►
From YouTube: Gov Hol CC 20200908
Description
Hollister City Council Meeting September 8, 2020
B
B
C
B
E
B
H
I
J
C
L
N
M
J
M
M
This
is
the
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
item
not
on
the
agenda
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
council
speaker
cards
are
available
in
the
lobby
and
are
to
be
completed
and
given
to
the
city
clerk.
Before
speaking
when
the
city
player
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
in
the
city
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
city
council,
each
speaker
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes
with
a
maximum
of
30
minutes
per
subject.
M
D
L
If
you
can
remove
your
mask,
that
would
help
as
far
as
the
speaking
part
goes
or
if
you
can
just
make
sure
that
you're
talking
into
your
microphone,
because
once
you
get
to
the
microphone,
they
say
they
can
hear
it's.
If
you're
gazing
off
or
talking
off
topic,
you
can
hear
that
it
kind
of
just,
but
if
you're
right
on
your
mic
like
this,
it's
everyone
can
hear
it.
O
O
This
was
put
out
in
I
believe
december
18
2017,
and
I
have
publicly
requested
to
see
the
the
reviews
and
how
this
was
evaluated
annually,
and
I
have
not
been
responded
to
that.
So
I
would
please
like
to
ask
that,
for
2018
and
2019
that
I
see
how
this
was
evaluated
and
reviewed
by
the
city
council,
the
boards
and
the
commissions.
Q
Good
evening,
so
this
item
is
related
to
an
employment
contract
with
brett
miller,
with
the
position
for
the
position
of
city
manager.
The
staff
report
is
brief
and
speaks
for
itself.
So
if
the
public
has
any
questions
regarding
this
item,
they
may
address
the
city,
council
or
the
city
attorney.
F
J
I
just
want
to
say
that
it's
been
a
pleasure
to
work
with
brett
as
interim
city
manager
for
since
november
he's
been
very
attentive
to
things.
I
ask
him:
he
if
he
doesn't
have
the
answer,
he
gets
it
and
he
gets
right
back
to
you,
and
I
always
like
that
because
I
don't
expect
a
city
manager
to
know
everything,
but
I
expect
them
to
see
what
their
staff
says
and
get
back
to
to
me.
I
I
found
him
enjoyable
to
work
with,
and
I
think
that
you
will
too.
J
D
I'll
make
a
brief
comment,
if
I
mean
sir,
thank
you,
mr
brent
miller.
I
think
you've
been
an
incredible
asset
to
the
city
staff
and
nobody
could
have
predicted
the
unprecedented
events
that
we
stumbled
upon
in
2020,
and
you
have
just
repeated
my
expectations.
I'm
extremely
grateful
that
you
are
have
been
the
interim
city
manager
and
I
think
that
you
and
your
staff
have
handled
with
the
utmost
respect
any
situation.
That's
come
out
of
come
towards
us
and
I'm
extremely
grateful
for
you.
D
So
thank
you
and
best
of
luck
to
you,
sir.
M
M
At
the
same
time,
working
through
the
city's
finances
and
everything
else,
you
were
in
charge
of
you
absolutely
excelled
through
this.
You
showed
you
could
handle
the.
I
don't
want
to
call
it
the
stress
of
it,
but
you
can
handle
tough
times,
shall
I
say
and
again
you've
been
very
responsive
with
questions,
doing
the
research
working
with
the
team
and
that
this
is
what
we
were
all
looking
for,
I
believe
as
our
future
city
manager.
So
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
all
the
hard
work
you
have
done.
F
I
J
L
P
J
L
L
Mr
mayor
f2
is
adoption
of
the
ordinance
for
the
city
of
hollister
amending
chapter
six
animals,
which
would
be
adding
section
6.08.125,
mandatory
microchipping
of
dogs
and
cats
prior
to
release
after
second
impound,
there
are
no
amendments
or
changes,
so
this
is
just
coming
back
for
the
second
reading
and.
J
J
R
J
I
P
P
P
This
is
an
item
to
remind
people
that
there
are
other
cities
or
counties
that
have
this
face
covering
some
of
them
are
san
francisco,
the
santa
clara
county,
san
mateo,
county,
santa
cruz
marin
almeida
both
monterey
county
and
the
city
have
a
face
covering
ordinance
and
as
well
as
them
on
our
neighbors
to
the
to
the
west,
san
juan
batista.
P
So
let's
say
we
have
brought
this
ordinance
forward
for
your
consideration.
M
L
T
Hi
this
has
been
coffee
council
members.
I
am
calling
about
the
mass
ordinance,
I
believe,
there's
spines
associated
with
that.
I
don't
believe
the
math
prevents
the
spread
of
covid,
in
fact,
that
recently
looked
up
several
incidences,
where
even
the
n95
mouth
doesn't
prevent
the
spread
of
cobain.
T
T
T
T
I
don't
believe
it's
worth
your
time,
trying
to
figure
out
an
ordinance
on
something
that's
only
affecting
a
small
percentage
of
the
population
when,
in
fact,
the
reaction
to
the
virus
is
affecting
the
whole
population,
whether
it's
depression
or
crime
or
suicide
or
whatever
it
may
be.
The
impact
has
been
extremely
negative
as
far
as
the
reaction
to
the
virus
and
perfect
comparison
to
the
virus
itself,.
H
U
Hi
good
evening
this
is
daviana
freitas.
I
emailed
you
guys
on
friday
over
the
weekend,
a
long
list
of
why
many
of
us
are
opposed
to
a
mass
mandate,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
little
reasons
why
we
were
opposed
to
it,
and
there
is
also
some
cultural
and
local
reasons
as
to
why
we
need
to
leave
people
alone,
and
you
know,
look
after
our
businesses.
U
U
Restaurants,
that
have
outdoor
scene
are
not
be
able
to
carry
that
out
very
much
longer
october
november,
it's
gonna
get
rainy
and
cold,
and
then
what
are
you
gonna
do?
I
think
our
businesses
are
gonna
be
forced
to
die,
especially
based
on
the
science.
That's
out
there.
As
of
right,
the
sciences
can
flip.
U
You
can
have
a
leftist
scientist
say
that
asking
works
and
you'll
have
a
conservative
scientist
say
it
does
not,
so
that's
to
say
whose
science
is
correct.
I
think
individuals,
I
just
heard
you
guys,
take
an
oath
of
office
of
the
whole
petition
and
the
california
constitution,
and
I
think,
in
order
to
do
that,
you
need
to
let
individuals
make
the
choices
of
what
they
need
to
do
to
best
take
care
of
themselves
with
family
and
community
and
to
force
mandates
on
people
is
going
to
be
very
divisive.
U
Based
on
some
of
those
points
I
outlined,
and
we
really
need
to
be
proactive,
getting
our
businesses
open.
If
businesses
want
to
open
with
bass
and
people
who
don't
want
to
wear
a
mask,
don't
need
to
go
there.
People
want
to
open
without
masks
and
people
who
want
to
wear
a
mask,
don't
need
to
go
there.
The
fairest
thing
that
you
can
do
is
to
open
up
this
community
and
let
people
make
their
the
mortality
rate
of
this
year's
flu
and
that's
what
it
is.
U
This
year's
flu
is
less
than
half
a
percent,
so
that
puts
us
right
in
range
with
all
the
other
flus.
I
think
there
is
no
science.
I
don't
think
I
know
there
is
no
science
that
validates
masking
healthy
people.
You're
talking
about
masking
98
of
the
people.
Further
cdc
has
already
come
out
and
amended
their
word
brutality
rates,
they've
already
come
out
and
said:
there's
no
benefit
to
masking
healthy
people
and
they've
already
come
out
and
said
that
asymptomatic
people
are
not
spreaders.
I
know
that
was
a
big
big
news
item
back
in
march.
U
L
W
Voice
this
gown,
thank
you.
I
lost
my
voice
to
those
the
smoky
air
conditions,
but
I'm
just
questioning
the
math
mandate.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
questions
about
it.
Number
one
people
in
hollister
don't
even
realize
there's
a
mass
mandate
that
is
under
discussion
just
being
out
in
the
community
and
talking
to
people.
They
have
no
idea.
C
W
Agree
with
everything
that
vadon
has
said
is
our
main
focus
right
now
should
be
opening
up
our
downtown
safely,
we're
killing
it.
We
have
worked
so
hard
to
bring
business
to
downtown
with
these
smoky
conditions
with
california
on
fire
the
smoke.
You
know
it's
so
sad
to
sit
out
in
the
parking
lot
and
see
restaurants
trying
to
operate
in
these
smoky
conditions.
Waitress
is
having
to
run
inside
outside
with
a
mask
on,
and
it's
they're
telling
us
that
wearing
a
mask
in
these
conditions
are
actually
worse.
W
I
also
just
don't
understand
the
mass
mandate.
If
we're
talking
about
a
mandate
to
help
against
the
coven,
why
are
we
not
doing
hand
sanitizing
stations
before
entering
stores?
You
can
walk.
Q
F
W
But
as
long
as
you
have
a
mask
on
there's
no
question
and
and
if
we're
going
to
talk
about
mandating
one
thing,
then
why
are
we
not
mandating
hand
sanitizing
six
feet
apart
stores
not
being
packed
essential
businesses
being
the
only
ones
open?
Apparently,
why
are
we
not
talking
about
that
and
mandating
that?
So
that's
a
question
that
I
have
also
if
you
are
mandating
it
says
I
read
the
three
pages
in
the
mandate
that
people
that
have
a
health
condition,
whether
it
be
mental
or
medical.
F
W
So
again,
I
would
say
no
on
a
mandate
revisit
it
november
december,
we'll
probably
have
a
lockdown
again,
maybe
that's
something
to
revisit
then,
but
as
of
now
it's
september,
it's
100
degrees
outside
and
people
are
walking
around
with
masks
on
because
they
just
they
just
don't
know
it's
okay,
to
take
your
mask
off
in
a
parking
lot,
it's
okay
to
have
your
mask
off
outside
back
in
march.
I
remember
wearing
my
mask
into
stores,
because
I
didn't
know
what
this
virus
was
about.
W
O
Am
calling
to
ask
that
you
take
this
off
of
this
and
all
future
agendas
right
now
you
are
trying
to
act
like
a
police
officer.
You
are
not
empowered
to
enforce
laws.
You
are
practicing
medicine
without
a
lie
which
is
illegal
in
all
states
of
america.
There
is
a
pretty
serious
felony
a
mask
to
prevent
a
viral
transmission
as
a
medical
intervention
that
carries
risks
and
to
wear
this
mask
it
would
reduce
my
oxygen
intake
increase.
My
co2
increase,
my
risk
of
viral
and
bacterial
fungal.
O
If
you
are
practicing
medicine
without
a
license,
you
can
be
sued
for
the
damages
that
your
advice
might
cause
and
that
another
county
or
city
has
an
enforcement.
That
is
not
a
legitimate
reason
and
I
hereby
again
claim
my
own
medical
invention,
I'm
not
required
by
law,
to
tell
you
my
medical
history,
nor
are
force
finds
upon
me
because
of
that
medical
professionals
can
only
precise
prescribe
medical
procedures,
which
means
give
advice.
They
are
not
legally
allowed
to
mandate
any
medical
procedures
which
includes
wearing
a
mask.
O
O
To
you
understand
the
offense
of
your
illegal
discriminations.
I
would
also
like
to
read
off
a
list
of
things
that
fall
under
a
medical
exemption.
It
is
ptsd,
it
is:
asthma,
allergies,
anemia,
fungal
infections,
blood,
clotting
disorders,
diabetes,
autism,
pre-existing
lung
conditions
and,
according
to
the
osha
air
quality
requirements,
it
is
a
necessity
for
humans
to
consume.
Oxygen
masks
have
been
shown
to
reduce
oxygen
to
18
and
increase
the
co2
to
over
10
000
ppm.
O
J
Okay,
okay
I'll
go
first.
This
has
been
on
my
mind
since
the
last
meeting
and
by
the
way
we
we
this
meeting
was
called
because
of
the
last
meeting
we
said
we
were
gonna,
have
a
public
hearing.
It's
noticed
in
the
paper
it's
out
there
on
facebook.
J
People
should
have
known
that
this
meeting
tonight
was
for
this
item,
so
I
don't
buy
the
people
didn't
know
if
you're
really
interested
in
an
item
pay
attention.
That's
what
I'm
saying!
Okay,
so
I
was
concerned
about
the
city's
ability
to
enforce
it.
That
was
the
first
on
my
mind.
I've
had
discussions
with
law
enforcement
and
I've
had
discussions
with
the
police
department
and
I
they
seem
to
think
it
could
be.
It
could
be
a
tool
that
that
they
could
use
I'll.
Let
them
speak
for
themselves.
J
I
don't
like
to
speak
for
other
folks
unless
they
say
I
can,
but
I
did
reach
out.
I
also
reached
out
to
a
local
physician,
because
I
wanted
his
opinion
and
he
said
well.
He
understands
the
importance
of
it,
but
even
he
admitted
that.
Well,
maybe
it's
a
little
far-reaching.
J
I
think
we
have
a
very
high
positivity
rate
9.2
as
of
today
and
monterey
only
has
11.2
and
they
got
a
lot
of
farm
workers
over
there
that
have
gotten
covered.
That's
why
their
numbers
are
driven
so
high,
but
why
are
our
numbers
so
high
at
9.2
percent
and
they've
been
higher
than
everybody
else?
They've
inched
up
inched
up
inched
up
and
you
see
santa
cruz.
You
see
how
their
numbers
have
come
down.
J
J
Okay,
just
a
second,
so
here's
what
I
have
to
consider.
Sometimes
I
literally
listen
to
the
to
the
health
department
community.
They
just
seem
very
insistent
that
face
masks
reduce
the
spread
along
with
the
six
foot
distance
scene
along
without
the
family.
Gatherings
look.
I
know
it's
tough,
but
tell
you
what
I
don't
want
to
get
anybody
sick
of
my
family
and
elder
and
they
pass
away.
J
J
Okay,
you
noticed
lately
on
tv
I
watch
tv
there's
a
lot
of
commercials
boy.
They
really
bumped
up
the
commercials
on
the
face
covering.
Do
your
part,
that's
what
they're
saying
do
your
part
and
they
they
they
must
have
spent
a
whole
bunch
of
money,
because
it's
all
over
the
tv
and
there's
a
reason
for
that.
J
Some
folks,
don't
even
know
they
could
be
a
super
spreader.
We
know.
Kids
are
super
spreaders
because
they
bring
everything
home
under
the
sun
when
they
come
home
from
school,
they're,
super
spreaders
and-
and
they
don't
know
sometimes
so-
that's
a
little
scary
for
me.
People
walking
around
not
knowing
they
have
it,
they
might
not
have
symptoms,
but
they
got
it.
J
J
J
J
J
Every
day
of
the
week,
john
freeman's
statement
I'm
for
face
mask
I'm
for
social
distancing
and
I've
tried
to
fight
this
virus,
and
that's
what
I
want
to
say
and
I
gave
it
a
lot
of
thought.
I
tried
to
go
with
the
no
fines,
but
I
just
can't
do
that
now.
I
would
be
willing
to
have
a
hundred
dollar
fine
across
the
board
with
no
escalator.
J
I
Yes,
councilman's
venture,
like
carol
said:
I've
looked
into
this.
I've
been
thinking
about
this
because
I
did
want
this
to
be
brought
back
up
and
again.
I
will
say
that
I
I'm
going
to
vote
against
it,
because
I
will
go
with
a
hundred
dollar
fine
across
the
board,
but
not
violations
being
two
and
five
hundred
dollars.
I
If
somebody
does
not
want
to
wear
a
mask,
then
I
it's
not
my
place
to
tell
them.
They
have
to
wear
one
if
they
walk
up
to
a
store,
which
I
know
happens
because
I
did.
I
walked
up
to
a
store
forgot.
My
mask.
I
was
told
to
go
back
to
my
car
and
get
a
mask
or
don't
come
in.
I
turned
around.
I
went
back
and
got
a
mask.
I
I
go
into
the
stores.
I
see
people
in
the
stores
without
masks,
I'm
not
going
to
approach
them
if
the
if
the
grocery
stores
allow
people
to
come
in
without
a
mask,
that's
on
them,
it
shouldn't
be
on
us
to
mandate
what
they
have
to
do.
If
a
small
business
does
not
require
people
to
wear
mass
in
their
business,
that's
on
them
too.
That's
their
bad,
it's
not
our
bad.
I
Things
that
just
don't
feel
right,
you're
you're,
creating
dissension
among
neighbors
you're,
creating
more
problem
than
what
we
have.
We
are
already
a
divided
community
thanks
to
certain
people
in
our
community.
This
will
divide
it
even
more,
and
I
just
can't
do
that.
We
need
to
bring
this
community
back
together.
I
I
Why-
and
I
said
this
to
somebody
and
he
understood
it
if
I'm
out
in
front
in
my
front
yard,
I'm
out
in
public
if
I'm
with
five
other
people,
whether
it
be
family
members
or
in
my
neighbors
and
we're
talking
and
none
of
us
are
wearing
masks
and
my
neighbor
across
the
street
has
a
grudge
against
me
they're,
going
to
call
the
police
on
me
and
the
police
are
going
to
show
up.
I
will
not
appreciate
that
that
will
cause
more
problems
in
my
neighborhood
than
anything
else.
I
I've
just
I'm
not
going
to
go
on,
I'm
not
going
to
preach.
I'm
just
gonna
say
that
I'm
voting
no
against
this
ordinance.
Again,
I
will
say
this
is
not
a
law.
It's
an
ordinance
and
that's
all.
I
have
to
say.
D
Thank
you.
I
think
it's
no
secret.
D
And
it
has
been
on
my
mind
since
we
last
talked
about
it.
It's
been
on
my
mind
since
the
very
first
time
you
talked
about
it.
I'll,
be
honest
with
you.
I
guess
what
frustrates
me
the
most
is
how
politicized
this
issue
has
become,
and
I
don't
want
to
blame.
I
really
don't
want
to
sit
there
and
place
blame
on
one
group
or
another.
I
just
don't
want.
D
I
think
that
if
we
were
going
to
do
this,
then
we
should
have
all
communicated
better
and
we
should
have
all
been
on
the
same
side.
It
doesn't
do
anybody
good
not
to
do
that.
It
doesn't
make
any
sense,
and
I
really
do
feel
that
they
were
influenced
by
politics
more
than
what
the
right
thing
to
do
is
and
from
their
constituents,
which
was
what
they
were
elected
to.
Do.
I
think
that
our
council
has
been
very
supportive
of
business
and
the
community.
D
If
you
look
at
our
track
record,
our
voting
record,
you
will
see
that
and
bottom
line
is,
if
you
pass
a
policy,
there
needs
to
be
some
type
of
consequence.
D
I
have
faith
in
our
staff
to
execute
the
ordinance
in
a
fair
manner,
and
even
more
so
after
hearing
that
council
remember,
the
lord
did
her
her
homework
and
she
spoke
to
them.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
honestly
mean
that
is
our
community
doing
well,
I
don't
see
that
many
people
in
the
stores
not
wearing
masks,
but
the
numbers
are
not
reflecting
that
they're,
just
not
reflecting
that.
We
had
another
fatality
in
our
community
two.
C
D
D
You
know
if
there's
any
potential,
that
we
did
not
pass
a
mass
ordinance
and
and
and
things
got
worse
then
I
couldn't
I
couldn't
live
with
myself.
I
would
be
very
heavy
on
my
heart.
You
know
I'm
not
going
to
be
that
person,
especially
being
in
public
office.
That's
the
wrong
side.
When
we
look
back
on
history,
I
think
it's
reckless
and
irresponsible
to
be
that
person
and
it
saddens
me
that
we
have
those
people
here
as
elected
officials
in
our
community.
D
If
you
don't
want
to
wear
mess,
then
don't
wear
fun,
but
don't
go
into
our
stores
and
don't
put
our
community
our
people
that
work
for
us,
their
health
and
their
safety
at
risk.
Just
don't
do
it
stay
home
and
send
someone
else
to
the
store,
find
other
ways
to
protect
your
physical
health,
your
mental
health,
that's
that's
my
take
on
it
and,
of
course,
I'm
going
to
support
this.
D
M
M
M
I
can
remember
in
the
early
days
we
as
a
community
were
working
together
so
well
to
keep
our
numbers
down.
I
remember
other
cities,
council
members,
calling
me
asking
how
we
were
doing
it
in
southern
batista
or
hollister
and
how
we
would
keep
our
numbers
low
and
how
it
was
that
with
the
load
numbers
we're
going
to
reopen
sooner
than
they
all
were,
and
they
were
just
asking.
How
are
we
doing-
and
I
can
tell
them-
we
are
working
as
a
community.
M
M
Although
people
feel
nobody's
dying
in
our
community,
they
are
this
week
we
had
two
insults
that
died
from
the
beginning.
We've
had
10
in
our
community
that
have
died
in
our
country.
We've
had
200
000
people
that
have
died,
and
I
remember
hearing
those
saying
this
is
no
worse
than
the
normal
flu
or
40
50
000
people
die
each
year
and
we're
not
even
done
we're
headed
towards
the
worst
part
of
this
pandemic
as
winter
comes
upon
us.
M
It's
a
shame.
Shame
that
here
we
are
still
finding
reasons
to
avoid
wearing
a
face
cover
a
face
cover
that
can
help
prevent
someone
else.
Forget
yourself,
if
you
don't
care
but
spread
someone
else
from
getting
the
infection
by
the
simple
measure
of
wearing
a
face
covered,
think
about
that
you
might
be
protecting
somebody
else's
life.
M
M
M
C
M
M
The
positivity
rate
is
actually
13
in
our
community
13,
which
is
extremely
high,
and
yet
here
we
are
still
having
these
same
conversations
about
the
constitution
and
everything
else
in
every
way
possible
to
keep
from
wearing
a
place
cover
a
simple
face
cover
to
protect
each
other
to
beat
this
virus.
It
was
all
for
the
face
covers
if
we
all
kept
our
distance.
M
If
we
all
did
our
little
piece
to
protect
each
other,
we'd
be
done
with
this
virus
and
we'd
be
back
to
normal,
and
our
kids
as
miss
old
north
point
out,
could
be
back
in
school,
but
instead
it's
become
political
and
lives,
are
being
lost
with
each
and
every
day
that
we
procrastinate
and
we
make
additional
excuses
and
that's
a
shame.
I
will
never
be
part
of
that.
M
I've
said
from
the
very
beginning.
Our
job
is
to
make
sure
our
enemy
is
as
safe
as
possible
and
I'm
going
to
stay
to
it
and
make
sure
we're
doing
our
part
in
our
community.
So
I
want
to
thank
councilman,
elenor
and
temporary
sentence
again
for
your
your
words,
I
think
they're
very
important
and
again
the
council
in
salmon
batista.
You
guys
are
awesome
over
there.
You
showed
real
leadership.
J
M
J
J
L
Now
this
e-signature
would
not
be
usable
for
resolutions
or
ordinances
minutes
things
that
need
to
be
kept
for
legislative
history,
but
what
it
will
do
is
make
it
more
possible
for
internal
and
some
external
documents
to
be
signed
because
of
all
the
teleconferencing.
Everyone
is
not
attending
the
meetings,
we're
not
able
to
get
all
the
signatures.
We
need
not
just
the
city
clerk's
office,
but
all
departments
have
expressed
that
they
could
use
this.
So
the
reason
I'm
asking
for
not
to
exceed
9005
is
because
it's
about
about
five
paul.
I
think
it's
about
five.
L
I
don't
know
if
you
saw
the
two
attachments
I
put
in
there,
but
we're
going
to
start
with
the
500
envelopes.
We
don't
know
how
much
the
city
is
going
to
use
because
we've
never
tried
or
used
this
system
before,
but
we
want
to
have
the
option
that
if
we
go
over
the
500,
we
can
either
pay
per
envelope
and
I'm
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
this
is
all
going
to
work
out,
but
eight
dollars
and
eighty
cents
each
or
they'll
give
us
an
option.
Like
let's
say
in
six
months.
L
They
discover
that
we're
already
almost
through
our
500,
then
we
would
have
the
option
to
move
to
the
thousand,
which
would
be
the
not
to
exceed
the
higher
price,
which
is
why
I'd
like
to
have
that
money
sitting
there.
Just
in
case
we
decide
that
that's
what
we
need,
but
in
the
meantime,
I'd
like
to
start
with
half
and
just
see
how
we
do.
I
know
police
has
just
has
said
that
they
can
use
it
and
I
think
all
departments
are
interested.
L
D
Not
necessarily
questioning
quick
comment,
sir,
I
just
want
to
point
out
again
christine.
This
is
another
example
of
how
competitive
our
staff
is
and
how
you
guys
are
always
ahead.
I
really
appreciate
it
not
just
with
this,
but
you've
done
that
with
our
filing
our
paperwork,
paul
with
all
of
the
technology.
D
I
Thank
you,
sir.
I
do
have
something
to
say:
I
love
ducky
signs.
I
do
I
have
been
using
it.
It
is
so
easy.
It
makes
signing
thing
signing
contracts
and
papers
that
I
have
to
sign,
not
through
the
city
but
through
the
high
school.
We
use
it
at
the
high
school
and
we
have
been
using
it
for
a
while.
It's
amazing,
I
definitely
think
you
guys
will
love
it.
L
The
county
really
helped
me
out
by
showing
me
what
they,
what
they're,
using
and
showed
me
how
they're
using
it,
and
that
really
inspired
me
to
to
bring
it
back
to
the
group.
Paul
tried
to
do
it
about
a
year
ago,
maybe
yeah.
So
I'm.
I
I
make
a
motion
that
we
accept
resolution
number
202173,
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
hollister,
approving
an
appropriation
from
the
general
fund
reserves
at
an
annual
amount
not
to
exceed
9500
authorizing
an
agreement
with
docusign
incorporated
for
e-signature
enterprise.
Pro
edition.
C
E
Good
evening,
mayor
council
members,
bob
martin
o'connell
fire
chief
hollister
city
fire
item
f6
is
a
resolution
2020
174,
making
a
recommendation
to
surplus
the
fire
apparatus,
ferrara
telescore,
it's
a
1997
piece
of
equipment.
10
years
in
service
front
line,
10
years
in
service
reserve,
it's
actually
23
years
old,
we've
tried
to
prolong
its
life
by
giving
repairs
and
maintenance.
E
It's
done
its
job
right
now
it's
been
plagued
with
continuous
maintenance
and
it's
costing
quite
a
bit
of
money.
It's
rather
expensive
for
an
antiquated
piece
of
equipment
like
that
it
it
like
I
said
earlier.
It
has
been
plagued
with
service
issues,
but
it's
done
its
job,
and
this
is
just
a
recommendation
for
council
to
go
ahead
and
allow
us
to
surplus.
It.
M
M
O
Supervisor
this
reservation
before
you
will
approve
an
agreement
with
san
diego
county
to
offer
driving
movie
events
at
the
veterans
memorial
park
parking
lot
and
the
parking
lot
is
located
where
staff
can
encourage
social
distancing
and
provide
safe
guidelines
to
entertain,
entertain
and
engage
residents.
The
city
of
hollister
recreation
department
would
like
to
offer
our
dive
and
movie
events
that
are
free
to
the
public.
J
O
Yes,
so
they
are
required
to
stay
in
their
vehicles.
Okay,
the
only
time
they'll
be
able
to
come
out
is
if
they
need
to
use
the
restroom.
C
O
Yes,
we
will
have
staff
out
during.
J
D
Common,
if
my
name
is
here
again,
I'm
going
to
beat
this
drum
all
night.
I
did
bring
this
up
at
a
city
council
meeting,
I
had
a
conversation
with
the
manic
city
manager
the
next
day
and
miss
tina
garza.
They
had
already
been
working
on
this.
It's
just
another
example
of
how
our
staff
is
looking
around,
bringing
things
back
to
our
city
that
are
going
to
benefit
our
community.
I'm
very
excited
about
this
and
again,
I'm
just
grateful
for
tina
garza
and
our
red
department
for
how
they
pivoted
during
these
times.
Thank
you.
J
J
P
O
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
recreations.
Getting
the
mayor
of
alaska's
and
city
council
members,
tina
garza
items,
f8
and
f9
are
two
grants
that
staff
applied
to
in
actually
august
of
2019
and
unfortunately,
the
city
of
hollister
was
not
awarded
either
grant.
But
recently
the
california
department
of
parks
and
recreation
office
of
grants
and
local
services
announced
the
opportunity
for
agencies
to
apply
for
for
the
statewide
park
program,
as
staff
recommends
by
we'll
call
vote
a
resolution.
M
O
D
I
do
have
a
question,
sir.
Thank
you,
miss
tina
garza,
then
the
two
grants
that
we
applied
for
they
were
not
approved
and
they
were
essentially
for
the
same
thing.
Is
that
correct?
It.
D
O
We
have
recently
worked
with
a
project
manager
with
the
state
parks
and
recreation
office
and
to
help
guide
us
and
maybe
changing
some
of
the
language
and
information
and
letting
us
know
what
some
of
our
faults
were
and
how
we
can
improve
it,
so
that,
when
we
do
apply
in
december,
we'll
have
a
better
opportunity
to
maybe
award
the
ground.
D
O
D
O
Feedback
from
the
community
the
park,
the
community
center
is
what
community
members
are
seeking.
Just
because
we
had,
we
requested
a
gymnasium
which
is
needed
here
in
our
community.
There
is
a
sales
dot,
a
soccer
field,
a
roller
rink,
so
the
community
was
in
favor
of
our
our
the
amenities
that
we
wanted
to
include
at
the
park.
O
The
grant
office-
and
there
was
some
information
that
we
were
missing.
So
we
will
now
be
able
to
provide
this.
The
second
go
around.
I
D
X
D
I
O
I
Is
there
a
motion,
I
make
a
motion
that
we
accept
resolution
number
20
21-77
I
got
lost
again.
I
make
a
motion
that
we
accept
resolution
number
2020
177,
a
resolution
of
the
city
of
council
of
the
city
of
hollister
approved
the
application
for
statewide
park
development
and
community
revitalization,
great
funds.
D
J
L
M
J
R
I
Y
Much
good
evening,
american
members
item
f10
is
a
resolution
that
will
designate
synagro
incorporated
as
the
lowest
responsive
bidder
for
removing
two
thousand
dry
tons
of
sludge
from
pong
2
at
the
industrial
wastewater
treatment
plant
and
appropriating
1.5
million
dollars
for
fund
665,
which
is
a
sewer
industrial
enterprise
spot.
Y
I
apologize
on
the
finance
choke
impact
section.
I
did
not
put
the
fund
balance
down
there
and
that's
because
things
were
in
flux
up
until
last
week.
I
am
happy
to
report
that
I
was
able
to
get
san
benito
boots
to
fully
execute
the
2020
discharge,
permit
which
obligates
them
to
pay
the
complete
cost
of
this
item.
C
Y
And
our
consultant
recommended
a
healthy
contingency
fee
because
sludge
estimation
is
a
inexact
and,
as
you
are
aware,
we
need
to
do
a
clean
closure.
We
need
to
get
it
all
out,
so
we've
been
ahead
and
put
a
thirty
thousand
dollar
thirty
percent
contingency
fee
to
that
amount,
and
we
included
sixty
thousand
dollars
paid
for
the
consultant
to
supervise
the
work.
D
Do
you
have
a
question,
sir?
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
So
what
you're
saying
mr
chambliss
is
that
san
benito
county
foods
essentially
agreed
to
remove
the
sludge
from
the
the
ponds.
Y
So
potato
foods
is
required
to
reboot
the
pledge
under
the
executed
discharge
permit
and
they
executed
option
one
under
the
permit
and
they
have
already
deposited
one
million
dollars
with
the
sydney
to
accomplish
this
work
and
they
pledged
pay
the
remaining
costs.
We
actually
don't
expect
it
to
come
in
at
1.5.
P
J
M
M
D
Y
The
bill
the
bill
may
be
less
than
that,
and
that
would
be
the
amount
that
they
pay.
They're,
not
they're,
not
obligated
to
pay
the
full
1.5.
If
we
don't
spend
it.
D
M
Thank
you
mike.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
following
this
through
it's
great,
we'll,
finally
get
this
slides
removed
from
that
pond,
and
so
we
can
move
on.
So
thank
you
very
much
again
for
everyone
involved
in
this
this.
These
conversations
is
there
a
motion
on
this
side.
D
I
will
make
a
motion,
mr
mayor,
that
we
adopt
resolution
number
2020
178.
A
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
hollister
is
designating
incorporation
as
the
lowest
bidder
for
removing
2
000
dry
ton,
sludge
from
the
industrial
wastewater
treatment
plant
pond
to
an
appropriating
1.566
534
million
dollars
from
fund
665
sewer
industrial
intel
enterprise.
Thank
you.
M
L
Y
As
the
recalls,
prior
to
the
summer
break,
we
went
out
to
the
bid
to
do
some
modernization
improvements
out
of
public
works
yard
in
a
component
of
that
project
was
backed
up
electrical
generation
for
the
animal
control
facility.
Q
Y
The
bid
for
the
generator
exceeded
the
grant
amount.
If
you,
if
you
all
recall,
you
had
a
grant
for
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
the
emergency
generator
for
animal
control
and
the
bid
amount
came
in
at
a
hundred
thousand.
So
we
need
that
extra.
Fifty
thousand
to
cover
that
part
of
the
project
there
is
about
30
000
in
there
to
upgrade
the
fire
safety
of
the
locker
room.
Y
We
went
ahead
and
upgraded
the
electrical
in
there
from
minimum
code
to
a
heavier
gauge
wire,
so
it's
staying
cooler
and
also
we
replace
the
normal
plywood
with
fire
plywood
so
that
there's
no
chance
of
there
ever
being
any
issues
inside
of
those
locker
rooms
and
then
finally,
there's
money
amends
the
cost
of
approximately
six
thousand
dollars
to
supervise
the
completion
of
the
project
with
finley.
Y
D
More
of
a
saying
that
all
right,
sir,
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
mike
sorry,
mr
chambliss,
I
didn't
realize
that
the
entire
graph
was
not
covering
it
and
when
I
hear
we're
taking
fifty
thousand
dollars
out
of
our
general
fund,
I
don't
know
if
right
now,
the
best
time
to
do
it.
So
what
I
guess,
what
are
the
stipulations
of
the
grant
are
we
do
we
have
to
do
this?
Do
you
think
we're
to
lose
and
then
how
much
more
are
we
getting
from
the
grant?
Aside
from
the
50
50
000,.
Y
I
I
would
defer
to
the
police
chief
because
he's
the
one
who
handled
the
grant
portion
I
just
know
the
grant-
is
for
50
000
in
the
cost
to
provide
the
emergency
right.
B
Yes,
if
I
may
council
member
rosendes,
the
grant
is
for
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
the
specifically
for
a
generator
at
animal
control.
B
The
grant
was
approved
earlier
this
year.
I
think
we
do
have
the
remainder
of
this
year
to
make
that
decision,
but
as
far
as
the
deadline,
I
would
have
to
get
back
to
you
as
far
as
a
drop
dead
deadline
to
do
something
with
the
grant
money
or
not,
okay
and
then
what's
the
total
amount
of
the
grant,
the
grant
for
the
generator
is
50
000,
and
this
has
come
in
at
43.
D
I'm
just
a
little
bit
concerned
about
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
go
back
and
look
at
your
budget
and
see
if
you
can
move
other
things
around
and
then
come
back
at
a
later
date.
That
would
probably
be
better
for
me
just
because
we
don't
know
what
our
finance
serving
lookouts.
M
Thank
you.
Do
you
have
a
question
I
I
thought
I
heard
mr
chambliss
say
something
about
upsizing,
some
wiring
and
some
other
things
to
to
make
this
work.
What
kind
of
cost
increases
are
we
talking
about.
Y
M
M
M
J
M
It's
you're
absolutely
right,
that's
from
one
hour
very,
very
expensive.
I
wonder
if
we
can
just
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
those
increases.
Also,
what
we're
talking
about
in
a
commercial
setting
usually
wiring
is
set
at
12
gauge.
I'm
I'm
wondering
how
that
would
have
been
designed
at
14
gauge
for
a
commercial
setting,
and
I'm
surprised
that
the
amount
of
extra
dollars
for
the
fire
approved
on
the
so
I
I
do
personally
would
like
more
information
on
this
myself.
M
How
much
time
do
you
need?
I
mean
I'm
assigned
to
see
what
else
we
can
do
here
to
save
some
dollars
and
and
still
get
this
project
done.
Y
J
Y
M
That
has
to
be
accepted
by
us.
Y
M
M
D
Question
go
ahead,
mr
shoutlist.
If
we
were
to
scrap
this
so
to
speak,
as
you
said,
and
we
were
to
go
and
and
put
it
out
for
bid
again
change
some
things
around
put
it
off
a
bit,
but
there'd
be
an
additional
cost
associated
with
that
too,
and,
if
so,
about
how
much
would
you
think
that
would
be.
G
Y
D
D
Y
M
All
right
do
we
have
any
speaker
cards
on
this
item.
J
L
H
M
If
we
can
get
a
motion
to
our
date,
servant
september,
21st
and
productions.
J
F
Y
Recently,
there's
been
a
change
in
management
out
of
the
domestic
voice,
fire
treatment
plan
and
there
have
been
many
surprises.
This
is
one
of
those
surprises.
Apparently
our
existing
victor
failed
in
2012
and
staff
have
been
and
mixing.
Y
Since
then,
this
has
led
to
higher
chemical
costs
because
it's
not
being
done
at
the
correct
amounts
and
chemicals
are
being
wasted.
So
the
plan
is
to
go
ahead
and
get
this
piece
of
equipment
back
up
and
running,
so
the
clamp
is
running
as
it
was
designed.
D
J
C
Y
Will
accept,
approve
the
plans
and
specification
and
direct
staff
to
receive
sealed
bids
for
an
appropriate
914
000
to
construct
a
fire
protection
system
for
the
electrical
room
and
other
fire
protection
improvements
at
the
domestic
voice,
art
treatment
class.
As
you
remember
from
our
previous
discussion,
our
insurance
company
identified
the
electrical
room
as
a
single
planet.
Y
Failure
for
the
system
and
directed
us
to
get
fire
protection
installed
in
that
room
at
the
last
time
it
was
before
the
council
requested
specific
changes
to
the
plan
specifications
which
were
completed,
which
include
automated
electrical
shutoffs
if
fire
is
detected
and
also
a
fire
alarm
system
for
the
entire
facility
and
for
the
record
how
this
place
was
ever
constructed
one,
it
was
constructed
without
any
of
this
I
do
not
know,
but
anyway,
the
goal
here
is
going
to
get
the
plans
and
specs
adopted
and
approved.
Y
M
Mr
chambers,
I
do
have
some
questions
and
you
know
I
have
concerns
about
this
project
and
I'm,
I
am
glad
to
see
the
fire
safety
measures
and
all
the
additional
buildings.
I
was
pretty
surprised
to
find
none
of
the
buildings
had
any
monitoring
involved
in
their
buildings.
So
that
part,
I'm
in
total
agreement
with
my
question,
is:
if
you
take
out
the
other,
that's
the
suppression
system
in
that
room.
What
does
the
cost
come
down
to?
Do?
We
have
that
broken
out,
separated.
C
Y
Not
not
with
I
do
have
it.
No,
the
suppression
system
is
a
600
000
estimated
cost,
and
once
again
it
told
us
that
we
don't
know
what
specific
costs
are.
As
we
saw
on
that
last
item,
we
thought
the
generator
was
going
to
come
in
at
50,
but
it
came
in
at
100,
and
so
our
engineer
consultant
has
said
that
the
suppression
system
should
be
600
000
and
all
the
alarm
improvements
and
other
electrical
shutoffs
will
be
an
additional
300
or
350.
On
top
of
that,
okay.
M
That's
the
engineer's
estimates
correct
and
the
conversation
the
the
last
part
of
this
conversation
that
I
wanted
to
have
was,
with
the
insurance
company,
make
to
be
clear
on
what
they're
asking
for.
As
I
pointed
out,
the
the
one
issue
that
I
saw
was
the
shut
off
system
with
the
fire
alarm
to
the
electrical
equipment.
M
Disconnects
no
power
push
would
kill,
of
course,
I'll
de-energize
the
tv
equipment
which
would
stop
as
far
as
the
fuel
for
the
fire,
but
I
never
got
the
clarity
from
the
insurance
part
of
this
of
what
they're
looking
for
exactly
other
than
a
a
fire
system.
Does
that
mean
it's
fire
monitoring?
It's
I'm
still
not
sold
on
the
system,
stopping
fire.
I
absolutely
believe
in
the
shut
off
system
very
important
and
I
absolutely
believe
in
the
monitoring
of
each
of
the
buildings
very
important.
Y
Y
So
if
the
fire
has
started,
there
needs
to
be
some
sort
of
active
suppression
to
put
out
the
fire,
so
it
doesn't
spread
and
rip
correct.
M
Yeah,
the
electrical
equipment
again
the
when
there's
a
short
and
electrical
system
that
is
going
to
burn
because
of
the
electricity
moving
through
it.
The
equipment
itself
is
not
going
to
it's
obviously
metal,
but
it
will
burn
if
there's
power
going
through
the
system.
That's
why
the
shutoff
itself
kicks
down
the
power,
so
there's
no
more,
basically,
energy
going
in
continuing
to
burn
I'm
just
still
not
100
convinced
on
this
other
system
to
shut
off
the
rest
of
the
or
to
starve
the
oxygen
to
put
out
any
additional
fires.
M
Y
The
suppression
system
includes
automated
dampers
and
there's
alarm
systems.
Obviously
that
have
to
be
installed
to
warn
anybody
in
the
room
that
the
oxygen
is
about
to
go
away
and
they
have
so
much
time
to
get
out
before
the
suppression
system
kicks
in
and
starts
displacing
the
oxygen.
But
I
will
refer
to
charlie
because
I
see.
M
Between
the
two
rooms,
there's
several
voids
openings
is
that
how's
that
filled
in
how
does
that
keep
it
from
jumping
to
the
next
room?
I
believe
the
pump
rings.
The
next
room
wasn't
it.
I
don't
remember.
M
Is
it,
but
there
was
some
openings
between
those
two
walls?
Yes
and
those
get
sealed
this
part
of
the
product.
That
does
that's
wrong.
That
does
he's
still
up.
Okay,
the
last
part
again,
I
just
wanted
to
again.
I
want
to
get
a
little
more
clarification
from
the
insurance
company.
Did
you
ever
set
up
that
appointment
with
the
insurance
company
to
be
exactly
clear
on
what
they're
looking
for.
D
Resendez,
thank
you.
I
know
we've
been
talking
about
this
item
for
a
while
and
I'm
pretty
sure
I
know
the
answer
to
this
because
we've
been
talking
about
for
a
song,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
claire
get
for
our
information
from
you,
mr
travis.
This
was
included
in
your
budget
correct.
D
Y
D
I
I
do
have
something
I'd
like
to
say:
we
have
a
expert
in
fire
at
the
podium
I'd
like
to
hear
from
him,
charlie.
Z
Hi,
mr
mayor
fellow
council
members,
thank
you
for
that.
I
appreciate
that
they
did
request
the
fire
suppression
system
and
you
got
to
remember.
There's
four
different
types
of
fires:
there's
a
class,
a
fire
class
b,
fire
class
c
fire
and
a
class
d
fire
a
class.
A
is
ordinary
combustible.
You
could
put
out
with
water
class
b.
Is
your
flammable
liquids?
Class
c?
Z
Is
your
energized
electrical
soon,
as
you
take
away
the
the
energy
or
the
energized
electrical
for
the
class
c
fire,
it
turns
it
into
an
ordinary
combustible
which
is
a
class
a
fire.
Therefore,
it
keeps
burning.
The
only
difference
is
our
fire
suppression
techniques.
So
we
can't
hit
it
with
water.
While
it's
charged,
we
have
to
use
a
dry
cam,
but
once
the
fire
is
de-energized
and
shut
down,
then
we'll
be
able
to
go
extinguish
fire
because
it
continues
to
burn
and
smolder
as
a
class.
Z
A
fire
is
ordinary
combustible,
so
just
because
the
power
does
get
shut
off,
it
still
continues
to
burn.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
understood
that
part
right
there
just
because
the
power
gets
shut
off.
It's
still
going
to
continue
to
burn
if
the
wires
are
smoldering
and
everything
the
components
with
that
too
and
it'll
burn
right
through
the
walls,
and
it
just
follows
it
through.
So
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
into
that
also.
M
M
Z
No,
that
was
just
that
was
just
the
initial
gas
to
extinguish
the
class
c,
the
classy
energized
electrical
fire
suppressed
system.
So
you
kind
of
want
to
do
it
as
clean
as
possible.
A
clean
room,
extinguishing
agent
that
way
it
doesn't
ruin
and
damage
all
the
equipment.
That's
in
there.
You
want
to
try
to
prevent
as
much
damage
minimal
damage
to
that.
So
they'll
hit
it
with
that.
That
way,
it's
easy
to
get
in
there
fixed
without
all
the
water
damage
that
shocks
and
blows
it
and
spreads
the
damage
more.
Z
I
mean
if
we
need
to
it's
already
out
and
shut
off,
that
we'll
need
to
do
what
we
need
to
do,
because
power
will
be
secure,
so
we'll
need
to
shut
it
off
with
either
a
dryer
cam.
We
will
need
to
extinguish
it
with
either
our
dry
cams
or
if
we
need
it,
we
have
a
hydrant,
we'll
use
copious
amounts
of
water
to
put
it
out
at
a
safe
distance.
Z
I
I
they
they
calculate
it
and
it's
it's
it's
it's,
however,
long
until
the
extinguishing
agent
depends
how
big
the
system
is,
so
they
should
have
it
for
the
that
size
room
that
they
have
it'll
it'll,
hit
it
and
knock
it
down.
But
that's
why
it's
important
that
we
put
some
gas
monitors
in
there
too.
I
believe-
and
that
was
part
of
it
too,
because
it
displaces
oxygen,
so
we
don't
want
to
have
it
go
off
with
someone's
in
the
room,
because
then
you'll
have
another
emergency
they
have
to.
Z
M
So
the
the
other
part
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
they
added
all
the
buildings
as
far
as
the
monitoring.
What
is
your
view
as
far
as
the
future
for
sprinklers
and
the
other
buildings
or
your
your
feelings
towards,
or
is
that
on
in
the
future?
What's
your
concerns.
Z
You
you
know
we
we
could
plan
for
it,
but
I
think
we
don't
do
a
proprietary
system
and
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
get
in
there
and
have
someone
be
able
to
just
bid
to
put
a
fire
suppression
system
a
clean
room
systems
in
there,
and
there
is
agencies
but
not
use
a
proprietary
system
and
we
should
be
able
to
get
it
at
a.
I
would
I
would,
I
would
guess,
a
way
decent
amount,
but
it's
something
we
work
up
to
so
right
now.
Z
The
way
it
is
we're
at
a
good,
comfortable
position
where
we'll
have
it
alarmed
and
monitored.
So,
if
anything
does
happen,
we're
going
to
get
out
there
within
a
few
minutes.
M
Z
M
M
For
me,
okay,
so
thank
you
again,
everyone
for
answering
the
questions.
I
do
feel
much
more
comfortable
with
the
system
now,
knowing
it's
protecting
the
entire
treatment
plan
now.
Did
I
ask
for
any
public
comment
already.
Y
C
Y
N
Y
Contact
engineering
and
they
they
said
it-
will
cost
68
000
to
replace
or
to
repair
all
the
cracks
in
the
project
cases
they
need
to
be
routed
and
then
crowded
and
then
sealed
to
prevent
the
fluids
from
getting
into
the
rebar.
C
J
L
Y
Thank
you
so.
My
last
item
is
a
resolution:
a
supplemental
appropriation
of
130
thousand
dollars
from
fund
662,
which
is
stormwater.
It
has
a
fund
balance
of
4.9
million
dollars
to
complete
a
storm
water
resource
plan
by
the
walls
group.
Our
on-call
engineering
consultant
when
it
comes
to
stormwater
recently
council
authorized
us
to
apply
for
a
prop
1
stormwater
grant
from
the
state
of
california,
and
we
completed
that
task
and
we
applied
for
5.2
million
dollars
in
grant
funds.
R
Y
Stormwater
filtration
unit
installations
that
were
required
to
complete
and
also
we'll
fund
portions
of
the
pond2
stormwater
treatment
project
in
order
to
qualify
for
that
5.2
million
in
grant
money,
we
need
to
complete
this
plan.
So
that's
what
the
item
is
for
you
tonight
to
consider
is
to
go
ahead
and
authorize
the
funds
and
allow
us
to
execute
the
task
order
to
complete
the
required
plan
to
qualify
for
the
grant.
Y
Y
There's
a
couple
things
I
don't
ever
predict.
I
never
predict
how
I
was
gonna
vote
and
I
never
predict
that's
a
great
result,
but
I
will
tell
you
that
this
this
has
strong
support
with
the
staff
water
board
and
that
would
this
is
a
kind
of
poster
child
project
for
these
grant
funds
and
both
the
wallace
group
and
the
water
board.
Both
have
made
comments
that
we
are
a
strong
contender
for
the
money.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
We
can
just
get
a
report
back
oftentimes.
We
approve
these
these
grants
and
then
we
don't
hear
back
so
I
really
appreciate
when
you
get
a
report
back
whether
we
got
it
or
not.
I'd
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
Definitely.
R
Fantastic.
Thank
you
item
f16
before
you
tonight.
You
heard
this
item
a
couple
council
meetings
ago
in
august.
This
is
for
the
initiation
of
both
free
zone
2020-2,
as
well
as
the
initiation
of
general
plan
amendment
2020-1,
to
include
four
parcels
three
by
the
apple,
which
are
zero
one.
Four
one:
two:
zero
zero
five.
I.
S
S
Not
included
the
staff
recommended
parcel
is
recommended
to
be
pre-zoned
to
m1
light
industrial,
organic
district,
and
then
the
three
applicant
parcels
are
recommended
to
be
consumed
into
the
industrial
business
parts
known
in
the
district.
S
M
No,
no!
I
I
do
have
some
comments.
I
I
did
finally
receive
the
set
of
plans
or
the
draft
of
the
concepts
which
looked
actually
looked
pretty
good.
I
did
like
the
the
concepts
and
ideas
the
only
concern
I
have.
We
still
have
some
issues
because
the
tax
current
agreement
was
not
finalized
for
commercial
properties,
so
that
still
needs
to
happen
and
there's
some
other
issues.
M
P
J
M
But
unfortunately,
when
we're
doing
a
case
by
case
basis,
we're
going
to
find
ourselves
in
a
case
like
this
and
that's
not
what
we
want
to
be
in,
I
think
we
need
to
have
those
discussions
now
to
move
to
the
next
step.
As
I
said,
I
did
like
the
concepts
I
like
the
ideas,
but
the
reality
is
we
need
to
get
this
tax
sharing
part
of
this
worked
out,
so
we
move
to
the
next.
J
M
Well,
and
but
that's
kind
of
the
problem,
we
kind
of
want
to
make
sure
we're
getting
everything
lined
up,
and
so,
if
we
move
forward
with
this,
there's
no
hold
ups
for
this
developer
on
his
commercial
property,
and
that's
again,
I
think
very
important
that
we
understand
that
otherwise
we're
going
to
find
ourselves
in
a
situation
where
we're
making
promises
and
if,
for
some
reason
the
county
does
not
want
to
negotiate
an
agreement.
M
This
developer
on
this
commercial
property
will
be
stuck
between
in
the
middle
here.
I
think
this
is
something
we
should
be
really
again
working
with
the
county
to
finish
off
these
negotiations
and
get
them
done
completely,
so
we're
not
having
to
do
this
every
time
there
is
a
another
parcel
that
wants
to
come
to
the
city
for
commercial
or
industrial
development.
P
No,
no
they're
I
mean
they
have
their
plans,
would
be
two
hotels
conference
center
restaurant
potential
fuel
stations,
so
there
are
different
retail
aspects
so,
but
the
issue
would
be
without
any
kind
of
approval.
We're
not
really
not
sure
what
we
would
be
negotiating
at
this.
M
I
think
this
goes
back
to
again
the
the
conversation
that
happened,
agreement
for
annexing
in
commercial
or
industrial
properties
so
that
we
can
move
forward
on
projects
and
not
have
developers
like
this
they're
trying
to
build
a
commercial
property
have
to
wait
for
that
agreement
to
happen.
I'm
so
concerned
that
we're
moving
forward.
But
again
we
don't
have
an
agreement
with
the
county
and,
as
I
said
before,
that
we
should
have
this
already,
but
we
need.
F
M
So
we
need
to
just
figure
out
where
we're
at
again
and
make
sure
we're
working
with
the
county
to
get
this
finalized,
as
we
had
before
on
these
types
of
projects.
So
I
think
it's
important
that
we
do
get
something
some
sort
of
agreement
in
place,
so
it's
more
fair
for
these
developers,
because
I
you
know
I
looked
at
this
project.
I
thought
not
a
bad
concept.
M
I
liked
what
they're
proposing,
where
we
act
with
these
other
steps
and
to
find
that
we're
not
there
yet
because
of
this
unlocking
agreement,
I
think,
puts
us
at
a
disadvantage.
It
definitely
hurts
the
developer's
timeline
of
this.
So
I'd
like
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
social
media,
soon,
city
manager,
with
the
county-
and
I
would
say
you
should
probably
be
the
one
negotiation.
M
P
Yes,
that's
something
we
can
do,
but
I
abraham
also
wanted
to
address
some
issues
that
you
brought
up
also
so
real
quick.
V
If
that's
okay,
mr
mayor
members
of
the
council,
abraham
prado
development
services,
planning
manager,
just
wanted
to
address
that
with
this
item
as
council
member
carolyn
knower
indicated
this
would
be
for
the
initiation
of
the
pre-zone,
as
well
as
the
general
plan
initiation,
which
the
general
plan
initiation
requires
unanimous
for
for
votes.
V
As
you
well
know,
and
so,
if,
if
approved
tonight,
then
at
this
point
we
would
be
able
to
start,
it
would
actually
provide
the
applicant
the
opportunity
to
start
the
environmental
process
which,
which
that
alone
in
itself,
can
take
potentially
at
minimum
one
year.
V
If
not,
if
not
more,
and
it
just
really
depends,
we
know
we've
done
environmental
documents
that
you
know
can
be
as
fast
as
16
weeks,
approximately
four
months,
but
for
something
like
this.
The
nature
of
this
project,
which
is
very
involved
with
with
the
pre-zoning
with
the
general
plan
amendment
and
future
commercial
developments,
we
we
normally,
we
normally
do
the
environmental
review
at
at
full,
build
out
in
this
case,
with
an
industrial
business
park
pre-zoning
that
we
would
be
recommending,
but
it
it's.
It
is
very,
very
involved.
V
So
we
don't
anticipate
this
environmental
review
going
any
any
sooner
than
than
one
year,
so
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out
there
just
to
to
indicate
the
the
process
of
of
just
the
initiation
part
of
it.
But
nonetheless
you
know
the
comments
that
you
indicated
as
well.
Mr
mayor,
regarding
the
property
tax
exchange
agreement
are
very
valid
in
regards
to
the
actual
pre-zone
as
you
as
you
all,
are
informed
and
know
about
as
well.
V
I
V
V
Q
V
For
for
purposes
of
getting
started
with
the
environmental
review,
that
is
correct,
with
the
novo
or
what
they,
even
with
the
331
vote
in
favor
of
it,
the
environmental
document
cannot
get
started
because
it
would
not.
It
would
not
be
approved
so
just
for
purposes
of
getting
the
environmental
done,
or
at
least
kicked
off
that
that
is
correct.
V
D
N
N
Well,
I
would
hate
to
go
into
any
details
regarding
what
what
a
developer
could
or
could
not
sue
the
city
for,
but
there's,
there's
always
a
risk
of
litigation,
especially
when,
when
one
party
or
another
interprets
what
was
or
was
not
done
by
a
city
council
differently.
If
that
makes
sense,
I
realize
that's
a
little
waffley,
but
that's
probably
about
as
far
as
I'm
comfortable
going
in
in
open
session,
councilmember
resendiz.
D
I
understand
thank
you
for
your
very
honesty
with
that
question,
so
I
I
too
did
get
the
plans.
Thank
you
to
the
developers
that
sent
that
to
to
me.
It
does
seem
like,
like
a
really
nice
project,
it's
got
a
lot
of
potential
for
our
community.
I
think
this
is
definitely
something
worth
considering
to
to
do
a
general
plan
amendment
and
to
annex
them.
But,
however,
I
don't
want
to
rush
into
anything
just
given
our
history
with
you
know,
being
threatened
to
be
sued
by
developers
and
whatnot.
D
I
think
if
we
take
that
first
step
where
we
we
may
open
ourselves
up
to
get
soon-
and
I
want
to
do
this-
the
right
way
and
make
sure
that
essentially,
we
cross
all
our
t's
on
our
eyes.
So
I
really
like
the
project.
I
appreciate
developers
reaching
out
to
me
and
I
look
forward
to
furthering
discussion
more,
but
I've
not
been
in
a
hurry
to
do
it.
That's
that's
for
sure.
M
I
think
city
manager,
abraham,
what
trying
to
point
out
is
if
we
start
this
in
this
direction,
for
example,
they
start
doing
environmental
studies
and
so
on
and
so
on.
Then
we
get
to
the
point
of
finalizing
the
tax
current
agreement,
but
we
cannot
come
to
an
agreement.
V
My
understanding,
mr
mayor
and
this
may
also
be
more
towards
a
legal
question-
is
that
that
my
understanding
is
that
if
the
there
is
no
agreement
property
tax
exchange
agreement,
then
then
it
cannot
be
annexed.
It's
my
my
understanding
right
and
it
would
have
to
be
annexed
in
order
for
it
to
be
built
in
the
city.
V
They
can
proceed
with
the
unincorporated
area
being
that
it's
currently
in
in
the
unincorporated
area,
but
but
citywide
in
order
for
it
to
be
built
in
the
city
and
get
his
proper
entitlements
it
would,
it
would
need
there
would
need
to
be
a
property
tax
exchange
agreement
in
place.
I
think
that
would
defer
that
more
towards
the
city
attorney,
because
it's
more
of
a
legal
thing.
V
However,
it
it
yeah
so
that
that's
my
my
understanding
of
of
the
project,
if,
if
sql
is
completed
at
this
time,
the
the
intent
is
to
review
at
full,
build
out
of
the
industrial
business
park,
pre-zoning
that
we
are
recommending
as
death.
For
this
I
for
this
parcel
or
these
four
parcels
to
have
pending
approval
of
the
sql
document-
and
you
know,
pending
that
the
property
tax
exchange
agreement
is
approved
and
pending
that
it's
that
it's
annexed
at
that
point,
we
actually
actually
we
actually
look
at
it
once
more.
V
Once
we
get
the
project
specific,
so
in
case
things
change
from
now
to
then,
then,
at
that
time
we
review
it
once
again
project
specific.
Of
course,
we
use
all
the
sql
document
that
has
been
prepared
and
and
hopefully
by
that
time
adopted,
but
we
look
at
it
once
more
and
if
we
have
to
do,
for
example,
an
amendment
to
the
traffic
study,
because
you
know
the
routes
are
more
specific
now
or
amendment
to
any
of
the
other
sections
of
of
the
environmental
document.
V
At
that
point
we
would
do
and
we
would
not
bring
it
before
the
planning,
commission
and
or
the
city
council
without
making
sure
that
we
have
that
additional
sql
information
prepared
for
at
the
project
specific
stage.
M
Correct
and
that
that
is
my
concern
I
think,
as
councilmember
has
brought
up,
the
pastor
has
been
different
deals
that
weren't
complete
and
then
threats
of
lawsuits
and
finger
pointing
at
different
things.
I
think
it's
very
important,
as
I
said
before,
to
get
this
agreement
done.
So
it's
more
fair
to
the
developer,
in
this
case
commercial
industrial
developer,
to
know
what
he's
dealing
with
up
front
that
it's
a
reality.
M
My
concern
is
we
take
it
to
the
next
step
here
and
then
find
ourselves
in
the
situation
where
we
can't
get
the
tax
put
together
and
a
lot
of
going
back
and
forth
with
no
results
and
leaves
us
in
a
bind
and
people
again
threatening
lawsuits
or
people
angry
about
promises
that
aren't
being
kept.
So
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
as
councilmember
senators
point
out.
Let's,
let's
get
the
keys
crossed
and
the
eyes
dotted.
M
Let's
get
this
done
in
a
way
that
makes
sense,
and
it's
again
it's
fair
for
these
developers
for
this
commercial
property
again,
I
think
it
was
a
good,
a
good
proposal
that
we
looked
at,
but
without
the
tax
current
agreement,
we're
going
to
find
ourselves
in
trouble
and
I'd
like
to
have
again
the
city
manager
go
back
and
speak
with
the
county
and
try
to
get
some
meetings
together,
work
this
out
and,
I
would
say,
bring
this
back.
Hopefully
we
get
an
agreement
before
october
19th,
just
given
enough
time
to
get
this
thing
finalized.
M
As
far
as
a
taxi
agreement,
and
if
I
tax
your
agreement,
I
mean
a
agreement
for
future
projects
also,
so
we're
not
one
by
one
by
one.
Each
time
a
commercial
property
wants
to
come
in
today,
we
can
have
an
agreement.
Just
like
was
done
for
the
residential
component
that
was
under
the
whole
for
any
new
products
coming
in
to
the
city
that
deal's
already
done-
and
I
want
to
see
the
same
thing
happening
with
the
commercial
side
of
this.
M
M
If
we
cannot
come
to
an
agreement,
so
I
would
request
that
the
city
manager
again
have
some
meetings
that
have
set
some
timelines
and
let's
bring
this
back.
Hopefully
you
can
have
an
agreement
by
october
19th,
so
we
can
vote
on
this
and
at
that
point
I'm
absolutely
willing
to
support
something
like
this.
But
I
want
to
see
that
we
have
the
basics
taken
care
of
first,
so
we're
not
getting
ahead
of
ourselves
that
we
have
any
past.
D
This
I
think
this
council
has
approved
every
commercial
business
or
that
has
our
industrial
business
that
has
come
across
us
on
the
diocese.
I
don't
remember
a
time
that
we
get
it
so
I
think
we're
very
pro-business
residential.
Obviously,
it's
a
whole
different
story.
We've
got
a
split
council.
Everybody
knows
that,
but
this
is
kind
of
a
big
deal
and-
and
I
don't
want
to
rush
through
it,
if
anything
like
you
said
it's
just
going
to
get
us
to
be
able
to
lay
a
strong
foundation
for
us
moving
forward.
D
But
this
is,
it
requires
a
general
undermanned
amendment.
It's
a
it's
a
lot
of
potential,
so
I
definitely
pay
for
that,
and
I
appreciate
you
pointing
that
out.
Thank
you.
I
Oh
wait.
I
would
like
to
point
something
out.
I
think
that
we're
getting
past
something
here,
we're
not
talking
about
annexing
this
property
tonight,
we're
talking
about
initiating
the
pre-zoning
we
have.
We
can
initiate
the
pre-zoning,
we
can
talk
to
the
county,
we
can
work
out
a
tax
share
agreement
and
then,
when
this
comes,
this
project
comes
back
to
us
for
approval
of
annexation.
I
We,
if
we
postpone
this
tonight,
we're
postponing
the
developer
for
another
month
or
two
we've
already
lost
one
commercial
development
because
of
the
lack
of
whatever
they
decided
to
go
to
san
juan
batista.
I
really
don't
want
to
see
this
one
leave
either,
so
I
don't
see
why
we
cannot
initiate
vote
a
4-0
vote
to
initiate
pre-zoning
and
before
it
comes
back
as
annexation.
I
We
have
the
agreement
with
the
county
on
the
tax
share
and
we
just
everything,
just
moves
ahead.
We
roll,
because
if
we
stop
this,
if
this
does
not
get
to
the
initiation
of
pre-zoning
tonight,
you're
postponing
the
developer
and
that's
not
a
good
thing,
not
a
good
thing
at
all.
They've
been
waiting
for
a
long
time
to
get
to
this
place,
and
if
we
postpone
it,
they
might
just
pull.
M
Thank
you.
Let's
go
back
to,
I
don't
know
what
company
you're
talking
to
that
pulled
out
of
building
the
halls
for
this
download
batista.
But
again
this
is
the
beginning
of
a
zoning
into
annexation
into
the
city
and,
again
again,
the
foundational
parts
of
this
are
still
missing,
as
I've
talked
about
for
years
about
these
issues
and
how
important
it
is
to
make
sure
we
have
everything
in
place.
M
So
these
types
of
issues
don't
happen,
get
this
developer
to
move
forward
and
we
start
having
all
these
conversations.
The
studies
are
done
and
for
some
reason
the
county
decides.
No,
they
don't
want
to
let
this
land
be
honest
in
the
city.
Then,
where
is
the
developer
at
what
you
need
to
do
the
basic,
simple
process
that
should
be
done?
It
should
have
been
a
long
time
ago,
as
I
said
when
the
negotiations
started
happening
about
tax
sharing.
M
I
learned
about
some
of
these
things,
making
sure
these
things
needed
to
be
addressed,
and
I
was
taken
off
of
that
committee,
even
though
I
had
spent
a
year
before
having
these
conversations,
so
I
knew
full
well
what
was
at
stake
as
far
as
not
only
residential
but
commercial
industrial
and
unfortunately,
only
half
of
the
negotiations
were
done.
We.
C
M
A
commercial
industrial
property
should
know
that,
if
that
property
is
there,
it
can
be
annexed
into
the
city
without
a
problem,
because
those
steps
have
already
been
taken
and
we
can
help
that
developer
move
along
much
quicker
to
get
this
project
or
her
project
done.
So
these
are
basic
steps
crossing
the
teens
dog
in
the
eyes.
M
Before
we
do
any
more
free
zones,
we
need
to
make
sure
we
have
something
can
actually
be
an
extent
and
avoid
any
more
threats
or
lawsuits,
because
something
couldn't
be
delivered
later.
So
I'm
just
asking
if
the
city
manager
can
take
the
time
to
meet
with
the
ceo
of
the
county,
discuss
sharing,
bring
it
back
october
9th.
Hopefully,
a
deal
has
worked
out
that
we
can
start
moving
forward
and
we
can
be
confident
from
that
point
on
that
any
commercial
industrial
retail
complex
can
be
annexed
and
we
have
the
agreements
in
place.
M
M
So
we
previous
moves
to
a
date
starting
of
october
19th.
Would
that
give
you
enough
time
to
make
this
that
happen.
P
I
will
do
my
best
to
make
make
sure
that
that's
enough
time
and
I
would
like
it
to
be
brought
back.
So
that's
fine.
M
K
Hello,
mr
mayor
and
council
members,
I
represent
bill
chris
for
the
owner
of
the
project.
As
you
all
know,
we
I'm
just
going
to
go
down
some
of
the
points
that
I
have
written
down.
I
will
have
a
letter
here
in
the
morning
from
bill
christopher
absolving
the
city
of
hollister
for
many
lawsuits
regarding
this
project
number
one
number
two
we've
already
met
with
the
county.
K
Your
existing
tax
sharing
agreement
with
the
county.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
rewritten
from
scratch.
It
just
needs
to
be
amended
to
add
the
percentages
that
the
county
and
the
city
are
willing
to
to
divide
between
each
other.
So
I'm
not
sure,
mr
mayor,
your
concerns
are
are
needed
regarding
being
sued
and
not
having
the
agreement.
K
You
guys
have
an
agreement,
it
just
it
just
needs
just
needs
to
be
tweaked
a
little
bit
and-
and
you
know
I
agree
with
vice
mayor
spencer,
every
time
we
come
here
and
we
hear
stuff
like
this,
we
lose
another
month
and
we're
at
a
critical
stage,
with
some
of
our
potential
people
that
that
are
looking
at
this
project
and
I'm
just
scared.
K
If
we
come
here
next
month,
even
though
we
get
this
agreement
and
this
the
city
and
the
county
get
the
agreement
worked
out,
there's
going
to
be
some
something
else
that
everyone
wants
tweaked,
and
I
go
back
to
the
fact
that
this
is
nothing
more
than
allowing
us
to
fill
out
and
submit
the
paperwork
and
the
drawings
and
the
project,
description
for
the
pre-zoning
and
annexation
agreements
and
our
civil
engineer,
who's,
rja
who's,
a
very
respectable
company
it'll,
take
us
two
to
three
months
just
to
get
once
we
fill
out
that
application.
K
If
we
fill
it
out
tomorrow,
it's
going
to
take
us
two
to
three
months
to
get
everything
designed
and
filled
out
the
drawings
that
I
went
over
with
everyone.
Mr
mayor
and
mr
resindis.
That's
a
conceptual
drawing
that
that
that
isn't
the
drawing
and
the
information
that
will
be
submitted
to
the
city
for
the
pre-zoning
annexation,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
else
to
say,
but
I
can
guarantee
you
this.
K
Mr
christopher
has
no
intentions
of
suing
the
city
he's
he's
well
vested
in
this
city,
and
I
I
can
tell
you
right
now
representing
him
that
the
christopher
family
would
not
ever
sue
this
city
over
something
like
this.
So
I
hope
you
guys
can
vote
on
it
tonight
so
that
we
don't
lose
another
month
because
we're
I'm
we're
at
a
very,
very
critical
stage.
Thank
you.
L
P
L
One
more
mark.
L
A
Mr
mayor
and
council
members,
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
First
of
all,
I'll
speak
to
the
tax
sharing
agreement.
The
tax
sharing
agreement
was
completed.
It
was
voted
on
three
to
two.
It
was
council
member
carol,
lenoir,
council,
member
honor,
spencer
and
council
member
marty
richman
and
the
people
against
it
were
the
mayor
and
resendez.
A
So
it
was
completed
and
we
did
say
in
if
you
read
the
the
agreement
and
if
you
can,
you
can
read
it
and
look
at
it.
It
says
a
case-by-case
basis,
so
this
is
exactly
what
this
is
intended
to
do.
A
So
with
the
I'm
sorry,
mr
mayor,
if
you're
hurt,
because
you
were
taken
off
the
committee
and
you
felt
that
this
was
not
the
right
way
to
do
it,
but
it
was
voted
on
and
it's
sitting
as
a
as
a
document
which
needs
to
be
upheld
by
the
city
attorney.
You
need
to
look
at
that
and
make
sure
that
it
is
a
case-by-case
basis.
It
makes
perfect
sense
to
me.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
Thank
you.
M
Thank
you
very
much.
Let
me
explain
mr
jeff
maloney.
Thank
you
for
chris
speaking
tonight.
I
agree.
The
christopher
family
are
very
reputable
people
and
I
appreciate
it
and
I
did
appreciate
you
guys
information
and
I
I
do
like
the
project.
Unfortunately,
mr
medina,
the
problem
is
a
case-by-case
basis,
does
not
mean
there's.
H
M
M
Y
Y
M
To
have
those
meetings
with
the
county,
let's
get
this
tax.
Current
agreement
worked
out
and
done
so
these
gentlemen
can
move
on
with
their
project.
As
I
said,
I
actually
thought
this
project
was
pretty
good,
but
without
a
tax
return
agreement
we
don't
have
anything
and
we
need
to
start
understanding
laying
down
the
foundational
issues.
M
So
we
don't
have
these
conversations
anymore.
We
can
plan
more
thoroughly
for
our
future
without
having
to
get
down
and
negotiations
by
case
by
case
by
case
basis.
That's
not
the
way
we
should
be
doing
business.
We
should
have
this
thing
worked
out
already,
and
I'm
going
to
ask
again
that
city
nutrition
step
back
meet
with
the
ceo
and
hopefully
have
the
agreement.
They
can
bring
back
october
19th
meeting,
so
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
episode.
Do
you
think
this
is
a
project
we
should
be.
J
We've
already
decided,
the
majority
of
the
council
has
already
decided.
Protocol
number
five,
also
states
that,
when
the
majority
of
the
council
votes
on
an
item,
the
other
two
need
to
follow
along.
That's
what
the
protocol
states
for
number
five
we've
already
stated.
We
settled
the
residential
tax
sharing
agreement,
and
that
was
what
we
were
supposed
to
be
doing,
and
we
said
that
we
would
do
a
case-by-case
you.
We
voted
on
that.
This
is
that
you
were
in
the
minority,
so
the
majority
has
already
said
that
it's
going
to
be
a
case-by-case
basis.
D
Married
is
regards
to
mr
jacqueline's
comments.
Thank
you
for
coming
up
here,
and
I
appreciate
that
you
dropped
off
that
letter
from
mr
christopher
and
I
don't
have
any
doubt
that
you
as
you've
stated
that
they
do
have
the
community's
best
systems
in
mind.
But
if
that
property
were
to
exchange
hands
for
any
reason,
then
I
think
that
letter
would
probably
be
no
longer
valid.
D
I
would
say
so
that's
something
that
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
we're
elected
to
essentially
protect
the
city's
interests,
so
we
haven't
had
very
good
luck
in
doing
that
when
we
were
in
the
minority
of
the
council.
My
other
thing
is
you
made
a
statement
about
essentially
that
the
county
is
willing
to
that
was
that
sit
down
and
to
discuss
this
touch
showing
agreement?
So
I'm
happy
to
hear
that.
However,
I
did
not
hear
that
echoed
from
the
fortitude
price
that
came
up.
D
He
essentially
said
it's
a
case-by-case
basis
that
doesn't
really
give
me
the
same
type
of
I
would
say
hope
that
you
were
telling
me
so
I
would
like
at
this
point
it's
obvious
that
we're
not
going
to
have
a
consensus.
D
Follow
the
direction
of
the
mayor
have
them
to
city
manager
and
ceo
sit
down
and
have
a
discussion.
That's
probably
what
I
feel
most
comfortable
with
and
if
mr
christopher
does
in
fact
have
the
city's
interest
in
mine,
then
he
wouldn't
mind
waiting
just
one
more
month
for
us
to
figure
that
out.
Thank
you.
So
much.
M
P
M
We
don't
have
any
more
case-by-case
basis.
We
have
solid
decision
making
and
solid
planning
which
is
critically
important
to
our
future.
So
we
don't
keep
just
doing
things
one
by
one
by
one.
We
need
to
have
a
bigger,
better
plan
and
we
can
do
this,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
again
for
the
city
manager
to
go
back,
have
these
conversations
and
bring
it
back
to
us
by
the
october
19th
meeting
if
you
can
get
a
negotiation
and
a
deal
with
the
county.
M
Okay,
so
is
there
a
motion
to
for
a
date,
certain.
D
J
Okay,
so
you
want
the
city
manager
to
go
and
negotiate
with
the
county.
Then
you
keep
your
fingers
out
of
it.
Got
it,
keep
your
fingers
out
of
it.
You
represent
yourself,
and
only
yourself,
you
don't
represent
me
or
honor.
You
represent
yourself
and
only
yourself.
So
when
the
city
manager
starts,
you
keep
your
input
out
of
it
unless
it's
in
a
public
meeting.
M
That's
right,
we
all
do
so.
There's
a
motion.
Is
there
a
second
to
have
the
meeting
prediction
of
october
19th
and
have
the
city
manager
go
back
and
negotiate
with
the
county.
C
M
R
C
R
Backing
out
even
item
f17
was
continued
from
the
august
17th
to
the
council
meeting
to
tonight's.
S
For
the
signing
and
executing
on
the
annexation
agreement,
the
little
property
as
you're
all
aware,
is
a
little
over
nine
acres,
north
of
buena
vista,
road
and
west
of
miller,
road
or
west
of
west
west
side
boulevard,
and
so
tonight.
Staff
is
recommending
that
the
city
council
adopt
this
resolution
to
approve
the
annexation
and
allow
the
agreement
to
be
executed.
L
Yes,
mr
mayor,
christine
kemp
is
going
to
do
a
powerpoint
presentation
and
then
I
have
two
speakers
so
actually
yeah
two
so
christine
are
you
there?
AA
Ahead
of
the
project
applicant,
as
I
said
before,
the
state
law,
the
housing
laws
mandated
your
council,
follow
staff's
recommendation
and
approve
the
little
annexation
agreement
and
initiate
the
annotation
proceedings.
As
the
mayor
pointed
out
in
the
last
discussion,
all
the
foundational
parts
are
here
for
this
project,
those
by
the
tree.
Please,
the
housing
actions
are
the
two
actions
before
you
tonight
are
necessary
for
the
little
housing
project,
the
housing,
development,
housing,
little
health
and
development
project
entitlements,
taught
by
mr
michael
off
for
98
single
family
detect
dwelling
units
on
the
little
property.
AA
The
little
project
applicant
has
expended
over
200
thousand
dollars
in
fees
and
costs
associated
with
the
little
housing
development
project,
including
property,
pre-zoning
mapping,
project
reports
and
sequel
analysis
as
well.
It's
fair
to
the
developer
to
know
that
he's
not
wasting
his
money
when
he's
gone
through
this
much
of
a
process
and
has
all
of
the
building
blocks
in
place
slide.
Five,
the
world
site
house
city
general
plan,
designation,
medium
density,
residential.
The
general
plan
actually
identifies
it
as
a
priority.
Infill
area,
the
project
site
has
historically
been
used
for
an
auto
restoration
business.
AA
It's
not
zone
4
used
for
agricultural
purposes.
The
science
within
the
city's
sphere
of
influence
slide
7,
your
project,
your
city,
council.
Again,
the
foundational
elements
are
all
in
place.
The
city
council
has
initiated
a
free
zone,
they've
done
the
negative
declaration
for
the
little
housing
development
project,
as
well
as
the
property
re-zone
to
facilitate
the
housing
development
project,
and
the
pre-zoning
has
been
approved
by
your
city
council
for
the
housing
development
project.
AA
The
negative
declaration
for
the
little
project
in
the
free
zone
said
that
the
development
of
the
project
site
is
a
logical
expansion
of
the
city.
Consistent
with
the
general
plan.
The
environmental
effects
of
the
population
growth
associated
with
a
proposed
project
are
evaluated
throughout
this
initial
study
and
all
impacts
can
be
mitigated
to
less
than
significant
levels.
The
initial
study
for
the
little
project
also
analyzed
the
impact
of
109
houses.
The
little
project
is
proposing
98
well
within
the
number
of
units
analyzed
in
the
negative
declaration.
AA
The
city
of
hollister
is
an
affected
city
under
fb,
3,
3
0
and
the
healthy
accountability
act,
as
well
as
the
housing
crisis
act
applied
to
the
city.
The
healthy
crisis
act
prohibits
the
city
from
down
closing
down
the
parcels
and.
AA
Q
AA
A
general
plan,
unless
it
finds
there's
adverse
impacts
to
health
safety
and
no
feasible
mitigation,
as
I
mentioned
before,
there's
been
a
negative
declaration,
mitigating
negative
declaration
and
that
mitigated
negative
declaration
for
the
little
housing
development
project
found.
There
is
no
substantial
evidence
in
light
of
the
whole
record
before
the
lead
agency,
which
was
the
city
that
the
project
with
mitigation
measures
may
have
a
significant
impact
on
the
environment.
C
AA
AA
The
city
has
twice
been
told
by
the
state
that
it's
violating
the
state
law
in
two
letters:
finding
that
the
city's
growth
management
program,
as
well
as
pending
in
as
inaction
on
stalling
and
blocking
pending
housing
applications
violate
state
law.
The
two
resolutions
before
the
city
council,
facilitate
the
housing
development
project,
comply
with
the
general
plan
and
zoning
standards
and
criteria
adopted
by
your
city
council
and
there
are
no
unmitigated
impacts.
The
city's
split
vote
on
these
resolutions
continues
to
be
a
de
facto
denial
in
violation
of
state
law.
AA
The
city
must
approve
the
little
project
within
five
hearings.
You've
already
had
four
on
this.
This
is
the
fifth
hearing,
and
also
it's
become
evident
that
continuing
to
pursue
this
process.
Continuing
with
the
split
vote
becomes
a
few
feudal
action
and
also
resulting
in
a
failure
to
move
the
project
forward.
AA
We
need
these
resolutions
passed
to
facilitate
the
housing
development
project
violating
the
house
state
housing
laws,
as
I
mentioned
before,
potential
fines,
awards
of
attorneys
fees
and,
additionally,
by
failing
to
take
the
legally
required
action
to
approve
the
little
property
entitlements
to
facilitate
the
housing
development
project.
The
city
is
causing
unreasonable
and
unnecessary
delay
and
continuing
losses
and
damage
to
the
project.
Proponent,
the
city
is
a
violation
of
state
law.
Q
AA
L
G
Hi
abraham,
the
attorney
said
all
the
the
legal
stuff
so
I'll
just
cover
the
easy
stuff.
G
The
property
has
no
well
to
supply
ag
water
and
is
supplied
only
by
domestic
water
from
the
city,
water
line
in
front
of
the
property
and
adjacent
to
it.
The
mediation
that
general
there
I'm
sorry,
the
the
secret
work
is
complete
and
when
the
project's
completely
cleared
are
we
no
negative
impacts
from
this
project?.
G
S
I
Mr
vickel,
when
the
property
was
voted
on
to
pre-zone,
do
you
know
what
the
vote
was.
G
I
know
that
at
that
time
the
mayor
voted
in
favor
of
going
forward,
which
is
what
we
based
our
decision
to
go
forward
and
start
spending
all
the
money
and
fees
and
time
and
effort
to
process
this.
But
apparently
the
mayor
has
changed
his
mind,
but
you
know
the
problem
is:
is
that
it's
way
too
late
to
be
changing
your
mind?
It's
not
fair
to
us.
It's
not
fair
to
the
woodlaws.
X
Good
evening,
members
of
the
council,
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
chance.
I
was
going
to
do
this
a
few
meetings
ago.
I
can
tell
you
as
a
character
reference
hugh
bickle
is
a
known
developer
since
the
60s
and
70s
when
he
started
at
san
jose
this
gentleman
here
I
can
tell
you,
takes
pride
in
building
homes
for
people
as
first
time
home
buyers.
He'll
tell
you
story
after
story
of
young
school
teachers
not
being
able
to
qualify
him
helping
them
out,
get
their
first
house.
X
I
can
tell
you
right
now,
as
far
as
developers
that
I
do
architecture
for
a
living,
I've
worked
seeing
hugh
bucco's
projects
and
work
with
them
for
years,
not
on
this
project
at
all,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
him
a
character
reference,
and
this
is
a
gentleman
that
plays
by
the
rules.
He
always
has
and
he's
a
hard
worker
and
he
loves
what
he
does
and
anyway
that
was
it.
I
just
want
to
give
you
a
character
reference.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
M
D
J
D
A
residential
growth,
they're,
sick
and
tired
of
council
members
being
appointed
to
the
council
by
their
friends
to
improve
more
houses
and
they're,
sick
and
tired
of
council
members
who
think
they
can
run
for
mayor
because
they're
backed
by
developers
and
they
had
a
majority
of
the
vote.
Look
at
you
now
and
anybody
else
that
is
pro
growth
is
going
to
end
up
just
like
youtube.
D
So
don't
come
up
here
and
sign
with
developers
and
put
on
a
show
for
your
friends
you're
putting
the
show
on
the
community,
and
it
shows
and
it's
an
embarrassment
anybody
else
that
sides
with
you
is
going
to
be
on
the
same
page
as
you,
and
I
am
so
sick
that
the
developers
are
taking
full
advantage
of
somebody
who
passed
away
to
try
to
tear
us
apart.
This
was
the
last
residential
project
that
you
three
approved
in
this
city.
F
J
M
J
M
I
I'm
not
miss
spencer,
I'm
vice
mayor
spencer
and
I
will
say
something
as
vice
mayor
now.
I
will
not
sit
on
this
dice
and
be
slammed
and
bullied
by
a
council
member.
I
J
I
I
I
don't
say
anything
bad
about
roland
and
I
don't
say
anything
bad
about
you,
but
I'm
tired
of
him
doing
it
to
me
and
you
doing
nothing
to
call
him
on
the
carpet.
You
talk
about
professional,
you
talk
about
sickened
and
you
talk
about
embarrassment,
roland
resendez.
You
are
the
biggest
embarrassment.
This
town
has
ever
seen.
Q
M
M
We
didn't
know
exactly
what
this
project
was
about,
but
that
whole
area
was
important
to
zone.
It
correctly
make
sure
we
had
the
amenities
we
needed,
but
guess
what
happened.
There
was
no
effort,
after
that,
to
do
anything
to
update
the
general
plan
to
make
the
improvements
we
needed.
So
I've
been
going
to
learn
that
approving
free
zoning
is
a
mistake
and
I
voted
no
on
the
final
zoning
on
this.
For
one.
J
E
M
So
it
benefits
our
community
as
a
whole
rather
than
a
few
individuals,
and
that's
just
what
needs
to
be
changed
and
that's
why
I
did
vote
no
on
the
final
annexation
of
this
project,
and
this
is
why
I'm
going
to
continue
to
vote
now
until
we
have
a
better
plan
in
place
that
the
community
as
a
whole
can
support
and
I'll
go
back
to.
Is
there
a
motion
on
this
item.
F
J
AA
N
And
I'm
sorry,
ms
kelly,
I
didn't
I
couldn't
quite
hear
all
of
that,
but
I
believe
you
were
asking
if
item
18
should
be
withdrawn,
given
that
it's
dependent
on
item
17
and
it
did
not
pass.
Is
that
correct.
S
Recommendation
to
laugh,
though,
to
apply
to
lacto
for
the
annexation
of
the
little
property,
because
item
f17
wasn't
tied.
I
just
asked
for
clarification
on
the
result
of
that,
because
they
are
tied
together.
N
Item
f18
at
this
point
is
essentially
moot,
so
the
city
council
still
can
discuss
it
if
it
wants
to,
but
I
don't
know
that
there
would
be
any
motion
that
would
be
appropriate
get
at
the
end
of
that.
J
S
Item
to
lavco
without
an
annexation
agreement,
so
I
I
would
recommend
that
you
adopt
this
resolution.
If
the
other
item
was
adopted.
L
AA
L
L
N
R
S
Outside
of
its
jurisdiction,
but
within
the
sphere
of
influence
to
the
property
located
at.
S
Apn01931009
also
identified
as
1735
santa
ana
road.
This
item
came
before
you
above
the
june
15
2020.
A
S
And
it's
before
you
again
tonight,
the
city
received
a
request
for
amateur
restriction
services
on.
C
S
And
there
is
a
proposal
in
san
diego
county
for
subdivision
of
this
property
into
41
watts,
which
would
construct
40
single-family
homes
as
well
as
have
a
stormwater
detention
parcel.
At
this
time,
staff
would
recommend
that
the
city
council
consider
the
adoption
of
a
resolution
to
provide
for
service
out
of
its
jurisdictional
boundaries
to.
C
N
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
This
item
came
before
the
city
council.
I
believe
it
was
in
june
of
2020
and
and
due
to
a
question
regarding
the
the
public
hearing
it's
back
before
you
tonight.
However,
it
appears
that
it
was
mistakenly,
not
agendized
as
a
public
hearing,
and
so
I'm
going
to
work
with
the
city
clerk
to
see
it
at
what
opportunity
it
can
come
back
before
the
council
as
a
as
an
item
for
to
be
held
for
a
public
hearing.
N
Well,
I
it's
not
absolutely
necessary,
mr
mayor
and
I'd
like
to
work
with
the
city
clerk
to
figure
out
exactly
what
that
first
opportunity
would
be,
or
she
might
know
right
now,
she's
looking.
J
N
F
L
F
X
M
X
X
I
can
tell
you
how
discouraged
I
am
right
now
it
took
us
three
months
to
get
back
to
this
hearing
in
my
career,
I've
attended
thousands
of
hearings,
my
sons,
even
at
one
point
told
my
wife,
said
dad's
gotta
be
having
an
affair
cause
he's.
Nobody.
C
X
Out
this
late
at
night
and
comes
home
at
midnight
or
one
in
the
morning,
and
I
can
tell
you
that
the
way
the
last
conducted
hearing
happened
on
our
project,
I
can
tell
you
out
of
many
projects.
I've
been
to
I've,
never
seen
it
in
a
situation
where
he
had
people
in
the
audience
still
trying
to
speak.
X
The
public
hearing
was
not
even
closed
down
yet
so
here
we
are
again,
so
I
don't
know
that
I
really
want
to
get
into
the
presentation
and
all
that
right
now
I've
got
the
attorney
ready
to
speak,
my
partner's
ready
to
speak.
I've
got
some
people
from
the
audience
ready
to
speak.
I
just
don't
know
I
need
some
direction
and
find
out
if
it's
something
that
we
should
go
into
tonight
or
if,
if
we
want
to
have
another
meeting,
then
that's
that's
fine.
I
just
need
to
know
some
direction.
M
Yes,
so
the
issue
was,
it
wasn't
posted.
It
would
be
best
to
do
your
presentation
at
the
meeting
we're
trying
to
set
for
october
5th.
I
believe
I
heard
and
if
you
do
your
presentation
and
everyone
can
speak.
Of
course
everyone
is
welcome
to
speak
tonight
too,
because
it
is
listed
on
the
agenda,
but
that
would
be
up
to.
X
You
I
mean
we're
prepared
to
make
work.
M
X
Well,
I
don't
know
that
it
would
be
hooves
to
go
ahead
and
make
our
presentation
all
of
that
if
you're
not
able
to
make
a
vote.
So
I
think
that
we'd
rather
just
wait
in
respect
of
time
and
everybody
else's
time
here
and
I
apologize
for
anybody.
That's
there
watching
this
meeting
via
zoom.
I
apologize.
I
just
I'm
kind
of
kind
of
without
words
right
now
so.
X
X
U
H
Hopefully
you
received
my
letter
earlier
this
afternoon
and
has
some
facts
which
I
think
we
should
be
aware
of
the
city.
If
I
could
ask
this
representative,
please
call
me
tomorrow,
because
this
delay
has
some
other
implications
related
to
timing
of
your
last
action
on
this
matter
that
we're
going
to
have
to
discuss,
because
the.
H
Actions
that
the
city
took
last
time
to
improperly
terminate
public
hearing,
they
have
some
legal
ramifications
and
we'll
have
to
discuss
how
we
deal
with
those.
If
the
hearing
is
going
to
be
delayed
again
and
as
I
set
forth
in
my
letter,
the
council
has
never
denied
a
request.
The
contract
doesn't
give
you
the
authority
to
do
that,
and
I
would
recommend
that
you
consider
the
legal
ramifications
of
violating
your
agreement
with
sunny
slope
and
hopefully
the
next
hearing.
You
can
move
forward
in
a
manner
which
is
both
equitable
to
the
property
owners.
M
F
J
They've
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
there,
so
it
was
good
to
be
to
hear
it
from
this
council
and
then
on
september
4th.
I
spent
some
time
with
combat
staff
and
making
sure
I
understand
the
regional
growth
forecast
the
way
they
come
to
their
numbers.
J
J
F
M
D
M
If
you
have
any
trips
on
what's
going
on
with
poverty,
25
the
wide
entire
25
and
what
will
be
going
on
that
would
be
the
day
you
tune
in.
You
can
contact
council
of
government's
website
or
like
they
usually
have
the
meetings
posted
on
the
county
site.
Also,
I
believe-
or
you
can
contact
me
directly
and
I
will
get
you
information
very,
very
important
night.
It's
finally
going
to
happen.
M
P
Yeah,
I
would
like
to
just
remind
everybody
with
the
parklet
program
we
are
still
moving
forward.
We
have
have
the
traffic
engineers
looking
at
the
traffic
study
to
look
at
not
only
the
stop
signs
on
san
manito
street
also
how
the
traffic
is
going
to
affect
monterey
and
e
street,
with
the
one-way
traffic
plus
they'll
be
doing
the
design
for
the
diagonal
parking.
So
we
just
ask
for
everybody
to
be
patient.
P
L
I
sent
all
council
members
a
email
regarding
the
league
of
california
city's
annual
conference
and
then
the
voting
delegates
received
via
email,
a
copy
of
the
resolutions
that
need
to
be
voted
on
at
that
teleconference.
L
So
I'm
not
sure
if
there's
a
way
for
you
to
do
a
vote
without
attending
the
teleconference,
so
I
just
wanted
you
to
to.
Maybe,
if
you,
if
you
don't
remember
seeing
the
email,
let
me
know-
and
I
can
reshoot
it
out
to
you
or,
if
you're
interested
in
doing
it,
because
I
think
it's
all
teleconference
this
year.
So
just
that's
it.
Thank
you.
M
In
the
memory
tim
ryder,
kim
ryder
is
a
those
that
know
him
very
kind
person
that
passed
away
from
cancer.
This
this
weekend,
I
had
the
honor
of
marrying
him
and
his
wife
susan,
almost
five
years
ago,
next
month,
two
incredibly
beautiful
people,
our
condolences
to
the
ryder
family,
susan
wade.
We
love
you
and
anything
we
can
do
to
support
you.
Please
let
us
know-
and
I
hope
we
can
adjourn
tonight
in
his
memory-
is
there
a
motion
to
hear.