►
From YouTube: CEAC 11162022 video
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
So
Mike
Chisholm
is
calling
in.
D
C
C
D
A
B
E
Okay,
we
have
a
quorum
call,
this
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
advisory,
a
committee
to
order
as
well
as
will
you
please
take
roll.
A
E
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
from
our
last
meeting.
E
E
Was
there
any
discussion?
Did
anyone
have
any
edits
or
anything?
E
E
A
C
E
Thank
you
and
just
confirming
remember:
Emma
Hines
you're,
the
phone
number
1763.
E
You
that
are
this
would
be
when
we
normally
do
the
public
forum.
No
member
of
the
public
is
present
so
we'll
skip
over
this
and
move
into
code
enforcement.
Significant
events,
code
manager,
Lewis,
hello
good
evening.
F
I'm
just
finishing
up
my
dinner:
it's
been
kind
of
a
long
day,
so,
thanks
for
your
patience,
first
off
I
don't
have
anything
any
new
major
information
to
bring
forward
other
than
the
title.
Seven
information
will
be
heard
that
you
all
voted
on
on
Monday
at
Council
for
the
first
I
believe
the
first
reading,
whether
if
there
is
any
other
concerns
or
questions
you
all
had
on
that.
F
If
you
wanted
to
to
bring
those
forward
right
now,
if
that's
possible,
to
see
if
there's
anything
else,
I
needed
to
discuss
with
you
all.
C
B
Thank
you,
so
code
manager,
Lewis
I,
actually
was
gonna
talk
to
the
committee
about
perhaps
adding
something
I
don't
know
that
it
will
get
added
on
first
reading
to
address
the
Good
Samaritan
issue.
E
Yeah,
please
please
let
us
know
what
you're
thinking
city,
council,
member
Russell.
B
What
what
I
asked
the
council
to
reconsider
and
I
just
did
this
in
Council
Members
Choice
I
will
bring
it
up
when
we
are
discussing,
because
it
was
very
clear
in
your
discussions
that
whether
and
a
dog
is
taken
in
by
police
or
code
enforcement
Personnel
or
whether
it's
taken
in
by
a
Good
Samaritan.
It
is
still
an
impounded
dog
and
I.
Have
concerns
about
that.
B
I
understand
that
if
it
is
a
habitual
problem,
but
I
would
just
like
this
committee
to
perhaps
discuss
that
Good
Samaritan
issue
and
see
if
there
is
something
and
it
doesn't,
this
ordinance
is
probably
going
to
pass
because
you
recommended
it,
but
I
just
was
going
to
ask
you
all
to
take
a
look
at
the
Good
Samaritan
piece
and
see
if
there
was
some
way
we
could
address
that
in
Title,
VII.
E
Did
you
have
a
suggestion
to
language
or
where
that
what
potentially
because
I
mean
when
we
talked
through
this
I
thought
we
were
all
on
the
same
page
at
the
point
we
made
a
recommendation,
but
if
there's
like
specific
language
that
you're
suggesting
or
change
in
a
particular
place,
I'm
very
interested
because
I
I
am
personally
not
a
fan
of
you
know
if
somebody's
dog
gets
out
and
it's
not
a
regular
thing
and
someone
helps
them
out
by
getting
it
that
and
it's
a
dog-
that's
been
lice,
you
know
not
licensed,
because
thankfully
we
don't
have
that,
but
if
it
is
up
to
date
on
shots,
Etc
and
there's,
you
know
it's
just
a
dog
got
out
because
of
something
that
they
take
care
of
responsibly.
E
B
I,
don't
necessarily
but
I
mean
I
I,
like
the
suggestion
you
just
made,
and
if
the.
If
the
committee
brought
forth
some
something
along
those
lines,
I
I
would
be
okay
with
that
I
do
have
one
question
for
you:
code
manager,
Lewis
council
did
raise
the
impound
fee.
It's
do
you
remember
what
it
was.
I
mean
it's
fairly
substantial
yeah.
F
So
it
went
from
250
to
300,
but
that
fee
was
not
does
not
apply
to
Good
Samaritans,
so
I
wanted
to.
Let
all
of
you
know
that
that
is
not.
That
is
when
code
enforcement
has
to
go
and
take
an
action
to
impound
that
animal.
It
is
not
a
fee
that
a
person
would
have
to
incur
if
an
animal
is
impounded,
that's
a
cost,
recovery
fee
and
I
wouldn't
add
any
changes
to
the
ordinance.
That
would
be
my
professional
recommendation.
It's
more
of
a
process
concern,
but
I
would
also
ask.
F
Then
you
would
be
asking
us
to
alter
processes
related
to
Good
Samaritans,
who
call
and
say:
oh
I
found
this
dog.
It's
not
in
my
backyard
or
I
found
this
dog
I
dropped
it
off
at
the
vet
and
the
vet
calls
us
it's
a
whole
process
change
the
which
is
probably
a
bigger
discussion
than
this
particular
ordinance,
because
this
is
not
the
Good
Samaritan
portion
is
not
part
of
the
ordinance.
F
It
just
allows
for
the
process
of
empowerment,
changes,
the
dangerous
dog,
everything
that
we
discussed
and-
and
that
is
something
that
you
all
can
we
can
discuss
and
you
can
make
a
recommendation
to
counsel
and
Council
can
give
direction
related
to
those
types
of
inbounds
in
the
future.
But
we
still
have
health
and
safety
concerns
that
we
have
related
to
any
animal.
That's
impounded.
B
Right
and
and
I
agree
with
that
and
I
do
believe.
The
ordinance
addresses
those
things
and
I
greatly
appreciate
the
committee
talking
about
that.
So
just
one
more
question
code
manager,
Lewis
on
the
on
the
impound
fee
that
doesn't
necessarily
apply
immediately,
though
does
it
I
mean?
Is
it
more
long-term?
So.
F
If,
if
a
Good
Samaritan
drops
it
off
and
they
happen
to
get
an
at-large
ticket,
it's
a
violation
bureau.
If
they
don't
have
to
go
to
court,
they
go
down
and
pay
a
nominal
fee,
which
is
not
the
impound
fee
and
in
most
cases
the
Violation
Bureau
says.
Okay.
B
F
They
would
be
given
a
thumb
in
for
that
process.
However,
when
they
go
to
the
Violations
Bureau
and
again,
the
violation
bureau
is
like
a
parking
ticket,
so
look
at
it
from
that
standpoint
they
go
and
they
express
their
concern.
The
violation
bureau,
typically
for
a
first-time
violation,
would
waive
that
and
give
them
a
letter
that
says
if
you
have
no
similar
violations
in
the
future.
So
if
it
happens
in
the
future
that
could
be
retroactively
added
on
top
of
any
new
fees
that
would
be
incurred
as
as
a
new
penalty.
B
So
the
the
violations-
that's
not
a
municipal
court,
correct,
that's
it's.
F
A
part
of
it,
it's
the!
So
if
you
go
to
the
desk
okay,
where
you
would
pay
all
your
parking
tickets,
your
violation
bureau
tickets,
which
could
be
a
variety
of
things,
someone
could
get
an
open
container
and
get
a
Violations
Bureau
and
not
have
to
pay
go
to
court.
They
just
pay
a
fine
for
the
violation
that
would
have
occurred.
E
F
F
F
Was
a
lot
of
confusion
about
this
due
to
a
a
few
activities
and
I
apologize
for
the
confusion,
I
hope
that
makes
it
a
little
bit
easier
and
more
approachable
and
understanding
how
how
impounded
and
look
at
it.
From
this
standpoint,
a
Violations
Bureau
is
really
a
cost
recovery
for
the
paperwork
and
fees
that
would
be
incurred
as
part
of
the
contract
for
the
city
of
Inglewood.
It
it.
C
F
Covers
10
percent
of
our
annual
contract
with
the
with
the
shelter,
so
it's
more
of
an
administrative
so
that
it
covers
some
of
the
cost
recovery
that
we
have
associated
with
the
shelter.
Maybe
the
animals
cared
for
for
two
hours,
but
it
allows
them
to
scan
for
microchip.
The
background
allows
for
us
to
investigate
for
any
kind
of
Cruelty
and
to
make
sure
it
has
its
vaccinations.
So
that's
really
the
purpose
of
that
process.
D
Yeah
I
just
have
a
question
for
a
code
manager
Lewis
in
terms
of
this
process,
of
going
from
the
first
slap
on
the
hand,
shall
we
call
it
where
you
know
you,
let
your
dog
out,
somebody
found
it,
took
it
to
the
pound,
where
you're
not
charged
to
the
second
one,
which
could
potentially
be
three
hundred
dollars.
D
F
No,
so
at
this
sliding
scale,
with
the
violation,
bureau
and
and
I'd
like
to
again
just
reference
this
more
as
a
parking
ticket,
it's
not
a
criminal
violation.
It's
a
it's
a
fine
and
it's
a
sliding
scale.
So
your
first
violation
you
may
have
to
pay
up
to
fifty
dollars
or
it
may
be
waived.
But
if
you
have
a
second
violation,
the
penalty
increases,
and
you
may
also
be
asked
to
pay
the
original
warning.
If
it
happens
within
like
a
year
period,.
D
F
E
F
So
it's
a
basically
you
have
to
look
at
it
as
a
deferred
judgment
if
they
say
Okay,
I
I
won't
do
this
again.
The
the
Violations
Bureau
has
the
authority
to
say.
Okay
great.
This
is
your
warning.
It's
an
official
written
warning,
but
if
it
happens
again
in
the
future,
you
may
be
asked
to
pay
this
50
fine,
plus
the
additional
fine
which
goes
up
so
each
violation
that
goes
up
on
the
third
offense.
It's
a
mandatory
court
appearance.
F
E
Okay,
thank
you.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
questions
on
the
Title,
VII
or
city
council
member
Russell's
thoughts
on
wondering?
If
there's
anything
we
could
do
to
make
the
Good
Samaritan
recommendation
more
clear
or
anyone
and
code
manager
Lewis?
How
would
you
like.
E
Should
we
want
to
encourage
that
perspective
from
city
council
I
mean
to
me
like
I,
get
what
you're
saying
about
it
being
processed,
but
whenever
something's
not
codified,
it
makes
me
concerned
because,
as
people
change,
you
know,
time
goes
by
intent
of
process
can
change.
The
effects
could
change
when
it's
not.
You
know
written
in
as
a
specific
thing,
and
is
there
like
a
way
to
address
that
in
a
long-term?
E
F
It
is
the
Violations
Bureau.
Information
is
set
up
within
code
that
that
process
is
already
established
and
it
is
the
judge
who
sets
most
of
the
the
finds
and
fees
associated
with
the
different
aspects.
They
are
updated
every
year
with
with
that
office
and
that's
just
the
separation
of
powers
under
our
constitution,
I'm
the
executive
branch
and
so
I
I'm
only
able
to
follow
what
the
judge
the
judicial
requires,
as
well
as
the
legislative
branch.
So
that's
why
we
have
checks
and
balances
on
that
on
that.
E
Part,
but
the
process
for
when
a
dog
is
like
if
my
dog
got
out
the
first
time
broke
through
a
weak
part
of
my
fence,
the
neighbor
took
it
to
the
pound.
You
you
I
I,
find
out
quickly
I
go
down
there,
I
contact,
you
you
come.
E
You
know
someone
from
code
enforcement
comes
and
gives
me
the
the
the
the
ticket,
essentially
like
the
fact
that
that
is
going
to
be
a
ticket.
I
thought
was
based
on
an
agreement
between
the
city
and
the
pound,
and
not
actually
it's
I
didn't
see
it
written
in
the
Title
VII
that
someone
has
to
get
a
ticket.
In
that
scenario,
it.
F
Says
it's
May,
we
use
discretion
in
those
and
that's
how
all
of
our
ordinances,
criminal,
non-criminal
and
penalties
are
written.
Just
like
a
parking
ticket.
You
have
to
look
at
it
kind
of
like
the
aspect
of
a
police
officer
out
doing
speeding
tickets.
He
has
the
that
officer,
has
the
discretion
based
on
the
circumstances,
whether
or
not
to
issue
a
ticket
and
and
that
just
that's
the
way
ordinance
is
written.
F
If
you
put
specific
required
like
shall
or
will
in
there,
then
that
takes
all
discretion
and
and
circumstances
and
we
don't
give
tickets
to
every
single
person
a
Good
Samaritan
situation.
Sometimes
things
happen
that
are
outside
the
control
and
we
do
take
those
into
consideration.
This
isn't
again.
This
is
a
process.
F
There's
no
agreement
between
the
the
shelter
and
us
their
responsibility
is
to
care
and
house
for
the
animal,
but
they
also
have
requirements
to
make
sure
that
that
animal
is
healthy
and
safe
to
be
back
out
in
the
community,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
if
there's
an
animal
running
at
large,
that
we
do
take
that
report
and
we
capture
that
information.
We
don't
know
how
long
that
dog's
been
out
running.
C
E
E
C
E
I
had
a
weird
switch
on
my
audio
for
some
reason.
Thank
you
code
manager
list
I
one
question:
I
thought
you
did
say
that
there
was
an
agreement
between
the
shelter
and
the
city
that
anytime
a
dog
is
brought
in
that
was
captured
within
City
Limits
that
they
have
to
contact
code
enforcement.
F
It
is
best
practice
for
any
shelter,
not
just
ours.
It's
just
Sheltering
communities
throughout
the
country
in
the
state
that
they
work
collaboratively
with
their
local
Animal
Welfare
law
enforcement
agency
to
make
sure
that
information
is
captured,
and
so
this
is
something
that
the
shelter
does
not
just
with
the
city
of
Inglewood,
but
they
also
serve
a
multitude
of
of
City
entities
in
the
adjoining
areas
from
Greenwood
Village
to
Cherry
Hills
to
Littleton.
They
provide
those
services
for
those
communities
as
well.
E
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
code
manager
Lewis
on
this.
Okay,
do
you
want
to
go
ahead
into
the
reports
code
manager
list
so.
F
First
off
ioul
an
apology
for
some
reason:
I
thought
second
quarter
had
been
delivered
to
you
all
and
there
was
a
process
error
and
that
was
not
transmitted
as
I
had
previously
thought.
It
was
done
in
part
of
this
committee,
so
that
is
my
responsibility
and
I
take
ownership
of
that
of
that
not
being
transmitted.
The
report
was
done.
It
just
was
not
transmitted
or
conveyed
to
this
body.
F
It's
usually
done
within
30
to
45
days
after
the
close
of
the
quarter
and
I
know,
I
think
Carson
and
councilmember
Russell
are
the
only
two
original
members
on
this
panel.
That
would
remember
the
fancy,
graphs
and
charts
that
you
would
receive
on
a
monthly
basis.
F
That
was
our
old
system
called
track
it,
and
that
system,
as
you
know,
did
not
conform
to
Criminal
Justice
Records
reporting.
It
did
not
capture
information,
it
was
not
being
updated.
The
system
actually
was
is
no
longer
operating
Nationwide,
and
so
we
had
to
move
to
a
different
type
of
reporting
system.
The
the
upside
with
our
current
RMS
system
is,
we
have
a
separate
module,
that's
built
onto
the
police
department.
It
was
a
custom
module
within
that
system.
F
That
does
capture
reporting
and
information
far
more
accurately,
but
it
does
not
self-generate
or
print
out.
Those
fancy
color-coded
reports
that
two
of
you
have
seen
before,
and
so
it
is
very
burdensome
on
on
Code
Enforcement.
We
can
print
all
of
the
statistics
and
raw
data,
but
in
order
to
utilize
that
material
we
have
to
analyze
it
and
hand,
put
it
into
documents
so
that
it's
more
meaningful
and
readable
for
the
community
and
yourselves
and
counsel
to
understand
Trends
and
what's
happening
with
our
statistics.
And
so
that's
why
I
know.
F
F
But
I
wanted
you
all
to
know,
because
it's
been
a
conversation
of
this
committee
as
to
why
we're
not
getting
the
similar
types
of
reports
and
that
that's
just
why
even
the
police
department,
it
doesn't
print
out
it
prints
out
data,
but
it
doesn't
provide
or
self-generate
those
types
of
pretty
reports
which
was
a
great
feature
of
the
old
system,
but
the
old
system
also
did
it
capture
information,
subjects,
owners,
dogs,
Property,
Owners.
It
didn't
capture
all
of
that
information
correctly,
and
so
our
system
was
very
outdated.
F
So,
with
that
being
said,
you
all
should
have
Quarter
Two
to
go
over
and
I
didn't
know.
If
you
had
any
questions
about
quarter
two
or
quarter
three,
the
only
two
things
that
I
would
say
is
you'll
notice,
different
changes
in
the
amount
of
weed
enforcement
versus
Snow
enforcement,
that's
seasonal.
It
goes
with
the
amount
of
snow
we
have
and
how
warm
we
get
quickly
and
how
many
weeds
are
generated
sooner
rather
than
later,
some
Seasons.
We
have
snow
that
goes
very
late.
F
E
F
Was
a
weird:
it
was
a
weird
number:
it's
just
the
way
that
the
numbers
transferred
and
again
it's
from
the
the
way
the
system
reports
itself.
F
F
Questions
the
other
Trend
that
you
would
see
is
you'll
see
a
huge
increase
in
park
rules,
violations
that
would
correlate
with
the
hiring
of
park
ranger
year
after
year
and
that
park
ranger
we're
just
now
going
into
this,
we'll
be
starting
the
second
season
in
January.
So
that's
why
you
would
see
a
large
increase
in
park
rules,
violations
and
those
could
be
anything
from
dogs
and
shelters
to
smoking
cigarettes
in
parks
to
not
having
proper
permits.
F
It
could
be
a
variety
we
have
several
park
rules
flying
a
drone
in
the
park
camping
in
a
park
overnight
parking
in
one
of
the
parks,
and
so
that
information
would
be
captured
there.
E
C
F
I
apologize
for
that
I'll
have
to
double
check
to
see
if,
for
some
reason,
the
date
was
off
when
we
ran
the
report.
Let
me
double
check
that
again.
If
that
is
it's
again,
it's
a
human
error
and
I
apologize
for
that.
E
D
I
I
understand
the
park
rules
being
higher,
and
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
is.
Do
you
have
any
other
breakdowns
Dave
about
what
you
know?
Are
there
other
categories
under
park
rules,
I,
guess
again
coming
from
where
I
am
with
Bellevue
Park
I
kind
of
be
curious
to
know
what
that
means
more
than
just
park
rules.
F
There
is
not,
we
can
only
capture
it
because
again
we
we
have
a
built
out
separate
section,
and
so
it
cappers
captures
a
variety
of
different
categories.
F
We
can't
break
those
down
any
further
within
our
system,
so
it
would
have
like
a
variety
of
things
that
are
listed
under
animal
control
and
have
a
variety
of
different
things
that
would
be
under
code
enforcement,
such
as
lead
enforcement.
That's
where
you
get
some
of
those
breakdowns,
but
we're
not
able
to
specifically
break
out
the
50
some
different
park
rules
that
would
apply.
F
It
would
have
in
the
narrative
portion,
but
that's
something
that
we
would
not
be
able
to
extrapolate.
D
What
would
would
park
rule
if
you
found
an
animal
running
in
the
park?
Would
that
fall
under
park
rules.
F
So
we
always
take
the
high
we
because
we
would
be
duplicating
a
report,
and
so
we
can't
select
more
than
one
option
for
that
report.
We
can
only
select
the
highest
of
the
value.
So
if
we
had
park
rules
in
Animal
Control,
we
can
only
select
one
of
the
highest
and
now
running
at
large
would
be
a
higher
category
than
a
park
rules,
violation.
E
Thank
you,
member
Emma,
Hines,
that's
something
that
we've
asked
about
before
as
well
like,
because
there's
certainly
lots
of
examples
where
one
incident
could
tick
multiple
boxes
and
that's
been
the
consistent
way
that
code
manager
Lewis
has
explained
it
is
whichever
one
is
the
they
have
to
pick
one
price.
What
do
you
call
it
like
primary
violation.
E
Yeah
member.
G
F
It's
a
right-of-way
obstruction,
so
we
found
this
summer
when
we
are
doing
a
lot
more
of
our
alley.
Inspections
that
a
lot
of
Residential
Properties
were
storing
trash
or
outdoor
storage
or
an
accumulation
of
junk
or
discarded
tree
branches
in
their
alley
behind
our
fences.
And
so
that
would
be
what
that
that
would
correlate
with
okay.
G
And
when
it
says,
citizen
concerns
are
most
of
those
done
online
or
are
they
called
in
or
what
we.
F
Can't
break
down
the
two,
but
it
is
either
an
online
report.
Through
the
Q
alert
system,
an
email
or
a
phone
call.
E
Any
other
just
high
level
or
specific
sense
of
things
that
has
stood
out
to
you,
code
manager,
Lewis
and
in
going
through
this.
F
No
I,
it
makes
sense
where
things
would
would
change
or
we'd
have
enforcement
activities
increase,
especially
related
to
The
Parks
versus
animal
control.
Because,
prior
to
that,
we
were
capturing
all
of
our
Park
enforcement
animal
control,
stuff
under
animal
control.
And
so
you
would
see
a
decrease
in
the
animal
control
because
we're
we're
now
doing
more
Park
enforcement.
F
So
and
if
it's
on
an
off-leash
Park
during
off
leash,
non-off
leash
hours,
that
would
be
park,
rules
violation
not
at
large,
because
we
moved
that
section
to
be
under
the
parks
section,
and
so
that's
kind
of
where
we're
the
trend
that
we're
seeing
I'm
not
seeing
any
unusual
trends
like
we
had
after
Kobe,
we
had
talked
about
an
increase
in
in
outdoor
storage
and
trash
issues.
B
Thank
you
so
code
manager,
Lewis.
Is
it
illegal
to
smoke
in
the
Parks?
I
mean
I
know
that
a
couple
years
ago
we
had
some
students
come,
but
I
thought
Council
made
it
voluntary.
F
B
Because
when
Council
talked
about
it,
we
all
agreed
on
Council
that
it
would
be
voluntary.
It
would
be
a
suggestion.
F
Yes,
that
they
not
do
that,
there
are
no
smoking
signs
that
are
part
posted
in
the
Parks.
Okay.
E
F
F
E
E
City
council,
member
Russell,
it's
your
official
time,
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
anything
else
for
us.
Thank.
B
You
the
the
one
thing
that
we
already
talked
about.
That
was
one
of
the
things
that
I
just
have
a
couple
of
other
things.
Council
right
now
is
working
on
title
16,
code
updates
and
for
about
the
last
three
weeks,
and
probably
through
the
end
of
the
year,
we're
going
to
be
going
through
all
the
suggested
title.
B
16
changes,
I
know
that
doesn't
impact
you,
but
I
I
think
this
is
a
a
pretty
big
undertaking
for
the
City
Council
planning
and
zoning,
and
the
steering
committee
have
been
hearing
all
of
it
and
now
council
is
reviewing
it
reviewing
the
draft,
but
anyway,
there's
that
and
just
I
know
that
code
manager
Lewis
brought
this
up
last
time.
Council
did
talk
about
the
waste
management,
postcard,
I,
don't
know
how
many
of
you
got
that
postcard
and
they're
not
doing
alley
pickup
starting
December
5th.
B
At
this
point,
Council
has
decided
to
allow
the
market
forces
to
address
this
situation.
I
did
ask
that
during
in
the
waste
Hunters
trash
license,
it
does
say
that
the
trash
companies
will
pick
up
on
Monday
or
Wednesday
and
that
there
shouldn't
be
trash
companies
in
Inglewood.
All
the
time
well,
I
think
we
got
kind
of
lacks
when
covet
hit,
so
I
asked
that
we
would
start
enforcing
some
of
the
rules
that
we
have
regarding
trash
companies.
B
So
that's
what's
going
on
right
now,
I
have
heard
from
several
individuals
a
lot
of
people
have
called
Republic
Republicans
picking
up
in
the
alley
in
certain
parts
of
the
city,
so
I
think
some
people
are
changing.
Trash
companies
and
council
did
ask
staff
to
look
into
perhaps
recruiting
some
other
trash
companies,
maybe
smaller
ones.
That
would
do
alley
pickup,
because
I
know
there
are
a
lot
of
sections
in
Inglewood.
That
would
be
almost
impossible
to
put
your
trash
out
front.
So
so
that's
really
all
I
have
for
now.
G
Yes,
I
think
that
the
increase
at
least
what
I
see
it
when
we
go
walking,
is
we
see
a
lot
of
trash
around
and
it's
coming
from
trash
bins
being
set
out
there
and
trash
blowing
off
it?
Sometimes
the
the
lids
are
not
put
on
because
they're
stuffed
to
the
hilt
and
things
blow
off
and
it
really
trashes
up.
G
All
around
the
streets
you'll
see
it,
it's
not
people
throwing
things.
It's
it's
coming
from
the
regular
trash
or
not
being
picked
up.
I,
don't
know!
If
there's
any
enforcement
that
you
would
have
to
seal
the
lid
or
put
the
lid
down
in
our
condo
I
mean
I.
Can't
tell
you
how
many
times
we
have
told
the
the
trash
people
that
they
have
to
put
the
lids
down
and
they
don't.
B
I
I
appreciate
that
and,
and
I
have
heard
her
similar
things,
some
of
it.
They.
It
really
is
the
trash
company's
fault
because
when
they
dump
it,
if
it
misses
the
truck,
they
don't
necessarily
pick
it
up.
No,
they
don't
and
in
our
neighborhood
we
try
to
pick
up
after
each
other
when
I
put
trash,
99
of
the
trash
in
my
trash
can
is
bagged
and
in
a
big
bag
or
a
kitchen
bag.
So
there's
really
no
loose
trash.
B
There
occasionally
are
some
things,
but
I
I
get
that
and
I
think
that
that
is
one
thing
we
need
to
work
on,
and
some
of
it
is
just
citizens
are
going
to
have
to
take
some
responsibility
to
clean
up.
You
know
when
that
happens,
but
we
do
have
trash
blowing
around
in
our
neighborhood
too.
That
came.
You
know
from
trash
day,
so
I
appreciate
that
okay.
E
You
know
bundled
branches
and
bags
of
leaves
outside
the
bin,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
bins
that
are
open,
not
fitting
everything
in
there
anytime
people
are
trimming,
trees
and
have
branches,
and
you
know
small
cars
or
no
cars
in
the
direction
I
mean
the
city
is
basically
pushing
for
increased
density,
less
cars
and
now
making
it
more
difficult
to
have
what
you
do
need
picked
up
picked
up
by
not
you
know,
I'm,
not
a
fan
of
the
way
things
are
going.
E
You
know
I'm
on
one
of
these
blocks,
where
it
would
be
a
nightmare
to
try
to
have
bins
in
front
of
the
house
and
for
the
people
in
the
middle
of
the
Block,
it's
even
worse,
not
to
mention
moving
them.
For
you
know
that
was
one
of
the
biggest
concerns
I
heard
when
I
was
knocking
on
doors.
A
few
years
ago,
when
I
was
running
for
city
council
was
concerned
about
not
being
able
to
move
the
things,
and
it's
been
traditional.
E
If
you
have
an
alley
in
Inglewood
that
you
don't
even
have
to
move
them,
you
leave
your
bins
on
the
Alley
and
you
take
your
trash
and
recycling
out
to
them
and
you
don't
have
to
touch
them
and
that's
reasonable
for
most
people
and
it's
unfortunate
that
city
council,
isn't
you
know,
holding
the
company's
feet
to
the
fire
and
I'm
sick
of
hearing
about
it
being
about
safety?
It's
not
about
safety.
It's
about
maximizing
profits,
that's
what
it's
about!
E
B
E
B
I
agree
with
you
100
and
the
truth
is
I
thought
it
did
say
in
the
code
that
there
would
be
alley
pickup
where
there
were
alleys
available
I,
don't
believe
it
says
that
it
says
it's
somewhere
in
something
I
believe
the
alleys
were
designed
for
utilities,
I
mean
originally.
When
Inglewood
was
formed,
there
was
not
trash
pickup.
There
were
incinerators
in
the
back
of
everybody's
yard,
but
generally
they
were
back
by
the
alley,
so
I
think
it
just
transitioned
there
anyway.
B
So
I
I
hear
you
all
and
I
appreciate
hearing
from
you
all
when
you
have
suggestions
or
whatever,
because
I
can
bring
it
back
at
some
point.
I
do
this
whole
thing
about
enforcing
them
to
pick
up
in
the
alley,
I
think
if
there's
enough
citizens
that
want
us
to
do
that,
I
think
that
we
can
make
an
ordinance
and
we
can
force.
But
then
that
may
mean
some
people
leave.
Some
trash
companies
leave
the
city,
but
that
is
then
that
is
their
choice.
B
If
we
have
rules,
they'll
follow
them
or
they
won't
pick
up
trash
here
and
I
absolutely
agree
with
you
Carson.
It
is
all
about
the
money
they
only
have
to
have
one
driver
in
one
of
those
big
trucks,
but
Logan
Logan
is
an
awful
Street
to
have
to
put
your
trash
out,
especially
down
in
the
Swedish
Hospital
area
because
and
their
work.
The
workers
fill
up
Logan.
B
E
An
email
today
from
the
city
about
this
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
got
that
I'm
signed
up
on
you
know
basically
getting
all
emails
from
the
city
and
I
got
an
email
from
the
city
today,
which
I
was
pretty
disappointed
in
because
it
basically
to
me
repeats
this
propaganda
line
from
Waste
Management.
Instead
of
you
know,
just
stating
it
as
facts,
they're
saying
it's,
the
city,
City's
email
says
it's
about
safety,
it's
not
about
safety.
E
It's
about
profit
and
it'd,
be
nice
to
have
the
city,
not
you
know,
Bandstand
for
the
you
know
the
line
that
waste
management
is
pushing.
We
know
that
it's
not
necessary
to
do
this.
It's
we.
We
know
that
in
the
the
RFP
that
we
just
processed
we
just
went
through
Republic
was
willing
to
pick
up
trash
and
recycling
on
alleys
without
issue,
so
code
manager
Lewis,
you
had
your
hand,
raise
no.
F
I
put
my
hand
up
by
accident,
but
I
will
share
this
with
you
and
I
I
hear
your
frustrations.
I've
spoken
to
a
number
of
citizens
on
this
topic.
F
Unfortunately,
there's
nothing
that
that
my
department
can
do
other
than
direct
them
to
a
list
of
service
providers
that
are
licensed.
I
did
have
a
talk
recently
with
one
of
the
routing
managers,
and
he
did
Express
and
I
know
you're
frustrated
about
safety.
F
He
did
say
that
they
were
having
a
difficult
time
recruiting
for
specifically
Inglewood
or
other
areas
that
have
alley
side,
because
they
were
having
a
number
of
injuries,
because
those
people
had
to
lift
cans
and
move
large
trash
cans
into
into
the
trucks,
and
they
were
having
more
lifting
and
pulling
related
injuries
and
worker
comp
claims
as
a
result
of
that,
and
that
was
shared.
That
was
shared
with
me
as
part
of
that,
because
I
did
Express
the
frustrations
the
citizens
are
coming
to
us
and
so
I
wanted
to
just
share
with
them.
F
F
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
that
information
just
so
that
you
you
had
it
I
I,
don't
agree
one
way
or
the
other.
My
role
is
not
not
in
that
aspect
and
I.
Think
I've
made
my
my
professional
views
known
on
on
this
during
the
single
hauler
chat
service
conversation
so
I'll
leave
that
there
city.
B
Thank
you,
I
just
would
encourage
you
actually.
I
would
encourage
all
of
you
to
email
all
of
City
Council
and
tell
them
your
frustration
Carson.
Would
you
share
that
email
with
me
I
mean?
B
Would
you
send
it
to
me
because
I
yeah
I
didn't
get
that
email,
but
if
enough
people
start
reaching
out
to
city
council-
and
you
all
have
suggestions
of
what
we
need
to
do,
you
all
can
put
heat
on
City,
Council
and
I
I
can
carry
back
what
I've
heard
here,
but
you
all
could
email
all
of
city
council
too.
I
will
bring
this
up,
but
the
next
at
my
next
liaison
report,
so.
E
You,
member
Hughes,.
G
I've
lived
in
Denver
and
I've
lived
in
Littleton
now
here
in
Englewood,
and
then
I
don't
understand,
even
even
in
Littleton,
where
you
had
to
put
your
trash
out
in
front.
There
was
a
certain
amount
of
time.
You
could
keep
the
trash
in
there.
It
couldn't
stay
there.
You
had
to
take
it
back
in
if
it
and
they
didn't
have
alleys,
but
there
was
no.
There
was
enforcement
that
you
couldn't
leave
your
trash
bin
out
in
front
of
your
house.
That's
happening
all
over
the
place
here.
B
B
G
You
so
you're
suggesting
Rita
that
we
right
to
city
council
and
put
our
our
opinions
forth
on
that.
Yes,.
D
G
Yeah
and
I'm
just
curious.
You
know,
I
know
that
I'd
heard
that
there
had
been
discussion
about
Englewood
Contracting,
either
Contracting
with
one
company
or
developing
their
own
was
in
the
both
of
those
were
mixed.
Well,.
B
B
Now
I
think
they
are
Contracting
out
some
because
it
is
becoming
so
that
was
never
the
option
and
I
think
that
chair
green,
since
he
was
the
chairman
of
that
committee,
had
they,
the
the
committee
did
come
back
and
once
wanted
the
city
to
renegotiate,
and
that
is
not
what
council
opted
for,
I'm
and
and
so
I
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
really
what
happened
there,
because
Council
and
I
felt
like
they
didn't
negotiate
enough,
and
the
former
chair
before
chair
green
told
me
that
staff
just
didn't
want
to
negotiate
anymore
because
they
didn't
have
a
full
consensus.
B
I
mean
if
there
aren't
four
four
board
members
or
four
council
members,
then
staff
doesn't
really
have
consensus
to
move
forward.
So
I
don't
know
really
what
happened
but
really.
In
my
own
opinion,
free
market
is
the
best
as
long
as
I
was
concerned.
When
we
got
the
postcard
that
there
were
Market
forces
to
create
a
monopoly
and
I
don't
want
a
Monopoly
created,
whether
it's
done
by
the
company
or
really
by
the
city.
D
I'm
concerned
and
I'm
fortunate
I
don't
live
in
an
area
of
town
that
has
narrow
streets,
however,
moving
large
bins
out
onto
narrow
streets
with
large
numbers
of
cars
and
the,
as
you
said,
chairman
green,
the
the
the
move
in
the
city
toward
higher
density
I
think
this
is
just
creating
a
huge
huge
traffic
jam
both
in
terms
of
traffic
on
the
roads,
as
well
as
safety
issues
with
regard
to
those
those
trash
cans.
D
I
think
we're
just
beginning
to
see
this
and
and
I'm
concerned
that
that
maybe
we
need
to
look
outside
of
that
that
lot,
that
that
picture
of
of
how
we
can
provide
this
I
I,
you
can
play
the
chess
game
pretty
quickly
with
the
fact
that,
if
you
put
an
ordinance
in
place
that
requires
them
to
go
down
alleys
that
you're,
basically,
you
know
you're
driving
this
into
a
potentially
monopolistic
or
definitely
a
minimal
service
with
high
fees,
so
I
I,
guess
I'm
just
expressing
a
concern
at
this
point
and
council
person,
Russell
I
I
appreciate
your
your
views
on
this
too.
D
B
I
think
for
right
now
it's
probably
not
going
to
go
anywhere
until
more
citizens
start
to
come
to
speak
to
council
or
or
start
complaining
now,
I
I
will
tell
you.
I
am
very
concerned
about
the
density,
but
what
I've
seen
in
the
last
two
to
three
years?
People
have
just
quit
coming
to
council
and
if
you
all
are
concerned
about
the
density
piece,
because
the
density
creates
more
problems
in
a
lot
of
areas.
B
B
E
Thank
you.
So
then
we
have
our
Communications
subcommittee.
Vice,
chair
Watson
is
not
here.
Remember
out
of
it.
Have
you
had
a
chance
to
communicate
with
anyone
from
the
city
in
the
Communications
Department.
E
Okay,
all
right
yeah
see
if
we
can
have
some
update
on
where
things
are
out
with
that.
For
the
next
meeting
I
appreciate
you
taking
that
on
yeah.
E
And
then
so,
we've
already
pretty
much
decided
we're
not
going
to
do
a
meeting
in
December.
Did
anyone
see
any
reason
that
you
wanted
to
vote
for
a
meeting
next
month?
Okay,
then
we'll
skip
December
and
then
we'll
have
our
first
quarterly
in
person
in
January.
E
E
Will
someone
please
give
me
a
motion
for
skipping
our
December
meeting.
Remember
Strom.
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second
remember,
Emma
Hines.
Thank
you.
Will
you
please
take
a
vote
as
well
as.
E
E
You
thank
you
and
then
like
I
was
starting
to
say,
we'll
have
our
first
quarterly
in
person
for
in
January,
so
that'll
be
our
usual
time,
so
be
January
18th
at
6
pm
and
we'll.
E
Does
anyone
have
any
so
Committee
Member
Choice
any
other?
And
as
part
of
this,
if
you
have
any
ideas
or
suggestions
for
things
for
us
to
discuss
or
look
into
now
would
be
a
good
time
to
do
that.
E
Anybody
have
anything
okay.
Thank
you
very
much,
we'll
figure
out
what
we're
going
to
prioritize
in
our
next
meeting.
That'll
be
a
good
thing
to
have
on
there.
So
I'll
make
sure
we
have
that
on
the
agenda.
We
can
have
some
discussion
around
priorities
and
talk
through
that.
F
F
One-On-One
I
can't
meet
in
large
groups
without
doing
a
post
notice,
but
if
you'd
like
to
receive
additional
education
on
anything
that
is
open,
but
also,
more
importantly,
wanted
to
wish
you
all
a
great
holiday
season
on
whatever
you
are
celebrating
with
you
and
your
families
and
I
want
you
to
have
a
very
special
New,
Year
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
all
of
you
again
after
the
first.
E
Thank
you
very
much
code
manager,
Lewis,
and
thank
you.
Yes,
thank
you
thanks.
Everyone
and
I
hope.
Everyone
also
has
great
holidays.
I
see
that
is.
Are
those
I'm
just
now
noticing
these
chats
remember
Reddit,
you
sent
us
a
bunch
on
the
chat,
so
I
don't
know
if
everyone
has
seen
that,
would
you
please
send
an
email
with
all
of
that
to
Ms
Willis
and
then
she
can
send
it
out
to
the
rest
of
us.