
to
let
you
know
the
information
that
we
are
making
decisions
with
again.
I
would
call
that
part
of
the
decorum
that
this
council
needs
to
have
is
to
stop
this
constant
undertone
of
accusations
if
you've
got
an
accusation
with
somebody,
I
would
appreciate
you
either
saying
what
happened
and
who
you
believe
violated.
C
It
then
constantly
having
this
shadow
going
on
as
if
something's
going
on,
and
you
never
have
to
prove
it.
You
never
have
to
prove
up.
What's
going
on,
I've
been
as
transparent
and
open
as
I?
Possibly
can
I'm
not
expecting
everybody
to
agree
with
me,
but
I
think
I'm
elevating
it
out
there
and
people
come
to
me.
I
get
more
information
and
I
believe
I'm
better
for
it.
C
I
have
laughed
a
meeting
before
after
the
mayor,
pro-tem
and
councilmember
Olson
left
an
executive
session
and
and
I
left
I
I
didn't
have
any
better
reason
for
them,
leaving
I
didn't
have
any
worse
reason
for
them,
leaving
it
the
process
had
fallen
apart
and
there
were
inappropriate
things
being
said
to
me
and
I'll
not
be
sworn
it.
So
I
left
the
meeting.
C
C
It
was
seconded
by
Rita
Russell,
and
it
was
voted
on
five
to
two
by
this
council
to
accept
that
to
go
back
a
year
later
now
and
say:
that's
the
reason
we're
having
problems
is,
is
only
to
continue
to
create
problems
if
we're
either
going
to
move
forward
or
not
and
I'm
getting
concerned
that
the
apologies-
and
this
is
becoming
more
defensive
and
not
moving
forward.
I
supported
the
mayor.
I
did
what
I
believed
was
the
right
thing
to
do,
and
I
would
do
it
again.
C
If
anybody
brings
up
something
like
that
back
door,
I
think
it
was
the
right
thing
to
do.
I
would
like
to
move
forward.
So
if
the
issues
that
I've
brought
up
and
I've
have
some
issues
too,
if
we
maybe
could
have
another
meeting
or
some
other
counseling
or
do
something,
but
if
we
don't
have
everybody
working
together
and
there's
just
going
to
be
this
kind
of
sniping,
we're
not
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
move
forward
I
for
one
am
willing
to
do
that
and
I
hope
tonight
ends.
It.
A
Appreciative
Brees
comments
here,
I,
you
know,
I,
think
that
we
all
have
a
desire
to
put
this
issue
to
bed
and
move
forward
with
the
city
business
for
the
city
of
Englewood.
You
know,
I,
I,
think
that
we
can
pick
this.
You
know
I,
think
we've
got
many
issues
that
we
need
to
discuss
and,
as
we've
all
agreed
upon
already,
we
are
going
to
work
through
some
of
these
issues
and
have
public
discussions
about
many
of
these
issues.
A
Moving
forward
with
the
help
of
our
new
city
attorney
with
the
review
of
our
policy
guidelines
and
procedures,
perhaps
with
a
review
of
the
Charter
itself,
so
I
hope
that
we
can
all
be
satisfied
that
at
least
there
is
a
path
for
us
to
discuss
these
issues
and
come
to
some
resolution
here
in
the
near
future.
Does
anybody
else
have
any
comments
before?
Maybe
we
take
a
recess
councilmember
Olsen?
If.
H
AB
E
That's
been
brought
up,
so
I
mean
you're,
saying
that
maybe
we
need
to
get
it
all
out
and
I'd
right,
I'd
like
to
defend
myself
to
say
in
both
cases,
I
asked
should
I
even
come,
because
I
had
something
that
conflicted
and
so
I
had
to
leave,
and
it
was
very
clear
to
council
why
I
was
leaving
for
family
situations
and
that's
why
I
left
so
I
will
next
time
not
come
at
all?
If
that's
what
we
want
us
to
do,
but
we
probably
should
have
a
conversation
about
that.
E
A
You
and
again
I
think
that's
another
issue
just
to
add
to
our
sort
of
laundry
list
and
I
think
you
folks
will
have
to
help
remind
me
what
those
lists
are
as
Alison
Brown
comes
on
as
our
new
city
attorney
I
think
this
is
probably
the
priority
item
to
have
some
conversations
regarding
the
public
conversations.
We
need
to
have
and
sort
of
laundry
listing
those
issues
out
and
scheduling
those
issues
as
soon
as
possible.
A
T
AF
AM
A
B
F
A
A
F
AI
AN
AI
H
AM
A
AF
AM
AH
AF
AN
AH
AH
AH
During
the
last
study
session,
I
made
a
comment
and
I
referred
to
the
citizens
of
Inglewood
as
customers,
which
they
all
are
from
the
standpoint
that
they
get
water
services
and
and
a
variety
of
other
services
from
our
community.
This
person
gets
so
irate
about
the
issue
that
our
police
officer
actually
came
over
and
asked
if
everything
was
okay,
I,
don't
really
feel
that
that
that
particular
position
should
be
filled
by
this
person.
C
Again
to
my
previous
point,
when,
when
it's
been
noticed
and
it's
transparent
here,
that
the
appointed
person
on
the
list
that's
been
noticed
is
the
alternate
member
for
coing
dickerson
as
to
who
he's
removing
I
think
that
we
need
to
stop
these
games.
This
is
public
information
it's
in
there
and
to
just
not
say
the
name
as
it
ends
up
being
somewhat
childish.
I
am
concerned
that
the
information
that
you're
bringing
forward
now
after
we
had
you
did
not
participate
in
the
study
session,
where
these
decisions
were
made.
C
Now
it's
being
an
anecdotal
issue
that
it
sounds
like
you
heard
from
a
third
party
on
what's
going
on
in
making
a
decision
without
that
person
ever
being
asked
about
what
happened
and
make
make
an
informed
decision
on
whether
it
wasn't
an
irrational
behavior,
what
the
issue
is,
but
for
a
third
party,
anecdotal
thing
tap
and
after
the
fact
that
we
made
a
decision
to
put
this
person
in
and
appoint
them,
I
think
is
unfair.
I
I!
C
Don't
think
that
there's
justification
to
go
ahead
and
have
these
kind
of
stories
going
on
when
this
person
can't
even
defend
themselves
or
explain
what
happened.
Nor
is
the
person
who
told
you
president,
to
go
ahead
and
give
the
information
either
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
frivolous
reason
to
go
ahead
and
remove
somebody
approaches.
AF
AO
AF
A
AF
A
A
Further
comments,
I,
you
know,
I
do
recognize.
I
think
I
was
present
at
the
situation
you're
describing
member
Yates
I.
You
know
I
recognize
that
Miss
Dickerson
can
be
passionate
about
issues.
You
know
at
this
point
we
you
know
we
did
gain
consensus
on
this
person,
I
generally
going
to
support
that,
since
we've
already
noticed
posted
it
order.
AH
AH
A
So
just
a
clarification
on
that
point
of
order
again,
whenever
there's
a
motion
in
a
second
we're
capable
of
discussing
that
motion,
then
at
that
point,
but
when
there's
an
amendment
at
that
point,
then
we're
taking
on
the
the
amendment
first
and
then
going
back
to
the
underlying
motion
and
so
right
now
we
are
discussing
your
motion,
mr.
Yates,
and
so
now
we
can
vote
yes
or
no.
A
yes
would
be
to
remove
mrs.
A
C
A
A
AH
A
B
C
AF
A
A
A
Y
D
A
A
AH
A
Thank
you,
I
do
believe.
I
was
present
that
the
incident,
perhaps
member
Yates
is,
is
referencing
and
mrs.
Dickerson
was
passionate
and,
and
did
you
know,
make
some
comments
and
I.
You
know
recognize
kind
of
the
desire
to
kind
of
separate
the
two
of
them.
I
think
I
walked
her
out
of
the
meeting
is
that
is
that
the
meeting
you're
referencing
or
now
yeah.
AH
A
A
Know
I
recognize
that
I
guess
I
just
didn't
see
the
police
officer
con
interaction.
Was
there
police
officer
interaction,
yours
name?
Yes,
it
was
again.
I
did
not
see
that
you
know
again.
I've
I
know
Cohen
Dickerson
I
know
she's
passionate
about
many
issues.
City
wide
and
you
know
again-
I
witnessed
her
passion
there,
but
I
didn't
think
he
rose
to
the
level
of
not
being
able
to
appoint
her
I
think
that
perhaps
she
has
some
issues
to
be
constructive
within
the
community.
You
know
she
is
kind
of
a
stickler
for
rules
and
I.
E
Alternate
that
we
wait
until
the
next
time
around
and
let
this
settle
itself
up,
because
I
think
what
we
saw
that
night
in
many
nights
before
has
been
raising
anxiety
about
whether
or
not
she
could
serve
in
the
best
way
that
she
can
right
now.
So
I'd
love
to
see
it
resolved
over
time
and
in
five
months
we'll
be
back
at
this.
She
can
reapply
and
positions
more
than
this
will
be
open.
Thank.
A
You
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
no
further
comments
at
this
time.
I
would
encourage
you
to
vote
on
the
motion
to
approve
8d,
which
is
a
resolution.
Appointing
cooing
dickerson
is
the
alternative,
the
Board
of
Adjustment
and
appeals.
Please
vote
it's
a
motion
to
approve
so
yes
would
be
approving
her
position,
and
a
no
vote
would
be
to
leave
that
position
on
field
or
to
discuss
at
a
later
date,
but
it
wouldn't
be
a
pointing
Cohen.
Mrs.
Dickerson,
further
comments,
seeing
none,
please
vote
votes.
D
B
A
AF
E
AN
A
Appreciate
you
commenting
on
that.
I
too
would
like
to
comment
on
that
and
just
say
that
I'm
excited
to
see
that
moving
forward
I
do
have
a
little
bit
of
concern
about
how
we
arrived
kind
of
at
some
of
these
goals,
and
you
know
some
of
the
usage
numbers.
I
didn't
quite
think
we're
really
accurate.
Given
the
situation
we
have
in
the
city
of
growing
residential
and
commercial
uses.
Obviously
we're
you
know,
gathering
some
efficiencies
as
we
continue
to
upgrade
equipment
and
other
things
citywide.
A
But
you
know
the
the
numbers
shown
I
think
we're
I'm,
not
so
sure
they're
accurate,
again
I
think
it
showed
a
pretty
substantial
decrease
in
in
electrical
and
natural
gas
consumption
and
and
I
think.
This
is
a
great
starting
point
and
I
think
that
if
we
can
meet
these
initial
targets,
we
just
need
to
be
conscious
about
re-evaluating
these
goals.
Moving
forward,
councillor
Olsen
so.
E
A
I
worry
a
little
bit
about
the
data
that
was
derived
through
the
process
through
the
Excel
partners
and
energy
program,
recall
at
the
study
session.
They
showed
a
double-digit
reduction
in
I
believe
it
was
natural
gas
consumption
as
well
as
a
single-digit
reduction
in
electrical
consumption.
Citywide-
and
you
know
again,
it's
and
I
don't
know
if
you
recall,
but
I
asked
the
folks
who
presented
a
few
questions
regarding
that
again.
I
think
this
is
a
great
starting
point.
A
We
got
to
use
the
data
we
have
and
but
again
I
just
think
that,
as
as
these
new
data
points
come
in,
we
just
need
to
ensure
that
their
number
one
accurate
and
number
two
that
the
goals
are
reasonable,
because
I
just
don't
think
there
was
a
real
processes
to
get
to
the
goals.
I
think
it
was
just
kind
of
hey.
This
sounds
like
a
good,
reasonable
number
and
I
don't
disagree
with
that.
So
it's
a
good
starting
point.
That's
all
I'm,
saying
anything
further.
A
On
edge
ni,
unten
public
hearing
items,
none
of
those
tonight
moving
on
to
agenda
item
11
ordinances
resolutions
and
motions
11a,
one
is
approval
of
ordinance
on
first
reading.
Council
bill
for
staff
recommends.
Council
approve
a
bill
for
an
ordinance
amending
the
current
ordinance
requirement
restricting
convicted
sex
offenders
to
be
2,000
feet
from
any
school
Park
or
playground
to
1,000
feet.
Our
staff
sources
acting
City
Attorney
Dugan
comer
good
evening.
Mr.
comer.
AO
A
A
C
A
concern
about
the
first
one
was
that
it
was
arbitrary
and
wasn't
thought
out.
This
is
arbitrary.
It's
not
thought
out,
there's
nothing
to
show
that
any
distancing
provides
any
safety
or
lack
of
safety.
Our
surrounding
communities
have
proved
that
out
five
years
of
not
having
this
ordinance
and
forced
to
prove
that
out
and
to
make
this
arbitrary
decision
just
to
go
ahead
and
go
well,
we're
cutting
it
in
half,
so
we're
compromising
or
making
it's
it's
it's
as
arbitrary.
AF
AF
AF
AF
C
A
Any
further
comments
on
this
I
would
like
to
add
that
you
know
I
am
looking
forward
to
the
public
hearing
on
this.
Obviously
the
you
know,
majority
of
the
information
and
data
and
opinions
that
we've
received
have
been
I.
Think
in
favor
of
removing
residency
restrictions
in
these
areas.
You
know
and
I
guess
I'm
starting
to
wonder
if
the
repeal
wouldn't
have
been
a
better
way
to
gain
more
public
comment
for
if
residency
restrictions
at
any
level
really
makes
sense.
A
A
On
to
1182
council
bill,
six
staff
recommends
council
approve
a
bill
for
an
ordinance
amending
title
1
chapter
10,
section
3
of
the
England
Municipal
Code,
to
allow
for
an
official
conducting
a
quasi
judicial
hearing
to
issue
and
enforce
subpoenas
to
testify.
Our
staff
sources
acting
City
Attorney
Dugan
comers
to
Co.
AO
Yes,
mr.
mayor,
during
the
initial
conversations
between
mr.
Finney,
the
special
counsel
for
the
city
on
I
baked
as
well
as
I
bakes
attorney,
they
discovered
that
the
an
officer
who's
conducting
a
quasi
judicial
hearing
could
not
issue
subpoenas
or
enforce
those
subpoenas.
And
it
was
decided
that
to
to
make
an
amendment
on
our
hearing
procedures
under
the
title
1.
Now
this
in
no
way
takes
out
that
authority
from
City,
Council
or
board
or
Commission.
AO
G
AO
AO
I
believe
in
the
last
23
years,
I
can
count.
On
my
one
hand,
we've
had
one
hearing
and
that's
the
I
baked
one.
That's
coming
up.
We've
never
had
as
far
as
I
know
a
license.
Revocation
hearing
of
this
type
we've
had
license.
Revocation
hearings
for,
say
you
know,
liquor
license,
isn't
that
type
of
thing
that
was
a
different.
A
C
With
title
seven
I'm
concerned
about
us
doing
things
until
the
new
city
attorney
comes
I,
just
I'll
be
voting
no
on
it.
If
we
lasted
23
years
without
it
maybe
I'm,
just
like
some
more
information
and
figure
out
how
we're
doing
this
and
how
it's
being
put
in
there,
but
I
would
prefer
that
the
new
City
Attorney
be
making
these
decisions
with
ordinances
and
these
kind
of
changes.
That's.
E
AO
AF
A
Thank
you
any
further
comments.
I
am
supportive
of
this.
You
know
I
see
the
need
to
be
able
to
effectively
issue
subpoenas
in
order
to
keep
this
hearing
moving
forward.
So
I
will
support
this
at
this
time.
It
is
a
rare
circumstance
that
we
haven't
encountered
in
years,
we're
not
in
the
business
of
generally
challenging
people's
businesses
license
in
the
city.
A
AO
AH
AO
A
AO
A
AN
Just
a
couple
things
from
the
culture
arts,
commission
we're
looking
at
I'm
doing
a
couple
of
really
cool
things:
culture,
Arts
Commission
is
working
with
Museum
of
outdoor
arts
on
a
mural
which
is
in
the
Paseo
on
the
zomo
site,
there's
nowhere.
That
is
so.
That
is
really
exciting.
That's
in
the
works
also
looking
at
the
pianos
on
parade
that
came
across
our
email,
a
while
back
so
we're
looking
at
participating
in
that
program.
I
think
that
would
be
really
neat.
AN
AN
In
April,
the
there's
gonna
be
a
joint
meeting
with
the
Cultural
Arts
Commission
in
the
library,
so
that's
gonna
be
also
Colorado's
finest.
They
have
a
sage
program
which
is
really
exciting,
and
it's
going
really
well
and
they're
also
going
to
be
doing
working
on
some
garden,
art
and
murals
for
their
compost
bins
at
the
school
there.
So
that's
pretty
neat
and
one
of
our
members
of
the
Cultural
Arts
Commission
is
teaching
a
cooking
class
at
the
Rec
Center
in
March,
April
and
May
so
check
that
out
if
you're
interested.
That's
all
for
me.
Thank.
AF
Was
where
I
just
again
want
to
thank
everybody
for
coming
out
tonight?
You
know,
even
though
we
may
or
may
not
agree
with
everything.
Somebody
says
I
appreciate
that
we
have
a
country
where
we
have
the
right
to
express
our
opinion.
Whether
people
agree
with
it
or
not,
and
I
want
to
thank
those
that
have
come
out
and
had
the
courage
to
come.
Look
at
us
in
the
eyeball.
That
means
a
lot
to
me.
AF
I'm
also
grateful
because
I
know
that
some
are
watching
for
all
the
wonderful
phone
calls
of
support
that
I
received
and
I'm
sure
that
all
of
us
have
ones
sort
of
another.
You
know
it's
people
that
have
watched
you
for
a
number
of
years,
known
know
what
you've
done
and
they
know
the
work
that's
you
you've
put
in
and,
and
they
appreciate
that
and
and
like
I
said
earlier.
AF
Sometimes
we
focus
on
one
thing
or
another,
but
generally
people
know
that
it's
all
of
our
desire
to
serve
our
city
and
do
a
wonderful
job
for
them
and
again
I
told
someone
tonight.
I
was
been
married
to
my
wife,
almost
40
years
now
and
I
still
don't
agree
about
everything.
I,
don't
expect
us
to
agree
about
everything,
but
I
do
expect
us
to
work
things
through
and
I
appreciate,
working
with
this
council
and
working
with
city
staff
seeing
the
wood
moving
forward.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Would.
AF
A
AF
AH
B
AJ
A
I
would
like
to
throw
out
there
that
I
know
some
of
us
are
leaving
on
Thursday.
In
the
past.
We
had
left
on
Wednesday
after
kind
of
lobbying
on
the
whole
all
day
for
those
staying
through
Thursday.
Perhaps
I
could
encourage
us
to
break
some
bread
together.
What
we're
out
there
and
use
that
as
an
opportunity
for
some
team-building
I
mentioned
that
idea.
Perhaps
councillor
Martinez,
she
said
she
was
leaving
so
I'm
open
to
another
date.
A
AF
A
C
Just
wanted
to
remind
everybody
to
keep
Rita
councilmember,
Russell
and
her
family
in
your
thoughts
and
prayers
as
her
as
her
daughter's
going
through
her
potential
surgery.
She
is
dearly
missed.
She
is
a
calm
voice
of
reason
and
I
respect
her
very
much
and
enjoy
working
with
her
on
council
and
she's
missed
tonight,
and
that's
it.
Okay,.
A
AL
Thank
You
mayor
I'd
like
to
go
over
the
tentative
study
session
agenda.
That's
coming
up
for
future
meetings,
the
study
session
next
week,
the
13th
we
are
having
the
state
Forester,
come
to
talk
about
the
emerald
ash
borer
as
well
as
Japanese
beetle,
with
the
heavy
emphasis
more
so
obviously
on
discussion
with
the
ash
borer,
because
that's
a
bigger
concern
right
now,
city
clerk,
Louie,
Ellis
and
staff
will
be
present
to
discuss
the
proposal
for
a
hearing
officer
for
dealing
with
liquor
and
marijuana
applications.
AL
E
AL
Thank
you,
council
members
for
raising
that.
Obviously,
if,
in
fact,
people
want
to
have
materials
heard
at
the
actual
hearing
on
the
21st,
those
need
to
be
submitted
to
the
City
Clerk's
office,
we're
in
then
the
mayor
can
write,
you
read
them
into
into
the
record
for
the
public
for
the
public
hearing
if
they
can't
be
present.
AL
Obviously,
if
you
can
be
present-
and
they
could
make
personal
testimony
that
evening
in
order
for
that
to
be
as
part
of
the
record,
council
will
then
have
to
come
back
during
the
second
reading
on
March
6th
to
debate
the
the
matter
to
determine
exactly
what
would
transpire
with
the
proposed
ordinance
as
it's
been
presented.
I,
maybe.
E
E
A
A
AL
It's
coming
forth
on
February,
27th
and
staff
is
meeting
this
week
to
discuss
that.
We
have
engaged
a
number
of
internal
resources
to
look
at
this.
Public
works
community
development.
Our
graphic
artist
is
also
going
to
participate
in
this
to
help
us
to
give
a
good
presentation
package
that
will
bring
forward
on
the
27th.
This
particular
issue
will
discuss
where
we
are
with
the
the
current
budget
for
the
project.
Therefore,
what
we
have
for
this
year
for
capital
improvements
in
the
3400
block
will
discuss
a
ala
carte
menu.
A
A
A
I
think
that
could
probably
be
pushed
back.
You
know
I'm
not
so
sure
exactly
when
Miss
Brown
is
going
to
be
here,
but
my
thought
is
again
that
will,
you
know,
have
a
discussion
with
her
and
say:
hey.
This
is
a
high
priority
item
you
know
and
see
which
one's
she's
sort
of
ready
to
tackle
and
kind
of
get
a
priority
of
how
we'll
take
those
but
again
we'll
need
several
placeholders.
My
thought
is
in
March,
April
and
May
to
be
able
to
sort
of
get
through
a
lot
of
the
issues
that
we've
already
raised.
AL
A
Mr.
March
27th
Oh
in
my
mind
you
know
several,
the
you
know
pretty
much.
Every
meeting
for
several
should
probably
have
some
of
the
sprinkled
in
so
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
preserve
some
time
for
that.
Finally,
communications,
we've,
you
know
approve
this
communications
plan.
Can
you
get
with
slate
and
figure
out
when's
the
appropriate
time
to
reschedule
them
on
these
items?
Councilor
Arrington.
C
AL
Again,
there
was
question
whether
or
not
there
was
consensus
for
it.
However,
in
as
much
that
we
understand,
the
complexity
of
the
information
that
was
given
to
council
will
require
a
meeting.
I've
asked
that
Dennis
stow
and
his
staff
work
with
Littleton
to
determine,
if
a
date
in
March
on
a
separate
meeting
date.
It
wouldn't
be
a
normal
council
meeting
day
to
discuss
that
that
information,
specifically
again
the
question
that
you
raised
concerning
capacity
so
that
we
can
have
a
dialogue
on
that
and
explain
from
a
legal,
technical
and
operational
standpoint.
C
There
was
extensive
list
of
questions
most
of
it
was
around
permitting,
should
watch
the
Littleton
meeting.
They
did
have
consensus
to
run
and
move
forward
on
that
they
brought
up
several
of
those
questions
again.
I'm
sure
you've
documented
the
questions
that
were
brought
up
at
that
meeting.
Also,
the
tri-cities
meeting
came
up
again
also
with
the
corridor
study
going
through.
C
AL
AL
C
C
There
wasn't
it
was
the
meeting
in
November
where
you
weren't
in
attendance,
but
I'm
sure
you
can.
Mr.
Murphy
can
get
it
back
to
you,
but
if
council
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
the
presentation
that
was
done
by
chafa,
Littleton
I
just
thought
it
was
extremely
informative
and
it
was
might
end
up
answering
some
questions
and
bring
up
some
additional
concerns
with
how
we're
working
with
them
as
we're
stuck
now
for
another
15
years
on
to
projects
with
this,
and
we
need
to
have
a
level
of
understanding.
AH
AL
A
I
think
we,
my
thought
is:
we
can
pick
that
up
next
week
and
you
know
again
if
Ms
Brown
is
ready.
That
would
be
ideal,
but
I
think
you
know
we
probably
will
not
be,
and
so
you
know
I.
My
thought
is,
you
know,
maybe
that's
an
appropriate
time
for
slate
to
come
back
and
give
us
an
update.
You
know
we
can
use
that
time
for
something
else,
as
my
thought
at
this
point,
but
you
know
I
I
was
going
to
try
to
keep
it
all
hold
it
open.
A
AN
Talking
about
the
board
and
Commission
kind
of
process,
I
think
the
sooner
we
can
talk
about
that,
the
better
because
I'm
a
worried
about
the
timeline,
because
we're
gonna
be
doing
that
again
in
June.
It's
gonna,
be
here
before
we
know
it.
It's
already
February,
so
I
think
the
sooner
we
can
kind
of
get
that
nailed
down.
AN
A
A
E
I,
this
is
exactly
what
I
was
gonna
I
totally
concur
with
you
on
this
I
think
that
the
sooner
the
better
we've
just
had
this
fresh
experience.
We
have
some
positions
that
are
hanging
yet
that
we
need
to
make
sure
the
public
understands
what
we're
doing
with
them.
I
would
say:
let's
do
it,
while
they're
things
fresh
in
our
heads.
We
don't
need
to
wait
for
the
new
city
attorney.
To
do
that,
we
can
decide.
It's
really
helping
us
really.
AN
A
AL
A
AL
Mayor
just
a
couple
more,
if
there's
no
other
discussion
on
des
there's
a
couple
of
important
meetings
coming
up,
that
council
needs
to
be
aware,
as
well
as
the
public,
first
and
foremost
on
Thursday
February
16,
which
is
actually
believe
next
week.
Our
Public
Works
staff,
along
with
the
urban
drainage
and
Flood
Control
District,
is
having
a
public
or
a
public
meeting.
It's
an
open
public
meeting
to
talk
about
the
floodplain
proposal
and
study.
That's
been
done
by
matrix
engineering
as
well
as
the
urban
drainage
and
flood
control.
AL
Again,
the
affected
area
is
basically
Northeast
Englewood
that
incorporates
from
Floyd
to
University
in
the
Yale
to
Washington.
This
meeting
will
be
from
at
6:00
p.m.
it'll,
be
here
in
the
Civic
Center.
On
the
second
floor
and
again,
it's
just
an
open
meeting
towards
the
end
of
trying
to
get
additional
clarification
and
information
on
that
today,
Public
Works
staff,
utility
staff
myself
mr.
Robinson
met
with
representatives
of
the
City
and
County
of
Denver
to
discuss
where
they
are
and
the
grand
scheme
of
making
this
connection.
C
AL
Yes,
ma'am
Thursday
the
16th
at
6:00
p.m.
another
meeting
that
recently
we
were
invited
to
was
by
the,
and
this
is
a
lunch
being
sponsored
for
Englewood,
City,
Council
and
staff.
Is
the
the
Apartment
Association
of
Metro
Denver.
They
would
like
to
have
a
meeting
with
City
Council
be
a
lunchtime
meeting
on
Friday
March
3rd
at
the
Alta
Cherry
Hills
apartment
complex
on
Broadway,
the
former
flood
middle
school
site.
I
know
many
issues
have
been
raised
about
this.
AL
They
would
like
to
sponsor
this
to
discuss
housing,
affordability
issues
as
well
as
the
role
that
the
Apartment
Association
of
metro
Denver
plays
and
that
meeting
again
would
be
Friday
March
3rd
at
noon.
At
the
Alta
Cherry
Hills
Complex
I
have
Flyers
that
I'll
give
I
can
hand
out
to
you
too.
As
a
reminder
for
that
meeting.
Do.