►
From YouTube: Planning and Development Committee Meeting 9-9-2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Okay,
okay,
thank
you.
Motion
passes
items
for
consideration.
We
have
P
one
tenant
based
rental
assistance
program
report,
the
housing
and
homelessness,
Commission
and
staff
recommend
approval
of
a
funding
renewal
of
$300,000
in
home
funds
to
continue
the
current
tenant
based
rental
assistance
program
administered
by
connections
for
the
homeless.
The
funding
will
provide
stable
housing
for
two
years
up
to
10
at
risk.
A
Evanson
families
with
children
under
the
age
of
18
in
Evanston
that
are
underemployed
and
break
the
cycle
of
poverty
and
instability
by
developing
the
capacity
to
earn
a
living
wage,
to
support
their
families
and
afford
market
rate
rental.
Housing
funding
is
from
the
home
investment
partnership
program.
Currently,
the
city
has
a
total
of
400
64317
dollars.
This
is
for
action,
see
if
we
have
a.
A
D
E
Good
evening
we
have
this
program,
and
right
now,
we've
been
to
give
300,000
to
help
families
to
stay
in
their
homes
and
stuff.
It's
a
good
thing,
but
with
the
home
fund
program
in
any
government
program,
we
need
to
have
feedback
as
to
how
many
family
was
successful
in
getting
out
of
this
program
in
stand.
If
it
comes
to
to
two
years
and
they
haven't
gotten
on
their
feet,
are
they
pushed
out?
We
don't
know
that
we
don't
have
no
kind
of
report.
E
I
would
like
to
know
how
many
currently
are
in
one
year
and
how
many,
currently
in
two
years,
if
we
spending
the
money,
I
would
like
to
see
the
results.
Those
are
my
tax
dollars
now
the
remaining
money
that
is
left
in
the
home
Phung
will
that
be
ear.
Toys,
affordable
housing
and
I
have
seen
nothing
in
the.
E
Allocation
and
everything
off
you
giving
money
to
the
Chodos.
We
still
have
Chodos
in
this
town
that
we
are
supposed
to
be
supporting
them
with
administrative
funds
in
stuff
when,
if
they
need
that,
that's
not
something
you
have
done
before,
but
I
think
that
you
should
give
them
that
fun
to
help
them
whether
they
ask
tonight,
it
should
be
a
gift
because
they
have
been
working
hard
and
staying
with
the
programs,
so
with
money
being
tight
in
from
grants
and
things
so,
money
that
comes
to
the
city
do
this
home
program.
E
F
F
Think
since
the
I
think
sue
is
here
tonight
and
while
she's
sort
of
an
overall
type
person,
there
is
a
paragraph
right
in
the
cover
letter
that
we
have
here
that
answers
every
single
one
of
Betty,
Sue
Esther's
questions,
she's,
challenged
connections
and
somebody
from
connections
or
somebody
who
follows
them
should
come
up
to
the
microphone
and
respond
because
we're
not
able
to
do
that.
So
could
we
ask
somebody
to
come
up
not
only
not
only,
for
you
know
not
not
one
of
our
staff
I,
don't
think
I.
F
G
Us
sure,
good
evening,
city
council,
my
name
is
Nia
Tavares
I'm,
a
director
of
development
at
connections
for
the
homeless
I'm.
Here
with
my
colleague,
juniper
Fourier,
Crystal's
she's,
the
director
of
our
housing
programs,
and
so
the
Tibor
program
is
one
of
the
housing
programs
that
she
and
her
team
administer
and
she's
just
going
to
share
a
little
bit
about
the
some
of
the
results.
H
Counsel
and
thank
you
Miss
Esther,
for
the
wonderful
questions,
so
we
do
report
to
back
to
the
city
all
of
our
outcomes
each
year
when
we're
renewing
our
grant.
So
in
this
year's
renewal,
we
shared
that
ten
of
the
families
that
exited
this
past
program
year,
100%
exited
to
permanent
housing
that
they
were
able
to
sustain
past
the
their
grant.
Subsidy
85%
of
the
families
either
started
a
job
or
maintained
a
job
that
pays
a
living
which,
throughout
the
year
there
last
year
in
the
program,
46
percent
of
families
served
last
year.
H
Increased
their
income
and
98
percent
of
the
children
served
achieved
strong
academic
outcomes
in
advance.
The
next
grade
level,
which
is
a
huge
piece
of
the
cheaper
program,
is
actually
children
not
having
to
leave
their
schools
because
of
homelessness
or
housing
insecurity.
So
that's
one
of
the
outcomes
I'm
most
proud
of
for
the
program
and
miss
esters
also
asked
about
how
many
people
leave
after
the
first
year.
H
We
sometimes
will
have
one
person
leave
one
household
leave,
but
it's
rarely
usually
does
they
usually
stay
below
the
ami
that
they
need
to
be
out
for
the
program
through
the
second
year,
and
we
do
let
them
keep
their
subsidy
throughout
that
year.
But
if
they,
if
we're
seeing
they're
paying
a
large
portion
of
the
rent,
that
does
leave
$1
lakh
that
sometimes
we
can
add
a
second
family
another
family
in,
but
we're
we're
recalculating
rent
constantly
as
income
changes
as
income
increases
to
make
sure
they're
paying
the
maximum
amount
of
rent.
C
H
G
Just
as
a
as
a
final
cloud
Alderman's,
you
know,
connections
really
values
this
relationship
with
the
city
and
we're
really
honored
to
be
able
to
partner
with
the
city
and
to
really
be
the
the
program
that
applies.
The
funding
home
funds
come
from
the
federal
government
through
the
city
of
Evanston.
We
go
out
to
connections,
we
go
out
and
leverage
other
resources
around
$100,000
of
giving
from
individual
donors
from
the
state
of
Illinois,
from
private
fund
from
private
foundations
to
administer
this
program
on
behalf
of
the
city.
E
A
A
I
Hi
there,
my
name
is
Kirsten
Coleman
I'm,
the
owner
of
1217
2012,
11,
Ridge,
Avenue
I'm.
Here
with
my
husband
as
well,
and
it's
our
understanding
that
tonight
we
just
needed
to
clarify
one
aspect
of
our
plan.
We
do
have
a
brick
circular,
driveway
in
front
of
our
home.
It
bridges
the
two
Lots
it
is
original
to
the
home.
It's
brick
I
do
have
photos.
If
that's
of
interest
and
on
our
survey,
we
did
not
have
specific
and
amount
language
as
to
the
easement
we're
requesting
living
on
Ridge
Avenue,
it's
a
very
busy
street.
I
We
feel
that
having
forward-facing
access
to
the
street
is
a
huge
asset
to
us.
We
have
young
children
and
it's
just
nice
to
go
through.
We
also
for
the
purpose
of
receiving
deliveries.
It's
nice
to
have
the
ability
for
contractors
so
forth
to
pull
in
safely
off.
Ridge
Avenue
not
be
flashing
on
Ridge
Avenue
because
it
is
such
a
narrow
and
busy
street.
So
what
we
did
bring
tonight
is
a
language
that
we
intend
to
add
to
our
survey
that
describes
the
easement
and
ownership
responsibilities.
I
C
I
Each
owner
hereby
grants
and
conveys
to
the
other
owner
a
non-exclusive
easement
for
vehicular
and
pedestrian
ingress
and
egress
over
and
across
the
plaited
area,
defined
herein
as
the
access
easement
to
the
owners
of
record
from
time
to
time
of
lot.
1,
&,
2
and
the
respective
contractors,
employees,
guests
and
invitees
owners
of
lot,
1
or
2
are
required
to
permit
and
provide
passage
across
the
easement
and
are
required
to
maintain
the
portion
of
the
access
easement
that
falls
within
their
ownership.
Parcel
and
I
do
have
additional
documents.
K
A
K
K
L
K
K
K
A
P3,
we
don't
have
any
public
comment.
Staff
recommends
adoption
of
ordinance,
104
o
19,
to
extend
the
time
for
completion
of
the
planned
development
at
3:18
through
3:20
Dempster
Street,
originally
approved
in
March
of
2008.
The
ordinance
grants
a
one-year
extension
to
obtain
building
permits
for
construction
of
the
third
dwelling
unit
within
the
former
livery
stable
of
the
property
by
September
25th
2020
Ottoman
Melissa
Wynn
recommend
suspension
of
the
rules
for
introduction
action
at
the
September
9
2019
City
Council
meetings
for
introduction
and
action
move
approval
okay
autumn.
M
M
A
A
J
A
J
Leslie
shad
I'm
a
resident
of
Evanston
and
lead
of
co-lead
of
natural
habitat,
Evanston
I'm.
Very
brief
I
just
have
emailed
to
each
member
of
the
committee
a
petition
from
260
people,
it's
in
support
of
a
heritage,
tree
ordinance
and
I.
So
much
appreciate
bringing
this
to
the
committee
discussion
and
you
know
it's
important
for
all
the
reasons
that
the
dr.
Westwood
from
Morton
Arboretum
mentioned
so
I'm
just
gonna.
Leave
it
at
that
and
I
just
brought
two
copies
since
I
emailed
it
so
I'll.
E
N
I
just
wanted
to
speak
in
support
of
this
discussion
item
when
I
moved
to
Evanston.
Four
years
ago,
I
was
told
by
the
real
estate
agent
that
this
is,
among
other
things,
the
city
of
trees
and
I.
Think
that's
still
true,
although
a
lot
of
them
have
unfortunately
died
due
to
elm
disease
and
other
things,
and
so
I
think
when
we
have
real
heritage
trees,
it's
something
that
we
should
be
really
proud
of
in
this
city.
It
draws
people
like
me
to
come
here
and
I
would
really
support
the
council.
A
O
Over
the
past
two
years,
we've
issued
probably
a
little
over
almost
250
tree
preservation
permits
for
various
projects,
most
of
which
just
involved
parkway
excavations
for
plumbing
repairs
or
sprinklers,
or
that
type
of
thing
cable
installations.
There
haven't
been
a
lot
of
projects
that
have
come
under
the
purview
of
this
ordinance.
I
know.
Tonight's
discussion
is
more
about
trees
on
private
property.
O
Defining
a
heritage
tree
can
be
very
subjective,
or
it
can
be
very
objective,
depending
on
which
way
the
committee
and/or,
the
council,
wants
to
go.
You
could
limit
it
to
sizes
and
species.
You
could
limit
it
to
certain
parts
of
town.
You
could
do
any
number
of
things.
So
I
don't
have
a
whole
lot
more
to
add
to
it
than
that
other
than
if
you
have
a
certain
direction.
P
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
Paul.
So,
let's
look
at
being
the
most
objective,
I'm
being
if
we're
looking
at
trees
on
our
list
of
preferred
replacement
trees
for
the
parkway
of
that
that's
a
fairly
long
list,
but
I
think
when
people
think
of
Evanston,
we
think
in
terms
of
the
oak
trees
that
were
here
originally,
why
we
all
have
oak
floors
and
our
vintage
houses
and
the
AMA
trees,
which
unfortunately,
are
a
challenge
and
continuing
to
be
a
challenge.
P
Can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
Preservation,
Commission
and
or
maybe
Rajan
young,
maybe
corporation
council
can
address
why
it
wasn't
chosen
to
amend
the
Preservation
Commission
to
include
trees.
They
include
landscape
masses
but
landscape
masses
as
a
different
definition
apparently
does
not
include
trees.
P
Okay,
well,
I,
don't
want
to
put
anyone
on
that.
You
repeat
the
question:
okay,
I!
Don't
my
question
was
why
couldn't
we
have
included
this
under
the
preservation
ordinance
for
their
review
when
they're,
looking
at
landmark
properties
and
historic
districts,
because
they
do
have
landscape
masses,
but
those
landscape
masses
unfortunately
do
not
include
trees,
and
a
number
of
us
in
our
Ward's
have
had
challenges
with
developments.
We're
obviously
very
very
old
and
historic.
Trees
have
come
down
or
been
threatened.
P
A
Q
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee.
It's
the
Preservation
Commission
to
discuss
this
issue.
Some
of
their
thoughts
are
included
in
the
packet,
but
in
summary,
they
felt
is
a
very
important
issue:
transparent
preservation,
it's
very
important
to
the
character
of
evanston
community
in
many
of
the
historic
neighborhoods,
but
for
a
couple
reasons
they
felt
that
it
is
better
served
be
located
within
the
current
location
of
the
city
code.
Q
Wine
is
that
the
preservation
ordinance
only
deals
with
historic
districts
for
certain
areas
of
the
city
or
landmarks,
the
specific
properties-
and
this
is
really
a
citywide
issue.
This
should
be
covered
in
the
city
code
citywide
and
then,
additionally,
they
felt
they
lacked
the
expertise
in
tree
preservation
and
they're,
no
arborists
on
the
Preservation
Commission.
Their
collection
of
architects.
Q
P
So
I
guess
what
I'm
looking
for
is
a
way
to
a
way
to
say
that
these
large
trees
is
two
hundred
three
hundred
year
old
trees
do
matter
in
our
community.
They
had
character,
are
to
our
community.
They
had
shade
they
had
they
clean
our
air
they've,
been
here
long
before
any
people
were
here
and
and
I
think
it's
really
is
time
to
make
them
a
part
of
our
protected
community
of
streetscape
and
character
of
neighborhoods.
So
that
was
the
that
was
the
impetus
behind
making
this
a
priority.
P
I
think
at
least
three
of
us,
though,
have
had
have
had
these
issues
come
up
in
our
ward
recently.
They
have
not
ended
up
well
and
have
created
a
lot
of
sadness.
I
guess
this,
or
is
the
right
word?
So
if
we
can
look
at
types
of
trees,
Paul
that
are
the
most
likely
to
fall
into
a
category
of
a
certain
age
and
I'm,
not
sure
where
we
draw
that
age,
whether
it's
a
hundred
years
and
above
or
I,
guess
I'd.
P
A
Thank
you,
Ottoman
Fisk,
I,
agree
and
support
that
this
should
be
extended
beyond
just
preservation
and
historic
districts.
The
trees
in
our
community
certainly
are
an
environmental
asset.
They
are
an
aesthetic
beauty,
they're,
an
amenity
that
just
cannot
be
replaced
so
I'm.
In
support
of
continuing
on
this
discussion,
we
had
Ottoman
when
than
Audrina
barrel
and
Ottoman
Rainey
necks,
Thank.
M
You
mowcher
III
am
in
support
of
heritage
tree
ordinance
very
much
and
I
agree
that
it
should
cover
the
entire
city.
I
do
think
that
that
we
should
have
an
objective
standard
so
that,
as
as
opposed
to
a
subjective
standard,
I
think
some
of
the
materials
that
we
received
I
believe
about
a
couple
of
the
other
cities
that
were
listed
here
described
a
couple
of
good
ideas.
M
I
would
tend
towards
I
think
it
was
Menlo
Park,
which
listed
a
series
of
species
to
be
protected
and
one
of
the
things
that
they
did
say
was
all
Oaks
native
to
California,
no
and
and
then
they
did
various
measurements
for
the
diameter
of
the
tree
at
particular
Heights.
So
that
would
be
an
indication.
M
M
I'd
like
to
hear
back
from
the
forestry
department
about
the
species
list
and
what
their
recommendations
would
be
about
how
we
could
come
up
with
an
objective
standard
and
then
I
do
think
that
we
should
move
forward
and
protect
these
trees
because
they
really
benefit
all
of
us.
I've,
like
alderman
Fiske
mentioned
I've,
had
a
concern
about
a
very
large
tree
that
was
taken
down
in
my
ward
and
so
I
think
that
it's
really
critical
that
we
should
look
at
these.
M
C
You
Otterbein,
Ravel,
well,
I,
agree
with
everyone's
comments,
thus
far.
I.
Think
in
addition
to
the
age
of
a
tree,
though,
I
think
looking
at
the
size
of
the
tree
would
be
another
important
objective
measure.
I
think
our
current
tree
ordinance
talks
about
trees
of
a
fairly
small
diameter,
I
guess
when
I
was
looking
at
some
of
these
other
ordinances
and
other
communities,
they
were
talking
about
DB
h's
of
a
much
larger
size.
C
We
need
to
be
reasonable
and
what
we
and
the
kinds
of
trees
that
we're
trying
to
save
so
and
making
an
objective
the
species
to
be
safe,
an
age
of
a
tree
and
then
a
tree
of
us.
You
know
a
reasonable,
a
reasonable
size,
and
it
occurred
to
me
that
asking
private
property
owners
to
go
through
a
permit
process
to
be
able
to
remove
a
tree
give
gives
us
an
opportunity,
then
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
property
owner
to
educate
them
about
the
importance
of
the
tree.
C
Obviously,
if
it's
diseased
or
dying,
then
they
should,
of
course
be
able
to
take
it
down,
but
if
we
can
encourage
them
to
make
amendment,
make
changes
to,
for
example,
a
planned
addition
to
the
home
in
order
to
save
the
tree.
I
think
that
would
be
a
very
productive
conversation
to
be
able
to
have
with
people
Thank
You
autumn.
A.
F
Rainy
well
I'm,
still
in
favor
of
the
tree
preservation
ordinance,
but
I,
don't
see
the
need
for
us
to
call
it
a
heritage.
Tree
ordinance.
I
think
we
can
do
a
fine
job
by
calling
it
a
preservation.
Ordinance
I
happen
to
have
a
case
in
my
ward,
where
a
family
is
suffering
terribly
because
of
a
very
large
gorgeous
tree
that
is
causing
their
sewer
line
to
be
so
totally
destroyed,
and
it's
going
to
cost
them.
Tens
of
thousands
of
dollars
to
have
the
sewer
line
moved,
and
you
know
the
the
tree
is
going.
F
If
the
tree
is
going
to
remain,
the
sewer
line
has
to
be
moved
and
the
city
says
it's
nothing.
They
can
do
about
it.
It
is
their
problem
that
is
their
line,
etc,
and
in
this
case
the
sewer
line
does
not
run
out
to
the
street.
It
runs
all
the
way
down
the
block
to
the
next
corner,
because
it's
a
long
story
and
that's
how
it
happened
to
be
constructed
so
I.
You
know
I,
think,
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
different
circumstances
here,
but
I
think
calling
it
a
heritage.
F
Tree
ordinance
causes
all
sorts
of
implications
that
I
think
we
should
not
deal
with
and,
as
alderman
just
said
in
her
opening
remarks,
I
don't
know
how
many
years
we
you
know
or
how
big
the
trunk
should
be,
and
so
it
just
it
just
causes.
All
sorts
of
you
know
different
opinions
about
what
is
a
heritage
tree
and
if
Paul
D'agostino
can't
tell
us-
and
you
know
10
words
or
less
what
a
heritage
tree
is
then
I
don't
think
we're
the
people
to
decide
what
a
heritage
tree
is.
So
that's
my
opinion.
Yeah.
A
So
I'm
not
as
commanding
the
heritage
piece
I'm,
not
that
educated
on
but
trees
and
the
respect
of
what
they
do
for
our
quality
of
life.
They
reduce
stress
and
lower
blood
pressure,
improve
moods
and
it's
something
that
we
should
look
at
really
as
and
ask
that
just
even
from
a
health
perspective
and
overall,
but
not
really
educated,
on
what
the
heritage
speech
does
and
how
that
will
limit
or
complicate
the
ordinance
further
Ottoman
Fisk.
P
Well,
I
think:
that's
that's
something
that
we
can.
We
can
look
at
and
ask
staff
to
give
us
an
opinion
on
based
on
what
other
communities
do
and
I
think
that
that's
fine
to
do
that.
As
with
almost
all
of
our
ordinances,
there
is
an
opportunity
for
a
homeowner
to
appeal.
This
isn't
just
a
do
or
die.
This
is
the
homeowner
certainly
can
come
to
the
come
to
the
city
and
say
in
the
case
of
Alderman
Rainey's
resident
that
there's
no
option
for
them
other
than
to
take
the
tree
down.
P
F
P
F
O
P
F
To
know
it's
a
new
light:
okay,
yeah
I
just
wanted
you
to
know
alderman
Simmons
that
I
was
probably
the
first
alderman
to
introduce
a
tree
preservation,
ordinance
for
which
I
got
absolutely
no
support
on
the
council.
Many
years
ago,
however,
from
around
the
country,
I
got
lots
of
support.
Just
so
you
know,
Thank.
A
L
There,
if
I,
can
get
just
get
a
clarification.
So
are
you
looking
for
staff?
What
I'm
hearing
is
that
you
want
us
to
come
back
with
an
ordinance
that
would
create,
like
a
group
D
where
it's
protected,
trees
and
it's
very
large
diameter
and
very
old
and
and
we
would
have
provisions
regarding
old
trees
that.
A
R
If
I
could
add
that
it
looks
like
there
are
other
communities
that
have
identified
a
species
list
and
then
it's
based
on
the
species
list
asides
of
a
tree
that
meets
a
protection
threshold
and
then,
if,
if
the
I'm
I
want
to
just
clarify,
is
their
desire
to
further
understand
what
a
heritage
or
landmark
tree
is?
Or
is
that
something
that,
at
this
time,
we
do
not
want
to
have
staff
pursue
I.
S
I
originally
intended
to
be
here
to
simply
answer
your
questions
of
the
position
paper
that
we
generated,
but
I've
received
a
number
of
comments
from
fellow
members
that
suggested
that
I
at
least
give
a
brief
summation
of
what
our
final
product
was
for
those
that
have
yet
to
see
the
document
and
for
the
public
that
is
here
not
tonight.
So,
if
you
would
grant
me
a
few
minutes,
I
will
do
my
very
best
to
edit
the
document
that
you've
all
received.
One.
S
A
S
Thank
you
very
much.
First
off
I
should
perhaps
define
what
Charette
is
then
the
architectural
parlance
that
is
a
gathering
of
designers,
typically
to
address
a
certain
design
problem
and
it
usually
starts.
It
starts
out
with
an
analysis
of
the
context
and
then
proceeds
to
move
into
design,
concepts
and
schematics.
S
We
had
a
gathering
of
around
20
people,
all
design
professionals,
members
of
design
evanston
and
to
start
out
the
process
we
needed
to
become
better
familiar
with
the
context
and
the
challenges
of
the
site.
So
we
had
a
presentation
of
a
timeline
history
of
the
site
and
it's
adjacent
neighbors,
the
WCTU
and
the
Women's
Club,
building
a
review
of
photographs
of
the
site,
ninaz
environs
and
analysis
of
the
zoning.
S
A
review
of
the
proposal
for
this
site
that
was
included
in
the
2009
downtown
plan,
a
review
of
recent,
the
recent
history
of
the
RFP
RFP
process
for
the
site
and
a
review
of
recent
proposals
for
the
site,
and
we
also
reviewed
in
a
very
brief
way.
Some
upcoming
major
projects
in
the
neighborhood
of
the
site,
such
as
the
office
building
at
6:01
Davis
and
the
residential
building
at
1621
in
1631,
Chicago
Avenue.
S
Subsequent
to
that
participants
were
broken
into
three
groups,
six
to
eight
people,
and
they
were
given
a
list
of
items
that
they
should
consider
in
their
deliberations.
For
what
might
happen
on
the
site.
These
items
included
financial
ramifications,
the
owning
taking
into
account
its
historic
neighbors,
whether
the
development
should
be
private
or
public.
S
The
best
use
of
the
site
transportation
issues
as
it
relates
to
anything
a
good
transportation
oriented
development
city
should
take
into
consideration
the
height
massing,
an
open
space,
how
the
how
anything
in
solution
might
affect
the
street
level
and
what
would
residents
of
Evanston
in
ten
twenty
or
thirty
years?
Think
of
anything
that
we
might
propose
for
that
site.
S
S
There
are
a
number
of
circumstances
that
are
unique
and
are
occurring
at
this
present
time.
That,
in
our
opinion,
would
affect
a
quality
approach
to
this
design
problem.
The
first
is
that
the
reassessment
of
property,
no
in
Evanston
and
the
two
significant
developments
that
are
presently
under
review,
601,
Davis
and
1231
Chicago
Avenue.
And
since
we
wrote
this,
there
is
yet
another
development,
and
that
is
that
the
city
of
Evanston
is
looking
for
a
new
city
manager.
S
So,
given
all
of
that,
we
felt
that
the
implementation
and
what
occurs
from
from
all
of
these
situations
and
projects,
would
have
a
significant
effect
on
how
the
development
of
this
site
should
be
approached
and
all
those
other
developments
were
significantly
your
greater
scale
and
prominence
than
this
relatively
meager
site.
And
this
relatively
meager
site
is
also
in
a
far
more
sensitive
historical
context
than
the
other
projects.
S
S
S
We
were
not
so
concerned
with
what
this
what
would
happen
on
the
site
as
it
relates
to
zoning,
as
we
were
to
what
the
quality
of
the
project
would
be
and
in
our
opinion,
the
zoning
or
what
use
any
development
might
take
would
be
determinate
upon
the
market
conditions
at
the
time,
and
so
we
were
not
concerned
whether
it
be
whether
something
there
would
be
a
residential
building
or
an
office
tower
or
whatever.
We
were
more
concerned
that
wherever
occurred,
there
would
be
a
high
quality
and,
of
course,
respond
to
present
market
conditions
parking
accommodations.
S
We
all
know
that
the
present
site
is
a
parking
lot
and
based
upon
all
of
our
chance,
encounters
and
visits
to
the
parking
lot.
We
felt
that
probably
60
to
70
percent
of
the
spaces.
Presently
there
would
probably
need
to
be
dominated
in
any
future
development,
given
what
we
observed
and
given
the
trends
and
reduced
automobile
usage
parking
is
also
expensive
to
incorporate
into
any
building
and
parking
spaces
in
any
building
use
space
that
could
farmer
laudably,
be
used
for
other
uses.
Ok,.
S
That
would
link
the
sites
and
then
the
building
would
then
sit
back
from
that
and
that
all
the
services
and
any
parking
would
be
located
at
the
rear
of
the
building.
And
we
were
not
that
concerned
about
the
height
of
the
building,
given
the
fact
that
it
would
be
setback
so
far,
and
the
tree
cover
in
the
park
in
the
front
would
add
to
pedestrian
scale
that
we
felt
was
so
important
and
that
might
tie
all
of
these
sites
together
into
perhaps
a
future
campus
as
it
might
relate
to
women's
issues.
Thank.