►
From YouTube: Hol CC 090721
Description
Hollister City Council Meeting September 7, 2021
C
E
F
B
G
E
A
B
A
C
H
B
H
Okay,
well,
I
was
not
provided
it
properly,
redacted
police
report.
I
don't
see
how
they
could
completely
leave
out
the
investigation,
there's
no
pending
litigation,
so
you
all
have
the
free
support
and
hopefully
I'll
be
hearing
from
you
in
regards
to
my
request
to
brady
captain
renoso
also
and
I'll,
be
getting
a
hold
of
attorney
general.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
C
F
B
Thank
you.
We're
going
to
now
move
to
see
public
input.
This
is
a
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
item
not
on
the
agenda
and
within
the
subject
matter.
The
jurisdiction
of
the
council
speaker
cards
are
available
in
the
lobby
are
to
be
completed
and
given
to
the
city
clerk.
Before
speaking
when
the
city
clerk
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
city
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
city
council.
B
B
I
At
the
last
meeting
I
heard
vice
mayor
resendez
state
that
the
current
council
is
much
better
at
getting
things
done
than
past
council.
There
is
nothing
further
from
the
truth.
Business
was
conducted
and
decisions
were
made.
As
I
recall,
we
did
not
continue
much
business.
We
made
decisions
based
on
facts
and
got
it
done.
Take,
for
example,
the
fire
services
contract
and
tax
sharing
agreement,
two
important
items
just
because
you
and
mayor
velasquez
dissented
on
most
items,
doesn't
equal
business
not
getting
done.
I
I
I
B
I
Okay,
I'll
agree
with
you,
mayor
velasquez.
Well,
then
inappropriate
comments
such
as
the
ones
made
at
the
last
meeting
by
vice
mayor
resendez,
on
beyond
saying
unethical
behavior,
and
you
got
the
is
that
not
talking
about
the
past?
So
I'm
commenting
on
what
he
said
there
I'll
continue.
Please
I
find
it
downward
conical.
I
I
You
offended
me
last
meeting
and
that's
why
I'm
commenting
this
evening
on
another
issue
to
the
full
council.
Respectfully
one
regular
meeting
is
not
adequate
for
the
public.
Maybe
you
need
additional
staff
to
get
it
done
by
monthly.
Thank
you.
My
last
comment
is
related
to
reckless
driving.
I
see
every
day,
but.
J
B
As
a
former
council
member,
your
other
points
should
have
been
the
items
brought
up
as
a
council.
We
could
work
on
so
please
in
the
future.
If
you
could
refrain
from
attacking
a
council
member
or
responding,
we
don't.
This
is
not
going
to
be,
as
in
the
past,
a
facebook
forum
to
attack
one
another.
Those
days
are
over
and
I'm
happy
to
say
we
are
working
together
well
as
a
council.
So
thank
you
very
much.
We'll
move
to
next
speaker.
K
Good
evening,
please
note
government
code
states
that
the
law
prohibits
the
city
council
from
discussing
or
taking
action
on
any
item
not
on
the
agenda.
You
must
hear
the
public
input
without
interruption.
You
have
established
rules
and
policies
that
only
fit
for
your
agenda
and
not
for
anybody
else.
You
don't
like
being
brought
up
on
a
subject,
that's
on
you,
because
we
are
here
and
we
can
criticize
your
job
that
you're
doing
whether
it's
a
great
job
or
whether
it's
a
bad
job.
K
But
you
are
not
entitled
to
stop
us
from
public
comment,
because
that
is
our
constitutional
rights
council
members
may
not
and
should
not
be
contacting
staff
directly,
whether
it's
management
or
the
city
manager,
to
direct
them
to
do
something.
You
may
contact
them
to
ask
them
to
play
something
the
agenda,
but
you
are
not
directed
to
tell
them
exactly
what
it
is
that
you
want.
That
is
up
to
the
entire
city
council.
This
has
been
going
on
for
a
long
time.
This
is
not
the
first
time
I
mention
it.
It
continues
to
happen.
K
You
established
these
policies
that
only
apply
to
something
that
you
like,
and
if
you
don't
like
it,
you
stop
us
from
talking.
I
can
be
up
here
and
I
can
be
three
minutes
and
I
can
say
anything
that
I
want
about
the
entire
council
and
I
may
name
you
you
cannot
stop
me.
You
think
that
the
new
rules
are
legal
they're.
K
Not,
unfortunately,
you
have
a
city
council,
city
attorney
that
needs
to
go
because
he's
not
giving
you
and
lacks
municipal
code
experience
to
tell
you
what
you
can
and
cannot
do
legally
and
that's
on
all
four
of
you
right
now
that
you
should
be
able
to
be
looking
for
an
attorney
that
can
give
you
guidance,
because
you
guys
have
placed
yourselves
in
a
situation
where
you're
going
to
be
sued
because
you're
trying
to
shut
us
down
and
what
you
just
did
with
former
councilman
carol.
Noor
was
completely
wrong.
You
made
a
comment.
K
K
B
For
I
will
repeat
what
I
said
earlier:
this
is
a
forum
as
residents
to
come,
speak
to
us
on
issues
that
are
happening.
You
know
happening
within
our
community,
so
we
can
help
solve
those
issues.
It
will
not
be
a
forum
to
again,
as
in
the
past,
spread
rumors
or
accusations.
That's
not
what
city
council
is
about
we're
here
for
you,
but
we're
not
going
to
go
through
those
same
times
again.
We
don't
need
to
do
this.
B
H
A
couple
of
stop
signs:
some
of
my
neighbors
are
here
from
the
maple
chapel
street
area.
We're
requesting
two
additional
stop
signs.
I've
spoken
to
my
councilman,
mr
perez.
He
advised
me
that
it
costs
several
thousand
dollars
to
do
a
traffic
study.
I
implore
each
of
you
to
drive
down
maple
street
heading
east.
H
H
H
We
just
need
to
have
three-way
stop
there.
It
would
probably
make
things:
go
a
lot
simpler
in
the
neighborhood,
we'll
avoid
some
deadly
accidents,
and
I
know
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
activity
going
down
there.
I
think
mr
perez
was
telling
me
that
there's
going
to
be
a
new
hotel,
a
strip
mall
and
I
think
800
houses
which
we
tried
to
not
get
through,
but
we
didn't
we
weren't
successful
in
that
so
anyway,
that's
all.
I
have
to
say:
please
get
us
two
stop
signs.
H
C
H
H
I
believe
that
is
not
safe.
It
is
not
safe
to
turn
on
chapel
in
either
direction.
I
watch
people
try
to
turn
left
and
almost
get
hit.
They
can't
see
the
vehicle
on
travel.
Road
coming
from
the
left
cannot
see
the
vehicles
they're
stopped
at
the
stop
sign
and
they're
almost
on
top
of
them
before
they
can
see
people
pulling
onto
chapel
the
vehicles
traveling
from
the
right
turning
onto
maple,
they
rarely
slow
down
and
they
cut
the
corner.
H
H
H
I
came
to
talk
about
parks.
I
attended
the
parks
commission
meeting
last
week
and
a
report
was
given
about
the
bathrooms
at
park
hill
and
I
understand
they're
short
staffed,
and
I
see
that
I
saw
an
agenda.
There's
lots
of
jobs
that
you're
putting
out
there
on
on
the
agenda.
So
I'm
hoping
that
you
will
add
a
parks
maintenance
so
that
perhaps
the
bathrooms
in
park
hill
can
be
finished
and
open.
H
We
were
told
back
in
june
that
they
would
be
done
in
two
or
three
weeks
and
now
it's
september,
and
you
know
I
get
it-
that
they
don't
have
the
manpower
to
do
it.
But
if
that's
the
case,
we
keep
adding
more
parks
with
all
the
new
development
and
I'm
for
parks,
I'm
not
against
parks,
but
we
have
to
have
the
manpower
to
maintain
the
parks
that
we
have
and
to
do
these
projects,
and
so
that
was
my
first
reason
for
coming.
My
second
one
is
also
at
the
parks.
H
Commission,
brigantino
park
was
discussed
again
and
moving
forward
on
the
development
of
it,
and
I
know
you
guys
are
really
excited
about
getting
some
sort
of
traveling
team
fields
in
there.
So
you
can
create
some
income
for
the
city,
but
until
you
get
a
safe
access
for
our
youth,
you
can
you
can't
possibly
in
good
conscience,
build
anything
out
there,
whether
it's
a
road
or
a
trail
through
the
river.
H
I
know
the
bridge
is
a
big.
You
know
way
too
much
money
whatever
you
cannot
build
anything.
You
cannot
develop
that
area
without
a
safe
access.
You
can't
expect.
I
mean
I
know
you
want
the
traveling
teams
to
drive
there.
I
have
past
kids
walking
and
riding
their
bikes
on
that
4th
street
bridge
more
than
once
other
people
have.
M
M
On
4th
street
684
right
644.,
it's
an
old
victorian
has
been
there
for
numerous
years.
The
gary
family
has
been
there
for
56
years.
Their
part
of
district
one
talked
to
rick
over.
There
is
very
helpful,
but
his
hands
are
tied
very
much
in
a
nutshell:
I'm
not
against
the
police
police,
I'm
not
against
the
firemen,
I'm
not
against
any
single
city
member
at
all,
but
I
feel
that
there's
some
waste
going
on
around,
for
instance,
and
flagpoles
put
outside
there's
twelve
thousand
dollars
right
there.
M
The
police
got
those
whirlybirds
or
whatever
that's
another
fifteen
thousand
dollars.
I
was
told
by
city
manager
and
then
on
top
of
that,
there's
another
five
thousand
dollars
going
to
train
the
officers.
That's
fine!
We
got
that
done
well.
My
concern
is
behind
the
house
going
up
to
the
electric
gate
that
we
have
over
there.
M
There's
potholes
at
30,
there's
35
yards,
there's
potholes
that
are
so
deep
when
her
mother
comes
she's,
a
special
needs
person
very
special
needs
when
her
mother
comes
home
from
the
doctors
with
roos,
takes
care
of
her
mother
and
takes
her
to
and
from
doctors
every
time
she
goes
through
there.
She
tries
it
very
carefully
and
very
diddly
chainsy,
but
her
head,
snaps
back
and
forth
and
her
neck
is
very
weak.
M
Okay,
and
that
concerns
me,
I'm
really
hot
about
that.
I'm
not
asking
to
repave
the
road,
I'm
asking
for
the
pot
roar,
the
potholes.
Have
beef
be
filled.
That's
all
I
go
to
find
out
that
they
were
being
done
and
I
thought
it
was
a
city
doing
it.
No,
it
was
a
gravel
guy
that
worked
acro
that
lives
across
the
street
from
us.
That
was
feeling
on
his
own
and
he
worked
at
the
gravel
company.
M
The
city
never
did
nothing
and
she
these
folks
have
been
paying
taxes
for
56
years
and
you
figure
by
now
that
something
could
be
done
with
that,
just
potholes
being
filled.
They
take
20
minutes
or
15
minutes
a
piece
and
there's
15
of
them
within
35
yards,
and
even
the
name
of
the
street
is
not
even
on
there.
You
make
a
delivery.
Some
guy
can't
even
make
deliveries
anymore.
What's
the
administration.
M
Park
fremont
and
that's
ridiculous-
I
mean
come
on
and
if
something
were
to
happen
to
my
my
mother-in-law,
you'll
be
really
you'll,
be
hearing
from
me
because
the
city
is
responsible
for
that.
I
wouldn't
imagine
not
to
make
a
new
road.
It
costs
a
million
dollars
just
to
fill
the
potholes.
Please.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
I
B
B
B
N
Hello
councilman,
my
first
meeting
pretty
excited
and
nervous,
but
I
love
it
right
now.
It's
I
feel
good.
So
I'm
here
about
the
traffic
issue
on
chapao
and
maple
street.
I
live
on
that
street.
It's
I
believe
I
just
want
to
get
into
some
history
of
that
I
live.
I
live
there
and
two
years
ago
someone
hit
my
jetta
in
front
of
my
house
and
it
shot
over
to
the
next
door
neighbor
and
then
they
hit
it
again
twice.
They
got
total.
N
I
really
moved
there
when
that
happened
like
not
even
two
weeks.
So
then
I
kind
of
thought.
Okay,
that's
not
good,
you
know
so
then
I
have
little
girls
and
boys,
so
we're
outside
playing
cards
are
just
zipping
by
and
I'm
new
to
that
I
was
new
to
the
area
I'm
born
and
raised
here
in
hollister.
I
really
never
really
appreciated
a
community.
I
left
hollister
and
I
came
back
once
I
had
my
kids
and
I
realized
it's
where
I
want
to
be.
N
I
want
them
to
be
safe
and
grow
up
in
a
good
environment,
but
my
concern
right
now
is
traffic.
My
neighbors
put
in
their
input.
I
would
like
to
just
say
that
I'm
I
was
looking
at
this
fence
high
man
maximum
of
three
feet
for
a
side
of
a
home,
the
shrubs
in
that
area
on
chappal
or
four
feet,
six
inches
and
four
feet
on
maple
street.
So
to
me,
that's
still
considered
a
fence
since
it's
wood
and
it's
obstruction.
N
So
I
did
some
measurement
stuff,
I'm
not
engineer,
but
it
is
a
pretty
hard
turn
to
turn.
Once
you
go
from
chipotle
maple,
you
have
about
nine
feet
on
one
side
and
then
20
20
feet
on
another
side,
so
you're
kind
of
cheating
the
other
side.
So
those
people
are
really
kind
of
hugging
the
the
line
the
center
divider
to
not
hit
the
cars
that
are
parked
on
that
side.
N
N
The
street
has
a
horrible
incline
where
it
dips
when
it
rains
it
floods,
but
that's
another
issue,
but
it's
just
it
just
seems
poorly
developed
and
my
other
concern-
or
I
would
like
to
just
also
say
that
I
would
like
to
see
a
three-way
stop.
If
anything,
I
mean
put
some
fence
some
signs
up
slow
down,
maybe
one
of
those
digital
things
that
tell
you
your
speed.
Just
anything
and
I
also
agree.
I
would
hope
someone
would
go
out
there
and
just
survey
that
area
and
just
check
it
out.
N
But
after
five
not
in
the
morning,
not
at
lunch
around
five
o'clock
we
have
a
starbucks
now
around
the
corner,
so
I
could
just
see
things
getting
worse.
People
are
going
to
go,
get
an
expensive
milkshake.
You
know,
I
mean
a
coffee
and
I
just
don't
think
it's
gonna
be
a
good
situation,
especially
kids
are
in
school
now,
of
course,
but
it
wasn't
too
bad
now
they're
in
school.
So
now
you
see
the
traffic
from
the
parents,
people
going
to
lunch
and
it's
it's
pretty
bad
and
I
just
hope
no
one
gets
hurt.
C
B
G
A
A
The
treatment
plant
impact
fee
from
san
juan
batista.
If
we
do
go
forward,
will
be
about
2.5
million
and
it's
been
requested
that
they
pay
it
over
30
years
with
the
interest
equal
to
the
city's
wastewater
bond
interest
rate.
The
mou
will
also
have
a
maximum
daily
flow
of
1.2
million
gallons
per
day.
Their
current
flow
is
right.
Now
is
160
000
per
day.
J
Reynolds
thank
you
mayor
members
of
the
city
council.
Thank
you
city
manager,
miller.
I
appreciate
your
time
tonight
and
your
consideration
of
this
matter.
We
have
been
working
hard
since
I
started
july,
2nd
2019.
It's
been
my
focus
and
just
in
2020
we
had
39
special
meetings
covet,
of
course,
but
water
was
on
every
agenda,
so
this
has
been
our
city
council's
focus
and
with
me
tonight
I
have
members
of
our
water
committee,
mayor
jordan
and
council
member
freeman
joining
me
tonight.
J
So
this
mou
that
we
bring
to
you
does
a
number
of
things,
but
it's
intended
to
be
a
bridge.
It's
a
temporary
agreement
to
get
to
a
long-standing
permanent
agreement.
So
this
agreement
would
would
ask
the
question:
is
this
project
feasible
and
if
it's
found
to
be
feasible,
then
the
next
step
under
the
mou
is
to
form
a
permanent
10
or
20-year
agreement,
and
the
city
of
hollister
is
already
in
a
such
agreement
with
sunny
slope
and
the
san
benito
county,
water
district
and
and
that
agreement
would
be
amended
to
include
san
juan
batista.
J
It's
modeled
after
an
mou
that
we
did
execute
in
february
of
this
year
with
the
water
district,
with
the
same
premise
where
we
have
to
import
water
that
is
less
salty,
so
we're
importing
surface
water
from
the
reservoir
through
the
west
hills
treatment
plant
into
our
water
system
and
blending
it.
So
that
way
the
water
output
is
cleaner
and
that's
the
ultimate
solution.
J
The
the
mou
was
drafted
in
april
and
we've
been
working
closely
with
city
manager,
miller
and
the
wallace
group
who
manages
your
treatment
plan
every
time
we
had
questions
or
recommendations,
the
wallace
group
and
our
technical
staff
who's
online.
I
believe
gabe
from
stantec
in
case
you
have
questions
about
some
of
these
technical
technical
issues.
I
did
negotiate
through
the
agreement
and
did
negotiate
and
discuss
the
connection
fee.
We
estimated
originally
in
section
3.12
of
the
mou
that
the
connection
fee
would
be
estimated
4.67
million
dollars
and
that's
based
on
your
publish
rates.
J
J
This
is
the
first
live
council
meeting
I've
been
to
in
18
months,
I'm
just
just
doing
the
zoom
thing,
man
very
exciting.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
patience,
so
right.
So
let
me
back
up
now,
I'm
too
far
ahead,
yeah,
okay,
so
that
was
paul.
Helping
me
paul,
I'm
still
on
the
first
slide.
If
that
helps.
J
Okay,
now
I
need
to
go
back
one
more
okay.
Here
we
go
so
right
there
you
go
so
the
final
draft
approved
by
this
hofstra
technical
staff
was
brought
board
to
the
san
juan
batista
city
council
in
in
in
august
and
approved
at
their
august
17
council
meeting.
It
includes
the
final
cost
analysis,
rate
study
and
funding
applications
await
approval
of
the
mou.
So
we've
been
also
looking
for
numerous
different
ways
to
to
fund
the
project.
J
What
we've
done
since
february
is
determine
a
final
path
for
the
force
main
to
hollister,
by
sending
it
out
through
county
roads,
and
this
way
we're
reducing
our
reliance
on
private
easements
and
acquisitions
from
14
down
to
just
two
that
also
sends
the
the
force
main
past
the
industrial
users.
So
let
me
talk
for
a
minute
about
our
industrial
users.
J
They
will
say
to
you
that
earthbound
farms
and
true
leaf
and
coke
farms
are
not
industrial,
because
they're
required
by
our
agreement
to
extend
sewer
services
to
them
to
only
send
us
domestic
wastewater,
so
they
are
only
sending
us
their
domestic
wastewater
earthbound.
Our
biggest
client
has
a
whole
industrial
water
treatment
plant
on
their
premises,
so
their
wash
water
and
other
water
is
separated
and
they
send
us
just
the
toilet
water
and
that's
what
we
get
from
their
employees.
J
So
their
use
agreements
are
limited
to
the
number
of
employees
and
based
on
the
number
of
gallons
per
employee
that
they
would
send
us.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
get
all
of
them
focused
into
one
location,
on
san
justo
road,
where
we
can
monitor
the
quality
of
the
water
24
7,
and
we
can
monitor
the
volume
that
it
put
out
right
now,
we've
been
entrusting
a
third
party
to
send
us
data
that
they
have
hired.
J
We
would
like
to
do
this
ourselves
and
take
it
upon
ourselves
so
that
we
can
assure
hollister
that
the
water
coming
to
you
is
as
good
as
your
permanent
limits
require,
so
our
design
should
be
completed
by
december
22,
but
our
30
percent
design
will
be
done
in
october
and
so
october
is
a
real
big
month
for
us.
We
hope
to
have
our
our
design
at
30
complete.
We
hope
to
have
our
environmental
studies
done
and
we
hope
to
have
our
rate
study
approved
to
help
pay
for
the
project.
J
J
J
Okay!
Okay!
Now
we've
been
through
that
one
okay
right.
So
this
is
this:
is
the
force
main
project
leaving
north
north
san,
juan
bautista
on
san
juan
highway
and
then
turning
east
on
prescott
and
then
using
san
justo
road
to
come
across
and
that's
the
design
for
the
six
and
a
half
mile
pipeline.
The
estimated
cost
is
14.8
million
dollars,
design,
acquisition
of
right-of-way
and
construction.
J
And
on
the
next
slide
paul
it's
going
to
end
here.
This
is
union
road
and
highway
156,
and
you
can
see
that
it
comes
in
at
the
bottom,
on
the
right
hand,
side
right
into
the
hollister
treatment
plant
to
a
manhole
that
the
city
will
have
to
improve
in
order
for
the
manhole
to
accept
our
pipe
coming
under
highway
156..
J
It
avoids
impacting
the
hollister
collection
system
entirely
because
it
terminates
our
responsibility.
Terminates
at
your
treatment
plant,
the
city
plans
on
sending
on
average
we've
calculated
about
160,
000
gallons
per
day.
It's
actually
gone
down
since
2017,
I
think
through
the
use
of
water
conservation,
toilets
and
other
efforts.
Our
general
plan
talking
about
growth.
This
is
a
sensitive
subject.
Of
course,
we
we
appropriated
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
this
year
to
initiate
a
general
plan
amendment.
J
The
general
plan
estimates
a
three
percent
growth
rate
and
the
city
has
never
grown
at
three
percent.
The
average
over
10
years
is
right
around
1.9
percent,
so
we
amended
our
water
and
wastewater
master
plans
to
include
this
1.9
percent
growth
rate
and
it's
based
on
the
general
plan.
So
the
number
that
you
see
in
the
mou
estimates
a
1.9
growth
per
year
and
as
brett
referenced,
it
says
our
our
portion
of
160
gallons
per
day
is
is
a
small
portion
of
the
total.
J
K
I
would
request
an
explanation
to
the
citizens
of
the
county
as
to
why
I
thought
it
would
be
a
great
idea
since
156
is
being
expanded,
why
not
decide
and
get
it
done
and
use
156
instead
of
going
through
all
this
meandering,
whatever?
Maybe
it
was
looked
into,
but
the
construction
is
there,
the
the
permit?
The
permission
can
be
granted
from
the
state
and
it's
more
direct.
K
It
is
shorter
routes.
So
I
don't
understand.
The
permission
has
already
been
done.
It's
just
a
matter
of
communicating
with
that
caltrans
to
get
permission,
pg
e
is
already
doing
the
underlying
underlying
wiring
there.
So
it'd
just
be
a
matter
of
adding
the
water
and
the
sewage.
I
think
it
would
be
america.
K
K
So
I
think
it's
a
great
idea
that,
as
advocate
for
the
citizens
of
san
juan
bautista,
to
have
something
they
have
issues
all
the
time
their
pipe
systems
are
well
over
100
years
old.
Even
I
think
it's
like
150
and
they're
going
to
have
to
they're
going
to
have
that
impact
as
well
to
get
new
lines
within
the
city
and
then
get
those
lines
hooked
up
to
this
new
system.
K
A
sewer
in
a
water
corporation,
however,
it
is
p
two
city
councils,
two
councilmans
or
supervisors
from
each
city
or
from
the
county,
a
city
one
from
each
for
or
anyway,
just
the
way
they
do
with
other
other
committees
so
that
it
can
be,
it
can
be
brought
up,
and
it
can
you
know
they
can
talk
about
it.
It
could
also
go
to.
K
E
J
J
It's
just
a
lot
easier,
so
we
have
the.
We
have
a
soft
go
ahead.
Of
course,
there's
encroachment
fees
that
we
have
to
pay
the
county,
but
we're
able
to
use
this
shoulder
and
not
necessarily
go
down
the
middle
of
the
asphalt.
It's
just
that's
what
stantec
did
when
they
came
on
board
on
in
february.
Is
they
spent
three
months
picking
the
best
path
and
we
agreed
that
this
was
the
best
path
it's
really
important
to
our
residents.
J
E
A
E
F
Thank
you.
First
of
all
welcome
our
colleagues
from
the
neighboring
city
to
the
city
of
hollister.
It's
good
to
see
you
guys,
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
make
mention
that
we
talked
about
this
at
the
last
intergovernmental,
so
those
that
were
there
is
probably
going
to
be
repeated
for
you,
but
I
believe
that
my
colleagues
here
have
not
heard
it
if
we're
thinking
about
expanding
broadband
services
out
in
the
county.
F
I
know
that's
something:
that's
a
high
priority
of
both
san
juan
batista,
the
city
of
hollister
and
the
county,
and
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
open
it
up
for
the
sewer
lines.
Then
I
would
just
say
that
we
ensure
that
we
do
the
broadband
at
the
same
time,
so
we
can
have
those
two
things
running
side
by
side
that
would
be
very
beneficial
to
to
everybody
and
all
the
citizens.
Those
are
my
thoughts.
Thank
you.
A
B
So
I
do
have
a
few
comments.
I
want
to
thank
the
council
members
here
mayor
there.
She
is
council
member
for
coming
it's.
This
is
a
an
opportunity
to
show
what
partnerships
can
do.
This
has
been
a
conversation
for
for
a
while
here
between
hollister
and
san
juan,
and
there
were
some
questions
early
on.
If
it
can
be
done,
it
was
looked
into
at
lafco.
I
think
there
was
a
question
before
if
lafco's
all
right
with
this-
and
yes,
it
does
work
with
lafco
legally,
because
we're
two
government
agencies
providing
the
same
services.
B
So
the
key
to
this
agreement
is
that
we're
providing
services
within
our
jurisdictions
and
not
just
out
anywhere.
Somebody
made
a
comment
about
providing
services
in
different
areas.
This
is
how
we
got
into
trouble
in
the
past.
With
growth,
we
had
a
basic
sprawl
happening
throughout
our
community,
our
county.
B
B
Why
wasn't
it
done
that
way?
Well,
if
you
go
back
and
look
at
the
history
of
our
sewer
plant,
all
of
you
that
are
paying
that
outrageous,
high
bill
right
now
that
we're
all
frustrated
with
that
was
designed
for
basically
the
entire
community,
but
at
the
time
part
of
that
community
decided.
They
didn't
want
to
be
part
of
the
payment
of
that
huge
facility,
so
chose
to
go
on
their
own
path,
not
san
juan
batista,
but
others
and
the
city
of
hollister
ended
up
shouldering
the
entire
bill.
B
And
this
is
why
we're
paying
this
huge
fee.
That
happened
because
of
a
lack
of
planning
in
the
past
and,
more
importantly,
a
lack
of
financial
planning,
because
when
you
have
these
plants
that
we
spend
120
million
dollars
for
you
have
to
understand
in
the
future,
there's
going
to
be
more
cost
to
this.
And
if
you
plan
correctly
you'll
have
the
dollars
ready
when
you
don't
you're,
given
a
bill
of
120
million
with
no
money
to
pay
for
it.
B
B
Our
connection
fee
at
this
time
is
much
lower
than
it
should
be
realistically,
and
the
study
will
show
what
that
connection
fee
will
be
in
the
future.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
understand
that
that
true
cost
of
that
connection,
because,
as
I
said
later
on,
that
sewer
will
have
to
be
expanded
and
there
will
be
major
dollars
into
it.
B
B
B
B
So
we're
we're
clear
on
that
up
front
because
the
more
salt
or
more
other
problems
with
it,
it
does
cost
more
to
process
that
water.
So
I
think
it's
it's
going
to
be
important
for
us
to
get
closer
to
the
rate.
What
we're
paying
our
citizens
are
currently
paying
in
our
our
city,
so
we
can
do
that
correctly
up
front
and
not
later
because
it
wouldn't
be
be
fair
to
the
residents
of
san
juan
batista
to
get
another
bill
later
saying
oops,
we
made
a
little
mistake
here.
B
This
is
how
we
got
again
into
problems
in
our
own
community,
where
service
was
provided
in
areas
it
shouldn't
have
been.
Cities
are
where
growth
should
occur,
not
more
sprawl.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
we
have
a
good
understanding
of
that
and
the
we're
clear
with
san
juan
bautista
and
I
the
conversation
that
I've
had
with
them.
They're
they're
again
I
love
working
with
these
partners.
B
We
worked
all
so
well
together,
so
we
understand
that
and
of
course,
the
future
growth,
a
number
that
we
can
live
with,
because
again
we're
going
to
have
growth
in
our
community
that
we're
seeing
right
now-
and
we
don't
want
to
be
in
a
situation
too
early
where
we
have
to
pay
for
an
expansion
before
we
have
time
to
pay
off
the
current
facility.
So
if
we
can
work
that
out,
I
don't
know
if
we
have
to
do
that
now
or
we
can
do
that
in
the
future.
B
A
B
B
B
B
J
Propose
mayor
is
that
that
be
part
of
the
permanent
agreement
which
we'll
know
by
the
end
of
october,
and
if
things
are
feasible
and
our
rates
do
get
approved,
then
we're
going
full
bore
ahead
on
this
permanent
agreement,
and
that's
where
I
think
I
think
bpa
would
would
feel
better.
If
we
had
your
confidence
tonight
and
so
we
could
move
forward.
B
A
G
J
B
J
G
A
Yeah
it
would,
it
would
definitely
help
you
know,
as
we
have
more
rate
payers,
there's
more
costs
to
spread
across
and
just
kind
of
for
information
for
everybody,
so
residential
has
a
flat
fee
where
our
commercial
rates
is
based
on
water
use,
but
yeah.
As
a
I
mean,
as
we
get
as
we
get
the
different
hookups
or
impact
fees.
We
have
been
using
that
to
pay
down
our
sewer
bonds,
which
helps
cut
down
on
interest
payments
and
their
principal
payments,
which
we've
used
to
help
lower
our
payments.
Also.
E
B
C
C
Their
decision
to
deny
the
applicant's
request
to
remove
condition
of
approval
number
55,
a
pc
resolution
2016-11
for
attentive
map
2015-9,
as
amended
by
pc
resolution
2017-31,
which
requires
the
applicant
to
provide
an
emergency
vehicle
access,
also
known
as
an
eva
for
the
proposed
homestead
subdivision
to
westside
boulevard.
This
item
did
come
before
council
on
august
16th.
This
time
staff
would
like
to
ask
if
you
would
like
to
receive
the
full
report
or
not.
H
H
I
oppose
the
currently
approved
design
and
cannot
believe
any
reasons
for
supporting
it.
I
feel
so
strongly
about
it
that
I
have
intended
now
my
third
hearing
on
this
matter
and
expended
a
thousand
dollars
in
appeal
fees
to
get
here.
I
want
to
make
sure
my
buyers
know
I
did
everything
I
could
to
protect
them.
H
H
H
M
At
the
last
meeting,
the
the
council
raised
two
issues,
one,
whether
the
elimination
of
the
eva
would
allow
us
to
build
another
home
out
there.
That
is
not
the
case.
If
you
look
at
the
the
schematic
of
where
the
eva
is,
it's
simply
a
26
foot
wide
expanse
from
an
interior
street
onto
west
side
boulevard.
M
So
when
I
initiated
that
call
in
february
this
year,
I
was
surprised
to
hear
that
the
new
fire
department
did
not
require
an
eva
and
in
fact,
at
the
planning
commission
hearing
in
april,
it
was
stated
that
even
if
the
eva
was
installed,
they
wouldn't
the
fire
department
in
responding
to
an
emergency
would
not
try
to
gain
access
through
the
eva,
but
would
go
through
the
regular
street
access.
That's
provided
to
take
care
of
the
emergency
rather
than
potentially
spending
time
trying
to
open
gates,
remove,
bollards
and
so
on.
M
It's
a
26
foot,
wide
open,
skateboard
park
that
would
empty
into
west
side
boulevard
and
we
think
a
better
solution
is
to
provide
an
emergency
person
access,
as
has
been
approved
and
installed
in
the
hillcrest
meadows
on
hillcrest
road
just
past
the
little
7-eleven
store
and
there
the
cul-de-sac
is
of
a
similar
size
and
they
have
a
four-foot
gate
that
people
can
enter
and
cross
over.
In
case
there
is
an
emergency
and
so
on.
We
don't
want
to
remove
an
eva
condition.
M
K
Thank
you.
I
would
kindly
ask
that
the
board
is
that
the
city
council
asks
so
that
the
public
can
hear
the
opinion
of
the
fire
chief,
the
police,
chief
and
the
planning
department
to
confirm
or
deny
what
they're
saying
that
it
will
not
be
used.
I
think
that
would
make
a
big
impact
on
a
decision
that
would
be
made
tonight.
Thank
you.
E
C
Absolutely
hi,
my
name
is
charlie
budo,
I'm
the
acting
I'm
your
acting
fire
chief
yeah.
You
know
I
stand,
I
stand
behind
the
planning
commissions
and
when
I
was
approached
about
this
I
didn't
know
it
was
a
condition
of
approval.
So
when
we
did
have
that
conversation,
I
had
no
idea
so
usually
on
these
smaller
ones.
C
It
only
took
one
time
emergency
and
I
would
have
said
no,
we
don't
need
it,
but
then
we
did
have
that
one
emergency
and
all
it
took
was
one
person
and
it
was
a
complete
blocking
of
the
whole
community
on
that.
So
with
that,
I
am
granting
a
variance
to
say:
hey,
we
could
do
a
20-foot
fire
access,
road
and
gate
it
up
and
lock
it.
So
I'm
okay
with
cutting
it
down
from
a
26
foot
to
a
20
foot,
gated,
lock
gate.
C
E
G
C
G
G
C
Take
up
that
six
feet,
I
think
a
great
example
of
one
that
we
had
was
on
black
forest
and
sunny
slope.
If
you
look
at
that
that
eva
it's
just
one
gate
and
people
are
able
to
climb
over
it
if
they
need
to
or
go
underneath,
they
need
to,
but
it'll
be
able
to
swing
open,
and
we
can
go
right
through
it
if
needed,
instead
of
completely
blocking
it
all
off,
so
nobody
has
access.
So
it's
just
the
tube
just
a
standard.
C
C
Especially
like
the
incident
where
we
had
the
whole
intersection
blocked
off
during
the
fire
at
that
one
house
and
murphy's
law,
it
did
happen.
So
I
was
corrected
and
I
stand
corrected.
I
did
say
no,
we
don't
and
we
won't
and
then
that
emergency
happened.
So
I'm
willing
to
admit
when
I
was
wrong
on
that
and
it
proved
it
that
day
so
we're
just
adding
more
homes
there.
Even
though
it's
the
12
or
14
we're
still
adding
more
people
there
and
cars
there
with
the
one
way
and
one.
G
C
F
C
F
F
Thank
you,
mr
badoya.
I
appreciate
your
your
report.
I
stand
by
my
previous
comments
that
I
said,
and
I
also
to
stand
by
the
decision-
the
planning
commission.
This
was
in
the
conditional
agreement.
You
agreed
to
a
26
foot
eva
at
the
time
and
there
was
a
fire
there
like
this
was.
This
could
have
been
a
complete
disaster,
so
I
mean
there
was
a
fire
there's
only
one
way
in
one
way
out.
I
still
stand
by
my
decision.
F
O
O
That's
been
brought
up
several
times
about.
You
know,
kids,
going
in
and
out
through
there,
whatever
gate
you
put
there,
those
kids
should
not
be
running
in
the
street.
They
should
stay
on
the
sidewalk.
I
don't
see
the
liability
on
the
city.
I
just
don't
see
that
it's
it's
a
type
of
construction,
that's
in
many
other
places
and
it's
a
very
common
and
there
is
a
need,
mostly
for
the
fire
department,
for
egress
and
in
emergencies
similar
to
the
fire
that
happened
there
before.
E
B
B
I
questioned
why
we
only
had
one
in
the
first
place.
I
mean
this:
is
a
fire
takes
place?
Those
trucks
need
to
come
in
and
get
out
of
their
way,
but
at
the
same
time,
people
need
to
exit
from
another
source.
So
almost
all
developments
I've
been
involved
with
in
the
past
from
my
own
companies,
everything
is
ingress
egress.
You
have
two
because
of
these
situations
that
happen,
and
it
will
happen.
C
G
L
G
Well,
actually,
I
feel
like
I'm,
I'm
just
wasting
our
time
right
here.
Anyways,
we
already
got
our
three
votes
in,
but
just
just
an
overall
view
of
having
a
gate
in
there,
which
would
provide
the
same
safety
concern
for
as
far
as
fires
going
in
and
out,
and
actually
it
would
actually
be
even
quicker,
because
there
would
be
one
lock
to
open
that
gate
compared
to
having
to
pull
up
three
poles,
which
is
three
locks
and
pulling
up
three
pipes.
So
I
mean
just
an
overall
view.
G
L
L
He
wasn't
aware
that
that
had
already
happened
during
when,
when
the
original
planning
commission
approved
it
chipotle,
I
believe,
was
not
part
of
our
development
review
committee
now
he
has
been
for
for
the
last
few
years,
and
so
he
has
all
the
background
on
these
last
projects.
At
that
time
he
was
not
so.
Hence
the
reason
why
he
came
back
to
us
afterwards
and
indicated
that
and
appreciate
that
from
him
as
well.
L
So
when
the
when
the
applicant,
the
that
has
the
approval,
mr
mr
sadwak
and
mrs
white
came
in,
they
came
in
and
they
they
asked
if
it
can
go
before
the
planning
commission
again
specifically
for
this,
for
this
condition
to
try
to
see
if
it
can
be
removed
and
the
planning
commission
at
that
time
unanimously
indicated
that
they
supported
that
it
stayed,
which
is
why
we're
here
today,
because
they
they
appealed.
That.
G
L
At
at
this
point,
the
gate-
26
foot
wide
gate,
emergency
vehicle
access
is
what's
required.
If,
if
you
as
a
council,
want
to
change
that
requirement,
you
you
have
the
ability
to
to
do
so.
If
that's,
if
that's
your
your
prerogative,
but
but
at
this
point,
if,
if,
if
it's,
if
the
appeal,
the
decision
of
the
planning
commission
is
uphold
by
the
council,
then
the
26-foot
wide
emergency
vehicle
access
would
be
required
to
be
built.
L
If
yeah
so
right
now,
the
26
foot
wide
gate
is
what
is
required
unless
you
want
to
change
it.
To
put
the
pulse
that
that's
your
that's
your
prerogative,
you
can
make
that
recommendation
on
that
change,
but
right
now
what
was
before
you
is
the
appeal
of
them,
the
applicant
wanting
to
remove
the
26
foot
wide
gate
requirement.
L
And
like,
unlike
chief
doyle,
indicated
the
the
the
gates
that
was
referred
to
as
in
the
hillcrest
metals
development,
that
that
is
a
pedestrian
gate.
However,
they
do
have
to
access
one
of
a
trinity
and
one
of
a
sawtooth
that
that
particular
development.
So
it
is
a
little
bit
different
as
council
member
tim
indicated
it's,
it
could
be
a
challenge
of
comparing
them
apples
to
apples.
G
I
don't
know
how
you
designed
to
put
in
a
a
gate
that
someone
else
can
get
out
of
there
too.
I
just
think
there's
a
there's
another
we're
only
looking
at
two
things
here:
yes
or
no.
What
do
what
about
another
option?
Can
you
can?
Maybe
they
guys
can
come
up
with
another
design
to
have
the
gate,
but
not
because
I
don't.
I
think
these
poles.
I
think
they
look
funky,
I
don't
know,
is
it
funky
a
good
word,
but
it's
like
they
do
so
as
a
gate.
G
L
G
E
J
I
Hi
good
evening,
mr
mayor
and
city
council
members,
my
name
is
bridget
kohler.
I
am
the
vice
president
of
forward
planning
with
lennar
homes,
we're
the
developers
bringing
this
stuff
forward.
I'm
here
this
evening
to
seek
your
approval
for
the
subdivision,
improvement
agreement,
the
deferred
improvement
agreement
and
the
final
map
and
authorization
of
agreement
for
improvements
for
the
phase
1b
west
fairview,
it's
1343
home
sites
portion
phase
1b.
I
I
K
Good
evening,
council
members,
I
asked
that
the
super
I'm
so
sorry,
I've
made
it
into
a
city
council
meeting
in
a
while,
and
I
keep
calling
you
supervisors.
I
apologize
for
that.
I
request
that
the
city
council
approve
the
resolution
where
these
for
the
lennar
homes
it's
been
a
long
time
in
the
planning
it's
been.
I
think
they
I
heard
2007,
but
actually
it
goes
longer
than
that
in
2007.
K
They
actually
finally
came
to
the
city
with
some
papers,
and
it
goes
along
with
the
influence
and
the
other
homes
that
are
already
on
the
east
side
of
fairview.
This
is
called
the
west
side,
so
I
go
well
airline
highway
anyway.
I
request
that
that
it
gets
it
get
passed.
She
already
has
mentioned
about
the
affordable
homes
that
have
been
taken
into
consideration,
which
brings
the
city
closer
to
being
in
compliant
with
the
state
mandate
with
having
to
have
affordable
homes.
So
thank
you.
M
B
J
N
B
F
D
D
B
D
B
B
K
To
the
incident
that
happened
with
the
firefighters
as
a
with
with
the
police
officers,
I
would
like
to
see
that
and
make
sure
that
they
all
get
vaccinated
as
well
and
in
with
regards
to
jacobson
versus
massachusetts.
It
overrides
having
to
go
through
their
union
to
have
to
approve
them
to
be
vaccinated.
So
it's
something
that
I
would
hope
that
the
city
council
approves.
G
D
P
P
On
the
august
2nd
meeting,
you
saw
some
reserve
revisions
and
had
recommendations,
and
these
recommendations
were
to
more
clearly
define
the
and
set
expectations
for
the
position,
as
well
as
include
the
master's
degree
wording
in
there
under
the
experience
training
qualifications.
So
those
revisions
have
been
made
and
staff
is
recommending.
Adoption
of
the
revised
job
description.
K
Thank
you.
I
don't
know
if
I
had.
I
read
the
the
description,
the
job
description,
and
it
was
my
understanding
that
there's
a
set
of
what
experience
that
they
should
have
or
a
bachelor's
degree,
and
then
I
think
I
heard
masters,
but
I
don't
know.
I
think
this
just
was
the
master
wording
of
the
job
description.
K
I
would
highly
recommend
that
a
position
like
this
that's
going
to
be
the
manager
of
the
airport
would
have
a
bachelor's
degree
and
not
or
based
on
the
experience,
and
that
being
said,
I
did
not
pull
a
card
for
three
and
four,
but
I
request
the
same
thing
if
it
also
states
the
same
that
it's
or
a
bachelor's
agreement
degree.
Thank
you.
A
E
F
B
D
P
All
right
so
item
f3
similar,
so
it's
adopting
a
revised
job
description
for
the
position
of
community
services.
Director
at
the
august,
2nd
city
council,
meeting
recommendations
were
made
to
separate
the
parks,
division
from
the
community
services
division
and
then
added
on
to
recreation,
for
parks
and
recreation
department
and
then
as
well
to
add
that
master
degrees,
language
which
we
have
done
and
then
staff
recommends
adoption
of
this
as
well.
E
E
You
I
may
have
just
misread
this,
but
as
as
I
look
at
f3a
under
experience,
which
would
have
been
on
pages
343
and
347
under
prior,
it
says
prior
experience,
managing
a
multifaceted
recreation
program
in
the
high
level
management
or
director's
position
is
desired,
and
so
maybe
maybe
I'm
confusing
things.
But
if
that's
there,
my
question
would
be.
Why
would
we
have
that
there?
If
we've
now
created
a
recreation
and
parks
director
position?
E
A
E
Right
now,
my
point
was
simply
when
I
read
the
job
description.
I
I
believe
I
read
that
it
said
you
know
prior
experience
in
managing
a
multi-faceted
recreation
program
in
a
high
level
management
or
director's
position
as
desired,
and
and
so
that
should
my
sense
is
if,
if
it's
there,
it
doesn't
apply
to
this
position,
and
so
it
should
be
removed
from
the
job
description.
P
C
G
F
P
All
right,
this
item
is
to
adopt
the
revised
job
description
for
the
development
services
director
position
on
the
at
the
august,
2nd
meeting
recommendations
were
made
to
add
the
master's
degree
wording
to
make
that
desirable,
as
well
as
to
change
the
aicp
cert
from
desirable
to
now
says
possession
or
ability
to
obtain.
So
those
revisions
have
been
made
for
those
recommendations
and
staff
recommends
adopting
this
as
well.
E
Bill
lasquez.
Thank
you.
I
understand,
and
I
agree
my
only
concern
is
when
you
have
an
open-ended
statement
under
licenses
and
certificate,
where
it
says
aicp
within
with
what
I'd
like
to
see
defined,
is
within
what
period
of
time
within
a
year
within
two
years,
clearly
define
that
as
a
as
as
an
expectation,
so
that.
B
C
C
B
E
C
E
E
Velasquez,
please
all
right,
sir.
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I
I
have
a
a
couple
of
questions
and
so
and
maybe
a
thought
or
a
comment
as
well.
I
I
see
where
we're
anticipating
that
the
total
cost
per
year
would
be
265
thousand
dollars
for
this
position.
I
am
supportive
of
the
position.
I'm
actually
excited.
I
think
it's
past
due,
but
my
question
and
probably
for
the
city
manager.
I
I
guess
would
be.
E
A
E
Thank
you.
I
I
even
feel
better
about
it.
Hearing
that
the
other
questions
I
have
or
or
thoughts
would
be
in
reading
the
job
description
it
talks
about
this
person
also,
maybe
being
involved
in
trees,
and-
and
so
I
could
absolutely
see
this
being
a
nice
segue
to
somebody
that
oversees
the
contracts
that
we
outsource
and
even
maybe
some
of
the
internal
work
we
do
as
it
relates
to
tree
management.
E
I'd
also
like
to
see
this
position
have
some
background
and
experience
and
disability
friendly
experience
for
our
playgrounds.
I
think
that's
a
very
important
thing
that
we're
we've
talked
about
and
we
we
need
to
move
forward,
and
I
know
the
council
has
had
those
conversations
and
then
also
one
of
the
things
I'd
like
to
maybe
see,
and
I
think
this
could
also
nicely
align
with
this
position-
would
be
management
of
contracts
for
our
sound
wall
maintenance.
E
A
E
A
G
I
I
just
actually
it's
not
necessarily
just
towards
this
one:
it's
it's
towards
all
of
them,
just
the
on
the
training
and
about
the
master's
degree
in
education.
The
word
just
desirable,
I
mean
I
I
see
where
it's
it's
very
desirable,
but
it's
like,
especially
in
the
other
department
heads
it's
like.
Why
are
we
not
making
those
mandatory.
P
We
mirrored
a
local
cities
so
typically,
when
searching
for
candidates
for
a
direct
level
position,
it's
going
to
be
very
difficult
for
a
city
of
our
size
to
find
someone
who
has
a
master's
degree
who
is
willing
to
apply
and
move
here
for
the
compensation
salary.
However,
we
do
like
to
be
competitive.
A
A
Sometimes
if
we
have
somebody
that
maybe
moved
here
that
has
20
30
years
worth
of
experience,
that's
probably
more
equivalent
to
a
master's
degree
in
that
in
that
field.
So
we
would
want
to
be
able
to
hire
the
the
best
candidate
and
sometimes
not
always
a
master's
degree.
Is
the
person
with
the
is
the
best
candidate
for
us.
G
E
G
D
D
H
H
C
C
It's
my
opinion
that
we
shouldn't
be
flying
that
flag
or
any
other
flag
in
front
of
city
council.
We
have
the
old
glory
flag
and
we
have
the
state
of
california
flag
and
the
true
meaning
of
these
flags
is
sufficient
for
everybody,
and
I
don't
think
we
should
be
catering
to
any
other
groups
or
mindsets
or
thoughts
or
persuasions
or.
However,
you
want
to
term
what
these
flags
represent.
C
K
K
K
It
doesn't
make
you
more
of
american
or
more
than
loving
this
country
than
I
or
anybody
else
who
does
not
wave
that
flag,
and
I
want
to
thank
councilman
roland
rosendes
for
bringing
this
fort
worth
in.
2020
he's
been
talking
about
this
for
quite
some
time.
It's
over
and
done
with.
This
is
what
is
going
to
happen
and
again
it
should
be
approved.
K
K
G
G
B
D
D
B
D
We
do
we
had.
We
had
the
first
application
we
received
from
them
was
for
october
of
2021,
and
then
we
received
a
second
application
for
may
of
2022.
At
the
time
we
received
the
application
for
may
of
2022.
We
had
pulled
the
flag
display
application
off
of
our
website,
so
I
was
holding
off
on
that.
I
can
present
it
to
council
in
at
our
next
council
meeting
or
in
october
or
whenever
you
suggest,
but
we
do
have
on
discussion
tonight,
our
flag
display
policy
and
application.
F
F
D
F
G
F
D
F
M
D
So
this
is
a
clean
up
on
this.
This
is
going
to
move
forward
as
as
october
and
we're
going
to
remove
may
as
an
as
an
error
and
then
once
we
discuss
what
the
flag
display
application
should
be
or
what
we
want
it
to
be,
or
maybe
call
for
a
special
study
session.
However,
we
want
to
handle
that
we
will
then
bring
the
may
2022
one
forward.
L
H
There's
284
that
have
been
died
in
the
line
of
duty.
So
far
this
year,
there's
22
thousand
names
on
the
law
enforcement
memorial
and
the
law
enforcement
out.
There
go
through
a
lot
they're
on
the
front
line,
and
this
needs
to
go.
This
needs
to
be
approved.
We
need
to
stop
tabling
it.
We
need
to
approve
it
and
the
way
it
sounds
it's
going
to
be
approved,
but
why
did
it
have
to
take
so
long?
It
should
have
been
approved
the
first
time
it's
disrespectful
to
the
law
enforcement
community
to
not
approve
it.
C
Greetings
again,
mayor
and
council,
thanks
again
for
being
here,
it
is
my
my
opinion
now
that
since
we've
passed
resolution,
six
that
we
have
no
choice
but
to
pass
resolution,
seven
and
anybody
else
that
puts
in
a
proper
application
needs
to
pass-
and
hopefully
we
won't
run
out
of
months
and
have
to
break
it
down
into
days
or
weeks
or
whatever.
If
we
break
it
down
into
days,
then
we
run
into
the
problem
of
foreign
countries
holidays,
which
love
to
be
celebrated
here
and
have
to
fly
a
foreign
country's
flag.
C
C
C
C
K
Thank
you
city
council,
since
1970,
the
california
police
officers,
research
association
prior
to
that
actually
went
to
the
senate
and
in
1970
it
was
passed
that
memorial
for
police
officers
would
take
place
in
the
month
of
may,
and
I
request
that
the
city
council,
please
stay
with
the
california
police
officers,
research
association
in
acknowledging
that
the
memorial
memorial
for
police
officers
is
in
the
month
of
may
the
I
want
to
acknowledge
and
give
kudos
to
the
hollister
police
department
that
the
flag
flies
there
every
day.
So
thank
you.
C
Mayor
council
members,
I
am
michael
fry,
the
signer
of
the
thin
blue
line
flag
with
the
support
of
the
concerned
citizens.
The
unity
flagpole
flew
its
first
flag
in
the
month
of
june.
No
other
flag
has
flown
in
the
months
of
july
august
or
september,
since
no
one
has
qualified
for
those
months.
I
chose
the
month
of
october
and
we
have
qualified
for
this
month
by
the
application
process.
No
other
has
qualified
and
the
very
reason
why
we
are
wanting
the
thin
blue
line.
Flag
flown
are
for
the
following
reasons.
C
Even
before
2021,
and
throughout
this
year
there
has
been
an
outcry
of
police,
injustice,
brutality
and
defunding
of
our
police
departments.
Many
cities
are
blaming
the
police
for
all
kinds
of
their
problems.
These
community
leaders
need
to
look
into
their
own
mirrors.
Politicians
are
listening
to
and
yielding
to
the
criminals
outright
terrorist
groups
and
liberals
who
are
destroying
our
homes
and
communities,
the
city,
county
and
federal
buildings
and
people's
lives,
including
our
first
line
of
defense
police
officers.
C
C
In
today's
unjust
media
and
community
leaderships,
police
officers
are
convicted
of
crimes
before
they
are
charged
by
any
authority.
The
police
officer
was
never
met
to
be
betrayed
as
a
political
official,
as
all
politicians
are
viewed,
they
are
disgraced
immediately
and
without
any
protection
from
the
city
and
the
agency
they
serve.
C
The
fiber
of
our
cities
and
communities
were
once
built
on
morality,
ethics
and
respect,
but
has
been
degraded
by
immorality,
lies
and
hate.
The
evidence
is
seen
by
the
political
and
social
officials
and
the
press
affirming
and
condoning
the
actions
of
the
violence
upon
our
police
officers
and
unjustifiably
so
many
law
enforcement
officers
have
retired
early
or
have
quit
their
local
departments,
because
there
is
no
trust.
C
This
is
why
we
want
to
see
the
thin
blue
line
flag
flown
over
the
city
of
hollister.
We
want
to
honor
our
law
enforcement
officers
because
there
are
many
who
serve
the
city
of
hollister.
What
is
more
beautiful
than
to
honor
our
men
and
women,
who
are
first
responders
in
serving
their
community
wholeheartedly.
C
I
Something
that
came
up
months
ago
should
come
before
new
business.
So
you
guys
need
to
make
sure
you're
following
your
own
rules
and
sticking
to
them,
because
then
you
just
look
like
you
have
no
credibility.
So
you
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
don't
get
accused
and
falsely
accused
of
things.
So
you
need
to
make
sure
that
you're
following
your
rules.
I
So
if
there's
a
protocol,
I
hope
that
you'll
stick
to
it
in
the
future.
I'm
glad
it
sounds
like
this
flag
policy
will
pass.
I
think
it's
preposterous
that
you're
going
to
hold
a
flagpole
hostage
from
the
thin
blue
line
flag
in
the
month
of
october,
just
because
it's
known
for
a
different
month
or
just
because
the
other
month
is
known
for
a
thin
blue
line
flag.
I
There
was
no
other
group,
nobody
put
in
the
application,
and
this
was
followed
by
your
rules.
So
therefore
it
should
be
flown
and
it
doesn't
matter
what
month
was
applied
for
the
rules
should
be
followed
and
I'm
not
sure
if
you
are
suggesting
that
you're
going
to
change
your
rules
in
the
future
and
that's
why
you're
not
going
to
approve
the
may
of
2022
flag.
I
I
think
it's
not
looking
very
good
if
you're
going
to
discredit
yourselves
by
not
even
or
already
changing
your
newly
implemented
rule,
people
have
valid
applications
on
file
and
they
should
be
followed
because
if
you
are
going
to
scrap
your
own
policy
to
suit
your
agenda,
that's
not
going
to
look
very
positively
on
you,
so
it
shouldn't
be
changing
your
policy
to
suit
your
desires
right.
We
are
the
people.
This
is
our
community.
I
D
A
E
B
E
A
B
A
We
had
conversations
with
a
different
con,
our
congressman
or
our
state
representatives,
to
try
to
get
that
to
move
forward
at
least
make
them
make
a
decision
where
they're
going
to
put
their
facility,
because
it
is
a
benefit
to
our
community
benefit
to
our
surrounding
counties.
That
cal
fire
is
here
big
sur
fire.
They
were
a
big
contributor
to
the
assistance
of
putting
that
fire
out
so
we'll
be
we're
working
with
them
right
now,
trying
to
come
up
with
solutions
before
the
fighter.
Is
that?
K
If
they
were
to
choose
to
do
through
the
fence,
then
obviously
it's
going
to
be
less
than
five
years,
and
if
so,
do
we
lose?
We
lose
the
lease.
Are
we
losing
the
lease
for
the
land
they're
currently
doing
where
they're
thinking
about
building
and
what?
What?
What's
the
economic
value
for
them
to
going
aside
from
you
know
being
here,
obviously,
is
there
any
economic
value
to
the
city
for
them
having
to
taxi
through
the
fence
to
what's
the
economic
value?
If
you
know
that,
thank
you.
A
Go
ahead,
sir,
so
the
economic
value
would
be.
There
would
be
a
through
defense
lease
with
with
that
land
owner,
so
that
that
would
be
the
only
economic
benefit
for
us.
The
other
economic
benefit
will
be
if
we
get
them
out
of
their
current
lease
that
we
could
actually
shop
that
property
to
new
potential
buyers
of
that
land,
or
at
least
leasees.
Sorry
of
that
land.
B
C
C
D
F
A
Thank
you
mayor.
This
seems
like
this
meeting's
on
the
friday,
the
13th
for
some
reason.
We
also
have
a
slight
error
on
this
one.
This
is
not
the
mccarthy
line,
it's
the
macrae
line,
so
so
we're
sorry
for
having
a
little
bit
to
meet
too
many
letters
in
in
the
water
line.
But
this
resolution
would
be
a
approve,
a
reimbursement
agreement
with
hawkins
company
for
a
new
new
mccarthy
water
line
mccray.
A
E
E
Under
typical,
as
my
understanding
as
a
general
contractor,
when
they
do
work
they're
on
the
hook
for
it
for
up
to
10
years,
but
but
I
you
know,
I
mean
we're
going
to
spend
a
significant
amount
of
money
to
do
this,
and
it
makes
very
good
sense
to
do
it
when
we're
already
in
there.
But
I
was
just
curious.
Thank
you.
K
K
K
B
You're
going
to
help
us
explain
that
this
is
a
request
from
the
city
of
hollister
when
the
city's
discovered
a
old
water
line
and
since
they're
doing
work
in
that
area,
it
was
recommended
to
put
in
a
new
line
while
the
dirt
work
is
still
being
done,
which
is
much
much
cheaper
than
after
the
fact
when
the
water
lines
do
break
so,
in
other
words,
we're
pre-planning
to
save
quite
a
bit
of
money-
and
this
is
a
city
issue-
it's
not
a
the
company's
issue.
This
is
the
city's
request.
B
To
basically
say:
hey,
do
this
a
favor
while
you're
there
and
do
this
work,
because
it
costs
a
lot
less
money
right
now,
while
your
tractors
are
there
than
it
will
cost
in
the
future
and
the
answer
for
the
other
water
lines
in
the
city,
we
are
working
on
a
lot
of
plans
to
do
a
some
major
projects
in
the
next
year,
so
we're
working
great
and
we're
looking
forward
to
getting
a
lot
of
projects
done
next
year.
Massive
project
coming
up
any
other
questions
comments.
F
F
B
F
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
attended
the
intergovernmental
meeting.
I
think
last
week
where
we
talked
about
two
items.
So
one
of
them-
oh
you're,
going
to
have
to
help
me
out
mr
mayor,
so
one
of
them
was
campaign,
finance
reform
that
oh
and
the
other
one
was.
How
are
we
going
to
spend
our
federal
dollars
for
the
covet
relief?
F
So
essentially,
I
think
that
the
city
managers
had
agreed
to
work
together
on
coming
up
with,
with
from
actually
some
batista
and
the
county
cio
and
our
city
manager
on
where
to
spend
the
monies
and,
if
that's
going,
to
go
towards
like
broadband,
I
think
that's
a
huge
priority
of
all
three
entities
and
then
second,
it
was
campaign
finance
reform.
We
had
a
very
robust
discussion.
F
Everybody
agreed
and
we
actually
took
action,
took
a
vote
and
it
was
a
unanimous
vote
that
the
intergovernmental
committee
agrees
that
the
entire
county,
including
san
juan
bautista
and
our
county
board
of
supervisors,
should
abide
by
and
follow
our
lead
and
should
abide
by
a
campaign
finance
reform.
They
were
very
happy
to
hear
what
we
did.
That
concludes
my
report,
mr
mayor.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
E
Thank
you,
mayor
velasquez.
I
would
just
ask
the
chief
of
police
through
the
city
manager
if
we
could
provide
some
increased
observation
and
patrol
and
maybe
some
enforcement
in
the
area
of
maple
and
chapel.
As
I
heard
tonight,
I
think
that
my
fear
isn't
asking
that
often
my
experience
has
been
that
you
go
and
you
do.
The
enforcement
and
the
people
that
you
enforce
are
typically
the
ones
that
are
asking
for
the
enforcement
and-
and
so
I
I
think
there
could
be
a
benefit
to
education
in
the
area
and
and
chief.
E
I
too
don't
know
why,
except
because
there's
a
requirement
to
do
a
traffic
survey
to
put
more
stop
signs
in,
and
I
recognize
it's
not
my
district,
but
the
comments
made
tonight
really
concern
me
and
so
anything
we
can
do
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
the
the
problem.
Chief,
I
would
be
appreciative
of.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
city
manager,
mayor.
That
concludes
my
comments.
Thank.
G
B
G
G
F
Thank
you,
sir.
I'm
going
to
jump
on
the
bandwagon
for
chappelle
and
maple,
and
I
thought
it
was
that
we
were
budgeted
a
certain
amount
of
money
to
go
ahead
and
order
traffic
studies.
It
wasn't
remember
because
I
remember
that,
because
I
caught
a
mistake,
so
I
thought
we
were
allotted
a
certain
amount
of
money
to
ask
for
traffic
studies.
F
So
I
could
be
wrong,
but
I
thought
that's
what
we
had
decided
on.
So
maybe
we
could
look
back
into
that
and
then
also
I
just
wanted
to
make
mention
that
I
was
happy
to
see
some
new
residents
come
to
the
city
council
for
the
very
first
time
I
I
love
talking
to
the
constituents
and
it's
really
nice
to
see
new
people
getting
involved
and
coming
out
here
to
address
us.
F
So
thank
you
guys
if
you're
still
in
the
audience
and
if
not
just
know
that
I'm
appreciative
of
you
guys
coming
out
and
voicing
your
concerns
and
reaching
out
to
your
councilman
and
then
my
other
thing
was
just
the
trees.
What
are
we
doing
about
the
trees?
I've
got
people
reaching
out
to
me
saying
that
they're
trying
to
do
the
right
thing
by
trimming
their
trees
and
then
they're
getting
fined
for
it.
F
A
Thank
you
yeah
mayor.
If
I
can
address
the
maple
and
chapel
councilmember
perez
talk
to
me
about
a
traffic
study,
one
of
the
kind
of
where
we're
at
right
now
is
there
is
construction
planned
for
that
area,
so
it
might
be
too
soon
to
do
it.
That's
why
we'll
look
at
some
other
ways
to
maybe
enforce
that.
Like
say,
the
chief
can
look
at
some
enforcement,
we'll
look
at
code
to
see
if
there's
brush
that
needs
to
be
cleaned
up
and
we'll
try
to
address
it
that
way.
F
B
City
manager,
I'm
wondering
if
perhaps
there's
already
a
traffic
study
that
was
done
with
that
new
development
there,
and
maybe
we
need
to
look
into
some
of
the
answers,
because
a
new
development
that
side
had
to
do
a
traffic
study-
and
maybe
we
can
look
at
that.
Maybe
there
was
trigger
points
yeah.
G
A
G
A
G
A
A
O
O
I
was
advised
that
they
were
going
to
be
there
from
8
to
10
30
for
a
small
ceremony
and
not
to
continue
talking
about
the
same
thing
but
jabel.
I
was
talking
to
abraham
about
that
that
when
those
buildings
were
built,
the
ones
that
are
there
there
was
a
traffic
study
indicating
that
it
would.
It
wasn't
warranted
at
that.
We
believe
that's
what
it
was,
because
I
remember
it
bring
coming
up
having
all
those
homes
that
are
built
there,
how
it
would
affect
it.
But
I
know
that
there's
other
developments
coming
in
as
well.
O
It
may
may
be
warranted,
but
in
the
meantime
we
will
go
out
there
do
some
extra
patrol.
I
think
we'll
we'll
check
like
the
city
manager
advised,
if
there's
any
obstructions
that
are
blocking
the
view,
so
that
people
can
see
the
vehicles
that
are
coming
and
we
could.
We
could
put
the
radar
trailer
out
there
as
well
to
see
if
that
helps
the
issue.
D
I
just
wanted
to
say
if
it
would
be
agreeable-
maybe
not
tonight,
because
we're
already
getting
late,
but
at
our
next
meeting
I
could
do
a
report
kind
of
just
on
what
the
city
clerk
does.
I
know
that
council
member
burns
had
requested
that
maybe
each
department
kind
of
give
a
little
bit
to
in
open
session,
so
the
public
kind
of
has
an
idea
of
what
each
department's
doing
and
what
we're
working
on.
So,
if
I
could
bring
that,
maybe
not
to
the
20th
but
to
the
october
4th
meeting
and
that's
it.
D
F
D
D
D
H
D
Yes,
he's
on
the
operations
board,
so
he
has
no
voting
power.
So
what
we
rotate
is
policy
board
and
operations
board
so
next
next
year
it
should
be
where
we're
the
operations
board,
where
we
attend,
but
have
no
voting
power
where
currently
we're
the
policy
board.
So
we
have
two
members
and
we
have
voting
power.
I
don't
know
if
that's
making
any
sense.
B
M
B
G
B
B
A
D
D
F
D
D
A
B
D
B
B
D
B
D
C
F
F
I,
mr
mayor,
if
I
may
I
had
like,
I
think
I
had
volunteered
myself
and
councilmember
perez,
but
at
the
last
meeting
that
you
weren't
here
councilmember
burns
expressed
interest.
I
believe
I
believe
in
this
committee.
I
could
be
wrong,
but
I'm
more
than
willing
to
step
aside
and
allow
him
to
serve
on
this
ad
hoc.
B
B
A
A
B
D
E
Thank
you
mayor.
I'm
going
to
remain
consistent
with
my
previous
thoughts
that
I
understand
the
desire,
but
I
no
way
know
how
can
support
moving
from
two
to
one
a
month.
I
did
hear
a
comment
about
that.
Doesn't
stop
us
from
meeting
with
our
constituents
and
I
absolutely
understand
and
agree
with
that.
E
B
I
I
actually
I've
always
been
a
believer
and
the
less
government
meets
the
better
off.
We
all
are
as
a
in
government.
I
I
think
the
congress
should
meet
much
less
it's
more
of
a
part-time.
I
think
the
state
should
have
fewer
meetings.
I
think
we'd
be
way
better
off
the
state
didn't
meet
as
much.
I
know
here
we
tried
to
actually
go
the
opposite
direction.
B
Where
we
tried
three
meetings
to
see,
we
get
more
work
done,
and
that
was
an
absolute
disaster
and
two
meetings
has
worked,
but
I
I
think
sometimes
I
feel
we
we
don't
give
you
staff
enough
time,
because
we're
always
trying
to
get
something
new
on
there.
I'm
personally
willing
to
try
one
meeting.
I
think
we
could
probably
can
we
do
it
like
a
test
and
see
how
that
works
out.
Would
that
be
something
we
could
do.
A
G
G
F
Thank
you
and
my
position
is:
I
stated
this
last
time.
I
don't
think
there's
any
harm
in
trying.
I
don't
think
there's
any
harm
in.
So
I
understand
the
concern
about
having
to
change
the
municipal
code.
Is
it
the
mini
code?
So
that's
fine
that
we
can
cancel
it
and
then
it
would
it
be
okay
to
accommodate
council
member
perez's
request
about
moving
it
forward
and
if
so,
how
could
we
do
that?
Because
I
think
that
if
we're
going
to
try
one
meeting
a
month,
then
we
should
move
it
earlier
as
well.
G
B
B
There
was
a
time
last
year,
the
year
before
it's
one
o'clock
in
the
morning,
and
a
lot
of
that
was
just
because
there
was
just
so
much
talking
over
and
over
and
over
again
and
not
moving
in
moving
on
the
business,
but
I
you
know,
I
like
your
idea.
We
tried
every
other
month
or
something
or
I'd
like
to
give
it
a
shot
and
see
how
much
work
what's
important
to
me
is
how
much
more
work
you
guys
can
get
done.
B
Staff
can
get
done
and
that
way
we're
following
through,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
times
what
I've
seen
over
the
years
is
we're
bringing
the
same
items
back
over
and
over
again,
because
they're
not
completed
and
we're
having
to
have
this
discussion
again.
I
think
we
make
sure
we
complete
our
business
at
our
meetings
and
give
you
time
to
complete
it,
and
then
we
just
get
the
updates.
I.
G
E
B
F
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
that
I
think
we
should
just
do
what
san
juan
batista.
I
said
that
at
the
last
council
meeting
just
scrapped
this
all
together.
I
think
that
was
my
language.
I
think
that
it's
never
been
really
that
big
of
an
issue
and
if
any
council
member
wants
to
bring
a
flag
forward
for
us
to
consider,
then
they
should
have
every
right
to
do
that.
I
think
we
added
we
might
have
over
corrected
ourselves
here.
F
I
think
that's
what
the
account
what
the
clerk
was
alluding
to,
but
you
know
we
were
elected
by
the
people
to
represent
them
and
if
they
request
us
to
bring
forth
the
flag,
then
any
council
member
should
be
able
to
do
that.
And
then
we
should
have
that
discussion,
make
a
decision
and
move
on.
I
think
that
you
know.
Maybe
there
was
some
good
intention
behind
the
flag
policy.
F
D
G
G
If
my,
if
the
flag
that
christian
flag
one
is
tabled,
we're
going
to
send
it
to
the
state
attorney
general,
which
I'm
really
upset
with
our
city
attorney,
I
have
not
gotten
a
copy
of
the
letter
that
he
was
supposed
to
send
to
the
attorney
general
to
know
exactly
what
he
was
asking.
I
haven't
noticed
any
response
from
that.
I'm
I'm
deeply.
G
B
I
think
that's
the
point
is
to
just
get
rid
of
the
rules,
and
then
the
council
can
bring
one
up
and
then
we
can
make
a
decision
on
yes
or
no
and
be
done
with
it.
Instead
of
going
through
all
the
procedures
of
100
signatures,
and
so
on
that
way
it
streamlines
it
group
wants
to
bring
it.
They
just
contact
a
council
member
as
I'm
understanding,
san
juan.
Does
it
this
way
correct.
Mr
ascendant.
F
I
think
that
they
would
have
been
the
same
and
that's
kind
of
what
the
problem
is
and
that's
what
I'm
that's.
What
I'm
trying
to
get
at
is
that
we
should
just
have
that
discussion
at
the
on
the
dice
and
we're
going
to
take
action.
Whatever
way
we
see
fit
we're
elected
to
see
the
peop
to
I'm
sorry
to
represent
the
people,
they
can
contact
us
and
then
we
can
bring
it
forth.
B
E
It's
been
divisive
for
our
community
versus
uniting
our
community
and
I
think
it
could
be
as
simple
as
having
a
member
of
our
community
approach.
A
member
of
council
bring
it
to
that
council
member's
attention,
and-
and
it
could
be
as
simple
as
a
simple
majority
on
the
on
the
dice
vote-
to
approve
it
once
we
have
a
full
council.
E
You
know
I
didn't
realize
until
last
meeting
that
if
we're
not
a
full
council
on
the
diocese
that
it
has
to
be
unanimous
and
so
we'll
get
beyond
that
point,
I
think,
and
we
can
simplify
this
and
I
think
it
will.
We
can
make
it
a
more
of
a
community
poll
than
than
it
feels
like
it
is
now
where
it
seems
like
we're
we're
challenged
and
we're
struggling.
I
did
want
to
say
that
I
do
support
bringing
the
christian
flag
forward.
E
100
signatures,
I'm
pretty
comfortable
with
the
fact
that
if,
if
I
had
taken
the
time,
I
would
have
been
successful
in
getting
a
minimum
of
100
people
to
sign
a
petition
to
fly
the
breast
cancer
awareness
flag
in
the
month
of
october.
But
nobody
in
the
community
brought
it
forward
and
I
chose
not
to
pursue
it
personally,
because
I
was
trying
to
de-personalize
it
not
personalize
the
conversation
and
further
polarize
our
community
on
something
like
this.
E
Our
our
commission
is
working
to
create
now
through
community
engagement,
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
there
and,
and
maybe
the
only
conversation
that
would
be
difficult
other
than
yes
and
no
from
the
diocese
would
be
do
we
allow
for
it
to
go
for
one
day,
10
days,
20
days
a
full
month
and
and
defend
depending
on
the
the
organization.
I
think
that
will
drive
that
I
mean
I
absolutely
100
percent
agree
with
the
lgbtq
plus
flight
flying
the
entire
month
of
june.
E
E
G
So
I
think
one
of
the
things,
the
potentials
that
I
see-
and
I
it's
like
I
mentioned
before-
it's
like
we're,
going
to
have
more
than
one
flag
we're
going
to
need
more
than
just
one
flag
a
month
and
it's
like
so
the
the
thing's
gonna
be,
and
this
I'm
just
looking
to
the
future.
It's
like
when
you
got
two
flags
coming
in.
It's
like
who's
gonna
go
on
top.
G
That's
why
I
I
would
suggest
this
is
just
another
suggestion.
If
we
get
one
flag
for
the
month,
then
that
flag
goes
up
two
flags
you
split
the
month.
Whoever
comes
in
first
gets
to
the
podium.
First
gets
to
because
it's
going
to
be
a
difference
when
you,
when
you
I'm
into
I
love
flags,
I'm
a
raider
fan.
I
love
my
flag
even
when
they
lose
so,
but
you
know
what
I'd
say.
That's
just
being
true,
and
you
know
you
always
want
your
flag
on
top.
It's
there's,
there's
there's
an
order
to.
G
If
you
look
at
the
the
flag,
ethics
for
the
federal
and
the
state,
there
there's
an
order,
and
so
I
think
that
people
are
going
to
want
their
flag
to
be.
On
top
me,
it's
like.
I
think
that
it
should
just
be
use.
However
many
flags,
you
have
you
split
it
up
during
those
days.
Whoever
comes
in
whoever
presents
first
goes.
First
gets
to
pick
his
his
time
and
second
one
and
so
on,
and
so
on.
That's
how
I
feel.
F
Thank
you.
I
would
just
say
that
we
should,
I
think
you
bring
up
some
valid
points,
but
I
think
we
should
discuss
those
when
and
if
and
when
we
bring
up
the
flags
to
be
adopted.
That
would
be
my
suggestion
and
then
lastly,
I
just
want
to
say
that
this
doesn't
have
to
be
a
negative
thing.
I
think
this
turned
out
to
be
a
positive
thing.
We
all
learned
from
it
and
it
brought
awareness
to
all
these
other
causes
that
exist
and
all
these
other
flags
that
we
could
potentially
bring
forth.
E
E
E
But
but
on
a
serious
note,
I
think
you
know,
if
we're
predicting
them,
we
can
prevent
a
lot
of
those
conver
those
challenges
and,
and
and
this
this
is
I
I
couldn't
agree
more
with
the
vice
mayor.
This
is
absolutely
growing
pains
of
this
council
moving
forward,
but
in
a
positive
way
to
do
good
things
for
our
community
and
I
think
our
spirit
of
cooperation
exemplifies
that
will-
and
you
know,
we're
going
to
take
some
missteps
as
long
as
they're
baby
steps.
I
think
we're
good.
So
thank
you,
mayor
for
the
opportunity
to
comment.
B
Absolutely
I
think
this
turned
into
a
a
better
way
to
do
it.
I
think
vice
mayor
recently
said
it
best.
It's
it
brought
awareness
from
the
community
and
there's
many
groups,
and
I,
if
there
is
two
to
a
coin
toss,
make
it
fair.
Somebody
outside
of
the
council
do
a
coin
toss
and
figure
that
out
and
we
move
on
because
mr
burns
is
right,
it
doesn't
mean
you're,
second
best
or
third
best
you're
part
of
the
community
yeah,
that's
right
and
we
should
be
proud
of
it.
B
G
D
G
D
E
A
D
G9
is
for
zoom
continuance
and
I
have
actually
gotten
an
update.
Just
like
we
had.
You
had
said
that's
to
the
mayor
on
march
17th,
when
the
california
governor
issued
the
executive
order,
n29,
which
amended
the
executive
order
n25
and
I
provided
them
all
for
you
as
part
of
a
series
of
emergency
measures
in
response
to
the
cove
19
pandemic.
D
Executive
order,
n29
allowed
local
or
state
legislation,
legislative
bodies
to
hold
meetings
via
teleconference
and
to
make
meetings
accessible
electronically
without
violating
the
open
meetings
laws
found
in
the
bagley
keene
act
or
the
brown
act.
The
order
waived
certain
provisions
of
the
brown
act,
including
requirements
that
meetings
be
conducted
in
physical
locations
and
that
a
majority
of
the
teleconferencing
members
are
physically
present
within
the
agency's
jurisdictional
boundaries.
D
There
is
a
new
executive
order,
n0821,
which
established
a
timeline
to
lift
that
coveted
pandemic
waiver
and,
under
the
governor's
reopening
plan,
the
brown
act,
provisions
with
executive
order
n2920,
as
well
as
california,
environmental
quality
act,
sequa
provisions
within
executive
order,
n5420
and
as
extended
by
executive
order,
n8020
paragraph
six.
It
will
expire
on
september,
30th
2021,
so
any
local
agency
meetings
taking
place
after
that
time
must
ensure
physical
public
access
to
all
meeting
locations.
D
D
It
would
extend,
they
will
allow
for
legislative
bodies
to
keep
conducting
meetings
virtually,
and
we
won't
have
to
follow
that
part
of
the
brown
act
that
requires
us
to
list
the
addresses
for
this
assembly
bill
to
work.
The
state
must
have
declared
a
state
of
emergency,
and
your
legislative
body
must
report
out
every
30
days
after
their
first
meeting,
using
this
as
to
why
they
are
meeting
virtually
so
I
have,
I
didn't,
provide
it
to
you,
but
I
will
email
you
a
copy
of
this
assembly
bill
361.
D
F
F
So
I
mean
I
could
be
wrong,
but
I
did
speak
to
you,
the
author
assembly
member
lee,
about
this
and
robert
rivas
about
this
a
few
months
ago.
So
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
more
research.
I
would
say
to
find
out
like
exactly
where
we're
at
with
it
and
then
yeah.
That
would
be
my
my
primary
thoughts
and
then
I
just
got
a
couple
of
other
thoughts.
Whenever
we
move
to
comments.
D
F
F
I
heard
council
member
tim
burns
request
that
he
would
like
all
department
heads
to
be
here
at
every
meeting,
and
I
wholeheartedly
agree
with
that.
I
support
that,
but
I
don't
necessarily
think
they
need
to
be
in
the
chambers
I'd
like
them
to
be
attending
at
least
on
zoom.
If
we
have
any
questions,
I
mean
that's
something:
that's
that's.
You
know
a
little
bit
more
flexible
and
it's
something
that
we
can
do
to
accommodate
them
and
and
their
families
and
all
the
hard
hours
that
they
work.
F
F
It's
very
convenient
I'll,
be
there
when
I
can
just
like
anybody
else,
and
I
know
that
this
is
a
little
bit-
could
be
controversial
for
some
people
they're
very
passionate
about
their
position,
but
I,
if
anybody
knows
me,
I'm
a
bit
of
a
techie
and
I
really
enjoy
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
we're
moving
forward
and
we're
adapting
and
we're,
including
all
of
these
tools
to
our
disposal.
Thank
you.
E
I
carry
a
flip
phone
and
I'm
proud
to
say
I
know
how
to
use
it
most
of
the
time.
Having
said
that,
I
have
actually
been
forced
as
a
result
of
the
pandemic
to
embrace
technology
and
as
a
direct
result
of
that,
regardless
of
the
posting
requirements,
regardless
of
what
what
passes
or
not,
I
think
it
still
provides
a
viable
alternative
under
a
certain
set
of
circumstances.
I
wouldn't
want
it
to
be
the
norm,
but
council
member
vice
mayor
rosentis,
was
absolutely
correct.
E
I
did
ask
on
one
of
my
longer
laundry
lists
and
council
comments
that
to
have
the
department
heads
here.
In
the
event,
there
are
questions
but
absolutely
agree
if
we
could
find
a
way
that
that
works,
where
they
could
zoom
in
from
home
or
wherever.
I
think
that
works
well,
and
I
think
it
gives
us
other
options
and
I
do
think
we
have
to
work
smarter,
not
necessarily
longer
or
harder,
and
so
I
would
like
us
to
to
move
forward
with
zoom
as
an
option,
regardless
of
what
the
requirements
are
in
the
future.
G
G
We
should
be
a
live
feed
just
during
closed
session,
because
we're
supposed
we're
supposed
to
be
know
that
we're
all
secluded
and
that
there's
no
public
access
to
that,
and
I
think
that,
at
least
during
a
closed
session
that
it
should
be
a
live
feed,
video
feed,
but
the
rest
of
it
leave
a
blank
screen.
Put
a
picture
up.
B
B
I
personally
like
to
be
here
if
it's
in
a
safe
environment,
which
I
think
it
is
now
but
there's
times
where
you
can't
and
if
you
can
zoom
in,
why
not
I
mean
it's
just?
Why
not
and
I
I
would
like
to
continue
if
we
can
with
it.
I
think
it.
It's
worked
out
well
and
I'm
sure
in
the
near
future.
That's
probably
going
to
end
up
being
the
standard
for
a
lot
of
communities
zooming
in
for
different
reasons,
but
that's
all
I
have
to
say
with
that.
K
That
took
that's
okay,
I
do
want
to
speak
on
well,
I
want
to
speak
on
a
lot
of
them,
but
on
our
number
nine
I
agree
that
the
times
have
changed
and
I
personally
have
been
asking
that
the
city
council
be
here
personally
and
it
hasn't
happened
and
it's
I
haven't
been
here
for
a
while.
I've
been
on
on
zoom,
it's
very
convenient
and
I
appreciate
the
mayor
being
here.
K
I
don't
know
how
long
he's
been
showing
up,
but
I
finally
see
that
he
is
here
so
following
the
rules-
and
I
know
I
realize
that
councilman
rosenda's
daughter
is
sick,
but
that
doesn't
mean-
and
I
do
not-
I
do
not
condone
and
I
don't.
I
don't
think
we
should
have
the
council
members
give
out
their
home
address.
If
that
wrote.
Oh,
you
know,
councilman
resendez
is
home
right
now.
K
K
Okay,
so
anyway,
I
don't
know
what
the
rule
is
exactly
that
it
says.
I
know
he
has
to
post
and
if
he
can
post
and
say
he's
going
to
be
doing
it
from
home.
Then
that's
good
enough
without
having
to
put
the
address
out
there,
but
it
hasn't
been.
It
hasn't
been
noticed,
that's
the
problem
so
that
the
times
have
changed.
The
zoom
is
so
convenient.
K
We
haven't
been
doing
any
traveling.
You've
either
been
in
the
city
or
you've
been
home
and
you've
been
at
work,
and
if
you
can't
make
it
here,
you're
caught
in
traffic
or
whatever
you're
able
to
zoom,
I
know
I've
done
it.
I
paid
attention,
but
you
can
pull
over,
which
I've
had
to
pull
over,
because
I've
got
comments
to
do
or
whatever
and
and
it's
so
convenient.
K
But
again
I
prefer
that
the
council
members
you're
here
to
represent
the
entire
city,
and
you
should
be
here
at
the
dyess.
If
the
department
heads,
I
think
it
would
be
okay
for
them
to
be
at
home.
You
know
we
have
one
right
behind
me
and
she
hasn't
had
to
come
up
and
speak
or
anything,
but
she
could
have
been
home
zooming
it
so
anyway.
Thank
you.
A
K
G
C
Hello
council,
sitting
over
there
in
the
corner
running
the
zoom
helping
the
city
clerk.
It
has
been
a
challenge
to
get
this
all
figured
out,
and
you
know
now
that
it's
all
kind
of
figured
out
we
got
kind
of
the
technology
to
be
able
to
do
it.
It's
easier
and
you
know
more
convenient
for
the
public
to
to
be
able
to
make
their
comments
and
and
attend
and
view.
C
C
C
A
Yeah,
just
real
quick
to
add
on
to
what
paul
was
saying
about
our
coastal
neighbor
cities.
They're
having
that
issue
that
anybody
can
from
around
the
world
can
call
in
on
an
issue
so
you're
not
getting
or
our
citizens
commenting
on
our
local
issues,
so
that
it's
always
something
that
you
need
to
kind
of
keep
in
the
back
of
your
mind.
B
It's
not
perfect.
Nothing
is,
and
we've
had
issues
in
the
past
without
zoom
people
coming
here
that
were
from
not
in
town
or
for
different
reasons.
So
no
perfect
thing.
I
think
it's
working
well
like
it
to
be
there
in
case.
We
need
it
there's
times
where
I
can't
make
it
physically
here,
but
if
I
can
zoom
that'd
be
great,
except
on
my
anniversary,
my
wife
won't
have
any
part
of
that,
but.
A
B
F
G
F
Thank
you
three
quick
points
number
one.
Usually
I
can
see
the
timer
on
my
screen
and
I
didn't
see
it
so
I
thought
the
timer
wasn't
running
so
I
apologize.
I
wasn't
trying
to
cut
off
your
time.
Number
two.
I
agree
with
the
speaker
about
the
safety
concerns
we're
living
in
some
very
scary,
divisive
times
right,
but
I
have
faith
in
the
legislators
and
I
think
that
they'll
work
all
that
out
throughout
the
process
right,
we'll
figure
it
out
as
we
go
and
then
number
two.
F
I
think
that
we
have
a
potential
and
we
have
seen
more
public
engagement
with
being
on
zoom
and
making
it
more
accessible
to
people
living
in
a
commuter
town.
They
can,
as
miss
salinas,
pointed
out
pull
over
if
they
want,
they
can
listen
to
it
on
the
way
over
here
and
then
they
can.
You
know,
make
comments
and
whatnot.
So
I'd
like
to
see
more-
and
I've
stressed
this
too,
to
our
already
busy
staff
they're,
more
of
a
social
media
presence,
more
of
technology
presence
rather
than
less
so.
Those
are
my
thoughts.