►
From YouTube: October 6, 2020 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
the
tower
expansion
here
and
another
drop-off
area
to
the
emergency
department
over
here,
the
the
tower
expansion.
A
Oh
okay:
well,
I
guess
I'll
just
have
to
explain
it
then,
to
the
left
of
the
drawing
the
one-story
building
is
the
is
the
existing
emergency
department
that
would
be
renovated
and
expanded
slightly
to
the
west.
So
a
little
bit
towards
that
parking
lot.
A
You
see
and
then
there's
a
drop-off
canopy
associated
with
the
emergency
department
and
then
the
bigger
building
in
the
middle
of
of
the
rendering
is
the
three-story
tower
expansion,
and
you
can
also
see
a
little
canopy
or
drop-off
area
associated
with
that
I
I
mentioned
and
then
to
the
right
of
the
rendering
is
the
existing
parking
garage.
A
I
I
mentioned
that
it's
a
currently
a
proposed
to
be
a
three-story
expansion,
but
actually,
if
we
were
to
go
to
the
other
side
of
this
building
on
the
back
side
of
it,
it's
a
four-story
expansion,
because
there's
a
significant
grade
drop
right
there
sloping
toward
towards
the
south,
so
it's
actually
a
four-story
tower
on
on
the
south
side
of
the
building.
A
A
So
now
I'm
going
to
just
move
a
couple
of
sheets
down
here
and
show
you
more
specifically
what
we're
talking
about
in
terms
of
the
right-of-way
vacation
so
to
orient
you
at
the
top
of
this
drawing
north
is
up
top
of
this.
Drawing
is
east
gerard
avenue
and
then
to
the
left
of
this.
Drawing
is
south,
logan
and
kind
of
in
the
middle
is
south
pennsylvania
street.
A
It's
cross-hatched
and
the
existing
properties
that
abut
south
pennsylvania
sheet
are
are
called
out
here
and
they
are
all
owned
by
either
columbia,
health,
1lc
or
hca
health
1
llc,
which
are
both
part
of
of
swedish.
A
The
the
cross
has
hatched
portion
coming
down
from
pennsylvania,
shows
the
requested
vacation
of
south
pennsylvania
street
and
then
the
little
appendage
sort
of
to
the
right
is
the
existing
alley.
So
so
this
vacation
vacation
request
again
is
abutting
swedish
property
only
it
doesn't.
This
part
of
the
existing
alley
and
south
pennsylvania
street
do
not
serve
any
other
properties
other
than
swedish
properties.
A
The
vacation
request
includes
about
16
500
square
feet
of
south
pennsylvania
street
and
about
44
100
square
feet
of
a
valley
in,
in
addition
to,
I
want
to
show
you
one
other
thing
in
this
next
graphic
and
this.
What
this
graphic
shows
is.
It
shows
those
vacation
areas,
but
it
also
shows
the
gray
shaded
portion
is
the
new
tower
and
the
renovated
portions
of
the
existing
building.
A
In
addition
to
the
tower
expansion
and
the
renovations,
the
the
project
also
includes
some
utility
infrastructure
work
that
would
support
the
expansion.
This
includes
underground
detention
and
water
quality,
as
well
as
the
relocation
of
some
public
utilities
around
this
building.
Some
utilities
that
used
to
run
through
south
pennsylvania
street
and
no
longer
can
because
the
building
will
be
crossing
that
so
in
order
to
accommodate
those
utility
relocations.
C
A
A
This
utility
easement
exhibit
shows
a
water
line
that
will
actually
be
relocated
along
east
gerard
avenue
and
then
south
on
logan
street
and
then
come
back
into
the
swedish
property
to
the
east,
as
shown
on
this
exhibit.
A
So
those
are
the
proposed
easements
that
would
be
dedicated
to
the
city.
The
the
runaway
vacation
requests
and
alley
vacation
were
reviewed
by
seven
different
departments,
including
community
development,
building,
fire
traffic
engineering
utilities
and
wastewater
treatment,
and
none
of
those
departments
had
any
objections
to
the
vacation
request
or
proposed
easements.
A
A
A
So,
looking
at
the
at
the
big
picture,
the
the
requested
right-of-way
and
alley
vacations
don't
provide
access
to
any
other
entities
other
than
the
swedish
medical
center
and
in
essence,
the
city
of
inglewood
no
longer
has
any
public
interest
in
the
pennsylvania
street
right
away
or
the
adjacent
alley.
D
A
I'm
going
to
go
up
to
this
graphic:
this
is
a
55
million
dollar
medical
tower
expansion
project
and
it'll
provide
some
other
benefits
to
the
city
other
than
the
obvious
improvements
to
swedish's
medical
facilities
and
the
services
that
they
provide.
A
Some
of
those
other
benefits
to
the
city
include
a
one-time
payment
to
the
city
of
approximately
1.2
million
dollars
in
building
permit
and
use
tax
fees.
A
Added
on
to
that
is
approximately
150
000
annually
in
increased
property
taxes
to
the
city
and
if
the
dda
or
downtown
development
authority,
the
downtown
matters
initiative
passes
in
the
november
election,
there
will
be
approximately
70
thousand
dollars
annually
from
swedish
to
contribute
to
those
dda
activities
in
the
medical
district.
A
So
to
summarize,
staff
is
requesting
that
the
commission
make
a
motion
tonight
recommending
that
city
council
approve
the
requested
vacations
of
south
pennsylvania
street
and
the
adjacent
alley,
and
with
that
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
and
I
know
that
mr
lestekau
would
also
like
to
address
the
commission
after
that.
We
also
have
other
members
of
swedish's
design
team
here.
If
there
are
any
technical
questions.
F
So
I
just
have-
and
it
may
not
even
be
relevant
to
this
request
for
the
vacation,
but
on
the
on
page,
eight
of
our
pack,
8043
of
our
packet.
It's
a
letter
to,
I
believe,
the
city
of
englewood
anyways.
In
the
second
paragraph
it
says
the
proposed
swedish
medical
center
tower
expansion
project
is
anticipated
to
include
the
demolition
of
two
existing
residential
homes
parking
and
drive
aisles
blah
blah
blah.
I
was
just
curious
about
the
two
existing
residential
homes.
Do
they
have
anything
to
do
with
this
request
that
we're
dealing
with
here.
A
Swedish
medical
center
owns
those
two
homes
and
they're
vacant.
I
they
may
have
already
been
demolished.
I'm
not
sure
positive
about
that.
I
think.
G
A
Okay,
thank
you
aaron.
Yes,
so
those
are
owned
by
swedish.
B
I
have
a
question
I
have
had
to
drive
myself
to
the
emergency
room
at
swedish
before
and
as
it
currently
stands,
you
turn
in
on
pennsylvania
and
you
can
just
there's
a
little
sort
of
it's,
not
a
roundabout,
but
there's
a
little.
You
can
make
a
left
turn
into
the
valet
and
that
sort
of
thing
and
drop
off
your
car.
How
will
that
be
handled?
It
looks
like
from
the
rendering
that
there's
no
ability
that
little
drive
lane
and
the
valet
station
are
gone.
Can
you
help
me
with
that?.
A
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
share
the
screen
again
and
then
so
pennsylvania
is
is
to
the
left
of
this
drawing
there's
actually
an
exit.
A
That
to
the
left
of
this
drawing
is
actually
the
exit
to
the
drop-off
area
and
this
smaller
parking
area
that
you
can
see
that's
angled
parking,
so
the
entrance
will
be
to
the
west
of
of
pennsylvania
street.
In
fact,
this
sign
you
see
in
the
foreground.
You
can
barely
see
but
there's
a
little
arrow
there.
That
is
where
you
would
enter
and
then
there
would
be
one-way
movements
either
into
this
angled
parking
lot
you
see
or
around
in
front
of
the
three-story
tower
building
or
you
would
continue
around
to
the
emergency
department.
A
G
I
can
I
was
waiting
for
carl
to
speak
up,
so
there
is
the
drop-off
that
is
in
front
of
the
er
today
will
essentially
be
moved
out
further,
so
there
still
will
be
a
drop
off,
but
the
turnaround
will
be
much
easier
because
you'll
navigate
the
entire
site,
as
burkhead
said,
you'll
enter
right
near
this
sign
in
the
front
and
then
kind
of
come
across
the
the
building
expansion.
B
In
the
middle
there
there's
the
I,
the
the
monument
sign
and
then
there's
the
driveway
and
then
look
is
that
a
little
parking
area
that's
there
or
is
that
I
don't
understand?
Maybe
I
should.
G
I
Thank
you
chair,
and
I
appreciate
the
presentation.
Obviously
it's
a
great
benefit
to
inglewood
to
continue
supporting
the
hospital.
I
did
have
one
question
about
excel.
It
sounded
like
they
had
to
relocate
some
of
their
utilities.
Also.
Will
they
have
a
separate
easement
at
a
later
date,
or
are
they
coming
through
either
the
the
water
easement,
where
it
seems
a
little
tight
there?
Well
there
will
there
be
another
space
for
them
at
a
later
time.
A
J
Oh
okay,
so
yeah,
so
we're
working
with
excel.
There's
a
there's,
a
gas
main
that
serves
the
existing
kitchen
in
the
ccu
building,
which
is
the
building.
That's
in
the
truck
dock,
is
the
best
way
to
describe
it
west
of
the
main
entry
off
of
hampton,
so
we're
working
with
them
right
now
to
relocate
that
gas
main
to
go
around
some
similar
alignment
as
the
water
line.
Yes,
so.
J
K
There
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
am
just
curious.
I
was
looking
through
the
documents
and
I
didn't.
I
know
you
mentioned
the
construction
plans.
I
was
curious
if
there
was
at
least
one
it's
a
little
hard
to
tell
from,
and
I
think
some
of
the
questions
suggest
this
as
well
from
the
documents
that
were
provided
it's
a
little
hard
to
tell
some
of
the
bits
and
pieces
without
an
actual
plan
diagram
a
planned
drawing
of
it.
Would
that
be
something
that
we
could
see
tonight
or
otherwise?.
A
I
can
I
can
call
that
up
it's
going
to
take
me
a
moment,
but
I
I
can
call
that
up.
I
believe.
J
Okay,
so
yeah,
so
this
this
the
north
or
the
top
of
the
sheet-
and
this
is
sorry
I
mean
zoomed
in
a
little
bit
here,
but
so
the
top
of
the
sheet.
This
is
gerard.
J
This
is
pennsylvania,
north
of
gerard
and
then
what
you
saw
in
the
gray
area,
on
the
exhibit
that
brook
showed
that's
the
same
gray
area
on
that
right-of-way
exhibit
and
then
this
is
the
circulation.
So
I
think
from
michelle's
comments.
This
is
the
entry
in
so
this
and
we've
worked
with
staff
on
this
to
come
up
with
this
plan
that
works
for
improving
circulation
within
and
out
of
the
area.
J
I
Can
can
I
follow
up
on
that
jeffrey
mayor.
I
Just
to
clarify,
or
will
there
not
be
allowed
a
left
turn
from
westbound
gerard
into
the
the
hospital
circulation.
J
No,
there
would
be
a
left
in
it,
it's
a
left
in
and
then,
if
you
can
make
a
left,
so
there's
a
shared
left
lane
or
left
turn
lane.
You
can
see
that
with
the
yep
in
the
center
of
gerard,
so
you'll
make
a
left
movement
into
on
the
furthest.
West
entry.
A
I
I
would
answer
that
in
in
two
ways
and
and
maybe
more
simply
talk
about
it.
Let's
talk
about
it.
A
lot
of
you
have
alleys
behind
your
house
and
let's
use
that
as
an
example.
A
So,
for
instance
when
when
property
is
platted
and
this
could
have
been
planted,
you
know
80
or
100
years
ago,
when
it
when
a
property
is
planted
for
development.
Let's
say
it
starts
out
as
farmland
that
property
owner
comes
to
the
city
and
says
I
would
like
to
plant
this
as
residential
land
or
whatever
kind
of
land,
and
if
I
do
that
and
dedicate
streets
and
alleys
to
you
and
I
build
them,
will
you
maintain
them
and
a
city
will,
by
by
approving
a
subdivision?
A
So
if,
at
a
point
in
time,
the
property
owners
adjacent
to
either
right
of
way
or
alleys
would
like
to
vacate
that
they
petitioned
the
city
to
vacate
it,
let's
take
an
alley.
For
example,
what
if
everybody
said
we
do
not
need
our
alley
anymore.
We
all
have
front
loaded
garages
and
we
all
agree.
We
would
like
to
have
this
vacated
and
they
petition
the
city.
A
Yes,
you
can
do
that
because
at
this
point
nobody
needs
to
access
their
garages
anymore,
and
if
that
vacation
is
approved,
then
a
half
of
that
alley
would
go
to
the
adjacent
property
owners
on
each
side
and
typically
there
would
not
be
any
exchange
of
money.
A
So
typically,
there
is
not
an
exchange,
and
I
guess
I
could
have
answered
that
in
a
in
a
shorter
way.
But
there
are
some
cases
where,
let's
say
you
had
a
busy
street
downing
or
something
and
the
property
owners
wanted
to
vacate
downing
street
in
front
of
their
properties.
A
Well,
if
downing
street
is
vacated
and
it
becomes,
you
know
a
park
or
something
then
there's
impacts
to
the
city
and
traffic
impacts.
Perhaps
a
another
street
might
have
to
be
widened
or
signal
improvements
might
have
to
be
done
and
that's
going
to
cost
the
city
x
amount
so
to
offset
that
we'd
like
a
payment.
A
So
that's
a
long
answer
to
a
fairly
simple
question,
but
in
this
case
there's
really
no
public
benefit
any
longer
towards
that
alley
or
that
portion
of
pennsylvania
street
and,
as
you
mentioned,
yes,
the
city.
A
This
project
really
can't
happen
without
these
vacations
and
swedish
is
proposing
these
improvements
that
you
know,
aid
the
city
in
many
ways
not
only
financially.
M
My
camera's
backwards,
I
can't
figure
out
how
to
put
my
hand
up,
I
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out.
I
realize
that
we're
trying
to
make
a
recommendation
tonight
for
city
council,
so
they
would
pass
an
ordinance
to
make
this
change.
So
is
this:
is
this
a
change
to
the
zoning
map
because
it's
putting
the
street
within
that
zone
district
or
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
kind
of?
What's
our
authority
here
and.
A
A
So
it
really
would
not
change
the
zone
district
or
the
zoning
map
to
vacate
this
portion
of
pennsylvania
or
the
or
the
alleys.
And
what
was
the
other
part
of
your
question?
I'm
sorry.
M
A
There
is.
There
is
actually
not
a
lot
of
language
in
the
inglewood
municipal
code
about
street
vacations.
We
are
following
one
we're
following
a
state
statute,
but
but
we're
also
following
a
process
that
we
did.
A
I
believe
it
was
in
2014
when
clarkson
street
was
vacated,
and
at
that
time
we
had
a
basically
a
meeting
and
a
recommendation
from
the
planning
and
zoning
commission.
A
So,
yes,
we
are
looking
for
a
recommendation
or
a
motion
for
that
recommendation.
E
Okay,
any
other
questions
or
concerns
before
we
move
forward
from
the
commission.
Yes,
carl.
H
Good
evening,
everybody,
thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening.
My
name
is
carl
leicester,
I'm
the
chief
operating
officer
at
swedish
medical
center.
D
H
Just
wanted
to
give
take
a
few
minutes
just
to
paint
a
picture
for
everybody.
As
we
talk
about
this
vacation.
E
Carl,
may
I
interrupt
you,
sir.
Yes,
with
all
do
due
respect,
we
have
multiple
carls
in
the
room.
Mr
I
I
was,
I
was
hoping
to
call
on
mr
adams.
First,
I
apologize.
Oh
no
worries,
no
worries,
you
know
what
being
a
mike
I've
been
in
meetings
where
there's
five
mics
before
it's
very
hard
to
differentiate.
So
with
that,
sir,
with
all
due
respect,
I'd
like
to
go
to
mr
adams,
carl.
O
I
had
a
question
on
the
draining
that
area.
That's
like
a,
I
believe.
It's
a
underground
drainage
that
they're
routing
around
the
building.
O
Okay,
where
does
that
empty
into
does
that
dump
into
the
infrastructure
and
old
logan
there
or
where
does.
J
O
J
No
so-
and
I
can
probably
I
don't
know,
but
the
current
so
the
current
so
pennsylvania's
right
here-
I
guess
and
honestly
you
can't
see
it,
but
basically
there's
storm
sewer
in
pennsylvania
and
that
firm,
fewer
actually
ties
into
the
truck
there's
storm
steward
public
infrastructure
within
the
truck
dock
area,
swedish's
truck
dock,
and
so
actually
that's
what
it's
tying
to
so
we're
routing
it
detaining
you
know
water
quality
and
detention
on
site
or
in
the
parking
lot,
and
then
we're
routing
it
around
and
connecting
to
the
existing
location
that
it
discharges
to.
O
And
if
I
get
another
question
on
the
the
actual
parking
there,
I
believe
there's
a
dirty
edition
being
put
in
there.
Is
that
correct.
O
The
parking
availability
there
it
looks
like
there's
a
30
bed
edition
going
in
there,
plus
the
expanded
emergency
device
department.
O
J
Yeah
I
can,
I
can
answer
that,
so
we've
actually
looked
at
the
parking
from
a
hole,
so
facility-wide,
and
so
there
was
a
study
that
was
done.
J
2017,
maybe
2018,
that
kind
of
looked
at
the
parking
management
on
site
and
the
inventory,
and
so
there's
enough
parking
facility
wide,
and
so
I
believe,
and
carl
and
aaron
you're
gonna
have
to
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
but
they're
there,
there
is
some.
I
guess
internal
operations,
modifications
that
are
going
to
be
happening,
maybe
at
some
point
here
with
the
western
garage
that
will.
H
That
is,
that
is
correct.
We
we
have
over
300
available
parking
spots
a
day,
primarily
thanks
to
a
brand
new
parking
garage.
That's
vastly
underutilized
and
what
we'll
end
up
doing
is
reappropriating
staff
and
physicians
that
are
relocating
or
that
are
currently
located
in
the
west
tower
garage
to
to
other
locations
that
are
more
amicable
to
to
their
use.
J
So
it
will
open
up
more
spaces
within
that
western
parking
garage
to
allow.
So
there
is
the
accessible
parking
in
that
garage
as
well.
So
it's
kind
of
two
you
know
two
locations
so
accessible
parking
there
and
then
standard
spaces
as
well
as
accessible
within
the
garage.
So
there's
no
intent
right
now
to
to
expand
that
garage.
O
O
Yeah
that
that
answered
my
questions,
I
I
do
have
a
carry
on
the
the
apartments
that
were
torn
down.
That
was
next
to
the
gas
station.
There
will
that
be
part
of
the
this
build,
or
is
that
what's
happening
with
that.
H
E
Any
other
questions
regarding
this
project.
Okay,
why
don't
we
go
to
carl
from
swedish.
H
Thanks
again
so
sorry
about
before
no
worries
I'll
just
take
a
few
minutes,
because
I
do
want
to
paint
a
picture
of
of
this
project.
You
know
I
I
came
to
swedish
in
january
of
2019
and
prior
to
that.
This
facility
has
done
multiple
process
improvement
projects
as
it
relates
to
maximizing
bed
availability
and
basically
creating
aaron's
done
a
phenomenal
job
in
creating
construction.
H
Through
through
those
iterations
of
the
hospital,
we
we've
really
come
to
max
out
the
availability,
the
available
campus
for
us
to
really
really
grow.
Specifically,
as
we
look
at
higher
acute
services
when
we
talk
about
higher
qed
services,
we're
talking
about
really
really
sick
patients.
We're
talking
about
neurosurgery,
we're
talking
about
stroke,
we're
talking
about
heart
disease,
we're
talking
about
cancer,
and
this
tower
really
provides
us
the
platform
to
expand
those
services
which
are
greatly
needed
already
and
actually,
we've
we've
had
further
demand
of
these
services,
particularly
with
covid.
H
We
are
seeing
high
crease,
morbidities
and
quantity,
sometimes
even
mortalities,
because
people
are
waiting.
Those
that
are
coming
in
are
coming
in
in
droves
and
we've
expanded
our
service
across
colorado.
We.
O
H
88
some
telemedicine
sites
across
the
state.
We
are
looking
to
help
rural
communities
to
provide
services
that
would
not
exist
in
those
services
and
that's
really
provided
an
additional
pinch
on
us
in
terms
of
space
and
of
course
we
continue
to
look
at
expanding
service
lines
and
bringing
in
very
unique
docs
to
provide
these
very
specialized
services.
H
I
H
H
What
specifically
that
provides
right
now,
the
30
beds
is
still
yet
to
be
determined,
whether
it's
med,
surg
or
icu,
but
we
do
know
that
we
need
expanded
services
to
be
able
to
create
a
domino
effect
in
the
main
hospital
and
start
moving
some
additional
services
out
into
that
new
tower
and
how
that
synergy
looks
as
the
tower
expands.
H
I
E
P
H
L
So
yeah,
so
the
tower
portion
we're
building
you
know
into
two
different,
distinct
builds.
You
got
to
build
a
tower
and
then
the
ed
the
tower
itself
is
22
months
and
we
want
to
start
in
mid-november
moving
utilities
and
then
once
the
towers
in
place
due
to
constructability,
then
we
can
build
the
ed-
and
I
think,
that's
another-
seven
months
for
a
total
of
29
months
for
the
entire
schedule.
K
Hi,
thank
you,
carl,
for
kind
of
sharing
the
vision
for
the
project
and
putting
it
in
context
of
our
kind
of
current
situation.
I
am
curious
and
excuse
me
if
I
missed
this,
but
I'm
curious
how
considering
the
expansion
of
the
acute
services.
K
How
do
you
intend
to
reduce
the?
K
How
should
we
call
it
the
the
tentativeness
of
people
coming
in?
Are
you?
Are
you
going
to
try
and
sort
of
suggest
that
it's
quarantined
off
from
everybody
else,
or
is
that
it's
hard
to
tell
because
the
plans
aren't
in
the
packet,
but
I'm
assuming
that?
The
point
is
that
you
can
kind
of
funnel
people
with
these
very
serious
conditions
there
and-
and
it's
going
to
be
very
clear-
that
that
people
with
something
like
kovid
would
go
somewhere
else.
Is
that
accurate
yeah.
H
Yeah,
that's
that's
a
great
question
actually,
so
we
do
have
specific
covid
units
to
treat
treat
that
disease
state
specifically,
since
it's
considered
a
novel
virus
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
history
or
genomics
around
it
right
now
what
this
tower
expansion
does
for
us
is.
It
really
is
the
first
domino
to
fall
in
as
the
30
bed
unit
to
be
able
to
allow
us
to
move
additional
units
around
the
hospital
and
maximize
that
space
for
this,
for,
for
whatever
we
determine
next
as
the
next
highest
priority
for
expansion.
H
H
I
don't
I
don't
want
to
come.
I
want
to
come
across
as
that's
going
to
be
a
covet
tower.
That's
that's
not
what
what
it
is.
It's
it's
definitely
more
focused
on
on
other
other
unique
disease
states
like
stroke,
neurosurgery,
traumatic,
brain
injury,
etc.
D
P
Few
years
ago,
too,
and
it
took
forever
to
get
me
into
the
icu
and
I
had
to
get
there
and
so
hearing
that
now
I
didn't
realize
that
was
kind
of
like
we
just
have
a
lot
of
demand
and
we
don't
have
what
we
need.
So
that
was
neat
to
learn.
G
H
H
However,
now,
obviously,
with
covet
and
advanced
pulmonary
disease,
we're
seeing
we're
seeing
increased
utilization
of
icu
beds,
our
our
cardiovascular
volume,
I.e,
specifically
open
hearts,
has
increased
and
stroke,
for
whatever
reason
is,
is
a
big
big
issue
in
this
state
and
and
in
the
surrounding
states,
and
we've
we've
seen
a
lot
of
volume
there
matter
of
fact.
Swedish
is
one
of
the
highest
stroke
volume
facilities
in
the
entire
country.
H
We
do
have
people
from
japan
and
other
countries
that
fly
in
to
see
our
stroke
program,
because
it
is
world
renowned,
there's
and,
of
course,
trauma.
Trauma
is
another
another
big
issue
being
the
level
one
trauma
facility
and
having
some
of
the
physicians
with
the
pedigrees
that
that
we
have
here,
they're,
very
well
known
across
the
state
and
when
ugly
ugly
traumas
come
in
to
those
facilities
and
there's
questions
about
whether
or
not
those
physicians
can
take
care
of
those
patients.
B
I'm
sorry
just
a
quick
one.
This
is
not
going
to
impact
the
on-street
parking
there
on
gerard
is.
B
J
So
this
is
actually
so.
There
will
be
a
couple,
no
parking
zone,
areas
to
accommodate
the
left,
turn
movements.
So
we
worked
with
staff
on
the
traffic
study,
so
there
was
some.
You
know,
expansion
of
just
in
the
existing
condition.
To
be
honest,
so
there
we
worked
with
traffic
on
that
staff
on
that
and
there
will
be
some
areas
of
no
parking
zones.
B
B
E
Okay,
well
I'll,
tell
you
what
it
looks
like
a
heck
of
a
project,
and
I
know
it's
been
building
out
nicely
frankly
over
the
number
of
years
and
a
number
of
different
editions
and
such
chair
would
entertain
a
motion
to
recommend
the
approval
by
the
city
council.
I
E
We
have
a
motion,
a
second,
a
discussion
before
we
call
the
roll
anybody
have
any
comments.
E
Oh,
I'm
sorry
we
had,
I
believe,
michelle
with
a
motion.
We
had
kate
fuller
with
a
second
motion
to
a
motion
to
approve
the
for
the
vacation
of
the
alley
right
away
and
such
as
presented
by
staff.
N
I
E
Although
yes,
for
the
following
reasons,
I
believe
it
does
provide
for
an
improved
health
care
system
and
availability
in
the
community,
as
outlined
by
mr
and
I'm
going
to
butcher
the
last
name
carl
from
swedish.
E
Yes,
that
and-
and
it
also,
I
believe,
adds
a
as
an
element
to
the
community
that
we
don't
currently
have
in
terms
of
medical
care
and
also
in
terms
of
capacity
which,
presumably
that
would
that
would
that
would
help
the
community
as
a
whole
number
one
number
two.
E
It
also
helps
to
to
position
inglewood
as
a
better
place
to
live
more
attractive
place
to
live
and
presumably
a
more
valuable
place
to
live,
and
so,
for
those
reasons,
along
with
many
others,
for
the
answers
that
we
received
all
the
questions
in
terms
of
the
planning
from
the
civil
engineering
to
the
traffic
flows,
to
how
it's
going
to
look
to
the
storm
water.
I'm
voting
yes,
and
with
that
the
motion
does
carry.
E
Okay,
seeing
item
number
that
carries,
thank
you
so
much
brooke
and
to
everybody
who
put
this
together
and
all
the
folks
from
swedish
the
engineering
folks
looking
forward
to
seeing
this
go
forward
to
the
city
council,
and
we
would
wish
you
nothing
but
all
the
best
in
the
future.
So
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you.
K
E
Q
Thank
you,
chair
freemire,
how?
How
is
everybody
tonight
we
are
checking
in
with
you
all
tonight
on
the
title,
16,
community
assessment
and
outreach
project
and
we're
checking
in
because
we
had
a
a
very
busy
month
of
october.
Q
We
have
some
of
those
coming
up
yet
this
month,
so
I
should
have
said:
we've
had
a
busy
september
october
just
started,
but
we
are
continuing
into
october
with
some
of
those
other
outreach
efforts
and
as
we
promised,
we
did
have
several
touch
points
with
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
on
this
project,
and
tonight
is
our
first
one
really
to
give
you
an
update
on
some
of
the
the
bigger
topics
that
we've
been
hearing
through
our
outreach
and
just
bring
you
all
up
to
speed
with
the
things
we've
been
doing
and
where
we're
going
to
go
next.
Q
So
without
further
ado,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
jennifer
gardner
from
logan
simpson,
who
has
been
right
there
leading
the
charge
along
with
the
city
for
us,
so
turn
it
over
to
jen.
R
Great
thanks
wade,
my
video
seems
to
be
kind
of
going
in
and
out.
Can
you
guys
hear
me?
Okay,
okay,
great
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
share
my
screen.
R
R
There
we
go
I'm
going
to
give
a
quick
project
overview,
we're
going
to
go
through
the
exercise.
I
know
you
guys
got
to
have
a
chance
to
kind
of
see
this
exercise
when
we
did
our
joint
work
session,
we
went,
but
we
wanted
to
give
all
of
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
members
a
chance
to
weigh
in
a
little
bit
more
on
on
some
of
those
questions
that
we
asked
early
on.
So
so
the
primary
goal
of
the
project
like
we've
stated
before
is
to
uh-oh.
R
Some
document
review,
like
we
said
before
the
the
process
is,
is
three
steps
reviewing
of
the
the
unified
development
code
in
court
documents
listening
to
the
community
and
then
pulling
all
that,
together
into
a
comprehensive
set
of
recommendations
for
what
might
or
might
not
need
to
change
with
the
code.
R
So
what
we've
heard
so
far
like
wade
said
we
have
had
many
many
touch
points
in
a
very
short
amount
of
time,
and
we
kicked
that
all
off
with
the
telephone
town
hall.
I
think
we
had
over
400
people
on
the
line
probably
heard
from
15
or
so
of
those
people
that
we
were
able
to
cycle
through
some
questions
and
answers.
R
We
just
closed
our
first
online
questionnaire
over
the
weekend
and
we
had
I,
I
believe
I
have
a
slide
next.
That
goes
into
some
of
the
numbers
on
that
one:
we've
had
nine
separate
focus
group
meetings
with
over
60
attendees
and.
D
R
Here
we
go
with
things
there
we
go
so
the
questionnaire
we
have
heard
from
about
693
people.
What
we're
finding
is
about
300
people,
313
people
went
through
the
whole
questionnaire.
380
took
kind
of
the
first
couple
of
questions
and
then
dropped
off.
So
the
first
couple
questions
were,
you
know
your
familiarity
with
the
code
and
those
type
of
things.
So
I
think
some
people
got
in
and
said:
well,
I'm
not
very
familiar
and
then
maybe
dropped
out
is
is
our
guess.
R
But
we've
heard
from
citizens,
architects,
business
owners,
developers,
staff,
the
design
review
team,
the
historic
preservation
commission,
like
I
said
earlier,
city,
council
and
yourself.
R
Okay,
we're
having
some
computer
blips
here.
I'm
sorry
guys.
There
was
split
response
on
adequately
implementing
communities,
values
and
goals.
There
were
two
questions
on
that
and
one
question:
the
respondent
said
that
the
code
did
adequately
reflect
the
the
community's
values
and
goals
and
the
other
question
kind
of
led
us
to
believe
that
that
the
community
did
not
really
respect
the
values
and
goals
so
kind
of
still
sorting.
R
Some
of
those
responses
out
and
most
respondents
had
not
taken
an
application
through
the
city,
so
they
were
familiar
with
the
code
familiar
with
some
of
the
processes,
but
hadn't
actually
taken
an
application
through
the
city
so
kind
of
some
of
the
big
topics
that
have
surfaced
out
of
this
first
phase
of
outreach.
Quite
a
bit
of
a
discussion
on
the
adu
regulations
and
what
we've
been
hearing.
R
We
have
another
quick
poll
out
right
now
that
we've
had
about
19
respondents
from
and
what
we're
hearing
from
that
quick
poll,
and
it
asks
this
question
is
of,
should
the
adu
regulations
be
changed
and
if
so,
what
should
changes?
Should
it
be
size
height
where
they're
located?
And
what
we're
hearing
is
a
lot
of
the
respondents
are
saying
where,
where
they're
located
and
the
size,
so
we
need
to
take
a
closer
look
at
the
zone
districts
that
adus
are
allowed
in
and
assess
that
a
little
bit
further,
we've
heard
a
lot
about
parking
standards.
R
We
are
currently
pulling
together
some
best
practice,
research
from
other
communities,
so
we
can
put
forth
some
options
and
then
see
where,
where
the
temperature
gauge
falls
with
some
of
those
options,
a
lot
of
conversation
about
focus
on
walkability
and
sustainability,
we've
heard
from
a
number
of
people
about
the
sidewalks
being
fairly
narrow
and
large
parking
lots
kind
of
making
it
harder
to
navigate
some
areas
in
a
walking
and
biking
kind
of
fashion.
R
Quite
a
bit
of
discussion
on
home
occupations.
Some
of
that
could
be
because
of
covid.
A
lot
of
people
are
working
from
home
now
and
the
home
occupation
standards
are
do
not
allow
visitors
to
come
to
the
home.
So
if
you
have
a
hair
salon
or
a
business
where
you
would
have
visitors
come
into
your
home,
it
does
not
allow
that
currently.
R
So
we're
looking
taking
a
look
at
that
and
see
where
we
might
be
able
to
provide
some
recommendations
on
adjustments
and
then
taking
a
really
close
look
at
dimensional
standards,
specifically
in
the
r2
zones,
districts
where
multi-unit
housing
has
started
to
really
emerge.
So
those
are
kind
of
the
high-level
topics.
We've
been
hearing
any
questions
about
any
of
that.
R
R
Everyone
good,
okay,
now
we're
going
to
move
into
the
exercise,
and
I
know
this
is
going
to
look
familiar
to
you,
because
we
did
the
same
exercise
with
you
during
the
joint
work
session.
But
we
kind
of
felt
that
the
the
city
council
got
to
weigh
in
a
lot
more
than
you
guys,
and
so
we
wanted
to
give
you
the
opportunity
to
to
really
just
spread
your
wings
and
share
with
us.
So
what
we're
really
looking
for
is
what's
working
well
with
the
existing
code?
What's
not
working
well
with
the
existing
code?
R
Are
there
any
application
processes
that
need
to
be
tweaked
and
with
you
guys
receiving
not
really
receiving
applications
but
being
able
to
review
applications?
You
might
have
a
sense
of
how
some
applications
have
been
going
through
planning
and
zoning
commission
smoothly
and
how
some
you
know
might
need
a
little
bit
more
information
and
actually
the
the
last
application
that
we
just
heard
was
was
helpful.
R
That
brook
said
that
the
right-of-way
vacations
aren't
clearly
spelled
out
in
the
code,
so
that
kind
of
sent
up
a
little
red
flag
for
me
to
take
a
look
at
that.
Are
there
any
specific
design
standards
that
need
to
be
tuned
up
and
are
there
any
standards,
topics
or
innovations
that
are
missing
that
you
know
of
from
the
current
code
or
any
thoughts
you
have?
R
You
know
with
regards
to
sustainability
or
just
really
anything,
that's
kind
of
new
trending
that
you,
you
think
we
need
to
take
a
look
at
and
see
if
the
code
is
either
a
barrier
to
or
is
is
silent
on.
So
that's
the
conversation
and
you
guys
can
go
in
any
order.
You
don't
have
to
go
in
this
order.
We
just
really
want
to
open
the
conversation
and
let
those
of
you
who
haven't
had
a
chance
to
weigh
in
too
much
tell
us
your
thoughts.
F
I
think
this
will
be
a
quick
one,
so
I
had
seen
a
news
report
at
some
point
where
the
state
made
it
was
a
state
and
I
don't
know
what
it
was
exactly
where
it
fit
in
the
world
of
laws
but
anyways
that
rick
doesn't
says
that
homeowners
associations
cannot
put
in
their
rules
and
rags
or
their
organizational
documents
that
you
cannot
have
in
home
daycare,
and
I
thought
that
was
an
interesting
thing
for
the
state
to
weigh
in
on,
and
I
didn't
know
if
there
was
something
that
was
gonna
happen,
that
the
state
was
going
to.
F
You
know
where
that
landed
with
individual
cities.
So
I
thought
it
was
an
interesting
thing.
I
didn't
have
time
to
go
into
it
any
further
why
they
specifically
made
that,
but
it
was
actually
a
state
mandate
of
some
sort.
So
I
thought
that
was
interesting.
F
I
think
that
the
home
occupation
thing
seriously
needs
to
be
looked
at.
I
know
there's
always
traffic
and
parking
issues
when
it
comes
to
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
my
experiences
more
and
more
people
are
going
to
be
moving
into
more
suburban
areas
because
it's
happening
already
where
they
have
more
room
and
want
to.
F
F
So
I
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
about
that
in-home
day
care
thing
and
allowing
more
occupations
in
homes.
That's
all.
I
got.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
Who's
next,
colin.
I
Yeah,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
again
to
comment
on
this.
It
was
great
meeting
with
the
with
council
and
I
think
you
know
this
was
it
was
another
good
opportunity
for
us
to
be
able
to
talk
and
bring
our
points
up.
There's
a
couple
of
things,
and
most
of
them
for
me
are
green
infrastructure.
How
to
incentivize
that?
How
do
we
bring
that
into
the
title
16
so
that
there's
no
conflicts
on
you
know
some.
I
What
can
be
done?
What
can't
be
done?
I
was
kind
of
glancing
through
and
it
seems
like
solar
is
mentioned,
but
not
really
much
else
other
than
that
you
can't
you're
not
allowed
to
have
it
be
seen
unless
it's
above
five
feet
from
the
ground
or
something
like
that
it.
I
guess
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
we
could
do
that,
but
anything
that
we
can
do
to
really
incentivize
sustainability
and
green
infrastructure.
I
think
would
be,
would
be
great.
O
O
I
believe
that
should
be
looked
at
at
some
point
or
another
on
what
what
you
have
solar
access
to
on
your
property
when
you
buy
your
property
at
that
point,
it
should
kind
of
lock
in
some
kind
of
a
rights
that
you
have
for
the
solar
that
you
that
you're
getting
at
that
point
not
sure
what
kind
of
regulations
that
would
be
on
that.
But
I
think
solar
power
should
be
looked
at
a
little.
K
Hi,
so
some
of
these
are
a
little
bit
repeats
from
the
steering
committee
meeting,
but
for
the
for
the
group
here
I
I
echo
the
comment
colin
made
about
sustainability
and
green
infrastructure
and
trying
to
really
take
the
englewood
forward
plan
and
you
know
breathe
it
into
the
zoning
code,
and
so
we
had
talked
about
looking
at
what
other
communities
do
in
terms
of
their
zoning
code.
K
I
think
that
something
else
that
I
mentioned
is
how
we
can
really
promote
the
desire,
as
expressed
in
englewood,
forward
the
desire
for
walkability
for
bikeability.
So
that
to
me
says
how
can
we
make
sure
that
we
have
good
connections
but
also
how
we
can
think
through.
D
K
Zoning
code
sidewalk
widths
provisions,
for
you,
know,
kind
of
preserving
or
enhancing
the
street
tree
canopy.
K
You
know
making
it
more
amenable
to
walk
to
and
from
places,
and
then
I
think
the
other
thing
that
that
I
thought
was
important
to
look
at
was
the
front
yard
setbacks,
perhaps
reducing
those
I
mean
we
are
very
close
to
denver,
we're
a
suburb
but
close
to
the
urban
center
and
that's
expanding
rapidly
and
people
are
coming
here
and
looking
for
a
little
more
space
and
a
lot
of
the
homes.
Here
are
quite
small
and
you
know
having.
K
E
Okay,
thank
you.
Who's
next
looks
like
I've
got
daryl.
E
C
Okay,
I
had
my
digital
hand
up,
but
I
don't
know
if
that
shows
up
or
not,
but
anyway
I
I
have
a
few
things.
I
guess
I'm
curious
is
this
just
such
a
hard
area,
a
large
area,
I'm
wondering
how
you
know
how
we
kind
of
pull
it
all
together
I
mean
I
have
you
know
a
few
different
things.
Everything
from
you
know
I
mean
is
this.
You
know.
Is
this
an
opportunity
to
address
the
fact
that
we
have
a
lot
of
people
that
live
in
more
than
they
will?
C
You
know
there's
a
certain
number
of
related
people
that
are
allowed
to
live
in
a
house.
I
mean.
Is
this
an
opportunity
to
look
at
that?
The
sidewalks?
You
know
people
express
the
unhappiness
with
the
narrow
sidewalks
and
the
hollywood
sidewalks
I
mean.
Is
that
something
that
we
want
to
look
for
going
for
what
those
things
have
you
know
the
opportunity
to
replace
that
you
know
there's
a
few
streets
that
have
detached
sidewalks
I
mean.
Is
that
something
we
want
to
move
more
towards?
C
I
mean,
I
think
you
know
there's
just
so
many
different
areas.
I
mean
how
first
I
guess.
The
first
question
is:
how
do
we
divide
into
the
different
different
subjects
and
and
what
what
are
you
know
I
mean,
are
the?
What
are
the
possibilities
are
the
things
I
mentioned,
even
something
we
can
look
at.
R
D
C
Okay,
what
about
the
other
thing
that
I
hear
people
mention
a
lot?
Is
we
have
a
lot
of
places
that
have
a
lot
of
parking
space
that
is
usually
empty?
Is
that
another
possibility
that
we
could
look
at
making
better
use
of
that
space
and
maybe
not
requiring
as
much
parking
in
some
cases
where
it's
not
really
used.
C
So
you
know,
another
thing
is,
and
I
don't
know
how
you
would
address
this
necessarily
to
the
code,
but
I
inguint
has
a
lot
of
infrastructure
that
I
think
could
be
used
better
or
kept
up
better.
You
know,
past
and
and
walking
paths,
and
you
know
that
type
of
thing.
Sometimes
you
know
I
I
don't
know
exactly.
C
You
know
if
that's
a
code
issue,
but
I
mean
I,
I
think
that's
something
also
that
you
could
be
looked
at
if
there's
ways
to
tweak
that
to
better
address
our
existing
infrastructure,
whether
it's
you
know
whether
it's
you
know
a
walking
path
or
a
bike
path
or
whatever.
R
M
Thanks,
I
got
a
laundry
list,
I
think
some
things
have
already
been
mentioned,
but
I
guess
one
of
the
things
I
feel
like
that.
I
heard
maybe
I
was
listening
for
it,
but
I
heard
at
the
town
hall
and
some
other
things.
It's
just
the
need
for
more
of
that
missile
missing
middle
housing-
and
I
see
you
know,
talk
about
that.
There's
a
need
for
some
changes
to
the
adu
code
great
and
that
there
may
be
some
needed
changes
for
the
our
two
dimensional
standards,
but
how?
M
M
I
I
think
it's
it's
great,
that
people
are
saying
that
they
want
to
relook
at
the
at
the
adus
in
particular.
I
think
that's
a
great
opportunity,
a
couple
things
that
I
think
are
more
in
terms
of
process
changes
would
be
around
some
of
the
small
lots
and
also
child
care
day
care
facilities,
and
whether
or
not
those
really
need
to
come
to
us
for
conditional
use
permits
or
whether
we
get
those
can
be
more
of
a
use
by
right,
home
occupations.
I
agree.
M
I
think
one
of
the
things
along
with
walkability
is
our
trans,
transparent
transparency,
standards
or
guidelines,
especially
along
broadway,
and
some
of
our
other
major
thorough
thoroughfares,
and
make
sure
that
we
have
transparency,
for
you
know
eyes
on
the
street,
walking
biking.
What
not
definitely
think
we
should
look
at
park
dedication
and
whether
or
not
the
park
dedication.
That's
in
the
code
matches
the
needs
that
are
in
the
park,
master
plans
or
what?
M
So
considering
that
either
in
terms
of
the
fee
in
lieu
of
or
the
the
land
that's
needed
in
park,
dedication,
I'm
thinking
with
the
the
parking
there's
always
the
the
two
sides
with
it.
I
think
it's
great
that
people
are
considering
rethinking
parking
to
make
the
community
more
walkable.
M
I
believe
littleton
is
also
going
through
this
process,
and
so
I
think
that's
a
good
consideration,
because
we're
often
you
know,
look
to
littleton
or
look
to
denver
and
just
see
what
are.
I
don't
know
I'd
like
to
hear
what
they're
looking
at
are
there
things
that
we
could
learn
from
their
process
and,
and
vice
versa?
E
O
O
People
wrote
notes
on,
and
there
was
only
a
couple
of
those
boards,
but
on
those
boards,
the
one
of
the
this
is
just
what
was
on
the
boards
is.
There
was
six
comments
about
stopping
development
within
the
city.
O
Another
one
was
six
comments
were
on
single
story,
housing,
keeping
a
single
storm
housing
as
a
characteristic
of
the
city,
and
then
another
one
was
six
comments
on
solar
power,
solar
access
and
size
coverage
and
drainage
on
those,
and
that
that's.
This
is
major
topics
that
were
written
down
for
the
parks
parks
me.
O
There
was
a
lot
of
other
comments:
the
large
trees,
they're,
raising
tap
fees
for
development,
just
a
lot
of
other
there's
like
one
one
on
each
one
of
those,
but
those
there's
three
of
the
they're
all
six
comments
on
each
one
of
them:
stop
development,
single
story,
housing
and
solar
and
block
coverage.
O
Those
are
the
three
things
that
I
saw,
but
that's
like
I
said,
that's
only
the
park
meeting,
so
I
don't
know
what
happened
with
the
other
ones.
E
Thank
you.
Michelle.
B
One
thing
occurred
to
me
that
I
did,
I
don't
think
has
been
brought
up.
I
think
it's
important
that
inglewood
not
try
to
mimic
denver's
code.
I
think
englewood
has
special
properties
and
that
we
don't
want
to
become
denver.
B
I
hear
the
same
things
that
you've
mentioned,
carl,
that
a
lot
of
people,
I've
heard
from
they're,
very
they're,
disturbed
by
the
like.
You
said
that
the
two-story
housing
going
up
right
next
to
them,
and
then
you
know,
there's
only
three
feet
between
the
houses
and
that
sort
of
thing,
and
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
people
are
concerned
about
the
density.
B
So
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
that
we
need
to
maintain
the
availability
of
street
parking
and
not
not
adapt
our
code
after
denver's,
because
denver's
close,
obviously
allowing
extreme.
I
Yeah
I
wanted
to
follow
up.
I
think
kyle
brought
up
a
good
point
about
like
tree
lawns
and
maybe
having
additional
tree
cover
requirements.
I'm
not
sure
how
clear
those
are.
I
honestly
I
haven't
looked
in
detail,
but
you
know
having
some
sort
of
requirements
to
make
sure
that
there
are
not
just
landscaping
but
tree
requirements.
Also,
I
think,
would
be
beneficial
if
they're
not
already
clear
in
there.
P
I
just
made
a
kind
of
a
bulleted
list.
Some
of
them
include
things
that
people
have
already
touched
on,
so
I
was
just
going
to
quickly
read
through
my
list.
I
do
think
it's
great
to
address
the
middle
housing.
I
guess
we
don't
really
have
much
of
that.
I
live
in
a
town
home
that
has
10
units,
so
I
have
a
unit
sort
of
like
that
and
I
think
that
you
know
a
lot
of
people
in
my
demographic
are
starting
to
move
to
inglewood
and
they
don't
really
have
many.
E
E
Okay?
Why
don't
we
do
this
we'll
hope
she
joins
us
here
in
just
a
moment
for
whatever
reason
she
dropped
off
and
we'll
when
she
gets
back,
then
we'll
go
back
to
her.
So
anybody
else
have
any
comments.
O
Kate
townley
brought
this
up,
and
now
I've
heard
it
before
and
I'm
just
a
little
confused
on
how
this
could
be
done.
As
as
changing
street
like
asphalt
over
to
grass,
I
mean
I
mean
it's
sounds
good.
I
don't
know
how
that
could
be
done.
O
I've
heard
that
before
and
we
need
smaller
narrower
streets
and
less
streets
and
turn
them
into
parks
or
whatever,
but
I
over
many
many
years
that
might
have,
but
I
don't
know
how
that
would
how?
How
could
we
do
that?
This
might
is
my
question.
E
Carl,
I
I
don't
know
that
we're
going
to
get
to
get
to
the
get
to
the
answer
of
how
we're
going
to
do
things,
but
I
think
the
point
is
for
jen
this
evening
to
be
able
to
write
down
the
notion
of
making
what
you
spoke
of
in
terms
of
narrow
streets,
etc.
More
park-like
atmosphere,
I
think
the
how
comes
way
down
the
road
but
duly
noted
what
I
would
like
to
do
at
this
point
in
time.
P
Awesome,
I
don't
know
which
part
I
cut
out
on,
but
my
first
bullet
bullet.
It
was
middle
housing,
so
we'll
just
go
to
the
next
one.
The
next
bullet
is.
I
mentioned
this
in
our
steering
committee
gin,
but
increased
connectivity
to
dtc.
I
know
no
matter
which
way
you
try
to
get
there.
It's
a
little
frustrating
whether
it's
hampden
bellevue,
the
light
rail
is
extra
frustrating
because
you'd
have
to
go
north
to
go.
You
know
east
to
go
south.
P
P
I
mentioned
in
our
steering
committee
that
some
of
our
sidewalks
are
really
busted
and
you
can't,
if
you
can't
bike
on
the
road,
you
also
can't
bike
on
the
sidewalk.
So
where
can
you
go
and
then
the
next
one
would
be
an
improved
priority
of
pedestrian
movement,
but
on
the
other
flip
of
that
kind
of
what
kay
was
mentioning
in
our
steering
committee.
Somebody
mentioned
that
walkability
is
great,
but
they
have
kids
and
they
have
strollers
and
they
need
to
pull
up
right
to
the
restaurant
and
they
were
worried
about
losing
parking.
P
So
I
think
that's
something
that
we're
going
to
have
to
balance
when
we're
solving
this.
I
think
that
the
rtd
station
at
oxford
station
is
kind
of
hard
to
access.
It's
on
that
hill,
there's
not
a
lot
of
parking.
So
if
there
was
an
opportunity
to
improve
that,
I
think
that
would
be
great.
I
wanted
to
second
the
green
solar
sustainable
direction.
I
think
that's
a
great
direction
to
move
in
that's
kind
of
where
the
whole
future
is
moving.
So
why
not
start
now
and
then
the
last
one
is.
P
C
I
just
wanted
to
agree
with
you
know
a
couple
points
that
were
brought
up.
Obviously
I
think
the
middle
housing
is
probably
housing
in
general
is
one
of
the
biggest
needs
in
englewood.
I
mean
I
just
I'm
sure,
I'm
not
the
only
one
that
knows
of
many
people
that
have
tried
to
move
into
the
community.
It's
just
increasingly
difficult
because
you
know
all
that
is
available
is
very
limited
in
terms
of
housing,
and
I
just
think
we
should
do
what
we
can
to
address
that
in
the
code.
C
I
also
want
to
mention
transit,
you
know
in
the
connections
to
transit
could
be
greatly
improved.
You
know
it's
something
that
wasn't
really
considered
with
the
code
because
it
wasn't
really.
There
wasn't
a
lot
when
the
code
was
established,
I'm
sure,
but
both
the
bus
and
the
rail
transit.
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
help
alter
the
code
to
to
make.
You
know
that
to
accommodate
that.
So
another
thing
I
did
think
of
too
is
the
you
know.
C
One
thing
that's
come
up
recently,
obviously,
with
the
schools
being
redone
is
the
interaction
between
the
schools
in
the
city,
and
there
tends
to
be.
You
know:
schools,
you
know,
do
the
little
bubble,
but
you
know
the
city
has
to
do
the
connections
with
it,
and
I
think
we
should
look
at
how
we
can
address
the
code
to
to
help
bad
interaction
between
those.
B
It
would
help
if
I
was
prepared
and
unmuted
myself.
While
I
move
my
hand
out
kate,
you
brought
up
a
good
point
about
you
know
people
with
with
strollers
and
kids
and
all
that
stuff,
and
they
need
to
be
able
to
have
parking
readily
available
to
pull
up
to
the
restaurant
and
things
like
that.
It's
not
only
for
them.
B
It's
for
people
like
me
who
I
don't
have
a
handicap
sticker,
I'm
too
proud
to
go
get
one,
but
I
do
have
a
condition
that
prevents
me
from
walking
very
far,
and
so
we
need
to
have
that
street
parking
or
the
parking
that's
close
in
available
to
so
we
can
all
get
to
restaurants
and
things
like
that.
E
Okay,
I
have
just
a
couple
I
just
like
to
add.
I
think
some
of
this
is
it
might
be
a
little
redundant
but
I'll
be
very
quick
storm
water
detention.
I
almost
wonder,
as
we
think
through
much
of
these
parking
lots
this
this
vast
sea
of
of
asphalt
and
as
we
consider
our
parking
regulations.
I
almost
wonder
if
we
don't
do
some
regional
detention
centers
and
with
that
with
that
it
becomes
part
of
you
know.
E
Building
a
detention
area
is
one
thing:
maintaining
it
is
another,
so
it's
you
know,
there's
there's
a
particular
standard
that
that
is
an
ongoing
expense.
I
don't
know
exactly
how
you
get
that
done,
but
happy
to
throw
that
out
there,
and
I
think
it
does
make
for
a
better
community
and
done
well.
It
could
be
really
an
amenity
at
some
point.
Walkability.
Certainly,
there's
there's
always
the
question
between
what
do
you
do
with
all
these
miles
of
two
and
a
half
foot
walkways
that?
Certainly
we
don't.
E
We
don't
enjoy
anymore
or
don't
use
anymore,
and
so
we
find
ourselves
walking
in
the
street.
What
do
we
do?
Relative
to
parking
and
how
do
we
separate
pedestrians
from
cars
and
they
can
still
accommodate
parking
one
of
the
things
I
think
we've
missed,
and
I
really
would
I
we've
got
to
have
this
okay
as
we
consider
what
we
do
in
its
entirety.
E
They
do
a
lot
of
urban
planning
and
he
used
to
be
the
usc
he's
a
great
guy,
colin's,
already
looking
him
up
s-u-m-e-k,
and
so
we
developed
after
cinderella
city,
we
developed
what
we
thought
as
a
community
people
would
want,
and
now
we're
going
to
redevelop
in
that
corridor.
E
Is
we
just
re
redeveloped,
our
uniform
or
unified
development
code,
and
nobody
wants
it
and
that
doesn't
help
anybody,
so
I
think
somewhere
between,
I,
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
synergies,
but
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So
that
brings
me
to
the
next
point,
which
is
that's
how
it
gets
paid
for
people
develop
their
properties,
redevelop
their
properties,
reinvest
in
their
properties,
and
the
tax
base
goes
up.
We
hope
that
that
makes
it
it
makes
everything
more
attractive
and
that
people
want
to
be
here
spend
their
money.
E
Here
we
get
sales,
tax
revenue
and
all
that.
So,
let's,
let's
understand
how
we
pay
for
the
wish
list.
E
So
I
know
everybody's
got
to
have
a
big
bucket
of
cold
water,
but
somehow
we're
going
to
have
to
have
the
cash
in
order
to
pay
for
it.
It's
not
going
to
come
from
residents
who
don't
want
change,
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
it
has
to
come
from
residents
who
only
want
change.
It
means
that
somewhere
there's
a
middle
ground
that
makes
sense,
which
leads
me
to
my
last
point.
E
There
was
nothing
in
between,
and
yet
we've
had
multiple
commissioners
tonight
say.
I
think
we
really
want
to
have
something
in
the
middle
which
wouldn't
that
be
something
in
the
middle
along
those
lines.
I
think
we
need
to
understand
the
economics
thereof.
So
when
we
look
at
when
a
police
officer,
for
example,
drives
past
lot,
a
that
has
a
58
and
brook
has
these
numbers
in
terms
of
what
percentage
is
actually
covered
by
the
building?
It
was
not
represented
in
our
questionnaire.
E
We
had
either
one
extreme,
very
small
one
or
two
bedroom
home
ranch
style
home,
or
we
had
huge
lot
coverage,
but
somewhere
in
between
is,
I
think,
where
we're
going
to
end
up-
and
I
think
that's
where
the
market
demand
has
already
put
us
on
many
of
these
developments.
Redevelopments
scrapes,
if
you
will
on
single-family
coverage,
so
I
think,
if
we're
going
to
do
any
changes
on
that,
why
don't
we
bring
our
code?
E
You
know
kind
of
solomon's
wisdom
here
and,
let's,
let's
look
at
what
the
actual
market
demands
and
then
understand
what
that
would
be
willing
to
pay
and
where
that
puts
us
relative
to
creating
a
unique
housing
product
in
the
market,
not
only
for
today,
but
for
the
next
10
or
15
or
20
years.
As
far
as
we
can
see-
and
I
think
once
we
get
that
done,
I
think
we're
going
to
have
a
much
better
product
than
what
we
had
when
and
not
to
throw
cold
water
on
people
from
days
gone
by.
E
But
when
cinderella
city
got
torn
down
and
redeveloped,
I
believe
what
we
had
was
a
lot
of
conversation
among
people
no
different
than
us
very
well,
meaning
to
say
I
want
I
want
I
want.
I
want
why
don't
we
go
out
and
say
what
do
you
want?
How
does
that
work?
What
are
you
willing
to
pay
and
what
are
the
things
you're
willing
to
give
up?
E
One
of
the
things
you
really
want
to
see-
and
I
think
what
we'll
find
is
that
people
are
going
to
pay
for
sustainable
communities
that
have
alternative
power
systems
that
have
street
lights,
that
that
are
cool
and
can
use
or
traffic
lights
that
can
use
photovoltaic
direct
energy
during
the
day.
I
think
we're
going
to
find
walkable
communities.
I
think
we're
going
to
find
adequate
storm
water
and
better
infrastructure
easier
maintained
in
the
future.
E
So
I
I
think
we
look
at
this.
This
is
a
golden
opportunity
to
say
what
is
what
does
the
next?
You
know
number
of
decades
look
like
and
I
I
don't
want
to
see
it
lost
on
the
people
wanting
to
either
stop
development
or
to
tear
down
every
old
house
that
they've
ever
seen.
Okay,
there's
there's
something
in
the
middle
and
I
think
we
have
a
great
opportunity
to
get
there.
E
Okay,
seeing
none
do
you
need
wade?
Do
you
need
any
additional
information
from
us?
I
think
is
wade's
still
here.
Q
No
yep
I'm
here,
I
know
we
don't
we
don't
need
any
additional
information.
I
think
we're
going
to
have
you
know
more
check-ins
we're
going
to
dive
a
little
deeper
into
some
of
these
topics
as
we
go
forward,
we'll
we'll
be
wrapping
up
this
part
of
the
project,
probably
in
in
january,
and
you
know
we're
going
to
take
everybody's
comments
that
we've
been
hearing
and
we're
going
to
plug
it
in
that
that
outline
form
of
the
code.
Q
And
we
will
present
that
to
you,
and
you
know
we
will
have
that
as
a
working
document
going
into
the
rewrite
next
year.
So
you
know,
everybody's
comments
are
being
documented
and
going
to
be
incorporated,
and
you
know
we're
going
to
put
what
everybody's
saying
into
you
know
that
matrix
to
where
we
can
look
at
you
know
what
specific
portions
of
the
code
we
need
to.
You
know
pay
a
little
more
attention
to
in
the
next
phase
of
the
project.
E
E
Appreciate
all
that
you
do
jen
and
certainly
wade
and
the
entire
staff.
I
mean
it's,
it's
it's
not
easy
and
it,
but
it
makes
a
huge
difference.
So
please
stay
enthusiastic
as
you
as
you
do
this
and
we'll
do
our
best
to
give
you
as
much
positive
feedback
and
and
honest
feedback
as
we
possibly
can.
So.
Thank
you.
E
E
Okay,
attorney's
choice:
dugan,
it's
always
a
pleasure
to
have
you
here.
Well,
it's
always
a
pleasure
to
be
here.
I
have
no
report
this
evening.
E
Excellent
dodged
another
month
how
about
that
commissioner's
choice?
I'll
just
go
around,
as
I
see
him
on
my
screen,
so
daryl
you're.
First.
C
E
I
I
have
nothing
that
I
I
have
one
small
thing
to
add.
I
wanted
to
get
to
one
of
the
park
meetings
and
had
two
of
them
on
my
calendar
and
missed
them.
So
I
apologize
for
that,
but
I'm
glad
to
see
carl
was
was
there
at
all
of
them
to
to
help
represent
us,
so
appreciate
those
efforts.
M
I
just
had
one
quick
thing:
I
wanted
to
respond
to
something
carl
brought
up.
I
think
at
our
last
meeting,
around
density
and
the
differences
between
inglewood
and
the
city
of
denver,
and
I
just
want
to
put
out
a
recommendation
to
consider
whether
or
not
denver
denver
includes
the
airport
in
the
calculation
that
you're
looking
for
are
looking
at
for
density,
because
it
really
creates
a
lot
larger
that
be
denominator
for
for
the
city
of
denver
where
nobody
lives,
but
they
have
a
huge
mass
massive
land.
M
M
But
that
also
includes
a
lot
larger
land
area.
That's
not
used
for
any
kind
of
residential
development,
so
just
consider
that
when
you're
looking
at
those
density
calculations,
whether
or
not
that
part
of
denver
is
included,
so
that's
all.
O
The
one
thing
this
the
the
uc
is
doing
is
basically
finding
out
what
the
meetings-
that's
it's
getting
input
from
the
citizens
and
that
that's
really
a
good
idea.
I
think
we
don't.
We
can
go
by
what
other
people
say
we
should
be
doing,
but
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
go
by
what
the
residents,
the
people
that
live
here.
O
People
have
just
moved
here,
as
people
who
lived
here
50
years,
get
all
the
combination
of
the
all
the
opinions
of
everybody
that
lives
here,
because
they're
they're
going
to
live
here.
We
want
to
know
what
they
want
to
live
in
and
then
create
the
codes
for
the
the
area
that
we
want
to
live
out.
O
That's
about
it!
Well,
one
thing
I
do
have
the
the
as
far
as
the
newer
houses
and
district
one
over
there,
I
I
did
an
average
of
cost
on
the
rent
for
the
the
newer
houses
and
it
was
like
3
100
for
rent
for
the
new
duplexes
and
in
the
same
area.
The
existing
houses
that
are
over
there.
O
The
rent
was
eighteen
hundred
dollars,
so
the
newer
houses
over
there
are
twelve
hundred
dollars
more
per
month
to
rent
them,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
figures
into
depends
on
what
you're
you
know.
Everything's
relative,
but
affordability.
Is
that
affordable
for
you
or
is
that
affordable
for
your
friends
family?
O
I'm
not
sure
that
that
is
happening,
and
it's
happening
now.
So
the
new
development
over
there
is
quite
a
bit
more
expensive
than
the
the
neighbor.
E
E
All
right
thanks,
I
I
would
wrap
up
with
this.
Has
everybody
had
the
opportunity
to
send
an
email
to
nancy
and
indicate
whether
they
are
or
are
not
going
to
be
available
on
november
3rd?
E
If
you
could,
if
you,
if
you
know
you
have
plans
or
you
think
you
have
plans-
please
let
us
know,
because
that
way
we
can
determine
whether
we
have
a
meeting
or
would
reasonably
expect
to
have
a
quorum
or
whether
we're
not
going
to
and
that
way
staff
can
can
prepare
agendas
that
make
some
sense
for
us,
and
so,
if
you
could
send
that
individually
to
nancy,
that
would
be
great.
I
know
four
years
ago
we
had
we
had
a
meeting.
E
I
don't
know
what
they
did
four
years
before,
that
I
don't
recall,
but
it
is
what
it
is.
O
Could
we
postpone
it
today.
E
O
E
So
if
you
just
let
nancy
know
and
then
we
can
determine
whether
whether
we're
having
a
meeting
or
not
or
if,
if
you
know,
you're
going
to
be
here,
please
say
yes,
I'm
going
to
be
here,
but
in
deference
to
this,
if
we
do
have
a
meeting,
what
we
would
ask
is
that
that
it
would
be
a
light
agenda
if
we
do
have
a
meeting
so
that
there's
nothing
consequential,
etc.
I
mean
maybe
informative
where
somebody
could
read
a
packet.
E
So
if
we
choose
not
to
a
commissioner
who
has
a
particular
obligation
on
november
3rd
would
not
feel
like
they're
torn
between
wherever
it
is,
they
want
to
go
and
where
it
is
they've
kind
of
already
committed
to
go,
and
so
what
do
you
do?
So,
if
you
could
do
that,
and
I
think
just
in
closing
you
know
the
market
forces
in
this
country
have
done
a
great
job
of
creating
balance
opportunity,
much
equality
of
opportunity
throughout
throughout
throughout
its
history.
E
E
It's
an
exciting
time
to
be
here,
and
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
joining
tonight,
look
forward
to
our
next
meeting
and
everybody
have
a
a
great
great
rest
of
the
week.
Thanks
so
much
we're
adjourned.