►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
And
then
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
are
some
presentations,
so
we
are,
we
are
broadcasting
now,
if
you
would,
if
you'd
like,
I
could
start
with
the
presentations.
B
C
We
are
dedicated
to
providing
safe
and
sustainable
water
to
the
state
of
illinois,
with
a
total
water
stewardship
engaging
our
communities
to
share
in
the
value
of
water.
Our
members
internationally
are
approximately
fifty
thousand
members
and
in
illinois
we
are
the
fourth
largest
section
of
awwa,
with
approximately
2
hundred.
D
D
In
this
program
we
have
three
different
levels
of
standard
that
you
can
achieve.
We
have
the
bronze,
the
silver
and
the
gold,
and
your
your
achievement
is
based
on
frequency
and
your
method
of
communication
to
your
members.
So
we
are
honored
to
present
the
city
of
evanston,
the
gold
level,
the
highest
standard
of
the
water
ambassador
program.
G
G
The
public
works
agency
takes
tremendous
pride
in
keeping
evanston
roadways
safe
for
all
users,
both
during
and
after
winter
storms,
and
we
continue
to
refine
our
plans
year
after
year
to
ensure
we're
following
best
practices
and
are
prepared
for
whatever
the
season
has
in
store.
I
would
like
to
thank
the
public
works
department,
including,
but
not
limited,
to
acting
public
works
director
edgar
cano
for
their
excellence
in
this
award.
A
Thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
do
that.
Chair
read.
We
can
move
on
to
the
agenda
at
this
time.
All
right.
We
have
public
comment.
I
believe.
J
F
All
those
opposed
and
extensions
the
motion
passes.
That
brings
us
to
public
comment.
A
And
we
have
one
person
in
person
tonight
and
clark,
mccarthy.
K
K
Good
good,
perfect,
yeah,
quick
introduction,
my
name
is
clark.
Mccarthy.
I
live
in
the
sixth
ward,
on
lincolnwood
street,
my
beautiful
family.
I
have
two
wonderful
children
and
I'm
a
union
pipefitter.
K
K
As
a
union
pipefitter,
I
travel
all
over
the
place.
I've
been
in
the
steel
mills
in
gary
I've
been
at
the
waukegan
county.
Courthouse
I've
been
as
far
west
as
aurora
every
day
is
a
new
place.
For
me,
a
big
project,
I'm
kind
of
proud
of-
was
the
installation
of
medical
gases
at
mccormick
place
when
we
needed
that
as
a
hospital.
K
So
it
was
kind
of
fun
to
be
an
essential
worker,
and
I
got
a
lot
of
cheers
from
that
and
right
now,
with
this
ordinance
being
written
the
way
it
is
I'm
concerned
not
only
for
myself
personally,
but
the
way
it's
written
now,
it
seems
to
say,
welcome
to
evanston
we'd
love
to
have
you
unless
you
do
one
of
these
jobs
and
that
job
requires
a
company
vehicle
or
a
van
or
anything
like
that.
K
I'm
a
little
interested
in
why
b
plates
have
been
removed,
but
the
reason
being
is
I,
I
drive
a
pickup
truck
for
work,
not
something
I
personally
would
have
ever
bought,
but
for
work.
It's
needed.
As
I
said,
I
go
all
over
the
place
and
sometimes
I
need
to
throw
stuff
in
there
what's
interesting
to
me
about
the
removal
of
the
b
plate
on
the
last,
and
I
don't
have
the
minutes
for
the
last
meeting
I
apologize
but
what's
interesting
is
all
pickup.
Trucks
are
b
plates.
K
Where
does
that
put
my
neighbors,
who
don't
have
company
logos,
but
they
do
have
pickup
trucks
and
even
further
I
have
a
neighbor
with
an
f350.
Now
that's
a
d
plate
and
again
I
find
that
to
be
particularly
obnoxious
myself,
but
a
guy
wants
a
pickup
truck.
You
buy
a
pickup
truck,
I
don't
care,
so
we
need
to
be
careful.
K
I
don't
know
about
you
guys,
but
that
seems
like
it's
clearly
a
violation
of
the
first
amendment,
because
I
can
have
a
neighbor
with
a
subaru
with
a
thousand
bumper
stickers
on
it.
But
if
I
got
a
company
logo
on
it
different
story,
so
I
think
I'm
agreeing
with
all
you
guys.
We
got
to
have
some
sort
of
rule.
K
I
don't
want
to
have
semi-trucks
parked
up
and
down
my
block
and
councilman
burns.
I
know
you
live
in
a
different
ward
there
and
this
is
might
play
a
little
differently
in
your
ward.
K
But
realistically,
the
reason
I'm
here
tonight
is
I'd
really
like
to
be
able
to
come
home
from
work
and
park
in
front
of
my
own
house
and
I'm
happy
to
pay
a
some
sort
of
permit
for
that
I'd
be
happy
to
I
just
I
want
to
park
legitimately.
You
know
I
don't
want
to
wake
up
every
morning.
Go
oh
there's
a
50
ticket
for
for
what
so
I
was
wondering
if
we
might
be
able
to
propose
some
sort
of
case
by
case
ordinance
and
that
you
know
maybe
we
need
to
look
at.
K
Zoning,
in
your
case,
because
I
know
you
have
a
lot
of
you-
know
different
contractors
living
over
there
but
yeah.
I
don't
think
we
can
just
ask
people
and
again
councilman
newsman,
I'm
sorry.
I
said
the
right
name
wrong
as
you
proposed,
and
I
think
it
was
february.
We
can't
just
say
we
can
have
five
per
block
because
we
have
five
plumbers
living
on
a
block.
Well,
what
about
the
six
that
wants
to
move
in?
K
So
maybe
we
need
to
look
at
that
on
a
case-by-case
basis
of
okay.
This
guy
wants
to
move
in
he's,
got
a
company
vehicle.
Is
there
no
parking
how
many
other
people
have
permits,
etc?
And
if
you
guys
want
to
reach
out
to
me,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or,
if
you
guys
have
any
other
info
on
that,
but
other
than
that.
A
We
have
three
more
francine.
Allen
is
next.
B
So
last
time
the
council
met
council
member
kelly,
requested
the
staff
come
back
to
you
with
kind
of
a
road
map
of
how
are
they
gonna
reform,
the
practice
of
preparing
a
bills
list
and
a
credit
card
list.
That
kind
of
requires
the
council
to
give
uninformed
consent
on
items
that
will
probably
come
back.
B
You
know
the
next
year
as
a
a
budget
increase
for
the
previous
year,
so
this
sounded
like
a
particularly
important
request
and
just
to
give
you
some
examples,
I
looked
at
the
bills
list
based
on
that
thought,
and
you
know
if
you
look
at
the
credit
card
bills,
they
total
on
average
200
000
a
month,
so
that's
2.4
million
dollars
a
year
that
is
basically
non-budgeted
spending.
B
B
Example.
Two
would
be,
though,
there's
a
lot
of
scheduled
maintenance
and
supplies,
and
what's
referred
to
as
stock
items
for
throughout
the
bills
list.
That
roughly
is
like
60
000
a
month.
So
that's
720
000
a
year.
It
seems
to
me
those
things
should
be
budgeted
as
part
of
operations
not
just
pushed
in
the
way
it's
currently
done
and
a
third
example-
and
I
don't
know
what
the
number
is,
but
there's
there
must
be
40
or
50
line
items
for
mc
squared.
B
B
I
guess
the
question
is:
if
we're
paying
185
000
a
month
for
mc
squared,
how
much
extra
are
we
paying
that
we're
not
benefiting
from
from
comet
right
now
that
185
thousand
dollars
a
month
is
2.2
million
dollars?
That
is
probably
unexpected
payments
that
again
should
be
part
of
an
operations
cost
budget
that
we're
currently
not
being
able
to
save
us.
I
would
ask
that
you
also
look
at
that.
B
Also,
I
just
had
a
question:
there's
232
thousand
dollars
for
parking
pay
stations.
I
I
don't
remember
that
being
requested
by
the
council
and
that's
for
roughly
the
28
stations-
that's
roughly
9
000
station.
F
Thank
you,
mr
silco.
Next
up
can
we
have
doreen
price.
L
L
I
think
what
we're
missing
is
a
step,
and
I
think
many
on
this
particular
group
would,
in
terms
of
overseeing
how
this
is
being
done,
would
agree
with,
what's
expressed
for
the
last
couple
weeks
in
interviewing
for
a
new
city
manager
and
then
also
what
the
community
has
said
and
it's
basically
increasing
public
input.
Well,
in
this
case,
this
is
community
input
by
people
who
are
going
to
be
affected
by
how
matters
are
decided
and
decided.
L
L
If
we
have
the
wrong
adjudication
people
in
place,
in
which
case
the
vulnerable
don't
have
a
chance
unless
they
hire
a
lawyer
and
that's
kind
of
pretty
much
the
way
it
sort
of
it
is
it's
over.
It
seems
because
we
know
that
we
need
to
have
inspectors
who
understand
circumstances
and
when
they
don't-
and
someone
goes
to
adjudication
and
the
judge
doesn't
understand,
circumstances
then
basically
you're
taking
money
from
low
income
people
who
can't
afford
it
on
them.
L
It
may
be
something
that
is
something
they
need
help
with,
as
opposed
to
being
fined
about
and
there'll
be
no
discussion
on
that,
one
for
sure,
and
if
they
ask
for
consideration
of
being
up
four
hundred
dollars
being
too
much
for
someone
with
low
income
and
being
told
well,
that's
it,
then
that's
pretty
insensitive
to
me
in
terms
of
someone
who's
trying.
L
So
I
would
think
that
this
really
deserves
public
input,
in
other
words,
review
from
not
pioneer
press,
but
in
the
city
of
evanston
in
fort
there
might
have
been
occasion
where
someone
had
experience
with
one
of
these
judges,
either
in
skokie
or
these
other
areas.
That
needs
to
be
found,
and
the
only
way
you
find
that
out.
L
If
you,
if
you
put
out
a
notice
and
for
and
for
sure
internally
for
everyone,
everyone
involved
that
they
can
review
these
people
and
review
the
what
they're,
what
they
see
as
essential
qualities,
which
the
qualities
aren't
there,
that
I
could
pick
up.
L
F
Thank
you,
miss
allen.
Are
you
on
the
line
and
that's
such
an
old-fashioned
way
of
saying
that
on
the
line
miss
allen?
Okay,
if
you're
not
there,
then
is
there
anyone
else
that
is
seeking
to
give
public
comment
in
the
audience.
Does
anyone
like
to
give
people
a
comment
seeing
no
further
harry.
F
Okay,
with
that,
we
are
moving
on,
we've
approved
the
minutes
already.
So
that
brings
us
to
the
consent.
J
And
I'll
pull
a15
as
well.
O
F
Okay
is
that
all
for
the
consent
agenda
council
member
burns?
J
One
two
three
and
four:
no,
not
two
one:
three
and
four
yeah
one:
three
four
got
it.
In
that
case,
I
will
move
the
consent
agenda,
which
consists
of
item
a2
approval
of
the
harris
amazon
credit
card
activity
item.
We
can
just
and
items
a5
through
a12.
Yes,.
F
Okay,
the
consent
agenda
has
been
moved.
Is
there
a
second,
the
second
second
about
council
member
kelly,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
any
abstentions.
The
eyes
have
it
okay.
So
that
brings
us
to
item
a1
approval
of
the
city
of
evanston
payroll,
bill's
list
and
credit
card
activity.
J
Mr
chair,
I
will
move
item
a1
approval
of
the
city
of
evanston
payroll
bills,
lesson
credit
card
activity
from
april
11th
through
the
24th
and
the
amount
of
2
million,
741,
927
and
bill's
list
for
may
10
in
the
amount
of
3
million
68
514
and
95
cents
credit
card
activity
for
the
period
ending
march
26th
in
the
amount
of
193
188.36.
N
A
Yes,
we
do
budget
for
electricity
purchase,
so
this
is
within
budget
and
then
I
believe
what
mr
vasilco
was
referring
to
was
the
additional
cost
that
we
paid
for
rex
to
meet
the
carp
goal,
even
with
the
wrecks
mc
squared's
price
for
electricity
plus,
the
rex
is
still
below
the
price
that
comed
offers
and
just
for
rough
numbers,
I'm
gonna,
say:
com
ed,
sells
at
seven
cents
kilowatt
hour.
A
Mc
squared
is
we're
purchasing
it
from
mc
squared
around
five
cents
a
kilowatt
hour,
and
so
we're
saving
that
two
cents
per
kilowatt
hour.
That
funding
is
being
put
into
the
budget
and
allocated
towards
other
carp
improvements.
F
Any
further
questions
on
the
bills
list
seeing
councilmember
kelly,
oh
saying,
none,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
any
abstentions.
The
eyes
have
it.
That
brings
us
to
item
a3
approval
to
hire
two
administrative
hearing
officers
in
response
to
the
request
for
qualifications
for
administrative
hearing
officers,
that
is
rfq
22,
I
guess
through
24.,
unless
that's
the
year
the
year,
22
number
24..
Yes,
okay,.
N
So,
where
are
we
at
currently
in
terms
of
our
hearing
officers?
Have
do
we.
G
G
They
are
well
they're
under
contract
in
the
legal
sense,
but
there's
not
a
written
contract
associated
with
their
tenure
here
and
there
hasn't
been
for
quite
some
time.
So
this
is
something
that
ordinarily
municipalities
or
counties
would
rfq
out
every
four
years
or
so,
and
so
we
did
that
to
see
just
for
fairness
and
to
see
what
the
going
rates
are
and
what
we
could
get
back
in
bids.
G
So
this
is
an
increase
of
up
to
144
an
hour
which
is
still
under
rate.
Generally
speaking,
some
municipalities
pay
200
an
hour
or
more.
We
upped
the
rate
to
see
if
we
could
entice
other
candidates
to
assist
us
in
this
process.
G
Well,
there
is
my
understanding
is
out
of
the
two
hearing
officers.
One
has
not
been
able
to
come
and
if
something
should
happen
to
the
other
or
that
he's
unavailable
or
sick,
we
wouldn't
have
anyone
to
hear
hearings.
N
Potentially
I
mean
I
would
see
if
we
could
hire
someone
else
for
the
moment
temporarily,
as
we
are
hourly
even
pay
them
more
hourly
if
we
need
to
until
we
actually
I
mean
is
that
a
possibility.
G
So
we
have
to
under
our
purchasing
rules,
we
had
to
put
out
the
rfq
if
we
assuming
this,
wouldn't
work
out.
If
the
candidates
didn't
want
to
sign
the
contract
or
the
council
wouldn't
approve
this
technically,
I
would
have
to
go
back
out
again,
which
would
take
some
time.
This
is
the
second
time
we
went
out.
G
I
could
probably
contract
someone
in
an
emergency,
but
I
will
say
these
are
really
difficult
positions
to
fill,
because
not
every
attorney
has
experience
with
municipal
administrative
adjudication.
It's
I
don't
want
to
say
a
specialty,
but
it
is
a
more
nuanced
approach
and
I
know
several
other
municipalities
have
trouble
recruiting
for
this.
These
positions-
they
don't
pay
very
well.
So
if
you're
in
a
law
firm
practicing,
it's
a
lot
of
times
not
worth
your
trouble
to
come
and
do
these
for
a
few
hours
for
a
couple
hundred
bucks.
P
I
I
think
you
did
a
great
job
explaining.
I
was
just
sharing
what
we
wanted
to
share
with
councilmember
kelly
and
other
members
of
the
council,
so
this
division
does
generate
fees
and
we
don't
do
it
to
make
money,
but
this
these
officers,
the
administrative
hearing,
parking
tickets,
other
fees
and
fines
and
then
more
recently,
we've
added
alternatives
to
arrests,
so
youths
that
would
normally
go
to
county.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
that.
Our
last
human
services
meetings
for
those
of
us
that
are
on
the
committee.
P
It's
a
great
opportunity
for
youth
that
would
normally
get
a
for
petty
theft
curfew.
P
I
won't
go
through
the
details,
but
all
of
those
cases
now
flow
through
our
administrative
adjudication,
which
means
that
they're
not
going
through
the
pipeline
of
prison.
So
I
do
see
a
huge
value
in
this,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
so
much
to
our
city
manager,
because
the
first
time
it
was
very
difficult
and
you're
trying
your
best.
So
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
move
forward
with
this
with
a
sense
of
urgency.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
F
Thank
you
any
further
questions
on
this
item.
All
right.
Seeing
none
would
someone
like
a
roll
we'll
do
a
roll
call
on
this
one.
F
All
right,
you
guys
have
it
that
is
item.
D
F
Item
a4
enter
the
interim
city
manager
request
that
council
approve
an
additional
staffing
position
for
the
2022
budget.
So
this
is
a
budget
amendment
councilmember
kelly.
J
I'll
move
item
a4
interim
city
manager,
requesting
the
city
council
to
prove
an
additional
staff
position
for
the
2022
budget.
N
I
guess
a
little
bit.
I
would
feel
a
little
more
strongly
about
this
position
versus
the
hearing
officers,
given
that
it
is
a
newly
created.
You
know,
full
ftes
are
one
of
the
most
expensive
parts
of
a
budget,
so
I
do
feel
strongly
that
this
would
be
good
to
wait
until
we
have
our
a
new
city
manager
in
place
for
this
particular
position,
and
I
would
like
to
hear
more
about
the
position.
F
Let
me
think
about
it:
okay,
then,
seeing
no
further
questions
or
concerns
all
those
in
favor.
I'm
sorry
well.
N
F
F
F
The
one
place
where
this
may
be
held
is
that
it
didn't
move
through
referrals,
and
so
that
is
it
did
not.
Oh,
it
did
move
the
referrals
all
right.
So
then
it
even
moved
to
referrals,
so
it
cannot
be
held
and
there's
no
tabling.
I
say
that
this
is
a
very
important
position,
given
that
this
is
was
a
recommendation
out
of
the
salvator
prescott,
porter
and
porter
lakefront
report
to
add
this
position
to
the
parks
and
rec
department.
N
Every
position
at
our
city
is
very
important.
I'd
like
to
say
I'm
just
again:
it's
about
the
you
know
that
we're
talking
about
increasing
fte
here
and
only
because
of
that,
because
it
is
a
particularly
important
position.
I
feel
it's
important
that
our
you
know.
N
New
city
manager
has
these:
you
know
the
ability
to
hire
for
such
positions.
F
Just
to
answer
that
the
new
city
manager
theoretically,
could
still
have
that
ability.
This
is
just
a
budget
amendment
approving
the
funding
for
the
position
correct,
and
so
maybe
that
helps.
F
The
assessment
of
the
need
for
this
position:
yeah.
Is
there
anything
a
council
member?
What
are
you
finding?
No.
P
I'm
fine,
but
you
know
sometimes
people
look
at
these
meetings
and
see
us
spending
money
and
I
think
it's
important
for
those
who
haven't
read
the
packet
to
understand
that
this
was
a
recommendation
that
came
from
the
law
firm
that
did
this
long
investigation
of
our
lakefront
and
what
they
said.
Because
I
know
you
read
it
is
that
we're
grossly
understaffed.
So
that's
the
reason
for
it.
P
P
G
So
we
may
actually
not
have
to
amend
the
budget
for
this
business
unit
line
item
because
of
the
lag
that
we've
had
in
other
positions.
But
as
you'll
note
in
the
memo
we
did
put
what
the
balance
is,
and
so
there
is
quite
a
bit
of
money
left
in
that
fund
at
this
time.
G
J
N
Can
you
tell
us,
is
it
like
cities
of
our
comparable
size
is
this?
Do
we
see
this?
Is
this
comparable
to
other
cities.
G
So
I
can
give
you
two
examples.
One
anecdotally
for
the
city
of
chicago
each
department
has
their
own
age.
C
G
Huge,
but
they
have
their
own
hr
liaison
per
department
and
in
meeting
with
baker
tilly
today,
who's
doing
our
class.
In
comp
study,
they
said
you
should
have
one
hr
specialist
per
1.25
employees.
That
would
mean
we
should
have
eight
hr
nine
hr
specialists.
We
currently
only
have
three.
P
N
Thank
you
right.
I
guess
I
was
thinking
of
other
cities
like
chicago.
I
expected
them
to
have
hr
many
more
hr
personnel,
but
so
can
you
give
me
that
number
again,
you
said
it
was
one.
I
believe.
G
F
P
F
Seeing
no
further
questions,
would
anybody
like
to
request
a
roll
call
vote
on
this
or
we'll
do
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
any
abstentions,
the
eyes
have
it
unanimously,
all
right
that
is,
item
a4.
So
that
brings
us
on
to
item
a
a13
which
is
ordnance,
I'm
sorry,
which
is
a
resolution
authorizing
city
manager
to
negotiate
and
execute
a
perpetual
easement
agreement
with
the
commonwealth.
F
P
Just
I
didn't
go
through
all
the
details
of
this,
but
I
do
believe
that
this
is
in
the
fifth
ward
councilmember
burns,
mr
stonebeck,
and
this
will
then
complete
all
of
the
alleys
that
have.
P
We
still
have
one
more
in
your
what
yes,
okay,
all
right,
so
there's
an
ongoing
project
that
have
impact
many
of
the
residents
that
live
in
that
touch
the
waste
transfer
station
and
it
was
a
huge
opportunity
when
we
signed
this
agreement
and
now
we're
finally
getting
all
the
pieces
together
to
make
sure
that
their
alleys
are
improved.
So
thank
you
for
that.
F
Thank
you,
councilmember
birthway,
seeing
no
further
discussion.
All.
F
Q
Just
to
pick
up
where
we
left
off
on
this,
this
looks
the
same
as
when
we
discussed
it
at
the
last.
I
think
it
was
the
last
ampw
meeting
but
alderman
councilmember
braithwaite.
You
may
recall
that
you
mentioned
we
may
want
to
want
to
increase
the
the
salaries
and.
Q
Dave,
I
don't
know
if
your
concern
is
that
it,
I
don't
know
if
we
have
any
other
water
apprenticeship
programs
that
are
also
about
this
much
around
30
000
and
is
a
concern.
If
we
were
to
you
know,
raise
this
one
that
it
would.
We
wouldn't
be
in
balance
with
the
apprenticeship
program
we
all
already
have,
and
if
that's
the
case
at
least
because
these
are
temporary,
you
know
apprenticeship
opportunities.
We
might
be
able
to
adjust
all
of
them
using
arbor
funds
if,
if
that
was
an
eligible,
arpa
expense.
P
Thank
you,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
respond
by
saying
that
I
did
follow
up
with
director
stoneback
in
between
the
meetings
and
we
had
a
very
long.
You
know
conversation,
he
explained
me
a
little
bit
more
and
in
fact
I
had
an
opportunity
to
speak
to
some
of
the
workers
that
are
in
the
that
are
in
the
water,
the
water
department
who
have
come
through
the
apprentice
program.
So
I'm
not
pretending
to
speak
for
all,
but
my
better
understanding
is
so
when
someone's
hired
as
an
apprentice
they're,
not
really
coming
with
any
job
skills.
P
So
as
it
pertains
or
else
they
would
be
applying
for
a
full-time
position.
So
if
I
was
to
have
a
cdl
coming
into
line,
one
could
say
well
I'm
qualified
to
to
drive
a
truck,
but
then
the
reality
is
you're
not
qualified
to
drive
a
city
truck.
So
when
I
get
to
the
working
understanding
of
the
salary
just
what
they
start
with,
there
is
a
built-in
range
that
will
help
them
to
increase
their
pay
as
they
gain
experience.
So
with
that
understanding,
I'm
fine
to
support
this,
and
it's
and.
Q
I
guess
my
format
if
I
had
a
concern
at
all,
which
I
didn't,
but
it's
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it
is
enough
to
attract
the
people
that
we
want
to
take
advantage
of
the
program
and
it
doesn't
seem
like.
We've
had
any
trouble
attracting
you
know,
candidates,
and
it
also
includes
health
insurance.
I
believe,
which
is
also
a
big
plus
so,
but
I
just
wanted
to
recenter.
That's
what's
most
important
to
me
if
we
weren't
attracting
the
the
people
that
we
want
to,
I
would
have
concerns
and
I
would.
P
No,
no,
I
appreciate
so
you've
said
something
important.
Yes,
they're
getting
insurance,
which
is
huge,
but
then
it
as
I
spoke
to
director
stone
or
you
know
what
your
title
is.
You
also
are
making
payments
into
their
you
very
much.
F
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
this
item
seeing
none?
I
just
want
to
add
that
I
also
am
extremely
supportive
of
this.
Thank
you
to
council
member
burns,
direct
interim
manager,
stoneback
and
others
for
leading
on
this
really
important
issue,
seeing
that
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
any
abstentions,
the
eyes
have
it
and
the
motion
passes
wonderful.
It
brings
us
on
to
item
a15,
ordinance,
3022
amending
city
code,
sections,
10-4,
stopping
standing
or
parking.
Is
there.
F
Second
seconded
by
council
member
burns:
are
there
any
questions
on
this
item?
Councilmember
nissman?
I.
J
Do
have
some
questions
lucas,
I
guess
it's
going
to
be
you.
Can
you
run
us
through
this
and
tell
us
what's
different
from
last
time,
if
anything.
O
Chair
member
of
the
council,
acting
division
manager,
so
there
is
no
too
many
changes
from
the
last
thing
because
there
was
no
too
much
direction
given
to
us
what
what
what
to
do
still.
There
was
a
lot
of
opposition
for
the
b
plate.
O
So
right
now
the
ordinance
written
as
the
fp
plates
and
the
regular
lice
passenger
car
plates
can
apply
for
the
permit
under
given
ordinance.
Right
now.
Excuse
me
ordinance,
but
still
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
confusion
about
the
v-plane,
so
I
did
some
research.
I
even
called
the
dealerships
today
and
according
to
illinois
state,
any
car
which
have
open
cargo
in
the
back
has
to
have
a
b
plate.
O
O
But
when
you
go
to
dealership
and
want
to
buy
the
ford,
pickup
truck
or
jeep
gladiator
or
let's
say
van,
you
require
to
have
a
b
plate.
But
after
that
you
can
reconsider.
Do
some
speciality
plates
and
stuff
like
this?
So
that's
why,
when
we
bring
the
ordnance
in
front
of
you,
the
the
committee
we
put
the
b
plates,
because
this
would
be
the
easiest
way
to
enforce
without
going
by
the
plate
size.
We
have
to
have
somebody
in
the
collector's
office
when
they
obtain.
F
O
F
My
family
interject,
specifically
when
looking
at
the
next
policy
about
the
wheel
text,
we
do
see
that
the
wheel
text
does
create
a
different
delineation
between
different
weights
of
of
cars,
and
so,
if
we
know
when
someone
pays
the
wheel
tax,
what
the
weight
of
their
car
is,
could
we
just
enforce
this
based
on
a
weight
classification
that
way
we?
We
include
I'd
in
fact,
flip
this
and
say
that
if
you
have
a
passenger
vehicle,
a
regular
or
you
know
a
regular
p
plate
or
even
fp
plate,
which
usually
is
a
passenger
vehicle.
F
You
know
for,
if
you're
going
to
stay
here,
just
pay
the
will
taxes,
what
I
would
say
without
having
to
pay
an
extra
30
fee,
because
what
is
the
impact
on
the
city
and
on
our
infrastructure
if
your
car
is
the
same
as
anyone
else's
car
and
the
only
difference
is
that
it
has
a
different
license
plate
or
maybe
it's
a
as
a
council
member
revealed,
it's
a
it's
just.
It
was
here
she's,
not
here
now,
as
councilmember
revell's
constituent
had
what
I
think
was
again
a
regular
vehicle
just
an
fp
plate.
F
Your
vehicle
isn't
causing
a
burden
to
the
city
more
so
than
any
other
vehicle,
and
so
we
shouldn't
try
to-
and
forgive
me,
but
you
know,
nickel
and
dime
residents
when
their
vehicle
causes
no
further
harm
to
the
infrastructure.
And
so
my
thought
is
that
for
those
vehicles
that
we
are
concerned
about,
that
council,
member
kelly
raised,
which
are
the
larger
vehicles,
which
are
these
big
semis,
that
in
your
ward,
you're
worried
about
those
things
can
be
addressed
by
the
weight
and-
and
that
is
already
built
into
the
system.
F
P
Yeah,
so
I
don't,
I
don't
see
much
change
since
the
last
time
we've
had
a
discussion,
and
my
concerns
are
very
simple.
Then
I
I
think
we
have
I'll
speak
for
my,
my
ward,
my
residents,
it's
it's
a
very
commercially
diverse
wars
based
on
the
shopping
center,
the
industrial
area
as
well
as
very
narrow
residential
streets.
The
complaints
that
I
get
are
complaints
of,
pickup
trucks,
work,
trucks,
they're
on
narrow
streets
that
sometimes
sit
for
days
and
don't
move
all
the
time
and
then
sometimes
it's
difficult
for
them
to
get
by.
P
So
we,
my
sense,
is
that's
difficult
to
enforce,
as
is
in
the
current
condition.
I
can't
speak
for
anyone
else's
wards
that
you
know
other
cities,
but
I
don't
know
how
this
impacts
our
carp
plan.
Also.
I
gave
some
thought
about
that
since
our
last
conversation,
because
you
showed
me
larger
vehicles
that
would
now
be
added
to
the
residential.
P
Would
not
be
okay,
the
largest
of
the
large?
Well,
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
So
I'm
just
again,
I
said
if
you
know
the
folks
in
the
wards
that
are
asking
for
this,
for
whoever
their
residents
and
individuals,
I
say:
let
it
do
a
pilot
start
small
and
then
you
can
expand
it,
but
I'm
definitely
not
in
support
of
this,
just
based
on
the
feedback
that
I've
received
from
my
my
residents.
Thank
you.
Thank.
Q
I
think
it's
hard
for
me
to
support
this,
as
is
because
it
doesn't
really.
I
don't
think
it
addresses
the
concern
that
that
you
know
prompted
this
discussion
unless
you
know
I'm
wrong
on
that,
but
I'm
also
concerned
just
as
much
about
pickup
trucks,
because
we
got
some
really
good
data
from
joining
forces
for
affordable
housing,
which
is
a
advocacy
group
out
of
connections
for
the
homeless.
Q
That
said,
the
fifth
ward
has
the
greatest
percentage
percentage
of
renters
than
any
other
ward,
and
what
that
means
is
you
may
see
a
lot
of
single
family
houses,
but
they've
been
converted.
Many
of
those
are
are
are
now
rental
properties,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
competition
in
a
sense
for
street
parking,
and
we
already
have
a
lot
of
pickup
trucks
in
the
neighborhood
and
my
concern
and
we
don't.
Q
I
don't
think
we
have
the
capacity
to
really
enforce
to
enforce
the
the
you
know
code
that
we
have
right
now,
especially
around
pickup
trucks,
and
I
can
see
I
could
see
potentially
additional
pickup
trucks
being
added
to
the
street
if
we
allow
them
to
park.
So
that's
my
issue
is
we
already
have
this?
This
is
already
happening.
Although
it's
not
supposed
to
be
happening,
it's
not
currently
being
enforced.
Q
It
could
create
more
competition
for
parking
with
people
trying
to
get
into
their
homes
in
these
kind
of
commercial
vehicles.
So
I'm
concerned
about
that.
That
being
said,
because
I
know
pickup
trucks,
I
think
that
is
really
what
started
all
this
I'd
still
be
open
to
a
pilot
program.
Now
councilmember
braithway
is
saying
it
should
be
narrowly
focused
on
in
certain
wards.
Q
I
think
it
would
be
tough
for
me
to
support
that.
I
get
what
he's
saying,
but
I
think
just
to
be
fair,
it
would
need
to
be
city-wide
in
all
the
wars
for
it
to
be
fair
for
all
residents,
but
I
would
I
would
support
some
type
of
pilot.
You
know
year
pilot
program
to
to
to
see
what
happens,
but
I
don't
know
if
I'd
support
it
as
it's
currently.
F
Written
can
I
can
I
make
a
motion
here
or
I'm
not
I'd
like
to
see
what,
how
folks
feel
about
this
emotion
that
I'm
thinking
about
making,
which
is
one
that
we
would
again
exempt
if
it's
a
passenger
plate
or
an
fp
plate,
the
only
thing
they
should
have
to
do
is
get
the
wheel
checks
and
then
they're
good
right.
I
F
Too
large,
but
they
are
somewhat,
you
know,
we
don't
want
six
of
them
on
a
block.
We
don't
want
five
of
them
on
the
block,
and
maybe
we
raise
the
fee
to
a
point
where,
if
you
really
want
to
do
it
you,
you
know
you
you
do
it,
and
so
I
think,
raising
the
feed
to
a
point
where
you
know
some
people
will
choose
to
continue
to
park
wherever
they're
parking
now
legally
or
pay
for
a
parking
spot
somewhere.
Q
Yeah,
I
would
support
that
in
a
pilot.
I
forgot.
We
talked
about
that
right,
because
the
idea
is
is
that,
if,
if
it's
cheaper
to
do
it
locally,
if
it's
cheaper
to
park
your
truck
in
front
of
your
home
than
it
is
to
park
it
in
a
lot
right,
where
you
have
to
then
everybody's
going
to
be
scrambling
for
the
cheaper,
more
convenient
option?
Q
You
can
do
it,
but
that
may
not
create
this
scramble
for
everybody,
for
people
who
who
did
have
accommodations
away
from
the
neighborhoods
and
now
want
to
park
in
front
of
their
home
because
it's
cheaper
to
do
it.
So
I
forgot
we
did
talk
about
that.
I
definitely
would
support
that
as
a
pilot.
Still
as
a
as
a
year
pilot
program.
I
I
The
specific
reason
why
we
created
a
permit
is
because
we
needed
an
identifier,
a
vehicle
if
you
will
so
that
we
can
pull
a
list
of
what
vehicles
would
be
eligible
and
what
residents
and
what
individuals
we
would
be
eligible
to
purchase
the
rights
to
parking
the
vehicles
within
the
city
of
evanston
with
an
fp
plate.
There's
fleet
vehicles
that
are
owned
in
morton,
grove
or
lake
county
and
those
vehicles
wouldn't
buy
in
evanston
wheel
tax
and
an
individual
who
was
an
evanston
resident,
wouldn't
register
that
vehicle,
because
it's
not
their
vehicle,
they
don't
own.
I
It
they're
only
allowed
to
use
the
vehicle.
Some
vehicles
are
also
registered
out
of
state
in
indiana
or
wisconsin,
and
employees
are
also
bringing
them
into
the
area.
So
in
order
for
us
to
track
it,
I
understand
to
your
point:
chair,
read
to
your
point.
I
understand
there.
There's
a
database
of
wheel
tax
and
we
know
who
purchased
a
wheel
tax
with
a
b
license
plate.
That
is
correct.
However,
we
wouldn't
know
who's
coming
from
outside
of
our
region.
F
Well,
my
question
on
that
is,
and
I
think
the
permit
is
is
accurate.
I
think
it's
just
applied,
maybe
to
the
wrong
group
and
apologies
there.
I
think
where
it
does
again,
I
don't
think
the
intention
of
the
permit
is
nickel
and
diming.
I
think
just
the
the
application
right
now
puts
an
undue
burden
on
folks
whose
vehicles
aren't
causing
a
new
burden
to
the
city.
F
I
would
say
that
with
the
important
thing
is
here,
is
that
that
same
vehicle
that
has
an
out-of-state
license
and
is
a
is
a
pickup
truck
or
has
an
fp
plate?
That's
registered
in
morton
grove
that
vehicle
still
I'm
saying,
would
not
be
allowed
to
park
on
the
streets
overnight.
They
just
would.
M
F
I'm
talking
about
like
a
passenger
vehicle
or
fp
plate.
Now,
if
it
is
a
pickup
truck
or
something
different,
I
would
say
that
is
the
car
that
needs
the
permit
the
larger
vehicle.
So
it
needs
the
permit
and
that's
the
one
that
we
want
to
identify
both
a
wheel,
tax
being
paid
and
the
permit
to
park
on
the
street.
I
P
This
conversation,
I
thought
the
last
time
you
made
a
case
for
uber
and
I
I
didn't
have
a
chance
to
circle
back
to
understand
the
details
of
that.
So
if
it's
an
uber
car,
that's
someone's
vehicle,
it's
normally
here
I
was
a
little
confused
in
the
conversation
to
think
that
they
wouldn't
be
able
to
park
their
vehicles
overnight.
So
I
didn't
have
a
chance
of
factor.
So
I
would
conclude
by
saying
if
somebody
has
a
passenger
vehicle
that
obviously
is
registered
to
their
address.
It's
already
here
that
to
me
makes
sense,
but
to
clarify.
P
F
I
Mr
chair
sure
I
mean
if,
if
I
can
interject,
I
I
don't
believe
we're
going
to
be
adding
vehicles.
I
mean
a
lot
of
times
the
individuals
that
work
for
the
corporate
companies
that
are
being
allowed
to
take
home
these
take-home
vehicles.
They
surrender
their
personal
vehicles
to
to
commute
in
locally
in
evanston
if
they
have
a
vehicle
that
they're
able
to
drive
to
and
from
their
job
sites,
so
oftentimes
it
would
alleviate
the
amount
of
vehicles
that
are
actually
in
in
evanston
councilmember.
F
D
J
It's
not
a
based
on
that
fact.
I
will
say
this
is
not
a
major
concern
in
the
fourth
ward.
Therefore,
what
I'm
looking
for
is
a
fair
and
equitable
solution
that
works
for
everyone
else
in
evanston.
I
think,
based
on
the
discussion
tonight,
we're
not
quite
there
with
something
that
we're
ready
to
approve,
so
I
am
going
to
move
to
table
this.
F
I
am
fully
in
support
of
your
table
in
this,
but
I
I
would
like
I
didn't
make
the
motion,
but
the
motion
that
I
was
intending
to
make
to
pass
first,
so
it's
clear
that
we're
giving
some
direction
as
this
committee
to
come
back
with
something
that
maybe
folks
are
willing
to.
At
least
you
know
cons
you
know.
Consider
so
are
you
fine.
F
To
amend
what
is
before
us
to,
I.
J
Think
my
point
is
mr
chair:
if
we
hold
it,
you
can
provide
that
feedback
offline.
F
I
guess
my
reason
am
I
asking
to
take
a
vote
on.
It
is
so
I'm
not
just
providing
feedback.
So
it's
the
committee
providing
feedback
saying
that,
based
on
the
discussion
today,
this
seems
like
a
direction
we're
interested
in
pursuing
and
would
like
staff
to
bring
us
something
back,
and
if
we
give
that
direction,
I
think
we're
more
likely
to
approve
it
and
have
something.
We've
we've
been
doing
this
the
last
few
times
where
we've
just
kind
of
had
the
discussion.
N
I
would
agree
with
councilmember
nusma
at
this
point
I
feel
like.
We
just
need
more
information,
as
opposed
to
saying
we're,
giving
direction
that
we're
definitely
leaning
in
one
position,
one
direction.
I
think
it
would
be
great
also
if
we
could
have.
I
mean
I've
done
some
just
research
on
my
own
of
scale
and
size
of
the
different
licenses.
I
feel
fine
with
like
the
ubers
and
the
you
know,
small
commercial
vehicles
being
able
to
park
overnight.
I
guess
I'd
like
to
learn
more
about
the
range
of
everything
that
we're
talking
about.
N
Maybe
we
could
get
some
visuals
on
that.
I
think
that
would
be
helpful.
I
mean
my
concern
is
whether
they
pay.
You
know
a
huge
fee,
it's
the
neighborhood,
it's
safety
issues
for
children,
because
once
you
allow
overnight
parking,
that's
you
know
we're
going
to
increase
the
parking
on
those
streets
so
definitely.
P
N
So
you
know
it's
about
the
neighborhood,
it's
more
about.
You
know,
kids,
the
neighborhood
the
size
of
the
vehicle,
so
I
would
ask
for
that.
I
you
know
I
would
would
concur
with
council
member
newsman
if
we
could
get
information
get
some
visuals
as
well
as
other
cities.
You
know
what
cities
allow
b,
you
know
b
plates
parking
overnight
and
all
that
I
think,
would
be
really.
F
Then
the
motion
to
table
is
there
a
second
to
that
motion
to
table.
Q
F
P
I
I
I
You
know
we
could
even
implement
limitations
of
100
200
300
vehicles-
we
you
know,
as
as
part
of
the
course
of
of
the
pilot,
to
obtain
data
to
see
if
we
are
in
fact
quickly
flooding
the
streets
with
larger
commercial
vehicles
or
if
it's
just
been
the
status
quo
and
we're
just
getting
a
few
one-offs
here
and
there.
So
so
my
intention,
you
know,
I'm
a
little
disappointed.
My
intention
was
to
at
least
come
out
here
with
some
some
kind
of
pilot.
F
I
I
will
say
that
the
most
in
the
table,
if
the
intention
was
to
table
it
beyond
this
meeting,
was
out
of
order,
and
so
we
have
to
remake
that
motion
to
table
to
a
date
certain
or
take
up.
G
J
This
isn't
the
appropriate
form
to
hash
out
that
follow
the
details
of
policy,
and
I
think
we
are
still
at
that
level
with
this
particular
issue,
we're
not
just
making
one
or
two
changes
we
need
to.
We
need
to
go
back
to
the
table
and
figure
this
out,
so
I.
F
J
J
I
The
next
meeting
would
not
work
for
me.
I
will
be
out
of
town
there.
F
Okay
june
13th,
so
the
motion
is
to
table
this
item
until
june
13th.
F
Okay,
all
those
and
first
is
there
a
second
to
that
motion
second
seconded
by
consonant
burns
motion
made
by
councilman
renusama,
all
those
in
favor
all
right
all
right.
All
those
opposed
any
abstentions.
The
motion
passes
and
this
item
is
tabled
until
june
13th,
okay.
So
that
brings
us
on
to
item
a16,
which
is
ordinance
32022
amending
title
2,
chapter
2
of
the
city
code
to
reflect
changes
in
the
public
safety
commission
rules.
F
Seeing
no
discussion,
I
have
one
question:
who
is
the
staff?
Oh
thank
you.
I
don't
want
to
make
your
time
here
in
vain.
So
thank
you.
Can
you
just
very
quickly
explain
what
the
changes
are
for
the
public.
R
Yes,
good
evening,
chair
reed
and
members
of
the
apnw
committee,
jody
wright,
deputy
chief
of
police,
so
we're
doing
two
things
here:
we're
moving
this
from
the
post
application
process
to
now
have
the
applicant
present
the
power
card
during
the
application
process
in
our
pass
process,
an
applicant
would
submit
an
application
and
then
take
the
power
test,
along
with
the
rating
on
the
same
date
we're
moving
that
from
after
the
application
process
to
have
them
to
require
them
to
submit
it
during
the
application
process
and
we're
also
kind
of
outsourcing
this
and
making
it
the
applicant's
responsibility
to
take
the
power
test,
as
opposed
to
having
city
of
evanston
police
department
staff
administer
that
test.
R
The
power
test
is
the
police
officer,
wellness
evaluation
report.
It's
a
test,
that's
been
instituted
by
illinois,
state
training
and
standards
board.
F
And
then
can
you
just
explain
why
we're
making
these
changes
or
why
these
changes
are
being
recommended.
R
So
if,
if
we
require
it
as
part
of
the
application
process
there,
there
will
you
make
it
incumbent
of
the
applicant
to
actually
present
that
at
the
application
process.
So
when
we
would
previously
do
it
along
with
the
written
test,
it
was
to
make
it
efficient.
So
we
would
have
a
one
day,
testing
process
where
we
would
administer
the
written
and
also
the
power
test
at
the
same
time,
because
we
aren't
administering
a
power
test
at
the
police
department
we're
moving
that
to
the
application
process.
R
R
A
lot
of
applicants
are
thinking
ahead
and
going
and
doing
a
power
test
with
you
know,
julia
junior
college
and
with
triton,
and
the
reason
why
is
you
may
have
several
police
departments
who
are
testing
on
the
same
date
or
you
may
be
interested
in
applying
for
four
or
five
police
departments,
and
this
will
prevent
the
applicant
from
having
to
take
a
power
test
week
after
week
after
week.
R
In
some
cases,
depending
on
how
many
departments
they
are
applying
for
great.
R
And
there
this
is
just
the
first
power
test,
so
there
is
also
a
power
test,
that's
administered
prior
to
the
applicant,
going
into
the
academy,
so
we
feel
like
it
will
broaden
the
application
pool,
but
we
also
recognize
the
fact
that
the
applicants
will
have
to
in
fact
stay
in
shape.
You
know
to
be
able
to
pass
the
power
test
to
be
admitted
into
the
basic
training
academy.
F
Have
we
had
folks
who
have
so
we're
doing
this
at
the
beginning
of
the
application
process
or
the
the
proposal
is
to
do
this
at
the
beginning
of
the
process,
whereas
we've
traditionally
done
it
at
the
end?
Have
we
had
a
significant
number
of
folks
go
through
the
process,
get
to
the
end,
and
then
you
know
fail
the
power
test.
R
I
would
say
no
in
my
in
my
experience:
well
we're
we're
just
moving
this
process
just
a
couple
months,
so
the
difference
between
the
application
closing
process,
what
we
would
be
accepting
this
to
maybe
a
written
exam
and
then
a
power
test
is
probably
just
like
a
month
or
two,
so
we're
only
moving
in
a
couple
a
couple
months.
But
yes,
there
have
been
applicants
who
have
not
passed
the
power
test
power
prior
to
going
into
the
police
academy.
R
F
I
I
would
like
to
know
more
at
this
point
based
on
this.
I
don't
see
any
further
discussion,
but
just
I
personally
would
like
to
know
a
little
bit
more,
and
maybe
we
allow
folks
to
submit
at
the
beginning-
and
we
also
allow
folks
to
submit
at
the
end
it
seems
I'd
like
to
know
more
about
the
impacts
of
you
know
what
we
think.
The
impact
on.
D
F
Might
be
and
on
the
diversity
of
our
police
department,
those
two
don't
sound
like
huge
changes,
but
I
think
when
we're
especially
changing
does
this
have
anything
to
do
with
civil
service
laws?
Is
there
any
impact
on
civil
service
laws
with
this?
Does
the
law
department
have
any
clue
on
that.
E
F
Thank
you,
okay,
seeing
no
further
discussion,
I
may
have
a
roll
call.
F
Thank
you,
okay.
That
brings
us
to
item
a17,
ordinance,
42022
amending
portions
of
title
title
10,
chapter
8,
wheel,
tax
of
the
city
code
is
their
emotion,
moved
back,
moved
by
councilman
braithwaite
seconded
by
councilmember
nisma.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
this
item
seeing
none?
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
this
would,
as
I
read
it,
this
would
not
have
a
phased
increase,
would
just
be
five
dollars
starting
this
year.
Correct
we're
starting
for
next
year,
correct.
I
That
would
be
at
the
start
of
the
sale
of
wheel
tax
for
2022
2023,
which
would
be
set
to
be
offered
august
1st
and
the
current
year's
wheel
tax
expires
september
30th.
Thank
you.
F
22.,
I
think
this
is
pretty
big.
This
will
add
roughly
you
know,
somewhere
between
200
to
250
000
a
year
to
our
climate
action
resiliency
plan.
It
will
or
I'm
sorry
fun
and
to
allow
us
to
execute
the
plan,
and
this
is,
I
think
the
first
will
be
the
first
dedicated
revenue
stream
to
that
fund.
So
I
think
this
is
really
a
good
right
step
in
the
right
step
in
the
right
direction
for
our
carp
goals.
F
Secondly,
I
have
had
folks
raise
issue
with
the
penalty,
so
this
was
the
the
new
penalty
structure
and
I'm
in
support
of
this,
and
I'm
really
happy
that
staff
took
the
opportunity
to
add
this
to
the
proposal
I
do
wish
it
would
have
come
to
committee
first,
but
nonetheless
I
I
do
like
the
addition.
So
can
you
explain
some
of
the
thought
pattern
behind
the
new
fee
or
the
new
find
structure,
for
example,
or
good.
I
Sure
some
of
the
mindset
behind
it
was
that
we
want
people
to
become
compliant,
so
we
want
to
remove
the
barriers
from
from
people
achieving
the
goal
of
being
compliant
because
they
don't
have
the
finances
to
do
so.
So
in
doing
that,
if
somebody
is
late
and
doesn't
come
in
to
buy
the
wheel
tax
within
a
certain
time,
they
can
still
come
and
buy
it
at
the
regular
rate.
I
If
somebody
is
late
and
received
a
citation,
we
would
still
give
them
an
additional
seven
days
to
come
in
and
purchase
the
wheel
tax
and
be
compliant.
We
would
waive
that
citation,
but
somebody
didn't
purchase
the
wheel
text
after.
If
somebody
didn't
purchase
the
wheel
tax
within
the
10
days,
they
would
normally
escalate
an
additional
20
and
we
will
remove
those
barriers.
So
so,
basically,
what
we're
trying
to
achieve
is
compliancy
we
want
to.
I
We
want
to
be
able
to
put
everybody
in
a
situation
where
they
can
be
compliant,
and
by
doing
so,
you
know,
there's
a
fair
amount
of
vehicles
in
evanston
that
don't
comply
with
purchasing
a
will
text.
So,
by
doing
that,
we
hope
to
raise
revenues
by
having
people
come
in
and
be
compliant
at
that
point,.
F
Thank
you,
and
do
you
think
so?
Your
estimation
is
that
with
this
new
scheme
and-
and
I
use
that
in
the
best
light
with
this
new
scheme
that
we
will
increase
so
right
now
we
have
about
eighty
percent
compliance
rate
with
the
wheel
tax.
So
you
believe
that
we
will
see
an
increase
in
that
compliance
rate.
I
There's
a
potential
to
increase
compliancy,
because,
right
now
you
know
the
wheel
tax
is
85.
The
ticket
is,
I
believe,
60
dollars
for
not
purchasing
a
wheel
tech.
So
somebody
who
foregoes
purchasing
a
wheel
tax
for
six
months,
let's
say
because
they
have
a
driveway
or
a
garage
and
we
just
haven't
caught
up
to
them.
They
may
we
may
catch
them
and
they'll
receive
a
60
ticket
which
is
still
25
less
than
the
wheel
tax.
I
So
they
might
continue
to
pay
that
ticket
and
continue
to
try
to
escape
buying
a
will
tax
for
the
remainder
of
the
year
until
they
come
in
and
decide
like
buying
decide
to
buy
the
the
the
incoming
years
wheel
tax
at
that
point
in
time.
So
by
us
removing
those
barriers
and
and
the
fines
and
fees
we
make
it
more
attainable
for
people,
and
we
just
want
them
to
be
compliant.
It's
our
first
stab
at
of
fine
and
fees
reforms.
F
And
I'm
sorry
one
of
one
of
the
key
things
here.
What
you're
saying
is
that
this
previously,
if,
if
I
was
coming
in
to
pay
this
year's
will
tax
and
I
hadn't
paid
last
year's,
I
would
also
have
to
pay
last
year's
before
I
could
pay
this
year's
correct.
Okay,
and
so
you
think
that
will
increase
compliance,
correct.
F
Okay,
thank
you.
F
J
F
Yeah,
let's
start
with
what
we
have
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
it,
but
I
definitely
in
years,
coming
for
the
bigger
vehicles
want
to
raise
the
the
fees
even
more
again
to
account
for
that.
F
We'll
we'll
we'll
save
that
for
another
day
so
enjoy
okay
with
no
further
discussion
on
this
item,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
any
abstentions,
the
eyes
have
it.
The
item
passes
and
seeing
nothing
further
before
us
and
no
items
for
discussion.