►
From YouTube: Gov Hol PC 20210128
Description
Hollister Planning Commission Meeting January 28, 2021
A
Public
comment
during
the
covet
19
emergency.
This
meeting
is
in
compliance
with
the
govern,
with
the
governor's
executive
order
n2520
issued
on
march
4th
2020
and
n2920
issued
a
march
18th
of
2020,
allowing
for
a
deviation
of
teleconference
rules
required
by
the
brown
act.
The
person
of
this
is
to
provide
a
safe
environment
for
staff
and
the
public
to
conduct
a
city
business
by
allowing
for
public
participation
during
the
cove
19
global
emergency.
A
Members
of
the
public
may
not
physically
attend
the
meetings
at
the
city
of
hollister
city
council
chamber,
in
accordance
with
executive
orders,
n2520
and
n2920
and
guidance
from
the
california
department
of
public
health
on
gathers
on
gatherings.
Remote
public
participation
is
allowed
and
public
comments.
Time
may
be
limited
if
you,
if
you
wish
to
make
a
public
comment
remotely
during
the
meeting,
please
use
the
zoom
registration
link,
which
can
be
found
on
the
city
of
hollister's
website.
B
B
D
A
A
F
A
Thank
you,
communications
from
the
public
on
items
not
listed
on
the
agenda.
This
is
the
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
items
done
on
the
agenda
and
within
the
subject
matter,
jurisdiction
of
the
planning
commission.
When
the
planning
commission
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
commission.
Each
speaker
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
Please
note
that
the
state
law
prohibits
the
planning
commission
from
discussing
or
taking
actions
on
any
items
not
on
the
agenda.
A
E
E
We
have
not
provided
architectural
services
for
item
number,
one
that
we
have
worked
with,
mr
lindsay
on
other
projects
in
hollister
and
therefore,
and
we
have
received
compensation
within
the
last
12
months.
Therefore,
it
would
be
improper
for
me
to
deliberate
on
item
number
one
I'm
going
to
close
out
of
the
zoom
meeting
and
then
after
the
deliberations
have
concluded,
abraham
will
call
me
and
I
will
rejoin
you
after
item
number.
One
is
concluded.
B
Youboy.
Thank
you,
mr
chair
members
of
the
planning
commission
good
evening,
abraham
prado
planning
manager,
development
services
interim
director.
The
applicant
is
requesting
citing
architectural
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
44
foot
in
height
single-story,
concrete
tilt-a,
building
measuring
129
540
square
feet.
B
The
land
uses
a
proposed
delivery
station
on
an
overall
25.5
acre
site,
made
up
of
four
contiguous
parcels
off
of
citation
way
in
the
city
of
hollister.
The
delivery
station
would
operate
as
a
distribution
facility
that
would
receive
shipments
from
fulfillment
centers
to
be
sorted
on
site
and
loaded
onto
delivery
vehicles
for
distribution
to
customers.
B
I'll
speak
a
little
bit
to
that
in
just
a
little
bit.
The
property
is
located
within
the
m1
light
industrial
zoning
district
of
the
city
of
hollister
and
also
within
zone
number
three
and
partially
within
zone
number.
Two
of
the
airport
safety
zone
within
the
airport,
land
use
comprehensive
plan.
A
condition
of
approval
actually
requires
that
the
project
receive
consistency,
determination
with
the
comprehensive
land
use
plan
from
the
airport
land
use.
Commission
a
condition
of
approval
actually
requires
a
prior
tuition
as
a
building
permit.
B
Also,
the
applicant
is
currently
processing
line
adjustment
for
all
four
parcels,
essentially
to
be
able
to
merge
all
four
parcels
into
one.
They
could
actually
proceed
this
way
with
four
separate
parcels.
It
just
gets
very
convoluted
because
they
would
have
to
record
reciprocal
access
agreements
and
reciprocal
public
utility,
easements
and
so
forth,
so
the
best
way
to
handle
it
would
be
to
do
a
lot
merger
of
all
four
parcels
into
one
which
would
make
it
at
one
parcel
at
25.5
acre
site.
B
B
The
shift,
work
and
deliveries
would
be
staggered
so
that
way
it
can
avoid
local
commute
times.
For
example,
shift
number
one
would
be
from
2
a.m
to
12
30
p.m,
and
that
would
involve
approximately
85
associate
employees.
The
second
shift
would
be
from
6am
to
2
30
p.m
and
would
involve
an
additional
27
associate
employees.
The
third
shift
would
be
from
1
30
p.m,
to
10
p.m,
and
would
involve
27
associate
employees.
B
The
additional
there
will
be
an
additional
approximately
50
drivers
that
would
arrive
at
4
pm
and
depart
at
around
5
pm
from
the
project
site.
All
vans
will
return
to
the
project
site
between
7
pm
and
9.
30
pm
deliveries
are
typical
for
customers
around
the
area,
residences
and
businesses,
with
an
approximately
range
of
50
miles
from
here
in
hollister
and
within
approximately
range
of
50
miles
or
less.
B
Regarding
security,
the
tenant
will
maintain
a
security
of
their
facility
with
cameras
on
site
and
alarms
throughout
the
building
product
is
not
stored
at
these
facilities
for
over
a
period
of
12
hours,
it
would
be
sorted
and
delivered
and
delivered
and
additionally,
staff
will
be
on
site
24
hours
a
day.
Seven
days
a
week.
B
The
building
would
have
an
approximately
50
foot
setback
from
citation
way
located
to
the
west,
approximately
410
foot
setback
from
flynn,
road
located
to
the
north,
approximately
500
foot,
setback
to
the
rear
property
line
and
approximately
280
feet
set
back
to
san
felipe
road.
Normally,
the
city
requires
buildings
to
be
closer
to
these
roads
like
in
this
case,
we
would
require
the
building
to
be
closer
to
san
felipe
road.
However,
as
mentioned
earlier
because
of
the
safety
zones
of
the
airport
in
particular
safety
zone,
two
that's
located
closer
to
san
felipe
road.
B
B
Regarding
access,
the
delivery
station
proposes
a
total
of
260
parking
spaces
that
would
be
located
on
the
north
side
of
the
building.
260
parking
spaces
would
be
for
staff
and
and
clients.
They
would
be
able
to
access
the
parking
area
through
citation
way
via
two
driveways.
One
driveway
closer
to
the
building
would
be
at
26
feet
in
width
and
that
lane
would
maintain
at
26
feet
because
everything
around
the
building
should
be
at
minimum
26
feet
in
width
for
fire
fire
department
requirements.
B
B
There
will
also
be
710
van
parking
spaces
for
the
delivery
fleet
and
15
semi-truck
parking
spaces,
11
of
which
can
be
positioned
along
the
south
elevation
of
the
building.
South
elevation
of
the
building
has
11
parking
spaces,
four
semi
trucks,
each
parking
space
would
have
would
be
able
to
the
truck
would
be
able
to
back
into
the
building,
and
each
I'll
show
the
elevations
a
little
bit,
but
each
will
have
a
roll-up
door
for
loading
and
unloading
purposes.
B
The
automobile
parking
area
for
the
employees
and
public
would
be
accessed
from
citation
way
as
as
indicated
also.
In
addition,
there
will
be
a
at
the
south
at
the
south
area
of
the
parking
lot.
There
would
be
a
fire
lane
which
would
allow
for
emergency
access
to
the
van
fleet
area
in
case
of
an
emergency
as
well.
The
applicant
originally
proposed
the
gate.
B
After
discussing
with
the
fire
department,
they
were
able
to
remove
the
gate
and
actually
have
it
as
a
as
a
red
striped
fire
axis,
with
pool
signs
signage
indicating
no
parking
future
access.
The
general
plan
of
the
city
of
hollister
currently
requires
that
there
should
be
interconnectivity
between
parcels
and
between
neighborhoods.
In
this
case,
it
is
in
the
industrial
area.
B
So
when
future
development
of
the
west
parcels
occur,
we
would
be
able
to
punch
in
the
road
and
be
able
to
access
to
the
west
we're
trying
to
find
out
all
the
other
ways
that
we
can
meet
the
general
plan-
and
this
was
one
of
them
and
the
the
applicant
has
agreed
to
provide
us
an
access
easement
for
future
development.
When
future
development
occurs
to
the
west,
then
we
would
be
able
to
create
that
road
for
interconnectivity.
The
applicant
also
proposes
one
crash
enclosure
at
the
south.
B
End
of
the
building
one
trash
enclosure
was
one
of
our
questions
for
the
whole
site.
They
indicated
that
actually
one
of
the
semi
trucks
on
the
west
on
the
south
side
of
the
building
would
actually
be
used
for
recyclables
and
they
would
be
able
a
lot
of
their
product
is
actually
contained
within
recyclable
material.
They
would
be
able
to
use
that
to
load
and
and
be
able
to
send
off
to
proper
recycling
centers,
and
so
therefore,
one
crash
enclosure
will
suffice
for
the
rest
of
their
refuse.
B
They're
actually
also
proposing
two
freestanding
signs
along
citation
way.
However,
they
have
not
at
this
point
been
able
to
provide
the
actual
full
details,
so
the
freestanding
science
will
come
before
you,
I'm
here
at
the
planning
commission
for
a
different
public
hearing
for
certain
architectural
of
the
freestanding
signs.
B
Currently,
there
is
sidewalk
curb
and
gutter
along
the
west
side
of
citation
way,
there's
only
curve
along
the
east
side
where,
where
the
building
would
be
there's
only
curve,
there's
no
sidewalk
along
citation
way.
There's
currently
sidewalk
carbon
gutter
along
the
south
side
of
flynn
road,
and
there
is
no
road
improvements
along
san
felipe
road.
A
condition
of
approval
would
require
that
sidewalk
urban,
gov
and
gutter
be
improved
along
citation
way.
B
There
was
also
a
discussion
where
originally
we
were
going
to
require
them
to
actually
improve
sidewalk,
curb
and
gutter,
all
along
san
felipe
road
as
well,
undergrounding
of
existing
overhead
utilities,
bicycle
lanes
and
so
forth.
However,
at
this
time
the
city
of
hollister
is
going
undergoing
studies
in
regards
to
how
we
want
san
felipe
road
to
be
one
of
the
determinations.
The
city
council
has
recently
adopted
a
preference
for
roundabouts
and
so
flynn.
B
The
reason
why
we're
not
requiring
them
to
do
it
now
is
because
we're
required
to
do
it
now
and
the
plan
when
plan
gets
adopted.
If
things
change,
we
wouldn't
want
to
have
to
rip
out
all
of
the
improvements
already
made
by
the
applicant.
So
we
would
prefer
that
we
have
the
funding
available
from
the
applicant
for
their
fair
share
of
their
frontage
improvements
and
then
eventually
be
able
to
incorporate
those
improvements
when
ready
and
approved
by
the
city
council.
B
B
The
east
elevation
of
the
building
would
also
include
the
potential
for
10
additional
roll-up
doors
in
the
future.
If,
if
needed
and
would
also
include
a
freestanding
steel
canopy,
which
would
measure
approximately
50
268
square
feet
and
would
cover
an
area
of
about
60
parking
stalls
with
dimensions
of
11
feet
by
27
feet
for
vans,
and
it
would
be
for
outdoor
loading
of
the
vans
for
delivery,
the
west
elevation,
which
would
be
facing
citation
way,
would
include
five
regular
doors
and
no
roll-up
doors
at
the
moment.
But
a
potential
for
15
future
roll
up
doors.
B
The
north
elevation
would
be
the
main
entrance
to
the
building
where
the
office
would
be,
and
basically
facing,
flynn
road
and
would
include
a
storefront
glaze
window
system
with
four
entrance
doors
and
the
north
elevation,
as
I
mentioned,
would
be.
The
main
entrance
into
the
building
would
be
closer
to
the
to
the
parking
lot
for
the
employees
and
the
public.
B
The
landscaping
plan
on
sheet
l02
and
also
up
in
the
screen,
illustrates
well
over
300
trees
throughout
the
site
along
various
and
also
aligned
with
various
ground
covers
and
bushes.
The
trees
would
consist
of
raywood
ash,
grape
murder,
myrtle,
fruitless
olive
trees
and
other
others
on
the
list
as
well.
B
Approximately
94
of
the
trees
would
be
located
throughout
the
associate
and
public
parking
area
along
the
north
side
of
the
of
the
building,
and
most
of
these
trees
would
be
crepe,
myrtles
and
fruitless.
Olive
a
tree
would
also
be
placed
at
approximately
the
width
of
every
three
parking
stalls
of
the
associate
parking
area.
B
Approximately
44
trees,
most
being
crepe
myrtle,
would
be
located
along
san
felipe
road.
There's
one
existing
detention
pond
to
serve
for
the
management
of
stormwater,
located
at
the
intersection
of
flame
road
and
san
felipe
road
at
the
southwest
corner
for
storm
water
management
for
the
whole
six
six
parcels
on
citation
way.
B
The
site
plan
illustrates
six
new
bioretention
ponds
for
storm
water
management.
The
largest
of
this
new
bioretention
pond
is
proposed
along
san
felipe
road
at
approximately
870
feet
in
length
and
approximately
50
feet
in
width
and
with
an
approximately
depth
of
six
and
a
half
feet.
The
proposed
landscaping
along
san
felipe
road
is
meant
to
provide
increased
planting,
appropriate
berms
and
mounding
to
minimize
or
eliminate
the
view
of
the
basin
from
the
road.
B
As
you
can
see
on
the
attached
on
the
screen
or
the
the
this
sheet
was
actually
not
as
part
of
your
plans
that
were
provided
to
you
on
friday.
This
is
a
rendering
that
the
applicant
submitted
today
to
illustrate
the
their
intent
to
provide
a
masking
or
a
block
of
the
retention
pond
proposed
along
san
felipe
road.
B
B
B
This
project
is
actually
located
in
the
industrial
zoning
district
away
from
any
residential
zoning.
Existing
residential
zoning
districts,
and
one
thing
that
we
would
like
to
add
is
that
the
applicant
has
a
very
strict
schedule.
What
they
would
like
to
do
is
actually
be
able
to,
with
the
blessing
of
the
planning
commission
this
evening,
be
able
to
hopefully
get
building
permits
and
there's
several
approvals
by
the
city
of
hollister
within
the
15
day
or
after
the
15
day.
B
Being
that
they're
outside
of
the
residential
zoning
district,
which
we
we
hold
up
very
tightly
to
the
applicant,
is
asking
to
see
if
there
can
be
an
exception
that
can
be
worked
with
the
planning
commission
to
allow
for
certain
certain
days
to
be
able
to
work
with
staff
to
be
able
to
have
them
or
allow
them
to
do
the
pouring
or
or
construction
of
their
work
on
times.
That
would
be
variable
or
separate
from
the
regular
noise
ordinance.
B
So
we
would
like
to
include
on
condition
number
eight
that
if,
if
okay
with
the
planning
commission,
we
would
just
like
to
have
that
acknowledgement
from
the
planning
commission
put
it
on
the
minutes
and
just
include
language
on
condition.
Number
eight
that
indicates
that
arrangement
for
overtime,
inspection,
services
and
payment
of
fees
for
same
should
be
made
48
hours
in
advance
and
are
subject
to
inspection,
availability
and
approval
by
the
city
engineer.
B
At
this
time,
as
I
have
mentioned,
we
don't
have
a
clear
layout
for
san
felipe
road
and,
and
we
would
really
be
it
would
really
be
sad
to
to
have
them
actually
do
the
improvements
now
and
then
ultimately
come
up
with
a
different
plan
that
would
require
those
improvements
to
be
ripped
off
so
or
removed.
So,
therefore,
basically
13
iii
indicates
that
they
should
pay
their
fair
share.
They
will
actually
be
providing
a
cost
plan
of
all
the
requirements
that
they
have
to
do
the
underground
of
any
existing
overhead
utilities.
B
The
the
sidewalk
curb
gutter
bike
lane
everything
that
needs
to
be
done.
They
will
provide
that
to
us.
We
will
review
it
to
make
sure
that
it
meets
the
requirements
with
the
standard
and
then
be
able
to
accept
that
payment
prior
to
final
occupancy
and
then
be
able
to
use
it
when,
when
the
city
actually
does
those
improvements,
so
so
that
13
just
basically
indicates
that
change
again,
also
with
condition
number
14
the
project
has.
B
We
did
a
study
regarding
acceleration
and
deceleration
lanes
on
san
felipe
road
and
also
on
highway
25
bypass,
and
so
this
condition.
Basically,
the
changes
in
this
condition
also
say
that
they
shall
provide
their
fair
share
of
a
of
their
cost
for
a
acceleration
lane
and
a
deceleration
lane.
The
study
has
already
been
done
by
kim
lee
horn.
The
analysis
of
what
their
fair
share
would
be,
so
we
would
just
not
necessarily
require
them
to
improve.
G
B
But
just
provide
us
with
that
fair
share,
so
that
way,
when
city
does
improve
it,
we
have
that
money
already
in
place.
Condition
number
20
requires
the
applicant
to
install
an
oil
grease
separator
the
oil
grid
separator.
We
talked
with
the
building
official
the
and
they
wanted
this
condition.
Because
if
there's
going
to
be
any
type
of
maintenance
on
the
vehicles,
then
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
identify
the
area
of
maintenance
and
have
an
oil
grease
separator
to
avoid
any
of
the
any
greases
oils
going
into
our
sanitary
sewer
system.
B
However,
they
have
indicated
that
all
maintenance
will
be
off-site,
there's
not
going
to
be
any
maintenance
on
the
property,
and
so
therefore,
with
that
staff
would
was
okay
to
remove
condition
number
20
requiring
oil
grease
separator
condition.
Number
31
basically
said
that
no
floor
drains
shall
be
connected
to
the
site
sanitary
sewer
system.
B
So
we
just
want
to
add
the
language
in
bed
that
basically
says
that
no
floor
trains
that
no
floor
drains
that
are
exposed
to
the
weather,
basically
all
floor
drains
that
are
outside
should
shall
be
connected
to
the
site,
shall
not
be
connected
to
this
site
sanitary
system,
obviously
the
ones
inside
the
building
appropriate
to
be
connected.
That
would
be
okay,
so
we
just
want
to
make
that
modification
in
the
red
language
up
in
the
screen
condition
62,
it's
it's
a
standard
condition
that
we
have.
B
B
At
this
time,
the
the
the
project
and
and
the
actual
the
project
for
the
lip
station
improvement
is
being
looked
at
to
be
covered
through
other
means,
such
as
a
city
grant
for
the
future
and
other
sources.
So
therefore,
we
are
respectfully
requesting
to
remove
this
condition.
It
does
say,
if
deemed
necessary,
but
it
would
be.
Staff
would
be
okay
to
to
remove
this
condition
from
the
resolution.
B
And
finally,
condition:
number
77:
that's
the
access
easement
to
the
west
that
I
that
I
mentioned
a
little
while
ago,
the
condition
when
you
received
the
members
of
the
commission.
What
read
that
the
applicant
shall
improve
design
and
improve
the
access.
However,
at
this
time
we
would
be
okay
with
just
accepting
the
easement
and
they
will
be
doing
a
study
to
see
what
the
their
fair
share
would
be,
and
so,
once
that
study
is
done,
they
will
provide
it
to
us.
B
Our
engineers
will
review
it
and
accept
it
or
if
they
need
to
modify
it,
they'll
modify
it
and
then,
prior
to
final
occupancy,
we
will
receive
the
payment
for
that
and
when
there's
development
to
the
west
or
when
the
city
engineer
deems
necessary,
we
will
then
use
that
funding
to
improve
that
access
to
the
west.
And
you
know
we
would
already
have
that
easement
dedicated
to
the
city
of
hollister
from
the
project
applicant.
It's
a
30-foot,
easement
30-foot,
wide
easement
that
they're
providing
all
along
the
length
of
the
property.
B
B
As
you
know,
there
hasn't
been
a
lot
of
development
out
there,
and
so
the
the
even
though
the
eir
is,
is
you
know,
close
to
20
years
old
or
approximately.
We
thought
that
it
covered
a
lot
of
a
ground
for
for
the
area.
However,
we
did
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
since
then,
there's
been
new
law
that
has
been
implemented
regarding
the
california,
environmental
quality
act
and
a
new
policy
regarding
greenhouse
gases
level
of
service
for
for
parking
for
vehicle
traffic,
and
so
we
actually
did
do
an
analysis.
B
We
did.
We
didn't
attend
them
to
the
environmental
impact
report.
We
did
a
traffic
analysis,
the
noise
study,
and
we
did
we
evaluated
the
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
and
so
what
we
found
chairman
munster
and
members
of
the
commission
was
that
when
this
project
was
when
the
subdivision
was
actually
analyzed
approximately
20
years
ago,
it
was
actually
expected
to
have
a
higher
construction
rate
and
a
higher
vehicle
trip.
And
so
because
this
project
is
actually
taking
four
out
of
the
six
parcels.
B
B
Not
only
would
this
project
allow
for
the
creation
of
new
jobs
that
are
highly
of
highly
need
of
this
in
in
the
city
of
hollister,
but
also
it's
a
great
tax
revenue
for
the
city
staff
has
worked
very
very
hard
in
collaboration
with
the
economic
development
corporation
and
the
chamber
of
commerce,
along
with
the
applicant,
through
the
application
process,
through
the
planning
process
process,
even
pre-application
process
as
well.
This
applicant
is
very
serious.
As
I
mentioned.
B
A
B
B
A
B
That's
a
good
question
chairman
munsor,
the
the
project
is
near
the
vicinity
of
of
the
airport.
It
is,
we
do
have
along
airway
drive.
We
do
have
parcels
that
actually
connect
to
the
airport
or
or
back
into
the
airport
and
and
require
a
separate
process
called
through
the
fence.
As
you
know,
in
order
to
have
like
airport
airplanes
be
able
to
come
in
and
out
of
of
the
facility,
this,
this
one's
a
little
bit
separate
the
applicant
mr
steve
beacham,
is
is
actually
on
on
the
zoom.
B
B
Thank
you
for
that
question,
commissioner
henderson
one
of
the
when
we
did
the
pre-application
meeting
we
actually
offered
the
applicant
to
actually
submit
a
minor
subdivision
application
sounds
sounds
kind
of
contradicting
the
application
is
called
the
minor
subdivision,
but
it
actually
is,
for
it
can
be
for
subdivision
of
lan
or
actually
to
merge
for
four
parcels
or
less,
and
so
the
offer
was
to
do.
Do
it
concurrently
with
this
process
and
be
able
to
present
it
tonight
with
the
center
architectural
and
the
minor
subdivision.
B
The
applicant,
though
purchase
of
the
vision
map
act
also
has
the
ability
to
merge
the
parcels
through
a
lot
line
adjustment,
as
as
mentioned
in
the
in
the
presentation,
as
as
you
indicate,
commissioner
henderson,
and
so
we
would
just
want.
We
have
a
condition
of
approval
and
the
resolution
that
basically
indicates
that,
prior
to
final
occupancy
of
the
building
prior
to
them,
starting
to
operate,
they
can
actually
start
construction
but
prior
to
the
city,
basically
saying
you
can
start
operating
now.
B
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
line
adjustment
merging
the
four
parcels
into
one
has
been
completed,
and
so
at
this
point
they
have
submitted
the
application
for
a
lot
line
adjustment
to
the
engineering
department,
it's
under
review
by
our
city,
engineer
and
city
engineering
staff,
and
the
hope
is
to
get
that
done
within
the
next
few
weeks.
If,
if
that,
what
was
that
did.
B
F
B
F
A
F
B
Yes,
so
they
will
their
their
hope
is
to
start
in
february.
Commissioner
henderson,
I
think
that
that
would
be
best
answered
by
mr
steve
beacham,
who
is
on
on
hold
for
and
just
raised
his
hand.
So
whenever
the
public
hearing
is
open,
we
would
get
a
schedule
from
them
and
be
able
to
know
precisely
what
their
schedule
would
be
and
how
they're
going
to
operate
for
their
construction.
F
Okay,
that's
that's
great
and
I
was
wondering
about
the
traffic
flow
of
the
semi
trucks.
So
I
mean
if
you're
going
on
highway,
25
south,
you
could
make
a
left
turn
onto
flynn
road
to
get
to
this
facility.
But
to
me
that
seems
kind
of
you
know
dangerous,
because
it's
crossing
you
know
across
a
lot
of
northbound
traffic.
F
B
B
It
is
the
industrial
amazonian
district
which
which
anticipates
a
large
volume
of
of
trucks
for
that
area,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
indicated
in
our
traffic
study
and
in
our
cost
sharing
analysis
for
their
fair
share
of
improvements
is
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
they
have
that
they
provide
their
fair
share
for
the
ultimate
improvement
of
a
acceleration
and
deceleration
lanes
for
both
san
felipe
and
also
for
highway.
25
bolsa,
so
eventually,
as
airway
drive
and
and
all
those
different
parcels
are
being
developed.
B
They
will
provide
their
fair
share
cost
for
for
that
improvement,
and
also
they
they
are.
They
actually
are
in
the
hook
as
well
to
provide
their
fair
share
costs
for
the
the
actual
improvement
that
already
occurred
on
fallon
road
and
san
felipe.
As
you
know,
there
there's
a
signal
light
already
there,
but
you
know
there.
B
G
G
I've
thought
that
for
a
long
time
that
this
type
of
a
warehouse
and
distribution
center
would
is
probably
ideal
for
a
city
like
hollister
just
because
of
our
location-
and
you
know,
because
of
rural,
we
have
space
etc
and
then
certainly
because
of
the
potential
for
job
opportunities
and
other
things
right,
there's
a
lot
of
potential
for
lots
of
benefits
to
the
city
and
the
residents.
So
my
questions
are
more
related
to
that.
G
And
then-
and
actually
my
second
question,
I'm
just
going
to
ask
a
second
question
about
myself
on
youtube
and
listen.
So
my
second
question
is
around
this:
it's
just
about
the
same.
You
know
about
pay,
and
I'm
just
actually.
I
have
three
questions.
Sorry,
it's
just
in
general.
What
do
they
expect
like
the
range
of
pay
for
the
employees,
because
it
looks
like
there's
a
potential
for
about
300
employees,
and
I
would
be
curious
to
hear
like
what
what
the
pay
range
would
be.
G
That's
my
second
question
and
then
my
third
question
is
about
the
description
of
the
business
as
a
last
mile
distribution
facility.
I
I'm
assuming
that
that's
not
literal,
because
that's
generally
I
mean
that
makes
more
sense.
When
you
live
in
a
big
city
where
you
do
actually
do
the
last,
while
that
last
mile
is
always
the
most
difficult
because
then
you
don't
rely
on
you
know
the
big
freeways
and
the
big
public
transportation
systems
and
all
the
other
things.
So
it's
that
last
smile
that
always
presents
issues
for
big
cities.
G
B
Those
are
all
great
questions,
commissioner
stevens.
Thank
you
for
bringing
that
up
for
your
questions
in
regards
to
the
pay
range
and
in
regards
to
the
certificates
required
by
the
drivers,
not
not
necessarily
semi-truck
drivers,
but
the
for
the
delivery
fleet
vans.
That
would
that
would
likely
be
more
for
mr
steve
beechum
from
panatoni
development,
the
con
the
company
in
charge
of
the
development
of
the
project,
and
so
I
would
defer
to
him
when
the
public
hearing
is
open.
B
But
on
regards
to
the
last
mile,
we
actually
had
the
same
question
for
the
applicant,
and
so
that
was
part.
That
was
one
of
our
many
comments
that
that
we
had
as
we
were
as
we
were
working
with
them,
and
so
actually
that
was
actually
comment.
Number
one,
and
I
and
I
have
their
response
here.
So
the
responses
and
I'll
just
read
it.
The
last
mile
refers
to
the
final
leg
of
a
package's
destination
for
delivery
to
a
customer.
B
It
arrives
at
the
proposed
delivery
station
which,
in
this
case,
would
be
the
citation
weight
delivery
station
being
being
proposed
tonight
from
a
larger
regional
fulfillment
center.
A
fulfillment
center
is
a
separate
larger
facility,
usually
farther
away
where
other
aspects
of
the
mail
order
delivery
business
are
performed
so
with
this,
and
mr
beacham
can
can
elaborate
a
little
bit
more.
B
The
fulfillment
centers,
where
the
semis
would
pick
up
would
be
loaded
and
then
cms
would
come
into
the
citation
way
delivery
station
and
then
at
the
delivery
station
on
citation
way
would
be
the
last
mile,
essentially
the
rain
loading
onto
the
vans
and
delivering
to
hollister
and
regional
areas
within
50
miles
or
less
from
the
from
the
delivery
station.
Your
other
other
are
great
questions
as
well,
and
I
think
that
would
be
more
in
regards
to
the
operations
where
mr
steve
beacham
would
be,
I
think,
more
appropriate
to
answer.
A
B
B
H
Great
yeah
thanks
steve
beauchamp
development
manager
with
panatoni
development
overseeing
this
project.
I
just
want
to
say
yeah
thanks
to
abraham
and
his
staff
and
the
city
staff.
So
far
they've
been
great
to
work
with.
I
think
we
came
to
hollister
either
late
september
early
october
and
said:
hey:
can
you
guys
pull
off
a
miracle
for
us
and
get
this
project
entitled
and
permitted
and
ready
to
start
in
february?
H
And
they,
you
know,
agreed
to
that
if
we
met
our
deadlines,
they'd
meet
their
deadlines
and
so
far
it's
been
working
great,
we're
we're
in
hollister
this
project's
in
hollister,
because
it's
challenging
to
get
entitled
and
permitted
quickly
in
jurisdiction,
certain
jurisdictions,
and
so
we
knew
that
hollister
was
business
friendly
and
also
had
this
development
that
was
previously
developed
and
entitled
with
panatoni
ownership
group
back
in
the
early
2000s.
So
it
was
made
for
a
real,
easy
decision
to
go
there.
H
H
I
don't
have
specific
data
on
what
the
drivers
make.
I
do
know
it's
competitive
with.
You
know
the
market.
They
they
do,
offer
good
good
salary
and
benefits
for
that
and
it
does
vary.
Some
of
these
drivers
are
independent
contractors.
Some
of
them
are
employees,
and
some
of
them
can
be
as
simple
as
you
know,
an
app
based
driving
option.
H
H
Those
delivery
vehicles
go
out
kind
of
off
peak
on
their
hours,
usually
around
the
10
o'clock
10
a.m.
Time
frame
is
when
they
head
out
on
their
deliveries
and
they
usually
come
back
in
late
evening,
five,
six
seven
o'clock
at
night,
so
they
minimize
peak
traffic
conflicts
and
they
do
that
for
their
operation
as
well
as
to
help
the
community.
So
that's
kind
of
a
quick
overview.
I
know
on
several
different
things.
I
I
might
have
missed
the
question
or
two.
H
H
A
F
Yeah,
so
I
remember
listening
in
on
the
some
of
the
g-pack
visioning
that
they
had
a
couple
a
few
months
back
and
one
of
the
comments
from
someone
in
the
community
was
that
you
know
hollister
would
be
an
ideal
location
for
a
distribution
center.
So
I'm
glad
to
see
that
that
they're
they're
a
project
like
this
is
coming
to
hollister.
G
B
B
A
B
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
chair
members
of
the
planning
commission
good
evening.
Once
again,
the
applicant
for
west
intended
map
2018-4
received
approval
for
a
subdivision
consisting
of
approximately
208
acres
and
for
the
subdivision
into
60
parcels
and
the
subdivisions
actually
in
the
included
in
the
screen.
The
location
of
the
subdivision
is
right
near
the
airport,
just
just
along
the
existing
runway
just
to
the
north
of
it,
and
the
parcel
would
be
so
divided
into
60
sub
60.
B
Different
lots
got
approval
january
of
2019
lot
number
one
if
you
recall,
actually
got
approval
for
a
approximately
150
000
square
foot,
building
for
a
smart
class
building
there,
and
that
actually
is
currently
under
under
review
by
the
building
department
for
for
building
permits
and
the
applicant
is
working
on
the
actual
subdivision
for
the
207
208
acres.
However,
the
tender
maps
approval
per
per
the
house.
Tremendous
per
code
allows
for
two
year
approval
and
then
the
there
is
an
option
for
an
additional
one-year
extension.
B
Actually
it
was
2020.
due
to
the
effects
of
covet
and
the
resolution
of
the
road
intersection
design
requirements.
The
applicant
has
only
recently
been
in
a
position
to
move
forward
with
improvement
plans.
The
improvement,
improvements
and
map
will
now
be
complete
by
january,
24,
2021
and
now
that
we
have
resolved
the
intersection
issue
with
mr
wynn
is
anxious
to
move
forward,
but
will
require
an
extension
to
the
map
approval
to
be
able
to
do
so.
They
submitted
the
requested
fee
743
along
with
this
letter.
B
Thank
you
again
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
please
call
me
and
there's
her
telephone
number.
Ms
hall
is
actually
in
the
also
with
the
zoom.
If
there's
any
questions,
so
at
this
time
the
applicant
or
staff
recommends
that
the
city
of
hofstra
planning,
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
adopt
a
resolution
approving
an
extension
to
rest
intended
map
2018-4,
subject
to
the
finance
and
conditions
contained
in
a
draft
resolution.
F
A
B
I
Okay,
great
I'm
sure
some
members
of
the
planning
commission
remember
this
project
and
we
are
appreciate
your
approval
of
the
project.
We
are
looking
forward
to
moving
forward
with
it,
but,
as
abraham
mentioned,
we
spent
some
time
with
city
staff,
discussing
some
of
the
roundabout
issues
and
various
things,
and
we
knew
back
in
december.
We
would
not
have
everything
complete
by
this
january
deadline.
E
I
We
we
had
several
meetings
with
staff
and
came
to
some
decisions
on
what
would
be
required
on
the
roundabout.
So
we
are
planning
to
do
a
roundabout
at
burt
drive
as
part
of
we're
actually
planning
to
do
it
as
part
of
the
glass
factory
construction,
because
it
would
be
required
for
the
subdivision
anyway,
and
then
bert
drive,
I
mean.
I
What's
called
d
road
ultimately
may
not
happen
right
away,
because
that
one
wasn't
warranted
at
this
time,
but
so
we
have
that
may
wait
until
the
future,
but
the
bert
drive
roundabout,
we're
looking
to
do
fairly
quickly.
That
would
be
part
of
part
of
our
first
step
actually,
like
I
said,
with
the
glass
factory.
E
A
A
B
J
J
Okay,
perfect,
so
thank
you.
This
item
number
three
is
for
an
amendment
request
to
the
conditions
of
approval
for
site
architectural
2019-10,
and
I
have
here
on
the
slide
as
a
reminder
to
the
commission
site.
Architectural
2019-10
was
an
approval
to
construct
two
duplex
units
on
two
existing
lots:
they're
approximately
0.19
acres,
both
the
lots-
and
this
is
at
the
corner
of
komienzo
drive
and
prospect
avenue,
komienzo
drive.
It
was
formerly
known
as
hazel
street,
so
this
is
the
site
plan
that
was
approved
and
then
abraham.
J
If
you
can
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
life.
For
me,
please,
these
are
the
approved
elevations,
so
they're
both
the
same
elevations,
two
duplexes,
two
story
duplexes
on
this
site,
and
so
the
request
today
from
our
applicant
is
to
amend
condition.
62
of
planning
commission
resolution
2019-32,
which
approved
this
project,
and
this
on
your
slide
here
is
condition
62,
as
it
reads
today.
J
Condition
62
is
for
right-of-way
improvements
along
both
homeowner
drive,
as
well
as
prospect,
including
sidewalk
curve,
better
lighting,
landscaping
and
undergrounding
of
overhead
utilities,
as
required
by
our
city
engineer,
and
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
amend
this
condition.
To
remove
the
requirement
for
undergrounding
of
overhead
utilities,
the
changes
requested
are
on
the
screen
here
in
red,
so
we
would
strike
undergrounding
of
the
overhead
utilities
and
also
strike
them
from
the
second
aspect
of
the
conditions,
which
is
at
the
discretion
of
the
city
engineer.
J
The
applicant
could
enter
into
a
deferred
improvement
agreement
for
any
or
all
of
the
improvements
required,
which
means
that
they
would
not
do
them
now
with
the
implementation
of
the
project,
but
they
would
do
them
at
any
such
time
as
they're
called
upon
under
the
terms
of
the
deferred
improvement
agreement.
So
perhaps,
if
the
city
had
done
a
large
project
or
that
included
the
area
around
this
parcel,
they
would
then
be
required
to
pay
for
their
fair
share
of
their
frontage
improvements
around
the
project
or
if
there
was
another
development
of
some
kind.
E
Southeast
corner
of
the
property
is
specifically
when
we're
talking
about
undergrounding,
the
overhead
utilities.
Are
we
to
define
the
location
of
that
underground
task?
It
would
be
to
the
point
of
connection
would
be
from
the
transformer
of
the
car
pulse
into
the
main
service
panel
of
the
buildings.
Is
that
correct.
J
J
J
They
would
never
be
undergrounded
at
this
applicant's
request,
potentially
if
the
city
ever
had
a
master
project
to
do
massive
undergrounding.
I
believe
there
are
some
funds
that
come
from,
like
pg
e
and
like
other
funds,
so
potentially
there's
like
a
grant
project
in
the
future
that
we
could
look
towards
where
the
power
poles
could
be
undergrounded
in
a
larger
project
by
the
city.
A
J
D
D
E
Mark
yeah
just
to
comment
on
the
the
actually
the
requirement
of
underground
utilities,
typically,
instead
of
having
overhead
utilities
overhead
power
lines
connecting
to
a
main
service
and
not
going
over
any
roof
structures,
would
it
be
correct
to
say?
Is
that
the
reason
that
we
underground
utilities
to
new
developments
like
this
from
power
poles
is
is
for
safety
reasons.
D
B
Mr
hugh
boy,
this
is
abraham,
and
that
is
certainly
a
reason
for
undergrounding,
which
is
why,
as
eva
mentioned,
is
our
standard
condition
to
to
underground
in
this
particular
case,
as
you
know,
most
of
old
town
in
the
city
of
hollister.
Being
you
know,
sam
neil
street,
south
street
monterey,
westry,
there's
a
lot
of
existing
overhead
utilities
that
have
been
there
since,
since
the
inception
of
of
when
this
community
started
building,
and
so
therefore
you
know
in
this
case.
B
In
this
particular
case,
I
mean
we
do
have
that
as
an
existing
condition
for
projects
to
be
able
to
underground.
But
in
this
case
the
applicant
is
requesting
that
you
know.
If,
if
the
planning
commission
would
be
able
to
give
him
that
exemption
to
not
allow
for
the
undergrounding,
he
would
be
able
to
do
the
rest
of
the
improvements.
B
Sure
sure,
sorry,
so,
the
reason
why
the
applicant
has
been
requesting
to
have
this
exception
is
because
there
are
existing
overhead
utilities
in
the
vicinity
and
the
whole
in
the
whole
area,
and
so
he's
asking
that,
in
order
for
him
to
move
forward
with
this
project,
he
actually
took
over
this
project
from
a
previous
property
owner.
When
we
first
brought
this
project
a
little
bit
over
a
year
ago,
it
was
a
property
owner
by
the
name
of
maggie
lasand.
A
G
G
So
I
think
that
the
goal
is
that,
as
we
as
a
city
have
some
of
the
the
development
of
some
of
the
existing
or
older
structures,
the
goal
is
that
then
they
get
upgraded
so
that
the
overhead
utilities
go
underground
right.
So
the
goal
is
that
as
we
do,
that,
little
by
little
through
attrition,
we
will
eliminate
the
overhead
ones
right.
J
I
believe
that
that
is
a
valid
reason
for
the
the
standard
condition
that
we
have
and
undergrounding
the
utilities
and
especially
with
how
densely
packed
they
are
in
these
areas,
as
abraham
was
mentioning
that
it's
not
very
practical
to
put
on
an
immediate
like
underground.
You
must
underground
immediately
with
this
project,
but
I
think
that's
why
we
put
in
that
deferred
improvement
agreement
option
so
that
any
or
all
of
the
the
improvements
of
the
frontage
for
the
ultimate
improvement.
J
When
we
see
these
areas
revitalized
full,
as
as
they
can
be
in
our
general
plan
and
as
they're
planned
to
be
when
they're
revitalized,
then
we
could
have
an
underground
project.
The
city
could
work
on
towards
a
grant
or
something
like
that
and
something
we
can
talk
about
in
our
general
plan,
update
and
actual
policies
towards
undergrounding,
but
which
we
don't
have
right
now.
J
G
B
B
B
We
recognize
that
we
there's
there's
issues
in
the
in
the
community
in
regards
to
having
existing
areas
that
were
developed,
50,
60
70
years
ago
or
or
the
city
started
developing
around
it,
and
then
these
areas,
unfortunately,
don't
have
sidewalks,
and
so
you
know
the
pg
e
rule
20a
works
with
communities
to
to
provide
funding
and
and
be
able
to
have
that
mechanism
to
underground
utilities
and
provide
a
sidewalk
curve
and
gutter.
So
there
that
that
thought
process
is
there.
B
B
G
B
Can
they
so
that's
a
really
good
question,
we're
always
open
for
developers.
You
know
thoughts
and
and
ability
to
to
provide
you
know,
search
for
grants,
but
a
lot
of
these
are
for
public
agencies
like
like
or
private,
like
pg
e
and
or
potentially
like
caltrans.
You
know
from
time
to
time
offers
various
types
of
grants.
You
know
for
improvements
of
public
infrastructure,
public
roads,
and
so
so
those
are,
you
know
it's
more
more
towards
like
government
type
of
grants.
A
B
C
Sorry
about
that,
commission
and
staff.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
on
this
item.
This
project,
if
built
out,
would
provide
much
needed
multi-family
units
if
you've
been
looking
for
a
rental
any
time
in
the
last
few
years,
and
especially
in
the
last
few
months,
with
the
housing
issues
related
to
covid
and
the
pandemic
rental
housing
is
at
an
absolute
minimum
in
terms
of
what's
available.
C
The
second
point
is
that,
by
moving
forward
with
this
project,
please
keep
in
mind
that,
even
if
the
utilities
aren't
undergrounded,
you
would,
as
a
city,
be
getting
new
curb
gutter
and
sidewalk,
because
the
engineer
is
going
to
walk
that
with
the
developer
and
point
out
anything,
that's
not
up
to
code
at
this
point
and
then
also
this
project
actually
brings
these
two
parcels
in
line
with
current
zoning,
whereas
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood,
it
doesn't
actually
fit
the
zoning.
So
please
keep
that
in
mind
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
K
K
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
review
this
potential
amendment.
I
just
kind
of
want
to
talk
about
the
nature
of
the
project.
It's
a
bit
unusual
in
that
there
is
an
existing
home
with
overhead.
You
know,
that's
been
served
here,
overhead
utilities
but
of
course
we're
gonna
underground
the
utilities
from
the
street
to
the
structure,
but
there
is
an
existing
home
on
the
property.
K
It's
kind
of
been
referred
to
as
a
new
development
and
it's
you
know,
there's
been
homes
on
both
of
these
parcels,
for
I
don't
know:
60
70
80
years,
even
the
person.
Now
that
is
at
the
corner
of
prospect
and
hazel.
There
was
a
home
there
until,
oh,
maybe
10,
15
years
ago,
something
like
that
in
there,
and
so
that
you
know
it's.
You
know
it's
new
construction,
it's
not
necessarily
new
development.
As
far
as
the
creation
of
new
lots,
lots
have
been
there
in
the
home
that
is
existing.
K
You
know
it's
certainly
in
very
substandard
condition,
and
you
know
it's
been
a
tough
situation
with
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
best
utilize
the
existing
home
on
the
property.
This
situ,
when
I
brought
bought
this
property,
it
was
a
oversight
on
my
part
to
to
you
know
if
I
had
known
about
the
condition
of
having
an
underground
that
I
it
was
my
fault,
there's
no
nobody's
fault
other
than
mine,
but
if
I
had
researched
that
mark
carefully,
it
would
be
cause
it's
cost
prohibitive
to
do
so
to
underground.
K
C
K
It
just
wouldn't
work
to
the
cost.
To
do
that
would
be
extraordinary
and
all
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
have
overhead
power
in
these
two
homes
that
have
been
here
there's
one
remaining
the
two
homes
have
been
here
have
had,
you
know,
been
served
by
overhead
power
for
80
years
or,
however
long
it's
been.
So
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
give
that
kind
of
visual
of
the
of
of
you
know
the
the
cost
and
the
limitations
on
any
future
development.
K
E
Question
tom,
so
I
know
we
have
to
I
know:
you're.
You
stated
that
you're
you're
going
to
go
ahead
with
the
curb
and
gutter
and
sidewalk
improvements
at
a
future
time,
if
the
option
of
about
a
deferred
agreement
and
having
the
underground
in
the
future
time.
That
would
be
more
disruptive
to
the
to
the
improvements
that
you
would
make
in
your
first
phase.
Did
you
consider
a
like
joint
trenching,
a
joint
trench
with
the
electrical
and
the
gas
mines
would
be
somewhat
of
a
cost
saving
measure.
K
If
I'm
thank
you
for
the
question,
I'm
not
I'm
not
servicing
these
properties
with
gas
just
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
one
of
them
just
environmentally
there.
The
change
is
there,
and
so
these
you
know,
but
as
far
as
you
know,
the
the
defer
to
prove
it
deferred
improvement
agreement.
You
know
in
the
future,
I'm
I'm
planning
on
upgrading
the
sidewalks.
K
If
I
were
to
proceed
with
them
and
this
curb
and
gutter.
If
I
were
to
proceed
with
the
project,
you
know
at
the
point
of
construction,
I
had
the
same
situation
on.
I
did
some
projects
on
san
benito
street
recently
and
I
improved
those
sidewalks
and
the
kerbs
and
gutter
at
the
same
time.
That's
something
that
I'm
very
willing
able
and
interested
in
doing
at
the
time
of
construction,
but
as
far
as
the
deferred
improvement
agreement
on
undergrounding
and
power
I
just
financially
now
or
in
the
future,
just
wouldn't
work.
For
me.
K
It
wouldn't
work
for
the
economics
of
the
project.
I
I
should
say
not
just
for
me,
I
mean,
if
I
you
know,
I
don't
know
it
would
not
have
a
lot
of
market
value
in
the
event
that
this
you
know.
I
don't
know
what
exactly
I
do.
I
guess
I'll
you
know
have
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
bring
the
existing
home
up
to
up
to
a
more
livable
condition
and
go
forward
like
that.
I
guess.
Thank
you
very
much.
K
K
The
only
thing
that
I
can
tell
you
there-
and
this
is
you
know
not
very
scientific,
but
from
other
people
in
the
past
that
have
done
this.
You
know
in
the
many
tens
or
tens
of
thousands,
many
tens
of
you
know,
I
don't
know
100
000,
I
don't
know
how
much
it'd
be
that's
kind
of
a
haphazard
guess
and
I
hesitate
to
say
what
it
would
be,
but
it
would
be
extraordinary.
E
I
I
I'm
not
excited
about
granting
granting
the
approval,
because
I
do
I
do
believe
in
that
the
safety
measures
of,
as
I
said,
but
given
everything
that
in
consideration
with
the
contest
of
this
development,
I
I
would-
and
I
think
that
you
know
cost
these
days,
especially
with
the
covid
situation
and
the
price
of
materials
is
going
up
extremely
high.
I
I
would
I
have
to
take
that
in
consideration
also
to
I
think
we
need
to
move
this
project
along
and
and
grant
the
request.
E
E
G
G
So
I
just
worry
about
having
that
as
an
expectation,
a
requirement
when
maybe
in
reality
it's
not
reasonable.
So
I
wonder
if
somebody
could
speak
to
that.
Is
that
just
simply
because
of
this
project,
because
it's
a
smaller
size
project
or
is
this
something
that
we
can
expect
in
the
future
from
other
projects
that
might
be
trying
to
accomplish
the
same
thing
as
what's
being
accomplished?
What
we're
trying
to
accomplish
in
this
project.
B
B
You
know
right
now
the
latest
poll
and
our
latest
report
with
our
update
of
the
general
plan,
indicates
that
about
eighty
percent
of
the
stock
in
the
city
of
hollister
is
single
family,
and
so
we
really
want
to
look
into
providing
policy
and
and
direction
for
more
multi-family,
and
I
think
this.
This
is
one
little
by
little
small,
with
smaller
projects
or
even
bigger
projects,
but
like
this
smaller
projects,
bringing
four
families
and
it's
it's-
it's
crucial
crucial.
B
I
think
that
that
you
know
in
probably
about
two
years
ago,
or
so,
alongside
needle
street,
there
was
a
project
called
the
old
flower
mill.
It's
a
building,
that's
located,
basically
between
hawkins
and,
I
would
say,
south
street
hawkins
and
south
street
to
the
to
the
east.
The
dokudo
brothers
actually
built
that
and
when
they
got
approval,
this
condition
was
there
and
they
came
back
to
the
commission,
basically
similar
to
what.
B
Mr
mr
ninos
indicated
saying:
hey
really:
we
didn't
really
realize
that
this
condition
was
in
there,
as
eva
mentioned,
as
a
standard
condition
that
we
have,
because
we
expect
it
in
new
development,
but
in
these
areas,
like
in
the
old
town,
where
there's
existing
overhead
and
they're
smaller
projects.
In
that
particular
case,
it
was
actually
eight
units
and
still
considered
a
small
project
it.
It
was
really
for
them
as
well
cost
prohibitive
and
so
planning
commission
actually
did
make
a
an
exception
to
them
as
well.
B
But
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
glad
you
brought
up
your
question,
commissioner
stevens
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
look
at
and
and
in
discussions
with
the
city
manager
earlier
today
before
before
this
meeting.
I
think
it
was
yesterday.
Actually
we
we're
thinking
of
your
same
question
and
the
possibility
of
of
working
with
the
city
attorney
to
see
if
there's
a
possibility
for
future
projects.
B
If,
if
they're
going
to
be
smaller
projects
like
this,
where,
where
you
know
it
is
a,
it
is
within
an
area
that
there's
existing
overhead
utilities,
but
it's
going
to
be
cost
prohibitive
and-
and
you
know
basically
not
see
anything
developed
there
or
or
improve
there,
because
we're
going
to
require
them
to
underground
or
you
know,
have
the
possibility
of
having
something
nice
there
meeting
the
general
plan
like
carson
was
saying,
and
actually
you
know,
providing
a
good
project
such
as
this
one.
Maybe
we
can,
you
know,
have
some
type
of
policy.
B
E
I
would
agree
from
like,
if
I'm
still
having
a
little
problem
hearing
abraham,
but
I
would
agree-
and
I
agree
with
commissioner
stevens
too-
I-
if
we
grant
this
and
it's
if
we
grant
this
leniency,
this
variance
on
the
requirement
of
undergoing
utilities.
I
don't
want
this
becoming
a
precedent
for
future
projects.
E
I
would
look
at
what
findings
is
presented
here
tonight
to
so
we're
not
we're
not
granting
something
that
that
is
not
a
good
precedent
for
future
development,
and
I
think
that
what
you're
saying
abraham,
I
think,
yes,
for
smaller
rehabilitation
projects
in
a
context
of
residential
development,
where
the
other
homes
have
overhead
power
is
pretty
ubiquitous
in
that
in
that
area,
and
I
know
that
in
a
different
in
a
different
light.
If,
for
example,
there
is
consideration
given
on
some,
for
example,
some
accessibility
improvements
that
create
hardships.
E
This
is
a
different
topic,
but
that
access
the
accessibility,
sometimes
a
hardship,
can
be
granted
depending
on
the
circumstances
that
that
project
is
undergoing
and
this
we're
looking
at
cost.
But
we're
also
looking
at
a
need
that
the
community
has
a
special
need
for
and
it's
in
a
residential
area
that
is
common
to
have
overhead
power
lines.
E
So
I
think
there
are
findings
that
are
being
presented
tonight,
but
I
think
I
would
also
encourage
us
to
come
up
with
guidelines
for
future
projects
that
are
pretty
clear
on
whether
or
not
the
threshold
is
met
or
not
to
not
or
have
to
require
underground
utilities-
and
I,
as
I
said
before,
is
that
the
general
measure
of
under
having
underground
utilities
is
important.
It's
important,
but
if
this
was
like
an
industrial
building,
of
course,
in
all
new
construction,
that'd
be
a
totally
different
situation
there.
A
A
It
would
be
easy
to
to
say
that
you
know
to
set
a
standard
that
we're
making
an
exception
for
it,
but
in
this
situation
you
know
these
projects
are
unique.
Each
area
is
unique.
This
is
the
older
part
of
of
town
that
still
has
overhead
power
and
the
applicant
is,
you
know
the
improvements
on
the
site,
they're
running
the
utilities
underground.
A
F
I
just
have
a
quick
comment,
so
yeah
to
me.
This
seems
like
this
was
a
an
oversight.
You
know
even
for
the
first
applicant,
because
I'm
sure
the
first
advocate
made
would
have
seen
that
it
would
have
been
a
cost
prohibitive
thing,
but
it
just
kind
of
I
mean
there's
100
conditions
that
are
on
these
things.
So
I
think
for
the
future.
A
B
F
A
B
You,
yes,
thank
you,
chairman
munster,
for
this
opportunity.
We
would
like
to
indicate
that
our
precious
city
engineer
danny
hillstock,
who
you've
seen
here
meeting
after
meeting
since
december,
actually
retired
from
the
city
of
hollister.
He
was
an
employee
for
many
many
years,
provided
a
lot
of
civil
service
and
worked
really
hard.
You
know
in
in
providing
the
best
the
best
engineering
for
for
the
city,
we're
going
to
miss
him
very
much.
B
We
are
happy
for
him.
We
communicate
from
time
to
time
via
via
tax
or
whatnot,
and
he's
indicated
that
he's
he's
doing
very
well,
so
we're
really
happy
for
him
and
wish
him
the
very
best.
So
yeah
just
wanted
to
indicate
that,
as
our
first
comment
second
comment
is
that
city
of
hollister
is
very
fortunate
to
have,
in
my
apologies,
for
not
introducing
them
earlier
in
the
meeting
we
had
it
set
for
our
plan
department
reports,
but
we
have
mr
mark
falgo.
B
B
Strong
program
and
project
management,
professional
with
a
bachelor's
degree
focused
on
civil
engineering
from
csu,
chico
and
so
mark
falgo
is
actually
in
our
zoom
right
now
has
been
really
helpful,
and
so
we
really
really
appreciate
his
his
presence
and
him
being
part
of
our
of
our
community
and
our
city
development
services
team.
So
thank
you
mark
just
wanted
to
indicate
that
welcome.
B
B
You
know
had
various
meetings
already
with
the
public,
even
though
we're
struggling
to
do
to
covet,
but
in
in-person
meetings.
However,
staff
planning
staff
eva,
amber
adelie,
has
have
done
a
really
good
job
in
coordinating
with
place,
works
our
consultant
and
reaching
out
to
the
public
and
setting
up
the
zoom
meetings
and
and
having
all
these
different
meetings
through
through
teleconference
the
new,
the
new
type
of
you
know
in
our
information
system
now
in
our
society,
and
so
that's
going.
That's
going
really
good.
B
We
are
at
the
point
where
we
have
had
two
general
plan
advisory
committee
meetings
already
and
in
our
last
general
plan
advisory
committee
meeting.
We
talked
about
creating
policy
for
our
new
update
of
the
general
plan
and
with
that
we
reviewed
existing
conditions
from
various
documents
that
we
have
from.
B
So
right
now,
we've
had
so
far
two
meetings
with
the
county,
one
was
between
city
development,
services
and
city
and
county's
rma
office.
The
second
meeting
was
with
the
city
and
the
county
and
lafco
because,
as
we
know,
you
know,
sphere
of
influence
and
annex
future
annexations
are
going
to
be
a
real
key
for
the
future
of
hollister
and
we
are
expecting
to
have
at
least
three
more
meetings
between
the
city
and
the
county
and
then
report
back
to
our
general
plan
advisory
committee.
B
To
address
that-
and
you
know
that's
just
a
very
brief
summary
of
all
the
work
that's
been
going
on-
we
generally
meet
in
a
weekly
basis.
Staff
and
the
consultant
place
works
to
go
over
all
the
agenda
items
and
and
all
the
items
for
discussion,
and
so
again
our
next
meeting
is
tentatively
for
march
general
plan
advisory
and
we'll
continue
to
move
on
in
that
update.
E
If
I
might
chime
in
there
too,
abraham
being
a
member
of
the
chief
pac
committee,
the
it's
the
last
last
meeting,
we
had
the
existing
conditions
and
they
were
sent
to
me
electronically,
and
I
looked
at
all
the
pages
that
were
involved
to
print
and
printed
everything
out.
And
so
I
I
thought,
I'd
call
amber
and
eva
to
see
if
they
could
help
me
out.
E
E
It
speaks
volumes
for
how
how
hard
our
staff
works
on
the
general
pen
update
and
makes
it
all
that
more
enjoyable
that
I
don't
have
to
get
involved
in
printing
things
out
and
three
hole,
punching
them
and
putting
little
index
fabs
on
all
the
different
categories
which
they
did
for
me
very
cheerfully
did
a
great
job.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
really
appreciate
that
thanks.
B
J
A
G
Commissioner
missouri,
can
I
just
make
one
quick
comment?
Yes,
please
I
don't
have
a
report,
but
I
did
want
to
thank
planning
staff
for
arranging
for
me
to
participate
in
the
league
of
cities
conference
that
happened
just
after
our
last
planning
commission,
meaning
I
had
not
had
the
opportunity
to
thank
them
for
coordinating
and
getting
me
registered,
getting
it
paid,
making
sure
that
I
was
able
to
connect
because
it
was
a
virtual
one
and
there
was
it
pretty
much.
Everything
went
without
a
good.