►
From YouTube: Mental Health Board Meeting 11/29/2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
In
the
free
application
letter
of
intent,
agencies
are
allowed
to
apply
if
they're,
a
501
C
3
government
agency,
a
city
department,
and
then
the
city
has
an
other
category.
This
category
is
kept
it's
held
for
religious
institutions
that
may
want
to
apply
if
they're
running
a
program
that
opens
all
or,
if
they're,
requesting
funds
for
a
public
facility
project
for
a
space
that
is
also
open
to
the
public
for
2019
progeny.
C
We
did
have
an
agency
apply
that
does
not
yet
have
on
the
1
C
3
status
and
and
we
always
encourage
applicants,
because
if
you
would
like
our
funding,
we
would
like
to
hear
from
you,
but
it
is
not
the
city's
practice
to
fund
startups.
So,
unfortunately,
this
agency,
just
based
on
its
status,
needs
to
be
disqualified
from
the
application
process,
and
the
board
needs
to
hear
it,
and
then
we
need
to
put
it
to
a
vote.
B
F
A
B
B
A
Okay,
next
item
2019
applications
for
mental
health
funding,
discussion
and
recommendations.
So
before
we
begin
it's
kind
of
in
a
while,
since
we
last
met
so
just
to
catch,
you
up,
we've
formed
a
welcoming
committee,
which
was
Irene
and
Mike,
and
they
were
tasked
with
gathering
all
the
schools
that
was
submitted
and
coming
out
with
funding
recommendations
so
before
they
get
into
that.
I
just
want
to
stop
by
thanking
all
of
our
services
and
agencies.
A
A
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
festival,
your
professionalism,
the
amount
of
respect
that
you
will
use
the
city
just
to
inform
people
about
your
agencies
and
the
work
that
you
do
and
I
believe
that
that's
probably
why
the
funding
amount
is
as
great
as
it
is,
because
the
city
heard
that-
and
they
recognized
the
great
work
that
you
do
so
on
behalf
of
the
board.
We
want
to
thank
you
fit
on,
so
I
really
appreciate
them.
D
G
H
Is
a
balancing
act?
It's
it's.
We
have
board
members,
so
we've
scored
ourselves
and
we
have
to
kind
of
put
that
on
the
back
burner
and
look
at
the
total
source
of
the
committee
and
as
usual,
because
we
have
such
excellent
agencies.
The
scores
are
very
tight.
Somebody
start
saying
the
agency
has
a
higher
score
than
now
and
we're
talking
fractions.
H
So,
basically,
what
we
did
is
we
just
found
an
average
and
the
average
was
very
close
to
the
mean-
and
we
said
anybody
under
the
average
number
of
points
as
the
score
the
board
made
would
get
90%
of
what
they
got
last
year,
those
that
scored
over
the
average
we
suggested
they
get
a
hundred
percent
of
what
they
got
last
year.
The
entry
number
that
the
grant
amount
has
been
flat.
So
there's
nobody.
We
felt
it
wasn't
appropriate
because
all
the
agencies
are
so
good
to
go
above
what
we
gave
last
year.
H
Since
the
grant
is
what
was
awarded
last
year.
The
exceptions
were
there
were
two
agencies
that
certain
board
members
recommended
that
funding
and
if
anybody
had
one
and
two
anybody
would
three-year
award
board.
Members
were
recommending.
No
funding,
we
declined
to
read
to
recommend
funding
for
those.
So
that
being
said,
it's
pretty
straight
forward
as
we
go
down,
but
I'll
turn.
I
Right,
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
is
that
we
did
have
a
couple
of
applications
that
were
new
that
had
not
been
funded
before,
and
so
that
was
another
important
consideration
in
looking
at
how
and
if
we
would
be
able
to
fund
them.
So
I'll
start
with
the
first
on
the
list
is
the
books
and
breakfast
program,
as
you
can
see
from
actually
one
of
the
posters
and
accordions
$15.
I
F
I
Next
is
see
any
learning
together
they
had
received
33600
in
2018
in
2019
and
requested
40,000.
They
had
an
average
Committee
score
of
two
point:
nine
nine,
which
again
is
above
average
and
so
based
on
that
we
are
recommending
a
hundred
percent
the
amount
that
they
received
last
year,
which
is
thirty
three
thousand
six
hundred.
I
Next
is
Sydney
early
childhood
education
and
family
support
in
2018
the
award
was
forty,
eight
thousand
and
sixty
three
they
request
for
2019
is
fifty
thousand
the
committee's
score
on
this.
One
is
two
point:
eight
one
which
is
above
average
I'm,
sorry,
which
is
below
average,
my
apologies
and
based
on
the
protocol
that
or
the
guidelines
that
we
had
come
up
with.
We
are
recommending
ninety
percent
of
what
they
received
year,
2018,
which
is
a
total
of
forty
3287.
I
C
A
A
A
A
B
I
One
we
were
just
talking
about
right,
family-focused,
the
after-school
program,
mental
health
board
awarded
them
thirty.
Three
thousand
six
hundred
last
year,
they're
requesting
thirty
five
thousand
for
2019
the
average
remain
score,
is
three
point,
one
one
which
is
above
average
and
so
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
last
year's
award,
which
is
thirty.
Three
thousand
six
hundred.
I
Should
I
continue?
Okay
impact
behavioral
health,
clinical
services,
2018,
the
mellah
board
award
was
57600,
their
request
is
60,000
for
2019.
The
average
comedic
score
was
two
point:
five
two,
which
is
below
average
and
based
on
the
rationale
that
we
discussed
earlier,
will
recommend
90
percent
of
the
last
year's
award,
which
comes
out
to
51,000
Econ
40.
I
Next
is
the
infant
Welfare
Society
teen,
baby
nursery
2018
award
was
sixty-two
thousand
four
hundred
the
mental
health
started
with
20
19
request
is
sixty
two
thousand
four
hundred
the
average
score
was
3.0
one
above
average,
and
so
with
that
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
2018
amount,
which
is
sixty
two
thousand
four
hundred
the
next
one
is
Center
paid
action
emergency
overnight
shelter.
This
is
one
of
the
new
programs
that
had
not
been
funded
in
the
past.
I
Next
is
the
James
Bieber
and
centered
legal
and
social
services
2018
amount,
was
it
thirty,
nine
thousand
three
hundred
and
sixty
the
request
in
2019
was
forty.
Eight
thousand
average
score
for
this
program
was
three
point,
one
nine,
and
so
with
that
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
the
2018
amount,
namely
thirty
nine
thousand
three
sixty
learning
bridge
the
infant
toddler
program
they
received
in
2018
18500,
their
request
in
2019
is
18,500.
I
I
B
I
Services
family
support
and
prevention
2018
amounts
sixty
seven
thousand
two
hundred
the
request
was
for
eighty
thousand,
the
request
for
2019
the
committee
score
average
was
three
point:
two
six
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
what
they
received
last
year.
Sixty
seven
thousand
two
hundred
is
the
figure
shall
we
continue.
I
I
Services,
mouth
health
award,
Mental
Health,
Board
award
in
2018,
was
28,800.
Their
request
for
2019
is
35,000.
The
score
came
out
to
two
point:
seven,
nine
slightly
below
average.
Where
recommendation
my
recommendation
is
ninety
percent
of
last
year's
amount
coming
out
to
twenty
five
thousand
nine
hundred
and
twenty
minutes.
I
Next
is
the
North
Shore
Senior
Center
pearls
hair
options
program
they
received
ten
thousand
and
twenty
eighteen
they're
requesting
twelve
thousand
for
2019.
Their
score
was
two
point:
nine
five
above
average
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
the
2018
amount
coming
out
to
ten
thousand
dollars.
I
Northwest
Casa
received
eighteen
thousand
dollars
in
2018
requested
twenty
thousand
dollars
for
2019
average
score
was
three
point.
One
two
which
is
above
average
I
hope
you
understand
when
I
say
average
score
meeting
of
all
the
scores
of
the
members
this
year
and
so
they're.
Getting
we're
recommending.
I
I
The
committee
score
was
three
point:
two
three
that's
above
average
and
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
last
year's
amount.
Eighty
eight
thousand
two
hundred
for
Community
Services,
the
lowest
lloyd
program,
received
seventeen
thousand
in
2018,
requested,
19,000
and
2019.
The
committee
scores
two
point:
eight
seven,
which
is
slightly
below
average,
we're
recommending
ninety
percent
of
last
year's
amount,
15300,
Shore,
Community,
Services
residential
services.
We
see
twenty
thousand
in
2018
requested
twenty
two
thousand
and
2019
committee
score
is
3.06
above
average.
I
I
I
Requested
$10,000
in
2019
the
score
from
the
committee
was
two
point:
nine
zero,
which
is
just
above
average,
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
that
amount.
Ten
thousand
dollars
trilogy
Evanston
male
health
care
coordinator
in
2018,
the
award
was
twenty:
eight
thousand
eight
hundred
this
year,
they're
requesting
I'm
sorry
for
2019
they're
requesting
thirty
thousand
the
score
for
this
program.
Three
point:
one
two
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
last
year's
amount.
28,800
next
is
turning-point
open
access
program.
They
received
ten
thousand
in
2018.
They
requested
ten
thousand
in
2019.
I
There
were
three
votes
among
the
board.
Declining
funding
of
this
program
and
based
on
that,
we
have
chosen
not
to
recommend
cutting.
Last
is
why
are
you
they
received?
Seventy
thousand
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
and
2018
they're
requesting
a
hundred
thousand
in
2019
committees
for
three
point:
one
eight,
which
is
above
average
we're
recommending
a
hundred
percent
of
last
year's
amount.
Seventy
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
so
as
as
Mike
was
saying,
we
didn't.
I
Numbers-
and
you
know
we
tried
to
include
everyone's
input,
including
comments
and
based
on
that.
This
is
the
this
is
the
package
that
we're
recommending.
In
particular,
we
noticed
that
there
were
several
programs,
new
programs
that
got
very
high
scores
and
for
that
reason
we
wanted
to
support
them.
Okay,
great
any.
So
we
have
two
that
we
want
to
look
at
potentially
increasing,
separate.
E
F
K
A
One
thing
I
found
from
turning-point
and
jumpy
and
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
Jessica.
Anyone
was
that
I
noted
in
that
application
that
the
actual
opening
hours
a
very,
very
slim
again,
the
consistency
of
that.
So
when
it
says
the
whole
idea
of
open
access,
but
it
was
the
timeframe,
was
you
know,
as
said,
what
about
is
one
day
a
week
ending
on
canary
after
someone
experiencing
like
a
mental
health
crisis
that
was
kind
of
what
I
actually
did
to
find
that
occupation?
Just
because
that
whole
premise
of
being
organized
no
spin
I
was.
D
Another
question
that
I
have
since
sandy
compared
it
to
another
agency
that
only
had
five
votes
in
favor.
How
do
we
look
at
learning,
bridge
and
Fatah
glare?
Essentially,
they
only
had
you
know
five
votes
in
favor
I,
don't
know
how
we
lost
the
other
votes
on
that
and
yeah,
because
it
was
only
five
people,
yet
they
still
ended
up
getting
90%
of
their
support.
H
D
B
B
D
D
Seven
of
the
agencies
that
applied
to
us
for
funding
applied
to
CDBG
for
the
exact
same
programs.
So
when
we
took
it
look
at
cooks
and
breakfasts,
they
requested
twenty
thousand
from
us
we're
recommending
eleven
nine
nine
six.
They
also
went
to
CDBG
for
the
exact
same
program
and
requested
ten
thousand
and
were
given
five
thousand
six
hundred
and
twenty.
So
I
don't
know
if
this
is
just
you
know
bringing
up
a
can
of
worms
or
if
this
gives
us
some
guidance.
D
H
This
you
noticed
I
read
that
I
was
looking
into
these
stress
kind
of
a
fairness
because
yeah
you
know
we
may
not
agree.
There's
some
here.
I
disagree,
I
disagree
if
the
numbers
that
come
out
even
for
ninety
percent,
but
we
thought,
as
the
committee
we
have
to
be
really
focused
on
fairness,
I,
don't
think
the
board
has
to
seriously
I
think
we
discussing
it.
No.
D
K
A
So
that's
really
from
that
point
of
view,
but
then,
when
we
look
at
connections
as
having
275
residents,
so
the
actual
breakdown
per
resident
is
disproportionate
among
programs
and
that's
always
going
to
be
the
way.
But
I
do
have
a
issue
with
that.
That's
kind
of
hot
that,
with
giving
a
lot
more
money
to
childcare
recipients.
When
I
was
like
my
most
population,
then
like.
A
A
Still
money,
just
in
light
of
the
extra
responsibilities
that
concert
is
taking
on
too
so
the
city
of
Evanston
that
contract
through
the
city
I
just
think.
That's
the
work
that
they
do
is
a
sensual
I,
think
it's
probably
very
underappreciated
or
under
recognized,
and
if
these
guys
weren't
at
the
hospitals
and
going
out
on
the
coals,
it
would
be
you
just
open
a
massive
massive
problem.
So
to
me
that
extra
mm
is
just
a
really
strong
show
of
support
from
the
board
that
we
recognize
that
what
they're
doing
and.
B
A
D
A
B
C
You
know
we're
gonna,
both
once
the
ones
once
the
amount
allocated
and
funds
remaining
total.
So,
for
example,
if
I
were
to
move
now
that
I'm
in
the
recommend
the
allocation,
at
least,
if
I
allocate
20,000
to
Northwest
Casa,
we
see
that
we're
in
the
negative
by
2000
and
I
can
also
increase
connections
for
the
homeless,
yeah
that
you
wanted
that
increased,
and
then
we
can
see
how
much
we
have
to
take
away
from
other
programs.
B
A
B
K
C
E
K
B
J
D
D
B
B
C
C
B
H
D
K
A
A
K
A
A
B
D
See
here's
my
proud
of
doing
that.
That's
been
sort
of
a
perennial
problem.
Family
focused
after-school
program
is
a
great
program,
but
it
serves
a
really
small
number
of
kids
they're
near
40.
Kids.
Y-O-U,
yes,
has
a
huge
budget
they're
at
five
different
schools
and
they
serve
350
kids
in
their
after-school.
For
my
money,
I'm,
not
a
huge
numbers
person.
So
don't
quote
me
exactly
on
those,
but
they
really
do
serve
probably
temple
the
number
of
kids
with
similar
services,
but.
D
A
One
good
point
too,
where
you
also
is
that
are
based
on
feedback
they
received
last
year
from
the
combine
CDBG.
That's
helpful
about
I'm,
gonna,
say
criticism,
but
perhaps
pointing
out
that
you
had
a
building
in
the
fifth
law
that
isn't
750
children,
and
then
they
develop
this
Saturday
program,
which
was
in
with
the
packet
and
I
think
that
was
a
good
responsive,
move
to
try
and
remedy
enough.
A
D
D
D
H
E
B
E
A
E
C
F
H
D
D
E
D
C
If
its
program,
students
and
residents
so
I
would
like
to
know
how
much
time
is
spent
working
with
at
least
investment
and
how
much
time
is
spent
working
with
mr.
Medlin
and
and
at
the
time
they
made
that
comment,
I
was
waiting
for
information
from
compact.
They
answers
provided
that
information.
So
I
thought
that
comment
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
turning
in
like
or
calendars
that
have
been
signed
off
by
the
SAP
person
and
then
the
supervisor.
C
A
B
B
B
D
A
D
C
C
B
A
D
B
I
G
C
E
C
C
E
B
K
That
we
gave
to
like
oh
I,
really
like
oh
I,
really
like
connections
for
the
homeless
versus
we
all
everybody's
done
incredible
work,
it's
hard
to
complete
disaster,
it's
difficult
to
score
these
applications.
I
just
think
it's
better
to
have
the
objective
numbers
to
braid
it
quite
honestly
versus
us,
picking
and
choosing
I
would
suggest,
go
back.
E
D
K
A
Didn't
I'm
sorry
they
gave
her
son
I
mean
when
you
just
as
a
silo
of
The
Hobbit,
it's
only
seven
nine
Evanston
residents,
but
that
breakdown
is
$1100
and
to
me
this
program,
that's
investing
1,100
builders,
the
teenage
bills,
that
formulas
that
you
know
our
risk
of
getting
caught
up
in
sex
trafficking.
Like
that's
money.
D
E
G
A
G
J
E
E
J
I
I
B
A
A
E
E
E
D
D
K
B
K
B
B
A
K
A
H
A
H
H
D
H
H
B
A
H
B
A
G
H
E
C
A
H
H
B
H
A
E
H
A
B
B
H
A
A
B
K
A
A
next
item
is
were
discussing
the
same
grants
application
of
process
at
this
point
anyone
who's
certified
and
needs
to
arm
your
mobile
algorithms.
If
you
want
to
stay
you're
more
than
welcome
to
stay,
this
discussion
is
just
reviewing
the
scoring
questions
that
we
used
and
just
checking
how
they
worked
out.
If
there's
any
redundancies,
its
kind
of
administrative.
C
A
I
would
love
that
if
anyone
has
feedback,
we
would
love
to
hear
feedback
before
we
talk
about
these
and
Gratz
questions.
You
guys
are
the
ones
in
the
driving
seat.
Answering
all
these
questions,
sir,
could
go
any
that
were
really
unclear.
That
were
are
helpful
that
were
redundant.
That
was
just
plain
confusing.
A
A
A
And
that
is
other
sources
of
funding
are
identified
secured
or
there
is
reasonable
likelihood
they
will
be
secured
program
will
be
implemented
if
funded
at
less
than
the
floor
request.
So
the
read
these
questions
tips
me
off
because
to
me
it
says
if
this
program
is
well
funded
by
outside
agencies
and
they're
gonna
do
fine
without
your
funding.
Well,
that's
like
a
score
of
five
right,
but
I
don't
know
that.
C
A
B
D
H
Talk
about
that
I'm
going
over
these
pretty
closely
with
I
think
so
many
of
the
questions
are
are
not
one
to
five
questions
there.
Yes
or
no.
It's
like
you
have
the
money.
You
don't
get
the
money.
Okay,
I
serve
having
some
residents,
you
don't
do
you
serve
more
well,
maybe
it's
a
housing
program,
less
people
there's
something
things
that
are
just
badly
going
from
one
to
five
and
really
it's
Manero.
This
is.
H
H
H
B
A
D
B
D
H
G
F
G
G
Maybe
we
say
Agency
has
improved
something
or
something
that,
as
opposed
to
just
or
anything
like
that,
anything
like
that
and
there
could
be
ones
that
are.
We
could
look
at
this
as
moving
weight
that
different
questions
differently.
For
example,
if
there's
a
new
agency,
that's
not
going
to
house
those
things,
then
look
at
those
sorts
of
things.
We're
just
trying
to
get
direction
of
wonder.
D
A
I
A
See
I
like
this,
sir
sign
poisoning
number
four
says
response
the
application
question
three,
so
you
then
used
to
flip
back
to
the
application
questions
where
they've
put
the
text.
So
I
would
like
to
see
more
of
that
that
we
go
through
each
question
like
maybe
in
brackets
after
each
question,
it
says,
there's
both
your
occupation,
question.
B
C
B
F
G
Is
also
used
for
cdbg
and
for
CVG
they
have
to
be
able
to
qualify
them
based
on
income
in
many
cases,
so
that
there
are
a
few
that
are
not
going
to
be
necessarily
as
relevant,
but
they're
going
to
put
that
information
in
and
if
they
are
asking
for
funding
for
both
ages.
You
know
proposed
sources.
That's
going
to
be
an
important
issue.
D
B
D
That
brings
up
a
big
issue,
is
you're
right
in
the
past
and
then
tohat
board.
Funding
has
not
had
that
stringent
a
guideline,
and
maybe
that
is
something
to
think
about
with
limited
dollars
that
they
really
go
to
many
populations.
I
think
that
out
of
economic,
yeah,
I
actually
think
that's
something
we
might
want
to
think
about,
but.
E
E
G
G
E
G
F
B
A
Priorities
actually
become
a
real
thing,
so
I
feel
like
we
spend
a
good
month
or
two
writing
these
priorities
outside
of
the
year
and
then
that's
the
priorities.
Sorry,
for
this
whole
this
whole
list.
There
was
only
one
agency
that
clearly
spelled
out
in
their
application,
how
they
fit
the
priorities
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
ride
it
into
the
occupation
question.
Somehow
a
specific
question
and
I
know
it's
going
to
be
difficult
because
CDBG
faces
mental
health
or
maybe
it's
something
like
mental
health.
Cooperatives
are
night
CDBG.
F
A
Think
we
put
so
much
effort
into
making
these
priorities
sound
right
and
target
how
we
gonna
do
that
funding
and
I
think
also.
We
can
fatten
them
up.
I
think
they
were
very
broad,
but
I
really
want
to
hear
more
from
A
to
Z.
It's
like,
for
example,
number
four.
This
is
the
one
that
I
was
really
passionate
about
programs
and
services
that
promote
mental
health,
cultural
diversity
and
social
inclusion
for
all,
including
refugees
and
immigrants.
A
Once
again,
there
was
one
agency
that
touched
on
that
and
I'm
sure,
like
in
the
whole
client
base,
they're
servicing
a
lot
of
refugees
and
a
lot
of
immigrants
were
ancestor
like
this
shirt
legal
clinic
for
acceptable
I've
been
hearing
more
about
lighting
application.
It
is
important.
So
if
there's
a
way,
we
could
get
a
question
written
specifically
about
the
priorities
very
good.
A
E
E
D
G
A
And
originally
we
put
the
we
added
the
last
one
in
because
remember
how
we
used
to
scold
each
priority
out
separately
and
then
we
realized
well,
that's
actually
disadvantaging
services,
so
we
clump
them
together,
right,
which
is
that's
cool,
okay,
but
I,
think
in
the
occupation,
and
they
really
need
to
be
talking
about
that
whole.
And
then
we
would
have
question
number
two
programs,
mission
goals
and
work
reflect
the
current
priorities
of
the
board,
see
application
question
two
right
right:
yeah,
I.
D
A
A
We
went
to
it
tonight,
but
I
was
hoping.
A
January
meeting
would
be
kind
of
like
a
2019
plan
meeting
and
we
had
really
nailed
down
a
lot
more
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
tonight
in
terms
of
funding
like
Mike's
suggestion,
and
maybe
we
put
a
cat
movie
recap
on
the
amount.
Maybe
we
I
mean
it's
going
to
be
popular
and
unpopular
suggestions.
Maybe
we
look
at
limiting
how
many
consecutive
use
agencies
you
know?
A
I,
don't
know
what
that
the
answers
are,
but
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
be
more
intentional
about
how
I
funding
and
what
our
priorities
are
and-
and
it
even
maybe
develop
more
of
a
streamlined
approach,
Lee
Corrine
and
join
house
system
last
year.
You
guys
have
a
system
this
year,
but
maybe
as
a
board,
we
need
to
think
like.
What's
you
know,
what's
gonna
make
more
sense.
I
One
one
question
that
I
have
is
that,
as
we
discuss
the
SUNY
France
scoring
questions
and
say
that
some
of
them
can
be
yes
or
no.
If
we
have
a
lot
of
those
kinds
of
questions
without
the
kind
of
dude
get
scored
on
a
scale
that
would
actually
make
it
even
more
difficult,
I
was,
as
in
you
know,
use
the
tool
they're.
A
G
B
C
G
G
H
H
A
Sarah
Jessica
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
even
an
option
or
if
it's
never
been
done
or
whatever,
but
do
we
have
the
ability
as
a
board,
to
come
up
with
our
proposal
and
then
kind
of
like
accept
like
10
does
in
a
way.
So,
for
example,
the
board
says
we
would
love
to
have
mental
health
or
depression
screening
clinics
quarterly
that
rotate
between
the
community
says:
okay,
random
idea
to
cross
that
out.
G
B
A
That's
definitely
steps
involved
in
it,
but
one
of
the
benefits
of
that
is
that,
if
we're
doing
more
broader
initiatives,
we're
actually
serving
more
residents,
I'm,
not
just
serving
residents
that
formally
come
into
contact
with
agencies,
so
we're
actually
being
a
mental
health
with
us,
more
Brown
town
and
all
our
residents.
Rather
than
do
you
know
what
I
mean
it's
hard
to
know
from.
G
A
C
B
A
B
G
A
G
D
Mental
health
and
the
Health
Department
actually
did
work
together,
I'm
thinking,
you
know
eight
ten
years
ago
or
whatever,
but
that
would
be
one
way
maybe
to
address
some
of
that,
and
the
other
thing
it
reminds
me
of
is
something
that
comes
has
come
up
on
the
board
before
in
that
fatty
of
doing
any
advocacy
work.
If
we
say
one
of
our
priorities
is
to
advocate
hotpot,
you
know
for
community
mental
health
is
that
we.
I
But
I
think
those
are
really
good
ideas
and
impressions
about
how
the
department
I
mean
how
the
health
department
works
and
how
this
structured
in
such
a
way
that
it
can
put
out
an
RFP.
Let's
say-
and
maybe
this
is
something
that
you
know
the
Medical
Corps
can
identify.
If
we
can
identify
that
early
enough
in
the
year,
we
can
then
ask
you
know
present
that
to
them
something
that
they
made
it
up.
I.
D
D
The
original
of
women
out
walking
things
started.
It
was
like
you
know,
hey
somebody
had
a
good
idea
put
a
program
together.
Very
few
people
joined
the
first
year
and
now,
like
a
couple
thousand
people,
do
it
every
year
and
I,
don't
know
where
the
outside
funding
are
worth
of
funding
camera,
but
it
really
was
a
very
generic
process,
I
think,
but.
E
G
Well,
that
keep
in
mind
that
those
densities,
this
city,
health
department
and
the
city,
library
and
all
those
are
still
going
to
those
are
things
that
they're
viewing
as
what
they
need
to
do
to
provide
their
services
and
the
mental
health
boards
role
is
looking
at
things.
The
city
doesn't
provide
that
are
needed
in
the
community,
so
I
don't
think
we
want
to
because
the
city
is
going
to
continue
to,
but.
G
But
but
the
city
knows
it
can't
provide
all
services.
So
that's
what
the
mental
health
port
funding
is
cuz.
You
know
really
don't
and
I
think
that
we'd
have
to
discuss
it,
because
the
city
also
does
some
don't
know
how
much
education
and
outreach
will
be
being
done
too
soon.
I
think
these
are
all
things
that
we
should
please
open
to
this,
but
you
know
if
it
makes
more
sense.
C
G
G
And
in
the
same
thing,
I
mean
we
every
year
we
try
to
look
at
the
actual
questions.
Agencies
fill
out,
but
that's
difficult
to
have
right
back
today,
because
they're
also
routing
limits
and
all
these
things
in
zoom
and
so
there's
certain
things
we
have
to
balance
like
it's.
You
know
so
we're
happy
to
work
on
what
what's
most.
B
G
D
G
B
G
The
middle
below,
where
I
think
it
should
be
above
work,
so
there's
kind
of
more
of
a
scale.
That's
easy
to
do
from
the
question
is
a
big
one
that
I
think
about
that
I've
heard
question
of.
Should
we
differentiate
whether
it's
in
the
score
in
questions
or
the
scoring,
or
have
some
questions
that
are
not
expected
of
new
applicants
just
because
some
of
them
may
not
be
relevant
in
that
sort
of
a
situation?
You
might
end
up
with
a
different
sort
of
scoring
scale
for
who
versus
you
know.
C
A
K
G
G
G
A
D
A
C
A
G
G
D
G
C
In
your
application,
absolutely
right,
typically
programs
address
this
question
by
projecting
services
to
a
broader
population.
So
they
say
you
know
we
served
you
think
we're
gonna
serve
like
so
many
in
this
current
partner
in
there
and
then
we
protect
to
serve
X
number
more
given
the
funding
in
the
upcoming
program
here,
but
that's
always
a
little
bit,
I
think.
E
E
G
D
C
A
D
A
I
A
Nice,
guy
and
I
think
he
added
a
really
great
perspective
on
discussions
and
yeah.
So
that's
that's.
Disappointing
I
reached
out
to
Emily
Richardson
Richardson,
who
receives
the
applications,
reviews
them
CC
Jessica.
In
still,
if
I'm,
not
good,
I
would
love
nothing
more
than
I'm,
not
pressing
forward.
Next,
you
don't
think
that
there's,
like
you
know
great
strength
in
that
and
I
think
that
maybe
one
advantage
of
the.
A
Like
paid
people
like
it's
a
volunteer
basis,
but
what
does
like
they
are
actually
allocating
money.
So
I
think
that
I
would
hope
that
that
would
generate
some
sort
of
interest
in
serving,
but
I
will
range
back
out,
centering
and
find
out
because
I
would
really
you
don't
have
any
info
on
that.
Do
Sarah,
not
off
the
top
of
my.
G
A
Perhaps
it's
the
Rules
Committee?
Oh,
maybe
it's
human
services,
this
proposal
of
the
amalgamation
of
animal
welfare,
that's
called
forward
and
the
emergency
system.
When
that
was
presented.
That's
a
rules
committee
right!
Yes,
it
was
when
that
was
presented
to
Rules
Committee.
The
resolution
of
that
was
at
that
February
meeting.
A
Possibly
think
that
work
was
joining
us
work,
so
I
think
she's,
the
one
that
that
should
be
reaching
out
to
the
chest,
and
then
we
can
discuss
it
at
the
meeting.
I,
don't
think
just
from
what
I've
observed
I,
don't
think
that
it
has
much
traction
either
I
think
there's
anything
to
worry
about.
I!
Think
it's
a
good
attempt
by
the
city
to
try
to
consolidate,
but
I.
A
A
So
yeah
our
next
meeting
would
be
January
10
hold.
He
wants
to
so.