►
From YouTube: CEAC 02172022 video
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
C
If
members,
I
would
let's
go
ahead
and
do
a
roll
call.
Please
maureen.
E
F
C
C
Thank
you.
It
looks
like
a
car
coween
and
then
a
second
please
sonia.
Thank
you.
So
are
there
any
correction
or
discussion
on
the
minutes.
C
C
G
And
hi
everyone,
so
I
apologize
that
I
hope.
Did
everybody
get
the
documents
I
forwarded
to
you.
F
G
Okay,
perfect
one
of
the
items
was
just
more
of
an
information
for
you
all,
because
you
were
asking
questions
relating
to
changes
to
the
upcoming
health
department.
This
was
more
of
an
informational
handout
for
you,
so
that
you
all
understand
what
the
next
steps
are
and
what's
going
to
be
happening
moving
forward.
D
G
G
I
hope
it's
not
in
your
guys's
spam.
I
I
typically
don't
email
you
directly,
but
in
this
circumstance,
because
the
chair,
what
the
recording
secretary
was
on
vacation,
I
took
the
liberty
because
I
felt
it
was
important.
A
G
E
G
It
is
and
that's
why,
with
all
the
public
health
orders,
that
have
happened
within
the
last
couple
years
and
why
it's
been
so
inconsistent
or
very
different
is
because
the
authority
actually
lies
with
the
health
department.
So
a
lot
of
stuff
that
we
intersect
with
whether
it's
zoonotics
the
transmission
of
animal
diseases
to
humans
that
intersects
with
code
enforcement.
But
the
county
also
has
a
major
responsibility
same
with
different
kinds
of
food-borne,
illnesses,
health
and
safety
issues,
rodent
issues,
those
all
intersect
between
code
enforcement
and
the
health.
G
G
Which
encompasses
a
considerable
amount
of
data
broken
down
in
the
last
three
year
increments,
and
so
this
is
what
the
city
manager
has
asked
that
I
prepare
for
council
annually
and
has
asked
that
moving
forward.
G
So
the
big
jump
in
total
numbers
between
the
years
you'll
see
that
we've
jumped
from
5
000
up
to
6
700..
The
two
major
things
that
stood
out
for
me
is
one.
We
took
on
a
seasonal
grass
and
weeds
enforcement
person
for
a
few
months
which
contributed
to
that
jump.
If
I
would
have
had
2018,
we
were
at
like
3
500
cases
in
2019
we
brought
on
an
additional
code
enforcement
officer.
G
G
G
If
you
take
out
the
weed
enforcement
because
that's
their
that's
our
sole
only
responsibility,
and
so
you
would
see
that,
even
though
we
do
supplement
weed
enforcement
with
the
seasonal,
it's
we
still
are
working
on
that
within
the
division,
but
it
still
leaves
animal
control
as
the
major
the
the
major
concern
within
the
city
and
again
that
goes
with
health
and
safety
violations.
A
majority
of
this.
G
If
we
were
to
take
animal
control
out
of
this
picture,
it
would
look
very
different
because
most
of
these
nine,
almost
96
percent
of
all
of
the
code
enforcement
violations
come
into
voluntary
compliance.
G
G
And
we've
only
had,
I
think
in
2021
we've,
we
only
ended
up
having
three
cases
go
before
jury
trial,
so
all
of
our
cases
were
put
together
so
thoroughly
and
so
well
that.
G
Subjects
in
their
representing
council,
if
present
recommended
that
they
take
some
type
of
a
deferred
plea
arrangement
and
come
into
compliance.
E
Thank
you,
I
could
manage
your
list.
Can
you
remind
me
what
what
would
fall
under
property
maintenance.
G
Property
maintenance
is
one
of
those
things
that
actually
falls
mostly
within
the
building
department,
part
of
it
within
the
fire,
marshals
and
and
community
development.
G
They
typically
would
be
the
first
person
to
receive
a
complaint,
and
if
they
don't
receive
voluntary
complaints,
then
enforcement
happens
and
that
would
be
code.
Enforcement
would
go
and
visit.
That
particular,
let's
say,
for
example,
a
business.
Their
lights
are
too
bright.
Code
enforcement,
be
the
one
doing
the
official
enforcement,
the
posting
and
moving
forward.
I
believe
the
airbnbs
also
fall
under
that,
so
we
had
several
that
were
in
violation
and
non-compliance
with
their
licensing
agreements,
and
so
that
would
fall
once
community
development
has
finished.
E
Would
that
include
like
if
someone
started
building
a
fence
without
a
permit
stuff.
E
G
G
We
go
to
the
particular
business
or
property
or
resident,
and
we
post
it
and
we
go
through
the
proper
avenues
to
either
get
that
remedied
or
take
them
to
court.
E
G
G
We
have
all
been
trained
on
this
and
it
is
an
option
that
we
do
present.
We
started
presenting
it
maybe
six
months
ago,
but
you
also
have
to
have
a
victim
that
is
willing
to
be
a
part
of
that
process,
and
so
far
we've
had
no
victims
that
want
to
be
participate
in
that
process,
so
mainly
with
this
would
come
into
play
with
dog
bite
type
situations.
G
But
as
of
yet
we
have
not
been
able
to
move
that
forward,
but
it
is
in
our
it's
in
our
work
queue
we
can
infer
things
and
code
enforcement
will
be
participating
in
the
future
on
some
of
the
restorative
justice
panels.
G
Yeah
and
we
we
rolled
it
out
as
a
limited
opportunity,
mainly
for
juveniles
and
a
few
other
types
of
offenses,
and
because
it's
so
successful
and
we
really
wanted
to
make
sure
the
workflow
worked
out,
that
our
reports
could
be
generated
and
forwarded
to
the
courts
in
a
different
way.
E
G
Well,
thank
you.
I'm
glad
you
are
supportive
of
that.
I
will
give
ames
your
feedback
in
our
meeting
next
week.
C
B
Good
evening,
so
last
week
at
the
city
council
meeting
during
council
members
choice
council
member
woodward
asked
that
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
just
review
one
of
the
sections
on
cutting
and
removing
weeds
and
grass.
The
city
attorney
sent
me
an
email
saying
it's.
It's
in
15-6-1.
B
Basically
and
I'll
I'll
forward
this
to
maureen
and
maureen
can
share
it
with
the
committee,
but
this
is
it
says:
every
occupant
and
or
owner
of
real
property
shall
cut
or
cause
to
be
cut
all
weeds
or
grasses
over
six
inches
in
height
growing
thereon
and
shall
remove
or
cause
the
removal
of
said,
weeds
or
grass
to
a
site
authorized
for
such
disposal,
and
I
mean
apparently
there
was
a
place
where
weeds
were
growing
through
the
snow,
so
the
city
attorney
suggested
she
just,
but
he
noted
that
weeds
in
excess
of
six
inches
aren't
growing
this
time
of
year,
so
code
enforcement
may
not
be
able
to
take
action.
B
I
think
we
could
simply
remove
the
word
quote
growing,
so
that's
just
a
suggestion
from
from
the
city
attorney
so
I'll
forward
that
email
to
you-
and
as
far
as
I
know,
I
mean
we're
working
on.
B
B
So
I
would
encourage
you
all
to
look
at
that
as
well,
and
hopefully,
city
council
is
going
to
get
a
copy
of
all
the
responses
as
well
as
the
committee.
So
those
are
the
two
biggest
things
that
I
can
think
of
for
right
now,.
B
Update
is
mostly
about
building
codes
and,
and
things
like
that
so
they've,
the
steering
committee
has
been
working
on
that,
for
I
want
to
say
almost
a
year
and
they're
getting
ready
to
go
public
with
some
of
the
information.
I
don't
remember
if
there's
a
survey
out
there,
the
I
think
it
was
the
study
session
not
last
week,
but
maybe
the
week
before
they
were
there
to
talk
about
it.
The
steering
committee
and
the
the
person
that
the
contractor
that
we've
hired
to
work
on
it
so.
E
C
B
Well,
I
think
probably
what
you
all
should
do
is
just
look
at
it
and
I
mean
look
at
the
the
15-6-1
and
I
will
send
the
email
to
you
and
and
simply
I
do
believe
that
that
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
should
weigh
in
on
it.
I
mean
I
don't
think
it
will
take
necessarily
any
work.
So
I
think
that
the
city
attorney
was
suggesting
that
it
was
a
pretty
simple
fix,
but
code
enforcement
does
have
to
weigh
in.
I
think.
C
Thank
you,
rita.
Okay,
moving
forward
item
number:
six
is
a
communications
update
monica's,
not
here,
but
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
got
your
your
inglewood
citizen
magazine,
but
there
were
several
topics
in
there.
I'm
related
to
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
with
snow
eab
and
then,
of
course,
yeah.
I
think
that
was
pretty
much.
It
there's
a
lot
of
information
in
there
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
mention
too.
The
communications
on
the
single
hauler
have
been
really
good
carson.
C
You
know
with
instagram
and
next
door.
I've
been
impressed
what
they've
put
to
get
with
what
they've
put
together.
E
I
mean
we,
no
because
there's
I
mean
you
know
we
put
together
an
rfp
based
on
input
from
citizens
that
had
a
set
of
terms
that
are
based
on
what
citizens
wanted.
We
put
that
out.
Two
proposals
came
back,
neither
of
which
satisfied
those
terms,
one
rejected
ali
service
and
the
other
rejected
large
item
pickup
and
allowing
anyone
to
opt
out,
and
then
we
put
out
this
survey
that
just
went
out
so
we're
gathering
info
feedback
from
citizens
based
on
you
know
the
fact
that
the
proposals
we
received
don't
satisfy
the
request.
E
You
know
the
requirements
that
were
identified
from
citizens
and
to
get
more
information
about
what
citizens
currently
pay,
what
their
current
services
are
et
cetera.
So
we
can
take
that
into
account
and
then
we'll
be
meeting
to
you
know,
process
that
data
and
then
make
a
recommendation
to
city
council
as
to
how
to
move
forward.
C
Thank
you,
cohen,.
F
Oh
yeah,
I
thought
I
was
muted.
I
have
a
question
about
the
the
article
on
ash,
trees
and
eab.
It
starts
out
that
we
have
an
estimate
of
22
500
ash
trees.
F
I
think
that
that
is
grossly
exaggerated
and
I
think
it
underscores
the
need
for
us
to
have
an
inventory
of
some
nature
when
I
was
going
through
all
of
this
to
put
the
matrix
together
most
of
those
cities
publicized
how
many
trees
they
had
in
the
city
and
they
estimated
it
we're
one
of
the
smallest
cities
in
land
area
and
the
largest
city
doesn't
even
have
14
000
ash
trees.
F
A
couple
years
ago,
the
city
attorney
said
there
are
9
000
single
family
homes
in
inglewood,
and
that's
where
the
bulk
of
our
private
trees
are.
If
we
just
assumed
rather
rashly
that
most
places
have
four
trees
on
their
property
and
a
lot
of
places
a
lot
of
even
in
my
neighborhood,
they
don't
have
any
trees.
F
But
if
you
assume
for
her
property,
that
would
be
36.
000,
total
trees
in
the
city
and
most
of
the
cities
estimate
that
ash
trees
only
make
up.
Maybe
15
of
their
of
the
total
trees,
so
that
would
leave
us
with
about
3,
600
or
4
000
trees
and
ash
trees
are
not
the
predominant
species
cottonwood
and
siberian
elves
seem
to
be
so
anyway.
I
think
it
underscores,
I
think,
that's
a
misnomer,
and
we
need
to
know
what
we're
actually
dealing
with.
E
Yeah,
just
in
regard
to
that
number
because
I'm
familiar
with
it
because
of
the
trash
committee,
the
9000
is
the
homes
that
are
units
of
four
or
less.
So
that's
not
counting
all
properties
that
are
units
of
four
or
more
so
there's
actually
like
it's
over
twenty
thousand
homes
in
inglewoods,
and
so,
if
you
were
calculating
just
by
that,
9000
that'd
probably
be
less
than
you
know
the
total
properties
that
have
ash
trees.
E
E
E
I
did
have
one
other
thing
on
what
you
were
talking
about:
chair,
bowden,
okay,
I
noticed
in
the
saving
your
ash
section.
It
was
a
pretty
strong
statement.
I
thought
the
city
of
inglewood
will
be
implementing
a
community
forestry
program
to
help
subsidize
inglewood
citizens
for
the
treatment
or
removal
of
ash
trees
on
private
property.
E
C
Yes,
I
I
talked
to
dave
lee
about
that
very
thing,
just
to
catch
up
with
what
they
were
working
on
and
and
I'll
give
you
guys
an
update
when
we
get
to
that
section.
But
yes,
there
is
a
subsidy
program
in
place.
E
C
C
Right,
I
I
I
dave,
lewis
might
know
manager
lewis
might
know
more
than
I
do,
but
they
are
implementing
the
subsidy
program
for
the
treatment
and
or
removal
of
ash
trees.
And
I
don't
know
what
that
subsidy
amount
or
how
the
program
works.
Yet.
D
G
E
And
just
since,
it's
directly
related
to
that,
since
remember
dickerson
and
I
did
work,
you
know
gathering
more
details.
E
I
the
the
one
of
the
cities
that
I
reached
out
to
in
email,
because
I
tried
contacting
a
couple
of
the
city,
foresters
and
westminster's
responded
and
they
were
really
interested
in
the
concept
of
collective
deals,
for
you
know
arborist
treatment
or
removal
and
ask
that
we
get
back
to
them.
If
we,
if
we
pursue
anything
like
that,
I
don't
think
we
found
between
us
and
all
the
cities
we
checked.
E
We
didn't
find
a
program
like
that
and
then,
as
far
as
the
actual
subsidy
of
removal
and
replacement
and
actually
paying
for
that,
the
only
one
we
found
was
denver
and
they
do
have
four
ash
trees
in
right
of
way.
They
will
for
citizens
pay
for
replacement
for
removal,
stump,
grinding
and
replacement.
E
I
think
it's
only
one
tree
per
property,
but
it
could.
D
D
C
Thank
you,
so
we
got
there
by
because
the
communications
lead
well
she's,
not
here,
but
because
of
the
article
in
the
newsletter.
C
So
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
sway
a
little
bit
regarding
you
know,
verifying
the
number
of
ash
trees.
I
think
that's
something
that
the
forestry
department
will
be
working
on
and
then.
C
F
You
said
the
forestry
department:
do
we
have
an
official
forestry
department?
Why
don't
we.
C
Hold
on
that,
when
I
give
you
guys
an
update
from
my
conversation
with
dave
lee,
so
actually
that's
the
next
thing
on
our
agenda.
So
if
there
isn't
any
other
topics
that
we
need
to
discuss
on
communications,
then
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
forward.
C
Okay,
so
unfinished.
E
Well,
I
was
gonna,
ask
one
thing,
since
some
remember
johnson,
I
don't
know,
is
if
she's
got
a
conflict
or
what,
but
she
this
is
two
meetings
in
a
row
that
we
haven't
heard
from
theirs.
Are
there
other
things
that
we
need
to
deal
with
for
communications.
C
I
don't
know
I
talked
to
her
earlier
this
week
and
she
said
she
was
supposed
to
set
up
an
appointment.
She
hadn't
done
it
yet,
but
I
can
I
can
contact
her
and
see
if
there's
anything
going
on
what
has
happened
with
the
communications
group.
Is
we've
worked
so
closely
with
them
that
they've
kind
of
taken
on
the
role
of
doing
the
communications,
which
is
exactly
you
know
what
we
were
going
for
and
they
basically
send
things
to
monica
and
have
her
review
it
and
approve
it.
E
C
So
I
haven't
seen
anything
I'm
usually
copied
on
those,
so
I
haven't
seen
anything
but
I'm
happy
to
check
with
monica
and
see
if
she
can
make
our
next
meeting.
E
C
C
There's
a
machine
there's
a
machine
running
because
it's
happening
yeah,
so
you
know
when,
when
we
first
started
with
the
committee
really
the
the
code,
communications
was.
The
first
thing
that
we
identified
was
was
that
the
city
could
do
was
to
educate
the
community
on
what
code
is
and
that
we
have
code.
C
C
G
D
C
Okay,
okay,
all
right
moving
on
to
unfinished
business,
we're
talking
about
emerald
ash
borer.
So
I
I
did
two
things.
I
talked
to
dave
lee
because
I
wanted
to
understand.
You
know
it
had
been
a
while,
since
we
had
met
with
him-
and
you
know,
as
as
we
move
forward,
the
city's
been
doing
several
things
regarding
emerald
ash
borer
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
were
up
to
date.
C
So
the
first
thing
we
talked
about
was:
they
are
hiring
an
assistant
city
forester
that
will
work
with
dave
and
they're
in
getting
ready
to
start
interviews
right
now
now
whether
that
is
the
creation
of
a
department,
I
don't
know,
I
didn't
ask
them,
ask
him,
I
he
just
filled
me
in
that
they
are
going
down
that
route
and
that
person
will
be
responsible
for
managing
the
subsidy
process.
C
So
he
was
excited
about
that.
Then
we
talked
about
the
subsidy.
We
didn't
get
into
specifics
because
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
that
was
indeed
the
case
and
how
that
was
going
to
work
out,
and
he
said
that
they
were
working
on
it
right
now
and
then
the
third
thing
I
wrote
it
down
and
my
notes
are
upstairs:
can
you
guys
hold
on
a
second?
I
need
to
go
grab
my
notes.
I
left
them
on
the
table.
I'll
be
right
back.
C
D
C
Now
I
can't
find
it,
but
the
the
arbor
day
tree
sale
will
be
happening
in
april,
so
be
sure
and
watch
for
it.
C
C
E
C
I
I
feel
like
that's,
that's
something
for
him
to
respond
to
city
council
on,
and
I
know
that
monica
was
supposed
to
talk
to
him.
I
doubt
that
she
has.
She.
E
C
Okay,
when
we,
when
we
do
get
her
online,
we
can
circle
back
with
her
and
ask
for
that
question
and
then
the
second
person
I
talked
to
was
the
city
attorney
on
the
code,
changes
that
we
recommended
back
in
september,
and
the
answer
that
I
got
was
that
they
are
working
on
them
and,
I
think
dave
lewis.
They
have
supervisor
code
manager,
lewis.
They
have
been
working
with
you
on
those
changes
and
we
should
hear
something
soon.
D
G
I'm
not
quick
enough
with
the
buttons
I
don't
have
an
update.
I
apologize.
The
city
attorney's
office
is
working
on
a
few
behind
the
scenes
contracting
things
that
need
to
be
expedited.
So
I
don't
have
an
update
on
any
of
that.
C
Okay,
so
moving
forward
eab
follow-up.
So
when
we
presented
to
city
council
the
proposed
changes,
they
approved
those
and
okayed
for
the
acidity
attorney
to
work
on
that.
But
they
also
had
some
follow-up
questions
for
us
and
we
agreed
to
provide
them
with
additional
information
about
what
other
cities
are
doing
for
eab
and
really
just
in
terms
of
you
know,
code,
changes
and
also
programs
and
resolutions
that
may
have
been
put
in
place.
C
The
first
thing
is,
is
the
examples
of
tree
shrub
authority
for
other
cities,
and
we
looked
at
the
cities
that
were
in
the
the
evaluation
that
we
did
and,
interestingly
enough,
you
know
we
we
found
several
cities
have
a
purpose
to
their
free
program,
and
so
I
cut
and
paste
basically
from
their
website
and
put
that
on
a
summary
page.
There
were
several
cities
that
did
not
so
I
didn't
include
it,
but
I
wanted
to
get
your
approval
on
on
what
we
put
together,
trying
to
find
it
there.
C
So
each
of
these
cities
have
a
purpose
to
their
their
forestry
program
and
and
its
role
in
the
tree
canopy
for
the
city.
So
you
can
see
that
I
put
the
city
name
at
the
back
because
I
didn't
want
them
to
get
caught
up
on.
What's
denver
doing
that
type
of
thing?
So
is
there
any
comments
or
question?
Oh
cohen,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
F
One
when
I
went
through
it,
I
found
that
arvada
all
the
ones
I
looked
at,
including
broomfield
had
a
purpose
and
all
of
them
except
broomfield,
have
it
in
their
code
and
that
would
write
you
know,
write
in
the
code,
legislative
intent
or
purpose
for
the
ordinance
with
every
single
code
they
had.
F
F
My
second
question
is
not
that
it
matters.
I
didn't
get
your
notice.
That
was
your
email
that
was
dated
monday.
F
Putting
this
in
you
know
it's
a
an
additional
document,
but
my
understanding
of
the
of
the
open
meetings
laws
is
that
all
documents
that
are
going
to
be
discussed
have
to
be
done
three
days
before
the
you
know
up
three
days,
including
the
day
of
the
meeting,
I'm
assuming
it
doesn't
look.
I
just
wanted
to
know
when
this
document
got
posted
for
public
review.
F
I'm
just
I'm
just
asking
the
question:
you
know
it's
not
important.
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
you
know
when
it
was
done,
and
I
understand
sharing
that's
fine
that
that
you
know
if
open
meetings,
you
set
something
up-
and
I
didn't
get
this
one
until
wednesday
either.
But
you
said
any
additional
documents
you
had
to
have
by
tuesday
at
8
00
a.m.
I
mean
8
p.m.
C
All
right
well,
I
will
be
happy
to
add
arvada
to
the
examples
of
the
si
of
other
cities,
how
they
phrase
the
commitment
to
the
tree
canopy
and
that
that
really
was
all
that.
That
exercise
was
about
the
other
three
documents
that
we
had
were
examples
of
subsidies
and
other
programs
and
a
matrix
of
other
tree
city
of
other
cities
tree
and
shrub
codes.
And
I
had
I
I
got
that
today.
So
we
will
not
be
reviewing
that
today.
C
We
already
have
the
tree
designation
requirements
and
I
we've
I
enclosed
our
proposal
on
programs
and
resolutions
and
that's
something
that
I
wanted
to
have.
The
committee
go
back
and
review,
because
so
many
of
the
things
that
we
identified
are
actually
happening
already
so,
which
is
great,
but
I
think
we
ought
to
go
back
and
and
review
those
proposals.
C
F
I
had
just
a
note
that
in
the
tree
city
standards
and
the
second
one
there
is
a-
I
think
it
deserves
to
be
highlighted.
A
key
section
of
a
qualifying
ordinance
is
one
that
establishes
the
authority
free
board
or
forestry
department
or
both
and
gives
them
the
responsibility
for
public
pre-care.
F
I'd
like
you
to
highlight
that.
I
believe
it
was
one
of
our
recommendations
that
an
authority
be
established
in
the,
but
if
it
wasn't,
I
think
we
should
update
that
particular,
but
highlighting
that
will
make
it
more
apparent
that
they
do
need
to
establish
an
authority
in
the
code
to
be
income.
You
know,
have
a
qualifying
ordinance,
so
it.
C
C
E
Yeah,
I
was
gonna
say
I
really
like
the
the
purposes
you
got.
You
must
have
gotten
those
from
a
variety
of
locations,
then,
because
some
some
of
them
I
didn't
like,
I
know
that
I
scrutinized
the
code
for
denver
and
westminster
and
didn't
find
those
in
either
the
code.
They
must
be
from
like
the
websites.
E
C
E
E
He
was
just
really
helpful.
He
went
over
what
their
subsidy
program
is.
I
mean
basically,
I
had
already
figured
it
out
from
their
published
info
and
and
then
he
expressed
interest
in
you
know
if
we
figure
out
that
collective
kind
of
agreement
for
getting
deals
for
citizens
on
treatment
or
removal.
E
C
F
Yeah
as
I
was
going
through
them,
I
printed
out
some
of
some
of
the
website
that
had
information
to
back
up
what
was
on
the
matrix,
and
I
even
printed
out
some
of
the
three
codes
for
the
different
ones.
So
that
would
have
it.
F
C
Okay,
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it,
so
we'll
get
that
out
to
the
committee,
so
we
can
see
that
in
march.
E
Carson,
the
one
other
thing
is:
do
we
know
if
inglewood
is
pursuing
like
that
excel
grant
program
or
the
other
ones
that
are
available,
because
there
may
be
timelines
involved
to
potentially
be
benefiting
from
those
this
year,
as
opposed
to
having
to
wait
till
next
year.
F
Colleen
yeah,
I
saw
in
the
minutes
that
I
was
supposed
to
send
the
information
to
dave
lee
and
I
looked
and
I
had
thought
I
had
sent
it,
but
I've
been
having
trouble
with
my
email
and
it
was
sitting
there
not
sent
yet
so
I
sent
it
out
today.
F
Okay
and
I
copied
monica
and
councilmember
russell
dave,
lee
and
christina
underhill,
because
I
didn't
know
which
one
of
them
would
be
responsible
for
a
grant
program.
C
No,
okay,
don't
know
what's
happening
there,
all
right.
So
moving
on
to
new
business
item
number
eight
on
our
agenda
and
it's
been
here
for
a
long
time.
We
actually
started
working
on
this
gosh.
It's
been
three
years,
but
we
included
in
the
agenda
packet,
the
current
dangerous
dog
code,
it's
about
a
paid
two
pages,
two
and
a
half
pages,
and
there
were
a
couple
of
areas
that
we
were
pretty
sure
that
they
were
not
relevant
anymore.
C
The
signage
requirement
was
a
question
and
then
some
type
of
harness
or
leash
to
you
know
visually
identify
and
notify
anyone
around
them
that
it's
a
dangerous
dog
and
I
thought
and-
and
I
gave
louis
I'm
going
to
put
you
on
the
spot
here-
I
we
want
to
see
what
what
is
different
than
actual
practice
than
than
what
the
code
says.
So
I
think
the.
G
Only
conversation
that
we
had
previously
was
regarding
the
tag
that's
issued.
The
city
has
never
issued
a
tag
and
we
considered
the
microchip
quite
a
bit
of
the
requirements
that
you're
speaking
of,
would
not
fall
to
the
code
enforcement
division,
because
those
are
sentencing.
G
So
like
we
would
issue
a
violation
for
dangerous
dog
behavior,
but
a
lot
of
what
is
involved
in
that
really
comes
down
to
the
adjudication
process
throughout
through
the
court.
C
H
C
G
They
do
ask
for
a
re-inspection
prior
to
their
status
court
hearing
for
that
one-year
mark,
because
their
case
stays
open.
G
They're
required
to
do
that
on
their
own,
if
not
then
they're
held
in
contempt
of
court,
and
so
that
would
go
back
to
the
judicial
portion.
Okay,
we're
requiring
signs
we
do
require.
Well,
if
you
want
to
go
step
by
step,
I
think
that
might
be
easier.
G
So
do
you
want
to
just
go
line
by
line
under
under
item
h,
conditions
for
keeping
an
animal
classified
as
dangerous?
Yes,
okay,
do
you
want
to
put
that
up,
maybe
share
your
screen,
so
everyone
can
see
it
and
read
along,
so
I
don't
have
to
read
at
all.
C
G
We're
looking
at
a
section
a
so
yes,
every
person
that
has
a
dangerous
dog
animal
that
lives
in
the
city
of
inglewood.
We
can't
enforce
this
for
anybody
that
moves
outside
of
the
city
of
inglewood
or
anybody
that
lives
outside
the
city
of
englewood.
So
this
only
applies
to
inglewood
residing
dogs.
D
C
G
And
we
do
approve
an
escape-proof
enclosure
as
part
of
that
permit
code
enforcement
conducts
a
site
inspection
and
we
require
gates
to
be
secured.
If
the
animal
is
able
to
get
over
fences,
it
does
need
to
be
a
six
foot
fence.
If
they're
able
to
get
out
or
the
fence
doesn't
meet,
then
they
are
required
to
have
a
fully
enclosed
type
of
pen
within
that
location,
and
we
mainly
run
into
this
when
we
have
specific
homes
that
may
be
rented
or
budgetary
constraints
where
they're
not
able
to
conform
with
proper
fencing.
G
G
G
G
No,
but
it's
good
proof,
it's
very
typical
for
animals
not
to
be
able
to
jump
over
a
six-foot
fence.
There
are
a
few
breeds
like
some
huskies
and
a
few
other
animals
that
have
the
ability
to
jump
and
then
get
their
feet
in
and
then
jump
again.
But
this
is
this
is
a
rare
occurrence
and
in
those
cases,
if,
if
we
do
have
that
type
of
a
situation,
we
do
ask
that
they
do
a
fully
enclosed
top
and
bottom
portion.
G
G
If
it
can
jump
that,
and
so
we
look
at
the
totality
we
do
recommend
for
a
majority
of
animals,
I'm
not
saying
for
a
chihuahua
or
a
few
others
of
the
smaller
breeds.
A
six
foot.
G
G
We
do
we
evaluate
the
whole
circumstance
where
we
are
required
to
look
at
all
the
fencing
any
possible
ways
that
the
animal
could
escape.
We
make
a
healthy
and
safe
environment
that
the
animal
can
be
in
and
we
we
have
failed.
G
We've
allowed
them
to
to
correct
the
issues
and
our
recommendations
and
we
make
those
recommendations
to
the
court
and
take
pictures
and
document
that
and
then
they
have
to
pay
a
re-inspection
fee.
You
know
just
because
you
pay
a
permanent
fee
just
like
what
the
fire
marshals
are
building.
If
you
fail
to
meet
the
expectations,
then
the
city
charges
an
additional
fee
for
us
to
go
back
out
and
do
that
service.
G
Okay,
on
section
b,
only
one
dangerous
dog
may
live
on
a
permit
and
that's
correct
that
we
are
enforcing
that
section
c.
G
G
That
was
going
to
say
the
next
portion
is
dangerous.
Animal
permit
tag
which
we
don't
we
don't
issue
because
they
they
have
been
proven
to
be
ineffective
in
a
variety
of
forums
and
just
seeing
a
red
tag
on
an
animal
up
close
or
far
away
is
not
going
to.
Does
it
there's
no
reasonable
standard
for
doing
that.
G
C
G
Every
city
is
very
different:
most
of
them
are
pretty
consistent.
The
statewide
dangerous
dog
portion
of
that
is
really
trying
to
put
together
a
statewide
registry,
because
right
now
each
municipality
keeps
their
own
registry
and
we
can't
we
can't
share
that
information.
D
C
G
So
I
because
this
is
something
that
we
do
not
currently
do.
I
would
recommend
that
you
all
decide
what
would
be
best.
I
don't
think
a
tag
is
appropriate.
A
lot
of
people
don't
look
at
leashes
or
harnesses.
C
G
F
I
thought
I
had
if
they're
not
going
to
enforce
it
and
it
isn't
being
enforced,
I
think
it
probably
should
be
removed.
F
In
my
personal
opinion,
a
muzzle
is
an
indication
to
me
that
the
dog
is
dangerous
and
court
will
go
by
what
our
rules
are.
If
they
have
the
opportunity
to
enforce,
you
know
to
order
something
it
it
should
be
in
our
rules.
You
know
because
they
do
right
now
they
only
do
it
for
sec,
a
muzzle
for
a
second
offense.
F
Personally,
I
think
we
need
a
muscle
for
the
first
offense
and
if
we
make
that
change
in
the
ordinance,
that
muzzle
is
an
indication
that
the
dog
is
dangerous
and
people
will
avoid
a
dog
with
a
muzzle,
but
my
personal
opinion
is,
and
generally
I
believe
this
is
supported.
F
C
Okay
dave:
do
you
want
to
continue
on.
G
D
G
G
First
off
victims
can
recuperate
any
type
of
civil
damages
through
a
homeowner
or
renters
insurance,
but
typically
we
ask
for
that
in
restitution
as
part
of
the
court
case.
So
if
somebody
had
any
out
of
pocket-
and
this
is
not,
this
is
not
for
like
pain
and
suffering
and
those
types
of
civil
litigations
for
restitution.
The
city
can
only
ask
for
monetary
paid
out
damages
so
like
co-pays
or
mileage
to
go
to
certain
treatments,
emergency
room
visits.
G
D
G
We
do
require
animals
to
be
spayed
or
neutered.
That
is
part
of
the
permit
process.
We
do
verify
that
with
their
veterinarian.
G
D
D
G
That's
very
complicated
because
it
also
comes
into
play
for
evidence.
Do
we
have
the
right
dog?
If,
if
it's
impounded,
you
know,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
dog
doesn't
have
a
microchip
or
it
gets
one
before
it's
released,
that's
part
of
the
process.
The
judge
typically
would
order
that
before
the
release
so
that
if
the
animal
something
happens
to
them
or
go
somewhere
or
winds
up
anywhere,
we
know
that
that
animal
is
related
to
that
behavior.
G
The
courts
so
when
this
ordinance
was
written,
it
was
microchips
were
kind
of
new,
and
so
that's
I
think
the
redundancy
was
with
the
tag
and
it
was
written
a
bit
odd
because
the
microchip
actually
becomes
the
the
tag
that
we
can
track
that
animal
with
that's
more
accurate.
D
G
So
again,
it
talks
in
h.
It
talks
about
escape
proof.
C
G
H,
basically,
this
talks
about
the
confining
of
the
animal
and
again
talks
about
escape
proof.
The
warning
signs
there's
a
variety
of
different
signs.
We
accept
because
there's
there's
not
one
quite
standard
one,
but
as
long
as
it
has
the
terminology
dangerous
dog,
we
accept
that.
C
So
my
neighbor,
that
has
a
dangerous
dog
just
has
a
sign
that
says:
beware
of
dog.
G
C
G
Can
clarify
that
it
just
needs
to
have
some
type
of
signage
that
would
warn
the
general
public
if
they
were
entering
into
that
location,
that
there
is
a
liability
and
that
they
need
to
watch
out
for
their
safety,
so
whether
it
says
dangerous
or
you
add
verbiage,
to
to
say
indication
of
a
dangerous
or
beware
of
dog
and
again
this
ordinance
was
written.
G
G
A
G
I
know
that
this
body
has
requested
that
dangerous
dogs
be
required
to
have
muzzles,
and
maybe
that
is
an
indication
of
being
dangerous.
That
would
be
up
to
you
all
if
that's
language,
that
you
would
recommend.
C
G
So
and
then
they
a
formal
hearing
and
it's
part
of
the
other
process,
that's
involved
in
here
regarding
the
destruction
of
an
animal,
that's
a
whole
another
process.
D
D
G
I
specifically
talks
about
the
city
manager
and
the
designee
if
the
animal
gets
loose
stolen
large
any
of
these
variety
of
things
and
to
notify
us,
I
think
the
one
portion
that
it
should
probably
state
is
that
they're
required
to
notify
us
if
they're
moving
outside
the
city
and
where
they're
moving,
although
it's
gonna
part
of
it,
would
be
unable
to
potentially
enforce
why
they're
still
living
in
the
city
of
england,
if
they're
planning
on
moving
it's
very
important,
that
we
coordinate
letting
the
new
jurisdiction
know
that
there's
been
a
conviction,
some
jurisdictions
like
denver
and
aurora.
G
No
so
an
I
says,
the
owner
shall
immediately
notify
the
city
manager
or
designee.
If
any
of
these
things
happen,
animals
loose
stolen
at
large
confined
has
mauled
bitten,
attack
threatened
menace,
but
it
doesn't
say
anything
about
moving
outside
of
inglewood.
G
So
that
would
only
apply
to
inglewood
residents.
This
one
specifically
would
state
moved,
because
the
only
time
we
really
are
notified
is
if
they're
like
leaving
the
state.
D
C
C
C
G
Do
not
because
we
don't
require
licensing
of
animals,
got
it
so
we're
not
able
to
verify
that
as
part
of
the
licensing
process
for
denver
and
aurora
they're
required
to
fill
out
an
application,
and
part
of
that
is
asking
about
behaviors
or
adjudications
of
being
dangerous.
F
F
C
G
So,
that's
not
something
we
can
go
through
it
just
to
talk
about
process,
but
again
that
most
of
that
lies
within
the
juris
within
the
courts.
So
one
animals
that
have
been
classified
it
talks
about
one
year
and
two
year
and
the
requirements
required
as
part
of
that
and
the
court
sets
those
up
got
it.
G
They
do
require
training
and
they
are
required
to
provide
proof
of
that.
That's
currently
happening
and
they're
required
to
provide
proof
of
any
additional
conditions
that
may
have
been
ordered
by
the
court
and
those
conditions
could
be
anything
from
the
owner
also
attending
some
type
of
an
animal
related,
behavior
class
or
any
other
orders
that
the
that's
the
most
common
that
the
judge
may
impose
on
that
particular
party.
D
G
And
then
it
talks
about
the
immediate
destruction.
D
C
C
I
can't
see
anyone
if
they've
raised
their
hand,
does
anyone
have
their
hands
up?
Okay.
Thank
you.
I
had
a
question
about
timing
in
terms
of
how
quickly
things
happen.
Is
there
a
kind
of
a
timeline
when
these
things
happen
so.
G
If
an
animal
bite
occurs
and
we
impound
the
animal
we're
required
to
have
that
hearing
within
10
business
days,
typically,
it's
the
next
wednesday.
That's
when
all
advisements
happen,
and
we
would
have
a
hearing
to
determine
if
the
animal
can
be
released
and
under
what
conditions
it
can
be
released.
D
G
So
we
use
the
standard
of
serious
bodily
injury.
We
don't
impound
animals
that
may
have
just
broken
the
skin
or
we
really
look
at
the
totality
of
the
circumstances
and
what
took
place.
And
so
we
would
impound
that
animal.
G
Typically
impounded
animals-
I
would
say,
ninety
percent
of
the
time,
a
majority
of
the
time
during
the
income
hearing,
the
judge
will
set
specific
restrictions
to
include
compliance
with
the
dangerous
dog
permit
before
it
will
be
released
without
a
plea,
and
then
the
animal
is
typically
released
back
to
the
owner.
It's
kind
of
the
one
strike
rule
within
the
municipal
court.
C
So
should
we
include
that
here
that
if
you
know
that
for
serious
bodily
injury
that
they
the
animal,
we
will
be
impounded
and
will
go
before
the
court
within
10
business
days?
No,
because
that's.
D
G
All
right,
and
then
it
goes
in
specifically
to
the
destruction
hearing
and
what
what
the
city
and
the
city
prosecutor
has
to
do
to
move
forward
to
ensure
public
safety
and
recommend
the
destruction.
I
don't
think
I've
ever
had
a
case
or
the
code
division
has
ever
had
a
case
where
the
city
is
recommending.
Euthanasia
and
those
are
taking
very
serious.
G
And
veterinarians,
as
well
as
the
code
officers,
and
we
really
stayed
our
case
and
we
to
my
knowledge,
I
don't
believe
any
of
the
euthanasia
requests
have
been
denied.
C
F
F
If
you
have,
if
you've
got
the
animal
under
control,
I
mean
it
doesn't
follow.
G
G
All
lab
makers
in
the
state
of
colorado
are
required
to
attend
animal
behavior
course
as
part
of
the
police
academy
and
ongoing
regarding
state
legislation.
If
they're
unable
to
gain
reasonable
control
by
using
voice
control
or
other
distraction
methods,
and
that
officer
life
or
abandon
bystander's
life
is
in
imminent
danger,
then
the
animal
can
be
destroyed.
C
All
right
so
did
the
training
actually
they're
taught
to
try
and
control
an
animal
first.
G
So
they're
taught
it's
a
two-hour
mandatory
course
that
basically
goes
through
animal
behavior
and
talks
about
distraction
techniques.
What
you
should
do
how
to
approach-
and
this
came
out
of
several
liability
lawsuits
that
happen
with
commerce
city
and
so
as
long
as
the
officer
is
able
to
articulate
and
again
we
all
have
body
cameras.
G
C
I
had
another
question
and-
and
I
know
you
have
to
to
balance
you
know
the
safety
of
the
citizens
with
the
rights
of
a
dog
owner,
but
I
mean
if
a
dog
has
attacked
some
a
person
or
another
animal,
but
it's
not.
You
know
it's
not
critically
injured.
You
know
they
haven't
been
critically
injured.
C
G
And
it
becomes
a
very
complicated
matter
because
the
animal
the
owner
this
is
written
criminally,
so
the
owner
still
has
all
the
rights
afforded
to
them
as
any
person
who's
accused
of
a
crime.
And
so,
although
we
have
the
authority
to
write
into
a
county
for
county
charges,
municipal
court
is
actually
the
fastest.
This
process
normally
doesn't
take
as
long
unless
they
want
to
drag
it
out
and
have
a
trial
is
the
fastest
way
to
have
justice
served
and
safety
evaluated
within
a
community.
G
The
one
step
is,
if
it
isn't
an
animal,
that's
cause
serious
bodily
injury.
We
do
impound
the
animal
and
that
animal
will
not
be
reunited
with
the
owner
without
complying
with
a
variety
of
steps,
as
ordered
by
the
judge
kind
of
like
a
conditional.
G
If
you
look
at
it
from
an
inmate
perspective,
there
may
be
conditions
of
their
bond,
so
the
animals
kind
of
released
on
bond
through
the
court
system,
and
then
the
judge
would
order
conditions
of
that
animals.
C
So
this
is
a
personal
experience
that
I
had
and
I
don't
want
it
to
be
just
all
about
me,
but
my
neighbors
kind
of
called
me
on
this,
because
I
felt
like
I
needed
to
let
my
neighbors
know
what
what
had
happened
to
my
dog,
because
you
could
obviously
see
she
had
been
harmed
and
I
thought
I
needed.
I
felt
like
I
needed
to
tell
people
that
the
dog
was
dangerous
and
they
they,
the
question
came
back
to
me
is
well.
What
are
you
going
to
do
about
it?
C
You
know,
and
I
kind
of
stood
there
and
I
was
like
well
I'm
telling
you
and
they
were
like
what
about
everybody
else,
and
I
ended
up
posting
the
story
on
next
door,
because
I
felt
responsible
to
make
sure
that
others
didn't
have.
The
same
thing
happen
to
them.
G
Yes,
that
goes
into
more
complicated
questions
for
the
city
attorney,
but
there
are
some
there's
some
victims
rights
concerns,
but
there's
also
some
offender
rights
that
are
afforded
to
them,
and
so
the
city
can't
brand
someone
or
require
them
in
certain
states
like
we
can't
publicize
that
information.
G
G
D
G
G
Is
there
inevitably-
and
in
this
case,
when
chair
boating,
came
forward
and
reported
this
and
also
posted
on
next
door,
the
codes
division
received
additional
information
related
to
the
animal
of
behaviors.
That
would
be
considered
dangerous.
G
Well
now
this
person
isn't
paying
for
my
bills,
and
so
then
it's
become.
We
can
document
the
case,
but
it's
become
too
late,
because
you've
entered
into
a
civil
agreement
to
pay
this
together
and
so
we'll
take
a
report,
but
we're
not
able
to
take
action
because
the
two
of
them,
just
like
a
car
crash,
agreed
to
exchange
information
and
handle
it
themselves.
C
And
in
my
case
I
mean
obviously
I'm
on
the
council,
so
I
knew
what
I
was
supposed
to
do,
but
the
vet
didn't
know
I
was,
and
she
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
knew
I
needed
to
report
it.
So
they
must
know
that
this
is
a
problem.
So
if.
G
A
Yeah,
that's
no!
It's
fine!
I'm
like
this
is
furthering
on
to
what
I
was
going
to
ask
anyway,
and
I
need
to
start
by
saying
I
am
not
the
neighbor
of
chair
bowden
here,
but
I
was
going
to
go
in
the
opposite
direction
and
what,
if
you
have
a
vindictive
neighbor
who
doesn't
like
your
dog
or
doesn't
like
that,
he
barked
during
their
party
or
something
and
tries
to
file
a
report
that
they
attacked
them
or
something?
How?
How
does?
G
That's
a
great
question
robert.
You
need
to
understand
that
when
we
approach
any
kind
of
a
case,
whether
it's
a
code
enforcement
violation
or
animal
and
animals,
we
really
do
scrutinize
more
detail.
We
need
not
only
have
written
witness
statements,
but
we
also
require
some
type
of
evidence
that
would
support
that
claim.
G
It's
just
like
with
any
type
of
crime.
We
can't
just
accuse
someone
of
a
violation
or
issue
a
violation
to
them
without
having,
and
this
is
constitutional
law
without
having
a
victim
who's
willing
to
come
forward
to
identify.
This
is
my
attacker.
This
is
the
dog.
This
is
the
owner.
Here's
the
vet
bill
that
shows
my
dog
was
attacked,
it
supports
and
we
get
all
that
information.
It
supports
the
animal
bite.
G
I
might
have
ring
video
to
show
you
or
pictures
and
then
all
of
those
things,
the
totality
of
the
case,
is
recommended
and
forwarded
to
the
city
prosecutor
for
review.
Okay,
thank.
A
C
Thank
you,
dave
code
manager,
lewis
for
walking
us
through.
All
of
that.
So
to
summarize,
I
see
a
couple
of
opportunities
here,
number
one
we
probably
need
we
need
to
adjust.
C
I
I
see
a
need
to
have
the
dog
visually
identified
as
a
dangerous
dog
and
whether
that
be
through
a
muzzle
or
a
leash
or
or
something
that
that
other
that
warns,
others
that
this
dog
is
not
a
good,
is
a
dangerous
dog.
C
So
and
then
the
third
thing
is
the
muzzle
and
whether
or
not
we
wake
to
the
second
offense
or
they
get
a
muzzle
on
the
first
offense,
either
way
a
dog
that's
been
adjudicated
once
can
go
to
a
park,
and
nobody
in
the
park
will
know
that
that's
a
dangerous
dog,
so
there
should
be
some
visual
identification.
C
And
then
I
see
an
opportunity
also
to
to
do
some
communications
to
encourage
people
to
report
dog
attacks
or
dangerous
animals,
or
you
know
some
incidences
to
to
code
enforcement
and
the
next
and
you
know
just
use
the
type
the
opportunity
to
explain
why
it's
good
to
report,
not
bad
report,
and
I
will
tell
you
people
don't
want
to
be
reported.
I
my
neighbor,
won't
talk
to
me
anymore,
but
oh
okay
is:
is
there
any
other
opportunities
for
changes
or
concerns
that
you
see
sonia.
C
H
Go
there
we
go.
Mine
was
on
the
bottom,
so
I
I
had
just
what
you
were
saying
about
people
need
to
like
step
forward.
I
had
a
terrible
neighbor.
H
This
is
probably
15
years
ago
who
let
his
dog
bite,
children
that
would
come
by
and
all
the
kids
were
afraid
to
go
to
court
against
this
man.
He
would
use
an
extend
a
leash,
let
his
chow
mix
dog
run
after
the
kids
when
they
would
walk
by
him.
He
did
it
on
purpose.
H
His
wife
could
walk
the
dog,
but
he
could
not,
and
then
that
worked
because
then
no
one
else
was
getting
bitten,
but
the
important
thing
was
that
people
were
too
afraid
to
people
called
the
police,
but
nobody,
none
of
the
children
wanted
to
go
to
court.
All
the
kids
felt
like
they'd
be
traumatized
to
have
to
face
this
man
and
then
the
sad
thing
was
after
four
years.
H
H
That's
true,
that's
true
yeah,
but
it's
just
an
example.
There
there
are
some
screwed
up
people
and
I
was
happy
to
find
out
like
four
years
ago
he
died.
So
I
the
man
I
was
like.
Oh
thank
god,
no
more
yeah,
but
still
it
was
sad
that
it
it
took
so
many
times
before
the
dog
actually
actually
before
anything
happened,
especially
when
it
comes
to
kids.
H
C
G
The
victim
will
never
have
to
go
to
court
unless
it
goes
to
trial,
and
then
the
victim
will
have
to
testify,
there's
very
few
exceptions
within
even
state
law
regarding
victims,
testifying,
and
that
typically
applies
to
certain
types
of
offenses
and
certain
types
of
violations
involving
children
and
then
that
information-
usually
it
is
a
doctor
or
a
trained
person
who
conducts
an
a
videotaped
interview
and
that
information
would
be
presented
in
court.
But
this
is
not
one
of
the.
G
G
A
majority
of
code
cases
outside
of
animal
other
than
certain
nuisance
type
calls.
G
The
officer
can
take
a
report
from
a
person
and
go
and
inspect
the
property
and
view
the
violation,
and
so
therefore,
that
they're
not
really
a
victim
unless
it
has
to
deal
with
different
types
of
noises
or
other
types
of
specific
nuisances
that
the
officer
can't
be
we're.
Not
the
witness
to-
and
I
would
say
90
percent
is-
is
the
officers
of
initiation
our
observation,
but
thank
you.
C
So
you
guys
are
now
fully
versed
on
our
dangerous
animal
code
and
we've
had
a
really
good
conversation.
I
I
I
highlighted
the
the
areas
that
we
could
discuss
and
look
into
more
and
I'll
put
those
in
the
minutes,
and
then
I
just
would
like
the
committee
members
to
think
about
this,
and
if
there's
anything
else,
we
will
talk
about
it
at
our
next
meeting.
C
G
May
I
take
one
more
moment:
yes
please
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
some
of
the
training
and
things
that
we
that
we
go
through
specifically
when
it
comes
to
victims,
because
I
think
that's
what
all
of
you
are
really
considering
the
most
in
this.
In
this
scenario,
we
do
really
work
closely
as
much
as
possible
with
the
victims
in
taking
an
empathetic
approach
and
providing
resources
when
available,
especially
if
they
have
some
emotional
concerns
related
to
what
took
place.
G
We
do
have
the
all
health
network
that
can
reach
out
and
provide
additional
resources
free
of
cost
to
victims.
That's
something
that's
new
to
code
enforcement,
and
we
really
do
have
courses
that
allow
us
to
speak
to
victims
in
a
more
empathetic
and
compassionate
manner,
rather
than
approaching
it
from
a
very
sterile
approach
that
used
to
be
utilized
widely
within
the
law
enforcement
community.
G
And
so
we
really
do
want
to
respect
what
our
victims
have
encountered.
The
trauma
that
they
might
have-
and
we
really
take
all
that
into
consideration
when
we
take
that
compassionate
approach
in
in
dealing
with
that,
and
so,
first
and
foremost
with
any
victim
here
within
the
city.
We
really
do
the
police
department,
code
enforcement,
animal
welfare
and
park.
Ranger
really
do
work
hard
to
garner
the
trust
of
that
victim
and
work
with
them
in
understanding
their
trauma
and
also
documenting
any
kinds
of
related
activities
that
they
might
need.
Support
with.
D
C
F
Yeah,
I'm
I'm
very
glad
that
you're
taking
the
steps
you
are
manager,
louis
on
dogs
and
dogs
in
general,
because
my
experience
in
before
you
came
on
board
was
very
negative
about
code
enforcement
and
animal
attacks,
because
I
was
attacked
one
of
my
neighbors
and
I
were
attacked
together
by
dogs
that
had
gotten
out
and
no
matter
how
much
evidence
we
presented.
F
That
got
solved
right
away
because
there
was
a
you
know,
a
problem.
He
got
money
back
for
what
he
had
to
go
through
and
the
dogs
were
euthanized,
but
it
took
like
four
years
and
none
of
my
concerns
or
anybody
else's
were
taken
into
account.
So
I'm
very
glad
you're
doing
what
you're
doing.
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
feedback,
and
I
remember
that
case,
because
that
was
right
when
I
was
coming
on
board
and
what
was
happening
with
that,
and
I
know
you're
giving
me
the
credit,
but
I
can't
give.
I
can't
take
all
the
credit
to
make
this.
This
department
work
in
this
division
work.
G
It's
not
just
me
and
my
show
it's
it's
the
teamwork
approach,
but
I
really
have
to
give
credit
to
the
leadership
and
the
steering
of
city
council
and
the
foref
thought
to
make
sure
that
we
are
highly
trained,
that
we
find
qualified
applicants
that
are
going
to
fit
within
the
standards
of
our
community
and
that
we're
setting
safe
policies
regarding
animals
or
any
code
enforcement,
and
you
all
play
a
big
part
in
those
those
policies
and
those
standards
and
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
have
staff
where
we
needed
staff
based
off
of
on
data
that
was
presented,
and
so
I
really
have
to
say
thank
you
to
council
member
russell
for
holding
us
accountable,
making
us
transparent
and
really
being
an
advocate
for
better
policy
and
improving
the
way
code
enforcement
has
worked
today.
G
There's
been
a
huge
learning
curve
for
me
and
over
the
last,
getting
ready
to
start
my
seventh
year.
It
has
allowed
me
to
grow
as
a
manager,
and
it's
allowed
this
division
to
become
one
of
the
premier
agencies
within
the
state
of
colorado.
People
look
to
inglewood
and
what
we're
doing
technology
training
certifications,
and
it
really
is
a
collaboration
from
everyone,
including
this
body.
So
thank
you.
C
C
Okay,
so
I'm
any
other
comments,
questions
observations,
otherwise,
we'll
go
ahead
and
talk
about
our
next
meeting.
It
looks
like
march.
17Th
is
the
is
the
next
day
or
I'm
sorry
march.
16Th
is
the
next
day.
How
are
you
on
your
thursdays
or
your
wednesdays,
carson.
E
A
C
C
G
That
work
for
everyone.
Okay,
could
you
all
be?
Okay?
If
I
excuse
myself
from
that
day,
I
will
be
on
vacation
that
week.
C
Topics
for
our
next
meeting,
obviously
we'll
resume
with
eab
and
hopefully
put
together
a
package
that
we
can
get
to
city
council,
we'll
talk
about
cutting
and
removing
weeds
and
grasses
15-6-1
and
see
if
we
agree
with
that
modification,
we'll
talk
about
the
dangerous
animal
code
and
and
see
how
we
want
to
move
forward
on
that
I'll
also
check
in
with
monica
and
have
her
give
us
an
update
on
our
communications
plans
for
the
year
and
then
we'll
be
voting
in
a
new
chair
that
that
day
so
think
about.
C
If
you
would
be
interested
in
being
the
chair
or
if
you
have
someone
in
mind
that
you
think
would
be
a
good
chair,
we'll
be
looking
for
nominations.
Coin
your
hands
raised.
F
We're
going
to
review
the
bylaws
then
also.
C
I
think
we
wanted
to
wait
until
we
had
the
new
chair
in
place.
So
if
we
vote
the
chair
in
next
week
next
meeting,
we
could
do
it
in
april.
C
G
Madam
charles,
would
you
consider
holding
the
meeting
on
the
15th
a
tuesday?
Would
that
be
possible?
Some
of
the
stuff?
That's
on
your
agenda.
I
think
you
may
need
some
input
from
a
code
enforcement
representative
and
I'd
really
like
to
be
available
to
answer
those
questions.
C
F
Well,
I
I
think
carson
was
first,
but
I
real
quickly.
I
just
noticed
some
some
typos
in
the
some
of
the
cities.
I
did
on
the
matrix
and
I'd
like
to
correct
those
with
carson.
So.
E
F
E
E
I
guess
I'll
just
throw
out
my
idea,
then,
or
my
kind
of
question
thought,
because
so
with
the
visual
identifier,
like
I
see
the
value
in
having
a
visual
identifier
and
and
since
it
does,
you
know
I
I'm
with
you
all.
If
there's
been
an
incident
with
a
dog
ending
up
being,
you
know
a
dangerous
dog,
especially
due
to
a
biting
thing
that
the
muslin
ought
to
be
after
the
first
offense.
E
I
I
would
support
a
change
in
that
direction
and
I
wonder
why
the
muzzle
couldn't
be
combined
with
the
visual
identifier
like
a
red
muzzle
or
I
don't
know
if
that's
even
realistic
or
are
possible,
but
you
know
it
could
probably
be
procured,
something
that
if
a
muzzle
is
a
requirement,
it
seems
like
we
could
incorporate
a
visual
aspect
to
the
muzzle
that
could
be
the
identifier.
It's
just
my
thought.
D
H
Needed
I
think
I've
been
a
lifetime
dog
walker
and
a
lot
of
people.
Don't
I
think
it
needs
to
be
something
big.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
a
service
jacket
or
something
because
a
lot
of
people
are
when
they're
walking
with
their
dogs
they're
not
really
paying
attention.
H
So
I
don't
think
most
people
would
notice
a
muzzle
until
they
were
very
close,
so
maybe
a
combination
of
a
muzzle
and
then
maybe
like
a
caution,
jacket
or
something
like
like
bright,
yellow,
saying.
Please
give
me
space
something
like
that,
because
most
people
don't
pay
attention,
don't
do
anything.
I
had
a
very
hyper
reactive
dog
years
ago
and
the
veterinarian's
office
was
always
saying,
tie
these
yellow
ribbons
onto
your
dog
leash.
H
H
But
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
very
unaware
of
their
surroundings
until
some.
So
I
think
something
big
and
bright,
like
a
neon,
yellow
like
little
service
jacket,
saying
please
give
me
my
space
and
then
with
the
muzzle
on
top
of
it,
I
think,
would
be
good
because
the
average
person
walking
their
dog
is
in
la
la
land.