►
From YouTube: Referrals Committee Meeting 8-18-2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
I
mean
I
can
do
it
too.
Council
member
avail.
B
A
A
A
One
was
to
talk
with
council
member
burns
about
the
local
hiring
process,
referral
which
is
on
row
18
of
the
of
the
referral
tracker
spreadsheet,
and
he
confirmed
that
that
he
has
a
you
know.
I
would
say
significant
and
ambitious
policy
items
for
consideration
regarding
not
only
local
hiring
goals
and
and
mandates
for
contractors,
but
also
for
city
staff
and
with
different
ideas
for
different
departments.
And
so
he
did
request
that
that
that
that
item
be
referred
as
opposed
to
just
rolled
in
with
existing
conversation,.
A
It
is
broad,
but
it
does
seem
like
that
committee.
A
A
Seems
right
to
me
the
next
item
on
my
homework
list
was
row.
22
council
member
reads:
referral
regarding
water
shutoffs
and
my
assignment
was
to
offer
them
a
few
different
courses
of
action
and
he
said
he
wanted
some
time
to
think
about
it
and
has.
C
A
Gotten
back
to
me
so
I'll
keep
everyone
posted
when
I
hear
back
from
him
and
my
last
assignment
was
row
26,
which
is
council,
member
suffragen's
referral
regarding
sewer
repair
and
sidewalk
replacement,
and
he
was
in
fact
totally
comfortable
with
rolling
that
up
with
the
existing
discussion
that
had
been
ongoing
regarding
sidewalk
replacement,
and
so
I
think
we
should
go
ahead
and
and
refer
that
one
council.
Member
fleming,
I
know
you
had
a
couple
as
well.
D
D
So
I
told
him
that
they
were
already
talking
about
potential
expansion
of
the
garden,
so
that
will
go
to
parks
and
rec
at
their
next
meeting
and
then
we'll
just
kind
of
follow
along
to
make
sure
it
doesn't
get
stalled
there
because
he
does
have
an
outside
partner.
He's
already
been
talking
to
about
this.
I
believe
hwe
policy
was
also
one
that
I
spoke
to
him
about
all
of
those
things.
As
the
chair.
D
D
Only
so
no
staff
memo
with
the
decriminalization
of
drugs
and
I'm
councilmember
reid-
and
I
had
a
conversation
about
that
coming
in
october,
but
some
things
got
moved
around
us
so
september
makes
more
sense,
and
so
he
is
simply
going
to
talk
to
the
committee
about
that
to
see
if
there's
any
interest
on
moving
further
on
that
item,
so
there'll
be
no
staff
time
needed
for
that.
One.
A
Okay-
and
I
think
the
only
other
one
I
have
was
council
of
member
burns-
referral
on
the
bearing
of
the
comed
lines.
D
Yeah,
so
we
did
talk
about
that
one.
It
seemed
like
there
was
a
little
bit
of
conversation
about
that
going
into
potential
a
tift
also
that
that
had
been
kind
of,
I
guess
some
years
in
the
conversation
between
the
two
wards
and
so
that
one
we
talked
about
going
to
economic
development.
He
was
not
sure
if
that
was
the
right
place
or
if
apw
was
the
right
place,
and
so
we
kind
of
had
a
little
bit
of
a
standstill.
He
was
going
to
talk
to.
D
B
B
D
D
D
A
Great,
thank
you.
I
think
that
concludes
the
items
that
we
that
we
had
agreed
to
follow
with
our
colleagues
about
subsequent
the
meeting
two
weeks
ago.
Does
that
seem
right?
Okay,
it.
D
A
D
A
Great,
so
I
think
the
next
thing
we
ought
to
do
is
we
have
four
new
four
new
referrals
that
that.
A
About
that,
okay
yeah.
As
I
look
in
the
in
the
spreadsheet,
it
looks
like
there's
four
that
are
still
there
and
I
think
one
is
being
is
being
held
to
figure
out
the
right,
the
appropriate
course
of
action,
and
so
for
those
following
at
home.
Those
are
lines:
29,
30,
32
and
33
of
the
spreadsheet
and
the
first
and
they're
all
from
council
member
reed.
The
first
is
a
referral
to
increase
council
member
compensation
to
a
living
wage,
and
if
anyone
wants
to
jump
in
with
their
their
assessment
of
that.
D
Sure
I
can
start
so.
I
gave
that
one
an
overall
score
of
an
11.
for
time-sensitive.
I
gave
it
a
two.
I
want
to
elaborate
for
scope.
I
gave
it
a
one
because
it
would
be
my
assumption,
a
counselor
decision
for
existing
policy.
I
also
gave
it
a
two.
I
guess
we
could
relate
it
to
what
we
already
get
paid
as
a
policy
for
community
interest.
I
gave
it
a
three
and
for
those
in
priority
I
gave
it
a
three.
A
Yeah,
I
I
gave
it
relatively
similar
scores
the
one,
the
one
thing
actually
for
for
scope.
I
had
a
one
and
I
crossed
it
off
and
marked
the
two,
because
I
realized
you
know
we
have
a
compensation
committee.
We
have
a
process
already
in
place
in
the
code,
and
so
I
think
this
would
involve
repealing
that
process
and
or
at
least
at
least
superseding
that
process,
which
is
a
little
complicated.
A
Additionally,
you
know
I
was
sort
of
brought
up
to
believe
that
it
was
really
problematic
to
change
compensation
of
elected
official
in
the
middle
of
the
term.
Now,
of
course,
the
constitutional
problem
is
with
diminishment,
not
increase,
but
nonetheless
I
think
I
think
there's.
I
would
just
want
a
little
bit
of
research
to
be
done
about
that,
because
it's
pretty
it's
pretty
unusual
to
to.
A
It's
definitely
illegal
to
decrease
it.
It
may
well
be
legal
to
increase
it.
The
the
explicit
prohibitions
I
know
about
are
about
decreases,
but
because
it's
illegal
to
decrease,
it's
not
usually
talked
about,
because
it's
sort
of
you
don't
want
to
operate
as
a
ratchet
necessarily
right
anyway,
I'm
not
suggesting
it's
illegal,
I'm
just
suggesting
it's.
It's.
B
A
A
D
A
A
No
sorry,
three
for
time
sensitivity
the
two
for
scope,
a
one
for
connection
to
existing
policy,
a
three
for
community
interest
and
a
three
for
alignment
with
their
goals,
which
adds
up
to
a
12.
B
So
I
had
a
3
for
time,
sensitivity,
a
2,
4
scope
and
a
1
one
for
connection
to
existing
policy,
and
I
gave
it
a
one
for
community
interest,
but
maybe
there
will
be
a
lot
of
interest
and
then
a
two
for
goals
and
priorities.
So
I
gave
it
a
lower
number,
but
I'm
happy
to
go
with
your
higher
number.
There.
A
A
Yeah,
I
mean
I'll
just
say
from
experience
not
to
cast
dispersions
in
the
policy
goal,
but
as
a
as
a
matter
of
community
interest,
politicians
voting
to
increase
their
own
paid.
D
A
D
A
D
So
then
I
gave
it
three
for
time
sensitivity.
I
gave
it
a
three
for
scope,
two
for
policy
also
three
for
community
interest,
although
maybe
it
would
be
just
a
2
and
a
2
for
goals
and
priorities.
So
I
give
it
a
13.
B
I
gave
it
a
2
for
time
sensitivity
in
a
2,
4
scope.
I
mean
because
I
there
are,
you
know
some
cities
that
have
done
this
and
anyway,
a
three
for
existing
policy,
a
three
for
community
interest,
because
I
think
the
employers
will
likely
be
pretty
interested
in
this
and
a
one
for
goals
and
priorities
so
that
I
think
11.
A
Yeah,
so
that
was
very
similar,
we
were
all
very
similar.
It
was
a
two
for
time,
sensitivity
of
three
for
scope,
three
for
connection
to
existing
policy,
three
for
community
interest
and
two
for
alignment
with
our
goals,
and
I
put
a
little
frowny
face
next
to
it.
To
indicate
that
I
mean,
I
think
this
is
a.
This
is
a
really
interesting
example.
Frankly,
we
all
gave
this
a
high
number,
which
would
sort
of
put
it
at
the
back
of
the
line.
A
And
to
me
that
does
to
me
the
issue
here
is
just
this
is
a
hard
project.
It's
not
it's
a
bad
project.
It's
not
that
it's
an
appropriate
project
at
all.
I
think
it's
a
I
mean
my
own
policy.
I
think
it's
a
great
project
and
I
think
it's
a
super
appropriate
project.
It's
just
a
really
really
hard
project,
and
so
I
I
don't.
I
just
left
sort
of.
I
wound
up
giving
it
a
13
which
councilmember
fleming
did
also,
and
I
you
know
we
could
just
sort
of.
A
I
think
I
think
when
we
give
something
like
this,
a
number
like
that
it
really
it
presents
really
the
council
member
in
question
with
a
with
a
fork
in
the
road
right
which
is
the
message
from
us
is
hey.
If
you
want
to
do
this,
it's
going
to
take
a
bunch
of
time
it's
going
to
have
to
be
kind
of
a
main
focus
and
then-
and
then
I
think
you
know
I
don't
know.
A
B
So
is
there
an
alternative
approach
which
would
rather
than
referring
it?
Well,
maybe
it
would
go
to
a
committee,
but
then
the
committee
would
say:
let's
have
a
subcommittee
that
works
on
this
for
a
while
before
it
comes
to
the
full
committee
or
just
some
other
some
way
to
continue
or
to
begin
the
conversation
but
sort
of
along
the
side.
Somehow
I
don't.
A
Well,
I
think
whatever
we
whatever
it
is.
If,
if
this
is
done
seriously,
it
will
take
a
lot
of
somebody's
time
right.
So
if
it's
a
subcommittee,
it'll
take
a
part,
you
know
a
subset
of
the
committee's
time
and
a
lot
of
some
staff
time,
and
that
doesn't
mean
that
it's
a
bad
thing.
I
think
it
just
means
it's
a
high-stakes
decision
right.
A
D
Well,
one
thing
we
could
think
about
is
before
we
do
right,
because
13
means
you
know
you're
just
out
there
in
the
ethernet
somewhere
we
could
ask
councilmember
reese
that
he
did
provide
the
link
for
chicago
and
I
didn't
look
to
see.
I
may
look
at
it,
but
I
don't
know
how
far
they
are
on
it.
Maybe
did
they.
Okay,
I'd
looked
at
it
to
see
what
it
was.
D
So
maybe
he
could
bring.
I
mean
I'm
thinking
of
economic
development,
that's
being
a
good
starting
point,
but
maybe
he
could
bring.
I
asked
someone
from
the
state
of
chicago
to
come
to
techno
development
just
to
talk
about
it,
so
that
provides
some
of
the
context
that
then
our
staff
don't
have
to
do
in
terms
of
a
whole
long
presentation.
D
D
That
seems
like
an
instant
place
to
go
for
us
to
at
least
hear
from
them
how
they
did
it,
how
it
went,
how
they
implemented
it,
how
it's
going
and
then
the
commission
economic
development,
wherever
we
send
it,
could
have
something
to
chew
on
before.
We
then
have
our
staff
go
into
like
a
long
memo
about
what
their
thoughts
are
on
it
here.
D
Yeah
I
mean
that
would
just
be
my
suggestion,
because
he,
he
probably
you
know,
given
the
breadth
of
the
work
that
we
have
to
do
and
the
you
know
lack
of
staff
we
have.
I
don't
want
to
put
it
on
him
to
do
a
whole
research
project,
nor
for
our
staff
to
start
that,
if
we
can
kind
of
look
at
a
local
expert,
but
I
would
be
hesitant
to
start
another
subcommittee,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
those
already
as
well
right.
A
Okay,
are
you
comfortable
with
that
course
of
action,
and
I
guess
we
probably
ought
to
write
a
number
irrespective
and
again
we're
pretty
close,
so
just
sort
of
averaging.
It
looks
like
two
for
time
sensitivity
through
three
for
scope,
though
you've
all
convinced
me
that
it
should
be
a
two,
because
there
is
a
off-the-shelf
ordinance
just
across
howard
street
three
for
connection
to
our
existing
policy.
Oops.
Sorry,
that's
not
good
three
for
community
interest
and
two
for
alignment
with
our
goals,
which
adds
up
to
11..
A
All
right,
let's,
let's
move
on
now
to
row
32,
which
is
another
another
referral
from
councilmember
reed.
This
is
to
appoint,
to
have
the
corporation
council
appointed
by
the
city
council.
D
Sorry
I
gave
that
a
2
for
time
sensitivity
just
because
it
has
to
do
with
the
referendum
three
for
scope,
I'm
one
for
existing
policy,
three
for
community
interest,
and
I
wasn't
really
sure
what
to
fall
on
the
goals.
I
gave
it
a
one,
but
I
continue
to
struggle
with
this
because
we
haven't
really
set
our
own
goals.
B
A
Three
for
community
engagement,
which
I
I
do
think
this
would.
B
A
D
A
Yeah,
but
I
guess-
and
I
you
know
councilmember
fleming-
you
make
a
very
fair
point-
that
we
haven't
really
articulated
goals,
but
you
know
when
we
think
about
what
they
would
be.
You
know
things
about:
racial
equity
and
housing,
affordability
and
climate
and
sustainability,
and
you
know
I'm
hard-pressed
to
see
the
direct
connection.
Obviously.
D
D
B
A
I
think
that's
the
I
if
folks
are
comfortable,
I
like
that
compromise
so
to
make
to
have
it,
be
a
one
for
connection
to
existing
policy
and
retain
the
three
for
for
for
alignment
with
city
goals,
which
would
turn
into
a
two-for-time
sensitivity
a
two
for
scope,
a
one
for
connection
to
existing
policy,
three
for
level
of
community
interest
and
three
for
alignment
with
existing
goals,
which
adds
up
to
11..
A
D
So
this
one,
I
gave
a
two
for
time,
sensitivity
again
thinking
through
a
referendum
and
when
we
have
elections
for
scope,
I
was
a
little
bit
torn
since
we
already.
You
know
this
has
already
kind
of
been
out
in
the
public
if
we
use
that,
if
this
is
what
he's
talking
about,
you
know
there's
not
much
for
the
staff
to
do,
but
I
I
wasn't
quite
comfortable
with
that
either
because
I
haven't
read
that
document
in
a
very
long
time,
and
so
in
order
to
put
things
on
the
referendum.
D
D
I
would
say
three
because
we
don't
have
an
existing
policy
about
residents
doing
such
for
community
interest.
I
had
three
and
four
goals
and
priorities.
I
also
had
a
three,
and
so
that
puts
my
ad
13.
right.
B
So
I
vacillated
between
a
one
or
a
two
for
time,
sensitivity
a
three
for
scope,
because
I
I
thought
you
know
we
had
a
whole
legal
discussion
about
whether
it
was
even
something
that
could
be
on
the
ballot
or
me
I
I
got
it
seemed
to
me.
I
had
a
lot
of
questions
about
about
whether
it
was
possible.
It's.
A
A
great
point,
but
I'll
say
my
recollection
as
a
guy
who
was
just
a
resident
at
the
time,
was
that
the
dispute
there
was
about
whether
it
could
be
initiated
by
referendum
itself,
not
whether
it
was
a
legal
thing
at
all.
So
my
understanding
at
the
time
was
the
view
of
those
who
got
it
knocked
off.
The
ballot
was
hey.
If
the
council
wants
to
do
this,
they
can,
but
the
residents
don't
yet
have
the
power
to
do
stuff
like
that
by
referendum.
Okay,.
B
A
Suddenly
my
11
looks
generous.
I
gave
it
also
like
everybody
else,
a
two
for
time
sensitivity.
I
went
the
sort
of
a
council
member
fleming
route.
I
gave
it
a
one
for
scope
just
because
I
felt
like
there
was
this
off
the
shelf
document
like
it
or
not.
At
least
it's
a
starting
point.
That's
already
written
out
in
detail,
though
you
raise
an
important
point
that
there
are.
There
are
questions
to
be
asked
about
that.
A
I
also
gave
it
a
three
for
connection
to
existing
policy,
three
for
community
interest
and
two
for
alignment
with
our
goals.
A
So
I
think
the
the
sort
of
average
averaging
it
out
actually
would
be
exactly
what
council
member
fleming
gave
it,
which
is
which
is
very
close
to
a
council
member
ravel
gave
it,
which
is
a
twofer
time,
sensitivity
two
for
scope,
three
for
connection
to
existing
policy,
three
for
community
interest
and
three
for
alignment
with
our
goals
for
a
total
of
thirteen.
D
So
I
know
we
talked
about
this
before,
but
didn't
really
land
on
a
decision.
This
seems
to
me
because
it
was
something
that
people
in
the
community
did
want
before
you
know,
by
giving
the
13
it's
a
according
to
our
rules
or
our
kind
of
process.
It
would
not
be
something
that's
a
priority,
but
maybe
this
is
something
where
we
think
about
using,
like
a
council
member,
where
you
can
find
three
more
people
on
council
or
whatever
it
is.
D
Some
more
support
on
council
to,
I
don't
know,
make
a
subcommittee
or
kind
of
work
through
through
this.
So
it's
when
it
does
come
to
us
it's
some
of
those
bigger
questions
are
hashed
out
my
you
know
just
as
an
idea
so
that
it's
not
kind
of
just
stuck
down
here
with
us,
but
it
also
isn't
straight
ahead
to
a
committee,
and
we
just
make
sure
that
the
council
has
an
appetite
for.
A
That
the
under
okay-
I
think
that's
that
seems
very
sensible
and
I'm
I'm
happy
to
add
that
to
my
list
when
I
talked
to
councilmember
reed
so
excellent,
so
we
have
15
minutes
left
my
computer's
frozen.
We,
so
we
have
a
few
things
that
we
want
to
do.
One
is
we
need
to
figure
out
if
other
things
should
be
assigned
right
now
one
is
council.
A
One
thing
that
I
think
we
clearly
want
to
do
is
pardon
me
as
a
follow-up.
From
from
the
conversation
I
had
with
council
member
sufferden
is
the
sewer,
repair
and
sidewalk
replacement
item.
I
think,
should
go
back
to
apw,
essentially
as
soon
as
possible.
Is
everyone
comfortable
with
that.
D
A
There
anything
else
on
this
list
I
mean
so
that
that
we
retain
the
status
that
we
left
two
weeks
ago
with
where
everything
with
the
number,
eight
or
less
has
been
dealt
with.
That
I
mean,
there's
still,
you
know
nines
that
were
referred
in
in
june
and
perhaps
even
may
so,
there's
still
things
to
get
to,
but
is
there
anything
that
folks
feel
we
ought
to
address
before
the
end
of
this
meeting?
Can.
C
I
just
jump
in
so
it
looks
like
erica
had
listed
the
comed
power
lines
as
going
to
economic
development
on
september
22nd.
Oh
great.
D
I
think
it
would
be
good
if
we
can
start
assigning
the
higher
number
items
so
that
they're-
not
just
lingering
here
and
I'm
happy
to
have
the
conversation
about
staff
referrals.
You
know
at
our
next
meeting
or
but
you
know,
I
think,
if
we
can
get
some
things
off
of
this
list
and
assign
we
can
let
our
peers
know
that
they
are
assigned.
A
So
do
folks
want
to
just
look
at
the
nines,
for
instance.
Does
that
seem.
D
A
Yeah
I
mean,
I
feel
very,
I
feel
like
I'm
in
the
hot
seat
now.
D
So
I
would
think
that
that
would
go
to
p
and
d,
but
you
have
we
have
economic
development
either
makes
sense?
I
suppose.
B
A
A
And
do
we
wanna,
I
mean
I
don't
see
a
lot
that
we're
sending
to
economic
development.
I
mean
I'm
comfortable
coloring
that
yellow,
if
we
think
it
we
should
wait
or
we
can
do
it.
Green.
D
D
Yeah
and
somewhere
to
you,
I
mean
I
had
already
spoken
before.
We
started
this
process
to
council
member
wen,
who
was
the
chair
of
planet
and
development
about
this,
so
I'm
happy
for
it
to
be
yellow
assuming
we
can
get
it
on.
D
You
know,
maybe
november
the
condo
conversion
that
was
in
my
award,
that
was
up
for
the
condo,
was
up
the
conversion
and
my
work
failed
to
vote
by
the
board,
but
they
definitely
are
still
interested
in
making
sure
they're
they're
not
in
that
place
again,
and
there
is
another
condo
building
where
there's
a
developer,
looking
to
buy,
to
make
it
to
apartments
again
in
the
war.
D
So
it's
time
sensitive,
at
least
for
those
few
people,
but
anyway,
so
I
would
say,
yellow
fingers
crossed
for
october
november.
A
All
right
so
I'll
communicate
that
and
we'll
keep
monitoring
it
in
case
there's.
You
know
if
it's
not
moving
fast
enough,
we'll
have
to
nudge.
A
B
A
A
D
A
A
D
D
D
D
As
well
as
city
services
for
re-entering
community
members,
which
is
just
a
discussion
item
and
the
hsc
policy
is
also
slated
for
september.
For.
D
A
D
A
Yeah
but
again
it's
the
only
thing
that
we'd
be
sending
to
mwb
now
or
even
in
the
foreseeable
future,
so
I'm
comfortable
coloring
it
green,
I
think
getting
the
one
item
is,
is
totally
responsible.
Okay,.
A
Yeah,
that
was
a
sign
actually
that
was
assigned
a
month
ago.
So
that's
a
good
one
to
check
in
about,
but
that's
that's
on
my
list.
A
A
D
A
D
A
A
C
C
A
A
So
so
I
just
wanted
to
add
one
more
thing
which
I
should
have
made
this
introduction
in
the
beginning,
but
I
think
many
of
you
have
gotten
a
chance
to
meet
alison
leipziger
who's,
the
city's
brand
new
policy
coordinator,
who
you
know
whose
job
is
really
to
help
with
stuff
like
this,
and
so
I
mean
that
thought
came
to
me,
especially
when
I
was
talking
about
the
fair
work
week,
but
also
perhaps
for
the
voter
initiative
or
other
of
these
more
complex
items.
A
You
know
we.
We
now
have
someone
on
board
who's
literally
here
to
help
us
with
this
stuff,
and
so
I
think,
that's
just
kind
of
useful
for
all
of
us
to
bear
in
mind
as
we're
as
we're
encountering
items
on
these
lists.
That
are,
you
know,
interesting
and
aligned
with
what
the
city
wants
to
accomplish,
but
just
a
little
much
we
don't
have
enough
bandwidth
like
we
just
somebody
just
came
on
board
to
help
us
with
that
very
problem.
So
I
think
that'll
be
really
really
helpful,
so
welcome
aboard
so.
D
D
Oh,
I
do
have
one
question
so
since
you're
here
in
lieu
of
the
city
manager,
can
you
at
before
our
next
meeting
provide
us
with?
I
guess
it
comes
in
the
city
manager's
report,
for
like
an
update
of
the
things
to
come.
D
It's
in
the
city,
manager's
report
right
usually
on
fridays,
there's
some
kind
of
spreadsheet
that
has
like
an
update
of
things
to
come.
Update
of
agenda
items,
we're
still
struggling
a
little
bit
with
knowing
what
the
city
manager
is
trying
to
put
on
the
agenda.
Okay,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
council
members
have
fair
access
to
the
agenda
items.
Are
you.
D
I
guess
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
sauna-
or
it
just
looks
like
a
spreadsheet
to
me,
but
it
comes
out
in
the
city
manager's
report
on
fridays
yep.
So
if
we
can
get
that,
I
mean.
Obviously
we
get
it
on
friday,
but
I
think,
as
a
committee,
if
we
can
make
sure
we
get
it.
C
D
Our
meetings
that
would
be
helpful
and
then,
if
you
can
relate
to
erica
that
we
would
like-
or
at
least
speak
for
myself,
would
like
to
have
a
better
follow-up
information
coming
from
the
city
manager's
office
with
upcoming
agenda
items.
Sure.
So,
when
we're
referring
things
over
the
ordinance,
I
think
was
said
that
we're
supposed
to,
as
a
committee,
be
the
ones
who
put
everything
on
the
agenda,
but
we
have
not
gotten
there
yet.
A
Thank
you,
and
actually
one
more
thing
emma.
If
you
don't
mind,
we
talked
to
the
last
meeting
about
having
just
it
doesn't
need
to
be
complicated
at
all,
but
just
a
quick
explanation
of
what
the
scoring
system
is
that
can
be
put
on
the
website,
because,
right
now
the
the
tracker
is
public,
but
those
numbers
are
just
completely
meaningless
to
anybody
who
doesn't
also
watch
the
meetings.
I.