►
From YouTube: Social Services Committee - Mar. 10, 2022
Description
Finalization of applications not funded under case management or safety net services, support services discussion, and FY2021 report updates. Find the agenda, packet and more information on the committee's web page: https://www.cityofevanston.org/government/social-services-committee
D
C
F
B
E
Yes,
I
did
thank
you
so
much
committee
members.
I
apologize
somehow
a
draft
of
the
february
10th
minutes
that
picked
up
in
the
packet.
This
was
not
at
all
the
final
version
of
the
minutes,
so
I
apologize
I
would
like-
and
I
realized
it
too
late
to
change
the
packet.
So
I
would
like
to
pull
those
minutes
because
they
are
not
the
finalized
minutes.
They
are
a
draft
version.
E
They
are
very
wrong.
So
if
we
could
please
skip
over
the
meeting
minutes
for
february
10th,
the
committee
could
approve
or
could
discuss
the
meeting
minutes
from
the
special
meeting
on
february
18th.
I
apologize
I'll
have
february
10th
meeting
minutes
for
approval
at
our
next
meeting
and
in
our
next
packet.
G
G
B
E
B
E
E
B
E
Sure
so
oftentimes
in
order
to
be
eligible
for
deeper
services
within
an
agency
and
I'll
use
trilogy,
because
I
know
that
representatives
from
trilogy
are
hanging
out
as
attendees
in
the
meeting.
So
if
I
get
anything
wrong,
hopefully
they
can
offer
advice,
but
in
order
to
be
eligible
for
deeper
counseling
or
therapeutic
services,
participants
first
need
a
mental
health
diagnosis.
A
C
F
C
F
A
F
G
I
was
just
gonna
talk
about
that
or
the
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
we
discussed,
but
I
think
the
question
was
around.
You
know:
there's
a
limited
amount
of
money
and
there's
the
three
sort
of
large.
You
know
categories
that
were
indicated
by
the
agencies,
so
we
kind
of
thought.
You
know
we
weren't
sure
how
you
know.
Should
we
focus
on
one
or
two
or
all
three.
G
If
we
did
would
we
want
to
sort
of
start
with
seeing
if
there,
if
any
of
current
agencies
around
town
could
expand
their
capacity,
but
we
also
know
that
that's
part
of
the
problem
is
that
waitlists
are
long
and
that
capacity
you
know
might
be
full
and
that's
why
we
sort
of
talked
about
having
doing
an
rfp
for
it.
We
also
talked
about
having,
and
maybe
a
criteria
in
that
would
be
having
an
agency
that's
willing
to
offer
on-site
services.
G
You
know
maybe
in
the
city
of
evanston,
building
or
somewhere
else,
so
that
transportation
isn't
an
issue
we
also
talked
about
in
terms
of
the
fee
for
service.
You
know
maybe
looking
into
some
telehealth
agencies,
so
that
access
could
also
be
readily
available.
Also
choice
in
terms
of
you
know,
making
a
match
with
providers.
B
Thank
you
so
much
amanda
and
I
think
the
thought
of
I
like
for
on-site.
I,
like
that
concept
and
then
obviously
telehealth
has
that
availability
and
I
think,
we've
really
seen
through
the
past
two
years,
a
real
significant
uptake
in
telehealth
and
satisfaction,
especially
when
and
and
mem
our
patient.
B
The
easiest
way
to
do
this
would
be
to
reimburse
medicaid
rates
for
those
in
need
of
services
that
are
unfunded,
and
I
do
think
that's
something
that
we've
also
previously
talked
about
about,
though
you
know
providing
funds
for
those
that
are
services
that
are
unfunded,
not
necessarily
funding
when
there's
other
another
funding
source
like
medicaid
or
something
along
those
lines
we
wanna,
we
have
a
limited
pool
of
resources
here
in
evanston.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
efficient
and
ex
you
know,
expanding
services
in
that
manner.
E
E
How
long
would
each
session
last,
whether
it
would
the
sessions
could
be
in
person
or
over
the
phone
or
the
telehealth
option,
that
amanda
discussed
and
then
any
additional
services
that
again
would
be
incorporated
into
the
fee
for
service
agreement,
so
preparing
records
or
clinical
review
summary
consultation
with
other
professionals.
These
are
typically
services
that
take
up
a
lot
of
time
and
are
part
of
the
main
service,
but
that
aren't
covered
those.
The
hours
spent
doing
those
more
administrative
tasks.
If
I
can
say
that,
aren't
covered.
E
So
when
we
consider
like
the
the
medicaid
reimbursement,
that's
typically
for
the
therapy
session
or
the
counseling
session,
but
not
for
for
these
additional
services.
So
how
would
we
want
to
factor
that
in
and
then
again
any
what
would
we
do
about
cancelled
or
missed
appointments
or
contact
between
appointments
if
participants
are
contacting
their
their
providers?
E
E
So
we'd
want
to
look
at
grievance
policies.
For
example,
client
sobriety,
expectations,
confidentialities
goals
of
service,
and
these
lists
are
not
exhaustive,
which
is
why
we
would
appreciate
input
from
from
professionals
in
the
field,
whether
it's
from
committee
members
or
others.
Staff
has
certainly
done
some
some
research
into
this.
But
again
it's
not
exhaustive.
C
I
did
just
want
to
build
a
little
on
what
jessica
is
saying,
so
jessica's
done.
I
think
a
pretty
substantial
amount
of
research
in
this,
but
this
is
why
a
working
group,
we
think
is
so
important,
because
these
are
the
types
of
things
that
we
are
hoping
that
practitioners
can
say.
These
are
the
key
ones
and,
and
one
of
the
things
I
we
did
want
to
point
out
about
perhaps
providing
compensation
compensation
for
things
that
medicaid
doesn't
cover
like
the
paperwork.
That
is
a
pretty
major
part,
at
least
as
we
understand
it,
of
people's
work.
C
You
know
there
are
a
lot
of
practitioners
or
practitioners
are
very
busy,
and
so
I
think
we
have
to
try
to
make
this
appealing,
perhaps
and
and-
and
that
might
be
a
way
of
of
helping
make
it
something
that
people
would
be
more
willing
to
take
on.
Just
I'm
saying,
due
to
the
circumstances
of
we
know,
there's
a
shortage
of
practitioners
and
that
their
time
is
very
valuable.
E
Yeah,
some
other
components
for
a
request
for
proposals
that
are
specific
to
mental
health
could
include
defined,
expected
deliverables,
a
description
of
the
qualifications
we're
looking
for
in
professionals
who
would
answer
the
call
as
it
were,
and
then
perhaps
a
description
of
the
requested
response.
So
how
would
the
applicant
you
know,
provide
the
requested
services?
What
approaches
would
applicants
take
to
work
with
culturally,
socially
and
economic
to
economically
diverse
families?
E
D
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
I'm
baselining
with
the
rest
of
the
group
here
and
I
understand
what
everyone
else
is
understanding.
So
if
the
fee
for
service
model,
the
services
that
would
be
provided,
there
would
be
a
fee
basis
based
on
what
is
provided
and
there's
different
modalities,
that
that
could
take
place
for
their
phone
or
in
person
or
telehealth.
D
Is
that
something
that
would
be
then
administered
by
the
city
itself?
That's
the
one
thing
I
wasn't
clear
on,
because
when
I
think
of
requests
for
proposal
on
rfps,
I
think
about
an
entity
like
the
city,
putting
out
a
proposal
for
third-party
agencies
to
then
pitch.
I
can
do
these
things
for
x
amount
of
dollars,
so
the
two
sound,
very
distinct.
I
just
didn't
that
didn't
come
across
to
me
in
the
in
the
two
slides
there,
though,
which
is
not
meant
to
be
a
critique
of
it.
E
Derek
yeah,
no,
that's
fair,
so
you're,
absolutely
right.
They
are
two
very
separate
ways
of
going
about
getting
these
services
and-
and
it
would
take
further
explanation
because
for
the
rfp
personally
and
sarah-
I
hope
you
speak
to
this.
I
do,
I
think
it
from
an
administrative
standpoint.
It
would
be
easier,
but
we're
happy
to
to
explore
the
the
fee
for
service
agreement
option.
Also,
if
the
committee
feels
like
that's
going
to
get
us
the
services
we
need
and
our
participants
need.
B
B
G
I
think
I'm
yeah
well,
I
can
just
say
quick,
I
think
I
think
the
fee.
If
I'm
remembering
correctly,
we
were
kind
of
thinking
about
the
fee
for
service
around
agencies
that
maybe
we
already
do
work
with.
Maybe
you
know
those
that
applied
for
this,
the
social,
the
safety
net,
so
that
they
are
established.
They
do
have
policies
in
place
things
like
that,
but
the
rfp-
and
I
you
know-
I
don't
know
enough
about
the
differences
myself,
but
it
sounds
like
you
know,
as
you
were
going
over
the
differences
jessica.
G
You
know
the
nice
thing
about.
That
is
that
you
can
have
some
quality
control
and
that
people
have
to
be
able
to
prove
that
they're
licensed
or
that
you
know
they
meet
certain
standards
and
that
sort
of
built
right
in,
but
perhaps
that
could
also
there
could
be
sort
of
a
hybrid.
If
we
end
up
going
with
the
fever
service,
where
people
have
to
prove
certain
things
in
order
to
and.
C
We
we
did
talk
about
also,
and
maybe
this
is
something
where
we
need
to
discuss
with
our
agencies.
Who
already
is
you
can
also
do
we
could
develop
a
fee
for
service
agreement
with
specific
agencies?
As
you
were
saying,
amanda
you're
absolutely
right.
We
talked
about
that
where
it
would
be,
but
we
wouldn't
have
that,
and
I
think
part
of
it
is
depending
on
the
number
of
people,
it's
hard
to
say
what
might
be
best,
and
it
is
one
of
the
challenges
so
we're
kind
of.
C
Trying
to
figure
this
out,
maybe
it
requires.
I
I
honestly
think
that
if
we
could
pick,
perhaps
there
may
also
be
differences
between
what
would
be
the
most
effective
method
for
different
services
like
psychiatric
services
might
be
different
from,
and
so
that
was
why
we
were
thinking
well.
Maybe
if
we
could
start
with
one
and
work
this
out,
because
it's
a
pretty
major
thing,
I
think
it
could
have
real
positive
benefits
to
our
people,
we're
trying
to
help
if
we
can
to
get
this
worked
out.
C
But
it
is
it's
a
pretty
major
undertaking
and
we
don't
want
to
enter
it
and
miss
something
or
end
up
not
doing
an
appropriate
job
and
because
it
is,
this
is
medical.
This
is
people's
health
and-
and
you
know,
and
it's
very
important,
that
we
have
all
the
proper
controls
and
proper
things
in
place
to
make
sure
that
they're.
You
know
that
confidentiality
is
retained,
all
that
all
the
types
of
things
that
are
so
much
part
of
the
of
the
medical
field,
whether
it's
mental
health
or
other
physical
health.
C
C
That
might
be
a
easier
to
manage
first
start,
but
we
also
could,
with
the
psychiatric
assistance
the
medicine.
The
medication
management,
for
example,
might
be
something
northwestern
excuse
me.
North
shore,
university
health
system
has
a
program
that
is
specifically
for
people
without
that
type
of
without
access
to
that
type
of
help.
C
So
we're
really
kind
of
thinking
this
might
have
to
be
a
hybrid
or
different
methods
for
different
types
of
services,
because
I
don't
know
that
we
would
be
able
to
get
a
private
psychiatrist
to
say,
oh
sure,
I'm
going
to
have
a
day
or
whatever
that
you
know
I'll
be
available
for
whatever
you
need.
I
I
don't
know
the
reality
or
the
likelihood
of
that
sort
of
thing
working,
so
there
may
be
different
approaches,
as
I
say,
for
each
one
of
the
needs.
C
D
Yeah,
I
think
I
I
just
no.
This
is
helpful.
I
think,
setting
the
context
for
this
was
really
helpful
for
me,
and
it
makes
me
think
with
amanda's
comment
as
well,
where
there's
a
fee
for
service
engagement
with
existing
agencies,
and
I
sort
of
see
three
buckets.
I
see
the
one
book
it
is
be
for
service
evanston,
so
it's
essentially,
we
are
a
startup.
D
We
create
an
agency
within
the
resources
and
capacities
of
the
city
of
evanston,
and
then
the
middle
bucket
is,
is
fever
service
with
existing
agencies
that
we
contract
with
and
partner
with
that,
we
assume
have
the
capacity
and
resources
talent
to
do
what
we
want
to
achieve,
and
then
the
third
bucket
is.
Is
we
want
to
throw
an
rfp
out
there?
That
says:
hey
agencies?
E
B
B
In
both
buckets
of
it,
mental
health
services
were
needed,
and
so
my
instinct
is
that,
while
assessments
are
critical,
if
we
don't
have
the
actual
counseling
or
like,
if
we
can
assess
somebody,
and
then
we
can't
pass
them
on
to
the
next
piece
or
if
we
already
know
that
somebody's
been
diagnosed
and
they
don't
have
access
to
counseling
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
fill
having
another
assessment
does
not
fill
that
gap.
So
if
we
can
only
do
one,
I
I
would,
or
we
only
or
we
start
with
one.
B
A
E
I'm
sorry,
I
also
wanted
to
bring
it
back
to
our
limited
pot
of
money,
and
so
the
committee
might
want
to
consider
if
we
want
to
set
an
amount
or
and
again
this
is
where,
because
I'm
not
a
practitioner
and
I'm
not
in
the
industry,
I
don't
know
how
far
our
dollars
are
going
to
go.
That's
that's
a
big
challenge.
A
D
D
It's
it's
there's
a
there's,
an
axis
there's
the
x-axis
or
the
y-axis,
and
that's
the
amount
spent
and
what
you
get
for
the
amount
spent,
and
I
I
just
I
don't
think
this
meeting
will
be
able
to.
You
know
effectively
determine
that,
and
I
think
it
sounds
like
more
and
more
that
we're
talking
about
is
that
there
needs
to
be
working
group
on
this.
G
Who
are
we
thinking
of
as
the
clients
for
this,
and
I
mean
I
come
from
a
college
mental
health
background
where
we're
all
about
obsession
limits,
because
we
have
to
you
know
kind
of
manage
demand,
but
I
you
know
I
would
be
in
favor
of
considering
something
like
that
like
if,
as
a
way
to
manage
the
money
like
if
everyone
gets
10
sessions,
we
can
say
how
much
that
is.
You
know
in
college
mental
health,
most
people
don't
even
use
10..
G
C
And
perhaps
a
way
to
approach
that
would
be
say
to
to
define
the
number
of
sessions
and
things
like
that,
and
then
because
the
these
are
support.
Services
for
the
people
who
are
in
case
management
is,
of
course,
the
focus
of
the
group,
and
that
would
probably
be
something
because
we
could
out
on
doing
you
know
I.
C
This
is
what
it
would
cost
or
what
we
would
need
to
have
this
many
sections,
and
but
it
could
also
because
in
a
way
it
could
be
a
fee
for
service
which
could
also
allow
individual
practitioners
if
they
were
willing
to.
I
mean
I
keep
remembering
demeta
talking
about
how
they
had
people
who
they
specifically
helped
and
had
lower
fee
schedules
for
because
they
didn't
have
access,
and
so
you
know
there
are.
C
You
know,
people's
areas
of
knowledge
might
be
stronger
in
some
areas
than
in
others,
just
based
on
what
they're
you
know
among
our
committee
members
and
also
if
we
would
need
to
pull
in
anybody
from
outside
for
a
working
group.
We
can
do
that
if
we
can,
if
we
need
to
get
expertise
on
some
of
this,
so
maybe
that
would
be
a
consideration
to
start
with.
A
E
Well,
and
just
to
provide
some
some
round
numbers,
the
illinois
fee
schedule
for
individual
counseling,
it's
about
29
per
quarter
hour,
so
without
taking
into
consideration
all
of
the
administrative
functions
that
that
fee
schedule
does
not
address
for
one
person
for
ten
sessions,
we're
looking
at
about
eleven
hundred
dollars.
So
again,
I
it
would
be
great
if
dimita
were
here,
I
have
a
feeling
she
could
provide
even
more
information.
E
But
if
we're
roughly
rounding
up,
you
know
it
could
be
that
we're
looking
at
2000
or
2500
dollars
for
10
sessions
for
one
participant.
If
that
gives
the
committee
an
idea
of
how
far
our
funds
are
going
to
stretch
and
again,
we
know
that
the
the
funds
we
have
are
never
going
to
match
the
demand,
but
just
in
terms
of
capacity
and
and
how
much
how
many
people
we
could
potentially
serve
effectively.
B
B
B
I
recognize
from
a
practitioner
standpoint.
That's
it
would
be
great
if
they
did.
I
think
that
does
add
another
layer
of
complexity,
especially
if
we
don't
have
something
to
model
after
and
how
do
you
monitor
that?
Like?
Is
it
15
minutes?
You
know
like
I
just
will
flag
that
it
just
adds
another
layer
of
complexity,
taking
into
account
that
admin
time
that
is
very
real,
but
also
like
you
know
it's.
I
don't
know
what
you
would.
C
You
know
I
mean
that
sort
of
thing
and
but
because
you're
absolutely
right.
How
would
we
do
that?
So
I
would
just
my
thought
if
we
were
to
try
to
do
that,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
would
work
would
be
to
somehow
come
to
a
you
know,
a
realization
I
mean
like
when,
for
example
when,
when
we
are
setting
fees
for
certain
things
here
at
the
city
like
if
there
is
you
know
or
a
question
about
it,
we
we
try
to
figure
out.
C
You
know
if
somebody
is
doing
an
inspection
of
a
property,
for
example.
How
long
does
the
average
unit
take
to
you
know?
We
have
to
try
to
some
of
them
take
much
longer
because
you
know
so,
but
we
come
to
something
that
is
sort
of
the
average
or
whatever
we
expect
or
or
or
what.
We
think
it
might
be.
Something
that
you
know
compensating
for
the
full
is
impossible,
but
at
least
just
something
to
sort
of
sweeten
the
pot
to
make
people
a
little
more
interested
in
and
maybe
is
something
amanda
please.
C
A
B
Got
a
question:
could
the
funding
be
allocated
for
position
in
an
agency
I.e
a
new
therapist
instead
of
a
number
of
sessions,
and
they
had
a
discussion
about
that
in
the
mental
health
task
force
today,
and
I
think
that
potentially
might
be
the
route
an
rfp
might
lead
to
a
solution
like
that?
Potentially
I
mean
the
issue,
of
course,
with
that
there
are
benefits
and
drawbacks
of
any
solution,
and
something
like
this.
B
C
C
But
as
I
say,
we
could
also,
if
it
makes
sense,
ask
out
people
who
are
not
on
the
committee
who
are
providers
if,
if
that
is
a
benefit
to
to
or
or
have
knowledge
of,
this
could
be
part
of
a
working.
We
working
committees
were
never
required
to
be
only
members
of
the
committee
if
we
could
get
advice
and
stuff
from
outside
so
but
we
should
form
it
on
the
basis
of
the
committee.
Obviously
right
councilman.
A
F
Yeah,
that
was
actually
my
comment
that
I
I'd
love
to
see
if,
if
some
of
our
partners
from
the
different
agencies
would
be
interested
in
joining
that
working
group
specifically
because
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
these
services
would
only
be
for
clients
who
are
enrolled
in
case
management
at
one
of
our
at
one
of
the
agencies.
Right
who.
B
F
F
You
know
I
brought
up
that
someone
brought
up
the
telehealth
which
I'm
really
supportive
of,
but
also
the
making
sure
that
we
can
provide
the
services
on
site.
Those
are
the
two
things
that
are
really
supported
and
so
no
matter
what
route
we
take
as
long
as
we
can
expand
services
in
those
areas,
I
would
you
know
personally
support
it,
but
you
know,
I
think
the
other
thing
is
just
trying
to
figure
out.
F
You
know
it's
not
a
lot
of
money.
So
what
are
we
trying
to
learn
from?
This
is
something
that
I've
and
I
can't
participate
in
the
working
group,
I'll
be
looking
for
the
recommendations
that
come
back,
but
I
would
love
for
the
working
group
to
explore
that
question.
You
know
we
only
have
a
limit
of
our
resources,
we're
not
going
to
make
a
huge
impact,
but
we
can
learn
something
from
this
and
that's
all.
Thank
you.
Chair.
A
D
D
Derek
I
I
think
you
know
the
question
should
be
asked
to
the
entire
committee,
because
obviously
right
now
we're
five
of
nine
five
nine
five
of
eight,
I
can
remember
the
exact
number
book,
so
I
think
the
question
should
be
asking
that
we
shouldn't
solidify
the
working
group
right
now.
This
is
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make.
B
B
C
Get
a
working
committee
formed
and
or
get
these
people
who
are
willing
to
be
on
it
and
I
don't
believe
we
have
to
have
an
official
approval
of
who
is
on
it.
I
don't
think
there's
any
reason
we
would
need
that,
but
we
could
certainly
do
that
if
you
think
it's
necessary
or
otherwise
we
can
just
sort
of
maybe
email
everyone
and
get
to
work.
Hopefully.
E
B
F
A
F
F
A
D
E
C
And
I'm
just
heard
committee
members
saying
that
focusing
on
the
direct
services
which
to
me
would
be
the
I
mean
I
shouldn't
say
direct
services
but
the
well.
I
guess
maybe
it
is
direct
services
for
the
people
receiving
it
in
terms
of
getting
into
service.
The
counseling
and
psychiatric
services
would
probably
then
take
priority
over
assessment
services.
G
Yeah,
I
think,
if
I
could,
I
think,
counseling
as
a
first
priority,
but
I
know
you
know:
psychiatric
services
oftentimes
goes
hand
in
hand
and
depending
on
what's
going
on,
for
someone
could
make
a
really
significant
difference
for
them,
and
then
thinking
about
the
folks
that
we're
trying
to
work
with
are
not
insured
in
any
way.
So
you
know
it
might
be
difficult
for
them
to
get
in
with
their
a
primary
care
physician,
so
it
might
make
sense
to
do
psychiatric.
G
G
Maybe
if
there
was
one
to
not
do
would
be
the
assessment,
because
there's
probably
a
piece
of
that
just
built
in
anyways,
and
I
don't
know
if
the
idea
was
that
the
diagnostic
assessment
was
more
like
a
significant
assessment
like
a
neuropsychiatry
one
or
you
know,
or
if
it's
just
like
your
intake
and
sort
of
you
know.
You
know
the
general
assessment
that
you
would
do
to
figure
out
treatment.
B
Yeah,
that's
a
a
good
clout
amanda,
I'm
almost
wondering
if
the-
and
it
is
something
the
working
group
can
figure
out,
but
also
sort
of
that
connection
to
perhaps
a
community
provider,
perhaps
an
fqhc
or
something
along
those
lines
that
if
they
can't
you
know
counseling,
but
if
they
need
you
know
if
they
need
somebody
to
prescribe.
Or
you
know
that
there's
that
sort
of
like
connection
to
that,
a
potential
community
partner
that
that
serves
those
without
insurance.
B
E
E
B
C
E
F
E
B
E
E
Okay,
can
everyone
see
my
screen?
Yes,
we
can
oh
great.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
reason
I'm
sharing
this
information
is
because
one
of
the
main
things
that
we're
doing
differently
this
year
is
trying
to
standardize
the
way
agencies
report
information.
So
I've
included
that
information
for
case
management
and
safetynet.
E
The
reports
should
include
information
about
the
number
of
evanston
residents
served
and
about
the
number
of
new
evanston
residents
that
that
were
seen
in
the
calendar
year
for
case
management.
You
know:
servant's
plans,
service
plans,
created
and
number
of
client
contacts,
referrals
and
additional
support
services,
outcomes
and
challenges
and
then
exits
very
quickly.
Safety
net
services,
in
addition
to
the
evanston
residents,
served
also
provided
information
about
service
hours,
the
types
of
services
and
the
services
provided.
E
Those
types
of
referrals
and
who
those
partners
included
and
staff
was
pretty
confident
about
asking
these
questions
in
the
reports,
because,
through
the
application
process
for
case
management,
agencies
provided
information
around
their
capacity
to
see
more
participants,
their
ability
to
create
service
plans
and
what
that
looked
like
what?
What
was
included
in
service
plans,
how
often
they
were
reviewed,
meeting
frequency
with
participants
and
and
metrics,
and
then
for
safety
net
services.
E
So
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions
about
the
information
included
in
the
report
outcomes
or
to
take
good
notes.
If
I
can't
answer
questions
and
get
back
to
the
committee
with
more
information,
but
again
committee
members
also
do
have
access
to
these
reports.
If
you
know
you
don't
want
to
take
my
word
for
it,
but
but
I'm
happy
to
address
any
questions.
E
I
also
wanted
to
mention
the
staff
report
that
at
the
last
meeting,
members
wanted
more
information
about
outcomes
for
cares,
act,
funding
and
that
information
is
available
in
our
draft
2021
paper,
which
is
up
for
review
it's
in
its
public
comment
period.
There's
our
15
day
public
comment
period
before
that
report
is
finalized
and
sent
to
city
council
for
approval
and,
ultimately
to
hud.
E
Those
programs
included
a
rent
assistance
program,
food
food
assistance
program,
the
violence
reduction,
youth
program,
a
child
care
scholarship
program
and
a
shelter
operations
program,
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
you
know.
I
know
I'm
just
going
over
those
titles
very
quickly.
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
about
any
of
those
five
programs
in
more
detail.
C
Is
it
I
will
add
one
thing
that,
and
that
is
the
federal
government
originally
was
supposed
to
have
its
budget
by
the
18th
of
february,
but
of
course
they
did
not
and
they
extended
it.
The
continuing
resolution
through
the
11th
of
march
and
there
appears
to
be
a
likelihood
that
they
are
actually
going
to
pass
a
budget
by
midnight
on
friday
fingers
crossed
if
they
do.
C
C
C
2020
cdbg
that
we
reallocated
to
cares
act
uses
that
let
us
use
it
for
so
for
services
that
gave
us
that
extra
124
000
in
2021,
so
we
know
we're
going
to
have
it's
likely.
We
will
have
less
to
work
with
in
2022
and
so
looking
at
how
to
continue
our
you
know,
we
did
say
we
don't
have
enough
information
to
do
a
whole
new
rfp.
Are
we
going
to
change
things?