►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment and Appeals - 13 Feb 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
B
So
there
are
five
board
members
present.
So
therefore,
for
affirmative
votes
are
required
to
grant
a
variance
or
appeal.
The
board
is
authorized
to
grant
or
deny
variance
by
part
three
section
60
of
the
Englewood
city
charter,
anyone
aggrieved
by
a
decision
rendered
by
this
board.
They
appealed
that
decision
to
a
court
of
record.
However,
such
appeal
must
be
made
within
30
days
of
the
Board's
decision.
B
Any
approved
variance
is
effective
at
the
end
of
the
appeal
period.
Building
permits
for
construction
associated
with
an
improvement,
approved
variance,
will
not
be
issued
until
the
appeal
period
is
ended.
Building
permits
must
be
obtained
and
construction
begun
within
180
days
of
the
variances
effective
paint
procedure
for
the
meeting
is
the
capably
introduced.
An
overview
will
be
given
by
staff.
Apple
will
present
their
requests
and
reasons
for
the
variance
proponents
will
be
given
an
opportunity
to
speak.
Opponents
will
address
the
board
and,
if
needed,
staff
will
again
address
the
board.
B
The
public
hearing
for
case
number
var
20
1900
1,
which
is
by
John
and
Cathy,
more
30
to
65
south
race
Street,
is
now
open.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
variance
to
encroach
encroach
14
feet
into
the
25
foot
front.
Setback
in
the
r1a
zone,
district
I
have
verification
of
the
publication
and
posting
of
the
subject:
property
staff.
If
you
could
give
us
an
overview
I.
E
F
F
The
subject
property
is
about
ten
thousand
four
hundred
square
feet
with
the
house
that
currently
stands
there
being
a
1890
foot.
Ninety
square
foot,
single
favor
residence.
The
applicants
are
proposing
to
demolish
this
house
and
then
construct
a
new
single-family
residence
that
would
encroach
approximately
thirteen
point
five
feet
into
the
front
setback,
as
the
current
house
ends.
F
F
With
the
new
structure
of
this
house
would
be
would
be
closer
to
the
rest
of
the
homes
on
the
block
than
what
currently
exists
as
far
as
symmetry
wise,
this
writing
properties,
or
what
makes
this
property
unique.
Most
of
the
other
homes,
as
I
said,
are
approximately
ten
feet
at
the
required
25
foot
front
setback
the
public
right
away.
This
location
is
considerably
wider
than
what
is
typical
for
the
city.
F
F
F
Additionally,
the
one
since
the
house
is
being
scraped.
However,
there
is
potential
that
it
could
be
built
to
the
current
setback.
However,
that
would
put
in
a
vastly
different
spot
than
the
houses
on
either
side
of
it.
For
this
reason,
staff
is
not
taking
a
petition
or
position
with
respect
to
this
variance.
I
can
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
G
F
Right
away
is
60
feet
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
so
much
that
the
right-of-way
itself
is
wider,
as
it
is
skewed
to
one
side
at
least
that's
kind
of
the
impression
I
got
from
looking
at
the
the
from
this
picture.
You
can
kind
of
see
how
it
you
can
see
my
mouth,
but
this
is
the
back
of
curb
and
it's
kind
of
pushed
considerably
in
from
the
side.
F
F
Write
write
or
I
mean
it
might
be
something
just
to
do
with
the
planners
of
the
time
now.
Checking
for
the
or
the
property
line
to
back
a
curb
issue.
I
know
that
the
there
was
an
addition
on
to
the
southern
house
that
was
done
within
the
last
15
15
years
or
so
for
the
kind
of
the
garage
addition
to
it.
F
But
that's
what
kind
of
made
it
all
in
line
with
the
rest
of
the
houses
that
are
the
rest
of
the
way
down
the
block
and
this
picture
on
the
back
kind
of
shows,
and
it's
a
little
it's
a
little
more
zoomed
in,
but
the
houses
above,
the
green
are
also
kind
of
in
line
with
the
same
houses
in
the
property.
Squared
and
yellow
is
our
subject.
Property.
D
F
It
would
be
a
good
question
of
the
applicant
from
from
our
conversations
leading
up
to
it.
I
think
it
was
mostly
to
get
in
symmetric.
You
know
a
little
more
symmetry
between
them
and
the
neighboring
houses,
as
you
can
see,
kind
of
from
both
both
sides
that
they
are
considerably
far
back
and
a
house
built
to
the
setback
would
have
to
be
three
feet
further
back
than
what's.
What's
in
this
picture,.
F
Well,
I
mean,
as
far
as
the
first
I
mean
as
far
as
the
first
step
criteria,
so
the
unique
definition
exist,
such
as
size,
shape,
location,
topography
or
surroundings,
which
are
peculiar
to
the
lander
structure
involved,
which
deprive
the
applicant
privileges
enjoy
by
the
other
properties
in
vicinity.
I
think
as
far
as
our
staff
input
on
it,
the
last
part
of
that
is
kind
of
the
important
applicant
privileges
enjoy
by
other
properties
in
the
vicinity.
Most
of
the
other
properties
in
the
vicinity
are
encroaching
into
this
front
setback,
but.
B
E
H
H
H
I
I
will
go
through
that
because
those
already
would
have
addressed
some
of
the
questions
raised
and
I'll
just
use
those.
As
my
talking
points,
if
that's
acceptable.
That
is
because
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
those
points
were
brought
in
to
this
again.
In
short,
our
request
is
simple.
We
would
like
to
encroach
there
thirteen
and
a
half
feet
round
it
a
fourteen
feet
into
the
front
setback
so
that
we
can
build
our
new
home
consistent
with
the
existing
neighborhood
a
little
bit
of
history.
H
H
Our
goal
does
our
goal
is
to
build
a
home
that
works
for
us,
but
now
and
for
many
years,
the
the
unique
physical
conditions
there's
two
unique
physical
conditions,
I'd
like
the
board
to
truly
understand
and
consider.
The
first
is
the
right-of-way
I'll
be
more
explicit.
It
is
unusually
large
on
the
west
side
of
the
road.
H
Typical
right
away
is
60
feet.
I,
know
east
side
of
the
road.
It
goes
I
had
a
I
had
a
sorry
survey
done
at
30
to
60.
The
property
line
is
30
feet
from
the
center
of
the
street
on
the
west
side
of
the
road
of
30
to
65.
The
property
line
is
42
feet
from
the
center
of
the
street,
so
there
are
12
extra
feet
on
the
west
side
of
race
that
differ
from
what
is
typical
in
the
city
and,
as
certainly
I
can
tell
you
from.
H
H
The
second
condition-
that's
buts,
related
to
it
is
all
of
the
homes
in
the
neighborhood
are
much
closer
than
the
47
feet.
That
would
otherwise
be
sorry
required
by
code
very
in
the
attached
survey,
which
again
a
professional
survey.
That's
not
my
work.
I
have
shown
that
the
neighbors
immediately
to
the
north
of
me
and
immediately
to
the
south
of
me,
are
twelve
point
three
feet
and
thirteen
point
five
feet
respectively.
H
They've
already
encroached,
you
know
12
and
13
14
feet,
basically
into
the
setbacks
and
our
roughly
33
to
34
feet
off
of
the
sidewalk
again
using
the
house
across
the
street
is
an
example
at
30
to
60.
It
is
about
30
four
feet
off
the
sidewalk
cities
right
away
on
that
site
is
just
shy
of
ten
feet:
the
house
a
little
bit
of
history,
addressing
some
of
the
points
I
already
raised.
Our
house
was
built
in
1992.
H
The
one
at
30
to
60
was
1954
every
reason
to
believe
the
houses
in
that
neighborhood
were
all
built
right
around
early
50s
I
think
that's
safe
for
me
to
say
so
they
were
what
I
do
not
know
what
the
setback
requirement
was
in
1952
I
do
know.
However,
what's
kind
of
interesting
speaking
of
the
house
south
of
me
at
32
75.
H
It
was
added
on
to
in
the
front
in
1999
two
staffs
knowledge
to
my
knowledge
that
those
set
back
rules
were
the
same
at
that
point
in
time
as
they
are
today.
That
house
was
added
on
without
a
variance
I
live
I
mean
we
again
we're
living
there
at
the
time.
I
know
that
it
was,
there
was
no
variance
posted
and
there's
no
to
my
knowledge
staff
verify
and
my
understanding
is
staff
verified,
there's,
no
variance
on
record
for
that
I
think.
Actually,
mr.
H
doe
confirmed
that
earlier
that
there's
no
variance
with
respect
to
that
house
at
3275.
So
in
general
that
all
the
in
general,
the
neighborhood
was
built
about
35
feet.
You
know
off
the
sidewalk
give
or
take
in
the
one
house.
Besides
mine,
there
was
a
little
bit
further
back
what
allowed
to
move
forward
as
recently
as
1999
without
issue.
H
It
does
what
I'm
just
speculating
here,
but
it
does
seem
everything's
consistent
with
the
idea
that
a
normal
right
away
applied
it
would
have
made
sense
and
why
the
one
house
was
built
without
a
variance
that
also
kind
of
explained
why
the
whole
neighborhood
is
roughly
35
feet
from
the
sidewalks,
but
in
fairness,
that
is
a
speculation
on
my
part.
I
can't
prove
that
one
way
or
the
other.
H
H
It
would
allow
us
not
to
be
deprived
of
the
privileges
enjoyed
by
the
other
properties
in
the
neighborhood,
which,
from
our
perspective,
is
backyard
space.
We
have
an
enormous
ly
large
backyard.
The
city
owns
22
feet
of
it.
We
would
do
not
wish
to
even
increase
that
further
and
take
away
the
space
we
need
in
the
backyard
to
where
we
spend
our
time
and
where
we
train
our
dogs
etc.
I
live
our
lives,
noting
just
the
other
criteria
for
for
variances.
H
H
B
H
We
have
the
way
it's
designed.
There
will
be
a
one
car
garage
attached
accessible
from
the
front.
We
wanted
that
attached
for
safety
reasons,
so
there
will
be
that
we
have
left
the
flexibility
to
add
a
second
detached
garage
in
the
Le
again,
that
would
be
conforming,
but
for
safety
reasons
we
wanted,
we
couldn't
attach
from
the
back
without
losing
a
lot
of
backyard
space.
H
Driveway
is
the
driveway:
is
there
you
can
actually
see
it
going
to
the
street
yeah
I.
Think
I
was
so
you
know.
Okay,
I
was
today
had
to
keep
these
date
half-mile
up,
and
it
makes
it
very
hard
to
read.
I
will
also
note
that
on
this
survey
here
just
to
point
it
out
there
we
had
the
surveyor
survey,
the
houses,
one
house
to
the
south
and
two
houses
to
the
north,
just
to
show
the
additional
setback.
H
What
I,
actually
what
we've
do?
What
I've
done
is
asked
to
move
move
up
to
the
same
distance
of
the
house
to
the
is
immediately
south
of
me,
so
we've
asked
only
go
as
far
forward
as
thirty
to
seventy
five
is
whether
I
mean
we,
whether
we
scoot
back
a
little
bit
or
not
from
there.
We've
left
flexibility
but
I'm
asking
to
go
no
further
forward
than
thirty
to
seventy
five
and.
H
D
It's
maybe
more
of
a
statement:
I'm
really
surprised
as
you're
willing
to
build
this
house
and
lose
a
big
tree
both
front
and
back
they're
beautiful
trees.
You
know
if
I
had
my
way
environmentally
as
a
social,
socially
responsible
person,
I
wouldn't
be
taking
those
trees
down
so
interesting.
Why
you're
doing
that.
H
So,
first
there's
a
number
of
factors
right
now,
the
biggest
problem
again
has
been
the
the
original
plans
that
we've
been
pursuing
would
not
have
changed
the
footprint
of
this
house.
One
bit
it
just
doesn't
work.
There's
too
many
issues.
So
at
that
point,
I'm
forced
one.
If
I
accept
that
I'm
I'm
forced
to
move
this,
where
we
actually
end
up
on
the
trees
is
not
the
the
backyard
tree
is
not.
Actually,
it
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
go
the
front.
We
can
still
shift
things
around.
H
What
I'm
asking
you
know
what
we've
done
here
is
just
a
lad
ourselves.
How
would
we
maximize
the
front
yard
we
may
choose
to
push
back,
but
I
mean
it's
also
noting
it.
Those
trees
are
older,
the
front
one
as
an
increasing
rate
of
mortality
with
it
in
terms
of
the
amount
that
dies,
so
I
will
also
factor
in
the
true
long-term
nature
of
the
house
versus
where
that
tree
is
in
his
lifespan
and
I
apologize
I
touched
on
the
tree.
Did
I
get
the
other?
Oh
you.
H
I
could
have
built
the
house
we
had
planned,
but
that
again
we're
just
you
know
and
again
there's
the
other
element.
I,
don't
want
to
tear
this
house
down
either,
but
we've
got
roots
in
the
community
that
leave
us
in
the
position
between
the
long
ties
that
we've
had
in
this
community
and
the
service,
as
well
as
dealing
with
aging
parents
and
everything
else,
and
we
love
the
location,
we're
kind
of
committed
to
sink
more
into
this
than
otherwise
be
economically
justified,
so
that
we
can
stay
put.
B
And
and
I
think
we
probably
all
understand
that
and
I
and
I
can't
speak
for
the
rest
of
the
board,
but
I
mean
I
think
that,
to
be
honest,
what
I
have
problems
with
is
one
in
four,
because
this
is
a
scrape
I.
You
know
we
don't
have
on
3275.
If
there
was
a
variance
or
not
I
know,
we
did
a
variance
a
while
back
for
house
that
wanted
to
push
in
kind
of
similar
to
this.
B
But
for
me
I
guess:
I!
That's
what
I'm
trying
to
get
my
head
around
is
that
in
a
lot
of
ways
it
is
what
it
is
so
could
you
I
mean
you
could
obviously
push
the
house
back?
It
would
decrease
your
backyard.
Yes,
you
could
add
additional
square
footage
to
the
top.
I
understand
your
reservation
with
the
right
away,
but
you
know
the
right
away.
In
essence,
is
not
your
property,
fair.
H
I'd
love
to
address
it,
the
one
the
latter
point
we're
not
interested
in
we're
building
this
home
to
last
us
for
the
long
term.
I
want
a
single
story
that
is
livable.
The
all
we've
put
upstairs
is
something
that
is
basically
office.
Space
works,
fine
where
we
are
in
our
current
stage
of
life
and
won't
be
necessary
for
us
in
the
later
stage
of
life,
and
when
time
comes
to
sell
the
house,
it's
designed
to
be
turned
into
two
bedrooms
in
an
ideal
family
home
for
a
larger
family,
but
otherwise
we
do
not
our
houses.
H
Our
neighborhood
is
primarily
except
for
one
house.
It's
currently
one
story:
homes
moved
to
the
west.
That
starts
changing,
but
our
general
areas,
one
story
homes,
so
we're
trying
not
to
be
too
out
of
place
with
with
the
neighborhood
on
the
the
the
right
away
issue
I,
you
know,
I,
don't
view
as
so
minor
and
I'll
share
it.
This
way,
even
if
I
wanted
to
just
rebuild
what
I've
got
today,
but
you
know
not
only
for
the
sake
of
updated
plumbing
and
electrical,
but
rather
than
building
on
a
65
year
old
cracked
foundation.
H
Just
start
fresh
and
redo.
What
I
would
want
to
do
today?
I've
got
to
come
in
here
and
get
a
variance
to
do
that.
That
also
means
that
my
neighbors,
who
maybe
could
find
themselves
wanting
to
scrape,
have
the
ability
to
as
long
as
they
can
reuse
their
foundation.
They
have
a
permanent
ability
to
build
that
far
forward
without
needing
a
variance
by
just
preserving
the
foundation.
H
Preserving
the
foundation
in
my
case
doesn't
make
again.
It
doesn't
work
for
me.
So
I
would
argue
that
my
neighbors
have
a
do,
have
an
extra
privilege
there
and
that
they,
in
somewhat
their
encroachment,
is
protected
even
with
certainly
the
kind
of
you
know,
even
even
as
long
as
they
can
manage
to
reuse
enough
of
their
foundation,
to
avoid
the
need
for
a
variance.
B
B
H
The
one
again
didn't
anticipate
this
question.
We
have
had
one
scrape
in
the
neighborhood
at
Dartmouth
place
that
again,
my
understanding
was
the
individual.
They
they
wanted
to
do
a
remodel
when
they
got
into
it
with
asbestos
problems
and
everything
else
they
did
scrape
they
scrape
from
the
foundation
up.
It
is
very
clear,
just
visibly
driving
by
no
setback
issue.
You
know
they
continue
to
encroach
on
their
setback.
No
variance
was
posted
for
that
property
either
because
they
preserved
I
did
ask.
H
B
I
I
noticed
the
application
for
variance
sign
in
this
gentleman's
yard.
Earlier
this
week
it
became
became
aware
of
his
request
to
have
a
variance
for
the
25-foot
setback
and
I
have
no
animosity
towards
you.
In
fact,
I've
seen
you
run
down
my
strength
for
years.
I
am
a
Hampton,
Hills
resident
would
45
years
and
the
reason
I'm
here
talking
tonight
is
I'm
trying
to
maintain
the
architectural
integrity
of
Hampton
Hills.
This
community
was
built
in
the
early
50s.
I
I
99%
of
the
homes
are
maintaining
the
25-foot
setback.
There
is
a
home
on
I
believe
the
corner
of
vine
and
Eastman.
That
was
remodeled
probably
10
years
ago,
and
they
did
a
bump
out
on
the
Vine
Street
side,
which
I
believe
encroach
is
on
that
25
foot
setback
I,
don't
know
whether
they
got
a
variance
for
that
or
not.
I
The
only
thing
that
I'm
trying
to
do
tonight
is
maintained.
As
I
said,
the
architectural
integrity
of
the
neighborhood
I
think
the
value
of
the
homes
and
Hickman
Hills
have
established
and
maintained
because
of
this
setback,
single
story,
home
size,
etc
and
I'm
concerned
that
we're
we're
creating
a
slippery
slope
here.
The
house
to
the
south
in
encroached
this
home
was
to
go
up
to
where
that
house
went.
I
I,
don't
want
to
be
here
two
years
from
now
and
have
somebody
asking
for
a
variance
to
build
a
house
five
feet
from
the
sidewalk,
which
I
think
might
be
understandable
as
a
concern.
When
you
look
at
what's
happened
in
Denver,
for
example,
they're
allowing
homes
to
be
built
right
up
to
the
Lots
front
back
side.
That
I
don't
think
it's
a
good
plan
for
Englewood
and
particularly
for
Hampton
Hills.
So
that's
my
piece
on
that.
I
have
a
theoretical.
B
B
I
I
D
I
I
did
not
measure
all
the
streets
in
the
neighborhood
or
on
Race
Street,
but
I'm,
assuming
that
by
the
Englewood
code.
For
that
r1a
area,
the
25
foot
setback
is
a
requirement,
so
I
apologize,
if
that's
not
the
case,
for
those
homes
along
there,
but
I
would
assume
that
it
is
and
that
they
are
conforming
to
the
25-foot
setback.
D
I
I
Applying
to
the
existing
building
codes
at
that
time,
I
don't
think
it's
changed
since
then.
I,
don't
think
that
setbacks
have
changed.
I,
don't
think
the
lot
sizes
have
changed.
I
think
you
can
build
a
32
foot
high
structure
in
Hampton
Hills,
but
the
setbacks
remain
the
same
20
feet
from
the
back
property
line:
25
feet
from
the
front
35%
home
on
that
9,000
plus
square
foot,
property
I.
I
B
F
F
I'll
go
ahead
and
yeah
I'll
go
ahead.
Answer
a
couple
of
the
questions
I
heard
along
with
it,
so
one
was
regarding.
If
a
house,
north
or
south
of
this
thing
was
to
scrape
down
to
foundation,
we
have
a
section
of
our
code
dealing
with
non-conforming
structures.
Basically,
it's
to
encourage
redevelopment
of
structures
that
have
become
dilapidated,
pretty
much.
The
way
it
breaks
down
to
is
you're
not
supposed
to
non
conformed
more
than
you
were
non
compartment
before.
F
So,
as
you
know,
if
they
could
save
a
foundation,
save
some
some
walls
in
it
that'd
be
encouraged,
so
you
had
theoretically
for
most
of
them.
You
know
if
you
have
a
extremely
cracked
foundation
and
you
have
to
tear
it
all
out,
anyways
be
something
we'd
look
at,
but
as
far
as
the
way
that
reads
is
basically,
yes,
you
can't
be
more
non-conforming
the
way
before
before.
F
Beyond
that,
you
know,
I
think
it
as
far
as
the
front
step
back
Yap
for
all
of
the
r1a.
It
is
the
twenty
five
feet,
as
you
can
see,
though,
in
this
neighborhood
that's
these
houses
are
encroaching
into
that,
and
this
is
kind
of
what
the
a
big
applicant
is
asking
as
well,
but
that's
just
the
way
some
of
these
some
of
these
streets
are,
you
know,
depending
on
when
the
properties
were
built
comparative
to
the
surveying
and
the
planners
of
1954
right.
G
F
As
far
as
non-conforming
structures
are
a
little
bit
harder
just
because
you
have
a
lot
of
cases
like
this,
where
I
bet
you
most
of
the
neighbors
on
the
street,
don't
even
know
that
they're
non-conforming
okay
for
things
like
safe,
wrecking
non-conforming
use,
save
for
a
you
know,
an
industry.
Let's
say
there
was
an
industrial
site
on
Broadway
and
they
closed
down
for
six
months.
H
Mr.
moon,
just
one
quick,
factual
statement,
I
appreciate
my
neighbors
comments.
3265
the
west
side
of
race
is
not
part
of
Hampton
Hills.
The
east
side
of
Ace
is
part
of
Hamlin
Hills.
My
father-in-law's
in
Hamden
house,
on
property
in
Hamden
Hills,
but
just
to
distinguish
Hammond
Hills
is
on
the
other
side
of
the
street,
from
where
the
variance
is
being
requested.
H
H
Be
blunt,
I
didn't
want
to
put
a
one
car
garage
in
I.
Don't
like
are
the
house
the
reason
I
bought
the
house
in
the
first
place
that
we
have
today
is
that
there's
no
garage
in
front
it's
alley
entrance.
It's
actually
underneath
the
house
and
I
loved
it.
I
love
the
fact
that
we've
got
a
more
green
space
in
front
than
anyone,
but
for
to
to
put
I
do
not
like
large
garages
in
front
of
the
house,
so
I
wanted
not
to
do
it
at
all.
H
B
F
B
G
D
D
B
D
B
G
B
B
But
to
me
the
setbacks
or
what
they
are
I
mean
I
go
back
to
the
case.
We
had
a
couple
weeks
ago
that
the
guy
wanted
to
go
into
the
back
setback
because
it
was
a
prefab
home
and
it's
the
setbacks.
You
know
you
wouldn't
have
been
able
to
sell
from
the
street
that
he
was
getting
carts
in
the
back.
I
guess.
B
And
I
guess
to
me:
what
goes
to
the
character
in
the
neighborhood
is
the
architecture,
because
you
could
have
a
house
scrape
next
door
and
build
something
totally
within
the
rags,
but
look
totally
out
of
place
for
a
neighborhood.
So
I
have
a
hard
control
right.
I
have
a
hard
time
falling
back
on
the
architectural
part
of
it.
Just
because
we
can't
control
that.
G
J
Mean
only
way
I
could
see,
justifying
it.
I
guess
from
my
perspective,
is
that
it's
not
a
self-imposed
difficulty
or
hardship
because
he
didn't
choose,
as
he
didn't
choose,
that
the
other
neighbors
built-ins
or
the
right
earthÃs
that
back
before
he
purchased
that
property.
So
he
didn't
make
that
decision.
Yeah.
B
But
but
it's
a
question:
if,
if
one
of
them
should
have
even
had
a
variance
or
not
so
if
someone
builds
something
incorrectly,
do
we
let
everyone
else
build?
It
correctly?
Is
my
fallback
position
there
I
mean
if
the
other
house
has
had
a
variance,
then
I
could
almost
go
along
with
that
easier.
B
But
for
for
I
mean
it's
because
it's
a
scrape,
that's
what
I
keep
getting
back
to
if
it
was
an
addition
or
something
where
the
house
was
set
previous
before
had
the
variances,
then
I
could,
before
we've
always
had
wiggle
room,
because
it's
the
house
was
area
to
have
something
there
and
the
house
was
set
to
forward
or
to
back
so
I
I,
just
I
mean
again
everyone.
You
know,
as
usual,
everyone
needs
to
vote
their
conscious,
but
I
just
have
a
hard
time
with
with
not
understanding
how
it
it
clears
for
another.
B
D
D
B
Voted
no
so
it
passes.
So
the
new
motion
on
the
floor
is
the
applicants
requesting
a
variance
to
encroach
twelve
twelve
feet
into
the
required
25
foot
setback
in
the
Harwin,
a
zone
district.
This
variance
to
table
16
a
6-1,
not
one
of
the
Inglewood
minutes
will
colour-code
all
right.
So
does
that
anyone
want
to
discuss
that
or
we
just
need
to
vote
I.
B
B
J
J
I
think
the
third
criterion
has
been
met,
that
the
variance
will
not
permanently
impaired
the
use
of
the
development
of
the
adjacent,
conforming
properties
or
alter
the
essential
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
I
believe
the
fourth
criterion
has
been
met,
that
the
variance
is
not
itself
pose
difficulty
or
hardship
because
of
the
adjacent
properties
and
corrosion
to
the
existing
setbacks.
Already.
C
C
C
B
No
fails
both
on
the
first
criteria
in
the
fourth
criterion,
its
self-imposed.
He
could
build
it
and
design
it
differently
to
stay
within
the
current
variance.
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
slippery
slope
when
we
start
looking
at
property
next
to
a
property
that's
being
built
when
we
don't
know
if
they
got
a
proper
variance
in
the
first
place,.
C
B
Var
20
1900
339
90
South
Galapagos
Street
Englewood
Colorado.
They
are
requesting
a
variance
to
encroach
11
feet
into
the
required
20-foot
rear
setback
to
construct.
In
addition
to
a
single-family
residence
in
the
r1c
zone,
district,
a
nine
foot,
rear
setback
would
remain,
I
have
verification
of
the
publication
and
posting
of
the
subject
property
staff.
If
you
could
give
us
an
overview
I.
K
E
K
K
K
K
There's
a
little
bit
closer
up
to
see
how
the
existing
residence
is
on
the
property.
Currently
again,
the
applicants
requests
to
be
allowed
to
encroach
into
the
rear
setback,
to
construct
this
addition
and
considering
the
Criterion's
for
a
variance
being
the
first
criteria,
not
unique
physical
conditions,
exist,
sister
size,
shape,
location,
etc.
K
This
is
very
unique
lot
in
terms
of
what
we
usually
see
in
the
city
and
also
if
they
were
to
wanted
to
construct
a
an
addition
elsewhere
on
the
property.
They
would
also
need
a
variance
there
as
well.
They
would
not
be
able
to
move
setbacks
even
if
they
were
to
build
on
the
south
side.
So
a
second
criterion.
It's
can.
The
staff
feels
this
is
consistent
with
the
intent
of
the
zone
district
regulations.
The
third
criterion
is
that
the
variance
will
not
permanently
impaired
the
use
or
development
of
adjacent
conforming
properties.
K
B
K
B
K
D
B
E
B
L
Really,
however,
this
all
started
where
we
initially
were
gonna
go
off
the
back
full.
You
know
16
to
18
feet,
hired
an
architect
to
come
draw
the
plans
wrote
the
check.
First
thing
he
comes
back
with
was
a
hey.
This
there's
absolutely
no
way.
This
is
gonna
happen
and
then
he
kind
of
started
explaining
how
it
worked.
L
I
did
find
a
survey
from
when
I
purchased
the
home
I
started
to
understand
that
that
wouldn't
work,
you
know
with
our
growing
family,
we're
we're
just
looking
to
add
a
master
bathroom
and
a
walk-in
closet,
make
our
house
maybe
a
little
more
and
not
modern,
but
you
know
to
accommodate
a
larger
family
as
a
lot
of
the
homes
ending
order.
L
They
don't
so
we
want
to
stay
there
and
that's
our
plan
and
that's
why
we're
gonna
try
to
go
as
far
as
we
can't
illegally
without
you
know
having
to
into
the
easement
we
can't
get
into
these
minutes.
Basically
how
it's
been
explained.
So
we
figured
we'd
push
the
limits
on
the
on
that
side
of
it
and
and
just
make
it
the
best.
We
can
it's
perfect.
B
B
B
J
J
I
voted,
yes,
I
believe
the
first
criterion
has
been
met
that
unique
physical
conditions
exist
because
of
the
shape
of
the
law.
I
believe
the
second
criterion
has
been
met,
that
the
variance
is
consistent
with
the
intent
of
the
zone
district
regulations
to
secure
public
health
safety
and
welfare
I
believe
the
third
criterion
been
met
that
the
parents
will
not
permanently
impaired
the
user,
development
of
the
Jason,
conforming
properties
or
alter
the
central
character
of
the
neighborhood
I
believe
the
fourth
criterion
has
been
met,
that
the
variance
is
not
a
self-imposed
difficulty
or
hardship.
C
C
C
B
B
A
B
F
A
B
A
A
B
Tuned
knowing
knowing
is
half
the
battle,
yes
board,
so
if
we
don't
have
a
meeting,
I
will
probably
suggest
perhaps
a
March
Madness
dinner
holiday.
If
we
also
note
a
mail
if
we
cannot
get
a
great
event
on
the
day
and
the
time
no
security
will
be
required
and
then
we'll
go.