►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
C
It
appears
the
city
has
lost
the
lawsuit
with
the
Chicagoland
paving
contractors
for
performance
problems.
$265,000
I
want
to
remind
aldermen,
that's
basically,
half
a
percent
property
tax
increase.
Of
course,
I
can
pull
you
the
total
cost.
There
are
no
doubt
where
legal
fees
and
things
included
in
this
is
probably
quite
a
bit
more
item.
10A
tonight
is
something
very
similar.
Staff
is
claiming
they
can
get
150.
Three
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
from
liquidated
damages
for
the
contractor
for
Fountain
Square.
Will
we
collect
this
very
highly?
I
may
be
highly
unlikely.
C
Of
course,
it's
okay
to
pretend.
Today
we
are
going
to
collect
it
and
approve
it.
If
this
is
on
consent
agenda,
maybe
in
a
year
the
public
will
forget.
But
again
again,
if
we
add
in
the
legal
fees
and
other
problems,
we
probably
have
another
half
a
percent
property
tax
increase.
So,
as
we
all
know,
the
legal
department
is
a
big
hole
in
our
budget
and
it
grows
there's
an
interesting
pattern.
C
Here,
though,
contractors
are
blamed
all
the
time
for
screwing
up
and
the
staffs
the
victims,
but
having
run
projects
myself
for
many
years,
I
make
them
success.
When
I
don't
blame
others,
you
got
to
manage
these
projects
and
that's
a
big
problem
here
and
I'll
move
on
to
a
p16.
The
waste
just
continues
on
in
Howard
Street
$600,000
for
engineering,
basically
we're
taking
more
money
out
of
geo
bonds
tonight,
which
we
don't
have
money
for
it's
another
tax
increase,
a
hundred
and
thirty
three
thousand
dollars.
C
So
it's
a
quarter
of
a
percent
property
tax,
increase,
that's
Howard,
Street,
again
more
stuff,
that's
unnecessary
on
Howard,
Street
and
finally,
a
piece,
a
piece:
17,
Lincoln,
wood,
I.
Think
I've
talked
about
this
numerous
times
that
the
water
department
needs
to
show
all
the
customers
as
a
group
and
what
they
are
paying
because
as
I
as
I
know-
and
we
all
know,
the
city
takes
303
million
dollars
out
of
the
water
fund
to
transfer
it
to
the
general
fund,
plus
more
and
basically
Evanston
residents
are
overpaying
on
their
water
bills.
C
They're
gonna
come
tonight
and
say:
isn't
this
great
we're
getting
a
big
deal
all
this
profit
to
everything?
So
maybe
it's
time
to
figure
out
what
the
real
profit
is
at
a
business.
You
don't
run
up
and
say:
hey
I
just
got
one
sale
and
I
made
a
profit.
You
look
at
the
whole
business.
They
haven't
done
that
and
they're
not
willing
to
do
it,
and
that
is
a
problem
and
if
any
old
urban
understands
that
you
really
should
understand
that
it's
not
a
business.
A
You
all
right,
we
will
now
go
through
the
consent
agenda
before
I
read
the
items
and
we
vote.
There
are
a
couple
items
that
are
going
to
be
pulled
off
by
request,
so
item
a2
is
coming
off
a
ten
and
eight
11.
That's
on
the
consent
agenda.
All
right,
so
a1
is
payroll,
dated
July
9
2018
through
July
22nd
2018,
and
the
amount
of
three
million
two
hundred
one
thousand
four
hundred
fifty-seven
dollars
and
seventy
six
cents.
Any
three
is
the
purchase
of
three
Public
Works
Agency
vehicles
from
Curry
motors
incorporated
and
JX
Peterbilt.
A
This
is
in
the
amount
of
sorry
two
hundred
fifty
six
thousand
two
hundred
eleven
dollars
coming
from
the
equipment
replacement
fund,
that
is,
for
action,
fuel
purchase
of
gas
depot
oil
company
I've,
rescued
me
from
gas
Depot
oil
company
for
July
6
through
July
5th
2019.
The
staff
is
recommending
we
make
this
purchase
the
prices
that
we
are
going
to
lock
in
our
two
dollars
and
42
cents,
a
gallon
for
87,
octane,
gasoline
and
250
a
gallon
for
biodiesel.
This
is
coming
from
the
major
maintenance
materials
and
maintained
auto
fund.
A
A
five
is
the
benchmark
analytics
License
Agreement,
the
staff
is
recommending.
We
authorized
City
Council
for
the
license
agreement
with
benchmarks
analytics
for
three
years,
with
an
option
to
renew
the
expenses
paid
for
out
of
the
police
departments
operating
budget
and
the
amount
for
the
amount
is
$25,000
for
our
first
contract
in
26,000.
For
the
second,
a
six
is
a
contract
with
capital,
cement
company
for
2018
alley
and
Street
improvement
project.
We're
executing
a
contract
for
this
project
with
capital
capital.
A
Excuse
me,
Cement,
incorporated
in
the
amount
of
eight
hundred
seventy
four
thousand
seven
hundred
sixty
one
dollars
and
thirty
cents.
The
funding
is
from
2018
general
obligation
bond
in
the
amount
of
two
thousand:
seventy
five
thousand
nine
hundred
forty
dollars
and
special
assessment
funds
in
the
amount
of
two
hundred
thirteen
thousand
six
hundred
forty
five
dollars
in
community
development
block
funds
at
three
hundred.
Eighty
five
thousand
one
hundred
seventy
six
dollars
in
30
cents.
A
A
seven
is
a
contract
with
Videla
LLC,
doing
business
at
Central,
rug
and
carpet
for
the
Noyes
Street
cultural
noise,
Cultural
Arts,
Center,
hallway
in
common
area.
Our
provements
we're
executing
a
contract
with
this
company
for
replacement,
hallway
projects
at
noise,
Cultural
Arts
Center,
the
fun
excuse
me,
the
amount
is
199
and
$145,000
funding
is
provided
from
the
2018
catherine
improvement
fund
and
will
be
reimbursed
by
the
noise
tenant
reserve
fund.
A
A
8
is
a
contract
with
mcguire
and
associates
for
architectural
and
engineering
services
related
to
the
water
quality
laboratory,
we're
executing
a
contract
and
the
amount
of
one
hundred.
Eighty
two
thousand
25
25
dollars.
Funding
is
coming
from
the
water
fund,
which
has
a
budgeted
amount
of
$150,000
for
these
services
in
2018,
and
an
additional
75
thousand
and
two
thousand
1989
is
a
contract
with
giant
maintenance
and
restoration
for
2018
fire
hydrant
paintings.
We
are
going
into
a
contract
with
the
amount
of
twenty-one
thousand
seventy
dollars.
A
A
D
Rainey
madam
chair
I,
just
want
to
make
one
minor
correction,
I'm
sure
I'm
supporting
every
item,
but
on
the
benchmarking
item,
the
item
that's
being
supported,
I
think
by
the
woods
foundation
for
the
first
three
years.
I
think
you've
indicated
that
the
the
first
two
years
were
26,000
and
I
did
thanks
for
that
correction.
The
first
three
years
are
being
paid
for
by
the
foundation.
A
Yeah,
so
let
me
update
that
for
the
record.
Thank
you.
So
I'm
gonna
reread
a
5-4
correction
in
the
record.
Is
the
benchmarks
analytic
license
agreement.
The
staff
is
recommending
City
Council
authorized
the
license
agreement
with
benchmarks
analytics
for
three
years,
with
an
option
to
renew
for
two
additional
years.
The
software
system
will
assist
with
the
management
of
the
epd
through
the
analysis
of
law
enforcement
related
information.
A
A
A
In
one
sense,
this
will
modify
the
existing
agreement,
amount
of
nine
hundred
forty
five
thousand
four
hundred
thirty
eight
sixty
eight
cents
to
nine
hundred
eighty
four
thousand
five
hundred
fifty
one
dollars
and
sixty
nine
cents
and
extend
the
contract
that
live
from
September
30th
2018
to
December
31st
2018.
Funding
for
this
work
will
be
through
the
washington
national
tiff
fun
from
liquidated
damages
assessed
against
the
construction
contractor
for
failure
to
complete
the
work
without
within
the
specified
time.
A
E
Good
evening
Dave
stone
at
public
works.
Director
liquidated
damages
are
taking
away
from
the
contractor,
as
he
submits
a
payment
application.
So
when
you
submit
something
and
its
value
say
a
million
dollars,
we
subtract
the
liquid
and
damages
from
that
and
pay
him
if
we
subtracted
twenty
thousand
dollars,
we're
paying
mine
honor
than
twenty
thousand
dollars
or
nine
hundred
eighty
thousand
dollars.
So
it's
not
like
we
have
to
recover
to
the
liquid
damages
from
the
contractor.
We
just
deduct
that
from
the
value
that
he's
earned
and
not
pay
that
to
him.
D
A
Then
I
have
a
question
also
for
this
in
pertains
to
eleven
as
well,
but
I
know
that
we've
had
some
issues
with
the
contractor,
as
it
says
here
so
can
you
just
explain
Christopher
Burke's
relationship?
If
we've
had
some
issues,
are
they
the
contractor?
We've
had
issues
with?
Are
they
separate
entity?
We.
E
Have
two
separate
contracts
on
this
project?
One
is
with
the
engineer
which
is
Christopher
Burke
and
one
is
with
the
contractor
that
is
koppenhaver.
It
is
my
opinion
that
Christopher
Burke
has
done
as
good
as
job
is.
They
can
do
on
this
project
and
I
think
that
they've
really
helped
the
contractor
not
be
as
bad
as
they
seem
to
be,
so
they
have
really
pushed
the
contractor
to
try
to
get
a
schedule
out
of
them,
which
is
very
difficult
to
do.
E
They
have
reviewed
some
middles
way
beyond
what
would
normally
be
required
to
address
issues
that
the
contractor
was
inappropriate
and
submitting
complete
documents
in
this
Middle's.
They
questioned
the
schedule
that
the
contractor
would
indicate
they
were
going
to
do
this
work.
Well,
you
had
to
do
this
other
work
first
and
Christopher.
Burke
would
point
that
out
to
them
and
really
kind
of
help
guide
the
contractor
long
to
try
to
do
the
work.
I
know
I've
heard
a
lot
about,
and
it
was
actually
on
the
interview.
E
Where
would
it
have
been
appropriate
for
the
contractor
to
test
the
water
pipes
underneath
the
fountain
before
they
poured
this
structural
concrete?
On
top
of
it,
it
would
have,
but
that's
not
the
pressure
test,
that's
required
by
the
by
the
specifications,
because
you
you
backfill
it
you
can
test
it,
and
then
you
know
that
your
subcontractor
did
their
work
appropriately
and
then
you
pouring
the
concrete
foundation
of
the
fountain
over
it.
While
doing
that
work
could
also
damage
the
pipes
as
well,
so
to
protect
the
city.
E
The
specification
developed
by
crash,
divert
Burke,
says
you
have
to
test
the
pipes
once
everything's
installed,
koppenhaver
elected,
not
to
through
a
preliminary
test.
When
the
pipes
are
first
installed
backfilled,
they
are
adhering
to
the
contract,
specs
and
testing
it
after
it
was
back
filled
and
after
the
concrete
structure
was
placed
on
top
of
it
and
we
found
leaks
had
they
only
tested
after
it
was
back
filled
that
built
the
concrete
structure
and
may
have
leaked,
and
then
we
won't
have
caught
it.
So
the
specs
are
right
that
it
requires
the
pressure
test.
E
After
all,
the
work
is
done
and
people
are
claiming.
Welcome,
Burke
didn't
make
koppenhaver
tested
earlier,
they
suggested
to
him,
but
it
wasn't
required
in
the
contract.
The
final
product
is
being
tested,
it's
found
a
leak
and
the
contractor
is
assuming
the
responsibility
to
repair
that
the
city
is
making
no
additional
payment
to
the
contractor
to
make
all
the
piping
work
we're
still
holding
$400,000
and
the
retaining
work
that
was
previously
completed.
We're
in
good
shape
in
this
project,
and
part
of
that
is
because
Christopher
Burke
has
done
a
great
job,
assisting
the
city.
E
I
feel
fairly
confident
that
we're
fine
yeah,
that's
hard
to
say
there
were
five
pipelines
that
we're
leaking.
Four
of
them
have
been
fixed,
the
fifth
one
we
thought
was
going
to
hold
last
time,
they're
lining
it.
They
found
an
error
in
the
lining.
Hopefully
that
will
be
fixed
soon,
and
then
we
can
start
actually
testing
the
software.
E
If
you
will
of
the
fountain
making
sure
that
the
fountains
go
up
when
they're
supposed
to
de
color
lights
change
and
all
that,
and
then
the
glass
has
to
come
in
as
well,
and
we
expect
that
within
that
time
period.
So
we
expect
construction
wrap
up
well
before
December
31st
with
their
new
project
closeout
that
has
to
be
addressed
and
that
will
take
them
until
December
31st.
All.
E
E
F
A
Right
that
carries
over
and
a
11
is
the
consulting
contract.
Amendment
number
three
design
and
construction
engineering
services
on
Sherman
Avenue
between
Davis
Street
and
Church
Street
staff
recommends
city
council,
authorize
the
city
manager
to
amend
and
extending
engineering
services
contract
for
Fountain
Square
renovation
project
with
Christopher
Burke
in
the
amount
of
sixty
four
thousand
eight
hundred
sixty
one
dollars
ten
cents.
D
A
E
And
thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
Our
contract
with
koppenhaver
is
around
five
point:
nine
million
dollars.
We
anticipate
that
final
project
will
coming
somewhere
around
five
point.
Four
five
point:
five,
sadly,
is
at
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
allocated
for
this
the
current
project,
and
then,
if
you
remember
way
back
when
we
start
this,
there
was
actually
three
parts
of
this
project.
E
When
we
initially
worked,
the
contractor
the
contract
didn't
appear
that
there
would
be
sufficient
funds
in
the
TIF
funding
to
be
able
to
do
the
face
to
in
the
face
three
work
based
on
where
we're
with
it
we're
anticipating,
closing
the
final,
the
first
contract
out
with,
and
the
funds
that
are
available
in
Washington
National
to
taking
another
under
a
thousand.
We
feel
that
we'll
be
able
to
restore
the
sidewalk
or
replace
the
sidewalk.
F
A
Opposed
all
right
motion
carries
all
right
before
we
move
on
I'm,
going
to
go
back
to
the
bills
list
so
a
to
the
bills
list
dated
August
14
2018
in
the
amount
of
seven
million,
seven
hundred
eighty-three
thousand
one
hundred
sixty
eight
dollars
and
33
cents,
as
well
as
credit
card
activity,
not
including
Amazon
purchases
for
the
period
ending
June,
26
2018
in
the
amount
of
$200,000
208
205,
okay,
205,
283
and
75
cents.
This
is
for
action.
Second,.
F
A
D
A
G
B
B
Just
just
looking
through
this
and
in
paying
a
little
extra
attention
to
this
attach
I
know
that
Ottoman
Rainey
raised
a
couple
of
questions
in
terms
of
the
expenses
and
I
basically
have
three
comments.
Just
in
terms
of
the
inconsistency
with
the
comments
on
the
credit
card,
I'm
speaking
directly
to
the
credit
card
list,
and
so
as
I
look
at
this
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
the
whole
thing.
But,
for
example,
on
page
four,
epic,
burger
and
I
know
I'll
be
asked
about
the
nature
of
the
meeting.
B
H
B
Just
so,
the
overall
comments
would
be
a
little
bit
more
attention
to
detail
in
some
categories,
its
explained,
what
the
trips
or
who
benefits
from
the
trips
in
some
situations
that
they
don't
and
then
my
other
question
for
you
is
at
the
end
of
each
department.
Can
you
transition
that
with
a
subtotal
we.
B
And
then
the
final
thing
is,
you
know
you
sit
on
our
MWBE
committee
myself
in
alderman
Simmons,
you
know
one
of
the
things
we're
paying
very
close
attention
to
is
the
local
spend
alright,
and
so
it
would
be
helpful.
Some
of
these
locations
attached
I,
can
or
I'm
sure
we
can
figure
out
just
where.
But
if
you
can
just
add
a
one
category
with
the
city,
I
would
really
appreciate
that.
B
A
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
public
statement
that
I
would
love
the
district
to
partner
with
us
a
little
bit
more
financially.
Our
police
obviously
need
access
to
the
buildings
in
case
there's
an
emergency
and
I'm
glad
that
they
were
proactive
in
purchasing
those,
and
it
is
a
small
amount,
but
it
would
be
great
if
the
district
would
maybe
just
provide
the
key
fobs
for
the
police
department
so
that
they
can
access
the
buildings
and,
if
I'm,
understanding
that
and
correctly
I
apologize,
but
I
I
noticed.
A
F
I
D
Story,
I
have
another
request
for
you
to
make
at
7:45
Howard.
We
had
a
police
outpost
for
several
couple
of
years
and
we
provided
the
police
with
Comcast
service
and
for
some
reason
we
had
a
plan
where
the
program
was
through
2019
and
since
we
had
that
plan,
we
are
required
to
continue
paying
them
to
2019.
D
D
D
People
help
us
out
all
over
town
and
then
Comcast
is
holding
the
city
of
Evanston
to
this
contract
is
outrageous
and
that
the
taxpayers
are
having
to
pay
for
a
contract
that
we
no
longer
use,
and
not
only
that
the
store
that
we
and
we
are
leased
ended
and
we
moved
out
right.
It's
a
vacant
store
and
that
we're
having
to
pay.
For
that.
It's
crazy.
D
D
I
D
I
Believe
when
the
service
was
initially
installed,
there
was
no
service
to
the
building,
and
so
they
had
to
run
something
infrastructure
to
the
building
in
order
to
put
the
service
into
place,
which
then
required
the
contract
to
be
entered
into
for
more
than
a
standard
months
a
month.
So
that
is
why
the
contract
is
longer
than
what
we
originally
had
to
sell
bet.
I
A
Right,
so
the
bills
list
has
been
moved
in.
Second,
in
all
those
in
favor
of
approving
police
say
aye,
any
opposed
all
right,
we're
moving
on
to
item
a
12
which
is
Amazon
credit-card
activity
period,
ending
June,
26
2018
in
the
amount
of
twenty
three
thousand
six
hundred
forty
nine
dollars
and
82
cents.
I
move
approval.
Second,
all
right,
seeing
no
lights
all
in
favor
of
approving
a
12,
please
say
aye
any
opposed
any
abstaining
all
right!
Thank
you,
odd.
My
break
away.
Can
you
please
take
813
yep.
B
F
A
F
814
staff
recommend
City
Council
adoption
of
resolution.
53
r18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
negotiate
the
least
of
office.
Space
was
North
Shore
Senior
Center
at
the
rate
of
500
$11.50
per
month
for
12
months,
beginning
October,
1st
2018
for
for
430
square
feet
of
space
on
the
ground
floor
of
the
Civic
Center
suite
G
205.
This
is
for
action.
F
J
15
is
resolution:
57
r18,
Illinois,
Department,
asportation
local
agency
agreement
to
face
to
engineering
on
the
Howard
Street
corridor
improvement
project.
The
agreement
establishes
the
maximum
grant
funding
of
the
engineering
cost
not
to
exceed
four
hundred
sixty
two
thousand
six
hundred
thirty-seven
dollars
income,
it's
Evanston
to
fund
137
thousand
three
hundred
sixty
three
dollars
of
the
engineering
costs
for
action.
Second,
team
All.
A
D
This
is
a
16
staff
recommends
that
we
approve
resolution,
or
we
recommend
approval
of
resolution,
55
r18,
which
would
authorize
the
manager
to
sign
a
preliminary
engineering
services
agreement
for
federal
participation
with
the
Illinois
Department
of
Transportation
and
the
professional
services
agreement
with
Christopher
Burke
in
the
amount
of
$600,000,
and
then
the
variety
of
funding
issues
are
the
same
as
the
previous
one.
I
move
approval.
This
is
for
the
Howard
Street
cut
for
exact.
F
D
F
A
Opposed
motion
carries
a
17.
We
are
going
to
be
suspending
the
rules
for
a
17.
It
will
be
for
introduction
and
for
action
tonight,
and
it's
ordinance.
83
OH
18
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
execute
an
agreement
to
sell
water
to
a
new
wholesale
water
customer,
the
village
of
Lincoln
woods
staff,
recommends
City
Council,
adopt
this
ordinance
authorizing
city
manager
to
execute
a
water
supply
agreement
with
the
village
of
Lincoln
wood.
The
initial
term
of
the
agreement
is
for
39
years
with
two
ten-year
extension
provisions
at
the
discretion
of
Lincoln
wood.
F
A
K
K
Similarly,
if
a
resident
near
the
parking
stadium
has
non
Evanston
guests,
once
again,
they
those
people
shouldn't,
have
to
pay
the
$40
surcharge,
and
also
we
heard
about
caregivers
and
a
number
of
kinds
of
people
that
need
to
come.
Come
visit
the
residents
on
game
day
and
then
the
third
area.
That's
a
concern
is
the
commuter
parking
along
the
metro
track
on
poplar,
even
though
it's
not
a
heavy
commuter
day.
There
are
people
who
do
park
there
to
take
the
train
downtown
and
it
wouldn't
be
reasonable
to
charge
them
$40
either.
K
So
we
would
have
to
remove
that
area
from
the
pilot
program.
So
considering
all
these
points
is
one
other
thing
that
actually
I
haven't
heard
about
from
residents.
Yet,
but
is
it
a
concern
that
occurred
to
me
was
whether
we've
given
adequate
federación
yet
to
the
parking
needs
of
the
businesses
on
Central
Street.
We
already
removed
the
parking
on
Central
Street
for
several
hours
doing
on
game
day,
which
makes
it
challenging
then
for
people
going
to
the
restaurants
and
the
shops
to
find
a
place
to
park,
so
so
that
we
don't
lose
the
program
altogether.
K
I
would
like
to
propose
that
we
test
the
basic
concept
with
a
substitute
proposal
which,
where
we
would
focus
just
on
the
Central
Street
parking
lot,
and
that
would
become
a
special
event
parking
lot
on
football
game
days
and
we
would
charge
anyone
who
parked
there
during
the
certain
hours
of
the
before
and
after
before.
During
and
after
the
football
game,
the
$40
and
so
be
a
way
for
us
to
test
sort
of.
What
is
that?
What
is
the
demand?
K
A
G
The
other
thing
is,
the
amount
of
revenue
is
I,
think
overestimated
by
twice,
because
it
assumes
that
there's
going
to
be
tents,
parking
spaces
in
each
block
that
will
be
available
for
Austral
non-resident
parking,
but
most
of
the
parking
over
there
because
they
are
narrowness
of
the
streets
and
it's
near
the
business
district,
the
only
Park
on
one
side.
So
there
is
just
a
lot
of
problems
plus
if
there
are
people
that
are
coming
in
and
they
inadvertently.
G
G
So
it's
just
I
think
it
just
is
a
program
that
needs
to
be
really
really
limited
before
put
into
effect,
because
it
feels
very
punitive
to
that
whole
target
area
and
I
full
disclosure
I
do
live
over
there
and
I
mean
if
you
really
wanted
to
solve
the
congestion
of
the
resident
parking
and
the
pressure
from
the
40,000
people
who
go
to
the
games
or
30,000,
you
would
make
it
non-resident
part.
You
would
make
it
resident
only
parking
during
the
game
days,
but
in
and
second
of
all,
I
had
I
kind
of
liked.
G
D
I
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
Eric
Astoria
system,
city
manager,
the
parking
on
Central
Street
is
limited
on
game
days
because
we
need
to
efficiently
let
the
traffic
flow
in
and
out
of
the
stadium
very
narrow
streets
entering
into
the
stadium
a
lot
of
people
trying
to
get
there
all.
At
the
same
time.
I
Typically,
we
put
signs
on
the
meters
saying
you
can
park
there
up
until
a
certain
time,
and
then
it
becomes
restricted
parking
so
that
we
can
free
flow,
the
traffic
coming
in
and
then
midway
through
the
game
switches
to
the
other
side,
where
the
other
side
of
the
parking
is
stripped
and
then
allows
for
a
faster
exit
from
the
stadium
for
the
game
release.
We
have
six
home
games
this
year,
four
of
which
we
anticipate
will
potentially
sell
out,
including
Notre
Dame
for
the
first
time
coming
to
the
stadium
in
a
long
time.
I
So
we
think
that
there's
going
to
be
an
extreme
burden
on
the
traffic
area,
trying
to
get
people
in
and
out
so
there's
we're
continuing
to
evaluate
what
types
of
restrictions
may
be
needed
along
that
corridor.
But
certainly
we
try
to
always
make
sure
that
there's
ample
parking
on
the
central
street
for
the
businesses
up
until
as
close
as
possible
to
when
we
need
to
remove
that
parking
for
what
game
at.
D
D
I
Would
like
to
have
that
capability?
We
tried
to
do
some
things
with
the
meters
earlier
last
year.
If
you
remember
for
Memorial
Day
to
put
notice
on
there
that
you
have
to
pay,
didn't
work
out
so
well
for
months.
We
didn't
have
to
pay
I
love
that
this
software,
for
those
meters
is
pretty
antiquated
and
we
don't
really
have
confidence
that
that
would
be
successful
if
we
tried
to
do.
D
D
I
I
C
D
B
A
Right
so
we
potentially
have
some
okay,
so
here
here
are
my
concerns
and
I:
don't
live
in
the
area,
so
I
do
defer
to
Ottoman
suffering
and
Ottoman
Ravel.
When
this
came
to
parking
and
transportation,
although
I
realized,
you
know
it
doesn't
necessarily
cut
back
on
the
congestion
of
the
neighbors
who
do
live
right
there,
particularly
the
ones
who
live
right
across
the
street
in
those
apartments
where
there
already
is
limited
parking.
But
at
this
point,
if
I
understand
correctly,
if
you
park
there
all
day,
you
get
a
$20
ticket.
A
I
You
park
it
a
meter,
that's
not
restricted
and
you
just
park
there
all
day.
You
would
get
a
ticket
for
overstaying.
The
meter
which
is
it
I,
think
$20
for
the
expired
meter.
But
if
you
extend
past
the
time
the
two-hour
time
limit
that
would
be
also
in
effect,
you
would
then
get
the
ticket
for
overtime,
which
I
think
is
40
or
$45.
So
it
would
depend
on
if
you
how
long
you
ever
stand
later,
but
so.
A
Yeah,
so
I
guess
them
I
guess
I
feel
like.
Maybe
this
needs
more
discussion
but
I
again
I,
don't
I,
don't
live
over
there.
I
think
that
we
have
an
opportunity.
You
know
slightly
for
revenue,
but
also
to
consider
their
neighbors
who
do
have
to
enter
the
parking,
particularly
for
these
large
games
that
we
have
coming
up
and
to
just
allow
someone
to
park
on
the
street
for
potentially
a
$20
ticket,
or
you
know,
$40
ticket
is
still
much
cheaper
than
I.
A
Imagine
you
know
when
people
go
to
Michigan
in
these
different
places,
and
it
still
is
not
necessarily
gonna
help
with
the
residents
having
more
parking
I
mean
if
I
have
a
husband,
who's,
a
season
ticket
holder
and
he'd,
happily
pay
25
bucks
and
take
a
ticket
and
walk
across
the
street.
So
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
missed
opportunity
to
change
it,
but
again
I'm.
You
know
gonna
defer,
I
think,
maybe
in
my
opinion,
I
would
like
more
information
I'm
autumn
and
suffering,
and
you
share
the
ward.
J
Yeah
Medicare
and
members
of
the
committee
I
think
the
I
would
like
to
be
as
deferential
as
possible
all
of
Monroeville,
since
this
is
really
that
her
constituents
being
affected
directly
I.
Think
to
mr.
Osinski
point
about
congestion.
There
would
not
be,
in
my
opinion,
fewer
or
more
cars.
They
would
just
be
generating
revenue.
They
are
not
generating.
Now
if
we
were
to
implement
the
original
proposal,
which
would
have
been
the
$40.00
to
park
on
the
street.
J
However,
after
the
meeting
that
alderman,
Ravel
and
I
had
with
residents,
are
a
lot
of
concerns
about
guest
passes
and
how
that
would
work
and
I,
don't
know
that
we
have
enough
time
to
implement
that
correctly
and
that's
a
concern.
Although
intervals
compromise
proposal
would
generate
revenue
to
allow
us
to
gauge
demand
and
also
diminish
the
subsidy
that
all
ovens
and
tax
payers
are
giving
to
gameday
operations.
J
When
particularly
these
large
games
with
variable
kickoff
times,
we
don't
know
what
our
police
overtime
costs
will
be
and
to
alter
and
Rainey's
point
about
ingress
and
egress
I
defer
to
the
police
on
that.
But
I
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
be
very
aware
of
the
effects
on
Center
Street
businesses,
who
kind
of
knew
what
they
were
getting
into
on
game
day,
but
we
shouldn't
do
anything
to
exacerbate
their
difficulties
but
still
maintain
safe
traffic
flow
west
towards
the
expressway
for
people
after
the
game,
so
I
think
all
their
intervals.
J
Compromise
is
a
good
start
and
then
hopefully,
as
we
get
further
into
the
park,
Evanston
app,
we
can
figure
out
ways
to
capture
more
revenue
from
out
of
town
people
who
have
another
option
for
parking.
Nobody
is
forced
to
park
on
the
streets
near
the
stadium.
There's
there
are
other
pay
Lots,
there's
northwestern
campus
parking
and
shuttle.
So
there's
nobody
who
is
going
to
be
taking
advantage
of
this
parking
near
the
stadium
who
has
no
other
option,
so
people
are
gonna,
be
making
a
choice
to
pay
the
$40
or
risk
the
$80
ticket.
J
A
Alright,
so
there's
no
other
questions,
so
I
did
not
write
down
all
of
your
amended
motion,
so
I'm
not
sure
I'm
gonna.
Do
it
justice
to
try
to
admit
it
here
on
the
floor
with
Miami.
A
K
A
Right
and
then
just
for
staff,
then
I,
guess
as
we
face
this
end
and
see
what
it
looks
like
I
guess,
it's
gonna
come
back
to
AP
end
up
your
parking
and
transportation.
I
would
like
to
make
the
request
that
we
actually
in
that
report,
not
only
track
the
parking
at
the
Central
Street
lab,
but
also
track
the
number
of
tickets.
So
I'd
like
to
make
that
request
when
it
comes
back
here
for
review,
I.
A
I
D
I
D
D
A
I
am
going
to
make
a
request,
then
at
the
chair
there
has
been
a
lot
of
changes
and
I
think
for
clarity
for
public
sake,
because
I
didn't
say
you
had
a
meeting,
but
other
people
maybe
didn't
attend.
Or
what
have
you
can
we
hold
this
because
we
have
another
meeting
before
we
will
have
the
first
game
am
I
correct
in
my
calendar
we
do
not
have
another
meeting.
We.
I
I
A
A
A
Is
that
correct,
I've
gotten
thoroughly
confused
now
all
right,
819
ordinance
de
94,
OH
18
and
many
City
Code,
section
10,
11,
17
parking,
violation,
penalties
to
add
schedule,
17
non-payment
of
special
event
parking
fee,
so
staff
recommending
City
Council,
adopt
this
ordinance
amending
the
city
code,
section
parking,
violation,
penalties
to
add
schedule,
17,
non-payment
of
special
event,
parking
fees
during
the
special
event
pilot
program
mentioned
an
item.
A
19,
the
penalty
fee
for
non-payment
would
be
$80.
This
is
recommended
suspension
of
the
rules
introduction
in
action.
A
G
G
A
Oh,
thank
you
all
right,
so
819
has
been
moved
in
second,
any
questions
all
right.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye.
Any
opposed
motion
carries
a
20
s,
ordinance,
92
uh-oh
18
in
Mini,
City,
Code,
section
10,
11,
7,
bus
stops
and
zones
to
add
signed
bus
stops
on
dodge
Avenue
from
Oakland
to
Main.
Street
I
am
suspending
the
rules
for
introduction
in
action.
A
Thank
you.
Seeing
no
lights
for
questions
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye.
Any
opposed.
All
right
motion
carries
and
our
last
item
for
discussion
is
a
pw1
proposed
amendment
to
snow
route,
code
of
ordinance,
10-4
13
and
the
snow
route.
Designation
is
section
10,
11,
six
schedule
six,
and
there
is
a
presentation
by
staff.
L
Better
view,
madam
chair
members
of
committee
I'm
a
Dracaena
public
services
bureau
chief
today,
we
wanted
to
bring
forth
discussion
proposed
amendments
to
snow
related
ordinances.
The
first
one
is
ten,
eleven
six,
the
snow
route
schedule.
It's
my
understanding.
You
do
not
have
the
paperwork
in
front
of
you
prior
to
this.
In
order
to
see
what
modifications
we
propose.
So,
if
you
have
any
questions,
please
feel
free
to
stop
me
and
I'll
address
any
issues
that
you
have.
L
Steph
took
a
look
at
the
current
snow
route
schedule
and
found
a
lot
of
discrepancies
between
the
schedule,
the
map
and
what
is
actually
posted
out
in
the
streets.
So,
in
order
to
correct
those
discrepancies
were
bringing
forth
proposed
modifications
you
do
have
the
exhibit
a
in
front
of
you
at
least
I
I
hope
you
have
exhibited
in
front
of
you,
and
that
explains
everything.
It's
a
detail,
but
pretty
much.
L
What
we're
gonna
be
covering
is
just
clarifying
starting
and
ending
points,
updating
the
snow
right
ordinance
to
match
what
is
currently
posted
and
necessary,
adding
new
proposed
snow
route
locations
and
removal
of
streets
which
which
no
longer
exists
or
necessary.
As
a
snow
route,
so
that's
going
to
be
the
first
orange
were
going
to
cover
the
second
one's
going
to
be
ordinance.
10
413,
subsection
C,
which
has
to
do
with
snow
emergency
revisions.
L
L
Our
main
things
that
we're
recommending
right
now
is
the
removal
of
a
couple
of
streets
from
the
ordinance
the
reason
for
the
removal
they
just
either
no
longer
exist
or
serve
no
purpose
being
a
snow
route
currently
so
those
streets
that
we
are
recommending
for
removal.
Our
foster
Street
East
from
its
intersection
with
Ridge
Avenue
to
its
intersection
with
Sherman
Avenue.
A
L
L
F
B
F
A
I
have
a
question:
I
know
this
is
for
discussion
and
we're
just
getting
big
exhibit.
Is
it
possible
or
when
do
you
need
to
make
these
changes
to
the
ordinance
we.
L
A
So
this
census,
just
for
discussion
now,
I
guess
I-
need
a
little
more
time
to
digest
this
before
just
trying
to
fly
clip
and
see
within
my
ward
is
up
top
of
my
head
so
deputies
thoroughly.
Is
it's
going
to
be
coming
back,
I'm
assuming
right
for
us
to
approve
all
right?
So
if
you
want
to
just
finish
that
up
and
I'm
happy
to
keep
taking
questions
from
the
council,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
some
time
to
digest
and
speak
with
you
individually,
okay
and.
L
I'll
just
touch
on
the
main
points:
okay,
thanks
streets
recommend
for
removal,
foster
stated
also
a
kini
Street
was
from
its
intersection,
will
share
the
road
to
its
intersection
with
Michigan
Avenue
King
Street
is
currently
listed
twice
on
the
snow
route
schedule,
not
sure,
if
that's
just
a
mistake,
but
we
are
recommending
removing
it
as
well
as
a
Railroad
Avenue
that
Street
no
longer
exists
at
the
points
designated
here
from
its
intersection,
with
Davis
Street
to
its
intersection
with
Church
Street.
So
we
recommend
removing
it.
L
L
Another
addition
would
be
Harrison
Street
was
from
its
intersection,
with
Crawford
Avenue
to
its
intersection
with
Greely
Avenue.
This
used
to
be
a
state
route
became
part
of
a
city
street,
so
we
want
to
add
an
out
to
the
snow
routes
and
no
need
to
update
the
map
or
the
posting
currently
posted
as
a
senora.
Another
addition
is
Lincoln.
Street
was
from
its
intersection
with
Green
Bay
Road
to
its
intersection
with
Hartree
Avenue.
This
is
not
on
the
ordinance,
however.
It
is
shown
on
the
map.
B
Edward,
can
you
stay
on
the
side?
Two
quick
questions.
First,
have
you
given
consideration
to
the
district
65
bus
routes
while
making
these
changes
in
updates?
That's
the
first
question.
We
can
address
the
next
conversation
and
then,
if
we
don't
do
it
now,
I'm
curious
I'm
always
wondering
how
our
city
staff
addresses
the
snow.
When
it
comes,
do
you
start
from
east
to
west
you
go
to
north
to
south.
Do
you
rotate
I
mean?
L
It
does
depend
on
the
snowstorm,
obviously
the
type
of
precipitation
the
severity
time
of
starting
everything.
However,
right
now
we
break
it
down
for
a
major
storm
into
nine
different
zones
within
those
nine
zones.
Typically,
all
the
trucks
start.
At
the
same
time,
I
have
one
major
truck
a
couple:
small
trucks
to
assist
with
the
residential
streets,
our
slasher
storms.
We
break
it
down
into
a
six
own
system,
but
everyone
goes
out
at
the
same
time
gets
plowed.
At
the
same
time,.
B
L
E
If
I
could
follow
up
on
that
Denine
snow
routes,
that
we
have
there
not
by
ward
boundary,
there's
just
an
equal
amount
of
miles
in
different
sections
to
the
city
and
there's
trucks
in
all
9
sections
at
all
times,
and
the
first
thing
that
they
try
to
do
our
two
primary
streets.
And
then
there
are
smaller
trucks
that
are
doing
the
residential
streets.
But
it's
a
fairly
equal
distribution
of
manpower
across
the
city.
All
at
the
same
time
got
it.
Thank
You,
director.
L
The
majority
of
the
streets
that
or
the
majority
the
revisions
that
we
plan
our
ladder
just
clarification.
Currently
the
sno-isle
schedule
doesn't
state
boundaries
at
some
of
the
streets.
It's
just
assumed
that
it's
from
beginning
to
start
within
the
city
boundary.
So
we
just
want
to
add
some
clarification.
There
there's
also
some
just
mistakes
as
far
as
direction.
It
states
north
from
one
street
south
to
another
when
it's
actually,
you
know
south
from
that
street
to
the
other
name
of
street,
as
in
the
case
with
Davis
and
Grove,
currently
Estates
north
from
Davis
to
Grove.
L
If
we
do
decide
to
go
with
these
recommended
revisions,
we
would
just
have
to
do
some
updated
posting
out
on
the
streets.
These
are
the
locations
that
posting
updates
would
have
to
be
taken
into
consideration.
Benson,
Avenue,
Green,
Bay,
Road
or
green
leaf.
Maple
Ridge
in
Torrington
I
can
go
into
some
more
detail,
but
I
know
we'll
be
discussing
this
at
a
later
time.
Yeah.
B
A
I
just
say
real,
quick,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
go
through
this
I
know
that
our
street
signage
has
been
updated
a
couple
times,
but
people
you
know
often
still
find
it
confusing
and
so
I
appreciate
that
you
went
through
each
part
particularly
to
take
off.
You
know
a
street
that
no
longer
even
exists
in
the
city.
A
So
thank
you
for
doing
that
and
then
my
second
request
is
when
we
get
to
a
final
list,
that
we
will
make
sure
that
that's
on
the
website
and
very
public
or
maybe
even
flyers,
at
Ward
meetings,
so
that
people
understand
you
know
if
they
used
to
move
their
car,
they
don't
have
to-
or
vice
versa
I
think
that's
very
important
during
the
snow
time.
So
so
we
have
this.
We
will
contact
you
with
further
questions
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation.