►
From YouTube: CEAC 06162021 Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
B
Sonia
you're
on
twice:
oh
you
try
to
log
in
another
time
I
couldn't
get.
D
D
D
So
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
welcome
everybody
and
call
this
regular
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
on
june
16
2021,
calling
it
to
order
maureen.
Could
you
please
call
roll
sure.
B
Chair
bowdoin
here
am
I
still
on
youtube
member
dickerson
here
vice
chair,
green.
B
So
you
do
have
a
quorum
so
far,
it's
just
member
frangipane
that
is
not
present.
D
Okay,
before
we
get
started,
I
wanted
to
do
two
things
number
one.
We
have
a
couple
of
changes
to
our
committee,
christopher
resigned
and
robert,
as
our
alternative
has
stepped
in,
to
become
a
full
member
as
of
july
or
is
it
immediate,
maureen.
B
D
Since
christopher's,
not
here
got
it
okay,
thank
you
and
then
we
also
have
a
new
member
which
actually
makes
us
full
again.
Her
name
is
tara.
Her
first
meeting
will
be
july
in
the
july
meeting.
I
believe
she
will
be
joining
us
at
some
point
today
tonight
and
if
she
does
I'll
just
welcome
her
but
I'll
wait
until
our
july
meeting
to
introduce
her.
D
I
thought
it
was
going
to
be
15
minutes
at
7
45,
but
the
flight
is
early,
so
I
need
to
call
this
meeting
to
a
close
at
7
30.
However,
if
we
are
in
the
midst
of
something
carson
has
agreed
to
continue
on,
so
that
we
could
finish
whatever
we
were
discussing.
D
D
D
B
Raised
I
do
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
that
as
I've
spoken
with
you,
I
will
be
on
vacation
july,
2nd
basically
to
the
10th,
and
if
you
guys
decide
to
change
your
meeting
to
july
14th
either
we
have
to
have
the
agenda
posted
by
july
1st
or
I'm
gonna
have
to
find
somebody
else
to
do
it.
But
if
you
decide
to
keep
your
meeting
on
july
21st
and
that
doesn't
pose
any
problem
at
all.
D
Okay
and
I
have
a
request
to
move
our
july
meeting
to
the
7th
of
july,
which
I'm
fine
with
and
I
can
I
will.
I
will
get
everything
done
in
advance
of
you
leaving
on
vacation
july.
2Nd.
Did
you
say?
Yes,
I
can
get
everything
done
before
you
leave,
but
that
that
means
somebody
else
will
have
to
do
minutes
for
us.
Is
there
a
replacement?
D
B
Have
no
oops,
sorry,
oh
I'm
not
on
mute.
I
have
no
replacement.
I
have
no
backup,
so
I
guess
I
can
try
to
ask
somebody
in
the
clerk's
office.
If
they'll
go
ahead
and
do
the
minutes
or
when
I
get
back,
I
can
listen
to
the
recording
and
do
the
minutes.
D
B
Well,
normally
you'd
have
backup,
but
since
I
do
not,
I
would
be
happy
to
go
ahead
and
just
listen
to
the
minutes.
I
can
listen
to
the
meeting
and
do
the
minutes
from
that.
Okay,.
F
And
I
just
wanted
to
check
with
you.
I
know
that
I
had
said
a
note.
I'm
on
vacation
leaving
july
14th,
and
I
also
wanted
to
just
pose
a
question
this
may
be
out
of
order
is
if
we
go
back
to
in-person
meetings,
it
would
be
the
tape
recorder
that
we
would
just
be
listening
to.
So
I
don't
know
if
this
committee
is
willing
to
move
back
to
in-person
meetings.
I
know
council
has
moved
back
to
in-person
meetings.
I
don't
know
what
the
directives
of
this
committee
would
be.
D
F
A
D
I'm
neutral
sonia
you're,
neutral,
okay,
I'm
neutral.
C
I'm
for
suspending
the
july
meeting
because
the
date
you
suggest
is
my
birthday.
Oh
well,.
D
C
Yeah
right,
I
can
think
of
nothing
better,
no,
it
just
in
light.
Well
I
mean,
if
we
do,
I
don't
care
where
we
have
meetings,
I'm
in
favor
of
meetings
in
the
park.
I'd
be
okay
with
suspending
the
july
meeting,
though,
because
there's
a
lot.
A
B
B
So,
and
just
as
a
caveat,
if
you
guys
decide
to
have
an
in-person
meeting,
I
will
not
listen
to
the
recording.
You
guys
will
ask
you
know
to
take
minutes
yourself
or
I'll
have
to
get
somebody
to
try
to
get
somebody
to
come
in
and
do
it.
G
D
Okay,
robert
did
you
like?
Would
you
like
to
weigh
in.
D
Okay,
well,
I
would
like
to
propose
that
we
suspend
the
meeting
because
I
will
have
company
during
the
middle
of
july,
actually
at
the
middle
of
july
through
the
end
of
july.
So
I
would
like
to
propose
to
the
committee
that
we
go
ahead
and
suspend
our
july
meeting.
D
Okay,
those
in
favor
of
suspending
our
july
meeting
since
we
have
so
many
people
that
are
will
be
out-
please
raise
your
hand,
looks
like
that's
unanimous
maureen.
Thank
you
all
very
much
for
your
patience
and
then,
as
we
move
through
the
meeting
tonight,
we
can
decide
carson
whether
or
not
we
end
early
or
we
or
we
continue
continue
on.
D
Okay.
Next
on
the
agenda,
is
code
manager
lewis
to
talk
about
code
enforcement,
significant
events,
I
see
we
have
a
report.
F
F
It's
been
kind
of
a
business
busy
day
for
me,
so
I
just
wanted
to
provide
that
first
quarter
report
and
give
you
the
the
details
of
the
first
three
months,
we're
still
here
at
the
police
department,
especially
code,
because
we
have
our
separate
subcategory
in
our
new
system
and
being
able
to
pull
anything,
and
we
do
have
a
training
scheduled
for
the
beginning
of
july
to
hopefully
navigate
some
of
the
the
way
that
we
can
pull
data
and
some
of
the
fields
that
we
currently
added
specialized
fields.
F
We
currently
can't
search-
and
that
has
been
set
back
to
the
programming
department
through
the
rms
program,
so
that
we
can,
we
can
search
the
highlighted
fields.
We
basically
broke
them
down.
Similarly,
to
this
as
to
what
you
see
now,
so
that
we'd
be
able
to
pull
reports
easily
and
that
search
function
is
not
currently
working.
So
just
to
let
you
all
know,
we
are
working
to
resolve
that.
It's
just
that
the
code
enforcement
division
of
our
police
reporting
system
had
some
specialized
fields
that
they
didn't
take
into
account
during
the
reporting
process.
F
But
I
want
to
see
if
you
had
any
specific
questions
about
the
statistics
that
you
might
see
it
was
the
last
several
months
have
been
consistently
busy.
You
can
take
into
account
that
we
did
have
one
significant
storm
event,
but,
as
as
you
all
know,
most
of
the
snow
did
not
come
this
spring.
As
we
normally
see
it
was.
It
was
in
the
form
of
rain,
so
you're
not
going
to
see
the
significant
violations
that
we
had.
G
Hand
raised
yeah.
I
just
have
one
quick
question.
You
mentioned
in
a
previous
meeting
that
you'd
had
two
complaints
or
resolutions
on
trees
and
shrubs.
F
I
can
tell
you
now
that
the
tree
issues
that
we
had
specifically
were
related
to
reports
of
dead
and
dying
trees
and
my
understanding
is
arborists-
have
been
called
and
the
trees
are
of
a
specific
species
that
we
have
within
the
city
that
do
show
some
disease,
but
not
to
the
extent
that
they're
pose
an
extreme
danger
to
the
property
and
therefore
the
trees
were
allowed
to
remain
in
the
sought.
Some
some
pesticides
to
resolve
the
issues.
F
We
do
have
one
additional
trade
complaint
that
does
not
show
on
here
that,
unfortunately,
did
get
struck
by
lightning
at
some
point
last
year
and
the
tr
we
did
put
them
on
notice
and
the
tree
has
been
removed.
So
that
is
not
reflected
in
this.
That
was
as
of
last
month,
and
it
was
a
large
pine
tree
in
the
front
of
a
property
that
did
pose
an
extreme
danger
to
the
to
the
property
and
the
residents
nearby.
A
D
So
dave
the
animal
control
for
the
month
of
march
you
know
was
significantly
higher.
Was
that
just
because
the
weather
was
nicer
and
people
were
out
or
was
there
something
specific
happening?
It
was.
F
The
weather
is
one
contributing
factor.
The
other
factor
is,
we
also
went
into
the
summer
hours
in
some
of
the
parks,
and
so
we
did
do
a
considerable
amount
of
education
at
a
couple
of
the
parks.
Just
letting
people
know
that
the
the
off-leash
hours
what
they
were
and
what
they
consisted
of,
and
so
that
also
accounted
for
a
portion
of
the
contacts
that
we
had.
A
E
So
code
manager,
liz
when
you
say
education
is
education,
does
that
always
mean
like
tickets,
or
is
it
also
just
talking
to
people
or
do
tickets
only
come
when
it's
like
a
multiple
warning
for
the
same
thing
for
the
same
people
or
how
does
that
work
out.
F
So
we
like
to
use
the
hope.
As
you
all
know,
the
primary
purpose
of
code
enforcement
is
to
gain
voluntary
compliance
and
our
first
step
is
always
through
the
education,
and
so
when
we
document
something
as
being
public
relations
or
education.
That
means
there
was
an
actual
violation
and
we
took
the
opportunity
to
educate
that
park
user
or
that
dog
owner
as
to
what
our
municipal
ordinances
are.
And
so
it
is
a
violation,
but
we
do
call
it
as
education.
E
Do
those
get
tracked
differently
when
it's
a
contact
with
someone
to
educate
them
versus
a
violation
I
mean
so
does
that
mean
that
some
violations
that
are
issued
don't
end
up
being
fees
or
every
time
someone
gets
one
of
these
notices?
It's
a
fee.
F
No,
so
if
we're
talking
specifically
about
animals,
unless
it
was
a
contact
that
resulted
in
let's
say
something,
that's
outside
of
our
discussion
like
a
bite
occurs
and
we
need
to
issue
a
summons,
that's
automatic.
But
if
we're
in
a
park-
and
we
see
somebody
that's
off
leash-
that's
not
a
repeat
violator,
which
somebody
has
not
been
warned
repeatedly.
We
take
the
opportunity
to
inform
them
of
what
the
ordinance
is.
It
is
still
a
violation,
and
it's
still
a
face-to-face
contact
or
a
warning
is
what
we
would
call
it.
F
But
we
like
to
use
the
term
education
because
warning
just
has
such
a
harsh
connotation
when
our
when
our
goal
is
to
gain
compliance,
not
pass
out
tickets
left
and
right.
H
D
Not
relating
to
the
statistics
dave,
what
about
the
park?
Ranger
position
has
that
been
posted.
F
It
has
been
posted
and
we
have
reviewed
41.
I
applications
report
to
my
team
and
city
staff
that
we
have
not
had
an
applicant
that
has
met
the
basic
needs
of
the
position,
so
we're
still
searching.
D
D
F
Is
if
you
go
to
the
inglewood
website-
and
I
think
at
the
bottom,
it
says
work
here,
or
jobs
or
openings.
It
automatically
lists
all
of
the
current
job
openings
for
the
city
of
englewood.
Thank
you.
F
A
I
Good
evening,
everyone
nice
to
see
you
all,
there's
just
a
couple
things.
As
has
already
been
said,
city
council
went
back
to
city
hall
a
week
ago,
this
past
monday,
so
we've
had
one
council
meeting
and
one
study
session.
I
We
will
be
meeting
in
the
community
room
probably
until
october,
because
they
are
updating
the
audio
visual
equipment
in
the
council
chambers
and
we
have
to
guarantee
that
it'll
be
dust
free
and
not
disturbed
in
there,
so
they're,
just
leaving
us
in
in
the
community
room
and
then
the
other
thing.
As
you
all
know,
the
the
new
city
attorney
is
here:
city
attorney,
tamara
niles
and
she's,
been
here
for
the
last
two
meetings
and
it's
really
great
to
have
her
aboard
and
to
be
moving
forward
with
that.
I
D
Did
the
off-leaf
off-leash
task
force
present
anything
on
monday
or
last
monday.
I
No,
the
off-leash
task
force
has
had,
I
believe
they
may
have
had
their
last
meeting
last
week
and
somebody
called
me
and
obviously
supervisor
or
I
forget
what
your
title
is
dave.
I
apologize
can
probably
answer
that
question
because
he
is
on
that
committee
and
I'm
not
sure
I
did
get
a
question
last
week
when
they
will
be
presenting
to
council.
I
So
why
don't
you
ask
dave
that
question.
F
So
we
did
have
the
final
meeting
of
the
off
leash
task
force.
Last
week.
They
went
through
multiple
recommendations
and
ideas.
A
I
Thank
you
for
that
that
that
did
help
me
also
dave,
because
I
have
had
some
questions
on
that
and
I
was
looking
on
the
agenda
and
could
not
find
it.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
C
I
submitted
topics
for
the
next
quarterly
article.
I
submitted
three
topics.
I
asked
for
at
least
two
spaces
in
the
magazine,
but
I
haven't
heard
back.
One
would
be
another
eab
reminder
and
the
other
would
be
a
spotlight
on
what
code
enforcement
does
for
our
city
and
how
citizen
participation
helps
that
train
move
forward
and
the
other
topic
was
related.
So
it
could
be
in
the
same
article,
which
is
why
we're
making
reports
to
on
dangerous
animals
is
the
responsible
thing
to
do
and
it's
being
a
good
neighbor.
C
So
I
haven't
heard
back.
I've
asked
for
a
meeting.
I
think
they
might
be
rotating
through
vacations
or
something
because
I
haven't
heard
back
from
anyone
in
quite
a
while.
So
I
will
be
following
up
with
them
and
I
guess
I
need
to
generate
some
copy
for
the
copywriter
or
it
or
just
information.
I'd
love
to
sit
down
with
dave.
A
C
D
Well,
I
noticed
there
were
a
couple
of
social
media
posts
on
eab
since
our
last
meeting.
C
I
I
also
gave
them
some
information
about
neighbors
with
ash
trees
that
were
willing
to
do
video
spots,
and
I
also
asked
if
dave
lee
could
do
one
because
I
feel
like
he
is,
is
a
good
communicator
and
you
know,
represents
the
community
well
and
he's
a
you
know.
I
think
he'd
be
a
good
person
to
do
that.
C
Yeah,
so
that's
kind
of
like
in
limbo
right
now,
but
but
we
do
need
to
get
moving
and
copy
for
the
next
issue,
and,
oh,
you
know,
hopefully
that'll
start
with
getting
approved
from
more
than
one
space
and
hopefully
a
big
space
for
our
article
next
time.
Around.
A
D
Nope
all
right,
carson.
E
I
hadn't
heard
about
the
video
spots
before:
where
is
that
for,
like
the
facebook
or
what?
Where
will
those
show
up.
C
Yeah
chris
hargis,
when
we
first
met,
mentioned
that
somebody
on
their
staff
was
used
to
be
a
reporter,
a
local
reporter
and
would
be
willing
to
do
like
kind
of
man
on
the
street
type
interviews
and
like
30,
second
or
less
spots
that
we
could
put
on
places
like
facebook
next
door,
the
landing
page
and
on
the
thingwood
website.
C
But
we
just
thought
those
would
be
pretty
efficacious.
I
just
I'd
love
to
see
them
with
dave
lee
standing
in
front
of
one
of
those
trees
that
the
ash
trees
has
wrapped
and
explaining
that
and
how
the
city's
moving
forward
with
it
and
maybe
do
the
leaf
identification.
C
I
think
that
could
be
very,
very
helpful
I've.
I
know
that,
since
I've
learned
how
to
identify
when
I
I
see
them
everywhere
now
and.
A
C
I
freak
out
because
I'm
like
that's
a
lot
of
trees,
a
lot
of
beautiful,
mature
trees
in
our
canopy,
so
yeah.
So
that's
what
that's
about
it's
and
we've
been
talking
about
it
for
a
long
time
and
now
that
the
ash
trees
are
in
bloom
from
now
until
the
fall
they're,
quite
beautiful
in
the
fall.
Also,
I
I
that's
the
next
thing
I
would
like
to
see
happen
so.
E
H
C
D
G
Me
I
just
unmuted:
okay,
there's
a
huge
ash
tree
across
the
street
from
me
and
down
one.
I
look
at
it
every
day
and
I
talk
to
the
neighbors
about
it.
I
thought
it
was
a
box
elder
and
they're
often
confused
and
she
said
the
arborist
told
her
that
it
was
definitely
a
nation
that
all
ash
cultivars
are
subject
to
the
emerald
ash
borer
and
it's
a
huge
huge
tree
and
I
don't
think
it
can
be
treated
besides.
It
is
and
she's
kind
of
anxious
about
it.
G
It's
a
real
addition
to
the
neighborhood,
but
I'm
sure
she
can't
afford
to
treat
a
tree.
That's
like
70
inches
around
I
mean
the
thing
is
huge.
G
You
said
between
10
inches
in
diameter
and
20
inches.
Was
it
or
30
inches?
I
believe
dave
lee
identified
it
beyond
that
treatment
doesn't
do
much,
and
you
know
unless
she
started
it
when
it
was
still
under,
but
at
any
rate
it
might
be
good
for
a
video
spot,
because
it's
a
gorgeous
tree
and
we'd
really
miss
it
in
the
neighborhood.
If
it
has
to
come
down.
D
All
right
further
questions
from
member
johnson.
C
D
You
know
it
might
be
interesting.
I
mean
this.
The
communications
department
has
a
better
sense
for
this,
but
since
we
have
so
many
trees
and
so
many
people
care
about
them,
it
would
be
kind
of
fun
to
have
like
a
mosaic
or
a
collage
of
people
standing
in
front
of
their
ash
tree,
showing
that
they
care
about
them
and
they're.
You
know
they're
part
of
their
world
and,
and
you
know,
they're
beautiful
and.
C
D
Okay,
okay,
all
right,
thank
you!
Monica
and
from
and
now
we
will
move
on
to
unfinished
business
to
review
and
discuss
proposed
changes
to
tree
code.
So
just
to
remind
everybody
where
we
were,
we
have
two
groups
of
recommendations
right
now.
One
is
to
have
a
list
of
topics
of
for
code,
changes
to
submit
to
the
city
attorney
and
then
there's
also
a
list
of
recommendations
or
programs
for
city
council
to
consider
to
assist
residents
with
eab
ash
trees
that
have
nothing
to
do.
D
That
is
not
related
to
code
and,
at
our
last
meeting
cohen,
offered
to
compile
further
suggestions
for
our
consideration,
and
I
have
those
in
our
agenda
and
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
share
my
screen
that
I
I
started
going
through
it
cohen,
and
I
was
wondering
if
you'd
be
willing
to
walk
us
through
the
document
and
help
us
understand
and
answer
questions.
Would
that
be
okay
with
you?
D
D
Got
it
okay,
so
there
was
at
the
top
of
this
coin,
they're
in
the
right
in
the
red.
Can
you
explain?
I
didn't
understand
what
you
were
trying
to
say
here.
G
That's
the
way
it
worked
with
the
ice
and
snow
revisions,
and
that's
what
the
attorney
told
us
at
the
time
that
the
process
was
supposed
to
be,
and
it
is
in
our
it
is
in
our
by-laws.
But
that's
the
way
it
works.
A
G
Then
they
they
also,
she
also
at
the
time
when
we
did.
We
were
working
on
her
working
with
her
on
the
changes
to
the
ice
and
snow.
G
She
did
say
that
there
should
be
more
of
these
codes
put
into
the
violation
bureau
instead
of
the
general
penalty,
which
is
2650.,
so
she
recommended
that
most
of
the
codes
do
that,
and
specifically
because
the
ice
and
snow
was
just
a
tiny
little
paragraph
in
title
11,
then
you
know
it
was
elaborated
on
and
because
it's
kind
of
different
from
any
other
of
the
codes
that
there
was
its
own
process
put
in.
D
So
so
we
so
thank
you
for
reminding
us
on
on
how
we
go
about
changing
code,
because
I
think
it
is
confusing
and
we
finally
were
able
to
work
out
that
process
and
we've
been
able
to
get
two
code
changes
enacted
over
the
past
year
and
a
half.
So
that's
a
good
reminder.
But
what
is
the
violation
bureau.
G
It's
the
less
it's
not
felonies,
since
it's
2
650
is
felony
weight
as
a
fine
anything
over
a
thousand,
but
the
viol.
That's
what
she
said.
The
violation
bureau
is
what
the
animal
control
stuff
is
done.
The
council
sets
a
schedule
of
fees
in
the
violation
bureau
and
it
just
it
just
saves
a
lot
of
effort
and
time
than
putting
everything
in
you
know
in
the
general
penalties.
D
E
D
H
G
Yeah,
actually
it
was
in
the
beginning
of
2018
and
after
she
did
that
she
re
iterated,
that
it
wasn't
supposed
to
go
to
her.
Until
this
we
were
supposed
to
go
to
the
city
council
and
they
were
to
make
a
determination
and
then
she
would
write
the
code
based
upon
their
acceptance
or
rejection
of
our
recommendations,
and
then
it
would
come
back
to
us
and
she
would
sit
there
with
us
and
make
sure
that
the
wording
was
what
we
wanted
and
that's
when
she
said
violation
bureau,
but
that
all
happened.
D
Right
and
that's
what
we
did
with
the
change
to
the
dog
code
with
the
last
round,
we
submitted
a
letter
to
city
council
city
council,
reviewed
that
and
then
directed
the
city
attorney
interim
city
attorney
to
draft
the
code
he
presented
that
to
us
and
then
from
there
went
back
to
city
council
and
was
approved
and
has
now
been
codified.
D
I
believe
so
so
I'm
I'm
unclear
as
what
moving
penalties
into
the
violation
bureau
means.
I
mean
we
haven't
been
talking
about
that
at
this
point
dave
you
have
your
hand
raised.
F
F
Barking
dog
off
leash
those
things
that
can
save
an
entire
court
trial.
Somebody
can
just
pay
a
fee.
Those
fees
are
established
by
the
court,
not
by
city
council,
so
the
court
determines
what
those
fees
are
on
an
annual
basis
and
not
all
things
can
go
through
the
violation
bureau,
and
I
would
say
particularly
this
one.
We
can't
just
give
a
ticket
for
someone
to
have
a
tree.
We
may
eventually
have
to
get
a
court
order
to
have
a
tree
removed
at
some
point,
especially
if
it's
in
a
danger.
D
G
I
think
that's
wrong,
because
I
did
talk
to
the
city
attorney
at
the
time
three
or
four
years
ago,
and
she
did
say
that
this
is
because
it
is
fairly
minor
because
it
needs
to
go
through
the
court
anyway.
All
of
these
fines
can
be
adjudicated,
dangerous
dog
can
be
adjudicated,
but
the
fine
is
not
twenty.
G
Six
hundred
and
fifty
dollars,
it's
a
it's
a
violation
bureau
thing
where
the
fines
are
set,
and
it's
not
just
the
court
that
sets
them
that
quite
a
few
of
the
fees
are
set
by
the
city,
council
or
they're,
set
by
the
code
like
we
did
with
ice
and
snow.
G
That
could
also
be
a
dangerous
thing.
You
know
somebody
slips
and
falls
on
ice,
so
I
don't
see
any
reason
why,
mostly,
if
they
have
to
remove
a
tree,
it
doesn't
need
to
be
a
twenty
six
hundred
and
fifty
dollar
fine.
In
addition
to
the
situation-
and
I
have
plenty
of
council
well,
I
have
a
council
request
that
was
dated
in
2016
and
it
was
renewed
in
2018
that
made
all
property
disputes
on
trees.
G
Isn't
done
civilly
in
court
is
if
a
tree
on
private
property
endangers
the
right
of
way,
then
the
city
has
the
right
to
notify
the
owner
of
the
tree
and
work
from
there.
B
I
think
you
guys
are
getting
bogged
down
in
something
that
you
don't
need
to
be
bogged
down
in
right
now,
you're
wanting
to
make
changes
to
code,
and
the
next
step
would
be
for
you
to
send
send
this
to
city
council
to
see
whether
or
not
they
even
are
interested
in
it
and
then,
if
they
do
say
yes,
we
want
to
make
these
changes
and
we
direct
the
city
attorney
to
do
it.
B
That
would
be
the
time
when
the
city
attorney
it
will
come
to
your
meeting
and
go
through
whatever
you
guys
want
to
do.
That
would
be
the
time
to
talk
about
the
violations
bureau,
but
right
now
you
guys
are
getting
bogged
down
on
stuff.
You
don't
really
need
to
get
bogged
down
in
because
right
now,
all
you
should
be
concentrating
on
is
the
changes
that
you
want
to
make
and
how
you
want
to
present
it
to
city
council
yeah.
C
Hand
is
up.
Okay,
thank
you.
I
maureen,
like
you,
are
irreplaceable,
you're
psychic,
that's
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
say:
I'm
I'm
just
listening
to
the
conversation
and
trying
to
digest
it
all,
and
what
I'm
picking
up
from
the
conversation
is
we're
talk.
C
I
feel
like
we're
talking
more
about
what
are
the
rights
of
the
of
the
code
enforcement
officers
in
the
city
in
regards
to
a
person's
rights
on
their
own
private
property,
and
what
we're
really
wanting
to
talk
about
is
is
what
the
code
is,
and
you
know
that
that's
a
whole
different
conversation
that
maybe
should
be
had
at
some
point.
What
is
the
perspective
of
this
committee
as
a
group
on
that?
But
right
now,
I'd
really
like
to
know
what
about
trees
and
shrubs.
G
D
Agree.
Okay.
Thank
you,
though
colleen
I
I
appreciate
you
bringing
up
the
issue.
I
just
wasn't
sure
how
how
that
related
to
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
on
eab.
It
seemed
like
a
a
tangential
tangential
topic,
but
I
do
think
the
reason
why
you
probably
put
that
there
is
the
recommendation
would
cascade
many
changes
within
code,
but
again
it
doesn't
necessarily
relate
to
the
eab
issue
at
hand.
D
G
Well,
code
takes
it
takes
into
account
diseased
trees,
but
if
we
just
go
through
the
code
as
it
is,
you
can
see
where
the
changes
possibly
need
to
be
made,
and
it
will
take
care
of
that
problem.
D
Okay,
so
I
had
I
would
I
I
had
taken
all
of
our
comments
and
summarized
them
into
a
higher
level
of
issues
that
we
wanted
to
present
to
city
council
as
something
that
would
need
to
be
addressed.
D
And
then,
of
course
that's
when
we
if
they
approve,
if
they
agree,
then
we
would
work
this
with
the
city
attorney
and
so
what
you've
done
is
you've
gone
through
and
commented
on
here,
one
of
the
and
so
one,
if
you,
if
it's
all
right
with
you
cohen
once
again
I'll
put
you
on
the
spot
and
ask
you
to
help
us
understand
your
thinking
here.
So
the
question
was
city
authority
to
come
into
private
property
to
inspect
trees.
G
D
Okay,
my
recollection
dave,
your
hand
is
raised.
F
F
That
we're
clear
on
just
this
particular
part,
because
I
mentioned
we
are
only
permitted
to
do
our
inspections
from
the
public
right-of-way
or
if
it's
viewable
from
the
public
right-of-way,
we
can
still
go
off
of
a
citizen's
complaint.
That
has
plain
view.
F
We
also
have
exigent
circumstances
in
which
we
can
enter
a
property,
and
there
are
several
circumstances
that
have
been
affirmed
by
the
supreme
court
and
as
municipal
officers,
we
do
have
limited
authority
to
enter
a
property
and
there
are
certain
circumstances,
one
of
them
being
animal
related
issues,
as
well
as
any
extreme
health
and
safety
matters
that
we
can
enter
a
property
as
well
as
a
police
officer.
We
don't
always
have
to
have
a
warrant.
We
do
have
to
have
a
warrant
to
enter
inside
of
somebody's
home,
a
physical
living
structure.
F
E
F
Well,
we
wouldn't
seek
a
warrant.
In
that
case,
we
would
post
the
property,
because
it's
an
exigent
circumstance.
We
can
see
the
the
distressed
tree.
We
do
have
the
process
that
we
have
to
follow
just
like
if
we
were
to
see
weeds
in
someone's
front
yard
or
we
just
see
trash,
we
still
post
the
property.
It's
it's
in
plain
sight.
We
can
view
it
just
like
with
a
police
officer.
If
it's
in
plain
sight,
it's
a
violation,
you
can,
you
can
see
it.
F
You
can
see
that
you
can
take
care
of
that
issue
where
we
run
into
the
concern-
and
this
is
very
far
and
few
between
in
the
city
of
englewood
is
where
can
I
not
see
into
an
area
whether
it's
a
front
residence
or
even
from
the
alley
or
the
back
of
someone's
house
a
large
tree
that
poses
a
danger
to
the
resident
or
to
the
adjoining
community
and
again
we're
not
tree
experts?
We
issue
that
notice.
F
They
are
directed
to
seek
counsel
of
a
professional
licensed
arborist
that
they
are
required
to
present
that
information
to
us
within
45
days
and
they're
required
to
follow
those
circumstances.
If
they
don't,
we
do
issue
a
summons
into
court
and
then
a
case
is
brought
against
that
person,
where
the
due
process
phase
goes
through
to
potentially
eliminate
that
nuisance,
either
by
them
coming
into
voluntary
compliance
within
the
court
phase,
or
they
can
be
ordered
to
take
care
of
it
within
a
certain
time,
and
if
not,
then
the
city
can
be
ordered
to
remove
the
tree.
F
We
do
not
go
on
to
someone's
property
to
remove
the
tree.
We
do
like
to
do
judicial
abatements.
We
very
rarely
do
administrative
abatements
at
this
point
only
because
it
does
run
some
liability
and
cautions
for
the
city,
and
so
we
we
very
we
sparingly,
use
administrative
abatement
and
that
order
has
to
actually
come
from
the
city
manager.
F
G
Yeah
one
of
the
things
that
that
that's
all
the
nuisance
value
is
all
in
title,
15
and
there's
a
process,
and
we
do
have
authority
to
make
comments
on
that
process,
and
I
one
of
the
things
I
recommended
when
I
went
through
the
code
as
it
exists
and
made
notes,
was
that
instead
of
the
process
that
is
outlined
there,
that
we
make
it
the
same
nuisance
process,
that's
in
title
15,
which
is
you
know
it's
under
our
authority,
because
it's
health
and
welfare
issues,
and
that
way
you
know
everybody
gets
notified.
G
If
it's
an
emergency,
they
can
issue
whatever
based
upon
the
process
and
because
it's
a
nuisance
or
it's
been
adjudicated
or
determined
to
be
a
nuisance,
a
problem,
and
I
think
that
would
make
it
very
very
clear
if
everything
that's
under
code,
enforcement's
authority
is
done
by
the
title
15
process,
and
that
was
something
that
the
the
city
attorney
had
had
recommended.
G
The
only
reason
why
it
wasn't
applied
with
snow
and
ice
is
because
of
certain
climate
issues
and
ice
is
kind
of
an
emergency
situation.
So
that's
one
of
the
recommendations
I
made
that
they
followed
that
process.
F
I
would
not
disagree
with
coheen
on
this
particular
point,
specifically
with
trees.
There
may
be
some
underlying
other
code
concerns
because
it's
placed
in
here,
because
it
also
conforms
with
what
trees
can
be
planted.
It
has
some
zoning
implications,
not
just
nuisance
abatement,
so
it
may
need
to
be
written
into
this
code
and
again
it
could
be
a
recommendation
for
you
all
that
maybe
this
this
be
moved
or
maybe
it
could
be
recommended
that
this
particular
title
be
the
enforcement
fall
under
the
nuisance
procedures.
D
F
F
It
does
take
longer
to
mediate
this
you
you
do
have
to
take
into
consideration,
though,
if
you
do
go
through
the,
if
you
refer
it
to
the
nuisance
process
it
might,
it
might
make
it
simpler
for
everyone
to
understand
and
again
this
is
more
complicated
than
my
my
expertise
and
moving
codes.
Changing
codes.
F
The
45
days
is
probably
reasonable,
but
if
you
look
through
the
nuisance
process,
it's
21
days
total
that
we
go
through.
It's
just
an
option
that
I'm
I'm
presenting
to
you
all.
F
G
I
was
just
going
to
elaborate
when
you
asked
what
the
process
is:
it's
under
11-5-6
a
and
it's
very
cumbersome
and
as
far
as
I
know,
it
hasn't
ever
been
enforced,
since
they
got
rid
of
the
bureau.
If,
if
you
would
like
it
would
be
easier,
I
think
if
we
just
go
through
the
code
as
it
exists,
because
a
lot
of
things
would
change
if
we
get
the
re-establishment
of
the
the
forestry
department
or
the
community
department.
G
Not
only
would
we
be
in
in
alignment
with
the
tree
city
requirements
standards,
it
would
also
make
it
very
clear
who
had
the
authority
and
it
would
be
an
arborist.
The
city
forester
would
be
an
arborist
who
could
make
these
determinations
on
his
own,
and
then
we
could
give
him
authority
and
then
change
whenever
we
had
a
situation.
G
Emergency
notices
are
kind
of
weird
when
it
comes
to
trees,
because
we
don't
know
that
the
tree
is
going
to
fall
necessarily
like
what
happened.
I
forget
when
it
was
at
least
three
years
ago
on
july,
4th
a
tree
in
the
park
at
bates,
logan,
suddenly
exploded
at
the
base
and
fell,
and
if
it
hadn't
fallen
on
power
lines,
the
guy
that
was
pulling
into
his
driveway
adjacent
would
have
been
killed.
His
car
would
have
been
crushed,
and
I
know
that
there'd
been
some
complaints
about
that
tree.
G
G
It
was
in
the
wrong
place.
It
was
a
beautiful
tree,
everybody
loved
it,
but
it
was.
It
was
dangerous,
but
nothing
was
done
about
it
when
something
could
have
been
done
about
it
and
fortunately
it
just
took
out
our
power
in
a
hundred
degree
heat
for
several
for
a
lot
of
hours
about
eight
or
ten
hours
before
they
could
put
it
all
back
together,
but
there's
no
real
emergency.
We
just
know
that
some
trees
are
dangerous.
G
F
I
just
wanted
to
provide
some
direction.
You
guys
have
spent
so
much
time
talking
and
discussing
this
topic,
and
I
think
at
this
point
with
all
the
research
and
things
I
think
what
you
guys
need
to
do
is
rather
than
evaluate
the
code.
Maybe
you
can
come
forward
with
some
recommendations,
such
as
you
would
like
to
have
have
code
change,
to
mirror
the
goals
that
you
want
to
achieve
and
allow
the
city
attorney
to
write
that
code
based
off
of
changes
that
other
cities
have
done
where
they
want
to
put.
F
This
would
really
be
up
to
them
to
best
suit
the
way
our
code
is
written.
Our
code
is
different
than
other
cities
so,
and
maybe
maureen
can
second
this.
I
think
what
has
been
successful
with
this
group
is
making
an
overall
general
recommendation
and
then
allowing
the
city
to
draft
that
right
that
take
that
recommendation
draft
what
they
see
and
put
it
forward
to
you
all.
I
think
you
guys
have
done
all
the
work.
F
D
I've
I've
pulled
up
for
everyone.
This
is
where
we
were
in
may
we
summarized
the
issues
here
under
key
issues
and
then,
based
on
that,
we
I
listed
from
all
of
our
conversations
the
high-level
recommendations
of
code
changes
that
we
would
like
to
see.
D
G
11-5-3,
and
I
know
that's
something
dave
lee
is
presenting
also
so
if
we
make
that
recommendation,
it'll
tie
into
that
and
it'll
and
then
under
11-5-4,
it's
also
reserved-
and
that's
where
we
put
in
the
authority
for
the
city,
forestry,
you
know
to
develop
programs
and
assistance
for
people
to
combat
any
disease.
That's
come
our
way
or
infestation
that
comes
our
way
and
then
under
11-5-5
the
property
owner's
responsibility
for
public
right-of-way.
G
I
think
that
needs
to
be
rewritten,
because
I
don't
think
there
is
any
legal
authority
to
force
a
private
property
owner
to
be
responsible
for
the
right
of
way,
except
if
anything
on
his
property
impinges
upon
the
right
of
way.
Then
we
could
ask,
you
know,
ask
him
to
take
care
of
that,
and
that's
already
in
here
about
they
have
to
maintain
clearances
over
the
right-of-way,
because
there's
there
are
some
places
where
there
are
trees
in
the
public
right-of-way
where
they
actually
have
street
trees.
G
But
those
were
planted
by
the
city,
but
that's
that's
just
my
opinion
on
that,
but
under
the
preservation
and
removal
procedures,
the
recommendation
would
be
to
strike
all
of
the
process,
which
is
half
the
code
and
just
simply
say
the
process
for
any
problems
with
trees
or
violations
of
trees
would
follow
the
process
outlined
in
title
15
for
nuisance
emergencies
and
normal
problems.
G
It's
almost
all
the
codes,
except
for
this
one
are
listed
under
title
15
and
the
first
thing
is
the
administration,
which
is
a
door
hanger
notice,
10
days,
a
posting
notice
14
days
an
appeal
process.
If
they
want
to
appeal
it
and
if
it'd
be
a
shorter
process,
if
there
was
really
a
problem
and
right
now,
there
hasn't
really
been
any
any
enforcement,
and
nor
can
there
be
the
way
this
is
written
without
the
city
forestry
being
re-established.
G
So
if
you
don't
have
to
do
it
within
here,
it's
just
that.
You
know.
I
know
carson
said
that
he
felt
it
would
be
a
lot
more.
It
would
be
a
lot
easier
to
understand
if
some
of
the
suggestions
were
written
within
the
code,
and
so
that's
why
I
did
it
that
way,
and
then
I
just
put
well
this
doesn't
work
and
it
would
work
better
if
it.
If
we
just
said
you
know,
turn
change
this
and
put
it
back
into
the
title
15.
G
it
used
to
be
that
way
for
the
title:
16
issues.
We
have
no
authority
over
title
16,
but
the
very
last
sentence
in
title
16
was
all
zoning
violations
have
to
follow
the
process
outlined
in
title
15.
that
changed
without
I
I
just
found
out
that
it
had
changed
and
I
don't
know
when
it
changed,
but
at
any
rate
it
was
a
very
simple
statement
and
that
could
be
in
here
too.
G
G
And
are
subject
to
removal
but
eliminate
the
except
for
mature
trees,
because
that
completely
eliminates
the
ability
to
get
rid
of
prohibited
trees
because
it
says
one
inch
in
diameter.
Well,
that's
not
a
mature
tree,
so
obviously
there
was
a
mistake,
so
any
tree
can
be
removed
and
if
we
want
to
remove
a
prohibited
tree,
we
need
to
take
that
out.
But
that's
just
a
little
housekeeping
thing.
G
But
a
lot
of
the
problems
would
be
solved
by
just
reestablishing
putting
back
in
the
the
two
reserves
space
recommending
that
that
they
re-established
the
forestry
department
and
re-establish
the
authority
for
the
for
the
department,
because,
basically
without
them
none
of
the
rest
of
it
can
happen.
G
You
know
there's
just
and
it
will
eliminate
our
problem
of
being
out
of
compliance
with
the
tree
city
standards
and
we
haven't
been
for
21
years
in
compliance
with
the
tree
city
standards
and
that
could
be
part
of
their
authority
to
administer
that
and
it
would
eliminate
a
lot
of
the
you
know
a
lot
of
these
other
issues,
because
property
rights
are
preeminent
and
with
the
exception
of
when
they
impinge
upon
other
people's
safety.
G
In
the
right
of
way,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
people
have
the
right
to
manage
their
trees
on
their
private
property.
D
Dave,
I
see
your
hand
as
ray,
but
I
want
to.
I
want
to
ask
coween
a
question
so
queen,
so
we're
we're
trying
to
come
up
with
this
list
of
things
that
changes
that
we
would
like
to
make
to
code,
not
not
necessarily
rewriting
the
code,
but
I
I
I
I'm
asking
you
to
help
me
state
what
it
is
that
we're
recommending.
D
G
Yeah-
and
you
know
you're
talking
about
a
mission
or
a
goal,
it
can
go
right
in
there
with
when
you
reestablish
the
city,
forestry
department
and
the
goal
and
purpose
of
I
just
put
in
this
encouraging
and
protecting
and
assisting
private
property
owners
in
the
expansion
and
maintenance
of
the
private
property
tree
canopy,
and
we
could,
you
know,
we're
very
proud
of
this
tree
city
designation,
but
we
haven't
been
in
compliance
with
the
tree
city
standard,
since
this
was
eliminated.
G
G
So
we
can
mention
that
in
there
or
not
same
with
the
11-5-4,
giving
them
the
authority
to
do,
programs
encourage
removal
of
prohibited
trees,
encourage
planting
of
diverse
trees.
G
It
was
very
specific
that
all
trees
that
were
in
dispute
or
too
close
to
a
property
line
that
was
an
issue
to
for
people,
property
owners
to
put
into
their
you
know
to
do
it
civilly.
It
had
nothing
to
do
with
the
city.
I
don't
know
if
I
agree
with
that,
but
that's
what
the
city
attorney
said
in
writing
so
and
if
you'd
like
to
see
that
I
can,
I
can
send
you
the
copy,
but
basically
I
would.
G
A
D
Okay,
so
cohen,
if
I
can
have
you
look
at
the
screen,
so
the
summary
of
the
code
changes
I,
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
add,
modify
what
we
have
here
based
on
our
conversation,
so
I
added
establish
or
re-establish
the
forestry
department
in
order
to
establish
authority
and
also
include
goal
and
purpose.
So
basically,
we
could
take
this
this
this
one
and
move
it
underneath
here.
D
D
Yes,
sorry,
I
didn't
see
your
hand.
E
H
E
All
right,
remember,
dickerson.
Thank
you
very
much
for
highlighting
all
of
the
changes.
The
way
you
did,
I
like
seeing
them
in
both
the
ways,
because
we've
got
kind
of
the
list
of
overall
goals
and
suggestions
and
then
the
actual
edits
in
the
code,
which
I
think
the
edits
and
the
code
are
really
nice
to
see,
and
I
would
just
suggest
chair
button
that
maybe
we
look
at
the
actual
like
if
you
switch
down
to
the
code
part.
E
Could
we
like,
I
feel
like
it's
difficult
when
remember,
dickerson
goes
through
like
so
many
points
all
at
once,
like
I'm
trying
to
take
notes
with
all
my
thoughts,
but
rather
like
all
of
us
address
one
of
those
at
a
time,
maybe
as
we
go
through
the
code
and
and
that
would
potentially
be
easier
for
all
of
us
to
keep
track
of
all
of
this
input
like
like.
Could
we
start
with
talking
about
what
this
forestry
thing
means
and
then
all
of
us
address
that
and
then
move
through
the
code
changes
in
the
code?
E
D
That's
I
I'm
very
open
to
that.
So
so
I
have
that
section
where
we
have
the
actual
code
here
and
where
she's
talking
about
reestablishing
the
forestry
department.
Is
that
what
you're
referring
to.
E
Yes,
so
like
I
have
questions
just
about
that,
I
mean,
if
we
put
that
like
say,
we
caused
that
to
go
into
the
municipal
code,
isn't
that
also
causing
the
need
for
a
new
set
of
expenses
for
the
city
and
and
do
we
want
to
structure
that
in
a
way
that
it
be
more,
maybe
ambiguous,
such
that?
If
the
city
has
the
establishment
of
forestry,
then
it
works
this
way
and
if
they,
if,
if
the
city
is,
is
not
currently
having,
you
know
a
forest,
you
know
a
funded
or
staffed
forestry
department.
F
That's
actually
the
point
that
I
was
going
to
bring
up.
I
I'm
I'm
going
to
caution
you
again.
You
guys
have
great
intentions,
and
I
know
that
city
council.
F
This
will
raise
some
red
flags
if
you're,
re-establishing
an
ordinance
or
requesting
you're,
adding
a
potential
110
to
125
000
annual
budget,
full-time
employee,
and
I
have
cons
and
I'm
sure
city
council
will
have
concerns
about
that,
which
is
why
we
originally
had
moved
this
to
utilizing
private
services
that
are
licensed
within
the
city
of
inglewood
to
do
the
same
thing
for
the
citizen
and
present
that
to
the
city.
So
it's
the
same
training
same
procedure.
F
The
city
is
just
not
taking
on
that
burden
or
expense,
and
we
already
do
have
the
authority
over
any
trees
that
is
in
public
property.
I
had
a
tree.
I
recommended
a
tree
for
removal
last
year
from
bates
logan
park
because
it
did
have
disease,
so
we
do
have
that
authority
already.
We
do
have
contracts
in
place
to
handle
those
if
it
can't
be
done
by
the
parks,
department
or
the
public
works
department.
F
We
also
had
some
cottonwoods
cut
down
that
were
diseased
in
the
last
year,
so
we
do
have
that
authority
already.
G
Dave
lee
has
already
stated
that
he
is
putting
this
concept
forward
to
the
city
council
and
getting
it
budgeted
in,
so
he
and
we
if
we
want
to
continue
being
a
tree
city,
we
have
to
re-establish
the
forestry
department
and
I
know
they
got
rid
of
it
as
a
cost-cutting
measure,
but
it's
actually
cost
the
city.
For
one
thing,
it
hasn't
been
done
on
a
large
scale.
G
A
lot
of
things
have
not
happened,
and
before
I
mean
three
years
ago,
the
committee
was
discussing
this
and,
of
course
you-
and
I
are
the
only
ones
left
that
were
involved
with
this,
but
at
any
rate
we
can
recommend
this.
But
it's
still,
I
think
the
other
changes
that
that
I
put
in
here
take
care
of
the
warrant
problem,
a
few
other
things
and
the
authority
thing.
So
if
they
don't
choose
to
re-establish
the
department
on
the
recommendation
of
dave
lee,
we
could
put
an
alternative.
C
Again,
I'm
just
listening
to
what
everybody's
saying
and
trying
to
siphon
it
down.
I
have
a
question
to
the
whole
committee
and
to
officer
lewis.
If
anybody
could
at
this
point
summarize
what
just
in
a
sentence
what
the
point
of
revising
the
tree
and
shrub
ordinance
like
what
is
the
reason
why
we're
doing
it
like
the
big
picture?
C
Reason
if
I
think
that,
like
like
officer
lewis,
said
all
the
work
is
here
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
can't
just
submit
a
statement
to
the
council
and
attach
the
work
like
here's,
here's
why
we
think
this
needs
to
be
revised
yeah.
So
why
can
anybody
answer
that
question
right
now,
because
I
we've
gotten
so
far
in
the
weeds
that
I
I
can't
answer
the
question
myself
so.
D
So
really
early
on
when
we
first
started
talking
about
it,
the
our
goal-
and
I
I
think
it's
written
somewhere-
was
to
anticipate
or
was
to
proactively
make
changes
to
tree
and
shrub
code
to
protect
the
city
and
the
residents
from
the
incoming
eab
infants
infestation.
D
C
Sure
and
best
practices
change
over
time.
So
couldn't
that
be
our
letter
that
we
want
to
revise
the
code
to
reflect
these
objectives,
that
you
know,
everything's
changed
from
from
the
perspective
of
the
law,
the
environment
and
the
community
has
changed
and
and
just
submit
that
and
put
in
some
of
these
and
just
like,
submit
all
of
this
work
that
coween
has
done,
which
is
excellent.
C
We
just
need
to
simplify
it,
submit
it
and
start
the
process,
maybe
so.
D
So
that's
what
I
have
here
I
mean
this
is
what
we
had
in
our
last
meeting
and
I
think
that's
why
dave
is
saying
we're
right
on
the
cusp,
because
it's
conceptual
meaning
here
are
the
things
that
need
to
be
done
to
code
to
help
the
city
and
residents
deal
with
the
upcoming
infestation,
and
it's
it's
very.
It's
very
basic.
It's
very
high
level
we're
not
writing
code.
So
then
that's
really
what
we
did
with
the
animal
ordinance.
We,
we
know
we
identified
where
the
gap
was,
and
we
recommended
here's.
What
can
you
know?
D
So
that
was
what
I
was
trying
to
bring
us
to
was
a
list
of
things
that
needs
to
change
with
the
existing
code
and
that's
why
I
keep
trying
to
go
back
to
this
list,
because
if
we
can
get
agreement
on
this
scope,
then
this
is
actually
what
we
would
submit
to
council
with
an
explanation.
Obviously,
and
then
that
would
help
us
have
a
conversation
with
the
city
attorney
on.
Why
we're
making
the
recommendation
does
that
fit?
What
you're
trying.
C
Yeah,
exactly
and
you've
got
just
added
in
the
number
11
and
number
10
and
everything
I
I'm
I'm
just
trying
to
support
and
push
forward
everything.
That's
on
that
list.
I
looks
good
to
me
and,
and
everything
you've
said
about
establishing
the
forestry
department.
I
have
heard
those
all
those
same
things.
C
I
I
feel
like
we're
really
on
on
the
the
right
track.
Here
I
guess
yeah
I
mean
I.
What
we're
all
looking
at
right
now
seems
like
it
would
be
great
to
send
with.
A
B
B
There's
no
reason
to
go
into
all
this
technical
issues
right
at
this
point
in
time,
and
you
can
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
to
send
this
to
city
council.
If
you
like
well.
D
I
I
did
I
I
did
want
to
go
through
the
the
recommendations
that
cohen
provided
it
with
us,
because
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
didn't
miss
anything
or,
or
you
know,
and
that
and
and
to
include
that,
the
ideas
that
that
she's
presented.
D
So
that's
why
I
wanted
to
go
through
the
document
that
cohen
shared
with
us.
Carson
your
hand
was
raised
next.
E
Then
I
I
like
what
remember
the
direction
remember.
Johnston
pushed
us
in
on
the.
I
think
that
the
can
you
can
you
maximize
what
you
have
on
the
screen.
I
can't
see
it
all,
and
I
don't
know
that
I
have
yeah
and
do
you
have
on
there
satisfy
the
four
requirements
for
standards
for
a
tree
city.
D
E
That
probably
would
be
good
on
there
and
then
on
the
the
forestry
thing.
I
think
that
you
know
we
don't
have
to
come
up
with
the
wording,
but
my
point
was
that
I
think
the
wording
can
be
made.
You
know
by
the
city
such
that
it
satisfies
that
number
one
of
the
standards
for
tree
city,
because
I
just
read
through
that
and
it's
pretty
it's
pretty
wide
open,
and
so
the
municipal
code
can
say
you
know
that
it
it
doesn't
have
to
like
define
it.
E
The
way
it
it
currently
is
where
it
sounds
like
we're,
creating
a
specific
you
know,
paid
person
role,
it
can
just
be
you
know
whoever
the
city
designates
and
but
otherwise
I
I
agree
that
our
high
level,
I
think,
is
covered
pretty
well
by
your
list.
There.
A
D
Real
quick
like
I've,
I
have
to
get
off
in
five
minutes
and
head
to
the
airport
carson.
Would
you
like
to
continue
reviewing
the
document
that
cohen
submitted
at
this
point?
I.
E
Mean
we
could
update
your
I'd,
say
your
list
that
you're
working
on
right
there,
oh
yeah,
should
be
our
our
master
that
we're
working
off
now
so
yeah
we
could
just
like.
I
could
take
everyone
through
making
sure
there's
nothing
else.
We
want
to
add
there.
Can
you
send
me
the
current
version
of
that
or
send
me
the
link
for
that.
G
D
E
Yeah,
I've
got
I've
got
the
all
the
stuff
from
okay,
colleen
I've
been
going
through
it
as
we've
been
talking,
and
then
I
guess
just
make
me
a
host
or
whatever
it
takes
to
be
able
to
share.
D
Okay,
colleen,
you
had
your
hand
raised.
G
Pretty
much
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
what
I
did
putting
notes
in
on
the
code-
they
don't
have
to
be
in
the
code
they
could
just
be
listed
out,
but
they
would
cover
almost
everything
on
the
list,
except
for
licensing
who
can
cut
prune
or
remove
trees.
That's
under
title
five,
which
isn't
under
our
authority
and
as
dave
lee
pointed
out,
all
tree
services
are
licensed
and
called
arborist
by
the
city.
G
The
only
requirement-
and
I
have
a
copy
of
the
license-
the
is
the
certification
to
apply
pesticides
for
dave
lee
all
tree
services
licensed
in
denver
and
littleton
are
automatically
licensed
in
inglewood
and
since
title
v
isn't
under
our
authority,
we
don't
need
to
even
discuss
that
or
or
add
it
into
suggestions,
because
it's
already
there
and
say
enforce
use
of
arborist.
The
title.
5
licensing
department
issues
updates
to
the
list
of
licensed
tree
services
when
new
or
renewed
licenses
are
accepted.
So
that's
always
available
too.
G
We
don't
need
to
even
have
that,
as
part
of
it
provide
written
notice
to
affected
property
owners
if
diseases
are
discovered.
Well,
that's
already
included
in
title
15
on
a
nuisance,
written
notice,
door
hangers
whatever,
and
but
I
don't.
I
don't
agree
with
this
issue-
written
warrant
to
residents
who
do
not
maintain
ash
tree.
G
I
don't
think
that
that's
that's
something
that
we
want
to
have
in
there.
E
E
G
B
E
A
B
E
I
know,
but
just
to
make
sure
everything's
addressed
just
give
me
just
a
sec,
because
chair
bowdoin
has
to
leave
and
I
want
to
make
sure
I've
got
access
to
what
I
need
to
share
and
keep
this
going.
A
D
D
A
D
Sent
okay,
you,
everyone
have
a
safe
july
4th
and
I
will
talk
to
you
later.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
All
thank.
E
A
E
C
E
E
G
Yeah,
what
I
put
in
under
that
was
that
the
definitions
are
determined
by
any
changes
or
the
wording
in
the
code,
and
so
it
would
be
up
to
the
city
attorney
to
identify
any
definitions
that
needed
to
be
changed.
E
Okay,
that's
good
eleven
five
three
she
has
in
here
already
right,
because
that's
the
forestry
part.
G
Of
confused
1153
was
reestablishing
the
community
forestry
department
and
that
would
go
along
with
the
tree
standards.
I
mean
the
tree
city
standards,
but
there
are
a
couple
of
other
ways.
It
can
be
done,
but
it's
some
it's
some
department
that
has
legal
authority
over
public
trees
and
it
has
to
be
in
the
code
right.
According
to
the
tree
city
standards,.
G
G
E
G
G
The
responsibility
for
public
right-of-way-
we
don't
really
know,
but
I
do
know
that,
except
for
where
private
property
plantings
impinge
upon
the
right-of-way
is
the
only
way.
As
you
know,
a
private
property
owner
has
responsibility
for
the
right
of
way
if
there
are
very
few
trees
that
are
on
public
property,
okay,.
G
E
Okay,
preservation
and
removal
procedures-
that's
where
we're
talking
about
moving
this
into
the
established
nuisance
process
right.
So
where
do
we
have
well.
G
The
initial
statement
says
public
or
private
property
and
I
think
what
they
meant
by
that
was
when
private
property
impinges
upon
the
right-of-way,
but
it's
gotten
a
little
muddled.
So
I
would
say
that
you
know
that
needs
to
be.
You
know,
clarify
the
responsibility
of
owners.
G
You
know
private
property
in
relationship
to
the
right
of
way
and
then
a
b
c
d,
e
and
f
should
be
replaced
with
the
process
outlined
in
title
15..
G
No,
no
just
the
just
the
process
for
dealing
with
it
should
be
in
the
the
process
outlined
in
title
15..
Oh
right,
right.
E
Move
tree
sub
code
part
about
dealing
with,
is
it
both?
It
says
in
the
code,
I'm
looking
at
preservation
and
removal.
G
Yeah,
it's
a
through
f
are
is
all
about
the
process.
G
Method
of
service
time
for
compliance
appeal
failure
to
comply
special
assessments.
It
would
just
be
a
lot
easier
if
it
was
just
a
simple
statement.
E
H
E
Okay
and
then
all
the
various
strikes,
I
think
we
could
sum
that
up
right.
G
Well,
you
just
you
can
just
forget
about
that.
If
we're
just
going
to
do
a
basic.
E
Right
which
they'll
see
because,
like
like
member
johnson,
said
we'll
we'll
supply
city
council
with
our
high
level
summary
of
code
change
recommendations
along
with
the
detailed
work
that
you've
done
and
you
know,
they'll
see
the
the
relation
between
I
mean
it's
that
part's
pretty
straightforward.
Please
raise
hands
speak
up.
If
anyone
has
anything.
G
And
there's
just
one
other
housekeeping
thing
under
it's
listed
here,
but
not
specifically.
G
G
Well,
all
ash
cultivar,
which
is
change
it
from
emerald
ash
to
ash
and
consider
adding
in
other
trees
that
have
been
identified
as
invasive
or
weed
trees.
A
G
Modify
well,
it
says
prohibited
plantings
and
it
lists
a
few
add
in
ash
trees.
G
G
Just
to
add,
allow
do
not
allow
any
of
these
prohibited
trees
to
grow
within
the
city
and
remove
the
reference
to
one
inch.
Diameter
mature
tree.
G
E
All
right,
so
we've
got
the
go
ahead.
I'm
member
johnson.
E
Cool
all
right,
so
we've
got
down
through
5-8.
I
think
we
have
good
summary
on
this
member
dickerson,
because
we've
got.
I
don't
even
think
we
need
to
say
at
the
top
of
this
prohibit
ash
tree,
we'll
just
say
1158
and
our
summary
is
modified,
prohibited
acts
which
I'm
still
not
clear.
What
we're,
what
the
height?
What's
the
point
of
that?
What
is
it.
G
G
G
Actually,
you
know
adding
ash
trees,
since
all
ash
trees
are
are.
E
I
think
that's
enough
to
get
the
point
across
okay
and
then
so
we
did,
we
did
get
in
here.
Yeah
satisfy
standards
for
tree
city,
the
the
four
points
we
don't
even
need
to
go
more
on.
That
is
there
anything
we're?
Not,
let's
see
so
we
got
authority
section.
H
E
Eleven
five:
five:
two:
if
we're
going
to
try
to
do
high-level
summaries
for
everything,
oh
yeah
changes
as
appropriate.
Okay,.
E
And
then
we've
got
that
we've
got
okay
s
this
solidify
preservation.
Oh
we've
got
that
kind
of
duplicated,
now
specified
dead
and
dying
trees
subject
to
removal
as
well
as
we
could
put
some
of
this
into.
A
G
Well,
I
know,
but
that
whole
thing
is
pretty
high
level
and
it
doesn't
take
into
account
that
the
city
doesn't
really
have.
Unless
it's
going
to
impinge
upon
the
right-of-way.
The
city
doesn't
really
have
any
responsibility.
G
You
know
any
ability
to
order
a
tree
to,
but
that
lot
that
bottom
line
is
important,
because
that's
one
of
the
things
that
was
said
in
by
the
city
attorney.
Well,
it
has
to
be.
G
G
That's
it
will
be
clear
if
it's,
you
know
if
we
move
it
to
title
15,
so
I
don't
know.
G
E
G
Yeah,
the
licensing
is
already,
you
know
it's
it's
in
the
licensing
department
and
so
that's
yeah.
E
E
G
Because
the
city
attorney
four
years
ago
or
three
years
ago
added
things
that
added
that
into
what
she
sent
us
to
consider.
But
she
changed
her
mind
later.
G
About
no,
they
have
to
do
it
they
have
to.
If
they
make
these
changes
to
our
code.
She,
the
city
attorney,
will
automatically
go
into
title
16
and
see
if
any
changes
need
to
be
made
to
title
16
or
eliminate
it
in
ours.
So
it's
not
it's
not
ours.
The
city
attorney
will
do
that.
Got.
E
C
G
Emerald
because
all
all
ash
trees
are
subject
to
the
emerald
ash.
G
G
Well,
go
down
because
I
I
was
really
confused,
because
there
was
something
that
said
revisions
to
tree
and
shrub
code
and
title
16..
G
I'm
abbreviating
that
it's
and
it
starts
at
what
we
identified
as
key
issues
for
code.
G
G
But
there's
a
whole
list
of
things.
It
says,
add
purpose
to
clarify
importance:
you've
done
that
establish
an
authority
section
you've
done
that
modify
it
you've
done
that
number
five
can
go
away.
G
Okay,
well,
then,
I
think
that's
fine,
but
all
this
stuff
above
that.
E
Of
you,
yeah
well
she's
got
her
own
copy
of
this
I'll.
Just
turn
this
into
just
our
recommendations.
So
we've
already
addressed
this,
there's
really
nothing
that
needs
to
change
there
right
a
code
officer
or
code
manager
lewis,
you
guys
do
you
need
anything
addressed
regarding
your
access
to
inspections,.
C
I
it
might
be
redundant,
but
I
I
think
just
like
a
good
essay,
you
can
say
it
and
then
elaborate
like
it.
You
know
that
top
section,
I
think,
should
stay
in
there.
G
Well,
it's
it's
not
in
there.
I
wouldn't
even
put
it
in
because
it's
not
an
issue.
C
E
I
would
suggest
I
mean
if
I
was
chair,
that's
what
I
would
suggest
is
like
one
of
us
organize
a
whole
email
with
appropriate
attachments
and
introduction
and
then
share
it
with
the
whole
committee
and
see
if
anyone
has
any
final
input
before
we
submit
it,
go
ahead.
Maureen.
B
The
other
thing
that
you
could
do
is
approve
what
you've
done
this
evening.
Okay,
somebody
can
make
a
motion
say
we
approve.
You
know
this
whole
list
of
stuff
and
in
the
motion
you
can
put
that
you're
going
to
forward
it
to
the
chairperson
of
your
committee
for
her
to
submit
to
city
council.
Then
she
could
just
submit
it
with
a
memo.
B
Remember
dickerson
is
absolutely
correct,
so
this
the
memo
would
go
to
council
member
russell
okay,
but
that
should
come
from
the
chair
of
this
committee.
E
Okay,
all
right!
Well,
I
will
clean
this
up
and
organize,
but
I
mean
I
still
just
as
a
member
of
the
committee.
I
think
you
know,
since
we've
all
put
work
into
this,
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
see
the
whole
thing
together,
so
we
can
all
see
it
before.
It's
officially
submitted
to
council
member
russell
code
manager
lewis,
I.
F
Just
wanted
to
recommend
based
off
of
past
processes
that
you
submit
you
all
clean
up.
Take
a
look
approve.
What
you
want
to
do
send
your
memo
forward
to
your
liaison,
who
would
address
it
to
city
manager
to
put
on
the
on
the
agenda,
and
then
you,
representatives
from
all
of
your
group,
would
be
would
come
in
during
a
study
session
to
present
how
you
came
to
that
agreement
and
is
that
correct,
council?
Member
russell?
Is
that
the
way
you
understand
that.
I
That
is
the
way
that
I
understand
it
I
mean
I
can
and-
and
I
can
actually
do
it
pretty
simple-
is
just
to
make
sure
that
it
gets
put
on
the
agenda.
I
mean
that
is
my
understanding.
I
mean
I
don't
know
if,
if
you
this
is
my
suggestion
vice
chair
green,
is
that
you
go
ahead
and
get
it
all
cleaned
up
and
everything,
and
then
even
have
the
committee
look
at
it
for
the
next
meeting
and
then
just
make
the
motion
then
and
vote
on
it.
E
G
Yeah
we
can
have
as
a
special
meeting
we've
done
that
before
we
have.
I
think
we
can
have
a
do
it
in
a
week
or
two
weeks
whenever
you
know
you've
got
it
circulated
around
and
we're
and
we're
ready
to
approve
it.
We
have
a
I'm
pretty
sure.
Even
without
the
chair,
we
have
a
quorum.
B
H
E
I
mean
I
could
finish
it
in
an
hour.
Councilmember
russell.
I
I
actually
think
that
you
probably
could,
if
you
all
here
tonight,
could
decide
on
a
date
that
you
could
meet
for
just
a
quick
zoom
meeting
before
maureen
leaves
it
could
be
posted.
Is
this
correct
maureen?
You
could
post
it
and
three
days
later
they
could
meet
via
zoom
and
and
just
vote
on
it,
and
it
wouldn't
be
necessarily
a
full
meeting.
B
The
actual
statute
says
that
the
agenda
has
to
be
posted
24
hours
before
a
meeting,
but
this
committee
has
directed
that
they
want
everything
three
days
before
a
meeting,
so
I
mean
it
can
be
done.
That's
not
a
problem
at
all.
You
guys
decide
what
you
want
to
do,
but
it'll
be
three
days
after
or
three
days
before,
whatever
day
you
decide,
I
have
to
post
an
agenda.
E
I
understand
is:
is
there
could
we
have
a
quorum?
Can
I
don't
know
if
everyone's
able
to
know
their
schedule
right
now?
If
we
could
bust
this
out,
we've
got
three
minutes
left
till
eight.
Is
there
any
chance,
the
all
the
members
of
the
committee
just
to
like
review
a
final
on
this
and
say
yeah
go
ahead
and
send
it
could
meet
on
the
23rd
or
the
24th.
E
That
we
wouldn't
need
council,
member
russell
or
code
manager,
lewis
on
that
it'll
just
be
us
to
review
our
our
final
email.
E
Remember,
watson
are
you
there
does
do
either
of
those
days
work
for
you.
It
would
be
a
quick
meeting,
probably
20,
minutes
yeah.
E
C
A
E
E
Right
so
we'll
have
this
in
the
packet,
so
all
we
have
to
do
is
meet,
have
a
motion
to
approve
it,
approve
it
and
then
chair
boden
will
have
it
to
send.
B
E
And
I'll
finish
that
this
week.
C
E
So
I
moved
that
we
meet
on
at
6
00
p.m.
On
june
24th
for
a
quick
approval
of
our
tree
shrub
code,
vice.
E
B
E
Okay,
all
right
we'll
meet
on
24th
at
6
00
pm
to
review
our
content,
to
submit,
on
behalf
of
our
committee
for
tree
shrub
code
to
council
member
russell
to
share
with
city
council
and
does
any
let's
see,
let
me
get
to
our
agenda
real,
quick,
so
we'll
that's
our
unfinished
business.
As
far
as
we
got,
we
wrap
that
up
we'll
everything
else
will
move
we'll
move
forward
to
future
meetings,
council
or
committee
member
choice.
Does
anyone
have
anything
member
dickerson,
your
hand
is
raised.
E
Did
any
committee
members
have
anything
I'll
just
share?
I
wanted
to
officially
thank
the
city
and
city
council
for
the
volunteer
appreciation
event.
I
I
did
attend
and
had
fun
on
the
water
slides.
It
was
really
hot,
so
it
was
perfect
and
that
was
nice.
Thank
you
and
code
manager.
Lewis
did
you
have
some.
F
I
just
wanted
everyone
to
mark
their
calendars.
That
august
28th,
the
city
of
inglewood,
is
hosting
an
open
house
here
at
the
police
department.
F
Oh
cool,
multiple
different
functions
to
be
released,
we're
even
talking
about
a
police
and
fire
softball
game,
as
well
as
having
sheltering
staff
here
to
do
an
adoption
day
and
then
provide
an
open
house
where
we'll
be
present
to
show
everyone
that'll
be
a
saturday
from
I
think
ten
to
two
so
mark
your
calendar.
So
you
have
plenty
of
time
to.
F
H
E
Thank
you.
Anybody
else
have
anything:
okay,
oh
god,.
C
I
just
want
to
thank
member
dickerson
for
all
of
her
research,
and
I
also
want
to
thank
you
for
having
a
brain
that
can
condense
it
all.
And
if
you
need
any
assistance,
streamlining
that
in
between
now
and
next
meeting,
I'm
available
to
help.