►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting via Zoom June 25, 2020
Description
Planning Commission Meeting via Zoom
June 25, 2020
C
C
B
The
public
participation
city
policy,
council
chambers,
who
will
be
open
to
the
public
during
the
meeting,
however,
in
accordance
to
this
executive
orders
of
in
25-20
and
29-28
items
from
the
California
Department
of
Public
Health
gatherings
regarding
social
distancing,
seating
will
be
limited
and
on
first-come,
first-serve
basis.
In
accordance
with
the
quarters
25.
E
F
G
Alrighty
future
person,
Munzer
and
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
sight
in
architectural
review.
Twenty
19-21,
the
applicant
is
requesting
sight
in
architectural
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
one
hundred
and
fifty-one
thousand
square
foot
concrete
tilts
up
building
on
about
eleven
point,
three:
a
KERS
of
a
total
forty
point:
five
one
acre
site.
No
development
is
currently
proposed
on
the
remaining
portion
of
the
project
site.
G
The
building
is
intended
to
house
a
smart
glass
manufacturing
company,
which
is
consistent
with
the
current
zoning
and
it
would
handle
and
process
glass
that's
manufactured
at
a
different
facility
and
no
glass
would
be
manufactured
at
this
site.
The
project
was
a
previously
approved
by
the
Planning
Commission
at
its
meeting
of
June
29th
2017
/
resolution
2017
16
and
the
prior
approval
has
since
expired.
So
the
applicant
has
contacted
the
city
and
is
requesting
approval
from
the
Planning
Commission
to
proceed
forward
with
the
project
with
a
new
application.
G
It's
a
single-story
building
overall
and
it's
a
concrete
tilt
up
building
which
will
be
painted
and
stuccoed
and
have
LED
lighting
throughout
the
Eastern
elevation,
which
you
see
on
your
screen,
and
just
so
you
know
on
its
a
very
long
building.
So
the
top
is
of
your
screen
is
going
to
be
the
entire
building
and
then
I've
split
it
in
half
for
you
to
zoom
zoom
in
a
little
bit
on
the
bottom
two
pictures.
G
So
the
eastern
elevation
that
we're
looking
at
now
faces
San
Felipe
Road
and
contains
multiple
storefront
window
systems
with
entry
points
in
several
locations
across
the
approximately
eight
hundred
and
forty
foot
frontage
and
there's
multiple
steel
awnings
located
above
some
of
the
storefront
areas
and
the
building
contains
various
articulations
and
recessed
areas
to
break
up
the
facade
throughout
moving
on
to
the
North
elevation.
This
would
face
the
newly
constructed
Burt
Drive
extension,
and
this
would
be
the
main
point
of
access
for
the
project.
G
The
storefront
windows
and
steel
awnings
wrap
around
about
half
of
this
elevation
from
the
eastern
elevation
on
the
San
Felipe
side,
the
western
elevation
again
same
kind
of
layout
on
my
PowerPoint
slide.
The
long
full
thing
is
on
the
top
there
and
then
the
bottom
two
is
split
in
half,
and
this
also
has
a
steel
awning
running
the
majority
of
its
length,
which
covers
the
walkway
on
this
side
of
the
building,
and
there
are
surfer
windows
on
either
end
and
smaller
windows,
located
above
the
awning
along
the
central
sections
of
the
building.
G
Finally,
the
southern
elevation
contains
one
storefront
entry
and
two-man
doors,
and
it
also
has
six
loading
docks
and
the
loading
dock
doors
are
depressed
and
into
the
ground
into
the
grade
of
the
elevation,
so
that
truck
deliveries
can
roll
right
up
and
then
there's
also
two
on
grade
roll-up
doors.
As
you
can
see,.
G
San
Felipe
Road,
which
is
at
the
top
of
your
your
screen,
but
so
we're
oriented
north,
is
going
to
be
to
the
left
side
of
the
screen.
San
Felipe
Road
is
our
primary
vehicle,
er
access
to
the
site,
and
there
would
be
a
new
primary
axis
on
San
Felipe
Road,
which
is
about
1200
feet
north
of
the
current
access.
G
The
bird
drive
extension
is
planned
to
extend
into
the
neighboring
industrial
park
and
it
will
align
with
the
future
bird
drive
on
the
eastern
side
of
San
Felipe.
As
that
property
develops
in
the
future,
there
will
be
deceleration
lanes
on
sampling
bay,
road
for
truck
traffic.
That's
entering
the
development
on
the
southbound
lane,
and
acceleration
lanes
would
be
required
for
truck
and
vehicular
traffic,
exiting
the
project
and
traveling
north
on
San
Felipe
Road.
The
current
access
on
San
Felipe
Road,
which
serves
agricultural
businesses
today,
would
operate
as
the
secondary
exit.
G
G
There
is
a
requirement
for
municipal
code
for
hundred
square
feet
of
floor
area
for
every
400
square
feet
of
floor
area
of
the
building.
We
need
one
parking
space,
and
so
there
are
378
required
vehicle
parking
spaces
and
a
19
required
bicycle
parking
spaces.
So
the
applicant
is
exceeding
and
meeting
the
parking
requirements.
G
And
the
project
site
would
be
landscaped
in
the
areas
that
are
shaded
on
your
screen,
so
along
the
San,
Felipe
and
fort
frontage,
as
well
as
a
small
strip
of
area
along
the
southern
side
of
the
property,
and
that's
just
going
to
be
kind
of
shrubs
and
grasses
and
ground
cover.
As
indicated
on
the
plans,
the
project
has
about
91
thousand
square
feet
of
landscaped
area,
which
is
about
eighteen
and
a
half
percent
of
the
site,
and
our
project
requirement
is
10%
minimum
so
that
18%
is
exceeding
our
landscaping
requirements
in
the
industrial
zone.
G
There
was
a
previous
environmental
impact
report
for
this
project
or
for
actually
for
a
larger
industrial
airport
terminal,
Business
Park
project
into
May
of
2000,
and
that
was
to
build
a
tended
map
for
this
area
for
airport
and
industrial
uses,
and
then,
since
then,
the
site
was
annexed
into
the
city
and
none
of
the
proposed
development
from
that
er
has
occurred.
But
when
this
project
was
previously
approved
in
2017,
there
was
an
addendum
to
that.
E
is
consistent
with
the
findings
from
the
original
EA
r
and
then
there's
also
a
tentative
map.
G
Approval
tentative
map
that
is
2019
for,
and
that
is
for
dividing
not
only
this
site,
which
is
the
forty
point
like
eight
eight
acres,
but
it's
it's
a
little
over
a
hundred
acres
and
into
sixty
industrial
lots,
and
so
that
is
also
an
environmental
impact
report
for
that
tentative
map
and
this
project
would
become
lot.
One
of
that
approved
tentative
map.
G
There
are
a
few
conditions
that
we'd
like
to
change
from
the
draft
conditions
in
your
draft
resolution,
condition
number
32
discusses
barricades
at
roads
that
end
at
the
property
lines,
we'd
like
to
strike
that
as
and
if
you'll,
if
you'll
see
from
the
previous
slides,
there
is
going
to
be
a
roundabout
at
the
end
of
the
bird
Drive
extension
which,
if
and
when
the
tentative
map
improvements
go
through,
that
will
be
extended,
replaced
and
extended
with
the
street
that
that
moves
through.
So
there
won't.
H
G
Isn't
a
need
for
barricades
on
this
project?
There's
no
streets
that
directly
end
so
we'd
like
to
strike
condition,
32
condition.
35
talks
about
frontage
improvements
again
due
to
the
tentative
map,
also
having
a
current
approval.
There
isn't
a
need
for
full
frontage
improvements
along
San
Felipe
road,
but
the
applicant
will
be
required
to
underground
existing
overhead
utilities,
but
we.
H
G
Like
to
strike
the
word
streetlights
from
this
condition
and
then
finally
condition
38
is
similar
to
condition
32.
It
talks
about
a
non
vehicular
access
strip
at
streets
that
terminate
at
the
project
boundary
again,
we'd
like
to
strike
that
condition
because
of
the
roundabout,
that's
being
proposed.
The
temporary
roundabout.
G
E
G
B
B
B
J
Right
this
is
an
hall
with
San
Benito
engineering
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
Oh
as
Eva
described.
This
is
a
project
you've
seen
before
and
we're
coming
back
with
it
to
try
and
move
forward.
We've
gone
through
design
and
it's
took
longer
than
expected.
So
we
are,
it
expired
any
rate
we
mr.
Winn
is
planning
to
move
forward.
We
have
gone
over
these
conditions
with
staff.
J
The
only
comment
I'd
like
to
make
was
I
think
we
also
discussed
this
a
little
bit
with
the
tentative
mouth
is
on
condition:
74
I'm,
not
looking
for
a
change
I'm,
just
commenting
that
we
in
discussion
with
staff.
We
agreed
that
mr.
Winn
is
responsible
for
in
any
need
to
change
the
lift
station
that
he
causes.
J
Certainly
anything
he
brings
to
the
project
that
would
cause
the
lift
station
to
be
upgraded
is
his
responsibility,
but
this
lift
station
has
had
issues
and
staff
has
agreed
that
they
can
provide
the
information
for
recent
projects
that
have
been
planned
for
this
lift
station,
so
that
we
can
make
sure
it
gets
designed
to
incorporate
not
only
what
mr.
Winn
is
doing,
but
possibly
address
their
concerns
for
this
lift
station
that
have
caused
it
to
be
on
the
CIP
list
for
a
while
now.
But
mr.
H
I
So
I
think
in
the
last
meeting
which
I
wasn't
at
in
January,
there
was
a
I
believe
this
was
the
same
project
that
was
discussed
and
in
the
subject
of
roundabouts
came
up,
so
it
is
so.
If
they're
going
to
do,
we
know,
there's
gonna
be
roundabouts
for
sure,
or
is
they
gonna?
Be
traffic
control,
the
inter
traffic
control.
B
F
B
I
B
G
All-Righty
item
to
is
site
in
architecture
overview,
20,
19-20
and
the
applicant
is
requesting
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
two-story
duplex
on
a
4,000
square
foot
lot
located
at
1,
1
4
4th
Street.
The
property
is
located
behind
an
existing
residential
unit
that
is
on
a
separate
parcel
and
this
project
property
has
access
provided
off
of
Hopkins
alley
to
the
north.
The
duplex
will
be
a
two-story
building
with
each
story
having
a
party
with
each
unit.
G
The
northern
front
elevation
will
face
hawkins
alley.
This
building
will
be
made
of
stucco
with
a
composite
shingle,
hip
style
roof,
and
this
elevation
will
have
an
exterior
staircase
leading
up
to
a
covered
second-story
entrance
to
unit
2
of
the
construction,
and
there
will
be
a
small
bathroom
window
in
a
larger
bedroom
window.
G
G
Section
17
1806,
oh
of
our
Municipal
Code,
requires
one
and
a
half
parking
spaces
per
two-bedroom
unit
for
a
total
of
three
required
spaces,
and
this
project
is
proposing
a
two-car
garage
for
each
unit
which
meets
this
requirement
and
for
bicycle
parking.
There
is
a
requirement
of
ten
percent
of
the
required
vehicle
spaces,
which
amounts
to
one
space
for
this
project,
and
there
is
proposed
to
be
a
bicycle
rack
located
under
the
staircase
for
unit
two
on
the
north
side
of
the
building,
and
this
meets
the
requirement
for
bicycle
parking.
G
There
is
a
requirement
for
five
hundred
square
feet
of
open
space
for
any
multifamily
unit
and
that
five
hundred
square
feet
is
divided
between
private
and
common
open
space.
So
the
project
requires
a
total
of
one
thousand
square
feet
of
open
space
for
two
units
and
at
ground
level.
Each
unit
has
to
have
250
square
feet
of
private
open
space.
G
This
site
is
designated
as
medium
density,
residential
in
our
general
plan
and
the
I
believe
that's
actually
incorrect
in
my
staff
before
it
should
be
downtown
mixed-use
in
our
general
plan,
so
the
4,000
square
foot
side
can
support
between
2
and
4
units
at
25
to
45
units
per
acre
and
2545
is
the
correct.
The
units
per
acre
for
downtown
makes
use,
and
so
the
project
is
consistent
with
the
general
plan
and
this
property
is
located
within
our
outpost.
Piolo
special
study
seismic
zone.
G
However,
pursuant
to
the
public
resources
code
regarding
earthquake
fault,
zoning,
the
proposed
development
does
not
constitute
a
project
as
defined
by
the
public
resources
Code
section
262
1.6,
because
the
development
is
water,
steel
frame
structure,
it's
less
than
two
storeys
tall
or
two
or
less
storeys
tall,
and
it's
part
of
a
development
of
less
than
four
units.
So,
therefore,
it's
exempt
from
the
outpost
role
of
size
and
extending
requirements,
which
would
be
a
trenching
study
to
determine
if
faults
are
present.
So
it
is
that
from
that.
G
The
facts
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
review,
the
applicants
request,
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
in
architectural
view,
application,
2019-20,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Thank
you
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
F
K
Good
evening,
applicant
is
requesting
an
approval
for
a
minor
subdivision,
numbered
2019
dashboard
to
subdivide
a
1.5
in
your
law
into
two
parcels
located
at
315.
Fourth
Street.
The
county.
Assessor
parcel
number
is
zero.
Five,
two
one,
three
one:
zero
two
one:
it's
located
within
the
West
gateway
zoning
district.
The
project
is
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
4th
Street
and
Feliz
Drive
south
the
Pentecostal
court
parcel
a
is
proposed
at
0.5
to
a
KERS
and
is
currently
vacant
with
no
proposed
development.
K
At
this
time,
parcel
B
is
proposed
at
one
point:
zero
three
acres
and
received
an
entitlement:
On
June
27,
2009,
teen
foresight
in
architectural
review,
2000
19-9
to
construct
a
nine
thousand
one
hundred
square
foot
retail
commercial
building.
This
entitlement
expires
on
June
27th
2021
unless
the
city
grants
an
extension,
the
city
of
Hollister's
2005
through
2023
general
and
designates
this
site
as
West
Gateway.
K
This
designation
provides
for
series
of
parcels
with
neighborhood,
commercial
and
multi-family
residential
uses
to
provide
a
retail
oriented
entry
Boulevard
at
the
west
entrance
to
the
city
near
the
San
Benito
River.
The
designation
is
intended
to
provide
convenient
services
to
regional
traffic.
On
highway
156
to
encourage
community
shopping,
retail
and
offices
with
medium
to
high
density
residential
uses
at
a
density
of
20
to
35
units
per
net
acre
outside
of
the
downtown
Hollister
area.
K
This
project
is
consistent
with
the
West
gateways.
Doning,
the
West
gateway
does
not
have
a
minimum
required
lot
size,
as
previously
mentioned
proposed.
Parcel
B
has
received
entitlements,
parcel
a
has
no
de
Ville,
then
proposals
at
this
time,
however,
parcel
a
proposed
at
0.5
to
acres
can't
support
10
to
18
residential
and/or
commercial
units.
The
1.55
acres
site
can
accommodate
up
to
31
to
50
for
residential
or
commercial
uses,
as
allowed
by
the
West
Gateway
zoning
district
for
the
access
further.
K
This
proposed
project
the
proposed
parcel
B
would
have
access
off
of
Feliz
Drive
to
the
east
and
Pinacate
court
to
the
north.
Access
to
proposed
parcel
a
will
occur
through
a
reciprocal
access
agreement,
which
can
be
seen
on
your
attached
parcel
maps.
The
reciprocal
access
agreement
will
connect
parcels
a
and
B
from
east
to
west
and
extend
across
parcel
a
to
allow
for
continued
access
to
the
west
as
future
properties
develop.
This
is
consistent
with
the
West
Gateway
guidelines
for
circulation
and
the
general
plan
and
the
zoning
code.
K
And
so
before,
making
a
recommendation.
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
we
do
have
a
few
changes
to
some
of
the
conditions
that
were
in
the
draft
resolution
for
a
condition
number
7.
As
you
can
see
on
your
screen,
we
will
be
eliminating
the
need
for
city
council
approval
for
the
parcel
mount
package
condition.
16
has
been
changed.
Its
shall
read
now
on
the
parcel
map.
The
applicant
shall
dedicate
a
reciprocal
access
agreement,
as
shown
on
the
tentative
map
condition.
26
has
been
eliminated
altogether
and
then
condition.
K
37
has
been
changed
to
now
read
on
the
parcel
map.
The
supervisor
shall
Ruth
wing
fish,
abutters
rights
along
the
4th
Street
frontage
for
parcel
a
and
B
along
a
portion
of
the
Pinacate
Court
frontage
for
parcel
B
and
along
the
Pinta
Kaji
frontage,
a
parcel
8,
as
shown
on
the
parcel
map,
and
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
review,
the
applicants
requests
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
parcel
and
make
the
following
motion:
a
dr.
K
D
K
K
So
parcel
B
is
what
will
have
the
dollar
general,
and
that
was
the
entitlements
for
a
commercial
retail
business.
That
I
was
mentioning
earlier.
That
is
planned
to
still
take
place.
They
still
have
entitlements
they're,
going
through
the
process
of
submitting
to
development
services
and
right
now
on
parcel
a.
We
do
not
have
any
proposals
at
this
time.
So
this
what
they're
coming
for
tonight
is
to
just
subdivide
the
parcel
okay.
L
C
K
K
I'm,
trying
to
so
until
parcel
B
is
developed,
they
will
still
have
access
through
Pinacate
and
through
police.
Our
police
drive
once
parcel
aid
has
something
that
is
proposed
to
be
develop
on
it.
That's
when
we'll
eliminate
access
at
pentacon
in
court,
so
the
traffic
that
would
have
previously
impacted
it
will
no
longer
be
going
on
to
pin
Tecate
court.
They
will
have
access
through
Felice
Drive
and
then
through
the
parking
lot.
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
kind
of
see
the
easement
that
goes
through
the
middle
of
the
parcel.
E
D
Through
police
Drive,
okay,
so
there
will
not.
There
I,
remember,
saying
that
they
don't
want
to
have
any
access
coming
in
from
the
main
road.
So
they're
telling
me
that
the
people,
if
parcel
a
gets
developed
they'll,
be
coming
through
from
a
police,
drag
not
I'm.
Gonna
I'm,
gonna
butcher,
that
name
the
punic
crazy
court.
M
The
engineering,
the
engineering
remember
what
we
also
speak
a
little
bit
about
that
ran
out
Commissioner
Johnson,
but
that
is
correct.
You
recollect
correctly
City
polisher
City
Council
adopted
a
mitigated:
negative
declaration
for
the
West
beautification
and
essentially
the
areas
from
Blackpool
all
the
way
to
West
Boulevard,
one
of
the
goals
of
the
West
identification
to
try
to
limit
access.
M
D
I
would
I
know
the
biggest
problem.
The
residence
has
they're
worried
about
a
lot
of
traffic
they're
worried
about
a
lot
of
cars
coming
through
their
neighborhood,
because
it's
been
a
court
for
so
long.
They
don't
have
any
traffic.
So
what
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
understand
that
there
will
not
be
access
to
parcel
a
from
that
court.
Once
it's
developed.
M
M
Or
the
dollar
general,
the
axis
would
be
for
these
crimes
being
created
and
whatever
on
development
of
partial
eight,
which
consistent
with
r18.
We
don't
need
this
rate.
It
can
be
a
combination
of
a
high
residential
and/or,
commercial.
So,
on
on
that
government,
there
is
a
conditional
approval
that
would
essentially
eliminate
the
access
from
peak
rating
and
it
would
only
be
described.
M
Upon
future
development
of
the
parcel
to
the
west,
essentially,
the
the
there
is
a
condition
that
indicates
that
the
access
will
continue
to
the
west
and
aligned
with
regular
shui,
essentially
without
any
new
driver
ease
along
forestry
and
maintaining
that
regulates
waiting
for
through
the
intersection.
Okay,
so.
M
D
F
I'm
yeah
I
have
a
question
not
really
sure
what
the
right
question
is.
I
guess
I'm,
trying
to
understand
the
purpose
of
doing
this
and
I'm
not
sure
that
I'm
not
sure
that
I
totally
understand
what
the
cuz
all
again.
It
goes
back
to
I.
Think
I'm,
not
asking
the
right
question
it's
about
the
impact
to
the
surrounding
area.
So
what
would
it
be?
Well,
what
would
it
be?
The
effect
if
this
was
not
approved
and
what
would
be
the
effect
if
it
is
approved.
M
As
well
regarding
their
their
intense
with
the
essentially,
what
would
happen
is
dorsal
feet
would
be,
or
the
Dollar
General
would
be
yet
and
then
pourcel
a
would
be
a
separate
parcel
with
with
easements
for
access
between
the
both
for
a
separate
parcel
and
universe
to
future
future
entitlements.
For
that,
so
somebody
can
come
in
later
on.
They
can
potentially
sell
personal
a
to
somebody
else
and
that
property
owner
can
then
build
something.
M
M
M
B
D
Just
have
a
just
a
comment:
I
would
hope
that
we
were
able
to
do
this,
that
the
residents
of
the
neighborhood
that
really
did
not
want
the
Dollar
General,
because
I
know
their
biggest
concern
was
traffic
in
their
course,
because
it's
been
a
court
for
so
long
and
it's
just
the
resident
that
finding
out
that
it
may
be
closed
off.
That
I'm,
hoping
I
can't
speak
for
them,
but
I
would
hope
that
maybe
that
would
give
them
some
relief
a
little
bit.
I
guess
is
the
word
I'm
looking
for
that.
G
C
C
Good
evening
the
applicant
is
requesting
site
and
architectural
approval
to
convert
to
existing
multi
office
buildings
on
a
twelve
thousand
eight
hundred
and
seventy
three
square
foot
and
locked
into
three
residences.
This
is
an
e
home
office.
Zoning
district,
the
front
primary
building
which
faces
San
Benito
Street,
consists
is
requesting
will
consist
of
two
attached
residential
units.
C
Per
the
zoning
code,
the
home
office
district
allows
multifamily
residences.
Additionally,
the
housing
density
or
the
home
office
district
is
eight
to
twelve
units
per
acre.
Therefore,
a
nearly
1300
square
foot
lot
can
have
up
to
three
residential
units.
This
makes
the
project
consistent
with
the
zoning
code
and
the
general
plan
right
now.
I'm
showing
the
floor
plans,
the
proposed
floor
plans
or
the
main
building
unit,
a
will
be
a
two-story
two-bedroom
house
and
unit
B
will
be
a.
C
C
C
Currently,
you
can
access
the
property
from
the
north
and
exit
from
the
south.
The
proposed
circulation
plan
will
allow
for
vehicles
to
enter
and
exit
from
the
south
entrance.
I
would
like
to
note
that
a
condition
of
approval
for
the
proposed
driveway
is
to
provide
a
clear
line
of
sight
for
the
vehicles
entering
and
exiting
the
property.
C
C
C
C
C
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Staff
recommends
the
Planning
Commission
review.
The
applicants
requests
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
in
Architectural,
Review
2020
for
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
C
C
F
H
I
C
M
Thank
you,
sir
I
understand
there
is
a
condition
of
approval
that
would
require
that
the
property
owner
enter
into
a
agreement
indicating
specifically
how
it
is
that
the
property
owner
will
be
maintaining
the
premises
landscape
and
he
any
any
type
of
maintenance.
It
would
be
specifically
detailed.
It
would
be
reviewed
by
staff.
We
would
you
and
make
sure
that
we
agree
with
it,
and
then
we
will
have
to
require
them
to
record
it
with
the
property.
M
So
that
way,
and
the
existing
property
owner
or
any
subsequent
property
owner
will
be
responsible
to
change
that
up
within
the
site.
The
ranchers
there
that
is
going
to
rent
the
units
that
would
be
perfectly
okay,
however,
in
property
owner,
would
be
subject
to
the
requirements
of
that
or
the
document.
The
cleaners,
the
creation
of
the
maintenance
for
the
same.
E
I
H
I
I
H
I
M
Okay,
I
think
it's
better
here
in
the
front
where
we
have
the
microphone,
that's
a
little
bit
more
sensitive.
So
when
I
was
indicating.
Is
that
to
answer
your
question?
Commissioner
intercepted
refers
to
whether
or
not
in
condition
to
be
applied
absolutely.
Can
we
actually
have
a
condition
that
requires
that
it's
prior
to
issuance
of
a
building
permit
that
we
receive
a
water,
efficient
landscape
application
that
specifically
specific
to
the
site?
M
And
that
gives
me
being
approved
by
our
landscape
architect
on
staff
that
we
consult
with,
which
is
the
Water
Resources
Association
of
San
Diego
County?
And
so,
if
you
would
like
to
add
or
the
Commission,
if
it's
the
edge
of
the
Commission
to
add
to
that
condition
that
something
likes
of
changing
the
front
of
the
front
yard
landscape
to
the
desire
of
the
Commission
that
that's
fine
or
for
it
to
be
changed
from
rock
to
another
type
of
landscape.
I
F
It
is
that,
like
a
better
time
to
ask
for
something
more
specific
rather
than
here
or
is
that
about
where
I
should
say
not
better,
but
is
that
another
opportunity
to
ask
for
something
specific
for
I?
Don't
really
have
a
preference
I
think
it's
fine,
but
I
do
think,
especially
like
Kevin
said
and
like
Commissioner
Henderson
said
it's
it's
you
know
residential
probably
makes
that
are
set
to
do
something
different,
but
I.
M
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
there
was
a
new,
a
new
state
legislature
that
came
out
that
basically
required
that
all
new
developments
that
were
approved
in
this
in
cities
in
California
maintained
a
water
efficiency
type
of
landscape,
and
so
because
of
that,
our
since
then
we
require
that
we
see
a
landscape
plan
when
we
approve
internal
mental
private
fire
to
improve
an
endowment.
However,
the
next
step
would
be
that
prior
to
issuance
of
a
building
permit
at
that
plan
comes
in
with
specifics.
M
Specific
type
of
ground
cover
specific
types
of
uses
of
bushes
specific
types
of
trees,
and
we
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
you
see
specific
irrigation
plan
plan.
That
shows
us
how
much
water
is
going
to
be
used
to
make
sure
that
that
the
landscape
is
going
to
be
up
kept,
and
so
there's
there's
specific
thresholds
that
we
have
to
use.
M
So
essentially,
what
would
happen
here
is
parenting.
Issues
of
building
prevent
the
applicant
would
cement
that
plan
to
us.
You
will
then
send
it
over
to
Sean
Novak
for
for
their
review
and
conformance
so
for
tonight.
If
the
desire
of
the
Planning
Commission
is
to
have
that
landscape
in
the
front
change
from
a
rock
type
of
landscape
to
something
different,
such
as
either,
maybe
some
bushes
or
or
some
ground
cover.
That's
not
going
to
use
a
lot
of
water,
that's
okay,
and
we
can
we
can
either.
M
I
H
A
F
I
think
I
am
only
because
I,
because
I
think
that
personally
I
think
that
it's
okay,
the
rock,
is
okay
I,
think
it
would
look
a
little
nicer
if
there
was
some
additional
bushes
or
shrubs
around
the
building,
but
it's
also
a
personal
preference
and
I
just
I'm
concerned
about
putting
a
personal
preference
into
a
condition
for
somebody
who
owns
this
property
I.
Think
rock
is
okay,
I
see
a
lot
of
homes
with
rocks
in
front
of
them
and
I
think
they
look
fine
and
they
add
other
there.
F
You
know
kinds
of
shrubs
and
trees,
and
things
like
that,
so
I
just
am
a
little
concerned
about
putting
up.
That
is
reference
and
when
I
think
it's
just
a
difference.
You
know
like
what
your
aesthetic
is
and
I
personally
think
it
looks.
Okay,
I
think
it
will
look
nicer
with
a
little
bit
more
shrubs
and
more
bushes
or
some
a
tree
or
something
but
I.
Think
it's
fine,
so
I
was
kind
of
thinking
that
so
the
reason
I
asked
the
question
earlier
was
I
was
thinking.
F
F
I
A
H
H
B
B
A
G
Good
evening
again,
thank
you,
as
mentioned.
This
item
is
for
citing
architecture
overview
2020
two
the
applicant
is
requesting
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
new
20,000
square-foot
industrial
shell
warehouse
building.
This
project
is
located
on
a
six
and
a
half
acre
site
at
12:58
McCloskey
Road,
north
of
Mojave
Road
and
east
of
San
Felipe
Road.
In
the
light
industrial
zoning
districts,
the
shell
building
will
contain
four
5,000
square-foot
tenant
spaces.
Each
will
have
a
separate
storefront
entry
as
well
as
a
restroom.
G
G
The
project
is
proposing
to
improve
3.92
acres
of
these
6.52
acre
site
and
leave
the
northern
remainder
undeveloped.
The
shell
building
will
have
a
large
open
industrial
yard
in
the
rear,
with
added
vehicle
entry
from
the
paved
parking
area
on
the
east
and
west
side
of
the
building,
and
the
yard
will
be
fenced
as
well
as
screened
with
landscaping.
G
The
east
and
west
elevations
are
plain:
painted,
metal,
facade
and
they'll
be
largely
facing
the
interior
of
the
fence
that
surrounds
the
Austria
Yard
and
then
finally,
the
northern
or
rear
elevation
will
have
four
large
roll-up
doors,
one
for
each
of
the
tenant
spaces,
and
this
facade
is
also
painted
metal
and
again,
there
will
be
LED
light
fixtures.
Next
to
each
of
the
doors.
G
The
project
proposes
a
35
foot
wide
landscape
strip
along
the
frontage
of
the
property
which
will
house
the
stormwater
management
systems
and
is
in
compliance
with
our
industrial
standards.
The
front
of
the
building
will
have
the
sidewalk
and
the
ends
of
the
parking
Rose
will
be
capped
with
the
landscape,
the
area.
On
each
end,
there
will
be
landscape
screening
along
the
eastern
and
western
property
lines
for
the
length
of
the
fencing
that
encloses
the
industrial
yard,
as
well
as
pursuant
to
our
parking
code.
G
Again,
one
parking
space
for
each
four
hundred
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area
for
any
of
our
general
industrial
uses,
and
this
twenty
thousand
square
foot
building
requires
50
parking
spaces.
The
project
has
proposed
all
50
of
those
parking
small
stalls.
Three
of
them
are
electrical
vehicles,
start
charging
stations
and
two
are
a
DA
accessible
stalls.
G
And
then,
at
this
time
before
you
today,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
add
on
to
that
original
approval
from
last
January
and
I
do
have
an
image
here,
which
was
a
three
tenants
lease
building
so
now
they're
proposing
to
replace
that
with
the
four
tenant
space
building.
That's
here
for
your
approval
tonight,
and
so
we
prepared
an
additional
addendum
for
the
MMD
which
determined
that
there's
no
additional
environmental
effects
as
a
result
of
this
approval.
G
So
with
that
it
is
consistent
with
sequa
and
staff
recommends
a
few
changes
to
our
conditions
as
well,
and
we
would
like
to
strike
condition
12,
16
and
28,
and
they
were
standard
conditions
and
they're
not
relevant
to
this
project.
One
is
about
maintenance
of
multifamily
puts
out
landscapes
and
one
is
about
existing
sidewalks.
The
applicants
requested
that
this
be
stricken
because
there
are
no
existing
sidewalks
in
the
area.
So
staff
agreed
to
strike
that,
and
then
one
is
about
a
trash
separator
which
is
not
relevant
to
the
project.
G
So
we
would
propose
that
the
Planning
Commission
review,
the
applicants
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
in
architectural
view,
2020
with
the
removal
of
conditions,
12,
16
and
28
as
described.
Thank
you
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
M
N
Yeah
good
evening,
Planning
Commission,
my
name
is
rich
Marcus
I'm,
with
Marcus
building
systems.
Here
in
Hollister
we
are
representing
the
owner
group
on
this
project
and,
as
staff
mentioned,
the
purpose
of
the
recent
middle
of
this
project
was
based
on,
after
the
previous
approval,
doing
the
cost
analysis
for
construction,
the
cost
associated
with
all
the
site,
improvements,
the
road
improvements
and
and
whatnot
really
didn't
make
it
feasible
to
build
the
15,000
square
foot
building.
So
the
owner
decided
to
pursue
this
20,000
square
foot
projects
to
make
the
price
per
square
foot
more
accommodating.
N
K
Thank
you.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
certain
architectural
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
2250
square
foot
addition
to
an
existing
6000,
150
square
foot,
industrial
building
on
a
zero
point,
a
curb
lot.
The
property
is
located
at
20,
Hamilton
Court,
which
is
in
the
light
industrial
zoning
district.
The
proposed
addition
will
be
approximately
24
feet
in
height
50
feet
in
width
and
45
feet
in
length.
The
exterior
of
the
building
addition
will
be
finished
in
stucco,
siding
that
will
match
the
existing
building.
K
Will
have
composite
shingles
to
match
the
existing
roof.
The
west
elevation
will
have
two
roll-up
doors
with
two-man
doors,
one
on
each
side,
the
eastern
elevation
will
have
a
single
man
door.
The
northern
elevation
is
proposed
as
a
one-hour,
stucco
finished
fire
wall.
According
to
the
applicant,
the
existing
portion
of
the
building
will
continue
to
house
administrative
operations.
The
newly
proposed
portion
of
the
building
will
have
CNC
drilling
and
testing
operations.
Cnc
operations
includes
drilling
holes
into
copper
panels,
which
is
used
in
the
manufacturing
of
circuit
boards
and
the
storage
and
staging
of
panels.
K
There
will
be
no
chemicals
or
hazardous
processing
or
storage.
At
this
time,
staff
did
want
to
note
that,
pursuant
to
section
17
10030
industrial
zoning
general
development
standards,
there
are
no
required
front
side
or
rear
setbacks
for
parcels
within
the
m1
light
industrial
zoning
districts
unless
adjacent
to
a
residential
zone.
The
applicant
plans
currently
show
a
five
foot
setback.
Let
me
switch
the
slides,
so
you
guys
can
see
this
five
foot.
Setback
is
on
the
between
the
north
side
of
the
property
and
at
the
building
itself.
K
Condition
number
eight
of
the
conditions
of
approval
requires
that,
upon
submitting
plans
to
the
building
division,
the
applicant
will
designate
and
label
their
plan
set
with
current
and
future
uses
within
the
development.
The
setback
is
subject
to
change
in
accordance
with
the
building
and
fire
codes,
depending
on
the
use
of
the
addition
should
it
change.
K
So
the
current
parking
will
not
be
changing
right
now.
They
have
26
parking
spaces.
They
are
only
required
to
have
twenty-one
parking
spaces.
In
addition,
they
will
be
required
to
provide
parking.
Currently,
there
is
no
proposal
for
bicycle
parking.
Our
section
of
the
code
requires
that
5%
of
the
amount
of
parking
is
taken
for
bicycle
parking.
That
equates
to
one
space
for
a
bicycle
at
this
time.
There
are
also
no
changes
for
the
landscape.
K
Parcels
that
are
15
thousand
square
feet
or
more
shall
have
a
minimum
of
10%
landscaping.
The
current
landscaping
meets
and
exceeds
this
requirement
by
providing
12.5%
landscaping.
As
you
can
see,
the
landscaping
will
have
a
variety
or
does
have
a
variety
of
covered.
Ground
covers
shrubs
and
trees.
The
majority
of
landscaping
is
located
along
the
frontage
of
Hamilton
Court
and
the
eastern
Western
boundaries
of
the
parcel.
In
addition,
there
are
two
landscaped
strips
on
the
eastern
portion
and
southern
portion
of
the
existing
building.
H
K
Project
is
consistent
with
the
general
plan.
The
proposed
and
current
use
is
circuit
board
manufacturing,
which
is
consistent
in
Kabul,
with
the
industrial
designation
of
the
m1
light
industrial
zoning
district.
In
addition,
the
property
is
located
within
the
zone.
Six
traffic
pattern
area
of
the
Hollister
Municipal
Airport,
comprehensive
land
use
plan
safety
zones
as
a
condition
of
approval.
K
K
And
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
review,
the
applicants
requests
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion:
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
in
architectural
review,
2020
five
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Are
there
any
questions
for
staff.
I
O
Good
evening,
commissioners
staff
is
requesting
to
amend
miscellaneous
sections
of
Title
17
zoning
of
the
Hollister
Municipal
Code
to
assure
internal
consistency,
identified,
permitted,
uses
and
implement
standards
in
the
Hollister
Municipal
Code,
regarding
where
cannabis
facilities
may
be
permitted
and
regulated,
as
already
intended
by
the
code
in
the
commercial
and
mixed
use.
Industrial
and
airport
support
zoning
districts.
O
In
June
of
2019
council
was
presented
with
the
request
of
approval
of
amendments
for
commercial
cannabis
uses
and
other
tax
changes.
These
amendments
were
based
on
public
comments
and
input
from
the
community
at
the
May
13
29
teen
town
hall,
meeting
on
June
17
to
2019
City
Council
adopted
ordinance
1179,
which
amended
chapter
542
cannabis
facilities,
regulatory
permit
of
the
Hollister
Municipal
Code.
O
The
proposed
amendments
to
Title
17
will
identify
where
cannabis
facilities
may
be
permitted
by
conditional
use
permit,
as
already
intended
by
chapter
542
cannabis
facilities,
regulatory
permit
in
the
following
zoning
districts,
commercial,
mixed
use,
industrial
manufacturing
and
airport
support
zoning
district.
The
proposed
amendments
to
Title
17
assure
internal
consistency
of
land
use
designations
that
have
been
previously
approved.
O
The
proposed
amendments
to
Title
17
will
identify.
Excuse
me.
The
proposed
amendments
to
section
17,
only
Oh,
OH,
commercial,
mixed
use,
zone
land
uses
and
permit
requirements
at
the
cannabis
facilities
table,
1708
1,
the
cannabis
facilities,
which
may
be
permitted
by
a
conditional
use
in
the
north
gate.
We
are
cannabis,
cultivation,
delivery,
dispensary
distribution,
manufacturing
nursery
and
testing
the
West
gateway,
our
cannabis
cultivation,
deliberate
distribution,
manufacturing
and
testing.
There
is
an
additional
yeast
regulation,
note
number
28
that
will
be
added,
which
will
refer
to
chapter
542
for
regulations
and
provisions
for
cannabis.
O
He
proposed
amendments
to
section
17,
1203,
o
land
use
and
permit
requirements
for
the
airport
support
zoning
district.
Add
the
cannabis
facilities
to
table
17
12-2
the
cannabis
facilities
which
may
be
permitted
by
a
conditional
use
permit
in
the
airport,
support
our
cannabis
cultivation,
delivery,
dispensary
distribution,
manufacturing
nursery
and
testing,
and
there
is
an
additional
use
regulation
note
number
5,
which
will
refer
to
chapter
542
for
regulations
and
provisions
for
cannabis.
O
These
cannabis
facilities
are
consistent
with
chapter
542,
specifically
with
section
542
160
cultivation,
nursery,
dispensing
manufacturing,
distribution,
delivery,
transportation
and
testing
locations
with
that
staff
recommends
of
the
city
of
Hollister
Planning
Commission
reviewed
the
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
a
proposal
and
make
the
following
motions
adopt.
A
resolution
recommending
excuse
me
to
the
City
Council
the
adoption
of
the
amendments
to
Title
17,
zoning
of
the
Hollister
Municipal
Code.
That
concludes
the
present
and
staff
is
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
F
Do
you
have
a
question?
Commission
Windsor
sorry
was
a
meeting
myself
as
soon
as
specifically
is
not
it's
not
on
the
resolution
or
on
the
staff
reported
it,
but
it's
more.
It's
from
the
actual
coordinates
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
someone
on
staff
could
explain
the
the
couldn't.
Is
this
a
condition
I'm
not
sure
what
what
it
is?
F
Attending
physician
parent,
documented
legal
guardian
or
designated
caretaker,
so
I
was
just
wondering
under
what
circumstance
would
that
be
necessary
like
where
a
person
under
the
age
of
twenty-one
would
need
to
go
into
a
dispensary,
accompanied
by
somebody?
That's
listed
there
I'm
curious
about
why
that's
in
the
ordinance.
F
L
Thanks
so
that
was
specifically
drafted
for
medical
patients,
so,
according
to
the
state
regulations,
patients
that
are
at
work
or
18
cannot
go
in
the
sensory
according
to
our
rules,
unless
they
have
a
excuse,
me
a
medical
card,
or
they
can
also
come
in
if
they
are,
if
there
is
specifically
coming
in
with
a
a
a
person
that
is
disabled
or
whatever,
and
that
needs
medicine
does
that
make
sense,
and
it's
specifically
all
for
all
for
medical
purposes.
Okay,.
F
But
is
it
only
for
those
people
that
are
that
are
adults,
so
it's
for
18
to
21,
because
the
way
it
reads
here
it
it
just
says
no
ended.
Individuals
under
the
age
of
21
shall
be
allowed
and
then
it
lists
who
has
to
accompany
them.
So
are
you
saying
that
it's
only
people
that
are
over
18
that
may
have.
F
F
Okay,
so
the
way
that
I'm
reading
this
particular
part
of
the
ordinance,
it
doesn't
say
that
it
says
under
age
21,
it
doesn't
say
between
ages,
21
and
18.
So
I
was
a
little
I
was
a
little
concerned
about
that,
because
I
was
like
somebody,
who's
12
can
go
in
there,
but
they
have
a
medical
marijuana
card
if
they're,
accompanied
by
somebody
so
you're
saying
that
this
only
applies
to
someone
who
is
a
legal
adult
right
so
they're
over
to
18
but
under
21.
F
L
F
Okay,
okay,
yeah
I
mean
I,
think
it
would
look
I
I,
wouldn't
mind
if
it
has
that
in
there
only
because,
when
I
read
that
I
was
like
what
does
that
mean
somebody
anyone
under
21
but
I,
guess
you
know,
I
think
it
would
make
it
cleaner
if
we
could
put
something
like
that
in
there
and
I
just
said
qualification
to
make,
maybe
in
parentheses,
age,
18
or
maybe
a
definition
of
qualified.
What
qualified
patient
means.
F
I
think
that
would
make
it
a
cleaner
and
I
know
that
that's
not
part
of
the
resolution
part
of
what
we're
doing
today,
but
I,
which
I
just
read
that
and
I
was
a
little
like
surprised
with
the
language,
and
so
I
was
just
hoping
that
that
could
be
that
that
would
be
clarified.
I
mean
if
it
is
18
to
21
I.
Think
that's
fine,
and
that
should
be.
That
would
be.
That
should
be
clarified.
M
H
M
B
B
M
Do
have
a
few
planned
Department
reports
that
we
would
like
to
address
today,
a
okay
you're
presenting
master
planning.
Commission
briefly,
we
would
like
to
report
that
we
are
happy
to
announce
that
the
city
of
Hollister
has
initiated
its
general
plan
to
optic
process
to
develop
planning
documents
that
reflect
the
community's
values
and
priorities
for
the
future
of
our
precious
community.
Today
and
Hollister
has
launched
a
website
that
dedicated
solely
to
the
update
of
the
general
plan.
H
M
M
The
website
is
equipped
with
a
background
link
which
provides
information
on
the
importance
of
the
general
plan,
as
you
can
see,
just
right
below
the
header
there's
a
bad
background
link
and
that
provides
information
of
the
importance
of
the
general
plan.
It
also
provides
a
public
engagement
link
inviting
users
to
engage
in
the
General
Plan
Update,
with
online
activities
such
as
requesting
the
user
to
share
their
vision
of
Hollister,
what
the
user
likes
about
Hollister
and
what
the
user
wishes
Hollister
had
in
our
community.
M
The
public
engagement
link
also
provides
the
user
the
opportunity
to
rank
key
issues
such
as
affordable
housing,
traffic
congestion,
I.
Don't
equate
public
services,
disaster
preparedness,
job
opportunities,
high
quality
schools
amongst
others,
so
there's
there's
a
there
is
an
attempt
to
reach
out
to
the
public
virtually
to
see
you
know
to.
M
So
there's
plenty
of
information,
there's
a
link
where
people
can
contact
that
directly
with
questions
and
also
they
have
the
ability
to
be
notified,
be
placed
on
a
list
to
be
notified
of
our
next
events.
Any
public
press
releases.
We
can
send
that
information
if
they
log
in
to
Hollister
2014
.
org.
There
is
a
calendar
link
which
provides
for
important
meeting
dates
such
as
GPAC
future
meetings,
feature
Planning,
Commission
meetings
that
are
gonna
address,
general
plan,
update
information
and
also
future
city
council
meetings
that
will
address
general
plan
update
information.
M
Also
the
calendar
addresses
workshops.
So
speaking
of
workshops,
we
would
like
to
address
the
council
and
indicate
the
Planning
Commission
in
the
killing
that
the
city
will
have
for
upcoming
workshops
with
one
on
Saturday
June
27th.
This
Saturday
at
10
a.m.
the
next
one
will
be
Tuesday
June
30th
at
6
p.m.
the
following
one.
The
third
one
will
be
on
Wednesday
July,
8th
at
7
a.m.
in
the
morning
for
the
people
who
the
morning
people
who
would
like
to
maybe
come
in
and
log
in
virtually
before.
M
Maybe
before
going
to
work
and
then
the
fourth
one
would
be
on
Thursday
July,
9th
at
6
p.m.
so
there's
four
different
opportunities
to
get
the
public
engaged
and
they're
all
four
of
the
same
presentations,
but
just
for
different
opportunities
that
we
would
like
for
the
public
to
participate
any
and
also,
very
importantly,
we
would
like
to
mention
that
the
website
is
is
in
English,
but
there's
also
a
link
to
also
get
the
information
in
Spanish
as
well.
M
What
you
see
in
front
of
you
in
the
screen
is
also
a
Facebook
page
that
we
started
as
well
in
collaboration
with
our
consultant,
who
has
been
really
great,
a
place
works
Inc,
and
there
is
also
a
Facebook
page.
So
please
log
in
to
Hollister
General
Plan,
Update
2040.
Please
give
it
a
like.
Please
give
it
a
thumbs
up
and
please
share
with
all
of
your
contacts.
M
So
that's
that's
the
general
information
in
regards
to
our
general
plan
update
to
other
brief
things
also
very
important.
Our
next
report
is
that
we
would
like
to
introduce
our
newest
system
planner
by
the
name
of
Adelaide
Perez.
She
is
the
one
I
just
gave
the
presentation
for
the
cannabis.
We
are
happy
to
introduce
her
she's,
the
newest
member
of
the
city
of
Hofstra
planning,
department,
I,
really
as
an
assistant
planner
for
the
city
of
hoster,
which
began
here
in
the
city
starting.
She
started.
M
March
16th
of
this
year,
I'd
only
graduated
from
California
State
University,
the
University
Northridge,
where
she
obtained
her
bachelor's
degree
in
urban
studies
and
planning,
with
the
focus
on
city
and
regional
planning.
Natalie
has
previously
worked
as
a
planning
intern
for
the
city
of
Lancaster
and,
more
recently
for
the
town
of
Los
Gatos
as
a
transportation
planning
intern,
and
she
is
currently
enrolled
in
San
Jose
State
working
towards
an
education
certificate
in
community
development,
finance
and
affordable
housing.
We
are
really
happy
to
have
her
on
board.
Thank
you,
though.
M
We
want
to
make
sure
the
council
at
that
time
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
program
was
adopted
in
a
way
that
we
would
maintain.
Our
certified
housing
element
is
really
crucial
and
really
important
for
the
city
of
Hollister
to
maintain
a
certified
house
housing
element
which
which
we
do
just
just
very
briefly,
certified
housing
element
and
the
planning
departments
upkeep
of
the
certified
housing
element
doing
their
annual
general
plan.
Progress
reports
to
the
state
essentially
provides
for
the
opportunity
to
receive
grants.
M
The
community
also
benefit
from
the
city
of
house
for
having
a
certified
housing
element
because
a
lot
of
time
they
are
competitive
grants
and
the
organizations
that
are
out
there.
That
can
apply
for
these
grants.
A
lot
of
attempts
of
states
requires
that
the
city
has
a
certified
housing
element
in
order
to
make
them
compatible
or
competitive
for
these
organizations
such
as
the
Community,
Food,
Bank,
homeowners
and
I
know
to
be
able
to
apply
to
these
grants
and
be
competitive
and
so
very
important
to
keep
that
certified
housing
element.
M
And
so
it
was
sent
to
the
state
of
California
Housing
and
Community
Development
Agency,
and
we
heard
back
from
HCD
on
May
12th.
The
letter
basically
indicated
that
at
this
time,
due
to
the
governor's
adoption
of
the
housing
crisis
act,
that
a
growth
management,
ordinance
or
a
growth
management
program
cannot
be
adopted
or
cannot
be
implemented,
at
least
until
2025,
and
so
the
letter
also
indicated
that
the
city
of
Hollister
shall
place
an
item
on
the
agenda
for
the
City
Council
to
be
sent
or
suspend
the
ordinance.
M
And
so
that
was
given
to
the
City
Council
and
its
last
regular
meeting
and
the
City
Council
actually
has
some
questions
about
the
ordinance
that
were
sent
to
a
CCD.
And
the
hope
is
that
we
will
get
a
response
from
each
city
and
provided
in
our
next
regular
City
Council
meeting
of
August.
So
just
want
to
give
you
an
update
of.
What's
going
on
with
that,
and
the
reason
why
I
say
next.
M
Meeting
for
the
month
of
July-
and
that
also
goes
with
all
Planning
Commission
parts
of
Reclamation,
so
just
as
an
FYI,
there
will
not
be
a
Planning
Commission
meeting
in
July
because
of
that
resolution.
So
that
concludes
the
staff
reports
for
Department
reports.
They
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
B
M
F
Neighbor
have
a
question
for
you
on
the
on
the
website:
the
Hollister
2040
website.
So
the
thing
that
you
said
about
the
spanish-language
piece
where
they
they
have,
they
can
go
to
a
link
and
it'll,
take
them
to
a
spanish-language
documents
or
whatever
it
is
it
mary?
What
you
see
if
you're
looking
at
a
name,
english
or
is
it
something?
Will
they
look
at
something
different?
That's.
M
A
good
question
it
is,
it
was
really
crucial
when
we
did
the
scope
of
work
and
the
contract
would
place
words
that
it
was.
It
was
highly
crucial
to
also
be
able
to
produce
the
information
in
spanish
as
well,
so
so
the
links,
the
information,
what
the
agendas
will
be
and
what
will
be
the
content
of
these
workshops?
These
meetings
will
be
in
spanish,
for
example,
if
the
public
clicks
on
document
that
they
want
to
see
the
existing
general
plan,
the
existing
general
plan
is
is
in
english.
F
M
F
M
Very
well
yes,
so
the
forum's
that
we
will
have,
we
will
have
them
all
because
of
covered
19.
Unfortunately,
it's
a
big
it's
a
big
deal,
because
you
know
these.
These
women
wish
to
have
more
in
in
person,
however,
because
of
Cova
19
there
they're
gonna
be
zoomed,
they're
gonna
be
a
virtual,
and
there
is
a.
There
is
a
link
on
the
on
the
program
on
the
zoom
program
that
our
consultant
will
be
managing
which
will
provide
for
the
ability
of
any.
M
If
there's
any
Spanish
Spanish
speaking
only
or
there
is
a
lot
of
people
who
actually
understand,
English
and
I
can
speak
it.
However,
they
feel
more
comfortable
in
Spanish,
and
we
want
to
provide
that's
that
aspect
they
want
to.
They
want
to
listen
to
the
workshop
in
Spanish.
We
will
have
a
simultaneous
translator
and
and
link
to
where
we
will
have
a
member
of
staff
provide
the
same
information.
That's
going
on
in
English
simultaneously
in
Spanish.
M
I
I
On
the
website,
when
otherwise
I
meant
to
you
visioning
visioning
workshop
that
are
coming
up,
I
didn't
say
anything
on
the
website
that
tells
people
what's
going
to
happen
or
how
to
prepare
important.
So
I
don't
know,
maybe
if
you
know
what's
actually
going
to
be
happening
and
how
would
someone
prepare
for
it.
M
So
we
could
break
break
in
two
small
groups.
Each
group
will
have
a
facilitator,
and
some
of
the
questions
that
these
small
groups
are
going
to
be
able
to
dialogue
amongst
the
groups
are
in
English
and
in
Spanish
are,
for
example,
what
type
of
values
should
guide
the
decisions,
the
future
decisions
for
the
city
of
Hollister.
M
M
I'm
gonna,
try
to
hear
from
everybody
and
then
we'll
have
a
facilitator,
provide
a
feedback
back
to
David
early,
who
is
a
project
manager,
and
we
will
have
all
that
information
provided
packaged
up
and
presented
at
our
next
general
plan
advisory
committee,
that
is
tentatively
scheduled
for
August,
and
so
that
that's
kind
about
summary,
of
what
we're
gonna
be
having
for
this
Saturday.
This
is
going
to
be
scheduled
for
one
hour
and
a
half.
However,
it
can
be,
as
you
know,
as
fast
as
one
hour,
depending
on
the
flow.
H
D
H
D
Of
comadre
learning
about
other
people
and
how
other
cities
are
working
together
and
some
of
the
speaker's
they
had
were
absolutely
outstanding,
the
gentlemen
and
in
the
series
of
the
conference
that
last
one
he
really
was
a
phenomenal
speaker
and
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that
he
said
still
resonates
and
I
still
remember.
You
know
four
or
five
months
later,
that
I
was
really
impressed.
I
was
really
impressed
with
how
it
was
ran
and
I
want
to
appreciate,
and
thank
you
guys
for
loaning
us
and
figuring
out
how
we
can
get
get
there.
F
F
We
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
do
that,
because
we
haven't
had
a
meeting
since
then
so
I'm
glad
that
Commissioner
Johnson
remember
to
say
that,
because
it
was
an
absolutely
incredible
experience
and-
and
things
are
just
so
different
now,
so
it's
I've
thought
about
how
the
conference
might
have
been
different
if
we
were
in
the
middle
of
the
pandemic
when
we
attended
and
if
we
would
have
attended
virtually.
But
it
was
a
great
conference
learned
a
lot
and-
and
it
was
well
organized
and
I'm
just
really
glad
to
have
had
that
experience.
I
Yeah
I
don't
feel
like
the
report
that
I
attended
also
attended
them.
California,
good
city
planning,
commissioners
conference,
so
I
think,
like
the
bank
staff
for
sending
us
all
there
and
I
did
learn
a
lot
and
attended
lots
of
presentations
and
I
also
wanted
to
comment.
I
am
I
have
looked
at
the
general
plan
website,
so
I'm
you
know
trying
to
participate
a
little
bit
in
the
some
of
the
activities
they
have
there.
I
did
share
on
social
media
about
the
these
visioning
workshops
coming
up,
which
I
got
zero
likes,
but.
H
I
I
Sorry,
for
that,
commissioner
Stevens
wasn't
able
to
be
appointed
to
that
Commission
I
mean
we
had
a
I
think
we
had
a
really
good
and
fair,
transparent
process
for
you
know
selecting
you
know,
commission
from
david
hoo
boy
and
commissioner
Steven.
So
it's
unfortunate
that
the
you
weren't
able
to
be
approved
for
that
and
it
doesn't
seem
like
there's
gonna,
be
any
any
move
to
add
another
planning
Commissioner,
so
I
just
wanted
to
I.