►
From YouTube: Gov Hol CC 20210201
Description
Hollister City Council Meeting February 1, 2021
C
D
D
E
F
A
D
D
Thank
you
mayor.
This
item
is
to
approve
the
sorry,
the
recognized
obligation,
payment
schedule
for
the
2021-22,
another
short
the
rops
for
period
2021
to
june
30th
2022..
This
has
been
approved
by
the
oversight
board,
and
this
is
just
the
allows
us
to
collect
the
appropriate
funds
from
the
the
county
to
pay
the
old
redevelopment
agency
bonds.
H
C
C
This
is
a
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
item
not
on
the
agenda
and
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
council.
Speaker
cards
are
available
in
the
lobby
and
are
to
be
completed
and
given
to
the
city
clerk.
Before
speaking
when
the
city
clerk
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
city
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
city
council.
Each
speaker
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes
with
a
maximum
30
minutes
per
subject.
C
J
Hello,
mayor
and
city
council
nice
to
see
you
tonight,
thank
you
for
being
there
for
us
and
our
community.
As
a
friend
of
the
library,
I
wanted
to
bring
up
the
library
committee.
I
believe
there
was
a
library
committee
operating
this
past
year,
so
I'd
like
to
see
at
some
point
who
might
be
the
members
for
the
library
committee
this
year.
Thank
you
so
much
thank.
I
K
Go
ahead
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
I
wanted
to
publicly
comment
regarding
the
last
meeting
under
your
committee
appointments.
K
I
I
probably
wouldn't
have
had
any
comment
except
that
respectfully
mary,
you
said
that
you
like
to
mix
things
up
and
it's
a
good
opportunity
for
other
council
members
to
get
a
taste
of
some
of
the
other
committees.
K
Although
I
couldn't
help
but
notice
that
you
maintain
your
ninth
year
on
lafco
and
probably
cog,
I'm
not
sure
that,
but
you
did
keep
rolling
on
cog
and
intergovernmental,
so
you
didn't
really
mix
it
up
there
like,
like,
I
I
thought
you
should
have.
I
think
honor
would
have
been
deserving
of
a
of
the
cog
seat,
this
time
or
or
maybe
on
an
intergovernmental
being.
She
has
the
same
seniority
as
vice
mayor
rosendis.
K
Excuse
me
councilwoman
spencer,
so
I
didn't
really
like
that,
but
you
know
I
really
feel
like
essentially-
and
I
lived
it
there-
that
you're
not
you're,
impeding
the
growth
of
some
of
the
other
council
members
when
you
do
that
selective
little
thing
there
you're
doing
and
but
the
biggest
injustice
of
the
night,
was
you
totally
skipped
over
the
jeep
back,
deeming
that
it
was
it's
done
three
member
gpac
again,
I'm
gonna
say
is
not
adequate
and
I
think
the
other
council
members
should
be
afforded
the
same
opportunity
to
have
somebody
that
representative
on
there
from
them
and
you
as
well
could
have
a
representative.
K
I
really
think
that
would
be
more
fair
than
just
locking
in
you
enrolling
on
the
very
important
committees
throughout
the
city,
the
more
important
ones
as
well.
You
maintain
yourself
on
the
fire
committee
for
a
long
time
now,
so
I
just
wanted
to
give
those
comments.
I
appreciate
the
time.
Thank
you
very
much.
C
A
L
Perfect
good
evening,
everyone-
this
is
eva
from
the
planning
department
item
f1
tonight,
is
a
resolution
for
the
city
hollister
to
approve
the
annexation
agreement
for
the
what
we
call
the
rosadi
property,
and
this
is
a
property
that
was
pre-zoned
back
in
december
2019
to
become
medium
density,
residential
performance
overlay,
which
is
the
r3
npc
zoning
district,
and
it
is
about
a
23.5
acre
property
located
south
of
santa
ana
road
and
just
east
of
margaret
mays
middle
school.
L
C
L
M
All
right,
can
you
hear
me
folks?
We
can
that's
wonderful,
thank
you
well,
honorable,
mayor
and
and
members
of
the
council.
Thanks
again,
this
is
victor
gomez,
consultant
on
this
property
that
you
have
here
before
you
for
annexation.
So,
first
just
thanks
for
the
opportunity
to
share
a
bit
about
our
proposal
and
the
community
benefits
it
brings
along
with
it,
as
I'm
sure,
you're
all
aware,
the
rosati
family
has
held
this
property
for
decades.
M
M
The
right
of
way
for
that
widening
annexation
of
this
property
will
allow
the
city
to
establish
and
control
the
transportation
link
between
meridian
and
santa
ana
by
the
developer,
paid
extension
of
memorial
drive,
the
importance
of
which
was
noted
by
many
residents
and
discussed
during
town
hall
meetings
held
by
the
city.
This
road
connection
will
help
alleviate
traffic
congestion
around
the
jason
schools
and
designed
in
accordance
with
the
complete
streets
program
that
you
guys
are
all
currently
developing
if
the
city
desires
for
us
to
do
that.
M
Ultimately,
the
development
of
this
parcel
will
also
provide
an
important
pedestrian
connection
along
santa
ana
road
from
the
existing
residential
to
gabilan
hills,
elementary,
creating
a
safe
path
for
to
school
for
children
living
east
of
the
site.
Additionally,
as
a
benefit
to
residents
in
the
school
district,
we
will
be
dedicating
land
and
have
already
preliminarily
designed
and
an
expanded
parking
lot
and
parent
pickup
drop-off
area
for
margaret
mays
middle
school,
helping
with
safety
and
security
of
children.
M
The
existing
medium
density
designation
will
provide
more
affordable
housing
by
design
and
help
fulfill
hcd's
future
housing
allocation
requirements.
Our
eventual
application
will
also
include
a
portion
of
the
site
designed
for
multi-family
housing,
so
we
will
be
committed
to
building
multi-housing
on-site,
which
is
desperately
needed
in
the
city
of
hollister,
as
all
of
you
folks
know.
So
as
part
of
the
plan,
we
also
will
include
a
neighborhood
park
for
the
benefit
of
the
new
and
existing
homes
in
that
area.
K
Good
yes,
good
evening,
mr
mayor
and
council
members
carol
noor
with
the
hollister,
I
was
going
to
say
city
of
hollister
there
for
a
second.
I
just
wanted
to
keep
it
brief
and
reiterate
that
I'm
in
agreement
with
mr
gomez,
this
property
is,
is
a
prime
infill
property.
It
brings
benefit
to
the
city,
most
notably
the
north
memorial
drive
extension
to
the
north
and
then
some
traffic
control
there
on
santa
ana.
Those
are
just
a
couple
of
the
big
ones,
but
there
are
several
things.
K
N
Victor,
I
have
a
paper
that
actually
was
forwarded
from
a
former
council
member
and
it
was
talking
about
the
project
will
exceed
the
staff
desired.
15
multi-family
units
and
you
guys
are
targeting
19.
Is
that
still
the
target
range
or
is
there
a
target
range?
N
N
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
ever
been
through
there
around
time
to
pick
up
the
kids
and
it's
I
know
I
I
try
to
avoid
that
area,
because
it's
not
good,
no
bueno
and
but
yeah.
N
So
if
you
can
give
us
a
little
bit
more
information
on
the
the
multifamily,
affordable
housing
picture
yeah,
I
think
that
would
help
help
us
out
soon.
M
Yeah
absolutely
council,
member
perez.
Thank
you
for
that.
Yes,
so
to
answer
your
question,
yes,
the
city
has
had
this
sort
of
lack
of
a
better
word
sort
of
this
loose
policy
around
multi-housing.
M
It
has
been
the
desire
of
the
former
council
and
and
existing
council
members
to
address
the
deficiency
right
and
multi-housing
in
our
community
and
as
a
general
plan
advisory
committee
was
was
shown
just
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
There
is
a
substantial
deficiency
in
multi-family
units
in
the
city
and,
more
importantly,
scattered
all
over
the
city
right
they
shouldn't
be
concentrating
necessarily
in
one
area,
so
you're
right,
council
member.
M
We
are
committed
to
that
nearly
twenty
percent
component
that
will
obviously
come
back
before
you
eventually
for
tentative
map
approval
whenever
we
get
to
that
point.
But
but
yes,
we
are
a
hundred
percent
committed
to
that.
The
city
has
had
sort
of
a
standard
15
and
there
is
a
a
bit
of
a
market
for
it.
So
so
we're
happy
to
again
provide
that.
Regarding
your
traffic
comments,
we
met
with
diego
ochoa
the
superintendent
of
the
hollister
school
district
gosh.
M
I
don't
know
how
many
times
and
doug
letterboard,
who
is
the
partner
on
this
project,
actually
is
available
to
answer
additional
questions
as
well
christine,
but
but
yes,
we've
met
with
diego
a
number
of
times
and
and
have
actually
stood
out
there.
M
I
don't
know
how
many
times
during
peak
hours
in
the
morning
and
in
the
evenings
or
afternoons
to
really
look
at
the
congestion
issues
around
that
area,
and
so
we're
very
happy
with
the
complete
streets
program
that
eva
has
led
and
and
the
planning
department
has
led,
and
we
really
think
that's
going
to
be
a
fabulous
addition
to
the
extension
of
memorial
drive.
If
this
thing
does
come
to
fruition
and
the
movement
of
traffic
as
well
in
the
in
the
smaller
neighborhoods.
As
I'm
sure
you're,
aware
of
council
member.
N
So
also
I
just
just
for
the
record-
I
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
what
I
am
I'm
I'm
not
in
favor
of
like
doing
a
booming
bust
out
here
or
growing
crazy
out
here
with
with
houses
and
stuff,
but
I
see
as
a
great
need
for
our
own
community
we
need.
I
will
be
advocating
always
for
this,
for
our
residents
that
live
here
now.
N
I
realize
with
I
think
with
that
that
there
has
to
be
a
give
and
take
situation
there.
Nobody
likes
the
traffic
on
25,
I
sure
don't,
but
I'm
I.
What
I'm
looking
for
is
is
fulfilling
the
needs
of
our
community
of
all
the
people
that
live
here
right
now.
How
can
we
help
them
and
I'm
hoping
that
you
can
stick
to
that
20
and
you
know
what
who
knows
in
future
projects
or
this
project
even
to
raise
that
number
up?
I
I
think
that'd
be
great.
N
I
know
you
guys
need
to
make
your
money
on
the
single
homes,
but
the
design,
the
thought
that
you
guys
put
into
that,
especially
with
continuing
memorial.
All
the
way
down
to
santa
hanna
looks
really
good
anyways.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
O
O
The
neighbors,
the
majority
that
I've
talked
to
are
all
in
for
this
project.
It
will
relieve
the
congestion
on
the
streets
as
of
just
a
few
years
ago
or
after
before
this
god,
it
seems
like
we've
been
in
this
pandemic
for
years.
O
P
Please,
mayor
tim,
berlin.
Sir.
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
hear
what
the
school
has
to
say
about
this,
and
did
I
understand,
mr
gomez
correctly
that
there's
somebody
that
could
speak
to
that
element.
M
Yeah
that's
correct,
councilmember
burns.
You
could
either
speak
to
mr
bazetta,
who
is
the
facilities
coordinator
for
the
hollister
school
district
and
or
superintendent,
diego
ochoa.
We
we're
not
at
that
point
yet
of
approving
the
map
they
have
seen.
You
know
obviously
configurations
of
what
that's
going
to
look
like,
but
yeah.
I
would
highly
encourage
you
to
reach
out
to
superintendent,
ochoa
and
or
aaron
bezetta
with
the
hollister
school
district
and
they'd
be
more
than
happy
to
fill
you
in
on
what's
been
happening.
P
M
I
can't
share
the
the
you
know
conceptual
map
here
during
this
meeting,
because
the
tech,
you
know
tech
issues,
but
you
know
I
will
say
on
the
south
west
corner
you
where
you
see
the
entrance
currently
the
bus
entrance
to
margaret
maes
middle
school,
that
portion
next
to
it
is
what
we're
to
dedicate
so
the
configuration
of
the
parking
lot
is
going
to
going
to
expand
and
also
again
provide
that
that
parent
pickup
drop-off
area
closer
to
that
intersection
as
well,
and
so
currently
what
we
have
going
on
out
there
council
member
burns
is
two
options
really
so
if
you're
at
gavilan,
gavilan
hills,
you
have
two
options
to
get
back
into
the
quote-unquote
core
of
the
city
number
one
you're
going
to
take
santa
ana
road
to
to
the
bypass
or
you're,
going
to
go
to
fairview
right
and
then
come
back
to
ridgemark
or
wherever
you're
headed,
and
so
that
has
really
bottlenecked
that
whole
santa
ana
road
area.
M
Now,
unfortunately,
one
thing
that
we
saw
happening
and
I'm
sure
your
staff
and
engineering
staff
could
certainly
share
a
little
bit
more
with
you
is
in
addition
to
the
to
the
you
know,
backlog
of
cars
trying
to
turn
onto
the
bypass
going
west
on
santa
ana.
We're
also
seeing
vehicles
actually
drive
through
the
existing
neighborhoods
that
are
there
so
they're
actually
going
through
residential
neighborhoods
and
cutting
that
cutting
through
there
to
make
it
to
meridian
same
thing
is
happening
to
the
west
or
excuse
me
to
the
east
of
our
property.
M
Folks
are
cutting
through
the
bergentino
development
or
the
development
a
little
bit
further
down
and
cutting
through,
and
so
it's
created
some
some.
You
know
certainly
some
traffic
safety
issues,
and
so
the
extension
of
memorial
certainly
would
address
the
traffic
flow
issue,
but
I'll
go
even
a
step
further
council
member
and
say
it's
also
going
to
address
the
pedestrian
issues
right
now
between
the
bergentino
development
and
gavilan
hills,
you
don't
have
a
sidewalk,
and
so
our
development
eventually
would
obviously
prepare
that
would
obviously
prepare
a
map
that
would
encompass.
M
H
Yeah,
mr
mary,
do
you
have
some
questions,
but
thank
you
so
much
so
I'm
gonna
have
to
respectfully
to
disagree
with
one
of
my
colleagues.
H
I
think
that
this
is
probably
a
very
contentious
issue
to
say
the
least,
and
given
my
experience
walking
around
and
just
communicating
with
the
public
for
the
last
couple
years,
I
think
that
most
of
the
residents
are
not
going
to
be
in
favor
of
this
or
are
not
in
favor
of
this
because
of
the
backlog
and
a
number
of
other
things
right,
but
just
for
for,
let's
just
play
devil's
advocate
I've
got
some
questions,
miss
kelly.
H
If
you
can
entertain
me,
please
you
know
I've
been
here
for
two
years
and
and
I
still
this
gets
a
little
mucky
for
me,
so
help
me
clarify
some
questions,
if
you,
if
you
may
so,
I
just
want
you
to
explain
basically
how
this
process
works.
So
this
is
a
county
property
that
wants
to
be
annexed
into
the
city
limits.
If
I'm,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
right,
correct,
yes,
okay
and
then
in
december
2019
a
majority
of
the
council
adopted
an
ordinance
pre-zoning
this
parcel
for
annexation.
H
So
that's
what
happened
last
and
I
was
on
the
on
the
no
vote
on
the
minority
vote
of
that.
Just
so
you
guys
know,
and
the
public
knows
that.
But
what
are
the
next
steps
eva
like?
What
exactly
are
we
considering
here
tonight.
L
Sure
yeah,
thank
you
for
the
question,
so
I'll
kind
of
start
from
the
beginning,
because
we're
still
in
the
beginning.
So
if
a
property.
L
Be
annexed
into
the
city,
they
come
first
to
the
council
to
get
an
initiation
of
pre-zone
requests,
and
a
few
months
ago
we
had
a
property
that
also
requested
initiation
of
free
zones
and
industrial
property.
And
so
that's
kind
of
the
very
first
step.
Is
they
come
to
the
council
and
they
request
from
the
council
to
initiate
the
pre-zone
for
annexation
process
and.
L
That
could
happen
based
on
annexing
the
property
into
the
city
and
then
so
that
happened
back
in
2018
and
2019
for
this
property
and
then
in
december.
Q
L
The
mitigated
negative
declaration
secret
document
that
was
prepared
for
this
for
this
particular
property
analyzing.
A
complete
full
build
out
at
our
maximum
allowed
density
of
12
units
per
acre
was
analyzed
and
it
was
determined
that
mitigated
negative
declaration,
which
means
that
any
potential
impacts
to
the
environment
could
be
mitigated
based
on
the
the
findings
that
were
in
the
mnd
and
so
that
sql
document
was
adopted.
L
F
L
So
then,
the
next
step
is
where
we're
at
tonight
is
an
annexation
agreement
with
the
property
owners
essentially
having
them
agree
with
the
city
that
upon
annexation
they
will
abide
by
our
regulations
and
our
policies
and
our
ordinances,
and
so
that
is
this
item.
F1
is
that
annexation
agreement
and
then
once
the
city
and
the
applicant
have
an
annexation
agreement
between
themselves.
Yeah.
P
H
H
H
Zoning
destination
of
medium
density,
okay,
which
can
okay,
so
then,
by
making
this
vote
tonight,
are
we
ensuring
that
we,
the
neighboring
school,
is
gonna?
Have
a
parking
lot,
miss
kelly.
L
H
Are
we
ensuring
that
memorial
road
would
get
built
all
the
way
through
or
one
way
or
another
at
all,
by
making
this
vote
tonight.
L
H
H
H
H
L
I
can't
really
say,
as
you
can
hear,
from
the
applicants,
they
clearly
have
a
project
concept
in
mind.
Yeah.
H
L
Would
be
submitting,
but
the
the
land
has
to
be
annexed
and
then
the
applicant
would
have
to
submit
it
whether
it's
a
tentative
map
or
multiple
different
entitlements.
They
would
have
to
submit
that
and
go
through
the
actual
project.
Okay,.
L
Yeah
they
could,
it
could
happen,
actually
you
know
soon
or
it
could
happen
at
any
time.
It
would
be
the
land
after
tonight
and
after
a
future
laugh
co
decision
to
announce.
H
H
Oh,
thank
you,
ms
kelly,
for
that.
So,
basically
my
decision
is
this.
Nothing
is
set
in
stone.
These
changes
changes.
A
lot
of
changes
can
still
be
made
okay,
so
we
may
not
be
here
to
see
certain
promises
come
to
fruition,
and
I
remember
the
very
last
time
that
this
was
before
us
on
the
council,
a
certain
council
member
voted
to
approve
this
and
his
he
rationalized
it
by
the
promises
that
were
made
to
him
at
that
time.
H
Well,
that
council,
member
is
no
longer
here,
they're,
not
here,
there's
no
sunset
clauses
and
no
assurance
that
this
project
will
be
built
exactly
how
it's
being
presented
tonight.
H
Currently,
the
county
ag
land
is
protected
by
state
law
from
requiring
more
homes
to
be
built,
not
the
city.
So
that's
another
thing
that
we
should
probably
consider.
I
think
we
need
to
stop
getting
distracted
by
shiny
little
objects.
We've
gotta.
We
were
voted
in
to
protect
the
will
of
the
people
and
their
interests,
and
if
this
property
is
annexed
in
tonight,
it
is,
in
my
opinion,
my
personal
opinion
that
we're
doing
the
exact
opposite
of
that.
H
N
Hang
on
mr.
C
I
L
Like
this
to
be
built,
so
the
tentative
map
process,
I
would
say
at
the
very
quickest-
is
going
to
take
about
four
months,
which
is
very
fast,
but
for
a
project
like
this,
the
sequel
that
was
done
for
the
annexation
based
on
laughter's
requirements.
We
have
to
analyze
what
is
full
build
out
and
because
of
the
intersections
at
santa
ana
and
hillcrest.
A
N
L
Okay,
great
so
so
the
tentative
map
process
I
was
saying
this
would
be
an
application
to
planning
and
then,
if
there
was
no
additional
sql
review
or
environmental
review
or
traffic
review,
it
could
take
as
little
as
I
would
say
about
four
months
to
get
something
before
the
planning
commission
for
consideration.
L
But
with
a
project
like
this
and
with
the
detailed
analysis
of
the
intersections
in
particular
of
memorial
and
santa
ana
memorial
and
hillcrest,
there
probably
will
be
some
specific
traffic
analysis.
That's
required
for
an
actual
concept,
because
the
sequel
for
pre-zoning
a
property
is
more
general
and
it
requires
just
a
review
of
the
the
maximum
allowed
build
out
per
whatever
zoning
that
you're
pre-zoning
a
property
to.
L
And
then,
once
we
get
to
planning
commission
and
if
the
planning
commission
approves
something
it
can
take
anywhere
from
a
year
to
we're
typically
seeing
like
a
year
and
a
half
for
the
actual
final
map
and
all
the
civil
plans
to
get
done
with
our
engineering
department
and
then,
after
that,
moving
kind
of
at
a
quick
pace
you
might
see,
building
permits
being
able
to
hold
or
greeting
permits
so
you're.
Definitely
looking
at
at
least
a
two
year
process.
N
Is
this
property
because
of
its
special
circumstances
and
where
it's
situated
for
240
dwelling
units?
That's
what
the
proposed
site
is
correct.
If
I'm
reading
correct
on
this
old
paper,
so.
N
N
What
I'm
trying
to
get
at
is
if,
because,
if
it's
going
to
take
10
years
for
each
building
site,
then
and
we're
not
going
to
move
forward
because
we're
not
sure
of
what
that
anyone's
going
to
keep
their
word
to
the
council,
so
are
we
never
going
to
build,
or
does
it
always
take
this
long?
So
I'm
new,
you
know
what
I
just
got
questions
and
I'm
I'm
not
saying
trying
to
make
this
this
hard,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
an
understanding
so
for
240
unit
dwelling
units.
N
L
Make
sense
to
anybody
and
councilmember
rosen
is
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
try
to
speak
for
you,
but
I
I
will
say
what
I
think
your
thoughts
were.
I
think
what
councilmember
rosendes
is
was
indus
was
saying.
Is
that
potentially
this
developer
might
not
even
develop
this
land
like
if
we
annex
it
in
so
it
could
be
someone
entirely
new.
I
I
I
think
that.
O
R
R
If,
if
approved
tonight,
then
the
next
step
like
eva
was
mentioning
it
would,
it
would
f1
would
basically
indicate
that
not
only
mr
douglas
varsity
rosati,
victor
gomez,
that
are
working
on
this,
but
any
subsequent
and
the
annexation
agreement
indicates
it
any
subsequent
owner
would
have
to
abide
by
the
annexation
agreement.
That
basically
indicates
that
they
would
abide
by
the
city
of
hollister
general
plan
rules
and
regulations,
polish
municipal
code,
an
extension
into
the
sea,
community
facilities,
district
and
so
forth.
R
The
next
item
talks
about
sending
the
item
to
lafco
for
annexation.
So
that
would
be
the
next
step.
That
would
require
a
whole
new
public
hearing
with
the
local
agency
formation
commission
and,
if
approved
there,
then
at
that
point
that
property,
whether
it
be
mr
rosati
and
victor
gomez
and
doug
letterboard
or
if
they
decide
for
whatever
reason
that
they
want
to
hold
off
and
or
sell
it
off.
R
That
can
be
a
possibility,
and
I
think
that
may
be
what
what
that
some
of
the
concerns
are,
that
they
decide
not
to
move
forward,
and
somebody
else
continues
with
it.
But
akiba
was
mentioning.
If
that's
the
case,
we
do
have
certain
policy
already
locked
in,
for
example,
in
our
circulation
plan,
our
circulation
element
of
the
general
plan.
R
It
does
indicate
that
memorial
shall
punch
through
and
shall
connect
to
santa
ana,
and
so
that
whoever
comes
up
unless,
with
this
update
of
the
general
plan,
that
changes-
which
I
highly
highly
doubt
that
that
would
because
that
that
is
highly
necessary,
as
we've
been
discussing,
that
would
remain.
I
agree,
and
so
the
only
other,
also
as
long
as
the
general
plan
remains
the
same
as
mdr
for
medium
density,
residential
requiring
8
to
12
20
units
per
acre.
That
would
also
that
would
also
continue
unless
there's
additional
things
that
change
that
says.
R
You
know
at
this
point.
It
should
not
regress
the
housing
state.
State
law
basically
says
that
from
now
moving
forward
we
shall
not
decrease
densities,
but
if
anything
increase
them,
so
that
would
be
yeah.
R
H
H
H
The
property
of
the
value,
because
they
now
are
gonna,
get
city
services
number
two,
it's
no
longer
gonna
be
protected
from
as
a
agricultural
land
number
three.
I
think
the
right
way
we're
right
in
the
middle
of
the
general
plan
process.
The
right
way
to
protect.
All
of
these
points
that
I
brought
up
to
ensure
that
that
there's
an
affordable
housing
unit
to
ensure
that
the
parks
are
up
to
par,
to
ensure
that
that
road
maintains
the
same,
and
the
zoning
maintains
the
same,
because
the
zoning
could
change
it.
H
Could
change
with
the
future
council
is
that
we
need
to
update
our
general
plan
which
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
right
now,
and
that's
that's
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make.
I
hope
that
clarifies
some
of
the
questions
that
we
should
be
focused
on
getting
the
general
plan
up
to
date,
not
building
more
homes,
and
once
we
have
everything
locked
in,
then
we
can
start
building
things
the
right
way.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
C
Thank
you,
sir
abraham.
Are
you
still
out
there.
C
Herfield
good
to
see
you
there,
thank
you
for
being
here
tonight.
I
look
at
this
property
and
I,
without
a
doubt
it's
gonna
eventually
become
a
a
development,
just
a
matter
of
what
that
development
looks
like,
and
I
think
there's
been
some
good
ideas
and
there's
a
lot
more
conversation.
C
The
problem.
I
have
a
this
area,
I
can
remember
the
other
development
they
got
built
next
door,
basically
jumping
over
a
house,
and
it
was
the
the
moment.
I
woke
up
to
the
problems
we
had
in
our
community
with
planning,
and
I
can
remember
when
that
one
came
up.
I
looked
at
the
plans.
I
thought
wow.
This
is
great
and
had
a
good
conversation
about
the
future
of
that
era
and
the
plans.
But
when
I
asked
the
question
about
traffic
and
kids
going
to
school,
it
was
brushed
aside.
C
I
remember
this
by
the
developers
saying:
don't
worry
about
everything's
gonna
be
just
fine
and
there's
not
gonna,
be
an
issue
there
with
traffic
or
anything
else,
and
that
I
pointed
out
that
time,
how
are
kids
gonna
walk
to
school
in
the
mud
when
it's
raining,
they're
like
they
can
walk
on
the
streets,
you
can't
put
kids
onto
the
street,
especially
in
the
rain.
Let's
be
honest,
and
then
somebody
replied
that
well
their
parents
can
give
a
ride
to
school.
That's
all
great!
If
you
have
parents
can
drive
to
school
long
story
short.
C
It
became
clear
to
me
at
that
point
that
our
general
plan
was
not
keeping
up
to
date
to
what
was
going
on,
and
that
is
the
point
where
I
really
started
pushing
hard
on
getting
this
general
plan
going.
Thankfully,
it
is
in
the
process
right
now
it's
moving
as
fast
as
it
can,
and
hopefully
we'll
put
the
other
two
members
on
pretty
soon
here,
so
that
part's
good.
But
what
we're
finding
out
the
general
plan
is
how
out
of
whack
our
our
counts
are
as
far
as
single-family
multi-family
and
with
affordable
housing.
C
R
Sure
sure,
mr
mayor,
so
we
we
have
a
list
of
projects
that
have
been
approved
or
entitled
in
our
city
of
hollister
website,
and
we
actually
have
a
map
that
points
out,
they're
all
numbered,
so
we
have
a
list
of
one
through
thirty.
I
believe
there's
thirty
projects
in
total,
and
then
we
have
a
map
from
one
to
thirty.
Basically,
every
every
project
on
the
list
is
identified
on
the
map
as
well,
and
so
eva
correct
me.
R
If
I'm,
if
I'm
wrong,
if
you're,
if
you're
there,
but
our
understanding
is
that
currently
we
have
approximately
1899
single
family
residential
units
on
the
pipeline
and
are
entitled
and
an
additional
364
which
is
16
of
that
for
multi-family,
for
a
total
of
2
hundred
and
sixty-three
total
units
and
that's
not
inc.
That's
not
counting
some
of
the
some
of
the
units,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
eva,
if
you
have
those
numbers,
that's
not
counting
some
of
the
units
that
have
actually
been
built
right
now,
like
allendale
serado.
R
C
So
you
know,
as
I
said,
it's
not,
that
this
property
is
not
going
to
eventually
become
a
development,
but
what
I
believe
we
should
be
doing
is
making
sure
we
get
through
the
general
plan
process.
First,
let's
make
sure
we're
addressing
major
issues
we
have.
I
can
talk
about
a
few
of
them,
one
one
of
the
biggest
is
schools
now
we're
hearing
now
that
the
high
school
needs
to
build
a
new
high
school,
which
is
going
to
be
over
100
million
dollars.
C
That
is
because
so
many
units
have
been
approved
between
the
city
and
the
county
that
it's
putting
tremendous
stress
onto
the
high
school,
and
now
we
have
to
go
back
out
where
the
schools
are
going
to
go
back
out.
Ask
the
taxpayers
to
pay
more
money
to
build
new
schools,
because,
unfortunately,
the
impact
fees
come
nowhere
near
covering
the
schools
and
that's
not
the
fault
of
the
county.
It's
not
the
fault
of
the
city,
it's
not
the
fault
of
the
schools.
C
We
all
had
to
pay
for
it.
That's
going
to
happen
with
additional
schools
with
the
forget
this
project
we're
talking
about.
Well,
let's,
let's
not
forget
we
got
another
one
coming
down
the
road
that
has
six
to
800
units,
so
really
we're
upwards
of
3
000
units.
Now,
because
that
one
is
already
annexed
into
the
city
and
there's
really
no
way
to
stop
that
one.
It's
just
got
to
be
better
planning,
so
we're
going
to
have
to
build
another
elementary
school,
and
these
are
keep
in
mind.
C
This
is
just
city
county
has
another
couple
thousand,
I
believe
so
for
every
2
000
units.
That
is
one?
U
school,
k
k
through
eight
again,
it's
time
to
talk
about
the
high
school,
so
we've
got
some
issues
there.
That's
the
first
thing
again,
better
planning.
We
can
do
better
things,
especially
more
multi-family
roads.
C
I
can
remember
chp
speaking
at
one
of
the
meetings
when
one
of
these
developments
was
moving
through
this
process
of
annexation
again
and
the
captain
said,
no
more
houses
should
be
approved
until
you
guys
get
highway,
25
done
and
all
the
commuters
that
use
that
highway
every
day
understand
exactly
why
that
is,
it
is
insane
insane
highway.
25
is
now,
and
that's
really
a
sad
thing,
because
we
should
have
had
that
thing
fixed
years
and
years
ago,
but
that's
on
track.
C
That's
moving
pretty
quick
now,
also,
hopefully,
within
the
next
eight
years,
we'll
get
that
thing
built,
widen
and
be
moving
along
on
that.
What
the
general
plan
does
help
us
do.
That
was
really
zoom
in
on
what
we
want
the
community
to
look
like
in
the
future
more.
I
think
mr
perez
pointed
this
out
more
of
the
multi-family
mixed
in
to
this
development.
You
know
20
multifamily
in
a
development
like
this
might
sound
good,
but
the
reality
is
we're
going
to
start
needing
to
build
neighborhoods
that
are
upwards
of
50
multi-family.
C
That's
we
just
got
the
new
agreement,
but
we
only
get
50
of
that
now
and
it's
of
the
13
cents
and
really
we
should
be
upwards
of
75
to
cover
more
of
our
costs.
So
there's
still
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
I
think
again
with
the
willingness
of
the
developer
and
I'm
sure
they're
going
to
be
willing
to
to
do
some
good
stuff
and
I'm
pleased
to
hear
that
they're
going
to
handle
the
connection
of
the
sidewalk
from
the
other
development
to
the
school
and
that's
a
potential
problem.
C
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
very
clear
because
I
know
once
the
other
development
was
built,
that
property
owner
pretty
much
said.
That's
our
problem
now
they're
not
going
to
give
us
any
land
to
or
allowing
the
land
to
be
taken
to
build
that
sidewalk
there.
So
that
needs
to
be
perfectly
clear
and
understood,
because
that
was
just
the
biggest
travesty
of
all
that
a
developer
could
make
millions
of
dollars
would
not
allow
sidewalk
for
kids
to
get
to
school
safely.
C
I
just
could
not
believe
that
and
never
want
to
have
that
happen
again,
but
that
also
should
be
protected
bike
lanes.
There's
all
these
little
pieces.
That's
why
we're
working
on
that
general
plan.
One
of
the
conversations
in
the
past
about
this
property
was
not
to
have
houses
backing
up
to
the
fence
of
this
of
the
schools,
but
to
give
it
room
there
to
have
a
a
walking
path,
bike
path,
parking
areas
from
santa
ana
to
meridian.
C
So
when
there's
events
at
the
schools,
there's
more
parking
there
and,
of
course,
when
people
want
to
go
use
this
neighborhood
or
the
schools
to
go
to
use
the
playgrounds,
they
can
go
out
there
and
use
that
without
problem.
And,
most
importantly,
you
don't
have
houses
looking
out
to
the
schoolyard
for
those
people
that
just
might
not
be
well
well
in
their
minds.
C
C
We
could
do
this
correctly,
but
those
conversations
should
happen
right
now
before
we
annex
property,
because
once
we
annex
property
in
with
the
the
laws
in
place,
we're
pretty
much
at
the
mercy
of
the
developer,
and
we,
I
think,
can
all
agree
that
we
went
off
track
with
the
number
of
homes
that
were
built
and
the
amount
of
traffic
we're
seeing
in
our
communities
now.
So
I
just
I
would
like
to
say,
let's
just
get
the
general
plan
done.
C
C
That
thing
turned
a
project
should
have
been
done
in
eight
years,
turned
into
a
20
30-year
project
or
issue
because
of
lawsuits
and
others
that
didn't
want
to
see
it
widen
so
right
now.
Highway
25
is
looking
pretty
good
as
far
as
staying
on
track
working
with
caltrans
and
our
partners
in
santa
clara.
So
that's
looking
pretty
good.
Actually.
A
F
N
N
Did
I
did
I
hear
correctly
that
if
we
annex
this
in
and
things
went
according
to
process
that
it
would
take
about
10
years,
isn't.
N
C
N
C
Let's
step
back
for
a
second:
all
projects
can,
if
they
go
through
the
process
here
within
two
years,
they
could
be
in
under
construction.
It's
just
depending
on
the
economy.
As
far
as
how
many
units
are
built.
Remember
we
already
have
over
2
000
units
are
approved,
ready
to
go.
There's
approval
from
approved.
C
Approved,
which
ones
are
we
talking
about
whatever
ones
you're
talking
about
the
one,
scott,
the.
N
C
Ready
to
get
started,
I
forgot
the
name
of
that
project.
That's
200!
Is
it
robert,
something
robert
there
you
go
that
one's
250
plus
units
the
one
over
on
next
to
it
was
one
out
of
the
90s
that
got
approved
early
2000s.
The
one
on
the
hill
on
north
street
was
approved
about
four
years
ago.
I
think
four
five
years
max
that
built,
I
think,
six,
seven
hundred
in
a
five
year.
N
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
it's
like,
because
that's
why
I
was
trying
to
understand
what
councilman
resendez
was
saying.
It
was
that
it
would
take
about
10
years
and
that's
why
I
was
trying
to
understand
it's
like.
Oh.
So
that's
why
I
was
asking
eva
because
I
didn't
know
if
I
was
not
hearing
right
because
of
the
microphone
and
if
it's
going
to
take
about
10
years
and
then
it's
going
to
take
about
10
years
to
get
25
done.
C
C
Being
you
know,
let's,
let's
do
things
right,
let's
step
back,
let's
make
sure
we
get
that
general
plan
in
place
understand
what
we
want.
Do
we
want
to
protect
the
bike
lanes
throughout?
How
do
we
plan
for
the
density,
because,
quite
frankly,
I
I
think
there
has
to
be
more
density
in
that
development
here
and
I
think
more
multi-family
makes
into
it.
So
it's
just
not
all
single
family
and
I
know
they're.
C
N
Can
I
ask
abraham
a
question
again,
go
ahead,
sir?
So
do
you
seen
those
the
the
drawings
didn't?
They
have
bicycle
lanes
on
on
memorial
and
I'm
not
sure
on
santa
hanna
and
if
not
or
would
it
be
able
to
put
anything
in
writing
that
whoever
owns
buys
that
property
owns
that
property
develops?
Our
property
is
going
to
put
that
in
like
the
sidewalk.
N
F
N
I
mean:
does
it
have
to
be?
Do
we
really
have
to
have
the
the
the
the
plan
for
the
whole
city
for
just
to
be
in
place
just
for
that
one
property.
R
R
At
this
point
there
are
discussions
and
they
are
things
that
you
can
request
that
when,
when
they
do
come
before
you
before
the
planning
commission
for
attending
a
map
that
they
that
they
are
put
in
place-
and
so
you
know
in
regards
to
having
a
bike
lane-
that's
what
you're
indicating
so
when
it
comes
to
planning
commission
time.
That
is
something
that
that
they
should
show.
R
They
should
demonstrate
that
and
and
if
not
we
can
say
during
the
public
hearing
for
the
annexation
agreement,
it
was
talked
about
having
a
bicycle
lane
by
it
by
the
city
council
and
so,
and
so
that
is
when
that
is
when
we
put
it.
That's
why
we
don't
have
any
conceptual
maps
here,
because
really
for
tonight
it's
it's
putting
it
for
the
annexation
agreement
and
sending
it
to
lafco.
The
the
actual
maps
are.
R
Are
attended
a
map
stage,
but
it's
still
really
good
that
you're
discussing
all
of
these
requirements
that
really
should
be
placed
you're,
putting
you're
putting
the
potential
developers
on
on
notice
that
that's.
That
is
what
you
want
to
see
and,
and
you
know
it
sounds
like
they're
they're.
You
know
wanting
to
do
that,
for
you.
C
Abraham
just
to
add
to
that,
and
thank
you
councilmember
perez,
it's
a
good
point.
The
the
difference
between
asking
for
it
later
and
having
in
the
general
plan
is
that
if
it's
in
the
general
plan,
it's
pretty
much
the
requirement
and
if
a
council
comes
in
and
says,
oh,
you
know
what
we
don't.
We
don't
think
they
should
have
to
put
a
bike
lane
or
anything
else.
That
really
can't
be
changed
without
a
forfeits
vote.
R
Was
that
question
for
me,
mr
mayor?
Yes,
sir,
so
yeah,
thank
you
for
that.
Yes,
so
in
in
the
general
plan,
items
that
are
in
the
general
plan
are
essentially
it's.
It's
policy,
that's
that's
where
you
know
the
zoning.
The
zoning
implements
the
general
plan.
So
if
it's
in
a
general
plan
it
is
policy,
that's
correct.
C
Yeah-
and
that's
all
I'm
trying
to
point
out
here,
is
that
if
we
have
a
policy
in
place,
it
puts
the
timelines
in
place
or
the
zoning
what
we
want
as
a
community.
You
know
we
talked
about
sound
walls.
Do
we
really
want
sound
walls
anymore?
Do
we
want
houses,
two
stories
backing
up
to
a
sound
wall
or
to
a
school
all
these
little
things
that
become
a
big
deal
later?
C
They
make
a
difference,
they
make
a
difference
and
every
time
we've
ignored
it,
and
this
is
not
any
of
you.
This
is
from
the
past
anytime,
it's
been
ignored
and
it's
been
a
conversation.
We'll
fix
it
later.
The
reality
is,
it
never
gets
fixed,
and
this
is
why
we
have
a
situation
sometimes
where
some
of
those
bike
lanes
are
kind
of
tight,
and
you
wouldn't
want
your
kids
on
those
bike
lanes
either,
but
there's
a
lot
of
good
things
going
on
everyone,
and
I
think
again
I
from
what
I
hear
from
these
developers.
C
I
I
hear
they're
willing
to
do
it.
I
know
they're
they
can
be
kept
at
their
word
here,
but
I
think
we
need
to
just
make
sure
we're
getting
through
this
general
plan
processing
this
and
staying
focused
on
what
the
voters
have
to
stay
focused
on
that's,
focusing
back
on
retail,
focusing
back
commercial
focusing
on
industrial.
I
think
if
the
great
majority
of
those
communities
said,
look
stop
approving
these
developments.
Let's
put
another
plan
together
to
get
more
of
our
jobs
within
our
community.
C
Let's
put
a
focus
on
this
and
again,
at
the
same
time,
we're
working
on
the
general
plan
to
when
we
we're
finished
with
that,
we'll
understand
what
we're
trying
to
do
as
a
community
for
future
growth
and
these
projects
will
automatically
fit
right
into
it.
So
I'm
hoping
to
have
some
good
discussions
later
about
some
more
of
their
ideas
and
incorporate
it
and
use
some
of
those
ideas
for
in
the
general
plan
as
we're
moving
forward
all
right
one
time.
Is
there
any
other
comments
or
questions?
C
H
Do
mr
mayor,
I
apologize,
but
I
want
to
go
back
and
forth,
but
I
want
to
be
very
clear:
what's
on
the
table,
tonight
is
whether
we're
going
to
take
this
land
from
the
county
and
adopt
it
into
the
city
legally.
If
we
do
that,
based
on
this
application,
we
have
an
obligation
to
follow
through
with
the
rest
of
the
process.
Is
that
correct,
mr
city.
H
If
we
annex
the
land
in
based
on
this
application
tonight,
are
we
then
required
to
build
homes
after
that
there.
E
No,
we
are
not
that
all
comes
down
the
line
as
it
proceeds.
Okay,.
H
And
I
think
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make
is
whether
it's
done
tomorrow,
two
years
from
now
10
years
from
now
that
whole
project
can
be
changed
unless
we
lock
it
the
policy
into
the
general
plan,
unless
we
ensure
that
neighborhoods
are
built,
the
way
that
our
community
deserves
to
have
them
built
and
that
they've
been
asking
for
them
to
be
built.
That
can
be
an
entirely
new
project.
It
can
in
fact
be
all
single
family
homes.
H
If
we
take
that
piece
of
city,
sorry
county
parcel
to
city
tonight,
it
can
be
entirely
different
project
in
10
years
from
now,
and
there's
no
assurance
that
from
what
I'm
hearing
the
affordable
housing
aspect,
the
multi-family
the
parking
lot
and
that
the
residents
want
that
that,
if
that's,
what
we're
basing
our
decision
off
of
tonight,
there's
no
assurance
to
support
that.
That's
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make.
Thank
you.
C
C
L
And
here
council,
this
is
eva
again.
Item
f2
is
for
the
same
property,
and
this
item
would
be
a
resolution
allowing
staff
to
submit
an
application
to
lacpo
the
local
agency
formation
commission
for
the
annexation
of
the
property
that
we've
been
discussing.
The
rosati
property
into
the
city
limits
of
the
city
of
hollister
and
staff
would
recommend
that
the
city
council
adopt
this
resolution.
Now
that
the
annexation
agreement
has
been
approved
by
the
council
as
well,
and
allow
us
to
submit
that
application
to
alaska.
I
S
Yes,
mr
mayor
members
of
the
city
council,
thank
you
before
you.
You
have
a
resolution.
Accepting
a
homeland
security
grant
in
actuality,
you've
already
accepted
it.
It
was
a
50
000
grant
for
a
backup
generator
at
the
animal
shelter
we
went
out
to
bid
and
we
received
a
bid.
The
sole
bidder
was
a
gold
coast.
S
S
So
before
you
is
an
acceptance
of
resolution,
accepting
the
bid
and
going
with
gold
coast,
electric
services
incorporated
for
the
backup
generator
project
at
the
animal
shelter
and
the
acceptance
of
the
additional
money
from
homeland
security,
a
total
of
58
344
dollars
and
85
cents
that
will
pay
for
the
entire
project,
with
no
general
fund
expenditures
at
all.
Do
you
have
any
questions.
P
Thank
you,
sir
sir.
I
P
S
P
S
Yes,
sir,
we
went
out
to
bid
a
few
months
ago
for
the
same
project.
It
was
a
married
up
with
an
additional
project
at
city
yard
and
this
portion
of
that
grant
that,
during
that
process
of
bids,
did
come
out
in
excess
of
90
000.
So
this
is
considerably
less
amount.
Obviously,
and
a
local
company
is
really
happy
about
the
the
way
it
worked
out
so
far.
P
Thank
you,
sir.
Congratulations.
I
really
appreciate
it
when
you
really
work
hard
to
save
the
taxpayers
money
and
get
good
outcomes.
Thank
you.
C
Q
Good
evening,
mayor
and
council
tonight
we
are
requesting
your
approval
on
resolution
number
2021-20,
and
this
would
authorize
appropriation
an
amount
of
56
thousand
dollars
and
it
would
execute
a
professional
services.
Agreement
with
snippets
for
spay
and
neuter
services
would
host
one
clinic
per
month,
with
the
exception
of
hosting
two
clinics
a
month
for
at
least
four
months,
and
the
purpose
of
those
two
clinics
would
be
to
help
with
the
feral
cat
population
in
the
city.
Q
So,
as
we
stated
that
for
the
remaining
months,
they
would
only
host
one
clinic
and
then
in
addition,
they
would
help
spay
and
neuter
five
animals
also
from
the
city
of
hollister
animal
shelter
and
they
would
host
their
services
at
the
airport
or
any
other
location
that
would
be
designated
by
the
city.
We
hope
you
approve
its
resolution
and
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions.
O
With
snipbuts
coming
in
now
this
will,
they
will
only
serve
san
benito
county.
Somebody
from
santa
clara
county
cannot
bring
their
animal
in
or
monterey
county
or
santa
cruz
it'll
strictly
be
for
san
benito
county
residents,
hollister
san
juan
the
whole
nine
yards.
O
I
I
think
we
should,
because,
if
this,
because
we've
done
this
before
and
you
get
other
people
coming
from
the
county,
they're
going
to
take
up
those
slots
for
our
residents-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
pets
out
there-
that
people,
especially
right
now,
who
cannot
afford
you-
know
two
three
hundred
dollars
to
have
their
animal
spayed
or
neutered
and
all
the
stuff
that
goes
with
it.
N
So
I
talked
with
melanie
earlier
today
and
we
didn't
really
talk
about
that,
so
I'm
not
clear
about
that
either.
I
think
they
have
a
couple
of
cards
that
people
want
to
speak.
I
don't
know
they
might
be
more
familiar
with
that,
but
from
my
understanding
it's
already
been
pre-pre-booked
till
next
month
with
local
residents
from
my
understanding.
N
So
it's
it's
great
to
put
that
in
there,
because
I
mean,
if
we're
paying,
that
it
is
for
our
residents,
so
I
think
it
is,
but
I
also
want
to
say
you
know
what
it's
I
was
trying
to
see
if
there
was
like
any
numbers
that
they
had
to
see.
How
many
I
mean
it's
like
how
many
cats
are
they
saving
from
running
feral
around
here
and
say?
That
is
a
great
thing.
I
don't
know
if
we
could
ever
come
up
with
a
number,
but.
O
O
Would
go
and
catch
40,
50,
feral
cats
and
then,
of
course,
they
would
release
them
again
or
they
would
try
to
tame
them
and
to
become
house
household
cats.
But
they
do.
They
have
volunteers
that
go
out
that
trap
humanely
trap
the
feral
cats
in
certain
neighborhoods
and
they
get
those
cats
taken
care
of.
Q
I
believe
they're
going
to
be
hosting
a
clinic
on
the
10th
and
they're
going
to
have
two
in
one
day
and
they
believe
about
84
feral
cats
that
they're
going
to
be
doing.
C
Councilmember
perez
hang
on
for
a
second
councilman
burns.
Did
you
have
a
comment.
C
P
Actually,
I
think
my
question
was
more
for
councilmember
spencer
in
that
I
absolutely
agree
100
with
what
you
said.
My
only
question
is-
and
maybe
this
is
also-
as
I
think
this
through
a
question
for
staff.
Also,
is
the
county
contributing
money
to
this,
because
I
absolutely
agree
it
should
be
for
san
benito
county
residents,
but
if
the
city
of
hollister
is
paying
for
it,
might
we
consider
refinancing.
P
O
O
Yeah,
I
I
thought
it
was
we
we
because
in
the
past
it's
been,
we
give
so
much
money
and
then
the
county
gave
so
much
money.
So
this
is
not
the.
D
O
Yes,
I
think
that's
that
should
be
specifically
just
for
the
residents
of
hollister,
and
I
think
it
should
also
be
that
when
they
bring
their
animals,
which
we
all
have
to
do,
show
id
make
sure
that
they
are
within
the
city
limits.
O
N
So
so
I
know
she
was
also
looking
for
other
parking
lots
to
to
have
these
events
happening,
but
so
with
what
you're
saying
and
it
does
make
sense,
the
people
that
already
have
appointments
and
if
they're,
not
in
the
city
they're
in
the
county,
would
those
places
be
those
of
reservations,
be
canceled.
F
C
C
Is
it
possible
to
get
to
the
county
or
through
the
shelter
where
they
share
half
the
cost
on
this,
so
it
doesn't
become
an
issue
of
just
city,
only
city
residents,
I
mean
we're
one
community,
but
definitely
we
want
the
county
involved
in
this
and
paying
their
their
fair
share
of
this.
How
do
we
have
that
happen
quickly?
Mr
city
manager,
rather
than
say,
for
example,
having
to
tell
some
of
those
that
are
registered
now
that
they
can't
participate
this
week?
C
F
D
C
So
tonight
would
be
as
proposed
and
then,
if,
if
the
county
decides
not
to
participate,
then
we
would
change
the
contract
to
only
for
city
residents,
correct
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're.
Clearly
I
would
hate
to
see
somebody
lives
in
the
county
be
turned
away.
This
is
such
an
important
program
for
our
entire
community.
So
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
clear
on
that.
Thank
you
very
much
for
clarifying
that.
C
So
those
feral
cats
seem
to
run
wild,
don't
they
council,
member,
our
vice
mayor
resendez.
Thank.
H
You
I
was
on
the
ad
hoc
committee
with
council
member
spencer,
and
I
I
thought
I
remembered
that
they
were
gonna
put
in
the
county
was
gonna
put
in,
and
so
I
agree
with
her
that
number
one.
This
is
an
important.
This
is
important
service
number
two
and
I
think
it
should
be
county-wide
for
sure.
At
this
point,
I
would
suggest
that
we
ask
the
county
what
happened
or
follow
up
with
what
happened
to
that
promise.
H
I
guess
back
then,
because
my
understanding
was
council
member
spencer,
that
they
were
going
to
contribute
to
part
of
it.
So
let's
follow
up
on
that.
I
would
a
lot
of
the
feral
cats
are
outside
of
the
county,
and
these
people
do
an
amazing
job.
I've
got
to
tour
it.
I
think
councilmember
spencer.
I
saw
her
out
there
a
couple
times,
they're
doing
a
fantastic
service
for
the
entire
community.
I'd
hate
to
limit
it.
So
I
would
say:
let's
ask
the
county
to
there's
a
new
whole
new
board
of
supervisors.
H
Let's
ask
them
what
happened
to
that
and
let's
see
if
they
can
either
match
for
another,
whatever
that
we
were
doing
56
000
per
year,
maybe
they
can
match
that,
but
let's
let's
see
if
they
can
do
that,
I
would
be
very
hesitant
to
to
limit
it
just
to
the
city
residents
and
I
think,
as
far
as
like
being
out
of
county.
I
think
that
goes
without
saying.
There's
this
is
our
money,
our
public's
money
here
and
yeah.
C
So
just
to
go
back
and
clarify
city
manager,
your
recommendation
then,
would
be
to
go
ahead
and,
if
approved
tonight,
as
is
but
come
back,
and
if
the
county
decides
not
to
participate,
that
we
can
adjust
the
contract
or
adjust
the
limitations.
Yeah.
G
O
C
O
O
Yeah,
when
I,
when.
F
O
Me
on
it,
my
very
first
when
I
first
was
elected.
Q
O
C
A
I
could
definitely
do
that
and
if
it
is
a
non-existent
committee,
I
can
bring
back
a
report
asking
for
it
to
be
removed
from
our
list.
Thank
you.
Christy.
C
O
No,
we
just
I
because
I
know
that
it's
myself
and
the
city
manager
that
are
supposed
to
be
we,
we
both
sit
on
this
committee,
but
we
never
go.
I
mean
I
didn't
go
last
the
last
two
years
and
I
not
really
in.
I
don't
think
they
want
us
there.
This
time.
O
I
do
not
know
because
when
I
went
the
very
first
time
two
years
ago
this
month,
I
think
it
was.
O
It
was
at
the
county
office
and
when
I
walked
in,
they
just
said
that
no,
the
city
doesn't
sit
in
on
this.
N
H
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
We
went
to
cog
since
we
last
saw
since
we
last
met
and
then
the
only
thing
that
happened
is
we
elected
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair,
and
then
we
had
a
one
closed
session
item
to
discuss.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you,
sir,
and
I
had
no
other
committees
other
than
just
what
mr
recent
has
reported.
We'll
move
now
to
item
g2
informational
reports,
council
member
burns.
P
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I'd
like
to
start
by
announcing
that
I've
selected,
my
planning,
commissioner
and
my
parks,
commissioner
and
I've
reached
out
to
the
city
clerk
to
move
this
forward
and
so
for
the
planning
commission,
I've
selected
salvador
mora
and
for
the
parks,
commission,
I've
selected
brian
to
carly
and
I'm
very
pleased,
and
I
think
we're
going
to
do
some
great
work
working
together.
And
so
I
look
forward
to
having
those
folks
involved
in
the
city,
and
everybody
knows
who
mr
moore
is.
P
Mr
moore
is
somebody
that
is
a
mortgage
loan
officer
lending
officer.
As
I
understand
it,.
T
Let's
call
the
snip
bus.
P
I
apologize
for
that
then
any
other.
G
P
I
am
at
a
loss
for
words,
which
is
rare
in
my
world,
no
sir
I'll
pass
at
this
point.
Thank
you
and
I
apologize
thank.
O
Oh
yes,
so
on
wednesday,
I
have
brought
this
up
to
the
council
before
about
our
precious
tumbleweeds,
and
I
know
it's
a
problem
on
wednesday
morning
a
gentleman
pulled
up
in
front
of
my
home
with
a
tumbleweed,
about
five
feet
wide
and
about
five
feet
tall
and
brought
it
up
to
my
front
door
and
left
it
there
later
that
morning.
O
O
They
will
not
even
answer
the
phone,
so
I'm
asking
the
city
to
actually
I'm
asking
the
chief
of
the
fire
department.
This
is
a
fire
hazard.
It
could
cause
a
fire
on
the
side
of
the
road
could
cause
houses
to
burn.
Is
there
any
way
that
we
can
get
the
fire
department
to
declare
this
area
of
fire
hazard
and
go
in
and
get
rid
of
these
tumbleweeds.
B
Well,
okay,
so
this
is
in
the
the
hands
of
code
enforcement
code.
Enforcement's
been
following
up
on
it.
It
it
is
a
nuisance.
They've
been
talked
to
about
this,
and
there
has
been
no
response,
as
you
mentioned
earlier,
for
us
to
do
anything
about
it.
All
we
could
do
is
make
a
request
from
public
works
to
address
it
other
than
that,
it's
it's
at
the
hands
and
the
mercy
of
the
railroad,
and
for
that
matter
I
I
I'm.
B
O
Yeah,
I
I
took
pictures
and
sent
him
to
our
city
manager,
mr
miller,
and
I
am
I
understand
that
this
gentleman
is
very
frustrated,
I'm
frustrated,
but
to
come
to
my
home
and
dump
one
of
these
in
my
front,
not
even
in
my
front
yard,
at
my
front
door,
I'm
just
it
needs
to
be
taken
care
of,
and
I
mean
I
I
it's
got
to
be
done.
These
these
residents
are
angry.
O
I
do
know
I
saw
one
that
looks
like
the
size
of
a
a
peter
belt
on
the
side
of
the
road,
but
it's
on
the
city's
property
on
highway
25.
That
needs
to
be.
I
think
we
need
to
get
at
that
before
it
causes
an
accident,
but
definitely
those
ones
along.
What
is
that
prospect
and
hawkins,
and
all
that.
F
O
B
C
Yeah,
that's
a
very
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
it's
very
frustrating
with
the
railroad
company
to
just
do
as
they
please
and
not
help
us
with
some
of
the.
As
you
know,
it's
not
the
only
area
that
has
problems
on
the
on
railroad
property.
It's
just
very
frustrating.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
it
up
again.
Councilmember
perez
yeah.
N
I
got
a
couple
of
things.
I
have
some
residents
getting
a
hold
of
me
concerning
the
dunn
park,
sixth
and
powell,
and
also
sixth
and
west,
as
far
as
why
we
only
have
a
two-way
stop
sign.
Instead
of
a
far
away
and
from
my
understanding
it's
like,
we
need
to
get
a
traffic
study
done.
So
if
we
could,
I
guess
if
this
is
why
I
request
that
I'd
like
to
get
that
done
also
on
sixth
street.
I
think
this
would
be
more
towards
the
city
department.
N
Between
again
powell
I
mean
west
and
monterey.
There
is
no
street
light.
What
we
would
have
to
do
to
see
about
putting
one
there
or
why
it
doesn't
have
one
there
and
from
talking
to
a
couple
other
residents,
I
guess
there's
a
couple
other
streets
that
need
some
lights.
N
I
don't
know
how
we
would
go
around.
I
know
how
to
do
that,
but
I
don't
know
who
would
go
around
looking
for
streets
that
need
lights,
but
I
think
lights
are
important.
N
The
also
for
you
were
talking
about
the
or
the
gpac
meeting,
getting
getting
all
the
the
general
plan
in
order.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
I'd
love
to
see,
or
we
wouldn't
have
to
go
through
what
we
were
we
had
to
go
through
earlier.
If
we
can
have
something
in
in
planned.
That
would
be
great.
N
My
question
is
for
that
for
the
members
of
that
committee,
it's
like
so
right
now
we
have
three
people
and
so
we're
going
to
be
updating
that
real
soon,
as
as
far
as
I,
as
far
as
I
hear,
but
so
we're
going
to
update
or
we're
going
to
bring
it
up
to
speed
and
that's
going
to
be
five
seats.
That's
two
council,
two
planning
commission
and
one
resident,
and
is
it
possible
to
get
more
of
a
residence
more
residents
in
there
instead
of
just
having
a
five
seat?
C
Part
of
I
can
kind
of
answer
that
the
what
the
what
the
company
does
that
come
came
in
to
do
this
project
they
bring
in
residents
they're
constantly
working
with
residents
to
get
input
on
what
their
vision
is.
That's
really
what
they
present
at
the
gpac
meetings
is
what
the
residents
are
asking
for
to
implement
in
our
plans,
so
they
get
a
lot
of
it.
C
As
a
matter
of
fact,
if
you
haven't
listened
or
had
a
chance
to
go
back
and
listen
to
one
of
them,
I
would
highly
recommend
going
and
seeing
some
of
the
videos
most
of
everything
most
of
what
comes
from
gpac
comes
from
the
residents
and
I've
I've
been
really
impressed
by
the
participation
of
the
residents
so
far
on
on
the
gpac
and
very
little
as
far
as
the
the
board
members,
we
we
listen
to
what
they
say,
help
understand
some
of
the
issues.
C
Yeah,
abraham
could
probably
explain
it
much
better.
He's
been
working
directly
with
the
the
person
that
the
company
we
hired
is
abraham.
C
And
I
well,
let
me
just
pull
aside
for
a
second
city
attorney.
Is
this
since
it's
not
agenda,
is
this
something
we
could
be
having
a
full
discussion
on?
Is
this
something
we
should
talk
about
once
we
request
for
the
other
two
seats
to
be
filled.
E
I
I
think
that
at
this
point,
mr
mayor,
having
mr
prado
respond
to
the
question
that
was
asked
and
addressed.
That
very
briefly
would
be
sufficient
and
then.
R
Thank
you,
mr
epperson,
mr
mayor
members
of
the
council.
Yes,
so
during
the
gpac
meetings
we
they're
open
to
the
public
and
we
advertise
them,
we
have
a
whole
page
web
page
dedicated
to
the
update
of
the
general
plan
and
we
advertise
and
we
encourage
public
participation,
and
so
as
as
we're
discussing
each
item,
we
allow
for
the
public
to
be
able
to
present
or
be
able
to
comment
most
the
majority
of
the
meetings.
As
you
know,
the
gpa,
the
general
plan
update
highly
consists
of
public
participation.
R
It's
it's
probably
one
of
the
most
prime
aspects
of
the
up
to
the
general
plan
we're
running
into
a
big
issue
with
covet.
However,
I
think
we've
done
a
really
good
job
and
still
trying
to
reach
out
paul
has
helped
us
tremendously,
with
with
the
the
telecommunication
aspect
of
it,
to
be
able
to
have
the
members
of
the
public
still
be
able
to
participate
and
be
able
to
comment
so
that
aspect
of
it
is
has
been
going
in
my
opinion
really
well.
R
I
do
agree,
though,
that
it
would
be
great,
though,
to
to
have
that
that
gpac,
complete
and
but
the
public
participation
as
mayor
has
alluding
to
is
is,
has
been
really
tremendous
in
shaping
what
we're
doing
for
the
update
of
the
general
plan.
C
Mr
perez,
do
you
have
any
more
updates
on
anything
for.
N
Your
district,
actually,
I
I'm
not
sure
if
that
even
answers.
My
question
I
mean
nothing,
it's
just
that
I
just,
I
think,
there's
just
a
difference
between
participating
and
having
a
vote
so
yeah
I'll.
Think
about
that
some
more!
That's
it
for
tonight.
N
Oh,
no,
I'm
sorry!
How
could
I
forget
the
the
rain?
I
I
make
a
motion
that
we
stopped
the
rain
just
kidding
the
the
floods,
alleys,
I've
got
multiple
emails
and
multiple
knocks
on
my
door
because
of
the
alleys
are
flooding.
In
fact,
I
have
the
first
email
I
got.
I
believe
it
was
friday
night.
I
actually
went
in
my
garage
and
seen
water
in
my
garage
because
I
have
an
alley
also
because
there's
no
drainage,
so
I
just
want
to.
N
What
I'm
doing
is
I'm
creating
a
folder
for
ali
complaints,
repairs
suggestions
just
wanted
to
mention
that
thank.
H
Mayor
just
picking
back
out
off
of
what
councilmember
spencer
had
stated,
I
think
it's
a
little
concerning
that
somebody
put
a
tumbleweed
in
front
of
her
house
or
city
hall.
I
would
just
suggest
that
we
look
at
the
ring
cameras
right,
especially
during
these
times.
H
We
don't
want
people
coming
to
our
houses
to
harass
us
and,
if
there's
any
action
that
can
be
taken
as
far
as
like
law
enforcement,
we
should
probably
look
into
that
and,
if
there's
any
type
of
citations
that
concerns
me
aside
from
that,
I,
along
with
a
couple
of
my
colleagues
on
the
diocese
we
attended,
the
new
mayor
and
council
members
annual
or
biannual.
A
H
Meetings,
okay
from
the
league
of
cities
and
a
couple
of
things
that
I
took
from
there
are
number
one-
and
I
probably
should
brought
this
up
earlier-
is
that
we
need
to
do
a
roll
call
vote
for
every
vote
when
we're
teleconferencing.
H
That's
something
new
that
I've
learned
we
haven't
been
doing,
and
I
think
everybody's
doing
that.
So
that's
the
new,
the
new
standard
and
then
another
thing
that
I
brought
that
I
learned
that
I
didn't
know
from
previous.
Actually
it
wasn't,
even
it
wasn't
even
around
previously
was
that
there's
a
new
law
for
social
media.
I'm
sure
that
you
that
everybody's
gotten
a
lot
of
emails
about
it,
but
they
went
into
it
pretty
deeply,
and
essentially
it
said
it's
like
you
shouldn't,
give
any
opinion
one
way
or
the
other.
H
You
shouldn't
give
an
opinion
on
social
media.
It
can
violate
certain
laws
like
brown.
The
brown
act
right,
so
we
should
use
social
media.
To
get
people
to
come
to
a
meeting
is
generally
what
they
said.
We
shouldn't
use
it
to
say
to
her
opinion,
one
way
or
the
other
or
to
get
people
to
tell
us
theirs
either.
H
So
that's
something
we
shouldn't
be
doing
now
with
this
new
law.
Apparently
there
was
a
case
president
said
that
we
have
to
abide
by
this
and
basically
what
the
rationale
was
like.
It
isn't
fair
to
the
other
members
of
the
public
because
it
wasn't
properly
noticed
and
we
should
never
like
or
comment
another
city,
council,
member
or
mayor's
post
in
regards
to
city
business
that
can
violate
the
brown
act
as
well.
H
So,
if
you're
sharing
pictures
of
your
grandkids
and
we
like
it
or
comment
on
it,
that's
fine,
but
if
we're
talking
about
any
type
of
business
it
can
give
the
perception
of
a
brown
act
violation.
So
that's
something
new.
I
learned
lots
of
other
things.
It
was
very
informative
and
you
know
I
appreciate
going.
I
think,
there's
new
things
that
we
can
learn
every
time
that
we
go.
H
C
Thank
you,
sir.
This
is
for
brett.
We
had
the
discussion
a
while
back
about
the
the
the
fees
for
the
for
building
fees.
Has
that
is
that
ready
to
present
yet
did
we
get
the
update
on
that.
C
Well,
maybe
you
don't
need
to
bring
it,
maybe
you
can
bring
it
to
the
next
meetings.
What
I
was
going
to
ask
for
is
if
we
could
also
talk
about
the
impact
fees
we
talked
in
the
past
about
some
of
those
need
to
be
increased.
C
I'd
like
to
at
least
look
at
the
park
fees
again
and
some
of
the
maybe
the
road
fees
or
different
areas
for
impact
fees,
because
I
think
we're
we're
still
trying
to
catch
up
we're
nowhere
near
where
we
need
to
be
yet,
and
we,
I
think,
fully
understand
now
the
importance
of
impact
fees
to
cover
some
of
these
original
costs
is
that
something
we
could
yeah.
D
We
can
bring
that
up.
We
can
bring
that
at
a
future
council
meeting.
I
would
ask
probably
like
the
first
meeting
in
march.
C
That
would
be
great
I'd
appreciate
that
the
other
thing
I
do
want
to
thank
is
the
staff,
the
maintenance
crews
out
there.
The
rains
came
in.
They
did
a
good
job,
getting
everything
cleaned
up
before
those
the
rains
flooded
our
streets
so
good
job
to
them.
C
Of
course,
they
could
not
save
the
alleys
as
councilmember
perez
pointed
out,
so
you
know
we,
we
lost
a
good
year
as
far
as
the
roads,
the
work
we
were
trying
to
do,
and
that
was
very
disappointing
the
past
years
that
we
didn't
get
those
roads
done
as
we
were
all
hoping
for.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
on
the
next
agenda,
put
together
an
ad
hoc
committee
to
talk
about
the
roads
to
make
sure
we
get
these
things
done
this
year,
because
this
is
we
have
to
be.
C
We
have
to
stay
on
this
and
to
be
very
aggressive
on
this,
and
that
includes
those
alleys
I
I
did
go
drive
some
of
the
alleys
after
the
reigns
and
yeah
I
pretty
hard
to
get
through
there
without
a
four
by
driving
through
those
alleys,
and
that's
something
we've
been
talking
about
way
too
long.
So
we
could
do
that,
talk
about
addock
for
the
roads
and
even
the
parks.
C
I
don't
know
where
that
went
wrong
or
what
happened,
but
if
we
can
put
together
the
ad
hoc
committee
to
make
sure
we're
doing
those
upgrades
and
get
us
on
a
back
on
a
time
schedule,
maybe
these
ad
hocs
could
be
for
six
months
just
to
get
these
projects
done
and
to
stay
on
task
on
this
because
they're
too
important.
It's
a
shame
that
we
lost.
C
D
I
S
Yes,
mr
mayor,
if
I
may,
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
the
council
that,
on
friday,
dan
nguyen
retired
from
the
hollister
police
department,
he
served
the
city
for
29
years
in
various
locations.
Yes,
and
it
was,
it
was
sad
that
with
covet,
we
can't
do
a
proper
celebration
and
we
did
get
together
a
little
bit
as
many
as
as
we
could
at
the
pd
to
wish
him
a
great
retirement.
S
But
he
has
done
fantastic
work
for
the
city
and
he's
going
to
be
missed,
he's
still
around,
but
we're
still
missing
him
already.
S
He's
he's
been
a
big
part
of
the
police
department
for
a
considerable
amount
of
time
and
he's
been
doing
fantastic
work,
and
I
and
I
hope
we
we
get
to
continue
working
with
him
in
some
capacity
or
another.
But
I
just
wanted
to
to
mention
his
contribution
and
his
retirement
on
friday.
S
If
I
may,
I
also
wanted
to
if
I
could
use
this
time
to
encourage
everyone
as
soon
as
you're
available
as
soon
as
you
can
and
qualify
for
the
vaccine
to
to
please
go
out
there
and
and
and
register
with
the
the
health
department.
It.
I'm
really
disappointed
at
this
point
that
our
police
department
has
not
received.
S
Our
officers,
have
not
received
vaccines,
yet
I
know
other
first
responders
have
and
they're
all
a
central
part
of
our
community,
but
speaking
of
as
someone
who's
been
afflicted
with
the
the
disease
earlier
last
month,
you
never
know
how
it's
gonna
affect
you
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
where
they're
asymptomatic
or
they
just
get
over
it,
really
quick
and
there's
people,
as
you
know
that,
ultimately
don't
make
it
and
people
who
suffer
through
it
for
months
and
I'm
here
to
say
that
it
this
is.
S
C
D
Thank
you
mayor,
I'd
like
to
introduce
don
reynolds
from
the
city,
the
city
manager,
from
the
city
of
san
juan
batista.
U
Oh,
thank
you.
Thank
you
perfect.
Thank
you.
That's
great,
and
I
had
a
few
slides
to
share
and
I
can
share
my
screen
or
I
don't
know
if
brett,
if
you
have
those
slides,
just
wanted
to
introduce
our
project
to
the
city
council
and
thank
you
thank
you
for
having
us
and
giving
us
this
opportunity.
U
Did
you
am
I
able
to
share
my
screen?
I'm
not
familiar
with
this.
F
Q
U
Well,
that's!
Okay!
That's
the
way!
It
goes
all
right,
sorry
about
that
I've
given
the
show
before
so
we
can
do
this
again.
My
name
is
don
reynolds,
I'm
the
city
manager
of
the
city
of
san
juan
bautista.
Thank
you
again.
V
U
F
U
Oh
okay,
there
we
go
okay.
Now
that
works
didn't
think
about
that
all
right
there
we
go.
Thank
you
for
your
patience
there.
It
is
that's
our
awesome
wastewater
treatment
plant
and,
of
course,
the
mission
all
right,
we're
going
to
start
again
and
move
through
this
quickly.
Thank
you
for
your
patience.
U
We're
going
to
talk
about
the
a
brief
background
of
the
city
of
someone,
bautista's
water
and
wastewater
systems,
an
overview
of
the
regulatory
framework
in
which
we
are
busy
muddling
through
our
success
so
far
in
being
in
compliance
with
the
epa
regulations,
compliance
projects
and
then
next
steps
and
questions,
and
it's
critical
that
we
that
we
partner
with
the
city
of
hollister,
and
so
that's.
U
Why
we're
here
today
to
explore
the
possibility
of
new
partnerships,
and
that
is
one
of
our
city
council's
objectives-
to
be
forming
partnerships
to
work
through
issues
so
tonight
also
on
with
me
tonight
is
our
city
council,
water
subcommittee,
mayor
leslie,
jordan
and
council
member
john
freeman,
I'm
hoping
that
they
would
have
a
chance
to
share
their
thoughts
either
before
or
after
the
presentation
of
myself
julie,
bazaar,
our
city
engineer,
and
we
were
lucky
to
hire
on
project
manager.
Carl
bajaki,
former
public
works
director
from
the
city
of
morgan
hill
to
manage
this
project.
U
For
us
we
operate
with
a
licensed
wastewater
operator
and
a
licensed
drinking
water
operator.
They
are
not
here
today,
but
we
hired
tonia
kell
engineering
to
manage
our
our
project
and
stantec
are
the
experts
that
they
hired
specifically
for
wastewater
and
steve
beck,
is
here
and
he'd
like
to
share
some
slides,
starting
with
about
slide
six,
because
we
get
into
just
a
little
bit
of
technical
stuff
so
that
everybody
understands
the
scope
and
magnitude
of
the
work
we're
doing.
U
Our
water
sources
come
from
three
different
wells
in
our
city
in
notoriously
hard
water,
with
a
heavy
amount
of
salt,
sodium
and
chloride,
and
we've
gone
over
the
years
battling
nitrates
and
closing
wells
as
fast
as
we
can
open
them.
The
water
distribution
system
is
powered
by
the
tank
on
the
hill,
the
1.3
million
gallon
storage
tank
and
gravity
feeding
to
our
residents.
U
A
lot
of
that
water
distribution
system
in
the
ground
is
very
old.
We
also
then
partake
in
wastewater
collection,
where
we
use
the
standard
wastewater
sewer
pipes
to
pump
the
wastewater
to
our
wastewater
treatment
plant
the
photo
you
saw
when
the
presentation
first
began
and,
of
course,
the
regular
operations
of
our
water
and
wastewater
systems
are
paid
by
residents
through
monthly
rates,
and
then
the
capital
improvements
are
are
funded
by,
as
the
mayor
was
alluding
to
impact
fees
and
connection
fees
as
we
move
through
our
system.
U
In
regulatory
framework,
we
have
permits
for
wastewater
issued
by
the
state
regional
quality
control
board
through
the
clean
water
act.
The
federal
epa
works
with
the
state
when
a
wastewater
treatment
system
discharges
to
a
public
waterway
or
a
creek,
and
our
system
has
been
discharging
to
believe
it
or
not.
U
The
name
is
no-name
creek,
and
so
therefore,
we
have
a
special
permit
and
a
special
permitting
with
the
epa
right
now,
when
I
first
came
on,
the
city
had
been
inspected
a
surprise
inspection
and
the
epa
and
water
board
came
in
frustration
that
we
hadn't
addressed
our
water
problems
and
so
by
that
was
in
june
2019
and
by
october
2019.
The
city
received
a
four-page
letter,
a
full
inspection
and
and
things
that
we
needed
to
do
to
make
our
systems
better
and
to
get
in
line
with
the
permitting.
U
For
years,
we've
been
violating
our
discharge
into
the
the
public
waterway,
but
right
now
we
are
got
our
system
up
and
running
as
well
as
it
can,
and
the
only
thing
where
we're
distributing
into
the
creek
is
salt
to
make
sure
that
we
kept
our
feet
to
the
fire.
The
epa
last
august
issued
an
administrative
order
on
consent
and
that's
an
official
compliance
order,
and
if
we
violate
that,
we
stand
a
chance
of
sanctions
and
fines
and
penalties.
U
One
of
the
first
things
we
needed
to
do
to
satisfy
with
the
epa
was
to
consider
various
project
solutions,
and
this
includes
a
commitment
then
to
take
one
of
those
compliance
projects
or
two
of
them
in
this
case
and
bring
our
water
into
compliance
by
2023..
U
So
we
hired
stantec
and
mckellen
associates
to
put
a
water
plan
together
for
us
and
also
put
a
wastewater
plan
for
us
and
those
were
done
in
the
fall
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
we
worked
on
something
called
the
preliminary
engineers
report
and
that's
where
our
options
came
from
different
ways
that
we
could
upgrade
our
plants
and
try
and
treat
and
remove
salt
at
our
plant
in
other
ways
distributing
the
water
over
the
surface
and
let
it
trickle
into
the
aquifer
or
or
that
another
option
was
to
connect
a
pipeline
to
the
regional
plant
in
hollister,
which
appears
to
have
the
capacity
to
take
our
wastewater.
U
If
that's
something
we
can
engineer
and
pay
for,
so
that's
our
regulatory
framework
working
both
with
both
the
epa
and
the
and
the
water
board.
These
are
the
dates
that
I
was
referring
to.
The
the
order
of
consent
was
done.
In
august.
We
certified
that
the
the
plant
was
up
and
running
in
september.
U
Master
plans
were
done
in
september
and
then
october.
We
we
approved
the
the
compliance
projects,
so
we've
made
great
progress
in
the
time
I've
been
there,
I'm
really
proud
of
our
team.
We
have
some
really
skilled
professionals
working
on
this
and
we're
making
great
progress.
So
with
that,
I
think
we're
keeping
the
epa
and
the
water
board
on
our
side
and,
if
steve,
if
steve
from
stantec,
could
could
pitch
in
he's
going
to
share
the
next
few
slides
with
us.
That
would
be
great
steve.
Are
you
able
to?
U
Are
we
able
to
have
steve
talk
at
this
point
or
I
can
cover
for
him
and
say
he's
on?
If
we
can
do
you
see,
does
the
city
clerk
see,
gentlemen
steve's.
V
U
W
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
city,
council
members,
my
name
is
steve
beck,
I'm
a
consultant
with
stantec
consulting
services,
and
we
were
responsible
for
preparing
the
analysis
looking
at
different
alternatives
for
compliance.
And,
first
of
all,
can
everybody
hear
me?
Yes,
sir?
Okay,
great?
So
as
don
mentioned,
you
know
we,
the
compliance
with
the
epa
aoc
required
us
to
look
at
two
of
the
four
parts
of
the
of
the
city's
satellite
batista
system.
W
W
Our
solution
to
reducing
the
amount
of
salt
that
we
discharged
was
to
look
at
improving
our
source
water
and
the
recommended
project
there
is
to
is
to
go
ahead
and
import
water
from
the
san
benino
county,
water
district
and
blend
that
water
with
our
well
water,
very
similar
to
what
the
city
of
hollisters
does
with
their
with
their
water
source.
Also,
the
the
city
of
san
juan
batista
has
applied
through
the
u.s
department
of
agriculture
for
a
low
interest.
W
We
were
required
to
do
an
alternative
analysis
for
that
report
and
we'll
talk
about
that
in
a
moment
and
then
the
other
component
of
this
is
we've
got
three
industrial
dischargers
that
discharge
into
our
sewer
collection
system.
The
city
has
an
arrangement
with
these
discharges
to
take
only
their
domestic
wastewater,
the
water
comes
from
their
employees
from
the
toilets
and
sinks
and
not
their
processed
water
and
we're
in
the
process
of
trying
to
develop
an
industrial
pre-treatment
program
to
enforce
that
and
make
sure
we're
not
taking
their
processed
water.
W
We've
had
some
instances
in
the
past
where
we
believe
that
they
have
discharged
wash
water,
that
they
use
chemicals
and
stuff
for
cleanup
that
are
adverse
that
have
salt
salt
in
them,
and
so
we
want
to
prevent
that
from
happening.
W
Our
wastewater
improvement
alternatives
that
we
looked
at
where
alternative
one
was
the
on-site
wastewater.
Looking
at
upgrading
the
existing
wastewater
treatment
plant,
the
recommended
alternative
option,
there
would
be
to
replace
the
existing
plant
that
struggles
with
compliance
with
the
membrane,
bioreactor
plant,
modern
technology
plan,
and
then,
when
we
use
the
word
off-site,
selenium
control.
We're
talking
about
importing
water,
better
quality
water
from
the
san
benito
county,
water
district.
W
Alternative
two
was
to
do
a
treat
for
the
salt
on
site
with
the
mbr
plant
and
also
provide
salt
removal
with
reverse
osmosis
or
other
other
treatment
technologies
very
expensive.
And
then
you
have
to
deal
with
the
salt
brine
that
this
would
be
a
very
expensive
alternative
for
the
city
to
do
that,
and
then
the
final
alternative
was
to
look
at
what
we
call
the
regional,
regional
alternative
regionalization
and
that's
to
send
our
our
waste
water
to
the
hollister
wastewater
trim
plant.
W
That
would
require
us
to
build
a
a
pump
pump
station
about
six
miles
of
forest
main
to
get
the
wastewater
over
to
the
hollister
plant
with
the
with
the
source
water
control.
The
quality
of
that
wastewater
would
be,
would
be
equal
or
better
to
what
the
city
of
hollister
sends
to
their
wastewater
treatment.
Plant
so
we
went
through
and
did
analysis
and
looked
at
a
number
of
different
did
a
kind
of
a
decision
matrix
not
only
looked
at
the
cost,
but
also
looked
at
the
operation.
W
Reliability
of
doing
this
and
and
most
importantly,
a
future
regulatory
compliance
and
scored
these
three
different
alternatives
and
the
alternative
that
came
out
with
the
best
score
was
the
to
send
our
wastewater
to
the
hollister
plant
and
import
water
from
the
west
hills,
water
treatment,
plant,
operated
by
the
san
bedino
county,
water
district.
W
So
and
just
in
summary,
improvement
project
recommendations.
You
know
we've
as,
as
you
know,
our
groundwater
is
very
hard
and
most
of
the
residents
in
town
have
water
softeners,
which
you
know
that
they
convert
that
hard
water.
Basically,
water,
soft
and
exchange
calcium
magnesium
for
sodium
that
ends
up
in
our
wastewater
collection
system
and
impacts
us.
So
the
idea
is
provide
better
water
quality,
so
our
our
citizens
don't
have
to
have
the
water
softeners
in
the
first
place
and
to
phase
out
these
water
supplements.
W
We
would
instead
institute
a
buy
back
program
again
already
mentioned
on
the
industrial
pre-treatment.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
our
industrial
dischargers
are
not
adding
salt
assault
into
the
system,
and
then
we
would
decommission
the
existing
wastewater
treatment
plant
and
convert
some
of
the
facilities
to
emergency
storage
and
equalization
storage,
build
the
pump
station
the
pipeline
and
then
pump
the
wastewater
over
to
the
hollister
plant
and
finally,
the
project
on
the
water
side.
W
We're
gonna
convey
water
from
the
west
hills
water
treatment
plant
to
the
to
the
city
of
san
juan
batista.
So
that's
that,
in
a
nutshell,
is,
is
the
project
that
we're
proposing
for
the
city
of
san
juan
batista.
W
This
is
just
generally
a
map
showing
some
different
alignments
that
are
looked
at
represented
by
the
green
lines,
and
I
think
the
option
of
trying
to
use
the
156
alignment
is
not
not
practical,
given
that
you'd
have
to
deal
with
caltrans
right
away
on
that,
so
we're
looking
at
an
alignment
that
would
of
the
six
miles
that
have
about
three
miles
on
on
county
right
away
and
then
we'd
have
about
three
miles
through
private
farm
land
and
have
to
obtain
easements
for
that,
and
we're
also
looking
at
other
alternatives
where
the
entire
pipeline
would
be
in
county
right
away,
but
the
the
distance
would
be
somewhat
longer.
W
This
right
here
represents
the
shortest
distance
we
have,
which
would
be
about
6.1
miles
next
slide
down,
and
then
this
is
just
the
as
it
stands
right
now
the
proposed
alignment
about
6.1
miles.
We
are
exploring
some
other
alternatives.
In
case
we
run
to
a
problem
obtaining
easements
through
this
private
private
property.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
that
we
leave
all
our
options
open
for
constructing
the
for
spain
over
to
the
city
of
hollister
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
don.
U
Thank
you,
steve.
That
was
great.
You
know
in
partnering,
with
jeff
cattano,
the
general
manager
of
the
san
benito
water
district,
he's
done
this
before
and
and
hollister
has
participated
in
agreements
to
buy
water
from
west
hills
and
other
things,
and
so
he's
he's
offering
a
process
that
simple
modification
of
processes
he's
used
before,
and
the
first
step
in
the
process
to
buy
water
from
the
west
hills
plant
is
to
execute
a
memorandum
of
understanding.
U
And
what
I
proposed
in
my
letter
to
the
hollister
city
council
and
to
hollister
city
manager,
is
that
we
agreed
to
a
similar
mou
in
the
case
of
san
benito
water
district.
They
will
pay
for
the
pipe
and
build
the
pipe
and
be
responsible
for
it,
and
our
rate
payers
will
will
pay
for
that
over
an
extended
period
of
time.
U
But
it's
basically,
the
water
districts
project
bring
the
pipe
and
then
the
water
to
our
city,
and
so
what
we're
offering
is
quite
the
opposite,
where
we
would
build
the
pipe
and
we
would
be
responsible
for
operating
that
hardware
and
that
pipe
and
bring
the
our
waste
water
to
hollister
and
connect
it
to
your
plant.
So
this
mou
is
is
interesting.
The
way
it's
formatted,
because
it
gives
the
city
councils
and
the
water
district
the
opportunity
to
say
no
to
this
project
in
several
steps
along
the
way.
U
So
the
first
part
of
the
mou
is
actually
a
feasibility
study
and
when
the
when
the
two
projects
are
at
30
design,
we
ask
ourselves,
is
it
financially
feasible?
Is
it
practical?
Can
it
be
done?
Is
this
is
this
project
now
that
we're
through
the
concept
and
we're
into
the
the
details?
Is
it
feasible
and
if
it's
not,
then
we
have
an
agreement
with
the
city
of
hollister
and
the
city
of
in
san
benito
water
district
to
pay
the
costs
and
and
find
another
compliance
project.
U
So
I
hope
it
doesn't
come
to
that,
but
we
just
have
that
relief
valve.
We
have
that
that
way
out
if
we
need
to-
and
of
course,
if
it
is
seasonable,
then
we
move
forward
towards
a
formal
agreement.
You
know
similar
to
the
the
hollister
regional
agreement
with
sunny
slope
water
to
buy
water
from
them.
It's
it's
a
big
agreement
that
it
sets
a
10-year
term.
It
sets
the
rates
that
the
city
would
pay
hollister
for
receiving
our
water
and
we
would
pay
like
any
other
user.
U
U
If
the
regional
plant
has
current
capacity,
it
wouldn't
have
to
be
expanded
to
take
in
our
800
or
so
residential
users
we're
a
drop
in
the
bucket,
but
it's
just
a
very
critical
project
for
us,
and
so
I
put
together
this
simple
chart
that
takes
some
very
complicated
pieces
and
shows
you
the
three
pieces
that
we're
working
on
the
fiscal
strategy
is:
that's
all
on
us
and
we're
working
with
municipal
advisors,
they're
called
cal,
muni,
california,
municipal
advisors.
U
We
just
executed
that
agreement
january
19th
we're
going
to
bring
the
mou
forward
for
our
water.
Our
source,
water
from
the
water
district
that'll
be
coming
forward
to
our
city
council
february
16th
and
if
the
council
in
hollister
is,
is
okay
with
this
idea,
we
would
start
to
draft
an
mouth
for
your
city
attorney
and
our
city
attorney
to
work
through.
So
that's
what
we're
hoping
for
and
to
that
end
we
have
three
simple
questions.
U
This
is
hollister
interested
in
partnering
with
san
juan
bautista,
and
would
you
authorize
staff
to
work
together
on
an
mou
and
if
you
don't
already
have
a
subcommittee,
maybe
your
subcommittee
could
work
with
ours
and
that
would
be
a
great
way
to
just
start.
The
communication
process
moving
forward
vice
mayor
resendez,
is
on
the
water
district
board.
We
already
enjoy
working
with
him.
U
So
if
I
had
to
pick
someone,
it
would
be
him,
but
with
that
I
hope
I
could
pause
for
just
a
minute
and
let
council
member
freeman
and
mayor
jordan
say
a
few
words
and
then
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
T
Yes,
this
is
john
freeman
good
evening,
mayor
and
city
council
people-
I
I
know
some
of
you
and
the
other
two.
I
would.
I
look
forward
to
getting
to
know
and
work
with
you.
I've
actually
been
working
on
this
project
for
quite
some
time
since
since
about
2016.-
although
I
I
do
admit
I
just
was
working
on
the
makeup
water
side
of
the
business
and
not
the
sewer
side,
so
I'll
cut
to
the
chase.
T
Real
quick
with
what's
in
it
for
hollister
is,
as
you
probably
know,
wastewater
treatment
works
very
well
on
a
large
scale
capacity
and
we
would
offer
you
know,
800
new
units
without
you
having
to
build
a
road
or
a
pipe
or
anything
and
800
new,
paying
customers
without
you
having
to
to
pay
a
road
or
a
pipe,
and
you
wouldn't
have
to
hire
any
new
people
and
you
could
get
some
extra
money
to
run
your
sewer
plant.
So
that's
that's!
U
U
V
V
Do
have
a
fire
station
out
in
san
juan
batista,
so
it
would
help.
U
Oh
she's,
asking
for
the
number
okay:
I've
got
the
agenda
here.
C
Paul
as
we're
waiting,
what
size
line,
would
you
need
just
the
pvc
here?
Would
you
run
the
fiber
at
the
same.
V
V
V
D
I
F
X
X
I
think
this
is
a
an
amazing
time
for
for
the
city
of
san
juan
bakista,
both
getting
a
portable
water
supply
that
will
lower
our
salts,
our
solids,
our
hardness
and
then
regionalizing
our
wastewater.
At
the
same
time,
I
I
think
it's
a
long
time
coming
and
and
hope
that
the
city
council
will
partner
with
us
and
form
an
ad
hoc
committee,
and
we
can
get
an
mou
done
and
and
start
moving
forward.
X
We
appreciate
anything
that
that
you
can
do
to
help
us
out
with
this.
Thank
you
steve.
Thank
you
don
and
look
forward
to
working
with
the
city
of
hollister.
Thank
you
very
much.
Sorry.
It
took
so
long
to
get
on.
C
That's:
okay!
That's!
Okay!
Thank
you
for
contacting
us
and
looking
forward
to
working
with
you
all
so
with
that,
let's
go
back
to
ask
some
questions.
Questions
of
the
council.
Do
you
have
any
questions.
I
D
Yeah
part
of
the
might
not
always
just
be
on
the
revenue
side,
but
it
would
be
on
the
our
expenditures
they
they
would
be
paying
into
the
west
hill
water
treatment
facilities.
So
that
is
a
shared
cost
currently
between
sunny
slope
and
ourselves,
so
that
would
actually
lower
our
our
cost
for
our
water
supply
and
then
the
issue
would
be
for
the
wastewater
they
would
be
buying
in
the
appropriate
amount
of
into
our
system
and
then
plus
like
say,
the
more
ratepayers.
D
Nothing
really
ballpark
right,
yet
we
I
mean
we
wanted
to
see
what
what
the
council's
desires
were
before
we
really
went
into
that
to
start
looking
at
the
feasibility.
Thank
you,
sir.
O
Yes,
I
have
one
before:
can
we
find
out
what
how
this
will
impact
our
wastewater
treatment
as
far
as
capacity
goes?
I
know
right
now
we're
like
at
what
40ish
percent.
D
D
It
should
have
a
let's
say:
it's
a
800
connection,
so
it
shouldn't
have
too
much
impact
for
us,
but
that's
I
mean
that
will
be
part
of
the
feasibility
study
because
we
probably
didn't
need
to
look
at
so
it
that
would
be
additional
treated
water
that
we
would
be
providing
also,
that
might
help
have
other
benefits
too.
So
we
have
to
look
at
the
complete
package.
C
I
do
have
if
there's
another
question,
I
do
have
some
questions
for
you
brett.
Maybe
you
could
help.
Let
him
finish
that
conversation
right
you,
you
did
make
mention
of
it.
The
partners
we
have
when
we
built
the
plant
west
hills.
We
had
the
three
partners,
I
think
at
the
end,
we
all
ended
up
putting
close
to
15
million
in
loans
into
that.
C
So
they
would
be
the
fourth
partner
in
there
correct
and
that
that
would
work
that
part
out.
Okay,
that
that
covers
that
part.
So
that's
good
and
I
think
again,
if
we
made
some
wise
moves
when
we
took
care
of
the
chromium
sticks
and
all
those
issues
at
the
time
going
back
to
the
the
wastewater,
I
think
it's
an
excellent
idea.
I
we
have.
We
have
the
capacity,
that's
not
an
issue.
I
think
we
had
that
one
time
we
looked
at
and
we
had
the
potential
for
another
15
20
000
hookups.
C
That
was
a
few
years
back.
The
question
I
have
for
san
juan
batista
is
more
of
a
a
future
view
of
this
is,
I
know
you
had
eight
inch
waste
water
line.
Is
that
can
be
sufficient
for
the
future.
I
mean
once
you
do
this.
You
obviously
don't
want
to
come
back
and
have
to
upgrade
your
lines
again.
Is
8
inch
large
enough
or
is
that
something
you're
going
to
want
to
look
at
10
inch
or
something
or
12
inch
make
sure
you
have
the
capacity
for
your
future.
C
I
know
you're
not
planning
a
lot
of
growth,
but
in
case
you
had
any
large
industrial
uses
or
something
that's
something
you're
going
to
look
at.
The
other
question
I
would
have
for
san
juan
batista
is.
I
was
actually
I
looked
at
the
the
different
design
layouts.
I
was
actually
hoping
that
you
would
choose
the
route
along
156
and
by
the
way,
caltrans
is
going
to
relinquish
that
as
soon
as
the
new
road
is
built,
I
know
might
be
a
problem
now
before
the
the
new
roads
built.
C
So
that's
probably
your
concerns,
but
I
was
hoping
that,
if
you're
going
to
be
putting
a
pipeline
through
there,
we
could
also
make
that
into
a
bike
trail
between
san,
juan
batista
and
hollister,
to
connect
our
communities
and
we
can
both
enjoy
weekends,
riding
back
and
forth
on
our
bikes
with
our
families.
So
if
we
can
kind
of
think
of
something
like
that,
that
would
be
great,
I'm
absolutely
more
than
willing
to
be
a
partner
with
your
community.
I
think
this
is
when
it
does
make
sense
that
we
work
together.
C
You
guys
have
done
a
good
job
at
preserving
your
historical
community,
and
I
definitely
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
facilities
to
help
you
on
something
like
this.
That
we'd
be
at
least
I
would
be
willing
to
participate
in
it.
Thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
council.
N
O
C
There's
a
consensus,
and
I
want
to
thank
councilmember
freeman
and
mayor
jordan
and
mr
reynolds
for
you're
willing
to
work
with
us
as
as
partners.
So
looking
forward
to
the
conversations.
Thank
you
thank.
T
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
guys.
May
I
ask
steve
if
I
could
get
more
information
you're
with
what
company
again.
C
R
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
members
of
the
city
council
good
evening:
abraham
prado
development
services,
planning
manager
interim
director
at
the
january
19
2021
city
council,
meeting
staff
was
directed
to
bring
an
item
before
the
city
council
to
discuss
the
timeline
of
the
approval
of
tentative
maps
within
the
city
of
hollister,
and
so
we
provided
a
transmittal
to
you
and
also
for
tonight.
We
will
just
briefly
go
over
what
was
discussed
or
was
indicated
in
the
transmittal.
R
We
have
a
few
slides
that
pertain
to
the
house
for
municipal
code,
that's
big,
two
tenant
maps
and
also
the
government
code
forward,
slash
subdivision
map
pack
that
also
addresses
tender
maps.
So
briefly,
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
go
over
the
presentation,
discuss,
discuss
the
timeline
requirements
and
then,
if
you
I'm
going
to
be
going
over
the
slides
and
if
you
have
any
questions
or
would
like
to
discuss
some
of
these
slides
more
in
depth,
I'll
be
happy
to
to
try
to
respond.
R
There's
also,
we
have
our
city
engineer
here
as
well.
Mr
mark
falgo,
our
acting
city
engineer.
If
you
have
any
questions
that
pertain
to
the
engineering
aspect
of
it,
but
like
to
indicate
that
briefly,
the
tenant
map
one
tenant
map
is
presented
to
the
planning
commission
and
approved
normally,
it's
approved
with
a
list
of
conditions
of
approval.
The
tenant
map
itself
shows
say,
for
example,
10
acre
parcel.
R
That's
subdivided
into
the
number
of
lots
that
are
going
to
be
subdivided
for
whatever,
if
it's
residential,
commercial,
industrial,
whatever
it
is,
and
with
that
we
show
the
number
of
lots.
We
show
what
the
lots
are
going
to
be
for
if
it's
going
to
be
for
residential
there's
going
to
be
a
park,
open
space
area
parking,
there's
going
to
be
a
parking
in
the
area,
but
also
within
the
conditions.
R
We
indicate
that,
for
example,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
sidewalk
curve
gutter
and
there's
detail
on
that
very
plainly
stated:
there's
any
easements
that
are
going
to
require,
like
future
roads,
to
connect
to
other
parcels,
and
it's
it's
very,
very
basic
when
it
comes
to
that
it's
it's
there's
a
lot
of
time
invested
on
it
by
a
licensed
licensed
engineer,
and
the
requirement
is
that
once
a
tenant
map
is
approved,
then
the
city
per
section
164010.
F
R
Of
the
hollows
from
this
poker
requires
that,
then
they
are
able
to
prepare
a
final
map
for
it
to
to
be
brought
forward
to
the
city
council
to
make
sure
that
the
conditions
of
approval
have
been
met,
and
so
that
is
where
all
the
detail
is
sidewalk
curve
and
gutter.
R
They
need
to
indicate
you
know
the
the
width
type
of
material,
all
the
details
in
regards
to
what
the
improvements
are
going
to
be
on
that
final
map
and
how,
essentially
those
improvements,
are
going
to
look
when
they're
constructed
on
on
the
site
and
so
that
that
takes
a
little
bit
of
time
normally,
and
it
doesn't
happen
all
the
time
where
normally
the
the
engineer
for
the
applicant
that
prepares
attendant
map
usually
is
hired
by
the
applicant.
R
To
also
do
the
final
map
doesn't
have
to
be
that
sometimes
it
does
change
and
they
do
have
two
years
per
the
hollister
municipal
code
to
be
able
to
get
it
brought
before
the
city
council
to
basically
indicate
that
they
have
suffice
or
they
have
met
the
requirements
of
the
tender
map,
approval,
but
all
of
the
conditions
of
approval.
R
R
However,
they
need
additional
time
to
finalize
it
and
and
either
get
it
submitted
to
the
city
of
hollister
or
it's
within
the
city
of
hollister,
and
then
the
city
of
hollister's
engineering
department
is
currently
reviewing,
because
at
that
point
the
city
of
hofstra
engineering
department
wants
to
make
sure
that
everything
that
was
set
on
the
tentative
map.
All
the
conditions
of
approval,
have
been
met
accordingly.
R
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that
everything
is
is
is
met
and
the
majority
of
the
times-
and
I
think
mark
mark
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
probably
100
of
the
times
it
doesn't
happen
on
the
first
round,
there's
always
going
to
be
comments,
and
it
goes
back
to
the
engineer
to
the
to
the
applicant
engineer.
They
provide
all
the
other
changes,
and
you
know
all
the
details,
and
one
of
the
big
things
is,
for
example,
storm
water
management.
R
Right
now
we
want
to
make
sure
that
state,
water,
regional
quality
control
board
requires
that
all
of
the
sites
that
are
being
developed
are
pretty
much
stone.
Waters
contains
pretty
much
100
percent
on
site
and,
if
there's
any
spillover,
that's
you
know
prop
it's
properly
maintained
so
final
map.
R
We
want
to
make
sure
that
if
it's
either
a
retention,
pond
or
detention,
pond
that's
approved
or
if
it's
underground
mechanism
that
all
of
that
is,
is
designed
and
engineered
accordingly
and
appropriate
to
what
the
state
requires
and
what
the
code
city
hall
share
municipal
requires
as
well.
So
all
those
details
take
take
a
while
so
timeline
the
approvals
for
two
years
per
section
164010.
R
They
have
the
ability
to
file
for
an
extension
as
long
as
they
come
in
to
the
city
of
hollister
within
30
days
of
the
expiration
approval
of
the
of
the
approval
for
when
it's
expiring
and
then
we
can,
we
can
bring
it
before
the
planning
commission
do
a
regular
public
hearing.
So
we
add,
we
have
to
publish
it
in
the
newspaper.
We
send
our
notification
to
to
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
project
site,
and
then
we
have
a
public
hearing.
Planning
commission
can
say
yeah,
we'll
give
you
the
extension.
R
No,
we
don't
want
to
give
you
the
extension
or
we
can
give
you
the
extension
with
additional
conditions
of
approval
at
that
point.
If
there
are
additional
conditions
of
approval,
the
applicant
can
appeal
the
decision
to
the
city
council
and
say
I
want
those
conditions
of
approval
removed
or
if
the
planning
commission
denies
it,
the
applicant
can
come
before
the
city
council
and
say:
hey
plan.
Commission
united.
I
would
like
to
appeal
the
decision
and
bring
it
before
you
city
council,
for
for
an
approval
for
the
extension.
R
So
if
the
two
years
pass
and
the
the
extension
also
the
extension,
the
city,
the
house
of
municipal,
said
you
can
get
it
in
the
case,
you
can
get
a
two-year
extension.
However,
the
subdivision
map
act.
Actually,
that's
a
state.
It's
a
state
government
code.
It
actually
says
that
that
the
municipality
can
have
a
two-year
approval
with
a
one-year
extension,
and
so
so
that's
what
we're
doing.
Just
on
january,
just
two
weeks
ago,
we
went
to
the
planning
commission.
Actually,
last
week
we
went
to
the
planning
commission.
R
R
So
what
happens
if,
if
that
one-year
extension
is
fulfilled
and
and
the
applicant
still
cannot
finalize
their
final
map
to
to
bring
it
before
the
city
council,
there's
there's
various
options,
one
is
that
the
subdivision
map
act
has
various
codes
for
automatic
extensions.
R
If
they
meet
any
of
those
codes,
they
have
the
ability
to
still
keep
it
alive.
If
they
don't,
then
the
tenant
map
essentially
dies
and
the
applicant
will
have
to
re
come
again
to
the
planning
commission
to
reapply
basically
start
all
over.
There's
a
few
there's.
A
few
sections
of
the
subdivision
map
act
that
I
that
I
have
indicated
in
the
transmittal,
and
I
included
it
in
the
screen
here
before
us,
which
kind
of
indicate
give
gives
a
few
examples
of
what
the
subdivision
map
pack
allows
for
automatic
extensions.
R
For
example,
according
to
subdivision
the
subdivision
map
act
or
governed
by
the
gov
california
government
code,
6646
3.5
d1,
it
indicates
the
period
of
time
specified
in
subdivision,
a
which
basically
says
24
months
originally
approved
with
an
exception
of
12
months,
shall
not
include
any
period
of
time
during
which
a
development
moratorium
imposed
after
approval
of
the
tender
map
is
in
existence.
However,
the
length
of
the
moratorium
shall
not
exceed
five
years.
R
There's
others
in
the
subdivision
map
act
as
well
that
during
that
time,
as
we
all
know
right
when
the
moratorium
lifted,
2009
or
so
december,
2008
2009,
the
subdivision
map
act
had
additional
laws
that
basically
indicated
we
were
going
through
a
recession
at
that
time.
It
was
a
great
recession
that
started,
and
essentially
these
laws
come
in
continuously.
We
as
the
city
of
hollister.
R
We
get
an
annual
report,
state
government
loss
of
all
the
other
new
implementation
for
the
government
for
the
subdivision
map
act,
and
some
of
these
are
included
to
where
at
that
time
there
was
a
government
code.
That
basically
said
if
your
tenant
map
was
approved
by
a
local
municipality
on
these
days
kind
of
around
the
where
the
great
recession
was
was
going
on,
then
it
automatically
gets
extended
for
36
months.
R
So
all
all
of
that
kind
of
kept
the
kind
of
kept
a
lot
of
these
projects
alive
because
of
because
of
state
law
that
takes
precedence
over
municipal
code.
Those
are
just
some
of
the
examples.
R
Another
example
is,
for
example,
where,
if,
if
a
tended
a
map,
after
being
approved
by
a
municipality,
is
being
upheld
by
courts,
for
example,
there's
a
lawsuit,
that's
established
government
code,
66463.5
d2e,
basically
indicates
that
the
period
of
time
specified
in
subdivision
a
which
is
a
two
years,
plus
that
plus
a
one
year.
Extension,
including
any
extensions
thereof.
Granted
pursuant
to
subdivision
c,
should
not
include
the
period
of
time
during
which
a
lawsuit
involving
the
approval
or
conditional
approval
of
the
tenant
map
is
or
was
pending
and,
of
course,
of
competent
jurisdiction.
R
So
there's
you
know
additional
government
code
that
basically
like
this
one,
that
kind
of
keeps
these
tentative
maps
alive,
even
even
above
and
beyond
the
two
years,
plus
a
one-year
extension
of
a
municipal
code.
R
Another
one
is,
for
example,
and-
and
these
are
some
of
them
are
very
precise,
like
for
example,
government
code.
664
52.6
indicates
that
if
attending
a
map
is
approved
and
over
260
000
236
790
are
used
to
construct
or
improve
improvements
that
are
off-site
that
are
not
adjacent
public
improvements
that
are
not
adjacent
to
the
project.
R
Then
it
is
automatically
approved
for
36
months,
why
the
specific
236
790
dollars,
or
why,
this
specific
three
years,
a
lot
of
it,
we
believe,
has
to
do
with
just
state
law
lobbyists
that
that
want
to
continue
to
keep
these
tenant
maps
alive,
and
so
they
they
enact
them
their
law,
and
then
they
they're
applied
to
local
municipalities
for
implementation.
R
These
are
just
a
few
of
the
examples
that
that
we
see,
as
I
mentioned,
staff
receives
amended
updates
of
the
subdivision
map
act
on
a
yearly
basis
from
the
american
council
of
engineering
companies
of
california.
R
We
review
them
and
you
know
we
see
we
see
if
they
apply
or
not
and
very
briefly
another
another
form
of
how
some
of
these
subdivisions
or
today,
maps
are
kept
alive,
is,
for
example,
how
we
did
for
award
homes,
how
the
city
did
for
award
homes
and
twin
oaks,
that
they
have
performance
agreements
or
development
agreements,
and
so
at
that
point
the
city
and
the
developer,
negotiate.
You
know
what
is
it
that
we
want
to
see
on
that
development
and
the
developer
usually
indicates
well,
you
know
if
we're
going
to
negotiate.
R
We
also
would
like
to
see
if
we
can
have
additional
years
of
life
of
our
tentative
map,
and
so
so
it
can.
It
can
also
be
established
as
a
form
of
a
performance
agreement
or
development
agreement,
and
this
transmittal
has
been
submitted
to
address
the
city
council
pertaining
to
the
life
of
attendant
map
approvals
staff
requested
city
council,
receive
the
report
and
provide
any
necessary
direction
to
staff
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
comments
at
this.
C
P
P
He
was
very
quick
but
very
thorough,
and
I
appreciate
that
very
very
much,
and
I
don't
know
if
there
is
an
answer
to
this,
but
this
is
actually,
I
think,
very
timely,
based
on
an
earlier
council
conversation
this
evening.
Regarding
the
other
development
that
we
spoke
about
in
the
lafco
case,
and
one
of
my
concerns
is
in
my
council
district.
We
currently
have
two
significant
projects
that
are
being
built
on
fairview
and
I
only
know
what
I've
been
told.
P
In
essence,
it's
kind
of
the
holy
grail
for
development
and
I
know
that
developers
spend
tens,
if
not
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
in
different
pro
processes
to
get
to
that
point,
and
I'm
not
trying
to
be
disrespectful
in
my
comments.
But
I
am
concerned-
and
I
know
that
the
water
moratorium
and
the
recession
certainly
created
reasonable
reasons
why
those
projects
wouldn't
have
gone
forward
at
that
point.
P
P
Maybe
it's
not
possible,
but
I
would
very
much
like
to
see
for
lack
of
a
correct
legal
term,
some
sort
of
a
sunset
clause
where
once
a
tentative
map
has
been
approved,
that
they
have
a
certain
amount
of
time
to
go
shovel
in
the
ground
and
begin
that
project.
And
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
do
that.
But
my
initial
thoughts
would
be
three
years
after
a
project.
The
tentative
map
has
been
improved.
P
They
need
to
begin
work
and,
if
not
to
maybe
come
back
to
council
for
council
consideration,
and
I
think
that
will
conclude
my
comments
for
the
moment,
but
but
I
absolutely
heard
council
member
resendez
vice
mayor
rosandez,
bring
up
the
his
concerns
and
and
for
the
mayor
and
the
council
vice
mayor,
I
I
heard
your
comments.
P
I
share
your
concerns,
but
I
want
to
be
reasonable,
fair
and
consistent,
and
I
think,
if
we
put
this
out
moving
forward,
if
there's
a
way
that
I
think
we'll
be
better
off
and
we
won't
necessarily
have
to
be
as
concerned
about
some
of
the
things
that
quite
quite
clearly
the
mayor
and
the
vice
mayor
are
concerned
about,
and
I
hear
that-
and
I
understand
that,
and
so
with
that
I'll
conclude
my
comments
for
now.
Thank
you,
sir,
and
again,
thank
you
very
much
for
getting
right
on
this.
I
truly
appreciate
that
you're.
P
H
G
H
H
Yeah
same
thing,
this
is,
I
think,
something
that
we
had
talked
about
and
it
just
kind
of
fell
off
because
of
coven
and
and
other
things,
but
definitely
something
that
I'm
considering
revisiting.
I
would
suggest
that
we
agendize
it
notice
it
and
and
and
make
a
decision
on
it
at
a
later
date,
but
at
the
same
point
abraham.
H
There
are
some
other
things
that
we
were
working
on,
that
we
just
have
not
for
one
reason
or
another,
just
fell
off
like
the
inclusionary
housing
element,
that's
something
that
we've
been
working
on
for
a
number
of
years.
So
I'd
like
for
that
to
come
back
too.
Along
with
this,
which
I
think
is
perfect,
the
inclusionary
housing
element
needs
to
be
revisited
so
that
aligns
with
this
and
then,
as
the
mayor
stated
earlier,
the
impact
fee.
Where
are
we
at
with
impact
fees?
H
Those
are
two
other
items
that
go
along
with
this
and
planning
that
I'd
like
to
see.
Probably
all
on
the
same
agenda.
I
thought
you
said
the
first
week
of
march
brett,
so
if
we
can
get
all
those
three
things
and
whatever
else
the
mayor
asked
for
on
the
same
meeting,
I
think
that
would
be
very
productive,
so
that'd
be
my.
Those
are
my
thoughts
and
my
suggestions.
Thank
you.
C
Abraham.
I
did
have
a
comment
or
question
and
I
think
mr
burns
kind
of
hit
it
almost
perfectly
there.
His
comment
was
about
the
three-year
period
attended
map.
I
was
my
thought
process
was
thinking
more
of
a
two-year,
with
a
two-year
extension
possibility.
C
Is
that
something
that
seems
like
it's,
fair
or
and
mr
burns?
If
you
have
any
put
on
that
too,
I
I
did
like
what
you're
saying
with
the
three
year.
I
think
that's
very
fair,
also
either
way.
I
think
we
we
definitely.
We
need
to
be
fair,
but
we
don't.
What
we
don't
need
to
have
is
projects
that
are
sitting
out
there
and
there
is
a
lot
of
concern
of
the
past.
C
Is
that
possible,
abraham.
R
If
it
is
legally
possible
to
to
do
so,
and
then
we
can
also
discuss
with
the
city
attorney
if
there
is
a
potential
to
as
a
municipality,
be
able
to
have
that
sunset
clause,
that
that's
it
no
more
or
if
it
no
more
extensions
after
that
or
if
there
is
a
possibility
that
or
or
the
requirement
for
the
city
to
follow
the
state.
Some
of
the
visual
map
act
in
regards
to
extensions.
R
E
C
Thank
you
that
would
fall
in
line
with
what
councilmember
burns
was
mentioning.
So
just
to
be
clear,
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
understanding
this
we're
talking
the
timeline
once
the
tentative
map
is
approved
not
going
through
the
process.
Correct.
C
They
have
a
two-year
and
then
there's
the
possibly
for
a
one-year
extension.
R
G
Okay,
I'm
perfectly
fine
with
that.
I
think
that's
what
mr
burns
was
bringing
up
originally
and
I'm
personally
fine
with
that.
I'm
excited
to
see
where
we're
there.
C
We
just
have
to
clarify
it
in
our
code.
R
And
that's
correct,
mr
marin,
that's
one
thing:
that's
in
addressing
mr
epperson
at
this
time.
It
would
be
good
to
discuss
and
see
if,
if
that
is
what,
if
there
is
something
that
we
need
to
do
to
the
court
to
fulfill
that
that
desire
from
the
city
council
or
in
looking
at
the
automatic
extensions
that
the
subdivision
map
act,
grants
how
how
to
address
that
from
the
developer.
E
C
P
P
R
That's
a
good
question
council
member
tim.
So
yes,
once
once
a
tenant
map
is
approved,
then
at
that
point
the
tenant
map
has
been
entitled
and
with
conditions
of
approval.
R
So
the
conditions
of
approval
that
are
stated
in
the
resolution
of
of
the
of
the
planning
commission
essentially
indicates
that
the
the
applicant
or
the
developer
has
to
fulfill
all
of
those
requirements,
and
then,
at
that
point
it
comes
to
the
city
council,
for
approval
of
the
final
map,
and
at
that
point
basically
it's
basically
a
a
statement
indicating
that
the
final
that
the
that
the
tenant
map
has
fulfilled
their
obligations-
and
you
know
they
they
have.
They
have
a
final
map
before
the
city
council
for
approval.
P
I
P
C
C
Sir,
thank
you
for
that
update,
we'll
move
to
item
five
at
the
city
council
committees.
Apparently
I
missed
an
alt
alternate
for
the
cog
committee.
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
since
mr
perez
will
be
if
we're
following
the
sequence
we'll
be
vice
mayor
next
year,
would
like
to
see
him
on
there.
But,
mr
perez,
would
you
be
willing
to
serve
as
the
alternate
on
cog.
C
Go
ahead
and
is
there
any
comments
from
the
public
before
we.
A
A
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council
item
six.
I
had
we
had
tabled
item
six
at
the
january
19th
city
council
meeting,
mostly
due
to
not
having
enough
applicants
and
needing
more
time
to
go
over
the
applications
you
did
have,
and
I
had
said
that
at
that
meeting
on
the
19th
that
we
could
bring
it
back
on
the
first.
I
C
P
Thank
you
mayor.
I
appreciate
it
so,
with
regard
to
district
four,
I
I've
selected
salvador
mora
to
serve
on
the
planning,
commission
and
brian
the
carly,
to
serve
on
the
parks
and
rec
commission.
I've
reached
out
to
them,
as
well
as
other
applicants
and
have
moved
their
names
forward
to
the
city
clerk
to
pursue
that
now.
Having
said
that,
they're
both
very
qualified,
in
my
opinion,
based
on
a
review
of
their
applications
and
with
conversations
with
him.
P
However,
I
also
want
to
talk
for
a
moment
mayor
if
I
may
and
stop
me
if
I
may
not.
The
current
planning
commissioner
for
district
four
is
david
houboy
and-
and
he
has
been
the
planning,
commissioner,
as
I
understand
it
for
about
16
years,
and
I
wanted
to
be
clear
that
it
had
absolutely
nothing
to
do
with
mr
haboi
and
his
qualifications
or
his
past
work.
I
think
his
work
has
been
exemplary.
P
However,
as
many
know,
I'm
a
strong
advocate
for
time
limits
for
different
positions
and
having
served
16
years,
and
he
served
our
community
well
for
16
years,
and
I
absolutely
want
to
acknowledge
that.
But
I
think
it's
time
for
a
change
in
district
four
and-
and
that
was
part
of
what
drove
my
my
decisions
and
having
said
that,
it's
my
understanding
that
he
currently
sits
on
the
general
plan
committee.
P
P
I
know
he's
very
conscientious
and
he
prepares
and
he'd
be
a
great
asset,
and
so
my
choice
of
mr
moore
has
absolutely
very
little
to
do
with
mr
heboy,
but
I
did
want
to
acknowledge
his
years
of
service
and
recommend
the
council
that
we
move
him
forward
to
continue
on
that
general
plan
review
committee.
Thank
you.
C
C
A
H
Yeah
I
I
too
appreciate
mr
hugh
boy's
commitment
and
dedication
to
our
community
for
the
number
of
years,
there's
no
formal
decision
or
any
type
of
law
that
says
that
we
can't,
or
we
can
have
somebody
not
on
there
because
of
term
limits.
I
think
that's
something
we
can
definitely
visit
at
a
later
date
and
we
need
to
give
them
considerable
time
to
to
be
able
to
accept
that.
H
C
All
right,
so
those
are
the
appointments
if
there,
if
there's
a
consensus
with
the
council
and
mr
perez,
I
think,
still
wants
more
time
to
sort
out
finding
somebody
for
his
is
that
process
still
going
to
continue
then
city
clerk
as
far
as
the
advertising
or,
mr
president,
you
have
a
few
people
you're
already
thinking
about,
or
do
you
want
her
to
continue
with
the
advertising.
A
C
Okay,
so
for
mr
perez
will
be
march
1st,
so
the
other
tonight
I've
heard
mr
burns
had
his
choices
and
mr
resendez
have
his.
Is
there
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
council?
C
Is
there
a
consensus
here
from
council?
Yes,
mr
mayor,
okay,
we'll
move
forward
with
those
appointments
and
then
we'll
finish
with
mr
perez's.
The
first
meeting
in
march.