►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission 19 Jun 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
C
F
G
B
A
F
E
G
D
F
E
D
G
A
A
F
C
B
E
A
J
J
Nirvan
WOD
is
defined
as
being
25
feet
of
lot
width,
which
is
under
what
is
currently
allowed
for
the
to
develop
a
new
lot
in
the
r1c
zone.
District
staff
is
recommending
that
the
plantings
any
question
to
prove
to
allow
for
creation
of
a
one
unit
dwelling
on
a
vacant
lot
I'm
at
42:10,
South,
Delaware,
this
property
and
all
properties
surrounding
it
are
located
in
the
r1c
zone
district.
J
This
property
is
3125
square
feet
and
as
25
feet,
a
lot
with
the
long
South
Delaware
Street
the
property
qualifies,
is
an
urban
WOD
in
our
r1c
zone.
District
urban
lot
of
urban
Lots
have
recorded
at
one
time
containing
or
currently
having
a
woman
of
dwelling
honor
before
the
effective
date
of
this
title,
which
was
February,
24th
2004
could
just
build
a
house.
J
J
This
property
is
part
of
what
was
the
Jackson
Broadway
Heights
subdivision.
This
was
plaited
in
1890
and
it
predates
the
city
of
Englewood.
By
about
13
years,
the
first
zoning
ordinance
in
the
city
of
Englewood
was
done
in
1940,
the
zone
and
so
on,
the
subject:
property,
r2
and
the
properties
to
the
north
and
west
of
over
r1,
and
this
was
actually
the
boundary
for
where
city
of
Englewood
ended
to
the
south.
J
J
J
J
During
our
analysis,
we
had
to
review
the
following
criteria:
the
walk
and
otherwise
cannot
otherwise
be
can
not
there
we
go.
That's
a
good
or
die's
cannot
not
going
on,
cannot
otherwise
be
used
for
any
purpose
permitted
within
the
zone
district
applicable
to
the
property,
since
this
is
an
urban
lot,
this
is
the
only
thing
that
could
be
developed
on
it.
No
other
thing
a
lot
in
this
own
district,
which
is
just
a
single
family
zone
district,
but
no
their
lot
size
could
be
developed
with
this.
J
The
waiver,
a
modification
if
granted,
is
necessary
to
afford
relief
with
the
lease
modification
it's
possible
of
the
development
or
dimensional
dimensional
standards.
Otherwise,
people
to
the
property
again,
the
property
is
not
asking
for
any
sort
of
adjustments
or
variance
as
to
what
is
allowed
under
the
urban
lot
in
the
zone
or
in
the
district.
This
property
will
have
a
one
car
garage,
two
car
two-car
parking
spaces
outside
the
park
outside
the
garage
on
a
driveway
in
the
back.
The
submitted
side
plank
applies
with
lot
area
setbacks
both
plain
all
those
this
property
is.
Development.
J
For
this
one
it
pretty
much
it
meets
all
the
again.
It
meets
all
the
requirements
of
an
urban
lot
in
that
zone
district
as
far
as
houses
in
the
surrounding
area.
The
house
to
the
north
of
it
is
one
thousand
two.
One
thousand
two
hundred
forty
eight
square
feet
in
the
lot
to
the
south
is
1921
square
feet,
so
it's
pretty
much
right
in
the
middle
of
those
as
far
as
square
footage.
J
The
final
criteria
is
that
the
pros
of
elm
is
compatible
with
the
established
Bell
and
patterns
int
into
the
zone.
District.
The
established
patterns
for
the
neighborhood
include
pre
and
post
war,
wood
frame
and
brick
single
family
homes
on
traditional
city
grid.
Most
of
the
have
varying
architectural
styles
on
the
prosed
one,
a
dilling
is
compatible
with
the
established
develop
patterns
int
into
the
zone.
District
again,
staff
recommends
approval
for
this
develop
as
a
one
needed
Welling
on
an
urban
lot,
and
I
can
sir,
any
questions.
K
J
K
B
D
A
C
A
J
They're
16:6
there's
the
abilities
for
an
urban
lot.
So
if
I,
like
mr.
Fremont,
was
saying
if
the
lot
you
know
already
had
a
house,
you
scraped
it
and
then
when
to
build
a
new
one,
you
could
do
that
if
you
wanted
to
waive
or
modify
what
is
under
that,
that
would
be
the
you
would
be
the
board
the
Commission
to
do
that.
So
without
that
it
would,
you
know,
follow
these.
H
H
G
G
G
J
Yeah,
the
the
2014
changed
to
that
I
kind
of
allowed
and
made
it
easier
for
this.
There's
an
actual.
You
know
process
in
there
now
and
this
a
lot
could
be
developed
and
before
I
believe
the
same
thing
could
have
been
said
about
if
there
was
a
house
on
it.
Currently,
the
change
is
mainly
for
Lots
that
never
had
a
house
before,
because
really
it's
a
non-conforming
lot
is
is
what
that
would
be.
J
J
J
So
if,
if
that
were
the
case,
they
would
not
be
able
to
subdivide
into
the
small
of
a
property
they
would
have
to
meet
the
current
standards
which,
as
far
back
as
you
know,
the
1948
they
wouldn't
build
a
build
or
could
do
is
subdivided
to
a
lot.
This
small
I
looked
back
until
about
the
70s
and
60s
and
70s
and
I
didn't
find
anything
that
indicated
these
were
under
the
same
ownership
at
any
point,
ask
the
owner
to
do
the
same.
She
couldn't
find
anything
as
well.
G
J
J
This
block
I
know
the
one
to
the
north
has
75
feet
of
lot
with
driving
through
the
area.
I'm
mostly
saw
probably
50
foot
what
with
developments.
Besides
that
one
a
lot
of
the
houses,
you
know
we're
built
a
while
back
and
so
most
a
lot
of
them
actually
are
pretty
narrow
similar
to
this
one.
They
don't
have
the
narrow
out
with
this
one
does,
but
I
saw
at
least
two
or
three
houses
that
were
probably
25
feet
or
less
and
and
width
for
the
actual
house.
L
L
Good
evening
I'm
Kristine
Martin
and
my
husband,
Matt,
Martin
and
I,
are
here
to
ask
you
to
approve
our
application
to
build
a
one
unit
dwelling
on
42,
10,
South,
Delaware
I
have
stood
before
some
of
you
before
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago.
With
this
for
the
same
type
of
hearing,
we
asked
to
build
this
house
on
a
small
lot
at
46
35,
South,
Pearl
Street,
and
for
those
of
you
that
were.
C
L
Here
that
was
granted,
we
did
build
that
house.
It
was
completed
early
2017
listed
for
sale
as
this
one
will
be
and
was
purchased
in
July
of
2017
by
a
nice
young
couple,
tripping
Kaitlyn
who
loved
the
house
loved
the
neighborhood
have
been.
You
know,
taking
really
good
care
of
the
house,
the
yard
contributing
to
the
tax
base
here
and
just
enjoying
Inglewood.
L
So
we're
asking
for
the
chance
to
do
that
again
here
at
42:10,
South
Delaware,
to
address
some
of
the
factors
in
the
application
and
I
might
repeat
some
of
what
we'll
said
so
I
apologize.
But
the
lot
is
25
feet
wide
and
125
feet
deep
and
is
currently
and
has
been
vacant
as
it
currently
sits.
It
is
serving
no
beneficial
purpose
to
the
residents
of
the
city
of
Inglewood,
but
with
the
addition
of
a
new
custom
single-family
home.
L
The
visual
aesthetics
of
the
lot
will
improve,
as
there
will
be
a
brand
new
custom
home
on
the
lot
complete
with
professional
landscaping.
Additionally,
the
buyer
of
the
home,
as
hopefully
the
buyers
of
4635
south
pearl,
do,
will
take
good
care
of
the
home,
contribute
positively
to
the
population
and
the
taxpayer
inglewood.
L
And,
to
give
you
a
little
bit
more
history
about
the
current
owner,
Gino
Kerman
is
85
she's,
a
widow
I
met
her
I
think
she
came
to
the
city
kind
of
trying
to
figure
out
what
she
could
do
with
this
lot
that
she
bought
in
a
tax
sale
years
ago.
That's
just
been
sitting
there
and
I
think
we'll
mentioned.
He
knows
that
there
were
some
people
that
had
developed
a
small
lot
the
year
before,
but
I
don't
think
he
gave
her
a
name
or
an
address.
L
L
Who
was
the
builder
that
we
will
be
working
with
this
same
builder,
that
built
4635,
south
pearl
and
she
sought
out
Carl
and
asked
if
we
would
buy
her
lot
so
I
went
and
met
with
her
and
met
with
her
son
Alan,
and
we
reached
an
agreement
for
buying
the
lot
contingent
upon
approval
by
you
to
build
this
home
when
I
called
her
yesterday
to
let
her
know
we
were
all
set
for
the
hearing
she
was
thrilled.
She
said.
L
Thank
you
so
much
I
think
this
would
have
been
really
hard
for
me
to
do
on
my
own
and
I
really
appreciate
you
guys
helping
you
know,
get
us
through
this
process,
and
hopefully
you
guys
get
to
buy
the
lot
after
the
hearing,
so
that
obviously,
would
be
a
big
benefit
to
the
current
owner
and
the
other
choice
being.
She
gets
no
benefit
and
just
has
a
vacant
piece
of
land
that
she
can
do.
Nothing
with.
L
The
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
the
spirit
and
intent
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan,
as
I
think
well
said.
The
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
has
specifically
allowed
for
this
process
to
improve
the
aesthetics
and
use
of
the
land
in
Englewood,
and
this
film
will
do
that
again.
The
vacant
lot
will
turn
into
a
single-family
home
with
a
yard
and
occupants
who
will
care
for
the
home
and
also
probably
I
think
as
with
Tripp
and
Caitlin
encouraged
more
people
such
as
friends
and
family,
to
be
in
the
area
and
potentially
move
into
the
area.
L
Additionally,
existing
homes
on
25
square
foot
Lots
are
entitled
to
modification,
and/or
replacement
and
building
a
new
home
on
the
lot.
Would
be
consistent
with
this
allowance,
the
proposed
project
does
fall
within
all
the
lot
coverage,
bulk,
plane,
setbacks
and
massing
required
by
the
city,
we're
not
asking
for
any
modifications
to
that,
and
it
will
not
alter
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
L
The
home
has
been
designed
to
blend
in
with
both
the
design
of
the
older
homes
in
the
neighborhood,
as
well
as
some
of
the
new
homes
that
have
been
built
or
some
of
the
homes
that
have
been
modified,
pop
tops
or
things
like
that.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
had
a
chance
to
drive
by
4635
south
pearl,
but
it
will
look
very
similar
to
that
home,
which
is
just
a
few
blocks
away.
L
L
It
will
enhance
property
values
on
the
street
again
because
of
the
way
the
real
estate
market
is
going
gar
last
one
when
we
met
with
you
by
the
time
it
was
built,
we,
the
price,
increased,
that
we
were
going
to
ask
by
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
So
with
the
way
the
markets
going
and
what
these
homes
are
worth.
I
think
it
will
also
contribute
positively
to
the
property
values
in
the
neighborhood.
C
F
A
L
A
Just
curious
with
you
know,
having
this
smaller
urban
lot
size
and
having
you
know,
three-foot
setbacks
on
either
side.
Has
that
been
any
kind
of
issue
for
your
current
tenants
or
their.
L
Owners,
they
bought
the
house
and
not
that
we've
heard
at
all
I
mean
there.
There
may
be,
did
roxor
landscaping
on
the
side,
so
obviously
nothing
foundationally
and
then
offense,
but
they
haven't
mentioned
anything
and
they've
got
Karl's
number
they've
got
our
number,
and
so
we
haven't
heard
anything
with
that
being
an
issue.
They've
got
lots
of
space
both
in
front
and
back
for
yard
and
space.
J
A
We're
gonna
have
an
opportunity
now
for
public
testimony.
It's
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
provide
testimony
regarding
this
case,
and
all
of
the
comments
should
be
directed
up
here
to
the
Commission,
we'll
give
each
speaker
about
five
minutes
to
be
able
to
tell
us
their
thoughts.
I
have
a
list
here
of
three
people
that
we
can
call
forward
and
and
start
with
Ralph
faragon
step
forward
here.
Nancy
will.
D
D
I
I
live
on
this
block
a
couple
couple
houses
down
from
where
this
lot
is
and
when
I
seen
the
sign
up,
I
definitely
raised
a
concern.
I
know
that
you
know
it
was
said
in
this
here
today
that
you
know
this
lot
would
just
stay
vacant.
Nothing
would
happen
to
it
if
they
don't
develop
this
home
on
it,
but
I
also
know
that
some
of
the
neighbors
bordering
this
empty
live
made
offers
on
this
lot
reasonable
offers
that
were
turned
down.
So
it's
not
like
the
lot
would've
stayed
empty.
I
They
could
have
been
enjoined
or
used
by
one
of
the
neighbors
on
either
side.
You
know,
Ralph
was
mentioning
you
know
it's
a
25-foot
lot.
You
can
build
a
19,
maybe
18
foot
with
overhang,
so
you
can
maybe
get
18
foot
of
a
house
with
on
there
and
from
the
square
footage
that
they
talked
about.
There's
not
going
to
be
much
the
yard
and
landscaping
left.
If
there's
a
two-car
garage
in
the
back,
you
know
the
the
neighborhood's,
an
old
neighborhood.
I
I
You
know
I
understand
that
for
this
one
home,
the
property
value
of
this
one
home
would
increase
and
it
probably
will
increase
the
way
economy
is
going,
but
it
doesn't
mean
that
of
what
will
happen
to
the
existing
homes.
The
existing
the
homes
that
are
bigger
and
worse
have
more
valuable,
probably
actually
losing
value,
because
when
they
win
Zillow
and
all
that
comes
out
and
they
market
houses,
you
know
they
look
at
the
neighborhood,
so
it
actually
would
be
a
negative
for
us
people
that
already
are
there.
I
You
know
I
I,
just
I
just
recommend
that
this
council,
don't
you
know,
like
board
member
Michael,
saying
that
this
this
ordinance
has
been
in
place
for
a
lot
a
lot
of
years,
and
so
this
would
be
to
modify
it
and
I.
You
know
where
to
put
a
variance
to
it
and
I
asked
his
counsel
not
to,
and
you
know,
I'm
awful
surprised
that
the
city
of
Englewood
is
lot
as
a
employee
of
the
city
of
Lynwood
lobbying.
M
H
A
A
G
F
E
G
C
A
H
H
H
K
The
issue
ultimately
comes
down
to
based
on
the
ordinance
as
it's
written.
Can
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
reasonably
accept
this,
or
is
there
a
reason
to
deny
this
based
on
the
ordinance
and
they're
asking
for
zero
variances
based
on
the
ordinance?
So
it
gives
us
little
alternative
relative
to
that.
K
So,
regardless
of
whether
we
like
the
view
or
don't
like
the
view
or
even
have
an
opinion
regarding
the
view,
it's
my
understanding
that
state
law
and
local
ordinance
does
not
protect
view,
which
is
not
just
similar
to
what
we've
had
with
various
redevelopments
along
various
places
where
there
was
previously
previously
a
view
that
was
desirable
to
neighbors
that
today
there
is
not,
and
so
that
doesn't
give
us
an
option
to
say
we
don't
like
this.
So
therefore,
we'll
vote
it
down.
K
So
within
those
property
rights,
and
my
point
of
saying
it's
been
zoned
this
way
for
78
years,
regardless.
If
one
cannot
obtain
the
property
to
enjoy
it
to
their
their
liking,
they
don't
have
the
opportunity
to
if
they
couldn't
obtain
it
and
put
it
and
enjoy
it,
how
they
like
it
to
then
dictate
what
will
be
for
all
times
as
long
as
they
happen
to
live
there
and
or
their
heirs
or
designee,
z--
and
I.
Think
therein
lies
lies
the
issue
within
the
city
of
Inglewood.
A
A
A
A
E
K
For
previous
four
reasons
previously,
given
as
much
as
I
have
as
much
as
what
I
can
understand
how
difficult
it
may
be,
it
meets
with
the
requirements
as
set
forth
within
the
Comprehensive
Plan,
as
it
previously
stated
by
staff
they're,
not
asking
for
any
variance
relative
to
any
ordinance
and
it.
It
does
add
to
what
has
been
here
and
regardless
of
whether
we
have
a
particular
affinity
for
esthetics
of
a
development
or
not.
If
it's
within
the
code,
and
it
meets
that
which
we,
which
we've
previously
set
out,
which
is
a
matter
of
public
record.
K
H
C
C
C
B
I
vote
YES
for
the
the
reasons
previously
stated.
I
think
the
the
proposed
structure
we'll
find
its
place
in
in
the
neighborhood
understanding
some
of
the
concerns
about
the
height.
It
still
meets
the
development
standards
that
have
been
put
forth
in
the
zoning
code,
so
I
find
no
compelling
reason
to
vote.
Yes.
G
A
Applicant
has
a
proposal
that
meets
the
goals
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
stated
in
the
staff
report,
and
meets
the
criteria
that
we
have
in
1694
in
the?
U
DC
and
also
has
the
ability
to
be
able
to
meet
the
character
within
the
zoning
district
and
create
more
opportunities
for
housing
in
Englewood.
M
E
G
B
C
F
K
A
A
A
H
E
Yeah,
the
only
thing
that
I
noticed
is
that
it
didn't
seem
like
people
that
were
here
had
had
seen
any
of
the
plans
and
everything's
available
on
online
if
they
want
to.
That
was
because
some
of
the
concerns
that
they
were
raising
I
understand
that,
like
being
opposed
to
it,
but
they
didn't
know
the
width
of
the
house
didn't
know
the
layout
of
what
had
been
proposed
and
I
assumed
that
everything
was
made
available
and
they
just
hadn't
seen
it.