►
From YouTube: City Council Regular 21 Nov 2016
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
E
A
C
H
I
A
Our
gracious
Heavenly
Father-
we
just
ask
you
to
be
with
us
this
evening
that
you
would
guide
and
direct
our
deliberations
and
father
I.
Just
ask
that
those
here
who
are
here
to
speak
tonight
that
you
would
cause
us
to
listen
to
them
and
that
they
would
be
heard.
We
just
give
this
time
to
you
and
thank
you
in
Jesus
name,
we
pray,
amen.
K
F
F
M
At
all
last
meeting
I
asked
why
I
could
not
access
eh,
ace
minutes
and
meetings
materials
as
I
can
all
the
other
boards
and
commissions
I
am
still
asking
I
have
had
to
make
several
core
requests
and
still
don't
have
the
minutes
for
January
through
March
in
September
and
October
I
cannot
get
to
2013,
2014
and
2015
without
great
cost
and
effort.
Why
is
this
so
difficult?
I
am
sure
other
citizens
would
like
to
know.
M
The
info
I
have
sought
and
it
should
be
available
on
the
website,
but
it
is
not
in
one
of
the
few
monthly
meetings
I
was
able
to
read
from
the
few
I
have
received
from
mr.
Gillett.
Mr.
Tillett
is
quoted
as
saying
that
all
the
EHA
meetings,
minutes
and
meeting
materials
have
been
delivered
to
the
city
and
they
are
on
the
website
somewhere.
I
cannot
find
them.
Where
are
they
and
why
are
they
not
easily
accessible
to
everyone?
Even
the
council?
Why
is
this
still
such
a
mess?
M
Then
there
are
licensing
procedures
which
are
so
deficient
and
Confused
that
scofflaw
businesses
can
apply
for
one
type
of
business
and
get
licensed
for
that
and
then
open
with
an
entirely
different
business
model,
shut,
I,
bake
down,
I
bake
studio
for
twenty
as
a
business
operating
business
does
not
fit
in
this
city,
allowing
mr.
comer
to
continue
to
ignore
the
clear
directions
of
counsel
to
shut
it
down.
Administrative
Lee
sets
a
dangerous
precedent
that
licensing
does
not
matter.
Truth
does
not
matter
that
enforcement
is
nil
and
anyone
can
do
whatever
they
want.
M
What
happened
in
Denver
has
no
effect
on
our
rules
or
plans.
The
recent
initiative
regarding
public
consumption
of
weed
is
a
pilot
program
and
requires
neighborhood
approval.
Let
I
bake
studio
420,
go
to
Denver
and
see
if
anyone
there
will
let
them
have
a
weed
consumption
Club.
In
addition,
medical
marijuana
shops
have
been
allowed
to
operate
out
of
compliance
for
years,
because
police
who
are
charged
with
enforcement
are
not
enforcing
the
state
requirements
because
they
are
a
low
priority.
M
Now
these
shops,
one
of
which
has
never
operated
and
could
not
because
they
never
established
a
cultivation
facility
under
their
name
as
required,
are
set
to
convert
to
rec
and
the
city
will
be
unable
to
enforce
the
stricter
rules
on
rec
weed
shops.
Staff
does
not
know
what
the
rules
are.
Mr.
comer
sure
does
not
know.
M
He
has
put
us
in
several
big
messes
and
cost
the
city
big
bucks
because
of
his
lack
of
competence
in
legal
matters,
for
instance
the
lawsuit
against
the
city
for
the
title,
seven
residency
issues
and
the
way
he
wrote
and/or
approved
the
ballot
measures
that
will
confuse
and
hinder
enforcement
and
the
welfare
of
citizens.
And
then
there
is
the
budget
in
the
looming
fiscal
cliff
before
mr.
comer
was
given
the
hundred
and
sixty
five
percent
raise
weather
deserved
or
not.
The
budget
for
legal
was
over,
a
million
eight
hundred
thousand
was
appropriated.
M
Where
did
the
rest
go
when
the
budget
was
supposed
to
include
sir-sir
payments,
which
had
been
for
the
last
four
years
over
400,000
per
year?
One
year
was
over.
700,000
revenues
have
to
exceed,
or
at
least
equal
expenditures,
or
there
is
no
balance.
The
budget
does
not
balance
even
with
including
what
is
labeled
savings
or
reserves,
and,
last
but
not
least,
have
few
examples.
M
I
have
time
to
address
taxpayer
dollars,
mine
included,
paid
for
a
consultant
to
evaluate
the
city
administration
and
a
30
95
page
report
was
compiled,
showing
lots
of
problems
between
staff
and
management,
at
least
that's
how
the
rumor
goes.
Why
can
I
not
see
and
view
this?
Why
is
this
not
public?
Where
is
it
if
there
are
so
many
problems,
we
citizens
need
to
know
about
it.
Where
is
the
transparency
here?
Why
is
this
a
secret
that
anonymous
employees
have
outed
why
my
tax
dollars
paid
for
this?
It
isn't
confidential.
It
is
mine
to
review.
M
F
Thank
you
ma'am.
We
see
if
we
have
any
questions
from
Council
for
you
seeing
none
I'll.
Thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking
this
evening.
Our
next
speaker
is
Scott
Kelly
from
Colorado
lighting
addressing
council
regarding
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
lighting
project
good
evening.
Mr.
Kelly,
hello,.
N
And
thank
you.
Scott
Kelly
Colorado
lighting,
5
to
75
Sanford,
Circle,
East,
Cherry,
Hills,
Village,
Colorado
I
came
rooted
today
to
address
the
comments
that
were
made
at
the
last
council
meeting,
because
there
are
several
emissions
and
factual
inaccuracies
that
adversely
affect
Colorado
Lighting's
credibility,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
city
of
Englewood
has
the
correct
facts.
It
was
stated
that
Colorado
lighting
had
designed
a
system
that
was
outdated
and
the
competition
had
brought
forth
a
wireless
system
that
was
sixty
thousand
dollars
less
and
better.
N
Like
most
things
in
life,
though
you
get
what
you
pay
for,
we
are
quite
familiar
with
that
system
and
have
worked
with
that
system
extensively
in
the
past.
That
system
isn't
right
for
the
city
of
Englewood
wastewater
treatment.
Plant
campus
and
I
would
like
to
justify
why
we
designed
the
system
we
did
for
the
city
of
Englewood
Wireless.
N
It
sounds
so
state-of-the-art
and
attractive
when
you
hear
it,
but
did
you
guys
know
that
almost
all
federal
facility
facilities
won't
let
you
use
a
wireless
system
in
them?
This
is
because
a
hardwired
system
is
always
more
secure
and
more
robust
than
a
wireless
system.
The
system
we
propose
in
light
has
a
wireless
option,
but
in
a
critical
facility
like
the
wastewater
treatment
plant,
we
believe
that
security
and
robustness
are
important
attributes.
N
A
wireless
system
is
easier
for
hackers
to
infiltrate
and
can
be
a
Trojan
horse
for
them
to
get
into
not
only
your
lighting
system
but
other
systems.
Additionally,
we
designed
this
lighting
system
with
maintenance
savings
as
a
primary
goal
over
a
10-year
period.
It
is
a
good
bet
that
you
will
have
less
maintenance
headaches
with
a
hardwired
system
than
a
wireless
system.
Your
admin
building
is
all
dropped
ceiling
and
the
system
we
proposed
is
all
low
voltage
plug-and-play
in
the
admin
building.
N
It
will
be
easy
to
install
and
it's
easier
to
Commission
than
the
wireless
system.
So
for
a
little
bit
of
extra
labor,
you
get
much
more
robust
and
secure
system.
The
main
cost
difference
in
the
in
light
system
we
specified
in
the
competition's
wireless
system
is
in
light,
has
far
more
capabilities.
That
wireless
system
has
no
front-end
dashboard
capability.
It
doesn't
have
a
lumen
management
system,
it
can't
be
incorporated
into
exterior
lights.
It
can't
be
pushed
up
to
a
building
automation
system
to
be
networked
into
other
building
control
systems.
N
It
can't
and
it
can't
do
in
response.
The
in
light
system
we
propose,
can
be
scaled
with
all
of
these
capabilities.
This
is
thus
apparent
standard
of
lighting
controls.
In
addition,
the
city
of
Englewood
has
already
done
two
phases
of
lighting
projects
representing
over
half
the
lights
on
the
campus,
with
acuity,
Brands
and
the
in
light
controls.
There
are
benefits
to
standardization.
It
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense
to
have
multiple
control
systems
to
have
to
learn
and
manage
in
one
campus.
In
addition,
the
city
of
Englewood
wastewater
treatment
plant
is
already
I'm.
N
Sorry,
the
in
light
system
we
specified
has
been
standardized
in
two
buildings
at
cu-boulder,
CU,
Denver,
all
13
buildings
of
the
new
VA
hospital
Fort
Collins,
the
National
Renewable
and
the
National
Renewable
Energy
Laboratory.
We
measure
fixture
efficiency
in
lumens
per
watt.
That's
how
much
light
a
fixture
puts
out
per
watts.
It
consumes.
The
competition's
fixture
is
91
lumens
per
watt,
not
very
good.
By
today's
standard,
acuities
is
a
hundred
and
eleven
lumens
per
watt,
or
twenty
two
percent
better.
N
The
system
that
the
competition
proposed
in
the
original
bid
is
not
the
right
fit
for
the
campus,
like
with
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
in
light,
is.
It
was
also
stated
that,
in
the
walk
through
that,
the
competition
had
discussed,
proposing
an
alternate
control
system,
but
that
should
be
irrelevant,
because
no
other
contractors
were
present
and
the
city
put
out
an
addendum
stating
that
you
could
only
propose
an
alternate
control
system
on
two
line
items,
not
the
hundred
and
forty
three
line
items
they
chose
to
propose
an
equivalent.
N
They
chose
to
propose
the
alternate
system
because
it
was
better
or
even
equivalent,
but
because
it
was
less
expensive.
I
would
encourage
our
engineers
to
research
both
technologies
to
decide
which
is
a
better
fit
for
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
campus
I
would
also
like
to
address
the
comments
made
regarding
Colorado
lighting,
designing
and
bidding
on
the
installation.
We
have
never
hid
from
this
fact,
and
it
was
one
of
the
first
things
we
told
Erik
when
we
met
with
him.
We
are
proud
of
the
fact
that
we
can
provide
high-level
engineering
services
and
installations.
N
N
N
It
was
stated
that
I
had
asked
for
a
third
bid,
I
think
the
council,
video
and
the
letter
I
emailed,
all
of
you
on
October
26th,
will
show
that
I
never
wanted
this
to
go
out
for
a
third
big
I
think
it
would
be
a
travesty
to
the
bid
process
for
multiple
reasons
which
I
spelled
out
in
that
email.
I
simply
wanted
the
city
to
use
the
language
language
in
its
bid.
Documents
too,
as
a
basis
to
reevaluate
the
bids.
N
F
O
Tonight
we
continue
to
wait
for
the
truth.
While
we
continue
to
wait
for
the
2010
sludge
report,
I'm
asking
City
Council
to
vote
against
approving
Keck
and
Brandon's
third
costly.
A
hundred
and
eleven
thousand
$675
study
I
will
go
through
each
study.
Topic
included
in
this
study
to
demonstrate
why
one
review
of
Inglewood
residuals
management
process
Engel
woods
on
paper.
Residuals
management
process
is
a
state-approved
and
detailed
reports
on
our
residuals
management
process
already
exists
and
are
available
through
the
city
and
to
the
water
plant.
O
So
why
are
you
paying
a
third
party
to
duplicate
already
existing
available
reports?
Is
it
because
it
will
look
good
on
the
report
to
review
alternative
residual
management
process
is
isn't
that
what
you
already
pay
Tom
Brennan
to
do.
So
why
are
you
also
paying
a
third
party
to
review
alternative
residuals
management
processes
simply
because
it
would
look
good
on
the
report
three
reviewing?
It
was
compliance
with
call
Department
of
Public,
Health
and
Environment,
but
I
will
refer
to
as
state
the
state
regulates.
O
O
Current
state
approved
residuals
management
process
requiring
the
yearly
disposal
and
instead
stop
how
the
sludge,
starting
with
2011,
rather
than
pay
the
high
cost
of
disposing
at
the
hazardous
and
radioactive
landfill.
It
was
only
after
a
citizen
complaint
in
2016,
informing
the
state
after
five
years
of
stockpiling,
that
Englewood
was
fun
finally
cited
by
the
state
for
their
failure
to
comply
with
Engle
woods
own
on
paper
residual
management
process,
a
record
of
only
one
citation
in
2016
from
the
state.
F
You
ma'am
see
if
council
has
any
questions
for
you
this
evening.
Seeing
no
thank
you
for
coming
in
smooth-talking
next
speaker
is
item
a
nickel
in
goid
resident
addressing
council
regarding
the
comprehensive
plan
good
evening,
mrs.
Nichol.
P
Good
evening,
mayor,
Jefferson,
Council
and
mr.
Keck
is
not
here
tonight.
So
mr.
Murphy,
my
name
is
Ida
me
Nicole
and
I'm
with
the
Engel
it
is
I'm
with
my
address
is
47
40,
South,
lepen
I
started
to
say
I'm
with
the
Englewood
Historic
Preservation
Society.
P
We,
the
Englewood
historic
preservation.
Excuse
me,
we,
the
Englewood,
Historic
Preservation
Society,
are
sincerely
grateful
to
you,
council
members
and
our
city
manager,
mr.
Keck,
for
considering
and
working
toward
making
it
possible
for
our
city
to
establish
an
Englewood,
Historic
Preservation
Commission
in
this
comprehensive
plan.
For
the
first
time
in
our
city's
history
in
well
over
a
century,
our
Englewood
history
will
be
recognized
and
appreciated.
We
also
appreciate
all
the
effort
and
hard
work.
Your
staff
has
put
forth
and
continues
to
do
for
our
citizens.
You
all
will
be
making
history.
Thank
you.
P
History
tells
the
story
and
has
enormous
power
in
bringing
the
past
before
our
eyes
as
if
it
were
the
present
to
establish
a
History
Museum
for
our
city
would
be
a
dream
come
true.
Our
legacy
is
an
interconnection
across
time
with
the
need
for
those
who
have
come
before
us
and
a
responsibility
to
for
those
who
come
after
us.
Any
city
who
saves
who
saves
their
heritage
is
a
healthy
community
in
this
comprehensive
plan.
P
I
am
so
appreciative
for
all
the
areas
involved
in
our
city
that
citizens
have
the
opportunity
to
take
part
in
and
enjoy
for
years
to
come.
I
appreciate
the
art
and
culture
for
what
it
brings
to
our
city,
which
is
good,
and
there
has
been
much
said
about
the
arts
and
culture
such
as
the
Museum
of
outdoor
arts.
However,
there
have
been
huge
amounts
of
funding
for
this
museum
over
many
years,
and
funding
for
saving
our
England
heritage,
heritage
or
museum
for
our
citizens
has
not
been
forthcoming
through
past
council
and
past
city
management.
P
Outstanding
objectives
in
the
comprehensive
plan
are
to
encourage
our
Inglewood
history
in
neighborhoods
and
would
add
character
and
established
neighborhood
identity
to
make
our
city
great
again
in
historic
terms.
The
Englewood
Historic
Preservation
Commission
will
not
be
part
of
the
Englewood
Historic
Preservation
Society,
they
will
be
separate
and
they
will
have
their
own
board
members
and
activities.
The
city
appoints
the
Commission
board
members.
This
is
just
for
information
for
our
audience.
P
The
inga
we
just
is
Historic
Preservation
Society
came
about
after
a
City
Council
meeting
concerning
the
sell
of
our
historic
ingo,
a
train
depot
on
March
19th
2012,
a
small
group
of
eight
people
formed
the
Englewood
Historic
Preservation
Society.
In
order
to
try
and
save
our
historic
train
depot,
we
received
our
501
C
3
and
two
months
and
was
unheard
of.
We
had
our
first
destroyed
lecture
program
in
May
up
to
12,
just
two
months
after
we
formed
the
Society.
P
Our
first
lecture
meet
me
at
the
motel
was
a
great
program
concerning
the
80-some
all
melt
motels
along
the
Santa
Fe
corridor.
Before
it
became
I
25.
Most
people
do
not
know
of
the
many
historic
treasures
that
have
come
out
of
this
little
city
called
Inglewood
and
the
history
surrounding
us.
We
welcome
you
to
our
activity.
We
welcome
all
of
you
to
our
tivities
and
membership.
We
have
a
monthly
lecture
program,
which
is
always
historic
and
a
newsletter
along
with
our
website.
P
We
have
fundraisers
such
as
the
Victorian
high
tea
in
one
of
Inga
was
beautiful,
Victorian
homes
in
a
beautiful
gala
and
other
activities
with
the
chamber.
We
are
very
appreciative
of
the
present
city,
council
and
city
manager,
mr.
Keck,
for
the
respect
they
have
shown
us
and
their
willingness
to
save
our
city
history.
We
thank
you.
F
Q
Good
evening,
mr.
mayor
and
council,
this
whole
thing
with
the
comprehensive
plan
seems
like
this
kind
of
been
a
marathon
and
I
got
to
thinking
about
that.
The
marathon
is
26
miles
next
month.
You'll
been
haven't,
been
working
on
this
for
26
26
weeks,
so
I
think
you've
done
a
marathon
here
and
I'm
I'm
pleased
with
quite
a
bit
of
the
stuff
that
that
you
guys
have
chosen
to
put
into
the
plans.
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
that,
and
then
I
had
a
question.
Q
If
any
of
you
guys
ever
heard
of
Dearborn
brass
Dearborn
plastic
is
another
name:
3211
South
Platte,
River
Drive,
the
different
company
started
in
the
1890s,
making
brass
plumbing
fittings
and
they
opened
up
the
Englewood
manufacturing
facility.
I,
haven't
I,
don't
know
the
details
of
this
got
I'm
guessing,
probably
in
the
50s
or
60s.
Then
in
1976
the
guys
figured
out
you
can
use
plastic
for
plumbing
pipes
and
that
they
don't
have
to
be
brass
and
the
Dearborn
company
just
down
the
street
here
participated
in
that
invention.
Q
They
started
with
styrene
plastic
and
that's
what
you
make
plastic
model
airplanes
and
cars
out
of
not
fitted
off
for
plumbing
pipes.
They
went
to
something
called
poly
butylene,
not
good.
Either
just
has
some
difficulties,
then
they
went
to
PVC
and
abs,
but
the
those
guys
were
in
the
forefront
of
the
whole
invention
of
the
plastic
plumbing
industry.
I
just
thought
it
was
kind
of
cool.
F
Thank
You
mr.
John,
let's
see
if
there's
any
questions
for
you
tonight,
seeing
none
thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking
moving
on
to
agenda
item
7.
That
is
recognition
of
unscheduled
public
comment.
We
do
have
some
speakers
this
evening.
Our
first
is
David
Chesky
here
to
speak,
about
sludge
and
on
deck
is
Bryan
brach.
Heusen
evening,
sir.
R
David
Chesky
4
9,
0,
West,
Grand,
Avenue,
hello,
everyone,
it's
been
a
couple
weeks
since
you've
seen
me.
Did
you
miss
me,
I'm
sure,
well,
I'm
back
here
to
again
ask
for
the
2010
solids
report,
as
you
just
heard,
from
Kathleen,
which
don't
have
it
several
weeks
have
gone
by.
Those
are
now
turned
into
months,
still
hasn't
been
produced.
R
F
S
Brian
brach
Howsam,
48:10,
South,
Fox
and
I
hope
everybody
has
a
nice
Thanksgiving
this
week.
So
of
course,
this
time
you're
always
looking
for
reason
to
be
grateful
and
always
been
grateful
of
Inglewood
tonight.
My
little
stories
about
one
particular
restaurant
in
Inglewood
that
in
here
forever
it's
well
known,
I
love
it.
So
I
was
a
year
ago
last
October
at
a
friend
of
mine,
a
registered
citizen
paroled
to
a
motel
in
Inglewood
up
on
Broadway
he's
out
looking
for
work.
S
This
restaurant
decided
to
give
him
a
chance
and
they
hired
him.
You
know
why,
because
they
stepped
out
because
they
were
willing
to
help
this
man
he's
successful.
Today
he
was
at
that
restaurant
for
a
couple
of
months
got
a
job
in
his
career
choice,
which
is
you
know,
doing
construction,
but
I
still,
if
could've
been
easy
for
them
to
make
that
decision
to
hire
this
man
to
give
him
a
shot
to
give
him
a
chance.
S
But
today
is
awesome,
he's
great
he's
very
successful,
so
we
stopped
in
that
restaurant.
Last
night
we
had
dinner,
it
was
so
cool
cuz
the
owner
came
up,
I
mean
she
had
a
smile
that
it
went
all
the
way
around
her
head.
She
was
just
so
happy
to
see
him,
and
it
was
just
a
wonderful
opportunity
to
do
that
and
to
be
a
part
of
that
last
night
and
to
know
that
all
it
takes
is
one.
S
It
takes
one
person
to
say
you
know
what
I'm
gonna
give
you
a
shot
and
it
can
change
a
lot.
This
man
is
growing,
he's
he'll,
be
over
at
my
house
on
Thanksgiving
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
family,
but
you
know
what
he's
moved
up
out
of
the
hotel
he's
got
his
own
apartment
is,
you
know,
managed
to
get
himself
a
car
and
she's
growing
he's
doing
what
we
all
do
on
a
day-to-day
basis,
and
that's
because
it
took
that
one
person
to
say
yeah.
We
care
enough
to
give
you
that
shot.
S
F
T
Evening
my
name
is
Susan
Walker.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
again.
I
decided
about
three
o'clock
this
afternoon
to
wax
eloquent
with
a
poem
tonight,
so
this
is
an
honor
of
those
that
have
been
victimized
and
with
hope
for
the
restoration
of
them
and
the
person
who
has
offended
it's
entitled
farewell
to
title
seven
for
all
the
tender
hearts
abused
to
all
who
have
been
so
misused.
How
can
we
help
you
to
derive
life's
best
to
both
survive
and
thrive?
T
Stranger
danger
lurking
near
is
not
really
what
you
have
to
fear.
It's
those
you
know
and
love
each
day
that
likely
puts
you
in
harm's
way.
The
person
living
beyond
the
fence
convicted
of
a
sex
offense
is
supervised
closely
by
the
law
and
endures
long
treatment
for
every
flaw.
If
we
push
offenders
underground,
it's
likely
that
they
will
be
found
returning
to
behaviors
past
their
restoration
may
not
last
with
a
place
to
call
their
own
a
stable
and
inviting
home
a
job
and
loved
ones.
To
lend
a
hand.
The
wayward
have
a
place
to
stand.
T
F
F
U
U
My
name
is
Caroline
Turner
and
I'm,
chairman
of
advocates
for
change,
we're
a
group
who
would
like
to
not
get
rid
of
sex
offender
laws,
but
just
see
that
they
are
just
and
as
in
Isaiah
10:1
says.
Woe
to
those
that
make
bad
law.
I
know
that
you
were
probably
rushed
into
the
residency
restrictions
with
not
as
much
knowledge
as
you
would
like
to
have,
or
was
even
available
at
the
time.
U
But
now
it's
been
proven
over
and
over
and
over
by
city
after
city
that
it
just
doesn't
work
it's
bad
law
and
it
needs
to
be
fixed.
So
again,
we're
asking
you
to
consider
overturning
this
I,
don't
know
it's
not
a
lot
whatever
you
call
it
and
an
enemy's
paper.
This
paper
just
shows
that
not
very
many
people
are
stranger.
Danger
is
just
nil.
U
Just
for
instance,
two
years
ago,
Colorado
came
out
with
their
report
and
they
had
about
two
people.
I
mean
two
points,
some
seven
people
who
innovated
sexually,
and
that
was
five
people
when
they
put
it
in
numbers.
Instead
of
percentage
of
those
five
people,
three
got
felonies
for
not
registering
one
got
a
felony
for
an
Internet
rule
and
then
the
other
one
was
not.
It
was
I,
don't
know
she
didn't
know
exactly
what
it
was,
but
so
I
just
think
that
the
residency
laws
is
going,
the
wrong
direction.
U
It's
forcing
people
to
be
homeless
and
certainly
I,
don't
think
you
or
anybody
wants
to
cause
people
to
be
homeless.
I
mean
the
cry
is
to
help
them,
but
this
law
makes
people
homeless.
That's
not
what
you're
after
I
do
not
believe
so
I'm
asking
you
to
look
at
the
facts,
how
few
people
who
get
out
of
prison
or
are
arrested
recidivate
they're,
not
the
dangerous
ones.
It's
the
people
sitting
in
church
with
you,
it's
the
people.
I
know
it
goes
on
in
the
home
most
normally.
U
So
stranger
danger
is
pretty
much
doesn't
of
all
and
it
does
not
help
residency
laws.
They
do
not
help
so
we're
just
asking
that
you
would
get
rid
of
it
period.
I
will
say
that
Kansas
has
something
that
they
have
safety
zones.
I,
don't
know
if
you've
looked
into
that
where,
like
a
circle
around
a
school
just
within
the
fence
of
the
school
or
something
a
person
who
has
a
sex,
offense
can't
go,
but
it
isn't
this
huge
thing.
U
F
V
Robert
Elliston
48:20
South
Fox
Street.
If
you
get
a
flat
tire
on
a
lonely
road,
the
next
passerby
will
likely
stop
to
help
you.
If
you
get
a
flat
tire
on
I-25
during
rush
hour,
thousands
of
people
will
pass
you
by
each
of
them,
believing
that
someone
else
will
help
you.
This
is
called
the
bystander
effect.
So
the
question
is
how
many
bystanders
does
it
take
before?
None
of
them
will
stop
Englewood
from
interfering
with
the
state's
plan
to
support
peaceful
registered
citizens
in
order
to
keep
them
from
becoming
sex
offenders.
V
Apparently,
that
number
is
7.
One
of
you
needs
to
pull
over
and
help
the
city
of
Englewood
fix
the
flat
tire
called
title:
7
chapter
3,
the
7
of
you,
have
been
driving
past
without
helping
for
four
months
now,
four
months,
councilmember
Tillett
you
locked
your
doors
and
rolled
up
your
windows
on
this
issue.
Long
before
I
showed
up
here
on
August
1st.
Will
you
now
respect
the
deeper
truths
of
this
matter
and
worry
about
the
political
expediency
of
it
later
mayor,
Jefferson
I.
Ask
you
please
stop
using
the
words
pending
litigation.
V
That's
a
convenient
dodge,
I,
firmly
believe
you
know
this
legislation
to
be
deeply
flawed,
step
beyond
your
mayoral
role
as
mediator,
an
appeaser
and
take
the
initiative
and
your
equally
or
even
more
important
role.
As
an
elected
council
member
councilmember
Olson
put
your
PhD
in
leadership
to
good
use
and
take
a
leadership
role
in
this
issue.
Your
understanding
of
social
psychology
and
your
ability
to
digest
research
data.
Put
you
in
an
ideal
position
to
take
a
stand
in
hell,
councilmembers,
Yates
or
Martinez.
V
Does
either
of
you
have
the
integrity
to
do
what
is
needed
to
move
Englewood
from
the
dark
ages
into
the
21st
century.
Councilmembers
Russell
and
Barrentine
tried
to
help
Englewood
on
August
15th
by
proposing
a
moratorium.
The
other
five
of
you
told
them
to
get
back
in
the
car.
Lock
the
doors
and
drive
on
an
oft-quoted
parallel
states
that
if
you
try
to
throw
a
frog
into
boiling
water,
it
will
jump
out
and
save
its
life.
V
But
if
you
put
that
same
frog
into
a
nice
cool
pot
of
water
and
bring
it
to
a
boil,
it
will
sit
there
until
it
dies
biology
it
biologically
incorrect,
but
fitting
Guerry
Sears
frighten
the
2006
City
Council
into
jumping
out
of
a
boiling
pot
of
Hannibal
Lecter.
Horror
stories
thus
came
to
be
title:
seven
Chapter
three
in
2016,
the
seven
of
you
sat
in
this
steadily
heating
part
of
political
water
for
a
third
of
a
year
jump.
V
If
the
citizens
of
Englewood
view
the
entire
council
as
a
pot
of
dead
boiled
frogs,
they
will
likely
try
to
find
seven
live
frogs
to
put
back
in
the
pot
next
election
rid
the
city
of
this
dangerous
legislation.
Do
not
be
a
bystander,
be
the
person
who
takes
the
stand.
It
only
takes
one
of
you
with
the
integrity
to
pull
over
and
three
others
with
the
integrity
to
help
you
for
the
city
of
Englewood
to
do
the
right
thing.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
You,
sir
see,
if
council
has
any
questions
for
you
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking
this
evening,
you
will
now
move
on
to
council
response
to
public
comment.
What
anybody
like
to
kick
us
off
I'm,
seeing
nobody
I
will
start
a
response
here.
I
would
like
to
thank
everyone
for
who
came
down
and
spoke.
You
know
regarding
the
title,
seven
issues
we
do
have
a
study
session
scheduled
for
the
28th
and
hopefully
we
can
move
the
ball
forward
on
that
issue.
F
W
At
this
time
we
do
not
have
any
update.
It's
the
same,
update
that
we've
gotten
last
week
and
the
week
before
in
that
they're
still
looking
through
there,
their
broken
computers,
I
guess
to
try
and
find
it
I
again
want
to
stress
that
if
we
had
it
we'd
give
it
a
give
it
to
them.
We
don't
have
that
document,
and
so
we
want
it
just
as
much
as
the
public
does.
Thank.
F
You,
sir,
you
know,
city
manager,
Keck
is
is
out
this
evening.
You
know
I
will
try
to
have
some
additional
conversations
with
him
regarding
additional
strategies
to
get
this
2010
floods
report.
It
has
been,
admittedly,
a
very
long
time
and
you
know
I
will
be
working
with
the
public
to
uncover
this
2010
reports.
We
can
move
on
with
other
issues.
F
You
know
thank
you
to
mr.
Cohn
and
Ida
Mae
who
came
in
spoke
regarding
the
comp
plan,
a
including
some
reference
to
historic
preservation,
as
well
as
a
Historic
Preservation.
Commission
I.
Do
think
that
it's
important
for
us
to
really
provide
opportunities
to
celebrate
our
unique
history
and
I.
Think
that's
one
of
the
reasons
that
makes
Englewood
a
really
uniquely
desirable
place
to
be
not
just
to
live,
but
also
to
do
business.
F
W
F
You
mrs.
Dickerson,
thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking.
You
spoke
about
a
whole
host
of
issues.
You
know
the
housing
authority.
Transparency
is
a
bit
of
a
concern
for
us
as
well.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
they're
getting
their
minutes
on
their
website
and
we'll
work
with
that.
They
do
have
a
separate
board
as
well
as
an
executive
director.
F
D
D
D
The
I
would
like,
if
you
would,
please
provide
the
City
Council
with
the
core
requests
that
you
did
on
the
issue
of
the
95
page
report
and
the
video
that
was
brought
up
in
that
letters
letter
anonymous
letter
provided
to
Council
by
the
concerned,
Englewood
employees,
and
that
you
said
you
were
denied
that
report
I'd
like
to
have
counsel
provided
with
the
reasoning
that
you
were
denied
that
request
and
if
you
could
provide
the
request.
So
I
can
see
what
you
were
requesting.
I
would
appreciate
that.
D
And
then
we'll
go
from
there,
I
guess
for
Scott
Kelly,
with
Colorado
lighting
and
the
wastewater
plant
lighting
project.
The
continued
presentations
done
by
the
two
companies
just
continue
to
bring
concern
about
what
our
process
is
and
how
we're
doing
things.
This
council
asked
for
a
third
it
to
be
put
out
and
I'm
a
little
confused.
Why,
like
so
many
citizen
issues,
they
feel
the
need
to
come
and
address
this
council
on
that
process.
D
So
if
we
could
find
out
what
the
process
is
what's
going
on,
how
were
how
we're
handling
this
and
how
we're
moving
forward?
It
was
one
of
the
things
that
had
gotten
brought
up
before
was
the
bidding
process
for
especially
for
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
and
a
concern
of
Littleton's.
That
Littleton
has
voiced
in
the
joint
meetings.
D
So
if
we
could
make
sure
that
we're
given
that
process
and
see
if
we
could
stop
this,
that
would
be
that
would
be
great
Kathleen,
Bailey
and
Dave
I
really
appreciate
that
you're
still
coming
I
echo
mayor
Jefferson's
concern
that
the
only
report
that's
missing
is
the
one
that
you've
been
asking
for
that.
This
has
been
a
long
time
that
we
should
not
lose
reports
that
we
should
have
the
information
available
and
get
this
taken.
Care
of.
D
It
is
well
spoken
as
Bailey
that
what
you
asked
for
and
have
asked
for
from
the
beginning
is
not
what
we're
going
to
end
up
trying
to
do,
and
it
is
concerning,
and
the
meetings
that
happened
on
August
15th.
It
was
made
very
clear
by
this
council
majority
of
this
council
that
they
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
make
sure
that
we
had
an
independent
investigation
and
that
the
community
was
going
to
be
at
least
considered
in
some
of
the
questions
and
issues
that
were
going
on
in
that.
D
And
what
we're
doing
is
another
testing
and
you've
made
that
clear
time
and
time
again.
That's
not
what
you
wanted,
not
what
you
wanted
before
and
we
still
seem
to
be
headed
in
a
road
that
isn't
going
to
answer
your
questions
and
it
is
going
to,
as
Dave
pointed
out,
keep
you
with
a
date
at
seven
o'clock
to
come
and
see
us
and
I
hope
we
can
get
this
resolved.
It
is
starting
to
look.
D
And
item
a
I'm
glad
we
created
a
historic
preservation
board
too
I
I
think
it
would
be
it's
going
to
provide
a
good
commentary
for
the
community
to
have
some
input
on
things.
I.
Think
that
your
comments
for
the
comp
plan
as
a
lot
of
people
have
brought
up
some
concerns.
As
we
see,
public
meetings
happen
that
there
might
be
a
little
bit
of
a
disconnect
with
something
part
of
the
comp
plan
and
what
the
community
views
that
that's
going
on.
D
The
comment
that
got
made
about
the
from
Robert
now
stream
about
pending
litigation.
It
is
an
unusual
situation
for
a
community
council
to
agree
that
there
is
a
serious
problem
with
an
ordinance
that
they
have
and
also
pursue
things
in
court.
I
understand
that
puts
everybody
in
a
very
odd
position,
but
it
is
what
this
council
has
decided
to
do
so
I
guess
we
remain
in
our
odd
position
of
trying
to
go
through
this.
Thank
you.
F
I
I
F
K
F
I
K
H
X
My
name
is
Harold
state
Senior
Planner
in
the
Department
of
Community,
Development
and
I'm.
Here
this
evening.
To
present
to
you
the
angle,
at
forward
2016
comprehensive
plan
and
before
I
begin
I
want
to
answer
the
clerk
affidavit
of
publication
and
public
8
in
the
angle
would
Herald
and
also
in
our
city
website,.
X
It's
a
pleasure
to
be
here
tonight.
It's
been
a
long
road
to
get
to
this
evening
in
terms
of
our
comprehensive
plan.
We
began
as
process
a
number
of
years
ago
to
look
at
the
existing
comprehensive
plan
and
see
how
our
community
has
changed
in
the
intervening
ten
years.
One
of
the
things
that
it's
really
important
to
consider
is:
why
are
we
doing
this?
Why
is
this
document
necessary?
X
The
angle
would
forward
2016
comprehensive
plan
is
a
result
of
over
two
years
of
effort
to
craft
a
document
that
establishes
a
vision
for
the
community
in
terms
of
land
use
and
serves,
as
the
policy
document
containing
direction
for
the
development
angle
would
for
the
next
10
to
20
years.
It's
a
guide
that
offers
private
development
community
guidance
in
investing
in
building
an
appropriate
scale
projects
in
appropriate
locations
within
the
community.
That
is
the
essence
of
comprehensive
planning
change
management.
X
The
angled
forward
plan
is
based
on
a
number
of
other
documents
over
the
last
10
or
so
years.
There
have
been,
of
course,
the
2003
comprehensive
plan
roadmap
Englewood,
but
a
number
of
plans
in
the
intervening
years
that
have
helped
build
momentum
for
development
in
Englewood.
The
plan
itself
is
based
on
four
parts:
the
importance
of
angle'
Wood,
ankle
woods,
framework,
envisioning
the
plan
and
realizing
the
plan
and
I'll
go
through
each
of
these
sections
individually.
X
The
first
section.
Let
me
back
up
the
the
the
plan
itself
was
based
on
a
set
of
goals.
In
fact,
this
project
was
part
of
a
multi
tiered
approach
to
comprehensive
planning.
There
were
two
other
projects
that
were
going
on
under
the
umbrella
of
Englewood
forward
a
light
rail
corridor
study
and
a
pedestrian
bike
plan
process.
X
But
for
those
two
other
programs,
as
well
as
the
comprehensive
plan,
there
were
four
sets
of
goals
for
the
projects,
strengthening
the
existing
goals
and
objectives
that
were
found
in
the
original
comprehensive
plan
from
2002
develop
strategies.
That
would
help
us
to
engage
the
public
and
also
to
improve
development
within
the
community.
X
Also
to
engage
the
community
in
evaluating
the
types
of
strategies
that
would
be
appropriate
to
meet
development
pressures
that
are
on
the
city,
so
that
that
development
is
appropriate
for
each
individual
neighborhood
in
the
city
and
then
finally
develop
an
implementation
program.
That's
based
on
community
support
and
is
adopted
with
strategies
that
are
effective.
X
The
plan
itself
is
composed
of
a
number
of
themes:
six
to
be
precise,
live
work,
move
shop,
learn
and
play
these
themes,
as
or
as
they're
known,
are
actually
another
way
of
addressing
the
traditional
comprehensive
plan,
elements
that
would
be
residential,
industrial
transportation,
commercial
and
business,
educational
and
institutional
uses
and
recreation
under
the
live
theme.
The
idea
is
that
diverse
housing
stock
is
important
in
this
community.
X
The
work
theme
has
to
do
more
with
educating
a
workforce.
Having
an
educated
workforce
in
this
community
means
that
we're
very
more
apt
to
attract
businesses
that
pay
living
wages
in
this
community
and,
in
fact,
one
of
the
things
that's
important
is
Baby.
Boomers
and
educated
Millennials
are
now
looking
at
communities
like
Englewood
to
call
home
and,
as
those
folks
move
into
the
city,
we
end
up
with
a
more
educated
population
and
that's
very
attractive
to
this
workforce
makes
it
very
attractive
for
businesses
to
locate
in
angle.
X
Would
the
move
component
is
is
basically
transportation
and,
as
you
know,
transportation
emphasis
has
been
switching
away
from
personal
vehicles
more
to
mass
transit,
since
we
have
a
massive
investment
of
public
transportation
infrastructure
here
in
England
with
the
light
rail
corridor.
The
light
rail
corridor
also
provides
an
opportunity
for
focused
redevelopment
around
the
stations
that
are
in
Englewood
that
will
provide
for
residents
not
just
in
those
areas
but
throughout
the
community.
X
The
shop
component
or
shop
theme
is
again
the
commercial
or
the
business
component,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we're
finding
is
that
communities
are
experiencing
a
loss
in
retailing
because
of
the
internet,
and
there
are
ways
to
combat
that.
One
of
the
ways
is
to
have
more
small
businesses
in
the
community,
and
that's
one
thing
that
our
economic
development
program
has
been
working
on
for
a
number
of
years.
That
will
now
be
coupled
with
an
employment
based
approach
to
economic
development.
X
The
learned
component
is
one
of
the
more
interesting
because
it
includes
not
just
the
city
of
Englewood,
but
the
school
district
and
other
educational
facilities
and
institutions
within
the
community
and
the
idea
there
is
that,
having
a
better
educational
system,
not
just
for
students
in
kindergarten
through
grade
12,
but
but
beyond,
that
is
very
valuable.
It's
something
that
employers
look
for
in
it.
It's
coupled
well
with
the
workforce,
a
highly
educated
workforce.
That
was
a
major
point
in
the
work
theme
play
is
something
that
we
do
very
well
here
in
angle,
wood.
X
X
Part
two
of
the
plan
is
called
envisioning
the
plan,
and
that
is
important,
because
what
we've
done
with
this
plan
is
to
create
13
neighborhood
areas
within
the
city
to
focus
our
comprehensive
planning
efforts.
Now
these
areas
are
not
hard-and-fast
lined
areas;
most
of
them
are
defined
by
a
primary
focus,
be
it
a
park
or
a
school,
and
we've
looked
at
each
of
those
areas.
X
We've
had
a
number
of
public
meetings,
neighborhood
meetings
to
get
input
from
the
residents
in
those
areas,
as
well
as
the
businesses
that
may
work
in
those
areas
and
by
defining
those
areas
we
get
a
better
idea
of
the
differences
and
the
similarities
within
each
of
those
minut
areas
within
the
city,
the
neighborhood
area.
So
I'm
going
to
show
you
a
map.
It
may
not
be
very
easy
to
see
for
the
for
the
community
here,
but
this
is
the
northern
half
of
the
city
and
it
shows
the
number
of
neighborhoods.
X
We
have
Baker
Park,
the
South
Platte
neighborhood
Cushing,
Park,
Bates,
Logan,
Park,
Roman's,
Park,
the
medical
district,
downtown
and
ankle
wood
station
area
and
then
the
southern
part
of
the
community.
We
have
the
Maddox
Jason
Park
area,
South,
Broadway,
Heights,
Duncan
Park,
the
Bellevue
Brookridge
area
and
in
Centennial
Park
area.
So
those
are
the
13
neighborhoods
that
we
focused
on
the
key
policies
that
we
came
up
with,
though
in
those
areas
are
important
to
to
focus
on,
because
those
help
sharpen
how
we
will
implement
a
comprehensive
plan
in
each
of
those
13
neighborhoods.
X
The
assessment
is
done
to
look
at
how
those
individual
neighborhoods
have
similarities
with
other
neighborhoods
and
how
they're
different
and
based
on
those
differences
in
similarities.
We
can
craft
specific
implementation
strategies
for
each
of
those
areas
and,
for
instance,
I'm
going
to
go
through
one
area:
the
Downtown
Englewood
Station
area.
Now
on
this
map,
you
can
see
that
there
are
different
colors.
X
There
are
pressures
in
the
downtown
area
for
for
redevelopment
and
we
hope
to
be
able
to
capture
that
redevelopment
and
contain
it
in
areas
where,
where
does
the
most
good
and
where
it's
most
appropriate,
the
orange
areas
which
are
below
to
the
south
of
the
downtown
area
into
the
east
are
those
areas
where
there
may
be
some
pressure
for
development,
but
it
would
have
to
be
very
targeted
and
we
wouldn't
be
careful
about
how
that
development
were
to
occur
in
those
areas.
The
other
areas
that
do
not
have
any
color
on
them.
X
The
neighborhood
policies
are
important
part
of
this
particular
plan,
because
what
they
do
is
they
outline
how
a
particular
neighborhood
will
be
managed
through
these
strategies.
Now,
for
instance,
we
have
eight
strategies
for
the
downtown
area,
so,
for
instance,
the
first
one
is
a
balanced
vehicular
movement
with
opportunities
for
bike
and
pedestrian
mobility.
So
we
want
to
look
at
how
do
people
get
in
and
out
of
angle
wood
around
the
downtown
and
through
the
downtown
and
make
sure
that
we
have
appropriate
infrastructure
to
accommodate
that?
X
The
next
set
of
policies
or
strategies
that
we've
identified
for
the
downtown
area
are
to
support
corridors
as
key
commuter
routes.
So
we
have
Broadway
as
a
key
commuter
route,
there's
a
fair
amount
of
community
traffic
on
Dartmouth
and
285
and
Santa
Fe.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
that
traffic
stays
there
and
doesn't
filter
in
through
the
neighborhoods,
but
we
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
appropriate
infrastructure
to
maintain
that
traffic
flow.
X
The
DT
number
for
or
downtown
strategy
number
four
is
to
work
with
partnership
with
hotel
and
small
event
facilities,
which
is
something
that
has
been
an
issue
in
angle.
For
a
number
of
years,
we've
tried
to
attract
some
hotel
flags
to
develop
an
angle
would,
and
up
to
this
point
have
not
been
successful,
but
we
think
this
plan
will
help
demonstrate
that
we're
serious
about
redevelopment
within
the
city,
if
it's
appropriate,
for
our
community
and
in
appropriate
locations.
X
Finally,
the
last
three
for
the
downtown
area
are
considered
daylighting
and
restoring
the
natural
state
of
little
dry
creek.
That
was
something
that
was
brought
up
time
and
time
again
by
the
community.
There
are
some
financial
implications
to
that.
It
would
be
a
very
expensive
project,
but
it
would
be
an
amenity
that
I
think
the
city
could
be
proud
of,
provided
that
technology
is
available,
as
well
as
funding
to
do
that.
X
Investing
in
parks
and
open
space,
especially
improvements
at
Miller
Field,
there's
been
much
discussion
about
how
that
area
might
redevelop
in
terms
of
police
facility,
but
there
may
be
opportunities
to
increase
park
and
recreation
activities
in
that
area
as
well,
and
then
finally
enhance
the
u.s.
285
as
a
community
gateway.
It's
a
major
crosstown
traffic
carrier
for
the
for
the
metro
area
and
we
have
an
opportunity
to
capture
some
of
that
traffic
for
the
city
of
Englewood,
and
so
those
are
development,
centered
strategies
for
the
downtown
area.
X
Finally,
the
last
part
of
the
plan
is
the
monitoring
aspect
of
the
plan
and
the
purpose
for
the
monitoring
aspect
is:
we
have
embarked
on
a
strategy
of
indicators.
We
have
a
series
of
indicators
that
are
consults,
that
put
together
that
we
will
monitor
on
a
yearly
basis
and
we
will
check
back
in
a
year's
time
after
the
plan
is
approved
and
we'll
evaluate
those
indicators
to
see
how
well
we're
doing,
and
it
may
cause
us
to
readjust
a
plan
as
necessary.
There's
a
select
group
for
the
for
the
yearly
review.
X
Brad
power,
Nancy,
Fenton,
Julie,
Bailey,
Brook,
Bell,
Audra,
Kirk,
Jeremy,
lot,
John
Ville
burrow,
who
did
a
yeoman's
work
in
helping
prepare
this
document,
Darrin
Hollingsworth
all
have
been
very
supportive
of
this
process.
Their
their
input
to
this
process
have
been
amazing
and
I
I
thank
them
for
their
efforts
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
X
M
Yes,
my
name
is
qaeem
dickerson
I
live
at
twenty-eight
thirty
five
South
Pennsylvania
Street
Englewood
Colorado,
okay,
that
was
a
lot
worse
than
I
expected
it
to
be.
I
have
read
over
200
comprehensive
plans
for
my
occupation
and
my
previous
incarnation
as
an
employee.
I
have
never
read
or
heard
a
worse
one,
just
because
it
cost
a
lot
does
not
justify
passing
it
wasted.
Money
is
just
that.
Do
not
pass
this
defective,
comprehensive
plan.
It
does
not
reflect
the
character
of
Englewood
nor
the
will
of
the
citizens.
M
Holding
this
public
hearing
at
this
point
is
rather
disingenuous.
A
lot
of
people
are
gone
for
the
holidays
and
haven't
had
time
to
reflect
upon
this
and
what
damage
it
could
do
and
I
would
suggest
you
put
off
the
schedule
another
one
for
after
the
first
of
the
year
before
acting
upon
this,
a
comprehensive
plan
is
required
by
the
state
constitution
is
a
legal
land
use
document.
The
proposed
one
is
a
cookie
cutter,
somewhat
socialist
plan
designed
by
questionable
inexperienced
people
and
never
customized
to
the
city
of
Englewood.
M
The
group
that
promoted
this
to
the
city
on
a
contract
basis
said
it
was
not
a
legal
document.
If
you
pass
it,
we
will
be
stuck
with
this
legal,
non
legal
garbage,
costly
document
that
will
give
all
power
to
developments,
developers
and
staff
and
will
destroy
the
unique
character
and
tax
base
of
Englewood
work.
Live
play.
Learn
is
a
very
specious
framework
that
is
not
the
business
of
any
government
to
decide
and
it
is
redundant.
M
For
example,
the
recent
community
meeting
on
the
redevelopment,
one
of
the
few
remaining
industrial
zoned
air
areas,
revealed
a
number
of
problems.
The
first
thing
they
did
was
promote
how
their
project
was
authorized
by
the
new
comp
plan
and
fit
into
it.
The
second
thing
noticed
was
that
their
proposed
40-foot
project
protected
the
adjacent
r1
neighborhood,
because
there
was
no
limit
currently
on
height
of
industrial
housing.
There
is
so
much
wrong
with
this
plan.
I
can't
even
begin
to
address
them
all
in
this,
but
one
thing
was
noted.
M
F
Thank
you
if
you
could
stick
around
for
just
a
second
see
if
council
has
any
questions
for
you,
I
do
have
one
mr.
Gerson.
Thank
you
for
testifying
this
evening.
I'm
sorry
I've
got
a
question
for
you,
hey
sorry,
if
I
was
a
little
unclear.
Thank
you
for
testifying
this
evening
and
my
question
for
you
is
you
know,
given
you
see
a
lot
of
flaws
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan?
Are
you
suggesting
or
advocating
for
a
redo
or
restart?
Are
you
suggesting
that
a
comprehensive
plan
in
its
nature
is
probably
not
a
good
idea
for
us?
F
M
You
are
required
to
have
a
comprehensive
plan
by
state
law
as
far
as
I
know
and
I.
Don't
think
that
Home
Rule
eliminates
that
from
you,
but
it
is
a
legal
document,
and
this
is
not
designed
like
a
legal
land
use
document.
It
is
designed
for
some
socialist
control
over
the
lives
of
people.
We
have
you
have
no
right
to
determine
that.
We
have
to
have
a
diversified
housing
stock.
M
F
M
The
besides
the
fact
that
they
said
that
this
was
authorized
by
the
comp
plan
that
hasn't
been
voted
on
her
past
yet
and
they
insisted
that
they
were
providing
a
transitional
buffer.
It
is
neither
a
transition
nor
a
buffer.
It's
going
to
be
over
40
feet
tall,
it's
going
to
be
very
expensive,
there's
no
attention
given
to
parking
or
traffic
flow
or
anything
else.
That
area
is
already
so
congested
that
nobody
knows
what
to
do
about
it
and
there's
nothing
built
into
their
plan.
M
They
are
just
going
to
rezone,
then
they're
going
to
buy
it
with
a
rezoning
and
then
they're
gonna,
build
this
horrendous
structure
and
add
to
the
congestion
in
the
neighborhood
and
wipe
out
an
industrial
area
that
we
need
for
commercial
and
other
things
that
the
real
issue
is.
If
it's
going
to
protect,
then
we
need
to
change
the
zoning
for
industrial,
so
they
can't
build
a
six
story
or
a
ten
story
building
there.
M
We
need
to
limit
it
to
say
twenty
store
to
two
stories
and
not
the
density
that
they're
planning
they're,
putting
seven
houses
in
next
door,
the
same
developer
on
1.4
acres
and
their
two-story
and
they're,
causing
problems
with
already
with
traffic
and
then
they're
going
to
do.
52
units
plus
12
commercial
industrial
units
on
the
ground
floor,
and
they
have
no
parking
to
account
for
visitors
or
whatever.
Thank.
F
Y
I
do
I'm
dr.
Patricia,
Ross
I
live
at
33,
61
west
monmouth
Avenue
in
Englewood
and
I've
come
to
this
whole
comp
plan
late,
but
it's
been
a
very
interesting
thing
to
learn
about
about
land
use
about
political
agendas
and,
as
I
watched,
this
presentation
I
kept
asking
myself
who
benefits
really
from
this
comp
plan.
I
get
that
there
was
an
issue
of
this
has
been
going
on
for
two
years.
Y
I
know
this
must
be
extremely
frustrating
for
you
I
understand
that,
but
at
the
same
time
this
is
something
that
is
going
to
dictate
by
law,
as
Miss
Dickerson
just
pointed
out.
What's
going
to
happen
over
the
next
ten
years,
when
you
hear
live,
what
was
it
before
and
live?
Work
move
ship
shop,
learn
and
play
its
smacks
of
an
agenda
that
privileges
government
interference.
Y
If
you're
familiar
with
agenda
21
through
the
UN,
it
does
the
same
thing
and
I've
ham
studied
that
to
a
point,
not
a
lot,
but
I
do
think
that
it
is
in
violation
of
the
very
tenets
of
their
Universal
Declaration
of
Human
Rights,
which
guarantees
us
the
right
to
choose
how
we
want
to
live
and
play
and
work
not
dictated
by
some
plan.
So
again,
I
say
who
benefits
us
the
citizens
with
more
traffic
with
more
whatever
it?
Is
that
we're
given
to
do
I,
don't
know
or
is
it
the
developers?
Is
this
another?
Y
Y
You
know
the
story
right
so
mayor,
Jefferson,
protium
mayor
until
it's
all
you
councilmembers,
as
you
look
to
decide
if
you
are
going
to
say
yes
to
this
plan,
is
this
in
the
best
interest
of
Inglewood
I
can
go
on
and
on
about
the
idea
of
high
density
housing
and
how
really
not
a
good
idea
that
is
for
our
community
when
it
said
that
we
were
had
chances
to
talk
about
this
I
was
never
notified
to
go.
You
know
me,
I'd
have
been
there
right,
I
wasn't
there.
So
is
this
really?
Y
I
get
that,
but
is
this
really
in
our
best
interest,
and
is
it
going
to
benefit
us,
the
citizens
of
Inglewood,
the
people
us
who
live
here
already,
not
the
people
who
are
going
to
come
in
and
who
are
going
to
bring
all
this
fabulous
tax
money
and
all
those
things,
but
us
folks
who
already
live
here
or
is
it
going
to
benefit
the
developers,
the
land
this
this
it's
or
the
the
the
urban
housing
or
whoever
else
is
involved
in
this?
Please
look
at
that
carefully.
Do
I,
like
this
plan.
Y
D
Y
High
density
issue,
I
live
as
I
live
in
the
very
far
part
of
England
that
little
funky
part.
You
know
that's
really
closer
to
ink
to
Littleton
and
they
have
a
land
use
issue
with
that
blighted.
You
know
that
was
self
blighted
area
and
that
was
high
density
and
so
I
had
to
study
high
density
I'm
like
what
really
is
this
high
density
now
I
did
my
doctorate
at
New,
York,
University,
I,
understand
high
density
from
a
personal
perspective
when
you
put
in
something
that
is
high
density,
you're
putting
in
high-rise
apartments.
Y
What
I
understand
with
this
high
density
is
that
if
it's
done
through
the
urban
renewal
or
the
Housing
Authority
that
there's
a
chance
that
you
have
the
voucher
system
and
that
you
can
have
this
issue
of
no
tax
and
there's
no
tax
base
that
goes
to
our
schools.
That
is
an
issue
that
is
addressed
supposedly
in
this
comp
plan,
which
which,
interestingly
enough
I
don't
believe
school
districts
are
under
the
jurisdiction
of
you,
local
City,
Council
members.
Y
So
there's
the
issue,
as
you
pointed
out,
councilmember
Barrentine,
the
schools
don't
get
the
tax
money.
If
this
in
fact
goes
to
a
voucher
system-
and
it
goes
to
a
section-8
type
of
development,
if
that's
in
fact
the
case
I
also
know
from
personal
experience
living
in
New
York
in
a
time
when
the
when
the
economy
was
not
good,
that
when
the
economy
goes
bad
and
you
have
these
high-rises
and
they're
not
and
they're
not
occupied,
then
it
becomes
a
problem.
So
we
look
at
now
when
everything's
going
great.
Y
But
what
happens,
if
is
that
addressed
in
this
plan?
Is
that
addressed
in
high-density
is?
Is
this
an
issue
of?
Are
we
going
to
be
able
to
handle
these
empty
or
these
empty
houses
or
putting
in
more
section
8
folks,
as
calling
as
counting
pointed
out
that
has
an
issue
of
bringing
in
less
tax
dollars,
less
educated
people
whatever
it?
Is
that
we're
supposed
to
be
having
with
this
comp
plan,
it
seems
to
me
to
be
somewhat
logically
inconsistent.
That's
just
looking
at
it
from
an
academically
trained
person.
Y
Does
that
make
sense
so
with
high
density,
you
also
get
more
people
more
traffic,
more
crime.
Is
the
tax
dollars
going
to
offset
all
the
costs,
and
you
know
that's
one
of
my
things:
okay,
great.
We
get
this
tax
dollars,
but
what
about
the
costs?
Are
the
costs
going
to
be?
Have
they
been
considered
with
these
new
folks
coming
in
and
the
costs
that
are
going
to
be
involved
in
the
city?
Is
this
again?
Is
it
a
good
idea?
Y
D
Quite
the
question
I
mean
I
thought
you
could
categorize.
If
you
could
just
give
me
without
I
mean
I,
don't
want
the
dissertation
expecting
that
I
appreciate
the
information,
but
if
you
could
just
give
me
the
list
of
things
that
you
thought
were
concerned,
you
had
mentioned
high
density
and
I
wasn't
sure.
If
I'd
cop.
Y
Yes,
there
was
high
density.
There
was
this
issue
of
the
schools
to
say
you
know
we're
supposed
to
bring
in
more.
You
know
highly
educated
people,
but
then
you
know
we
have
to
address
the
problem
of
the
Englewood
school
districts
and
I
said:
that's
not
something
that
a
city
council
does
that's
a
state
issue
or
skilled
school
districts
are
not
under
the
jurisdiction
of
this.
If
I
could
say,
I
took
more
notes.
Oh
you
know.
The
other
thing
too
I
do
have
to
say.
Y
Y
D
F
Z
My
name
is
Bill
Clayton
I
live
at
9:58,
East,
Cornell
and
I'm.
Not
a
big
fan
of
the
plan.
I
think
it's
kind
of
vague
and
just
big
but
I
do
have
some
particular
objections
that
I
just
think
are
not
made
a
high
enough
priority
and
I
look
at
these
things.
I've
looked
at
what
I
wrote
and
then
I
realized.
These
are
things
that
have
been
here
for
a
long
long
time.
Z
We
just
keep
kicking
them
down
the
road
and
we
don't
do
anything
about
them
and
I
would
hope
that
the
comprehensive
plan
would
have
it
as
its
goal
to
improve
our
lives.
The
lives
of
the
city
of
the
citizens
of
England
I
see
a
lot
in
here
about
regional
cooperation
and
I.
Wonder
if
regional
cooperation
doesn't
mean
we're.
English
is
supposed
to
take
a
hit
for
the
team
and
and
in
particular,
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
traffic
I.
Think
traffic
in
our
neighborhood
divides
our
city
in
dangers.
Z
Our
lives
make
walking
and
cycling
difficult
adds.
Noise
and
pollution
reduces
our
quality
of
life,
but
I
don't
see
the
comprehensive
plan
making
traffic
improvement
a
goal.
It
has
some
vague
small
places.
It
says,
city
of
Englewood
will
discourage
commuter
traffic
on
collector
streets,
but
it
doesn't
name
those
streets.
We
all
know
which
streets,
those
are
they're
downing,
Dartmouth,
Logan
Oxford,
let's
name
those
streets
and
let's
take
some
serious,
meaningful
action,
and
let's
put
that
in
the
plan
us
to
85
as
described
as
a
gateway,
that's
true!
What
else
is
it?
Z
It
divides
the
city
like
a
noisy,
smelly,
River.
You
can't
get
across
there.
Imagine
if
you
live
on
the
south
side
of
285
and
you
want
to
go
to
our
business
district.
How
do
you
get
there?
Logan
is
a
terribly
dangerous
intersection,
so,
as
Bannock
Cherokee
downing,
we
should
have
something
in
the
comp
plan.
That
says
we
want
to
address
this
and
we
want
to
try
to
fix
this
access.
We
can't
have
a
vibrant
connected
city
if
you
can't
get
from
the
south
north.
Z
Excuse
me
just
very
briefly
a
couple
of
other
items:
recreation.
We
talk
about
recreation.
We
see
a
lot
of
push
to
improve
recreation
along
the
South
Platte
River,
but
no
mention
of
this
Centennial
Lake,
which
is
a
wonderful
recreational
opportunity.
We
should
be
allowing
canoeing
and
sailing
more
activities
on
that
Lake.
It's
it's
ironic
I'm
on
whitewater,
kayaker
I
was
on
the
US
team
in
1967
I've
kayak,
most
of
the
rivers
in
America,
and
we
just
fine
with
us.
F
Z
Well,
the
third
one
is
the
quality
of
our
drinking
water
tastes,
bad.
It
smells
bad.
You
know
it
has
strange
colors
from
time
to
time.
Our
comprehensive
plan
designed
to
make
our
lives
better
should
make
this
a
priority.
We
should
we
need
to
say
in
the
next
10
years
we're
gonna
fix
our
water,
everybody
I
know.
I
was
just
talking
to
Doug
Cohn
and
some
other
folks,
everybody
I
know,
has
a
water
filter
and
in
the
bottom
line
for
all
this,
these
problems
we
don't
fix,
as
I've
lived
in
England
a
long
time.
Z
F
Q
Of
all
the
talking
that
we
did
with
the
Historic
Society
and
you
guys
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
the
phrase
Historic
Preservation
Commission
does
not
appear
in
the
plan
and
I
don't
know
if
that,
though,
that
three
word
phrase
needs
to
appear
in
the
plan.
There's
talk
about
thinking
about
some
looking
at
the
old
historic
documents
that
have
the
regulation
from
2006
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is.
Q
Q
Q
I'm
sorry
realize
in
the
realized
part
of
the
plan,
five
point:
five:
they
talked
about
consider
doing
something
with
the
existing
Historic
Preservation
ordinance,
it'd,
be
real
nice
to
say:
let's
have
the
Historic
Preservation
Commission
consider
what
to
do
with
the
preservation
ordinance
so
realize
5.5.
Thank.
F
O
O
This
plan
is
all-encompassing
and
it's
a
little
bit
more
familiar
if
someone
was
breaking
ground
somewhere
and
actually
designing
a
development,
it
desired
development
I
a
little
bit
concerned
because
a
constant
theme
throughout
this
and
this
these
are
quotes
Inga
woods,
average,
smaller
homes
and
lower
than
average
income.
Our
deterrence
to
this
plans
goal
and
throughout
the
plan
you
continue
to
identify
the
average
Inglewood
citizen
and
the
average
angle
at
home
as
a
deterrent
and
I
I
happen
to
have
always
appreciated
our
modest
city
and
I.
Don't
know
exactly
what
that
means.
O
O
In
fact,
it
even
said
the
plan
said
that
they
believe
that
the
smaller
homes
were
the
reason
for
the
recent
or
relatively
recent
loss
of
number
of
citizens
from
31,000
or
whatever
it
is
down
to
30,
but
rather
than
considering
what
the
gentleman
before
just
said,
the
traffic,
the
water
other
issues
that
have
always
been
part
of
Inglewood
eminent
domain
was
not
used.
I
kept
because
of
all
this
criticism
for
what
exists,
I
kept
right
being
concerned.
O
I
might
see
the
word
eminent
domain,
it
doesn't
exist,
but
there
do
seem
to
be
some
pressures
being
placed
on
testing
homeowners
who
don't
quite
meet
or
less
than
the
average
homeowner
size
and
what
that's
going
to
feel
like
to
them
and
and
what
that's
going
to
mean
to
those
who
still
already
exist
here,
and
my
other
concern
is
the
and
again
I
I
simply
have
a
degree
in
economics.
I'm,
not
I,
don't
have
a
doctorate
in
anything.
I
also
have
a
teaching
certificate,
but
it
seems
to
be
somewhat
backwards
in
its
in
your.
O
O
F
B
That's
been
involved
in
us
moving
forward
on
that
when
it
comes
to
the
comp
plan.
Certain
things
that
do
concern
me
too,
is
this.
Increased
diverse
density
of
building
I
I
do
believe.
There
are
people
that
do
like
our
smaller
I,
like
the
term
modest
homes.
I
do
believe,
there's
ways
that
we
can
work
with
the
homes
to
honor
the
historic
aspect
of
them
that
has
created
these
craftsmen
craftsman
homes
and
these
different
things
that
I
think.
Sometimes
we
just
look
at
is
oh
they're,
so
teeny
or
this
that
they
can
be
adjusted.
B
They
can
be
changed
to
accommodate
more
maybe
another
child
moving
back
for
economic
reasons,
maybe
for
aging
parents
taking
in
their
families,
but
that
idea
of
still
honoring
the
facade
Arapahoe
acres
where
I
live,
is
a
landmark
historic
district.
It
is
not
protected
at
all.
We
have
already
lost
six
homes.
One
of
them
recently
made
quite
a
big
quantity
of
money
made
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
in
taking
one
of
our
homes
in
honoring
12
feet
of
the
front
facade.
B
We
had
nothing
to
do
to
protect
it,
I'm,
begging
and
pleading
that
there
is
consideration
in
the
comp
plan
for
what
we
do
have,
whether
it
be
done
in
planning
zoning
remodeling,
the
building
rules
and
regulations.
The
idea
that
Arapaho
acres
has
such
a
strong,
national
and
international
renowned,
what-do-you-call-it
reputation.
B
It's
it's
interesting
to
me
that
I
can
go
somewhere
and
someone
says:
oh
no,
rapo
Akers!
What's
that
and
I'm,
just
like!
Oh
my
gosh!
Well,
let
me
go
ahead
and
show
you
to
where
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
guys
know
that
you'll
be
receiving
an
invitation
to
come
out
and
see
a
few
of
our
homes
and
see
how
some
of
these
things
can
be.
B
Honored
as
well
has
modernized
and
I
can
see
that
in
other
aspects
of
Englewood
that
doesn't
have
that
fight
that
doesn't
have
maybe
some
of
that
educational
coalition
that
pulls
people
together
and
talk
about
that
history
and
that's
what
I'm
hoping
this
commission,
as
well
as
our
Englewood
Historic
Preservation
Society,
can
help
with
this
comprehensive
plan
specifying
that
you
do
honor
what
we
do
have.
So.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
F
I
I
AA
Q
P
C
C
H
K
AB
F
F
Moving
on
to
agenda
item
11,
so
this
is
ordens
resolutions
and
motions
under
11a.
We
do
have
a
new
item
that
got
pulled
from
consent
agenda,
that
is
the
new
11a
1
and
that
is
council
bill
47
to
approve
a
city,
ditch
grant
of
temporary
construction
easement
and
a
city
ditch
crossing
agreement
with
public
service
company
of
Colorado,
our
staff
sources,
director
of
utilities,
Tom
Brennan.
Sorry,
we
got
a
little
bit
out
of
order
because
we
got
pulled
out
of
consent,
good.
AC
Evening,
mayor
members
of
the
council
and
before
you
this
evening
to
recommend
approval
of
a
city,
ditch
grant
of
temporary
construction
easement
in
a
city
ditch
crossing
agreement
for
public
service
of
Colorado
for
an
electrical
conduit
to
provide
electrical
service
to
2100,
West,
Littleton
Boulevard
angle.
Would
city,
ditch
right
away,
runs
through
a
portion
of
this
property,
which
is
requires
a
license
agreement
to
cross
city
ditch
this
work
will
not
hinder
the
ditch
operation
nor
the
maintenance
activities,
and
we
will
realize
two
benefits.
One
is
an
all-weather
surface
for
access.
AC
D
So
I
was
somewhat
concerned
about
that,
considering
that
the
project
is
still
in
court,
they're
continuing
to
bill
it
build
it
and
the
Rockets
around
this
whole
thing
actually
was
one
of
the
catalysts
and
why
the
Littleton
city
manager
was
fired.
So,
when
I
saw
this
come
forward
and
realized,
how?
How
could
we
be
doing
some
kind
of
agreement
with
him,
or
is
that
going
to
cause
us
any
problem
in
doing
an
agreement
with
sekolah
when
this
project
isn't
still
in
court?.
AC
D
Right
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
mean
I
already
I'm
sure
the
color
didn't
care
that
the
city
manager
fight
it
got
fired,
but
I
mean
I'm
not
interested
in
getting
involved
in
that
whole
mess
of
what's
going
on
and
knowing
that
it's
still
in
court,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
making
that
clear.
That's
huge
concern
for
me.
O
F
AA
K
F
A
I
do
have
a
question
about
this,
and
just
because
of
one
of
the
things
that's
on
the
agenda
tonight
to
approve
for
one
hundred
and
eleven
thousand
dollars
it.
It
just
boggles
my
mind
that
at
the
beginning
they
have
a
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
674.
They
take
in
nineteen
one
fifty
five
to
forty
two.
They
spend
that
exact
amount,
leaving
the
same
amount,
and
you
know
when
things
come
up.
It
is
amazing
to
me
that
it
just
matches
totally.
AA
The
reason
this
one
matches,
especially
for
the
expenses
in
the
revenue,
is
that
we
expend
first,
we
know
exactly
how
much
we've
spent,
and
so
that's
what
we
bill
and
that's
why
the
revenue
equals
the
expenses
we
haven't
built
in
any
additional
to
increase
any
balance
at
all.
There
should
not
be
a
huge
need
for
balance.
I
L
K
F
D
I'm
voting
no
on
both
of
these
I
really
do
hope
that,
as
the
joint
a
meeting
with
Littleton
that
we
start
to
get
a
lot
more
information
on
this
budget
on
the
expenditures,
there
was
a
request
for
a
line-item
budget.
I
think
that's
appropriate,
going
forward.
I
think
we
need
a
lot
more
information
on
what's
going
on
with
with
this
process
and
with
the
finances.
F
K
AA
D
F
A
Actually,
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
what
councilmember
Barrentine
just
shared
about
the
fact
that
council
has
been
told
and
city
departments
have
been
told.
We
are
heading
towards
a
financial
cliff
in
2019
and
the
fact
that
we
are
not
dealing
with
this
sooner
than
2019
is
very
troubling
to
me.
So
I
will
be
voting
no
Thank.
D
K
F
AA
H
D
F
You
know,
I
do
see
this
as
a
surplus
budget
in
the
general
fund
and
the
additional
spending
through
some
of
our
other
funds
are
sustainable
and
planned
for
those
particular
expenditures,
and
this
year
I
do
generally
agree
with
councilmember,
Barrentine
and
councilmember
Russell's
comments
that
we
do
need
to
take
a
little
bit
deeper.
Look
at
what
we're
doing
I
think
2017
is
going
to
be
vital
for
that.
F
You
know:
I
know
that
we're
going
to
be
beginning
some
conversations
regarding
budgeting
and
taking
a
look
at
some
of
what
has
come
about
as
a
result
of
our
new
priority
based
budgeting
for
council
to
be
able
to
talk
about,
discuss
and
make
some
decisions
on
so
again,
I'll
be
supportive
this
evening.
Any
further
comments
seeing
none,
please
vote.
F
Move
on
to
11
b6,
this
was
a
council
bill,
45
that
was
pulled
from
a
consent
agenda.
This
is
a
proposed
bill
for
an
ordinance,
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding,
with
the
Colorado
Department
of
Public
Health
and
Environment
sin
vironment
a
leadership
program.
Our
staff
source
is
wastewater
treatment,
plant
Director,
Dennis
toke
evening.
E
F
F
D
N
D
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
had
an
opportunity
to
go
over
this
document,
knowing
them
from
the
answer
to
my
question
last
time
was
that
this
had
not
been
discussed
with
Littleton
that
and
that
there
was
kind
of
a
maybe
some
policy
procedures
that
were
being
done
in
here.
That
might
concern
them
on
undoing
this
process.
Is
there
an
intent
to
go
ahead
and
do
that
in
the
future,
so
that
our
partner
and
this
wastewater
treatment
plan
is
included
in
what
could
be
considered
policy
decisions
or
policy
guidance?
D
AB
As
far
as
Littleton's
involvement-
that's
all
done
through
the
supervisory
committee,
where
we
are
making
award
recommendations
or
applications
or
results
of
those
applications.
That
information
is
shared
with
both
councils.
There
things
in
particular
like
our
environmental
management
system,
that's
something
that's
budgeted
and
approved
every
year
as
far
as
audits
are
concerned
for
that
expenditure,
so
they're
well
aware
of
that
program.
Yes,.
D
D
The
reasons
the
questions
that
I
brought
up
I
will
be
building
no
on
it,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
that
I
do
think.
Well,
it's
stated
in
here
that
there
is
no
financial
impact
and
looking
over
this
I
do
think,
there's
a
financial
impact
to
it
and
that
I
think
there's
some
dictate
to
our
process.
Our
procedures,
our
policies
that
we
end
up
taking
on
and
I
would
like
to
explore
that
more
I,
don't
think
I
have
enough
information.
Okay,
you
can.
AB
D
AB
D
AB
K
F
You
thank
you.
Moving
on
to
11
c1,
the
Englewood
Water
and
Sewer
board
recommends
council
approved
my
motion:
a
risk
assessment
or
Alan
water,
filtration
treatment
plan,
Alan
residuals
in
the
amount
of
a
hundred
and
eleven
thousand
six
hundred
and
seventy
five
dollars.
Our
staff
sources
utilities
director
Tom
Brennan
good
evening.
Mr.
Brennan
good.
AC
At
councils
requests
this
proposal
was
developed
to
address,
raised
concerns
about
the
possible
health
risks
to
workers
and
adjacent
neighbors
from
exposure
to
tea
norms
present
in
the
treatment
residuals,
for
particular
we're
going
to
be
forming
a
human
health
risk
assessment,
we're
going
to
analyze
the
alan
filter
plant
water
treatment
procedures.
That
analysis
will
help
with
the
input
in
equations
for
the
risk
assessment,
we're
going
to
have
alternative
management,
alternative
processes
evaluated
with
a
risk
assessment
associated
with
them
and,
finally,
a
final
report
in
a
presentation
to
counsel
in
the
public.
AC
The
rfp
was
advertised
September,
1st
2016
proposals
will
do
September,
22nd
staff
evaluated
and
recommended
award
on
the
28th.
It
was
recommended
by
Water
and
Sewer
Board
for
approval
of
council
at
the
November
8th
meeting.
We
received
three
proposals
based
on
the
selection
criteria.
The
recomment
ago
was
recommended
integral
offers
independent
fresh
set
of
eyes
with
an
impeccable
credentials
to
their
staff.
For
this
evaluation.
AC
This
proposal
brings
together
a
team
of
scientists
and
engineers
from
integral
consulting
Dewberry
engineering
in
two
lines,
incorporated
to
write
experience
in
performing
risk
assessments,
valuing
radionuclides
health
effects
and
design
and
valuation
of
water
treatment
process
and
residuals
handling
and
disposal.
Staff
believes
integrals.
Team
approach
is
a
most
effective
way
to
accomplish
the
objectives
of
this
work,
as
it
covers
multidisciplinary
knowledge
and
expertise
to
complete
a
comprehensive
evaluation.
AC
AC
Task
2
will
evaluate
the
residuals
management
practices.
Our
current
practices
to
establish
the
correct
input
into
the
model
it'll
that'll
consist
of
the
overview
of
the
plants,
current
processes,
compliance
with
relevant
rules,
regulations
and
best
management
practices,
an
assessment
of
the
current
risk
and
future
exposure
to
radiation
based
on
the
current
residuals
management
program.
AC
AC
AC
The
final
report
will
build
on
this
analysis
to
construct
and
convey
a
complete
understanding
of
the
potential
of
human
health
risks.
You
know
be
presented
in
person
at
a
council
meeting
to
be
determined
stack,
staff
recommends
award
of
rfp
16-0
20
to
integral
consulting
and
its
teammates
in
the
amount
of.
AC
$100,000,
the
project
funding
will
come
from
our
professional
services
budget
as
a
industry
that
is
heavily
regulated
and
process
driven
in
our
professional
services.
But
we,
we
have
a
contingency
fund
that
we
utilize
for
times
like
this,
for
regulatory
and
operational
issues
that
arise
requiring
outside
consulting
this
work
will
be
completed
within
six
months
from
the
Notice
to
Proceed.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
me
at
this
time?
F
AC
I
A
Actually,
it
makes
me
very
sad
that
we're
at
this
point
I
went
back
and
watched
the
August
fifteenth
council
meeting
and
the
discussion
that
ensued
there
and
I
don't
believe.
I
believe
this
is
a
waste
of
money
to
do
this,
because
this
is
not
what
the
citizens
asked
for
and
I
do
not
believe
it
is.
What
council
asked
for
I
believe
that
council
member
Olsen
asked
for
an
independent
investigation
of
the
management
practices
and
I.
A
The
thing
that
makes
me
incredibly
sad
is
there
is
this
trust
issue
and
we
are
spending
money
that
our
is
not
going
to
fix
that
trust
issue
and
I'm,
not
exactly
certain
how
to
do
it.
But
this
is
a
huge
waste
of
money
and
I
feel
like
the
whole
discussion
got
turned
around
that
night
when,
when
things
were
asked
for
I,
do
believe
some
of
the
council
members
were
asking
for
this
assessment
done,
but
if
we
have
the
data,
we
don't
need
to
spend
a
hundred
eleven
thousand
dollars.
A
AC
A
A
AC
Yes,
I
fully
understand
that,
as
you
know,
I
took
over
as
director
last
July.
Currently
we
are
on
back
on
track
with
our
ways
residuals
management
plan.
All
the
residuals
generated
in
16
will
be
hauled
off
the
first
quarter
of
17.
There
will
be
no
residuals
on-site
till
the
next
year's
production
and
we
will
that
will
continue
from
now
forward.
AC
D
This
council
member
Russell,
was
so
upset.
She
called
me
and
made
me
listen
to
the
meeting
again
and
I
and
I
did
and
I
have
to
agree
with
her
that
the
consensus
of
Council
at
that
August
15th
meeting
was
to
have
an
investigation
from
an
independent
expert
and,
as
this
was
initiated
by
council
member
Olson,
who
who
of
course
said
you
know
she
supports
whistleblowers
that
we
needed
to
offload
this
from
the
staff
that
we
needed
to
go
ahead
and
take.
D
As
mayor
man,
city
manager,
Keck
said
that
the
state
violation
was
that
we
didn't
remove
the
residuals.
That's
exactly
what
miss
Bailey
has
brought
up
again,
that
we
didn't
remove
them,
as
we
should
per
our
management
plan
that
we
were
wrong
and
that
we,
the
intent,
was
not
to
continue
this.
But
to
and
I
liked.
Councilmember
Olsen's
word
to
offload
it
from
the
staff
and
have
this
handled
by
an
expert,
and
at
that
August
15th
meeting.
D
But
there
was
a
higher
rate
and
that
it
is
the
cause
during
that
period
of
time
of
people
contracting
cancer
in
an
order
to
go
ahead
and
lay
their
fears
and
their
concerns.
They
have
asked
for
certain
material
to
be
given
to
them
and
we
are
short,
the
most
important
apparently
year
and
the
one
year
that
we
don't
have
documentation
for
it.
D
So
there's
a
trust
issue
and
a
concern,
but
this
all
came
from
people
in
the
community,
believing
that
our
stockpiling
of
this,
which
we
did,
which
was
against
our
management
process,
which
we
shouldn't
have
done,
caused
people
in
the
community
and
in
that
plant
our
employees,
cancer
and
that's
the
what
I
believed
we
were
going
to
do
to
move
forward
to
try
and
either
allay
their
fears
or
figure
out
what
we,
whether
we
contributed
to
it
or
not.
I,
don't
think
that
this
is
going
to
solve
that
problem.
D
I,
don't
think
it's
addressing
with
what
the
original
issue
is
and
I
think
that's
part
of
why
we
see
them
continue
to
come
every
two
weeks
because
we're
not
addressing
that
issue
and
so
I
do
agree
with
councilmember
Russell
I.
Don't
think
we
did
what
we
said.
We
wanted
to
do
what
this
council
directed
on
August
15th
and
if
any
other
council
members
would
like
to
save
yourself
an
hour
and
40
minutes
trying
to
get
to
it.
It's
at
about
a
hundred,
it's
a
at
about
an
hour
and
40
minutes.
D
AC
D
What
I
understand,
but
as
you've
just
you
have
just
put
really
you've
put
it
really
well
the
words
of
why
they're
concerned
it
is
the
only
report
that
is
missing
and
you
have
people
in
this
community
that
believe
that
that
is
the
report.
That
would
prove
that
we
contributed
to
giving
our
employees
cancer
and
it's
the
only
report,
that's
missing,
I
sure
their
concern
is
obviously
you
do
too.
D
H
D
Don't
think
what
we're
doing
is
going
to
help
so
for
this
particular
piece
of
it
I
don't
think
either
from
the
meeting
that
started
this
whole
process
on
August
15th
that
this
was
what
council
wanted.
I,
don't
think
it's
going
to
help
answer
the
problem
and
it's
a
lot
of
money
to
not
fix
the
problem.
Yes,.
I
But
we
have
spoken
numerous
times
since
then,
and
mr.
Keck
has
also
addressed
this
council
I'm,
not
only
finding
out
what
happened,
how
to
prevent
things
in
the
future,
how
to
set
a
plan
forward
to
ensure
our
citizens
that
if
we
were
having
a
process
that
may
not
have
had
the
most
beneficial
aspect
or
outcome
that
we
wanted,
that
we
would
find
others
that
was
part
of
our
RFP
process.
This
is
no
secret.
All
of
a
sudden
we're
finding
this
out.
We've
had
numerous
discussions
about
this,
including
getting
an
RFP.
That's
been.
I
I
But
I'm
thankful
that
we're
going
through
this
process
I
want
to
know
if
we've
done
anything
wrong,
I
want
to
know
if
we're
doing
anything
wrong
now,
I
want
to
know
if
we
can
do
anything
better
in
the
future.
I
believe
this
process.
This
RFP
helps
us
to
analyze
and
move
forward
with
confidence
that
we
can
tell
the
community.
We
have
outside
agency
look
and
here's
the
best
way
to
move
forward
from
here
forward.
I
Also,
the
water
board
approved
this
unanimously
they've
looked
at
this
and
they
said
this
is
the
best
move
for
our
city
to
move
forward.
We
didn't
have
any
of
the
community
there
when
this
was
discussed,
so
we
just
the
water
board
figured.
It
was
the
best
and
I
supported
that
as
well
as
I
know,
the
mayor
may
have
been
there
as
well,
and
it's
also
we
have
transcripts
of
that.
But
it's
something
I
think
we
need
to
move
forward
on
I.
I
Think
the
citizens
demand
that
we
we
not
just
do
the
right
thing,
but
but,
as
a
group
say,
this
is
what
we
want
our
city
to
know
and
move
forward
on
and
continue
to
look
for
is
what
my
question
is.
You
know
in
20
years,
if
we
still
can't
find
that
report,
are
we
still
gonna
have
the
same
people
here.
If
the
report
isn't
available,
we
need
to
have
a
you
know.
Somebody
tell
us
it
is
not
going
to
be
available.
We
will
never
get
it
so
that
they
don't
think
so.
I
The
community
doesn't
think
we're
trying
to
hide
some
I.
Don't
think
we
are
I'm
dismayed
that
that
individual
item
is
missing,
but
we
have.
None
of
us
here
can
say
that
that
report
shows
approved
someone
got
cancer
or
not,
it
would
prove
a
reading
or
a
reprove
a
report.
What
I
think
would
be
important,
but
for
any
of
us
up
here
to
say
that
a
single
report
would
prove
you
know
cancer.
I
None
of
us
here
are
scientists
or
doctors,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
community
knows
we're
trying
to
do
the
best
thing.
We're
trying
to
find
out
the
facts,
yeah
we're
trying
to
be
proactive
in
the
future
and
I
appreciate
mr.
Keck,
wanting
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
looked
at
alternate
sources
for
make
sure
if
we're
to
change
our
process
and
that's
what
we
need
to
do,
and
we
have
an
outside
agency
to
help
us
do
that.
I
L
L
I,
don't
think
some
people
are
ever
gonna
trust
on
this
one,
and
it's
in
perhaps
it's
you
know
it's
it's
unfortunate,
but
I
wanted
to
ask
one
question,
though,
in
terms
of
historic
data,
the
reconstruction
are
you
hopeful,
I
mean
I
would
expect
that
if
they
did
this
reconstruction
that
they
would
be
independent
enough
to
say
you
made
mistakes
along
the
way
and
that's
what
number
two
and
three
then
would
also
begin
to
follow
up.
Is
that
what
the
intent
is
of
this?
That's
how
I
read
it?
L
Yes
right
so
I,
don't
get
this
whole
thing.
Untrust
I
mean
I,
don't
I!
Think
Trust
is
something
that
has
been
broken
and
it's
very
hard
to
rebuild
trust
after
it's
been
broken,
and
so
this
to
me,
is
the
best
next
step
of
what
we
need
to
do
along
with
it
be
great
if
we
can
find
that
one
report,
but
you
have
a
summary
of
it
right,
but
we
don't
have
the
actual
report.
L
AC
L
You
and,
in
my
mind,
for
people's
health.
The
funding
for
this
is
a
small
amount,
given
what
risk
alleged
alleged
risk
is
out
out
there
for
so
many
people
that
people
are
fearing.
So
to
me,
this
is
a
small
small
amount
to
pay
to
try
and
figure
out.
Is
that
risk
real?
Is
it
you
know?
What
is
it
so?
Thank
you
appreciate
it.
Thank.
F
F
You
know,
as
far
as
the
you
know,
cause
of
the
cancers
and
things
that
mr.
Robinson
I
don't
know.
If
you
know,
maybe
this
is
more
prudent
for
a
council
request,
but
I
know
that
we
have
looked
to
outside
agencies
for
I
think
believe.
The
term
was
clusters
that
you
know.
Who
did
we
go
to
do
you
recall
or
no
off-the-cuff,
sorry
to
put
you
on
the
spot
there
regarding
what
type
of
research
we
did
or
who
we
look
to
looking
for
other
potential
environmental
causes?
Sure.
W
F
You
but
again
I'll
offer
that
for
Council
as
an
alternative
to
approving
or
disapproving
this
tonight
to
delay
this
for
two
weeks
to
gather
additional
feedback,
reconsider
for
the
scope
of
work
and
then
approve
it
again.
I
you
know
if
I
had
to
choose
between
approving
and
not
approving
tonight,
I
would
probably
choose
to
approve,
but
again,
I
think
it'd
be
more
prudent,
given
the
amount
of
money
and
given
the
feedback
we've
already
received
from
the
public
to
delay
this
for
two
weeks,
councillor
Martinez
thank.
J
J
AC
L
I
appreciate
me
or
your
desire
to
get
more,
it's
just
an
input
into
this.
It
sounds
like
nobody
wants
us
to
even
do
this
so
I,
don't
know
what
more
would
be
would
be
helpful
at
this
point.
So
and
people
are
denied
wanting
to
be
a
part
of
this
process
all
along.
They
just
wanted
the
the
one
report
we're
missing
so
I
would
say:
let's
move
forward,
move
forward,
we
have
a
contractor.
We
have
a
great
organization
that
can
do
it,
let's
move
forward
and
get
it
done.
Thank.
D
Would
disagree
with
councilmember
Olson
and
that
they
haven't
denied
wanting
to
be
part
of
this
process.
They
have
been
in
the
process.
They
haven't
agreed
with
how
we
wanted
to
do
it.
They
come
every
week
and
there
are
very
much
part
of
this
process.
They
are
the
reason
that
we're
still
talking
about
this,
so
they
are
the
process,
so
I
think
that's
a
I
think
that's
kind
of
just
a
little
bit
unfair
in
that
I.
D
Think
they've
been
very
clear
on
exactly
what
it
was
they
did
want
and
through
this
process
they
asked
for
certain
documentation,
and
it
was
through
that
request
that
we
even
found
out
that
we
were
missing
stuff
I
mean
if
they
hadn't
requested
it.
We
probably
this
council
would
probably
never
even
know
that
it
was
missing
or
that
there
was
maybe
some
opportunity
for
some
other
process
to
handle
it.
D
Then
it
was
through
that
process
through
their
involvement,
their
research
that
we
found
out
that
it
was
on
a
hard
drive
somewhere
being
chopped
up
or
tried
to
get
out
of.
It
was
through
their
research
in
their
process
that
we
found
out
that
there
are
other
companies
that
we
deal
with,
that
hold
this
information
for
three
or
five
or
10
years,
and
the
information
is
all
different
from
different
people.
So
they've
been
very
engaged.
D
They
are
this
process
and
since
they
are
the
process-
and
they
say
no
I
don't
want
to
participate
in
a
public
meeting
in
a
town
hall
where
I
think
you're
just
going
to
cover
it
up
and
do
what,
as
Bailey
said,
was
a
dog
and
pony
show
that
was
that
was
well
taken.
If
that
wasn't
going
to
fit
what
they
wanted
for
the
process
for
the
concern
because
they
brought
it,
this
council
didn't
bring
this
concern
to
the
public.
It
came
the
other
way
around
and
I
agree.
D
If
I
really
thought
that
this
was
going
to
answer
the
question
of
whether
we
have
processes
and
procedures
in
place
in
the
past
that
didn't
contribute
to
people
contracting
cancer,
then
that
would
be
helpful.
You're
saying
that
there
are
some
pieces
of
this
that
may
be
of
some
value
but
I'm
not
sure
that
the
entire
hundred
thousand
needs
to
be
spent,
because
it's
not
going
to
answer
those
questions.
D
They
have
been
very
clear
on
what
they
what
they
wanted.
So
if
we
separately
or
the
Water
and
Sewer
Board
separately,
wants
to
go
ahead
and
evaluate
your
operations
and
your
procedures
moving
forward.
I'm,
not
saying
that.
That's
might
not
have
some
value,
but
this
is
being
put
out
there
as
if
this
is
going
to
resolve
that
issue
and
they've
made
it
very
clear
that
it
won't
she's
made
it
very
clear
that
group
has
made
it
very
clear
what
they
want.
Thank.
G
Keep
it
simple
here:
I
would
say
that
I
agree
with
the
concept
that
we're
moving
forward
and
creating
this
report.
The
issue
of
the
water
park
department
isn't
just
the
allegations.
It's
about
trying
to
plan
for
the
future,
make
sure
we're
doing
the
best
processes
and
if
it's
been
the
80,
since
the
last
time
that
that
was
looked
at
technology
has
changed.
So
in
this
situation,
we're
going
to
be
able
to
deliver
as
much
possible
information
as
we
can
not
just
in
one
area
but
across
the
board
and
I.
L
I
was
misunderstood:
it
mayhaps,
misspoke,
miss
Barrentine,
but
I
did
not
for
a
minute
want
to
communicate
that
the
people
who've
been
coming
haven't
been
part
of
the
process.
This
is
a
process,
that's
been
wonderfully
led
by
them
and
bringing
it
up
no
question.
What
I'm
saying
is
that
this
particular
assessment
tonight
that's
before
us
is
not
something
that
they
want
and
they've
made
that
really
clear
tonight
to
is
they?
Don't
they
don't
really
want
this
done?
It's
a
waste
of
money.
L
You've
said
that
miss
Russell
has
said
that
so
I'm
saying
that
it
doesn't
really
make
sense
to
delay
at
another
couple
weeks,
because,
regardless
what
we
do
with
this
particular
assessment
I
doubt
that
it
will
be
useful
to
them.
It
won't
build
trust.
It
won't
necessarily.
It
will
not
resurrect
the
missing
document.
We
have
to
do
both
I
believe
we
have
to
do
this
and
I
think
we
should
be
flying
someone
down
to
Arizona
to.
H
L
At
that
computer,
but
I
know
it's
probably
confidential
and
they
have
other
stuff
in
that
computer,
so
they
probably
won't
give
us
access
to
it.
What
I'm,
seeing
tonight
I
hope
does
that
make
better
sense
to
you.
That's
what
I
meant
miss
parenting
counselor
that
I
didn't
mean
that
these
people
were
not
in
the
process
of
it.
They've
been
a
part
of
it
the
whole
time.
This
is
a
one
response
to
help
get
the
background
information.
L
F
I
F
F
Again,
I
will
support,
but
I
do
think.
This
is
logical
for
the
neighbors,
the
employees,
the
customers
of
the
city
of
Inglewood.
To
do
this.
You
know,
as
far
as
the
trust
issue
and
what
some
of
the
group
would
like
to
see
forward.
I
would
still
invite
them
to
make
those
comments
and
see
if
we
can't
improve
the
scope
moving
forward.
W
F
I
L
D
Really
brought
to
light
some
of
the
disconnect
that
we
might
be
having
and
using
the
comp
plan
with
the
higher
density
going
on
because
you're
getting
some
pushback.
We
don't
really
seem
to
be
disconnected
with
what
the
community
wants.
One
of
the
things
that
we
had
brought
up
before
Mayor
was
about
having
another
viewpoint
of
this
was
bringing
in
somebody
like
Evan
Fodor,
with
better,
not
bigger,
maybe
Randall
O'toole,
who
I
seen
at
a
presentation
who
had
been
I,
think
with
heritage
and
had
been
a
Yale
professor
and
had
delved
into
this
subject
pretty.
D
Well,
it
kind
of
get
a
different
perspective
on
some
of
the
issues
going
on
with
high
density,
and
there
was
an
opportunity
for
us
to
maybe
pony
up
with
the
city
of
Littleton
to
bring
in
a
speaker
and
do
some
kind
of
joint
meeting
and
I
haven't
heard
anything
more
on
that.
So
if
we
could
kind
of
look
at
where
that's
at,
because
I
brought
it
up
a
couple
of
meetings
ago
and
I
believe
the
city
manager
was
going
to
be
looking
at
talking
to
mark
Ralph,
the
interim
city
manager
for
Littleton.
D
D
F
D
And
then
the
sewer
plant,
the
joint
wastewater
treatment
plant
meeting
before
the
end
of
the
year.
That
was
my
understanding.
We
were
going
to
get
that
going
so
that
we
can
get
some
of
these
questions
answered
go
into
the
new
year.
In
looking
back
on
some
of
the
previous
meetings,
I
mean
it
was
somewhat
disheartening
to
see
that
the
exact
same
process,
the
exact
same
timeline.
D
These
issues
that
everybody
keeps
saying
is
so
serious,
but
we
keep
just
not
discussing
so
if
we
could
make
sure
that
that
gets
put
on
the
mayor
manager
agenda
sites
and
what
we're
doing,
because,
when
I
listen
to
that
meeting
and
all
of
a
sudden,
it's
where's
if
we're
doing
stuff
for
February
and
I
might
still
haven't,
heard
anything
about
talking
about
a
budget.
So
if
we
could
kind
of
put
a
little
focus
on
that
with
all
of
these
issues
going
on
I'd
appreciate.
D
F
D
D
Went
past
the
the
thing
because
tons
of
people
are
it
took
them
four
days
they
poured
the
concrete
they
did
a
beautiful
job
and
I
would
like
to
get
an
update
on
what's
going
on
with
Excel,
which
is
we
were
told
that
that
mid-block
crossing
wouldn't
be
opened
up
like
legit,
you
know
legally
until
Excel
did
their
piece
and
I'd
like
to
get
an
update
on.
What's
going
on
with
that,
it
looks
really
nice,
they
did
a
beautiful
job.
It
was
done
quickly.
D
It
was
done
with
a
minimum
amount
of
aggravation,
so
all
of
the
businesses
down
there
seemed
to
be
happy
that
that's
moving
forward
and
where
we're
going
to
address
the
process
for
the
east
side
of
the
Paseo
and
the
what's
going
to
be
done
with
Public
Works
for
the
parking
lot
and
the
lighting
on
that
East
Side.
For
that
hundred
and
fifty
spots
back
there,
safety
and
lighting
has
been
a
huge
issue
on
all
of
this
construction
and
what
the
businesses
down
there
so
I
want
to
keep
people
safe.
A
F
F
Excellent,
thank
you.
You
know,
as
folks
are
aware,
still
unofficially
I
suppose
the
general
obligation
bond
for
the
new
police
station
was
passed
by
the
voters.
You
know
the
council
will
need
to
move
quickly
in
order
to
get
those
bonds
to
market
we're.
Not
thinking
to
be
you
know
the
only
ones
asking
for
money
or
who
got
money
approved.
F
The
second
thing
I
have
was,
of
course,
election
related
as
well.
It
is
that
recreational
marijuana
past,
as
well
as
the
special
tax
being
proposed,
the
special
tax,
I
guess
I
should
say
I
guess,
I
have
a
question
for
mr.
wrinkle
I.
Don't
know
if
you're
able
to
answer
this
or
perhaps
again,
maybe
something
that
might
be
better
handled
through
a
counsel
request.
But
do
you
know
if
that
money
will
be
separately
accounted
for
or
what
that
will
just
be
general
fund
monies?
F
AA
H
AA
F
Fair
enough
they'll
still
have
to
get
licensed
and
and
get
through
that
piece.
So
you
know
our
year-end
estimate
of
I
think
half
a
million
or
a
little
over
slightly
over
half
a
million
is
probably
ambitious
for
our
first
year.
Okay,
that's
all
I
had
for
you.
Thank
you,
but
I
would
advocate
to
Council
that
we
consider
a
separate
accounting
for
marijuana
issues.
You
know
having
spoken
with
jurisdictions
who
do
have
recreational
marijuana,
it
does
seem
to
be
I
think
a
best
practice
to
gather
data
on
how
much
money
revenues
are
being
generated.
F
What
the
use
of
those
revenues
are
so
I
would
advocate
not
necessarily
for
a
special
fund,
but
at
minimum
a
special
line
item
for
recreational
marijuana,
tax
revenues
and
I
suppose
we
can
take
that
up
at
a
later
date.
But
if
you
know,
if
counsel
is
okay
with
that,
I
would
prefer,
or
I
would
like
to
schedule
a
study
session
on
that
on
that
topic.
If
others
might
be
interested
seeing
a
lot
of
heads
nodding,
I
won't
waste
our
time
any.
D
F
Exactly
so
we'll
be
getting
around
to
that,
that's
a
good
point.
I
also
secondarily
want
to
let
you
know,
is
recently
selected
to
be
part
of
Taiwan's
US,
Young
Leaders
program
and
recently
traveled
to
Taiwan
for
an
educational
and
fact-finding
trip.
I
was
able
to
meet
with
local
elected
officials
there
to
learn
from
each
other
and
tour,
some
civic
spaces
and
monuments,
museum,
rail
operations,
business
parks
and
some
private
businesses.
F
F
You
know,
as
our
mayor
you
know,
I
realized
I
represent
our
community
at
all
times
and
even
when
no
official
action
is
taking
place,
I
think
it's
helpful
for
everyone
to
know
and
be
a
resource
for
all
of
us,
as
well
as
staff
in
generally
city
staff
generally
so
feel
free
to
email
me
any
questions
or
comments
or
concerns,
or
call
me
any
time
to
discuss
that.
Finally,
I
wanted
to
highlight
that
I
was
at
the
councilmember
gates
and
I
were
at
the
Birdsall
grand
opening.
F
W
And
so
we
are.
We
are
going
to
be
doing
that.
We
are
going
to
be
looking
forward
to
bringing
you
more
of
the
budgetary
process
as
well
as
bring
you
all
the
ppb
items
and
getting
you
more
involved
in
the
budgetary
process.
Asap,
because
that's
necessary
for
us
to
make
changes
as
well
as
looking
forward
to
this
to
this
so-called
cliff
that's
coming,
and
so
we
would
avoid
it
and
so
know
that
that's
that
that
is
our
top
priority.
Also
Happy
Thanksgiving.
E
H
E
As
you
all
know,
we
have
a
hearing,
December
1st,
it's
my
understanding
that
several
members
have.
This
counsel
have
been
subpoenaed
for
that
hearing
and
I
am
just
expressing
a
concern
to
this
body
that
if
there's
a
discussion
prior
to
this
hearing,
I'm
a
concern
about
what
some
of
the
subpoenaed
individuals
might
say
and
if
that
conversation
might
be
used
at
the
hearing,
so
I
am
recommending
that
that
study
session
topic
be
moved
till
after
December.
First
but
again,
that
is
a
question
for
this
council.
But
that's
my
concern
and
it's
a
journey.
E
D
What
did
we
think
was
going
to
happen
when
we
said
we
were
going
to
continue
to
look
at
an
ordinance,
knowing
that
we
were
in
court,
that
we
wouldn't
do
a
moratorium?
We
weren't
taking
any
steps
to
go
ahead
and
and
give
ourselves
any
space
to
prevent
going
to
court.
We
knew
we
were
in
court
and
we're
still
looking
at
the
ordinance
why
this
isn't
a
surprise.
I
mean
this
is
exactly
what
happens.
We
knew
the
December
1st
as
she
was
coming,
so
we
we
do.
D
We
do
everything
and
we
do
nothing
at
the
same
time.
We
don't
do
anything
to
prevent
it
or
stop
enforcement
of
it
so
that
we
could
have
some
time
to
discuss
it.
We
force
that
issue
so
that
we
end
up
in
court
and
knowing
that
we
have
to
redo
this
ordinance
that
we
have
currently
a
lot
of
people
on
councils
that
have
problems
with
with
what
we're
doing,
and
at
least
acknowledge
that
we
have
to
address
something
and
I.
L
L
So
I'm
I'm
in
favor,
of
moving
it
to
the
12th
and
keeping
moving
on
and
trying
to
set
a
public
hearing
for
whatever
we
determine
we'd
like
to
see
happen.
If
any
changes
being
proposed,
I'm
hoping
we
will
propose
changes
and
a
public
hearing
be
set
as
soon
as
possible
in
January.
The
timings
Act
may
be
is
actually
a
little
bit
better
because
the
public
hearing
would
be
after
the
holidays
before
so,
but
I
think
we
need
to
keep
moving
I,
don't
want
to
delay
it
any
further.
Her.
F
D
E
D
D
E
D
The
information
that's
been
provided
in
open
counsel
here
that
the
judge
has
made
comments
that
he
believes
this
is
a
legislative
issue
that
probably
is
affecting
his
decision
already,
that
he
knows
that
we're
looking
at
the
ordinance
so
I'm
not
sure
that
we're
changing
anything
we're
just
delaying
it
again,
and
so
we're
not
nothing
to
lend
this
point.
Nothing
is
going
to
be
any
different
after
this
hearing,
then
I
mean
one.
F
D
F
F
L
F
I
said
the
options
would
be
November
28th,
where
it's
scheduled.
Currently
December
12th
has
been
suggested
as
a
study
session
that
it
could
move
to,
and
then
the
third
option
would
be
to
continue
it
indefinitely.
In
my
mind,
and
not
necessarily
pick
a
date,
you
know
we
would
probably
have
to.
If
that
were
the
option
selected,
this
council
would
probably
have
to
come
to
consensus
again
to
reconsider
it
and
schedule
it.
In
my
mind,
I'm
councilor,
Martinez
I
would.
F
F
Suppose
the
good
thing
about
the
12th
as
it
wouldn't
it
may
provide
some
window
of
opportunity
if
there's
not
another
subpoena
data
afterwards,
other
others
want
to
weigh
in
and
where
they're
at
on
this
Loretta
got
you
temp
every
eights,
were
you
on
the
twelfth
or
indifferent
indefinite
I'll
come
back
to
you.
If
you
wanted
to
on
it.
F
A
F
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
that
there's
several
alternatives
that
could
come
about
as
a
result
of
that
study
session
and
I
see
no
action
as
a
distinct
possibility.
I
see
repeal
of
the
ordinance
as
a
possibility.
I
see
a
modification
of
the
ordinance
as
a
possibility.
I
think
mr.
comers
office
will
be
providing
some
information
regarding
all
three
of
those
alternatives,
and
council
would
probably
need
to
give
some
consensus
direction
on
what
to
move
forward
with
didn't.
E
F
A
Bottom
line
is
I,
do
believe.
Excuse
me,
I
didn't
maintain
a
row,
please
good
the
the
bottom
line
is
we
could
discuss
that
at
a
council
meeting
and
take
care
of
it,
because
we
can't
make
a
decision
in
a
study
session
anyway.
Well.
F
And
one
of
the
things
that
I'd
like
to
discuss
during
the
study
session
is
the
possibility
of
a
public
hearing.
You
know
I.
Do
you
think
it
would
be
prudent
to
move
this
towards
a
public
hearing,
regardless
of
what
the
consensus
was
to
put
the
public
on
notice
that
this
is
an
issue?
The
council
is
going
to
consider
and
draw
as
much
public
comment
on
the
issue
as
we
could
before
we
made
a
decision
so
that
the
I
forgot
to
mention
that
at
that
public
hearing
element
is
well
not
legally
required.
F
D
If
we're
moving
toward
a
public
hearing
and
notifying
the
public,
then
we
don't
need
to
have
the
study
session
at
all.
We
just
need
to
set
the
public
hearing
and
notify
the
public,
and
if
we,
if
people
think
that
there's
more
notification
that
needs
to
go
out,
I
think
what
council
member
Russell
is
saying
is
what
world
would
we
be
discussing
it
there
yeah.
D
F
I'm
saying
is,
though
there
could
be.
You
know
what
we're
presenting
to
the
public
for
their
comment
on
the
public
hearing
could
be
very
different.
Again,
it
could
be
a
repeal.
It
could
be
a
modification.
You
know
wherever
we
feel
like
the
general
consensus
of
council
is
at
that
time.
So,
in
my
mind,
I'm
trying
to
get
that
question
answered
in
my
mind
and
I
think
what
I.
D
F
Disagree:
I
think
that's
prudent
for
study
session
to
get
consensus
on
what
to
bring
forward
other
comments.
We
do
have
consensus
to
reschedule
this
to
the
twelve
Mayor
Pro
Tem
Gillette
you
and
I
will
at
our
next
mayor
manager,
meeting
have
to
bump
one
of
these
other
items,
but
we'll
make
it
happen.
Yeah.