►
From YouTube: Gov Hol PC 20210527
Description
Hollister Planning Commission Meeting May 27, 2021
A
A
B
C
D
A
B
B
B
B
C
C
B
C
F
F
There's
going
to
be
a
faux
storefront
entrance
with
stucco
and
birth,
accents
and
a
location
for
signage
and
then
they'll.
Continuing
on
there'll
be
a
stucco
wall
which
will
be
broken
up
by
trellises
along
large
stretches
of
the
wall,
and
there
will
be
sections
of
architectural
build-outs
which
have
corrugated
metal,
finishing
and
wood
siding
to
go
out
as
we
continue
across
felon
road
to
the
east
and
the
main
entrance
to
the
facility
will
have
a
tube
steel,
rolling
gate
which
has
a
keypad
entry
for
the
patrons
to
go
inside
to
the
storage
facility.
F
The
main
entrance
tower
will
have
a
wood,
siding
and
a
glass
storefront
entrance
door
with
a
window
on
the
second
story
and
the
residence
portion,
as
well
as
an
area
for
signage.
And
then
the
main
body
of
the
manager's
office
will
be
stucco
with
the
brick
accents
from
trend
continuing
to
the
east
of
the
elevation
along
the
project.
Frontage
there'll
be
another
section
of
architectural,
build
out
with
the
metal
and
brick
siding
variations
and
additional
trellises
along
portions
of
the
stuff,
though
concrete
walls.
F
Moving
to
the
west
elevation
of
the
project,
this
will
face
technology
parkway,
beginning
at
the
northern
end
of
the
property.
So
again,
beginning
at
the
top
left
of
your
screen
and
moving
to
the
right
and
then
down
below
left
to
right.
There
will
be
a
concrete
tilt
sub
wall
which
runs
the
end
of
building
b,
and
then
this
will
have
a
central
architectural,
build
out
with
wood,
siding
and
a
location
for
signage
and
to
the
south
of
building
b.
F
This
will
be
a
secondary
emergency
access
gate
with
similar
to
fencing,
and
then
the
remainder
of
the
elevation
of
the
street
is
inside
of
building
e,
and
this
will
contain
portions
of
concrete
tilt-up
wall,
which
is
broken
by
trellises
architectural
build-outs
of
metal,
wood
and
brick
finishes
similar
to
the
build-outs
on
the
front
elevation
and
finally,
on
the
southwest
corner
of
the
site
in
the
lower
right-hand
side
of
your
screen,
that
is,
at
the
corner
of
technology.
Parkway
and
fallon.
F
G
F
Square
feet
of
landscaping
throughout
the
site,
and
that
is
16
block
coverage
of
landscaping,
which
exceeds
the
10
requirement
of
section
171030
of
the
municipal
code
and
the
landscaping
will
be
located
along
both
project
frontages
on
fallon
road
to
the
south
and
technology
parkway
to
the
west.
Within
the
setback
from
the
right-of-way
to
the
buildings,
the
landscaping
will
also
be
placed
inside
of
the
curved
areas
along
the
entrance
to
the
property
on
fallon,
road
and
it'll,
be
within
the
parking
lot
and
the
manager's
office
city
of
hollister
municipal
code.
F
Section
17
18060
requires
one
parking
space
for
each
ten
thousand
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area
as
well
as
two
spaces
for
as
any
resident
manager
for
self
storage
facilities.
So
for
this
use
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
five
parking
spaces
which
you
can
see
here
on
fallon
road,
and
this
includes
one
ada
space
as
well
as
a
one
car
garage
which
you
can
see
in
the
rear,
which
is
for
the
managers
unit.
F
The
project
proposing
ninety
seven
thousand.
Ninety
nine
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area,
as
well
as
a
manager's
unit,
would
equate
to
12
total
parking
spaces
being
required.
So
the
project
does
not
meet
the
parking
requirements
of
the
municipal
code.
However,
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
conditional
use
permit
to
reduce
the
parking
requirements
on
the
site,
and
this
is
because
the
storage
facility
is
not
anticipated
to
have
an
excess
of
customers
which
need
to
park
outside
of
the
entrance
gate
in
this
parking
lot
area.
F
If
needed,
an
additional
vehicle
could
be
parked
behind
the
manager's
unit
as
well
to
provide
that
second
parking
space
requirement,
but
there's
nothing
actually
striked
out
on
the
prints.
So
this
parking
requirement,
too,
is
met
by
the
layout
of
the
site,
but
it's
not
through
a
designated
space.
So
that
would
be
part
of
the
conditional
use
permit
request.
F
F
F
On
this
slide,
you'll
see
the
floor
plan
or
the
manager's
office
slash
residence
again.
Administrative
cub
is
typically
required
for
employee
housing
in
the
industrial
area,
but
because
they
also
require
discretionary
site
and
architectural
disuses
before
you
as
well,
and
the
bottom
floor
will
contain
the
reception
and
office
space
with
the
restroom,
whatever
your
office,
as
well
as
the
managers,
one
car
garage
and
then
the
second
floor,
will
contain
the
manager's
living
space
with
the
bedroom.
A
den
a
living
room
kitchen
and
a
full
bathroom.
F
And
then,
finally,
here's
a
rendering
of
the
view
from
technology
parkway,
and
then
there
were
a
few
conditions
that
staff
is
proposing
amendments
to
from
the
conditions
of
approval
for
the
s
a
for
the
site,
architectural
resolution.
So
that's
been
working
with
the
applicant
on
these
changes
as
well
as
our
engineering
division.
F
F
The
next
change
requested
is
to
remove
conditions,
nine
and
ten.
These
are
with
regard
to
demolition
permits
and
demoing
existing
structures,
and
there
are
no
structures
on
the
site
which
need
demolition,
so
we're
proposing
to
remove
conditions,
9
and
10.
For
that
reason,
as
they're
not
relevant
to
the
project
condition,
26
just
had
a
spelling
error,
the
draft
condition
read
contracted
usa
north
should
be
contracted,
but
it
should
have.
It
should
read,
contracted
so
a
spelling
request,
change
for
condition,
26.
F
for
this.
These
these
next
couple
of
conditions,
the
engineering
department
proposes
modifications
to
conditions,
34,
37,
38
and
39,
which
consolidates
some
repetitive
conditions.
Regarding
storm
water,
the
modification
here
to
condition
34
adds
language
regarding
the
water
quality
control
board
resolution
for
post
construction,
storm
water
requirements.
F
F
F
And
then
condition
38
again
regarding
stormwater
requirements.
This
is
proposed
by
our
engineering
department
to
simplify
and
clarify
the
language
regarding
stormwater
prevention
plans,
and
this
condition
has
been
drafted
by
our
engineering
department.
So
it
modifies
the
commission
to
reference
a
stormwater
prevention
plan
and
eliminates
quite
a
bit
of
redundant
language
at
the
end
here.
F
F
Condition,
44
is
proposed
to
correct
a
typo
and
modify
the
dedication
requirements
for
the
project
to
say
that
they
are
as
needed
by
the
engineering
department,
because
much
of
the
right-of-way
along
the
project,
frontages
on
technology
and
fallon,
is
actually
already
dedicated
to
the
city.
So
they
would
be
required
to
dedicate
anything
necessary,
but
nothing
more
than
that.
F
Condition
69
had
an
error
where
there
was
a
requirement
for
a
co2
monitoring
system
plan
and
for
the
fire
department.
This
isn't
a
requirement
for
this
type
of
use.
It's
more
of
a
cannabis
use
requirement,
and
so
the
condition
has
been
amended
to
state
that
the
applicant
shall
install
fire
suppression
and
alarm
systems,
as
required
by
the
fire
code.
F
Condition
81:
this
is
a
sorry
for
the
small
front.
This
is
regarding
the
fouling
road
and
technology.
Parkway
frontage
improvements
and
the
engineering
department
has
proposed
these
conditions
amendments
to
indicate
the
actual
required
road
improvements
on
both
branches.
So
it
changes.
Timing
from
issuance
to
final
approval,
clarifies
irrigation
and
street
lighting
here
and
then
for
technology.
F
And
then
condition
82
has
been
modified
to
include
only
roads
in
the
vicinity
instead
of
on
the
project
site
as
there's
no
on-site
roads
and
finally,
for
condition.
Amendments
condition.
87,
has
been
amended
to
correctly
reference.
The
renumbered
condition
82
if
all
proposed
amendments
are
accepted
by
the
planning
commission.
Otherwise,
we
will
amend
this
to
correctly
reference.
F
The
first
would
be
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
architectural
review
2021-3
with
amendments
to
conditions,
4,
26,
34,
38,
44,
46,
55,
69,
81,
82
and
87,
the
deletion
of
conditions,
9
10,
37,
39
and
47,
and
the
inclusion
of
a
new
condition
regarding
trash
and
closure,
as
previously
discussed
and
then,
secondly,
adopt
a
resolution.
Approving
conditional
use,
permit
2021-2,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
I
I
think
it's
now
condition
77
a
it
talks
about
relocating
the
water
line
in
fallon
road
along
the
fallon
road
frontage.
The
water
line
is
currently
located
in
the
right
way,
but
once
all
the
road
improvements
are
done,
it
will
end
up
behind.
You
know
if
it
stayed
where
it
was,
it
would
end
up
behind
the
face
occurred
and
this
is
not
desirable.
I
understand
that.
However,
this
location
of
the
water
line
is
not
unique
to
this
property.
I
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
it,
but
that
was
really
the
extent
of
my
question.
I
think
we
have
no,
you
know
no
issue
with
the
remainder
of
the
conditions,
but
this
one
again,
we
understand
why
you
want
it
moved
we're
just
asking
it's
a
big
expense
that
we
hadn't
really
planned
on
and
we're
just
asking
if
it
was
eligible
for
any
type
of
reimbursement
as
a
capital,
improvement
and.
I
C
K
K
Thank
you
so
much
I
I
was
able
to
speak
to
some
of
the
planning
commissioners
before
the
meeting,
but
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that
at
the
encouragement
of
city
attorney
jason
epperson,
we
brought
this
before
the
city,
council
and
and
even
though
even
spoke
to
it.
I
just
wanted
to
let
everyone
know
or
remind
them
that
the
city
council
voted
five
to
zero
in
favor
of
making
the
exception
for
the
for
the
project
being
within
the
500-foot
buffer.
K
Also
at
the
city
council
meeting
we
brought
forth
and
I
don't
know
if
they're
in
your
packets,
but
we
brought
forth
letters
from
many
of
the
neighbors
and
businesses
in
the
vicinity
of
the
project,
all
in
support
of
it.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
that
mr
crocker,
who
has
a
tremendous
history
in
construction
of
projects
such
as
this
just
this,
is
a
class
a
building
and
I
think,
we're
very
fortunate
to
see
a
project
like
this
come
forth
in
hollister.
Thank
you.
So
much.
B
B
B
Play
on
words
there
you
know
I'm
looking
at
the
it's
a
conditional
use
permit
for
the
based
on
the
use,
but
we're
also
looking
at
the
parking
reduction
and
also
the
issue
that
of
the
300-foot
buffer
requirement.
That
was,
in
my
view-
and
I
remember
when
that
came
up.
I
was
on
the
commission
at
that
time.
B
I
remember
who
it
was
charlie
scott,
who
brought
that
up
and
that
was
primarily
for
highway
25
as
the
issue
there.
I
look
at
the
site
design
on
this
particular
project
and
it's
nice
to
see
that
it's
a
nice
landscape
buffer
along
technology,
parkway
and
also
on
fallon
road.
So
I,
if
you,
if
you
look
at
the
intention
of
that
300
foot
buffer,
it
was
primarily
for
aesthetics,
and
I
think
in
this.
If
we
look
at,
I
know
that
the
virtual
audience
well,
it's
not.
B
I
can
see
the
photographic
displays
here,
but
I
think
in
terms
of
the
aesthetics,
the
architecture
of
the
two-story
element
manager's
office
gives
it
a
nice
focal
point.
I've
seen
a
lot
of
the
storage
facilities.
They
I
mean
you
talk
about
the.
What
brings
you
back
to
the
memories?
The
post-war
cookie
cutter
architecture-
this
isn't
this-
isn't
that
this
is
more
of
a
thought
out
well-designed
project,
and
I
I
think
I
think
a
lot
of
work
went
into
this,
so
I
think
it.
B
It
certainly
would
benefit
that
in
m1
industrial
zone
by
by
permitting
this
use
for
sure
the
the
actual
the
parking
requirement.
I
agree
with
the
narrative
there.
That's
normally
in
those
stalls
or
for
parking.
Your
car
right
there
going
into
the
office
signing
up
for
a
storage
space
or
those
the
business
dealings
to
have
a
parking
parking
spaces
close
to
the
manager's
office
does
make
sense,
but
when
you're,
actually
in
the
storage
yard,
there's
you
park
next
to
the
unit
and
there's
plenty
of
space
to
get
around.
B
So
I
don't
have
any
problems
with
parking.
The
conditions,
I
think
the
conditions
are
fine,
the
one
that
brought
and
brought
up.
I
I'd
like
to
just
to
say:
if
we
could,
if
we
do,
approve
this
project
it
we
could
approve
it
with
the
caveat
that
condition.
Number
88
with
81
excuse
me
would
need
to
be
worked
out
with
with
the
staff
regarding
the
expenditure
of
moving
the
water
line.
H
H
B
I
agree,
I
think
quite
some
bit
of
time
went
into
the
aesthetics
of
this
project
to
make
it,
albeit
a
storage
facility
that
has
a
redundancy
because
of
the
nature
of
the
project.
It
certainly
does
have
some
nice
features
in
the
landscaping
and
tied
into
that.
I
think
it's.
It
makes
it
into
an
attractive
project.
B
D
E
You
can
you're,
okay,
sorry
about
that,
I'm
just
having
like
serious
audio
problems
with
my
laptop,
so
I'm
trying
to
work
with
my
cell
phone
and
my
laptop
and
anyway
it's
it's
not
as
easy
a
thousand
me,
but
I
have
a
really
quick
question
about
condition.
81
I
just
I
just
would
like
to
get
a
little
bit
of
information
from
staff
about
why
that
was
a
condition
initially,
because
if
what
ms
hall
is
saying
is
accurate,
that
it's
not
really
part
of
the
project.
C
L
L
In
addition,
the
the
project
is,
there's
a
condition
to
underground
the
overhead
lines
that
are
on
fallon
road
and
those
that
underground
line
will
very
likely
go
underneath
the
sidewalk
and
will
be
too
close
to
the
to
the
existing
water
line.
That's
the
preferred
location
for
the
for
the
undergrounding,
so
we
kill
two
birds
with
one
stones.
L
B
B
E
B
B
This
this
is
similar
to
the
project
we
we
talked
about
for
the
taco
bell
facility
about
the
costs
involve
undergrounding
there,
and
then
it
took
some
time
to
look
into
getting
some
some
more
research
on
on
the
cost,
and
I
don't
think
it's
it's
a
good
use
of
our
time
tonight
to
to
analyze
that.
That's
why
I
I
suggest
in
going.
B
J
J
C
Thank
you,
commissioner,
mora.
Typically
when
it
comes
to
like,
for
example,
the
example
that
chairperson
huboy
brought
up
on
undergrounding
in
the
past,
we've
seen
that
normally
it's
a
it's
a
requirement.
Whenever
there's
a
project
that
that's
coming
in,
especially
one
where
there's
a
vacant
law,
we
require
all
the
furniture
improvements,
sidewalk
curve
gutter,
you
know
that's
when
we
we
require
staff.
What
would
be
the
for
the
best
interest
of
the
community
to
for
the
infrastructure
of
the
community
for
the
safety
of
the
community?
What
would
be
the
best?
C
C
Definitely
considering
that
and
and
that
option
in
in
the
case
of
parcels
like
this,
that
are
vacant-
and
you
know,
as
development
starts
occurring
throughout
it
would
be
it's.
We
would
require
that
same
that
same
condition
to
all
the
projects
as
development
occurs.
Everybody
will
continue
to
to
underground.
In
regards
to
the
particular
matter
on
this
on
the
water
line
aspect
mark,
what
were
they
to
answer?
Commissioner
morrow's
question:
what
the
relocation
of
the
water
line
to
to
where
it's
proposed
for
condition?
81A?
L
L
B
So
it
it's
a
little
different
in
this
particular
case,
because
in
this
specific
case
you
have
a
section
of
line
that
will
conceivably
be
relocated
because
they're
pouring
a
new
sidewalk,
but
then
once
that
section
of
sidewalk
is
poured
the
line
continues
where
its
original
location
outside
the
property.
So
it's
not
a
shared
issue
such
as
the
over
underground
in
the
overhead
over
lines
for
the
taco
bell,
because
that
benefited
the
other
properties
and
work
was
proposed
for
the
taco
bell
owner
to
underground
those
lines
that
would
benefit
adjoining
properties.
B
This,
in
this
particular
case,
the
expense
that
is
involved
in
relocating.
That
line
is
only
site-specific
correct
and
then
once
development
occurs
outside
of
that
area,
the
same
would
condition
would
have
if
the
depending
on
the
location
of
the
water
line,
it
would
have
to
be
the
same
condition
for
any
other
developer
of
another
site,
with
the
same
situation
where
the
water
line
is
currently
in
the
location
of
where
the
new
walk
would
have
to
be
poured
correct.
B
So
you
know
I
I
I
want
to
keep
that
condition
because
you
we
need
to
have
that
water
line
relocated.
So
I
want
to
keep
it
now
who
pays
for
it?
I
I
don't
in
in.
I
don't
think
it's
a
planning
commission's
purview
to
say
that
so
I
I
just
want
to
that's.
That
needs
to
be
negotiated
with
either
the
city
planning,
building
staff,
city
manager
and
the
applicant.
I
don't
think
that
the
planning
commission
would
make
a
judgment
on
that,
and
maybe
I'm
wrong.
A
A
C
M
G
E
If
that
seems
to
be
a
reasonable
alternative,
then
I
would
fully
support
that.
So
I
think
you
know
having
those
kind
of
ideas
and
suggestions
that
can
make
it
easier
for
both
parties.
I
I
think
that's
exactly
what
we
should
be
shooting
for,
so
I
would
really
like
to
see
them
come
back
together
and
try
to.
E
E
It's
great,
I
think
it's
something
that
will
be
useful
to
our
community.
I
think
it's
a
good
project.
I
just
don't
want
to
make
a
decision
about
this
when
I
feel
like
there
is
an
opportunity
for
some
resolution.
If
they
just
you
know,
there's
just
a
little
bit
more
negotiation
or
some
you
know
like
sharing
of
ideas.
I
think
it
can
get
resolved.
B
B
B
H
F
C
B
N
G
C
Thank
you,
city
attorney,
epperson
and
just
for
the
record
that
is
for
conditional
use,
permit
number
21
2021-2
is
pc
resolution
number
2021-13,
and
with
that
we
will
start
a
roll
call
vote
and
we
will
start
with
commissioner
seth
munser
aye.
Commissioner
salvador
mora
aye,
commissioner
jose
fernandez
aye
commissioner
roxanne
stevens.
B
E
B
B
The
applicant
is
requesting
project
approval
to
subdivide
an
11.1
0
acre
parcel
into
130
multi
family
units
across
48,
duplex
and
triplex
buildings.
The
applicant
is
requesting
conditional
use
permit
for
a
planned
unit
development
approval
to
request
flexibility
with
the
city
of
hollister's
setback
requirements.
C
F
F
The
project
will
provide
private
roads
throughout
the
project
site
and
it
will
have
access
off
of
buena
vista
road
to
the
south
here,
which
is
directly
across
from
vista
view
lane
and
will
also
have
direct
access
to
carriage
road
here,
which
is
in
the
currently
under
construction.
Mirabella
ii
also
called
the
west
field
subdivision,
which
is
directly
to
the
east
of
the
project
site.
F
A
conditional
use
permit
for
planned
unit
development.
The
cup
for
a
pud
allows
for
development
to
have
some
flexibility
within
the
general
development
and
site
layout
standards,
while
protecting
the
integrity
and
the
character
of
residential
areas
in
the
city.
It
encourages
innovation
and
development
of
affordable
housing
or
housing.
That's
more
affordable
compared
to
standard
market
rate
single-family
homes,
and
it
also
ensures
consistency
with
the
general
plan.
F
For
example,
the
minimum
lot
size
requirements
within
the
medium
density,
r3
zoning
district
are
5
000
square
feet
for
a
single
unit,
6
800
square
feet
for
two
units
and
10
000
square
feet
for
three
units
and
the
performance
overlay.
Zoning
district
allows
forest
up
for
png
to
create
variation
that
allows
unique
housing
developments.
F
The
applicants
requesting
the
following
variations
for
development
requirements
for
the
project.
They
are
requesting
a
reduction
in
the
minimum
lot
size
for
the
smallest
duplex
lot,
they're,
proposing
3
165
square
feet
and
for
the
smallest
triplex
lot
in
the
subdivision,
they're
proposing
4
653
square
feet.
F
The
overall
density
of
the
development
is
still
11.7
units
per
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
medium
density
residential
zoning
district,
which
allows
between
8
to
12
units
per
acre.
So,
despite
their
lot
size
reduction
request,
they're
still
maintaining
the
integrity
of
the
medium
density,
residential
and
actually
this
allows
them
to
get
up
to
that
higher
end.
F
In
addition
to
lot
size
minimal
variation,
the
applicant
is
also
requesting
variations
in
the
setbacks
and
lock
coverage
from
the
r3
standards.
Looking
at
the
screen,
the
standard
just
see
before
you
are
modified
from
the
draft
resolution
and
the
staff
report
over
the
past
few
days
has
been
working
with
the
applicant
to
clarify
the
required
setbacks
for
the
proposal
and
in
order
to
accommodate
some
of
the
architectural
features
shown
in
the
plans.
F
There
are
additional
considerations
for
the
second
floor
cantilevers
as
well
as
architectural
features,
encroachments,
which
are
being
proposed
to
you
tonight.
Condition
number
five
of
the
cep.
Resolution
and
I'll
also
show
that
again
near
the
end
of
the
presentation
is
proposed
to
be
modified
to
the
setbacks
you
see
on
the
screen
and
also
on
the
following
slide.
So
for
the
front
yard
setback
to
the
residence.
F
However,
they
are
requesting
to
allow
second
floor.
Cantilevers
and
architectural
features
to
encroach
into
that
10-foot
setback
up
to
18
inches
for
the
interior
side
yard
of
all
of
their
units.
They
are
proposing
to
maintain
the
standard
five
foot
setback.
However,
they
are
requesting
that
uninhabitable
architectural
elements
I'll
be
allowed
to
encroach
into
the
setbacks
up
to
24
inches,
so
this
would
be
for
any
porch
features
or
kind
of
architectural
build-outs
on
the
sides
of
their
building
proposals
and
then
for
corner
locks
for
their
side
yard.
F
F
If
engineering
approves
it
to
be
closer,
the
applicant's
asking
for
this
measurement
of
10
feet
to
actually
be
from
the
curve
to
the
residence
rather
than
the
property
line,
and
then
again
asking
for
a
24
inch
encroachment
for
architectural
elements
and
then
for
a
measurement
to
the
fence.
It
would
still
be
the
same
10
foot
but
again
measure
some
curve
to
the
fence
rather
than
property
line,
and
then
continuing
on
these
are
additional
setbacks
that
you
wouldn't
have
seen
in
your
original
proposal.
F
Our
standard
zoning
allows
porches
to
encroach
up
to
six
feet
into
the
front
yard
and
up
to
three
feet
into
the
side:
yard
setback,
but
no
closer
than
five
feet
to
the
side
property
line,
and
they
are
requesting
an
encroachment
up
to
four
feet
from
porches
into
the
side
property
line,
which
normally
would
be
fine
or
it's
a
little
bit
further.
But
they
are
going
to
get
some
of
the
porches
on.
F
Some
of
the
lots
will
go
to
zero
lot
line
or
potentially
two
about
two
feet
from
the
line
on
one
particular
set
of
lots,
and
but
all
those
that
are
zero
feet
and
I
can
point
out
some
of
them.
They're
zero
foot
lot
line,
but
they're
next
to
a
landscape
parcel,
so
they're
still
set
back
from
the
curve,
just
not
from
the
the
lot
line.
F
And
so,
as
I
was
discussing
briefly
the
paseo
here
in
the
center.
These
lots.
They
would
be
requesting
a
zero
lot
line,
but,
as
you
can
see,
it's
not
that
the
parcels
or
the
the
buildings
are
right
up
next
to
each
other
and
then
like
this
lot.
For
example,
I
hope
you
guys
can
see
my
mouse
at
the
very
top
left.
F
This
would
be
requesting
a
porch
encouragement
to
the
property
line
with
four
feet,
but,
as
you
can
see,
there's
also
this
landscape
parcel,
and
so
it
would
be
set
back
from
the
curb
farther
than
the
standard
10
feet
on
a
corner.
It's
just
the
way
that
the
lot
lines
are
drawn,
they're
requesting
that
encroachment
allowance,
so
that
covers
the
cop,
but
because
this
is
multi
family.
F
F
Each
unit
will
have
a
two
car
garage
on
the
first
floor,
a
dining
living
room
kitchen
and
a
half
bath,
and
then
the
second
floor
of
each
unit
will
consist
of
three
bedrooms
with
a
master
bath
secondary
bathroom
and
a
laundry
room,
so
they're
a
total
of
three
bed
two
and
a
half
bath
beans.
So
this
is
the
second
floor
plan
of
the
duplexes
again
three
beds,
two
and
a
half.
F
F
There's
a
three
windows
on
the
upper
floor
of
the
plantation
unit
and
this
unit
has
an
architectural
build
out
of
cantilever
area.
On
the
second
floor,
to
break
up
with
the
spot.
Excuse
me
and
then
there
will
be
panel,
siding
that
begins
on
the
build
out
and
continues
on
to
the
roof
peak
and
the
plan
for
second
floor
of
the
duplex
and
the
plan.
4
unit
will
have
two
groups
of
two
windows
on
the
upper
floor
and
units
which
face
buena.
F
F
The
rear
elevation
of
the
farmhouse
unit
will
have
two
of
these
cantilevered
build-outs
on
the
building
both
have
vertical
paneling
and
a
window
on
each
unit.
The
plan
four
here
on
the
left
has
the
large
central
window
on
the
second
floor,
and
this
has
a
horizontal
siding
enhancement
when
it's
facing
one
of
this
road
and
then
the
plan
three
on
the
right
has
two
smaller
windows.
F
F
So
there's
a
farm,
a
farmhouse
elevation
craftsman,
elevation
for
each
of
the
floor
plans
and
each
unit
will
have
a
two-part
garage
on
the
first
floor,
with
the
dining
and
living
room,
kitchen
and
half
bath
same
as
the
duplexes
and
then
the
second
floor
of
the
units
on
either
end
for
floor
plan,
one
which
we're
looking
at
here.
The
plan
two
and
plan
three
and
for
the
floor
plan
two.
It's
actually
twin
two
and
a
plant
four.
They
consist
of
three
bedrooms
with
master
bathroom
secondary
bathroom
and
a
laundry
room.
F
A
F
There's
two
additional
windows
here
above
the
garage
and
this
second
floor
has
horizontal
siding
as
a
feature
and
then
the
plan
3
unit
has
vertical
paneling
on
their
architectural,
build
out
as
well
with
a
central
window
and
some
additional
windows
here
on
the
right
above
the
door
entry
and
on
the
second
floor
and
then
to
show
the
second
elevation,
which
was
not
shown
in
your
staff
report.
The
main
differences
between
the
farmhouse
elevation
of
this
one
is
that
the
plan
floor.
F
F
Obviously,
the
left
elevation
of
the
farmhouse
triplex
with
the
first
floor
plan
contains
the
entry
to
the
plan
too,
and
it
has
a
covered
porch
with
some
wood
posts
and
a
tile
roof,
and
the
unit
has
two
small
windows
on
either
side
of
the
door
and
some
additional
windows
of
various
sizes.
On
the
second
floor,
and
the
only
difference
between
the
two
floor
plans
is
that
this
second
elevation
has
some
additional
enhancements,
some
shutters
and
some
sliding
enhancements
or
units
that
face
fun
of
us
to
roam
moving
to
the
right
elevation.
F
F
The
difference
between
the
two
floor
plans
is
that
plan
four
has
its
cantilever
filled
out
located
on
the
opposite
side,
let's
look
back
and
forth
so
plan.
Three
is
here
and
then
plan.
Four
is
the
floor
plan's
slightly
different,
so
the
cantilever's
on
the
opposite
side,
but
otherwise,
very
similar
to
the
the
previous
or
previous
floor
plan
elevation.
F
The
craftsman
elevations
of
the
triplex
building
is
the
same
main
features
and
floor
plan
as
the
farmhouse
version,
but
has
the
stuff
of
siding
and
wooden
corbels
that
we
saw
on
the
duplexes
so
a
slightly
different
accents
here
and
there's
some
shutter
enhancements
that
face
buena
vista
road
again
much
the
same
way
as
the
craftsman
duplex
elevation.
So
this
is
the
front
elevation
of
4.1
for
an
elevation
of
4.2.
The
main
difference
again
is
the
entry
to
floor
plan.
4
is
on
the
side
and
there's
a
slightly
different
roof
arc
pressure.
F
F
Fourth
and
then
we
also
have
a
leasing
office
which
is
located
in
the
southern
central
portion
of
the
project
site
and
it's
right
at
the
entrance
to
the
project.
If
you're
coming
off
one
vista
road,
it
contains
a
covered
porch
entry
and
rear
covered
shade
area
on
the
outside
here,
and
it
has
two
offices,
a
work,
break
room
and
a
bathroom
as
well
as
a
waiting
area
on
the
inside
and
the
overall
theme
and
materials
of
this
leasing
office
matches
the
farmhouse
elevations
of
the
duplexes
and
triplexes.
F
So
this
is
the
front
or
south
facing
elevation.
It
has
a
single
window
on
a
wall
under
the
covered
entry
and
then
three
windows
located
in
the
waiting
room
area.
It
has
a
stucco
based
trim
and
vertical
panel
siding
and
then
the
three
of
the
other
elevations
on
the
left,
the
spaces
to
the
west
and
has
the
main
entrance
to
the
building.
F
F
And
then
the
applicants
proposed
additional
parking
throughout
you'll,
see
some
parking
areas
off
of
their
private
streets,
located
throughout
the
parking
or
throughout
the
project,
site
and
they're,
proposing
a
total
of
334
spaces,
including
four
ada
spaces,
which
meets
and
exceeds
the
parking
requirements
for
the
development,
and
then
they've
also
been
conditioned
to
ensure
that
there's
a
minimum
of
10
percent
of
our
bicycle
parking
spaces,
which
would
be
28
total
required.
So
we'll
work
with
them
to
make
sure
that
there's
some
physical
parking
throughout
the
site
as
well.
F
For
open
space,
the
applicants
provided
the
minimum
of
250
square
feet
of
private
open
space
at
ground
level
for
each
unit
and
there's
an
average
of
350
square
feet
per
unit.
So
that's
a
total
of
about
45
500
square
feet
of
private,
open
space
and
section
1704040
requires
a
total
of
500
square
feet
of
open
space
per
unit
and
that
500
is
divided
between
private
and
common.
F
So
there's
a
total
of
65
000
square
feet
of
open
space
required
for
130
units
and
after
you
remove
the
45
500
that
they've
provided
as
private
there's
19
500
square
feet
of
common.
That
was
required
for
the
project
and,
as
you
can
see
here
in
the
paseo
and
these
kind
of
open
landscape
areas
for
the
private
development,
there
is
about
36
000
square
feet
of
private
open
space
which
meets
and
exceeds
the
remaining
requirement.
F
So
in
addition
to
the
private
open
space
within
the
apartment
development.
So
these
these
larger
square
feet
of
open
space-
that's
improved,
possibly
here
the
applicant
is
also
proposing
to
improve
and
dedicate
an
additional
25
450
square
feet.
So
about
point:
it's
acres
here
to
expand
the
mirabella
to
subdivision
public
park
and
the
public
park.
Dedication
contributes
to
the
africans,
columbia
to
park
dedication
requirements
and
is,
in
addition
to
those
multi-family
open
space
requirements
of
our
code.
F
So,
overall,
the
applicant
will
be
kind
of
redeveloping
and
redesigning
this
park.
Dedication
to
make
a
big
reactor
park
for
the
community.
The
following
slides
are
just
some
renderings
that
the
apple
has
provided
mostly
showing
this
landscape
buffer
proposed
along
one
of
us
to
road
between
the
right-of-way
and
the
sound
wall.
As
you
can
see,
you
can't
see
the
sound
wall
to
reduce
the
visual
impact
of
that's,
not
the
wall
along
this
development.
So
this
elevation
is
looking
east.
F
F
F
F
And
again,
we
do
have
a
few
amendments
to
conditions
that
staff's
been
working
on
with
the
applicant,
but
I
promise
it's
not
as
many
as
the
last
one.
This
condition
31
is
proposed
to
modify
slightly
condition
to
require
six
foot.
Public
utilities
easement
along
public
frontages
and
the
applicant,
and
the
engineering
department
will
determine
when
public
utility
seasons
are
needed
along
the
private
roads.
Inside
of
the
development.
F
F
F
And
then
finally,
condition
12
of
the
site
and
architectural
resolution
is
the
same
condition
about
continuous
maintenance,
and
so
we
would
be
proposing
again
to
change
the
timing
of
this
and
then
also
there
was
some
garbage
that
didn't
match.
So
this
verbiage
that's
proposed
exactly
matches
the
other
condition
on
the
tentative
map.
F
B
B
F
That
would
be
correct.
Yes,
so
it
would
be
three
feet
to
the
garage
and
then
three
feet
to
the
residence
and
then
they
would
allow
those
those
second
floor.
Cantilevers
would
be
allowed
to
come
that
18
inches
a
foot
and
a
half
into
that
three
foot
setback
and
then
the
ada
parking
is
throughout
the
site
and
there's
one
here
near
the
leasing
office.
There's
one
located
here
on
the
southern
portion
of
the
site.
B
So
I
I
I
believe,
without
really
researching
the
building
code,
that
these
setbacks
front
setbacks,
the
three-foot
setbacks
they're
primarily
at
the
front,
so
that
the
applicant
probably
is.
I
think
that
normally,
if
you're
less
than
three
feet
to
the
property
line,
you
you're
not
allowed
any
openings
in
that
wall,
but
I
think
because
of
the
drive
or
the
street,
I
think
they're
they're,
probably
getting
flexibility
there
without
really
getting
too
far
into
the
building
technical
building
code
aspects,
but
normally
on
the
side
for
the
5
foot.
B
B
But
what
primarily
my
my
main
issue
is
that
the
only
accessibility
feature
on
the
floor
plan
is
for
the
manager's
office.
I
don't
see
any.
I
don't
see
any
any
adaptable
or
accessible
floor
floor
layouts.
So
none
of
the
bathrooms
meet
accessibility
requirements
unless
they
have
a
some
program
and
or
some
information
that
additional
information
that
we're
not
looking
at
tonight.
C
Yeah
we
do
have
the
kuipers
john
and
michael
kuiper,
who
are
the
developers
they
they
actually
they're,
actually
the
ones
who
are
currently
constructing
the
westfield
development
right
next
to
the
adjacent
to
the
east
of
this
project,
and
they
actually
have
these
multi-family
units
spread
throughout
this
commission.
The
planning
commission
approved
there's
some
single-family
homes.
C
E
I'm
commissioner,
who,
before
we
do
that
I'm
wondering
if
it
might
be
better
if
we
just
ask
questions,
because
there
might
be
other
questions
that
come
up,
that
the
applicant
will
need
to
answer
for
us,
and
I'm
wondering
if
I
might
be
better.
If
you
just
hear
from
all
the
commissioners
and
hear
their
questions
and
then
ask
them
the
applicant
to
spawn.
B
E
E
It
looks
like
there's
just
one
way
to
get
in
and
one
way
to
get
out.
So
if
you're,
it's
through
buena
vista,
and
it's
at
that
entrance
where
that
that
big
circle
appears
on
the
map,
and
so
I
just
was
wondering
if
the
applicant
could
address
that
a
little
bit
more
and
the
reason
that
I'm
raising,
that
is
just.
F
Okay,
yes,
and
we
can
definitely
have
the
applicant
address
it,
but
I
I
will
just
add
so.
The
main
entrance
here
is
off
buenos
aires
stated,
but
it
also
connects
through
to
carriage
road
which
is
within
the
mirabella
subdivision,
the
westfield
subdivision
to
the
west,
and
so
this
carriage
road
is
a
through
road
and
then
there's
the
a
secondary
access
at
gonzales
and
the
the
mirabella
westfield
subdivision
also
has
northern
and
two
axises
further
to
the
east
to
miller.
F
So
this
subdivision
does
have
two
access
points,
and
I
will
also
note
that
originally
the
proposal
was
to
have
this
as
a
gated
community,
with
a
gate
here
and
a
gate
on
carriage,
but
for
the
fire
department.
They
requested
that
it
be
open,
there's
nothing
in
our
code
to
require
gated
versus
ungated,
but
the
applicant
did
open
up
these
roads,
so
they
will
be
privately
maintained
for
publicly
accessible
roads
and
again,
two
access.
F
O
Hello,
everyone.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
hi?
Yes,
this
is
michael
kuiper.
I
would
like
to
get
to
the
accessibility
issues.
We
actually
have
our
architect
on
the
line
as
well
as
mark
zanrich
in
the
lobby,
but
I
was
hoping
to
kind
of
comment
on
the
project
jet
more
generally,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
would
like
to
first
speak
with
our
architect
about
the
accessibility.
Or
would
you
like
me
to
go
first.
B
O
N
Yes,
can
you
all
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
hey
good
evening,
thank
you
to
address
your
question
in
terms
of
the
accessibility.
The
plan
for
units
have
been
designed
to
be
adaptable,
ada
units,
I'm
not
sure
if
the
like
turning
radii
and
stuff
were
shown
on
the
floor
plans,
but
they
are
designed
to
be
accessible
in
addition
to
the
ada
spaces
on
site
for
parking,
the
four
spaces.
There
are
two
that
are
located
by
the
leasing
office
and
then
two
in
the
southwestern
corner
or
southeastern
corner.
N
B
Thank
you
for
that.
I
I
do
know
that
adaptable
units-
you
don't
have
to
put
the
grab
bars
in
right
away,
but
they
have
to
meet
the
clearance
requirements
and
there
are
some
issues,
but
I
I
know
that
a
lot
of
these
issues
will
be
reviewed
during
the
building
permit
stage.
It's
not
for
us
to
really
get
overly
technical,
but
I
did
want
to.
B
N
B
B
Although
you
know
I'd
like
to
see
that
in
the
future,
although
I
I
know
that
when
it
goes
through
the
again
when
it's
routed
through
the
the
permit
review,
they're
they're
they're,
going
to
really
take
a
very,
very
stringent
look
at
that.
So
this
something
I
I
feel
can
as
an
architect,
I
feel
compelled
to
bring
up
in
the
discussion
that
I
did
not
see
the
clearance
requirements
for
the
adaptable
units.
B
N
N
B
Yeah,
I
think
in
your
fronts,
I
think
there
is
like
it
there's
an
exception
for
the
fire
rating
when
you're
overlooking
the
street
or
probably
right
away
of
street
or
alley
of
such
such
or
a
drive.
So
I
think
your
fronts
are
okay,
but
I
think
you
you
need
to
on
those
side
ones.
You
need
to
pay
some
close
attention
to
to
the
fire
rating
requirements
on
the
side,
setbacks.
B
B
C
O
O
O
This
project
has
evolved
many
times
since
our
first
proposals
to
planning
commission
back
in
2015
we're
very
excited
with
the
final
outcome,
and
if
I
may,
I'd
just
like
to
quickly
give
a
bit
of
background
and
then
I
can
turn
it
back
to
you.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
the
project,
so
the
applicant
is
an
affiliate
of
kuiper
homes.
We
are
a
family
owned
home
building
company
we've
been
in
business
for
over
40
years
and
active
in
hollister
for
the
past
five.
O
For
years
now,
we've
been
hearing
the
city
expressed
a
desire
for
more
multi-family
housing
at
westfield.
The
planning
staff
actually
suggested
that
we
build
26
duet
units
in
addition
to
the
single-family
homes.
In
the
subdivision
for
this
project,
abraham
and
eva
asked
us
to
propose
a
percentage
of
the
subdivision
that
would
be
multifamily.
O
We
initially
agreed
on
20,
but
then
we
reconsidered
once
we
started
getting
public
feedback
on
our
duet
rental
units
at
westfield.
The
dwight
units
have
been
incredibly
well
received.
As
of
today.
We
have
tenants
in
all
16
of
the
units
that
we
have
completed
thus
far
and
so
between
the
success
at
westfield
duets
and
the
city's
need
for
more
multi-family
housing.
We
decided
to
go
all
in
and
the
plan
before
you
tonight
is
100
multifamily
with
private
streets,
just
like
our
duet
units
at
westfield.
O
The
product
here
is
designed
to
blend
in
with
the
character
of
surrounding
neighborhood,
although
this
is
an
attached
product,
each
unit
has
a
two-car
garage
and
a
backyard.
So
these
truly
live
like
single-family
homes
for
hollister
residents.
Looking
for
the
single
family
lifestyle,
but
not
ready
to
buy
a
home,
these
will
be
a
terrific
option,
as
zeba
mentioned,
we're
also
adding
a
.63
acre
expansion
to
the
westfield
community
park,
including
a
new
playground
and
a
dog
park
which
will
benefit
all
residents
in
the
area
and
also
just
so.
O
You
know
our
intent
is
to
hold
these
units
for
a
long
time.
Kuiper
homes
has
built
84,
similar
attached
town
homes
in
turlock
15
years
ago,
also
surrounded
by
single-family
homes,
and
we
are
proud
to
own
those
townhomes
to
this
day.
We
would
love
an
opportunity
to
do
the
same
thing
here
in
hollister
and
now,
if
you
have
any
questions,
we're
here
to
answer
them,
and
we
also
have
our
architect
mark
sonrich
and
our
engineer
tony
demelo,
if
you
have
any
technical
questions
about
the
plans.
Thank
you.
P
P
This
is
a
lot
of
triplexes
and
then
all
of
the
requests
for
changes
are
to
really
like
reduce
the
setbacks
and
to
to
increase
the
lot
coverage
from
50
to
70
percent
and
taking
things
down
from
10
feet,
to
3
feet
and
5
feet
to
0
feet,
and
it
just
seems
overly
dense.
It
seems
like
a
lot
of
congestion
for
that
area,
especially
considering
the
westfield
development
and
then
also
the
fact
that
it's
all
ventures
that
it's
not
going
to
be
any
homeowners.
P
B
E
E
A
lot
of
concerns
raised
in
various
forums
around
that,
as
well
as
issues
around
safety
and
then
schools.
So
that's
my
concern.
I'm
just
really
concerned
about
the
location.
I
I
think
that
we
do
need
this
kind
of
project,
because
there
is
a
real
shortage
of
rental
units,
but
I'm
really
concerned
about
that.
The
location.
B
B
B
I
don't
know
where
we
are
on
that
specifically
when
it
will
be
done,
but
it
is,
it
is
going
to
be
I'm
sure
it's
going
to
be
part
of
the
special
study
area
in
the
general
plan
that
we
discussed
so
hopefully,
that'll
that'll
help
the
traffic
in
the
future.
Once
that
connection
is
made,
it
is
compatible
with
the
zone,
the
r3
overlay
zone.
B
B
It
would
be
nice
to
have
some
affordability
features
in
it
in
the
future.
When
we
get
through
the
general
plan
update
process,
we
have
an
inclusionary
zone,
that's
it's
gonna
change,
but
based
on
the
looking
at
it
from
the
conformity
to
the
existing
land
use
the
type
of
project,
the
type
of
housing
that
certainly
is
needed
and
some
of
the
features
within
including
the
expansion
of
the
park.
H
H
H
The
ada
concerns
are
important
and
should
be
worked
out,
but
it's
a
solid
looking
good
looking
project
the
park
being
expanded,
I
mean
the
the
the
company
is
showing
that
they're
invested
in
the
city
and
if
they
stay
in
the
ownership
role,
I
think
it
would
be
a
really
good
addition
to
the
city.
Yes,
it's
dense,
but
you've
got
to
do
something.
I
think.
J
The
ada
parking-
I
know
that
there's
four
spots,
two
at
the
leasing
office
and
then
two
and
I
believe
it
could
be
correct.
I
mean
it
could
be
incorrect,
but
I
believe
it
was
the
southwest
corner
I
like
to
see.
Maybe
it
spread
out
a
little
bit
more.
That
way,
you
know
it's.
It's
a
pretty
large
community,
I
like
to
see
it
spread
out.
A
little
bit
looks
like
there
is
a
possibility
that
it
could
be
done.
J
J
You
know
to
the
school
to
go
park,
though
the
one
thing
that
that
I
that
I'd
like
to
see,
which
I
I
don't,
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
our
authority
to
do,
but
just
a
personal
comment
is
maybe,
instead
of
just
having
the
the
play
structure,
maybe
had
some
swings
or
something
to
it,
something
a
little
bit
different.
I
have
seen
some
of
these.
J
J
Yeah
to
address
the
issue
of
you
know
it's
not
what
what
residents
in
that
particular
area
are
desiring.
You
know,
like
commissioner
fernandez
says
this,
is
in
the
perfect
world
I
mean
I.
I
think
this
is
the
townhouses
and
duplexes
I
think
they're
a
better
option
as
opposed
to
apartments,
because
it
does
give
renters
a
feel
of
a
sense
of
a
real
home
as
opposed
to
apartment,
nothing
against
apartments
because
they
are
needed
as
well.
But
I
do
like
that
aspect.
J
I
I
don't
think
that
it
brings
down
the
value
of
a
neighborhood
by
having
these
duplexes
and
triplexes.
I
don't
think
that
necessarily
gonna
attract
a
bad
element
just
because
people
are
renters
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
they're
bad
people.
I
think
that
there's
some
some
real
people
that
make
decent
money
that
just
can't
afford
to
purchase
and
and
in
my
profession
I
see
that
a
lot
and
it's
better
than
having
a
to
live
in
an
apartment.
So
I
think
this
is
a.
J
This
is
a
need
that
our
q,
you
know
for
our
community,
I'm
glad
that
we're
seeing
projects
like
this
come
about.
You
know
as
as
a
someone
who
who
lived
in
an
apartment
years
ago.
If,
if
I
had
something
like
this,
I
definitely
would
have
tried
to
to
live
there
as
opposed
to
an
apartment.
So
I
think
that
we're
giving
people
an
opportunity
to
have
like
a
home
environment,
especially
for
the
kids,
to
have
a
backyard
and
those
kind
of
things
I
think
that's
great,
but
yeah.
J
D
D
You
know,
even
the
past
planning
manager
was
in
that
same
situation,
brian
swanson,
when
he
moved
here,
he
couldn't
find
a
place
to
to
stay.
So
I
I
definitely
see
this
as
as
a
fill
in
that
void.
The
other
thing
that
I
like
is
is
that
the
the
developer
has
a
stake
in
the
game
in
which
he
is
going
to
manage
it
and
and
own
it,
and
you
know,
there's
some
accountability
with
that.
So
you
know
next
time
they
want
to
do
a
project
or
a
proposal.
D
D
So,
as
far
as
the
the
you
know,
the
traffic,
those
are
always
concerned
when
there's
changes
going
on-
and
you
know
that's
something
where
you
know
this-
the
city
would
have
to
work
with
the
community
to
do
traffic
studies
and
and
improvements
in
that
sense.
So
that
way,
this
is
a
good
quality
of
life
for
everybody
and
and
the
surrounding
neighbors.
B
G
C
Yes,
thank
you,
chairperson
huboy.
We
will
now
begin
the
roll
call
and
just
for
the
record,
it
is
for
tentative
map
for
the
tender
map
number
best
nintendo
map
number
2021-1,
which
is
planning
commission
resolution
number
2021-14,
and
the
roll
call
will
begin
at
at
this
time.
Commissioner
seth
monser
aye,
commissioner
salvador
mora
aye,
commissioner
jose
fernandez
aye
commissioner
roxanne
stevens
day.
B
B
C
Thank
you,
chairperson,
we'll
begin
the
world
cup
at
this
time.
Just
for
the
record,
it
is
for
conditional
use,
permit
number
2021-6
and
the
pc
resolution
is
20
2021-15
and
we
will
commence
the
broker
at
this
time.
Commissioner,
said:
monster
aye
commissioner
salvador
aye,
commissioner
jose
fernandez
aye
commissioner
roxanne
stevens,
nay,
chairperson,
david
hiboy,.
B
B
C
C
B
H
B
G
C
C
C
C
We
do
have
plenty
of
department
reports.
We
would
like
to
announce
that
the
city
council
has
scheduled
a
special
city
council
meeting
for
june
22nd
at
the
council
chambers
and
through
zoom.
It's
through
zoom,
we're
not
sure
if
it's
going
to
be
in
person
at
this
time.
Yet
it
appears
that
it
may
be
but
to
provide
that
option.
But
it's
going
to
be
for
the
city
council
to
listen
to
the
policy
implementations
for
the
general
plan
update
similar
to
what
we
listened
to
on
monday.
C
A
C
C
And
also
just
wanted
to,
let
you
all
know
that
city
council
did
a
adopted
resolution,
essentially
not
having
any
meetings
in
july
so
and
that
goes
for
all
commissions
as
well.
So
just
we
do
have
our
next
planning
commission
meeting
on
june
24th
and
then
that's
a
regular
planning
commission
meeting,
but
just
in
case
you
are
looking
into
possibility
of
vacation
time
or
whatnot.
Just
note
that
july
we
have
no
planet
commission
meeting.
Okay,
thank
you.
J
P
J
No
I'd
just
like
to
thank
commissioner
stevens,
as
well
as
commissioner
huboy
for
their
work
on
the
general
plan,
update
it's
a
huge
task
that
you
guys
have
taken
on
definitely
appreciate
all
you
guys,
hard
work
as
well
as
city
staff,
everyone
involved,
including
our
community
members
that
are
part
of
gpac
gpac.
Yes,
we
appreciate
all
your
work.
We
appreciate
place
works
for
all
the
hard
work.
C
J
E
B
E
J
E
A
C
Yes,
yes,
absolutely
so
the
city
council
did
adopt
an
ordinance
recently
and
the
ordinance
1202
trying
to
look
it
up,
but
I
I
did
it
is.
It
is
an
ordinance
that
was
adopted
in
regards
to
part
of
it
included
the
whether
whether
the
city
council
kind
of
a
point
of
order
of
in
regards
to
meeting
with
applicants
or
meeting
with
people
in
the
community
for
for
projects.
C
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me
right
now,
I'm
not
sure
if
the
city
attorney
may
have
it,
but
I
remember
I
remember
that
email
I
remember
speaking
to
our
city
attorney
in
regards
to
that
and
the
language
itself.
I'm
not
sure
I
don't
I'm
trying
to
look
it
up
in
our
phone.
Commissioner
stevens,
if
you
haven't,
maybe
it
would
be
good
to
read
it
out,
but
I
I
recall
the
city.
E
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
try
to-
hopefully
you
can
hear,
and
the
part
of
the
part
that
I
want
to
clarify
is
that
there
is
there's
some
limits
put
on
the
city
council
council's
contact
with
various
groups
regarding
agenda
items
and
included
in
that
are
commissions,
so
that
I'm
assuming
that's
us
right.
So
I
just
wanted
to
ask
about
clarification,
or
what
does
that
really
look
like.
B
Commissioner
stevens,
if
I
might
jump
in
here
for
a
second,
perhaps
we
can
put
that
on
a
future
agenda
and
not
only
talk
about
the
role
of
the
city
councilmen
and
regarding
our
city
council,
women
and
regarding
getting
requests
to
talk
about
projects
prior
to
public
hearings.
We
can
also
talk
about
this
planning,
commission
sure
and
some
of
the
issues
that
that
that
we
face
when
we're
asked
to
meet
with
developers
or
meet
with
applicants
prior
to
public
hearing.
G
E
C
It
you're
welcome
and
yeah,
and
we
can
have
ours.
We
can
talk
with
our
city
attorney
to
possibly
provide
some
clarification
in
regards
to
that,
but
and-
and
my
recollection
is
that
the
planning
commission
was
able
to
speak
to
people
from
the
developers
who
are
interested
in
and
talking
to
the
commissioners
to
explain
as
long
as
as
long
as
it
is
disclosed
when
the
public
hearing
opens
up,
the
commissioner
discloses
that
they
met
with
the
applicant
or
their
team
in
regards
to
the
project
that's
proposed,
but
we
can.
G
Only
I
would
agree
with
with
what
you
said,
mr
prado,
and
I
am
getting
a
little
nervous
about
discussing
something
that
isn't
agendized
on
tonight's
meeting,
even
though
it's
obvious,
the
commission
is
not
reaching
any
common
mind
about
an
issue.
Still
even
discussing
is
we're
starting
to
get
near
the
edge
of
of
of
of
something
we
shouldn't
be
doing,
but
we
can.
We
can
address
it
at
a
future
meeting.
If
everyone
would
like
to.