►
From YouTube: Gov Hol GPAC 20201117
Description
Hollister General Plan Advisory Committee Meeting
November 17, 2020
A
So
it
looks
like
we
have.
I
sat
brian
as
well
as
abraham
and
eva
it's
hard
to
see
exactly
who's
there
with
the
face,
masks
and
all,
but.
A
A
I
think
we
are.
We
have
11
members
of
the
audience
as
well,
who
are
signed
in
and
others
of
course
may
join
us,
and
I
am
going
to
actually
share
my
screen
just
so.
Everyone
can
see
the
order
of
business
at
all
and
then
we'll
turn
it
over
to
you,
mr
mayor,
to
formally
open
the
meeting
and,
of
course,
I'm
available
to
facilitate
as
soon
as
you're
ready
for
me
to
take
over
my
screen
at.
C
A
There,
great
okay,
just
for
the
sake
of
formality,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
roll.
The
mayor
is
here,
mr
mayor,
yes,
yes,
I
am
council,
member
zendes
president
and
planning
commissioner
hugh
boy.
A
Hear
me
now
there
you
are
yes
all
right.
Okay,
welcome
to
all
of
you.
I
just
quickly
already
introduced
the
other
folks
who
are
here.
We
have
four
members
of
city
staff
in
the
city,
council,
chambers,
brian
swanson,
abraham,
prado,
amber
cameron
and
eva
are
all
here,
and
then
we
have
three
other
members.
Four
other
members
of
our
consultant
team,
kerry
stone
from
place
works.
Our
project
manager
is
here.
We
have
frederick
venter
our
traffic
engineer
from
kimberly
horn
and
we
have
both
matt
kota
and
matt
ferris
from
bae
urban
economics.
A
A
So
we've
had
the
call
to
order,
I'm
in
a
welcome
and
all
to
tonight's
meeting
I'll
give
you
a
quick
overview.
We
are
required
by
law
to
have
reports
from
the
gpac
on
any
public
conversations
or
feedback
that
they've
received,
and
then
we
also
require
to
take
public
comment
on
any
items
not
on
the
agenda,
and
then
we
have
one
item
of
business
this
evening,
which
is
a
comprehensive
second
report
on
existing
conditions.
A
You
will
recall
that
we
already
talked
about
its
existing
conditions
at
meeting
number
two
and
tonight
meeting
number
three
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
remainder
of
the
existing
conditions
work.
I
will
give
a
presentation.
We
will
take
questions
from
the
gpac
and
all
four
of
us
who
are
here
from
the
five
of
us
who
are
here
from
the
consultant
team
are
available
to
answer
questions
we'll
then
take
public
comment
and
then
have
discussion
on
your
any
questions.
A
The
gpac
members
have
any
comments
you
want
to
make
and
we
can
wrap
up
by
talking
about
next
steps
in
the
process
of
moving
into
2021..
So
are
there
any
questions
about
that
agenda
this
evening?.
A
A
None
let's
go
on
and
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
gpac
meeting
procedures.
These
meetings
are
being
recorded
and
that
shows
up
on
the
screen
as
well
in
the
upper
left
bar.
If
you
have
that
on
your
screen
and
we've
been
recording
since
the
beginning,
we
did
start
the
meeting
with
the
brief
roll
call
and
overview
of
the
meeting.
A
There
will
be
public
comment
periods
first
for
items
not
on
the
agenda
as
well
as
agenda
items.
We
do
have
a
three-minute
speaker
time
limit,
which
I
will
be
timing.
We've
tried.
We
haven't
needed
to
enforce
that
too.
Strictly
up
till
now,
and
as
long
as
people
are
reasonable,
we
won't
make
a
big
deal
of
it,
but
I
am
going
to
be
keeping
time
on
three
minutes.
A
We
would
like
you
to
register
make
sure
that
we
have
your
registration
online
on
the
zoom
meeting
and
if
you
are
here,
if
you're
in
the
city
council
chambers
in
person,
there
are
blue
speaker
cards,
but
I
believe,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
brian
adam
amber
eva
there.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
council
chambers
with
you
this
evening
as
a
member
of
the
public,
we.
C
Do
have
one
person
in
the
chambers
from
the
public.
A
Oh
tonight
they
are
young
speakers.
All
right,
forgive
me
for
that
we
will
come.
We
will
gladly
accept,
yellow
speaker
cards
as
well
good
to
know
that
we're
limiting
ourselves
to
the
cows
use
berkeley.
Colors,
that's
great!
The
gpac
comments.
I
just
want
to
point
out
primarily
for
the
public
gpac
members
of
course
know.
This
is
that
the
gpac
discussion
is
limited
to
items
that
are
on
tonight's
agenda,
so
that
is
to
talk
about
the
existing
conditions
work
this
evening
and
the
future
steps
on
the
general
plan.
A
If
other
speakers
bring
up
other
items,
the
gpac
members
can
ask
that
those
be
agendized
at
a
future
meeting,
but
we
are
not
able
to
discuss
them
this
evening.
Any
questions
about
those
procedures,
no
all
right.
So
then
we
will
move
it's.
It
says
here
public
comment,
but
let
me
just
go
back
a
slide.
We
do
need
to
ask
if
there
have
been
any
communications
about
the
project
or
feedback
that
any
member
of
the
gpac
has
received.
That
should
be
reported
since
the
time
of
our
last
gpac
meeting.
A
Why
don't
we
start
with
mr
mayor?
If
you
have
any
such
items.
A
And
commissioner
hugh
boy
nothing
to
report.
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you
all,
right
with
that,
we
will
go
on
to
comments
from
the
public
members
of
the
public,
and
I
because
I'm
sharing
my
screen.
I
actually
am
going
to
stop
the
share
just
for
a
moment,
because
then
I
can
see
more
people's
names.
Is
there
any
member
of
the
public
who
would
like
to
address
the
commit
the
gpac
on
an
item
that
is
not
on
the
agenda
this
year.
A
Okay,
great
so
miss
pollard
go
ahead
and
approach
the
podium.
Yes,
please
do
and
the
microphone
I
hope,
is
connected
and
we'll
take
your
comment
and
then
we'll
take
any
from
the
people
online
as
well.
Robin.
F
Okay,
so
robin
pollard,
I
I've
been
here
a
few
times
talking
about
park
hill
and
I'm
sorry.
I
missed
last
time
when
you,
I
guess,
discussed
it.
Something
came
up.
I
wasn't
able
to
be
here,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
somewhere
in
this
plan
park,
hill
is
brought
up
more
than
than
than
what
it
is,
because
it's
coming
up
on
a
hundred
years.
It
burnt
this
summer,
it's
a
mess
and
we
need
to
either
move
forward
with
it
and
make
it
something
really
special
or
turn
it
into
parkland.
F
A
Thank
you
very
much.
The
next
person
who's
raised
their
hand,
is
canyon,
consulting
we'll
take
you
next
and
let
me
just
say
we
have
no
other
members
of
the
public
with
a
hand
raised
so
far.
If
you
do,
if
others
want
to
speak,
please
raise
your
hand
during
the
canyon.
Consulting
comment.
Go
ahead.
Please.
G
Miss
me
too
hi.
My
name
is
canyon,
coyote,
woman,
sarah's
roots.
I
am
daughter
of
tribal
chairwoman,
anne-marie
sayers
of
the
indian
canyon,
woodson
band
of
costano
and
oloni
people.
We
live
out
in
the
outskirts
of
sienega
valley,
we're
on
the
only
indian
country
in
the
bay
area,
that's
identified
by
the
federal
government
as
indian
country.
G
What
I
wanted
to
offer
is
well
myself
and
my
contact
information,
because
when
it
comes
to
nagpra
and
sequa
california,
environmental
qualities
act
and
nagpra
native
american
graves
and
repatriation
act,
our
family
is
consulted
in
regards
to
section
106
any
project
or
plan,
that's
happening
in
potentially
archaeologically
sensitive
territories,
and
I
wanted
to
offer
an
update
to
some
of
your
records,
because
I
know
my
mother's
been
on
the
old
native
american
heritage
commission
list.
G
I
am
now
added
to
that
list
and
I
want
to
be
more
diligent
in
navigating
projects
around
our
county,
especially
around
those
around
cultural
resources.
So
I
wanted
to
just
offer
my
contact
information
and
I
hope
that
you're,
considering
how
development
of
hollister
impacts
not
only
like
the
economy,
but
the
indigenous
peoples
and
cultural
resources
around
us.
G
A
All
right,
you,
I
think,
you've
broken
off
there,
but
I
think
we
did
get
your
comment.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that.
The
next
speaker
who
has
identified
herself
is
anita,
kane
anita.
Let's
see,
if
can
you
unmute
yourself
yeah
go
ahead
and
unmute
there
we
go.
H
Go
ahead,
yes,
we
can
hear
you,
so
I
had
two
issues:
I'm
not
sure
if
there
are
items
that
are
covered
under
the
general
plan,
but
I'm
going
to
throw
these
out
just
in
case
they
are
one.
Is
the
city
really
needs
to
have
a
heritage
tree
ordinance
that
protects
trees
of
a
certain
size
from
being
destroyed
with
development
projects?
H
And
the
second
thing
is
the
historical
preservation
commission,
I
believe
at
one
time
we
had
one
and
it
foundered
due
to
lack
of
staff.
I
believe-
or
there
was
some
reason
why
it
didn't
move
forward,
but
we
do
need
to
have
a
historical
preservation.
Commission
that
looks
at
historical
properties
that
are
in
the
line
of
fire
of
development.
H
That
would
be
where
the
the
we
would
have
a
person.
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
identify
myself,
I'm
the
president
of
the
historical
society,
san
benito
county,
historical
society,
and
we
would
like
to
have
to
have
our
resources
available
and
utilized
when
development
projects
come
up,
that
that
have
historical
buildings
involved
so
as
as
advisors,
okay.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
next
person
who's
identified
herself
is
erica
sanchez
erica.
You
can
unmute
yourself
and
begin
to
speak.
I
Good
evening,
everybody
thank
you
for
the
work
that
you
do.
My
name
is
erica
sanchez.
I
am
here
on
behalf
of
the
hollister
school
district.
We
represent
many
of
our
elementary
schools
and
two
of
our
comprehensive
middle
schools
here
in
hollister
and
our
brand
new
school
rancho
santana
that
is
being
built
on
fairview
road.
I
On
behalf
of
the
district,
I
would
like
to
just
let
you
know
that
we
are
interested
in
being
involved
in
future
conversations
as
they
pertain
to
the
growth
of
our
community,
so
that,
as
a
district,
we
can
prepare
for
any
future
plans
that
may
come
forward.
That
would
require
us
building
future
schools
or
taking
into
consideration
the
schools
that
we
have
within
our
community.
We
welcome
any
type
of
invitations
to
participate
in
these
types
of
conversations,
and
we
thank
you
for
the
work
that
you
do.
A
Right,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
comment.
We
have
another
request
from
kevin
henderson
to
speak.
Mr
henderson,
you
should
come
on
right
away
there
you
are,
and
you
can
unmute
yourself
and
begin.
E
Good
evening
this
is
kevin
henderson
I
just
wanted.
I
was
just
inquiring
on
if
there's
plans
to
complete
the
gpac
committee,
so
there's
another
planning,
commissioner,
and
a
representation
representative
from
the
public.
E
I
understand
the
city's
paying
about
1.4
million
for
this
process
and
it
you
know,
was
such
an
investment.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
make
sure
that
that
you
know
the
committee
gets
completed
sooner
than
later.
So
you
know
looking
back
it'll
be
viewed
as
a
process
that
included
representation
from
the
public.
Thank
you.
A
All
right,
any
other
speakers.
I
don't
see
any
other
hands
raised
at
this
time.
A
Let
me
just
give
it
a
moment
in
case.
Anyone
else
does
want
to
speak
all
right.
It
looks
like
there
are
none,
so
I
will
close
that
part
of
the
comment.
As
I
already
mentioned,
the
gpac
is
not
able
to
discuss
any
of
these
items
this
evening,
but
I
would
ask
the
three
members:
if
there's
any
items
that
were
just
spoken
about,
that,
you
would
want
to
see
agendas
for
a
future
meeting.
A
Let
me
mention
that
some
of
the
things
that
came
up
tonight
on
native
american
resources
park
hill,
historic
resources,
coordination
with
the
school
district
are
several
that
will
definitely
be
covered
by
our
team
anyway.
So
you
don't
necessarily
need
to
bring
those
up.
They
will
be
on
lists
of
future
items
for
us
to
discuss,
but
if
there
were
any
of
those
or
any
other
items
that
you
heard
this
evening,
that
you
would
like
to
either
comment
on
or
ask
to
have
us
put
specifically
on
a
future
agenda.
Please
let
us
know
at
this
time.
C
I
think
the
point
of
park
hill
was
brought
up,
but
it
is
a
very
important
part
of
our
city
that
needs
to
be
addressed
because
it,
it
is
one
of
the
pieces
that
I
think
very
important
for
our
entire
community.
I'm
glad
to
hear
canyon
is
at
our
meeting
today
and
now
we
have
the
representative
for
the
native
american.
C
B
I
appreciate
the
comments
from
the
general
public
and
I
agree
with
that.
It's
good
that
we're
covering
the
historic
preservation
and
also
the
getting
the
input
from
the
native
americans
as
well
as
coordinating
with
the
hollister
school
district.
I
think
that's
all
those
are
very
important
as
well,
including
park
hills.
One
of
my
favorite
vista
points
in
the
city
right.
A
All
right:
well,
then,
we
will
move
on
to
the
bulk
of
our
meeting.
I
have
put
the
screen
share
back
up,
so
I
hope
you
can
see
that
and
we
are
going
to
go
further
into
existing
conditions,
and
this
is
marked
existing
conditions.
A
Part
two,
because,
as
I
mentioned
already
and
as
a
reminder,
we
did
already
discuss
other
existing
conditions
in
part,
one
at
gpac
meeting
number
two
gpac
being
number
two,
which
was
the
first
meeting
talking
about
existing
conditions
and
those
existing
conditions
that
we
talked
about
at
that
time
are
listed
here.
They
include
agricultural
resources,
air
quality,
biological
resources,
cultural
and
tribal
resources,
arts,
energy
geology
and
soil,
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
public
services
and
recreation
wildfire
and
climate
change.
So
all
those
items
were
already
covered.
A
We
did
talk
about
cultural
and
tribal
resources
and
that's
available
in
our
written
report,
and
I'm
very
glad
that
canyon
could
be
here
this
evening.
We
did
in
that
previous
work
also
looked
at
some
information
on
hazardous
materials
and
including
park
hill,
and
that's
information
that
we
can
talk
about
a
little
more
as
well.
A
Tonight
we're
going
to
talk
about
the
seven
issues
that
you
see
listed
on
this
slide,
beginning
with
land
use
and
market
demand,
and
I
already
mentioned
that
both
matt
kota
and
matt
ferris
from
bae
urban
economics
are
here
to
answer
questions
about
their
market
demand
analysis
we'll
be
talking
about
transportation
and
circulation
and
frederick
ventura
is
here
this
evening
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
for
him.
A
We'll
also
be
talking
briefly
about
aesthetics,
noise,
hydrology
and
water
quality
utilities
and
services,
and
an
evaluation
of
the
existing
general
plan
and
then
we'll
wrap
up
with
a
summary
of
the
next
steps
and
important
items
that
have
come
out
of
both
part
one
and
part
two
of
these
reports.
So
I'm
going
to
go
through
all
of
that
all
at
once.
I'm
just
sort
of
for
the
sake
of
of
efficiency,
I'll,
probably
take
about
10
or
15
minutes
to
give
a
presentation
on
all
of
these
items.
A
A
So
let
me
begin
by
talking
about
land
use
and
market
demand
issues.
The
report
put
together
by
bae
has
a
and
our
own
land
use
report
by
place
works.
These
reports
begin
with
a
pretty
thorough
documentation
of
current
population
and
housing
conditions.
A
These
include,
of
course,
that
there's
about
39
000
residents
in
the
city,
there
was
a
pretty
robust
growth
rate
of
about
12
percent
in
the
period
from
2010
to
2019,
which,
as
of
course,
you
know
was
his
was
much
greater
than
the
growth
rate
in
the
previous
decades,
where
growth
was
constrained
both
by
the
moratorium
that
was
in
place
and
then
by
the
great
recession
that
began
in
2008,
but
once
the
recession
ended,
coming
out
of
the
recession
by
about
2011
or
12
up
through
2019,
robust
growth
has
been
quite
robust.
A
Hollister
has
a
very
high
number
of
both
households
identifying
as
families
as
well
as
single-family
units
in
the
housing
stock.
If
you
look
at
these
numbers,
statewide
or
nationally,
many
people
are
surprised
to
learn
that
many
many
families
are
many.
Many
households
are
actually
not
families,
they
are
seniors
living
alone.
A
They
are
individuals
who
are
in
the
younger
part
of
their
life
or
have
just
made
a
choice
not
to
have
children
who
may
live
one
or
several
adults
together,
but
in
hollister
82
of
all
families
are
families
that
are
at
least
one
parent
or
sometimes
not
often,
of
course,
two
parents,
as
well
as
their
children,
and
that's
the
definition
of
a
family.
So
that's
a
relatively
high
number
and
if
you
jump
down
on
the
slide,
you'll
see
that
correspondingly
hollister
has
a
very
high
number
of
single-family
units.
80
of
the
housing
stock.
A
In
other
communities
in
california,
you
might
find
only
say
60
or
65
percent
of
the
housing
stock
in
single
family
homes
and
the
remainder
of
the
community
with
multi-family
units,
and
that's
not
the
case
in
hollister
and
those
two
facts
go
together.
82
percent
are
families
80
of
the
housing
stocks,
family
units,
69
of
the
residents
in
hollister,
identify
as
hispanic,
and
that
is
the
largest
ethnic
subgroup.
A
By
far
this
again
is
not
unusual
in
many
parts
of
california,
but
does
give
hollister
a
unique
characteristic
relative
to
many
communities
in
the
ambag
region
or
the
greater
bay
area.
Median
household
income
is
pretty
median
for
the
state
as
a
whole
is
about
at
about
71
thousand
dollars.
A
A
Three
top
occupation
categories
identified
in
vae's
work,
our
office
and
administrative
support
at
13
sales
at
10
and
construction
at
9.
So
those
together
account
for
about
30
of
the
jobs
in
the
city.
There
are
many
more
employed
residents
than
there
are
jobs
and
that's
to
say-
and
I
think
we
all
know
this.
A
Many
many
people
who
are
living
in
hollister
and
do
have
jobs
are
commuting
out
of
hollister
to
go
to
those
jobs
both
to
other
locations
in
the
county
and
also,
of
course,
to
other
parts
of
the
particularly
the
bay
area
and
the
ambag
region.
Monterey
bay.
They
go,
of
course,
to
santa
cruz
to
monterey
and
perhaps
most
significantly
to
santa
clara
county
and
other
parts
of
the
bay
area.
A
The
other
part
of
economics-
that's
important
to
understand
is
that
the
city
not
only
could
use
additional
employment
opportunities,
but
could
also
use
additional
retail
opportunities
as
well,
and
the
city
does
experience
what
the
experts
call
leakage
in
retail
sales.
That's
to
say
that
people
are
spending
their
dollars,
that
they're
earning
they're
living
in
hollister,
but
they're
spending
those
dollars
in
stores
in
other
communities
generally,
because
the
the
kinds
of
shopping
that
they
need
or
want
are
not
available
in
their
local
community.
A
The
amount
of
money
spent
on
those
items
in
hollister
is
much
less
than
one
would
expect,
given
the
population
of
the
community,
and
we
know
that-
that's
probably
because
the
city
does
not
have
the
larger
large-scale
scores
like
a
costco
or
walmart,
but
also
lacks
the
sort
of
medium-sized
stores
like
ross,
marshall's
or
tj.
Maxx
hollister
today
is
probably
too
small
for
those
large-scale
stores
like
costco
or
walmart,
but
could
reasonably
expect
to
start
recruiting.
A
Medium-Sized
stores
like
ross,
marshall's
or
tj
maxx,
and
also
other
local
retailers
might
be
encouraged
as
well,
and
those
kinds
of
things
would
cut
down
on
retail
leakage,
not
only
in
clothing
and
accessories,
which
is
the
major
place.
We
see
leakage
but
other
sectors
of
retail
as
well,
and
if
you
have
questions
on
those,
I'm
sure
that
matt
and
matt
can
comment
further
on
those
other
sectors.
A
Moving
along,
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
growth
scenarios
that
we've
put
together,
and
these
are
in
a
great
deal
of
detail
in
the
work
we've
done.
I
mean
this
is
looking
at
on
the
residential
side.
Growth
in
hollister
today
is
expected
by
ambeg
to
be
at
a
baseline
level.
That's
reflective
of
growth
over
the
past
say
two
decades,
but
does
not
necessarily
reflect
the
rates
that
are
more
robust
in
the
last
couple
of
years,
and
so
we
do
have
here
and
I'll
point
out
with
my
cursor.
A
We
have
a
baseline
analysis
that
looks
at
growth
both
within
the
city
limits,
but
also
what
we
call
the
greater
hollister
area,
which
is
the
unincorporated
area
around
the
city
of
hollister,
because
the
greater
hollister
area
is
so
interrelated
to
the
area
inside
the
city
limits.
The
number,
at
least
that
I
look
at
is
this
number
of
total
residents,
which
is
a
combination
of
both
inside
the
city
and
immediately
around
the
city
in
the
unincorporated
county.
A
A
On
the
outside
of
the
city
limits
now,
when
we
move
along
in
a
little
bit,
you'll
see
that
these
numbers
of
units
are
actually
less
than
the
numbers
that
are
already
proposed
and
approved
within
the
city
and
the
county,
so
we're
pretty
sure
and
those
are
approved
or
proposed
today,
not
for
the
next
20
years.
So
I
at
least
feel
relatively
sure
that
growth
is
probably
growth.
A
If
there
is
a
cap
in
place,
then
we
expect
that
the
total
number
of
housing
units
in
this
within
the
city
limits
would
get
to
be,
and
I'm
not
sure
these
numbers
are
completely
correct.
A
But
we
expect
about
between
8
000
and
11
000
units
if
within
the
city
limits,
if
there
is
a
cap
with
the
remaining
of
those
units
going
out
to
the
city
limits,
so
you
you
see
that
there's
a
total
of
6300
units
under
the
moderate
scenario
or
about
8
800
units
under
the
robust
scenario
and
the
only
difference
between
them
is
whether
those
get
built
inside
the
city
limits
or
in
the
greater
hollister
area.
A
Now
the
city
does
have
quite
an
extensive
amount
of
residential
land
currently
available
and
projects
already
proposed.
This
map
shows
in
the
hatching
projects
that
are
already
proposed
inside
the
city
limits
in
this
turquoise
hatching,
and
you
can
see
quite
a
number
of
them,
as
well
as
projects
residential
projects
proposed
in
the
unincorporated
county
and
those
are
shown
in
this
darker
blue
hatching,
so
pretty
extensive
development
all
around
the
city
on
both
the
residential
and
non-residential
sides,
particularly
up
near
the
airport
inside
the
city
and
down
near
ridge
mark
outside
the
city.
A
That
said,
there's
also
quite
a
bit
of
additional
vacant
land,
I'm
shown
in
green
here
for
non-urban
uses.
This
is
all
agricultural
land
or
designated
for
agriculture,
as
well
as
vacant
land.
That's
designated
for
urban
uses,
which
are
primarily
for
higher
density
residential
that
is
multi-family
residential,
as
well
as
commercial
and
industrial
uses.
A
So
bae
did
put
together
a
pretty
exhaustive
analysis
of
how
that
future
land
supply
meets
with
the
future
demand,
and
you
can
see
that
expressed
here
in
numbers
of
units,
and
you
can
you'll
see,
then
that
we
have
here
remember
the
baseline
of
2038
units,
that's
expected
with
in
the
with
and
as
expected
under
baseline
conditions.
You
see
the
capped
number
of
3339
units
in
both
the
moderate
and
robust
numbers,
and
you
see
a
demand
of
4,
854
or
6854
units.
A
A
That's
already
proposed
shows
2
400
units
that
are
proposed
inside
the
city
limits
today,
which
is
greater
than
that
baseline
development
amount,
but
somewhat
less
than
the
numbers
with,
even
without
the
cap,
and
quite
a
bit
less
than
the
demand
that
will
occur
with
the
cap,
but
there's
also
quite
a
bit
of
additional
land
available
as
well
for
residential
development,
and
that
gets
us
down
to
having
a
surplus
of
land.
That's
shown
in
red
under
almost
any
of
the
scenarios,
all
except
the
robust
number.
A
Without
the
cap,
what's
important
to
understand,
though,
about
all
of
these
numbers
on
the
residential
side
is
that
most
of
these
units
that
can
still
be
built
on
a
remaining
residential
land,
where
there's
not
already
a
project
proposed,
is
almost
exclusively
multi-family
or
mixed
use
and
remember.
The
city
today
is
about
80
percent
single
family
homes.
A
As
noted
on
the
left
side
of
this
slide
that
might
be
needed
to
fill
in
for
some
of
these
multifamily
and
mixed
use
lands
if
you
want
to
accommodate
single-family
homes.
Instead,
I
want
to
very
clearly
state
that
none
of
this
is
for
sure.
These
are
both
projections
and
their
policy
issues.
You
could
well
decide
that
you
want
the
balance
to
shift
more
towards
multi-family.
A
You
could
decide
that
you
want
to
try
and
keep
the
cap
in
place.
You
could
decide
to
allow
the
county
to
do
the
development
at
the
edges
of
hollister.
Those
would
all
be
scenarios
in
which
no
additional
develop.
No
additional
designation
of
residential.
A
So
that
gives
you
a
sense
of
the
needs
on
the
retail
and
local
side
and
again
really
quite
a
strong
supply
of
land
on
the
industrial
side
today,
so
that
wraps
up
about
the
land,
use
and
market
demand.
That's
by
far
the
most
complicated
set
of
issues
that
I
have
to
discuss
this
evening,
I'm
going
to
go
through
now
the
other
issues
that
we
looked
at,
starting
with
transportation
and
circulation,
and
we
did
look
at
37
individual
study
intersections
for
their
level
of
service
and
congestion.
A
We
found
acceptable
circumstances
and
conditions
at
30
of
those
37
intersections.
Oh
I'm,
sorry
that
pushed
the
wrong
button
there,
30
of
those
37
intersections.
There
are
eight
intersections
that
have
that
have
lower
than
acceptable
service,
and
that
will
require
some
additional
improvements
over
the
next
20-year
life
of
the
plan.
I
do
also
want
to
mention,
of
course,
that
highway
25
is
a
big
issue
for
many
people.
The
san
benito
county,
local
transportation
authority
is
already
studying
congestion
relief
for
highway
25.
A
It
may
be
an
additional
item
that
you
would
like
us
to
call
out
in
the
general
plan.
Certainly,
we
want
to
talk
about
the
existing
plans
that
are
already
underway
and
memorialize
those
in
the
general
plan.
We
are
also
looking
at
vehicle
miles
traveled
as
a
new
measure
of
significant
transportation
impacts.
Our
staff
team
under
kimberly
horn's
leadership,
is
working
with
your
staff
to
create
a
new
vmt
significance
threshold
and
that
will
get
rolled
out
over
the
next
few
months.
A
We
all
are
also
looking
at
future
bicycle
and
pedestrian
improvements.
Those
are
needed
on,
for
example,
on
buena
vista,
road,
santa
ana
road,
meridian
street
and
memorial
drive.
A
We're
also
concerned
about
safety
of
the
city
has
a
crash
ranking
of
49
out
of
94
northern
california
cities,
so
that
puts
it
sort
of
in
the
low
middle
and
suggests
that
there
is
a
need,
perhaps
for
enhanced
safety
improvements
and
improve
roadways,
and
then
there
is
also
one
other
issue
that
we
want
to
try
and
address
with
you,
which
are
roundabouts
which
you've
encouraged
via
your
city
council
resolution
in
2019,
but
there
hasn't
really
been
enough
policy
direction
about
this,
to
give
clear
indication
of
how
the
roundabout
should
be
used
for
intersection
control.
A
So
that's
an
issue
we'd.
Also
like
to
look
at
as
part
of
our
transportation
and
circulation
work,
and
let
me
go
on
from
transportation
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
aesthetics
and
we've
done
an
exhaustive
aesthetic
analysis
of
the
city
and,
of
course,
been
able
to
document
how
the
city
has
transformed
over
time,
from
a
more
rural,
small
town
to
a
more
suburban
setting,
but
still
has
really
maintained
the
strong
character
of
the
downtown
and
the
historic
neighborhoods
that
surround
the
downtown.
A
We
heard
about
those
tonight
from
one
of
our
speakers
and
that's
certainly
an
item
that
you'll
want
to
work
on
in
the
general
plan
to
make
sure
that
that
historic
character
is
maintained
and
enhanced
outside
the
traditional
core.
Of
course,
the
building
scale
and
type
varies.
A
You
might
want
to
have
us
look
at
additional
design
guidance
for
new
subdivisions
to
enhance
the
quality
there,
and
you
may
also
want
to
look
at
scenic
views
and
corridors,
and
currently
the
general
plan
does
not
identify
any
for
preservation.
We
heard
about,
for
instance,
park
hill
this
evening,
which
is
certainly
one
important
view
site.
There
may
be
others
that
you
would
like
us
to
work
on
to
identify
as
important
views
and
corridors
that
should
be
preserved,
I'm
moving
along
to
noise
and
vibration.
A
We
will,
of
course
be
working
on
the
noise
element
as
part
of
the
general
plan.
That's
an
element,
that's
required
by
law.
We
have
documented
primary
noise
sources,
which
include
the
seven
items
you
see
listed
here:
highways
major
roadways,
residential
streets,
the
airport,
local
railroad
activity,
outdoor
recreation
and
truck
loading.
We've
been
able
to
document
where
those
sources
are
and
how
low
noise
conditions
are.
The
union
pacific
railroad
line
is
a
particular
concern
because
there
are
seven
rail
crossings
throughout
the
city.
A
A
Also,
we
did
identify
through
our
existing
conditions,
work
that
the
city
is
regulating
hours
of
construction,
but
does
not
have
specific
guidance
on
temporary
construction,
noise
and
vibration
thresholds,
and
those
may
be
something
that
we
should
look
at
developing
as
well,
either
through
the
general
plan
or
as
an
implementation
task
in
the
future.
A
A
There
is
also
a
storm
drain
master
plan
in
place
from
2011
that
identified
eight
percent
of
the
city's
storm
grade
network,
I'm
lacking
capacity
to
convey
the
100-year
storm
peak
flow,
which
is
a
relatively
common
storm
and
really
should
be
conveyed
that
master
plan
called
out
a
series
of
33
different
storm
drainage
improvements,
and
three
of
them
have
been
implemented
as
far
as
we
know,
but
that
does
leave
30
more
to
that
need
to
be
implemented,
and
that
would
make
a
big
difference
in
covering
the
rest
of
the
city
for
storm
drainage
issues.
A
When
we
go
on
to
look
at
utilities,
that
brings
us
back
to
first
to
water
service
and
again,
the
local
groundwater,
just
like
the
rivers
does
have
high
concentrations
of
several
pollutants
or
several
issues.
Total
dissolved,
solids,
hardness
and
chromium-6
that
creates
marginal
quality
for
both
drinking
and
agricultural
purposes,
and
your
local
well,
water
is
mixed
with
water.
Coming
from
outside
the
region
to
improve
that
water
quality,
I
want
to
be
clear,
particularly
for
members
of
the
public.
A
It's
not
dangerous
water
quality
by
any
means,
but
it
does
have
some
quality
issues
that
are
resolved
by
mixing
the
water
with
water
from
outside
sources,
and
that's
also
has
led
to
a
restriction
on
some
pumping
from
groundwater
pumping
from
the
city's
wells,
so
that
talks
a
little
bit
about
water
in
terms
of
the
sanitary
sewers,
I'm
just
like
storm
drainage.
There
has
been
a
2018
study
of
the
sanitary
sewer
master
plan,
which
found
insufficient
insufficient
capacity
for
future
flows
of
from
future
development.
A
That
plan
identified,
21
recommended
capital
improvement
projects
and
nine
of
those
have
been
implemented,
leaving
another
12
to
be
implemented
to
accommodate
future
development
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
there
are
some
significant
planning
issues
around
the
provision
of
both
sewer
and
water
capacity.
I'm
sure
many
of
you
know
that
the
city
has
its
own
water
utility
and
then
there's
also
the
sunny
slope
district
that
provides
sewer
and
water
capacity
as
well.
A
The
city
is
bound
by
an
agreement
with
sunny
slope
and
the
county
that
requires
the
city
to
serve
for
sewer
service
in
any
area
served
with
water
by
sunny
slope,
and
that
means
that
the
city
can't
always
oversee
development
that
occurs
outside
city
limits
under
sunny
slopes
jurisdiction,
even
though
the
city
ultimately
becomes
the
sewer
provider
in
those
areas.
A
A
So
that
ends
the
formal
environmental
existing
conditions
issues.
I
want
to
switch
gears
now
and
talk
about
legislative
updates.
The
general
plan
guidelines
from
opr,
that
is,
the
office
of
planning
and
research
and
best
practices
in
general
plans,
and
I
know
particularly
commissioner,
hugh
boy.
This
is
an
issue.
That's
been
important
to
you
and
I,
I
trust,
you've
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
memos
we've
prepared.
A
So
I'm
going
to
be
talking
about
recent
legislative
changes,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
2017
directives
from
the
office
of
planning
and
research
and
I'm
going
to
talk
about
best
planning
practices
as
well.
So
looking
at
general
plan
law,
your
general
plan
was
last
updated
in
2008
and
there
have
been
a
number
of
changes
to
state
law
since
then,
and
one
of
our
missions
with
you
and
our
obligations
is
to
help
you
to
update
your
general
plan
to
cover
all
of
the
items
that
are
listed
here.
A
Very
significant
changes
in
terms
of
housing,
element,
law
and
housing
provision,
particularly
through,
what's
called
sb
330,
the
housing
crisis
act
of
2019
new
climate
change
regulations
that
are
both
in
sb
32,
as
well
as
sb
379,
the
complete
streets
act.
That
requires
you
to
have
policies
for
complete
streets
throughout
the
city,
as
well
as
the
assessment
of
transportation
impacts.
A
Sustainable
groundwater
management
act,
tribal
cultural
resources,
which
was
already
mentioned
by
one
of
our
speakers
this
evening
on
fire
hazards
and
planning
for
healthy
communities,
also
called
environmental
justice
in
sp
1000
in
2016.,
so
we'll
be
working
with
you
on
all
of
these
items
as
well.
But
it's
important,
I
think,
for
you
to
have
this
list
in
front
of
you
to
know
the
kinds
of
things
that
we'll
be
needing
to
work
on
with
you
as
we
move
forward
through
the
next
phases
of
the
planning
process.
A
So
that
concludes
my
talk.
Overall
on
existing
conditions,
I
want
to
wrap
up
with
just
two
more
slides.
One
is
to
remind
you
they're
both
about
our
next
steps,
and
one
is
just
to
remind
you
of
eight
special
planning
areas
that
have
already
been
identified
by
staff
that
we
will
be
looking
at
for
the
general
plan,
update
and
they're.
A
All
mapped
here,
five
of
these
exit
exists
today,
already
the
the
north
gateway,
the
west
gateway,
the
downtown,
the
old
town
residential
area
and,
what's
called
the
home
office
area
of
those
five
are
already
called
out
in
the
existing
general
plan
and
we'll
be
providing
additional
guidance
for
them,
and
then
there's
also
the
buena
vista
corridor,
the
meridian
road
extension
and
the
union
road
corridor
that
we're
called
out
by
staff
when
we
put
together
our
scope
for
this
general
plan,
we'll
be
looking
at
all
eight
of
these
as
areas
for
additional
design,
development
and
and
overall
design
guidance.
A
In
addition
to
that,
we'll
be
covering
a
large
number
of
policy
issues
that
are
listed
here
on
this
slide
and
many
of
which
we've
talked
about
already
this
evening.
These
include,
I
already
mentioned
farmland
mitigation
to
mitigate
the
loss
of
farmland
that
might
occur
through
development,
sensitive
habitat.
We
talked
about
at
meeting
number
two,
both
for
the
california
tiger
salamander
and
the
red
flag
and
frog
wildfire
safety.
Earthquake
fault
safety.
A
I
mentioned
this
evening
the
large
issue
about
residential
land
and
residential
mix,
whether
it
would
be
appropriate
to
enhance
the
sphere
of
influence,
inclusionary
housing
policies
to
create
more
affordable
housing,
coordinating
with
the
county
regarding
growth
management,
economic
development
and
job
creation,
complete
streets,
safe
routes
to
school
level
of
service
standards.
Roundabouts.
A
So
a
large
number
of
subjects
that
will
come
up
as
key
policy
issues
so,
and
that
gives
you
an
overview
of
the
work
that
will
be
going
on
from
here
on
out
based
on
those
existing
conditions.
So
we'll
be
looking
at
these
eight
special
planning
areas
and
we'll
be
looking
at
this
set
of
key
issues
as
well
and
getting
your
guidance
on
each
of
them.
Making
recommendations
to
you
and
then
coming
to
you
for
guidance
on
all
of
these
issues.
A
A
I'm
going
to
stop
the
screen
share
and
we'll
open
it
up
for
any
questions
specifically
from
gpac
members,
then
we'll
take
public
comment
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
the
gpac
for
comments
and
important
issues,
but
you
want
to
make
sure
we
cover
moving
forward.
So
questions
from
the
the
three
gpac
members
and
I
want
to
point
out
again:
we
have
frederick
venter
here
from
kimberly
horn
on
transportation
as
well
as
matt
kota
and
matt
ferris,
foreign
development
and
land
use
issues.
So
cheap
members,
questions.
B
Okay,
one
thing
that
kind
of
stands
out
is
that
when
we
talk
about
implication
for
general
plan,
updates
quote:
coordinate
with
the
county
to
ensure
orderly
growth
and
development
and
other
general
plan
best
practices
in
response
to
county
approving
large
residential
projects.
We
say:
well,
the
city
should
have
a
stronger
voice
in
the
approval
of
these
projects
and
also
under
those
different
growth
scenarios.
We
have
two
kickers
for
residential
caps.
B
A
Well,
there
are,
there
are
definitely
issues
and
conflicts
there.
Ironically,
most
of
those
issues
when
push
comes
to
shove
may
exist
more
at
the
county
level
than
the
city
level,
as
I
showed
in
the
numbers.
Most
of
your
residential
land,
at
least
on
the
single
family
side,
has
already
been
spoken
for
you.
It
is
for
better
or
worse
it's
too
late,
even
if
it
were
legally
possible,
it
would
be
too
late
to
change
designations
on
those
lands,
because
you
already
have
development
proposals
on
them.
You
could
you
so
by
law.
A
You
cannot
ratchet
back
those
development
allowances
at
this
time.
You
don't
have
a
requirement
to
create
additional
development
allowances
beyond,
what's
already
in
your
general
plan
and
zoning,
but
you
could
create
additional
capacity
if
you
wanted
to
so
that
will
be
a
key
question
for
you,
where
the
rub
comes.
If
you
will
is
that
the
county,
through
its
general
plan
today,
has
several
thousand
acres
already
identified
for
residential
growth
around
the
edges
of
hollister.
A
So,
even
if
you
don't
do
it
barring
a
way
to
coordinate
it
with
the
county,
it's
likely
that
the
county
will
allow
that
development
to
occur
under
its
jurisdiction
instead
to
some
degree,
and
so
where
it's
really
going
to
become
an
issue
is
how
the
city
can
work
with
the
county
and
how
you
can
ensure
that
the
development
that
occurs
on
land
that's
currently
under
county
jurisdiction.
A
A
Now
sb
330
only
it
does
sunset
after
five
years,
so
there's
a
chance
that
after
five
years
the
county
could
lessen
some
of
those
designations
if
it
wanted
to.
But
for
these
coming
five
years
those
designations
do
pretty
much
have
to
remain
in
place
and
there's
certainly
a
chance
that
sb
330
will
be
extended
within
that
five-year
period
and.
B
E
C
Is
you
boy,
mr
resendez,.
D
D
Okay
and
then
the
rest
of
that
was
on
the
slide.
Deck
is
things
that
we're
going
to
include
on
this
general
plan
right.
A
A
You
know
no
one
can
foresee
that
under
some
projections,
those
projects
already
proposed
perhaps
are
a
20-year
supply.
That's
that's
a
possibility,
but
I'm
sure
that
the
people
who
own
and
have
proposed
those
projects
I'll
hope
that
they
will
happen
much
quicker
than
20
years
from
now,
but
there's
no
way
of
knowing
for
sure
how
quickly
they'll
they'll
occur.
So
that
said
again,
we
would
encourage
you
to
look
we'll
help
you
to
look
to
identify
a
land
supply
that
you
think
is
the
right
land
supply
for
that
20-year
horizon
very.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I
had
some
comments
going
back
to
some
of
the
comments
and
questions.
Mr
hugh
boy
had
and
thank
you,
mr
hugh
boy.
You
brought
up
some
very
good
points.
Do
you
want
to
point
out
a
few
things?
So
when
we
do
talk
about
sp
330,
I'm
really
glad
you
explained
that
we're
not
forced
to
add
the
additional
capacity,
but
we
are
forced
to
deal
with
what
we
do
have
within
the
city
limits
now
and
that's
something.
That's
been
a
lot
of
confusion
locally
and
a
lot
of
misinformation
locally.
C
C
It
is
not
nice,
but
the
city
is
not
forced
to
add
the
additional
capacity
or
annex
more
land.
That's
again,
something
that's
been
confusing
a
lot
of
people
here
locally,
so
I'm
really
happy
to
hear
that
you're
you're
pointing
that
out.
So
that's
really
important.
The
other
question
I
had
one
of
the
statements
you
made
was
the
sewer
the
services
anywhere
sunny
slope
hooks
up
water,
that
we
had
to
provide
sewer
services
and
that's
actually
incorrect,
and
we
had
a
couple
of
situations
where
that
was
happening.
C
Unfortunately,
one
of
them
we
did
provide
this
services
where
we
shouldn't
have,
and
that
was
done
through
a
vote
that
were
where
loophole
was
used,
and
I
thought
that
was
not
the
right
choice,
but
it
is
not
something
that
is
absolutely
required.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
clear
on
those
things
and
the
the
growth
numbers
I
know
there
was
this
talk
about.
C
The
demand
happened
because
of
pent-up
demand
and
from
the
moratorium,
but
reality
it
wasn't
the
pint
of
demand
for
the
moratorium,
because
after
moratorium
was
lifted,
very
little
construction
happened
for
several
years
afterwards.
C
It
wasn't
until
I
think
about
2014
15,
where
the
market
started
to
take
off
again,
where
you
saw
the
demand
of
the
developers
coming
back
in,
so
it
wasn't
pent
up
demand
here
locally
and
that's
another
thing
that
is
used
to
mislead
a
lot
of
our
our
residents,
but
I
am
glad
to
point
out
or
what
you
point
out,
the
extremely
high
number.
C
We
have
a
single
family
housing,
which
has
been
a,
in
my
view,
a
big
mistake
for
quite
a
while,
and
something
that
I
definitely
want
to
see
this
group
fix
for
the
on
the
future
plan.
So
those
would
be
my
comments
at
this
point.
Oh
and
you
already
talked
about
we're,
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
park
hill,
which
is
again
something
that
we
need
to
be
focused
on
in
our
planning
planning
areas.
A
All
right,
so
I
think
at
this
point
the
next
appropriate
thing
would
be
to
open
it
up
for
public
comment.
Public
members
of
the
public
are
also,
of
course,
welcome
to
ask
questions.
A
We
won't
respond
to
those
immediately,
but
I
will
take
notes
and
council
member
gpac
members
can
take
notes
as
well
and
if
the
gpac
asks
us
to
respond
at
the
end,
we
will
respond
to
any
questions
that
the
gpac
would
like
to
hear
answered
and,
of
course,
we'll
also
take
comments
and
gpec
members
are
very
interested
in
the
comments
as
well.
I
know
there
was
is
one
member
of
the
public
in
the
council
chambers
and
but
I
I'll
just
ask
at
some
point.
If
that
person
wants
to
speak.
A
For
now,
I
see
roxanne
stevens
has
her
hand
raised
and
so
will
recognize
her
first
others
who
would
like
to
be
recognized
can
raise
their
hands
virtual
hands
as
well.
Roxanne
go
ahead
and
unmute
yourself
and
speak.
J
J
So
when
the
the
staff
that
you
said
that
you
presented
around
about
the
rate
of
family
homes,
so
the
single-family
homes
was
80
in
hollister
and
you
said
that
that
was
pretty
high.
So
I
was
my
question
was:
is
that
in
comparison
to
just
all
cities
in
general,
or
specifically
to
cities
that
are
the
same
size
as
hollister?
And
then
my
follow-up
question
to
that
is
what
is
more,
of
an
average
number
for
a
city
of
the
size
of
hollister.
C
What
do
the
other
members
feel
you
guys
want
to
take
them
all
at
one
time
I
I
think
it
would
be
probably
wiser
to
take
them
all
at
one
time
in
the
end.
Okay,
so
we'll
know.
A
A
K
Yes,
I
am
with
reach
san
diego
parks
foundation
as
well,
but
I
live
out
in
the
county,
and
my
concern
with
the
hollister
general
plan
is
that
it
affects
the
whole
county
as
county
seat
and
what
I'm
very
interested
in,
promoting
and
and
accentuating
is
the
transportation
and
circulation
that
the
accommodation
we
need
more
than
just
three
boulevards
or
streets
that
have
currently
been
proposed,
that,
with
the
coveted
incidents
we've
had
at
present,
it's
extremely
evident
that
people
need
exercise
and
to
be
out
in
the
fresh
air,
and
so
our
parks
and
bicycle
accommodation
and
trails
is
something
that
needs
to
be
very
much
emphasized
in
the
future
plans
of
hollister,
as
especially
as
it
connects
with
the
county
in
order
to
have
longer
and
better
bigger
kinds
of
trails.
K
I,
the
ambag
regional
clearing
house
yesterday,
announced
that
a
project
area
in
salinas
on
the
monterey
monterey
county,
bordering
or
near
the
border
of
san
benito
county
is
going
to
be
a
760
acre
land
development
with
nearly
4
000
dwelling
units
and
about
a
half
a
million
feet
of
mixed-use
commercial,
and
I
cannot
imagine
that
this
is
not
going
to
impact
san
benito
county
and
hollister,
so
there
are
planned
three
schools,
17
parks
and
other
supporting
uses.
K
So
I
feel
that
anything
that
hollister
is
looking
at.
As
far
as
their
general
plan,
we
need
to
consider
our
partnering
and
neighboring
counties
and
how
we
are
going
to
connect
with
them
with
our
circulation
and
transportation.
A
You
valerie,
the
next
speaker
is
sarah
steiner.
L
Hi
good
evening
this
is
sarah
steiner,
with
the
representing
the
san
benito
agricultural
land,
trust
and
thanking
you
for
and
the
panel
for,
holding
the
gpac
presentation
this
evening
and
I'm
of
course,
I'm
really
pleased
to
see
that
agriculture
and
species
mitigation
is
earmarked
as
paul's
part
of
your
policy
planning.
L
But
the
question
I
have
is
the
current
policy
states
recommendations.
So
there
is
beyond
highly
recommending
mitigation.
There
is
no
actual
policy
that
states
there
will
be
mitigation.
Is
this
something
you
see
changing
in
the
2040
plan.
A
A
Thank
you.
Okay,
you're
welcome,
yeah,
we'll
get
back
to
that
question.
The
next
speaker
is
bruce
mcconnell.
M
Yes,
I'm
a
21-year
resident
in
this
community
and
I,
along
with
many
people,
are
very
concerned
about
what
appears
to
be
random,
haphazard
growth
that
is
taking
away
from
the
identity
of
this
community
and
the
beautiful
assets
that
we
have
here,
and
I
guess
to
put
it
into
a
question.
What
forums
are
offered
with
you
and
elsewhere,
where
we
could
have
a
strident
dialogue
along
the
lines
of
creating
a
vision
for
where
we
actually
want
to
go
instead
of
muddling
along
and
just
having
one
development
after
another,
without
any
coherent
plan.
M
M
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
those
comments.
There
are
no
additional
hands
raised
at
this
time.
Okay,
here
we
have
elia
salinas,
has
her
hand
up
so
we'll
take
her
next
go
ahead.
N
So
one
of
the
questions
that
I
have
is
you
had
a
on
your
graphs
and
you
had
purple
colors
and
all
that
around
the
city
and
the
county,
and
my
my
question
was
or
is
of
those
purple
I
believe
you
said
were
undeveloped.
Is
that
correct.
A
N
And
of
those
blue
or
those
purple
and
green,
what
what
of
those
are
actually
not
incorporated
into
the
city
so
that
we
actually
have
what
they
call?
You
know
leapfrog
that
it
it's
not
incorporating
the
city,
but
it's
designated,
even
though
it
hasn't
been
incorporated
in
it.
N
And
then
my
other,
I
guess
you're
gonna
wait
till
the
end,
and
my
other
question
is
shouldn't
the
the
g-pack
be
larger.
Are
we
are
we
waiting
until?
I
guess
this
is
a
for
the
committee
we're
waiting
for
the
new
council
to
come
in
before
other
people
can
be
appointed.
I
mean
we
only
have
three
people
making
a
decision
right
now
and
participating
in
these
meetings
aside
from
a
few
public
members,
so
is
there?
N
Is
there
something
in
the
plans
that
this
committee
is
going
to
is
going
to
get
is
going
to
get
bigger
and
as
a
woman,
I
would
like
to
see
some
female
input
in
this
some
females
on
this
committee?
Not
it's
just
all
men
making
decisions
for
the
city.
So
thank
you
for
taking
my
comments.
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
other
people
who
would
like
to
raise
a
hand
to
speak
in
the
council
chambers?
Do
you
have
any
speaker
cards.
E
A
None
all
right,
I
see
that
sarah
steiner
has
raised
her
hand
a
second
time.
Mr
mayor,
we
don't
always
take
second
rounds
of
comments
from
people
should
we
would
you
like
to
I'll,
see
only
miss
diner.
At
this
point,
would
you
like
to
remember.
C
L
I
just
wanted
to
bring
back
the
original
question
that
I
don't
believe
was
answered
about
completing
the
people
on
the
commission,
especially
addressing
the
a
resident
on
the
commission.
What
what
is
the
status.
A
All
right,
okay-
and
I
think
so
that's
a
one,
more
question
that
we'll
try
and
figure
out
an
answer
to
in
a
moment.
Let
me
just
ask
if
there
are
any
other
speakers
who
have
either
comments
or
questions.
A
Okay,
I
don't
see
any
I've
made
a
list
of
about
six
questions
here
and
I'll
try
and
go
through
a
few
of
them.
I'm
gonna
ask
matt
or
matt
to
talk
about
the
housing
split
issue
and
then
perhaps,
mr
mayor,
you,
if
you
feel
like
it's
appropriate,
you
could
talk
about
the
situation
with
gpac
membership,
but
let
me
start
with
the
other
questions.
A
One
of
the
questions
which
I
believe
did
come
from
ms
steiner
was
whether
there
will
be
a
policy
on
agricultural
management,
agricultural
mitigation
in
the
general
plan,
and
the
answer
to
that
is
that
that
is
a
policy
decision
that
will
be
made
by
the
gpac
and
ultimately,
the
planning,
commission
and
city
council.
A
As
this
process
proceeds,
ms
steiner
was
correct
to
point
out
that
there
is
no
clear
policy
per
se
on
that
in
the
general
plan
today,
and
it
is
an
issue
that
we've
identified
as
one
that
needs
consideration
by
the
city
and
it'll
be
up
to
the
gpac
and
then
the
planning
commission
city
council
to
make
a
decision
on
that,
but
we'll
create
the
format
in
which
it
can
in
which
it
can
occur.
A
A
Well,
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
have
the
map
handy
here.
Let
me
just
answer
the
question.
The
question
was:
can
one
differentiate
on
this
map
of
vacant
and
undeveloped
lands
those
lands
that
are
inside
or
outside
the
city,
and
the
answer
is
yes:
the
map
does
have
those
boundaries
very
clearly
delineated,
as
the
city
limits,
the
sphere
of
influence
and
the
urban
services
area.
A
So
if
you
look
at
the
map,
you'll
be
able
to
tell
not
by
the
shade
of
green,
but
just
by
the
location
of
the
lines,
whether
the
lands
are
inside
or
outside
of
the
city
limits,
and
I'm
I'm
sorry
that
I
don't
have
the
map
handy.
But
if
you,
if
you
have
your
own
copy
of
the
map,
you
will
be
able
to
see
that
and
then
we
had
two
questions
that
were
closely
related.
A
Just
the
questions
were
asked:
how
can
we
create
a
coherent
plan
and
vision
for
the
city
and
in
particular,
can
we
take
steps
to
support
local
businesses
and
those
also
much
like
the
question
about
agricultural
policy?
Those
are
policy
questions
and
they
will
be
addressed
through
the
general
plan
process.
A
It's
certainly
my
hope
that
by
the
time
we're
done
with
this
general
plan
update
that
you
all
will
feel
that
you
have
created
a
coherent
plan
for
the
city's
future
growth,
and
I
think
the
2005
plan
has
actually
served
you
well
in
that
regard.
You're
pretty
much
at
the
end
of
the
life
of
that
plan,
you,
you
have
designated
certain
lands
for
residential
development
projects
have
been
proposed
on
them
that
you
you
have.
We
have
identified
a
series
of
issues
like
coordination
with
the
county
like
economic
development
and
support
for
local
businesses.
A
Those
are
all
things
that
will
be
addressed
as
this
planning
process
moves
forward,
and
hopefully
this
meeting
and
the
three
future
meetings
we're
going
to
be
having
as
we
develop,
these
policy
issues
will
be
the
forums
in
which
we
can
create
that
that
plan
and
and
as
one
particular
example
talk
about
ways
to
support
local
businesses.
So
I
hope
that
that
does
happen
up
through
this
planning
process.
A
Those
are
answers
to
four
of
the
questions
I
heard.
Let
me
turn
it
over
to
either
matt
code
or
matt
ferriss
to
talk
about
the
housing,
split
and
other
similar
cities
of
similar
sizes
and
similar
locations,
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
mayor
to
talk
about
anything,
that's
appropriate
at
this
juncture
regarding
the
gpac
composition,
matt.
O
Yeah
thanks
david,
so
this
is
matt
ferris
with
bae,
as
we
alluded
to
in
our
report.
We
asked
and
david
also
noted
in
his
presentation,
is
roughly
eighty
percent
single
family.
Also
in
that
report
we
have
kind
of
comparison
geographies,
one
of
which
is
the
ambag
region,
which
represents
the
all
cities
as
well
as
unincorporated
areas
in
san
benito
county,
santa
cruz
county
and
monterey
county.
O
There
we're
seeing
that
single-family
homes
are
roughly
70
percent
of
all
housing
units
and
then
we
zoom
out
at
the
at
the
entire
state-wide
level
and
and
note
that
roughly
65
of
all
units
are
single-family
home.
So
I
think,
with
that
kind
of
comparison,
geography,
you're,
seeing
you
know
that
the
80
percent
rate
in
in
hollister
is
is
notably
higher
than
any
of
our
kind
of
comparison.
Geographies
right.
A
Thank
you
for
that
answer,
okay.
So
the
last
question
that
was
asked-
I
think
that
was
asked
by
two
different
folks
is:
is
there
any
comment
at
this
time
about
the
composition
of
the
gpac?
I
think
many
members
of
the
audience
know
that
there
are
currently
two
positions
on
the
gpac
that
are
vacant
ones,
for
a
planning,
commissioner,
and
one
is
for
the
public
at
large
and
I'm
not
sure
if
the
council
has
had
a
chance
to
look
at
that
recently.
C
Yeah
and
thank
you
for
the
question,
so
the
council,
when
we
were
originally
getting
this
set
up,
we
put
the
applications
out
to
the
public
to
get
the
public
at
large.
The
members
from
the
planning
commission,
all
the
we
had
chosen,
the
two
planning
commissioners
and
the
citizen
at
large
was
chosen.
Unfortunately,
the
council,
two
members
and
it's
kind
of
interesting
one
of
the
people
that
made
the
comment
about
why
aren't
they
filled
was
one
of
the
people
that
was
against
the
some
of
those
choices.
C
A
Right.
Okay,
mr
mayor,
thank
you
very
much
for
that
answer.
So
that
concludes
my
presentation.
We've
had
questions
from
the
gpac
we've
had
both
questions
and
comments
from
the
audience.
At
this
point,
it's
about
7,
15.
A
We've
still
got
a
bit
of
time
in
the
agenda,
and
our
last
item
would
be
just
to
hear
from
all
of
you
about
any
comments
or
issues
that
we've
brought
up
this
evening
or
that
we
have
not
brought
up
this
evening
that
you
want
to
make
sure
are
on
our
agenda
for
talking
about,
as
we
go
into
policy
discussion
again
about
those
eight
special
planning
areas
that
are
identified
in
our
scope
of
work,
as
well
as
the
wide
variety
of
issues
that
I've
mentioned
and
that
others
have
mentioned
here
this
evening.
A
So
we'll
open
it
up
for
comments
from
any
of
the
three
of
you
on
those
sets
of
issues.
B
I
did
read
through
the
material
and
made
some
notes
and
I
think
back
on
the
2005
general
plan
update
and
it's
amazing
how
much
legislative
information
has
come
out
since
then
assembly
bills
in
the
senate
bills-
and
I
quite
I'm
happy
to
say
that
I
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
that
development
since
the
2005
general
plan
going
through
these
different
a
and
senate
bills.
B
There
are
some
areas
that
were
left
to
the
discretion
of
the
chief
hat
committee
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
comments
on
some
of
the
recommendations,
not
the
requirements.
I
agree
with
the
requirements
but,
for
example,
on
ab
836
when
we
talk
about
climate
change
and
it's
not
going
to
go
away
anytime
soon,
so
there
was
mention
about
smoke,
clean
air
centers
and
it's
not
a
general
plan
requirement,
but
it
was
suggested
that
we
have
a
pilot
program
for
a
clean
air
center
and
I'm
totally
in
agreement
with
that
for
our
vulnerable
demographics.
B
We
go
down
to
senate
bill
1000,
where
there's
an
enviro
screen
process
that
would
identify
us
as
a
disadvantaged
community.
We
are
not
classified
as
a
disadvantaged
community.
J
B
I
am
a
strong
believer
in
environmental
justice
and
that
I
think
that
I
would
be
totally
and
given
our
their
farm
worker
community.
I
I
totally
believe
that
we
need
to
look
at
environmental,
environmental
justice
information
in
the
general
plan
and
have
policy
on
health
and
safety
and
our
health
and
safety
element.
So
I
agree
with
on
removing,
for
example,
removing
lead
pain,
asbestos
in
these
older
homes
and
these
environments
and
enforcing
health
codes.
I
totally
agree
with
that
recommendation.
B
Also,
you
know
I,
with
the
speaker
of
sarah
steiner
on
on
agricultural
land
and
just
talking
about
growth
as
a
concept.
I'ma
believe
I
believe
that,
and
we've
learned
it's
always
from
the
2005.
I
thought
it
was
great
that
we're
looking
at
looking
at
sprawl
as
not
being
a
very
good
planning,
one-on-one
concept.
B
I
think
that
growth
should
come
from,
and
I
think
it's
generally
speaking
from
the
urban
core
and
higher
density
growth
and
then
and
the
outer
layers
of
agricultural
land
should
be
larger
parcels
and
there
has
been
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
mention
about
conservation
of
environmental
and
agricultural
resources.
B
Is
one
of
the
three
planning
state
planning
priorities
other
than
that?
B
I
found
it
interesting
we're
talking
about
in
our
industrial,
for
the
market
analysis
that
we
have
a
strong
industrial
market
and
with
the
issues
with
cobit
19
we're
looking
at
more
stay
at
home,
working
at
home
environments,
satellite
offices,
I
think-
and
we
should
be
mindful
of
flexible
zoning,
especially
in
residential
areas,
to
allow
office
space
because
office
there's
not
a
lot
of
office
commercial
projects
in
the
pipeline.
B
That's
what
I,
what
I've
been
reading
here
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
also
consider
resiliency
as
part
of
the
general
plan
and
either
and
one
of
those
how
it
relates
to
the
elements
and
I'm
happy
to
see.
We
have
a
new
arts
element
and
an
economic
element
that
would
be
in
addition
to
the
previous
general
plan,
and
I
agree
with
valerie
eglendon
on
the
importance
of
recreational
amenities,
and
I
think,
certainly,
I
think
we
could
address
that
and
help
the
safety
element.
Those
are
my
comments.
D
Mr
mayor,
in
closing,
in
summary,
I
would
just
like
to
say
that
I
think,
and
I
the
general
plan
process
and
everything
that's
been
coming
out
of,
it
seems
pretty
spot
on
with
the
conversations
I
have
with
the
public,
with
the
conversations
that
we're
having
at
council
and
the
dialogue,
that's
just
out
there
in
general,
so
I'm
pretty
excited
about
it.
You
know,
I
think
you
guys
are
doing
a
fantastic
job.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
to
the
staff.
You
guys
are
awesome.
I
really
appreciate
everything
you
guys
are
doing.
D
I
do
agree
with
commissioner,
you
boy
that
we
need
to
build
an
environmental
friendly
way
in
a
manner.
That's
not
going
to
put
too
much
of
a
burden
on
our
environment
or
our
public
as
well.
I'm
also
happy
to
see
that
there's
so
many
different
people
involved
advocating
for
for
the
needs
of
our
community.
D
Ms
pollard
she's
been
involved
over
the
years
and
she's
absolutely
correct.
I
think
we
need
to
protect
park
hill.
It
is
one
of
the
most
prime
spots
of
hollister,
where
you
can
go
up
there
and
you
can
see
all
of
our
city.
So
we
need
to
do
something
to
protect
that
I'd,
be
interested
in
looking
at
more
areas
that
we
can
protect,
as
you
stated
that
those
are
not
designated
right
now.
D
I
like
the
fact
that
they're
talking
about
how
downtown
residential
units
are
historical
and
that
miss
kane
came
on
here
and
she
is
pointing
that
out.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
canyon
came
here
because
last
meeting
we
were
talking
about
not
having
that
much
input
from
the
our
native
community.
So
I
really
am
grateful
for
her
to
come
out
and
I
just
look
forward
to
partnering
with
everybody
we're
spot
on
and
I
think
we're
doing
a
wonderful
job.
So
thank
all
of
you
guys
for
all
your
hard
work.
You're
much
appreciated.
C
Thank
you,
mr
hersendes,
so
I
do
want
to
go
back
through
a
lot
of
the
comments
or
points
we're
making
today
and
going
back
to
the
growth
rate.
The
12
and
again
we
were
at
80
single
family.
C
We
far
exceeded
the
numbers
required
of
us
from
the
state,
and
this
is
why
we
are
currently
having
so
many
issues
within
our
community.
We,
we
do
need
to
have
a
much
more
reasonable
plan
for
a
community
that
does
incorporate
more
multi-family
homes
in
our
community,
and
I
definitely
want
to
make
sure
we
match
those
numbers
that
we're
seeing
in
other
communities
more
at
the
60
percent
rate.
So
we
have
new
communities
built
with
a
mix
of
single-family
multi-family,
affordable
mixed
in
rather
than
just
going
at
the
profit
maker
of
the
single
family
homes.
C
It's
very
important
that
we're
focused
on
that
and
more
towards
the
line
of
the
baseline
numbers
rather
than
the
extreme
numbers,
because
we
just
cannot
absorb
that
kind
of
growth
in
our
community.
It
is
putting
stress
on
our
infrastructure,
some
of
the
points
made
where
the
inefficiency
or
the
insufficient
capacity
for
some
of
the
on
the
sewer
master
plan
that
we
have
to
be
dealing
with.
It's
going
to
cost
me
quite
a
bit
of
money
to
try
to
catch
up
the
issue
of
making
retail
commercial
industrial.
C
C
We
do
need
to
put
that
focus
in
there
and
make
that
an
attractive
feature
of
our
community
to
bring
in
the
businesses,
and
we
do
need
to
grow
a
more
planned
way,
instead
of,
as
somebody
mentioned
earlier,
a
haphazard
way
that
it's
been
happening
over
the
last
several
years,
so
that
we
have
that
balance
and
again
our
residents
are
proud
of
our
our
beautiful
community
and
they
can
actually
live
work
in
our
community
and
shop
in
our
community
very
important
pieces
that
we
need
to
work
to
to
get
to
incentivize
for
the
retail
that
we
do
need
here
and,
most
importantly,
we
have
got
to
find
a
way
to
have
the
county
work
with
us.
C
This
just
plopping
down
developments
all
around
the
city.
You
know
hundreds
of
homes
or
thousands
is
really
putting
a
major
strain
on
our
city,
and
it
just
cannot
continue.
We
have
to
find
a
way
to
to
find
that
balance
in
a
better
planned
way.
Leapfrog
just
does
not
work,
so
that's
one
of
the
priorities
that
has
to
happen
here,
because
we
can
plant
a
great
city,
but
if
all
around
us
we're
building
thousands
of
homes,
we
really
haven't
accomplished
much
because
we
still
feel
the
effects
of
it.
C
Transportation
25,
as
we
talked
about
before,
is
been
approved.
Now
the
widening
roundabouts.
We
do
need
to
move
forward
on
some
of
the
plans
on
those
and
put
together
a
few
spots
that
we
can
demonstrate
they
do
work
when
they're
done
well,
it's
going
to
play
an
important
part
in
our
community
subdivisions.
C
We
do
need
to
have
subdivisions
again
that
it's
not
just
crowding
homes
in,
but
it's
creating
a
community.
The
trails,
as
was
mentioned
by
several
speakers
tonight,
that
interconnect
our
communities,
so
a
child
can
ride
his
bicycle
safely
from
their
home
to
the
core
of
our
our
community
on
a
trail
or
running
trail
or
a
bike
trail
or
whatever
it
is.
We
need
to
be
really
looking
at
planning
on
that
planning
on
what
we
want
to
see
if
we're
building
these
sound
walls.
C
What's
on
the
other
side
of
the
sound
wall,
how
much
area
is
between
that?
Curb
to
that
wall?
Do
we
build
two
store
homes
along
the
sound
walls,
single
story,
homes?
Those
types
of
things
have
to
be
talked
about.
C
I
don't
know
if
we
do
that
here
in
the
general
plan
or
we're
going
to
do
that
city
level,
but
it
has
to
be
discussed
the
roadways
within
the
city
making
sure
we're
not
building
roadways
that
are
oversized
or
undersized,
because
currently
we
have
several
roadways
within
the
city
that
are
oversized
which
created
issues
with
people
using
them
as
drag
strips
throughout
the
community
or
racing
around
town
and
some
of
the
things
that
were
pointed
on
the
previous
plan.
C
One
of
these
and
some
of
the
others
are
still
not
completed.
We
need
to
put
that
focus
in
and
get
those
projects
done.
So
we
understand
what
our
community
can
really
support.
As
far
as
the
traffic
you
mentioned,
the
storm
drain
improvements
need
to
be
taken.
Care
of
do
want
to
mention
the
water
as
far
as
water
quality,
we
did
build
a
new
treatment
plant
that
does
meet
the
chromium
six
requirements
and
we
were
one
of
those
communities
that
moved
ahead
on
that
early.
C
There
were
several
discussions
on,
shall
we
do
it
later
or
now?
The
city,
along
with
our
partners,
committed
to
taking
that
project
on
and
meeting
those
requirements,
and
so
we're
under
the
10
parts
per
I
think
per
billion,
and
we
are
doing
well
on
that
part.
With
the
treatment
of
our
water
quality
of
our
water
sewer
itself,
the
plant
can
handle
much
more
capacity.
C
The
problem
is
our
lines,
bringing
it
back
to
the
to
the
plant
and
which
is
storm,
and
the
sewer
creates
a
potential
issue
for
us
as
far
as
the
city
and
the
cost
of
upgrading
that
infrastructure.
So
that
is
very
important.
I
again,
I
appreciate
the
additional
information
on
3
30.
point
it
out.
C
County
is
exempt
and
the
city
is
actually
meeting
or
has
exceeded
their
requirements,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that's
clear,
because
again,
a
lot
of
people
are
being
misinformed
about
that
and
we
don't
want
misinformation
going
on
within
our
community
planning
with
the
school
districts
is
critically
important.
We
have
several
bonds
right
now.
If
anybody
looks
at
their
property
tax
bill
right
now,
they
will
see
the
many
many
bonds
that
we're
paying
for
for
the
improvements
of
our
schools
and
for
the
new
schools.
C
We
have
to
really
plan
our
future
growth
based
on
some
of
these
bonds.
So
we
can
absorb
these
rather
than
just
adding
more
and
more
and
more
bonds
to
our
tax
bill
and
of
course,
our
children
deserve
a
quality
education,
that's
not
impacted
because
of
growing
too
quickly
and
the
planning
area,
as
you
mentioned
before
again.
This
is
something
that
I
think
the
city
has
been
talking
about
and
we
need
to
just
put
that
focus
on
this,
but
I
do
appreciate
it
becoming
part
of
this
conversation
and
again
to
close
off
the
gpac
committee.
C
Hopefully,
with
the
new
council,
we
can
appoint
the
other
two
members
and
we
can
have
a
full
committee
in
place
which
does
include
one
female
and
again,
the
other
two
people
that
were
involved
were
very
qualified
to
be
on
this,
so
I'm
hoping
we
could
continue
working
in
a
in
a
positive
in
a
a
pace
that
does
reflect
our
community.
B
Mr
chair,
can
I
say
just
a
couple
more
observations,
and
I
want
to
thank
you,
david
on
place
words
for
this
comprehensive
material
that
that
I
spent
most
of
the
weekend
going
over.
B
I
I
do
want
to
also
say
that
the
chairman
had
some
great
good,
very
good
points,
and
I
also
want
to
say
that
I
agree
it's
very,
very
critical-
that
we
have
a
good
communication,
collaboration
and
coordination
with
the
county,
we're
talking
about
the
water.
I
know
they
need
to
complete
or
they
are
the
process
of
completing
a
sustainable
groundwater
management
plan,
which
is
very,
very
important
to
us,
also
the
growth
that
is
occurring
outside
the
city
limits.
B
I
think
we
need
to
have
a
better
say
in
that
and
since
the
2005
general
plan,
you
know
the
same
issues
are
coming
up.
That
beckons
us
to
roll
up
our
sleeve
and
see
what
we
can
do
about
it.
And
one
of
that
to
me
is
that
is
the
eighty
percent
of
single-family
detached
homes
in
our
inventory
that
we
we
still
have
that
that
problem.
When
we
did
our
original
general
plan
but
and
our
housing
element,
we
identified
that
we're
not
responding
to
the
lower
income
groups.
B
B
So
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
that
and
also
there's
no
mention
in
our
circulation
element
regarding
the
conditions
of
the
actual
physical
condition
of
our
streets
and
roads,
and
I
don't
know
if
where
that
will
be
addressed,
but
it
was
just
something
that
I
know
we
spent
a
lot
of
money.
The
city
does
on
maintaining
our
roads
and
our
streets.
B
I
don't
know
where
that's
going
and
where
that
will
be
addressed,
and
but
I
I
would
expect
that
we
do
address
that
as
a
very
serious
issue.
And
that
concludes
my
observations.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Yes,
thank
you.
Let
me
just
go
back
for
a
moment
to
the
slides,
which
will
take
me
a
moment
to
pull
up.
A
A
Sorry
about
this,
it
takes
just
a
moment
here
we
go
and
I
just
want
to
go
ahead
here.
We've
gone
through
all
these
slides.
I
apologize
for
going
through
them
so
quickly,
but
I
just
wanted
to
wrap
up
by
talking
about
our
our
next
steps
we
are
now
going
to
tonight
constitutes
the
third
meeting
and
the
second
of
two
meetings
on
existing
conditions.
A
We've
now,
given
you
an
overview
and
you've,
given
us
feedback
about
the
issues
that
need
to
be
covered,
so
we're
going
to
now,
I'm
starting
essentially
tomorrow,
begin
looking
at
land
use
and
design
and
circulation
within
the
eight
special
planning
areas,
as
well
as
covering
that
list
of
various
policy
issues
that
we've
all
talked
about
this
evening,
we
will
be
coming
back
to
you
at
a
series
of
community
outreach
events
and
gpac
meetings.
A
It
says
here
number
four,
but
we
also
have
actually
two
others
to
look
at
the
climate
action
plan
and
other
special
planning
documents
as
well
as
well
it
moving
into
winter
and
spring
of
2021,
we'll
be
meeting
with
you
three
times
hosting
various
community
outreach
events
and
then
going
to
the
planning
commission
in
full
city
council
to
do
an
interim
check-in
to
talk
about
the
work
we've
done
on
these
items.
A
So
you
can
expect
to
see
that
as
members
of
the
gpac
and
all
of
you
are
also
on
either
the
planning
commission
or
the
council
you'll
see
them
there
also
and
you'll
be
seeing
us
working
with
you
on
those
eight
special
planning
areas,
as
well
as
the
policy
questions
that
we've
been
talking
about
this
evening,
and
we
really
look
forward
to
to
diving
into
all
of
that.
A
It's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
fun
to
address
those
issues,
and
I
I
did
hear
the
mayor
say
that
hopefully,
we'll
have
the
full
gpac
appointed
at
that
point
and
starting
at
meeting
number
four,
we
should
have
a
meeting
of
of
five
people
instead
of
just
three.
So
that
gives
you
a
sense
of
where
we're
headed
from
here
on
out,
and
that
concludes
my
presentations
for
this
evening
and
include
concludes
most
of
the
items
on
the
agenda.
A
C
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
participating,
so
it's
important
to
have
our
community
involved
and
I
want
to
thank
again
the
gpac
members
for
the
great
information
you
provided
tonight.
The
question
so
looking
forward
to
the
next
meeting
yeah,
I'm
hoping
we
do
have
a
full
a
board
at
that
time
and
again,
thank
you,
mr
early,
and
all
your
staff.
You
guys
are
really
making
this
project,
something
that
we
can
go
through
in
a
way
that
we
can
be
proud
of.
So
thank
you
again.