►
From YouTube: CEAC 031522 Video
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
E
It's
not
real
critical,
but
I
noticed
in
the
in
the
minutes
the
written
minutes
that
it
said
that
we
were
adding
arvada
to
the
authority,
but
it's
actually
the
purpose.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
matters
to
anybody,
but
you
were
adding
the
purpose
that
was
in
the
code
for
arvada
to
the
purposes.
A
Yeah,
that
was
a
mistake
on
my
part.
I
did
go
ahead
and
add
arvada.
So
if
it's
okay
with
you
we'll
just
leave
that
error
in
there.
A
Yeah
no
yeah,
I
went
ahead
and
did
that
so
that
was
just
a
typo
or
a
miss
thought
on
my
part,
any
other
further
corrections
or
discussions
regarding
the
minutes.
A
D
F
Hi
good
evening,
it's
nice
to
see
you
all.
I
want
to
start
something
a
little
differently
rather
than
just
giving
you
if
this
is
okay.
If
you'll
entertain
me
we're
working
on
some
leadership
classes,
and
so
I
wanted
to
pose
a
question
to
you
all,
just
to
kind
of
break
this
up
a
little
bit
and
get
to
know
each
other.
D
B
A
G
E
F
I
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
about
a
sweet
potato,
it's
very
it's
very
high
on
the
anti-inflammatory
diet!
So
and
it's
good
for
you.
F
And
it
was
going
to
lead
into
something
I
was
going
to
talk
about
next
it
is,
it
is
something
that
has
been
found
in
tombs
dating
thousands
of
years
old
and
it's
still
edible.
It
has
not
changed
for
thousands
of
years,
even
though
some
of
us
have
manipulated
some
of
the
bee
populations,
it's
still
the
same
formula,
complex
makeup:
they
they
have
lots
of
restorative
properties,
including
fighting
allergies.
F
We
always
go
and
try
and
get
honey
from
wherever
we
travel
just
to
try
that
and
build
up
our
immunity
for
that
area
that
we're
visiting,
but,
most
importantly,
those
that
produce
that
honey
is
our
pollinators.
And
so
again
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
I'm
still
advocating
on
behalf
of
our
pollinators
here
in
inglewood
and
throughout
the
state
of
colorado,
that's
going
to
allow
for
more
local
authority
control
in
order
to
better
serve
our
pop
pollinators.
F
And
I
know
a
lot
of
you
have
been
educated
on
this
topic
and
take
a
a
clear
passion
on
this.
But
two
of
the
things
that
we're
really
working
on
is
is
certain
pesticides
not
being
readily
available
because
it's
harming
our
our
bee
population,
whether
or
not
that
translates
into
the
dna
of
the
plant
or
the
flowers
or
the
pollinators
itself,
and
it's
causing
some
high
collapse.
F
We're
also
looking
at
giving
local
authority
back
as
into
some
grant
money
doing
some
research
in
our
local
communities
to
help
improve
this
and
without
our
pollinators.
70
of
our
food
sources
would
be
gone,
all
those
beautiful
fruits
any
of
the
colorful
vegetables,
our
trees,
that
fruits
and
our
nuts.
We
really
rely
on
not
just
bees,
most
people,
think
of
bees,
but
local
pollinators,
whether
it's
one
of
the
several
dozen
local
bees
to
certain
other
insects
that
do
provide
this
vital
resource.
F
We
are
continuing
to
do
extra
patrols
within
our
parks
and
I'm
happy
to
report
that
we
are
finding
that
a
majority
of
parks
during
these
patrols
are
in
compliance
with
all
park
rules.
F
We
continue
to
just
evaluate
this
as
we
move
forward
and
having
conversations
with
people,
we
are
seeing
a
trend
in
one
particular
park
and
we're
also
receiving
complaints,
and
so
we've
added
extra
random
patrols
into
this
particular
park,
which
would
be
rotolo.
We
are
seeing
an
increase
in
in
off-leash
violations
as
well
as
other
violations,
and
so
we're
really
focusing
in
using
data
that
we're
finding
from
our
our
contacts
and
speaking
with
the
public.
F
I'm
happy
to
report
that
we're
also
our
interactions
with
the
code
enforcement
department
have
become
very
positive,
and
I
think
I've
explained
this
trend
over
the
last
year.
Part
of
it
is
due
to
the
work
that
this
body
does
and
advocating
on
behalf
of
code
enforcement
and
being
that
liaison
with
our
citizens.
F
I
know
that
our
communications
team
has
partnered
with
you
all
in
certain
topics
and
that's
really
made
it
beneficial
for
my
team
we're
coming
into
more
pleasant
conversations
that
are
educational
versus
adversarial,
and
so
I
really
wanted
to
thank
you
all
for
that.
F
Have
I
completed
our
rounds
of
interviews
for
the
park
ranger
and
we
have
extended
an
offer
to
a
candidate
who
is
currently
in
backgrounds,
so
we
hope
to
have
that
done
within
the
next
four
to
six
weeks
and
that
person
can
be
brought
on
board.
So
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
having
this
new
park
ranger
and
introducing
them
to
this
body.
F
It
is
budgeted
for
two
seasonal
code
enforcement
officers
this
summer,
we'll
be
posting
those
positions
soon
and
those
will
be
specifically
designated
working
on
weave
and
overgrowth
within
the
city
of
inglewood
and
so
they'll
be
identifying
providing
education.
And
then
any
follow-up
will
be
passed
to
code
officials
where
we
will
take
the
next
steps
for
the
habitual
or
problem
properties.
F
We've
run
into
some
concerns
recently
and,
and
it's
not
so
much
a
concern,
it's
more
of
a
lack
of
resources
and
as
we
continue
to
move
forward
in
talking
about
the
unhoused
populations,
one
of
the
barriers
that
we
have
identified
is
that
those
that
are
in
unhoused
situations,
whether
it's
of
their
doing
or
their
choice
or
current
situations.
F
Many
of
them
are,
are
unable
to
seek
help
or
want
to
get
help
because
they
have
their
animal
companions
with
them.
A
lot
of
our
sheltering
community,
a
lot
of
our
shelters
or
those
services
don't
allow
for
any
type
of
cohabitation
with
their
pets
and,
as
many
of
you
know,
who
are
pet
lovers
and
what
we're
seeing
in
in
current
conflicts
around
the
world
and
in
natural
disasters.
F
That's
the
first
thing
that
people
think
about
is
taking
their
pets,
and
so
we've
identified
some
resources
so
that
we
can,
at
a
bare
minimum
within
the
state
and
with
the
inglewood,
have
those
animals
that
are
experiencing
emergencies
or
need
care
or
regular
veterinarian
services.
We've
identified
some
of
those
services,
as
well
as
the
governor's
office,
is
putting
forward
some
funding
to
have
specific
areas
for
sheltering,
so
these
people
can
get
services
and
their
pets
with
companions
would
be
permitted
with
them.
As
we
all
know,
having
a
companion.
F
Animal
really
lessens
the
stress
on
those
that
are
experiencing
traumatic
events,
and
some
of
these
folks
who
are
on
houzz
are
experiencing
trauma
in
a
variety
of
different
ways,
and
studies
have
shown
that,
even
though
they're
unhoused
their
pets
are
still
taken
care
of
very
well
they're
they're,
that
most
of
their
basic
needs
are
met
even
before
the
owner's
basic
needs
are
met.
But
we
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we
continue
with
vaccinations
and
emergency
care,
and
so
we've.
F
So
again,
this
is
at
zero
cost
of
the
city.
This
is
just
identified
as
as
a
an
opportunity
should
we
need
to
provide
services
to
someone
who's
in-house
and
is
willing
to
allow
us
to
provide
those
services
so
that
we
can
get
them
and
their
furry
companions,
hopefully
off
the
off
the
streets
as
soon
as
possible.
F
It
is
not
so
we
ran
into
an
a
few
emergency
situations
that
prompted
me
to
look
for
resources,
and
there
are
very
very
few.
I
presented
this
to
maggie's
fund
who
provided
us
with
a
resource.
It
is
a
national
resource,
that's
out
of
nevada,
where
a
caseworker
is
assigned
and
prior
to
any
services.
F
We
they
can
contact
code
enforcement
for
their
referral.
They
can
also
contact
the
humane
society
of
south
platte
valley.
Again,
we
are
one
of
the
first
in
the
state
of
colorado
to
identify
this
service
and
it's
getting
through
our
all
health
network.
Also,
I
just
it
really
breaks
my
heart
to
see
just
like
all
of
you,
animals
that
may
be
in
crisis
at
no
fault
of
their
own
due
to
unforeseen
financial
burdens,
and
so
we
at
a
minimum.
F
We
want
to
try
and
get
that
that
pet
seen
in
safe
housing
receiving
treatment
until
they
can
go
back
to
a
safe,
a
safer,
more
healthy,
stable
environment.
F
Several
of
them
we've
run
into
some
situations
where
they
felt
that
it
was
best
to
relinquish
the
dog,
knowing
that
it
would
be
better
suited
for
the
animal
to
be
rehoused
with
the
home
that
can
provide
those
services.
But
in
the
case
of
one
particular
gentleman,
he
had
been
with
this
animal
for
six
years
and
he
really
did
run
into
some
significant
hardships
and
really
needed
some
resources,
and
I'm
glad
we
got
him
in
the
system
not
just
for
that
or
for
other
assistants.
F
F
I'm
really
proud
that
we
stepped
in
to
help
this
animal
as
well
as
this
gentleman,
because
now
he's
receiving
the
help
that
he
actually
needs
so
that
he
his
biggest
thing
is.
He
didn't
have
an
identification
to
get
work
and
nobody
would
hire
him
without
that.
And
so
we
found
a
way
to
eliminate
that
barrier
and
he's
been
on
several
job
interviews
and
and
I'm
waiting
to
hear
back
for
his
success.
B
A
I
think
it's
wonderful
that
you
all
stepped
in
to
help
him.
I
think
your
leadership
dave
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
code
enforcement
division
is
looked
at
so
favorably.
I
mean
the
changes
that
I've
seen
over
the
past
six
years
have
been
phenomenal
and
the
fact
that
you've
turned
code
enforcement
into
a
significant
asset
for
the
city
is
testimony
to
the
hard
work
you
have
put
in.
Thank
you.
A
H
I
So
I
am
experiencing
multiple
problems.
I
tried
new
batteries
in
the
mouse,
that's
not
working!
So
as
long
as
I
don't
fat
finger
these
things,
I
think
I
can
control
it
from
the
screen,
but
the
I
don't
know
that.
There's
really
that
much
to
report
last
night
at
the
city
council
meeting.
Actually
I
think
we
had
gotten
an
email
a
little
earlier
that
one
of
the
utility
boxes
for
the
payments
was
broken
into
and
and
the
police
are
in
our
kind
of
warning.
I
I
Last
night
we
only
had
two
things
on
the
agenda:
wiffy
alones
their
low
interest
loans;
they
got
approved
for
water
and
sewer
infrastructure
and
total
60
60
million
dollars,
just
over
60
million,
and
and
so
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
lot
of
infrastructure,
and
I
think
one
of
the
big
things
that
the
city
is
looking
at
over
the
next
five
to
ten
years
is
starting
to
replace
lead
water
pipes,
which
I
believe
is
a
huge
problem
really
for
a
lot
of
cities,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
that
money
has
come
from.
I
I
don't
remember
if
this
is
the
american
rescue
plan
act,
but
anyway,
so
that's
pretty
much.
All
that's
been
going
on,
like
I
said,
that's
mostly
what
happened
last
night,
so
I
you
know,
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
probably
can
answer
them.
I
just
can't
think
of
anything
else
off
the
top
of
my
head.
E
I
So
all
I
can
say-
and
I
did
ask
this
question
last
night-
we
were
able
to
secure
the
low
interest
loans
because
of
the
increased
rates
you
have
to
prove
that
you
can
make
the
payments,
and
so
I
mean
I
did
ask.
Does
that
mean
that
we're
not
going
to
have
to
raise
them
and
they
said
no,
the
the
the
loan
amount
was
based
or
the
payments
are
all
based
on
that.
But
the
one
thing
about
wikia
loans.
I
They
only
will
give
us
as
much
as
we
need
at
the
time
and
we
only
have
to
start
repaying
principal
on
the
amount
that
we've
actually
taken,
and
I
think
that
we
can
defer
the
payments
for
10
years
on
principal.
So
anyway,
I.
E
E
Okay,
can
I
follow
up
with
there
was
a
we
got,
a
huge
grant,
wasn't
it
200
million
dollars
or
something
for
infrastructure,
and
we
were
like
what
should
we
spend
it
on
and
if
it
I
think
it
should
be
spent
on
the
water
and
sewer
infrastructure,
and
that
way
we
wouldn't
have
to
pay
these
enormous
amounts,
because
I'm
paying
now
monthly
what
I
used
to
pay
quarterly.
I
Well-
and
you
know
colleen,
I
I
can
identify
with
you-
I've
gotten
a
lot
of
phone
calls
and
I
did
ask
last
night
if
we
could
defer
some
of
those
and
I'm.
I
am
incredibly
concerned
about
people
that
are
living
on
fixed
incomes,
which
of
course,
you
know
cohen,
that
it's
it's
difficult.
Peter
van
ray
assured
me
that
if
people
are
struggling,
they
can
contact
his
the
utilities
department
and
his
there
are
some
resources.
I
I
I
do
know
that
arapahoe
county
is
making
available
monies
to
help
people
originally
council
talked
about
doing
a
a
program
to
help
seniors,
but
the
county's
already
doing
that.
So
I
I
think
there
will
be
money
available,
but
I
I
did
ask
last
night:
is
there
any
way
that
we
can
back
off
of
some
of
this?
We
have-
and
this
is
what
director
van
rei
said-
and
I
concur
with
this-
that
we
have
deferred
our
infrastructure
for
so
long.
It's
getting
to
the
point
that
it's
very
difficult
to
do
that.
I
So
I
hear
you
all
and
I
it
is
difficult,
and
I
do
believe
that
maybe
it
was
that
big
grant
money
program
where
a
lot
of
the
lead
pipe
replacement
money
is
coming
from.
A
G
Okay,
one,
I
would
just
have
two
things:
carson
had
the
question:
where
does
the
two
dollars
per
capita
for
our
tree
city
designation,
come
from
and
dave
lee
says
that
that
funding
comes
from
the
parks
budget
and
the
open
space
fund.
G
He
also
said:
we've
met
all
of
the
requirements
and
if
you
have
any
further
inquiries,
you
can
look
at
the
national
at
tree
city
at
the
arbor
day
foundation
to
see
those,
but
we
have
met
those,
and
it's
really
you
know
it's
done.
So
that's
great
news.
The
other
thing
is
the
magazine
going
forward.
Let's
see
where
is
that
sorry,
I'm
looking
in
my
email,
just
please
hold
there.
C
G
Okay,
we
have
two
requests
in
for
the
summer
magazine.
G
The
topics
are
weed
mitigation
and
emerald,
ash,
borer,
we'll
probably
recycle,
and
maybe
jizz
up
an
old
article,
encouraging
people
to
mitigate
their
weeds
before
they
get
out
of
control,
and
the
second
topic
is
to
a
reminder
to
treat
your
ash
tree
for
emerald
ash
borer
and
to
notify
residents
of
the
new
city
forester
and
as
well
as
financial
resources
that
will
be
made
available
to
help
people
decide
whether
they
have
a
healthy
tree
that
should
be
treated
or
if
they
can
get
some
financial
assistance
treating
or
removing
a
tree
that
is
at
risk.
G
E
Monica,
where
did
where
did
the
figure
22
500
ash
trees
come
from?
Was
it
just
an
estimate.
G
That
I
that's
a
great
question:
that'd
be
a
question
for
dave
lee.
So.
E
So
do
you
do
you
want
to
feel
that
or
should
I
just
send
him
a
little
quick
note,
because
when
I
was
doing
all
of
this
work
for
the
tree
matrix
some
of
the
some
of
the
cities
that
I
worked
on?
In
fact,
four
out
of
the
five
I
think
indicated
how
many
ash
trees
they
had
and
how
many
were
in
the
entire
city,
and
so
I
correlated
some
of
that
with
the
size
of
this.
You
know
of
the
city,
boundaries
and.
E
That
then,
the
closest
the
closest
to
us
was.
Is
it
lafayette?
I
think
it
was.
It
had
nine
square
miles
and
they
came
up
with
an
estimate.
E
E
22
500
on
six
square
miles:
okay,
but
most
almost
all
the
city
said
the
ash
trees
of
any
type
of
ash,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
different
types
of
ash,
were
15
maximum
10
to
15
maximum
of
the
total
number
of
trees.
But
we
don't
know
what
our
total
number
of
trees
are
so
and
just
looking
at
my
neighborhood,
there
may
be
one
or
two
ash
trees
per
10
houses.
E
G
G
So-
and
you
have
to
remember,
you
know
we're
a
different
location
than
lafayette.
They
are
a
little
more
open.
Space
like
like
englewood
is
the
wooded
nook
right.
We
have
a
pretty
dense
tree
canopy,
so
I'm
sure
that
there
has
been
a
lot
of
analysis
that
went
into
that
estimation
and
I
will
be
happy
to
follow
up
with
dave
lee
on
that.
He
out,
you
know
and
I've
never
stumped
the
guy.
He
always
is
able
to
answer
questions
pretty
much
right
away.
G
So
how
did
we
get
that
total
great
I'm
on
it
cohen?
Thank
you.
A
Right
seeing
none,
then,
let's
move
forward
to
new
business
and
first
on
the
agenda
is
election
of
a
new
chair
and
vice
chair,
and
I
thought
I
would
just
go
through
the
process,
real
quick,
so
that
everybody
understands
so
the
both
positions,
both
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair,
serve
one
year
in
that
role
and
then
next
march
we
have
another
voting
session.
So
it's
a
it's
a
year
commitment.
A
First,
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
open
up
I'll,
open
up
the
floor
for
nominations.
You
can
only
nominate
one
person
until
the
other.
All
the
rest
of
people
have
nominate,
had
finished
nominating
and
then
we'll
need
to
confirm
the
willingness
of
the
member
to
serve
as
either
chair
or
vice
chair,
and
then
we'll
close
the
nomination
and
do
a
vote
by
vote
voice
vote.
A
Yes,
yes,
you
do.
Yes,
yes,
so
I'm
going
to
close
the
floor
to
nominations
and
go
ahead
and
conduct
a
vote.
Those
in
favor
of
remember
green
as
chair.
Please
raise
your
hand
for
an
eye.
Those
opposed
please
wren,
raise
your
hand
as
a
no
looks
like
we
have
five
votes
in
favor.
So
congratulations,
member,
green!
You
are
now
the
chair
of
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee,
effective
immediately,
actually.
A
I
turned
the
meeting
over
to
you
yeah
I'll
help.
You,
though,
all
right
so
now
I'd
like
to
open
nominations
to
the
floor
for
point
of.
J
J
To
I
would
like
to
I'm
not
sure
how
to
address
you.
You're,
not
chair,
bowdoin
anymore,.
A
C
J
E
E
E
J
Thank
you,
remember,
watson,
the
vice
chair
and
then
let's
go
ahead
and
vote
show
it
show
hands
in
favor
and
then
that's
everyone.
So
unanimous,
remember,
watson
will
be
vice
chair
watson
now
if
he
accepts
so
I
guess
I'll
contact
him
and
make
sure
he
accepts
that
and
then
let
you
know
maureen.
If
we
have
to
do
this
again
next
time
or
not.
C
D
J
J
Removing
the
word
growing
and
former
chair
burden
is
your
impression
of
what
we're
doing
here,
just
getting
a
consensus.
If
we
think
we
should
make
that
recommendation
and
and
just
okay,
so.
A
I
I
believe
the
council
just
wanted
us
to
look
at
that
and
see.
If
there
were
any
issues
rita
do
do
we
need
to
respond.
I
I
think
that
last
time
it
was
all
available
right,
but
we
couldn't
vote
on
it
because
it
was
new
business.
It
hadn't
been
on
the
agenda.
Isn't
that
what
happened
the
last
time?
So
I
think
you
just
give
the
recommendation
if
you
think
the
word
growing
needs
to
be
changed,
or
probably
you
can
change
it
any
way.
You
would
like.
F
So
this
stemmed
out
of
some
properties
that
became
uncompliant
and
because
we
went
into
that
snow
season
and
cowen
can
know
first
hand
because
she's
chimed
in
on
this
ordinance.
Before
once
the
growing
season
ends.
We
are
prohibited
from
doing
enforcement,
even
though
the
cast
off
and
the
shells
of
what
may
have
been
weaved
that
we
have
previously
documented.
We
no
longer
can
enforce,
and
so
we
found
a
way
around
that,
with
with
one
particular
case
that
member
that
member
woodward
brought
forward.
C
F
A
I
I
didn't
see
a
reason
why
we
shouldn't
remove
it
and
I'm
surprised
we
didn't
catch
it
before
so
I
I
approve
that
change.
J
F
We
had
to
articulate
that
it
was
considered
a
nuisance
prohibited
that
way
it
would
allow
us
to
abate
the
property.
There
were
other
concerns
on
the
property,
not
just
the
growing
former
growing
weeds
that
have
had
gone
out
of
compliance,
and
so
we
utilized
nuisance
prohibited
and
the
property
eventually
came
into
compliance.
J
I'm
curious
how
you
identify
on
a
property.
What
things
that
are
over
six
inches
are
considered
weeds
versus.
You
know
somebody
having
plants
that
may
or
may
not
be
considered
weeds
by
one
person
or
another.
F
That
is
a
great
question,
so
the
person
would
need
to
prove
that
they
were
intentionally
planted
or
part
of
their
landscaping,
and
we
use
common
sense
here.
If
someone
has
dandelions
the
first
short
period
of
the
season
and
they
say
hey,
can
you
give
us
a
couple
more
weeks
why
the
bees
pollinate
it's
their
first
food?
Then
we'll
go
back
a
couple
weeks
later.
F
It's
it's
more
of
those
properties
and
you
can
identify
them
that
may
have
something
that
would
be
considered
noxious
under
state
ordinance
that
we
could
tie
into
that
again.
I
like
to
use
the
the
we
had
a
the
milkweed
person
come
forward.
F
The
resident
wasn't
educated
on
that,
but
if
she
would
have
said
this
is
intentional,
it's
for
the
monarchs
we
wouldn't
ask
them
to
cut
that
down
or
the
person
who
received
constant
complaints
because
they
had
a
whole
patch
of
thistles
in
their
backyard,
but
the
the
complainant
educated
us
on
this
is
this
is
a
specific
type
of
thistle.
It's
not
the
colorado
one.
I
imported
this.
I
use
this
in
cottage
industry.
I
use
this
to
make
crafts
specifically
around
scottish
and
irish
heritage.
F
That's
not
something
we're
going
to
enforce
because
it
was
an
intentionally
planted
item.
Artichokes
is
a
thistle
and
someone
called
on
a
an
artichoke
plant
that
had
gone
to
seed
in
someone's
yard
and
they
articulated
that
they're
now
past
the
eating
stage
and
they
wanted
to
use
them
for
to
dry
them
and
do
flower
and
just
with
them.
So
it's
kind
of
communication
between
ourselves
and
the
citizen.
If
the
citizen
feels
they're
not
reads,
then
we
will
go
out
and
have
a
further
conversation.
E
I
have
had
a
problem
with
this.
I've
had
several
people
call
me
about
this.
A
lot
of
native
grasses
turf
grasses
grow
a
little
bit
taller
than
six
inches
and
you're
not
supposed
to
mow
them.
It's
bad
for
them,
and
there
was
a
the
guy.
I
got
my
dog
from
who
wheeled
me.
The
dog
had
very
long
grass,
but
once
it
got
to
about
four
inches,
it
fell
over
and
he
didn't
he
liked
it
growing
like
that.
It
was
better
for
his
lawn,
but
it
did
exceed
six
inches.
E
Some
of
the
cities.
I
know,
make
the
limitation
to
12
inches,
but
then
they
include
even
flowers,
which
I
don't
think
is
appropriate.
But
if
it's
a
native
grass
like
buffalo
grass-
and
it
grows
a
little
bit
taller
than
six
inches-
is
that
something
you're
going
to
enforce
again.
F
If
somebody
comes
forward
with
us
and
again,
this
has
been
part
of
the
whole
opportunity,
with
code
enforcement
becoming
more
educational
than
enforcement,
when
we
interact
with
our
citizens
is
really,
if
they're
able
to
articulate,
we
have
a
gentleman
that
calls
us
every
fall.
Who
is
a
biologist
who
works
at
bu
who
has
planted
native
grasses
and
he
calls
us
preemptively
every
year
just
want
to
let
you
know
I
have
these
grasses
growing
in
my
yard.
F
You
can
come
and
take
a
look
at
them.
I
have
the
invoice
for
for
when
I
planted
them
and
they
most
of
them
only
reprop
propagate
from
their
seed,
so
they
have
to
go
to
seed,
and
so
then
that
would
not
be
something
that
we
would
move
forward
with
and
we
would
not
even
be
able
to
obtain
a
conviction
if
you
were
to
come
to
my
yard.
I
have
a
grass
plant
that
grows
six
feet
tall
so
and
it
was
intentionally
planted
to
offer
some
more
privacy
around
my
my
front
windows.
F
So
we.
F
Of
circumstances
and
what
may
not
look
like
a
native
species
to
us
if
we
issue
a
notice,
someone
calls
us
and
says
hey
code
enforcement.
This
is
the
circumstance
we'll
document
that
case
and
have
a
conversation
about
that.
J
Any
other
thoughts
or
anything
on
this
change,
councilmember
russell.
Should
we
like
officially
respond
to
city
council
about
this
or.
I
I
I
think
that
you
just
have
to
vote
on
it
and-
and
I
see
miss
willis
is
got
her
hand
raised.
I
think,
probably
she
will.
She
will
address
that-
whether
it
just
goes
straight
to
the
attorney
or
not,
but
I
think
you
have
to
do
a
vote,
but
talk
with.
J
C
J
Okay
and
communicate
that
back
to
counsel,
and
was
that
a
second
member
burden?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you
all
right
show
hands
in
favor
of
making
this
change
recommending
to
city
council.
What
member
city
council,
member
woodward
suggested?
J
Okay,
remember
dickerson!
Was
that
a
yes
as
well.
E
J
Okay,
then
that's
unanimous.
Everyone
voted
yes
for
that,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
make
that
recommendation
to
city
council.
Ms
willis,
do
I
need
to
write
an
email
or
something
or.
D
E
J
Okay,
and
did
you
have
something
else,
councilmember
russell.
I
No,
that's
just
what
I
I
would
was
going
to
do,
or
probably
even
if
I
didn't
get
the
email
would
just
share
with
the
council
next
meeting.
But
thank
you
for
taking
care
of
that
marine.
J
J
Thank
you,
code
manager,
lewis,.
F
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
all.
This
was
a
trouble
spot
that
doesn't
come
up
very
often
and
it
was
identified-
and
I
appreciate
your
quick
response
and
and
having
this
set
forward.
H
A
J
That's
funny
yeah
that
doesn't
happen
much
not
like
that,
so
now,
moving
into
unfinished
business.
A
Be
happy
too,
so
I
would
start
with
the
proposed
changes
to
code
that
the
city
attorney
sent
us
based
on
our
presentation
back
in
september
because
they
have
revised
that
code
based
on
that
maureen.
Oh
sorry,
yeah.
J
D
Ahead
as
well,
it's
hard
to
get
used
to.
I
understand
the
city
attorney
apologizes
for
not
being
able
to
attend
this
meeting,
and
she
asked
me
to
be
able
to
answer
any
questions
that
y'all
might
have.
She
said
the
the
main
thing
that
was
changed
is
that
all
of
the
co,
all
of
the
items
that
should
be
in
in
the
code
where
it's
punishment
she
moved
into
that
area,
so
you're
going
to
notice
that
in
this
in
this
council
bill.
But
if
you
have
any
questions,
please
let
me
know.
J
Okay,
remember
dickerson.
E
Yeah,
I
have
a
question:
nothing
was
done
about
the
prohibited
trees,
and
that
was
one
of
our
main
interest
presenting
back
in
2018
because
it
it
still
has
that,
except
for
mature
trees,
more
than
one
inch
in
diameter.
There
is
no
such
thing
as
a
mature
tree
one
inch
in
diameter.
E
E
E
E
So
if
we
just
change
that,
because
there
is
something
early
on
about
the
tree
advisory
board
and
the
director
of
parks
coming
up
with
a
list
of
noxious
trees,
then
instead
of
saying
prohibited,
plantings
just
say
noxious
trees,
as
defined
by
the
colorado
department
of
agriculture
or
the
forest
department
or
whatever
it
is.
E
I
think
there's
a
couple
of
the
of
the
cities
and
it's
listed
on
the
tree
mate,
the
tree
matrix.
J
E
J
D
E
J
What
they
do
have
is
they
have
recommended
as
a
separate
thing
outside
of
code.
What
recommended
street
trees?
Ms
willis.
D
So
maybe
what
we
should
do
is
right
now,
title
seven
is
being
completely
rewritten
the
entire
title,
seven,
so
my
recommendation
would
be
to
maybe
hold
off
and
I'll
get
a
draft
of
title
70
guys
for
your
next
meeting
and
then
maybe
you
can
go
through
those
nuisance
abatements
and
make
sure
that
the
items
that
you
want
in
there
are
in
there.
E
D
Title
15,
then
I
can
send
that
to
you
guys
with
the
changes
in
it,
but
we've
got
it
and
do
they
have
the
changes
of
the
trees
that
you're
worried
about
no
okay.
So
that's
what
you
guys
are
wanting
to
give
to
the
city
attorney
is
this
kind
of
information,
but
I
think
that
she's
going
to
move
those
all
over.
E
Well,
in
any
case,
we
have
to
eliminate
the
exception
for
mature
trees.
That's
gotta
go
and
instead
of
saying
planting,
it
should
say
they're
banned
from
the
city.
E
There's
a
whole
list
of
problem
noxious
trees
that
is
established
by
some
department
in
colorado
and
in
the
nation
for
that
matter.
Department
of
agriculture
has
a
list
of
noxious
trees
and
that
by
that
they
mean
invasive
non-native,
dangerous
self-propagating
disease,
vectors
like
siberian
elms,
every
single
siberian
elm,
you
see
is
non-native.
A
I
think
I
can
help
clarify
this
a
little
bit
some
time
on
it.
They've
they've,
created
a
tree
advisory
board
and
yearly.
The
tree
advisory
board
is
to
submit
a
list
to
the
director
on
recommended,
trees
to
plant
and
also
a
list
of
prohibited
news
nuisance
species
which
I
think
covers
what
we're
talking
about.
So
it
gives
the
city
an
opportunity
to
change
that
list
as
we
move
forward,
and
I
think
they,
the
it
was
left.
An
old
statement
was
left
in
there
on
20
on
page
23
11-5-8.
A
D
In
response
to
the
tree
advisory
board,
that
has
not
been
established
as
yet,
and
I
was
told
that
either
the
code
enforcement
board
can
be
the
tree.
Advisory
board
or
parks
and
rec
would
be
the
tree
advisory
board.
Would
you
guys
want
to
be
the
free
advisory
board,
or
would
you
prefer
be
park
and
rec.
J
Okay,
well,
let
me
hear
from
see
council
russell.
You
had
your
hand
up.
I
And
I
don't
remember
what
meeting
I
was
at,
but
I
brought
up
this
board.
I
asked
why
it
had
to
be
parks
and
rec
or
miss.
Willis
is
absolutely
correct.
Those
two
parks
and
rec
and
the
other
one
that
she
mentioned
and
I
said
well,
why
couldn't
it
be
code
enforcement?
E
E
It
can't
just
be
right
here,
but
at
any
rate
they,
you
know,
that's
what
they've
decided
and
I
don't
have
really
anything
to
say.
You
know
I
mean
I
think
that
people
have
that's
fine,
but
the
problem
is
everything
on
here
about
their
doing
the
recommend
to
the
director
a
list
of
preferred
fees
and
a
list
of
prohibited
nuisance
species
within
the
city.
E
E
Noxious
trees
are
prohibited
in
the
city
of
inglewood,
defined
by
the
department
of
whatever
and
I'll
get
you
the
exact
thing.
There's
a
forestry
department
there's
a
department
of
agriculture
and
they
all
have
these
invasive
trees,
and
mainly
it's
aimed
at
things
like
the
tree
of
heaven
and
siberian
elms
and
emerald
ash,
and
that
kind
of
thing.
D
That's
why
it's
before
you
all
so
that
you
can
review
it
and
make
suggestions
to
it,
including
who
would
be
the
tree
advisory
board,
so
it
can
either
be
you
guys,
code
enforcement
that
has
been
what
was
told
to
me
by
the
city,
attorney
parks
and
rec,
or
code
enforcement,
whichever
you
guys
prefer.
You
can
make
that
recommendation
along
with
any
other
recommendations
you
want
to
make
on
this
draft
council
bill.
J
Thank
you
miss
remember,
button.
A
I
I
E
J
Well,
you
mean
if,
if
we
were
the
tree
advisory
board,
that
we
would
still
need
the
specific
banning
section?
Is
that
what.
J
Yeah
and
that's
what
remember
bowdoin
was
pointing
out
is
whoever
ends
up
being
becoming
the
tree
advisory
board.
It's
listed
in
here
in
the
suggested
responsibilities
that
they
can,
let's
see
so
the
tr.
They
make
a
list
of
preferred
tree
species
and
prohibited
nuisance
species,
so
that's
already
listed
in
there
and
that's
why
I
remember
bowdoin
was
pointing
out
that
if
that
exists,
then
we
really
don't
need
this
section
that
specifically
excludes
particular
trees
and
the
mature
tree
definition
that
doesn't
really
make
sense.
H
F
My
recommendation
to
be
consistent
with
with
code,
would
not
be
to
put
this
board
here
with
code
enforcement
that
it
would
stay
with
park
and
rec
only
because
the
the
ordinances
specifically
first
the
authority
of
the
forestry
which
falls
into
the
parks
and
recreation
division,
not
code
enforcement.
What
by
doing
it
through
this
organization
or
this
group,
they
can
weigh
in
on
ordinance
changes
related
to
it
and
that
I
encourage
that
moving
forward.
F
But
the
potential
burden
that
you
may
put
on
code
enforcement
officers
who
are
not
subject
matter,
experts
requiring
that
the
forestry,
the
parks
and
rec
handle
this
also
send
forward
the
investigation.
And
then,
if
there's
a
subsequent
violation,
the
referral
would
come
to
code
enforcement
for
issuing
the
summons
or
the
abatement.
F
Just
because
we
we
really
I'll
be
honest.
I
don't
we
don't
have
the
capacity
to
take
on
that
knowledge
and
education
and
enforcement
component
or
those
recommendations
and
many
of
the
people
that
are
on
and
monica's
on.
The
parks
and
rec
commission
as
well.
Many
of
the
appointees
are
working
within
our
park
system
or
employ
live
in
inglewood
and
employed
by
other
park
systems
within
the
metro
area,
and
so
they
are.
They
are
very,
very
well
educated
and
subject
matter.
Experts
on
a
variety
of
horticulture
issues.
J
G
That's
why
I
had
my
hand
up
and
well
said
code
manager.
Louis
there
are
yeah
they've
got
it
so
and
dave
lee
is
heavily
involved
in
that
committee
and
he
works
with
the
forester
and
they
you
know
they're
working
on
that
side
and
that
would
be
pulling
them
into
yet
another
committee-
and
it's
really
I
mean
dave
lewis-
has
his
hands
full
with
all
that
they
do.
G
It's
a
totally
different,
totally
different
thing,
but
I
can
see
the
I
mean
these
two
committees
overlap
quite
a
bit
and
like
the
parks
and
rec
department
is
doing
all
the
development
in
the
parks,
but
manager
lewis
is
enforcing
the
code
in
those
spaces.
So
you
know,
I
think
the
best
thing
to
do
is
just
you
know,
communicate
and
rely
on
their
expertise
where
we
need
to.
E
E
I'm
I'm
not
as
concerned
with
the
who
is
acting
as
the
tree
advisory
board,
as
it's
made
very
it's
in
the
enabling
legislation
as
well
as
here,
but
the
list
of
their
stuff
is
they
recommend
a
preferred
tree
species
and
a
list
of
prohibited
nuisance
species
within
the
city,
but
the
first
one
was
public
property
and
they
list
a
prohibited
nuisance
species
within
the
city
and
once
that's
established,
how
is
that
enforced?
E
So
there's
some
loopholes
here,
there's
a
lot
of
kind
of
weirdnesses
that
I
I
see,
but
I
I
don't
have
a
problem.
You
know
whoever
they
designate
is
the
tree
board.
E
D
C
D
So
I
don't
know
how
you
guys
want
to
do
this,
but
that's
what
she
was
hoping
for.
J
Okay,
so
I
think
we
are
going
to
at
least
need
this
to
into
our
next
meeting
for
that,
and
I
think
it
would
help
if
we
could
see
whatever
the
draft
changes
are
to
the
enforcement
part
to
take
that
into
account
when
we
go
through
this
in
more
detail.
These
are
all
really
good
points
and
it
sounds
like
you
know,
maybe
removing
that
specifically
prohibited
section
and
making
sure
we
cover.
J
You
know
these
the
loopholes
that
remember
dickerson
just
pointed
out.
It
is
kind
of
weird
that
it
recommends
only
for
public
and
prohibited
throughout
seems
like
that
should
be
for
both
and
code
manager
lewis.
What
do
you
think
of
that
point
about?
So,
if
the,
if
this
tree
advisory
board,
is,
I
don't
know,
as
often
as
maybe
annually
changing
the
list
of
prohibited
nuisance
species?
Does
that
then
put
it
on
code
enforcement
to
enforce
that
when
a
neighbor
says
hey,
they
have
something
on
this
list
that
was
just
updated.
F
So
this
could
potentially
go
into
nuisance
instead
of
the
way
that
it's
written
only
from
the
standpoint
of
the
maybe
the
park,
the
forestry
department
or
the
forestry
person
should
be
the
ultimate
responsible
person
to
investigate
it's
just
like
if
we
were
to
have
a
water
issue.
The
water
department's
gonna,
investigate
and
forward
us
their
information
for
issuing
a
violation,
and
so
I
really
would
like
some
consistency
with
the
subject
matter.
F
J
So
that
really
sounds
to
me,
like
you,
think
that
whatever
the
enforcement
part
of
this
becomes
in
section
15,
that
it
should
specifically
say
enforcement
of
whatever
the
current
nuisance
tree
list
is,
should
go
to
the
city
forester,
whoever
that
that
authority
is
and
then
code
enforcement
would
be
responsible
for
implementing
the
actual
enforcement
of
whatever
that
person
deems
is
necessary.
Yeah,
okay,.
F
And
that
would
be
consistent
with
the
way
we
work
with
other
departments
currently,
whether
that
be
some
of
the
licensing
stuff,
whether
it
deals
with
some
other
safety
concerns
water
department,
illicit
discharges.
All
of
those
are
investigated
in
the
authority,
but
the
actual
summons
is
actually
is
done
either
by
a
peace
officer
or
a
swarm
municipal
officer,
which
would
be
us.
A
I
always
kind
of
responding
to
maureen's
question
about
how
you
guys
want
to
go
through
this.
I
did
pull
up
the
presentation
on
where
we
asked
the
city
council
to
consider
code
changes
and
that's
what
was
sent
to
be
a
city
attorney.
J
That
does
make
sense
and-
and
there's
also
like-
I
know
like
just
going
through
this
and
and
I'm
sure
remember-
dickerson
too
after
we
just
went
through
all
the
code
of
all
those
cities.
There's
things
that
stick
out
to
me.
That
could
be
potentially
structured
differently
and
I
haven't
written
all
those
differences
down
yet.
But
I
I
do
think
that
what
you're
suggesting
makes
makes
sense.
Do
you
want
to
you
think
we
should
do
that
right
now,.
H
E
Yeah,
I
think
that
where
they
haven't
met
is
the
fact
that
it's
been
changed
around
so
much
now
that
there
are
more
loopholes
than
there
were
before
we
did
suggest
at
the
meeting
you
guys
suggested.
I
sat
there
and
watched
but
suggested
that
a
change
had
to
be
made
on
this
and
a
few
other
things.
E
E
You
know
that
how
they're
going
to
go
about
determining
if
this
is
a
nuisance
or
not,
and
I'm
not
even
sure
we
need
to
even
designate
it
as
a
nuisance.
E
There's
if
a
tree
is
endangering
property
or
persons,
then
the
director
or
the
open
space
manager
or
whoever,
along
with
a
a
certified
arborist,
needs
to
determine
that
and
then
they
should
follow
the
enforcement
process
outlined
in
title
18..
I
don't
think
we
need
to
shuffle
it
off
to
listen.
I
I've
I've
made
notes
all
over
this,
and
this
is
just
scatter
shooting,
so
I
would
volunteer
with
you
or
anybody
else
that
wanted
to
write
up
some
changes.
E
Take
this
draft,
get
it
into
a
format
and
right.
You
know,
redline
it
and
add
things
to
it
on
our
recommendations
and
where
we're
having
a
problem,
and
we
can
discuss
it
at
the
next
meeting.
E
J
Okay,
I
let's
go
ahead
and
do
it
remember
bowdoin
suggested
I've
got
the
powerpoint
that
you
sent
me,
so
I
should
be
able
to
share
this
because
it
does
make
sense
to
just
walk
through
that,
and
everything
else
that's
been
said
also
makes
sense.
So,
let's
see
sure
screen.
J
J
J
Problem
all
right,
so
we
you
know.
H
J
I
mean,
unless
we
were
gonna
recommend
we
do
that
with
just
ash,
because
we
know
that,
but
even
then,
like
I
guess
it's
it's
possible.
That
would
almost
be
confusing
if
someone
chooses
to
treat
and
keep
an
ash,
so
we
don't
want
to
make
them
completely
prohibited.
J
So
it
does
seem
like
with
the
direction
that
this
is
going.
Where
there's
going
to
be
a
tree
advisory
board
under
parks
and
rack,
you
know
under
dave
lee
or
whoever's,
acting
in
that
capacity
will
make
the
list
of
recommended
and
prohibited,
and
then
this
doesn't
address
okay
yeah.
This
was
in
the
the
udc
part
about.
H
J
So
that
probably
still
needs
to
be
addressed,
then
it's
been
a
while,
since
I
looked
at
that,
does
that
already
have
specific
trees
specified
in
the
in
the
udc
part
it
does
okay,
so
that
should
be
unless
that's
going
to
be
modified
as
well.
I
mean
that
would
be
another
thing
to
potentially
treat
the
same
way.
We
could
recommend
that
you
know
to
the
city
attorney
to
look
at
that
part
and
make
that
reference
the
same
thing
as
the
you
know.
What
this
tree
advisory
board
is
responsible
for,
specifying
recommended
and
prohibited.
J
Okay
and
I,
since
I've
got
my
screen
showing
this,
I'm
not
seeing
everyone.
So
if
I
miss
someone
letting
me
know.
A
You
know,
I
think
it
said
just
public
property
and
we
were
saying
we
needed
to
do
it
also
on
private
property.
A
But
overall
I
would
say
there:
this
is
the
biggest
gap,
I'm
seeing
because
it's
it's
really
unclear
what
the
private,
how
the
private
addresses
trees.
A
You
know
there
was
the
addition
of
a
statement
in
section
or
entitled
15
on
you
know
what
happens
if
you
don't
comply,
but
instead
of
you
know
they
replace
that
whole
preservation
and
removal
procedures
with
a
statement
on
standards
for
planting
maintenance
and
construction
activities
and
instead
of
citing
what
we
expect.
A
A
J
In
in
the
new
version,
the
proposed
version
of
1156
it
has
the
director
shall
maintain
official
list
of
desirable
tree
species
specifically
for
public
and
is
I'm
not
sure
what
the
overlap
between
that
and
the
tree
advisory
board
list
of
preferred
tree
species?
Is
I
mean
it
would
make
sense?
Oh
I
see
so.
The
tree
advisory
board
in
this
proposal
recommends
to
the
director
the
preferred
list
and
nuisance
list,
and
then
the
director
defines
what
that
is.
J
A
D
J
Okay,
do
you
know
if
the
city
attorney
would
be
able
to
come
to
our
next
meeting,
potentially.
D
Yes,
you
know
she
felt
really
bad
about
not
being
able
to
make
tonight.
So,
yes,
I'm
sure
she
would
be
able
to
attend
the
next
meeting.
J
Okay,
that
would
be
great
yeah,
so,
let's
whatever
we
set
our
next
meeting
for,
let's
try
and
confirm
that
she'll
be
able
to
come,
because
I
think
we
can
have
some
good
suggestions-
and
I
know
I'll
have
a
lot
of
good
questions.
J
Okay,
so
continuing
on
with
this
clarify
property
owner
versus
city
responsibilities,
okay,
so
all
of
these
kind
of
fall
under
that
same
things
that
we've
already
talked
about
those
same
things.
We've
already
talked
about.
J
A
J
Yeah,
it's
very
similar
to
what
we
saw
in
the
other
cities
too
yeah
other
than
like
some
of
the
cities
do
have
like
the
kinds
of
things
that
code
manager
louis
told
us
he
didn't
want
to.
He
didn't
think
we're
appropriate
or
that
we
we
should
put
on
them
to
deal
with
like
because
some
of
the
cities
specifically
say
that
code
enforcement
can
go
on
to
private
property
without
necessarily
permission,
and
that
was
kind
of
surprising
to
see.
J
E
Yeah
boulder
is
usually
the
one
that
is
the
one
that
did
that.
They
said
that
the
city
manager
who
was
given
the
responsibility,
could
go
on
private
property
to
inspect
for
disease
and
dead
or
dying
trees.
E
But
he
couldn't
take
any
action
without
a
warrant
and
he
had
to
have
an
arborist
with
him
to
identify
whether
or
not
the
trees
were
healthy,
but
be
that
as
it
may
most.
Otherwise,
they
didn't
enforce
anything
and
on
that
on
private
property
and
it
had
to
be
done
by
a
warrant
and
it
wasn't
code
enforcement
that
did
it,
but
he
had
to
have
a
warrant
to
demand
any
change.
J
Code
manager,
lewis,
whenever
it
says
an
order
in
code,
does
that
typically
mean
a
warrant
or.
F
No
an
order
or
notice
of
violation.
I
I
just
have
to
remind
everyone
that
our
codes
in
inglewood
are
very
unique.
Unlike
some
of
my
colleagues
where
code
enforcement
falls
to
civil
arbitration
versus
criminal,
these
are
all
criminal
municipal
violations,
so
I
would
physically
have
to
apply
for
a
warrant
to
physically
go
onto
someone's
property.
F
J
I
see
yeah
because
I
noticed
that,
like
denver
and
westminster,
if
they,
if
the
parks
that
like
the
like
westminster
specifically
the
director
of
parks
and
rec,
can
order
someone
to
take
care
of
something
and
if
they
don't,
then
they
can
go
on
and
do
it
themselves
even
on
private
property
and
then
charge
the
owner
for
it.
F
The
only
situation
where
that
would
occur
is
if
we
are
able
to
and
again
they
are
civil
and
they
can
go
to
a
civil
administrator
and
ask
for
that
jurisdiction.
But
for
us
we
utilize
our
nuisance
abatement
process,
which
is
clearly
defined
the
properties
we
would
need
to
do
the
inspection
from
the
right-of-way.
F
We
would
afford
the
owner
the
opportunity
to
have
a
licensed
arborist,
come
in
to
review
and
make
recommendations
and
present
those
to
the
city,
and
if
they
fail
to
do
that,
then
we
can
take
action
under
nuisance
abatement
if
it
is
a
hazardous
tree
or
poses
an
imminent
danger
and
that's
the
only
way
that
the
city
will
will
get
involved
and
that
process
we
haven't
dealt
with
that.
Almost
everybody
comes
into
compliance
within
45
days.
J
So
ms
willis
is
the
is
there
already
is
title
15
already
in
a
state
of
draft
like
what
was
given
to
us.
J
J
Thank
you,
so
we've
covered
everything
on
here
right.
Remember,
burden
this
one
all
right
so.
E
Yeah
I
thought
that
the
purpose
was
too
weak
and
it
doesn't
say
anything
about
protecting
trees
of
diversity
of
planting
and
protecting
existing
trees
from
damage
of
developers
or
and
when
I
looked
through
you
know,
I
saw
all
of
the
purposes
in
the
five
cities
that
I
looked
at
and
ju
member
founded
was
very
careful
to
duplicate
that.
For
us
you
know.
So
it's
all
in
one
place,
and
it
looked
to
me
like
denver's
purpose-
was
the
cleanest
and
the
you
know
and
the
the
briefest
but
the
most
encompassing.
J
Okay,
do
you
want
to
write
up
a
suggested
new
version
to
have
for
next
time,
then
we
can
talk
with
the
city
attorney
about.
E
E
Necessary,
or
particularly
good,
like
the
definition
of
tree,
it's
kind
of
like
what
there's
a
lot
of
trees
that
don't
reach
a
mature
height
of
over
12
feet
like
a
some
of
the
red
buds.
H
E
Well,
that's
something
they're
limited
to
16
feet
and
like
siberian
elms
reach
yeah.
I
I
think
the
definitions
are
unnecessary,
but
anyway,
I
think
it
just
complicates
things.
A
J
E
Yeah
I'll
be
happy
to
work
up
something
or
you
know
we
could
look
at
all.
Everybody
should
be
looking
at
all
of
those
purposes
that
the
different
cities
have
and
see
how
much
of
what
they've
got.
We
want
to
include
or
exclude,
but
I
think
at
the
very
minimum
we
should
say,
promote
diversity
of
trees.
E
You
know
a
healthy
diversity
of
trees
and
private
property
protection
of
trees,
and
I
think
it
should
be
built
into
the
code
too
that
how
to
protect
trees
from
development,
and
then
that
would
guide
the
unified
development
code
on
trees,
because,
right
now
it's
pretty
loosey-goosey
and
it
really
doesn't
protect
trees
at
all
existing
trees.
D
Yes,
thank
you
chairman,
so
member
dickerson,
are
you
going
to
write
up
a
sheet
with
all
of
these
questions
to
give
to
these
to
the
members
of
this
board?
Yes,
I
will,
would
you
please
include
me
as
well,
so
that.
E
I
certainly
will,
but
I
think
I
should
go
to
carson,
I
mean
to
our
new
chair
absolutely
and
then
he
can
forward
it
to
you
and.
D
D
E
J
So,
let's
that
that
makes
perfect
sense,
so
I'd
like
to
see
anyone
who
has
thoughts
on
this
that
haven't
you
know
already
just
been
spoken
or
that
you
just
want
to.
You
know,
speak
in
discussion,
but
if
it's
you
know,
structural
changes
or
feeling,
like
things,
are
missing
or
thoughts
on
how
to
write.
How
to
include
things,
like
obviously
miss
miz.
Remember,
dickerson
has
a
lot
of
those.
Let's
get
those
to
me
by
a
week
before
our
next
meeting
well.
J
Okay,
good,
but
at
least
by
then
so
then
you
know
I
can
look
at
it
and
have
time
to
get
it
to
ms
willis
to
get
it
to
the
city
attorney.
So
they
have
time
to
review
it
too,
before
our
meeting
and
then
so,
the
stor
on
the
authority
code
changes
the
definition
of
authority.
That
seems
pretty
good.
What's
in
there
to
me,
did
anyone
else
have
anything
on
that?
Remember
bowdoin.
A
Have
my
hand
raised
for
something
else,
there
was
one
other
thing
I
noticed
and
if
the
other
members
have
a
better
sense
for
this,
let
me
know
I
couldn't
find
the
statement
where
you're
supposed
to
use
an
arborist
maureen.
Do
you
know
if
that
was
removed.
E
E
And
I'm
pretty
certain
that
it
was
never
in
anything,
but
the
licensing.
J
And
I
think
that
would
only
apply
to
commercial.
I
don't
think
in
the
old
at
least
my
memory
of
the
old
version
of
the
code
was
a
homeowner
doesn't
have
to
use
an
arborist
for
anything
if
they
do
it
themselves,
but
if
they
hire
someone
they
have
to
use.
Someone
licensed
and
someone
licensed
is
based
on
whether
they're
licensed
in
I
think
like
denver
or
lakewood,
and
that
requires
that
they're,
an
arborist,
isn't
that
accurate
number
buddy.
A
You
know
that
was
my.
I
thought
it
was
for
private
homeowners
too,
and
if
it
is
only
in
the
licensing
section,
maybe
we
can
recommend
that
it
get
moved
to
where
homeowners
could
see
it,
because,
if
you're
getting
ready
to
you
know
do
something
to
your
tree
and
you
find
out
that
there's
standards
it'd
be
helpful
to
just
go
to
one
place.
A
H
J
A
E
Yeah
when
I
went
through
this,
you
know
on
the
tree
matrix
that
we
did.
There
was
not
one
place
where
they
required
you
to
use
an
arborist
or
any
particular
tree
service.
I
think
there
was
one
city
that
required
anybody
you
use
be
licensed
by
the
city,
but
never
a
requirement
for
arborist,
and
basically
there
isn't
any
definition
in
our
in
our
licensing.
J
F
You
just
touched
on
the
point.
I
just
wanted
to
re-emphasize
that
if
someone
was
to
use
an
arborist
that
it's
licensed
through
the
city
of
inglewood
referenced
in
this
ordinance,
not
just
in
the
licensing
component,
because
those
are
two
things
and
also
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
capture
that
homeowners,
so
that
we're
not
putting
an
undue
burden
on
homeowners.
They
still
have
the
ability
to
remove
on
their
own
and
and
that's
what
I'm
hearing
so.
Thank
you.
J
I'm
one
of
those
homeowners
who
likes
to
do
it
on
his
own,
all
right,
yeah,
we're
all
on
the
same
page
on
that,
let's
make
sure
we
have
that
language
ready
to
share
with
city
attorney
all
right,
so
encourage
desirable
all
right
so
now
what
about
this
part
encourage
property
owners
to
plant,
maintain
diverse
and
desirable
trees
through
programs,
assistance
in
purchasing
selecting
planting
maintaining
trees
in
order
to
expand
the
tree
canopy.
So
this
is
more
about
kind
of
the
programs.
J
We
were
hoping
that
we
would
find
information
about
and
we
we
did
find
information
about
what
is
out
there.
There's
denver
has
the
most
by
far
and
that's
all
in
that
matrix
of
what
we
found
and
then
we
you
know,
I'm
still
curious
what
was
implied
in
the
last
city
magazine
about
the
programs
in
the
works
to
help
people
with
that,
because
I
don't
think
we've
really
learned
what
exactly
that
is.
Does
anyone
know.
H
G
Because
I
went
to
the
parks
and
rec
meeting
last
week
and
they've
set
aside
funds,
I
think
30
000
or
something
like
that,
and
I
have
to
look
back
and
see
exactly
what
it
is.
But
they've
hired
the
position
of
the
forester
and
that
person
is
going
to
advise
and
help
residents
decide
whether
they
have
a
tree
that
they
that
it's
worth
maintaining
or
a
tree
that
should
be
removed
because
we're
not
in
that
stage
of
the
emerald
ash
borer
epidemic
and
they
I
believe
they
gave
a
ballpark
figure
of
500.
G
per
tree
as
the
cost
that
it
would
as
the
cost
of
mitigating
emerald
ash
borer.
So
they
would
be
offering
that
amount
of
funding
towards
that
I'll.
I'll
have
to
look
back
at
what
parks
and
rec
said
last
week,
but
they
have
some
like
parameters
set
and
they've
got
a
person
in
place
to
assist
residents.
G
So
that
is
happening.
J
So
that's
specifically
money
that
will
be
available
to
help
with
replacing
ash
trees.
Is
that
right?
Okay,
cool
yeah,
yeah.
H
G
Yeah
they're
working
like
they're
they're,
making
taking
steps
and
putting
things
in
place,
and
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
talk
to
vanessa
about
and
why
I
asked
for
that
to
be
mentioned
in
our
next
article,
because
people
need
to
know
about
that.
You
know.
In
addition,
the
city
tree
sale
is
happening
right
now,
so
it
just
started
on
monday
and
it's
going
on
for
a
couple
weeks.
G
They're
already
sold
out
of
a
of
a
few
varieties,
so
that
is
also
part
of
this
process,
and
I
can
see
that
expanding
since
they've
gone
to
the
online
forum
with
a
arbor
sale,
they're
selling
out.
So
I
and
dave
lee
is
aware
of
that
and
hopefully
plans
to
expand
the
number
of
trees
that
they
offer
in
the
future.
A
Yeah,
I
was
referring
to
the
last
bullet
point
there,
so
what
we
were
trying
to
do
was
to
encourage
them
to
add
a
component
in
the
in
our
in
our
purpose
that
applied
to
tree
to
tree
owners.
It
wasn't
just
you
know
we
establishing
the
importance
of
a
tree
canopy,
but
also
encouraging
you
know
putting
a
statement
in
there
for
property
owners.
That
applies
to
them
just
to
catch
their
eye,
and
let
them
know
we
care
that
they
do
these
things.
H
E
H
C
E
E
I
think
we
did,
but
I
a
question
occurred
to
me
this
morning
and
I
should
have
mentioned
it
earlier,
and
one
of
my
neighbors
has
what
I
think
are
two
ash
trees
and
they're
about
five
feet.
Back
of
the
curb.
E
E
No
they're
in
we
don't
have
any
right
of
way
or
very,
very
little
of
it
where
we
have
the
easement,
which
is
12
feet
the
sidewalk
and
then
another
right
of
way
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
yeah
he's
actually
in
the
easement.
F
Okay,
so
the
trees
are
there,
so
the
way
the
ordinance
is
written
is
to
maintain
the
adjacent
right-of-way
is
the
responsibility
of
the
homeowner,
whether
that
is
we.
C
E
Yeah,
but
I
don't
have
an
easement
on
my
property
so
and
there's
quite
a
few
different
properties
that
are
in
my
same
boat,
so
there's
just
very
few
places
where
there's
easements
or
right-of-way
plantings
in
inglewood,
but
that
doesn't
address
and
we
did
discuss
this
and
I
believe
it's
you
know
it's
on
my
list
of
things
to
address
if
a
tree
is
on
fully
on
private
property,
but
could
impact
the
right
of
way
falling
branches
needing
pruning
no
clearance
or
whatever
that's
left
out
of
this
ordinance.
F
Based
on
my
experience,
because
we
deal
with
this
with
branches
of
other
trees
or
trees
that
are
too
close
or
rose
bushes,
that
might
be
too
close
to
the
sidewalk
we
still
have
to
maintain,
and
that
would
be
considered.
We
already
have
an
ordinance
regarding
the
obstruction
of
public
right-of-way,
so
that
would
just
fall
into
that
category,
regardless
of
what
kind
of
tree
or
bush
or
shrub
or
planting
that
would
be.
F
A
normal
sized
vehicle,
not
an
oversized
vehicle,
must
be
able
to
transverse
the
area
without
any
problems,
and
that
includes
the
alleyways
for
regular-sized
vehicles
and
pedestrians.
So
you
know
we
usually
take
the.
F
The
usual
standard
of
I
don't
want
to
say
common
sense,
but
you
know
if
someone
who
is
seven
feet,
seven
foot
can't
go
by
then
that
might
be
a
little
different
than
somebody
who
is
six
foot
and
is
is
hitting
their
heads.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
create
those
dangers
and-
and
we
do
get
those
complaints
for
a
variety
of
reasons
and
we
do
enforce
them.
E
There's
one
other
question:
I've
got
on
the
visibility
triangle
since
that
has
specifically
called
out
in
this
ordinance.
There
is
a
is
there
any
grandfathering
in
that
in
anywhere,
because
there
are
several
places.
I've
noted
where
there
are
mature
plantings
that
are
within
that
visibility
triangle,
and
it's
very,
very
dangerous,
particularly
on
ogden
and
yale,
on
the
west
side
of
the
street.
F
F
For
that
component,
but
as
far
as
the
right-of-way
obstruction
or
the
right-of-way
view,
that
does
not
fall
to
the
purview
of
of
a
tree
expert,
it
actually
falls
to
the
purview
of
a
traffic
engineer
to
evaluate
that
and
that
that
that
would
be
for
any
type
of
obstruction,
whether
it's
a
fence
or
a
sight
line,
and
there
is
no
grandfathering
in
about
it.
It
is
a
traffic
safety
hazard
that
has
been
adopted.
So
I
I
don't
see.
F
We
have
very
few
things
that
spell
out
and
code
where
it's
grandfathered
in
or
when
building
codes
were
certain
ways,
but
with
code
enforcement
I
would
say
no,
this
really
does
still
fall
to
the
traffic
and
that's
that's,
who
we
use.
E
F
I
think
we
address
that
specific,
specifically
in
another
part
of
the
code.
J
Okay,
any
other
thoughts
or
ideas
that
we
should
talk
about
now
on
these
potential
code
changes
anything
that
I've
taken
as
good
a
notes
as
I
can.
Obviously,
this
is
recorded
and
go
back
through
it,
but-
and
I
know,
remember-
dickerson
you're
going
to
have
a
lot
when
you
put
it
all
together,
go
ahead.
Member
strong.
B
The
only
thing
I
was
really
thinking
about
when
we
were
talking
about
having
a
list
of
nuisance
trees.
I
know
that
so
many
people's
trees
in
my
neighborhood
that
are
probably
100
years
old,
are
nuisance,
trees,
and
so
that
would
probably
be
very
hard
on
a
lot
of
people
because
they
like
them.
B
Even
we
should
probably
make
sure
that
we
grandfather
them
in
and
just
say
that
we
don't
allow
for
any
new
box
elder
or
any
new
tree
of
heaven
or
russian
olives
or
siberian
elms
siberian
elms.
B
Exactly
because
I
think
it
would
be
really
hard
on
a
lot
of
people
and
they
would
feel
like
they
were
losing
something
of
their
neighborhood,
because
some
people
do
like
them
even.
J
And
I
think
that's
what's
intended
by
the
old
language
around
definition
of
mature
tree,
but
it
just
wasn't
a
very
good
definition
because
it
said
one
inch
which
is
practically
everything,
but
I
I
I
think,
we're
all
on
the
same
page
that
we're
not
expecting
people
who
have
mature
trees
that
are
on
the
not
recommended
list
to
have
to
pay
potentially
thousands
of
dollars
to
have
them
removed
if
they're
healthy.
B
J
Anybody
else
have
anything
else:
okay,
so
we're
at
7
51
and
we
have
not
addressed
whatever
our
next
consideration
on
the
dangerous
dogs
is
a
chair
buddy.
Can
you
make
sure
I'm
clear
on
where
that
stands
or
I'm
sorry,
former
chair,
but
whatever.
A
Right,
I
think
we
were
going
to
finish
going
through
all
the
materials
that
had
been
prepared
for
eab
and
the
next
one
was
the
matrix.
J
Okay,
so
we
haven't
done
that
yet
either
and
it
is
a
you
know
what
why
don't
I
bring
up.
I've
got
the
actual
excel
file,
which
is
exactly
the
same
content
as
what's
in
the
agenda.
Just
it's
going
to
be
easier
to
look
at.
I
can
bring
that
up.
Real
quick
now,
remember
dickerson
in
I
sometime
at
the
end
of
last
week,
sent
me
an
update
for
this,
and
I
did
not
have
time
to
incorporate
it
in
time
to
get
it
into
the
agenda
so,
but
I
will
for
the
next
one.
J
So
ms
willis
expect
a
new
version
of
that
matrix
with
some
updates
for
some
of
these
cities
that
member
dickerson
added,
but
the
version
that
I'm
going
to
bring
up
right
now
is
the
same
as
what's
in
the
agenda,
it's
just
in
the
excel
format,
because
I
think
it's
a
little
easier
to
look
at.
J
So
I
guess
everyone
should
have
had
access,
at
least
to
the
this
content,
it's
kind
of
weird
looking
at
it
the
way
it's
laid
out
in
the
agenda,
but
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
thoughts
or
questions.
J
There's
a
lot
of
links
in
here
too
that
go
to
like
actual
lists
from
these
cities,
like
their
recommended
tree
lists
their
arborist
lists.
There's
a
lot
of
info
in
here
go
ahead.
Remember
bowdoin,.
A
Wow,
you
guys
did
a
great
job.
I
was
fascinated
by
this
the
I
what
I
did
do,
however,
is
I
added
vertical
lines
in
between
the
cities?
Okay,
because
it
helped
me,
read
it
a
little
bit
better
sure
I
mean
just
to
have
the
lines
visible,
it's
easier
to
read,
because
when
I
printed
it
out,
it
was
kind
of
like
words
floating
on
a
page,
so.
A
A
J
H
H
A
And
then
I
also
printed
it
in
a
landscape
format
like
you
have
here
versus
a
portrait,
so
that
was
helpful
too.
J
Yeah,
I
think
that's
easier
to
look
at
so
I
don't
know
if
anyone's
had
time
to
go
through
this,
but
we
you
know,
we
kind
of
broke
it
into
two
main
sections.
J
The
top
part
here
was
based
on,
what's
actually
in
the
ordinances,
so
the
code
for
purpose
authority,
responsibility
for
right-of-way
responsibility
for
ali,
because
some
had
them
different,
prohibited
trees,
arborist
requirement
and
approved
trees,
and
then
rules
related
to
disease
dying,
trees
on
private
property
and
then
development
requirement
of
diversity,
and
not
all
of
them
had
all
of
these
things.
But
for
the
cities
that
you
know,
we
had
originally
considered
boulder,
arvada,
longmont,
lafayette,
broomfield,
denver
and
westminster
member
dickerson,
and
I
went
through
and
got
the
data
for
all
of
these.
J
So
I
don't
know
if
anyone
wants
to
ask
any
specific
questions,
or
I
mean
I
don't
think
it
makes
sense
for
me
to
like
read
through
it
all
the
and
then
the
second
part
of
what
we
did
was
the
eab
specific
subsidy
support
incentive
programs
and
recommendations.
J
So
we
documented,
where
eav,
when
eib
was
first
found
for
each
of
the
cities
and
some
of
them
it
hasn't.
Yet
like
denver's
still
not
as
of
december
2021
or
denver,
not
yet
confirmed
in
broomfield,
not
as
of
december
2021,
what
eab
education
information
they
had,
they
pretty
much
all
have
you
know
websites
about
it
and
then
what
the
subsidies
grants
they
have
and
most
of
them
it
was
just
arbor
day
sale.
But
then
denver
had
multiple
programs
there.
J
They
do
have
a
free
ash
tree
replacement
program
similar
to
what
member
johnson
was
just
telling
us.
It
sounds
like
we
have
in
the
works,
which
is
pretty
cool
and
then
westminster
has
a
on
top
of
or
it's
kind
of
their
arbor
day
thing.
It's.
They
have
a
discount
tree
program
and
the
other
ones
were
all
just
basically
the
arbor
day
sales
right,
remember,
dickerson,.
H
J
Yeah,
okay
and
then
the
only
subsidy
for
treatment
removal.
I
think
that
we
found
was
the
denver
in
their
free
ash
tree
replacement
program.
That
does
include
removal
and
stump
grinding,
which
is
pretty
interesting
since
that
can
be
very
expensive
and
then
nobody
had
a
coordinated
deal
for
treatment,
but
the
forester
of
westminster,
included
in
our
agenda
is
the
email
that
I
sent
them
and
he
responded,
and
he
was
really
curious
about
that
and
asked
us
to
keep
him
up
to
date.
J
So
then,
you
can
see
like
all
the
different
things
that
we
tried
to
find
info
on
and
then
like
westminster.
They
don't
even
have
their
own
list
of
arborists.
They
just
referred
to
trees
or
good.org,
but
most
of
them
do
have
their
own
licensing
or
list
of
approved
any
thoughts
or
questions
or
anything.
On
this.
J
Yeah
no
problem-
and
that
makes
sense-
remember
putin,
to
make
these
lines
easier
to
see
the
separations
on
and
ms
willis
is
it
possible
to
include
other
documents?
Besides,
just
like
the
the
text
dumped
into
the
file
for
the
agenda,
is
there
a
way
to
include
other
types
of
documents
in
the
records?
So
if
someone
wanted
to
access
like
this
excel
file,
they
could.
J
J
Okay
yeah
just
so,
we
can
have
like
some
formatting
to
it,
and
then
I
don't
know
we
just
went
through
what's
in
here.
This
is
kind
of
what
we
boiled
down
the
the
questions
from
city
council.
Did
anyone
have
any
other
thoughts
or
anything
to
include
or
questions
about,
including
this
to
city
council
in
our
response
to
their
questions.
J
Remember
boden:
what
do
you
suggest?
How
do
you
suggest
we
do
this
to
to
actually
forward
it
to
them.
A
Well,
I
would,
I
would
recommend
that
you
package
everything
together,
because
you
know
we
have
how's
my
agenda
go
so
we
have
this
matrix.
We
also
have
examples,
yeah
the
purpose,
and
then
we
also
have
proposals
for
programs
or
resolutions
that
we
still
need
to
refine.
H
J
That's
a
good
point.
Okay,
so
so
we
still
need
to
refine,
which
part
did
you
just
say.
A
The
the
proposals
for
eab
programs
or
subsidies
or
resolutions
we
put
that
together
and
finalized
it
in
november
of
21.
But
since
then
a
couple
of
things
have
come
up,
such
for
example
the
program
with
parks
and
rec
for
removing
or
treating
trees
that
wasn't
in
place
when
we
wrote
that.
So
we
just
need
to
go
back
through
our
proposal
and
see.
If
there's
anything,
we
want
to
change
or
kick
out.
A
J
I'm
getting
a
lot
of
echo.
Would
you
think
that
the
way
we
would
do
this,
then,
would
be
just
someone
update
that
and
then
include
it
in
our
agenda
next
time,
and
then
we
just
look
at
it
all
and
agree
that
we
package
it
and
send
it
to
through
city
council
member
russell.
A
I'm
happy
to
go
through
that
because
I
included
a
section
of
things
that
have
already
been
have
been
enacted.
So
I
can
just
move
those
things
that
have
been
done
since
then
into
that
area
and
I'll
be
happy
to
forward
that
to
you
and
maureen
to
include
for
next
month.
J
Okay,
then
we
are
past
eight
o'clock.
We
have
not
touched
on
dangerous
dogs,
so
we'll
move
that
forward
for
next
time.
J
Yeah,
so
we've
been
adjusting
them
because
of
that
elevate,
inglewood
program
so
that
I've
been
able
to
attend
that,
and
I
appreciate
everyone
being
flexible
on
that.
I
believe
my
last
scheduled
elevate
inglewood
meeting
is
on
the
13th,
so
the
20th
should
be
fine.
So
is
anyone
opposed
to
going
back
to
our
regular
schedule
and
having
our
meeting
on
the
20th
okay
then.
E
Can
we
just
assume
that
where
are
we
all
in
agreement
that
the
20th
is
a
good
time
so
we'll
just
assume
that
and
do
we
have,
we
don't
have
to
vote
on
it
he's
made
the
decision,
so
no
objections.
So
since
we
don't
have
a
vice
chair,
can
maureen
adjourn
the
meeting.
D
C
My
computer,
I
apologize
everybody,
I'm
not
sure
what
happened
if
there
was
a
power
issue
or
what
it
looks
like
power,
he.
C
So
I
I
think
we're
did
remember
russell.
Did
you
have
anything
to
bring
up.