►
From YouTube: Gov Hol PC 20200625
Description
Hollister Planning Commission Meeting June 25, 2020
A
A
This
meeting
is
in
compliance
with
the
with
the
governor's
executive
order,
n25-20
issued
on
march
4th
2020
and
n2920
issued
on
march
18th
of
2020,
allowing
for
a
deviation
of
teleconference
rules
required
by
the
brown
act.
The
purpose
of
this
is
to
provide
a
safe
environment
for
the
staff
and
the
public
to
conduct
city
business,
while
allowing
for
public
participation
during
the
covet
19
global
emergency.
A
A
A
The
public
participation,
the
city
of
hollister
council
chambers,
will
be
open
to
the
public
during
the
meeting.
However,
in
accordance
to
this
executive
orders
of
n25-20
and
n29-20
and
guidance
from
the
california
department
of
public
health
on
gatherings
regarding
social
distancing,
seating
will
be
limited
and
on
first-come,
first-served
basis
in
accordance
with
the
executive
orders,
n25-20
and
n29-20
and
guidance
from
the
california
department
of
public
health
on
gatherings.
Remote
public
participation
is
allowed
and
public
comment
time
may
be
limited.
A
B
Good
evening
the
agenda
for
the
thursday
june
25th
2020
planning
commission
meeting
was
posted
on
friday
june
19th
2020
at
4
50
pm.
E
F
A
D
C
A
All
you
at
this
time,
communications
from
the
public
on
items
not
listed
on
the
agenda.
This
is
the
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
items
not
on
the
agenda
and
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
planning
commission,
when
the
planning
commission
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
commission.
Each
speaker
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
Please
note
that
the
state
law
prohibits
the
planning
commissions
from
discussing
or
taking
action
on
an
item
not
on
the
agenda.
G
G
Okay
and
then
paul,
if
you
could
just
thank
you
so.
G
Much
all
righty,
thank
you,
chairperson
munzer.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
site
and
architectural
review
2019-21.
G
G
The
project
was
a
previously
approved
by
the
planning
commission
at
its
meeting
of
june
29
2017
per
resolution
2017-16
and
the
prior
approval
has
since
expired.
So
the
applicant
has
contacted
the
city
and
is
requesting
approval
from
the
planning
commission
to
proceed
forward
with
the
project
with
a
new
application.
G
This
would
face
the
newly
constructed
burt
drive
extension,
and
this
would
be
the
main
point
of
access
for
the
project.
These
storefront
windows
and
steel.
Awnings
wrap
around
about
half
of
this
elevation
from
the
eastern
elevation
on
the
san
felipe
side,
the
western
elevation
again
same
kind
of
layout
on
my
powerpoint
slide.
G
Finally,
the
southern
elevation
contains
one
storefront
entry
and
two
mandars,
and
it
also
has
six
loading
docks
and
the
loading
dock
doors
are
depressed
and
into
the
ground
into
the
grade
of
the
elevation,
so
that
truck
deliveries
can
roll
right
up
and
then
there's
also
two
on-grade
roll-up
doors.
As
you
can
see,.
G
San
felipe
road,
which
is
at
the
top
of
your
your
screen,
but
so
we're
oriented
north,
is
going
to
be
to
the
left
side
of
the
screen.
G
San
felipe
road
is
our
primary
vehicle,
vehicular
access
to
the
site,
and
there
would
be
a
new
primary
access
on
san
felipe
road,
which
is
about
1200
feet
north
of
the
current
access.
So
if
you
look
at
your
screen
on
the
right
side,
there
is
a
exit,
only
area
and
that's
kind
of
where
the
current
access
to
the
site
is,
but
the
new,
the
new,
bert
drive
extension
would
be
at
the
north
or
most
side
of
this
site.
G
The
the
burt
drive
extension
is
planned
to
extend
into
the
neighboring
industrial
park
and
it
will
align
with
the
future
burt
drive
on
the
eastern
side
of
san
felipe.
As
that
property
develops
in
the
future,
there
will
be
deceleration
lanes
on
san
felipe
road
for
truck
traffic.
That's
entering
the
development
on
the
southbound
lane,
and
acceleration
lanes
would
be
required
for
truck
and
vehicular
traffic,
exiting
the
project
and
traveling
north
on
san
felipe
road.
G
The
current
access
on
san
felipe
road,
which
serves
agricultural
businesses
today,
would
operate
as
the
secondary
exit.
Only
access
to
the
clearest
park
site
on-site
circulation
includes
two
26-foot
wide
drive.
Aisles
on
the
east
and
west
side
of
the
building
and
again,
acceleration
lanes
would
be
required
for
truck
traffic
exist.
Exiting
this
access
and
traveling
north
onto
san
felipe
road.
G
There
will
be
led
fixtures
dispersed
throughout
the
project,
parking
areas
and
pedestrian
pathways
to
provide
lighting
throughout
the
project.
There
are
382
parking
stalls
and
12
ada
parking
stalls
and
as
well
as
eight
evc
charging
vehicle
stalls,
there
are
25
bicycle
parking
stalls.
There
is
a
requirement
per
municipal
code
of
400
square
feet
of
floor
area
for
every
400
square
feet
of
floor
area
of
the
building.
We
need
one
parking
space,
and
so
there
are
378
required
vehicle
parking
spaces
and
19
required
bicycle
parking
spaces.
G
G
There
was
a
previous
environmental
impact
report
for
this
project
or
for
actually
for
a
larger
industrial
airport
terminal
business
park
project
into
may
of
2000,
and
that
was
to
build
a
tented
map
for
this
area
for
airport
and
industrial
uses,
and
then,
since
then,
the
site
was
annexed
into
the
city
and
none
of
the
proposed
development
from
that
eir
has
occurred.
G
But
when
this
project
was
previously
approved
in
2017,
there
was
an
addendum
to
that
eir
that
determined
that
it
was
consistent
with
the
findings
from
the
original
eir
and
then
there's
also
a
tentative
map.
Approval
tentative
map-
I
believe
it
is
2019-4,
and
that
is
for
dividing
not
only
this
site,
which
is
the
40.
G
like
eight
eight
acres,
but
it's
it's
a
little
over
100
acres
and
into
60
industrial
lots,
and
so
that
is
also
an
environmental
impact
report
for
that
tentative
map
and
this
project
would
become
lot.
One
of
that
approved
tentative
map.
G
G
There
are
a
few
conditions
that
we'd
like
to
change
from
the
draft
conditions
in
your
draft
resolution,
condition
number
32
discusses
barricades
at
roads
that
end
at
the
property
lines,
we'd
like
to
strike
that
as
and
if
you'll,
if
you'll
see
from
the
previous
slides,
there
is
going
to
be
a
roundabout
at
the
end
of
the
bert
drive
extension
which,
if
and
when
the
tentative
map
improvements
go
through,
that
will
be
extended,
replaced
and
extended
with
the
street
that
that
moves
through.
So
there
won't
there
isn't
a
need
for
barricades
on
this
project.
G
G
There
isn't
a
need
for
full
frontage
improvements
along
san
felipe
road,
but
the
applicant
will
be
required
to
underground
existing
overhead
utilities,
but
we
just
like
to
strike
the
word
street
lights
from
this
condition
and
then
finally
condition
38
is
similar
to
condition
32.
It
talks
about
a
non-vehicular
access
strip
at
streets
that
terminate
at
the
project
boundary
again,
we'd
like
to
strike
that
condition
because
of
the
roundabout
that's
being
proposed.
The
temporary
roundabout.
G
A
A
And
we'll
open
up
the
public
here,
our
public
comments
at
6
18..
Do
we
have
any
speaker
cards
on
this
item.
E
A
J
All
right,
this
is
aaron
hall
with
san
benito
engineering,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant,
oh
it
this
is
a
project
you've
seen
before
and
we're
coming
back
with
it
to
try
and
move
forward.
We've
gone
through
design.
C
J
It
took
longer
than
expected,
so
we
are
expired
anyway.
Mr
wendy
is
planning
to
move
somewhere.
We
have
gone
over
these
conditions
with
staff.
The
only
comment
I'd
like.
K
J
C
C
J
Planned
for
this
station
so
that
we
can
make
sure
it
gets
designed
to
incorporate
not
only
what
mr
winn
was
doing
but
possibly
address
their
concerns
for
this
lift
station
that
have
caused.
We
have
the
cip
list
for
a
while
now,
but
mr
win's
responsibility
is
for
the
changes
he
brings
to
this
station,
but.
C
H
Yeah,
so
I
think
in
the
last
meeting,
which
I
wasn't
at
in
january,
there
was,
I
believe
this
was
the
same
project
that
was
discussed
and
there's
such
a
roundabout
came
up.
So
that
is
so.
Is
there
gonna
do
we
know
there's
gonna
be
roundups
for
sure
or
is
it
gonna
be
topics.
K
Yeah
with
the
with
this
project
there
there
is
not
going
to
be
any
intersection,
control,
roundabout
or
anything
constructed.
That's
going
to
be
constructed
with
the
the
tentative
map.
I
think
when
eva
mentioned
a
roundabout,
she
was
actually
talking
about
the
temporary
cul-de-sac
at
the
end
of
bert
drive.
Yes,.
D
C
A
Commissioner,
stevens
will
acknowledge
that
we'll
we'll
do
a
better
job
of
speaking
into
the
mic.
So
that
way
everybody
can
hear,
and
then
engineer
has
a
also
another
comment
in
regards.
K
Right
in
regard
to
the
lift
station-
and
we
will
work
with
san
benito
engineering
for
any
documents
that
the
city
may
have,
we
will
freely
turn
those
over
to
san
benito
engineering
to
review
and
consider
for
any
design
that
they
come
up
with.
However,
san
benito
engineering
is
going
to
have
to
stand
on
their
own
to
provide
a
design
and
analysis
for
that
lift
station.
So
any
documents
that
the
city
has
we're
are
more
than
willing
to
turn
over
to
san
benito
engineering.
A
K
Okay
yeah:
this
is
an
in
regard
to
the
lift
station,
any
documents
that
the
city
has
in
their
possession
for
that
lift
station
from
a
previous
draft
design
that
that
the
city
had
performed.
The
city
will
gladly
turn
those
over
to
san
benito
engineering
to
consider
as
part
of
san
benito
engineering's
responsibility
and
design
of
any
potential
upgrades
that
are
necessary
for.
C
A
Item
I
will
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
adopt
pc
resolution.
E
A
A
The
item
passes.
Thank
you.
Moving
on
to
item
number
two
site
and
architecture
review
for
number
2019
dash.
If
we
can
have
the
staff
report
on
that.
C
G
Thank
you
so
much
alrighty
item
two
is
site
and
architecture
review
2019-20
and
the
applicant
is
requesting
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
two-story
duplex
on
a
4
000
square
foot
lot
located
at
1144
street.
The
property
is
located
behind
an
existing
residential
unit
that
is
on
a
separate
parcel
and
this
project
property
has
access
provided
off
of
hawkins
alley
to
the
north.
G
G
G
Section
1718060
of
our
municipal
code
requires
one
and
a
half
parking
spaces
per
two-bedroom
unit
for
a
total
of
three
required
spaces,
and
this
project
is
proposing
a
two-car
garage
for
each
unit
which
meets
this
requirement
and
for
bicycle
parking.
There
is
a
requirement
of
ten
percent
of
the
required
vehicle
spaces,
which
amounts
to
one
space
for
this
project,
and
there
is
proposed
to
be
a
bicycle
rack
located
under
the
staircase
for
unit
two
on
the
north
side
of
the
building,
and
this
meets
the
requirement
for
bicycle
parking.
G
There
is
a
requirement
for
500
square
feet
of
open
space
for
any
multi-family
unit
and
that
500
square
feet
is
divided
between
private
and
common
open
space.
So
the
project
requires
a
total
of
1
000
square
feet
of
open
space
for
two
units
and
at
ground
level.
Each
unit
has
to
have
250
square
feet
of
private
open
space.
G
This
site
is
designated
as
medium
density,
residential
in
our
general
plan
and
the,
I
believe,
that's
actually
incorrect.
In
my
snap
report.
It
should
be
downtown
mixed
use
in
our
general
plan,
so
the
4
000
square
foot
site
can
support
between
two
and
four
units
at
25
to
45
units
per
acre
and
25
to
45
is
the
correct
units
per
acre
for
downtown
mixed
use,
and
so
the
project
is
consistent
with
the
general
plan
and
this
property
is
located
within
our
alcus
priola
special
study
seismic
zone.
G
However,
pursuant
to
the
public
resources
code
regarding
earthquake
fault,
zoning,
the
proposed
development
does
not
constitute
a
project
as
defined
by
the
public
resources
code,
section
2621.6,
because
the
development
is
a
water
steel
frame
structure,
it's
less
than
two
stories
tall
or
two
or
less
stories
tall
and
it's
part
of
a
development
of
less
than
four
units.
So,
therefore,
it's
exempt
from
the
aqueous
parole
of
seismic
study
requirements,
which
would
be
a
trenching
study
to
determine
if
faults
are
present,
so
it
is
exempt
from
that.
G
With
that
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
and
architectural
review
application
2019-20
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Thank
you
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Steph,
if
we
have
no
questions
for
staff,
we'll
go
ahead
and
open
up
to
this
item
to
a
public
hearing
at
6,
32.
A
Any
speaker
cards
on
this
item.
None
all
right,
we'll
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing
at
6
32.
D
I'll
make
a
motion
so
I'll
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
food
in
the
site,
an
architectural
application
2019-20
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
trapped
resolution.
E
F
A
A
L
Good
evening
the
applicant
is
requesting
an
approval
for
a
minor
subdivision
number
2019-4
to
subdivide
a
1.5
acre
lot
into
two
parcels
located
at
350
4th
street.
The
county
assessor
parcel
number
is.
L
052-131021,
it's
located
within
the
west
gateway
zoning
district.
The
project
is
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
4th
street
in
felice
drive
south
of
penicate
court
parcel
a
is
proposed
at
0.52
acres
and
is
currently
vacant
with
no
proposed
development.
At
this
time,
parcel
b
is
proposed
at
1.03
acres
and
received
an
entitlement
on
june
27
2019
for
site
and
architectural
review
2019-9
to
construct
a
9
100
square
foot
retail
commercial
building.
This
entitlement
expires
on
june
27
2021.
L
The
city
of
hollister's
2005,
through
2023
general
plan,
designates
this
site
as
west
gateway.
This
designation
provides
for
series
of
parcels
with
neighborhood,
commercial
and
multi-family
residential
uses
to
provide
a
retail
oriented
entry
boulevard
at
the
west
entrance
to
the
city
near
the
san
benito
river.
The
designation
is
intended
to
provide
convenient
services
to
regional
traffic
on
highway
156,
to
encourage
community
shopping,
retail
and
offices
with
medium
to
high
density
residential
uses
at
a
density
of
20
to
35
units
per
net
acre
outside
of
the
downtown
hollister
area.
L
This
project
is
consistent
with
the
west
gateway.
Zoning.
The
west
gateway
does
not
have
a
minimum
required
lot
size,
as
previously
mentioned
proposed
parcel
b
has
received
entitlements,
parcel
a
has
no
development
proposals.
At
this
time,
however,
parcel
a
proposed
at
0.52
acres
can
support
10
to
18,
residential
and
or
commercial
units.
L
The
1.55
acres
site
can
accommodate
up
to
31
to
54
residential
or
commercial
uses,
as
allowed
by
the
west
gateway
zoning
district
for
the
access
for
this
proposed
project,
the
proposed
parcel
b
would
have
access
off
of
felice
drive
to
the
east
in
pinacate
court
to
the
north.
Access
to
propose
parcel
a
will
occur
through
a
reciprocal
access
agreement,
which
can
be
seen
on
your
attached
parcel
maps.
L
The
reciprocal
access
agreement
will
connect
parcels
a
and
b
from
east
to
west
and
extend
across
parcel
a
to
allow
for
continued
access
to
the
west
as
future
properties
develop.
This
is
consistent
with
the
west
gateway
guidelines
for
circulation
and
the
general
plan
and
the
zoning
code.
A
condition
of
approval
has
been
added
to
the
draft
resolution
that
requires
that
the
developer
record
a
deed
restriction
on
the
property,
which
indicates
that
once
access
to
rakovich
way
to
the
west
becomes
available
through
future
development,
the
access
to
pinacate
court
to
the
north
shall
be
eliminated.
L
L
L
L
L
So
at
this
time
this
particular
proposal
is
to
divide
the
lot
to
subdivide
the
lot.
I
don't
want
to
get
them
mixed
up
right
here,
on
which
parcel.
Let
me
go
back.
L
So
parcel
b
is
what
will
have
the
dollar
general,
and
that
was
the
entitlements
for
a
commercial
retail
business
that
I
was
mentioning
earlier,
that
is
planned
to
still
take
place.
They
still
have
entitlements
they're,
going
through
the
process
of
submitting
to
development
services
and
right
now
on
parcel
a.
We
do
not
have
any
proposals
at
this
time.
So
this
what
they're
coming
for
tonight
is
to
just
subdivide
the
parcel.
F
C
D
There
be
any
or
anything
that
we
should
consider
in
terms
of
impacts
to
the
neighbors
to
the
businesses
et.
D
L
So
the
the
impacts
to
be
considered
would
be
similar
to
those
that
we
had
discussed
for
parcel
b.
However,
as
parcel
a
gets
developed,
pinacote
court
will
be
eliminated,
so
the
traffic
that
could
be
sorry.
L
I'm
trying
to
so
until
parcel
b
is
developed.
They
will
still
have
access
through
pinacate
and
through
police
or
felice
drive
once
parcel
a
has
something
that
is
proposed
to
be
developed
on
it.
That's
when
we'll
eliminate
access
at
pinte,
cotta
court,
so
the
traffic
that
would
have
previously
impacted
it
will
no
longer
be
going
on
to
pentecode
court.
They
will
have
access
through
felice
drive
and
then
through
the
parking
lot.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
kind
of
see
the
easement
that
goes
through
the
middle
of
the
parcel.
E
That's
correct
the
engineer:
the
engineering
department
will
be
also
speaking
a
little
bit
about
that
right
now,
commissioner
johnson,
but
that
is
correct.
You,
you
recollect
correctly.
E
The
city
of
hollister
city
council
adopted
a
mitigative
negative
declaration
for
the
west
gateway
beautification
and
essentially
the
the
areas
from
graf
road
all
the
way
through
west
side
boulevard,
and
that
is
one
of
the
goals
of
the
westgate
rebedification,
to
try
to
limit
access
from
forestry
onto
private
property,
and
the
engineering
department
will
talk
a
little
bit
more
in
regards
to
what
amber
was
commenting
in
regarding
access.
E
E
Yeah,
so
so,
right
now,
with
the
approval
of
dollar,
general
access
would
be
from
felice
drive,
which
is,
which
is
the
access,
that
it
is
a
budding
the
samurai
health
foundation
off
of
fourth
street,
and
there
will
also
be
access
from
paying
credit.
The
cul-de-sac
and
your
recollection
is
correct.
E
We
did
have
various
members
of
the
area
come
in
and
speak
about
their
concerns,
especially
people
who
live
on
being
created
and
one
of
the
things
that
staff
talked
about
at
that
planning,
commission
meeting
and
and
we're
also
indicating
today
in
our
resolution.
What
thing
can
within
the
conditions
of
approval,
is
that
for
the
dollar
general,
the
axis
would
be
felice
drive
paying
credit.
However,
upon
development
of
parcel
a
which,
consistent
with
our
west
gateway
zoning
district,
it
can
be
a
combination
of
a
high
density,
residential
and
or
commercial.
E
Essentially,
the
the
there
is
a
a
condition
that
indicates
that
the
axis
will
continue
to
the
west
and
align
with
rakovich
way,
essentially
not
creating
any
new
driveways
along
forestry
and
maintaining
that
racket
rich
way.
Forestry.
E
F
D
Yeah,
can
I
yeah,
I
have
a
question,
I'm
not
really
sure
what
the
right
question
is.
I
guess.
D
The
purpose
of
doing
this
and
I'm
not
sure
that
I'm
not
sure
that
I
totally
understand
what
the
because
again
it
goes
back
to.
I
think
I'm
not
asking
the
right
question
it's
about
the
impact
the
surrounding
area.
So
what
would
be?
What
would
be
the
effect
if
this
was
not
approved
and
what
would
be
the
effect
if
we,
if
we
authorized.
E
E
Understand
as
well
as
you
understand,
and
the
neighbors
in
the
area
that
this
is,
you
know,
there's
there's
questions
and
there's
concerns,
and
so
essentially,
for
this
evening,
all
we're
looking
at
is
essentially
splitting
that
one
existing
parcel
into
two,
and
so,
if,
if
it
did
not
move
forward
with
the
subdivision,
it
would
be
essentially
one
parcel
where
there
is
a
current
existing
entitlement
for
one
commercial
building,
which
is
the
dollar
general
that
commissioner
johnson
was
referring
to
that
that
had
previously
come
before
you
at
the
planning
commission
tonight,
essentially
would
be
a
request
for
him
for
an
approval
to
subdivide
that
one
parcel
into
two
and
the
intent
here
and
we
have
the
applic.
E
The
applicants
should
be
on
the
line
as
well
in
case
in
case
we
have
questions
for
the
applicant
as
well
regarding
their
their
intent,
but
the
essentially,
what
would
happen
is
parcel
b
would
be
where
the
dollar
general
would
be
at
and
then
parcel
a
would
be
a
separate
parcel
with
with
easements
for
axis,
between
the
both
for
a
separate
parcel
and
in
regards
to
future
future
entitlements.
For
that.
E
So
if
some
somebody
can
come
in
later
on,
they
can
potentially
sell
parcel
a
to
somebody
else
and
that
that
property
owner
can
then
build
something.
That's
consistent
with
our
west
gateway
zoning
designation,
which
would
be
consistent
to
either
or
commercial
and
multi-family
residential,
because
we
have
commercial
already.
It
would
be
okay
to
have
another
commercial
aspect
of
it
or
they
can
propose
multi-family
in
the
form
of
apartments
or
condominiums
townhomes,
or
they
can
propose
another
commercial
building
there.
A
If
we
have
no
additional
questions
from
the
commissioners,
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
open
this
up
to
a
public
hearing
at
6
49.
A
Do
we
have
any
speaker
cards
on
this.
E
The
applicant
is
waiting,
but
he
has
not
requested
to
speak,
but
I'm
sure
if
there's
any
questions
for
the
applicant
he's
he's
in
the
line
as
well
just
in
case
there's
any
questions.
A
A
F
Dollar
general,
because
I
know
their
biggest
concern
was
traffic
in
their
courts
because
it
has
been
a
court
for
so
long
as
just
the
resident.
F
A
Thank
you
for
the
comment
carrie
at
this
time.
I
will
go
and
ask
what
the
the
pleasure
of
the
commission
is
on
this.
E
A
Great
thank
you.
That
item
passes
moving
on
to
item
number
four
site
and
architectural
review
20
20-4.
We
can
have
the
staff
report
on
that
item.
E
E
M
H
M
Good
evening
the
applicant
is
requesting
seitan
architectural
approval
to
convert
to
existing
multi-office
buildings
on
a
12
873
square
foot
lot
into
three
residences,
and
this
is
in
the
home
office.
Zoning
district.
The
front
primary
building
which
faces
san
benito
street
consists
of
is
requesting
will
consist
of
two
attached
residential
units.
M
M
Per
the
zoning
code,
the
home
office
district
allows
multi-family
residences.
Additionally,
the
housing
density
for
the
home
office
district
is
8
to
12
units
per
acre.
Therefore,
a
nearly
1300
square
foot
lot
can
have
up
to
three
residential
units.
This
makes
the
project
consistent
with
the
zoning
code
and
the
general
plan.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Property.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Staff
recommends
the
planning
commission
review.
The
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
proving
site
and
architectural
review
2020-4
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
M
D
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
say
again
how
you
access
the
property,
how
you
exit,
so
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
really
clear.
M
M
Entrance
so
the
project
is
proposing
that
the
north
entrance
be
blocked
off
or
closed
off,
to
be
able
to
accommodate
the
installation
for
public
and
private
open
space.
D
D
H
Yeah,
I
have
a
question
so
who's,
so
this
is
subdivided
into
ih3
references,
who's
responsible
for
the
upkeep
of
the
front
yard.
E
Yes,
thank
you,
commissioner
henderson.
There
is
a
condition
of
approval
that
would
require
that
the
property
owner
enter
into
a
agreement
indicating
specifically
how
it
is
that
the
property
owner
will
be
maintaining
the
premises,
the
landscape,
all
the
roads,
any
any
any
type
of
maintenance.
It
would
be
specifically
detailed.
It
would
be
reviewed
by
staff.
We
would
review
it,
make
sure
that
we
agree
with
it,
and
then
we
would
require
them
to
record
it
with
with
the
property.
E
So
that
way,
the
existing
property
owner
or
any
subsequent
property
owner
would
be
responsible
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
up
kept
within
the
site,
the
renters,
if
there,
if
that
is
the
goal
to
to
rent
the
units
that
that
would
be,
that
would
be
perfectly
okay.
However,
the
property
owner
would
be
subject
to
the
requirements
of
that
recorded
document.
The
maintenance,
recreation
of
the
maintenance
for
the
site.
A
K
C
A
H
So
I'm
not
I'm
not
a
fan
of
the
rocks
in
the
front
yard
and
I'm
wondering
if
if
there
could
be
a
condition.
H
About
you
know,
maybe
upgrading
the
rocks
or
something
because
I
mean
right
now
it
works
for
a
business,
but
I
don't
think
it's.
E
Commissioner
henderson,
can
you
hear
me
yeah?
Okay,
okay,
okay,
I
think
it's
better
here
in
the
front
where
we
have
the.
E
Microphone,
that's
a
little
bit
more
sensitive.
So
what
I
was
indicating
is
that
to
answer
your
question,
commissioner
henderson
in
regards
to
whether
or
not
a
condition
can
be
applied.
Absolutely
it
can.
We
actually
have
a
condition
that
requires
that,
prior
to
issuance
of
a
building
permit,
that
we
receive
a
water,
efficient,
landscape
application
that
indicates
a
type
of
landscaping
specifically
specific
to
the
site
and
that
gets
reviewed
and
approved
by
our
landscape
architect
on
staff
that
we
consult
with,
which
is
the
water
resources
association
of
san
benito
county.
E
And
so,
if
you
would
like
to
add
or
the
commission,
if
it's
the
pleasure
of
the
commission,
to
add
to
that
condition
that
something
in
the
likes
of
changing
the
the
front
of
the
front
yard
landscape
to
the
desire
of
the
commission,
that
that's
fine
or
for
it
to
be
changed
from
rock
to
another
type
of
landscape,
to
be
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
city
that
that
would
be
okay
as
well.
But
the
condition
can
be
amended
or
changed.
D
Commission
abraham,
can
you
say
again
what
the
expectation
is
for
the
landscaping
plan?
Is
that,
like
a
better
time
to
ask
for
something
more
specific
rather
than
here
or
is
that,
or
I
should
say
not
better,
but
is
that
another
opportunity
to
ask
for
something
specific
for.
C
D
I
E
You
see
that
it's,
the
landscaping
is
a
little
different
than
before
before
a
lot
of
the
single-family
homes
that
were
built
like
in
the
90s
or
before
you
see
a
lot
of
regular
front
yard
grass
and
we've
we've
come
to
know
that
I
mean
we've
known
all
along
that
that,
for
example,
uses
a
lot
of
water
to
make
sure
that
it's
green
and
and
so
in
2011.
E
E
That
shows
us
how
much
water
is
going
to
be
used
to
to
make
sure
that
that
the
landscape
is
going
to
be
up
kept,
and
so
there's
there's
specific
thresholds
that
we
have
to
use
that
the
applicant
cannot
go
over
to
make
sure
that
the
water
is
that
not
so
much
water
is
being
used
on
the
site,
because
if,
if
you've,
as
we
know
the
water
resources
association,
sean
novak,
he
he
commonly
comes
to
the
city
council
meetings
and
makes
his
presentations
and
indicates
that
the
majority
of
water
that's
used
in
a
property,
is
mainly
for
exterior
uses
for
landscaping.
E
E
We
will
then
send
it
over
to
sean
novak
for
for
their
review
and
and
conformance
so
for
tonight,
if
the
desire
of
the
planning
commission
is
to
have
that
landscape
in
the
front
change
from
a
rock
type
of
landscape
to
something
different,
such
as
either
maybe
some
bushes
or
or
some
some
type
of
ground
cover.
That's
not
going
to
use
a
lot
of
water
that
that's
okay
and
we
can
we
can
either.
E
H
H
I
think
the
motion
I
was
I
could
would
make
would
be
to
replace
the
rocks
with
some
other.
H
Water
conserving
landscapes,
and
that
can
be
just
they
can
work
with
the
the
city
on
that.
H
How
to
word
the
motion,
I
guess
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
that
we
approve.
H
H
An
architectural
review
2020-4,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
traffic
solution,
so
with
the
added.
H
People
to
replace
the
rocks
with
some
other
water
conserving.
N
J
C
D
D
C
D
Shrubs
and
trees,
and
things
like
that,
so
I
just
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
putting
out
reference
and
when
I
think
it's
just
a
difference
of
you
know
like
what
your
aesthetic
is
and
I
personally
think
it
looks
okay,
I
think
it
will
look
nicer.
A
Okay,
just
to
reiterate
there's
motion
on
the
on
the
on
the
floor
was
that
an
amendment
to
the
motion
that
you
were
proposing.
D
H
Yeah
well,
okay!
So
so
right
now
at
the
resolution
that
we
have
now,
is
there
any?
Is
there
any
provisions
where
the
applicant
works
with
the.
N
And
I'm
sorry,
we
do
seem
to
be
getting
a
little
far
afield
from
from
amending
or
making
a
second
gear.
I
think
what
probably
in
order
to
keep
it
everything
as
clear
as
possible
at
this
point,
is
to
either
either
look
for
a
second
of
commissioner
henderson's
original
motion.
Since
he
didn't
specifically
accept
that
amendment
or
he
could
withdraw,
there
could
be
further
conversation
and
then
he
could
make
the
same
motion
or
a
different
motion
or
anyone
else
could
make
a
motion
that
might
just
keep
our
chain
of
events
a
little
more
clear.
A
A
C
D
Motion
I'll
just
make
the
motion
and
touch
off
the
resolution
of.
K
D
H
A
Okay,
moving
on
to
item
number
five
site
and
architecture,
mr.
N
A
Yes,
let's,
let's,
if
we
can
ask
staff
to
do
a
recall,
recall
or
not
a
recall,
a
roll
call
on
the
vote.
A
G
G
G
This
project
is
located
on
a
six
and
a
half
acre
site
at
1258,
mccloskey,
road,
north
of
mccloskey,
road
and
east
of
san
felipe
road.
In
the
light
industrial
zoning
district,
the
shell
building
will
contain
four
five
thousand
square
foot
tenant
spaces.
Each
will
have
a
separate
storefront
entry
as
well
as
a
restroom.
G
G
The
east
and
west
elevations
are
plain:
painted,
metal,
facade
and
they'll
be
largely
facing
the
interior
of
the
fence
that
surrounds
the
industrial
yard
and
then
finally,
the
northern
or
rear
elevation
will
have
four
large
roll-up
doors,
one
for
each
of
the
tenant
spaces,
and
this
facade
is
also
painted
metal
and
again,
there
will
be
led
light
fixtures
next
to
each
of
the
doors.
G
G
Pursuant
to
our
parking
code
again,
one
parking
space
for
each
400
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area
for
any
of
our
general
industrial
uses,
and
this
20
000
square
foot
building
requires
50
parking
spaces.
The
project
is
proposed
all
50
of
those
parking
spot
stalls.
Three
of
them
are
electrical
vehicle,
start
charging
stations
and
two
are
ada
accessible
stalls.
G
So
in
last
year
I
believe
january
2019,
the
applicant
proposed
a
15
000
square
foot
building
in
this
location,
and
so
the
staff
prepared
an
addendum
to
that
original
community
food
bank
mnd,
which
determined
that
there
was
no
additional
environmental
effects
for
building
a
15,
000
square
foot,
building
kind
of
replacing
the
rear
community
food
bank
building,
which
would
have
been
on
the
north
end
of
the
property,
with
a
new
industrial
building
of
about
the
same
size
on
the
south
end
of
the
property.
G
And
then,
at
this
time
before
you
today,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
add
on
to
that
original
approval
from
last
january,
and
I
do
have
an
image
here,
which
was
a
three-tenant
space
building
so
now
they're
proposing
to
replace
that
with
the
four
tenants
space
building.
That's
here
for
your
approval
tonight,
and
so
we've
prepared
an
additional
addendum
for
the
mnd,
which
determined
that
there's
no
additional
environmental
effects
as
a
result
of
this
approval.
G
So
with
that
it
is
consistent
with
sqa
and
staff
recommends
a
few
changes
to
our
conditions
as
well.
We
would
like
to
strike
condition
12,
16
and
28..
They
were
standard
conditions
and
they're
not
relevant
to
this
project.
One
is
about
maintenance
of
multi-family,
facil
landscapes
and
one
is
about
existing
sidewalks.
G
The
applicants
requested
that
this
be
stricken
because
there
are
no
existing
sidewalks
in
the
area,
so
staff
agreed
to
strike
that,
and
then
one
is
about
a
trash
separator
which
is
not
relevant
to
the
project.
So
we
would
propose
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
and
architectural
review
2020-2
with
the
removal
of
conditions,
12,
16
and
28
as
described.
K
A
A
Any
speaker
cards.
E
C
O
My
name
here
in
is,
we
are
representing
the
owner
group
on
this
project
and
as
staff
mentioned,
because
of
the
recent
middle
of
this
project
was
based
on
after
the
previous
approval,
doing
the
cost
analysis
for
construction,
the
cost
associated
with
all
the
site,
improvements,
road
improvements
and
and
whatnot
really
didn't-
make
it
feasible
to
build
the
15
000
square
foot
building.
So
the
owner
decided
to
pursue
this
20
000
square
foot
project
to
make
the
price
per
square
foot
more
accommodating.
O
A
Any
further
comments
from
the
commissioners
on
this
okay:
what
is
the
pleasure
of
their
commission
on
this
item?.
F
A
There's
motion
and
second
all
in
favor
hi.
Congratulations
on
that
item
and
moving
on
to
item
number
six
site
architectural
review
2020-5
we
can
have
staff
report
on.
A
L
Thank
you.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
certain
architectural
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
two
thousand
two
hundred
and
fifty
square
foot
addition
to
an
existing
six
thousand
one
hundred
and
fifty
square
foot
industrial
building
on
a
zero
point
acre
lot.
The
property
is
located
at
twenty
hamilton
court,
which
is
in
the
light
industrial
zoning
district.
L
The
proposed
addition
will
be
approximately
24
feet
in
height
50
feet
in
width
and
45
feet
in
length.
The
exterior
of
the
building
addition
will
be
finished
in
stucco,
siding
that
will
match
the
existing
building.
The
roof
line
of
the
addition
is
proposed
to
match
the
existing
roof
line
in
the
rear
of
the
building
the
roof.
L
Will
have
composite
shingles
to
match
the
existing
roof.
The
west
elevation
will
have
two
roll-up
doors
with
two
man
doors,
one
on
each
side,
the
eastern
elevation
will
have
a
single
mandar.
The
northern
elevation
is
proposed
as
a
one
hour,
stucco
finished
firewall
according
to
the
applicant,
the
existing
portion
of
the
building
will
continue
to
house
administrative
operations.
The
newly
proposed
portion
of
the
building
will
house
cnc
drilling
and
testing
operations.
L
Cnc
operations
includes
drilling
holes
into
copper
panels,
which
is
used
in
the
manufacturing
of
circuit
boards
and
the
storage
and
staging
of
panels.
There
will
be
no
chemicals
or
hazardous
processing
or
storage.
At
this
time,
staff
did
want
to
note
that,
pursuant
to
section
171030
and
industrial
zoning
general
development
standards,
there
are
no
required
front
side
or
rear
setbacks
for
parcels
within
the
m1
light
industrial
zoning
districts
less
adjacent
to
a
residential
zone.
The
applicant's
plans
currently
show
a
five
foot
setback
and
let
me
switch
the
slides,
so
you
guys
can
see
this
five
foot.
L
Setback
is
on
the
between
the
north
side
of
the
property
and
the
building
itself.
Condition
number
eight
of
the
conditions
of
approval
requires
that,
upon
submitting
plans
to
the
building
division,
the
applicant
will
designate
and
label
their
plan
set
with
current
and
future
uses
within
the
development.
L
L
L
Our
section
of
the
code
requires
that
five
percent
of
the
amount
of
parking
is
taken
for
bicycle
parking.
That
equates
to
one
space
for
a
bicycle
at
this
time.
There
are
also
no
changes
for
the
landscape
parcels
that
are
fifteen
thousand
square
feet
or
more
she'll
have
a
minimum
of
ten
percent
landscaping.
L
The
current
landscaping
meets
and
exceeds
this
requirement
by
providing
12.5
percent
landscaping.
As
you
can
see,
the
landscaping
will
have
a
variety
or
does
have
a
variety
of
covered.
Ground
covers
shrubs
and
trees.
The
majority
of
the
landscaping
is
located
along
the
frontage
of
hamilton
court
and
the
eastern
western
boundaries
of
the
parcel.
In
addition,
there
are
two
landscape
strips
on
the
eastern
portion
and
southern
portion
of
the
existing
building.
L
L
In
addition,
the
property
is
located
within
the
zone.
Six
traffic
pattern
area
of
the
hollister
municipal
airport,
comprehensive
land
use
plan
safety
zones
as
a
condition
of
approval.
This
project
will
be
taken
to
the
airport
land
use
commission
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
building
permit
to
confirm
that
is
consistent
with
the
airport,
land
use
designation.
L
And,
lastly,
this
project
does
not
lie
within
the
fault
zone.
However,
it
is
within
the
100
year
flood
zone,
a
condition
has
been
drafted
that
requires
that,
depending
on
the
site
and
architectural
approval,
that
the
applicant
shall
provide
evidence
of
the
building
permit
plans
and
with
a
flood
elevation
certificate
from
a
licensed
civil
engineer
registered
in
the
state
of
california
that
the
base
elevation
of
the
building
in
all
mechanical
and
electrical
equipment
is
one
foot
above
the
federal
emergency
management
agency's
100
year,
flood
elevation.
L
And
with
that,
steph
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
in
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion:
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
and
architectural
review
2020-5
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Are
there
any
questions
for
staff.
A
A
I
will
what,
where
I'll,
ask
what
the
pleasure
of
the
commission
is
on
this
item.
A
A
P
P
In
june
of
2018,
council
was
presented
with
the
request
of
approval
of
amendments
for
commercial
cannabis
uses
and
other
tax
changes.
These
amendments
were
based
on
public
comments
and
input
from
the
community.
At
the
may
13
2019
town
hall
meeting
on
june
17
2019
city
council
adopted
ordinance
1179,
which
amended
chapter
542
cannabis
facilities,
regulatory
permit
of
the
hollister
municipal
code.
P
The
proposed
amendments
to
title
17
will
identify
where
cannabis
facilities
may
be
permitted
by
conditional
use
permit,
as
already
intended
by
chapter
542
cannabis
facilities,
regulatory
permit
in
the
following
zoning
districts,
commercial
and
mixed
use,
industrial
manufacturing
and
airport
support
zoning
district.
The
proposed
amendments
to
title
17
assure
internal
consistency
of
land
use
designations
that
have
been
previously
approved.
P
Proposed
amendments
to
section
1708,
020,
commercial
and
mixed
use,
zone
land
uses
and
permit
requirements
at
the
cannabis
facilities
to
table
1708-1
the
cannabis
facilities
which
may
be
permitted
by
a
conditional
use
permit
in
the
north
gateway
are
cannabis,
cultivation,
delivery,
dispensary
distribution,
manufacturing
nursery
and
testing
the
west
gateway.
Are
cannabis,
cultivation,
delivery,
distribution,
manufacturing
and
testing?
There
is
an
additional
use
regulation,
note
number
28
that
will
be
added,
which
will
refer
to
chapter
542
for
regulations
and
provisions
for
cannabis.
P
These
cannabis
facilities
are
consistent
with
chapter
542,
specifically
with
section
542
160
cultivation,
nursery,
dispensing
manufacturing,
distribution,
delivery,
transportation
and
testing
locations
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
city
of
hollister
planning
commission
review
the
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motions
adopt.
A
resolution
recommending
excuse
me
to
the
city
council,
the
adoption
of
the
amendments
to
title
17,
zoning
of
the
hollister
municipal
code.
That
concludes
the
presentation
and
staff
is
available
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
D
C
D
Was
just
surprised
to
see
the
one
exception
to
the
rule
around
about
no
one
under
the
age
of
21
that
there
is
an
exception
if
an
individual
is
a
qualified
patient
and
accompanied
by
his
or
her
license
physician
parent,
documented
or
designated
caretaker.
So
I
was
just
wondering
under
what
circumstance
would
that
be
necessary?
D
C
I
Are
18
cannot
go
in
the
dispensary
according.
D
I
D
D
Okay,
the
way
that
I'm
reading
this
particular
part
of
the
ordinance,
it
doesn't
say
that
it
says
under
age
21,
it
doesn't
say
between
ages,
21
and
18..
D
I
That
is
correct,
yes
and,
like
I
said,
it's
also
is
regulated
the
same
way
by
the
state,
but
perhaps
I
mean
it
could
be.
D
Is
that
right?
That
is
correct?
Okay,
okay,
yeah!
I
mean,
I
think
it
was.
I
I
wouldn't
mind
if
it
had
that
in
there
only
because
when
I
read
that
I
was
like,
does
that
mean
somebody
anyone
under
21,
but
I
just
you
know,
I
think
it
would
make
it
cleaner
if
we
could
put
something
like
that
in
there.
That
just
said
make
that
maybe,
in
parentheses,
h18.
D
C
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
commissioner
stevens,
for
that.
For
that
comment,
and
I
don't
think
we
have
an
issue
with
with
including
that,
if
it's,
if
the
city
attorney,
I'm
not
sure,
if
he's
still
there
jason
epperson,
if
it's
okay,
that
we
just
include
that
as
part
of
our
recommendation
to
the
city
council,
that
that
we
wouldn't
have
an
issue
in
and
taking
that
recommendation,.
E
Okay,
thank
you
see
that
attorney
emerson.
K
A
For
for
public
comments
at
7,
46.
B
A
A
in
regards
to
amendment
on
this.
Are
you
is
the
staff
looking
for
a
motion
or
a
recommendation.
C
A
So
what
is
the
pleasure
of
the
commission
on
this
item.
D
A
E
There's
no
old
business
at
this
time,
commissioner
monster.
E
We
do
have
a
few
planned
department
reports
that
we
would
like
to
address
today
if
it's
okay,
chairperson
monster
members
of
the
planning
commission.
E
The
city
of
hollister
has
launched
a
website
that
dedicated
solely
to
the
update
of
the
general
plan.
Let's
see
if
we
can
try
to
look
at
the
actual
front
front,
page
or
home
page
of
the
website
and
that
can
be
accessed
by
typing
in
hollister2040.org,
as
you
can
see
on
the
screen
before
you,
and
we
urge
all
planning
commissioners,
all
members
of
the
public
to
please
please,
please
log
in
type
in
hollister2040.org
and
please
spread
the
word.
The
general
plan
update
is
a
highly
particip
participatory
process.
E
E
It
also
provides
a
public
engagement
link
inviting
users
to
engage
in
the
general
plan
update
with
online
activities
such
as
requesting
the
user
to
share
their
vision
of
hollister
what
the
user
likes
about
hollister
and
what
the
user
wishes
hollister
had
in
our
community
engagement
link
also
provides
the
user
the
opportunity
to
rank
key
issues
such
as
affordable
housing,
traffic
congestion,
adequate
public
services,
disaster
preparedness,
job
opportunities,
high
quality
schools,
amongst
others.
So
there's
there's
a
there
is
an
attempt
to
reach
out
to
the
public
virtually
to
see
you
know
to.
E
Let
us
know
we
want
to
hear
from
you
what
it
is
that
you
prefer
and
that
you
rank
as
high
from
high
to,
to
least
in
our
community
there's
also
a
link
with
existing
documents,
such
as
the
existing
adopter
general
plan,
along
with
the
existing
adopted
housing
element
that
we
have,
and
also
the
hollister
zoning
code
in
the
document
section
of
our
website.
E
E
Also
the
calendar
addresses
workshops.
So
speaking
of
workshops,
we
would
like
to
address
the
council
and
indicate
the
planning
commission
indicating
that
the
city
will
have
four
upcoming
workshops,
beginning
with
one
on
saturday
june
27th
this
saturday
at
10
a.m.
The
next
one
will
be
tuesday
june
30th
at
6,
00
pm
the
following
one.
The
third
one
will
be
on
wednesday
july,
8th
at
7
00
a.m.
E
In
the
morning
for
the
people
who
were
the
morning,
people
who
would
like
to
maybe
come
in
and
log
in
virtually
before,
maybe
before
going
to
work
and
then
the
fourth
one
would
be
on
thursday
july
9th
at
6,
00
pm,
so
there's
four
different
opportunities
to
get
the
public
engaged
and
they're
all
four
of
the
same
presentations,
but
just
four
different
opportunities
that
we
would
like
for
the
public
to
participate
in
and
also
very
importantly,
we
would
like
to
mention
that
the
website
is
is
in
english,
but
there's
also
a
link
to
also
get
the
information
in
spanish
as
well.
E
E
So
that's
that's.
The
general
information
in
regards
to
our
general
plan
update
two
other
brief
things
also
very
important.
Our
next
report
is
that
we
would
like
to
introduce
our
newest
assistant
planner
by
the
name
of
adelie
perez.
She
is
the
one
that
just
gave
the
presentation
of
the
zoning
amendments
for
the
cannabis.
We
are
happy
to
introduce
her.
She
is
the
newest
member
of
the
city
of
hollister
planning
department.
E
Areli
is
an
assistant
planner
for
the
city
of
hollister,
which
began
here
in
the
city
starting
she
started
march
16th
of
this
year.
Adelie
is
a
graduate
from
california
state
university
university
northridge,
where
she
obtained
her
bachelor's
degree
in
urban
studies
and
planning,
with
the
focus
on
city
and
regional
planning.
E
Adelie
has
previously
worked
as
a
planning
intern
for
the
city
of
lancaster
and,
more
recently,
for
the
town
of
los
gatos
as
a
transportation
planning
intern,
and
she
is
currently
enrolled
in
san
jose
state
working
towards
an
education
certificate
in
community
development,
finance
and
affordable
housing.
We
are
really
happy
to
have
her
on
board.
Thank
you.
E
Areli
welcome
well
deserve
a
plus
for
her
and
also
last
but
not
least,
we
would
like
to
share
with
you
that
the
city
of
hollister
received
a
letter
from
the
state
of
california,
housing
and
community
development
in
regards
to
the
city
of
hollister
city
council,
adoption
of
the
residential
growth
management
ordinance
that
was
adopted
back
in
october
of
2019.
E
when
it
was
adopted,
the
city
council
directed
staff
to
also
send
a
copy
of
the
document
to
hcd
for
their
review.
We
want
to
make
sure
the
council
at
that
time
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
program
was
adopted
in
the
way
that
we
would
maintain.
Our
certified
housing
element
is
really
crucial
and
really
important
for
the
city
of
hollister
to
maintain
a
certified
housing
element
which
we,
which
we
do
just
just
very
briefly.
Certified
housing
element
and
the
planning
department's
upkeep
of
the
certified
housing
element
doing
their
annual
general
plan.
E
Just
recently,
the
city
of
hollister
received
a
little
bit
over
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
grants
just
because
we
have
a
certified
housing
element
and
just
because
we
have
updated
the
state
in
a
year
yearly
on
our
progress
reports,
we
received
a
little
bit
over
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
the
improvements
that
were
made
to
mccarthy
park,
and
that's
just
one
of
very
various
examples
that
we,
as
as
a
community,
can
benefit
and
also
different
organizations
that
are,
for
example,
non-profit
throughout
the
community,
also
benefit
from
the
city
of
hollister.
E
Having
a
certified
housing
element.
Because
a
lot
of
the
times
there
are
competitive
grants
and
the
organizations
that
are
out
there.
That
can
apply.
For
these
grants
a
lot
of
the
times.
The
states
requires
that
the
city
has
a
certified
housing
element
in
order
to
make
them
compatible
or
competitive
for
these
organizations,
such
as
the
community
food
bank,
hovenes
and
daniel,
to
be
able
to
apply
to
these
grants
and
be
competitive
and
so
very
important
to
keep
that
certified
housing
element.
E
And
so
it
was
sent
to
the
state
of
california,
housing
and
community
development
agency,
and
we
heard
back
from
hcd
on
may
12th.
The
letter
basically
indicated
that
at
this
time,
due
to
the
governor's
adoption
of
the
housing
crisis
act,
that
a
growth,
management,
ordinance
or
growth
management
program
cannot
be
adopted
or
cannot
be
implemented,
at
least
until
2025,
and
so
the
letter
also
indicated
that
the
city
of
hollister
shall
place
an
item
on
the
agenda
for
the
city
council
to
resent
or
suspend
the
ordinance.
E
And
so
that
was
given
to
the
city
council
at
its
last
regular
meeting
and
the
city
council
actually
had
some
questions
about
the
ordinance
that
were
sent
to
hcd,
and
the
hope
is
that
we
will
get
a
response
from
hcd
and
provide
it
in
our
next
regular
city
council
meeting
of
of
august.
So
just
wanted
to
give
you
an
update
of
of
what's
going
on
with
that,
and
the
reason
why
I
say
next.
E
Regular
city
council
meeting
of
august
is
because
the
city
council
adopted
a
resolution,
essentially
not
having
any
type
of
city
council
meetings
unless
unless
it
is
an
emergency
council
meeting
for
the
month
of
july-
and
that
also
goes
with
all
planning
commission
parks
and
recognition.
So
just
as
an
fyi,
there
will
not
be
a
planning
commission
meeting
in
july
because
of
that
resolution.
E
E
A
Any
reports
from
the
commissioners.
C
E
That's
a
good
question:
it
is.
It
was
really
crucial
when
we
did
the
scope
of
work
and
when
we
adopted
the
the
contract
with
place
works
that
it
was.
It
was
highly
crucial
to
also
be
able
to
produce
the
information
in
spanish
as
well,
so
so
the
links,
the
information
of
what
the
agendas
will
be
and
what
will
be
the
content
of
these
workshops?
E
These
meetings
will
be
in
spanish,
for
example,
if
if
the
public
clicks
on
documents-
and
they
want
to
see
the
existing
general
plan,
this,
the
existing
general
plan
is,
is
in
english.
It
can
take
them
to
to
where
to
download
the
existing
general
plan
or
some
of
these
documents,
but
you
know,
unfortunately,
some
of
these
documents,
like
the
housing
element,
the
general
plan
are
in
english,
so
those
will
remain,
however,
all
other
information
in
regards
to
what
the
next,
the
upcoming
meetings,
what
the
meetings
will
be
about.
D
I'm
assuming
they
will
also
have
the
ability
to
make
to
make
their
comments
to
answer
the
questions
about
what
you
like
about
how
someone
you
don't
like
about
allister,
so
they'll
be
able
to
do
that
as
well.
In
spanish,.
E
E
There
is
a
link
where,
where
it
indicates
the
language,
and
so
by
clicking
that
link
into
the
spanish
aspect
of
it,
you'll
see
the
translation
of
it,
and
so
yes,
you're
you're,
absolutely
right
that
that
it
will
be
the
information
will
be
in
spanish
and
that
if
any
member
of
the
public
would
like
to
type
in
any
type
of
information
in
spanish,
we
would
we
would
highly
recommend
that
they
do
and
that
is
submitted
in
spanish,
and
we
would
love
to
to
get
it
in
spanish
as
well
and
be
able
to
incorporate
it
in
in
the
update
of
the
general
plan.
E
D
Forums,
how
will
the
translation
in
spanish
be
those
meetings.
E
Very
well
yes,
so
the
forums
that
we
will
have,
we
will
have
them
all
because
of
covert
19.
Unfortunately,
it's
a
big
it's
a
big
deal,
because
you
know
these
these.
We
would
wish
to
have
more
in
in
in
person.
However,
because
of
covet
19
they're
they're
going
to
be
zoomed
they're
going
to
be
all
virtual
and
there
is
a.
There-
is
a
link
on
the
on
the
program
on
the
zoom
program
that
our
consultants
will
be
managing
which
will
provide
for
the
ability
of
any.
E
If
there's
any
spanish,
spanish
speaking
only
or
there
is
a
lot
of
people
who
actually
understand
english
and
and
can
speak
it,
however,
they
feel
more
comfortable
in
spanish
and
we
want
to
provide
that
that
aspect
of
if
they
wanna
they
wanna,
listen
to
the
workshop
in
spanish,
we
will
have
a
simultaneous
translator
and
and
link
to
where
we
will
have
a
member
of
staff
provide
the
same
information.
That's
going
on
in
english
simultaneously
in
spanish.
H
H
I
didn't
see
anything
on
the
website
that
tells
people
what's
going
to
happen
or
how
to
prepare
for
it.
So
I
don't
know,
maybe
if
you
know
what's
actually
going
to
be
happening
and
how.
E
Sure
sure
so,
under
the
public
engagement
link
of
the
website,
and
also
actually
on
the
front
page
as
well,
two
two
different
two
different
links,
but
if,
under
the
public
engagement
aspect
or
link
of
the
of
the
general
plan
update
website,
there
will
be
there's
information
that
basically
talks
a
little
bit
about
what
what
the
workshops
are
are
going
to
be
about
and
and
essentially
what
what
they're
going
to
be
about
is
our
our
consultant,
david
earley,
from
place
works
who's.
E
Also,
a
instructor
at
uc
davis
extension
will
be
giving
we'll
start
out
by
giving
an
overview
of
what
is
a
general
plan
and
the
importance
of
a
general
plan,
and
so
with
that
he
will
also
facilitate
with
with
the
members
who
are
registered,
and
hopefully
we'll
have
a
good
enough
turnout.
So
we
can
break
break
in
to
small
groups.
E
Each
group
will
have
a
facilitator,
and
some
of
the
questions
that
these
small
groups
are
going
to
be
able
to
dialogue
amongst
the
groups
are
in
english
and
in
spanish
are,
for
example,
what
type
of
values
should
guide
the
decisions,
the
future
decisions
for
the
city
of
hollister.
E
Also,
what
are
the
themes
or
what
are
the
topics
of
major
importance
that
the
city
of
hollister's
general
plan
updates
should
should
take
into
consideration
and
last
but
not
least,
describe
your
vision
of
the
city
of
hollister
for
the
year
2040..
E
So
these
are
going
to
be
broken
up
into
small
groups,
we're
going
to
try
to
hear
from
everybody
and
then
we'll
have
a
facilitator,
provide
that
feedback
back
to
david
earley.
Who
is
the
project
manager,
and
we
will
have
all
that
information
provided
packaged
up
and
presented
at
our
next
general
plan
advisory
committee
that
is
tentatively
scheduled
for
august
and
so
that
that's
kind
of
a
summary
of
what
we're
gonna
be
having
for
this
saturday.
This
is
going
to
be
scheduled
for
one
hour
and
a
half.
A
Any
any
other
questions
for
steph.
A
Okay,
if
there's
no
no
other
questions
next
planning.
Commission
meeting
is
thursday
august
27
at
6
00
p.m.
It's.
F
I'm
sorry
the
planning
commission
reports
we
weren't
able
to
discuss
it,
but
I
attended
the
league
of
cities
conference
back
in
march
just
right
before
everything
shut
us
down.
So
I
want
to
say
I
want.
I
want
to
appreciate
and
thank
you
guys
for
allowing
us
to
go,
because
I
learned
a
lot
from
that
conference.
A
lot
of
eye-opening
information,
a
lot
of
cadre
learning
about
other
people
and
how
other
cities
are
working
together
and
some
of
the
speakers
they
had
were
absolutely
outstanding.
F
D
D
D
If
we
were
in
the
middle
of
the
academic
when
we
attended
and
if
we
would
have
attended
virtually,
but
it
was
a
great.
D
H
Conference,
so
I
think
I'd
like
to
thank
staff
for
sending
us
all
there
and
I
did
learn
a
lot
and
had
lots
of
presentations,
and
I
also
wanted
to
comment.
I
am.
I
have
looked
at
the
general
plan
website,
so
I'm
you
know
trying
to
participate
a
little
bit
in
some
of
the
activities
they
have
there.
H
I
did
share
on
social
media
about
these
visioning
workshops
coming
up,
which
I
got
zero
likes,
but
so
I
don't
know
as
much
type
in
out
there
for
for
these,
but
I
hope
that
the
public
can,
you
know,
feel
a
desire
to
participate
and
actually
participate
and
as
part
of
the
jeep
hack,
it's
unfortunate.
I
just
want
to
comment.
I
I
I'm
sorry
for
that.
Mr
stevens
wasn't
able
to
be
appointed
to
that
commission
I
mean
we
had
a.
H
I
think
we
had
a
really
good
and
fair,
transparent
process,
for
you
know,
selecting
you
know
commit
from
david
dubois
and
and
commissioner,
so
it's
important
that
you
weren't
able
to
be
approved
for
that
and
it
doesn't
seem
like
there's
going
to
be
any
any
moves
to
add
another
commissioner.
H
So
I
just
wanted
to.
I
think
it's
even
more
important
that
we
get
the
public
involved
in
the
visioning
centers.
You
know
less
left
committee
members
and
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
any
plans
to
direct
clients
at
times.
So
that's
all
I
wanted
to
report
on
here.
A
The
commissioners
all
right
well
next
meeting
is
thursday
august
27th
at
6
pm.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
adjourn
this.