►
From YouTube: GPAC Zoom 060420
Description
Hollister General Plan Advisory Committee Meeting - via Zoom
June 4, 2020
A
Good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
please
welcome
you
to
the
first
meeting,
probably
kick
off
or
be
house
for
Jeremiah
field
at
40.
The
important
first
step
of
our
journey
on
updating
some
several
plan
are
your
attendance
and
questions
are
very
important.
Welcome
you
active
member
and
appreciate
your
time.
Didn't
do
that.
C
Thank
You
Bryan
shall
I
go
ahead
from
here,
okay,
great,
and
why
don't
we
then
put
the
slides
on
I've
introduced
myself
a
couple
times,
but
I'll.
Do
it
again
just
to
make
sure
everybody's
heard
at
my
eye
on
David
early
and
I?
Am
the
principal
in
charge
for
the
team
from
place
works
place
works?
Is
the
consultant
who's
been
selected
by
the
city
to
run
the
General,
Plan,
Update
and
I?
Think,
as
all
of
you
know,
this
is
the
first
meeting
of
the
general
plan.
C
Advisory
Committee,
who
will
be
overseeing
on
the
process
for
us
with
me
this
evening,
is
Carrie
stone.
Who
is
our
project
manager
Carrie's
done
a
great
deal
of
the
work
to
get
us
this
far
and
will
be
helping
me
to
oversee
the
project
as
we
move
forward.
There
are
a
number
of
other
members
of
city
staff
here,
as
well
as
the
g-pack
committee
members,
and
so
maybe
city
staff
can
introduce
themselves.
We
already
heard
from
Brian
Abraham
if
you're
there.
Maybe
you
want
to
introduce
yourselves
and
then
amber.
D
C
Maybe
I
don't
know
that
we
I
think
most
folks
probably
know
even
really
so
maybe
we'll
just
move
on
Rose
Redlich
is
also
here
from
city
staff
and
Maria
I
I'm,
not
sure
we've
met.
If
you
want
to
introduce
yourself
and
then
we'll
have
the
three
oh
and
Frederick
Venter
from
our
team
is
here.
Frederick.
Is
our
traffic
engineer
he's
here
this
evening?
Marie?
If
you
want
to
introduce
yourselves
and
then
the
three
committee
members
could
introduce
themselves
as
well.
C
F
G
H
Hugh
boy:
oh,
thank
you
very
much
for
this
opportunity.
My
name
is
David
Hugh
I
am
a
local
architect,
self-employed
architect
in
the
city
of
Hollister
and
I'm.
Also,
a
current
planning,
Commissioner
I
was
on
the
2004
Gpad
committee,
as
a
member
of
the
general
public,
and
when
the
seat
came
up
on
the
Planning
Commission
in
2005
I've
been
on
the
in
commission.
Never
sets
well.
H
C
I
C
C
Thank
You
Danny,
I'm,
sorry,
you
and
I
spoke
earlier
and
I
forgot
to
introduce
you.
Thank
you.
Anyone
else
all
right.
Well,
then,
let's
go
to
the
slide.
Show
the
slides
are
up
already.
If
we
could
have
the
next
slide.
I
want
to
just
give
an
overview
of
the
agenda
and
I
want
to
note
at
this
point
that,
and
we
anticipate
that
the
agenda
for
all
G
PAC
meetings
will
generally
follow
the
same
overall
order.
There
will
be
a
call
to
order.
C
We've
talked
about
we've
had
the
G
pack
introductions
already
I'm
gonna
give
a
little
bit
of
an
overview
of
meeting
procedures.
Then,
as
you
do
in
all
your
city
meetings,
there
will
be
a
time
period
for
public
comment
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
I
believe
there's
no
public
here
this
evening,
even
though
this
is
a
publicly
noticed
meeting
so
I
think
that
will
go
quickly
and
then,
if
there
were
any,
we
would
take
old
business.
C
C
E
C
C
We
do
okay,
but
that's
great
I'm,
sorry
I
guess
I
did
not
realize
this,
but
I
guess
I
can't
see
them
as
on
the
screen.
Oh
I,
so
I've
got
a
different
list
here:
okay,
we
have
13
panelists
and
thirteen
attendees,
oh
nice,
okay,
so
I
am
not
as
adept
with
this
as
I
should
be.
There
are
I
apologize
to
those
of
you
who
are
here.
I
can
now
see
that
there
are
13
attendees
who
are
not
considered
panelists
and
I
apologize
that
I
missed.
C
That
and
Kerry
is
very
wise
to
point
that
out
to
me.
So
thank
you
all
for
being
here
this
evening.
We
will
be
having
public
comment
on
items
not
on
the
agenda
and
then
every
one
of
the
four
new
business
items
will
take
public
comment
as
well
all
right,
any
other
comments
or
questions
before
we
go
on
from
the
agenda.
C
Okay,
let's
take
the
next
slide.
Then
I'm
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
meeting
procedures.
These
meetings
are
being
recorded,
I
believe
many
of
you
who
can
see
the
screen
can
see
in
the
upper
upper
left
hand,
corner
a
little
red
dot
and
the
word
recording
that
does
indicate
that
we
are
recording
this
meeting
over
zoom
as
a
video
and
with
the
audio
obviously
also,
and
the
meeting
will
be
posted
to
the
general
plan
website.
C
Once
it's
once
the
meeting
has
concluded,
all
meetings
will
begin
with
the
roll
call
which
we've
essentially
done
through
the
self
introductions
and
a
brief
overview
of
the
meeting.
There
will
be
public
comment
periods
on
both
items,
not
on
the
agenda
as
well
as
agenda
items.
We
will
be
asking
speakers
to
stick
to
the
standard
on
three
minute
time
limit.
For
each
time
a
person
speaks
and,
of
course
each
speaker
would
speak
only
once
on
at
during
each
period.
C
If,
once
for
items
not
on
the
agenda
and
once
for
each
agenda,
item
comments
can
be
come
online.
The
email,
while
we're
in
the
zoom
phase
of
shelter-in-place,
they
can
be
sent,
as
it
says,
on
the
slide
here
to
plan
meetings
at
Hollister,
CA
gov,
and
that
allows
folks
to
request
a
registration
link
for
the
zoom
meeting.
Once
the
once
you
have
registered
yourself.
C
You
will
also
be
able
to
make
comments
either
through
email
or
at
the
meeting
here
itself
via
the
zoom,
and
you
will
be
recognized
and
then
will
turn
on
your
video,
your
your
audio,
and
if
you
are
there
in
person,
we
ask
that
you
complete
a
blue
speaker
card
and
provide
it
to
staff
at
the
meeting.
If
you
are
going
to
speak
and
you're
not
in
the
space,
we
do
request
that
you
send
an
email
and
identify
yourself
which
is
the
equivalent
of
the
blue
speaker
card.
C
If
new
items
come
up
through
a
public
comment
period
or
some
other
time
during
the
last
item
on
the
agenda
for
next
steps,
CPAC
members
can
ask
that
those
items
be
agendized
for
future
discussion,
but
they
can't
be
discussed
at
the
meeting
itself,
so
I
that
I
believe
gives
an
overview
of
all
the
g-pack
meeting
procedures.
I.
C
Let
me
mention
in
terms
of
if
you,
if
you
are
in
the
public
and
want
to
make
a
comment-
and
someone
should
correct
me
if
I
say
this
incorrectly,
but
I
believe
that
there
are
two
ways
you
can
do
that
I.
If
you
have
it,
you
can
use
the
chat
function
and
send
a
chat
message
or
you
can
raise
your
hand
using
the
hand,
raising
feature
and
amber
eva
or
le.
Are
there
other
ways
that
that
people
who
want
to
speak
and
can
make
themselves
known
and
did
I,
say
those
ways
correctly.
K
C
D
C
The
bottom,
it
should
be
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen.
Okay,
so
hopefully
you
can
all
see
that
if
you
are,
if
you're
unable
to
see
it-
and
you
are
at
a
computer,
I
believe
you
could
send
an
email
to
plan
meetings
at
Hollister,
CA,
gov
and
we'll
try
and
work
that
out
for
you
all
right.
So
I
think
then,
unless
there
are
questions
or
comments,
otherwise
we
can
go
on
next
slide
all
right,
so
we
did
have
a
brief
introduction
from
each
of
the
3G
pack
members.
C
H
Do
have
a
statement
on
my
hopes
for
the
general
plan
that
I
may
please
I'd
like
to
say
is
that
I
guess
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
was
selected
to
the
previous
keep
act.
Committee
was
my
passion
for
solar
design
and
green
building
standards
and
energy
conservation
programs,
which
I
was
able
to
make
some
contributions
in
the
2005
general
plan
and
I
also
had
some
input
in
the
areas
of
workforce
housing
as
well
as
proponent
of
new
urbanism
and
mixed
views
for
the
downtown
area.
H
C
Great,
thank
you
very
much
for
that
statement.
All
right
with
that.
We
can
move
on
to
our
next
slide,
and
this
is
the
time
now
for
public
comment
regarding
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
So
hopefully
you
and
the
public
have
had
a
chance
to
review
the
agenda.
I
went
over
it
a
little
earlier.
If
you
have
a
comment
on
an
item,
that's
not
on
the
agenda.
Now
would
be
the
time
to
give
it
and
so
staff
Eva
amber
or
Ellie.
Do
you
have
a
show
of
hands
if
there
is
a?
C
A
C
There
in
person-
okay,
great
well,
then
let's
go
ahead
and
recognize
Robin
and
I
guess
she'll
be
speaking
and
I
do
want
to
say
it's
still
hard
to
hear
folks
from
the
microphone
lectern.
If
there's
any
way
that
she
could
get
closer
to
the
actual
microphone.
That's
picking
up
the
sound
I
think
that
would
be
a
service
for
those
of
us
who
are
attending
remotely.
D
D
Because
the
last
general
plan,
mr.
Marc
Gill,
which
is
in
the
heart
of
our
city,
was
designated
at
our
three
and
it
was
actually
sitting
properly
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
this
round,
you
don't
have
the
required
getting
the
troops
here
to
acknowledge
that
this
is
public
property
and
not
our
three,
and
also
in
this
general
plan.
It's
very
important
that
we
make
a
plan
for
Park
Hill.
It's
earned
three
times
this
week.
D
C
L
I
have
hi.
This
is
MIA,
Casey
and
I'm
here
today
to
just
comment
just
some
general
on
the
process
itself.
So
you
know
I'm
excited
to
participate
in
our
general
plan
process,
but
I'm
also
deeply
troubled
I
hear
that
we
want
to
have
lots
of
engagement
from
the
public,
but
my
experience
is
so
far
has
made
me
doubt
whether
this
is
true.
L
Talking
in
general
terms
about
a
petition
I'm,
not
talking
about
that
specifically,
we
also
had
asked
for
someone
of
a
different
viewpoint,
rather
than
counsel
number
Resendez
being
appointed.
We
wanted
someone
who
was
similar
to
councilmember
Richmond
to
replace
him
so
that
we'd
have
diversity
of
opinion
and
good
dialogue,
and
we
also
had
asked
for
inclusion
and
discussion
around
an
urban
growth
boundary
for
Hollister
to
be
part
of
the
general
plan
process.
L
You
know
it
makes
far
more
sense
to
integrate
this
into
that
process
and
for
the
community
of
Hollister
to
decide
what
should
happen
with
regard
to
growth
in
our
city,
rather
than
an
initiative
being
shoved
down
our
throats
by
outsiders,
there
was
no
response
or
even
an
acknowledgement
of
any
kind
to
the
petition
or
by
the
public
comments.
Instead,
the
mayor
have
pointed
who
he
wanted
and
had
someone
who
holds
a
similar
view
on
growth
and
has
decided
he's
not
going
to
allow
any
more
delays
and
would
move
ahead.
L
So
here
we
are
without
a
full
G
PAC
committee
and
no
citizen
representation
at
all
now.
I
have
grave
concerns.
Whether
or
not
public
engagement
is
truly
going
to
be
considered
in
this
process
and
I
think
it's
ill-advised
to
move
forward
and
start
electing
chairs
and
co-chairs
without
a
full
representative
committee,
and
at
least
some
citizen
representation.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank.
C
You
miss
Casey
on.
Is
there
anyone
else
who
would
like
to
speak
at
this
time
on
an
item
that
is
not
on
the
agenda?
I
see
John
Casey
has
raised
his
hand
as
we
move
forward.
I
do
want
to
point
out
as
I
believe
it
was
the
mayor
who
said
that
the
question
of
the
g-pack
composition
and
whether
the
g-pack
itself
will
make
a
recommendation
about
the
composition
is
on
the
agenda
for
later
so
I
do
want
to
echo
the
comment
that
those
comments
really
should
be
saved
until
later.
C
I
do
also
agree
that
miss
Casey
just
made
other
comments
that
were
not
specifically
about
that
item,
but
on
those
speakers
who
may
be
coming
for
next.
If
you
have
commentary
on
the
g-pack
composition,
I
would
encourage
you
to
hold
it,
but
and
you'll
be
welcome
to
give
it
later,
but
you're
very
welcome
to
speak
right
now.
On
any
other
item,
that's
not
on
the
agenda.
Mr.
Casey
I
see
your
hand
has
gone
down
again.
Are
you
still
wanting
to
speak?
C
C
All
right,
then
I
think
we
can
go
on
and
we're
ready
for
the
next
slide,
and
this
slide
begins.
My
presentation
about
the
general
plan
process
overall
and
I'll
be
going
through
about
10
to
15
slides
here,
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
the
funds,
the
flow
of
things
and
I'm
given
overview
of
the
entire
process.
This
is
not
an
action
item
for
the
g-pack,
but
we
will
once
we're
done
with
this.
C
Follow
the
same
standard
protocol,
which
is
first
take
any
clarifying
questions
from
GK
PAC
members
then
open
it
up
for
public
comment
and
then
go
back
to
any
final
comment
from
the
g-pack.
If
there
were
the
need
for
an
action,
the
end
of
that
discussion
would
be
an
actual
vote,
and
that
won't
happen
on
this
item,
but
it
will
happen
on
the
other
items
this
evening.
So
what
is
the
general
plan?
Many
of
you
know
this
already.
C
The
general
plan
in
every
jurisdiction
in
the
state
of
California
is
a
blueprint
for
growth
and
development,
as
it
says
here,
and
also
for
conservation
for
an
entire
city
or
even
County.
So
every
city
and
town
in
the
state
has
a
general
plan.
Every
county
has
a
general
plan
that
affects
the
unincorporated
areas,
so,
for
instance,
San
Benito
County
has
a
general
plan
for
the
unincorporated
portions
of
San
Benito
County
Hollister's
general
plan
governs
development
within
Hollister
and
again
it
is
the
blueprint
for
growth
and
development
and
conservation
within
the
city.
C
It
establishes
a
community
vision
and
supporting
goals,
policies
and
actions.
It
provides
consistent
direction
for
future
development,
it
balances
growth,
conservation
and
quality
of
life,
and
it
also
is
a
place
where
we
document
baseline
environmental
ditions,
so
that,
as
development
occurs,
were
able
to
both
prepare
environmental
impact
documents
and
also
just
understand
and
track
changes
to
the
environment
that
occur
as
development
occurs.
C
Next
slide
should
the
general
plan
under
the
law
is
required
to
contain
a
total
of
roughly
I,
say,
roughly
seven
elements,
because
the
law
changes
on
this,
and
there
are
some
elements
that
are
a
little
bit
optional,
but
the
the
state
law
talks
about
elements
which
I
like
to
say.
It's
a
fancy
word
for
chapter
the
the
reason
they're
called
elements
and
not
chapters-
is
that
the
law
actually
specifically
says
that
these
elements
can
be
combined
in
any
number
of
chapters.
However,
one
would
like
to
do
it
in
the
case
of
the
hollister
general
plan.
C
C
Considered
as
we
move
forward
through
the
process-
and
it's
important
to
note
here
that
the
general
plan
was
last
updated
in
2005,
Commissioner
Hugh
boy,
as
he
mentioned,
was
on
the
general
plan.
Advisory
Committee
at
that
time
and
I
want
to
say,
I
think
it's
actually
an
excellent
general
plan
that
you
have.
It
is
15
years
old.
Now
it
does
need
to
be
updated
to
accommodate
both
state
law
and
other
changes
that
have
occurred
on
the
ground
in
Hollister.
C
C
All
of
our
meetings
of
the
g-pack
will
be
open
to
the
public
and
I'm
glad,
despite
my
faux
pas
earlier
I'm
glad
to
see
that,
despite
this
being
a
virtual
meeting
that
we
have
some
pretty
robust
engagement
here
this
evening,
we
certainly
hope
that
can
become
even
greater
as
we
move
forward
into
in-person
meetings.
At
some
point,
we
will
also
be
running
virtual
and
later
in-person
community
events
to
engage
the
community
further.
We
will
also
and
I'll
talk
about
this
later.
C
We
will
have
a
robust
community
on
website
and
it
will
have
online
engagement
activities
to
engage
the
community
as
well,
so
engaging
a
broad
spectrum
of
the
community
is
the
first
goal
beyond
that.
It's
establishing
the
community's
vision
for
Hollister
in
2040,
and
it's
interesting
that
the
general
plan
it's
a
great
document.
C
One
of
the
things
that's
actually
missing
is
a
succinct
statement
of
what
the
community's
vision
for
itself
is
and
so
we'll
be
working
with
you,
based
on
the
pre
current
general
plan
and
also
based
on
input
in
that
community
engagement,
to
develop
a
short
and
concise
vision.
Statement
for
what
Hollister
wants
to
be
in
2040.
C
Other
goals
are
to
continue
to
maintain
the
town's
a
small-town
agricultural
character,
which
I
think
most
residents
really
love
and
cherish
I'm
to
manage
growth
consistent
with
the
community's
overall
goals,
to
ensure
high
quality
development
of
all
types
to
support
economic
development
and
to
respond
to
state
mandates
and
general
plan
guidelines
that
have
put
input
in
place
since
2005
and
are
therefore
not
reflected
in
the
current
general
plan.
So
those
are
the
overall
goals
on
for
the
project.
C
If
a
community
input
will
be
creating
a
new
general
plan,
but
we'll
also
be
doing
five
other
things
that
are
listed
on
this
slide
and
we're
working
to
implement
SB
743
that
Senate
bill
743,
which
is
a
state
law.
That's
actually
almost
10
years
old
now,
but
it's
just
being
implemented
this
year,
which
requires
some
cities
and
counties
to
move
away
from
analysis
of
traffic
impacts,
using
what
are
called
delay
based
mechanisms
such
as
level
of
service,
which
some
of
you
may
have
heard
of
that
look
at
congestion
and
instead
to
an
analyze
vehicle
miles.
C
Traveled
we'll
be
able
to
talk
more
about
that
as
a
future
meeting,
but
implementing
SB
743
and
doing
this
transition
from
level
of
service
or
congestion
based
analysis
to
vehicle
miles.
Traveled
is
one
of
the
very
important
components
of
this
project.
We're
also
going
to
be
developing
a
climate
action
plan,
as
well
as
a
hazard
mitigation
plan,
both
of
which
are
planning
documents
that
cover
obviously
climate
change
and
hazards,
and
both
of
which
go
into
a
greater
level
of
detail
than
we
can
do
in
the
general
plan,
but
which
are
important.
C
That's
required
under
state
law
and
by
what's
at
the
county
level,
called
the
local
agency
formation,
Commission
and
updating
that
municipal
service
review
document
is
another
important
part
of
our
scope
of
work
next
slide.
And
we
will.
As
we
look
at
all
of
those
issues,
we
will
be
considering
what
we
call
a
planning
area,
which
you
see
noted
on
this
slide.
It's
the
slightest
noises
a
little
hard
to
read,
but
hopefully
you
will
be
able
to
to
make
sense
of
it
and
perhaps
I'm
amber
I
believe
you've
got
control
of
the
pewter.
C
It
may
never
be
annexed,
it
may
never
be
developed,
it
will
probably
are
some
it
much
of
it
will
likely
stay
under
county
jurisdiction,
but
it's
it's
adjacency
to
the
city
makes
it
very
important
as
well
so
that
purple
line
that
you
see
is
the
outermost
purple
dashed
line.
That
is
the
area
that
we
plan
to
study
as
the
planning
area
for
this
general
plan.
C
That's
the
area
that
we'll
be
considering
from
a
planning
perspective,
we'll
be
seeking
to
understand
existing
conditions
in
that
entire
area
and
we'll
be
seeking
to
understand
how
development
that
occurs
in
that
area,
even
if
it's
under
county
auspices,
how
that
development
might
affect
things
inside
of
the
city
of
hollister.
So
it's
a
relatively
large
area,
as
I
said
already,
it's
larger
than
the
servant
urban
service
area
or
the
sphere
of
influence,
but
it
does
completely
include
both
the
sphere
of
influence,
as
well
as
the
urban
service
area.
C
Next
slide,
I
wanted
just
to
mention
some
other
key
issues
that
we'll
be
looking
at.
I've
already
alluded
to
most
of
these,
but
I
think
they're
important
to
understand
and
we
will
be
considering
growth
management
and
how
growth
should
be
managed
within
the
context
of
the
city
as
a
whole
and
both
within
inside
the
city
and
also
in
coordination
with
the
county,
because
I
think
we
all
know
that
a
large
amount
of
development
occurs
on
unincorporated
County
lands
immediately
adjacent
to
the
city
limits,
so
we'll
be
looking
at
all
those
issues.
C
We
will
be
looking
at
circulation
and
transportation
for
cars,
but
also
for
pedestrians,
for
bicycles
and
for
transit.
We
will
be
looking
at
economic
development
and
particularly
the
creation
of
high
quality
jobs,
and
we
will
be
looking
at
community
identity
and
high
quality
design.
Of
course,
there
are
many
other
subjects:
safety,
health,
noise,
greenhouse
gases
and
so
forth.
Those
are
all
things
that
will
be
covered,
but
these
four
issues
are
four
of
what
we've
at
least
so
far
identified
as
four
of
the
most
important
issues
for
this
planning
process.
C
Next
slide
and
I
already
mentioned
that
we
have
a
very
robust
opportunities
planned
for
public
involvement,
and
you
see
this
list
here.
That
includes,
as
at
least
six
workshops
and
community
events
over
the
course
of
this
process
online
activities
on
the
project
website,
a
total
of
10
G
PAC
meetings,
of
which
this
is
the
first
updates
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
City
Council
at
key
junctures
and
then,
of
course,
action
on
the
general
plan
and
at
Cir
by
both
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
City
Council
at
the
conclusion
of
this
process.
C
Dudek
ovid
19,
of
course,
on
future
outreaches
for
the
foreseeable
future,
going
to
rely
on
virtual
technology
as
we're
using
at
this
meeting,
and
the
online
activities
of
course,
will
continue
to
be
conducted
as
online
activities
and
what
we're
going
to
be
in
person.
Workshops
and
events
will
be
done
online
as
well.
So,
for
example,
and
I'll
talk
about
this
again
in
a
few
minutes.
But
we
did
originally
plan
to
have
a
visioning
workshop
that
would
have
been
held
in
person.
G
C
C
C
We
do
want
to
underscore
the
fact
that
we're
very
committed
to
outreach
to
diverse
groups.
Some
of
you
heard
me
say
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting
that
we
are
hoping
and
we
are
planning
to
conduct
simultaneous
interpretation
of
all
of
these
meetings
online
in
Spanish.
That's
turned
out
to
be
a
little
more
complicated
to
do
with
the
zoom
technology
than
we
hoped,
and
so
we're
not
able
to
offer
it
this
evening,
but
we
do
believe
that
it
will
be
ready
for
future
meetings.
C
In
addition,
as
the
third
bullet
on
this
slide
mentions
that
we'll
be
translating
our
outreach
materials
into
Spanish,
the
website
is
being
translated
into
Spanish.
We're
also
going
to
be
working
with
community
leaders
to
make
sure
that
they
help
us
to
reach
out
to
all
the
diverse
portions
of
the
hollister
community.
C
So
I
do
want
to
mention
the
project
website.
It
is
up
and
running
and,
as
you
can
see
here,
it's
available
at
WWE,
star,
24,
T
RG,
and
if
you
go
there
today,
you
will
find
what's
called
a
splash
page
or
a
landing
page.
That
looks
like
the
one
you
see
on
this
screen.
As
you
can
see,
it
has
a
couple
of
most
prominent
boxes,
the
one
on
the
far
right
talking
about
this
evenings
meeting
box
to
that
she
can
click
on
to
find
out
other
ways
to
get
involved.
C
The
left-hand
blue
box,
giving
an
overview
of
the
general
plan
itself,
the
yellow
bar
at
the
top,
as
a
link
directly
to
the
online
activities
which
we're
getting
online
already
and
then,
as
you
can
see
there
are.
There,
are
sub
menus
to
get
background
about
the
general
plan
and
the
general
plan
process
for
public
engagement
for
a
calendar
of
events
for
existing
and
past
documents
that
you
might
want
it
that
one
might
want
to
look
at
and
a
way
to
contact
us
as
well
as
to
sign
up
for
the
general
plan
mailing
list.
C
You
can
rank
key
issues
that
need
to
be
addressed
in
the
general
plan
and
you
can
upload
both
photos
and
words
that
you
think
are
important
to
describe
Hollister,
either
photographically
or
through
a
single
word,
and
we're
going
to
be
making
a
word
cloud
showing
which
words
get
the
most
prominence
and
we're
also
going
to
be
letting
people
see
those
photos
and
the
comments
on
them
to
understand
what
others
think
are
really
important.
Visual
items
about
the
city
of
Hollister,
so
these
are
all
up
and
running
already.
C
There
will
be
additional
online
activities
in
future,
but
again
I'd
encourage
those
of
you
who
are
here
this
evening
to
go
online
and
do
tell
your
friends
and
family
as
well.
We
really
hope
for
very
robust
participation
again.
This
is
all
available
in
English
and
Spanish,
so
it's
very
accessible
for
speakers
of
both
primary
languages
in
Hollister
and
we're
very
excited
to
have
all
of
you
fill
out.
These
engage
in
these
four
online
activities
right
away
as
soon
as
possible.
C
C
The
baseline
conditions
work
in
October
and
once
we
get
there,
then
starting
it
says
here:
August,
but
really
starting
from
October
to
December
or
January
will
be
doing
policy
assessments
and
design
alternatives
of
a
series
of
important
alternative
issues
that
need
to
be
covered
under
the
general
plan.
I'm
starting
about
the
first
of
the
year
will
be
preparing
the
general
plan
itself,
as
well
as
some
of
those
other
work
products
and
those
will
all
become
available
over
time.
C
I'm
culminating
in
the
fall
of
2021,
so
just
over
a
year
from
now,
the
environmental
impact
report
will
be
available
about
the
same
time
and
then,
even
though
I've
been
doing
this
for
25
years,
it
always
amazes
me
to
say
that
the
public
review
and
adoption
once
we're
done
we'll
still
take
about
another
six
months.
Once
we
have
the
documents
published,
it
takes
quite
a
long
time
for
them
to
get
through
public
review,
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
City
Council,
so
that
will
happen
from
fall
of
2021
into
the
first
few
months
of
2022.
C
There
are
two
main
functions
and
both
of
which
are
of
equal
importance,
and
the
first
is
to
make
review
and
make
recommendations
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
City
Council
as
a
whole
on
the
work
products
that
will
form
the
content
of
the
Plan
Update
and
I
want
to
underscore
that
this
is
intended
to
be
a
review
and
recommendation
function.
It's
not
necessarily
line
item
editing
the
general
plan,
as
I
think
all
of
you
know,
is
a
document
of
probably
several
hundred
pages.
C
The
word
about
the
general
plan
update,
encourage
broad
participation
and
build
community
support
for
this
process,
so
that
process
of
going
out
to
the
community
and
listening
to
the
community,
as
well
as
reviewing
the
documents
that
we
do
are
both
equally
important
in
this
process.
Next
slide.
The
g-pack
meeting
we
are
is
planning
10
meetings
total.
C
They
obviously
won't
be
every
month
over
these
two
years,
but
they
they
will
be
probably
at
most
about
once
a
month
and
in
some
cases
there
will
be
a
two
or
perhaps
even
three
months,
gap
in
between
and
we're
planning
generally
on,
two
hours
per
meeting
and
I
believe
that
at
least
now,
during
shelter-in-place
or
minimal
City
Council
activities,
minimal,
City
activities
in
person
will
be
doing
them
online
and
probably
at
about
6
p.m.
we.
C
We
believe
that
this
is
a
pretty
good
time
for
people
to
be
at
their
computers
and
and
not
need
to
go
too
late
into
the
evening
and
we're
always
going
to
try
to
make
the
meetings
of
a
meeting
materials
available
online.
The
Friday
before
each
meeting
next
line
and
I
did
want
to
just
go
further
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
interface
between
the
g-pack
and
the
public.
C
We
are
looking
to
do
a
very
coordinated
approach
to
gathering
of
public
comment,
and
so
what
that
means
for
g-pack
members
is
to
be
able
to
listen
to
input.
If
you're
asked
factual
questions
about,
what's
happening
on
the
general
plan
to
go
ahead
and
answer
those
as
we'll
talk
under
the
Brown
Act
discussion
that
we'll
have
in
a
few
minutes
and
I
think
all
of
you
as
G
pack,
members
notice,
you
are
actually
prohibited
from
doing
anything
resembling
this
making
outside
of
a
cheap
pack
meeting.
C
You
can't
even
discuss
among
yourselves
those
items
outside
of
a
g-pack
meeting,
so
decision-making
is
limited
to
the
g-pack
meeting
itself.
But
you
are,
of
course,
really
encouraged
to
listen
to
public
input
and
answer
factual
questions
as
they
come
up.
We
are
going
to
include
on
our
agendas
I'm
moving
forward
time
to
report
any
significant
interactions
that
you
may
have
from
one
meeting
to
the
next.
C
We're
certainly
we're
expecting
that
you'll
have
lots
of
interactions
about
the
general
plan,
we're
not
going
to
ask
you
to
report
on
all
of
those
and
we're
going
to
leave
it
up
to
you
to
determine
which
ones
you
think
are
significant,
but
if
you
do
have,
for
instance,
an
interaction
with
a
significant
citizen
based
organization
or
a
significant
developer
in
town
or
someone
else.
Who
really
has
an
important
message
for
you.
C
We
would
encourage
you
to
disclose
that
during
the
GP
meetings
at
that
point
on
the
agenda,
and
we
are
also
asking
you
to
defer
formal
opinion
gathering
things
like
surveys
to
the
staff
and
consultant
team,
obviously
with
Facebook
and
other
technologies
available.
It's
super
easy
these
days
to
just
create
a
survey.
If
you
would
like
us
to
do
surveys
like
that,
we
can
do
them.
C
We
can
talk
about
doing
them
at
the
staff
and
consultant
team
level,
and
but
we
would
like
that
kind
of
opinion
gathering
to
occur
from
staff
and
consultants
rather
than
from
one
individual,
g-pack
member
or
another
individual
g-pack
member.
So
that
gives
you
some
information
about
what
we
foresee
as
your
role
as
chief
pack
members
for
the
public
interface
on
this
project.
I
do
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
Brown
Act
requirements.
C
That
I
think
many
of
you
are
aware
of,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
the
public
is
aware
of
these
as
well.
The
Brown
Act
was
put
in
place
by
the
state
of
California
many
years
ago.
It
was
last
updated
in
2003,
but
it's
been
on
the
books
much
longer
than
that,
and
it's
intended
to
ensure
equitable
public
participation
in
government
decision-making,
and
there
are
a
number
of
issues
here
that
come
up
for
this
committee,
which
is
subject
to
the
Brown
Act.
C
So
the
first
is
that
every
meeting
needs
to
be
publicly
noticed
and
its
agenda
must
be
posted.
The
committee
is
precluded,
as
I
mentioned,
that
the
outset
from
talking
about
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda
other
than
to
ask
that
they
be
agendized
for
future
discussion.
So
that
is
state
law
on
this
item
and
does
apply
to
the
G
pack
as
well
as
other
city
bodies.
C
I'm,
all
meetings
of
the
G
pack
by
definition
are
open
to
the
public
and
that's
why
we're
doing
this
robust
work
on
zoom'
and,
of
course,
when
we
can
we'll
be
going
back
to
public
and
in-person
meetings,
there
are
bylaw.
There
need
to
be
opportunities
for
public
comments
at
every
meeting,
both
an
opportunity
to
discuss
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda
as
well
as
items
as
well
as
some
public
discussion
on
every
item.
C
C
So
in
that
concludes
my
slideshow
on
the
general
plan.
This
will
be
I
believe
our
longest
item
this
evening.
Also,
certainly
it's
my
longest
presentation
by
far
I
want
to
open
it
up.
Now
and
we're
gonna
do
this
on
all
the
items
there
will
be
three
parts
of
the
discussion
now.
The
first
is
that
I
want
to
open
it
up
for
any
G
pack
members,
the
three
of
you
for
clarifying
questions.
C
Only
then
we
will
go
to
public
comment
if
there
are
public
members
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item
and
then
we'll
come
back
for
a
g-pack
discussion.
If
there's
any
additional
discussion
on
your
part,
there's
no
action
on
this
item,
but
on
the
remaining
items
this
evening
at
the
end
of
that
discussion
and
you'll
be
able
to
move
an
action.
If
you
want
to
do
that,
so
can
I
ask
if
there
are
questions
from
any
of
the
three
G
PAC
members
I.
F
You
brought
up
a
very
good
point
about
disclosing
any
connections
with
developers
or
other
interests.
I
just
wanna
make
sure.
Are
people
supposed
to
be
disclosing
that
if,
for
instance,
somebody
is
working
with
a
developer
or
special
interest
group
to
help
shape
this?
Does
that?
Is
that
a
requirement
to
make
sure
that
people
are
disclosing
that
ahead
of
time?
So
we
don't
have
an
issue
later
of
these
things
coming
forward
and
basically
arguments
about
it.
I
mean
it.
F
Obviously
people
can
have
the
conversations,
but
are
we
going
to
be
making
that
requirement
to
make
sure
if
there's
any
connection
or
involvement
with
the
developers,
whether
it's
in
the
city
or
out
of
it
that
would
help
shape
this?
Can
we
make
that
a
requirement
to
make
sure
that
is
disclosed?
Yes,.
C
I
I
would
absolutely
think
that's
a
good
idea.
The
way
I
couched
it
earlier,
which
is
a
little
different,
is
that
if
one
has
a
significant
discussion
with
a
developer,
I
see
be
a
citizen
based
organization
or
any
other
group
that
that
should
be
disclosed
as
an
individual
item,
an
individual
discussion.
But
it
would
be
my
hope
that
none
of
the
general
plan
advisory
committee
members
are
specifically
aligned
with
a
certain
developer,
CBO
or
other
interest
group.
C
But
if
any
of
you
three
are
or
if
there
are
two
additional
members
in
the
future
and
either
of
them
is
certainly
we
would
want
them
to
disclose
in
general,
that
they're
aligned
with
those
groups
again.
My
understanding
is
that
all
five,
three
and
ultimately,
five
g-pack
members
are
being
appointed
to
represent
the
city.
Their
interests
of
the
entire
city,
so
I
would
I
would
hope
that
there
is
no
g-pack
member
who
is
specifically
aligned
with
a
specific
developer
or
point-of-view.
But
if
there
is
I
do
think
that
should
be
disclosed
correct.
C
I
think
that
that
would
honestly
be
up
to
the
individual
speaker
under
state
law.
All
speakers
have
the
right
to
come
forward
and
to
give
testimony
simply
by
giving
their
name,
we
ask
that
people
identify
the
organization
they're
from
and
also
where
they
live
as
possible
by
their
street
address,
or
at
least
the
town
that
they
live
in,
which
might
be
Hollister
and
might
be
elsewhere.
But
my
understanding
of
the
law
is
that
we
cannot
require
that
disclosure,
even
though
I
think
it
is
good
good
form
and
common
courtesy
to
do
so.
Thank
you.
F
C
G
Is
okay,
so
I
think
I
have
my
answer,
but
we
only
have
three
G
pack
members
and
you
said
one
to
two-
constitutes
a
majority
right.
What,
if
we're
meeting
at
the
city,
council
chambers,
let's
say
or
the
Planning
Commission,
let's
say,
is
that
going
to
be
a
violation
of
the
Brown
Act
and
I
would
imagine
that
it's
not
because
it's
being
formed
as
a
public
meeting
but
I
just
wanted
to
get
clarification.
I
have
to
recuse
myself.
If
we
have
any
G
pack
discussions
at
City
Council
meetings
and
such.
C
M
C
Council
members
end
as
I
apologize,
I,
maybe
imagined
this,
but
I
thought
I
did
see
his
name
he's
apparently
not
here
now
so
I'll.
Take
my
best
shot
at
answering.
That
and
staff
could
maybe
check
with
him
to
confirm,
but
it
is
my
understanding
that,
as
long
as
you're
at
a
public
meeting
that
is
duly
notice
to
discuss
the
general
plan
itself
that
the
two
of
you
being
there
does
not
constitute
any
violation
of
the
Brown
Act.
C
Even
if
you're
only
a
committee
of
three
at
that
time
that
that
is
it
is,
it
will
be
an
agendized
item.
It
will
be
appropriate
for
you
to
talk
about
it.
Of
course,
it
wouldn't
be
appropriate
for
the
council
to
discuss
the
general
plan
if
it's
not
an
agenda
item
regardless.
So
that's
not
really
not
an
issue
either.
C
D
C
C
Justice,
yes,
environmental
justice
refers
to
the
overall
concept
that
there
are,
unfortunately,
communities
in
our
societies
that
have
borne
a
disproportionate
brunt
of
environmental
degradation
and
those
tend
to
be
lower
income
communities
and
communities
of
color
they're,
not
always
that,
but
they
often
are,
and
they
are
communities
that
are
often
subjected
to
large
amounts
of
traffic
pollution,
less
access
to
food,
more
congestion
in
their
communities,
lower
levels
of
education
and
all
sorts
of
issues
like
that.
The
state
passed.
C
The
law
and
I'm,
probably
gonna,
mess
up
the
date,
but
I
believe
it
was
2018
which
required
every
city
when
it
goes
to
update
its
general
plan
to
assess
whether
communities
that
meet
certain
criteria
under
state
law
in
terms
of
socio
economics
and
race
exist
within
the
community.
And
if
they
do,
then
it's
a
requirement
to
prepare.
What's
called
an
environmental
justice
element
to
address
those
items
that
that
do
have
to
do
with
with
equitable
treatment
in
terms
of
planning
and
environmental
issues.
C
So
we
will
be
doing
that
for
this
effort
and
even
and
I
believe
we
will
probably
find
what
are
called
EJ
community's
environmental
justice
communities
that
require
treatment
under
the
law.
Even
if
we
don't
find
any,
the
city
can
still
elect
to
develop
policies
to
address
environmental
justice
issues
within
the
context
of
the
city
as
a
whole.
M
M
D
C
You
and
I
do
want
to
note
for
everyone
we
are
taking
note
this
evening.
Kerry
in
particular,
is
taking
extensive
notes
and
we
have
the
reporting
as
well,
and
we
will
be
following
up
to
consider
all
these
items
after
the
meeting.
Is
there
anyone
else
in
the
council
chambers
to
submit
a
card
to
speak.
A
C
Right
all
right,
then
I'll
recognize
people
from
the
online
audience
right
now.
Roxanne,
Stevens
and
John
Casey
have
both
raised
their
hands
or
I'll
call
on
Roxanne,
first
and
I
do
want
to
point
out
again
for
members
of
the
public
that
there
are
additional
agendized
items,
one
of
which
does
include
the
g-pack
composition.
So
if
that's
an
item
you
want
to
speak
on,
you
can
do
that
later.
But
right
now
any
comments
on
my
presentation
or
any
of
the
points
I
brought
up
are
very
welcome.
Roxanne,
okay,.
C
J
Actually,
let
me
let
me
just
step
back
a
little
bit.
Cuz
I
didn't
fully
introduce
myself,
so
I
am
Rossi
I'm
a
resident
of
Hollister
and
I'm,
also
on
the
Planning
Commission
with
mr.
who
boy
I'm
excited
to
hear
that
we're
gonna
be
doing
visioning
work
as
well
as
talking
about
city
identity,
because
I
think
that's
really
missing
the
one
thing
that
I
would
that
I
hope
to
see
improved
in
this
current
general
planning.
J
Also.
I
also
hope
that
we
have
a
version
of
the
plan
that
is
more
succinct
because
I
think
that
can
be
a
really
daunting
document,
especially
for
the
general
public
to
review.
And
it
would
be
good
if
we
had
one
that
had
all
the
information
needed
so
that
people
can
go
back
and
refer
to
the
bigger
document,
but
also
have
another
document
that
that
is
more
succinct,
so
that
people
can
look
at
the
main
points
without
getting
bogged
down
in
all
the
detail
and
something
that
would
be
really
easy
for
the
public
to
follow.
J
And
then
my
last
comment.
There's
a
round
process
and
I'm
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
there
will
be
a
way
for
Spanish
the
spanish-speaking
community
to
be
involved
and
really
sorry
that
that
didn't
happen
for
tonight's
meeting.
But
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
that
will
be
happening
in
future
meetings.
I
think
that
often
times
that
community
for
a
lot
of
reasons,
are
left
out
and
their
voices
are
not
heard
so
I'm,
hoping
that
every
effort
is
made
to
make
sure
that
we
make
it
as
easy
as
possible.
J
For
that
part
of
our
community
to
be
involved.
And
also
just
the
general
public
I
hope
that
every
there's
every
effort
to
make
sure
that
the
general
public
can
be
involved,
because,
ultimately,
the
general
plan
needs
to
be
a
document.
That's
reflected
of
the
community
or
reflective
of
the
community,
not
the
g-pack
advisory
committee
or
our
City
Council,
or
the
planning
commission
for
that
matter.
But
it
really
needs
to
reflect
our
community.
J
C
All
right,
thank
you
and
I
am.
I
do
have
my
timer
on
and
I
didn't
necessarily
want
to
stop
our
first
person
who'd
gone
over,
but
I
will
start
enforcing
a
three-minute
limit
now
I'm.
The
next
person
is
John.
Casey
I
want
to
recognize.
Can
we
put
his
microphone
on
mr.
Casey?
You
can
unmute
yourself
and
begin
speaking.
K
Didn't
make
changes
to
be
able
to
make
changes
to
as
we
move
forward,
because,
again,
our
current
point
out
is,
you
know,
started
in
2005.
It
really
hasn't
run
out,
but
we're
looking
at
it
because
of
changes
that
are
impacting
us
from
legal
perspective
and
from
environment.
But
what
we
look
at
today
doesn't
the
same
as
when
this
plan
was
started
when
the
first
old
plan
was
started,
so
I'm
just
curious
how
that
works.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
You
let
me
I
will
go
ahead
and
answer
that
quickly,
since
it
was
a
very
direct
question.
I'm,
the
general
plan
is
very
much
a
living
document.
It
is
a
doc.
The
city
actually
is
required
by
law
to
follow
it
and
cannot
approve
development
projects
that
are
inconsistent
with
it.
If
a
development
project
comes
forward,
that
is
inconsistent
with
the
general
plan.
The
only
way
to
approve
it
is
to
first
an
amend
the
general
plan
to
allow
that
project.
C
C
That
actually
happens
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
county,
not
the
city,
and
so
in
some
cases
the
city's
general
plan
may
not
foresee
a
particular
project,
but
it's
consistent
with
the
county
general
plan
and
if
they
can
therefore
move
forward,
but
no
project,
that's
in
this
inside
the
city
limit
of
the
city
of
Hollister
can
move
forward
unless
it
is
consistently
the
general
plan,
either
through
the
existing
document
or
through
an
amendment.
I
hope
that
answers
the
question
and
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
our
next
speaker,
who
is
Cristina
Chavez
Wyatt.
N
Good
evening,
everyone
thank
you
David
and
team,
and
members
of
the
committee
and
staff
for
convening
this
evening.
My
name
is
Cristina
Chavez
Wyatt
I
am
a
resident
Hollister
on
Sunnyslope
Road
I
do
have
a
request
on
behalf
of
the
work
I
do
as
I
serve
as
a
consultant
executive
director
of
the
San
Benito
County
Business
Council
I'm,
just
hoping
to
bring
as
a
point
of
information
in
future
meetings.
N
The
recent
letter
that
the
city
had
received
from
the
housing
community
development
department
at
state
of
California
in
regard
to
the
city's
growth
management,
ordinance
I,
just
think.
It's
a
really
important
point
of
information
for
the
committee
and
for
the
public
to
consider.
I
also
want
to
thank
you,
I'd
also
I'm,
working
with
Matt
Farris,
with
BAE
or
consultant
to
convene
a
discussion
with
the
Business
Council
Executive
Committee
I
also
do
work
with
California
manufacturing
technology.
Consulting
is
a
manufacturing
extension
partner
with
the
Department
of
Commerce.
N
We
also
work
with
the
state
of
California
small
business.
Technical
assistance
and
expansion
program
with
the
governor's
office
of
business
and
economic
development.
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
work
with
their
staff.
To
convene
a
focus
group
for
manufacturing
businesses
in
support
of
the
development
of
your
economic
development
element.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
C
K
K
My
name
is
Kevin
Henderson,
president
of
Hollister,
I
am
also
a
member
of
19
condition.
I
got
a
question
so
there.
Actually,
there
will
be
two
members
of
a
friend
condition
on
the
G
panic.
Actually,
okay,
this
question
is
off,
but
not
what
I'm
trying
to
ask
is
about
the
brown
act.
It
can.
A
third
member
of
my
condition
attend
the
meetings.
C
Okay,
I
I
will
repeat
what
I
think
was
the
question
for
everyone.
My
understanding
of
the
question
is
that-
and
this
would
apply
to
council
members
now
and
later
to
the
Planning
Commission,
that
if
there
are
two
council
members
or
planning
commissioners
on
the
on
the
g-pack,
is
it
permissible
for
a
third
or
fourth
a
member
from
those
bodies
to
to
attend
the
meeting
and
participate
as
a
member
of
the
public
and
again,
the
city
attorney
is
not
here
and
I'm
a
little
worried
to
give
legal
advice.
C
But
it
is
my
understanding
that,
yes,
as
long
as
you
identify
yourself
and
as
long
as
you
do
not
engage
in
the
decision-making,
but
you
only
ask
questions
or
even
give
commentary
or
input
and
testimony
it
is
permissible
for
you
to
attend
and
to
participate.
Obviously
just
not
as
a
decision
maker
on
the
issue.
C
C
E
E
We
at
the
Land
Trust
of
San
Benito
see
agricultural
lands
is
about
Oh,
Sam,
Benitez
economy
and
one
of
the
primary
sources
of
jobs
in
revenue.
In
our
County.
We
recognize
that
many
halls
to
residents
along
a
broad
range
of
income
levels
are
employed
directly
in
local
agriculture,
while
many
others
are
also
employed
in
other
related
businesses
and
industries.
We
also
see
agriculture
as
an
integral
part
of
our
local
heritage,
our
quality
of
life
and
the
open
landscapes
you
cherish.
E
We,
the
Land
Trust,
is
not
an
advocacy
organization.
We
don't
take
positions
on
growth,
but
we
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity
to
introduce
ourselves
to
the
g-pack
this
evening,
as
well
as
to
members
of
the
public
to
let
everyone
know
that
we
are
the
only
local
land
trust
based
in
San
Marino
County,
and
we
have
the
ability
to
help
protect
agricultural
land
by
working
in
partnership
with
landowners.
E
So
farmers
and
ranchers,
as
well
as
with
cities
and
counties
with
Realtors
developers
and
the
community,
and
we
work
to
protect
the
most
valuable
agricultural
land
through
a
tool
called
conservation.
Easements,
don't
have
time
to
go
into
that
tonight,
but
I
just
wanted
to
encourage
those
of
you
who
are
not
familiar
with
how
conservation
easements
work
and
what
they
are.
E
The
last
thing
I
wanted
to
say
is
that
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
that
one
of
the
goals
of
the
general
plan
of
fate
that
was
on
one
of
your
slides
earlier
was
to
maintain
the
small-town
agricultural
character
of
Hollister
I.
Believe
that
also
aligns
very
much
with
the
mission
of
the
Land
Trust.
However,
we
would
say
the
best
way
to
accomplish
that
goal
as
to
keep
our
agricultural
lands
and
economy
thriving.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
Can
you
hear
to
me
yes,
okay,
hey
I,
just
really
want
to
just
go
on
record
on
a
couple
of
small
things,
one
glad
to
see
some.
You
know
some
of
the
other
speakers
here
tonight
and
and
the
community
getting
involved
just
want
to
go
on
record.
I,
still
think
that
it's
critical,
that
we
get
more
community
involvement
with
this
process,
as
well
as
more
community
representation
on
the
g-pack
board
in
order
for
this
process
to
really
yield
the
best
result
for
the
best
good
of
the
community,
a
Hollister,
long
term.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
A
C
Right
and
I
don't
see
any
other
hands,
so
I
believe
we
are
I'm
ready
to
go
back
to
the
G
pack
for
a
discussion
on
this
item
again.
This
is
not
an
action
item.
So
whatever
comments
you
have
we're
happy
to
hear
from
the
three
G
pack
members
and
then
we'll
move
on
to
our
other
agenda
items.
Do
any
of
the
three
of
you
have
comments
at
this
time,
David.
H
I
do
have
some
comments.
Please
I,
but
I
did
make
a
fairly
comprehensive
list.
What
I
think
are
the
key
issues
and
the
biggest
challenge
and
I
appreciate
Roxanne
dick
Stevens
ability.
I
do
agree
that
we
started
with
what
the
general
plan
is.
It's
a
consensus
of
Community,
Edition
and
I.
Think
the
biggest
challenge
is
to
obtain
that
consensus.
I
know
back
in
2005,
we
did
not
have
an
interactive
web
site,
so
I
think
that
could
be
a
very
constructive
tool
in
that
regard.
But
again
it's
the
it's
getting
the
building.
H
The
consensus
of
the
community
I
think
is
the
biggest
challenge
in
this
process.
I
know
and
back
in
2005
before
we
went
into
the
visioning
of
the
of
the
general
plan,
means
start
off
with
a
critique
of
the
current
general
plan.
I
think
it
may
be
helpful
to
begin,
or
at
least
that
the
first
step
of
this
process
is
to
critique
the
existing
general
plan
and
prove
upon
it.
Now.
What
I
think
and
I'll
try
to
be
briefed
on
this?
H
What
if
the
key
issues
I
think
is
and
I
made
the
a
list
of
these
items?
I'll
go
very
very
very
briefly
through
them,
but
I'll
read
what
I
wrote
is
what
I
think
are
the
key
issues
and
I
started
off
with
consideration
for
adaptive
growth
to
be
flexible
and
responsive
to
changing
needs.
Shouldn't
growth,
be
incremental
future
connection
of
past
passenger
rail
to
high-density
housing.
That's
another
another
item,
consensus
of
the
future
of
the
airport,
coordination
and
I.
Very,
not
be
that
you
added
another
element
to
this
general
plan.
H
Is
the
arts
component
and
I?
Will
I
want
to
disclose
that
I
am
a
member
of
the
public
art
with
you,
and
we
are
currently
trying
to
get
the
city
council
to
with
a
cultural
arts
master
plan
and
that
can
be
switched
to
be
strengthened
through
the
partnerships
of
the
city
upholstery,
Gavin
colleague,
Samuel,
high
school
Youth,
Alliance
off
to
school
district
notice.
Promoting
culture
within
the
urban
context
do
identify
spaces
and
neighborhoods
not
served
by
public
art
and
generate
great
greater
community
engagement
and
social
cohesion
to
entertain
ways.
H
B
H
Design
changes
in
response
to
the
pandemic
get
parking
lots
to
be
used
for
outdoor
dining
and
the
women.
The
downtown
is
closed
off
and
this
I
think
I
am
right
here,
but
I
think
the
time
is
right.
You
can
embrace
a
vision
of
Hollister
as
a
place
to
a
place
of
destination,
a
place
of
distinction.
A
place
are
cut
above
where
visitors,
tourists,
citizens
and
families
cannon
celebrate
in
an
environment
that
fosters
camaraderie
and
a
place
to
be
enjoyed
by
people
of
all
ages
and
lots
of
life.
C
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that.
I
want
to
say
to
you
and
the
other
two
committee,
members
I,
think
you
were
looking
at
some
written
remarks
and
if
you
want
to
submit
those
to
staff,
we
would
love
to
have
them.
We
are
taking
notes,
but
anything
you
want
to
give
us
in
writing
would
be
welcome.
Any
comments
at
this
time
from
councilmember
Resendiz
or
mayor
of
Velazquez.
F
Add
to
what
mr.
Hugh
I
said,
I
think
Hugh
boy
myself
had
spoken
for
many
many
years
about
Smart,
Growth
and
planning
for
our
community.
He
went
over
a
lot
of
those
details.
I
think
it's
very
important
and
to
understand
and
I
absolutely
agree.
We
need
as
much
public
participation
as
possible
from
from
the
citizens
that
actually
live
here
and
have
to
face
that
daily
commute
every
day
that
traffic.
F
That's
been
happening,
so
the
goal
is
from
our
community
from
our
city
in
our
counties.
How
do
we
develop
a
community
that
we
can
afford
to
live
in?
Not
only
the
residents,
but
the
government
can
actually
afford
to
pay
for
the
bills
to
keep
it
up
in
a
way
that
we
can
be
proud
of
it.
So
that
is
another
major
major
component,
because
the
road
costs
are
out
of
control
in
a
way
that
we
can't
afford
to
keep
up
and,
of
course,
the
ongoing
maintenance.
So
we
want
to
figure
out
a
newer,
Smart,
Growth
sattvic.
F
You
know
smart
city
that
makes
sense
and
there's
so
many
great
visions
out
there
and
I
think
that's
actually
one
of
the
reasons
we
chose
your
company,
you
guys
a
lot
of
good
ideas
out
there
and
that's
what
we
want
to
implement
here
and
start
stepping
back
from
the
idea
of
just
more
sprawl,
more
sprawl,
more
single-family
homes,
but,
let's
start
building
communities,
as
mr.
joyboy
mentioned.
Thank
you
thank.
C
C
Okay
on
our
next
x-
and
I
our
next
item
and
the
first
action
item,
if
we
can
have
the
next
slide,
is
a
consideration
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair.
This
is
a
brand
new
committee,
and
so
it
would
be
up
to
the
up
to
the
the
g-pack
to
elect
a
chair
and
vice
chair.
There
is
a
council
resolution
that
establishes
the
g-pack.
C
There
shall
be
a
vice
chair
and
vice
chair,
and
the
role
of
the
chair
will
be
to
open
and
close
the
meeting
to
state
as
the
chair
sees
appropriate
and
to
ensure
that
the
meeting
follows
the
proper
process.
It
is
the
recommendation
from
staff
and
the
consultant
team
that
you
allow
us
and
me
in
particular
to
continue
to
facilitate
the
meetings
I'm,
just
because
I've
done
this
for
many
years.
C
For
many
many
general
plans
I'm
happy
to
serve
as
the
resource
person
for
on
presentations
and
facilitation,
but
I
will,
of
course,
work
closely
with
the
elected
chair
or
in
his
action
the
vice
chair
too
again
to
ensure
that
the
meeting
is
open
properly
closed
properly
and
that
the
meeting
follows
all
proper
process
at
all
times.
So
with
that
said
I'm
again,
we
would
go
into
that
same
process,
questions
or
initial
comments
from
the
three
g-pack
members.
C
F
C
B
H
C
F
C
None
all
right,
there
are
also
no
hands
raised.
John
Casey
has
raised
his
hand
so
we'll
take
and
again
this
is
I
want
to
remind
everyone
that
there
is
a
still
a
next
item
to
talk
about
the
vacancies
on
the
committee.
But
right
now,
if
there
are
comments
about
chair
and
vice-chair-
and
we
will
take
those
at
this
time-
the
first
one
person
is
John
Casey.
K
Premature
all
seats
are
full.
That
being
said,
if
you
must,
before
I
request,
David
Bowie
be
elected.
This
chair,
I've
known
David
for
a
long
time,
I
believe
in
the
integrity
you
will
be,
who
will
support
and
look
forward
to
wars
to
come
or
start
dinner
and
varied
opinions
on
how
the
plan
was
for
so
I'd
ask
for
consideration
of
the
chair.
Thank
you.
L
Hello,
this
is
MIA
Casey
from
Hollister.
Also
I
am
echoing
the
sentiments
of
David
Q
boy,
it's
premature
to
be
electing
chairs
and
vice
chairs.
When
you
only
have
three
of
your
five
members
that
said,
I
also
agree
that
David
tea
boy
is
the
most
experienced
person
on
that
committee
and
has
been
through
a
process
before
and
would
be
an
excellent
chair.
So
that
would
be
my
my
thought
anyway.
Thank
you
all.
C
C
C
I
think
it
would
be
the
committee's
prerogative
to
defer
that
I'm
not
recommending
that
one
way
or
another,
but
just
wanted
to
say
for
the
record,
to
make
sure
everyone's
clear
on
this,
that
you
could
not
ask
these
motions
and
then
you
would
be
without
a
chair
until
there
were
a
further
motion
to
do
that
at
a
future
meeting.
So
with
that
said,
let
me
open
it
up
for
any
comment
and
then
we
will
take
the
votes.
C
I
would
suggest
that
you
folk
first
on
the
chair
and
then
second
on
the
vice
chair
and
dude,
that
Bob,
please
Lee
as
majority
votes,
but
I
think
we
could
take
comments
on
both
items
together
and
then
do
again.
The
vote
first
one
chair
and
then
to
vote
on
vice-chair.
Anyone
have
any
comments
before
we
take
the
votes.
I.
F
F
H
I
also
I
appreciate
the
comments
from
me
and
John
Casey,
but
and
I
think
it
is
important
to
say
is
that
the
g-pack
committee,
let
me
go
through
this
general
plan
update
process-
is
that
we
find
commonalities
and
emphasize
positive
direction
for
the
city
and
I
know
we
have
different
viewpoints
on
items,
but
I
think
that,
with
respecting
our
differences
of
opinions
on
some
of
these
subjects
and
having
civil
discussions,
I
think
we
can
we
can.
We
can
be
very
productive
and
I've
known
Ignacio
for
a
long
time.
H
We
may
not
agree
on
everything
but
gosh
I
I
do
have
a
lot
of
respect
for
his
dish
and
I.
Think
he's
gonna
he's
gonna
be
a
valuable
member
of
this
committee.
As
a
chairperson
I
did
such
a
that
nomination.
I
did
make
and
I
I
do
agree
that
we
could.
You
know
we
could
postpone
it,
but
I
think
again.
I
think
we
need
to
move
on
and
we
need
to
go
forward
in
a
positive
way.
So
I'll
go
ahead
and
keep
my
second
two
Rowland's
nomination
for
ignacio's
chairpersons,
and
so
we
can
move
on.
G
C
All
right!
Well,
in
that
case,
let
me
ask
for
a
vote
on
regarding
the
nomination
of
Ignacio
Velazquez.
As
the
committee
chair,
I
just
go
down
the
role
of
the
three
voters
and
hear
from
each
of
you,
mr.
mayor,
your
vote,
all
right,
councilmember
Resendez,
I
have
Commissioner
Huw
boy
by
motion
passes
three
to
zero
and
now
on
the
nomination
of
boy.
As
committee
vice-chair
on
mr.
mayor
I,
councilmember
Resendez,
I,
Commissioner,
Hugh
boy;
yes,
all
right,
so
that
also
passes
three
zero.
Congratulations,
both
of
you
thank
you
for
taking
on
those
roles.
Mr.
C
C
Right,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
confidence
and
allowing
me
to
do
that.
Let's
move
on
then
to
our
next
slide
in
our
next
item.
Next
slide.
The
next
item
and
we've
heard
a
number
of
speakers
already
allude
to
this
tonight-
is
the
fact
that
there
are
right
now
two
needs
vacant
on
the
g-pack
I'm.
One
of
those
through
the
council's
resolution
is
intended
for
a
planning
Commissioner.
The
other
is
for
a
member
of
the
public
at
large.
Just
to
give
a
little
background
on
this
item.
C
They
could
either
directly
request
that
the
Planning
Commission
make
a
nomination
that
the
council
make
a
direct
appointment
or
the
g-pack
could
nominate
one
of
the
commissioners
to
serve.
There
is
also
a
slot
for
one
member
of
the
public
at
large.
There
was
a
previous
City
process
to
look
for
nominations
for
that
role.
C
C
It
is
I
think
clearly
in
the
charter
of
the
g-pack
that
it's
ultimately
the
City
Council's
decision
to
appoint
people
to
these
two
vacant
seats,
so
that
would
ultimately
need
to
occur
on
a
majority
vote
of
the
City
Council.
So
that's
my
understanding
of
the
situation.
I've
been
following
our
standard
procedure
here.
I
would
open
it
up
for
committee
questions
that
might
arise,
then
we'll
open
it
up
for
public
comment
and
then
go
back
to
the
committee
to
the
g-pack
I'm
to
determine
if
an
action
is
desired.
F
You
let
me
make
clarifications,
because
some
of
the
information
wasn't
correct
in
this.
This
has
been
probably
the
disappointing
part
of
selecting
the
g-pack
and
moving
forward.
It's
been
a
long
long
process
to
just
get
to
this
point.
Mr.
hue
boy
knows:
we've
been
trying
to
get
here
for
about
five
years,
the
Planning
Commission
actually
selected
a
member
of
their
Commission
to
be
the
member
along
with
mr.
hue
boy.
That
was
clear.
That
Commissioner
is
actually
still
on
board
matter
of
fact.
She
had
spoken
earlier,
mrs.
F
Stephens,
so
that
person
was
chosen
by
the
Planning
Commission
is
reading
and
willing
to
serve.
Unfortunately,
the
City
Council
vote
of
two
to
did
that.
Let
that
proceed,
which
is
very
unfortunate,
very
intelligent
person
that
has
a
good
vision,
and
that
was
disappointed
that
it
became
political.
The
member
at
large
was
a
person
that
put
their
name
man
a
while
back
with
a
few
others
that
applied
it
to
time.
F
It
was
sad
to
me
that
a
person
such
quality
of
a
resident
in
our
city
to
be
told
that
basically,
yes,
he
went
through
all
the
hoops
all
the
obstacles.
You
did
everything
you
attended.
You
met
with
everybody,
and
yet
we
don't
want
you
and
we'll
start
again.
We
want
to
find
somebody
else,
so
that
was
disappointing.
I'm
hoping
this
g-pack
could
appoint
that
person
and
hopefully
somehow
we
can
appoint
the
other
planning
commissioners.
So
we
can
move
together
as
a
full
board.
H
Also,
if
I
might
say
a
few
words
about
that
too,
because
I
was
chairman
when
Gabriel
Torres
was
the
other
member
that
was
previously
elected
through
the
Planning
Commission
to
be
a
member
of
this
committee
was
no
longer
a
commissioner.
We
had
two
very
capable
commissioners
who
were
interested
in
that
position
and
gave
presentations.
We
all
voted
on
on
the
winner
was
very
close.
H
There
was
Roxanne
Stevens
who
was
got
the
nod
from
the
Commission
to
fill
that
seat
and
unfortunately,
as
mayor
of
the
Ignacio,
as
stated
that
it
didn't
go
through
because
it
was
a
deadlock
to
two
to
go,
but
that
was
along
with
the
other
delegate
from
the
general
public
one
serve,
so
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
go
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
when
we
already
have
the
representative
that
went
through
the
process
and
it's
Ross
and
Stephen.
That's
who
got
the
nomination
from
the
Commission,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
very
clear
and.
C
I
want
to
apologize
what
you
are,
what
the
two
of
you
have
said:
I
did
know
that
and
I
somehow
failed
to
say
it.
The
process,
commissioner
hue
boy
that
you
just
mentioned
was
the
one
I
was
alluding
to.
There
was
a
previous
appointee
and
he
left
the
Commission
but
you're
absolutely
right.
There
was
a
subsequent
vote
by
the
Planning
Commission
to
to
nominate
miss,
Stevens
and
I
want
to
apologize
to
the
public
and
miss
Stevens.
Who
is
here
that
I
did
forget
that
that
set
of
details
and
it
I
do
concur.
C
C
G
Thank
you,
so
I
was
fortunate
enough
to
watch
both
both
of
the
processes
take
place.
I
don't
think
I
was
there
in
person,
but
I
did
see
and
I
really
do
appreciate
how
fair
and
how
transparent
the
process
was
to
the
Planning,
Commission
I.
Think
if
I
recall
mr.
joyboy,
you
might
be
able
to
correct
me,
but
both
of
these
people
were
very
much
interested
and
they
gave
speeches
and
there
was
a
voting.
They
scored
each
other
and
ultimately
Roxanne.
Mr.
G
Commissioner
Stevens
was
the
one
that
was
voted
on
so
I
think
and
then
what
happened
with
the
City
Council
I
mean
ultimately
I.
Think
at
this
point
it's
just
time
to
move
on.
It's
very
unfortunate
that
politics
and
self-interest
get
in
the
way
and
ultimately
hurt
the
community
of
having
a
very
fair
process,
take
place
and
very
qualified
individuals
on
the
committees.
So
at
this
point,
I
just
think
it's
it's.
We
just
need
to
move
forward
with
the
three
that
we
have
and
we'll
take
it
from
there.
So,
but.
H
G
I
absolutely
do
not
disagree
with
you.
I
think
that
was
the
intent.
However,
at
this
point,
I
don't
see
that
happening,
I,
really
don't
and
I
just
think
it's
just
best
to
move
on
at
this
point
like
ultimately,
the
reason
why
is
because
it
needs
to
go
back
to
the
council
to
get
rid
of
ratified.
You
understand
Commissioner,
who
doing
that's
just
not
going
to
happen.
I.
F
Just
want
to
point
out,
it
is
a
shame
again.
It
was
a
very
fair
process
and
I
I
personally
have
an
issue
with
changing
the
process.
When
you
do
not
get
the
outcome,
you
were
hoping
for,
especially
when
you
had
two
very
talented,
dedicated
people
that
wanted
to
be
involved
in
community
that
had
no
connections
to
anyone.
That
was
the
surprising
part
of
this
whole
issue.
Now,
if
the
council
would
like
to
bring
it
back
and
vote
on
those
those
individuals,
I
have
absolutely
no
problem.
F
I
would
love
to
see
it
because
I
think
it
is
important,
but
I
think
it
would
not
be
fair
to
say
we're.
Gonna
change
the
rules
and
do
it
again
do
it
do
over
here
and
that
that's
just
part
of
something
I
don't
want
to
be
involved
with,
but
it's
if
the
g-pack
wants
to
recommend
the
council
re-examine
relook
at
seating.
Those
two
empty
seats,
I'm
100%
in
favor
of
it
and
I
hope
at
this
point
that
they
would
be
willing
to
understand.
This
is
for
the
community.
F
These
are
people
dedicated
to
their
community
and
we
do
need
to
move
forward
in
a
fair
process
and
it
starts.
This
process
starts
from
the
very
beginning,
with
being
upfront
and
honest
to
the
public
and
not
having
any
special
agendas
going
on,
because
if
we
start
in
the
wrong
way
of
changing
rules
to
fit
agendas,
we're
gonna
fail.
We're
gonna
get
through
this
process
halfway
and
start
to
sail.
This
has
to
be
a
fair
process.
F
From
the
very
beginning
and
again,
those
two
people
were
absolutely
perfect
to
do
play
this
role
and
it
was
disappointing,
so
I
would
say,
as
a
g-pack.
Absolutely,
let's
recommend
back
to
the
City
Council
to
vote
on
that
those
two
positions
again
and
hopefully
there's
a
different
outcome
and
we
move
forward
if
not
I
will
not
be
in
favor
of
changing
rules
to
get
a
different
outcome.
M
C
H
Say
this
I
like
to
go
along
and
concur
with
the
mayor
and
his
proposal
to
bring
that
back
and
agendize
it
for
a
future
City
Council
meeting
and
see
if
that
can
be
reconsidered.
It
may
be
more
difficult
and
to
change
the
structure
of
the
committee
to
branch
out
to
more
people
for
the
general
public.
But
again
we
had
a
very
capable
commissioner
in
Roxanne's
demons
and.
C
A
C
K
The
current
insist:
the
current
people
on
the
g'tok,
so
the
first
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
was
that
on
February
5th
2018,
the
City
Council
meeting
resolution
2018
there's
a
27.
It
was
housed
to
form
the
feedback
and
also
adopt
a
set
of
bylaws
that
were
included
in
the
journal
packet
and
the
resolution
20
team
by
seven
states,
the
journal
and
devices
made
shall
consist
of
five
members
appointed
by
the
City
Council.
K
That's
key
a
point
about
C
Council
and
will
be
comprised
of
two
z+
five
commissioners
C
City
Council
members
and
one
member
of
the
college.
Next
next
point
is
at
that
same
meeting,
councilmember
friend
and
mayor
for
us,
as
guests,
were
appointed
to
the
committee
by
consensus,
so
they
were
at
that
point.
They
were
not
appointed
by
the
mayor
alone
and
then
the
next
point
is
the
vitalized
that
are
the
currently
governing
this
defect.
K
I
have
never
fired
at
the
state's
vacancies.
Vacancies
created
my
resignation
or
removal
for
non-attendance
may
be
filled
both
by
the
City
Council
for
the
remainder
of
the
government,
though,
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
the
resignation
of
councilmember
pride
and
left
a
vacant
seat
that
needed
to
be
filled
by
the
City
Council,
so
I
believe
that
the
action
taken
by
the
mayor
on
vehicle,
28,
City
Council
meeting
of
this
year
was
to
be
neural
area.
Point
of
tells
member
percent
is
to
the
g-pack
and
there's
a
violation
of
the
resolution.
K
M
K
My
name
is
John
Casey
and
upholster.
Thank
you
for
allowing
this
level
of
public
input
to
the
process.
Although
I
think
a
lot
more
is
leaving
in
the
county.
General
plan
that
took
for
the
six
years
to
a
dog
did
appears
folks
running
for
office
for
traffic
on
University,
who
leave
none
or
not
public
input
was
potentially
I.
Don't
want
us
to
be
put
it
put
this
together
only
in
fearing
that
same
issue
later
bring
members
just
not
enough,
especially
folks
having
similar
viewpoints
on
growth.
K
The
essence
that
in
essence,
technically
committee
I
think
there
was
an
error
and
misunderstanding
made
during
the
April
twentieth,
City
Council
meeting
that
allowed
this
to
happen,
and
that
needs
to
be
corrected,
otherwise,
I
feel
as
though
nowhere
and
the
city
will
find
itself
on
the
other
side
of
referendums
and
lawsuits.
Again.
K
L
Okay,
so
I
would
echo
what
Kevin
Henderson
had
said
regarding
the
resolution
and
the
manner
of
appointment
of
councilman
Resendez
I
do
agree
with
the
idea
of
opening
up
for
the
public
at
large
I
would
love
to
see
more
citizen
representation
and
input.
I
think
it's
very
important.
I
do
have
a
suggestion,
because
part
of
I
did
attend
the
April
20
meeting
and
it
was
very
confusing
because
the
agenda
item
was
not
to
appoint
the
planning
Commissioner.
It
was
to
appoint
the
planning
commissioner
and
the
public
at
large
person.
I.
L
Don't
think
that
there
was
any
problem
with
the
planning
Commissioner
appointment
I
felt
like
that
process
was
very
thorough
and
she
was
recommended
by
the
Commission
and
I
didn't
have
any
problem
with
her
whatsoever,
but
the
public
at
large
position.
There
were
three
candidates
that
applied
I,
think
it
was
advertised
in
the
freelance
I
never
knew
about
it.
L
I,
don't
read
the
freelance,
so
the
fact
that
one
person
moved
away
and
the
other
person
became
a
city
council
member
had
left
the
person
one
person
behind
and
I'm,
not
saying
anything
in
regards
to
his
qualifications.
It's
just
that
there
is
more
going
on
these
days
with
public
land
use
and
there
are
a
lot
of
interested
people
and
I
just
think
it
would
be
worth
going
back
out
and
letting
people
apply
and
seeing
what
kind
of
inputs
you
get
if
you're
truly
truly
interested
in
having
you
know,
citizens
be
part
of
this
process.
L
So
that's
my
recommendation.
If
you
brought
it
the
planning
Commissioner
back
as
a
separate
agenda
item,
I,
don't
think
you
would
get
an
argument
because
she
sounds
like
you
know:
she's
been
vetted
and
is
you
know
we're
putting
on
the
the
committee
I
would
like
to
see
the
public
at
large
position.
They'll
go
back
out
and
and
get
people
involved.
You
know
it
seems
like
a
smart
thing
to
do.
Anyways.
Thank
you
for
listening.
L
M
O
You
I
to
echo
Kevin
Henderson.
Thank
you
very
much
for
what
you
stated
and
I
was
there
at
that
meeting.
So
the
the
resolution
or
the
ordinance
from
2018
was
to
be
appointed
by
City,
Council
and
I.
Think
there
was
a
misrepresentation
or
misinformation
with
regards
to
how
the
city
attorney
interpreted
it.
O
Earley
from
place
works.
You
must
at
least
you
know,
agree
with
us
that
you
should
have
all
different
people
tied
to
giving
you
input
and
having
having
a
councilman
Resendiz
and
having
the
mayor
on
the
same
you're
not
going
to
get
anything
other
than
what
did
what
they.
What
the
mayor
wants,
I
think
that
also
with
regards
to
appointing
an
ad
the
public,
I
think
that
the
the
city
should
you
know
you
have
the
duty
to
the
entire
community
to
appoint
more
people
more
input.
O
The
County
Board
of
Supervisors
had
more
than
one
ad
large
person
and
I
think
that
the
city
should
follow
it.
If
you
want
a
fair
representation
of
the
entire
community,
I
believe
that
each
council
person
should
be
able
to
appoint
a
person
from
their
district
to
be
able
to
be
on
this
committee.
That
would
be
the
fair
thing
to
do
to
get
an
input
from
all
aspects
of
the
entire
community.
O
Instead
of
you
have
one
person
and
I
am
completely
against
having
that
one
person
appointed
whom
you
claim
to
be
well
koala,
but
he's
got
a
great
resume,
but
at
the
same
time,
he's
team
he's
team,
Ignacio
Velasquez.
He
also
is
against
a
growth.
You
have
an
entire
committee
right
now
that
is
already
anti
growth
and
you're
not
going
to
get.
How
are
you
gonna
get
a
general,
a
general
plan.
O
You
know
for
what
we
believe
is
for
the
best
interest
of
the
community
in
the
entire
city
of
Hollister,
when
they're
all
in
the
same
page,
I
think
we
need
to
go
back
and
we
need
to
actually
to
replace
councilman,
Resendez
and
replace
him
with
Councilwoman,
honor,
Spencer
I.
Think
actually,
once
and
you
know
we
go
through
this
Carol
Leonor
councilman
Leonor
when
she's
off
the
city
council,
she
has
so
much
knowledge
when
it
comes
to
the
planning
and
what's
been
going
on
in
there.
I'm.
O
C
C
B
Can
you
hear
me
yes
in
the
interest
of
saving
everyone
time
I
just
want
to
second,
the
comment
that
miss
Salinas
just
made
I'm
in
complete
agreement
with
what
she
said
and
it
sounds
like
David
may
have
a
response
to
that.
So
I'll
I'll,
wait
and
hear
that
response,
or
rather
than
saying
the
same
things
over
I,
just
want
to
go
on
record.
That
I
feel
the
same
way.
Thank
you.
C
E
You
know
all
across
San,
Benito,
County
and
different
types
of
work
and
and
from
different
communities
and
I
was
really
looking
forward
to
trying
to
get
more
people
engaged
in
this
process,
because
I
think
it's
really
important,
and
it
is
disappointing
to
me
that
there's
not
a
full
committee.
My
main
concern
with
that
is
that
the
entire
process,
once
it's
complete,
will
lack
credibility
with
the
residents
of
Hollister
if
they
know
that
there
was
only
three
of
the
intended
five
committee
members,
so
I
will
second
what
some
of
the
other
speakers
have
said.
E
C
C
No
others
all
right
and
there
are
no
hands
raised
I'm,
going
to
turn
it
back
to
the
g-pack
I.
Just
I
do
want
to
say
I'm
very
briefly
to
the
Jeep
back
and
to
the
public
that
I
and
I
think
all
the
g-pack
members
have
said
this
as
well
as
many
members
of
the
public
I
would
love
to
have
a
fuller
committee.
C
And
one
of
the
things
we're
going
to
rely
on
the
g-pack
for
is
that
they
give
us
good
guidance
about
what
the
what
the
council
itself
can
and
will
adopt,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it
is
a
general
plan
as
it
gets
drafted.
That
does
does
receive
the
political
support
of
the
council
members
so
that
we
can
get
a
majority
vote
at
both
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
council,
and
that's
another
thing
that
all
be
working
very
hard
to
do
so.
C
I
just
want
to
make
those
comments
just
to
paint
a
picture
of
how
we
at
place
works,
and
the
consultant
team
as
a
whole
see
our
role
with
that.
Let
me
turn
it
over
to
the
g-pack
members
and
at
some
point,
if
one
of
you
wants
to
you
can
make
a
motion
or
if
no
motion
is
made,
it
would
just
be
up
to
the
City
Council
to
figure
out
how
to
move
this
forward
or
if
to
move.
It
forward.
H
Need
to
respond
to
you
Lee
comment
about
my
position
on
growth.
I
just
could
only
speak
for
myself.
I
am
NOT,
anti-growth
and
I
said
it
when
the
key
issues
that
I
am
a
proponent
of
smart
voice
and
the
biggest
challenge
is
building
consensus.
I
want
to
build
consensus
based
on
community
input.
I
want
them
to
take
ownership
in
this
process,
I'm
for
its
expending
the
representation
on
this
committee.
I,
don't
know
how
feasibly
that
can
be
done,
but
I
would
like
to
see
those
two
positions
build
and
I
appreciate.
H
H
Just
want
to
clarify
my
position
on
growth,
I'm
in
the
mode
of
Smart
Growth
principles,
there's
ten
principles
of
Smart,
Growth
and
I'm
not
going
to
take
the
time
to
go
through
each
one
of
those
principles,
but
I've
been
and
I've
always
been
a
proponent
of
that
from
the
first
general
plan
is
to
learn
that
we
can't
gain
anything
through
sprawl
if
we're
going
to
grow
and
that's
the
growth
from
the
urban
centers.
That's
what
we
learned
from
the
problems
that
we
had
with
our
infrastructure.
H
G
I
may
make
a
comment.
Please
please
same
I
want
to
echo
this
the
same
sentiment
as
commissioner.
You
boy
I,
appreciate
everyone
that
that
made
a
comment
during
public
comment
right
now,
and
people
that
are
watching
this
as
well,
but
I've
got
to
make
my
position
very
clear.
I
do
not
think
it's
a
good
idea,
especially
after
hearing
the
public
comment.
I'm,
sorry,
but
I
do
not
think
it's
a
good
idea
and
a
good
use
of
our
staffs
time.
Our
counsels
time
I
think
it's
been
decided
upon.
G
I
have
so
much
faith
and
place
works
to
to
not
only
engage
but
to
come
up
with
a
legitimate
general
plan
for
our
community
and
I
would
rather
see
us
focus
on
really
engaging
the
public
at
large
and
getting
them
involved
then
having
to
go
back
and
have
this
discussion
again,
I'm
not
completely
opposed
to
it,
but
I.
Just
don't
think
right.
Now
is
a
good
time.
A
better
time
to
consider
going
back
to
the
council
would
be
after
the
November
election.
G
So
after
hearing
the
public
comment
and
having
a
little
bit
more
time
to
think
this
through
I
just
would
strongly
advise
for
us
not
to
go
back
to
the
council
or
the
Planning
Commission.
I
also
must
be
honest
with
you
guys
and
say:
we've
already
had
two
Planning
Commission's
make
public
comments,
and
now
we've
got
a
third
who
is
out
at
the
chamber
is
making
another
one
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
a
Brown
Act
violation,
especially
if
this
is
going
to
go
back
to
the
Planning
Commission.
G
So
I'm
learning
more
as
we
go
here,
but
we
need
to
be
very
cautious,
but
we
don't
make
any
mistakes
here.
Anyways!
That's
my
recommendation.
It's
just
not
a
good
use
of
our
time.
It's
not
a
good
use
of
the
council
sign
and
I'm
tired
of
wasting
the
staffs
time.
We
need
to
move
forward
with
this,
let's
revisit
it
after
the
next
election
and
let's
really
focus
on
getting
the
public
involved
in
this
process
as
much
as
possible.
Thank
you.
F
Okay,
I'll
make
a
comment
now.
I
will
agree
absolutely
with
Council
Marie
senders
comments,
especially
after
hearing
some
of
the
other
comments.
Mr.
hue
boy
has
been
a
man
with
the
vision
in
this
community
for
a
long
time
and
that
vision
has
always
been
the
same.
How
do
we
build
a
smarter,
better
community?
He
knows.
That's
been
my
vision
for
years
and
years
and
years
yet
over
and
over
there's
a
group
of
people
that
keep
claiming
we
are
anti
growth
or
misleading
the
public
knowingly
misleading
the
public.
F
Over
and
over
again-
and
you
know,
I
mentioned
something
earlier
about
people
having
to
disclose
or
ties
with
developers.
That
should
be
happening
because
some
of
those
comments
were
those
types
and
developers
or
that
want
to
develop
in
the
near
future.
So
we
need
to
be
honest
on
this
from
the
very
beginning
and
to
go
back
and
try
to
change
rules
to
try
to
get
somebody
the
fits.
F
What
you
want
to
accomplish
is
not
why
we're
doing
this
general
plan.
I've
said
this:
over
and
over
again,
it's
been
over
five
years
that
I've
been
asking
for
this
update
five
years,
and
yet
here
we
are
still
those
looking
for
a
way
to
keep
it
from
moving
forward.
It
is
not
fair
to
our
community.
We
know
we
need
to
make
this
update.
F
It
would
be
great
if
the
two
people
that
had
been
chosen
or
for
a
fight
and
did
everything
right
had
been
chosen,
but
they
weren't
for
whatever
reasons
that
they
came
up
with
at
the
time.
The
accusations
of
being
in
my
pocket
is
so
incredibly
unfair
to
those
individuals
that
have
spent
their
lives,
building
their
own
careers
and
doing
things
that
make
their
lives
or
families
in
a
community
better
to
be
accused
of
somebody's
outright
false.
We
can't
keep
doing
it
and
that's
why
I
have
to
agree
with
mr.
Rezendes.
F
It's
just
going
back
with
that
kind
of
discussion.
It's
just
not
going
to
work
and
I'm
really
am
going
to
start
asking
that
we
really
have
to
have
people
disclose
their
ties
and
development,
and
it's
okay,
that
they
have
ties
to
development.
But
it
needs
to
be
upfront
because
we
can't
keep
hearing
accusations
and
misinformation
work.
It's
just
going
to
make
this
process
a
long,
drawn-out
process
of
hate,
and
we
don't
need
to
go
there
because
the
public
is
looking
for
us
to
do
the
right
thing:
the
public
not
special
interests.
F
Let's
please
remember
that
it
is
our
community
and
we
need
to
make
sure
we're
doing
this
right
and
I
absolutely
have
the
confidence
and
place
works
to
do
what
you
need
to
do
to
get
us
there
and
I
look
forward
to
it
and
we're
just
going
to
move
on
and
just
as
mr.
Rossano
says,
we're
just
going
to
need
to
move
on
and
not
keep
rehashing
this
all.
C
C
I
I
actually
has
thought.
If,
if
none
of
you
make
a
motion,
you
will
have
taken
no
action,
so
I,
don't
I.
Don't
think
you
need
to
make
a
motion
to
take
no
action,
I'm
so
I'm.
I
am
asking
just
to
close
the
item.
I'm
guessing
the
answer
might
be
no,
but
I
wanted
to
ask:
is
there
any
g-pack
number
who
does
want
to
make
a
motion
for
an
action
all
right,
I
hear
none?
Does
anyone
I
think
we
can
move
on
unless
one
of
the
g-pack
members
once.
H
C
G
I,
just
don't
think
it's
good
for
our
staff
I,
don't
think
it's
good
for
the
City
Council
just
to
go
through
that
again.
So
it's
unfortunate,
but
it
is
what
it
is
they
had.
The
council
had
the
chance
to
make
that
decision.
They
voted
against
it.
So
I
really
think
we
just
need
to
lay
that
to
rest
I'm
completely
willing
to
look
at
that
in
November.
After
those
upcoming
elections.
C
C
For
that
reason,
the
general
plan
will
include
an
assessment
of
a
number
of
intersections
within
the
city
on
the
scope
of
work
that
we've
put
together
covers
analysis
of
30
such
intersections,
and
they
are
listed
on
this
list
on
this
slide
and
they
are
mapped
as
well.
I
recognize
that
the
map
in
particular,
is
a
little
hard
to
read,
but
I.
Think
those
of
you
who
are
looking
for
a
certain
location
can
see
the
red
dots
at
each
location.
C
There
they're,
actually
red
crosses,
and
there
is
a
text
list
as
well,
and
we
did
publish
this
list
in
advance
of
the
meeting
so
I'm
hoping
at
least
the
g-pack
members
have
had
a
chance
to
review
it.
I
do
want
to
let
you
know
that
staff
and
consultants
have
looked
at
this
list
very
closely
and
we
considered
a
list
of
over
50
intersections
for
possible
analysis.
The
scope
is
limited
30,
so
we
tried
to
choose
the
30
that
we
felt
were
most
appropriate
and
most
important
to
study
within
that
budgeting
constraint
of
30
intersection.
C
What
we're
hoping
to
hear
from
you
tonight
is
ultimately
that
you
would
approve
this
this
set
of
intersections
for
study
so
that
we
can
move
them
forward
into
the
formal
traffic
analysis
and
again
we'll
follow
the
product
protocol
we've
already
been
following.
I
can
take
questions
from
the
g-pack
members.
Then
we
will
take
public
comment
and
then
we'll
turn
it
back
to
the
g-pack,
and
in
this
case
we
really
would
like
a
motion.
It
may
require
some
modifications,
but
we
do
hope
to
finish
tonight's
meeting
with
an
approved
list
of
30
study
intersections.
F
Yes,
I
have
some
questions.
I
see
several
those
marked
along
Fairview
Road,
that
is
a
County,
Road
and
I'm
I'm
concerned.
Why
we'd
be
reviewing
those
intersections
and
also
I,
see
some
on
the
southern
end,
along
South,
Side
Road
and
some
of
the
other
roads
that
are
in
the
county
now
I
know
it's
overview
of
the
entire
area,
but
I
think
I'm.
Part
of
the
part
of
the
issue
that
were
having
at
this
community
is
obviously
that's.
Why
we're
doing
this?
Is
the
traffic
patterns
and
the
congestion,
but
we
have
those
issues
within
the
city.
F
C
Right
well,
let
me
let
me
take
that
as
a
question
and
I'll
try
and
answer
it
in
Frederick
Ventura
from
our
traffic
consultant,
Kinley
horn,
who
many
of
you
know
is
here
as
well,
and
he
might
want
to
add
something.
But
let
me
just
say
that
you're
actually
required
both
under
sort
of
the
principles
of
good
planning,
but
also
under
state
law,
to
assess
environmental
and
traffic
impacts
without
regard
to
the
jurisdiction
in
which
they
occur.
C
Now
that's
changed
slightly,
because
sequa
has
changed
and
you're
no
longer
required
to
do
an
intersection
level
of
service
analysis
anywhere
inside
or
outside
the
city,
but
to
the
extent
that
these
are
environmental
impacts,
you're
charged
under
the
law.
Your
requirement
under
the
law
is
to
assess
impacts,
regardless
of
whether
they're
inside
the
city
or
not.
C
But
we
didn't
particularly
limit
ourselves
to
those
that
are
inside
the
city
limits
right
now,
I'm.
Certainly
we
could
change
that
again
because
of
the
changes
in
state
law.
You
know
a
year
ago,
I'd
have
told
you
you're
absolutely
required
to
look
at
intersections
both
inside
and
outside
the
city,
if
you
could
have
an
impact
there.
C
Now,
with
this
change,
you're
not
absolutely
required
to
do
that,
but
I
would
still
advise
that
it's
it's
good
planning
and
it's
good
neighborliness
towards
the
county,
both
the
unincorporated
County
lands
and
the
county
as
a
governmental
institution
to
consider
that,
but
to
consider
those
intersections,
but
it
would
be
up
to
you,
as
a
committee
and
I
I,
do
want
to
call
on
Frederick
or
perhaps
Danny
from
city
staff
as
well.
If
one
of
them
wants
to
add
to
anything,
I
just
said
in
terms
of
explaining
why
we
have
intersections
outside
the
city
limits
No.
F
And
I
just
so
clarification
for
you,
it's
not
that
I
understand
that
part
of
it.
It's
just
that
I'm,
seeing
I
think
you
said,
he's
limited
to
30.
That's
our
second
and
I've,
seen
several
places
within
the
city
that
aren't
addressed
here.
That's
the
only
reason
if
we
had
more
opportunities,
I
get
and
it's
again
it's
not
that
I'm!
Absolutely
against
that.
I'm
just
seeing
spaces
within
the
was
in
the
city.
First
need
to
be
addressed
that
are
in
issue
all.
C
Right
well,
we
can
certainly
look
at
removing
some
of
the
ones
that
you
feel
are
less
important,
whether
they're
in
the
city
or
out
and
and
swapping
them
out
for
some
literary
in
the
city.
Let
before
we
do,
that,
I
would
like
to
call
on
both
Frederick
and/or
Danny.
If
you
do
want
to
add
anything,
and
we
can
then
take
other
questions
and
comments,
take
the
public
comment
and
then
come
back
and
have
a
discussion
about
whether
you
want
to
make
changes
to
this
list.
H
H
P
Thank
you
David.
This
is
Frederick,
yes,
so
that
would
be
well.
That
was
my
very
first
comment.
Well
we're
in
the
planning
area
for
it
for
the
city
number
two
is
also
remember.
We
we
we
anticipate
some
growth,
and
so
we
I
think.
We've
also
tried
to
select
these
intersections
where
we
do
anticipate
growth
happening.
P
You
know,
Navy
Road
is
used
by
a
lot
of
people
to
you,
know
to
commute
northwards
and
also
cross
over
to
get
to
25
so
but
I'm,
yes,
we're
open
to
to,
if
there's
more
important
intersections
within
the
city
that
the
g-pack
feel
we
should
rather
study
and
not
look
at
these
ones
that
are
in
the
you
know.
We
have
been
open
to
that
discussion
and.
G
P
Absolutely
so
so
the
next
you
know
one
once
we
address
the
the
improvements
that
will
be
in
the
in
these
intersections
I
will
need
to
happen
because
of
the
future
development
or
a
congestion
I
will
occur.
The
next
step
is
that
they
will
actually
go
make
it
into
the
fee
program,
and
currently
you
know
between
the
county
and
the
city,
there's
a
common
fee
program
to
collect
traffic
fees
from
developers
right
at
these
intersections.
So,
yes,
there
is
a
benefit
in
in
the
coherence
of
how
the
the
governance
is
structured
around
and
within
all
astir.
P
G
I
think
the
mayor
brings
up
a
good
point
since,
since
we
do
have
only
were
only
limited
to
30,
these
areas
are
all
potential
areas
that
we
can
collaborate
with.
Other
partners
I'm
not
opposed
to
eliminating
some
of
those
on
the
outskirts
and
then
focusing
and
bringing
some
of
those
in
where
there's
not
going
to
be
that
opportunity
to
collaborate
with
both
the
county
and
developers.
So
I'd
really
rather
focus
more
on
in
filling
and
looking
over
at
the
outskirts,
so
to
speak,
so
I
think
that's
a
good
plan.
H
B
C
Frederik
started
to
say
no
and
it's
true,
we
have
not
done
a
level
of
a
recent
level
of
service
analysis
yet
and
what
we're
asking
you
is
to
approve
the
list
where
we'll
start
that
analysis
and
at
the
same
time
these
were
studied.
Are
these
were
chosen
because
we
think
that
they
are
points
where
either
or
both
there
are
or
will
be
congestion
issues
and
or
where
there
will
at
least
be
relatively
high
volumes
that
are
important
to
understand
in
understanding
the
city's
overall
traffic
flows.
C
Frederick,
do
you
want
to
add
to
that
again?
I
would
say
that
they
were
chosen
based
on
either,
although
no
analysis
has
been
done
recently
either
some
background
information
and
knowledge
that
they
are
areas
of
congestion
or
high
traffic
flows
and
or
that
they
are
at
lead.
They
are
areas
that,
because
of
the
amount
of
traffic
that
comes
into
them
from
various
directions,
that
they're
likely
to
become
important
points
in
the
future.
P
I
F
M
F
Cedric
and
Danny-
maybe
you
can
help
you
here,
but
I
I
know
a
long
fairview,
a
lot
of
those
intersections.
You
have
I
believe
they're
already
installing
signal
lights
at
a
few
of
those
and
the
county
has
done
a
few
studies
because
of
the
growth
they've
had
in
that
those
areas,
as
a
member
of
the
Council
of
Governments
I've
been
involved
as
far
as
the
roads,
the
traffic
patterns,
and
you
know
the
the
issues
with
Enterprise
Road
or
not
enterprise,
but
airline
in
that
area
going
towards
Fairview.
F
These
are
big-ticket
dollar
items
that
create
another
problem
and
I
know
the
county
has
studied
them
and
is
working
with
some
of
the
developers
to
implement
signal
lights
in
these
areas.
So
I
think
a
lot
of
that
works
been
done.
Frederick
and
I
I
get
that
you
want
to
go
back
and
get
pick
up
a
little
bit
more
of
that
information.
You
see
the
traffic
patterns,
but
I
think
one
of
the
questions.
One
of
the
things
I
did
like
the
discussions
was:
how
do
we
create
a
a
flow
within
the
community?
F
So
we
can
get
to
the
point
of
having
people
start
using
a
walk
or
bicycling
in
a
way.
That's
a
safe,
safe
way
for
them
to
get
around
town,
and
that's
as
our
conversation
in
the
past
would
have
been
about.
How
do
we
create
a
community
more
or
not
within
and
safe
enough,
where
people
feel
comfortable
to
to
use
other
methods
of
transportation
within?
So
that's
that's.
G
M
P
In
recent
analysis,
you
know
and
and
and
if
we
could
incorporate
some
of
those
in
the
general
plan
on
a
qualitative
disk,
I,
listen,
we
we
extract
this
from
a
certain
project
and
future
cumulative.
You
know,
then,
that's
maybe
a
way
to
do
it
as
well,
so
to
not
go
and
analyze
an
encounter,
but
just
incorporate
it
from
another
document.
C
C
We
don't
have
another
g-pack
meeting
scheduled
for
a
few
months,
but
could
this
do
we
have
to
get
a
decision
tonight
or
is
there
a
way
that
we
could,
if
we,
if
we
say,
scheduled
an
extra
meeting,
even
if
it's
very
brief
meeting
to
bring
back
a
list-
and
you
know
in
three
or
four
weeks
with
that
slow
us
down
or
do
we
want
to
try
and
do
this
tonight?
I.
P
Am
totally
in
your
hands,
I
mean
for
me.
The
next
step
to
get
the
data
is
to
have
the
right.
Now
we
have
the
30
intersections.
We
are
going
to
use
historic
data
for
the
bulk
of
them,
but
for
many
of
them
we
need
to
do
the
big
data
collection,
which
is
a
little
bit
of
a
delay.
You
know
if
I
mean
I
for
me,
it's
just
extending
my
work
a
little
bit
and
I'm
okay
with
that.
C
Friday
I'm
sorry
to
digress
here,
but
just
to
clarify
if
I
just
it's
just
so
the
committee
understands
we
are
slowed
down
because
the
traffic
data
that
we're
going
to
be
collecting
because
of
kovat
19
has
to
be
data
that
was
collected
remotely
before
March
and
the
company.
That
does
that,
probably
needless
to
say,
has
much
greater
demand
now
than
they
had
before
March.
So
they
are
slowed
down.
It's
going
to
take
an
extra
three
or
four
weeks
to
assemble
that
data
because
of
the
demand
on
that
company,
so
Frederick.
P
It
takes
two
weeks
right
to
make
the
decision
right
then.
Obviously,
if
I
come
back
and
tell
me
at
that
time,
hey
we
still
overloaded
with
requests
for
them
to
take
us
two
or
three
weeks
to
get
it
to
you.
Then
that's
what's
gonna
happen
right,
so
I'll
lose
my
spot
in
the
queue
you
know,
but
but
right
now
that
yeah,
that's
where
we
are
so.
C
If
we
did,
if
the
comitia-
let's
let's
see
if
we
can
get
through
this
tonight,
though,
but
it
sounds
as
though
if
the
committee
really
needs
time
to
make
a
decision
or
perhaps
needs
more
input
from
staff
to
see
a
new
map.
We
maybe
could
reconvene
in
a
couple
of
weeks
and
do
a
quick
meeting
on
just
this
item
to
finish
it
up
and
and
our
schedule
would
still
be
the
same.
Carrie
does
that
seem
acceptable
to
you
and
Brian
and
Abraham
city
staff?
P
C
G
One
thing
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
if
we're
gonna
collect
data
and
we're
going
to
go,
that's
data
for
years
to
come,
a
lot
of
people
are
telecommuting.
A
lot
of
children
are
not
even
going
to
school
at
this
time.
I'm
concerned
about
the
data
that
we
collect
is
not
the
actual
data,
so
I'm
really
not
opposed
to
just
focusing
on
restructuring
this
of
it
and
then
waiting
even
longer
before
we
start
gathering
data,
so
it
could
be
a
little
more
we're.
C
Really
getting
down
in
the
weeds
now,
but
what
I?
What
I
tried
to
explain
to
you
before
and
I'm
sure
I
wasn't
successful?
Is
that
we're
going
to
actually
data
about
operations
at
these
intersections
prior
to
kovat,
19
and
the
way
this
is
done?
You're,
probably
all
familiar
with
traffic
counts
that
are
conducted
in
real-time
at
the
intersections
and
obviously
what
if
we
did?
Those?
Now
as
councilmember
Resendiz
said,
we
would
get
an
inaccurate
representation,
because
so
many
people
are
not
going
to
work
or
school.
C
You
don't
need
to
worry
that
the
data
will
be
inaccurate
due
to
the
slowdown.
Now
it
will
actually
be
data
from
February
and
early
March
that
we're
going
to
collect
and
we
want
to
collect
it.
We
want
to
get
underway
as
quickly
week
as
we
can
and
we're
absolutely
not
proposing
to
wait
until
things
get
back
to
whatever
normal.
Maybe
in
the
future
we
are
going
to
use
the
available
historical
data
about
what
traffic
was
before
the
pandemic
began.
C
That
it
exists,
but
that
and
that's
what
I
was
saying
was
you
know
three
months
ago,
when
you
went
to
this
company
they're
called
streetlight
is
the
name
of
the
company.
They
could
get
you
this
data
within
a
week
or
so
because
they
had
it
all
just
sitting
there.
Now
every
jurisdiction
in
the
state
needs
to
do
the
same
thing.
They
can
no
longer
do
real-time
traffic
counts.
They
need
to
get
the
cellphone
data
instead.
C
So
there's
really
only
one
company
who
does
it
and
they've
got
a
huge
backlog
and
that's
why,
on
the
one
hand,
we
can
make
the
data
available.
We
can
continue
the
project,
but
we
do
have
to
wait
a
few
extra
weeks
because
they've
got
such
a
backlog.
Thank
you
for
that
clarification,
yeah
all
right.
So
with
that
said,
shall
we
ask
for
public
comment.
M
C
P
Can
I
make
a
suggestion
right
to
make
us
easy,
I'm
thinking
that
the
intersections
along
sphere
along
Fairview?
So
it's
number
24
number
one
number
seven
number
six
I
can
get
from
recent
studies
that
has
been
conducted
information
from
those
very
easily
right
and
then
we
can
assess
those
from
other
sources
and
address
it
qualitatively
in
imaginal
plan.
So
at
this
stage
those
four
intersections
for
me
are
up
for
grabs
and
selecting
other
ones
in
the
city
right.
C
Okay,
well
that
maybe
will
help
to
make
it
easier
tonight,
so
you're
saying
Frederick
that
we
can
delete
without
deleting
numbers,
24,
1,
7
and
6.
They
will
still
get
studied
just
through
a
slightly
different
method
and
we
can
add
for
other
intersections
more
in
town,
great
okay,
so
G
pack,
members.
A
K
225
or
son
flow,
considering
that
three
to
2728
really
are
connected
in
terms
of
timing
and
traffic
flow,
since
once,
if
you
say
from
25
appear
to
be
part
of
your
planning
area,
I
would
probably
include
that
intersection.
That's
a
big
traffic
pickup,
but
maybe
there's
a
reason,
maybe
it's
too
far
out
but
anyway.
That
would
be
at
least
that
you
thought
the
spots
that
I
saw.
That
I
would
recommend.
J
J
I
thought
that
was
so
and
number
21.
What
exactly
does
that
mean
and
then
also
I'm
just
wondering
if
the
analysis
will
include
some
contingencies.
So,
for
example,
we
know
that
we
have
development
that
are
in
the
pipeline,
so
to
speak,
so
we
know
that
they're
coming
and
that
there
may
be.
We
have
a
broken
ground
but
they're
in
the
works.
So
I
know
I'm
assuming
that
that
will
be
part
or
they'll
be
taken
into
consideration
in
this
analysis.
J
But
I
also
think
that,
as
we're
moving
forward,
we
want
to
be
able
to
think
of
what
are
some
of
the
possibilities
moving
forward
and
how
traffic
will
be
impacted
based
on
those
possibilities.
So
I
and
I
know
that
that
might
be
a
big
ass
because
there's
there
may
be,
you
know
endless
number
of
contingencies,
but
I
also
think
that
some
that,
as
we're
making
decisions
about
moving
forward,
I
think
that's
going
to
be
something
important
for
us
to
think
about.
J
So
I
just
wanted
to
see
is
that
is
that
included
in
the
analysis
or
as
we
move
forward
in
this
planning
process?
Well,
we
then
need
to
come
back
and
relook
at
the
analysis
and
add
more
information,
as
we
consider
you
know
possible
future
development
so
that
those
are
my
two
comments
and
questions.
Yeah.
C
Since
they
were
questions,
let
me
try
and
answer
them
and
Frederick
or
Danny
may
want
to
add
to
them.
Taking
the
second
question.
First,
all
of
these
intersections
have
been
chosen
with
an
eye
toward
what
we
believe
is
the
likely
future
development
pattern
within
the
city
and
the
surrounding
area
in
the
unincorporated
County.
C
As
you
said,
there
is
a
known
pipeline
of
quite
a
large
number
of
projects
and
beyond
that,
there's
even
an
understanding
of
likely
areas
where
development
might
occur,
and
so
we
have
selected
these
intersections
with
that
in
mind
and
the
analysis
that
we're
going
to
do
will
begin
by
looking
at
at
existing
traffic
volumes
at
those.
But
the
whole
point
of
the
analysis
is
to
project
future
traffic
volumes,
congestion
and
necessary
improvements,
assuming
that
the
development
that
will
be
foreseen
in
the
general
plan
occurs.
C
So
that's
a
very
long
way
of
saying
the
short
answer
is
yes.
Future
development
is
being
taken
into
account
in
terms
of
your
second
question
or
your
first
question
about
what
future
means
as
I
understand
it.
The
word
future
means
that
these
are
intersections
that
don't
actually
exist
today,
but
you
know
one
of
the
streets
exists,
but
there's
not.
There
may
be
a
three-legged
intersection
today
that
will
become
four-legged.
There
may
be
some
significant
changes
or
there
may
just
not
be
an
intersection
at
that
location.
P
C
O
C
I
Hi-
and
this
is
Danny
when,
when
we
looked
at
the
intersections
originally,
we
had
far
more
than
the
30
intersections
and
what
we
did
was
we
prioritize
that
30
intersections
the
ones
that
were
over
that
the
amount
of
30
what
staff
could
do
at
a
later
date?
If
we
needed
to
study
more
intersections,
we
could
probably
put
together
a
project
outside
of
a
general
plan
project
and
take
that
to
Council
and
do
a
limited
study
at
those
intersections
separate.
And
apart
from
the
general
plan,
update.
C
C
O
Yes,
so
I
guess
the
second
part
to
that,
because
you
were
talking
about
pulling
25
and
one
and
I
can't
remember
the
other
number.
So,
if
you're
pulling
those
off
the
draft
study,
I'm
assuming
that
you've
already
spent
the
money
for
the
study-
or
you
were
talking
earlier-
that
you're
gonna
go
and
you'll
be
able
to
look
at
what
the
what
the
county
has
done
with
that
add
more
streets
more
intersections
or
this
is
it
otherwise,
it
is
gonna
cost
more
money.
O
C
Very
welcome
so
the
just
to
clarify
this
is
what
Frederick
has
said
is
that
we
can
remove
those
intersections.
They
will
actually
still
get
studied.
We
will
use
different
techniques.
It
will
be
utilizing
some
data,
that's
available
from
the
county
from
previous
studies.
It
may
not
be
exactly
the
same
type
of
analysis,
but
I
think
Frederick's
assuring
us
that
it
will
be
good
enough
and
by
eliminating
those
four
I'm,
all
along
Fairview
number,
one,
six,
seven
and
twenty
four.
C
It
actually
does
free
up
for
other
intersections,
and
we
did
get
a
couple
of
recommendations
to
look
at
156
and
25
to
look
at
another
intersection
along
25
and
I.
Think
we're
done
with
public
comments.
So
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
Frederick
I'll,
put
you
on
the
spot
for
a
minute
and
ask
if
you
have
a
recommendation
as
to
what
those
four
would
be
or
if
you
prefer,
we
can
ask
the
g-pack
members
for
their
four
recommendations.
P
So
so
for
25
and
156
right,
that's
the
way
Gotham
I
just
want
to
put
the
roundabouts
in
and
in
a
long-term
there's
a
plan
to
where
you
need
to
change
there.
I
am
I,
don't
want
to
get
I,
don't
want
to
get
no
value
out
of
studying
it.
I
know,
that's
what's
planned
right,
it
was
confirmed
today
Calkins
as
a
short-term
plan
to
to
install
around
about
there
and
the
long
term,
the
overcrossing,
so
I
and
again
it's
way
outside
of
the
city,
even
though
it
may
be
important
for
the
community.
C
P
They
were
also
thoughts,
maybe
on
4th
and
San
Felipe
I
think
those
were
the
bigger
ones
that
I
can
recall.
We
could
probably
study
we
have
it
on
Buena,
Vista
I
think
we
have
mother
there,
there's
a
well.
It's
actually
like
for
intersection,
run
boy,
I,
noticed
I,
don't
know,
there's
more
there,
that
we
should
look
at
okay.
C
Let's
turn
it
over
to
the
g-pack,
then
it
sounded
like
some
of
the
g-pack
members
also
have
ideas
of
specific
ones
to
look
at.
So
let
me
just
open
it
up
turn
it
back
to
the
g-pack
for
conversation.
Does
any
of
the
three
of
you
want
to
suggest
specific
intersections?
We
can
add
four.
So
are
there
specific
intersections
that
you
would
like
to
see
to
round
out
those
four.
F
Yeah
I'd
like
to
jump
in
here
again,
I'm
pretty
familiar
with
the
some
of
the
studies
have
been
done
and
just
to
add
to
that
19.
There
is
a
intersection
plan
there
already
and
18.
Some
other
improvements
are
already
planned.
So
there
is
information
on
those
two
areas
right.
There
I
look
at
coming
from
that
direction,
though
Union
Road,
Sarah
Vista
area
you're
going
to
have
a
water
new
traffic.
F
Coming
from
that
new
development,
that's
being
built
there,
that
might
be
an
area
to
consider
if
there's
also
the
issue
of
the
union
of
Valley
View,
but
if
anything
Cerebus
who
probably
has
to
be
looked
at,
there's
a
school
there
and
a
lot
of
new
homes
being
built
a
lot
of
more
a
lot
more
traffic
coming
in
that
direction,
pretty
quick!
My
concerns
were
had
to
do
with
Sunnyslope
federic
I.
Think
you
hit
that
correctly.
F
That's
an
area
that
has
a
lot
of
traffic
flow,
going
through
it
and
even
into
up
to
live
Lane,
which
is
another
problem
to
that
point.
Hillcrest
memorial
area
is
exactly
right
again.
Those
are
problem
areas.
Danny
can
jump
in
to
some
of
these
I'm
sure
he's
very
familiar
with
some
of
these
problems
that
we
him
and
I
have
talked
about
for
years,
so
that
Hillcrest
area,
memorial,
Hillcrest
and
I
think
there
was
another
intersection
I'm
not
familiar.
F
What
the
name
is
right
now
that
is
a
problem
along
Hillcrest
I,
wouldn't
worry
about
the
156
to
25.
We
just
got
done.
Having
a
meeting
about
that
it
is
an
overpass
is
probably
one
for
one
of
the
projects
on
highway
25,
so
that's
being
taken
care
of
already
so
I
wouldn't
go
in
that
direction,
but
I
would
start
with
Union
some
of
the
sunny
slope,
Hillcrest,
Memorial,
definitely
and
the
other
items
that
you
might
have
had
for
Hillcrest.
C
Right
and
I
think
I
just
want
to
say,
I
think
we
to
move
this
along.
It
might
be
sufficient
to
give
staff
and
consultants
direction
for
those
generalized
areas
and
then
through
through
a
motion.
Allow
us
to
finish
this
up
and
not
bring
it
back
to
another
meeting,
but
I
course
want
to
get
the
consent
of
the
g-pack.
To
do
that.
Danny
were
you
about
to
talk?
Was
that
your
voice
coming
through
yeah.
I
No
I
I
agree
with
you
about
getting
that
to
give
us
depth
just
a
little
bit
of
leeway
in
making
those
tough
final
decisions
after
the
g-pack
gives
us
some
general
consensus
and
in
the
direction
they
wanted
to
go
with
regard
to
a
sunny
slope.
Road
I
have
a
couple
of
traffic
studies
that
are
being
done
on
some
slope
now.
I
do
agree
with
the
mayor
with
regards
to
Hillcrest
and
Memorial.
Maybe
that
intersection
should
be
studied.
I.
H
B
H
C
Finally,
we
verify
that
we
have
enough
happening
separately
through
other
traffic
studies
along
sunny
slope
and
if
those
would
not
be
sufficient,
that
we
consider
adding
those
as
well.
So
that's
not
that's!
Neither
an
exact
list
of
what's
taken
out.
It's
saying
four
to
six
would
be
taken
out.
It's
also
not
an
exact
list
of
what's
to
be
added.
There's
there's
six
or
seven
that
might
be
added
there,
but
that
you
would
empower
staff
to
make
those
changes
and
finalize
this
list.
Based
on
on
that
motion
that
I
just
suggested.
C
C
Okay,
then
I'll
just
quickly
call
a
vote.
Chair
Velazquez,
all
right,
a
vice-chair
Hugh
boi
I
on
a
council
member
as
n
des
all
right,
great
okay,
I.
Think,
then,
that
that
ends
that
particular
item
and
we're
close
to
being
able
to
wrap
up
our
meeting
and
I
just
essentially
have
a
couple
of
announcements
here
at
the
end,
and
we
can
also
open
it
up
if
any
g-pack
member
wants
at
this
time
to
agendize
any
other
items.
C
Your
next
meeting
will
not
be
until
august
before
august
we
are
planning
a
series
of
online
visioning
events
and
I
already
alluded
to
those
earlier
in
the
meeting.
I
know:
we've
lost
some
members
of
the
public
from
the
audience
already,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
everyone
knows
that
these
are
also
published
on
the
website
already,
so
people
can
go
back
and
look
at
those
to
find
out
exactly
when
they
are,
and
this
will
be
the
same
visioning
event
held
four
times.
C
So
no
one
needs
to
come
more
than
once
it's
going
to
be
so
interesting.
Maybe
some
people
would
like
to
come
more
than
once,
but
it
will
be
essentially
the
same
experience
for
different
times
and,
as
you
can
see
here,
those
are
listed
on
Saturday
June
27th
at
10:00
in
the
morning
on
Tuesday
June
30th
at
6:00
p.m.
Wednesday
July
8th
that
7:00
a.m.
early
in
the
morning,
particularly
for
business
people
and
people
who
need
to
get
out
early
in
the
morning
and
then
Thursday
July
9th
at
6:00
p.m.
C
this
will
be
a
hands-on
visioning
exercise
facilitated
through
zoom
I'm
likely,
including
small
group
work,
and
a
lot
of
really
robust
discussion
to
talk
about
some
of
what
are
the
most
important
issues
I'm
facing
Collister
and
what
should
go
into
a
vision
for
the
city.
I'm.
Will
then,
after
we
we
get
all
that
information.
We
will
pull
that
all
together
and
bring
it
into
a
single
vision
statement
that
will
bring
to
the
g-pack
in
a
draft
form,
and
that
will
happen
at
a
meeting
on
August
13th
again
at
6:00
p.m.
C
like
this
one
was,
and
that
will
be
a
meeting
of
the
g-pack.
Unless
we
again
requested
add
other
items,
it
will
be
a
g-pack
meeting
exclusively
focused
on
visioning.
Your
meeting
number
three
is
not
on
this
slide,
because
we
don't
have
an
exact
date.
As
we
mentioned
already,
the
were
slowed
down
a
little
on
some
of
the
primary
existing
conditions
work
because
of
the
the
issues
with
Kovan
19,
but
we
anticipate
that
meeting
number
three
will
happen
in
late
October,
because
that's
the
soonest
that
we
can
get
our
existing
conditions.
C
Weren't
finished,
and
that's
when
that
that
that's
the
topic
of
that
meeting
is
the
existing
conditions.
I
want
to
mention
also
that
member
hue
boy
suggested
that
there
be
what
I
would
call
an
audit.
He
called
it
a
critique
of
the
existing
general
plan
and
that's
something
that
we
can
make
sure
that
we
bring
forward
at
that
October
meeting
as
well.
C
So
that
gives
you
an
overview
of
where
we're
headed
again.
The
online
visioning
events
in
late
June
and
early
July,
and
your
next
meeting
in
August
and
your
meeting
number
three
in
October
on
a
date
still
to
be
set.
That
pretty
much
concludes
our
presentation,
but
the
last
thing
would
be
to
ask
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
committee
who
want
to
request
any
other
items
to
be
added
to
that
August
13th
agenda.
C
Yeah
I
mean
one
of
the
great
things
about
doing
these
remotely
is
that
they
can
be
done
very
remotely,
so
folks
who
aren't
vacation
or
elsewhere
and
log
into
any
of
these
and
I
do
also
want
to
mention
that
it
will
be
great.
If
some
are
all
the
g-pack
members
can
observe.
Some
are
all
of
these
meetings
and
we
don't
expect
or
encourage
you
to
be
act,
participants
in
these
four
meetings
and,
if
you're
not
able
to
attend
all
of
them.