►
From YouTube: CEAC 102622 Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
B
Well,
we
know
remember
this:
one
won't
be
able
to
be
here,
but
if
I
remember
right,
remember
omohan
said
he
wouldn't
be
able
to
make
this,
but
he's
here.
So
that's
good.
D
E
Actually,
I
think
on
the
other
schedule
I
wouldn't
have
been
able
to,
but
with
the
change
it
worked
out.
So
okay.
B
A
B
Okay,
I'll
call
the
meeting
to
order
Ms
Willis.
Will
you
please
take
roll.
B
Please
please
speak
up
unmute
and
say
when
you're
here
and
please
I
would
prefer
everyone
use
video
if
we're
going
to
be
zooming.
Let's
do
video.
E
C
Ultimate
alternate
member
reddovid
apps.
You
have
a
quorum.
B
So
she
is,
do
you
want
to
just
say,
present,
remember
renovated,
so
we
hear
it
yep.
B
B
Thank
you,
memorize
is
there
a
second
member
Strom
has
raised
her
hand
as
a
second.
Was
there
any
discussion,
any
corrections?
Anyone
have
any
thoughts,
concerns
okay,
Ms
Willis.
Please
take
a
vote
on
the
motion
to
approve
the
minutes.
C
E
C
Ultra
member
relevant
yay,
thank
you
and
Sheriff
chair,
green
yeah.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
We
are
now
to
the
part
of
the
agenda
for
public
forum.
There
is
someone
into
attendees.
This
is
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
address
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee.
There's
an
expectation
the
presentation
will
be
conducted
in
a
respectful
manner.
We
may
ask
questions
for
clarification,
but
there
won't
be
any
back
and
forth
dialogue.
Please
limit
your
presentation
to
three
minutes.
B
B
Here,
hello,
hi,
welcome
and
thank
you
for
coming
and
what
are
your
thoughts
and
Ms
Willis?
Will
you
please
time
it.
B
Okay,
I
may
assume
so
who
is
it?
That's
joining
us.
B
G
Yeah
I
have
a
few
concerns
about
the
code.
That's
up
for
review
and
one
of
the
passages
it's
on
the
Title
VII
on
dogs
impound
revisions.
I
would
like
on
passage
where
it
says
known
to
the
city.
If
the
dog
may.
C
B
C
How
it
works
is,
is
that
somebody
who
wants
to
speak
on
Title
VII
absolutely
has
a
chance
to
speak
on
Title
VII
at
that
time,
but
if
she
has
some
other
reason
why
she
cannot
speak
during
that
time,
then
she
can
speak
during
public
reform.
Normally
public
forum
is
for
items
that
aren't
on
the
agenda
to
bring
to
your
guys's
attentions
so
that
maybe
next
time,
you'll
put
it
on
your
agenda
to
start
to
discuss.
I've.
B
Never
in
any
meeting
I've
participated
in
with
the
city,
for
you
know,
since
the
beginning
of
2000
had
public
input
during
parts
of
the
meeting
that
were
between
among
committee
or
board
members
I.
How
would
that
even
be
introduced?
I've
never
experienced
someone
just
suddenly
talking
in
the
middle
of
discussion
between
committee
and
board
members
you're.
C
B
Okay
to
me,
I
think
it
makes
more
sense
to
have
public
input
during
the
public
forum.
If
there's
something
some
someone
saw
on
the
agenda
that
they
have
input
on
questions
on
comments
on
that
they
would
like
to
bring
to
our
attention.
Then
that
seems
like
the
appropriate
time
for
them
to
do
that,
whether
they
want
to
bring
things
up
that
are
on
the
agenda
or
not
on
the
agenda.
Yeah
excuse
me
someone's
got
background
noise
going.
Please
keep
yourselves
muted
unless
you're
speaking.
G
Okay,
there
are
some
some
things
came
up
in
the
previous
meeting.
That
concerned
me,
the
discussions
and
I
think
I'll
start
with
that
particular
thing
that
experience
I
had
my
dog
got
lost
a
neighbor
took
down
my
fence
without
me,
knowing
about
it
were
telling
me
and
my
dog
got
out
and
was
looking
for
me
and
he
was
picked
up
in
Bates
Logan
Park
I
found
out
within
30
minutes.
G
I
was
down
at
the
shelter
because
he
dropped
the
dog
off
at
the
shelter
and
I
was
told
at
that
time
that
I
could
not
get
my
dog
out
of
the
shelter
without
getting
a
ticket
for
at
large
or
they'd,
lose
their
contract
with
the
city
and
I
heard
in
the
meeting,
something
about
that
it
was
automatically
impounded
and
I
had
to
pay
a
ticket
for
dog
at
large
before
I
could
get
my
dog
out.
The
agreement
doesn't
say
anything
about
that.
G
Impound
is
only
when
a
city
official
actually
picks
up
a
dog
and
puts
it
in
the
pound,
and
it
was
a
very
traumatic
experience
for
me
and
my
dog
and
I
think
that
something
should
be
clarified
on
that
issue,
because
I
don't
see
how
code
enforcement
has
any
Authority
to
deputize
a
private
Enterprise.
G
That's
not
even
in
this
city
to
impound
and
inform
and
get
a
ticket
before
they
release
the
dog,
but
the
code
as
it
exists
and
is
under
review.
G
If
it's
known
to
a
city,
official
I
would
think
you
would
want
to
be
a
little
more
specific
and
say
if
the
dog
has
tags
or
a
microchip
or
is
otherwise
known,
it
can
be
released
to
the
owner
or
returned
to
the
owner
immediately
and
another
one
is
there's
a
whole
thing
about
hearing
for
probable
cause
after
impound
should
not
the
probable
cause
be
established
before
the
impounding
and
a
warrant
be
issued
based
on
probable
cause
before
seizing
an
animal
for
a
private
property
or
a
private
owner?
G
I
can
see
not
having
it
for
exigent
circumstances
like
the
dog
is
dangerous
but
or
is
doesn't
have
any
way
of
determining
who
the
owner
is
so
I
could
understand
that
that's
an
exigent
circumstance,
but
the
hearing
doesn't
establish
probable
costs
it.
The
problem
because
should
be
established
and
a
warrant
issued
before
seizing
for
private
property.
B
I'd
like
to
clarify
one
thing
about
the
experience
you
told
us,
so
your
dog
got
out,
your
fence
was
changed
by
someone
just
trying
to
make
sure
I
understand
what
happened.
Your
dog
got
out,
a
Good
Samaritan
picked.
It
up,
took
it
to
the
pound,
you
were
notified.
Somehow
was
there
like
a
phone
number
on
the
dog's
collar
or
was
it
a
chip?
How
did
they
get
to
you.
G
No,
it
was
I'm
not
on
next
door,
but
a
friend
of
mine
saw
a
picture
of
my
dog
on
next
door
and
gave
my
information
to
do
the
Good
Samaritan.
Who
texted
me
got.
B
It
okay,
so
you
were
notified
that
your
dog
was
at
the
shelter
really
quickly
one
way
or
another.
You
went
there
and
got
to
the
shelter
you're
saying
30
minutes
after
the
dog
got
there
and
approximately
yes,
okay
and
then
my
understanding
is
when
this
situation
happens.
Even
if
it's
on
a
weekend,
the
shelter
reports
it
to
code
enforcement
code
enforcement
will
come
to
the
shelter
and
issue
a
ticket
and
allow
you
to
take
your
dog.
Is
that
not
what
happened
for
you.
G
No,
what
I
was
told
was
that
you
can't
have
your
dog
back.
You
have
to
go
to
an
interview
with
code
enforcement
at
police
headquarters
and
get
a
ticket
for
dog
at
Large
and
pay
the
fine
and
then
code
enforcement
will
allow
us
to
release
the
dog
to
you.
G
Nope
and
she
I
I,
informed
her
that
I
didn't
think
that
that
was
part
of
their
agreement.
She
said
because
if
we
don't
do
this,
we
will
lose
our
contract
and
I
go
I.
Don't
think
that
that
you
know
code
enforcement
has
any
authority
to
do
that
and
she's
well
I'm,
going
to
call
the
police
and
they'll
tell
you
so
she
called
the
police
and
nothing
happens.
In
the
meantime,
the
supervisor
comes
out
and
asked
me
the
situation
and
all
before
I
could
even
say
any
more
than
she
won't
give
me.
G
My
dog
back
he's
only
been
here
for
30
minutes
he's
senior
he
needs
medicine
before
I
could
even
get
that
out.
She
pointed
at
the
woman
who's
on
the
phone
and
said
give
her
her
dog
back
right
now.
We
this
circumstances,
don't
warrant
anything
with
code
enforcement.
At
this
point
and
I
was
very
grateful.
B
A
G
B
Okay,
does
anyone
else
have
any
questions,
all
right?
Thank
you
for
come
in
and
speaking
and
letting
us
know
about
your
experience
about
this
topic
that
we're
discussing
I,
appreciate
it
Ms
Dickerson.
Thank
you.
B
I,
don't
know
how
to
okay
I
guess.
We
can
mute
that
there
we
go.
Okay,
I,
don't
see
anyone
else
present
besides
that
person,
so
we'll
close
the
public
forum
and
move
on
to
report
from
code
manager,
Lewis,
hello,.
H
My
friends,
how
are
you
doing
tonight
good
to
see
all
of
you
and
your
faces?
It
was
nice
to
also
meet
with
you
several
weeks
ago.
I
want
to
just
give
you
kind
of
an
update
of
some
activities.
H
Currently
we
are
down
to
code
officials
due
to
FMLA
leave,
so
we've
been
stretched
a
little
bit
thin
here
in
Code
Enforcement,
with
the
amount
of
work
and
calls
for
service,
and
our
proactive
activities
have
gone
down
the
last
several
months
several
weeks
due
to
that,
so
we
do
anticipate
being
backfully
staffed
when
those
team
members
return
within
the
next
couple
weeks,
so
I
will
be
happy
to
have
them
back.
H
One
of
the
proactive
activities
that
the
park
ranger
and
code
has
been
conducting
is
in
relation
to
Bellevue
Park
there's
been
several
Community
meetings
that
have
taken
place
and
surveys
regarding
some
activities
that
have
occurred
there
in
the
past,
and
so
we've
really
tried
to
help
out
and
reach
out
and
be
a
part
of
the
neighborhood
discussion.
We're
actively
doing
extra
patrols
along
with
police
of
the
parks
to
try
and
deter
some
of
the
behaviors
that
have
occurred.
H
That
would
be
considered
nuisance,
monitoring
parking
lots,
making
sure
that
we're
not
having
any
camps
set
up
and
when
we
do
we're
notifying
the
appropriate
personnel
to
provide
resources
and
to
get
those
people
to
move
along
sleeping
on
benches,
trying
to
deter
graffiti
some
of
the
more
minor
nuisance.
H
Things
are
what
my
team
has
been
concentrating
on
on
in
that
area,
not
counting
October,
because
I'm
not
able
to
generate
those
statistics
until
next
month,
so
July
August
and
September
we've
opened
68
active,
increased
Patrols
in
those
months
to
better
support
that
neighborhood.
So
I
wanted
to
report
out
on
that
I'm
sure
you
all
have
heard
about
those
concerns,
I
read
about
them
or
seen
them
on
next
door.
H
B
H
That
is
done
through
our
community
relations
department
with
community
members
in
the
immediate
area.
So
homeowners
were
present.
One
of
the
large
meetings
that
we
had
at
the
park
and
and
if
I'm,
not
speaking
at
a
turn,
I
I
know
that
one
of
your
members
is
part
of
that,
as
well
as
a
council
member
that
did
attend
that.
That
meeting.
E
I
want
to
thank
code
enforcement
manager
Lewis
for
all
the
work
that
he
and
his
team
have
been
doing,
and
we
definitely
appreciate
that
I'm
actually
live
very
close
to
Bellevue
Park
and
was
part
of
the
group
that
requested
some
additional
things
happen.
E
That
would
help
to
secure
the
park
better
in
the
ways
of
lighting,
better
maintenance
of
parking
lots
in
the
area
for
a
while,
we
had
the
Overflow
parking
lot
for
billview,
Park,
roped
off
and
I
think
that
created
a
nice
deterrent
that
minimized
the
sort
of
information
passing
among
groups.
That
said
this
was
an
open
area
that
they
could
do
things
in
it
has
since
been
a
reopened.
E
My
question
for
for
David
is:
do
you
see
if
you
have
any
idea
how
many
people
have
attempted
to
overnight
park
there
or
have
been
needed
to
be
taken
off
of
that
parking
area
in
that
overflow,
since
the
work
was
done
with
regard
to
the
roping
off.
H
America
I'm
not
familiar
most
of
the
code
enforcement
work
is
done
before
seven
at
night.
Most
of
our
activities
regarding
overnight
parking
or
camping
would
happen
early
in
the
morning
when
the
park
would
still
be
closed
and
I
don't
have
any
the
park.
Ranger
hasn't
reported
anything
specific
regarding
his
activities.
It
does
not
mean
that
police
aren't
involved
in
and
that's
that's
a
great
question
to
ask
Crystal
she's
the
best
person
for
that
resource.
E
I've
reached
out
to
her
already
I
just
thought:
perhaps
you
might
I,
could
cut
it
through
it
a
little
bit
and
if
you
knew
anything
more
but
again,
I
want
to
thank
very
much
the
rapid
response
that
was
done
by
epd
and
specifically,
you
manager
Lewis,
so
that
we're
we're
moving
forward
on
a
lot
of
act
activities.
That
way.
Thank
you
very
much
and.
H
I
appreciate
your
kind
words
Rick.
This
was
a
new
learning
opportunity
for
all
of
us
and
A
Better
Way
We
are
following
a
different
Model
A
policing
model
with
this
particular
incident
and
I
think
think
it's
been
successful
with
getting
community
members
involved,
getting
multiple
stakeholders,
those
people
that
are
actively
working
and
communicating,
and
we
really
tried
to
open
up
the
lines
of
communication.
H
So
I
think,
although
it's
not
perfect
yet
I,
think
this
model
was
very
successful
and
and
I
think
the
city
is
going
to
Police
Department
to
Pacific
is
going
to
continue
to
utilize
this
community
engagement
model
and
not
we're
not
keeping
things
from
Citizens
We're
communicating
they're
part
of
an
active
email
list,
we're
pushing
stuff
out
to
them,
as
we
have
information
some
stuff
we're
not
able
to
release
because
of
the
District
Attorney's
office.
But
we
are
trying
to
maintain
that
model
and,
as
Rick
Rick
said
and
I
apologize
for
calling
you
record.
H
That's
okay,
I
think
this
is
one
success
story
of
how
we
can
utilize
this
model
moving
forward
with
problem
hotspots.
A
B
H
Perfect
and
so
Crystal,
who
is
our
Community
relations
liaison
here
in
crime
prevention?
A
partner
came
in
with
a
lot
of
experience,
specifically
in
this
area,
and
she
brought
this
model
forward.
The
city
city,
council,
the
city
manager's
office.
Several
citizens
went
to
council
and
expressed
their
concern,
and
so
it
was.
H
It
was
best
that
we
set
a
community
meeting
and
we've
done
this
in
the
past
and
and
I,
don't
think
it's
been
as
successful,
because
the
follow-up
component
wasn't
there
and
so
with
this,
is
we
allowed
the
citizens
to
sign
up
and
generate
being
put
on
an
email
list?
We
were
able
to
communicate
some
of
the
activities
and
some
of
the
requests
and
how
that's
going
to
move
forward
and
I.
Think
that's
where
the
success
is.
Is
we've
taken
it
in
Little
Steps?
So
we
received
the
complaint,
multiple
complaints
and
concerns
from
a
neighborhood.
H
H
B
H
In
that
circumstance,
one
we
had
a
number
of
witnesses
that
were
involved
with
the
incident,
so
we
started
there.
We
also
really
relied
on
the
citizens
to
work
together
neighborly.
H
We
really
want
our
neighbors
to
be
part
of
a
neighbor
work
together,
collaboratively
to
approach
the
city
with
Creative
Solutions,
not
just
tell
us
what
a
problem
is,
and
so
this
was
so
successful
because
one
we
communicated
with
the
residents
the
residents,
met
and
communicated
with
each
other
and
came
to
the
city
with
some
potential
solutions
that
we
could
Implement
things
that
they
wanted
to
see.
B
That's
great
nice
to
hear
that
that
went
so
well
and
thank
you
for
telling
us
about
it.
It's
nice
and
I
mean
that's
that's
a
perfect
example
of
how
code
enforcement
can
work
with
the
community
to
have
you
know
really
good
outcomes,
and
it
sounds
like
there
were
positive
outcomes
pretty
quickly
from
your
involvement
in
the
community
organization.
Organizing
around
that
I
really
appreciate.
Knowing
that
that's
going
on
I
didn't
know,
I
mean
I
heard
about
the
case
a
little
bit
but
I
didn't
know
anything
about
all
the
community
involvement.
That's
really
great.
H
Yeah
and
we're
really
trying
to
this
is
this
is
all
crystal
athman's
responsibility
here
within
the
city
and
what
she's
been
driving
if
you've
seen
our
websites,
especially
the
police,
one
we're
sending
out
information
as
quickly
as
we
can
about
street
closure
incidents
that
take
place
cases,
arrests
and
so
we're
really
trying
to
be
more
transparent
on
social
media.
Regarding
that,
so,
please
make
sure
that
you
follow
those
like
that.
That's
a
huge
benefit
to
everybody.
H
I
think
I
think
the
shooting
I
was
asked.
When
was
that
July.
H
And
I
I
really
am
not
allowed
to
go
into
a
lot
of
details
about
that
specific
case.
We've
actually
been
asked
not
to.
We
can't
have
conversations,
because
most
of
it
is
still
active
investigation
and
prosecution
from
the
D.A,
but
we
did
give
information
this
specific
incident
and
why
it
was
successful
is
rather
than
there's
two
parts
either.
We
can
blast
this
out
to
the
entire
city
and
we
can
get
City
members
from
all
over
the
area
to
come
and
have
conversations
which
hasn't
proven
to
be
successful.
H
It
turns
into
really
a
lot
of
complaints,
not
really
a
lot
of
action,
and
so
this
particular
incident
was
specifically
targeted
to
those
adjoining
neighbors
because
they
were
the
major
stakeholders
at
that
time
and
that
allowed
us
to
come
up
with
Creative
Solutions.
H
So
yes
and
Rick
has
been
very
instrumental
in
that
so
moving
that
forward
and
having
a
part
of
this
committee
and
being
a
liaison
to
talk
about
some
of
the
stuff
is,
has
been
really
helpful.
So
thanks
Rick,
how
many
of
you
have
seen
the
new
educational
video
that
came
out
about
code
enforcement.
H
B
A
A
I
I
H
K
Line
that
hello,
Inglewood
I'm
here
today
to
introduce
you
to
inglewood's
code
enforcement,
Division
I,
think
you're
going
to
be
surprised
by
their
varying
responsibilities
and
the
positive
impact
they
have
on
our
community.
The
mission
of
Code
Enforcement
division
is
to
enhance
and
preserve
our
neighborhoods
and
business
districts
while
providing
a
safe,
healthy
and
environmentally
friendly
Community.
We
strive
to
gain
voluntary
compliance
through
education,
Community
involvement
and
enforcement
importances
in
a
fair
and
unbiased
manner,
while
providing
Superior
customer
service.
The.
I
Code
enforcement
division
in
Englewood
is
an
arm
of
a
police
department's
Special
Operations
Division
as
part
of
the
police
department.
Road
officers
have
access
to
specialized
training
in
Crisis,
Intervention,
Emergency,
Management
officer
safety,
de-escalation
practices,
recognizing
handmade
explosives,
clandestine
drug
labs
and
other
Public
Safety
hazards.
K
The
code
enforcement
division's
primary
role
is
to
educate
and
gain
voluntary
compliance
code
officers,
inspect
properties
from
the
public
right
away
and
look
for
accumulations
of
trash
debris.
Outdoor
storage
of
junk
overgrowth,
along
with
health
and
safety
concerns.
Should
you
receive
a
notice
of
violation?
Don't
worry?
The
code
official
will
partner
with
you
to
gain
voluntary
compliance.
K
Besides
conducting
proactive
patrols
of
Inglewood
parks
and
neighborhoods,
one
third
of
our
time
is
spent
working
on
Animal
Welfare
matters,
making
sure
that
pets
are
healthy,
safe
and
living
their
best
lives
is
a
top
priority
in
Inglewood
it
can
be
very
traumatizing
when
a
family
pet
goes
missing.
Nothing
is
more
rewarding
to
us
than
reuniting
a
pet
with
its
family.
K
L
The
Woods
Park
Rangers
are
also
a
part
of
the
code
enforcement
division.
Our
park
rangers
are
responsible
for
protecting
our
City's
natural
resources,
ecosystems
and
the
wildlife
within
them.
They
also
protect
the
people
who
visit
them.
Park
Rangers
ensure
that
everyone
has
a
safe
and
memorable
experience
when
they
visit
one
of
our
Parks
or
Open
Spaces.
I
The
city
of
Inglewood
Police
Department,
has
full-time
mental
health,
clinicians
embedded
within
the
department.
The
code
enforcement
team
utilizes
these
specialized
services
to
provide
valuable
resources
for
mental
health
related
code
matters,
along
with
resources
for
our
most
vulnerable
residents.
K
Code
enforcement
team
members
are
frequently
asked
to
participate
in
city-wide
initiatives
and
committees.
Their
perspective
is
highly
valued
by
other
City
departments,
because
our
team
members
interact
with
multiple
departments
on
a
daily
basis.
Members
participate
in
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion,
alternative,
Justice
programs,
wellness
policy,
review,
employee
relations
and
more
the
feedback
given
by
code
enforcement
team
members
serving
on
these
committees
impacts
how
policies
and
procedures
are
written
and
implemented.
J
Code
Enforcement
Officers
think
beyond
the
boundaries
of
the
city
and
provide
valuable
input
and
testimony
to
support
a
variety
of
Statewide
legislative
changes.
Some
of
these
changes
include
legislation
supporting
pollinators,
collusing
loopholes
for
animal
breeders,
cleaning
up
language
related
to
their
Authority
and
enhancements
to
Statewide
privacy,
protections
for
code
enforcement
and
Animal
Control
Officers.
I
Of
division
plays
and
maintaining
the
help
of
the
safety
of
our
city.
Englewood
is
a
community
of
choice
as
a
result
of
the
great
work
this
team
does
their
ongoing
dedication.
Commitment
to
the
community
and
problem-solving
abilities
enhances
the
overall
quality
of
Our
Lives
folks
join
us.
Each
October
can
help
us
celebrate
these
dedicated.
L
H
H
You
know:
code
enforcement
people
don't
like
to
be
told
what
to
do
with
their
homes,
their
properties
and
their
animals,
and
so
we're
really
trying
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
friendly
and
less
stressful.
But
on
that
note
did
I
mention
to
you
all,
the
national,
the
American
Association
of
code,
enforcement's
annual
conference.
The
last
time
we
met.
H
I
did
want
to
give
you
some
information.
We
were
nominated
for
three
National
level
Awards.
H
Our
evaluation
process
was
over
the
last
five
years
regarding
Staffing
some
statistics,
our
training,
our
creative
programs
and
our
overall
experience
in
the
city
of
Inglewood,
and
if
you've
lived
here
for
more
than
five
years
as
Council
mobile
Russell
has
and
I
know
that
councilmember
Greene
Sonia
lived
here
for
a
while
that
you've
seen
a
huge
transformation
in
the
codes
Department
from
where
we
were
with
two
team
members
to
to
where
we
are
with
a
staff
of
five
and
a
park
ranger
and
the
tremendous
amount
of
progress
that
we've
made
within
our
community
and
being
more
valued,
rather
than
seen
as
a
concern
within
the
city,
and
it
has
been
a
bumpy
road.
A
H
I'm
really
proud
of
that
and
part
of
the
presentation
is
about
this
panel.
We
I
had
a
final
presentation:
I
did
there?
Was
there
the
original
nomination
from
the
Colorado
code
enforcement
Association,
a
variety
of
supporting
letters
and
documents
from
members
on
this
panel
past
members
and
part
of
the
conversation
was
about
the
code
enforcement
advisor
committee
and
what
you
all
do
and
how
we
collaborate
to
make
Inglewood
a
better
place.
H
Part
of
it
was
also
our
relationship
with
Council
and
how
we've
improved
our
relationship
with
council
members
be
more
open
and
transparent
about
council's
ability
in
the
city
Manor's
office
to
properly
staff.
Us
train
us
support
where
we've
moved
to
really
make
some
important
impactful
changes
that
are
meaningful
to
our.
H
Are
we
perfect?
No
we're
not
a
homeowners
association.
We
never
will
be
perfect,
but
I
think
we've
made
tremendous
progress
in
the
last
five
years
and
I
can't
I
can't
wait
the
things
that
I
learned
at
this
conference
make
me
really
excited
for
the
next
five
years,
and
we
have
some
ideas
that
we're
going
to
bring
forward
to
this
body
and
to
council
that
will
help
us
improve
our
customer
service,
improve
our
delivery
and
improve
the
way
that
we
we
do
business
here
in
the
city
of
England,
from
a
code
enforcement
standpoint.
H
I
also
want
to
let
you
know
that,
because
of
this
committee
and
some
letters
that
were
written
specifically
regarding
my
performance,
I
received
the
Excellence
in
leadership
award,
the
national
excellence
and
Leadership
award
as
well
at
this
conference.
So
I'm
really
proud
out
of
the
work
that
this
team
has
done,
the
work
that
we
have
accomplished.
We
have
more
work
to
do
and
I
really
am
excited
to
see
where
we
come
in
the
next
five
years.
B
H
Do
them
quarterly?
It
was
determined
that,
based
off
of
the
amount
of
work
that
needs
to
be
done,
the
new
system
is
really
it
doesn't
print
out.
Reports
like
it
did
before
and
I
think
we
talked
about
that.
The
city
manager
has
also
asked
that
we
provide
those
quarterly
and
then
annually,
because
it
gives
it
a
more
accurate
seasonal
approach
to
dedicate
staff
to
do
that
on
a
monthly
basis
is
really
time
consuming
and
considering
our
limitations.
H
We're
only
able
to
do
that
quarterly,
so
you
will
have
the
quarterly
statistics
coming
up
soon.
So.
H
Reports
that
specific
report
was
the
best
feature
of
that.
The
old
system
that
was
archaic,
wasn't
being
serviced
or
was
not
even
able
to
be
upgraded.
The
platform
actually
has
been
disabled
by
the
company.
That
was
the
only
positive
thing
about
working
with
that
old
system.
There
were
other
complexities,
but
this
system
we
actually
have
to
physically
pull
statistics
from
a
different
area
and
hand
transcribe
them
into
a
statistical
reporting
database.
H
Hand
we're
not
really
we're
not
really
happy
with
this
program.
We
are
experiencing
some
challenges
with
some
upgrades.
This
is
a
Arapahoe
County,
so
everyone
in
Arapahoe
County
is
involved
with
this
reporting
system
and
we
all
bought
into
it
together
and
we're
all
experiencing
quite
a
few
challenges.
H
H
Can't
answer
that,
because
we're
still
in
negotiations
and
conversations
with
the
programming
and
that's
way
above
my
Pace.
B
Sure
I,
I
I'm
sure,
okay,
any
other
questions
for
code
manager,
Lewis.
N
Yes,
I've
noticed
that
at
several
the
parks
in
my
neighborhood
lately
there's
new
signage
up
and
it's
referencing
referencing
code
1143
and
it
looks
like
the
way
it's
written
is
that
the
code
enforcement
or
the
police
have
the
right
to
remove
people
from
the
park
if
they
have
inappropriate
behavior.
H
N
Oh,
no
I
was
just
they
were
new
signs
and
just
in
the
last
month
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
understood
them
correctly.
Yeah.
H
So
mostly
that
is
mostly
handled
by
the
police
department.
It
is
a
code
of
conduct
for
City
properties,
which
also
not
just
our
Parks
but
also
extends
to
our
city
buildings.
We're
asking
that
people
partake
in
a
certain
decorum,
a
standard
of
participating
in
our
Open
Spaces
and,
if
they're
unable
to
do
that,
there
are
certain
steps
that
have
to
take
place.
First,
the
warning
before
they're
giving
a
trespass
this
came
about
as
a
as
a
ruling
from
us,
another
Court.
H
H
This
was
mainly
focused
at
a
few
of
our
parks
where
people
might
be
disobeying
multiple
park
rules
camping
overnight,
not
just
the
violation
but
trespassing
them
in
the
in
some
of
our
city,
buildings,
people
are
bringing
in
items
that
couldn't
be
brought
in
were
acting
inappropriate,
saying,
inappropriate
things
doing
inappropriate
activities
within
our
city
buildings,
and
so
we
were
having
a
difficult
time
in
in
managing
those,
and
so
staff
members
felt
unsafe,
and
so
this
was
the
result
of
of
a
variety
of
legislative
ideas.
B
H
And
we
can't
permanently
trespass
someone
I
think
the
most
is
90
days,
we're
really
looking
not
to
keep
people
from
the
city,
we're
looking
for
people
to
modify
their
inappropriate
behaviors,
and
so
that's
really
what
the
intent
of
this.
This
is
yeah
and.
A
H
Could
also,
as
code
enforcement,
it
is
written
in
the
code
as
a
designee
to
trespass
people
from
Parks.
If
they
have
multiple
park
rules,
violations
continue
to
bring
dangerous
dogs
to
the
park.
We
have
the
ability
to
also
issue
those
we
prefer
not
to.
We
prefer
to
have
an
officer,
a
police
officer,
but
sometimes
that's
just
not
that's
not
possible
due
to
case
loads.
So
we
do
have
the
ability
to
do
that
as
well.
We
have
not.
A
B
Okay,
thank
you
code
manager
list.
Moving
on
update
from
city
council
liaison
city
council,
member
Russell,
hello,.
O
Hi
opening
thank
you
for
all
that
you're
doing
actually.
First
of
all,
I
do
want
to
congratulate
code
manager
Lewis
on
his
award
and
also
for
the
department,
and
we
do
appreciate
all
the
work
that
the
code
enforcement
department
does
for
the
city.
So
congratulations
and
then
I'm
gonna
just
keep
it
pretty
short
tonight.
O
Last
night,
I
attended
the
budget
advisory
committee
meeting
and
Parks
and
Rec
Supervisor
was
there
and
actually
gave
a
report
on
the
parks
and
especially
the
off
leash
program
at
Jason
Park
and
since
the
permanent
fences
got
have
have
been
put
up.
Things
are
running
much
more
smoothly
and
there
are
not
as
many
incidents
and
I'm
assuming
code
manager,
Lewis
can
confirm
this
it
in
the
Off
Lease
dog
park,
since
the
fence
is
completed
and
things
to
be
things
seem
to
be
running
much
more
smoothly.
O
The
sense
that
is
working
out
I
want
to
thank
you
for
looking
at
the
impoundment
ordinance
and
city
council
will
take
their
recommendations.
You
give
us
and
look
at
those
I
believe
it's
on
it's
going
to
be
on
the
agenda
for
November
7th,
so
I
don't
want
to
take
any
more
of
your
time.
I
appreciate
all
that
you're
doing
and
just
thank
you.
B
Thank
you
city,
council,
member
Russell.
Did
anyone
have
any
questions
for
her.
B
Moving
on
to
our
Communications
subcommittee
update,
so
Vice,
chair,
Watson
is
still
not
here
tonight
and
then
we
have
member
redovid
who's.
Also
a
part
of
this
I
just
right
before
our
meeting
realized
I
had
not
sent
them.
The
communication
from
our
previous
subcommittee
head,
our
former
member
Johnson
and
I
I,
did
send
those
to
them,
but
they
would
have
just
gotten
them
right
before
the
meeting
and
so
remember,
radovid.
B
Those
there's
like
two
people
on
those
emails
that
are
probably
worth
both
you
and
Vice
chair,
Watson,
reaching
out
to
and
get
their
input
on
where
things
are
at
and
how
to
communicate
with
them
and
how
to
because
what
you
know.
Our
previous
main
involvement
here
was
coming
up
with
topics
for
the
Inglewood
magazine
and
working
with
the
Communications
Department
on
those
articles
and
I.
B
What
I
think
you
guys
should
do
is
you
know,
find
out
where
things
are
at
with
them
figure
out
what
topics
are
coming
up
and
if
they
can
use
any
help
and
and
then
potentially
proactively,
query
us
at
this
time
in
our
meetings,
and
we
can
discuss
ideas
for
those
articles
or
any
other.
B
B
B
Okay,
thank
you
all
right
and
then
let's
move
into
our
new
business.
So
this
is
the
amending
amendments
to
Title
VII
around
impounding
animals.
That
was,
we
discussed
some
in
our
last
meeting
and
then
in
our
agenda.
B
We
have
you
know
the
the
whole
section
with
the
proposed
edits
that
we're
to
go
over
and
see
if
we
have
any
thoughts
and
I
definitely
have
some
questions
for
code
manager,
Lewis
and
we'll
just
have
you,
you
know
we
can
move
through
it
and
see
who
has
questions
on
any
page
or
in
general.
Just
raise
your
hand,
and
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
anything
you
want
to
go
over.
Does
anyone
want
to
start
with
any
questions
or
thoughts
or
concerns
with
any
of
the
edits.
B
B
My
my
first
question
is
just
to
clarify
it
code
manager,
Lewis.
The
the
changes
that
are
proposed
is
everything
that
is
in
italics
or
struck
through
in
this
agenda.
Right.
H
Yes,
let
me
I
need
to
bring
up
that
packet
again.
I
apologize,
I
closed
everything
when
I
shared
my
screen,
yeah.
H
And
maybe.
H
I've
got
this:
maybe
that's
the
way
to
do
it
and
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
go
through
everything
step
by
step
or.
H
Yes,
so
this
is,
this
would
be
the
bill,
that's
moving
forward
or
the
piece
of
legislation
to
council
regarding
EMC.
So
the
portion
that
you're
reviewing
is
there's
just
a
couple
of
highlighted
things,
but
the
major
bulk
of
it
would
be
at
the
beginning
and
anywhere
there's
any
strikethroughs
or
underlines.
B
H
And
more
maybe
Maureen
can
also
if
she
needs
to
clarify
any
of
that,
because
she's
more
involved
with
these
specific
types
of
documents
than
I
am.
B
B
Thank
you
for
clarifying
okay,
so
my
first
question
was
on
so
this
page,
our
page
five
of
86,
any
such
animal
may
be
impounded
and
not
must
not.
B
Ticket
must
and
not,
and
not
necessarily
cats
like
that
that
that's
where
I'm,
like
I'm,
still
confused
about
what
we
talked
about
last
time
and
what
the
person
who
spoke
during
our
public
forum,
Ms
Dickerson,
brought
up
in
regard
to
the
the
Good
Samaritan
scenario,
with
someone
bringing
and
and
like
you
know,
my
fence,
my
dog
gets
out
of
my
fence
because
he
dug
a
hole
under
the
fence
that
I
hadn't
put.
You
know
already
buried
bricks
in
that
spot.
My
neighbor
doesn't
know
it's
my
dog
and
takes
it
to
the
shelter.
B
It's
got
rabies
tags
on
it
and
they
figure
out
how
to
contact
me
or
I,
find
out
through
next
door,
like
that
person
did
and
it's
a
Saturday
and
I
go
down
to
the
shelter
and
what
I.
In
our
last
meeting,
you
said
that
someone,
a
code
enforcement
person,
would
come
to
the
shelter
and
issue
a
ticket,
even
though
there
wasn't
a
rabies
issue
and
then
I
would
be
able
to
get
my
dog
right.
Then
right.
H
So
I
can't
really
speak
to
miss
Dickerson's
specific
case.
She
had
sent
the
notice
to
the
city
attorney's
office,
so
I'm
not
permitted
to
talk
about
her
specific
yeah.
H
I'm
trying
to
understand
the
process
we
can't
use
must
in
any
kind
of
ordinance,
because
then
that
means
the
city
must
do
that
every
time.
Even
if
you
looked
at
criminal
law,
it
never
said
must
it
says:
may
because
there's
discretion
in
certain
aspects.
So
that's
why
it
has
May.
Most
of
these
changes
specifically
are
not
regarding
the
Good
Samaritan
situation,
it's
specifically
with
the
duty
with
animals
that
have
gone
to
due
process,
and
we
don't
have
to
have
a
warrant,
because
this
is
accident
circumstances.
H
It's
a
dog,
that's
neglected,
it's
cruelty,
a
dog
that
is
bitten
or
attacked
someone
or
another
dog
or
killed
someone
or
an
animal
that
we
have
the
ability
under
state
law
and
this
law
to
impound
that
animal.
That's
an
exigent
circumstance
we're
really
trying
to
streamline
this
so
that
it's
more
of
a
cost
of
care.
So
this
doesn't
involve
the
circumstance
that
the
speaker
was.
J
H
Guest
was
speaking
about
or
any
other
Good
Samaritan
situation.
The
shelter
is
required
to
report
to
us
any
in
pounds,
because
under
Title
VII,
it
specifically
States
that
we
shall
maintain
a
record
of
all
animals
impounded,
whether
it's
a
good
Samaritan
dropping
off
an
enema
the
shelter.
H
It's
still
considered
an
impound
we're
holding
someone's
property
as
a
designated
Authority,
and
so
we
make.
We
will
hear
hear
from
that
shelter
that
an
animal
was
found
in
Inglewood.
It's
also
a
way
for
us
to
better
reunify.
Not
all
animals
have
tags
our
license.
That's
another
conversation
in
front
of
the
day
have
microchips
tags
or
identification
on
them.
So
we
really
rely
on
the
shelter
plus
us
keeping
a
record,
because
people
are
going
to
call
one
of
two
places
when
their
animal
goes
missing.
H
H
Anytime,
an
animal
because
any
animal
in
the
city
is
in
the
state
in
the
country,
but
specifically
we'll
talk
about
Inglewood
and
Colorado
is
property,
and
so,
if
you
are
depriving
somebody
of
that
property,
even
if
it
was
found
by
a
Good,
Samaritan
and
impoundment
basically
is-
is
a
legal
term
saying
that
someone
has
been
designated
to
hold
on
this
onto
this
animal.
Their
license.
They're
accredited
they're
contracted
to
hold
on
to
this
animal
until
they
can
be
reunified
with
the
owner
or
in
cases.
Criminal
cases
such
as
cruelty.
B
H
Anytime,
another
person
that
is
not
the
owner
takes
control
of
that
animal,
even
if
it
was
a
private
person,
it's
still
considered
an
impound.
So
if
you're
walking
down
the
street-
and
you
found
fluffy
on
the
side
of
the
road-
and
you
take
possession
of
that
animal
technically-
that
Good
Samaritan
is
impounding
that
animal.
B
H
So
that's
not
specifically
stated
in
the
contract.
It
is
best
practice
and
I
want
to
put
this
into
context.
There's
multiple
other
jurisdictions
that
utilize
this
shelter.
So
if
it
was
Greenwood,
Village
or
Littleton
or
Sheridan
or
Denver,
the
shelter
will
notify.
H
If
a
dog
is
found
in
that
jurisdiction,
then
if
the
shelter
will
notify
that
jurisdiction
that
this
particular
animal
matching
this
description,
maybe
these
tags
is
at
the
shelter
has
been
impounded
brought
in
by
a
Good
Samaritan,
so
that
that
jurisdiction
is
also
aware
if,
for
some
reason
it's
we
have
we're
seven
square
miles
about
and
we
have
joining
jurisdictions.
The
dog
could
have
come
from
Denver.
The
dog
wound
up
in
Inglewood,
an
Inglewood
dog
could
wind
up
in
Denver.
H
We
can
also
work
with
those
agencies
to
try
and
figure
out,
and
this
is
why
we
contract
with
the
shelter
the
shelter
ultimately
tries
to
reunify
any
animal,
specifically
Good
Samaritans
that
are
lost
with
their
with
their
so
scanning
for
microchip
peeing
the
microchip,
but
sometimes
can
take
24
hours
to
get
a
response
back
on
the
systems
as
to
who
is
the
last
registered
owner
working
with
the
local
jurisdiction
to
try
and
help
notify
them
they
post
stuff,
sometimes
on
their
on
their
social
media
or
their
web
pages
about
dogs,
and
so
that
just
starts
the
process
of
this
property.
H
B
And
is
there
a
situation
separate
from
what
we
heard
about
this
anecdote,
but
going
forward
where
a
citizen's
animal
ends
up
at
the
shelter
they
find
out?
They
go
down
there
it's
Saturday
morning
and
they
won't
be
able
to
get
their
dog
back
no.
H
That's
not
that's
not
correct.
An
officer
is
always
available
from
code
enforcement
or
Police
Department
24
hours
a
day
when
the
shelter
is
operating
during
business
hours
to
be
available
to
handle
the
situation.
Okay,.
B
D
H
Typically,
the
process
would
come
to
me
or
a
patrol
supervisor
to
work
with
the
on-call
code
officer.
We
have
code
enforcement
officials
in
animal
welfare
on
call
24
hours
a
day,
I.
H
Oh
without
getting
into
that
particular
case,
I
am
notified
if
there's
any
concerns
or
discrepancies.
I'm
on
call
all
the
time
to
work
with
my
team
and
and
Command
Staff,
so
someone
is
always
available
is
able
to
to
work
with
the
circumstance
and
make
it
reunify
the
animal.
Thank.
D
B
And
just
you
know,
because
whenever
I'm
looking
at
language
like
this
I'm
going
to
think
about
how
it
could
be
games,
if
I
decided,
I
didn't
like
the
cats
that
are
always
wandering
around
my
neighborhood,
you
know
crapping
in
my
yard,
could
I
start
catching
cats,
take
them
to
the
shelter
and
force
those
people
to
get
tickets.
H
Oh,
it
is
actually
illegal
to
trap
animals
in
the
city
of
Inglewood,
specifically
domestic
animals.
However,
if
an
animal
is
on
your
property,
you
believe
it
to
be
a
stray.
You
don't
know
where
it
lives.
Yes,
you
can
take
the
cat
to
the
Humane
Society.
The
Humane
Society
would
do
the
exact
same
process
that
it
would
for
a
dog
notifying
the
where
it
was
located.
We
do
have
a
cat
at
large
ordinance.
H
Cats
really
can't
leave
your
yard
just
like
any
dog,
and
this
would
happen
for
any
pet.
If
it
was
a
snake,
we
found
a
snake,
a
very
large
one
in
someone's
apartment
that
happened
to
wander.
In
there
we
tried
to
reunify
the
animal
and
give
them
a
violation
for
the
snake,
disrupting
this
poor
lady's
breakfast
we've
had
parakeets,
we've
had
Turtles,
so
any
any
animal
that
process
would
go
through.
D
E
H
Three
or
more
so
we
actually
have
a
current
case.
That's
working
through
the
system
that
the
animal
has
been
found
running
at
large
six
times
in
the
last
year
and
have
been
adjudicated,
meaning
found
guilty
or
pled
guilty
on
the.
This
is
a
basically
an
additional,
more
severe
consequence
outside
of
neglect,
that
is
an
automatic
enhancement
to
the
charge,
and
that's
typically
done
through
the
courts.
So
the
courts
will
see
okay
well,
this
person's
been
here
now
five
times
we
know
the
stock.
H
So
we
already
knew
this
and
we
have
to
add
this
added
enhancement
at
risk,
which
has
additional
penalties
and
fines
associated
with
that.
E
Okay,
so
so
Angry
neighbor
is
bone
to
pick
with
neighbor
one
and
neighbor
One
lets
his
dog
lose
twice
in
two
weeks.
Can
that
be
claimed
to
be
repeatedly
no.
H
H
H
Also,
a
court
is
not
going
to
proceed.
We
are
not
going
to
proceed
from
a
code
enforcement
standpoint.
If
there's
an
affirmative
defense,
we
have
to
follow
the
probable
cause
circumstance
which
is
a
huge
burden
to
move
any
cases
through
court
or
ISU,
summon
so
in
in
this.
In
that
circumstance,
this
would
that
would
not
apply.
H
They're
all
great
questions
by
the
way,
I
like
the
way
you
all
think,
I
actually
think
with
my
team
when
we
Ponder
all
these,
we
think
about
some
of
these
aspects
to
see.
Well,
what's
the
concern
what
what
can
be
raised
about
this?
What
would
the
public
think
about
this?
What
would
be
if
someone
was
to
take
advantage
of
this
ordinance?
How
would
they
take
advantage
of
it?
So
we
constantly
think
about
those
things.
B
Any
anything
else
on
first
page
pitch
five.
Okay,
then
over
Emma
Hines
had
that
on
there,
I
also
wondered
on
what
was
the
reason
behind
changing
the
bottle:
injury
definition
from
requiring
medical
treatment
to
not
requiring
that.
H
It's
the
type
of
Burden,
it's
basically
legal,
the
way
it's
defined
legal,
the
standard
of
serious
bodily
injury,
which
is
the
way
it
was
defined
before,
is
a
very
high
burden,
and
so
we
weren't
able
to
charge
on
some
of
these
cases
with
dangerous
Behavior.
We
had
to
go
with
at-risk,
so
this
allows
us
to
really
address
the
behavior
of
that
animal
over
just
the
medical
terminology,.
H
No
we've
had
cats.
B
Oh
really,
there
are
adjudicated
cats.
B
H
They
didn't
go
to
the
doctor
or
they
did
not
have
serious
bottle
of
injury
and
serious
bodily
injury
is
a
terminology.
That's
used
primarily
mostly
for
police
work
for
criminal
charges,
and
so
that
burden
is
very
high
to
try
and
prove
serious
bottling
injury.
You
have
to
get
medical
reports.
You've
got
to
get
stuff
signed
by
doctors.
We
have
to
it's
a
higher
burden.
This
one
actually
reduces
the
burden
so
that
we're
allowed
to
effectively
charge
the
dog
with
dangers
because
of
their
behavior
over
just
the
medical
definition,
so
it
goes
hand.
B
H
This
is,
this
is
actually
something
taken
out
of
state
ordinances
and
so
to
be
more
consistent,
we
needed
to
put
that
in
there
because
we're
trying
to
mirror
that
the
reason
it's
in
there
is.
Unfortunately,
there
are
quite
a
few
people
that
still
engage
in
exotic
animal
trading
and
breeding,
and
so
that's
why
that
was
put
in
there.
H
We
do
have
large
facilities
in
adjoining
neighbors
adjoining
states
that
still
allow
for
pet
lions,
believe
it
or
not
in
this
in
this
day
and
age,
this
is
Colorado,
does
not
it's
outright
prohibited,
with
the
exception
of
sanctuaries
and
so
to
be
consistent
and
not
be
allowing
a
loophole
for
this
type
of
animal
animals
in
our
city.
We
have
to
put
that
in
there.
B
H
Yeah,
so
this
is
really
more
to
capture
those
hobby
breeders.
I,
don't
know
of
too
many
links
that
are
being
hobby
bred
right.
The
animal.
These
three
specific
cats
are
very
highly
prized.
H
Just
think
about,
if
this
wasn't
in
there
all
of
a
sudden
because
we're
home
rule
we
might
have
somebody
say:
oh
it's
a
great
idea:
I'm
gonna
move
into
Inglewood
and
I'm
gonna
bring
my
pet
lion.
B
E
I'm
gonna
jump
in
I'm
jump
jump
in
again
and
I
guess:
I'm
going
ahead
a
little
bit
here,
but
domestic
animal
domesticated,
animal
versus
dog
or
cat.
What
was
the
intent
of
trying
to
broaden
the
terminology?
There.
A
H
Specifically
only
had
dog
and
animal
Define,
dog
and
cat
defined
in
our
ordinances
and
over
the
last
20
years,
we've
seen
the
Pet
Market
and
our
companion
animals
gots
that
we
change
where
we
may
just
have
a
cat
or
a
dog,
but
people
are
now
moving
into
other
types
of
pets,
and
so
we
weren't
able
to
work
on
the
interest
of
that
animal.
We
had
cases
of
Cruelty
neglect
regarding
certain
types
of
animal
species
that
were
not
dog
and
cat,
and
we
it
teared
me
up.
H
We
presented
evidence
to
this
body
where
we
weren't
able
to
take
those
animals
from
that
person
and
leave
them
in
such
deplorable
horrible
conditions
where
the
animal
was
just
could
not
bribe
there.
B
And
and
yeah
that
was
something
we
changed
recently
because
of
that
specific
situation
or
type
of
situation
code
manager,
Lewis
brought
up
I
did
notice
that
it
seemed
like.
Let's
see.
B
B
C
H
E
H
So
State
definitions
are
very
complicated
livestock
it
for
the
purpose
of
this
ordinance.
We
outright
prohibit
all
livestock,
and
so
you
can't
have
live
domesticated
livestock,
and
this
is
primarily
the
pet
industry,
so
mini
pigs,
mini
horses
mini
cows,
more
of
not
the
ones
that
would
produce
food.
You
know
food,
water,
feathers,
fur,
that's
a
more
legal
definition
from
the
state
claiming
that
it
would
be
a
domesticated
animal.
B
H
Don't
permit
those
they
are
known
to
have
significant
failures
and
have
significant
concerns,
and
so
it's
not
recommended.
It's
actually
not
good
practice.
If
you
lived
in
a
rural
area
in
the
country
where
this
would
be
more
utilized,
but
because
we
are
so
confined
to
quarter
to
half,
acre
lots
and
so
densely
populated
that
the
failure
could
potentially
result
in
some
liability.
So
we
really
didn't
feel
that
that
would
be
in
the
best
interest
of
the
animals.
H
It's
something
that
you're
allowed
to
have
it
as.
H
Or
to
utilize
within
your
property,
but
it's
also,
we
actually
had
a
case
that
was
prosecuted
regarding
something
similar
to
this
and
where
it
caused
undue
harm
to
the
animal,
and
so
it's
just
it's
not
something
that
is
best
practices,
which
is
why
it's
it's
been
put
in.
So.
B
H
Are
able
to
articulate
in
an
affirmative
defense
that
that
way
of
restraining
the
animal
and
keeping
it
under
reasonable
control
at
the
properties
at
the
owner's
property?
Then?
Yes,
that's
fine.
We
just
don't
want
animals
leaving
the
property.
H
So
if
that
works
and
they're
able
to
articulate
in
court
or
even
through
us,
we
would
not
prosecute
that.
But
it's
the
it's
the
instance
where
that
animal
leaves
the
property.
B
Right
well,
in
that
case,
they
are
running
at
large.
It's
it
was
a
failure.
Okay,
thank
you.
Anything
else
on
this
page
on
eight
I
had
a
question
on.
H
Then
all
can
be
at
large
in
the
city
of
Inglewood.
Now
so
like
The
Snake,
That,
Never
Was
reclaimed
in
this
poor
person's
house.
It
was
at
large
off
the
property.
B
And
then
on
the
tethering,
what
about?
And
maybe
this
is
just
a
completely
separate
thing
but
barking
like
if
a
if
a
dog
is
Tethered
and
Barks.
The
whole
time
is
that
how
is
that
addressed?
It's
separate
from
tethering,
because
if
the
tethering
part
of
it
is
Within
These
limits,
but
then
they're
barking,
the
whole
time.
That's
a
whole
separate
issue.
So.
H
Barking
is
a
completely
different
matter
and
we're
evaluating
how
we
can
move
that,
like
we
had
talked
about
previously,
there
is
some
ordered
changes
that
we're
evaluating
regarding
that
to
make
it
more
user-friendly.
So
it's
two
different
actions
of
the
animal.
The
tethering
is
more
for
the
ownership
of
the
animal
and
how
you
treat
the
animal
The
Barking
is
the
behavior
of
the
dogs.
They
have
to
be
treated
separately.
B
B
Yeah,
so
the
you
know
that
what's
been
brought
up,
obviously
is
impoundment,
but
there's
actually
no
changes
in
in
here.
As
part
of
this,
these
proposed
changes
right,
not.
H
Of
that
specific
change,
part
of
this
was
specifically
dealing
with
the
cost
of
care
and
how
that
was
applied
for
animals
that
had
due
processed.
So,
yes,
this
part
has
not
changed.
H
H
We
were
a
small
City
and
everybody
knew
everybody,
and
everybody
knew
what
animal
belonged
where
we
we
just
don't
have
that
capability.
Now
there
are
repeat
offenders
that
are
known
to
the
city.
We
have
seen
them.
It
does
also
allow
us
discretion.
So
if
we
are
driving
down
the
street
and
we
get
a
call
for
a
dog
at
large,
we
put
the
dog
in
it
in
in
our
car
and
then
we're
flagged
by
down
by
someone
saying.
Oh,
this
is
my
dog
here's,
my
information.
H
H
There's
a
discretion
with
that.
We
we
typically
will
issue
a
violation
for
at
large.
There
is
a
little
bit
of
discretion.
For
example,
we
had
a
case
a
few
weeks
ago,
where
we
went
out.
We
had
that
big
Windstorm.
H
We
picked
up
an
animal
that
was
in
someone's
front
yard.
It's
actually
their
front
yard
that
kept
going
between
the
neighbor's
house
and
their
yard.
It
was
determined
that
the
fence
blew
down.
We
didn't
issue
them
an
at-large,
because
the
dog
kept
going
back
to
its
own
property,
so
that
was
an
instance
where
we
used
discretion.
B
And
then
I
think
they're,
oh
I,
guess
yeah
I
saw
a
dog
or
cat,
but
I
guess
those
are
the
only
ones
that
get
vaccinated.
You
don't
want
domesticated
animals
in
these
situations.
So.
B
Okay!
Thank
you
very
much
for
going
through
all
that
with
us.
Unless
anyone
has
anything
else,
they'd
like
to
discuss
on
this,
then
I
guess
we'll
just
make
that
one
change
recommendation
to
City
attorney
Niles
on
updating
that
one
spot
to
be
here.
Domesticated
animals
instead
of
dog,
specifically.
F
Tags
from
Denver:
where
do
you
get
them
here
when
you
register
for.
H
Babies
a
licensing
program,
yet
it
is
an
option.
The
city
is
moving
forward
in
exploring,
but
you
would
get
a
rabies
tag
from
your
veterinarian
or
you
would
have
a
copy
of
the
record.
I
always
recommend.
You
know
those
callers
get
you're
required
to
have
something
affixed
to
your
caller.
We
will
accept
the
digital
form.
H
H
So,
yes,
that's
where
you
would
receive
your
rabies.
Vaccination
certificate
would
be
from
your
veterinarian.
H
You
don't
have
to
have
specifically
that
time
you
just
have
to
have
a
concatenation,
so
just
take
a
picture
of
if
you're
ever
contacted
and
we
can
contact
any
animal.
It's
considered
administrative
contact
with
Chuck
barabies
just
carry
around
a
picture
of
the
veterinarian
record
that
shows
the
baby
rabies.
Vaccination
expires
on
this
date.
F
Right,
okay
and
I
had
one
other
question:
it's
not
related
again
to
the
edits
which
I
thought
were
fine,
but
it's
the
removal
of
excrement
damage
to
sharbury
and
plants,
and
it
says
it
it
that
it's
illegal
for
people
to
leave
their
dog
or
cat
excrement
out
and
not
pick
it
up.
Basically,
how
does
that
get
enforced?
When
you
see
a
a
person,
that's
constantly
violating
it.
H
That's
a
great
question:
this
kicks
into
two
accounts:
one
is
the
property
owner
that
has
the
dog
that
lets
them
out
in
the
backyard
and
doesn't
pick
up
their
waste
at
all
which
causes
the
nuisance,
and
so
we
do
rely
on
our
neighbors
to
report.
That
smell
is
subjective,
but
understanding
that
and
getting
that
statement
we
would
do
that.
The
other
thing
is,
is
we
live
in
in
an
era
where
everyone
has
a
camera,
and
so
we
do
get
ring
video.
We
get
cell
phone
video
people
know
where
the
dogs
live.
A
H
F
Okay,
so
you
would
so
if
you
took
a
picture
and
everything
and
were
able
to
identify
the
person,
you
would
call
code
enforcement
show
them
what
it
is
and
then
they
would
go
forward
and
do
the
tickets
yep.
We
would
and
we,
okay,
all.
B
Right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
member
Hughes,
any
other
thoughts
on
this
okay,
I'm
gonna,
stop
sharing.
A
H
H
A
C
No
I,
don't
think
that's
necessary,
I.
Think
that
just
this
meeting
and
although
you
all
could
vote
on
it
to
change
that
I
think
it's
actually
just
a
grammatical
error,
so
I
I,
don't
think
any
of
that
legislative
stuff
needs
to
happen.
I
think
it
just
needs
to
be
changed
and
it
was
just
overlooked.
B
E
My
teacher's
coming
out
in
me
as
I
rode
through
it
and
read
different
sections,
some
of
the
Amendments,
some
of
the
corrections
and
things
had
some
misspellings
will
that
be
reviewed
prior
to
finalization.
B
C
B
But
if
you
notice
specific
spelling
mistakes,
you
know
send
send
an
email
with
them
to
Ms,
Willis
and
myself
and
we'll
just
make
sure
that
they
get
picked
up.
Can.
B
B
And
then
I
didn't
realize.
I
was
muted
thanks
for
notifying
me
as
well
as
but
I
was
saying.
Okay,
let's
move
on
from
new
business
into
our
unfinished
business
and
I
did
yeah.
H
B
Yeah
I
think
that's
fine.
Is
there
a
motion?
Someone
want
to
make
a
motion
to
recommend
that
the
edits
that
we
just
reviewed
go
forward.
N
Oh
no
I
was
just
proving.
B
E
I'm
I'm
I
motion
that
the
the
Amendments
be
move
forward
upon
with
the
corrections
and
and
amendments
that
we
made
and
that
we
approve
it.
B
C
You
can
just
ask
all
in
favor
and
I'll
just
record
what
everybody
says.
All.
A
A
D
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
that
was
a
unanimous
eye
for
that
motion,
so
that
passes
and
these
edits
will
move
forward.
Thank
you
for
going
through
that
with
us
code
manager
list
and
then
all
right
now,
we'll
move
on
to
unfinished
business
with
our
bylaws.
So
I
edited
our
bylaws
as
we
discussed
last
week,
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
different.
B
That
I
did
other
than
I
did
throw
in
this
Oxford
commas,
and
hopefully
you
all
had
a
chance
to
take
a
look
at
it
or
you
really
didn't
need
to
do
anything
to
scrutinous
because
it
was
exactly
as
we
discussed,
but
we
should
go
ahead
and
have
a
vote
on
that
as
well.
Does
someone
want
to
make
a
motion
for
those
changes.
B
B
You
all
in
favor,
let's
be
visual.
Okay,
all
in
favor
raise
your
hand
hi,
and
thank
you
all
right.
That
was
unanimous.
So
our
bylaw
changes
are
official
and
let's
go
ahead
and
does
anyone
have
any?
Does
anybody
have
any
specific
topics
to
discuss
in
future
meetings.
H
H
Actually
I
forgot
to
mention
something
that
has
come
forward
recently
regarding
trash
haulers
and
trash
services,
and
there
is
a
council
request.
Pending
on
this,
we
are
going
to
run
into
some.
Some
we've
been
having
some
enforcement
concerns
related
to
how
trash
is
being
picked
up
when
it's
being
picked
up.
So
basically
some
licensing
concerns
those
have
been
addressed,
but
as
of
right
now,
Waste
Management
has
notified
its
service
area
that
they
are
no
longer
doing
Ali,
side,
pickup
and
I
believe
there's
a
couple.
H
Other
conditions
I
did
not
receive
a
postcard.
I
did
speak
to
a
few
citizens
today.
Regarding
that
I,
don't
know
if
they're
requiring
their
specific
bins.
I
had
heard
that
that
was
part
of
the
condition
as
well,
and
so
we're
really
affiliating
a
lot
of
those
concerns.
There's
nothing
that
code
enforcement
can
do
right
now
to
support
our
residents
other
than
let
them
know
that
they
do
have
a
choice
and
service
provider.
H
We
are
a
choice
City,
and
that
is
that
is
up
to
each
individual,
homeowner
resident
or
occupant
to
determine
how
they
want
who
they
use
for
their
trash
hauling
services,
but
it
has
Waste.
Management
has
the
largest
portion
of
service
area,
I,
think
a
third
based
off
of
what
they
told
me
of
our
residents
that
that
utilize
that
service,
so
I,
did
want
to
bring
that
forward,
that
that
is
moving
its
way
through
and
it
has
caused
some
concern
for
residents.
B
H
Are
discontinuing
all
alley
service
their
trucks,
their
new
trucks
are
unable
to
maneuver
alley
side.
They
are
wider
than
the
way
our
alleys
are
designed.
They
have
had
some
concerns
related
to
some
power
lines
and
their
new
automated
systems,
instead
of
being
two-party,
trash,
hauling
Services,
where
they
use
two
people
to
go,
pick
up,
trash
they're,
finding
creative
and
better
ways
to
reduce
their
expenses
and
provide
services,
and
so
they're
utilizing
trucks
that
have
automated
arms
and
those
arms
cannot
operate
in
our
alleyways.
B
H
Also
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
other
trash,
hauling
services
that
are
part
of
this
licensing
have
already
discontinued
and
they
notified
their
members.
I,
don't
know
well
over
a
year
ago,
two
years
ago,
and
so
a
lot
of
people
switch
to
waste
management
because
they
were
the
only
ones
doing
alley
service
and
now
they've
discontinued.
That.
O
We
do
have
rules
that
the
city
can
enforce
and
that's
what
I
wanted
to
know.
What
are
the
rules
that
we
have,
because
the
other,
the
other
problem
is
not
only
are
they
requiring
to
use
their
containers,
they
will
no
longer
be
picking
up
extra
bags
of
trash
which,
in
essence,
really
eliminates
all
yard
waste.
O
So
that's
going
to
be
problematic
for
the
city
unless
we
can
handle
that
and
I
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
this
committee
has
authority
over
I,
don't
know
if
the
part
of
the
code
that
I
don't
know
what?
What
section
of
the
code
that
is
yeah.
H
O
That
was
not
in
the
postcard.
The
bottom
line
is
when
you
can
get
a
96
gallon
trash
can
for
free.
But
if
you
want
any
more
trash
cans,
it
will
be
six
dollars
a
month
rental
fee
on
each
extra
trash.
Can
that.
H
O
Well,
I
think
It,
ultimately
could
be
a
problem
for
the
city
if
we
don't
take
care
of
it,
because
if
the
citizens
can't
afford
to
have
their
trash
hauled
away,
that's
going
to
create
a
problem
for
the
city
too.
So
do
you
know
office
or
code
manager
Lewis?
If,
if
the
trash
code
falls
under
the
authority
of
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
or
not,
no.
H
H
I'm
going
to
pose
it
from
this
standpoint,
based
on
my
training
and
experience,
this
is
just
anecdotal
to
throw
out
to
you
all.
I
haven't
had
professional
conversations
with
the
haulers
I
think
the
concern
might
be
is
if
we
push
back
on
one
of
these
haulers
and
again,
there's
really
only
three
major
haulers,
because
all
the
little
ones
have
been
bought
out
is
Waste.
Management
could
potentially
come
back
and
say
fine,
then
we
no
longer
will
serve
as
Inglewood
and
I'll
be
very
honest
with
you.
H
Waste
management
has
continued
contracts
with
with
service
areas
in
smaller
cities
to
be
able
to
provide
services
to
their
larger
contracts
like
Inglewood,
and
so
we
do
run
the
risk
of
potentially
creating
more
of
a
monopoly
with
one
group
over
another,
and
if
we
really
articulate
those
concerns
and
require
it,
we
are
also
risking
us
as
a
city
creating
a
bigger
problem
and
telling
and
them
telling
us
we'll
find
them.
We
just
won't
service
you.
We
will
devote
our
our
resources
somewhere
else.
B
But
at
the
same
time,
the
city's
pushing
increased
density,
which
makes
it
harder
to
have
cans
on
the
curb
anyway,
which
makes
it
more
difficult
for
haulers
to
be
able
to
even
access
cans.
It's
it's
a
mess,
and
it's
it's
a
very
frustrating
issue.
As
you
all
know,
I'm
quite
aware
of
after
two
years
on
the
trash
and
recycling
committee,
but
city
council,
member
Russell,
you
had
something
else:
yeah.
O
It's
going
to
create
huge
traffic
problems,
picking
up
in
the
street
and
especially
as
we
increase
density,
there's
I,
don't
know
if
you've
ever
been
down
Logan
when
on
trash
day
and
they're
picking
up
on
Logan
you
get
stuck
behind
a
trash
truck.
You
could
be
there
for
a
while.
O
So
there's
a
lot
of
problems
according
to
the
licensing.
I
do
believe
that
I.
If
an
alley
was
available,
Ali
pickup
originally
was
required.
So
I
suppose
when
I
was
little,
we
had
incinerators
and
it
was
my
job
to
burn
the
trash.
So
I
guess
we
could
go
back
to
incinerators
and
just
forget
trash
pickup
so
anyway,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
it.
E
I
I
know
we're
kind
of
way
off
the
code
stuff
right
now,
which
is
I,
guess:
okay,
what
happened
and
I'm
sorry
that
I
didn't
follow
this.
What
happened
to
the
idea
of
having
a
single
single
hauler
in
the
city
did
that
just
go
to
the
Wayside
or
where
is
that
at
we.
B
Put
out
an
RFP
that
the
there
was
a
commit
citizen
committee
made
and
we
put
out
an
RFP
and
both
of
the
haulers
that
responded
to
it
didn't
satisfy
the
requirements
of
it.
And
then
the
committee
recommendation
to
city
council
was
push
back
on
the
haulers
and
get
you
know
these
points
which
were
alley
service
yard
waste
and
not
more
than
a
reasonable
cost
and
city
council.
Instead
of
trying
to
negotiate
decided
to
give
up.
B
H
You
very
much
oh,
go
ahead,
one
more
thing:
I
apologize!
Typically,
you
all
have
gone
on
a
hiatus
hiatus
or
taken
the
month
of
December
off
just
because
it's
Falls
within
usually
that
holiday
week.
Is
that
something
that
you
guys
wanted
to
to
continue
vote
on?
What?
What
are
your
thoughts?
Sorry
about
my
Prague.
B
No
problem
I
mean
at
this
point:
we
don't
have
any
like
important
business.
We
don't
even
have
anything
lined
up
for
our
next
meeting
and
then
we've
already
decided
we're
going
to
do
in
person
in
January.
B
You
know
I'm
not
opposed
to
skipping
December
as
far
as
the
you
know,
where
the
week
before
Thanksgiving
for
next
month,
so
that
seems
reasonable,
but
I
mean
we
would.
We
can
also
decide
officially
then
about
December,
but
I
think
we
could
plan
on
skipping
December
unless
something
pressing
came
up.
B
H
May
I
ask
if
councilmember
Russell
feels
comfortable
staying
on
after
we
all
leave
and
we
stop
the
recording
just
for
her
and
I
to
have
a
quick
conversation
is
that
okay.