►
From YouTube: CEAC 09212022 Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
F
A
C
G
Okay,
yeah,
I
saw
vice
chair
watson,
just
joined
alright,
so
we
will
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
for
those
of
you
who
haven't
participated
in
zoom
sessions
like
this,
a
lot
of
us
are
used
to
it
from
previous
couple
years,
but
in
general,
please
keep
yourself
on
mute
until
you're
directly
addressed,
and
then
you
can
raise
your
hand
if
you
don't
see
how
to
do
that.
G
Let
us
know,
but
it
should
be
pretty
clear.
It's
generally
on
the
bottom
in
the
middle
and
then
when
called
on
then
click
to
unmute
yourself,
but
by
keeping
everyone
mute
while
they're
not
talking.
We
minimize
background
noise,
improve
the
quality
of
the
recording
for
or
the
experience
for,
everyone,
as
well
as
the
recording
for
the
public.
So,
ms
willis,
will
you
please
take
a
roll.
J
A
G
Thank
you
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
our
minutes
from
our
august
17th
meeting.
G
Member
strom
just
raised
her
hand.
Is
there
a
second,
I
remember
emil
haynes
am
I.
Can
you
correct
me
if
I'm
saying
your
name
wrong.
G
Emel
heinz,
thank
you.
Thank
you
cool.
Thank
you,
member
emil.
Hans.
So
we
have
remember
emil
hans.
As
second
was
there
any
discussion.
Did
anyone
have
any
corrections
additions?
G
C
C
G
Okay,
thank
you.
Everyone
all
right
so
now
is
when
we
would
have
the
public
forum.
I
don't
see
anyone
listed
as
an
attendee,
so
we
don't
have
any
members
of
the
public
present.
So
we'll
I
mean
this.
This
was
the
opportunity
for
public
to
address
our
committee,
seeing
as
no
one
is
present
we'll
move
on.
B
To
see
you
all
again,
I
really
wanted
to
acknowledge
your
time
that
you
spent
with
us
last
time
and
thank
you
for
taking
the
tour
of
the
police
department.
I
think
that
was
very
insightful
and
helpful
for
you
to
see
how
the
police
department
operates
and
a
basic
overview
of
how
coda
the
code
enforcement
division
operates.
So
thank
you
for
that.
B
Just
a
few
highlights
to
go
over
with
you.
First
off
october
is
national
code
enforcement
appreciation
month
that
has
been
signed
into
legislation
by
the
governor
and
has
also
been
set
forward
to
counsel
for
recognition
by
proclamation.
I
know
that
council
has
supported
this
in
the
past
and
is
my
understanding
that
will
be
finalized
on
october
3rd.
B
In
conjunction
with
that,
the
city
has
been
working
on
an
educational
video
for
the
public.
It's
about
a
four
and
a
half
hour,
four
and
a
half
minute,
educational
video
that
will
be
in
its
draft
form
and
will
be
finalized
and
released
in
conjunction
with
code
enforcement
appreciation
month.
It
is
an
animated
educational
document
that
just
briefly
highlights
code
enforcement
and
the
things
that
we
do
for
the
community.
B
In
conjunction
with
that,
the
city
of
inglewood
has
taken
to
the
national
stage
and
has
been
recognized
by
our
peers
on
the
national
level.
The
city
of
inglewood,
codes,
division
and
I'll
have
more
information
regarding
that
at
the
next
meeting,
but
the
city
of
inglewood
is
being
highlighted
and
being
recognized
for
some
of
the
great
work
that
we're
doing
on
a
national
level.
B
The
program
progress
that
we've
made
here
at
inglewood
in
the
last
five
years
alone:
positive
changes
and
collaborations
with
the
community.
Our
increases
to
the
code
enforcement
division
training
are
changed
from
being
purely
reactive
to
being
proactive.
We're
about
69,
proactive
in
the
work
that
we
do
within
the
community
versus
back
to
when
I
started
it
was
under
39.
B
We
made
sure,
with
the
assistance
of
counsel
and
being
good
stewards
of
our
finances,
evaluated
our
statistics
and
deemed
that
we
needed
additional
staff
in
order
to
come
to
a
proactive
level
of
response.
That's
what
our
community
needed
from
us
and
so
for
those
changes,
we're
being
recognized
on
the
national.
The
city
of
inglewood
is
being
recognized
on
a
national
stage.
B
So
I
really
wanted
to
thank
this
committee.
They
were
a
big
part
of
making
that
happen,
as
well
as
council,
member
russell
and
the
rest
of
council
for
the
ongoing
stewardship
that
they've
had
in
support
of
code
enforcement
over
the
last
several
years
and
moving
this
to
being
one
of
the
most
premier
agencies
in
the
state
and
now
one
of
the
most
recognized
premier
agencies
in
the
nation.
So
we're
doing
some
very
positive
work
here
in
englewood.
B
That
is
all
that
I
have
for
updates.
Oh
one,
more
we've,
just
looking
at
my
notes.
We've
continued
to
operate
and
conduct
abatements
within
the
city.
Abatements
are
conducted
as
explained
after
the
due
process.
Phases
have
run
out,
and
that's
typically
21
to
30
days
that
we
try
to
work
and
gain
voluntary
compliance
from
citizens
owners
occupants
of
residents.
B
If
we're
unable
to
gain
that
cooperation,
then
the
city
is
left
with
no
choice
but
taking
two
actions
either
as
summons
the
court
or
to
abate
the
nuisance,
and
some
of
these
nuisances
were
significant,
with
trash
to
be
litter,
outdoor
storage
that
the
city
had
to
step
in
to
abate
those
cases.
So
I
did
want
to
let
you
know
that
the
city
continues
to
do
that.
B
Those
are
not
funds
that
come
out
of
the
general
fund.
The
city
lays
out
the
initial
finances,
however,
that
is
reimbursed
by
the
county
and
the
city.
The
county
then
takes
on
the
collection
portion
of
that
in
the
form
of
taxpayers.
B
And
outside
of
that,
I
have
something
for
new
business.
If
the
chair
believes
this
is
the
appropriate
time
for
me
to
talk
about
that.
I
can,
if
not,
we
can
save
that
towards
the
end
of
this
meeting.
G
B
B
So
the
process,
the
way
that
works
is
first
step.
We
do
the
whole
due
process
as
required
and
outline
a
municipal
code
that
gives
the
residents
an
opportunity
to
contest
any
type
of
conditions
on
their
property
or
to
work
with
the
city
to
come
into
voluntary
compliance.
Each
case
is
treated
individually.
The
next
step
is,
we
would
abate
or
issue
to
summons.
If
we
abate
the
property,
then
the
city
will
go
ahead
and
order
the
contracted
service
with
the
city
to
go
out
and
remove
that
nuisance.
B
When
that
is
done,
the
city
will
attempt
to
collect
that
those
funds
plus
a
service
fee,
as
outlined
in
municipal
code,
if
the
city
is
unable
to
collect
those
funds
with
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
to
the
finance
department,
the
city
code
enforcement
handles
zero
finances,
so
we
don't
collect
money.
The
finance
department
attempts
to
collect
if
that
is
unable
to
be
resolved
between
the
finance
department
and
the
owner
occupant,
then
that
is
forwarded
to
the
county.
B
G
Okay,
that
makes
more
sense.
Thank
you.
Did
anyone
else
have
any
questions
for
code
manager,
lewis
for
anything
he's
gone
over.
G
And
I'd
like
to
congratulate
you,
I
know
that
you
know
we
really
are
appreciative
of
the
way
that
you
run
the
code
enforcement
department
and
it
obviously
is
showing
based
on
all
of
these
recognitions,
and
I
want
to
recognize
you
and
thank
you
for
all.
You
do,
and
you
know
the
the
high
level
of
integrity
that
you
carry
as
you
run
the
department.
It
really
means
a
lot
to
us
and
we
appreciate
you.
G
And
then,
as
the
I
mean,
why
don't
you
introduce
what
you're
gonna
tell
us
about?
I
just
I
don't
want
the
whole
discussion
to
end
up
on
that,
since
we
have
to
get
back
to
city
attorney
niles
on
the
tree
shrub
code,
and
I
know
that
that
could
take
a
while
and
then
at
least
I
want
to
address
the
the
bylaws
as
well,
but
go
ahead
and
introduce
the
the
topic
that
you
know
go
ahead.
B
As
we've
discussed,
the
city
has
put
forward
a
change
to
ordinance
regarding
impounds.
B
This
is
consistent
with
state
law.
What
most
municipalities
are
adopting
the
ordinance
change
this
process
started
well
before
the
current
chair
is
in
place.
The
previous
chair
did
not
want
to
go
over
this
type
of
ordnance.
With
this
body
or
the
previous
body.
B
We've
had
a
significant
change
and
wanted
the
city
to
move
forward
with,
with
these
amen,
ordinance
changes
what
the
impound
ordnance
is
being
put
in
place
for
what
it
is,
is
it's
shifting
the
responsibility
of
payment
for
those
cases
that
are
related
to
cruelty,
neglect
or
dangerous
dog,
in
which
a
subject
owner
has
been
through
the
due
process
phase,
meaning
the
judge
has
found
that
there's
probable
cause
to
hold
this
animal,
that
it
cannot
go
back
to
the
home
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
and
that
that
owner
will
pay
financial
responsible
responsibilities
in
advance,
leading
up
to
the
trial.
B
We've
had
cases
recently
where
the
city
is
financially
responsible
after
15
days
of
holding
that
dog
at
25
a
day
we
are
currently
in
the
rears
of
around
12
000.
Regarding
current
cases,
this
ordinance
will
not
change
the
outcome
of
those
cases,
and
the
shelter
did
say
that
they
would
work
with
us
to
reduce
that
tax
burden
or
that
burden
on
our
taxpayers.
B
What
it
does
not
do
is
it
does
not
change
the
current
process
for
impounds
for
dogs
that
are
found
at
large
dogs
that
good
to
meritan
bring
into
the
shelter
it
does
not
penalize
good
samaritans
or
dog
owners,
and
it
does
not
keep
the
due
process
phase
from
happening
with
that
that
type
of
circumstance
again,
this
is
only
for
animals
that
are
impounded
have
been
through
the
due
process.
Probable
cause
has
been
determined
that
this
animal
needs
to
be
kept
in
the
care
of
inglewood.
B
It
is
not
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community
for
the
for
the
dog
to
be
brought
back
into
the
community,
and
it's
not
in
the
best
interest
of
the
dog
to
go
back
to
the
home
due
to
potential
cruelty
neglect
the
bill.
The
ordinance
also
does
qualify
that
if
at
trial
the
subject
owner
is
found
not
guilty,
then
the
city
would
reimburse
the
owner
of
who
paid
those
fines
back
for
anything
that
they
have
paid
out
at
the
conclusion
of
their
case
and
found
finding
of
not
guilty.
B
So
it's
basically
a
financial
fiscal
responsibility,
ordinance
all
along
the
front
range
we're
finding
that
animals
are
being
put
and
and
stay
in
shelters
for
long
periods
of
time.
At
the
conclusion
of
cases,
when
the
verdict
of
guilty
is
read,
these
animals
are
abandoned
and
there's
no
way
because
the
shelter
is
not
not
a
victim.
B
We
can't
the
court
cannot
order
that
the
owner
pays
those
those
fees,
those
fees,
and
so
that's
where
we're
trying
to
shift
that
a
burden
from
from
the
city's
financial
responsibilities
to
the
owner
or
the
financial
responsible
person
of
that
dog.
G
Oh
go
ahead.
Let
him
finish,
then.
B
So
this
was
brought
up
at
council
on
monday
and
council.
Your
representative
and
a
few
other
council
members
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
had
an
opportunity
if
you
wanted
to
take
this
up
as
a
body
to
review
or
if
you
wanted
the
city
to
move
forward
with
this
and
go
through
the
public
hearing
phases
of
the
ordinance
change
or
if
you
guys
want
to
review
it
at
the
next
meeting.
That's
what
they
were
asking
is
some
direction
from
you
all.
G
And
just
to
add
a
little
bit
so
this
was
brought
to
my
attention
and
I
watched
the
city
council
meeting.
I
don't
know
if
any
of
you
have
had
a
chance
to.
I
have
not
had
a
chance
to
review
the
ordinance
change
recommendation.
G
G
J
J
B
I
think
it's
right
now.
I
think
the
conversation
is
just
a
consensus.
You
can't
vote
on
this
particular
subject
because
we
didn't
properly
post
it
to
the
public,
but
we
can
take
discuss
this
under
new
business
and
take
a
consensus.
Just
like
city
council
would.
G
So
vice
chair
watson
go
ahead
and
put
out
like
put
out
your
thoughts,
I
mean
obviously
we're
we
don't
have
the
the
recommended
cone
changes
in
front
of
us.
It
sounds
like
you
have
reviewed
them.
I
have
not
yet,
but
most
of
us
probably
haven't
and
haven't
even
heard
about
this
until
now,
but
I
think
it's
worth
bringing
up
points
for
everyone
to
have
in
their
heads
as
we
have
the
opportunity
to
look
at
it
so
go
ahead.
G
Suspect,
it's
probably
a
different
part
of
the
code
right.
Yes,
so
there's
been
a
lot
of
updates
to
code
to
remove
duplication,
because
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
have
been
mentioned
in
code
in
multiple
places
is
that
accurate
code
manager
lewis
that
it
was
already
covered
elsewhere.
That
is
correct.
G
Thank
you
and
remember
emma
hines.
E
Yeah,
I
have
a
couple
questions
for
you.
First,
you've
referenced
dogs
as
you've
been
making
your
statement,
I'm
assuming
that
this
is
all
animals.
I
think
dogs
probably
represent.
E
E
Second
question,
and
I,
as
I
reviewed
this,
it
seemed
like
a
lot
of
this
was
clarification.
Things
too
just
wording
that
that
was
a
little
bit
of
a
big
ambiguities
or
just
a
clarification
of
the
the
language.
E
B
One,
the
biggest
change
is
to
be
consistent
throughout
the
state
of
colorado
to
have
similar
procedures
and
processes
in
place
again.
Other
municipalities
have
adopted
this
format.
It's
become,
colorado
has
become
a
hodgepodge
quilt
of
ordinances
count.
The
counties
themselves
actually
have
this,
because
it's
in
part
of
the
state
statute,
but
municipalities
have
changed
this
and
made
it
so
it's
less
consistent.
The
biggest
portion
of
this
is
the
fiscal
responsibilities.
B
From
from
hearing
from
other
people,
they
do
not
want
to
pay
extra
to
the
shelter
for
for
criminal
cases,
and
these
are
criminal
cases
for
for
animals
that
are
being
neglected,
treated
horribly,
cruelly
or
an
animal
that
has
attacked
to
a
point
or
has
a
history
of
attacking
where
the
taxpayers
are
paying
are
having
that
burden
placed
on
them
rather
than
the
subject
owner.
E
Okay
and
final
question
has
to
do
with
liability
for
the
pound
fees.
You've
indicated
that
there's
a
that
there's
a
deficit
right
now.
Do
you
feel
that
the
new
verbiage
is
going
to
improve
that,
and
if
so,
what?
What
kind
of
enforcements
are
you
going
to
have
to
be
able
to
improve
people
paying
their
their
actual
fees
for
this
stuff.
B
So
what
will
happen?
Is
the
party
will
go
through
the
due
process?
They
will
be
informed
by
the
judge
of
what
their
financial
responsibilities
would
be.
They
would
be
required,
within
a
certain
amount
of
time,
to
go
and
prepay
for
those
fees
leading
up
to
their
next
court
hearing,
so
usually
speedy
trials.
90
days
typical,
I
would
say
a
few.
G
So
the
since
we're
in
this
discussion,
it
looks
like
we've
gotten
pretty
far
in
this
and
time
seems
pretty
good.
I
would
suggest
that
could
manager
louis
maybe
address
the
the
questions
that
were
brought
up
in
city
council
regarding
the
concern
about
the
situation
with
a
good
samaritan
right.
So.
B
B
Without
that
due
process
and
that
code
enforcement
was
getting
involved
because
the
shelter
is
asked
again,
each
situation
is
different
and
there
may
be
some
extenuating
circumstances
such
as
unable
to
verify
rabies
vaccination
concerns
for
the
dog's
health.
It's
not
properly
groomed
or
has
overgrown
nails
or
has
bad
teeth.
B
Maybe
the
animal
is
not
getting
proper
care,
and
so
the
shelter
does
reach
out
to
us
for
quite
a
few
cases,
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
reviewing
that
we
follow
the
animal
to
make
sure
that
it
is
going
back
and
is
part
of
a
healthy
and
safe
family.
We
can
rule
out
a
variety
of
things,
such
as
poor
health,
old
age
under
vet
care.
B
Those
are
circumstances,
but
we
do
have
an
obligation
to
our
to
those
that
don't
have
a
voice
to
make
sure
that
they're,
healthy
and
safe.
B
In
this
particular
instance,
code
enforcement
was
called
to
go
down
to
the
shelter
and
that
particular
party
did
not
want
to
wait
for
a
code
officer,
and
so
it
escalated
to
a
point
that
was
that
really
could
have
been
resolved
in
a
more
amicable
decision
or
communication,
and
that
was
a
one-off
situation
again.
B
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
the
concerns
that
were
raised
by
this
citizen
is
the
city
is
not
taking
away
the
due
process
of
any
dog
that
we
impound
if
we
impound
a
dog
and
again
this
is
a
good
samaritan
situation,
but
we
always
allow
for
that
due
process.
If
there
are
other
extenuating
circumstances
regarding
a
pet,
we
do
take
our
shelter
staff's
input.
B
B
We
have
had
people
that
have
come
forward
that
have
been
involved
in
in
unusual
domestic
cases,
where
there's
three
or
four
people
trying
to
claim
a
dog
and
the
shelter
and
code
enforcement
have
to
make
the
determination
who
has
the
ownership,
and
if
not,
we
have
to
go
to
a
court
and
say:
will
you
please
beam
who
owns
this
property
so
again,
we're
looking
out
one
number
one
for
the
health
and
safety
of
our
community?
Is
this
animal
vaccinated?
Is
it
healthy?
Is
it
safe?
B
G
Now,
if
a,
if,
if
I
have
a
dog
and
my
dog,
somehow
gets
out
of
my
yard
figure,
you
know
like,
like
I've
talked
to
you
about
in
the
past,
I
had
an
escape
artist
dog
and
it
took
a
lot
of
work,
multiple
effect,
multiple
efforts
to
to
make
my
yard.
You
know
proof
to
keep
him
in
there.
I
had
to
bury
bricks
under
the
fence
and
all
sorts
of
stuff.
G
So
if
a
dog
get
I
mean,
obviously,
if
it
happens
over
and
over
and
over
that's
that's
it's
reasonable
that
someone's
gonna
have
to
deal
with
code
enforcement
over
it.
But
if
it's
first
time
a
dog
gets
out
a
neighbor
instead
of
what
would
probably
be
the
nicest
would
be,
they
just
call
the
phone
number
on
the
dog's
collar
find
me
get
it
back
to
me
without
having
to
go
through
the
shelter
or
the
city
say
they
take
it
to
the
shelter.
B
They
will
typically
contact
us
one
when
an
animal
comes
in,
because
citizens
not
only
go
to
the
shelter
it
may
be,
this
shelter,
it
may
be
another
shelter.
They
also
contact
the
city
of
englewood
police
department
and
get
a
code
officer
because
they
may
have
information
that
this
dog
is
being
held
is
at
the
shelter.
B
So
it's
just
one
being
informed
two.
We
need
to
make
a
case
report
because
all
impounds
that
come
in
and
whether
it's
a
good
samaritan
dropping
it
off
or
or
code
enforcement.
It
is
an
impound
and
we
are
required
an
ordinance
to
make
sure
that
we
maintain
impound
logs
and
so
the
best
way
to
do.
That
is
to
capture
that
in
a
code
enforcement
case.
B
This
is
the
same
situation
that
happens
in
joining
jurisdictions.
It
is
also
best
practices
for
animal
shelters
within
a
jurisdiction,
and
this
is
not
just
inglewood.
This
is
throughout
the
state
and
throughout
the
nation,
but
they
partner
with
their
animal
welfare
organization
or
law
enforcement
in
the
area.
Many
are
run
out
of
the
shelter.
We're
unique
in
inglewood.
Is
that
we're
not
run
out
of
the
shelter
we're
run
out
of
the
police
department,
but
we
rely
on
the
shelter
versus
us.
B
Normally,
all
impounds
would
would
come
to
us,
but
we've
contracted
with
the
shelter
to
be
able
to
provide
those
services
for
the
for
the
inglewood
citizens,
and
so
again
it
goes
back
to
making
sure
that
the
healthy
and
safe
situation.
B
I
would
like
to
say
in
a
perfect
world
chair
that
every
animal
that
is
that
goes
to
the
shelter
by
a
good
samaritan
has
a
collar
has
a
rabies
tag
on
it
has
identifying
information
in
this
chip.
That
is
not
the
case.
B
No,
it's
not
a
contract,
so
they're,
basically
a
third
party,
but
our
impound
records
are
maintained
here
at
the
police
department.
So
we
would
be
able
to
run
a
list
of
all
the
impounds
that
occur
within
the
city
of
englewood.
G
So
an
impound
is
when,
if
an,
if,
if
my
dog
got
out
and
a
neighbor
found,
it
took
it
to
the
shelter,
that's
that's
an
impound
prior
to
the
city
being
involved.
B
G
B
Then,
like
in
some
jurisdictions,
unlike
in
inglewood,
their
again
their
shelter
staff
and
their
humane
law
enforcement
is
in
one
building,
so
they
already
are
doing
that
record-keeping.
B
That
does
not
have
to
be
in
the
contract.
That
is
something
that's
in
our
code,
and
so
we
do
require
them
to
follow
all
relevant
codes
and
make
sure
that
you
know
the
animals
have
rabies
and
if
not
then
there's
rabies
vaccinations.
Then
then
that's
when
we
get
involved.
B
So
in
their
contract,
they're
required
to
to
do
a
variety
of
things,
including
making
sure
that
they
follow
municipal
code
and
so
because
we
we
have
to
keep
the
records
of
an
impound.
The
shelter
is
not
responsible
for
that.
We
are
required
to
be
notified.
B
G
Okay,
so
if
if
the
shelter
receives
any
so
they
impound
an
animal,
there's
no
signs
of
neglect,
there's
not
a
dangerous
incident
report
and
they
contact
inglewood
code
enforcement
and
they
find
the
owner
and
the
owner
comes
down
there
and
wants
to
collect
their
animal
and
pay
the
shelter
whatever
their
you
know
fee
for,
however
long
it's
been
is
and
inglewood
can't
dispatch
a
code
enforcement
officer
right,
then,
then
the
person
would
be
able
to
take
their
animal
without
englewood
code
enforcement
having
to
show
up.
B
There
are
circumstances
that
that
would
occur.
Yes,
I
don't
think
they
can
even
see
me.
One
of
the
other
concerns
is
to
make
sure
that
we
document
the
each
animal
that
is
impounded
because
in
the
city
of
englewood,
if
an
animal
is
at
large
more
than
three
times
and
they
have
additional
penalties
added
to
that
animal.
G
G
If
it's
not
any
of
those
things-
and
you
know
worry,
can
the
concern
about
not
being
able
to
get
a
hold
of
like
having
your
dog
be
stuck
there
for
days,
because
you
have
to
pay
a
fine
or
deal
with
code
enforcement
and
code
enforcement's
not
available,
and
I
appreciate
that
you
just
clarified
that
if
a
code
enforcement
officer
is
not
available,
then
the
shelter
would
take
the
information
from
the
person
and
code
enforcement
will
follow
up
with
that
person
for
the
inglewood
required,
summons
and
fee
afterwards.
B
Yes,
and
and
just
to
clarify
the
particular
person
that
was
speaking
about
their
individual
case
was
a
unique
situation
again
that
had
potential
circumstances
where
code
enforcement
needed
to
get
involved,
and
it
escalated
to
a
situation
that
I
think
was
was
unfair
on
the
shelter
staff
and
it
was
unfair
on
on
the
city's
perspective.
B
G
Thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
you
going
through
all
of
this
with
us.
I
would
suggest
to
to
our
committee
that
my
perspective
on
all
this
is
everything
code
manager
lewis
has
presented
to
us
makes
it
appear
clear
that
the
this
ordinance
change
is
just
really
around
revenue
and
shifting
the
financial
responsibility
to
the
owner
in
the
situation
of
neglect
or
danger,
where
an
animal
is
kept
for
a
long
period
of
time.
G
Pending
court
cases,
it's
been
confirmed
by
code
manager,
lewis
and
city
attorney
niles
in
the
city
council
meeting
that
there's
not
an
urgency
for
this
to
be
immediately
approved,
and
so
I
feel
it's
our
responsibility
as
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
being
that
this
is
brought
up,
and
it
is
in
our
bylaws
to
review
ordinance
changes
that
we
include
in
our
next
meeting
the
ordinance
changes
we
all
be
prepared
to
discuss.
I
would
expect
it'll
be
a
clear
cut.
G
Everything
seems
fine
and
we
send
it
through
our
city
council
liaison
russell
to
offer
city
council.
That
was
interested
in
our
input
that
we
recommend
moving
forward
with
it,
but
that
gives
us
all
a
chance
to
review
it
in
detail
and
meet
next
time
and
ask
any
other
questions
we
come
up
with.
So
if
anyone
is
objects
to
that,
please
speak
up
right
now.
G
Okay,
so
that's
what
we'll
plan
for
and
since
we're
talking
with
you
code,
manager,
lewis-
and
I
know
your
schedule-
is
you're-
going
to
be
at
a
conference
right
during
our
next
normal
meeting.
G
So
we
discussed
that
we
would
potentially
move
our
next
meeting.
So,
let's
just
I
I'd
like
to
hear
from
everyone
if
these
dates
are
available
october,
11th
or
26th
instead
of
our
standard
meeting,
because
I
would
like
to
have
code
manager
louis
present
and
I've
already
confirmed
with
city
council
member
russell
that
she
could
participate
in
either
of
those
nights,
the
11th
or
the
26th.
Is
there
anyone
who
could
not
do
the
11th
or
the
26th.
G
Okay,
so
we'll
officially
make
that
the
date
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
but
thank
you
very
much
code
manager,
lewis
did
anyone
else
have
any
other
questions
or
discussion
on
what
code
manager
lewis
presented.
G
Yeah
I'm
aware,
thank
you
very
much,
ms
willis
member
emil,
heinz.
E
G
Okay
and
then
our
agenda
will
include
it
and
it
sounds
like
you've
already
read
through
it
anyway.
So
if
you
do
have
any
thoughts,
then
send
them
please
to
ms
willis
and
myself
and
I'll
make
sure
to
include
those
in
our
discussion.
G
F
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
your
service,
it's
exciting,
to
have
a
new
group
of
people
to
take
a
fresh
look
at
things
that
are
going
on,
and
you
already
are
aware
of
everything.
Probably
almost
that
was
on
my
council
update
report.
Council
did
on
monday
night
vote
four
to
one.
Two
council
members
were
missing
to
to
ask
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
to
look
at
this,
because
that
is
really
what
this
committee
was
established.
For.
F
The
thing
is,
you
all
represent
the
citizens
of
inglewood
and
the
public,
and
it
gives
openness
and
transparency
to
all
the
decisions
that
are
made
in
the
city,
because
we
don't
want
to
make
rules
just
based
or
just
based
on
specific
cases,
but
we
need
to
consider
really
what's
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city,
and
it's
always
good
to
have
more
eyes
look
on
on
something
and-
and
I
think
that's
why
council
agreed
overwhelmingly
to
send
it
back
to
you.
F
I
I
appreciate
the
time
that
you
take
to
serve
the
citizens
in
englewood
and
that
I
just
appreciate
that
also
I
do
want
to
congratulate
the
code
enforcement
department
on
their
national
recognition
and
to
code
member
lewis
or
code
manager,
lewis
for
all
that
he
does
for
the
city.
So
thank
you
all
for
your
time.
Thank
you
that
you
will
be
considering
this.
G
Thank
you,
city,
council,
member,
russell,
okay.
Our
next
thing
is
communications
subcommittee
update.
Now,
currently
we
don't
have
a
communications
subcommittee.
The
people
who
are
involved
in
that
are
no
longer
a
part
of
the
committee
and
their
previous
responsibilities
were
to
coordinate
with
the
the
members
of
city
staff
who
produced
the
quarterly
community
newsletter
and
the
social
media
updates
and
provide
our
input
around
topics
to
include
in
those
and
participation
in
the
actual
language.
Now
the
city
staff
has
done
a
really
good
job
of
mostly
taking
that
over.
G
Seeing
none
I
will
between
now
and
our
next
meeting
I'll
reach
out
to
city
staff
and
see
if
they
have
any
vice
chair
watson,
yeah
I'll,
go
I'll.
Do
it,
okay,
cool
then
I'll,
send
you
the
emails
I
have
from
oh
and
remember:
redevid
just
wrote
in
that
she
would
assist
so
why
don't
I'll
go
ahead
and
assign
I'm
gonna
make
a
new
subcommittee.
Now
it's
made
up
of
vice
chair
watson
and
remember
redavid,
and
so
I'll
get
you
to
the
contact
info.
G
Oh,
do
you
have
something
about
this
code
manager,
lewis.
G
Okay,
I'll
go
ahead
and
define
our
subcommittee
to
include
the
two
of
you
and
I'll
get
you
the
information
for
the
previous
communication
and
then
you
can
reach
out
to
city
staff
and
find
out
where
things
stand
with
code
enforcement,
citizen
communication
and
let
us
know
about
it
either
in
our
next
meeting.
If
you've
had
a
chance
to
get
that
done,
or
at
least
by
the
following
meeting
sound
good
vice
chair
watson
and
remember,
redavid,.
G
Yes,
that
sounds
good
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
you
offering
to
help
with
that.
Go
ahead.
Code
manager,
lewis,.
B
And
for
the
new
subcommittee,
if
you'd
like,
we
can
schedule
a
meeting
to
kind
of
go
over
the
processes
and
how
that
works
from
the
city,
because
we've
changed
the
way
that
we
work
with
that
in
the
slate
communications,
as
well
as
the
communications
team.
So
please
feel
free.
We
can
meet
for
coffee
somewhere
in
the
community
or
at
a
park,
or
even
here
at
the
police
department,
to
just
kind
of
go
over
what
what
they're
looking
and
how
that
process
looks
now.
G
Thank
you
very
much
good
manager,
lewis,
I'm
sure
I'll.
Take
you
up
on
that.
That
sounds
great
okay
moving
on
into
our
unfinished
business,
so
this
we
definitely
want
to
get
through
tonight.
Hopefully,
everyone
has
taken
the
time
to
review
the
the
documents
related
to
the
tree
and
shrub
code
updates
and
all
of
the
comments
from
city
attorney,
niles
and
I'd
like
to.
G
G
I'll
go
ahead
and
start
I
I
went
through
it
in
detail
and
really
appreciate
city
attorney
niles's
way
of
responding
through
all
of
the
notes
and
thoughts,
and
I
found
nothing
I
disagreed
with.
I
feel,
like
the
I
had
one
note.
G
Yeah,
it
was
really
just
around
like
one
of
our
previous
committee
members
and
I
did
a
deep
dive
on
code
around
tree
and
shrub
enforcement
and
structure
for
a
bunch
of
neighboring
cities,
and
one
of
the
things
that
was
kind
of
odd
in
the
existing
code
was
the
definition
of
tree
with
a
really
weird
diameter
definition,
and
I
like
that.
G
That's
basically
just
been
removed
and
the
new
definition
is
so
general
and
I
I
think
it's
appropriate,
and
I
I
also
agree
with
the
the
simplification
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
things
that
city
of
mountain
city
attorney
niles
has
simplified,
so
that
there
is
a
lot
less
duplication.
The
definitions,
I
feel
are
more
clear.
G
The
organization
around
the
nuisance
and
code
enforcement
aspects
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me.
I
feel
like
we
should
just
put
together
a
real
simple,
so
unless
you
guys
all
have
other
thoughts
or
discussion
or
recommendations,
I
would
suggest
that
we
and
I
can
draft
a
simple
email
that
we
appreciate
all
of
these
changes
and
we
agree
with
them
and
recommend,
through
our
city
council
liaison
to
city
attorney
niles
and
the
city
council,
that
they
move
forward
with
the
changes
as
defined
and
recommended.
Unless
anyone
else
has
any
thoughts.
G
All
right,
that's
pretty
simple,
then
we
will
I'll
go
ahead
and
put
that
together
and
get
that
out
with
the
assistance
of
ms
willis
and
now
we'll
move
into
our
new
business
and
review
and
revise
our
bylaws.
Hopefully,
everyone's
taken
a
chance
to
review
the
bylaws
in
detail
and,
let's
discuss,
does
anyone
have
any
thoughts,
additions,
edits,
etc
around
the
bylaws.
G
Okay,
I'll
start
there
too.
I
don't
know
that
it's
worth
it,
but
I
tend
to
I
happen
to
be
a
fan
of
the
oxford
comma,
and
some
of
these
statements
are
missing
it,
and
I
I
mean
I
would
recommend
that
they
be
in
there.
I
also
noticed
in
section
four
d.
G
I
believe
that
that
first
sentence
is
intended
to
be
a
city
council,
comma
code
manager.
Is
that
accurate?
G
F
I
believe
it
does
mean
the
city
manager,
because
in
a
previous
well
in
one
of
these,
it
talks
about,
like
in
b,
review
the
processes,
procedures
and
administrative
functions
of
the
code
enforcement
unit
of
the
police
department.
The
committee
shall
make
recommendations
to
the
city
manager
or
his
or
her
designee
for
improvements
that.
G
Makes
sense
when
I
wrote
my
edits,
I
first
wrote
city
manager
assuming
that's
what
it
was
and
then
thought
about
it
again
and
just
based
on
the
way
we
operate.
It
seemed
like
it
was
more
appropriate
to
be
code
manager,
but
I
think
we
should
specify
that,
since
it's
not
really
clear
what
the
manager
is,
so
I
I
agree
with
you:
it
makes
sense
that
it's
city
manager
couldn't,
I
could
manage
your
list.
Do
you
have
any
thoughts
on
that.
B
G
Okay,
so
you
do
you
agree
that
it's
it's
it's
implying
city
manager,
correct,
okay!
I
would
suggest
we
just
spell
that
out.
Just
because
I
was
it
was
enough
of
a
confusion
to
me
I
mean
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
make
that
big,
a
difference
and
then
another
thing
that
I
noticed
or
all
right.
So
that's
one
change.
G
G
Okay,
so
right
now
I'm
not
going
to
worry
about
the
oxford
commas.
That's
just
a
preference
thing
and
I
think
we
all
can
read
it
without
that
need,
but
so
I'm
going
to
start
with
one
change.
We'll
have
city
we'll
add
the
word
city
in
front
of
manager.
In
section
four
d,
in
that
first
sentence,
I
starred
make
annual
written
recommendations
to
all
stakeholders
as
needed,
but
no
less
than
annually.
G
I'm
not
familiar
with
having
previously
done
that
as
a
committee
over
the
last
couple
years,
and
so
you
know
I
in
reviewing
this
in
detail,
I'm
wondering
first,
have
we
been
doing
that?
Ms
willis?
Are
you
familiar
with
us
doing
a
written
recommendation
to
all
stakeholders
annually.
F
I
don't
know
about
the
written
thing,
but
I
do
know
the
last
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
been
the
last
couple
of
years
and
it
maybe
only
happened
once
during
covid
and
then
before
that
the
committee
appeared
before
city
council
and
gave
a
report
to
city
council
on
things
you'd
been
doing
through
the
year.
So
the
the
other
part
I'm
not
sure
about
the
written.
G
F
You
know
before
the
last
change
in
council
really
the
council
wanted
to
get,
and
this
has
been
going
on
since
I've
been
on
council.
I
think
when
joe
jefferson
was
mayor
we
did
this
and
then
when
linda
olsen
was
the
mayor
we
did
this.
We
tried
to
get
as
many
of
the
committees
to
come
to
council
and
present
as
possible.
F
Now,
council
liaisons
there
are
some.
There
are
some
committees
that
do
have
have
reasons
that
they
need
to
come.
It
is
good
to
hear
from
the
committees
to
see
to
see
what's
going
on,
even
though
council
members,
we
do
have
opportunities
every
month
to
to
give
a
a
council
liaison
report
for
the
committees
that
we
sit
on
so,
but
I
I
personally
think
it's
a
good
idea,
but
I
guess
this
council
we
really
haven't
talked
about
that.
So.
G
Would
you
think
it
would
be
reasonable
for
us
to
update
our
bylaws
to
make
just
to
take
out
the
but
no
less
than
annually
and
keep
it
as
needed?
Then
that
way,
if
we're
invited
to
do
an
update
to
council,
we
do
and
if
not,
and
we
don't,
because
if
we
found
a
reason
to
address
council
we're
going
to
so,
I
would
suggest
that
we've
changed
that
to
make
written
recommendations
to
all
stakeholders
as
needed
or
requested.
G
Does
anyone
disagree
with
that
change
want
to
discuss?
Okay?
So
then
that's
our
second
change,
ms
willis.
So
we
have
city
manager
and
then
in
that,
at
the
end
of
that
d
change
it
to
make
written
or
in
person,
recommendations
to
all
stakeholders
as
needed
or
requested.
G
Okay,
more
oxford
cameras,
I'm
not
going
to
worry
about
anybody
else.
Have
anything
yet
just
going
through
my
paper
notes.
G
C
G
Okay,
well,
I
would
suggest
we
remove
the
two
sections
that
are
reserved
and
empty
and
just
bump
the
numbers
up
unless
anyone
sees
any
value
in
keeping
that
I
mean
it
just
simplifies
it
so
like,
for
instance,
section
what's
currently
section
4
right
of
chair
to
vote
would
become
section
3
right
of
charitable.
I'm
just
saying
we
remove
the
empty
reserved
section.
G
Three
and
eight
remember
emel
huns.
E
Yeah
this
is
actually
regarding
the
earlier
comment
about
the
changes
that
you
wanted
to
make
chairman.
I
I'm
just
wondering
whether
there's
anything
specific
to
advisory
committees
that
would
require
us
to
make
a
written
presentation
that
maybe
we
need
to
do
before.
We
strike
that.
C
C
There
is
no
requirement
that
you
guys
give
an
annual
report.
It
would
be
up
to
city
council
to
decide
that,
so
I
mean
you
can
take
it
out
if
you
like,
or
you
can
leave
it
in.
G
Yeah,
thank
you.
Okay,
so
we're
removing
the
two
blanks
city,
council,
member
russell.
F
I
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
I
agree
with
that
on
that,
but
I
just
want
to
add
one
other
thing
for
you
all
to
talk
about,
because
I
don't
know
on
5d
where
it
talks.
When
a
committee
member
is
present
at
a
city
council
meeting
and
addresses
the
city
council
on
a
matter.
F
The
member
should
take
care
to
represent
the
viewpoint
of
the
enforcement
advisory
committee
as
a
whole
and
to
avoid
expressing
his
or
her
personal
opinion
unless
clearly
stated
as
such,
and
I
I
don't
know
if
that
is
only
in
reference
to
when
you
appear
before
city
council
on
behalf
of
the
committee,
because
I
it
may
impact
your
constitutional
right,
because
just
because
you're
on
this
committee
doesn't
take
away
your
right
to
redress
city
council
on
anything
that
I
mean,
but
you
would
make
it
clear
that
you're
not
you're,
not
representing
this
committee.
G
Yeah
yeah
I
mean
when
I
read
that
I
felt
pretty
comfortable
with
it.
I
think
it
makes
sense
if,
if
I
were
to
go
to
a
city
council
meeting
in
whatever
the
difference
between
structured
or
unstructured
public
comment,
I
recognize
that
you
know
the
city
council.
Members
are
going
to
know
that
I'm
on
the
committees
I'm
on
and
if
I'm
there
just
to
state
my
opinion
as
a
individual
citizen.
I
I
would
prefer
to
make
that
clear
rather
than
there
be
any
ambiguity
around
me
making
a
statement.
F
C
G
Yeah-
and
I
I
recently
had
this
experience
because
I
was
chair
of
another
committee,
where
I
did
speak
to
city
council,
both
as
an
individual
and
as
the
chair
of
that
committee
and
each
time
I
clarified
he
basically
I
mean
at
one
point
I
was
within
a
conversation
clarifying.
This
is
my
opinion.
G
This
is
what
our
committee
came
to
a
consensus
of,
and
I
really
had
no
trouble
expressing
that
and
I
felt
you
know
comfortable
doing
so
and
I
think
that's
an
important
thing
for
for
us
to
do
it's
a
responsible
thing
to
do
as
a
citizen,
and
we
don't
want
to
be
representing
something
that
you
know
as
being
a
position
of
the
committee.
That's
not
a
position
of
the
committee.
G
All
right.
I
had
those
suction
removals.
G
I
noticed
on
so
article
4,
section
3,
the
first
sentence.
All
members
of
the
committee
shall
be
notified
either
during
a
scheduled
meeting
by
electric
by
electronic
mail.
I
think
that's
intended
to
be
comma
or
by
electronic
mail.
G
Article
5
finance
section
1
management
of
funds,
it
states.
The
committee
will
provide
a
finance
report
to
the
city
council
annually,
including
a
statement
of
all
monies
or
other
donations
received.
G
I
as
far
as
I'm
aware
other
than
the
private
funds
that
were
donated
by
committee
members,
namely
member
johnson,
when
she
put
together
the
stuff
that
we
provided
the
community
in
our
booth
and
then
I
think
she
did
get
reimbursement
for
that,
because
it
was
like
a
candy
measurement
system.
It
was
pretty
cool,
but
I'm
not
aware
of
any
funds
going
through
this
committee
since
I've
been
on
it.
G
C
C
Right
and
also
you're
not
giving
it
given
a
budget,
so
you
have
no
funds
to
spend.
G
I'm
not
sure
what
the
do
you
have
a
suggestion
as
to
how
to
go
ahead
could
manage
your
lewis.
I.
B
Was
just
gonna
say
there
is
no
financial
responsibility
or
obligation
to
this
committee,
and
you
you
could.
I
would
not
even
say
that
you
even
need
to
put
donations
in
there,
because
if
you
want
to
donate
to
the
city
you
can
donate
to
the
city
anytime.
Any
citizen
can
do
that.
Any
future
expenses
I'm
able
to
purchase-
and
this
this
was
something
that
was
not
discussed.
B
When
you
were
working
on
that
project,
I'm
able
to
process
those
and
expense
that,
through
the
code
department
because
you'd
be
working
in
conjunction
with
us,
rather
than
have
you
all,
lay
out
any
funds
or
have
to
be
reimbursed.
C
C
G
Okay,
how
about
this
all
all
up
I'll
make
an
updated
version
that
includes
wiping
that
base
like
I'll
figure
out.
What
I
think
makes
sense
to
wipe
and
then
provide
that
for
our
next
agenda
for
us
to
just
do
a
final
vote
on
with
all
these
changes,
and
that
was
all
I
had
did
anyone
else
have
anything
okay,
so
we'll
have
an
updated
version
of
that
for
everyone
to
review
in
our
next
agenda
and
then
we'll
just
do
a
vote
on
the
bylaws
in
our
next
meeting
to.
A
G
That
and
any
other
thoughts
on
bylaws,
okay
moving
on
we've
already
dealt
with
scheduling
our
next
meeting.
G
It's
going
to
be
october
26th
and
please
everyone
before
that
meeting
review,
the
updated
bylaws
make
sure
the
everything
looks
good
there
and
the
ordinance
change
that
we
discussed
with
code
manager,
lewis
and
let
us
know,
if
there's
any
thoughts
or
concerns
there
ahead
of
time,
preferably
because
if
there
are
thoughts
or
concerns
about
that,
we
could
request
that
city
attorney
niall
see
if
she's
available
to
come
to
our
meeting
and
answer
any
questions.
G
G
That's
something
that
I
feel
like
we
should
talk
about.
Personally.
I've
been
running
a
company
for
over
20
years
remotely,
so
I'm
super
comfortable
with
remote,
and
I
find
it
really
efficient
like
right
now.
I've
got
zoom
on
one
screen
and
I've
got
you
know,
side
by
side,
documents
and
notes
on
my
other
screen.
I
recognize
not
everybody
comfortably
and
normally
operates
this
way.
It
works
well
for
me,
but
I
also
value
and
enjoy
in
person.
I
was
thinking.
Maybe
we
should
have
like
quarterly
in
person
or
something
like
that.
B
So
that
that's
the
hybrid
model
that
most
of
the
most
of
the
committees
are
are
utilizing.
I
love
your
suggestion
that
you
meet
quarterly.
I
think
there's
value
or
even
twice
a
year.
I
think
there's
value
in
meeting
and
collaborating
together
and
and
bonding
over
our
mutual
experience,
and
we
can
always
reserve
space
here
at
the
police
department
or
we're
in
kind
of
a
transition
within
the
city
and
the
way
our
spaces
are
being
used.
But,
yes,
I
would
welcome
that
we
can
even
meet
if
it's
nice
in
the
summertime
at
a
park.
E
Yeah,
I'm
all
for
that.
I
think
that
I'm
a
relational
person-
and
I
I
kind
of
like
to
be
in
the
same
room
with
people
with
whom
I'm
talking
to,
and
I
think
that
you
get
a
lot
more
exchange
of
ideas,
because
people
are
feeling
freer
to
speak
and
they
always
have
to
raise
their
hand
on
a
screen.
E
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
member
emil,
heinz
and
then
for
those
of
you
not
watching
the
chat.
Remember
redived
prefers
remote
or
hybrid.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
input
or
discussion
on
this?
I.
G
Okay,
thank
you,
member
hughes.
So
that's
you
know,
that's
a
few
votes
for
in
person.
Maybe
we
remember
it's.
Can
you
remind
me
how
to
say
your
last
name.
D
G
H
H
G
Thank
you,
member
chisolm.
I
agree.
I
think
that,
based
on
all
this
input,
we
should
be
considering,
at
the
very
least
regular
interspersed
in
person.
Ms
willis,
is
it
always
an
option
for
us
now
to
utilize,
hybrid
meaning,
some
people
in
person
and
some
people
remote.
C
C
G
Well,
I
would
suggest
why
don't
we
start
with
moving
towards
in
person
quarterly
and
zoom
and
or
hybrid
for
the
rest
of
them.
Any
thoughts
on
that.
C
B
I
would
suggest
that,
if
possible,
that
you
allow
staff
three
months
before
we
move
to
the
hybrid
version,
maybe
after
the
first
of
the
year
it
does
take
some
coordination
with
scheduling
those
rooms
are
very
popular
and
are
scheduled
way
in
advance.
So
we
may
not
be
able
to
schedule
them
right
away,
so
I
would
suggest
that
perhaps
you
continue
with
this
version
for
the
next
three
months.
We
have
three
months
left
in
the
year.
B
Normally
you
take
a
hiatus
in
december
just
because
of
the
holidays,
and
then
we
can
look
at
maybe
starting
in
january.
C
C
15Th,
you
guys
decide
you
can't
meet
in
january
in
person
or
you
want
to
change
your
meeting
date.
You're
not
going
to
be
able
to
do
that.
You're
going.
G
To
have
that
makes
sense.
I
understand
that
and
if
it
was
like
a
certain
situation
like
our
next
meeting,
where
we're
switching
the
date
to
accommodate
code
manager,
lewis
being
out
of
town,
then
we
could
just
make
that
a
zoom
one
if
it
was
gonna,
be
a
in-person
one.
G
G
The
remember
redove
just
asked
a
question
that
it
she's
talking
about
doing
the
the
hybrid
where
people
are
in
person
and
zoom.
That's
why
it's
limited
to
a
particular
room.
G
That's
why
it's
that,
if
we're
do
because
we
want,
we
want
to
be
able
to
accommodate
everyone,
because
I
know
some
members
are
not
comfortable
being
in
person
still,
and
so
we,
our
in-person
ones,
at
least
for
now-
will
plan
to
be
hybrid
and
so
we'll
plan
to
have
that
be
the
first
meeting
of
each
quarter.
Ideally,
everyone
please
show
up
in
person
I
mean
it
is.
There
is
a
lot
of
value
of
being
around
each
other
and
interacting
with
each
other
and
being
able
to
get
to
know
each
other.
G
You
know
I
mean
all
city
citizen
meetings
up
until
the
pandemic
were
always
in
person,
and
I
think
there's
value
to
that.
I
mean
I've
participated
for
well
over
a
decade
prior
to
the
pandemic
and
always
did
enjoy
the
benefit
of
meeting
with
people
in
person.
G
So
for
now,
we'll
plan
the
rest
of
the
year
zoom
january,
in
person
with
the
hybrid
option,
although
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
come
in
person
and
then
we'll
do
that
for
the
first
meeting
of
each
quarter
and
otherwise
we'll
be
on
zoom,
and
if
anyone
wants
to
suggest
or
request
changes
to
that
feel
free
to
bring
it
up.
You
know
in
a
committee
member's
choice
in
a
future
meeting
and
now
we're
oh
go
ahead.
Remember
emma
hines.
E
Yeah
I
I
know
that,
I'm
speaking
for
myself
and
I
believe
mike
that
we're
on
two
committees
and
some
other
people,
I'm
sure,
have
other
committee
issues
too.
I
would
ask
that
perhaps
a
schedule
be
determined
early
so
that
we
can
try
to
make
as
many
of
those
meetings
as
possible
and
not
conflict
with
them.
Mm-Hmm.
G
Our
they
are
always
the
third
wednesday
of
the
month,
unless
we
have
a
situation
like
we
have
for
next
month,
where
there's
a
pretty
critical
piece
of
information
to
discuss
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
have
code
manager,
lewis
involved
in
and
he's
going
to
be
away
at
a
conference
that
week
and
when
a
situation
like
that
arises,
we
communicate
with
everyone
ahead
of
time
to
see
if
we
can
come
up
with
an
alternate
date
that
works
for
everyone.
In
my
five
years
on
this
committee,
we've
done
that
maybe
three
or
four
times.
G
E
G
All
right,
well,
we've
gotten
through
a
lot
and
it's
only
7
18.
So
thank
you,
everyone
for
your
time
and
participation
and
it's
nice
to
have
a
full
committee
and
thank
you
very
much
for
all
the
answers
and
information.
You
provided
code
manager,
lewis
and
good
luck
at
the
conference
and
we'll
see
everyone.
Oh
ms
willis.
C
G
G
Yeah,
I
didn't
realize
you
were
there
either.
I
remember
chisholm
because
I
haven't
were
there,
were
there
any
other
things
that
in
all
the
times,
I
asked
for
input
that
you
had
thoughts
or
input
on?
No,
I
was
good.
Okay,
okay!
Thank
you
all
right.
Well,
thank
you.
Everyone
have
a
great
month
and
we'll
adjourn
the
meeting
good.
Thank
you.