►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
D
You
can
measure
the
the
season
by
how
dark
my
room
is
during
these
meetings.
E
A
D
F
Hey
this
is
andy
papa
christos,
I'm
gonna
be
in
the
car
for
the
next
15
or
20
minutes,
but
I'm
I'm
here.
D
F
D
On
it,
I
apologize
well.
F
D
I
appreciate
the
clarification
okay
well
so
now
I've
got
conflicting
imperatives.
On
the
one
hand,
I'm
supposed
to
stall.
F
B
D
D
Yeah
something
like
that:
okay!
Well,
we
do
really
have
like
a
really
fabulous
forum
and
a
good
attendance
and
so
out
of
respect
for
folks
times
time
I
will
get
started
and
we'll
just
we'll
make
sure
to
get
evangeline
the
right
length
as
we
work
through
the
procedural
items
at
the
top
of
our
agenda.
D
H
Okay,
I
read
and
was
delighted
to
see
how
much
progress
you
made
on
this
ticket
to
enumerate
where
the
the.
What
do
you
call
what
the
bottlenecks
can
be,
and
I
sort
of
took
that
as
part
of
what
I
was
reading
or
how
I
was
reading
it
and
one
thing
that
can
be
a
bottleneck
besides
politics
which
you
all
hope
goes
away
sometimes,
even
though
I
know
mayor
bis
knows
how
to
explore
that
really
really.
H
Well,
I'm
not
one
of
those
the
reimagining,
the
police
has
to
do
with
exercise
of
police
powers,
whether
it
be
the
police
or
city
inspectors.
So
when
you
talk
about
ticketing,
it
reminded
me
so
much
of
the
inspectors
and
some
of
the
issues
that
have
been
brought
up
recently.
That
has
been
mentioned
at
city
council
about
inspectors
and
their
relationship
with
residents
and
stuff,
not
just
inspectors,
but
the
city
staff
interactions
with
with
residents.
H
So
it
would
be
a
positive
thing
and
not
a
bottleneck,
because
it
would
definitely
counteract
whatever
good
you're
trying
to
achieve,
or
if
you
want
to
bring
attention
to
a
cause.
You
let
the
city
operate
in
a
way.
That's
caused
problems
and
if
it
could
be
avoided
by
the
approach,
you
take
that's
another
approach
as
well.
H
So
it's
not
my
decision
in
terms
of
strategy,
but
it
occurred
to
me
that
it's
very
tightly
woven
together
as
to
do
you
do
one
first
or
you
do
both
so
anyway,
you
talk
about
develop
a
model
for
division
or
unit
that
overseas
and
coordinates
trauma-informed
violence
prevention.
Yes,
yes,
yes,
a
million
times,
yes
determine
how
it
best
fits
within
the
existing
everson
infrastructure,
talk
structure,
that's
the
non-police
part
and
if
it
means
what
I
just
discussed,
that's
great.
In
more
words,
of
course,
victim
services
begin
with
complete
needs
assessment.
H
I
agree
a
thousand
percent
and
we
think
this
can
be
done
with
staff.
I
disagree
with
that
in
terms
of
what
I've
seen
and
what
I've
experienced.
H
I
think
we
need
to
go
and
you've
heard
this
at
council
to
have
an
outside
group,
and
I
think
council
member
reed
brought
up
the
need
to
have
outside,
in
this
case,
similar
similar
minds,
as
I
suppose,
where
actually
they
live
and
they
live
in
california
and
they
have
this
approach.
That
is,
is
a
little
bit
beyond
the
middle,
but
something
that's
doable,
then
that's
good
for
us.
H
Yes,
yes,
yes,
but
beyond
that
those
services
to
imagine
if
we
had
our
own
public
health
service
and
could
have
local
people
working
to
help
residents
and
in
a
continuous
fashion,
which
you
know
for
trauma,
is
so
super
important
to
have
continuity,
whether
it's
drugs
or
trauma
or
like
ptsd,
further
develop
scaffolding.
This
is
cool,
including
a
process
evaluation
that
provides
insights
and
opportunities
for
program
improvements.
Yes,
a
thousand
times
understand
priorities
and
coordination
of
services
across
existing
and
development
efforts
and
programs.
H
Yes,
but
the
caveat
there
is
with
a
new
vision
and
a
new
view
which
your
group
is
starting,
so
reimagine
them
too,
then
last
is
the
outreach
services
which
I
I
can't
ex
emphasize
enough
and
that
one
has
to
be
be
done
differently
in
your
group
has
tried
with
regard
to
outreach,
and
the
number
of
commentators
right
now
are
really
kind
of
on
the
low
side,
and
so
it'd
be
nice
to
increase
that
somehow
and
to
do
that,
maybe
to
get
some
input
from
grassroots
there's
grassroots
organizations
that
have
yet
to
be
tapped
or
have
tried
to
work
into
larger
groups.
H
I
know
the
cash
group
that
I'm
affiliated
with
has
failed
to
integrate
and-
and
I
wanted
to
you
know-
have
integration
in
something
like,
oh
god
joining
forces,
so
it's
still
a
vision,
but
it's
not
happening,
and
so
people
want
to
do
it,
but
it's
something
that
needs
to
be
done
by
people
who
are
committed
to
it.
H
This
group
seems
very
committed
to
it,
so
I
suggest
this
group
can
lead
the
way,
so
I
develop
an
existing
specific
street
neighborhood
outreach,
a
service
program
based
on
existing
models,
and
I
think
it
should
include
both
the
police
sector
and
the
enforcement,
which
should
be
amenable
both
of
them
amenable
to
having
social
services
oriented
kinds
of
things
so
so
for
inspections
as
a
council.
H
Member
reed
knows
that
with
regard
to
inspections
and
and
things
in
the
fifth
ward
or
wherever
they're
gone,
that
they
can
be
done
in
a
way,
that's
fair
and
equitable,
and
not
in
terms
of
hit
or
miss
based
on
a
neighbor
who
doesn't
like
you
for
reasons
that
may
not
be
actually
it's
never
valid,
but
at
least
reasons
they
think
are
valid.
What
can
we
do
next
quarter
continue
fact:
funding
conversations
with
leaders,
models
in
the
space
plus
the
residents
emphasis
on
that.
What
is
an
intermediate
step?
H
That
is
a
huge
question.
I've
spoken
long
enough,
so
I'll
talk
later,
if
you
need
further
develop
scaffolding,
including
a
process
evaluation
that
provides
intuitive
opportunities
for
programming
improvements
again
track
tack
that
into
if
it's
an
online
system
to
resident
input
and
the
more
resident
input
you
get,
and
people
will
pair
up
with
meetings.
That
would
be
one
way
to
attack
them,
bring
them
in.
What
does
this
look
like
in
three
years,
develop
with
the
metrics
and
process
evaluation?
H
I
would
say
we
see
a
change
of
positive
change
in
culture
and
that
people
start
working
together
in
the
way
that
this
group
is
working
together,
because
everybody
has
different
points
of
view,
but
you
know
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish.
If
we
don't
agree
that
we
want
to
help
people
who
are
vulnerable,
it's
not
going
to
happen
and
we've
seen
some
resistance
from
the
city
and
just
to
be
completely
open.
I
don't
know
where
it's
coming
from,
but
this
could
be
one
of
them
and
that's
it.
So.
Thank
you.
D
D
All
right
scene,
none,
let's
move
forward.
We
need
to
address
the
minutes
of
the
previous
two
meetings
september,
28th
and
october
26th.
Would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
those
minutes.
D
Council,
member
reid,
moves
approval
of
the
minutes
both
from
september
28th
and
october
26th.
Sarah
bogan
seconds
on
favor,
say
aye.
A
D
Was
there
an
a
okay
for
a
second,
I
thought
it
would
be
one
to
zero,
just
patrick,
but
then
everyone
joined
in
so
the
motion
carries
and
the
minutes
are
adopted.
This
brings
us
to
item
four.
The
report
outs
from
the
two
groups
that
are
on
item
five
of
the
agenda.
I'll
start,
the
breaking
down
data
working
group,
doesn't
have
much
to
add,
given
how
much
our
work
was.
D
The
focus
of
the
last
meeting,
but
we
did,
we
did
meet
in
the
intervening
time
and
and
committed
to
to
continue
working
on
the
other
items
that
we
hadn't
yet
kind
of
reached.
Resolution
on
and
we'll
definitely
be
back
to
you
with
thoughts
about
our
progress
over
there
for
the
rethinking
the
organizational
structure
working
group,
I'm
told
that
council
member
reed
will
be
presenting
in
lieu
of
council
member
burns.
G
G
I'm
sorry
tease
what
we
learned
from
our
conversations
with
the
moran
center
evanston,
fight
for
blacks,
fight
for
black
lives,
peer
services
and
so
forth,
and
so
on
to
begin
actually
modeling
out
a
new
organizational
structure
for
the
department.
So
that's
that's
the
update
from
the
reorganizing
organizational
structure
committee.
D
Thank
you:
does
anyone
have
any
additions
or
questions,
and
obviously
you
know
sarah
was
sort
of
referenced
there
without
speaking.
So,
if
you
want
to
add
anything,
sarah
jump
in
as
well.
E
That
pretty
much
covers
it.
I
think
one
main
point
was
that
there's
a
lot
of
overlap
among
the
various
subcommittees
and
committees
outside
of
this
committee.
When
it
comes
to
these
conversations,
so
I
think
what
we're
really
trying
to
do
is
stay
focused
on
looking
at
each
position
and
coming
with
a
plan
that
could
maybe
web
in
the
other
initiatives
happening.
D
C
I
have
one
hi,
sarah
and
I've
been
going
over
the
plan
and
stuff.
It's
really
insightful
one
of
the
things
I
did
have
a
question
about,
and
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
go
back
and
find
the
union
contract.
C
Oh
excuse
me:
the
union
gotta
get
some
water.
C
The
union
contract
and
in
the
paragraph
on
the
bottom
of
page
17,
and
where
you
reference
that
with
people,
policemen
that
are
hired
and
how
things
would
be
structuring
everything-
and
you
mentioned
the
managed
management
right
clause-
that's
in
the
union
contract.
I
know
this
is
lazy,
and
I
should
do
this.
C
But
exactly
what
page
and
section
of
the
contract
was
that
that
could
help
me
and
if
you
had
it
somewhere
that
you
could
show
that
as
an
attachment
to
this
document
to
read,
because
what
we
was
doing
here
at
cnp
is
to
look
at
your
document
and
see
how
they
correlate
with
our
with
a
cnp
proposal
and
everything
and
how
it
meshes
in
together
and
how
it
would
be
working
in
the
the
two
groups
proposal
working
in
the
community.
E
I
don't
know
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
I
will
work
with
we
made
this
over
a
year
ago,
but
I'll
talk
to
the
group
and
when
I
find
it,
I
can
just
update
the
packet
and
add
it
in
as
well
as
email
that
to
you
or.
D
Perfect.
Thank
you
so
much
esther
any
other
questions
for
for
this
working
group.
D
Okay,
then
let
us
move
forward.
I
don't
know
the
status
of
andy's
road
trip.
F
I'm
about
I'm
about
three
blocks
from
home,
but
we
could
start.
I
just
don't,
have
the
document
open.
Obviously
so
I
can.
I
can
walk
through
the
three
main
points
and
and
we
could
we
could
start
digging
in.
D
Great
and
also
obviously
I
don't
know
whether
you
and
evangeline
had
a
particular,
you
know
you.
I
will.
D
It
over
to
your
working
group
to
move
forward
as
you
as
you
see,
fit
and
looking
forward
to
the
discussion.
F
Great,
so
I
know
evangeline's
here
I
don't
know
who
else
from
the
committee
is
here,
but
let
me
just
start
by
thanking
everybody
allison
as
well,
who
helped
us
kind
of
pull
everything
together.
You
know,
as
you've
heard
us
report
back
before.
Really
our
focus
has
been
on
thinking
through
on
the
ground,
violence
prevention
efforts
continuing
to
acknowledge
that
these
need
to
be
done
in
conjunction
with
more
transformative
sorts
of
approaches
to
violence,
prevention
and
the
the
proposal.
I
think
that
you
have
in
front
of
you
focuses
on
three
key
elements.
F
There
are
plenty
of
other
things
to
do.
There's
plenty
of
other
work
to
done
to
to
be
done,
but
we
looked
at
these
three
things
as
really
crucial.
Next
steps
in
evanston's,
you
know
objective
to
reimagine
public
safety
and
how
we
can
deal
with
violence
and
victimization.
So
broadly,
the
three
recommendations,
then
perhaps
what
I
can
do
is
just
state
what
they
are
at
a
large
scale,
and
then
we
can
kind
of
go
in
each
of
the
order.
F
The
importance
of
this
from
our
perspective
was
having
trained
staff
and
for
us
in
particular
as
being
trained
in
violence
prevention
efforts,
not
just
service
provision
more
broadly,
but
having
experience
including
lived
experience
that
deals
with
issues
of
violence
prevention
and,
as
we've
mentioned
in
previous
meetings,
these
sorts
of
units
and
offices
and
departments
there's
a
lot
of
work
being
done
across
the
country
and
helping
establish
these
things.
So
we
believe
that's
important
for
coordinating.
F
I
think
even
one
comment
that
came
up
in
public
remarks.
You
know
coordinating
these
efforts
across
the
city,
including
the
private
and
sort
of
non-profit
sectors.
F
So
that's
one
recommendation
recommendation
two
which
evangeline
will
speak
to
and
has
been
leading
up,
was
really
considering
and
looking
at
what
does
a
holistic
and
victim-centered
approach
to
victim
services
and
victim
response
look
like
in
evanston
and
how
do
we
coordinate
what
the
city
is
doing
with
the
county
and
state,
but
also
really
making
sure
that
those
services
again
are
staffed
and
coordinated
with
professionals
that
are
are
specifically
familiar
with
trauma
informed
care
again
going
back
to
one
of
the
presentations
at
our
first
meeting?
F
That's
item
two
and
then
item
three,
which
I
think
we've
currently
listed
as
street
or
or
neighborhood
outreach
looking
at
reaching
folks
who
are
currently
in
harm's
way
or
engaged
in
activity
that
could
potentially
lead
to
violence
where
they
are
and
developing
a
holistic,
trauma-informed
victim-centered
approach
with
programming,
potentially
jobs,
all
sort
of
linked
up
and
again
here
and
I'm
happy,
I'm
sure
we'll
get
into
these
details.
There
are
lots
of
models
being
developed
nationally
that
are
looking
at
best
practices
and
what
this
would
entail.
F
So
those
are
the
three
again
high
level
recommendations,
developing
an
office
of
violence,
prevention
or
unit
department.
This
sort
of
a
victim
centers
victim
services
and
a
neighborhood
outreach
sort
of
effort,
so
I'm
pulling
into
my
home,
I
will
be
in
front
of
a
computer
in
two
and
a
half
minutes,
but
those
are
the
three
sorts
of
areas
that
I
think
we
want
to
open
for
discussion
in
our
proposal.
D
F
Well,
I
defer
to
the
I
defer
to
the
committee.
I
mean
I
think
you
know
the
most
of
our
recommendations.
Wouldn't
that
document
the
core
ones,
I'm
happy
to
expand
on
any
of
those
things
evangeline
if
nathan
is
here.
Cecilia
was
also
involved
in
this
conversation,
so
I
think
we
can
go
into
any
of
the
specific
areas
I
would
recommend
we
take
it.
Sort
of
you
know
the
department
victim
services
outreach
kind
of
in
some
order,
rather
than
jump
around,
but
I
think
we
can
go
into
specifics
any
way
we
might
like.
I
I'm
prepared
to
provide
a
little
more
detail,
or
you
know,
maybe
take
a
pulse
and
see
where
people
are
thinking
right
now
before
we
do.
That
nathan
is
also
on
the
call
andy.
J
D
Perfect,
so
let's
do
that
so,
let's
just
open
it
up
either
for
reactions
or
questions
and
we'll
we'll
try
to
structure
this
so
that
there's
we
leave
time
for
the
group
to
give
kind
of
more
in-depth
detail.
D
Look
at
that
kristen.
K
Oh,
yes,
sorry
every
I
every
time
I
forget
how
to
raise
my
hand,
let
me
lower
my
hand,
I
think
it's
exciting,
you
know
being
part
of
an
organization
that
does
a
particular
aspect
of
violence
prevention
work.
We
are
certainly
on
board
and
see
the
necessity
and
the
value
to
the
community.
K
I
think
that
to
me
what
stands
out
is
the
opportunity
to
think
more
deeply
as
a
community
about
violence
prevention
and
what
we
mean
by
that
there
are
different
spheres
of
violent
kind
of
different
types
of
violence,
and
so
I
know
we've
been
part
of
an
effort
in
chicago
with
the
police
department
and
street
outreach
organizations
to
bring
the
lens
of
sexual
assault
and
domestic
violence
prevention
to
those
spaces.
K
So,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
interesting
conversation
to
explore
there
around
kind
of
the
parameters
of
what
we
define
and
the
type
of
violence
that
we
seek
to
prevent
because
they're
just
really
different
strategies,
depending
on
where
you
choose
to
focus.
F
Yeah,
so
the
one
thing
I
would
add
to
that
other
than
yes
is
even
in
that
space
and-
and
I
I
believe,
the
rest
of
the
committee
also
as
we
talked
about
this,
making
sure
that
the
people
that
are
dealing
with
that
are
trained
in
that
right.
I
think
you
highlighted
some
of
the
tensions
that
outreach
in
chicago
and
others
experienced
during
the
pandemic.
F
You
know
having
to
do
that
which
would
require
you
know
having
specific
sets
of
folks
and
specific
sectors.
So
I
think
what
you
said
aligns
and
with
what
our
our
committee
was
thinking.
D
Thank
you
other
comments,
reactions
or
or
questions.
C
Yes,
not
a
question
kind
of
a
reaction.
Last
year,
cnp
had
a
workshop
and
we
did
a
workshop
and
it
was
around
sexual
harassment
and
sexual
violence
and
everything
we
worked
with
several
groups
in
trying
to
pull
them
together
to
see
okay.
What
did
they
want
to
do?
How
did
they
want
to
do
this?
What
did
they
want
to
do
and
there
was-
and
it
was
with
district
65
and
league
focus?
C
The
y
was
there,
and
we
also
had
the
young
lady,
that
is,
with
the
sexual.
C
Oh,
I
forgot
the
name
of
the
organization,
but
she
is
the
person
that
kind
of
represents
the
state
and
for
the
outreach
in
helping
to
talk
to
people
into
community
and
to
educate
them
about
domestic
and
sexual
trauma
and
everything.
C
She
has
an
office
down
in
the
basement
of
the
civic
center
and
we
tried
to
get
individual.
C
Where
is
the
different
agencies
and
things
in
town
that
one
could
go
to
so
did
that
as
an
outreach
event,
and
we
wasn't
taking
it
on
as
to
do
to
run
that
once
we
get
fully
staffed,
we
probably
will
run
more
program,
but
mostly
we
get
got
the
information
out
there
to
the
community
and
one
of
the
things
that
was
surprising
to
me,
that
came
from
one
of
the
districts,
65
staff
and
she
was
concerned
and
wanted
to
know
more
about
the
title
ix.
C
Action
and
what
it
meant-
and
that
was
in
terms
of
with
girls
and
things
in
sports,
so
we're
still
waiting
to
hear
back
from
her
to
as
to
when
she
would
like
to
put
together
a
program
to
present
it
to
the
community
right
now
we
haven't
heard,
but
this
unit.
What
you're
talking
about
is
what
things
that
was
brought
up
in
that
meeting
of
may
of
last
year.
C
So
it's
good
to
see
that
it
will
continue
and
work
on
getting
the
information
and
things
out
to
the
community
and
where
one
would
go
to
this.
So
with
this
department,
the
model
and
everything
where
would
it
be
located?
That
was
one
of
the
questions.
C
F
F
I
didn't
mention
your
name
as
part
of
our
group,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
recognized
your
efforts
as
well
and
anybody
else
I
miss,
but
I
think
we
know
what
other
cities
are
doing
and
we
need
to
think
about
what's
right
for
evanston,
I
think
the
the
focus-
and
everyone
should
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
was
that
it
needs
to
be
part
of
the
city
and
whatever
is
the
most
appropriate
way
and
that
the
staff
have
explicit
training
and
experiences
in
these
issues
which
are
multifaceted
and
and
complex
right.
F
So
there
are
places
which
may
or
may
not
make
more
sense
public
health,
health
and
human
services
whatever
so,
where
it
actually
fits.
I
think,
is
totally
open
for
debate.
I
don't
think
we
have
a
recommendation,
but
I
think
what
we
say
is
it
should
be.
It
should
have
power,
it
should
have
staff,
it
should
have
resources,
we've
felt-
and
I'm
going
to
say
this
very
directly.
F
You
don't
want
to
set
it
up
and
then
it
fails
right.
You
don't
want
to
set
it
up,
especially
with
people
who
have
lived
the
experience
who
are
giving
their
life
to
it
without
resources
without
having
the
ability
to
make
change.
So
we
feel
like
it
should
be
an
entity
that
has
resources
that
has
power
to
make
decisions
and
coordinate
with
all
the
ways
that
other
departments
do,
but
where
it
sits.
I
don't
think
we
had
an
opinion
on
that.
I
think
we
wanted
to
have
that
discussion,
but
it's
an
important
question.
I
think.
C
Okay,
no,
it
is
in
the
information
and
stuff
that
goes
with
this
department.
C
D
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
add
that
you
know
I
think
this
group
I
mean.
Obviously
you
know,
nathan
and
councilmember
fleming
have
been
heavily
involved
and
so
there's
certainly
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
knowledge
about
the
city.
That's
been
brought
to
the
table,
but
I
think
they've
been
very
humble.
I
guess
I
would
say,
and
try
not
to
dictate
exactly
the
you
know
the
org
chart
solution
as
much
as
this
explaining
what
what
criteria
the
thing
that
gets
set
up
has
to
satisfy.
If
it's
actually
gonna
work.
D
You
know,
I
think
something
that
I've
shared
with
the
group
that
you
know
is
just
a
practical
answer
is,
I
don't
think
it's
really
in
the
cards
for
this
entity
to
be
a
department.
You
know,
if
you
think
about
the
city
departments,
like
the
you
know,
parks
and
direct
department,
let's
say,
or
the
community
development
department
you're
talking
about
big
operations
with
dozens
and
dozens
of
people,
and
I
think
it
would
be
in
practice
likely
for
this
to
be
inside
of
a
department.
D
K
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
add
on
what
miss
esther
was
saying,
since
she
brought
up
our
two
school
districts.
I
think
we
can't
underscore
enough
the
role
that
our
school
districts
play,
since
they
are
the
largest
youth
serving
institutions
in
our
community
and
quite
often,
the
sort
of
interpersonal
harassment,
bullying.
Violence
in
schools
are
antecedents
to
the
violence
that
happens
outside
in
the
community,
and
so
you
know-
and
it's
not
there's
I'm
not
like
speaking
behind
anyone's
back.
K
When
I
say
school
districts
can
get
very
uncomfortable
with
letting
partners
in
to
really
explore
and
interrogate
kind
of
how
the
districts
are
addressing
interpersonal
violence,
whether
it's
sexual
assault,
domestic
violence
or
teen,
dating
violence.
And
so
I
think
that
that
should
be.
K
I
would
hope
that
that
would
be
those
would
be
key
stakeholders
in
the
conversation,
because
without
collaboration
with
the
school
districts
in
really
meaningful
substantive
ways,
I
think
that
the
city
then
is
sort
of
locked
out
of
the
the
places
where
youth
spend
the
most
time
and
really
accessing
them
in
those
they're
sort
of
more
natural
environments
where
they
spend
a
lot
of
time
with
their
peers.
I
So
I'd
like
to
echo
that-
and
I
think
that
that's
been
part
of
our
conversation
as
well
as
on
other
subcommittees-
that
I'm
on
making
sure
that
the
schools
are
are
very
much
centered
in
the
exploration
of
services
like
an
alternative
response
model
like
like
what
we're
suggesting
here
for
this
shared
unit,
and
I
think
it's
also
important
to
highlight
you
know:
evanston's-
had
a
victim
service
function
since
1976
according
to
the
city
website,
and
so
over
time.
A
lot
has
changed
right.
I
We've
had
this
legacy
of
service,
but
you
know,
services
provided
by
the
unit
have
changed.
Reporting
structure
has
changed,
it
originated
in
the
police
department
and
now
it
is
over
in
health
and
human
services
and
how
it
has
worked
with
youth.
The
youth
component,
which
was
called
youth
outreach
back
in
1969
when
that
started,
like
those
relationships,
have
been
there
and
have
been
altered
over
time,
and
so
we're
really
looking
at
kind
of
taking
that
step
back
and
and
recommending.
I
This
staff
needs
assessment
to
really
help
ensure
that
these
units,
or
the
combined
areas
within
the
unit
really
have
a
clear
purpose
and
guiding
principles
to
help
guide
the
work
and
then
there's
an
understanding
about
the
most
pressing
needs
of
the
community
now
and
and
that
making
sure
we
have
the
staff
to
meet
those
needs
in
the
survivor
community.
I
It's
really
important
that
everybody
is
considering
everyone
who
is
a
survivor
in
the
wake
of
violence,
including
witnesses
and
neighbors
and
classmates,
who
are
directly
impacted,
and
we
also
think
that
the
needs
assessment
will
help
to
ensure
that
our
city
has
this
coordinated
and
equitable
and
trauma-informed
response
for
survivors
across
departments
in
the
wake
of
a
violent
incident,
particularly
when
there's
a
person
who's
been
harmed
that
lives
in
one
ward.
That
is
different
from
where
the
harm
occurred
and
nathan-
and
I
talked
about
this
a
lot
in
our
group.
I
You
know
there
could
be
an
incident
of
gun
violence
and
usually
the
response
is
around
where
the
harm
happened
and
not
necessarily
where
the
survivor
or
the
victim's
family
is
living
which
could
be
in
a
totally
different
ward
and
making
sure
resources
and
responses
are,
are
addressing
the
needs
of
all
the
neighbors
in
all
the
areas.
I
So
we
do
think,
like
the
the
assessment
will
really
help
set
up
the
future
and
the
vision
for
what
this
can
be,
so
that
the
most
critical
support
that
survivors
may
be
seeking,
which
can
change
over
time
right
and
can
change
based
on
the
type
of
violence
that's
experienced
and
then
also.
How
do
we
align
the
resources
that
and
services
that
exist
within
the
city
to
the
available
services
within
the
nonprofit
sector,
as
well
as
the
local,
the
county
and
the
state
levels?
I
There's
been
a
lot
of
work,
especially
the
county
and
the
state
level,
to
expand
survivor,
support
and
victim
services,
and
so
the
the
last
point
goes
really
to
what
ms
esther
was
speaking
on,
which
was
that
this
assessment
will
really
help
to
inform
some
sort
of
plan
to
communicate
about
these
services.
I
How
is
the
youth
outreach
team
going
to
be
able
to
support
me
right,
and
so
this
will
really
help
not
only
form
a
plan
to
communicate
about
the
services
and
educate
the
public
in
multiple
languages
and
methods,
but
also
help
to
establish
some
sort
of
continuous
process
for
evaluating
and
revising
these
services
to
make
sure
we're
always
meeting
the
ever-changing
needs,
because
that
piece
is
missing
right
now
and
I
think
it's
really
critical.
D
D
F
Now
I'm
going
to
muddle
it
a
little
bit,
but
I
think
just
to
summarize
a
couple
of
things
in
kristin's
point
and
and
others
is.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
sorts
of
interventions
we
were
talking
about,
whether
it
involves
school-aged
young
people
or
older
young
people,
the
victim
in
asia,
the
vic,
the
actual
victims
age,
tends
to
be
older,
which
requires
something
different
than
say
someone
who's
connected
to
school
as
someone
who's
disconnected.
F
So
I
think
our
hope
is
that
this
unit
will
do
that
differentiation
to
make
sure
that
what
the
young
person
is
receiving-
or
they
say
the
victim
of
a
sexual
assault
is
receiving
is
not.
This
is
appropriate
and
not
you
know
you
don't
just
give
everybody
the
same
thing
and
that's
the
sort
of
com,
and
we
don't
have
the
recipe
for
that
other
than
acknowledging.
It's
really
important
to
say.
F
Here's,
a
young
person
who
is
connected
with,
say
this
school
in
b65
and
here's
a
27
year
old,
who's
disconnected
who
has
been
you,
know
locked
out
disenfranchised
and
they
need
something
different
and
all
those
things
can
be
coordinated
in
ways.
And
now
that's
the
lesson
learned
that
we
want
to
hope
to
kind
of
start
for
discussion
and
evangeline.
You
know
his
point
in
this
space.
I
mean
her
expertise
in
nathan's,
for
example,
is
really
you
know
it's
a
there's,
a
treasure
to
evanston
and
including
others.
D
Great
thank
you
before
we
reopen
it
for
more
questions.
Did.
Did
anyone
from
the
working
group,
especially
you
know,
andy
and
evangeline,.
A
D
I
think
kind
of
you
know
held
the
pen,
so
to
speak,
for
for
a
lot
of
the
writing.
Did
you
want
to
just
expound
further
on
anything
in
this
outline.
J
Well,
mr
mayor,
I
would
love
to,
but
both
of
my
groupmates
have
done
such
a
fantastic
job,
nothing
for
her
to
outline,
but
I
you
know
I
just
really
echo
you
know
both
of
you
all
sentiments
and
you've
done
a
fantastic
job
of
articulating
everything.
So
I
think
I'm
okay
right
now.
F
I'll
I'm
gonna
keep
adding
because
nathan's
also
too
modest
and
something
that
councilman
reid
stressed
in
one
of
our
things.
When
we
were
talking
about
outreach,
the
goal
is
not
just
to
locate
and
connect
people,
but
to
create
something
that
says:
evanston
that
has
connections
to
life,
affirming
and
giving
sorts
of
resources
right,
whether
it's
I'm
just
I'm
making
these
up.
So
this
is
not
any
model,
but
when
we
look
at
other
models,
they
include
transitioned,
whether
it's
therapy
or
life
skills
or
education,
or
work
and
oftentimes.
F
These
things
are
now
being
pieced
together
that
include
cash
transfers
and
stipends
right,
so
you're,
identifying
individuals
that
we
do
with
traditional
say,
outreach
efforts
and
then
you're
connecting
them
to
an
effort
which
again
would
be
created
in
evanston
specific
pulling
in
experts,
and
it
would
be
a
thing,
a
program,
an
entity
that
would
include
payment,
and
there
are
these
models
that
are
being
done,
that
we
had
mentioned
before
and
again
the
modesty
of
the
rest
of
our
committee.
F
You
know
there
are
wonderful
ways
we
could
do
something
like
this
in
evanston
and
and
have
an
impact
in
the
short
and
the
midterm
that
then
could
probably
align
with
larger
term
things
that
are
on
the
on
the
you
know
in
the
evanston
vision,
whether
it's
reparations
or
universal
income,
or
all
these
other
things.
You
know
this
is
a
small
way
that
could
kind
of
have
that
spirit
there.
F
We
don't
know
what
it
would
look
like,
but
part
of
it
was
really
thinking
about
not
just
find
them
and
tell
them
to
stop
right,
but
really
think
about
best
practices
and
put
it
in
something
that
represents
the
sort
of
spirit
of
it
and
again,
I'm
just
taking
all
their
ideas
and
putting
it
here
so,
but
we
don't
know
what
it
looks
like.
That's
what
we
hope
to
have.
That's
why
we
use
the
word
scaffolding.
F
You
know
to
think
like
here's,
some
parameters,
what
would
it
look
like
in
evanston?
What
would
it
look
like
for
20
people
for
50
people?
What
would
it
look
like
in
schools,
for
example
like
it
would
be
different,
but
I
think
we
have
smart
enough
people
and
experience
and
and
people
that
love
this
city
that
could
do
that.
J
And
I
would
just
go
on
to
say
andy,
you
did
a
fabulous
job,
but
it's
not
only
just
preventing
violence
but
you're,
also
helping
individuals
reach
their
fullest
potential,
and
I
think
that
that
is
prodigious
and
and
so
this
this
office
of
violence
prevention
accounts
for
so
much
more
than
just
what
the
what
the
what
the
title
of
it
stands
for.
So
I
think
that
that
is
that's
something
that
is
happens
underlying
but
is
is
really
not
just
prevention,
but
it's
also
the
development
and
it's
cultivating
our
society
and
our
community.
D
D
All
right,
so
I
you
know.
Two
weeks
ago
we
had
a
presentation
from
a
different
working
group
that
had
some
pretty
kind
of
specific
policy
changes.
You
know
stopped
doing
traffic
stops,
for
you
know,
for
equipment
violations,
for
example,
which
is
very
easy
to
imagine
in
your
mind
how
to
translate
that
into
a
city,
ordinance
or
resolution
and
put
in
front
of
city
council.
This
group,
you
know,
has
been
so
much
more.
D
You
know
it's
not
necessarily
the
case
that
that
every
word
on
this
proposal
would
turn
into
an
ordinance
that
would
pass
and
change
the
city
code,
but,
on
the
other
hand,
in
my
opinion,
these
are
specific
steps
that
this
working
group
is
calling
upon
the
city
to
engage
in,
and
so
my
understanding
is
that
the
group
was
interested
in
putting
this
up
for
a
vote
of
the
committee,
and
I
think,
that's
appropriate
again,
not
because
we're
voting
on
a
specific
ordinance
that
council
could
then
adopt,
but
because
we're
we're
giving
really
we're
putting
the
stamp
of
approval
on
this
committee
on
a
direction
that
we
believe
the
city
ought
to
go.
F
D
D
You
know
the
the
downside
of
not
just
sort
of
having
a
policy
change.
You
can
write
an
ordinance.
Is
that
you're
giving
we're
giving
out
a
lot
of
homework
and
that
homework
will
be
done
methodically
and
deliberately
and
it
won't
be
overnight,
but
I
think
if
this
is
a
blueprint
that
the
committee
believes
is
the
right
blueprint,
I
think
it
would
be.
It
would
be
constructive
to
have
a
vote
that
memorializes.
K
D
D
But
even
if
folks,
you
know
at
some
point
folks
will
be
tapped
out
and
move
on
to
other
things.
I
think,
even
if
that
is
the
case
at
some
point,
still
having
clarity
about
what
we're
trying
to
achieve
and
clarity
about
the
level
of
support
that
these
ideas
have
would
be
of
value.
D
D
Well,
thank
you
for
what
I
have
to
say.
It
was
an
extremely
eloquent
motion,
so
disaster
moves
that
we
we
recommended
that
this
become
reality,
that
these
recommendations
become
a
part
of
how
the
city
is
structured
and
what
kind
of
services
we
provide
is
there?
Is
there
a
second?
D
E
H
D
So
the
second,
the
first
second,
which
is
a
weird
thing
to
say,
I
believe,
comes
from
sean
peck
collier.
So
the
motion
was
made
by
ms
esther
and
seconded
by
sean.
D
D
It
is
particularly
perverse
that
nathan
is
not
going
to
vote
on
this,
given
the
role
he
played
and
putting
it
together,
but
the
the
rules
are
the
rules
and
as
officially
on
the
books,
city
staff
are
not
members
of
this
committee.
So
that's
that's
why.
That
explains
why
some
names
that
we
feel
ought
to
be
called
will
not
be
called
sarah
bogan.
I
D
Betty
bogg
hi
councilmember
burns,
I
believe,
is
not
here.
Marcus
campbell,
I
believe,
is
not
here.
Betty
esther.
C
D
Councilmember
fleming,
oh,
I
believe
he's
not
here.
I'm
sorry,
alejandra
ibanez,
hi,
patrick
keenan,
devlin,
hi,
andy
pepper,
christos,
I'm
sean
pett,
collier,
hi,
councilmember,
reed,
hi,.
A
E
K
D
I'm
sorry
I,
oh
and
and
daniel
biss
also
votes.
I
apologize.
I
don't
know
why
this
is
so
difficult
for
me,
so
by
a
vote
of
12
voting
in
favor
and
none
voting
against
the
motion
carries.
I
want
to
echo
what
everybody
else
has
said.
This
is
really
really
a
remarkable
remarkable
amount
of
time
and
energy
and
just
really
really
great
thinking
that
this
working
group
has
put
into
this
there's
no
questions.
D
This
is
not
the
end
of
the
road
by
any
means,
but
it's
a
pretty
clear
arrow
and
I
think
I
think
we
have
a
responsibility
to
follow
that,
follow
that
direction
and
and
do
what
we
need
to
do
to
make
this
make
this
reality.
So
so.
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you
for
that,
but
I
know
I
know
that
there's
been
some
pressure
on
you
to
sort
of
take
what
were
a
lot
of
really
big
ideas
and
put
them
into
you
know
into
this
kind
of
format,
and
I
know
that
was
not
easy,
but
I
really
really
appreciate
the
work
and
I
think
I
think
the
city
will
really
benefit
in
very,
very
meaningful
ways
from
this.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
allison
leipziger,
who
those
of
you
don't
know
her
is
the
city's
policy
coordinator.
B
Thanks,
I
just
wanted
to
say
that,
as
many
of
you
know
on
friday's
my
last
day
before
I
go
on
maternity
leave,
so
I
will
be
back,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
have
really
enjoyed
working
with
this
group
and
all
of
the
working
groups
so
much
and
I'm
so
excited
to
see
where
we
are,
when
I
get
back
in
february
and
happy
to
jump
back
in
and
show
off
a
little
baby,
so
yeah,
it's
just
been
really
lovely
working
with
you
guys
so
far.
Thanks.
J
Hey
allison,
it's
been
really
great
working
with
you
as
well,
and
I
I'm
gonna
miss
saying
hi
as
I
walk
back
and
forth
every
day,
but
you
know
thank
you
for
all
the
support
and
thank
you
for
I
know.
We've
been
on
a
couple
of
meetings
and
zooms
and
different
things
like
that,
but
it's
been
great
and
congratulations
to
you
and
your
family.
So
much.
G
D
Thank
you.
Congratulations
in
advance,
good
luck
and
yeah.
We
will
we'll
look
forward
to
the
addition
to
the
working
group
in
february.
D
So
I
have
I
keep
on
putting
talking
about
our
value
statement
on
the
agenda
and
I
keep
on
skipping
it
because
we're
literally
over
time
when
we
get
to
it.
So
now
we
have
five
minutes
left
which
is
really
not
doing
the
project
justice.
Just
as
a
recap,
you
know
this
is
something
that's
been
sort
of
hanging
over
our
heads
throughout
this
this
this
time-
and
you
know
both
there
was
both.
D
You
know
some
really
really
generous
help
in
putting
together
a
draft
that
was
then
followed
with
some
folks
who
were,
you
know,
took
some
time
to
make
recommendations
in
the
in
the
google
doc,
and
so
I
guess
the
question
that
I
want
to
ask
rather
than
launch
into
a
discussion
about
it,
which
I
know
we
will
not
be
able
to
do
justice
two
in
five
minutes.
Do
folks
have
an
interest
in
really
taking
time.
D
You
know
this
is
definitely
kind
of
a
we've
already
gone
and
put
the
cart
before
the
horse.
I
guess
you
know
the
carts
going
off
and
being
a
cart
without
a
horse.
Do
do
folks
still
notwithstanding
that,
want
to
spend
real
time
in
one
of
our
subsequent
meetings,
and
I
promise.
D
If
the
answer
is
yes,
I
will
make
it
happen
on
a
on
a
scheduling
basis
to
really
go
through
the
draft
that's
been
produced
and
the
changes
that
have
been
suggested
and
and
come
to
some
agreement
about
about
that
for
for
the
future.
Is
that
an
exercise
that
folks
would
would
find
valuable
given
where
we
are
in
our
work.
C
C
D
That's
a
great
suggestion,
so
I'm
seeing
I
saw
to
my
initial
question
some
yeses
and
some
nods
and
and
ms
esther
makes
a
great
point.
So
what
I
will
do
after
this
meeting
is
send
an
email
to
the
group
asking
folks
to
share
with
me
the
value
statements,
or
you
know,
related
statements
that
your
own
groups
and
organizations
that
you
represent
have
and
circulate
all
of
those
to
the
group
before
before
the
next
meeting.
D
At
which
point
you
have
my
commitment,
we
will
carve
out
real
time
to
have
a
an
honest,
truly
inclusive
discussion
on
this,
so
it'll
be
on
our
next
agenda,
but,
unlike
all
the
other
agendas,
it'll
actually
be
observed,
and
we'll
gather
that
information
in
advance,
which
I
think
is
a
really
great
suggestion.
So
thank
you
for
that
disaster
and
with
that
and
just
again
sharing
my
appreciation
to
the
working
group
for
all
that
you've
done
to
bring
us
to
this
point,
seeing
no
further
business
to
come
before
us.