►
Description
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/144708?handle=57EE88F31A8941669DBC1D2FDA7F0797
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/144707?handle=637BE910B7E242508CC2146754E4E309
1. Chair Knaddison approved the agenda
2. Call to Order
2. Recognition of Public Comment
a. Recognition of Public Comment is an opportunity for the public to address The Transportation Advisory Committee (ETAC). There is an expectation that the presentation will be conducted in a respectful ...
4. Approval of Minutes
a. July 14, 2022
6. New Business
a. Federal Blvd BRT 30% Design & NEPA Project
5. Old Business
a. Old Hampden Utility Replacement/Complete Streets Project Update
7. Director's Choice
8. Chairperson's Choice
9. Committee Member's Choice
10. Adjournment
Agenda HTML: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/144708?handle=57EE88F31A8941669DBC1D2FDA7F0797
Agenda PDF: https://englewoodgov.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/144707?handle=637BE910B7E242508CC2146754E4E309
A
C
A
C
A
A
A
F
D
B
And
Tim
Whitney
as
well:
either
I,
don't
I,
didn't
see
an
email
from
him
saying
he'd
make
it
or
not.
That's
necessarily,
but
I
think
that
we've
got
a
quorum
now
regardless,
so
I
will
call
to
order
the
September,
8th
2022
and
go
with
Transportation
advisory
meeting,
and
it
looks
like
the
first
thing
that
we
have
is
recognition
of
public
comment.
B
A
D
B
E
B
And
the
next
item
I
think
we
were
going
to
go
through
in
slightly
different
order
tonight,
so
that
so
that
David
can
speak
first
and
then
choose
whether
or
not
to
stick
around
for
the
rest
of
our
business.
So
this
is
I.
Guess
I'll
I'll
pass
it
off
to
you
unless
Tim
I
don't
know.
If
you
have
like
an
introduction,
you
want
to
share
about
this
project.
D
But
just
one
quick
suggestion:
if
before
we
get
started
here,
chair
Con
Edison,
is
it
possible
and
I
don't
know
if
this
pertains
to
maybe
your
your
input
introduction
here,
presentation
here,
David,
but
should
we
put
the
agenda
up
with
that
material
there
that
we're?
So
we
can
view
that
or
again,
if,
if
you
have
other
ways
of
presenting
this
I,
don't
want
to
discourage
that,
but
I
just
thought,
maybe
that
might
be
beneficial
to
to
have
a
as
part
of
the
agenda.
B
D
B
F
F
Appreciate
the
opportunity,
so
the
purpose
of
our
discussion
tonight
I've
been
having
discussions
with
Maria
and
sorry
to
see
that
she's
moved
on
and
then
picked
up
those
conversations
with
other
members
of
the
public
works
department.
Since
then,
Denver
has
been
leading,
as
many
of
you
know,
the
East
Colfax
bus,
Rapid,
Transit
project
and
we've
been
partnering
with
the
city
of
Aurora
on
that
and
within
Denver.
F
F
You
know
Greater
Community,
infill,
the
long
Dartmouth
and
south
of
Dartmouth,
so
the
it
gets
to
keep
it
brief.
The
rest
of
the
the
materials
show
all
of
the
prior
studies
that
have
got
us
to
this
point:
Studies
by
RTD
in
2018
2019.
Looking
at
quarters
all
around
the
region
and
sort
of
prioritizing
which
quarters
made
the
most
sense
in
terms
of
ridership
quarters
that
had
the
most
opportunity
to
save
people
travel
time
and
most
likely
to
be
implementable
within
within
a.
B
F
And
let's
see
what
else
can
I
share
with
you
briefly,
then
so
I
think.
The
the
upshot
of
this
towards
the
bottom
of
this
is
to
ask
you
guys
to
participate
as
part
of
a
coalition
to
put
in
a
requests
for
four
million
dollars
in
Regional
tip
funds.
Dr
Cog
Regional
call.
The
applications
are
due
on
October
11th.
F
F
F
What
this
would
mean
as
a
partner
is
that
you
have
a
seat
at
the
table
and
that
you
can
expect
that
the
darkness
and
Inca
corridors
would
be
studied
for
infrastructure
improvements
as
part
of
this
overall
effort,
the
I
think
your
your
options
here
are
to
accept
this
proposal.
If
you
also
wanted
to
add
South
Federal
south
of
the
city
of
Sheridan,
your
your
match
should
increase
a
little
bit
if
you
went
the
other
direction
and
weren't
finding
the
value
or
the
urgency.
F
B
Yeah,
thank
you.
Certainly
you
know.
That's!
That's
really
puts
it
in
perspective
to
describe
Federal
as
having
such
a
high
ridership
when
it's
not
when
it's
such
a
you
know,
I
think
challenging
area
for
pedestrians
with
not
a
lot
of
you
know
like
the
sidewalks
are
not
super
consistent,
the
the
stops
don't
have
great
amenity
stuff
like
that
is
in.
In
my
you
know,
from
my
experience
on
a
relatively
small
section
of
it,
so
that
seems
really
impressive.
B
B
D
C
D
D
F
F
D
Chair
can
Addison.
Could
you
scroll
back
up
to
just
a
few
more
pages,
I
think
to
the
initial
page
on
this
one,
here's
the
description
yeah.
So,
let's
see
here
interesting,
interesting
facts.
That's
in
the
description
there
that
I
found
there
and
that
that
really
surprised
me
as
well
too,
in
terms
of
I
mean
I
suspected
that
Federal
have
a
had
a
heavy
presence
in
terms
of
the
ridership,
but
I
didn't
know
it
was.
D
To
that
extent
that's
called
out
there
too
I
mean
typically
I'm,
always
thinking
Colfax
and
Broadway,
or
pretty
much
the
The
Heavy
Hitters
when
it
comes
to
to
that
Transit
there,
but
I
think
there
was
a
part
of
this
to
where
I
think
it
described.
What
some
of
the
changes
would
mean
to
that
with
the
with
the
brt
and
I
think
it
was.
D
D
Beard
is
expected
to
operate
20
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week
and
we'll
provide
enhanced
service
frequencies
compared
to
current
server
proposed
operations
of
five
to
ten
minute
frequencies
during
the
peak
and
10
to
15
minutes
frequencies
during
most
of
the
day,
so
I
think
I
think
that's
an
incredible
Improvement
in
terms
of
access
and,
and
you
know,
being
able
to
offer
transit
to
the
community
there
from
what
what
the
current
is.
Current
standard
is
so
to
20
hours
a
day.
D
F
F
E
I
I
have
a
question:
I
apologize,
I
had
to
jump
off
and
rejoin
here,
but
yeah
I
I.
Sorry,
I
missed
a
lot
of
the
presentation.
If
you
covered
this
already,
please
I
can
go
back
and
review
the
notes.
That's
fine,
but
I'm
I'm
curious.
You
know
a
big
Connection
in
Inglewood
is
on
Dartmouth
and
with
that
you
know
development,
that's
at
the
top
of
the
hill.
There
I'm
just
kind
of
curious
if
and
how
this
might
tie
into
some
of
the
work.
E
That's
already
been
scoped
out
and
and
is
sort
of
planned
for
that
section
of
Dartmouth
and
that
connection.
But
you
know
I,
don't
know
when
the
study
was
done.
I
I
heard
you
guys
kind
of
talking
about
changes
in
ridership,
I
think
when
I
joined
back
and
pandemic
a
little
bit,
I'm,
not
sure
the
context,
but
with
that
new
development
coming
in
and
looking
at
those
corridors
where
there
could
be
the
high
crash
intersection,
you
know
issues
with
pedestrians.
E
You
know,
while
you're,
focusing
on
these
specific
orders
that
section
on
Dartmouth
is
that
going
to
be
tied
in.
Are
you
guys
going
to
be
tying
that
into
this,
or
is
part
of
this
going
to
help
out
with
that,
because
you
know
that's
really
where
Inglewood
ties
in
on
our
end,
for
the
most
part
on
the
federal,
you
know
I've
in
support
of
some
of
the
other
stuff.
But
can
you
speak
to
that
a
little
bit.
F
So
we
we
had
a
field
trip
earlier
in
the
summer
with
CDOT
Denver,
Regional,
Council
of
governments,
RTD
and
other
folks,
and
stood
out
there
at
that
intersection
and-
and
you
know,
recognize
what
sort
of
poor
quality
infrastructure
there
is.
If,
if
you
want
to
feel
comfortable
as
a
passenger
of
this
service,
you're
standing
literally
on
the
street
Edge,
we
saw
some
people
dashing
across
the
intersection
against
the
light
because
they
were
about
to
miss
their
bus.
On
the
other
side.
B
Yeah
thanks
Chris
I
I
had
a
question
about
the
sort
of
the
location
as
well,
and
I
tried
to
try
to
draw
a
map
of
the
locations
of
what
I
read
in
this.
So
it
looks
like
it
would
be
for
federal
from
like
up
at
120th,
correct
down
down
through
Dartmouth
and
you're,
saying
that
there's
sort
of
an
option
that
we
have
that
we
could
encourage
expanding
the
map
further
south
and
and
then
Inglewood
would
be
expected
to
kick
in
more
money.
F
Yeah
I
mean
Dartmouth
could
be
a
piece
that
you
participate
on.
The
part
of
federal
down
near
Centennial.
Park
could
be
a
piece
that
you
want
considered
for
Capital
Improvement.
You
could
do
both
you
could
do.
Neither
so
I
think.
That's
really
a
choice
that
you
guys
could
make
and
the
way
that
we've
been
working.
The
agreement
with
Partners
is,
is
generally
by
Corridor
length
sort
of
a
proportional
level
of
effort
with
RTD
providing
a
million
dollars
of
match.
They
don't
have
court
or
Frontage.
F
With
the
ask
before
you
tonight,
it
would
look
at
the
entire
length
of
Dartmouth
from
federal
over
to
Inca
and
then
all
of
the
the
piece
of
Inca
from
Dartmouth
down
to
Inglewood
station.
So
complete
that
connection
all
the
way
across
there
and
into
the
Inglewood
station,
so
that
you
guys
have
high
quality
bus
stops
and
improvements
being
made.
F
B
Yeah
sure
sure,
okay,
okay,
that's
that's
good
to
understand,
because
that
was
one
of
the
questions
that
I
had
was
about
the
these
different
numbers
and
I
was
just
curious.
So
what
you're
saying
is
that
these
are
proportionate
to
the
section
of
the
map.
You
know
just
the
distance
on
the
map
that
is
going
through
each
of
these
different
municipalities,
correct,
okay,
yeah
I,
see
we
got
a
couple
hands
raised
that
I
think
I
saw
Tim
your
question
your
hand
up
first.
C
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everybody.
You
know
the
city
does
have
a
project
on
Dartmouth
already
from
zoo
and
I
over
to
the
Platte
River,
to
put
bike
lanes
and
white
in
the
sidewalks
and
that
segments,
so
that
kind
of
takes
it
over
to
the
city
boundary.
The
rest
of
the
rest
of
there
is
Denver
and
Sheridan.
So
we
do
already
have
a
lot
of
that
program
to
do
already.
So
we
would
want
to
duplicate
efforts
there
and
contribute
more
money
to
some
we're
already
doing.
But
that's
just
something
to
keep
in
mind.
C
We
do
have
a
a
study
already
to
connect
Dartmouth
over
the
Inca
to
get
to
the
to
the
Light
Rail
station
there
in
the
past
and
stuff
I,
don't
know
if
you
show
that
on
the
aerial
photo,
they
kind
of
see
the
trail.
That's
already
there
that
we're
trying
to
connect
to,
and
at
least
get
all
the
way
to
zunai
through
the
city
where
the
Pipelines.
B
C
That'd
be
it'd,
be
a
five-foot
bike
that
both
directions
under,
but
there
is
what
we're
going
to
be
doing.
We've
got
grant
funding
for
the
that
already
that
project's
actively
on
their
way
now
to
get
the
design
done,
we're
going
to
replace
the
signals
of
Zuni
and
ft
home
there
as
well
to
make
a
little
more
multimodal
friendly
there
for
all
modes
of
transportation.
So
we're
what.
C
C
A
G
Hi
everyone
I
am
I.
You
covered
this
already,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
was
clear.
If,
if
we
or
the
city
council
says
no,
the
bus
still
runs
to
our
city
center,
but
you
just
don't.
Do
bus
stop
improvements
along
the
way?
What's
the
like
big
drawback,
if
the
city
says
votes
no,
on
contributing.
F
As
you
see
right
now,
the
Route
30
has
been
broken
into
a
bunch
of
pieces,
and
so
the
Route
30
comes
down
to
Yale
and
then
goes
west
over
to
Wadsworth
and
piece
of
Route.
29
picks
up
Southern
federal
here
and
goes
down
there.
And
then
you
have
Route
35,
that's
got
Dartmouth,
and
so
it's
a
it's
a
much
different
combination
of
services
since
the
pandemic
than
it
was
in
2019..
G
F
F
F
B
Yeah,
so
the
if
maybe
I'll,
try
to
State
my
understanding
and
and
see
if
this
sounds
right.
That
sort
of
this
is
the
planning
phase
where
something
would
get
studied
and
reviewed
and
designed
to
a
30
level
and-
and
then
you
know
in
the
future,
what?
If
and
when,
there's
funding
for
it,
then
that
then,
whatever
the
plan
that's
laid
out
now,
it
becomes
very
likely
to
get
done
and
I
think
for
a
lot
of
members
of
the
Angola
Transportation
advisory
committee.
B
We've
seen
how
that's
worked
with
like
the
walk
and
wheel
plan,
where
the
high
priority
projects
from
that
were
just
sitting
there
on
a
shelf
and
then
over
the
years
Money's
been
found,
and,
for
example,
now
we
have
bike
Lanes
on
Dartmouth,
because
that
was
one
of
the
high
priority
projects,
and
so
they
they
were
just
able
to
take
that
off
the
shelf.
When
funding
was
available
and
work
on
it
does.
That
is
that
an
accurate
description,
David
yeah
and
that's.
F
That's
accurate
so
again,
we'd
be
pursuing
the
a
small
starts
Grant
to
25,
to
you
know,
2025
time
frame
that
would
pay
for
about
150
million
dollars
of
the
total
quarter.
Denver
would
bond
for
its
section
of
the
match,
and
CDOT
has
money
available,
as
as
the
state
I
guess
proportionate,
based
on
cdot's
proposal,
they're
they're
looking
to
put
in
somewhere
between
70
and
90
million,
so
we're
getting
pretty
close
to
you
know
we'll
have
enough
money
to
construct
I!
F
Sure
our
intent
is
to
submit
Regional
tip
application,
October
11th,
with
whatever
Partnerships.
We
have
been
able
to
confirm
at
that
point.
Our
intent,
then,
is
to
release
requests
for
proposals
in
January,
which
would
be
about
the
time
that
the
tip
Awards
would
be
made
and
put
this
effort
into
motion.
Mid-23
I'm
expecting
that
it's
about
a
two-year
study
and
design
and
environmental
clearance
effort.
E
C
Well,
right
now
we
did
not
program
any
money
into
the
budget
for
this
Sheriff
City
sheriff.
If
you
want
to
move
forward,
we'd
have
to
reduce
the
amount
spent
on
a
different
project
or
something
that's
been
programmed
into
the
23
budget.
So
this
is
not
currently
any
funding
identified
in
next
year's
budget.
For
this
it
becomes
a
priority
to
be
something
we'd
had
to,
but
we
trade
off
another
project.
That's
got
funding
to
be
able
to
put
any
City
share
towards
this.
E
C
Yeah
I'd
be
looking
at
adjusting
the
capital
budget
there
to
accommodate
this.
Somehow,
if
you
want
to
produce
another
project
or
something
to
share
in
any
of
this
costs,
that's
why
I
mentioned
the
the
Dartmouth
project
is
programmed
into
the
budget.
We've
got
the
funding
for
that
for
the
bike
range
and
the
sidewalks,
so
we
do
already
have
money
towards
this
Corridor.
Anyway,
it's
not
the
specific
project.
We
do
have
some
funding
identified
to
meet.
Some
of
these
needs.
E
A
The
public
hearing
on
the
budget
is
not
until
the
2,
the
18th
or
the
19th
of
September,
so
we
still
have
time,
but
at
least
from
this
committee,
obviously
like
a
recommendation
of
moving
forward
with
this
project,
it's
something
that
we
would
want
to
see
from
Council,
but
obviously,
from
our
standpoint,
we
just
got
to
make
sure
that
the
budgeting
dollars
are
there
and
and
B
yeah.
That
would
be
the
big
thing,
especially
with
so
many
capital
capital
projects
they
already
have
invested.
A
E
Thankful
thank
you
that
that's
that's
helpful
and
and
I
think
yeah
I
guess,
as
a
committee,
we
need
to
decide
I,
don't
know
if
other
people
have
questions
to
you,
but
just
thinking
you
know
what
what
we
want
to
put
forward
to
you
know,
counsel
or
recommend
or
or
not.
You
know
either
way
that
the
community
wants
to
go.
We
want
to
be
thoughtful
about
that.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
all
for
your
input
on
that
I
appreciate
that.
F
One
one
last
thing:
some
of
the
other
partners
are
programming
their
commitment
over
a
two-year
period.
I,
don't
know
what
inglewood's
rules
are
around
that,
but
they
seeing
that
the
study
won't
start
in
Earnest
until
2023
and
it's
probably
a
two-year
process
and
they're
they're
budgeting
that
over
a
two-year
period.
C
F
A
F
C
F
C
F
C
That's
what
I
remember
there
so
yeah!
That's
the
different
options
there,
I
guess,
depending
on
the
level
of
Interest
or,
and
it's
more
for
if
we
want
to
do
future,
Capital
Improvements
along
those
quarters
there
for
for
Transit
and
we
would
need
to
participate
to
get
into
the
NEPA
process
and
stuff.
Is
that
right.
F
Correct
now
now
or
later,
I
mean
Aurora
made
the
decision
with
us
that
they
didn't
want
to
participate
and,
as
we
went
through
the
30
design
process,
they
they
said.
Oh
those
stations,
look
pretty
nice
and
what
you're
doing
for
your
community
is
going
to
make
us
look
pretty
bad
when
you
get
to
the
city
limits
so
we'd
now
like
to
participate,
and
so
they
have
city
of
Aurora
has
approved
14
million
dollars
this
year
to
join
the
East
Colfax
project.
C
F
C
F
Correct
yeah
Sheridan
felt
like
they
were,
making
current
Transit
improvements
with
a
tip
grant
that
they
had
won
a
year
or
two
ago
and
are
currently
constructing
that
and
they're
feeling
like
at
the
moment,
that's
what
they
are
able
to
commit
to,
and
so
they
were
going
to
provide
a
support
letter.
Instead,
that
said
they
they
think
this
is
a
good
effort
and
they
would
like
to
be
considered
operational,
even
though
the
infrastructure
wouldn't
be
considered
they'd
like
to
be
considered
that
way
and
participate.
B
F
B
Does
anybody
have
I
mean
you
know
like
when
we
think
about
spending
money?
It's
tempting
to
just
say:
let's
spend
it
all
and
do
the
500
000
version,
but
you
know,
as
you
mentioned
Chris,
that
we
just
went
through
a
budgeting
process
and
you
know
chose
the
highest
priority
project.
So
does
anybody
have
any
specific
feeling
about
how
like
what
we
should
fund.
D
No
memory,
kinetics
and
I
would
just
like
for
cherick
and
Addison.
I
would
like
to
say
that
I
generally
do
support
this
project,
and
it
was
interesting,
though,
as
the
more
information
came
to
light
here
regarding
I
guess
the
fact
that
and
and
Tim
Might
again
I
don't
want
to
put
words
in
your
mouth.
But
what
I'm
understanding
is
that
by
supporting
this
and
moving
forward
with
that,
the
city
would
have
to
take
funding
away
from
perhaps
another
project.
That's
already
slated
and
23.
Is
that
my
understanding
of
that.
C
D
But
there
is
also
flexibility
that
I'm
understanding
from
I
think
David
here
in
terms
of
the
city,
can
break
that
amount
up
and
if
it's
300,
000
and
split
it
up
from
150
000
this
year
to
150
000
the
following
year.
That's
also
a
mechanism
the
city
city
council
can
use
as
well
too.
Is
that
that
correct.
C
That
may
be
something
we
have
to
you
know
if
you
commit
to
one
year
and
you
commit
to
the
second,
we
need
to
make
that
clear
that
it's
committing
24
funding
as
well,
and
it's
going
to
affect
the
24
budget
as
well.
Right,
let's
see
if
we
don't
do
the
two-year
cycle,
like
that's,
usually
they're
following
year
with
the
program
out,
but
we
would
need
to
make
it
clear
that
it's
not.
A
D
And
those
improvements
Tim
that
you
mentioned,
that
are
happening
that
are
slated
to
happen
with
the
Dartmouth
improvements
up
to
Inca.
So
those
are
bike,
lanes
and
I
think
some
of
that
which
are
detailed,
but
they
exclude
some
of
the
improvements
that
David
is
suggesting
here.
At
those
stations,
no
shelters,
I'm
imagining
or
whatever
those
improvements
would
be
right.
C
Yeah
yeah,
it
was
no
specific
bus,
stop
shelter,
improvements
or
anything
with
that
project,
but
it
definitely
handles
the
sidewalks
and
bike
Lanes
along
there.
So
it
makes
it
easier
to
walk
and
ride
your
bike
through
there.
So
it's
the
bus
stops
are
a
little
bit
of
a
different
to
program.
A
project
data
and
I
were
offended
by
that.
B
A
Since
we
last
look
at
the
budget,
but
one
of
the
things
that
I
did
want
to
mention
is
that
I
know
this
Council
looks
favorably
for
projects
when
there
is
any
type
of
coordination
with
other
committees
when
there
are
matching
grants
or
matching
dollars
involved.
So
it
kind
of
moves
a
little
bit
higher
in
the
priority
list.
But
again
it's
kind
of
hard
for
me
to
say
whether
or
not
this
is
something
you
would
prioritize,
not
knowing
exactly
what
we
have
in
the
store
for
the
next
couple
years.
So.
B
B
E
So
I'm
I'm
kind
of
I'm
kind
of
curious
just
to
see
amongst
the
groups.
You
know
kind
of
what.
What
do
you
guys
think?
Because
I
don't
want
to
necessarily
put
a
motion
forth.
You
know
without
knowing
where
people
are
at,
because
I
would
want
to
make
the
right
motion
also
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
can
make
one,
because
my
camera
is
not
working
so
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
officially
count
for
something
like
that,
but
I'm
just
kind
of
curious.
What
the
team
thinks
so
you
know,
Dartmouth
is,
is
an
important
connection.
E
I
I
think
that
if
we
were
going
to
support
something,
I
would
be
more
in
favor
of
Dartmouth
than
you
know.
The
other
extended
option,
I
I,
really
think
it's
important
for
us
to
participate
in
this
Inglewood
station
is
an
important
connection
to
the
light
rail
as
it
comes
down,
Federal
and,
and
that
thoroughfare
on
Dartmouth
is
important.
You
know
at
the
the
timing
is,
is
kind
of
thrown
me
for
a
loop
here,
because
I
really
want
to
support
some
of
this
stuff.
I
know
it's
on
short
notice.
E
We
would
have
to
go
up.
You
know
thinking
about
some
of
the
things
that
were
in
the
budget,
we're
going
to
have
to
go
like
there's
some
prioritization
and
some
consideration
that
would
have
to
be
made
with
a
few
projects
in
there
and
and
so
I
know,
that's
going
to
be
some
hard
work
as
well
and
and
I
want
to
be
respectful.
E
You
know
people's
time,
because
I
know
there
will
be
a
lot
of
effort
there
too,
but
also
you
know,
Greg
made
a
really
good
point
earlier
about
how
these
are
the
types
of
projects
that
really
help
us
with
the
long-term
things
that
can
help
us
apply
for
Grants.
You
know
we
can
go
out
and
just
we
already
have
this
in
our
pocket.
Something
comes
available.
E
So
I'm
I'm
a
little
torn
on
on
what
the
ask
is,
but
I'm
I'm
comfortable.
You
know
with
some
convincing
in
any
direction.
I
I
think
it's
important
that
we
participate
at
least
in
some
respect
on
this.
Just
because
of
the
connection
that
we
have
to
that
light
rail
station
there
and
a
lot
of
the
work
that's
going
to
be
going
on
along
that
Corridor
on
Dartmouth,
so
I'm
kind
of
curious.
What
what
is
the
rest
of
the
group
thing.
D
Me
a
little
skeptical
in
that
sense
there
so
because
I
know
we
have
a
tight
budget
and
we've
gone
through
that.
But
again
you
know.
I
I
could
generally
say
that
I
support
this
and
doing
that,
but
I'm
I'm,
hoping
that
at
least
the
committee
would
be
included
in
further
conversation
about
what
that
entails
and
how
we
can
even
problem
solve
or
prioritize
what
we
refer
to
down
the
road.
If
the
issue
of
funding
becomes
an
issue,
as
that
makes
sense
there
so
to
do
that
there,
but
that's.
A
D
B
Got
it?
Thank
you,
yeah
I
think
you
know
one
other
thing
if
I'm
understanding
your
characterization
here
David,
is
that
there's
sort
of
money
that's
being
thrown
into
this
pool
that
any
work
that
we
do
now
is
sort
of.
It's
like
it's
like
there's
a
sale,
there's
like
a
30
off
40
off
sale
or
whatever
on
any
work.
That's
done
now,
whereas
if
we
were
to
do
it
later,
we
would
be
funding
the
whole
bill
for
ourselves.
Is
that
does
that
seem
accurate.
F
I
think
that's
that's
accurate
or
you
would
be
pursuing
your
own
grants
at
that
time.
So
the
four
million
dollars
ask
for
Dr
Cox
CDOT
funds
proportionally.
Is
it
would
amount
to
about
200
250
000,
coming
back
to
match
what
Inglewood
is
is
getting
on
this,
what
what
you'd
be
putting
in,
and
so,
if
you
forego
that
opportunity
at
this
point,
then
at
some
later
point
you
decide
you
want
to
do
that.
You're
going
after
your
own
Grant
and
writing
your
own
application.
B
E
E
There's
work
going
on
that
specific
spot
right
there
and
I'm
I'm
just
wondering-
and
maybe
you
can't
even
answer
this
but
I'm-
just
kind
of
curious
based
on
what's
been
discussed
and
planned
for
that
specific
piece
of
this
corridor,
and-
and
maybe
this
goes
to
David
as
well,
based
on
the
RTD
Maps
but
I'm
just
kind
of
curious.
What
are
the
stuff
that
we're
working
on
right
now?
Is
that
going
to
be
prohibitive
or
not
mesh?
F
I
I
mean
I,
think
we're
we're
largely
talking
about
us.
Priority
lanes
and
bus
stops
along
this
to
include
a
bridge
replacement
or
expansion.
I
think
is
unless
we
could
show
that
there
was
a
Transit
Nexus
that
there's
no
way
to
get
buses
across
the
bridge,
then
I
think
the
Federal
Transit
Administration
won't
look
at
that
as
a
part
of
the
transit
project.
They'll.
Look
at
that
as
a
separate
Bridge
Project
that
needs
to
occur.
Oh.
C
Yes,
we've
already
got
a
project
going
to
whiten
that
bridge,
so
the
whitening
that
bridge
would
definitely
help
the
bus
service
through
Dartmouth
there.
That's
obviously
a
bottleneck
like
you
said.
We
need
to
get
that
extra
Lane
on
there
to
go
all
the
way
to
Santa
Fe.
So
it's
certainly
going
to
help
the
buses
get
back
and
forth
across
that
bridge.
A
lot
better
when
we
get
that
project
underway
here,
yeah
definitely
is,
would
help
the
bus
route
for
transit
for
sure.
E
Okay,
thanks
that,
that's
that's
very
helpful.
You
know
my
I
guess:
I
was
kind
of
asking
in
case
you
know.
Maybe
the
plan
says
we
need
a
dedicated
bus
lane
or
something
along
those
lines
along
with
The
Pedestrian
Lane.
So
you
know
knowing
that
the
which
bridge
will
be
why
our
I
I
guess
that
sounds
like
it
will
allow
for
more
options
in
how
traffic
gets
across
that
bridge.
So
thanks,
Tim
David.
E
Sure
I
mean
do
you
guys
want
to
recommend
the
city
looks
into
this.
What
do
you
think
I
was
fishing
earlier
yeah?
What
do
you
guys
think
I
mean
it's
a
short
time
frame.
I
know,
there's
a
few
options.
I
I
personally
would
vote
in
favor
of
something
for
at
least
a
next
step
and
I.
Don't
know
if
that
means
that
you
know
Tim
would
need
to
get
out
the
prioritization
list,
real
quick,
so
that
we
can,
you
know,
provide
a
strong
recommendation.
E
If
that's
what
the
committee
wants
to
put
forward,
that's
probably
would
be
a
way
to
move
something
quickly,
or
maybe
it's
a
some
other
type
of
consideration.
But
I
mean
what
do
you
guys
think
I'm
like
Patrick
Chen
or
you
know?
What
do
you
guys
think
about?
Should
we
ask
the
city
to
look
at
this
further
I
mean
I
I.
Think
we're
we're
obviously
in
support
of
supporting
it.
But
what
do
you
guys
think
yeah.
A
D
For
for
this
to
kind
of
engage
with
what
the
next
steps
are
to
understand
how
the
city
is
going
to
react
to
it
or
approach
it,
I
guess
moving
forward
if
that,
if
that
triggers,
that
and
I
would
hopefully
we
appreciate
the
city
just
coming
back
to
us
and
I,
don't
know
again
concerning
the
time
frame.
What
we're
up
against
when
it
seems
has
to
happen
pretty
quick
here
how
quickly
that
can
happen,
maybe
by
the
next
meeting,
I'm,
not
sure.
If
that
would
be
something
we
can
look
at
then
so.
C
A
F
C
B
B
E
Yeah
we
could-
and
we
could
also
make
a
motion
to
you-
know,
have
the
city
recommend
or
pursue
being
a
part
of
the
committee,
as
was
also
discussed.
There's
a
few
other
things
like
you
know,
we're
the
transportation
committee.
Let's
act
in
our
best
interest
and
and
at
least
let
the
city
know,
and
we
think
things
are
important
if
you
guys
think
this
is
important.
E
E
I'd
just
like
to
clarify
I
understand
that
our
participation
may
not
be
of
our
own
accord.
We
may
or
may
not
be
allowed
to
participate
whether
or
not
we
fund
this
project,
but
generally
speaking,
I
just
wanted
to
have
that
on
the
record.
That
I've
realized
that
we
may
not
be
the
final
decision
maker
in
that
participation.
B
D
E
C
E
B
C
Yeah
I
can
go
over
this
side.
I
wanted
to
show
this
I'm,
not
sure
everybody
on
the
committee
is
seen.
These
are
our
concept
plans
for
the
old
Hampden
improvements
between
Lafayette
and
Broadway,
so
I
think
I,
remember,
Heller
and
I.
Think
I,
remember
D
group
as
well
I'm
here
on
the
planning,
the
public
comment
committee
for
this
project,
but
I
wanted
to
share
this
concept
with
everybody
and
get
get
your
feedback
on
the
kind
of
what
we're
looking
at
for
the
multimodal
improvements
and
see.
C
If
you
have
any
thoughts
on
ways,
we
can
make
this
work,
but
if
you
want
to
just
I
guess,
I
can
kind
of
go
through
it
at
least
gets
that
was
just
kind
of
broken
down
into
three
different
segments
of
old
hand
in
there
and
they
all
have
a
one.
One
thing
in
common
is
the
concept
is
a
it's
called
a
multi-use
path
on
the
North
side,
it's
a
10
foot
wide
path
for
bike,
stand
pedestrians
and
that
that's
common
to
the
whole
quarter.
C
The
cross-section,
though,
that
one
there
shows
the
it's
along
the
north
side.
There
would
be
the
this
multi-use
path.
I
was
talking
about
and
then
there'd
be
a
four
foot
landscape
buffer
there
between
the
path
and
the
road,
and
then
we
have
the
street
would
just
be
just
for
the
cars.
Only
all
the
bikes
would
be
up
on
the
multi-use
path,
along
with
the
pedestrians
on
the
North
side,
and
there
would
be
a
five
foot
walk
on
the
South
Side,
that's
wider
than
is
there
now.
C
I
mean
templates,
are
kind
of
a
typical
width
for
a
path
for
bikes
and
pads,
but
there's
been
some
concern
about
the
trying
to
have
them
share
that
and
how
we
might
want
to
do
that
differently.
I'd
like
to
get
some
feedback
from
the
committee.
If
we
could
your
thoughts
on
that
concept
there
and
if
you
have
any
other
ideas
or
what
might
work
a
better,
how
to
divide
that
path
up
for
bikes
and
pits.
D
Chair
can
Addison.
This
might
be
a
question
for
you,
so
I've
I've
I've,
seen
occasionally
where
you
have
what
would
be
a
a
path
and
I'm,
not
quite
certain
of
the
width
that's
laid
out
and
you
do
have
what
would
be
pedestrians
kind
of
on
one
side
and
then
bicyclists
on
the
other
side
coming
back
and
forth
as
well.
You
know
just
opposite
directions,
obviously,
and
then
but
I'm
not
certain
to
width
on
that.
D
What
the
requirements
would
be
on
that
it
seems
to
try
to
facilitate
something
of
that
nature,
to
kind
of
separate
them,
and
you
know
the
understanding.
You
know
you
got
bikes
here
and
pedestrians
here.
I
think
that
would
be
beneficial
to
kind
of
avoid
the
confusion
and
everything
that
would
happens
on
a
multi-use
path,
but
I'm,
just
unfamiliar
with
what
that
width
requirement
would
be
and
I
don't
know.
If
10
foot
is
sufficient.
B
B
If
10
feet
is
enough
or
not
or
I,
I
guess
you
know,
I
have
seen
on
like
the
Campus
of
CU
Boulder
that
they
have
I,
think
bikes
going
in
both
lanes
and
people
walking
or
bikes
going
in
both
directions,
plus
people
walking
going
in
both
directions
and
I
wonder
how
wide
those
paths
are.
Those
are
probably
they
feel
like
they're,
pretty
close
to
10
feet.
D
I
mean
that's
right
now,
the
only
question
that
I
have
in
regards
to
I
think
Tim.
What
your
question
was
in
terms
of
you
know,
facilitating
a
comfort
level
for
for
everyone
to
be
able
to
use
that
10-foot
path.
You
know
which
I'm
I'm
supportive
of
I
mean
it's
a
great
Improvement
right
here
to
what's
existing
out.
D
There
I've
been
on
that
quarter
way
too
often
recently,
but
to
understand
that
this
is
a
great
Improvement
but
again
yeah
just
to
to
make
it
to
where
it's
something
that
people
feel
safe
and
they
feel
like.
Oh,
this
is
something
that's
functioning
to
a
higher
level
to
do
that
there
you
know
we
do
have
in
this
slide
right
here.
D
It
shows
that
seven
and
a
half
foot
park,
strip
and
I
don't
know
and
I
think
the
following
slides
might
show
that
shrunk
down
a
little
bit
as
well
too
so
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
sense
that
that
could
be
minimized
just
a
bit
to
gain
a
little
bit
more
on
the
path.
I,
don't
know
if
that
conversations
been
brought
up
as
well
too
so
again,
just
brainstorming
just
thinking
out
there
in
terms
of
maybe
something
that
could
could
help
without
out
with
that.
D
A
B
G
I
might
have
missed
this,
but
is
there
not
room
to
put
a
bike
lane
in
the
street
and
have
pedestrians?
I
was
also
just
wondering
like
that
whole
Corridor,
where
the
hospital
is,
has
a
lot
of
traffic
coming
the
other
way
too
so
I
don't
know
which
is
easier
to
not
even
just
car
traffic
but
like
the
the
valets
and
people
patients
going
to
those
parking
lots,
don't
always
use
the
bridge
and
there's
those
crosswalks.
G
So
I
was
just
wondering
I,
guess,
sort
of
two
questions:
is
there
enough
room
to
put
the
bike
lane
in
the
street
and
have
it
protected
there
versus
on
the
sidewalk?
But
then
my
other
question
is
if
it
does
become
all
of
it
on
the
sidewalk,
because
they're
going
to
be
a
lot
of
signage,
that
bikes
also
have
to
yield
I,
don't
know
just
seems
like
there's
I
drive
down
there.
A
lot
seems
like
there
could
be
a
lot
of
collisions
of
bikers
and
Hospital
people,
visitors
and
things
like
that.
C
Yeah,
so
it's
pretty
difficult
to
get
the
bike
plane
a
protected
bike
lane
onto
the
asphalt
there
it
Narrows
the
sidewalk
down.
We
lose
a
lot
of
that
landscape
strip.
That
is
an
option
that
they
looked
at
to
do
and
it
was
just
very
tight
and
it
was.
It
didn't
really
give
us
the
protection
we
were
looking
for.
That
was
kind
of
the
goal
anyway.
C
So
that's
where
they
came
up
with
this
concept
of
keeping
the
bikes
and
the
pads
on
the
on
that
multi-use
path
and
being
able
to
totally
separate
the
bikes
from
the
vehicle.
So
there
was
no
try
to
reduce
the
any
incidence
between
bikes
and
vehicles,
so
that
was
that
was
an
alternative
look
at,
but
it
just
didn't
it
wasn't
enough
that
protected
location,
I,
just
wasn't,
didn't
fit
very
well.
So
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
I
wasn't
pursued,
but
the
other
option
that's
been
brought
up
too.
Is
we?
C
If
we
keep
the
multi-use
path,
we
could
put
a
sharrow
down
on
the
street
for
the
more
comfortable
bike,
riders
or
tomorrow.
What
do
they
call
them?
A
commuter
cyclist
that
a
little
more
comfortable
riding
with
the
traffic
that,
if
somebody
did
want
to
ride
out
in
the
street,
it
would
still
be
allowable.
You
know
you
could
be
out
there
and
if
you
wanted
to
avoid
all
the
pigs
you
could
ride
along
with
the
traffic
there.
C
B
C
So
so
the
multi-use
path
would
be
10
foot
for
the
whole
length,
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
difference
in
the
width
of
the
landscape
strip
and
some
some
sections
have
to
have
a
term
line
for
intersections
and
stuff.
We've
got
to
keep
the
term
right
in
there
if
we
left
turns,
but-
and
you
can
scroll
through
the
rest
of
the
slides
here.
Each
of
the
quarters
has
a
little
bit
of
a
different
I
see
with
to
it
there.
So
this
is
the
segment
B.
This
is
between
Logan
and
Clarkson.
C
This
next
one
here.
So
it's
it's
pretty
similar.
It's
just
the
sidewalk
on
the
south.
It
gets
a
little
wider
there.
It
could
be
seven
feet.
We
have
a
little
more
room,
so
it's
a
little
different,
but
then
the
one
furthest
to
the
west
by
Lafayette.
We
actually
have
enough
room
to
get
an
island
in
that
section.
So
it's
really
nice
we're
able
to
get
the
landscape
down
the
center
there
as
well,
is
what
we're
looking
to
do.
C
B
G
C
B
E
Tim
so
I
I
have
a
question
for
you:
I
don't
want
to
get
too
far
ahead
on
the
agenda.
I'm
looking
through
the
packet
and
some
of
the
slides,
and
it
looks
like
there's
a
couple
of
different
sections
that
are
just
laid
out
a
little
bit
different
than
each
other,
and
so
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
might
make
sense
to
look
at
some
of
those
or
if
you
were
trying
to
solicit
input
individually
on
each
of
these
kind
of
different
sections
that
are
displayed
on
here.
C
So
yeah,
these
additional
slides
just
show
all
the
turn
lanes
and
a
little
more
detail
about
the
actual,
every
single
block,
how
it
would
look
there
but
yeah
the
main
thing
we're
looking
at
now.
The
multi-use
path
is
a
major
decision.
We
need
to
make
to
move
forward
there
to
see
if
we're
going
to
do
that
or
not
because
that'll
change
the
quarter
quite
a
lot.
C
If
we're
not
going
to
do
that
or
if
there's
other
thoughts
or
preferences
there,
we
wanted
to
for
them
to
make
sure
that
multi-use
path
is
going
to
be
able
to
be
used
by
everybody
and
everyone's
comfortable
with
that
judaismat
of
a
new
concept
as
well.
We
don't
have
multi-use
paths
in
the
city
right
now
for
bikes
and
pads,
so
we
want
to
verify
if
that's
going
to
work
or
not,
because
we'll
have
to
get
feedback
to
the
consultant
there.
It
does
appear
that
this
project
is
going
to
receive
the
grant
funding.
C
C
Correct
yeah,
that
is,
we're
not
going
to
do
the
path
we're
going
to
need
to
do
somebody
working
here
this.
This
presentation
is
what
was
submitted
with
the
Grant
application.
So
this
is
right
presented
is
what
we
would
build
with
the
funding.
So
for
we're
not
going
to
do
that,
we
need
to
start
addressing
some
of
those
topics.
D
C
More
than
likely
the
sidewalk
would
narrow
and
we
would
try
to
fit
the
bike
lane
onto
the
street
somehow
and
have
it
be,
like
you
know,
like
I,
was
saying
it's
tough
to
make
it
fully
protected,
though
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
room
to
make
any
kind
of
an
island
or
any
kind
of
a
landscape
ship
there
in
the
street.
If
you'd
ride
the
sidewalk
and
the
bike
lane
up
it's
difficult
to
divide
those
two
up,
it
just
takes
more
space
to
get
that
division
there.
C
A
C
S
want
to
use
that
and
still
have
to
ride
it
out
in
the
street
with
traffic
and
stuff
I.
Think
a
lot
of
this
quarter
is
not
necessarily
commuter
cyclists,
but
maybe
more
Leisure,
cyclists
and
stuff.
We
want
to
make
it
comfortable
for
people
that
were
maybe
riding
around
with
their
kids
and
stuff
that
this
would
be
a
safer
alternative
to
keep
them
away
from
the
traffic
going
through
there.
D
D
Maybe
that's
something
that
could
come
about
a
little
bit
later
on
in
understanding
how
how
people
are
reacting
or
responding
to
that
if
we
find
it
to
be
more
problematic
than
we
initially
thought,
but
I
I
generally
am
in
in
support
of
you
know
of
that
10-foot
multi-use
path.
There
I
think
it's
just
going
to
be
more
space
for
people
to
just
move
about,
and
do
that
and
feel
that
Comfort
level
there.
That's
not
existent
right
now.
G
G
G
Guessing
it's
a
lot
of
employees
that
are
working
on
that
particular
build
right
there,
but
I
would
also
assume
that
there's
going
to
be
people
from
both
those
new
apartment
complexes
that
do
not
have
enough
garage
space
is
the
city
requiring
enough
or
where
will
alternative
parking
be
with
I?
Think
it's
great
that
there's
no
parking
I'm
just
wondering
if
all
of
this
is
going
to
overflow
into
neighborhoods.
C
I
think
that
is
part
of
the
study
is
to
make
sure
that
there
is
enough
parking.
I
know
the
new
developments.
They
were
required
to
put
enough
parking
on
site
that
they
do
have
enough.
I.
Think
some
of
these,
you
might
be
I,
think
some
of
them
charge
for
parking,
so
people
park
on
the
street,
because
it's
free
so
I
think
there's
some
issues
where
we
need
to
work
through
with
some
of
those
complexes.
C
G
Yeah
I
I
think
that
would
be
great
I
mean
I,
don't
know,
I
just
think,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
people
from
both
of
those
apartment
complexes
that
don't
have
the
garage
space
to
park
and
I
know
that
the
Julia
Temple
nursing
home
employees
already
park
outside
of
their
parking
lot
and
there's
had
to
be
permit
parking
only
over
there.
So
I
don't
know
the
answer.
Just
maybe
something
to
consider.
G
C
All
right,
that's
good
feedback
and
for
all
the
businesses
it's
up
to
you.
We
don't
want
the
businesses
to
be.
You
know
struggling
for
their
customers
to
find
a
place
to
park.
We
want
to
make
sure
people
can
still
get
to
the
businesses
in
that
area.
So
that's
definitely
something
that's
going
to
be
looked
at
closer
as
we
get
further
into
the
design
on
this
to
make
sure
we
don't
create
an
unintended
consequence
somewhere
else.
By
doing
that,
so
definitely
be
part
of
the
overall
look
at
the
final
design.
I.
G
Have
one
more
positive
of
that,
though,
the
positive
piece
of
not
having
any
of
that
street
parking?
Is
it
really
opens
up
The
View
when
you're
trying
to
make
any
kind
of
right
hand
turn
off
of
any
of
those
side,
streets
or
left-hand
turn?
It
is
so
hard
to
see
where
you're
going
so
a
benefit
to
not
having
any
street
parking
right.
G
There
is
the
visibility
and,
if
you're
going
to
have
more
pedestrians,
which
is
the
Hope,
then
you
know
that
visibility
opens
up
a
lot,
so
there's
definitely
Pros
to
it,
but
just
thinking
about
where
people
who
live
in
those
apartment
complexes
who
have
you
know
two
to
three
cars
per
unit
and
only
one
garage
spot.
Where
are
they
going
to
go
so
that
was
it
sorry.
E
Oh,
it
says
on
the
it's
on
the
North
side,
correct
of
the
road
okay,
I
I,
really
like
seeing
the
park
strips
on
there
I
think
that's
something
that
Inglewood
has
done
well
with
the
updates
on
Broadway
and
some
other
areas
and
and
I
think
this
is
another
great
spot
for
us
to
add
some
of
that
as
as
a
feature
and
and
the
separated
wide
path.
I
think
is
a
great
idea,
especially
given
that
there's
always
going
to
be
emergency
vehicles
in
that
area.
E
Okay,
great,
you
know
I've,
given
the
nature
of
that
road.
I
see
people
on
one
side
of
the
road,
probably
utilizing
that
significantly
more,
particularly
on
the
downhill
side,
not
the
uphill
side,
which
also
in
the
winter.
The
uphill
side
would
be
the
side
that
would
be
more
in
the
shade
as
well
over
there
as
a
consideration.
You
guys
have
thought
about
a
lot
of
that
already.
Given
the
building
designs
in
that
area,
the
10
foot
wide
path,
I,
don't
think
it
should
go
any
more
narrow
than
that.
E
I
I
liked
Greg's
idea
of
that
sort
of
Separation
by
maybe
color
or
even
you
know,
texture.
You
know.
Maybe
you
have
a
different
texture
on
The
Pedestrian
side
that
would
just
make
it
less
comfortable
for
bikes
to
ride
on
and
it
wouldn't
actually
put
people
over
on
the
other
side,
or
you
know
textured
rumble
strips
now
and
then
or
something
to
give
it
a
little
design.
E
Inglewood
Locos,
maybe
just
just
a
thought
but
I,
don't
think
that
should
go
any
narrower
and
I
like
that,
it's
separated
and
and
to
keep
it
separated
from
the
traffic
perfectly
and
so
fully
and
supported
that
you
know
if
it
could
even
be
a
little
wider.
There's
a
there's,
a
part
of
me
that
looks
at
this
width
of
the
road
and
I.
You
know
I,
think
about
it
like
a
budget,
and
where
do
you
allocate
your
money
or
what
you
allocate
your
100
feet
that
you
have
to
work
with.
E
You
know
so
where's
your
priorities
here
on
on
the
section
of
Road
and
and
so
I
think
there
there's
been
a
nice
prioritization
of
the
pedestrian
areas
in
in
the
park
strips
which
I
think
are
important
because
also
those
Parks
groups,
if
we
do
need
to
make
adjustments
to
the
past
in
the
future.
That
gives
some
leeway
on
on
either
side,
but
also
I
like
the
protection
from
the
traffic,
because
you
know
sometimes
it
can
get
a
little
fast
in
that
area,
so
fully
unsupported
that
as
well.
E
You
know
I
I,
don't
know
what
the
effect
of
the
budget
would
be
to
make
that
10
foot
path,
an
11
foot
wide
path,
yeah,
it's
it's
quite
a
distance
and
that's
quite
a
bit
of
concrete
in
there.
You
know
there's
some
real
costs
associated
with
that,
but
thinking
about
Greg's
idea
of
the
separation
a
little
bit
of
the
the
ped
and
and
the
cyclist
over
there.
You
know.
Maybe
that
could
be
something
that
could
be
considered
in
the
way
that
it's
designed,
as
maybe
a
future
update
to
maybe
widen
that
side.
E
E
You
know,
I
hadn't
even
thought
of
that,
because
I
don't
go
over
and
that
section
as
frequently
as
others
do,
and
so
the
parking
hasn't
really
affected
me
other
than
the
businesses
that
I
visited
with
the
Lots
but
I
think
with
some
of
the
zoning
and
and
the
requirements
there.
You
know
the
lots
are
gonna,
maybe
be
a
little
smaller
than
they
need
to
be
in
some
situations
and
that's
just
the
nature
of
some
of
the
businesses
over
there.
So
anyways,
that's
my
input.
Thank
you.
D
Yeah
so
yeah,
basically
I
going
back
to
again
member
Heller
that
did
bring
up
a
great
point
about
the
parking
there
too
I
I
understand
how
how
busy
that
history
there
and
for
people
in
neighborhood,
or
whether
your
employee
at
Swedish
and
so
on,
there's
just
quite
a
bit
happening
there
and
the
parking
is,
is
a
concern
there.
I
guess.
D
Therefore,
you
know
developer
needs
to
understand
that
there's
going
to
be
maybe
additional
parking
needs,
or
you
know
for
that.
So
I
hope
that
happens
and
I
think
I,
don't
generally
from
what
I've
heard
here.
It
seems
as
if
Tim
everybody's,
pretty
agreeable
and
a
10
foot
sidewalk
there
or
multi-use
path.
There
probably
is
a
minimum
I.
Think
member
member
Diedrich
mentioned
11
foot,
so
I
I
think
right
now
we
could
almost
vote
on
that
if
we
need
B
in
terms
of
that.
So
but
that's
my
comments
on
that.
B
C
Yeah
I
think
at
this
time,
just
feedback
and
what
we're
going
to
do
is
go
back
to
the
consultant
with
some
of
this
feedback
and
see
what
they
can
do
to
address.
Some
of
this
see
what
we
can
I,
really
like
the
thought
of.
Maybe
the
different
color
concrete
for
the
bike.
Section
I,
think
that
might
help
to
find
that
better.
Also
we'll
kick
around
some
of
those
ideas
and
come
back
to
you
with
some
other
options,
maybe
and
some
things
we
can
do
and
not
do
to
get
some
more
feedback.
C
A
C
B
B
Yeah
but
I
think
I
think
that
you
know
the
at
that
section,
especially
that
the
the
like
morning,
traffic
when
the
class
is
starting,
is
pretty
heavy
on
the
campus
and
I.
Don't
think
that
the
hospital
approaches
that
level
of
of
foot
traffic
in
a
concentrated
time
period
so
I
feel
like
something
that's
at
least
10
feet
should
be
pretty
good
for
the
for
how
dense
that
area
is
and
I
feel
like
yeah
remember,
Lewis
I
feel
like
that
was
a
great
idea
to
the
sharrows
as
well.
B
You
know
so
that,
like
we've
got
I
think
it
was
your
idea
anyway
that
yeah
so
like
providing
you
know
hey
if
you
want
to
be
on
the
sidewalk
like
you're,
saying
I,
think
you
mentioned
this
Tim
like
if
somebody's
going
with
folks
who
are
not
as
as
bold
of
riders.
If
they're
like
a
level
one
writer,
then
staying
on
the
sidewalk
and
traveling
at
10
miles
an
hour.
Okay,
fine
that
that's
a
pretty
compatible
use
with
somebody
who's
walking
on
the
sidewalk.
B
C
No
I,
don't
think
I
have
anything
additional
to
share
this
evening.
Those
are
the
two
two
items
we
have
ongoing
now
for
the
committee
I'm.
Not.
Let
me
give
you
a
couple
updates
on
projects
and
things.
We
did
recently
kick
off
our
melon
overlay
project
for
this
year
that
started
earlier
this
week,
they're
going
to
be
repainting
a
lot
of
the
streets
in
the
southeast
part
of
the
city.
C
That's
where
we're
working
this
year,
so
that's
kicked
off
and
our
allegrating
program
is
just
about
wrapped
up
for
the
year
we've
just
about
rated
every
alley
now
with
the
V
channel.
So
that's
exciting
to
see.
We've
got
Derby
alley
now
about
that
contractor
is
going
back
and
touching
up
some
of
the
ones
that
needed
a
little
more
work
and
we
should
be
in
good
shape
for.
C
B
B
D
But
what
I've
seen
too
often
is
that
you
you
get
a
new
roadway
or
paved
roadway
and
then
immediately
following
that,
there's
somebody
there
just
cutting
it
up
and
putting
some
patch
back
and
depending
on
the
patch
it
just
just
doesn't
come
back
to
being
a
nice
finished
product
as
it
was
previously.
Does
a
city
have
a
any
sort
of
moratorium
or
guidance
on
that.
C
So
yeah
we
do
have
a
two-year
moratorium
on
that.
But
what
happens
like
you
said
those
emergency
gas
leaks.
It's
hard
to
stop
on
the
gas
is
leaking
yeah.
Whatever
reason
they
seem
to
follow
around
the
overlay
project,
you're
right
that
that
kills
me
as
much
as
anything
to
see
that
happen.
Oh
my
gosh
we're
going
to
cut
into
a
brand
new
map.
Definitely
we
don't
let
them
do
any
kind
of
planned
work,
we'll
push
them
out.
You've
got
to
wait
at
least
two
years
after
we
pave
the
road,
so
they
don't
cut
into
it.
C
But
it's
those
service
lines.
At
times
you
don't
have
a
leaking
gas
service
or
a
leaking
water
service
or
something,
and
we
just
we've-
got
to
get
those
repaired.
Those
are
the
safety
yeah.
So,
unfortunately,
those
are
some
of
those
cuts
you
see,
and
that
is
something
we've
we're
trying
to
get
the
contractor
to
do
a
little
better
job,
we're
patching
those
back
in
so
they
don't
look
like
such
a
scab
on
the
street
or
looking
through
that
yeah.
That
is
something
that
will
hurt
us
as
well.
C
G
D
Just
when
they
patch
it
back
it
just
you
know,
you've
seen
it
or
commented
on
it,
just
just
kind
of
feels
like
it
ruins
the
road
it
just
they
don't
quite
get
it
right
to
what
it
was,
and
so
I
was
just
curious
on
that,
so,
but
obviously
out
of
necessity
and
out
of
safety.
If
it
needs
to
happen,
you
got
to
go
in
there
and
cut
up
the
road,
whether
they
just
pave
it
yesterday
doesn't
matter
that's
understood,
but
I
was
just
curious
on
the
city's
policy
on
that.
But
you
answer
this.
C
So
those
fiber
guys
we
do
push
them
off.
Quite
a
lot.
Actually
they'll
try
to
come
in
and
want
a
pothole
and
stuff.
Let's
say
you're
done
for
two
years.
You
can't
do
that
right
now,
when
I,
let
that
happen
right,
yeah
exactly
in
a
different
way
around,
so
you
can
go
around
to
a
different
block
or
something
you
don't
need
on
this
block
right
now
and
we
do
try
to
share
our
plan
with
them.
So
they
know
what
streets
we're
Paving
yeah.
You
want
to
get
it
in
now
before
we
pay
it.
C
Otherwise,
you're
gonna
wait
for
wait
for
a
little
more
proactive
with
them,
so
they
know.
What's
coming
and
same
with
Excel
and
CenturyLink
and
stuff,
we
try
to
meet
with
them
once
a
year
and
say
Here's
the
streets
we're
Paving
this
year.
Do
you
guys
have
anything
planned
for
these
streets
before
we
pay
them,
make
sure
they're
at
least
aware
of
it?
Then
they
can
can't
come
back
later
and
say
they
didn't
know.
We
were
Paving
the
road
we
make
sure
they
know
what
we're
whatever
it
looks
like.
B
E
Hey
remember
on
on
Neil's
question
real
quick
just
as
a
follow-on
Tim.
How
does
that
apply
to
like
new
developments
and
redevelopments?
Is
it
the
same
ruling
because
I
in
my
area
there's
a
lot
of
perpendicular
cuts
for
these
duplexes
and
things
going
in
the
I'm
just
curious?
Does
that
same
rule
apply
there.
C
So
for
those
we
do,
we
do
try
to
plan
ahead
for
those,
because
we
know
those
developments
that
are
coming
in.
We
try
to
not
do
the
overlay,
because
we
know
they've
got
to
cut
in
their
service
lines,
their
utilities
for
their
new
site
there.
So
we
do
try
to
coordinate
around
those
I.
Think
there's
there's
been
a
time
or
two
I
think
where
we've
not
realized
that
the
victim
developer
was
coming
in
that
quick
or
whatever,
but
normally
we
do
plan.
A
C
A
B
G
G
So
it
might
be
something
that
the
school
needs
to
address,
but
essentially
we
as
a
school
wanted
to
close
off
the
street
Eastman
right
here
from
I'm,
pointing
as
if
you
can
see
me
but
Eastman,
between
Downing
and
Marion,
with
just
some
temporary
cones
and
people
standing
there
to
essentially
let
our
school
bus
load
kids
up,
and
then
parents
like
to
play
Frogger
and
run
across
that
street,
and
so
closing
it
just
was
much
safer,
because
our
only
crosswalks
are
right
on
Marion
Street
or
on
Downing,
not
in
between
there.
So
anyway.
G
One
one
particular
parent
was
adamant
that
we
were
not
allowed
to
close
the
streets
off
and
we
couldn't
do
it
and
called
and
complained,
and
so
complained
enough
that
the
police
said
you
can't
do
it,
which
legally
we
couldn't,
but
we
were
all
standing
there.
This
is
a
long
story,
but
it's
just
it
feels
sometimes
very
dangerous.
Downing
is
busy
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
a
way
or
a
recommendation
or
anything
that
we
could
do,
that
encourages
the
Inglewood
Police
Department
and
the
City
to
work
more
closely.
G
So
let
me
be
proactive,
just
a
bigger
partnership,
a
greater
partnership
to
keep
our
kiddos
safe
and
whether
that
means
more
police
are
on
patrol
the
first
two
weeks
of
school
or
they're
assigned
a
rotation
for
the
first
two
weeks
of
school,
giving
giving
our
parents
tickets
they
block
driveways.
They
block
the
alley.
They
block
everything
they
park
in
handicap,
places
without
handicap
stickers.
They
Park
in
staff
parking
like
it's
just
it's
really
unfortunate,
but
it's
sometimes
a
lot
out
of
our
hands
once
they
start
getting
into
the
city
streets.
G
C
We
do
actually
have
a
coincidentally
you're
mentioning
right
now
tomorrow,
there's
a
meeting
with
the
police
department
on
our
traffic
staff
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
more
Charles
hater,
what's
going
on
and
see
if
we
can
come
up
with
a
better
plan.
So
we
are.
We
are
looking
at
that
and
we
did
get
a
request
from
the
police
department
to
take
a
look
at
better
ways
to
handle.
That
is
that
meetings
happening
tomorrow
to
try
to
discuss
some
strategies
on
that
and
make
it
different
report
back
after
the
meeting
I'll.
C
C
B
C
G
She's
ahead
of
the
bus
department,
so
the
school
bus
person,
so
she
she
probably
has
some
ideas
too
I-
think
that's
great
Tim
and
I
really
appreciate
it.
You
know
if
you
just
could
just
share
some
of
the
concerns
around
what's
out
of
our
hands.
One
parent
I'm
sure
the
neighbors
are
completely
frustrated
by
how
often
their
driveways
are
blocked,
and
it's
it's
really
just
people
not
I'm
gonna,
say
it
but
they're
being
lazy.
They
don't
want
to
walk
any
further
than
they
have
to.
G
They
want
to
get
their
kids
as
quickly
as
possible,
which
I
completely
understand
and
we're
trying
to
work
on
on
our
end
too.
But
just
it's
dangerous
people
run
the
stop
sign
people
speed
through
there.
So
I
think
you
know
if
you
could
share
all
of
those
things
and
see
if
the
city
could
help
out
or
send
officers
more
often
around
to
just
make
it
a
safer
place
and
not
have
the
staff
at
the
school
have
to
argue
with
parents
every
single
day.
C
B
B
You
know
we,
it
feels
like
there
probably
could
be
a
couple
more
especially
going
across
Floyd
since
Floyd
is
a
bit
busier
of
a
street
to
encourage
kids
to
walk,
which
you
know
then
reduces
the
number
of
people
driving
so
maybe
makes
a
Smite
slight
reduction
for
the
problem.
You're
talking
about
I
I,
wonder
about
it,
looks
like
there's
a
dedicated
right
turn
lane
here
into
this
area
is
the
idea
that
that's
like
a
drop-off
path.
G
Apparently,
when
the
school
was
originally
built,
that
that
whole
area
was
actually
just
supposed
to
be
a
bus,
pick
up
and
drop
off
a
school
bus
drop
off,
and
so
the
rest
of,
like
Lafayette
I,
mean
our
car
line,
extends
from
Eastman
and
Marion
all
the
way
around
the
back
side
of
Lafayette.
That,
however,
didn't
happen,
and
what
we
do
have
now
is
that
dedicated
right
lane
off
of
Downing
into
behind
the
school
is
for
four
through
six
pickup,
so
grade
levels.
G
Four
through
six
pick
up
back
there,
that
car
line
goes
pretty
fast,
I,
don't
think
we
have
too
much
of
a
backup
on
Downing
I,
don't
think
that's
been
the
major
complaint
and
then
the
younger
kiddos.
We
walk
them
to
their
cars,
so
they
go
and
then
right
in
front
of
the
school.
So
all
the
way
from
Downing
to
Marion,
essentially
or
where
that
parking
lot
starts,
is
a
dedicated
bus
lane.
So
we
don't
even
start
our
car
line
back
there,
but
what
maybe
will
happen
with
Kim
being
at
this
meeting?
G
Kim
de
Haven
is
that
the
bus
goes
to
where
it's
originally
was
supposed
to
go,
because
we
only
have
one
boss
and
maybe
10
kids
ride
it.
Maybe
so
we're
committing
a
whole
system
and
routine
to
one
boss
with
10
kids
on
it,
that's
kind
of
disrupting
things,
so,
hopefully
that
all
gets
worked
out
as
well,
but
I
I,
don't
you
know,
I'm
sure
that
with
Downing
is
being
as
busy,
it
is,
and
even
Dartmouth,
which
is
a
little
farther
off,
but
dartmouth's
pretty
busy
too,
that
it
creates
some
concerns
over
there.
G
B
For
sure
yeah,
my
memory
from
the
last
time
was
that
there
were
sort
of
parents
who
had
feedback
and
we
couldn't
find
somebody
on
the
school
side
who
was
willing
to
get
together
and
have
conversations
so
I
feel
like
now.
There's
some
some,
you
know
if
we
can
get
you
know:
police,
plus
parents
plus
school.