►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 5/10/2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
it
is
Wednesday
May,
10th,
2017.
The
time
is
713.
This
is
the
plan
Commission
of
the
city
of
Evanston
I'm
Jim
Ford
we
have
a
quorum,
so
I
will
call
the
meeting
to
order
we're
having
technical
difficulties
tonight.
So
those
of
you
who
are
watching
remotely
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
see
the
screen.
We
apologize,
build
we're
doing
the
best.
We
can.
A
A
A
We
have
three
zoning
text
amendments
to
come
before
us
this
evening.
The
first
is
a
return
from
a
prior
discussion
case:
number
17,
pln
d:
zero,
zero
one;
five
zoning
text,
amendment
regarding
the
establishment
of
regulations
for
allowing
the
location
of
generators
miss
jones
you're,
going
to
lead
us
through
this.
Yes,.
B
B
B
Generators
are
not
actually
referenced
within
the
zoning
ordinance,
so
staff
uses
regulations
that
are
related
to
air
conditioning
equipment
when
we
have
to
determine
setbacks
and
screening
requirements.
So
this
leads
staff
to
use
a
sections
and
items
6
4
6
9,
which
is
special
regulations
applicable
to
air
conditioning
equipment.
So
essentially,
we've
been
regulating
generators,
the
same
as
air
conditioning
equipment.
So
at
the
March
8th
plant
Commission
meeting,
we
brought
before
a
text
amendment
which
essentially
placed
generators
within
the
same
regulations
for
air
conditioning
equipment
over
the
course
of
discussion.
B
For
that
particular
item
there
were
several
different
concerns
and
questions
raised
the
major
points
being
actually
regulating
air
conditioning
units
and
generators
the
same
way
despite
them
having
some
differences
in
how
they
actually
operate
and
then
also
accounting
for
possible
nuisances
that
come
from
generator
views.
So
staff
went
back
through
the
research
that
we
did
looking
at
other
communities
and
I
will
correct
myself.
I
think
I
said
that
the
previous
meeting
that
Oak
Park
had
the
more
stringent
regulation
that's
actually
well
met.
B
So
we
paid
a
lot
of
attention
to
those
regulations
and
also
talked
with
the
building
and
inspection
services
manager
and
our
electrical
inspectors
who
see
the
installation
and
actually
do
the
checking
once
the
installation
has
occurred
of
the
generators
and
got
their
feedback
and
suggestions.
So
before
you
this
evening,
we
have
the
updated
amendment
which
consists
of
creating
a
new
subsection
that
would
be
specific
to
generator
use.
B
So
generally,
this
will
have
similar
setback
requirements
as
the
air
conditioning
equipment,
but
will
allow
for
the
use,
owning
administrator,
to
reserve
the
right
to
require
additional
setbacks
from
neighboring
properties,
specifically
for
the
portable
generator
units,
and
this
is
seen
for
both
SI
or
for
all.
The
side:
yard,
setbacks,
interior
side
yard,
a
street
side
yard,
where
yard
and
in
the
front
yard,
is
still
prohibited.
B
In
this
new
section,
we
are
also
adding
a
small
portion
that
addresses
testing
of
the
permanent
standby
generators.
So
we
are
suggesting
that
the
testing
for
those
particular
units
are
done,
Monday
through
Friday
between
10
a.m.
and
1
p.m.
and
it's
our
process
here
was
that
that's
typically
going
to
be
a
time
when
residents
are
not
at
home,
so
there
is
less
likely
to
be
some
disturbance
of
those
particular
residents.
B
B
We
have
the
following
standards
for
amendments,
which
include
whether
the
proposed
amendment
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
general
plan,
as
a
doctor
then
amended
from
time
to
time
by
the
City
Council.
Whether
the
proposed
amendment
is
compatible
with
the
overall
character
of
existing
development
and
immediate
vicinity
of
the
subject
property,
whether
the
proposed
amendment
will
have
an
adverse
effect
on
the
value
of
adjacent
properties
and
finally,
the
adequacy
of
public
facilities
and
services.
C
B
C
C
B
D
B
C
E
Naughty
or
my
question
goes
more
with
the
section
617
2
3
about
landscaping.
One
of
the
concerns
I
think
we
brought
up
last
time.
We
talked
about
generators
was
the
amount
of
heat
that
they
can
generate
and
I'm
just
wondering.
If,
if
it's
the
same
allowable
materials,
they
can
be
used
as
creams
as
for
the
air
conditioning
and
if
there's
any
concern
there
from
staff.
B
Generally,
that
would
be
through
similar
materials
and
speaking
with
the
building
and
inspection
services
manager.
He
did
mention
that
for
Italy
see
the
larger
development
that
he
may
at
times
request
additional
screening
or
special
screening
that
would
prohibit
some
of
the
nuisance
or
the
safety
concerns.
B
Well,
I
guess
addressing
the
setback
question
we
did
leave
it
a
little
bit
more
open
and
that's
generally
thinking
of
the
varying
lot
sizes
that
we
have
within
the
city.
If
it's
something
that
you
would
like
for
us
to
add,
we
can
increase
the
setback
or
perhaps
that
additional
language
that
addresses
placement
within
the
lot
well,.
F
G
If
I
may,
mr.
chairman,
Scott
mang
and
planning
as
an
administrator,
I
think
the
ideas
with
a
portable
generator,
obviously
there's
there's
more
flexibility
and
the
ability
to
place
that
so
it's
being
brought
in
for
an
event,
and
it
can't
move
if
there
is
a
complaint
or
issue
with
surrounding
property.
We'd
be
able
to
evaluate
the
site
where
it's
being
placed
on
and
see
if
there
are
alternate
locations
on
that
site
that
might
cause
less
than
impact
to
adjacent
properties.
A
A
A
B
A
H
I
My
name
is
John
D'angelo
I'm,
an
Evan
stone,
Ian
I,
live
at
735,
Chicago,
Avenue
and
the
reason
I'm
interested
is
it's
one
of
the
determining
factors
on
whether
or
not
I
purchase
a
home
in
Evanston.
I
can
offer
some
issues
that
I
can
foresee
with
the
way
that
it's
currently
written
and
it
depends
on
how
that
generator
is
meant
to
be
used
either
a
permanent,
fixed
generator
or
a
portable
generator
on
the
permanent,
fixed
generator.
I
There
are
superseding
codes
in
NFPA,
101
and
others
that,
if
it's
other
than
for
a
private
residence,
the
testing
has
monthly
annual
and
try
annual
testing
the
try.
Annual
testing
is
3-hour
testing,
which
is
three
hours
from
full
load
to
full
load.
So
the
test
itself
actually
takes
four
hours
of
run
time
on
the
generator
and
I
did
not
see
in
the
limited
review
ahead
of
the
text
where
it
specifies
that
the
generators
you're
talking
about
or
just
for
residential
use,
as
opposed
for
other
types
of
use
on
the
portable
generators.
I
The
the
codes
depending
on
the
size
of
the
generator
and
its
intended
use
tend
to
be
a
little
bit
more
specific,
whether
it's
meant
to
be
a
permanent
standby
to
supplement
house
storing
commercial
power
interruptions,
a
permanent
standby
to
supplement
key
services
on
a
house,
a
permanent
standby
for
something
other
than
a
residential
occupancy,
and
then
there's
multiple
degrees
of
temporary.
So
I
didn't
really
hope.
That's
helpful!
That's.
A
I
C
A
J
C
There's
well
there's
the
the
National
Electric
Code,
there's
the
International
Electric
Code,
there's
International
Building
Code,
which
all
govern
the
parameters
and
the
type
and
size
and
the
type
of
fuel
the
thing
uses
so
I
man.
This
thing
would
get
really
really
long,
I
think
the
RIT.
The
focus
of
this
thing
is
just
on
setback
and
screening.
In
that
you
know,
the
other
provisions
and
their
other
various
codes
take
care
of
that
now.
The
window
of
testing.
C
E
F
A
Let
C
be
a
deal
with
it,
so
hard
I,
think
I.
Think
Commissioner
Belle
Isle's
observation
that
if
we
go
much
beyond
that
setback
and
screening
or
clearly
within
our
jurisdiction,
and
that
if
we
go
much
beyond
that,
it's
going
to
get
a
very
complicated
and
B,
probably
maybe
walking
in
somebody
else's
regulatory
turf.
E
Maybe
question
for
staff
I
know
we're
trying
to
put
in
to
codify
something
that
is
not
in
code
right
now,
it's
easier
to
regulate
it
afterwards,
but
how
large
an
issue
do
you
consider
it
to
be
like?
Is
it
something
you
have
to
be
able
to
like
it
so
often
that
I'm
trying
to
evaluate
it
for
picking
apart,
something
that
isn't
huge.
B
Well,
I,
don't
know
that
it's
necessarily
been
an
issue
very
often,
but
you
definitely
given
some
of
the
larger
developments
and,
just
in
general,
a
lot
of
the
different
home
improvements
that
occur
where
people
have
air
conditioning
equipment
and
possible
backup
generators.
It
is
something
that's
like
that
on
a
fairly
regular
basis.
I
don't
think,
there's
been
too
much
in
the
way
of
an
issue
say
between
neighbors,
with
the
location
of
a
generator
or
any
kind
of
disagreement
along
those
lines.
B
J
B
A
H
A
B
E
This
may
touch
on
temporary
but
longer
uses
such
as
construction
or
or
anything
that
is,
you
know
trailed
in
as
opposed
to
something
you
take
out
your
garage
that
you
would
want.
We
get
somebody's
building
next
door
and
there
they
brought
in
something
on
the
trailer.
That's
big
enough
to
be
on
the
trailer.
That's
going
to
make
some
noise.
It's
not
going
to
be
there
forever.
President
recent
nor'easter.
C
A
E
A
B
Ready
all
right,
this
text
amendment
actually
is
revisiting
one.
That
plan
commission
saw
last
year
that
particular
text
amendment
amended
the
zoning
code
and
established
the
applicants.
Responsibility
for
mailed
notice
requirements
for
cases
that
had
a
notice
requirement
of
500
treat
and
1000
feet
from
the
actual
property
that
particular
ordinance
was
approved
by
council
in
July
of
2016
that
essentially
affected
the
processes
for
planned
developments.
B
Major
variations,
special
uses,
substitutions
of
special
uses,
unique
uses,
zoning
map
amendments
and
appeals
from
zoning
administrative
decisions,
and
during
that
discussion,
that
we
did
have
some
feedback
regarding
whether
or
not
to
include
cases
that
required
a
250
foot
radius
mailing.
So
there
was
some
back-and-forth
on
that.
We
initially
did
not
include
that,
but
for
this
go-around
we
are
actually
proposing
to
add
those
cases
and
have
the
requirements
that
the
third
party
mailing
notice
be
used
for
those
cases
as
well.
B
So,
essentially,
what
we
would
be
doing
is
adding
similar
language
that
was
done
for
the
previous
cases,
but
we
would
also
be
adding
an
additional
sentence
where
the
city
would
reserve
the
right
to
provide
those
notices
by
first-class
mail.
If
the
Zoning
Administrator
finds
it
necessary,
so
in
some
cases
where
the
amount
of
mailings
may
be
very
small
or
if
there
is
a
last-minute
change,
where
use
a
third
party
noticing,
it
may
take
a
little
bit
longer
than
just
doing
it
ourselves.
B
There
might
be
cases
like
that
where
it
would
make
more
sense
for
the
Zoning
Administrator
others
on
a
planner
to
just
go
ahead
and
do
those
cases
themselves,
so
that
particular
provision
would
affect
the
processes
for
minor
variations
and
sense
variations
as
well
as
family
necessity
variation.
So
each
of
those
cases
requires
a
250-foot
mailed
notice
be
sent
out.
B
So,
in
addition
to
those
particular
changes
in
the
previous
amendment
or
the
ordinance
that
was
approved,
we
did
not
have
the
provision
that
allows
for
the
Zoning
Administrator
the
zoning
planner
to
send
out
the
notices
if
necessary.
So
we
would
also
be
amending
the
previously
approved
text
amendment
in
order
to
add
that
provision
in,
in
certain
cases,
if
necessary,.
H
B
B
So
for
that
you
have
the
same
standards
for
approval
of
the
amendment
and
B
whether
the
proposed
amendment
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
general
plan
is
adopted
in
a
minute
from
time
to
time
by
City
Council.
Whether
the
proposed
amendment
is
compatible
with
the
overall
character
of
existing
development
in
the
immediate
vicinity
of
a
subject
property,
whether
the
proposed
amendment
will
have
an
adverse
effect
on
the
value
of
adjacent
properties
and
adequacy
of
public
facilities
and
services
and
civilities
don't
actually
apply
since
it's
not
an
actual
site
project.
E
B
E
B
There
may
also
be
the
case
where
there
might
be
a
last-minute
change
or
update
that
requires
us
to
go
in
and
make
an
adjustment
prior
to
an
actual
review
of
their
project.
Again.
That
may
be
something:
that's
done.
A
lot
faster
by
staff
versus
going
back
and
forth
with
the
third
party
to
get
approve,
approve.
The
proof
have
them,
send
that
prepare
everything
and
then
send
it
out.
F
B
A
B
Have
an
example:
I
double-checked
with
our
zoning
staff,
who
different
does
the
majority
of
these
mailings?
The
range
is
anywhere
from
thirty
to
seventy
five
mailings,
most
the
time
with
the
average
right
now
being
about
forty
five
mailings
that
go
out.
The
contract
that
we
worked
out
with
the
blue
print
shop
essentially
provides
the
notices
for
70
cents
per
mailing,
so
the
cost
is
relatively
low,
but
as
the
additional
cost
is
for
most
of
these
cases,
there
are
two
mailings
echo
well,
so
the
first
is
basically
a
general
notification
that
a
case
is
happening
then.
B
The
second
is
one
of
the
cases
decided
that
is
sent
out
to
those
same
individuals,
letting
them
know
of
decision
so
with.
If
we
have
the
two
mailings
plus
the
application
fee,
which
at
this
point
is
$250,
that
would
be
a
little
over
$300.
So
the
example
I
have
with
the
45
mailings,
is
about
three
hundred
thirteen
dollars.
B
B
B
A
J
B
J
So
one
potential
concern
I
have
is
just
shifting
cost
to
maybe
a
household
who
it
might
be
a
lot
for
them
just
to
pay
the
250
application
fee
and
then
adding
a
cost,
for
maybe
a
small
change
to
their
home
might
be
an
additional
burden.
That
I,
don't
know
was
entirely
fair.
I,
don't
know
if
that
would
fall
under
some
discretion.
But
that's
one
concern.
I
have
that's.
A
F
A
I,
don't
expect
to
wear
this
rock
down
in
the
seven
months
that
I
have
left
but
I'm
going
to
try
one
more
time
when
we
considered
this
a
year
ago,
I
said
and
I
will
say
again,
I
think
for
minor
variations
and
fence
variations.
250
feet
is
excessive
in
my
situation.
If
I
want
to
move
a
fence
3
feet,
I
have
to
notify
people
7
houses
away.
H
A
D
D
A
Would
that
be
a
discretionary
I
mean?
Do
you
want
language
to
the
effect
that,
where
do
we
say
the
city
reserves
the
right
to
provide
the
aforementioned
notice
by
first-class
mail,
where
the
Zoning
Administrator
finds
it
necessary?
I
mean:
do
you
want
to
include
language
like
the
Zoning
Administrator
may
consider.
J
H
J
So
the
place
could
be
maybe
on
the
application.
I
don't
know
so
I.
Just,
however,
its
exercise
I
would
I
think
it's
important
that
it's
clear
what
the
standard
is
and
that
it's
applied
uniformly
and
it
I
guess
what
qualifies
as
our
chip
or
low
income
is
not
to
the
discretion
of
the
Zoning
Administrator.
So,
like
I
said,
I,
don't
know
that
the
ordinance
is
the
right
place.
Maybe
it
is
a
statement
on
the
application,
but
the.
B
J
C
D
A
C
One
comment:
I
mean
I,
I,
don't
I
agree
with
the
sentiment,
but
if
someone
is
going
for
a
zoning
ordinance,
the
cost
of
mailing
is
a
pretty
small
percentage
of
what
what
normally
some.
If
someone
is
going,
it
needs
to
install
an
air,
conditioner
or
well
I.
Suppose
there
could
be
instances
where
the
the
ask.
H
F
D
E
C
A
C
A
A
A
K
A
K
B
Okay,
so
this
is
an
item
that
came
about
from
an
automatic
request,
so
I
will
start
with
what
the
current
regulations
are.
Very
generally
speaking,
the
front
lot
line
and
following
the
front
yard,
is
determined
by
the
owner,
and
this
becomes
very
important
on
certain
through
lots
or,
if
you're,
on
a
corner
lot,
especially
as
it
applies
to
placing
fences
or
accessory
structures
or
if
you
have
a
larger
development
and
trying
to
figure
out
where
certain
setbacks
need
to
be
in
relation
to
their
effect
on
neighbors.
B
So
the
proposed
amendment
is
fairly
simple.
We
would
establish
the
zoning
administrator's
authority
to
determine
that
front
lot
line
for
corner
Lots,
and
that
would
be
giving
consideration
to
any
existing
improvements
that
are
on
that
lat
and
the
proportions
of
the
light
line
dimensions
as
well
as
the
pattern
of
existing
development.
That
is
within
that
neighborhood
on
that
block,
pretty
straightforward,
some
general
guidelines
for
how
that
would
be
determined,
and
we
would
also
do
a
minor
change
to
the
definitions
that
would
show
that
the
authority
for
that
determination
would
be
for
the
Zoning
Administrator.
B
You've
got
similar
standards
for
improvements,
as
we
had
for
the
previous
amendments.
Whether
the
proposed
amendment
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
general
plan,
as
adopted
and
amended
from
time
to
time
by
the
City
Council.
Whether
the
proposed
amendment
is
compatible
with
the
overall
character
of
existing
development
in
the
immediate
vicinity
of
the
subject
property,
whether
the
proposed
amendment
will
have
an
adverse
effect
on
the
value
of
Jason
properties
and
the
adequacy
of
public
facilities
and
services.
J
J
I'm
I
don't
know,
can
you
give
maybe
a
couple
examples
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
where
this
is
coming
from
and
what
the
potential
impacts
are,
but
it
seems
like
if
I
were
existing
property
owner,
and
you
told
me
my
friend
what
I
was
considering,
what
has
always
been
treated
as
my
front
lot
is
no
longer
and
I
would
have
I,
don't
know
if
that
would
necessitate
change
it
to
my
property.
That
would
be
problematic
for
me.
So
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
potential
impacts
of
this
I.
B
Definitely
understand
where
you're
coming
from
again.
This
is
where
the
provision
where
we
look
at
existing
structures
on
the
lot
and
take
a
look
at
the
history
for
that
particular
property.
If
something
has
if
a
particular
property
has
had
a
configuration
for
some
amount
of
time
and
the
front
lot
line,
the
front
yard
has
been
the
same
for,
however,.
B
Or,
however
long
a
period
of
time,
then
we
would
probably
end
up
going
with
what
has
been
consistently
decided,
and
that's
that
tends
to
be
what
zoning
staff
does.
We
try
to
be
consistent
and
how
we'll
review
the
items
and
interpretations,
so
you
would
want
to
all
of
a
sudden
flip
where
the
front
yard
is,
if
it's
not
been
considered
that
way
at
all.
A
Well
now
am
I
correct.
This
is
not
a
decision
that
you
would
be
making
sort
of
unprovoked
and
isn't
it
the
case
and
that
if
the
owner
of
a
corner
lot
comes
in
and
asks
for,
zoning
variance
to
build
a
shed
and
the
shed
is
permissible
in
the
side
yard
and
not
in
the
front
yard.
At
that
point,
you
have
to
look
at
it
and
make
a
determination
if
there's
nothing
else
on
the
lot.
That
tells
you
which
is
the
front,
which
is
the
side.
A
C
You
know
looks
like
it's
intended
to
you
know.
This
comes
up
a
lot
more
than
youth
I
would
imagine
more
than
I
would
have
imagined
that
does
come
up,
it
does
come
up
and
what
was
a
front
yard
you
know
fifty
years
ago,
just
sometimes
evolves
and
it
just
it's
not
really
much
of
a
front
yard
anymore.
You
know
the
primary
entrance
is
used
and
it
on
the
side,
yard
and
I
the
way
I
read
it.
C
J
F
J
A
If
there's
no
there's
nothing
that
makes
it
that
has
established,
which
is
the
front
yard
the
homeowner
gets
to
decide.
This
is
my
front
yard.
This
is
my
side
yard
and
what
this
does
and
I
understand.
I'm.
Sorry
Mario,
isn't
here,
I
understand
that
there
is
a
case
now
in
court
in
which
a
homeowner
made,
essentially
that
determination
and
a
neighbor
didn't
like
it,
which
is
sort
of
predictable
and
essentially
what
this
does
is
I'm
concerned
put
the
Zoning
Administrator
in
the
middle
of
that
situation
of.
A
A
You've
spoken
of
giving
consideration
to
existing
improvements
so
that,
if
there's
something
on
the
lot,
that
already
in
effect,
establishes
one
yard
as
the
front
yard.
Then
you
then
that's
to
be
considered
and
proportions
of
the
lot
line.
Dimensions.
I'm,
not
sure
what
that
means
in
pattern
of
existing
development.
A
E
In
that
specific
language,
when
we're
talking
about
any
existing
improvements
on
the
lot
is
improvements
the
right
word
as
more
of
existing
I'm
trying
to
find
the
right
word.
But
if
you
we
have
kind
of
a
formal
may
be
older
than
older
home
formal
entrance
in
the
front,
but
side
entrance
on
the
other
side.
It's
more
need.
The
day-to-day
the
front
probably
would
be
determined
as
the
more
formal
part
of
it
and
the
climate
showing
improvement.
It's
just
an
existing
all
I
can
think
of
is
existing
condition,
but
that's
another
debate.
A
A
A
So
that
would
be
a
matter
that
would
be
one
of
the
existing
improvements
to
which
you
would
have
to
pay
attention.
I
mean
in
effect
the
side
yard
would
have
been
defined
and
the
homeowner
can't
come
along
and
say:
oh
wait,
a
minute,
that's
my
front
yard,
because
once
you
do
then
you're
in
violation
of
the
ordinance
with
respect
to
the
air
conditioner.
Yes,.
A
E
Was
trying
to
accommodate
with
commissioner
because
II
was
saying
that
uses
of
regards
that
kind
of
change
in
order
over
time,
I'm
thinking
of
my
neighborhood
in
a
lot
of
similar
homes
that
are
my
neighborhood?
Are
our
corner,
Lots
kind
of
have
one?
What
I
would
consider
the
front
historically
may
not
be
used
as
the
front
anymore
other
than
being
very
formal,
very
pretty
and
but
you
park
on
the
side.
Are
you
you
come
in
the
side
door?
That's
I
think
that's
what
he
meant,
but
I
certainly
understand
the
improvements
part.
E
A
J
So
the
intent
at
this
point
in
time
is
one
thing,
but
if
the
language
allows
something
else
and
I
think
it
needs
to
be
I
want
to
say
more
specific
and
I'm
not
saying
list
every
single
circumstance
under
which
right
the
Zoning
Administrator
would
consider
this,
but
I
think
that
it
just
seems
too
broad
right
now:
I'm
not
comfortable
approving
that
area
voting
on
it
because
it
just
seems
very
open-ended.
It
says
that
they
would
give
consideration
to
existing
uses,
but
also
the
pattern
of
existing
development
in
the
neighborhood.
J
H
C
Well
that
that's
kind
of
dawning
on
me.
Why
are
we
I
mean
there
is
a
process
of
amending
of
going
in
for
an
amendment?
And
then
you
have
to
pay
the
mail
service
and
all
that
good
stuff.
But
I
mean
there
is
a
price.
There
is
truly
a
problem
for
somebody,
and
you
just
have
to
go
and
amend
it.
Your
property
and
change
your
the
definition
of
your
front
yard
and
at
least
there's
a
due
process.
Instead
of
leaving
it
up
to
the
administrator
or.
A
G
A
F
G
If
there's
any
digital
direction
would
be
appreciated
to
go
back
and
take
a
look
at
it,
there's
certainly
codes.
That
would
just
say
wherever
the
front
door
is
facing.
That's
the
front
card
or
code
to
say
whatever
is
a
narrower
side.
That's
the
front
yard.
So,
if
there's,
if
they
want
something,
if
the
intent
does
have
something,
that's
certain
in
every
case
and
not
allow
any
discretion,
that
would
be
one
thing.
Staff
could
look
at
if
their
additional
factors
you
want
staff
to
consider
when
determining
which
is
the
front.
E
In
the
interests
of
as
you
Scott,
the
administrator
trying
to
give
you
a
little
more
guidelines
and
I
think
how
to
establish
your
authority
so
that
also
a
homeowner
knows
a
little
bit
with
you
more
what
you're
basing
it
on.
Maybe
beefing
up
a
little
bit
d.
The
authority
part
of
it
for
like
a
better
word,
is
putting
my
recommendation
staff
for
that.
One
yeah.
A
A
If
it
seems
to
me
that
if
this
were
to
take
the
form
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
want
to
I
mean,
maybe
we
want
a
laundry
list
in
the
ordinance,
but
even
if
we
had,
if
we
can
establish
a
record
but
says
here
are
the
kinds
of
things
we're
concerned
about,
so
that
when
you
come
to
enforcement,
you've
got
the
language
of
the
ordinance,
but
you've
also
got
our
record.
Maybe
that
would
be
sufficient
run
that
past
Mario
yeah.
J
H
A
A
B
Have
a
presentation
for
this,
however,
sir,
there
is
an
ordinance
that
is
being
drafted
that
will
come
before
council
I
believe
may
22nd
that
will
establish
guidelines,
regulations
for
the
use
of
drones.
We
don't
have
specific
language
as
of
yet,
but
it
will
address
concerns
over
I,
believe
privacy,
where
the
drones
can
be
used,
allowable
Heights
and
things
of
that
nature.
I
believe
this
was
an
item
that
was
also
referred
to
Planning
Commission
from
Council,
but
at
this
point
the
actually
use
of
drones
is
not
within
the
purview
of
the
zoning
code.
B
A
A
E
E
J
A
F
K
Good
evening
and
chairman
Ford
and
commissioners
I
just
wanted
to
issue
a
big
thank
you
for
what
you
guys
do
for
the
thoughtfulness
and
the
seriousness
in
which
you
discuss
these
issues
for
raising.
You
know
basic
questions
about
what
is
the
problem
that
we're
solving
I
think
that's
always
a
fundamental
question
that
we
ought
to
ask
anytime
we're
passing
an
ordinance
or
considering
an
ordinance
or
making
a
change
to
something.
So
just
you
know
on
behalf
of
me,
Steve
Haggerty,
as
a
resident
and
in
my
new
position
as
mayor
of
this
wonderful
city.
Thank
you.
K
You
know
you're
bringing
a
lot
of
talents
and
expertise
in
seriousness
to
this
commission,
and
it
makes
me
feel
really
good
and
I
know
it
makes
others
in
this
community
feel
good,
because
the
decisions
and
the
recommendations
that
you
guys
are
making
ultimately
to
the
City
Council,
some
of
which
become
laws
around
here
affect
people's.
You
know,
lives
right
and
their
properties
as
well
as
development
in
this
community
and
I.
Don't
know
how
often
people
get
up
here
and
thank
you,
but
I
just
wanted
to
do
that
before.
F
D
Sir
yeah
I
didn't
sign
my
name
out
front,
but
I'll
introduce
myself.
My
name.
Excuse
me.
My
name
is
Ken
Jones
I'd
moved
into
Evanston
just
in
the
last
couple
of
weeks
and
thought
I'd
come
by
just
see.
Government
in
action
and
I
am
impressed
as
well.
I
had
a
couple
questions
that
I
thought
would
interjected
in
the
process
before.
But
when
you
are
establishing
the
front
street
the
front
of
a
house
does
that
impact
the
address
of
that
property?
The
street
address.
D
A
D
Second
comment:
excuse
me:
I,
think
the
weather's
got
my
voice
here,
but
up
on
the
drone
issue,
I
was
at
Starved
Rock
State
Park
on
the
weekend,
and
there
was
a
young
couple
there
with
a
very
noisy
drone,
taking
selfies
of
themselves
the
drone
up
taking
pictures
with
the
with
the
river
and
stuff
behind
them.
So
drones
are
here
to
stay.
Yes,.
B
Yes,
on
June
27th
at
5
p.m.
see
map
will
be
hosting
a
meeting
regarding
their
on
to
2050
plan,
we'll
be
sending
out
more
information
about
it
in
the
coming
weeks
as
we
obtain
that
information,
but
that
will
be
in
the
parasol
room
again
June
27th
at
5
p.m.
and
you
will
all
be
receiving
invitations
to
that.
It's
also
a
multi
community.
So
it's
not
just
going
to
be
Evanston,
so
several
other
communities
that
will
be
invited.