►
From YouTube: Referrals Committee - Jun. 23, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
Yeah
me
too
allison.
Do
you
know
if
we're
waiting
for
kelly
this
morning
or
not.
D
A
Yeah,
we
don't
have
too
much
to
address,
so
I
think
it's
I
don't
think
we'll
need
too
much
input.
One
thing
I
want
to
flag
is
that
the
spot
on
the
website
where
the
agenda
is
supposed
to
be
the
link
itself
doesn't
exist
it
just
it
just
it
just
haunts
you.
It
just
says
agenda,
but
there's
no
link
at
all,
so
the
agenda's
the
same
every
time.
A
So
I
don't
think
anyone
was
too
confused,
but
that
that's
just
a
fact
I
wanted
to
at
least
acknowledge
for
the
for
the
world.
So
let
us
call
to
order
the
june
23rd
meeting
of
the
evanston
referrals
committee,
councilman
suffering.
A
Physically
indicate
that
he
is
present
councilmember
bell
here.
Oh,
should
we
record
the
meeting
as
well.
C
A
Great
mayor
bis
is
here
so
they're
with
three
members
present.
We
have
a
quorum
and
prepared
to
do
our
work.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
public
comment.
Is
there
any
member
of
the
public
seeking
to
give
comment
this
morning.
A
Seeing
none
be
moved
to
the
next
item
on
our
agenda
approval
of
the
minutes
of
the
june
9th
meeting.
Is
there
a
motion
on
this
matter.
A
Second,
council,
member
of
el
news
approval
of
the
june
9th
meeting
minutes
council
member
suffering
seconds.
Is
there
a
discussion
seeing
none
councilman,
sufferden
aye,
councilman,
revell
hi.
C
A
Vote
ion
with
three
voting
in
favor
and
now
voting
against
the
notion
passes
and
the
minutes
are
approved.
This
brings
us
to
the
the
bulk
of
our
work
items
for
consideration.
A
As
I
understand
it,
we
have
one
new
referral
that
was
made
recently
by
council
councilmember
kelly
regarding
hazard
pay
for
firefighters,
and
then
we
have
some
some
holdovers
from
our
previous
meeting.
That
allison
can
point
us
to.
Let's
handle
the
new
one.
First.
A
So
this
is
a
referral,
as
indicated
from
council
member
kelly
to
utilize
arpa
funding
to
as
a
kind
of
a
hazard,
pay
or
or
compensation
associated
with
some
of
the
negotiations
that
occurred
between
the
city
and
the
firefighters
when
the
pandemic
messed
everything
up.
A
One
was
for
hazard,
pay
and
one
was
for
revenue
loss.
I
think,
and
I'm
not
sure
that
revenue
loss
totally
makes
sense,
but
we're
over
my
we're
over
we're
above
my
page
right
here.
Okay,.
C
A
You
know
my
first
instinct
was
to
send
this
to
finance
and
budget,
but
then
my
second
instinct
was
well.
I
don't
know
all
the
other.
Arpa
requests
have
just
gone
to
some
substantive
committee
that
deals
with
the
underlying
issue,
and
so
I
wonder
if
this
should
go
to
administration
of
public
works,
but
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
strong
feelings
about
this.
C
E
Yeah
they're
not
really
qualified
for
the
arpa
hazard
pay.
Last
we
checked
into
that
because
of
their
salary
range,
so
I
mean
I
suppose
this
can
go
to
apw,
but
I'm
just
not
really
sure
that
I'm
not
really
sure
what
the
request
is.
I
guess
if
it's
hazard
pay
for
through
arpa,
I'm
fairly
certain
that
most,
if
not
all,
of
them
would
not
qualify
under
the
arba
constraints.
A
A
E
Correct
and
it's
a
long
explanation,
but
you
can
count
other
things
as
revenue
loss
if
you
wanted
to
use
the
general
fund
budget
for
this
long
story
short,
it's
a
it
seems
to
me
a
budgetary
issue.
C
The
the
link
to
revenue
loss,
as
I
understand
it,
is
that
the
firefighters.
E
A
Well,
I
I
I
don't,
look
I'm
totally
comfortable
sending
this
to
apw
or
finance
and
budget.
I
I
if
I
mean
I,
I
guess
if
I
were
to
say
my
preference
and
I'm
totally
comfortable
either
way
my
preference
would
probably
be
apw,
but
either
one
is
fine
with
me
and
if
someone
wants
to
make
a
motion
for
either
one,
that's
fine
with
me.
C
E
Okay,
respectfully
is
like
the
right
goal
here
I
mean
this
affects
our
budget
and
we
have
collective
bargaining
coming
up
and
I
think
this
should
be
considered
with
our
budget,
so
I'm
going
to
strongly
suggest
to
go
to
budget
and
finance,
even
though
they've
got
a
boatload
of
items,
but
obviously
it's
up
to
the
committee.
What
they'd
like
to
do.
F
This
is
come
to
remember
reid
here
on
the
phone
mayor,
truman.
F
Because
I've
I've
spoken
to
the
firefighters
on
this
issue,
I'm
I've
got
some
clarity
on
what
the
matter
is.
It's
fine
have
fun.
Do
what
you
want.
A
I
mean,
I
guess,
look,
I'm
totally
fine.
This
is
finance
and
budget.
I
guess
I
think
you
know
I
don't
I.
I
think
that
they'll
have
the
whoever
hears
it
will
have
the
information
to
make
a
decision
and
if
they
want
to
throw
it
in
with
the
23
budget
and
the
negotiation
or
the
budget
decision
discussion,
that's
fine
if
they
want
to
throw
it
into
collective
bargaining.
That's
fine!
If
they
want
to
do
it,
that's
fine
if
they
wanted
to
vote
it
down.
A
That's
fine
too,
but
I
think
the
information
will
be
there.
I
don't
think
this
is,
I
don't
think
it's.
I
don't
think
it's
a
complicated
issue
to
understand.
A
Second,
what
time
frame
do
you
want
to
recommend
to
them.
C
So-
and
we
have
asked
them
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
before
the
end
of
the
third
quarter,.
A
Okay,
so
councilman
bravo
moves
that.
We
refer
this
to
the
finance
and
budget
committee
with
a
recommendation
that
they
hear
it
before
the
end
of
the
third
quarter
of
2022
council
members
suffered
in
seconds
senator
discussion,
seeing
none
counselor
suffering
hi.
That's
my
revell.
C
A
I
vote
I
and
with
the
vote
three
voting
in
favor
and
I'm
going
against
the
motion
passes
and
the
items
duly
referred.
So
I
think
this
brings
us
then
to
kind
of
hold
over
items
that
we
didn't
act
on,
because
we
perhaps
were
seeking
further
information,
and
I
think
that's
why
councilman
reed
is
here,
which
is,
I
think,
can
be
very
helpful
allison.
Do
you
want
to
kind
of
walk
us
through
what
we
have
before
us.
D
Yes,
so
we've
got
lines:
23,
24
and
25
of
the
new
referrals
form
and
I'd
say
the
first
2
23
and
24.
We
last
time
said
it
was
best
to
speak
to
staff
so
I'll.
D
I
think
we
should
take
those
one
at
a
time
and
then
the
third
line
25
with
questions
about
just
clarity
of
what
the
intent
was
just
based
on
confusion
because
of
conversations
so.
A
A
F
Yeah
it's,
it
would
create
a
new
expenditure
that
was
not
budgeted
for
and
as
a
budget
amendment.
That
is
a
policy
change.
The
funding
for
it
would
get.
This
is
a
cdbg
alley,
and
so
the
funding
would
come
from
cdbg
for
net
from
for
next
year,
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
this
alley,
which
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
new
living
room,
would
would
be
paved
and
we'd
create
an
area
that
is
safe
and
conducive
for
for
them.
A
So
I'm
I
think,
I'm
just
behind
here,
you
said
for
next
year,
so
that
wouldn't
why
would
that
not
just
be
a
part
of
the
2023
budget.
F
C
My
understanding
is
that
we
that
we've
already
designated
how
this
year's
cdbg
funds
are
going
to
be
used
with
the
the
infrastructure
portion
of
the
cdbg
funds.
C
And-
and
I
I'm
I've-
never
I've
not
been.
I
have
been
part
of
approving
these
expenditures,
but
I'm
not
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
process.
We
use
to
decide
which
alleys
in
our
cdbg
areas
are
how
we
decide
which
ones
are
the
ones
to
to
pave
next,
because
I
think
we
probably
have
lots
of
valleys
in
the
in
those
eligible
areas
that
that
are
eager
to
get
paved.
C
So
I'm
I'm
not
sure
why
I
mean
I
understand
that
there's
renewed
there's,
inter
special
attention
on
this
alley
right
now
because
of
the
adjacent
living
room,
but
I
don't
think
I'm
not
sure
why
that
should
go
to
the
head
of
the
line.
E
Yes,
so
for
ali
requests
they
go
into
a
queue
and
they're
done
in
order
and
they're
planned
for
yearly.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
this
one's
already
analyst,
but
if
it
is
it
could
be
somewhere
in
the
queue
I'm
just.
I
would
have
to
look
and
see
where
it
would
be
on
the
list
and
public
works
gets
that
information
from
the
community
members
in
that
area
and
then
they
effectively.
E
C
F
Yeah
it
is,
it
is
different
with
cdbg
alleys
and
there
it's
it's.
Unlike
a
non-cdbg
alley,
there
is
a
process
as
the
clerk
I
used
to
sit
on
the
local
board
of
improvements,
and
so
folks
get
a
petition,
and
you
know
the
neighbors
cover
half
the
cost
of
of
the
pavement
through
either
a
direct
payment
or
a
lien,
and
so
there's
a
whole
process
there,
but
with
cdbg.
Always
it
is
a
different
process
and
you
know,
I
think,
creating
a
more
formal,
formal
process
with
cdbg
would
make
sense.
F
If
there
is
a
c,
I
don't
think
that
I
I
don't
think
there
is
a
cdbg
list.
That's
developed
years
out.
That's
not
my
understanding,
based
on
conversations
that
I've
had
but
sure
we
can
say
put
it
on
the
list,
but
there
is
no.
If
there
is
no
list
it
would
be
at
the
top
of
the
non-existent
list
so
sure
we
can
say
looking
to
put
it
on
the
list.
A
A
C
Yeah,
so
I
guess
I
so
in
my
mind,
the
paving
of
allies,
the
non-cdbg
alley
paving
program
is,
is
functioning
fine.
C
I
mean
extremely
slowly
because
there's
not
much
money
to
put
into
it,
so
we
only
do
one
or
two
alleys
a
year
which
is
really
frustrating
for
residents
with
terrible
alleys,
but
so
I'm
not
suggesting
that
we
try
to
change
that,
because
I
think
that
processes
is
working
okay,
but
we
could
get.
We
could
ask
the
housing
community
development
committee
to
clarify
of
how
the
process
works
or
should
work
for
the
cdbg
alley.
A
I
mean
that
that's
fine
with
me.
It
was
fine
to
just
get
a
memo
from
staff
and
we
didn't
decide
if
we
wanted
to
change
things.
I
mean
I'm,
I'm
cool
with
anything,
I'm
not
dogmatic,
but
I
just
think
my
instinct
is
that
we
don't
want
the
prioritization
of
molly
paving
to
go
through
this
committee.
I
think
that
that's
sort
of
not
why
we're
here.
C
A
I
agree
yeah,
and-
and
I
just
I,
I
take
councilman
reed's
point-
that
the
process
might
be
confusing,
and
I
also
take
this
point
that
it's
important
for
the
word
for
that
ali
to
get
paved,
and
I
hope
that
that
will
get
the
appropriate
consideration.
F
If
I,
if
I
may
ask
I
would,
I
would
recommend
or
ask
that
this
be
sent
to
as
councilmember
revell
just
mentioned
the
hcdc
community
at
committee.
I'm
sorry
as
that
committee
is
in
their
you
know,
charter.
If
you
will,
in
their
in
their
purpose,
they
are
set
up
specifically
to
deal
with
allocation
of
cdbg
funds,
and
so
just
like,
we
have
a
very
clear.
F
The
whole
point
of
the
referrals
process
was
to
create
a
clear,
transparent
process
for
city
actions,
and
the
city
council
is
responsible
for
authorizing
all
funds,
so
it
just
makes
sense
that
there
is
a
clear
legislative
process
and
we
the
way
we
pave
allies
through
through
the
current
transparent
process
with
the
board
of
local
improvements,
is
a
first
come
first
serve.
F
It's
really
no
difference
different
than
a
referral
other
than
the
folks
making
the
referral
essentially
are
residents,
and
so
who,
who
is
better
positioned
to
understand
which
alleys
are
more
problematic
in
their
ward
and
which
alley
should
be
prioritized.
If
you
know
any
unpaved
alley
is
in
a
pretty
similar
condition,
which
is
not
great
than
the
elected
representative
of
that
ward,
and
so
I
I
don't.
F
I
don't
think
that
working
through
a
referral
process,
and
maybe
even
tweaking
that
process
to
try
to
prioritize,
maybe
the
most
damaged
allies
is
is,
is
a
bad
idea.
But
I
still
think
that
going
through
a
clear,
transparent
process,
particularly
going
through
hcdc,
which
is
already
charged
with
cdbg
funds,
makes
sense.
E
So
I
just
got
off
the
phone
with
dave
stoneback
and
he
said
for
cdbg
areas,
the
city
rotates
between
the
wards
and
then
for
when
they
get
to
a
particular
ward.
They
call
the
council.
Member
of
that
word
and
say
this-
is
the
alley
we're
scheduled
to
repave?
Do
you
think
that's
the
la
that
has
the
most
need?
Yes
or
no,
and
they
kind
of
defer
to
the
council
member
based
on
the
complaints
the
council
member's
been
getting
from
the
area
award.
So
it's
a
rotation
system,
that's
in
place
already.
F
All
right,
I
understand
that
to
be
the
case
from
conversations
with
sarah
and
bobby
and
councilmember
burns
fifth
order,
so.
A
A
Guess
I
would
be
mo
if
we
want
to
act
on
this,
I
would
be
most
supportive
of
referring
to
the
hcdc.
I
did
it,
I
think
just
the
question
of
assessing
this
process
and
seeing
if
they
want
to
recommend
a
different
one.
A
I
my
instinct-
and
I
think
I
I
think,
council
members
making
a
pretty
good
point-
that
it's
not
obvious,
that
just
sort
of
a
rotation
on
a
behind-the-scenes
phone
call
is
the
fairest
and
most
transparent
way
to
handle
that,
and
so
I'm
really
hoping
they
do,
that
maybe
a
different
process
would
be
better.
My
instinct
is
that
the
referrals
committee
is
not
the
place
is
not
the
right
venue
for
that
process,
and
so
so,
rather
than
set
a
precedent
of
referring
this
one
out
and
the
next
time,
somebody
wants
an
alley.
A
Fame
they'll
come
to
the
referrals
committee
and
say
yeah,
but
you
were
for
devon's
alley.
I
would.
I
would
propose
that
we
refer
to
them,
request
that
they
evaluate
this
process
and
consider
whether
they
want
to
recommend
a
different
one.
A
C
Right
yeah,
I
mean
given
that
I'm
on
that
committee
and
I
had
no
idea
that
that
was
the
quote
process.
It
does
sound
like
the
committee
itself
should
at
least
be
more
aware
of
of
why
a
particular
ally
is
on
the
list
in
a
given
year.
So
I.
C
F
C
Well
so
so
I
know
daniel,
you
don't
want
this
to
get
become
a
to
have
all
this
alley.
Stuff
come
to
referrals,
but
how
about
making
forwarding
this
item
to
hcdc
just
to
add.
C
D
I
just
would
recommend
either
like
making
a
new
referral
or
making
a
very
clear
amendment
to
this
one,
just
so
that
it's.
A
All
right,
I
would
recommend
making
a
specific
motion
and
I've.
I've
already
got
a
sort
of
typed
I've
memorialized
it
in
the
way
that
I'm
going
to
type
up
the
let's
see
column
q
of
the
spreadsheet.
A
What
I've
said
is
housing
community
development
with
requested
they
discussed
the
process
used
for
this
category
decision
rather
than
analyze.
The
specific
request.
C
Okay,
I
so
move.
G
A
Right
so
council,
member
ravel
knows
that
this
be
referred
to
the
housing
and
community
development.
The
committee,
with
the
request
that
they
discuss
the
process
used
for
this
category
decision
rather
than
analyze
the
specific
request.
With
the
recommendation
that
occurred
in
the
third
quarter,
2022
councilmember,
suffered
in
seconds
there
are
discussions
seeing
none,
that's
member
suffrage,
all
right,
councilmember
rebel,
hi,
I
vote
I
and
with
three
that's
it.
A
I
can
call
it
a
three
you're
welcome
everybody,
three
voting
in
favor
and
then
voting
against
the
motion
passes
in
the
item
is
duly
referred.
A
This
brings
us
to
line
24,
which
is
about
prohibition
of
trucks
on
certain
streets
in
the
eighth
ward,
so
council
member,
what
was
it's
kind
of
like
at
a
high
level,
the
same
kind
of
category?
It
seems
like
a.
F
Yeah,
no,
no,
no,
this
one's
a
very
different
category,
because
this
actually
is
a
code
revision.
So
within
our
code
is
a
section
and
I
I
think
I
included
a
memo
for
this,
or
maybe
that
was
the
next
one.
Maybe
I
didn't,
but
within
our
code
no,
I
did
include
a
memo
for
this
one.
So.
F
There
are
there's
a
section
that
prohibits
trucks
on
certain
streets
and
there
are
certain
streets
in
evanston
that
already
have
trucks
prohibited,
and
I'm
just
looking
to
amend
that
ordinance
to
include
the
the
specified
streets
in
the
memo
in
the
eighth
ward,
and
so
you
and
literally
the
way
the
memo
is
written.
That's
exactly
how
the
code
is
drafted,
so
you
plug
that
language
directly
into
the
code.
A
F
Have
not
seen
that
it
seems
as
though
once
these
streets
are
prohibited.
It
would
take
another
amendment
to
the
code
to
to
change
that.
God.
C
There's
a
there
is
another
heavy
truck
issue
that
ampw
is
wrestling
with
that
whole
the
trucks
getting
to
evanston
lumber
on
custer.
F
C
So
I
don't
know
if
it
if
those
two
need
to
go
hand
in
hand
or
but.
A
C
A
So
councilmember
rebel
news
be
referred
to
the
administration's
work
committee,
with
the
recommendation
to
hear
it
during
the
third
quarter
of
2022
council
members
suffered
in
seconds
their
discussion,
seeing
them
constantly
separating
aye.
That's
memorable.
A
Three
voting
in
favor
and
none
voting
against
the
motion
carries,
and
the
item
is
referred,
and
this
brings
us
to
item
line
25,
which
is
the
issue
with
july
4th
parkway
regulations,
which
we
we
held
because-
and
this
may
have
been
a
consequence
of
a
game
of
telephone,
but
it
sounded
like
there
were
a
couple
options
that
had
been
discussed
in
conversation
between
councilmember
reed
and
allison.
A
That
focus
is
really
really
different
and
different
in
terms
of
how
controversial
or
difficult
they
would
be,
and
so
we
didn't
want
to
refer
it
until
we
had
more
clarity
about
what
what
direction
was
intended
here,
because
we
thought
we
could
do
a
better
job
of
recommending
a
sensible
time
frame.
If
we
had
some
some
understanding
and
as
I
recall
well
so.
A
Me
actually
turn
over
to
allison,
first
just
to
to
kind
of.
D
Yes,
so
the
ordinance
or
the
proposed
ordinance
in
the
referral
strikes
it
and
gets
rid
of
it
completely.
The
conversation
I
had
with
council
member
reed.
D
I
sort
of
understood
that
it
was
the
goal
was
to
sort
of
equalize
things
in
terms
of
any
other
parades
as
well,
and
so
I
thought
maybe,
if
we
sort
of
expanded
it
to
the
type
of
parade,
so
maybe,
instead
of
getting
rid
of
it,
it
was
like
it
applied
to
any
parade
that
you
know
had
a
license
through
the
city.
Those
are
two
very
different
things,
and
so
we
just
wanted
clarification
about
which
direction
council
member
reed
wanted
to
go.
A
A
Got
it
so
councilmember
reed?
Do
you
want
to
jump
in
and
say
more.
F
Yeah
yeah
my
my
concern
here,
one
I
want
to
clarify
to
the
committee
because,
looking
back
at
it,
it
could
be
my
email
response
to
the
last
email
could
be
seen
as
snippy.
But
when
I
said
respectfully,
I
quite
literally
meant
respectfully
to
be
clear.
It
wasn't
like
a
passive,
aggressive
respectfully,
but
anyhow.
F
My
my
thing
here
is
I'm.
My
only
goal
is
that
this
law,
as
written
on
the
books
is,
does
not
comport
with
the
constitution
and
would
be
found
on
at
facial
value
unconstitutional,
because
you
can't
it's
not
content
neutral.
You
can't
say
that
you
can
do
this
activity
for
the
fourth
of
july,
but
not
do
the
same
activity
for
the
juneteenth
parade
or
for
some
other
parade,
even
a
parade.
That
would
be
offensive
and
we
know
locally
that
even
offensive
parades
as
we've
seen
in
skokie
are
allowed
to
occur
here.
F
Our
last
meeting
and
so
yeah,
and
so
my
referral
is
to
I
just
because
I
took
the
time
to
actually
often
draft
the
ordinances
that
I'm
seeking
to
introduce.
F
I
just
struck
it
and
I'm
perfectly
happy
during
the
legislative
process,
for
someone
to
devise
some
other
scheme
that
can
address
all
grades,
that
just
wasn't
my
goal
and
just
as
we
saw
with
council
members
suffered
in
truck
referral,
you
know
we
just
let
the
legislative
process
the
referral
is
made
and
folks
can
amend
and
change
and
do
whatever
the
heck.
You
know
the
council
wants
to
do
with
it
before
it
either
passes
or
fails
and
so
yeah.
I
would
use
that
as
an
example.
G
C
F
F
F
Just
like
burning
a
flag
is
you
know,
you
can
burn
a
flag
in
a
and
that's
been
found.
A
F
Made
a
law
a
while
ago.
They
said
you
can't
burn
flags.
I
found
unconstitutional
because
it
was
not
a
content
neutral,
but
if
they
said
that
you
can't
burn
a
flag
in
public
or
you
can't
burn
anything
in
public
perfectly
fine.
But
when
you
specifically
say
you
can't
burn
a
flag
in
an
offensive
manner
that
makes
it
facially
unconstitutional
similar
here.
G
G
Okay,
but
yeah
I
mean,
what's
the
what's
the
time,
I
guess
I'm
sorry,
but
I
want
to
sorry,
mr,
like
what
I
understand
is
in
terms
of
the
ideal
legislative
process
would
be
bringing
a
finished
product
or
a
boat.
So
what?
What
is
the
timeline
in
terms
of
parades
that
are
known
to
be
upcoming
in
terms
of
figuring
out?
How
much
time
we
can
spend
on
the
front
end
to
make
sure
whatever
we
bring
to
council
is
as
close
to
a
completed
project
mean
the
product
is
possible.
I.
A
Annual
parade
tradition,
I
mean
look.
I
think
I
think
we
should
just
refer
this.
I
mean
I,
I
don't
think
this
is
the
appropriate
place
for
us
to
argue
about
the
legal
issue.
I
I
have
instincts
and
no
law
degree
and
I'll
keep
my
mouth
shut
for
that
reason,
but
I
think
we
should
refer
this
and
I
think
you
know
to
to
council
mercedes
point:
it's
not.
A
I
don't
think
there's
like
a
real
emergency
here,
because
you
know
there's
no
anticipated
parades
until
until
next
year,
but
you
know,
let's,
let's
refer
to
the
appropriate
place
and
let
them
talk
it
over
and
make
a
judgment,
and
you
know
they've
got
they've
got
time
to
do
it
right
and
ask
the
right
questions
and
get
input
from
the
law
department
and
anybody
else
needed
input
from.
A
You
know
he,
the
customer
reid,
requested
human
services.
That
seems
as
good
as
any
to
me.
I
mean
I
guess
it
would
have
to
be
human
services
or
apw.
I.
C
Don't
yeah?
Well,
let's
say
human
services
great
okay,
so
I
move
that
we
forward
this
item
to
human
services
and
ask
them
to
address
it
by
the
end
of
the
first
quarter
of
2023.
G
A
Council
member
revel
removes
inside
and
be
referred
to
the
human
services
committee,
with
the
request
that
it
be
heard
with
the
recommendations,
sorry
that
it
be
heard
before
the
end
of
the
first
quarter
of
2023
councilman
perception
in
seconds.
Is
there
any
discussion
seeing
don
councillor
suffering
aye,
councilmember
revell?
A
I
vote
I
and
with
free
voting
in
favor
and
none
voting
against.
This
item
also
passes
and
is
dually
referred.
F
Make
one
request
chair
and
then
I'll
drop
off
there.
There
are
a
number
of
items.
Referrals
of
mine
that
have
been
referred
to
finance
and
budget
and
finance
and
budget
appears
not
to
really
at
this
point,
be
focusing
on
any
actual
referrals
and
just
as
was
mentioned
earlier
with
council
member
kelly's
referral,
it
seems
that
you
know
a
number
of
those
referrals
that
I
made
that
have
budget
impacts,
and
I
made
these
last
year
last
summer.
A
Okay,
well
with
that,
thanks
everybody
for
their
time
and
attention,
and
thanks
councilmember
reed
for
being
here
to
help
us
understand
better
understand
these
these
items
and
so
see
nothing
further
to
come
before
us.
The
june
23rd
meeting
of
the
finance
and
budget
committee
stands
adjourned.
Okay,.