►
From YouTube: Gov Hol PC 20210422
Description
Hollister Planning Commission Meeting April 22, 2021
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
C
A
Commissioner,
jose
fernandez
here,
chairperson
david
hueboy
here,
I
will
note
that
commissioner
seth
monster
and
commissioner
roxanne
stevens
or
have
an
excused
absence.
Thank
you.
B
A
E
Great,
so
we
did
have
a
few
questions
actually
that
were
submitted,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
didn't
get
any
confirmation
around
that,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
they're
floating
around
somewhere,
if
they
weren't
received,
we
did
have
a
few
clarifying
questions
regarding
a
sound
wall
for
the
property
and
whether
or
not
the
access
point
was
going
to
be
the
only
access
point
for
this
development.
E
A
Oh
no,
we
do
have
two
two
three
items
for
tonight
is
this:
for
the
I'm
assuming
it's
gonna
be
for
the
the
farmstead
project.
A
D
A
There
is
no
no
reigns
raise
hands
at
the
moment,
commissioner,
chairman.
B
All
right,
so
we
go
into
public
hearings.
Item
number
one
conditional
use
permit
2021-5
for
a
planned
unit.
Development
michael
cady.
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
for
the
reduction
of
the
front
yard,
setbacks
for
lot
18
and
lot
19
in
the
cyril
verde
subdivision,
parentheses,
tm,
22
2016-2,
due
to
the
formation
of
the
cul-de-sac
for
lot
18,
which
is
addressed
1230
robbie's
court.
B
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
reduction
of
the
front
yard
setback
from
18
feet
to
12.20
feet
for
the
house
and
from
20
feet
to
18.27
feet
for
the
garage
for
lot
19,
which
addresses
1220
ravi's
court.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
reduction
of
the
front
yard
setback
from
18
feet
to
15.44
feet
for
the
house.
B
A
Before
I
introduce
eva
to
present
this
item,
I
just
would
like
to
say
if
it's
okay
with
you,
we
can
proceed
with
item
number
one,
but
then
at
some
time
either
between
item
number
one
and
item
number,
two
or
or
after
we
have
the
approval
of
minutes.
So
but.
F
Yes,
thank
you
good
evening.
Everyone,
as
mentioned
item
number
one,
is
a
request
of
approval
for
a
conditional
use,
permit
2021-5
for
a
planned
unit
development,
and
could
I
have
the
next
license.
F
This
request
is
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback,
requirements
for
lot,
18,
1230,
robbie's
court
and
lot
12
20
robbie's
court
in
the
approved
and
under
construction,
sarah
verde
subdivision,
and
so
we're
looking
at
lot,
1819
to
be
putting
those
on
the
right
side
of
the
screen,
and
so
this
is
the
ceremony
subdivision.
F
The
tentative
map
2016-2
was
approved
by
the
planning
commission
at
the
may.
4Th
2016
commission
meeting
by
resolution
2016-15
and
the
math
was
extended
for
one
year
by
resolution,
2018-9
on
march
22,
2018
and
then
was
also
extended
for
an
additional
year
by
resolution
2019-17
on
april
11th
2019
by
the
planning
commission.
F
F
F
Thank
you,
and
just
so.
Everyone's
reoriented
we're
now
looking
with
north
facing
up
and
lot
18
and
19
are
at
the
top
of
the
page.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
reduction
for
front
yard
setbacks
for
these
two
lots
lot
18,
which
is
in
the
middle
there.
Their
request
is
to
reduce
the
front
yard,
set
back
to
12.20
feet
to
the
residence
so
from
18
feet
is
the
current
standard
and
then
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
on
this
lot
to
18.27
feet
to
the
garage.
F
So
a
reduction
from
20
feet
standard
and
then
for
lot
19.
So
just
to
the
left
on
your
screen
there,
the
request
is
to
reduce
the
set,
the
front
yard
setback
from
18
feet
to
the
residence
to
15.44
feet
proposed,
and
there
will
still
be
more
than
20
feet
of
step
up
to
the
garage.
So
there's
no
request
for
reduction
to
the
garage
on
lot
19..
F
F
The
request
for
a
cup
for
planning
the
development
has
been
submitted
to
respond
to
a
desire
to
construct
a
single-family
home
design
which
does
not
currently
meet
the
standards
of
the
r1
zoning
districts.
For
these
particular
lots
in
a
subdivision
which
otherwise
is,
in
conformance
with
the
r1
zoning
district
standards.
B
F
So
this
approved
tentative
map
was
not
approved,
concurrently,
with
a
request
for
plan
unit
development
to
plan
for
these
flexible
standards
in
other
aspects
and
the
remaining
17
lots
in
this
19
lot
subdivision
are
larger
than
the
required
minimum
lot
size
of
5
000
square
feet
within
the
r1
zone.
District
and
all
lots
comply
with
the
standard
setbacks
and
lot
coverage
requirements
in
accordance
with
the
standards
for
approval
of
a
pud
of
plan
unit
development
that
I've
described.
F
For
you,
the
request
does
not
constitute
an
increase
in
variety
of
lot
sizes
and
housing
types
within
the
subdivision
as
these
floor
plans
and
elevations
are
part
of
the
same
approved
master
plan
set
which
are
being
utilized
throughout
this
subdivision,
and
the
proposal
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setbacks
for
the
placement
of
these
particular
floor
plans
on
the
lot
doesn't
create
additional
density
or
cluster
development.
Nor
does
it
provide
the
opportunity
for
additional
connections
throughout
the
neighborhood
or
additional
recreation
within
the
approved
subdivision.
F
The
properties
in
question
are
surrounded
by
other
r1
development,
both
their
the
existing
development,
as
well
as
the
remainder
of
this
server
subdivision,
and
all
of
this
development
is
in
compliance
with
the
current
r1
standard
setbacks.
F
It's
staff's
recommendation
that
the
applicant
be
directed
to
select
from
their
existing
master
plans
or
design
a
new
floor
plan
which
can
be
proposed
for
these
two
lots,
18
and
19.
That
would
be
in
compliance
with
the
setbacks
applied
to
the
remainder
of
the
subdivision
and
consistent
with
the
existing
surrounding
low
density.
Residential
development
staff
has
provided
this
recommendation
to
the
applicant
previously
as
well.
F
However,
it
is
the
purview
of
the
applicant
to
apply
for,
and
it
is
the
discretion
of
view
of
the
planning
commission
to
review
and
approve
a
request
for
a
commercial
use
permit
for
a
planned
unit.
Development
within
this
zoning
district,
the
performance
overlaid,
zoning
districts,
including
r1
lpc,
and
if
I
could
have
the
next
slide,
please.
F
As
stated,
it
is
staff
staff's
recommendation
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicants
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
deny
the
resolution
approving
cup
2021-5
for
planned
unit
development
based
on
the
findings,
as
described
in
the
staff
report
and
direct
the
applicant
to
develop
a
home
which
meets
the
standards
of
the
r1
zoning
district,
as
is
required
under
the
approval
of
tenative
map
2016-2
and
as
complied
with
for
the
remainder
of
the
homes
in
the
cerebral
base.
Subdivision.
B
F
B
D
G
F
Thank
you
for
the
question,
so
the
approved
master
plans
are
the
building
permits
that
were
submitted
by
the
applicant.
The
proposed
floor
plans
in
elevation,
so
they
for
all
of
our
subdivisions,
there's
typically
a
set
of
various
master
plans
that
get
approved
by
the
planning
and
building
departments,
and
so
they
have
a
set
of
floor
plans
that
have
been
reviewed
through
the
building
department.
And
these
are
these
are
part
of
that
set.
So
the
cerro
verde
subdivision
has
several
master
plans
they're
using
throughout
the
subdivision,
but.
B
H
All
right,
thank
you,
eva
for
the
the
staff
report.
I
wanted
to
give
a
little
bit
of
a
context
to
this
to
this
project
in
this
particular
situation.
Commissioner
huboy
just
to
answer
your
question.
This
has
a
a
recorded
final
map.
In
fact,
we
have
pulled
building
permits
for
16
of
the
19
units.
H
This
project
is
underway,
going
vertical
construction.
As
eva
said,
there
is
a
basically
a
master
plan
of
the
architecture
approved
for
this
project,
and
just
so
you
guys
know
this
is
a
small
infill
site.
I
wish
we
had
an
aerial.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
handle
the
screen
to
me,
but
this
is
a
a
site
that
is,
amongst
previously
developed
properties
on
pretty
much
all
sides
so
with
infill.
Always
you
have
difficulties
and,
and
things
of
of
that
nature
in
this,
this
this
cul-de-sac
is
is
one
of
them.
H
So
we
have
for
this
19
units.
We
have
three
plans.
Each
elevation
has
three
different
elevations.
Our
each
plan
has
three
different
elevations
and
we
have
six
different
color
schemes.
So
for
a
little
19-unit
subdivision,
it's
it's.
It's
got
a
it's
got
a
lot
of
variety
to
it
and,
as
they
said,
the
investing
tenant
map
was
approved
and
then
we
kind
of
went
in
with
the
architecture
in
our
master
plan.
H
We
basically
have
two
what
I
call
very
traditional
two-story
units
when
we
went
in
to
pre-plot,
with
with
with
staff
abraham
was,
are
pretty
much
are
pretty
much
our
contact.
H
One
of
the
issues
that
arose
with
our
pre-plotting
is
in
the
spirit
of
keeping
with
the
neighborhood,
and
we
were
asked
to
basically
put
single
family
rear
elevations
to
all
of
the
existing
neighbors,
which
we
debated.
We
eventually
cooperated
and
said
we.
We
would
do
that.
So,
even
though
there's
two
plans
in
our
approved
master
plan
that
that
would
fit
the
setbacks,
I
think
for
basically
a
win-win
solution
for
everybody.
H
We
went
with
our
our
unit
that
basically
has
a
a
single
story:
elevation
in
the
rear
on
the
cul-de-sac.
If,
if
you
kind
of
go
back
to
I'm
sorry,
you
can
go
back
to
the
kind
of
that
setback
exhibit.
F
Yeah
paul,
do
you
mind
taking
the
screenshot.
H
You'll
see
that
the
setbacks,
I
I
call
them
false
setbacks,
because
a
lot
is
impinged
upon
because
of
the
cul-de-sac,
and
if
you
really
look
at
the
homes,
we
are
not
trying
to
put
the
homes
closer
together.
It
is
simply
because
that
lot
is
cut
short
a
little
bit
because
of
the
cul-de-sac,
particularly
on
lot
18.
H
If
you
go
to
lot
19
and
you
look
at
the
cul-de-sac-
exhibit
we're
actually
we're
at
18
plus
feet
in
certain
parts
of
that,
but
you
can
tell
there's
a
there's
a
there's
a
little
curve
there,
where
we're
less
than
the
18
feet.
A
lot.
18
is
just
a
little
bit
difficult
because
the
cul-de-sac
eats
into
it,
but,
as
you
can
tell,
if
you
go
front
to
front
from
lot
18
to
the
lot
directly
across
this
cul-de-sac
from
it,
those
houses
are
the
most
far
apart
in
the
whole
subdivision.
H
So
I
I
think
this
is
just
a
little
bit
of
anomaly
because,
where
you
measure
from
is
impacted
by
the
court,
I
think
that
the
spirit
of
putting
single
stories
next
to
single
stories
is
what
we're
trying
to
achieve
here.
I
think
abraham
would
agree
with
that.
H
Unfortunately,
if
we
would
have
known
about
this
early
in
the
process,
we
probably
would
have
handled
the
cup
a
little
bit
differently,
but
I
really
think
this
is
the
best
solution.
I
think
it's
a
very
technical
perspective
that
staff's,
taking,
which
I
understand
and
appreciate
in
this
political
climate,
but
I
really
do
think
this
is
a
this
is
a
is
a
win-win
for
everybody,
us
and
the
neighbors
and
everybody's
trying
to
be
cooperative.
I
believe
we
were
cooperative
and
I
hope
the
city
will
be
cooperative
in
in
a
reciprocating
manner.
H
B
I
do
have
a
couple
questions.
Thank
you,
mr
katie
sure
so
correct
me.
If,
on
this,
you
have
building
permits
for
all
lots.
Is
that
correct.
H
For
18
and
19
in
13,
because
13
we
have
a
construction
trailer
on,
and
this
has
kind
of
been
an
issue
that
we've
been
discussing
with
abraham
prior
to
brian's
departure
him
and
we
figured
this
is
probably
the
best
way
to
to
handle.
Let's
come
to
planning
commission,
so
here
we
are
at
the
at
at
the
last
minute,
trying
to
hopefully
be
in
a
position
to
pull
the
billing
permits.
If
we
get
this
resolved.
B
B
C
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
katy,
for
your
presentation.
For
speaking
a
quick
question.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
heard
you
speak
correctly,
that
you
do
have
have
two
models
or
a
model
that
would
fit
the
lot
without
needing
a
reduction
of
the
front
yard
setback.
Correct.
H
That
is,
that
is
correct.
We
have.
We
have
three
plans
here:
plans
two
and
three,
which
are
the
larger
two-story
rear
elevation
plans
would
be
the
setback
but
again
we're
trying
to
create
a
win-win
situation
amongst
neighbors
and
things
of
that
nature.
C
H
Again,
I
think
we're
trying
to
be
accommodating
of
the
city's
spirit
of
wanting
to
have
new
houses
relate
to
their
their
neighbors
in
their
this
backs
up
to
two
single
stories.
H
So
that's
what
we
are
trying
to
implement
we're
trying
to
be
cooperative
with
the
city
cooperative
with
neighbors,
and
I
think
we're
comfortable
with
that,
but
we
to
come
up
with
a
fourth
plan
on
a
19
unit
subdivision
that
already
has
three
plans.
Three
elevations
per
plan
is
extremely
punitive
and
I
think
staff
would
agree
with
that
and
that's
why
we
think
this
is
the
most
elegant
solution
in
probably
a
win-win
situation
for
everybody
involved.
So
hopefully
that
answers
your
question.
B
But
the
the
ones
that
are
on
the
exhibit
here,
mr
katie,
on
sheet,
one-
are
showing
two-story
units
on
lot.
18
and
19..
H
Yeah,
so,
commissioner,
who
how
that
how
that
that
works
is
those
the
the
second
story?
All
of
those
bedrooms
are
front
loaded,
and
so
the
the
rear
elevation
doesn't
is
all
roof
and
there
are
no
windows.
The
rolling
windows
on
that
on
that
elevation
are
on
the
first
floor,
so
that
was
part
of
the
compromise.
H
That
that
is
correct,
but
there's
only
two
stories
on
the
front:
the
back.
There
are
no
two-story
windows
whatsoever;
it
is
all
it
all.
Is
all
roof?
Okay,
so
that's
that's
what
makes
it
a
more
compatible
use.
So
there
are
no
the
other
ones.
They
have
windows,
there's
actually
bedrooms
on
the
back.
In
this
case,
where
there
are
no
bedrooms
in
the
back
on
this
plan,
the
other
plans
have
bedrooms
in
the
back
and
windows
and
things
of
that
that
nature.
That's
not
the
case
for
this
particular
plan.
H
We
we
we
do
not
trust
me.
If
I
had
an
easy
solution,
I
would
I
would
I
would
I
would
take
it.
I
think
abraham
would
tell
you.
We
have
a
ten
year
relationship.
We've
done
a
lot
of
projects
in
the
cities.
We've
always
tried
to
be
cooperative,
and
this
is
just
unfortunately,
the
situation
we're
in
on
on
this
one,
and
I
think
we're
trying
to
do
the
right
thing,
and
this
is
a
I
think,
it's
it's.
It's
it's
a
good
solution
and
again,
I
think
the
setback,
and
this
is
a
bit
false.
H
The
only
reason
that
we
are
not
meeting
the
setback
is
because
of
the
cul-de-sac
location
right
there,
but
there
is
all
of
the
separations
of
all
the
houses
around
them,
so
we're
not
we're
trying
to
jam
stuff
together.
It's
a
it's
a
false
reading,
because
of
where
you
have
to
measure
your
your
setback
from
so.
C
So
to
follow
up
on
your
question
because
it's
kind
of
similar
to
the
question
I
I
asked
earlier,
we
got
a
little
bit
different
answer,
so
I
was
a
little
confused
on
that.
So
just
to
to
kind
of
recap,
the
question
I
asked
you
earlier,
mr
katie,
is
that
you,
you
guys
do
have
a
floor
plan
that
could
fit
the
lots
without
needing
a
reduction
of
the
front
yard
setback
requirement.
Correct.
D
H
B
One
one
clarification
that
that
I'm
gonna
put
out
there
to
staff
is
that
it's
just
so.
I
have
an
understanding
of
the
setback
policy
regarding
the
20
of
the
lot,
the
the
length
of
the
lot
here.
We
have
two
of
these
lots.
Both
lot
19
and
18
are
trapezoidal.
So
if
you
take
that
property
line
between
lot
18
and
lot
19.,
I
scaled
at
1
to
30
and
scale.
I
scale
that
as
92
feet,
I
take
20
percent
of
the
92
feet.
I
come
up
with
18.4
lot.
B
18
is
showing
an
18.39
foot
setback
at
the
rear.
Why
wouldn't
lot
19
also
be
able
to
go
to
18
feet
four
there?
That
would
be
almost
enough
to
meet
the
18-foot
setback
for
lot
19
on
the
on
the
front,
and
that
would
make
that
into
compliance.
I'm
not
sure
why
you're
going
20
feet
on
lot,
19
where
or
they
have
that
demising
property
line.
If
you
take
the
20
percent
of
the
92
feet,
you
should
be
able
to
go
to
18
feet
four.
D
B
B
B
you're,
reducing
the
the
front
yard
to
12
feet.
If
you
don't,
if
you
don't
have
a
the
other,
the
other
houses
in
this
subdivision
do
have
relatively
decent
sized
front
yards.
C
No,
the
only
comment
I
have
is
you
know
no
specific
to
the
question
I
had
is
that
you
know
that
this
development,
the
developer,
does
have
so
they
do
have
a
floor
plan
that
could
make
this
work.
C
I
definitely
understand,
and-
and
and
I
do
appreciate
the
fact
that
they're
thinking
about
you
know
neighbors,
you
know
you
know
that
that
own
that
live
in
single-story
homes,
so
I
I
definitely
understand
that
part,
but
it's
in
the
same
token,
you
know
you
know,
I
live
between
two
two-story
homes
and
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
it'd
be
nice
to
have
one,
but.
J
C
You
know
it
kind
of
is
what
it
is.
You
know
if,
if
yeah,
but
the
fact
that
there
is
a
solution,
that
they
do,
have
a
solution
that
would
kind
of
kind
of
like
okay.
Well,
instead
of
asking
for
a
reduction,
why
don't
we
just
go
with
a
different
floor
plan
or
even
if
they
didn't,
you
know,
there's
plenty
of
time
for
them.
You
know
with
their
with
their
team
to
come
up
with
with
something
that
fits.
I
do
agree
with
you
online
19.
C
I
do
believe
it
is
feasible,
yeah
exactly
you
know,
and
I'm
glad
you
explained
that
you
know
because
we're
just
looking
at
it
visually
without
all
of
the
you
know,
taking
the
numbers
into
consideration.
C
I
was
thinking
that
it'd
be
easier
with
a
lot
19
than
18,
but
you
know
the
fact
that
they
they
do
have
a
solution.
Already
kind
of
leads
me
to
believe
that
you
know
I
I'd.
Rather,
let
them
come
up
with
the
answer
on
their
own
because
they
can
instead
of
asking
for
a
reduction.
B
You
know
the
the
architectural
aspect
of
this
problem
solving
is
that
this
this
you
know
as
an
architect
when
you
have
a
master
plan,
that's
already
pre-designed.
With
these
units
you
try
to
fit
them
into
confines
of
a
approved
tentative
map
that
was
did
not
go
along
with
this
plan
unit
development.
The
tentative
map
was
approved
now
they're
trying
the
applicant.
B
Is
trying
to
fit
pre-designed
units
to
to
property
lines
that
are
already
been
are
already
configured,
whereas
the
traditional
approach
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
work
for
multi-unit
developments,
but
the
beautiful
thing
about
architecture
is
that
it
starts
from
the
views,
the
wind,
you
know
the
the
the
solar
aspects
and
it's
designed
to
peculiarities
the
site
here
we're
trying
to
fit
something
onto
that's
some
a
configuration,
and
we
already
have
these
designs
we're
trying
to
fit
that.
That's
that's
the
problems
you
get
into.
B
But
those
are
the
issues
you
have
in
multi-unit
development
when
it
doesn't
start
from
the
beginning
you're
trying
to
it's
like
an
end,
run
on
this
and
trying
to
make
it
fit,
and
those
are
the
problems
you
have,
and
those
are
the
issues
that
I
have
with
that
approach
a
lot
of
times
if
they
were
more
site-specific
from
the
beginning,
then
this
this
wouldn't
have
come
up
tonight
so
and
since
the
the
lots,
18
and
19,
there
is
no
construction
in
their
way.
There's
no
reason
why
they
can't
make
it
work.
So,
mr.
J
I
I
agree
with
commissioner
mora.
I
mean
they
have
a
solution,
it's
unfortunate
if
you
get
stuck
with
a
two-story
house
next
to
you.
Sometimes
that's
just
life,
but
if
they
have,
the
easiest
solution
is
to
just
build
what
will
fit
out
of
the
plans
that
they
already
have.
I
could
understand
if
they
didn't
have
another
plan,
a
floor
plan,
and
this
was
just
a
mistake
at
some
point,
but
this
is
something
that,
like
you,
both
said
it
can
be
corrected.
They
have
a
solution,
just
build
what
you
need
to
build
on
their
personal
thought.
D
A
Yeah
definitely
very
well
taking
comments.
I
do
want
to
indicate
that,
as
mr
kitty
stated,
he
does
have
other
projects
that
he
has
been
working
with
in
the
city
and
normally
he
he
does
start
since
the
very
beginning.
He
was
involved
with
the
benchmark
development
out
of
seminar
extension,
your
union
one
of
the
first
developments
that
came
in
with
after
the
recession
and
since
a
very
conceptual
part
of
it
and
with
others
here
in
in
town
saddlebrook
right
next
to
it
as
well.
This
one
was
a
little
different.
A
As
you
mentioned
it
was.
It
was
processed
through
a
the
property
owner
at
that
time,
with
the
help
of
other
engineers
and
then
ultimately
was
taken
over
by
michael
katie
and
and
his
team.
So
so
point
well
taken
in
regards
to
you
know
since
the
inception
of
it
it's
good
to
have
architectural
in
mind,
and
normally
mr
katie
and
his
team
have
done
that
in
the
past
in
hollister.
But
in
this
particular
case
it
was
a
little
different
but
point
well
taken.
B
Yeah,
it's
in
summary,
my
point:
is
it's
really
beautiful
when
you
start
from
the
beginning
and
and
the
design
is,
if
you
will
an
organic
process
now
this,
this
is
more
contrived
trying
to
make
it
fit,
whereas
there
are
other
alternatives
so
with.
Are
there
any
other?
Okay
without
any
other
comments
from
the
commission?
What
is
the
pleasure
of
the
commission
on
item
number?
One.
B
D
C
For
that
make
a
motion
that
we
deny
the
resolution
approving
conditional
use
permit
2021-5
do
I
need
to
read
the
whole
thing
or
do
it.
D
A
B
Hearing
the
public
hearing
has
been
closed
and
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
Any
other
discussion
from
the
commission
on
the
motion
do
I
have
a
second
on
that
motion.
I
second,
I
have
a
motion
a
second
all
in
favor
say
aye,
oh
or
no
excuse
me.
B
J
B
Yeah
so
right
so
report
that
when
I
say
yeah,
I
support
mr
motion
to
deny
the
request
correct.
C
B
D
B
2015-9
amendment
mr
alex
psywack.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
amend
the
city
of
hollister
planning
commission
resolution
2016-11
by
deleting
condition
of
approval
number
55
emergency
vehicle
access
which
states
prior
building
permit
prior
building
permit
issuance.
The
applicant
shall
provide
an
emergency
access
to
west
side
boulevard
in
the
quote.
This
project
tentative
map,
2015-9
and
conditional
use
permit
2016-3
for
planned
unit
development.
B
Farmstead
was
originally
approved
by
the
city
of
hollister
planning
commission
on
january
28
2016
for
a
tentative
map
to
subdivide
an
approximately
two
acre
parcel
into
13
single-family
lots
in
the
low-density
residential
performance
overlay.
R1
dash,
l,
slash,
pc
zoning
district.
The
project
site
is
located
south
of
south
street
west
of
west
side.
Boulevard
and
north
steinbeck
drive
further
further
identified
as
san
benito
county
assessor
parcel
number.
A
Yes,
thank
you,
chairperson,
you
boy,
I'll,
have
we'll
have
amber
cambron,
provide
the
presentation
for
this
item.
K
Good
evening,
thank
you,
as
mentioned,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
amend
the
city
of
hollister's
planning
commission
resolution
2016-11
to
remove
condition
of
approval
number
55,
which
is
the
emergency
vehicle
access
or
eva,
which
states
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
building,
permit
that
the
applicant
shall
provide
an
emergency
access
to
westside
boulevard.
K
This
project
tentative
map,
2015-9
and
conditional
use
permit
2016-3
for
planned
unit
development,
also
known
as
farmstead,
was
originally
approved
by
the
city
of
hollister's
plan
commission
on
january
28
2016
for
a
tentative
map
to
subdivide
approximately
two
acre
parcels
into
13
single
family
lots
in
the
low
density
residential
performance
overlay.
Zoning
district,
as
you
can
see
on
your
screen,
there
is
a
map.
That's
been
provided
of
the
homestead
subdivision.
K
K
And
you
go
down
to
the
next
slide,
so
sorry
and
one
more,
thank
you.
The
applicant
would
like
to
request
the
removal
of
condition
55
from
pc
resolution
2016-11,
which
states
as
follows.
Prior
to
building
permit
issuance
the
applicant
shall
re
provide
an
emergency
vehicle
access
to
westside
boulevard.
The
removal
of
this
condition
would
illuminate
the
condition
to
provide
emergency
vehicle
access
to
westside
boulevard.
K
A
letter
dated
march
1st
2021,
which
was
submitted
to
interim
development
services
director
and
planning
manager,
abraham
prado
and
by
the
applicant,
was
also
provided
to
the
planning
commission,
which
outlines
the
specific
reasonings
for
why
the
applicant
is
requesting
this
condition
to
be
removed.
I
would
also
like
to
add
that
another
letter
was
issued
today
through
an
email
specifically
addressed
to
the
planning
commissioners
with
the
applicant
again
providing
reasonings
why
the
eva
should
be
considered
for
removal
next
slide.
Please.
D
B
If
I
may
jump
in
here
just
for
a
second,
it's
eva
singular,
but
the
previous
map
that
we're
showing
looked
like
there
were
two
emergency
access
locations.
There's
one
south
and
one
north
on
lindsay
avenue's
lane
is
that
correct?
Is
it's
a?
I
don't
see
the
northern
one
on
sheet
c2.
I
see
the
removable
bollards,
the
one
on
the
south
where
lindsay
transitions
into
a
moore
street,
but
I
guess
there's
on
c2
there's
one:
that's!
B
A
We
are
discussing
one
eva
that
was
approved
by
the
planning
commission,
a
previous
planning
commission
that
is
on
the
southern
part
of.
B
K
K
Thank
you
so
much
so.
The
inclusion
of
an
emergency
vehicle
access
onto
west
side
boulevard
was
a
recommendation
and
requirement
of
the
planning
commission
for
inclusion
on
this
project
at
the
january
28
2016
planning,
commission
meeting.
This
was
due
in
part
because
there
was
only
one
ingress
and
egress
driveway
on
south
street
into
the
subdivision,
which
consists
of
a
total
of
52
homes,
39
homes
for
the
cottagers
subdivision
and
13
for
the
farmstead
subdivision
in
the
case
of
an
emergency
or
calamity
that
obstruction
access
to
the
only
driveway.
K
The
eva
could
be
potentially
used
most
recently,
and
this
item
was
taken
before
the
hollister's
development
review
committee.
At
our
april
1st
2021
meeting
the
city
of
hollister's,
police
and
fire
department
have
indicated
that
the
eva
is
not
required
by
any
of
the
fire
codes
or
any
other
codes.
Both
the
emergency
services
departments
have
indicated
that
they
are
neutral
on
the
removal
or
retention
of
the
eva
for
this
location.
K
Can
you
advance
the
slide?
Please.
Thank
you.
So
much
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
city
of
hollister's
playing
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
in
oral
testimony.
Regarding
the
proposal
and
either
one
adopt
a
resolution
amending
pc
resolution
2016-11
to
grant
the
applicant's
request
to
amend
condition,
55
to
remove
the
eva
as
described
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution
or
to
deny
the
applicant's
request
and
uphold
the
findings
and
conditions
of
pc
resolution
2016-11
for
attentive
map
2015-9,
as
originally
adopted.
B
A
We
do
have
somebody
on
call.
Acting
fire
chief
pedolia
indicated
that
if
we
needed
to.
B
But
perhaps
you
or
amber
may
know,
the
answer
to
my
question
is
that
on
the
fire
code
I
read
that
with
30
units
or
over
830
or
over.
That
would
need
those
that
eva
access
point,
but
with
38
that
are
fire
sprinkler,
then
that
would
be
exempt.
Is
that
said?
Did
I
get
it
right
or
is
that
is
that
correct,
so
we're
not
in
violation
of
fire
code?
If
we
remove
the
eva.
A
According
to
acting
fire
chief
at
at
this
point,
he
indicated
that,
incredibly
from
wrong,
amber
that
we
would
not
be
in
violation
of
removing
the
eva
if
the
planning
commission
determined
it,
we
brought
it
before
you
tonight
because
it
was
approved
by
the
previous
planning
commission.
I
think
I
think
you
might
have
been.
You
might
be
the
only
one
that
was.
B
A
But
it's
it's
just
policy
that
you
know
now.
Previously
it
was
a
more
than
likely.
It
was
a
different
fire
chief
at
that
time
as
well,
and
so
now,
as
as
mr
cyrus
is
getting
ready
to
to
commence,
the
improvements
of
the
site-
and
you
know
is-
is
submitting
his
application
to
all
the
different
departments.
A
When
I
got
to
the
fire
department,
fire
fire
chief
indicated
that
you
know
basically
that
if,
if
the
commission
indicated
that
they
did
not
want
it
that
he
would
be
okay
with
it,
and
if
the
commission
indicated
that
they
want
to
keep
it
per
what
was
discussed
back
and
I
think
it
was
2015
and,
as
amber,
stated
part
of
the
staff
report
as
well.
The
reasoning
was
because
there
is
only
one
ingress
egress
out
of
south
street
for
the
I
think
it's
a
total
of
52
units.
A
A
I
think
it
was
39
units
on
that
development,
and
so
and
so
because
of
that,
it
was
decided
from
the
previous
planning
commission
that
in
case
of
an
emergency,
there
should
be
an
emergency
that
could
potentially,
if
there's
a
calamity,
that
can
block
access,
ingress,
egress
off
of
south
street,
that
there's
a
potential
for
a
secondary
emergency
vehicle
access
off
of
westside
boulevard.
A
But
if
fire
chief
indicated
that
he
would,
he
would
be
okay
either
way
and
so,
therefore,
which,
which
is
why
we're
bringing
it
tonight
before
you
as
amber,
stated.
A
C
So
yeah,
mr
proud,
you
did
mention
that
acting
fire
chief.
D
A
Amber
actually
has
was
in
contact
with
him,
and-
and
she
just
notified
me
that,
if
we
need
to
hear
from
him
that
he's
he's
happy
to
for
us
to
put
him
on.
C
Regarding
what
was
submitted
to
us
by
mr
sywack
sure-
and
I
just
want
to
get
a
little
bit
of
clarification
of
where
his,
where
chief
padilla's
comments
were
coming
from
as
far
as
like
what
was
he
answered,
was
he
answering
just
from
just
just
regarding
just
the
emergency
vehicle
access
or
like?
If
there
was
a
need,
maybe
to
to
have
the
epa
in
case
of
emergency?
If
people
need
to
evacuate,
you
know,
I
just
want
to
see
what
what
exactly
his
his
thinking
was
when,
given
that
answer.
A
Sure
we
can,
we
can
try
to
get
them
on
right
in
a
bit.
If
you
like
yeah,
we
can
wait
until
we
get
them
on
or
if
you'd
like
to
open
up
the
public
hearing.
However,
you
prefer
I'm.
B
K
Okay,
sorry,
if
I
may
just
to
clarify
because
I'll
be
able
to
text
him
or
call
him
to
let
him
know,
but
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
you're
all
able
to
hear
him,
do
you
want
me
to
send
a
zoom
invite,
or
will
someone
in
the
chambers
be
calling
him
on
their
cell
phone
abraham.
A
Thank
you
amber.
I
just
texted
him
actually
right
now,
as
as
commissioner
mora
was
asking,
and
so
he
he
indicated
that
he
was
available
now.
If
I,
if
you
like,
I
can
give
him
a
call
and
paul
indicated
that
phone
phone
would
be
okay.
We
could
just
put
the
microphone.
A
Yes,
mr
mr
chair,
we
have
two.
We
have
alex
sywek.
L
L
Additionally,
after
you
pass
the
first
easterly
home
off
of
south
street,
the
one
adjacent
to
our
lot
number
two
two
access
roadways
serve
all
the
homes,
and
earlier
mr
hugh
boy,
I
believe,
questioned
the
google
map
with
the
with
the
two
red
arrows.
The
red
arrows
actually
indicate
the
extensions
of
the
barricaded
peri.
L
Is
it
called
petric,
drive
and
amore
street
so
that
the
those
two
arrows
will
now
become
the
northerly
and
south
and
southerly
entrance
into
the
continuous
north
south
road
running
parallel
to
west
side
boulevard
labeled
lindsay
lane
so
that
there's
there's
a
whole
there'll,
be
a
circle
of
continuity,
with
the
two
access
points
and
throughout
through
our
project
once
it
gets
built.
L
If
the
requirement
for
the
eva
is
not
removed,
there's
going
to
be
some
significant
impacts
to
health
safety
and
the
physical
environment
to
install
the
eva
over
30
feet
of
the
existing
curb
gutter
and
sidewalk
along
west
side.
Boulevard
will
need
to
be
demolished,
hauled
away
and
disposed
of
that
same
30
feet.
Segment
of
curb
gutter
and
sidewalk
will
have
to
be
replaced.
L
L
Storm
water
will
sheet
flow
from
lindsay
lane
over
the
sidewalk,
a
west
side
boulevard
again
potentially
causing
slip
and
fall
incidents
bollards
will
entice
teens,
and
I
I
believe
there
was
a
picture
shown
earlier
of
an
existing
eva
towards
the
south
part
of
san
benito
street
with
a
near
cross
street
of
promise
lane,
and
you
can
see
on
that
picture
that
it's
it's
a
mini
skate
park
and
ballers
will
entice
teens
to
bike
or
skateboard
from
lindsay
lane
into
west
side.
L
Boulevard,
sidewalk
or
accidentally
continue
into
west
side
boulevard
traffic
lanes,
even
if
the
bollards
are
replaced
with
a
gate.
The
elevation
changes
at
both
ends
of
the
eva
sidewalk
along
west
side
boulevard,
will
entice
teams
to
use
those
elevation,
changes
and
bumps
and
again
potentially
finish
up
in
the
traffic
lanes
and
again
with
the
during
the
period
of
installation
of
the
eva
traffic
and
pedestrians
will
be
impacted.
L
So
that's
a
quick
summary
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
C
Yeah,
I
have
a
quick
question,
so
you
know
you
know
you
mentioned
how
there
will
be
a
six
inch
elevation
change
at
each
end
of
the
sidewalk,
which
could
potentially
lead
to
injury
or
or
incidents
trip
and
fall.
C
Knowing
that
that
that
it's
going
to
create
that
that
potential
issue
have
you
and
your
team
come
up
with
a
solution.
So
that
way,
it's
not
a
hazard.
L
Okay,
so
one
of
the
facets
of
the
west
side
boulevard
existing
design
that
it
was
put
in
it
was
completed
20
years
ago.
The
sidewalk
backs
up
to
the
curb
and
gutter
so
that
you,
when
you
do
a
cross-section
of
west
side
boulevard,
you
have
the
the
gutter.
It
goes
up
six
inches
of
curb
and
then
continues
five
feet
wide
sidewalk
for
the
for
the
eva
area.
L
There
there
can
be
no
curb
so
that
the
maybe
a
foot
or
two
of
sidewalk
closest
to
west
side
boulevard
would
have
to
be
depressed,
a
maximum
distance
of
of
six
inches
so
that
the
sidewalk
goes
down
to
the
to
the
bottom
of
the
gutter
and
no
curb
exists.
It's
exactly
the
same
as
in
a
standard
driveway.
L
You
know
in
a
regular
home
so
that
if
the
emergency
vehicle
has
to
come,
it
smoothly
travels
from
the
surface
of
the
west
side,
boulevard
up
the
little
little
ramp
to
get
get
up
to
six
inches
and
continue
on
over
the
sidewalk.
That's
at
the
same
elevation
as
the
surrounding
sidewalk
is,
and
so
at
either
end.
If
you
take
a,
maybe
you
don't
really
see
it!
L
Well
in
that
picture
that
I
took
of
the
existing
one
down
at
the
southern
end
of
san
benito
street,
but
you
will
have
a
curvature,
a
curve
where
the
curb
on
either
end
of
the
eva
will
drop
down
six
inches
to
nothing
where
that
over
the
width
of
the
26-foot
width
of
the
eva
and
the
concern
and
the
concern
is
that
that,
because
the
sidewalk
is
right
up
against
the
curb
and
gutter,
which
is
how
it
is
on
both
sides
of
west
side
boulevard
up
and
down
the
the
street,
that
there
will
be
that
that
little
ramp
that
six
inch
ramp-
and
I
can
I
you
know-
I
don't
want
to
overstate
it.
L
But
I
suspect,
if,
if
a
a
10
11
9
year
old,
is
walking
along
there
with
his
skateboard
he'll
he'll,
try
to
take
that
little
bump,
or
maybe
even
with
his
little
trick
bike
or
whatever
so
and
right
there.
L
At
the
intersection
of
south
and
west
side
boulevard,
there's
a
four-way
stop
sign.
There
is
none,
no
stop
sign
on
west
side,
boulevard
traffic
at
the
intersection
with
steinbeck
and
another
four-way
stop
sign
with
at
west
side
with
apricot
lane.
So
once
people
stop
southbound
on
the
stop
sign
on
west
side,
boulevard,
they're,
picking
up
speed,
knowing
that
their
next
stop
sign
is
down
at
apricot
lane
and
they
have
the
right
of
way
to
go
through
the
steinbeck
intersection
at
at
the
at
the
at
the
speed
limit.
L
So
that's
for
for
what
it's
worth,
that's
a
that's
something
worth
considering,
and
and
since
marshall
bedola,
without
any
prompting
or
without
any
coercion,
simply
answered
back
my
email
saying
we
don't
need
the
eva
bva
and
then
went
even
further
saying:
there's
adequate
access
in
and
out
of
the
development.
L
I
thought
it
was
worse
than
pursuing
removal
of
the
eva,
and
here
we
are.
C
Great
thank
you
and
the
second
question.
I
have
sorry
to
take
up
so
much
time
guys.
What
is
the
financial
cost
to
install
the
eva.
L
It's
probably
going
to
be
significant.
We
have
to
break
it
up,
jackhammer
it.
We
have
to
probably
finish
up
at
least
a
foot
or
so
into
the
blacktop
area
of
the
asphalt
surface
of
west
side
boulevard.
It's
going
to
be
the
eba
is
26
feet
wide
and
probably
have
to
extend
three
or
four
feet
at
either
end.
C
L
D
B
A
Yes,
mr
chair,
we
do
have
one
want
to
indicate
that
we
do
have
chipotle
on
the
line,
but
we
do
have
a
second
speaker
lindsay
schoolcraft.
A
E
Okay,
great
so
you
know
I've
heard
mr
cywak
speak,
and
you
know
I
respectfully
appreciate
his
concerns
of
you
know:
rambunctious
teenagers
and
disturbing
the
land
out
here
I
don't
know
if
mr
cywak
or
even
the
standing
police
chief
realizes
that
we
have
already
had
a
fire
in
this
development
that
has
kind
of
scarred
us
as
a
whole.
E
The
fire
was
at
the
last
home
on
the
corner
of
patrick
drive
and
the
entrance
of
south
street,
so
the
only
entrance
that
mr
cywak
is
claiming
will
be
significant
for
both
communities
that
house
right,
there
was
comp,
was
engulfed
and
it
was
engulfed
from
the
left
side
of
the
home,
so
that
would
trickle
have
trickled
into
the
farmstead
development
if
a
home
had
been
there
at
that
point,
given
the
extensive
damage
of
that
home,
the
entire
entrance
to
brennan
way
as
well
as
partial
sides
of
south
street
were
blocked
by
emergency
vehicles.
E
E
If
that
fire
had,
you
know
somehow
jumped,
we
would
have
all
been
stuck,
and
so
it
is
extremely
concerning
to
hear
that
a
builder
would
suggest
to
eliminate
an
evacuation
access
route
when
this
is
something
that
this
community
has
already
had
to
deal
with.
You
know,
thankfully,
we
there's
nothing
blocking
either
route
right
now
on
that
end
of
omar
and
brennan,
as
well
as
patrick.
So
if
we
really
needed
to,
we
could
have
gotten
out
that
way,
but
in
terms
of
vehicles
there
was
no
way.
E
So
I
I
don't
know
I
mean
if
a
fire
had
happened
further
down.
I
don't
understand
how
you
know.
Potentially
50
vehicles
are
supposed
to
get
out
at
one
time
and
let's
just
assume
that
that's
a
minimum,
you
know
event.
If
something
larger
happens,
heaven
forbid,
we
have
a
devastating
earthquake
and
we
need
to
get
out
or
people
need
to
get
into
us
to
help
us.
You
can't-
and
you
know
I
honestly,
if
I'm
going
to
be
completely
honest.
E
If
we
hadn't
had
that
fire,
I
probably
could
have
cared
less,
I
would
have
had
known
no
better
as
to
whether
or
not
that
emergency
vehicle
access
route
would
have
been
beneficial
or
not.
Given
that
we
have
already
experienced
this,
I
can
say
100.
It
is
not
safe
for
our
community
or
for
the
farmstead
community
to
only
have
one
access
route.
That's
way
too
many
homes
way
too
many
people,
despite
the
fact
that
it's
their
relatively
small
developments.
E
You
know
we
have
like,
I
said:
38
families.
We
have
50
children
alone
in
this
community,
so
that's
just
something
that
I
want
everybody
to
take
into
consideration.
If
something
like
this
was
to
happen
again,
we
speak
from
experience
that
road
was
blocked.
We
could
not
get
in
and
we
could
not
get
out.
That's
not
to
mention
all
the
traffic
that
started
on
south
street
because
of
you
know
lookie-loos.
A
There
are
no
more
speaker
with
their
hands
raised.
Mr
chair.
A
Online
we
have
charlie,
we
actually
paul
was
kind
enough
to
send
them,
send
them
a
link.
Let
we
will,
we
will
go
into
it
right
now.
I
Thank
you.
Sorry.
I
couldn't
be
there
tonight.
It's
been
very
busy
taking
on
this
dual
role,
so
I
apologize
otherwise,
I
would
have
been
there,
but
I
I
respect
both
sides
on
the
decision
of
the
eba.
I'm
just
going
to
give
you
my
my
view
on
it
and
on
on
the
way
forward.
I
So
back
in
the
days
when
we
had,
for
some
reason
they
would
put
up
evas.
So
to
me,
and
a
fellow
other
departments
are
the
the
eva
is
a
complete
waste
and
I'll
tell
you
why
I
either
want
to
full
access
or
no
eva
at
all,
so
the
eva,
it's
kind.
It's
there's
two
bad
things
about
the
eva.
I
Whenever
we
have
an
emergency,
whenever
we
have
an
incident
there
we're
not
going
to
go
to
the
eva
to
unlock
it,
we
need
everybody
cleared
out
of
there
prior
to
us
getting
into
there
we're
the
only
ones
that
have
the
keys
to
it
and
we're
not
going
to
stop
and
go
to
the
eva
to
unlock
the
evas.
I
As
far
as
we're
concerned,
you
know
the
the
the
fire
code
doesn't
allow
traffic
calming
devices
and
that's
considered
a
traffic
calming
device
on
my
part,
I'm
on
in
my
book.
An
eva
is
also
a
a
it's
a
it's
an
opportunity
for
crime.
So,
if
you
think
about
it,
someone
could
park
on
westside
boulevard,
they
could
walk
into
the
development
and
they
could
go
in
rob
cars.
Do
whatever
police
are
coming
into
the
development.
Where
does
that
person
go?
They
go
directly
right
onto
westside
boulevard
and
take
off
and
they
get
away
clean.
I
So
that's
another
thing
for
that,
so
this
was
approved
with
it
at
the
time.
The
fire
code
states
that
you
only
need
one
with
a
certain
amount
of
homes
and
it's
usually
about
200
homes
before
you
start
putting
in
a
second
egress
exit
only
because
the
old
code
required
it
down
to
90..
But
now
every
home
is
sprinklered,
every
home
has
a
sprinkler
in
it.
I
Now
you
know
we
have
other
developments.
We
have
maple
park,
that's
a
lot
more
homes
in
there,
a
lot
tinier
a
lot
more
congested.
I
don't
like
those
those
were
before
me
now.
We
would
say:
have
a
second
have
a
second
exit
out
on
those
if
they're
going
to
have
that
condensed
and
no
gated
communities,
because
you're
just
locking
them
into
there
with
this
one
I'll
support
either
way
from
it.
I
I'm
not
going
to
say
I'll,
I
understand
the
residents,
they
did
see
the
fire
the
fire
did
get
put
out,
but
you
know
for
them
to
experience
that
too.
You
know
they
were
safe.
I
guarantee
they
were
safe,
every
home
sprinklered,
but
I
can't
take
away
the
way
they
feel
in
the
way
what
they
experienced.
You
know,
I
don't
know
if
this
helps,
but
from
this
this
the
way
forward,
I
would
say
no
evas.
I
I
We
get
have
to
do
full
access.
Well,
it's
they
were
saying
all
those
homes
are
going
to
be
sprinklered,
they
are,
but
your
development
was
built
to
have
exit
in
the
future.
None
of
your
homes,
none
of
your
200
plus
homes,
are
spring
guarded,
so
I'm
more
worried
about
those
200
homes
on
the
old
development
than
the
new
homes
that
we're
going
in.
So
it
was
more
for
the
old
development
more
than
the
new
development,
so
evas
from
this
point
forward.
I
I
don't
approve
of
them
and
you
know
we
move
forward
and
have
full
access
or
one.
This
is
a
small
development.
I
understand
it
and
I'll
support
either
way.
Whatever
the
decision
is
on
this
one,
but
from
this
forward
this
way
on,
I
I'd
really
ask
that
we
don't-
and
I
I
missed
he
came
to
me
asking
about
an
eva
and
I
wish
I
would
have
known
a
little
bit
more
when
I
said
no,
I
don't
need
it
because
if
I
knew
it
was
already
approved
and
in
there
then
I
would
have
said
hey.
I
This
is
already
too
far
and,
like
they've
told
me
before
this
is
a
rate
too
far
down
the
road.
It
was
already
approved,
but
if
they
would
have
came
to
me
in
the
first
place
prior
to
it
getting
approved
by
everyone,
then
I
would
have
said
okay,
it's
approved,
we'll
just
leave
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
this
helps
on
your
decision,
but
in
the
future
I
would
say
no
eva
full
access
because
we're
not
going
to
kind
of
unlock
the
eva
and
usually
it
gets
to
about.
I
I
don't
go
the
full
200
homes,
but
but
we
started
getting
about
that,
we're
starting
to
put
in
a
second
exit
or
we're
building
for
the
future
for
future
connectivity
to
connect
it
to.
I
understand
this
one.
I
know
there
was
talk
about
it,
but
there
was
no
way
to
do
that.
Second,
full
access
out
of
there,
because
it
was
too
close
to
the
other
roadways
at
the
intersection.
I
So
if
there's
any
other
questions
I
could
help,
I
don't
know
if
I'm
helping
or
not
or
making
it
worse,
but
I
support
either
way
on
this
one,
but
the
the
way
to
move
forward
on
this-
I
I
I
don't.
I
don't
approve,
I
don't
agree
with
the
evas,
and
that
was
the
reason
why
okay.
B
Charlie,
so
that
this
eva
that
we're
looking
at
tonight,
if
there
was
a
way
it
was
fully
accessible,
you
wouldn't
need
a
knockbox,
lock
box
or
anything
to
just
for
the
fire
department
to
access
it.
I
Now
I
went,
I
believe,
that's
with
through
engineering
and
and
on
that
part
on
the
traffic
and
that's
their
expertise,
meaning
it's
way
too
close
to
that
other
intersection.
Where
there's
a
stop
sign
to
have
it
come
out
and
then
turn
directly
right.
I
want
to
say
it's
really
close
within
50
feet
of
the
other
intersection.
It's
pretty
close
to
there.
It's
really
not
that
far.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
feasible
per
engineering
standards.
I
That's
why
I
was
like,
but
if
it's
full
access,
I'm
okay,
but
I'm
not
gonna,
go
against
to
vote
and
say
I
go
against.
You
know
what
the
the
city
standard
or
the
engineering
standards,
because
that's
their
expertise.
If
they
say
it's
not
safe,
it's
not
feasible.
I
support
him
on
that.
I
But
but
like
you
said,
I'm
not
going
to
fight
against
the
eva
on
this
project
right
here,
it's
better
to
get
it
ahead
of
time,
I'll
support
it
either
way
on
on
this
right
here.
C
So
so
the
question
I
had
for
you
and
the
reason
why
I
asked
to
get
you
on
online
to
speak
about
it
is
when,
when
you
were
emailed
your
professional
opinion
regarding
whether
the
fire
department
needs
the
eva.
C
I
guess
this
is,
I
don't
know
who
it
is.
Commissioner,
maura.
I
Oh
hi,
mr
maura,
okay,
sorry,
no,
you
know
I'm
I'm
more
on
the
emergency
vehicle
access
for
it
too,
but,
like
I
said
I
I'm
going
strictly
by
what
the
code
says
and
evas.
It
really
doesn't
say
anything
in
there
that
we
support
evas,
I'm
like
okay.
Well,
why
does
everyone
keep
saying
put
evas
in
I
go?
I
don't.
This
might
have
been
something
in
the
old
days
that
happened.
It
just
kept
going
and
going
and
going,
but
it's
not
feasible
for
us,
because
we
don't
come
and
unlock
them.
I
People
are
trapped
in
there
anyways,
if
they're,
depending
on
them.
So
that's
why
I'm
saying
we'll
rather
go
full
access
because
it's
it
has
two
functions:
it
gets
the
people
out
of
there
and
it
gives
them
another
way
to
get
out
of
there
without
being
locked
in
because
we
want.
We
want
everybody
out
of
the
way,
so
we
could
come
in
and
take
care
of
the
mitigate
the
emergency.
If
that
makes
sense.
C
Got
it
got
it,
and,
and-
and
you
know
that
you
know-
respect
for
evas-
there's
not
just
one
set
standard
word
word,
because
I'm
looking
at
a
photo
which
you
can't
see,
but
you
know
that
we
do
have
an
existing
epa
at
promise
way
in
san
benito
street.
Where
there's
three,
I
don't
know
what
the
correct
term
is:
bollards,
yeah,
bollards!
Yes,
you
don't
have
to
have
a
locked
gate.
There
correct
you
could
just
you
know
the
eva
could
have
the
bollards.
I
It
does
the
same
thing
so,
instead
of
one
lock
gate
now
we
have
three
bollards
that
we
have
to
go
unlock,
so
it
makes
it
even
worse.
You
know
what
I
mean
and
that
one's
I
don't.
I
don't
even
know
why
they
put
that
one
in
there
anyways
that
was
before
me
and
everything
so
they're
like.
Oh,
we
have
to
have
it.
I
would
have
said
no,
don't
put
it
in
like.
I
said
right
now.
I
All
that
alls
that's
done
is
ruined
the
other
roadway,
because
people
try
to
go
in
on
the
other
side
of
it.
We
did
have
a
fire.
It
could
have
contributed
to
the
damaging
subpart
of
that
eva
where
they
caused
the
fire
to
the
side
of
the
house.
We
have
no
ways
of
knowing,
but
people
would
gain
access,
cross
and
wreck
that
person's
yard
to
get
in
on
the
promise
way
in
san
benito
street,
so
they
would
just
go
around
those
bollards
to
drive
up
on
the
curve
and
over
the
person's
yard
doing
damage
to
there.
I
Honestly,
you
know,
I
would
have
it
just
fully
ope.
Well
that
one
it's
a
little
different,
because
you
can't
gain
that
access
onto
san
benito
street
to
leave
it
fully
open
you're
only
allowed
a
certain
amount
of
time.
That's
why
and
I
I
get
it
you
know.
I
have
no
fight
in
that.
I
think
that
was
per
caltrans
or
the
state
says
nope.
You
can't
come
in
off
of
here,
but
I
don't
know
why
they
put
it
on
there
anyways.
So
they
said
you
got
to
lock
it
up.
Lock
it
up.
C
I
Other
ones
like
black
forest
and
sunny
slope
they
have
that
one
and
that
one's
never
and
that
never
has
been
used.
But,
like
I
said
you
know,
kids
come
in
or
whoever
comes
in.
It's
an
opportunity
for
crime
people
to
come
in,
do
what
they
want
to
do
and
head
on
out
and
they
can't
get
caught
because
they
take
their
cars
and
they
take
off.
You
have
to
go
all
the
way
around
through
there,
so
it's
kind
of
security
and
and
emergency
access.
C
Yeah
and
then
what
was
part
of
your
your
opinion,
yeah
in
to
the
email,
was
it?
Were
you
just
looking
at
it
from
just
a
fire
perspective?
You
know,
because
I
know
you
mentioned,
and
it's
been
mentioned
in
this
email
that
that
all
the
homes
have
sprinklers.
Now
you
know
I'm
not
I'm
not
a
firefighter
or
a
fire
a
marshal.
C
I
don't
have
experience
in
there,
but
just
because
a
home
have
just
because
homes
now
currently
have
sprinklers
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
there
won't
be
out
of
control
fires
and,
as
well
as
a
need
for
evacuation
for
other
considerations,
gas
leaks.
C
C
You
know,
maybe
they
can't
take
their
vehicles
out
of
them
at
least
get
their
their
their
themselves
and
and
their
family
and
neighbors.
At
least
that
would
create
a
secondary
evacuation,
correct
because,
let's
say
there's
an
incident
that
kind
of
blocks
the
the
the
one
and
only
entrance
to
that
development
as
well.
C
As
you
know,
there
could
be
in
a
medical,
an
emergency
situation
where
there's
there's
first
responders
vehicles
that
are
blocking
that
entrance
so
kind
of
going
back
to
and-
and
you
didn't
hear,
the
the
the
one
neighbor
or
maybe
you
did
so.
C
Just
to
me,
it
just
doesn't
make
sense,
I'm
looking
at
it
from
a
perspective
of
you
know,
being
able
to
at
least
get
themselves
out
of
there
who
cares
about
if
they
lose
their
vehicle
or
whatnot,
but
at
least
they're
alive
and
safe
create
a
second
you
know,
and
of
course
this
is
all
you
know
hypotheticals,
but
coming
from
from
again
from
you
know,
kind
of
thinking
like
worst
case
scenario.
C
If
I
live
there,
you
know,
or
you
know,
would
I
want
another
weight
to
be
able
to
exit
that
development
if
there
was
a
worst
case
scenario
where
you
know
we
couldn't
get
out
through
the
main
and
only
inch
entrance
through
this
difficult
and
that's
the
only
issue
I
have.
Is
that
the
fact
that
there
is
only
one
entrance
and
exit
to
this
development?
C
I'm
you
know
I
I
I
just
recently
joined,
but
I'm
not
sure
why
this
was
approved
this
way.
But
I
I
do
feel
a
little
more
confident
that
worst
case
scenario,
people
do
have
another
option
to
to
evacuate
their
homes.
You
know
with
the
ava.
I
It's
the
fire
code
and
the
fire
code
allows
up
to
like
200
homes
for
single
entrances
now,
and
you
got
to
understand
a
lot
of
the
times.
The
best
thing
to
do
is
to
shelter
in
place
rather
than
to
get
out,
because
that
could
be
safer
also,
and
we
practice
that
all
the
time.
In
addition,
I'd
be
a
little
more
concerned
if
it
was
in
the
wui,
where
it's
not
in
the
wooey,
it's
not
in
the
wild
urban
land
interface.
You
know
it's
in
the
middle
of
the
town.
I
We
know
where
the
major
gas
lines
go,
so
that
that's
why
we're
saying
this
is
such
a
small
development,
but
I
do
respect
that
it
was
already
approved
and
it
was
there.
So
the
the
the
the
plan
for
the
future-
I
wouldn't
I
I
wouldn't
I'd-
just-
have
full
two
two
full
accesses
in
and
out.
If
we're
gonna,
do
that
and
say
get
rid
of
the
eva
we're
not
gonna,
we
don't
use
them.
They're
locked
up
people
are
still
trapped,
no
matter
what,
because
they
can't
get
their
vehicles
out,
so
even
the
gate.
I
Even
if
there
was
a
gate,
it's
not
a
fence,
it's
just
a
gate
where
you
just
whip
it
open
and
open
it
up.
Okay,
so
that
that's
where
we're
at
on
that,
I
mean
like
I
said:
I
support
either
way
on
this
one
right
here,
but
the
planned
future.
If
this
were
to
happen,
I
would
say
full
access,
or
it's
such
a
small
development
that
and
the
sprinkler
systems
are
to
protect
the
residents
that
are
in
the
inside
too,
and
the
they're
made
with
non-combustibles
on
the
outside
too.
I
So
I
I
do
remember
that
on
the
fire,
it
was
an
exterior
fire
due
to
waste
in
the
trash.
Can
that
caused
that?
So
it
was
just
the
exterior
of
the
home
that
ended
up
burning,
which
is
scary.
Fire
is
scary,
so.
B
I
don't
have
any
further
questions.
Mr
fernandez
do.
J
I
J
B
A
Mr
chair,
if
I
may
yes,
my
colleague
eva
just
reminded
me
that
the
public
comment
period
is
still
open.
If
you
would
like
to
close
that,
but
I
I
do
have
a
hand
up
again
for
miss
lindsay
schoolcraft
I'm
she
did
speak
already,
but
it
is
up
to
you
and
the
commission.
If
you
would
like
to
allow
her
to
speak
again
before
you
close
the
public
hearing.
E
I
can
hear
you
thank
you
so
much.
I
appreciate
for
the
second
opportunity
to
speak.
I
really
just
wanted
to
kind
of
so
I
I
did
not
realize
that
a
second
access
point
was
an
option
for
this
build,
ideally
a
second
access
route
for
this
build
would
be
preferred
over
an
eva.
I
agree
with
the
the
standing
chief
that
right
if,
if
an
event
was
to
happen
like
it
already
has
they're
going
to
access
it
through
the
south
street,
which
is
what
they
did.
E
I
also
want
to
just
kind
of
echo
something
that
mr
mora
mentioned
in
that
you
know
sprinklers.
Just
because
our
homes
have
them
does
not
mean
that
they
always
work.
And
yes,
the
fire
chief
was
correct
in
that
it
was
an
external
fire,
but
that
external
fire
went
to
their
pg
e
box,
which
caused
an
explosion.
E
Her
sprinklers
did
not
go
off.
She
did
not
have
any
type
of
safety
from
that
fire
reaching
the
inside
of
the
home,
so
just
to
clarify
that
that's
an
example
of
these
wonderfully
newly
built
homes
having
amazing
sprinkler
systems
that
still
sometimes
don't
work.
But
yes,
if
a
second
access
route
is
an
option
that
is
much
more
preferred
by
this
community
than
having
an
eva.
B
A
Mr
chair,
I
know
that
you
did
allow
for
miss
lindsay
to
speak.
We
do
have
mr
alex
cyrux
hand
raised
again.
He
did
speak
already.
It
is
up
to
you
and
the
commission
if
you
want
to
close
it
now
or
if
you
want
to
allow
him
to
speak
again,.
L
Me
now,
yes
feel
free,
so
I
I
think
another
point
that
people
should
pay
attention
to
is
that,
along
the
whole
length
of
our
property
line
with
west
side
boulevard
apart
from
the
26
feet
of
eva,
there
is
a
three
foot:
high
wrought
iron
fence
and
it's
the
same
type
of
fence.
As
most
of
you
may
have
seen.
That's
on
the
south
east
corner
of
4th
street
and
west
side
boulevard
running
on
west
side,
boulevard
in
front
of
those
three-story
apartment
buildings
right
on
that
corner.
L
D
A
Mr
chair,
we
do
have
oh
if
you
would
like
to
close
a
public
hearing
at
this
point.
We
do
not
have
any
anybody
else
with
their
hands
raised.
It's
up
to
you.
It's
up
to
you
in
the
commission.
A
Mr
chair,
if
I
may,
I
know
there
was
questions
in
regards
to
actually
making
that
eva
an
actual
road
back
then
just
just
a
little
history
with
when
we
get
an
application
in.
We
normally
within
that
first
week
prepare
a
draft
staff
report
and
we
send
it
out
to
the
different
departments:
police,
fire,
engineering
building
public
works.
A
If,
if
it
involves
restaurants,
we
send
it
to
environmental
health,
we
give
them
about
a
week
to
review,
and
then
we
get
together
as
a
whole
to
discuss
the
project,
and
so
one
of
you
know
we
have
every
every
department.
You
know
pretty
much
provide
us
comments
ahead
of
time
if
it's
possible
and
then,
when
we
when
we
meet
lately,
we
haven't
been
meeting
in
person
through
zoom.
We
give
each
department
the
ability
to
speak
right
now.
The
representative
for
the
fire
department
is
chipotle,
so
definitely
any
future
projects.
A
We
will
make
sure
that
we
we,
I
think
we
all
agree
that
it
would
be
nice
to
have
two
accesses
instead
of
one
and
an
eva.
At
that
point,
I
believe
I
was
a
different
fire
chief
and
I
was
a
different
city
engineer.
We
do
have
our
acting
city
engineer
on
board
now,
but
it
is
my
understanding,
similar
to
what
chief
patoya
was
indicating,
that
the
reason
why
that
eva
is
not
actually
a
road
that
connects
to
us
at
boulevard
is
because
westside
boulevard
is
considered
more
of
a
higher
traffic
road.
A
I
believe
it's
term
a
collector
road
and
it
is
also
a
truck
route
for
for
san
mano
county
and
also
the
proximity
to
the
intersection
as
well,
which
is,
which
is
why
the
city
avoids
having
other
intersections.
Then
then,
what
is
already
kind
of
planned
planned
for,
but
he
is,
he
is
online
in
case
you
would
like
for
him
to
to
speak,
but
that
that
was
you
know
the
reason.
Those
are
the
discussions
that
happen
at
the
drc
meetings,
development,
review
committee
meetings,
the
recommendations
of
why?
B
Because
of
the
issue
with,
if
it
was
a
full-fledged
intersection
route,
it
would
be
too
close
to
the
other
ones
correct.
B
A
traffic
issue
correct:
okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
You're
welcome.
Oh
we've
heard
testimony
here
tonight
from
mr
sidewalk
with
some
of
his
technical
issues.
I
don't
quite
understand
at
all
that
I
think
it's
you
know
like
any
ingress
to
a
property.
You
flare
the
edges
out.
I
don't
see
the
issue
there,
but
we
heard
testimony
from
mr
bodela,
the
fire
chief
regarding
his
his
reservations
for
this
eva
and
then
also
from
the
practicality
standpoint.
B
B
I
think
in
the
future.
Just
to
I
want
to
make
this
clear
in
the
future.
I
think
we
really
need
to
take
a
look
at
the
issues
with
these
evas
and
come
up
with
some
some
design
alternatives,
but
any
other
comments,
comments
from
my
fellow
commissioners
cell.
C
Yeah,
thank
you,
sir
yeah.
You
know
I
I.
I
definitely
agree
with
with
the
chief
with
the
fire
chief
that
in
the
future,
I
think
they
really
need
to
take
a
harder
look
at
these
ebas.
I
can.
I
definitely
understand
why
he
he
he's
not
in
favor
of
them.
That's
definitely
understandable.
C
I
I
don't
really
care
for
him
a
whole
lot
myself,
something
it
doesn't
make
sense
like.
How
are
you
going
to
have
time
to
really
get
out
there
and
who's
going
to
think
about
that?
You
know
when,
when
first.
C
Are
you
know
getting
to
the
their
destination?
I'm
sure
that's
not.
On
top
of
mine,
oh
yeah,
you
know
this
place
has
the
eva
and
we
should
try
to
go
through
that
way
as
well.
But
you
know
that's
something
that
that
should
be
considered
for
the
future.
Fortunately,
this
one
was
was
approved
with
the
condition
of
of
of
having
the
eva.
C
I
I
definitely
understand
the
the
applicants.
You
know
you
know
why
they
want
to
to
remove
the
eva.
I
I
definitely
get
it
especially
considering
the
fact
that
you
know
that
that
westside
boulevard
is
is
is
busy
it
could.
Potentially,
you
know,
I
think,
that's
where
we're
kind
of
like
parents
kind
of
have
to
step
in
and
kind
of
parent
their
children,
whether
or
not
to
use
that
as
a
as
a
ramp.
C
Although
that
kids,
we
all
have
children,
don't
always
listen
to
us,
but
you
know
when
I
look
at
it,
I
look
at
it
from
you
know.
Worst
case
scenario.
I'd
rather
be
I'd
rather
give
the
residents
there
a
second
option
to
evacuate
if
needed
at
least
bodies.
C
You
know,
if
not
vehicles,
so
it's
it's
really
difficult
for
for
me
to
to
go
against
that
recommendation.
I
was
looking
at
the
cost.
It's
like
okay,
15
20,
000
yeah,
but
you
know
I
I
think
that's
really
shouldn't
really
be
take
into
consideration
when
it
comes
to
potentially
saving
lives.
C
I
think
that
that's
more
important,
yes,
you
know,
does
it
potentially
open
it
up
for
crying
for
people
to
park
their
cars
along
westside,
boulevard,
jump
out
and
go?
You
know,
breaking
the
homestead,
that's
a
possibility.
You
know,
but
with
that
possibility
we
shouldn't
be
looking
at
removing
a
potential
escape
route
for
for
people
that
live
there,
that
that's
my
biggest
thing.
C
A
Approximately
chairperson
hiboy
that's
the
example
on
on
the
promised
way
that
currently
exists.
So
it
appears
to
be
approximately
that.
D
C
Know
and
and-
and
I
think
you
know,
unfortunately,
we're
kind
of
maybe
too
far
down
the
road
in
the
process,
but
I
think
maybe
the
architectural
design
could
have
been.
Maybe
a
little
you
know
could
have
been
altered
to
potentially
have
you
know
like
a
you
know,
if
there's
only
one
entrance,
you
know
and
and
access
entrance
and
exit
it
feels
wide
enough
to
potentially
have
like.
C
You
know
two
lanes,
you
know
or
or
whatnot
you
know,
because
you
know
you
know
I
I
I
know
that's
not
a
huge
lot,
so
they're
trying
to
fit
as
many
homes
there
as
possible,
but
you
know,
looks
like
you
know.
If
they
did
some
alterations,
maybe
they
don't.
You
know,
have
one
single-family
residence
in
that
you
know
and
maybe
close
to
to
that
then
maybe
that
would
could
have
been
a
possible
solution.
Could.
B
C
C
B
I
didn't
yeah
from
what
abraham
was
saying
and
from
when
I
went
through
the
drc
review.
A
full-fledged
vehicular
access
is
is
not
not
acceptable
from
the
standpoint
of
engineering.
D
B
D
B
But
what
we
have
here
is
is
we've
got.
You
know,
we've
got
your
access
coming
in
from
south
street
on
brennan
way,
but
this
eva
would
be
a
kind
of
a
partial
escape
route.
Partial
access,
if
you
will
not
fully
accessible,
but
at
least
it
does
it
does.
I
it
does
present
an
alternative
means
of
egress
in
case
of
for
hazards,
and
we
we
will
all.
I
guess,
concur
with
that.
J
That's
all
I
have
yeah,
commissioner.
I
I
kind
of
agree
with
the
fire
chief.
I
mean
he's
kind
of
the
expert
of
the
group.
I
I
agree
that
these
evas
I've
been
in
different
companies
where
we
actually
had
evas
for
the
buildings
and
every
time
there
was
an
emergency
it
never
got
used.
People
came
in
the
front
door
and
took
care
of
their
business.
J
I
think
if
you
had
to
evacuate
for
a
major
earthquake
or
a
gas
leak,
I
don't
think
you'd
be
getting
that
in
your
car
and
I
think
a
lot
of
people
when
there
is
a
situation
like
that,
tend
to
panic
and
go.
I
gotta
get
out.
They're
gonna
go
the
normal
way
their
brain
says.
I
come
in
this
way,
I'm
going
out
the
road.
It
leads
me
in
and
out
people
panic
forget
about
the
eva
and
just
start
running
in
whatever
directions.
J
J
A
bigger
entrance
would
have
been,
like
commissioner
morris
said
if,
if
there
was
just
a
bigger
entrance
in
and
out
to
begin
with,
none
of
this
would
be
an
issue
I
mean
I
have
my
children
at
home
too.
I
understand
that
fire
would
be
a
very
scary
thing.
J
Part
of
that
would
be.
You
know
you
plan
for
things
and
you
train
your
children
and
yourself
hey,
there's
a
gas
leak.
We
need
to
grab
a
coat
and
walk
outside
and
calmly.
You
know
exit
the
subdivision
out
onto
the
main
street
or
you
know.
What's
going
to
happen,
I
did
not
know
that
the
fire
departments
don't
even
bother
with
those
evas
that
answered
a
question
of
mine
is
like
why
don't
they
ever
use
them?
You
know,
and
it
is
true,
their
first
thought
is.
J
J
J
J
J
C
B
C
B
A
B
And
I
appreciate
the
testimony
from
the
applicant
and
also
what's
your
first
name
again
amber
heard.
Miss.
A
B
B
B
Okay,
it's
been
a
little
while
for
me,
since
I've
been
up
there.
Okay,
I
I
trust
you
all
had
a
chance
to
review
the
minutes
of
march
25th
2021.
B
J
B
A
B
All
right,
my
favorite
topics,
the
halls
of
general
speaking.
A
B
Go
before
I
begin
I'll
say
this
is
that
I
don't
know
if
you've
been
following
from
the
public
here.
The
progression
of
the
general
plan
update
and
we've
gone
through.
We're
on
to
our
eighth
meeting
will
be
coming
up
next
tuesday,
we'll
be
going
over
climate
change
and
local
hazard
mitigation
like
we're
discussing
tonight,
and
so
I'm
very
excited
about
the
progress
we're
making.
We've
had
some
really
interesting
discussions
and
coming
up
with
some
good
policy.
I
think
so.
This
brings
us
to
item
number
three.
B
The
holster
general
plan
update
2040
climate
action
plan
plan
and
sphere
of
influence,
amendments
and
annexations
scoping
meeting
city
of
hollister.
The
city
of
hollister
will
prepare
an
eir
for
the
hollister
general
plan,
update
2040
climate
action
plan
and
sphere
of
influence,
amendments
and
annexations.
B
It
will
hold
a
public
meeting
to
receive
comments
on
the
scope
of
the
eir.
The
city
also
invites
written
comments
on
the
scope
of
the
eir
and
alternatives
that
should
be
considered
from
april
9.
2021
no
later
than
the
close
of
the
30-day
notice
of
preparation
review
period
at
five
o'clock
on
monday
may
10th
2021.
D
A
Very
excited
about
this
process.
We
are
now
in
the
point
where
we're
going
to
be
doing
the
notice
of
preparation
for
our
environmental
impact
report
for
the
general
plan
update.
As
you
know,
we
have.
The
city
council
has
adopted
a
contract
with
place,
works
inc,
they're
very
they've,
been
really
helpful
in
regards
to
the
process
of
the
general
plan
update.
They
are
the
experts
in
general
plan
update
the
principle
of
the
place
works.
A
Mr
david
earley
he's
actually
works
for
the
uc
davis
extension
in
regards
to
the
updates
of
general
of
the
general
plan
and
a
little
bit
before
that.
One
of
my
colleagues
and
I
actually
took
a
class
on
that,
and
he
was
a
professor
of
it.
We
have
his
book
and
we're
fortunate
enough
now
to
have
him
and
his
team
lead.
A
The
general
plan
update
for
the
city
of
hollister
and
with
that
being
said,
we
do
have
kerry
stone
from
place
works,
and
we
also
have
terry
mccracken
and
allison
dag
who
are
going
to
be
presenting
this
item
for
for
this
evening.
Ladies,
are
you.
M
We
are
here
thank.
A
G
Yeah,
so
thanks
to
city
staff
and
planning,
commission
and
everyone
else
for
joining
tonight's
scoping
meeting
for
this
project.
It's
a
pleasure
to
be
here
with
you
today
my
name's
allison
dagg
and
I
am
an
associate
with
spaceworks,
which
is
an
urban
planning
and
environmental,
consulting
firm,
assisting
the
city
of
hollister,
with
the
hollister
general
plan,
update,
2040
and
climate
action
plan.
G
I'll
refer
to
that
as
the
proposed
project
throughout
this
presentation
and
the
associated
environmental
impact
report
referred
to
as
the
eir
and
then,
as
mentioned,
I'm
joined
here
today
by
my
colleagues,
terry
mccracken,
who
is
the
principal
for
the
eir
as
well
as
kerry,
stone.
Who
is
the
project
manager
for
the
general
plan
update.
G
Today's
meeting
is
really
just
to
listen
to
everyone
here
about
what
their
concerns
are
if
they
have
any
regarding
the
project's
potential
environmental
impacts
and
the
content
of
the
eir,
so
won't
necessarily
be
a
question
and
answer
session,
but
we
want
to
gather
public
input
so
that
that
will
help
shape
the
direction
of
our
eir
next
slide.
Please.
G
So
this
presentation
will
start
with
a
project
overview
given
by
my
colleague
carrie
and
then
I
will
go
over
the
environmental
impact
report
process
and
then
I'll
pass
things
back
to
city
staff
to
receive
comments
from
meeting
attendees
and
next
slide
and
carrie
I'll.
Let
you
take
over
this
section.
Okay,
great!
So
next
slide.
M
Please
all
right,
so
what
is
a
general
plan?
The
general
plan
is
the
city's
blueprint
for
growth
and
development,
and
it
establishes
the
community's
vision
for
the
next
20
years,
including
goals
and
policies,
and
actions
to
implement
that
vision.
M
So
the
state
requires
that
the
general
plan
include
the
following
elements.
You
can
see
the
list
here
on
the
left.
In
addition,
cities
can
choose
to
have
optional
elements.
The
existing
general
plans
includes
the
optional
community
services
and
facilities
element
and,
as
part
of
this
update,
we
will
be
adding
an
arts
element
and
an
economic
development
element.
M
M
So,
in
addition
to
the
general
plan
update,
we
have
some
implementation
tasks
that
we
are
also
including
that
includes
senate
bill
743,
which
requires
the
city
to
use
vehicle
miles
traveled
instead
of
delay-based
metrics,
such
as
level
of
service
when
evaluating
environmental
impacts.
M
An
environmental
impact
report,
which
is
why
we're
here
tonight,
a
municipal
service
review,
which
is
a
document
that's
required
by
lafco.
Should
the
city
want
to
amend
this
fear
of
influence
and
potentially
soi
amendments
and
annexations,
depending
on
what
the
decision
makers
decide
to
do
for
hollister's
future
growth
pattern?
The
next
slide,
please.
M
So
to
date,
we've
held
six
community
workshops,
seven
general
plan
advisory
committee
meetings
and
we've
offered
two
online
surveys,
and
through
this
process,
we've
heard
that
these
are
some
of
the
key
issues
that
dental
plan
updates
should
address.
So
growth
management
circulation,
including
expanding
the
travel
choices,
people
have
to
navigate
throughout
the
city
economic
development,
including
expanding
local
jobs
and
retail
options
in
the
city,
maintaining
the
community's
identity
and
pursuing
high
quality
design
and
increasing
the
variety
of
housing
types
in
hollister
that
are
affordable
to
all
income
levels.
D
G
Okay,
so
some
of
you
may
know
seqa
is
the
state's
premier
environmental
protection
and
disclosure
law.
One
of
the
one
of
sequo's
mechanisms
for
analyzing
a
project
is
an
eir
and
informational
documents
under
seqa
disclose
information
about
the
effects
that
a
project
could
have
on
the
environment,
but
note
that
that
is
not
effects
that
the
environment
would
have
on
the
project.
G
So
sequa
does
allow
the
incorporation
of
mitigation
as
goals,
policies
and
actions
of
the
project
as
part
of
the
project
in
order
to
reduce
or
avoid
potential
impacts
to
the
environment
as
a
result
of
future
development,
in
which
case
the
project
would
be
self-mitigating
and
then
the
eir
must
be
certified
prior
to
project
approval,
and
it's
important
to
note
that
the
information
contained
in
a
sql
document
does
not
approve
or
deny
a
project
or
a
plan.
Its
purpose
is
solely
to
write
to
provide
information
regarding
the
project
to
help
the
decision
makers
next
slide.
G
Please
so.
Environmental
review
documents
can
be
a
project
or
program
level.
Project
level
documents
are
used
for
specific
construction
level
projects,
whereas
program
level
eirs
are
appropriate
when
a
project
consists
of
a
series
of
actions
related
to
the
issuance
of
rules,
regulations
and
other
planning
criteria,
and
so
they
therefore
do
not
evaluate
impacts
of
future
construction
level
projects,
and
so
because
the
hollister
general
plan
update
and
climate
action
plan
are
long-range
policy
documents.
We
will
be
preparing
a
program
level
eir
and
preparing
a
program
level.
G
G
The
scoping
meeting
tonight
focuses
only
on
input
of
the
scope
of
the
eir,
not
on
the
project
components,
and
this
is
only
one
of
the
opportunities
for
people
to
provide
input
on
the
eir.
Following
this,
we
will
conduct
the
environmental
review
and
put
together
the
draft
eir,
and
then
there
will
be
a
45-day
public
comment
period
and
public
hearing
similar
to
tonight
on
the
contents
and
conclusions
of
the
draft
eir.
G
Then
we
will
put
together
the
final
eir,
which
will
include
all
of
the
comments
that
were
made
on
the
draft
eir
as
well
as
responses
to
those
comments,
and
then
the
complete
eir
comes
before
the
planning
commission
meeting
to
for
review,
followed
by
the
city
council
meeting
where
they
will
consider
the
certification
of
the
final
eir
next
slide.
Please,
this
slide
lists
all
of
the
topics
that
will
be
evaluated
in
the
eir
that
are
relevant
to
the
proposed
project.
G
G
So
this
slide
contains
information,
which
was
also
included
in
the
notice
of
preparation
on
how
to
submit
comments
on
the
eir,
either
verbally
at
tonight's
hearing,
mailed
physically
to
the
city
of
hollister
development
services,
department
or
email
to
abraham
prado,
with
the
city
of
hollister,
with
the
appropriate
subject,
line
of
hollister
gpu
2040
climate
action
plan
and
soi
eir
and
for
comments
shared
tonight
as
mentioned
earlier.
Our
goal
here
is
really
to
just
listen
to
any
community
members
and
any
concerns
and
input
regarding
the
content
of
the
eir
next
slide.
Please.
G
So
the
next
steps
include
the
following
tentative
schedule.
The
city
is
currently
accepting
scoping
comments
during
this
30-day
period
and
will
then
conduct
the
environmental
review
through
the
end
of
the
year
with
the
goal
of
publishing
the
draft
eir
early
next
year,
followed
by
the
final
eir
in
the
spring
and
finally
general
plan.
Adoption
and
consideration
of
the
final
eir
certification
next
summer,
and
so
this
includes
my
portion
of
the
presentation.
G
A
Thank
you,
mr
chair
members
of
the
planning
commission.
So
this
this
really
was
a
it's
a
requirement
for
the
environmental
impact
report
that
we
will
be
preparing
to
have
a
scoping
meeting
in
front
of
the
planning
commission
to
get
any
any
potential
comments
that
you
may
have,
as
as
lindsay
was
indicating
we
do
have.
We
have
had
already
six
workshops.
As
you
had
indicated,
seven
general
plan
advisory
committee
meetings.
A
Already
number
eight
is
coming
up
on
tuesday,
so
we
have
gathered
quite
a
bit
of
information
already
and
we
are
looking
forward
to
coming
coming
before
you
in
may
to
provide
you
with
a
summary
in
regards
to
the
policy
options
that
we
are
currently
preparing
for
for
the
for
the
general
plan
update
and
we're
hoping
that
in
june
we
go
before
the
city
council.
We
actually
already
have
a
special
meeting
set
up
for
june
22nd
with
the
city
council.
It's
going
to
be
a
study
session.
A
It's
it's
going
to
be
all
about
the
policy
options
of
the
general
plan,
and
so
we're
excited
about
that
and
in
our
reports
today
we
will
be
asking
for
a
potential
special
planning
commission
meeting
for
may
for
us
to
discuss
those
those
same
policy
options
that
would
be.
A
A
The
virtual
audience
we
do
not
have
any
any
speakers,
chairperson,
you
boy.
D
C
Your
you
know
yourself,
as
well
as
your
your
peers
that
are
on
the
committee.
D
C
You
know,
thank
you
thank
the
community
that
that's
been
involved,
because
you
know
it's
it's
our
plan,
not
just
specific
individuals
right.
So
it's
great
to
hear
you
know,
I
I've
been
keeping
an
eye
here
and
there
and
kind
of
going
back
and
watching
it's
great
to
hear
different
ideas
and
see
what
people
think.
D
C
It's
good,
I
mean
it'd,
be
nice
if
it
if
it
happened,
you
know
quick
sooner
rather
than
later,
but
it's
good,
though,
that
we're
going
through
this
process-
and
I
definitely
you
guys-
should
definitely
have
your
work
cut
out
for
you
for
a
while,
so
you'll
be
busy,
but
yeah.
We
definitely
appreciate
everyone's,
especially
from
the
community.
Their
input
on
this.
B
I'm
just
I'm
very
thankful
to
be
part
of
this
committee
and
I
think,
as
a
as
a
body
at
home,
working
with
place,
works,
they're,
doing
a
fantastic
job
and
there's
quite
a
bit
of,
like
you
say,
quite
a
bit
of
information
to
go
over
in
preparation,
and
I'm
just
just
hoping
that
I
know
that
from
the
public
workshops
that
we
are
getting
quite
a
bit
of
public
input,
but
I
just
I'm
just
hopeful
that
we
encouraged
get
the
word
out
by
whatever
source
to
let
the
general
public
know
that
we
are
discussing
a
item
and
the
hollister
general
plan,
which
is
extreme
vital
importance
to
our
future.
B
Our
collective
future
and,
like
I
totally
agree
with
cell,
is
that
we're
all
stakeholders
in
this
process,
so
I'm
just
hoping
that
we
continue
get
the
word
out
bilingually.
You
know,
and
it
continue
to
make
progress
on
this
and
I'll,
be
looking
forward
on
tuesday
to
discussing
some
of
the
more
specific
items
regarding
the
climate
action
plan
and
also
the
local
mitigation
plan.
That
is
on
schedule
for
apr
april.
B
A
There's
no
new
business
tonight,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
any.
A
Yes,
we
do
have
a
planning
department
report.
A
My
colleague
eva
asked,
if
I
can
address
the
planning
commission
this
evening,
to
see
if
we
can
set
aside
some
a
potential
date
we
can
we
can
see
if,
if
based
on
our
agenda,
maybe
we
can
maybe
even
have
this
for
a
regular
planning
commission
meeting
of
may
may
27th,
but
if
it
is
gonna
kind
of
kind
of
a
heavy
agenda,
we
would
rather
just
see
if
right
now,
we
can
kind
of
agree
to
a
potential
special
planning
commission
meeting
of
to
discuss
the
policy
options
that
we
have
been
generating
over
the
past
two
or
three
gpac
meetings.
A
We
have
mainly
been
focusing
on
policy
options
for
our
general
plan
update,
and
so
we
would
like
to
bring
it
before
you
and
eventually
to
the
city
council
as
well,
but
we
would
like
to
have
that
discussion
and
see
if
potentially,
we've
been
we're.
Thinking
of.
Maybe
since
we
were,
we've
been
having
our
gpac
meetings
on
tuesdays,
if
possibly
tuesday
may
27th,
it
would
be
tuesday
may
25th
at
six
o'clock
if
that
would
be
a
potential
date
for
you
all
to
be
available.
A
If,
if
we
get
to
the
point
where
we
may
not
have
a
heavy
planning
commission
meeting
next
month,
we
can,
we
can,
let
you
know
see,
maybe
we
can
keep
it
on
on
that
last
thursday
as
part
of
it.
But,
as
you
know,
even
today,
with
with
two
items
we
didn't
get,
we
didn't
get
into
this
until
8
o'clock
so
and-
and
that
would
be
a
nice,
it's
going
to
be
a
good
presentation
regarding
all
the
policy
options
that
have
been
discussed
touching
out.
A
All
the
different
subjects
that
that
were
presented
today
of
the
different
land
use
different
elements
such
as
land
use,
the
economic
development,
one
that
is
new
to
our
general
plan,
now
arts
and
so
forth.
So
in
the
arts
element
too.
D
B
A
That
that
is
another
new
one
that
the
state
requires
us
to
to
to
look
into
in
our
in
our
eir.
That
was
not
one.
When
we
adopted
our
general
plan.
B
Our
current
general
plan
back
in
2005
so
we'll
have
three
we'll
have
the
arts
element.
The
economic
development
and
the
environmental
justice
elements
will
be
three
that
will
be
new,
that
we
were
not
covered
in
the
2005
general
plan.
It's
exciting.
D
May
25th
potentially
may.
A
And
and
we'll
know,
maybe
within
the
next
two
to
three
weeks,
if
we,
if
we
don't,
have
a
heavy
planning
commission
meeting
for
the
20
for
for
our
our
regular
one
is
going
to
be
may
27
thursday
may
27th,
then
we
can
maybe
make
the
determination
and
let
you
know
that
we
will
keep
it
at
one
meeting.
A
But
it
would.
B
A
D
A
D
C
A
Okay,
we
will
let
you
know
within
the
next
two
two
to
three
weeks.
If
we
do
need
this
special
meeting
or
we
can
just
generate
it
in
our
fourth
thursday,
on
on
a
regular
meeting
of
may
27th.
B
Okay,
great,
thank
you
any
other
reports
from
the
planning
department.
Thank
you.
A
There
are
no
other
reports,
chairperson
hillboy.
Thank
you
so
much.
B
B
B
It
all
behooves
us
to
protect
it
and
preserve
it,
the
best
we
can
for
future
generations.
So
it's
a
very
important
day,
and
that
concludes
my
planning
commission
report.
C
Oh,
I'm
just
going
to
say
something
real,
quick
and
and
and
in
spanish
to
to
hopefully
that
some
of
the
our
spanish-speaking
residents
encourage
them
to
participate
in
in
the
general
plan.
Update
great.
So
you
know
ci
residentes,
the
the
hollister
casta
parsipando
and
excuse
me
because
my
spanish
isn't
the
greatest.
In
la
plan
general,
the
hollister.
C
C
It's
basically
just
said:
you
know
kind
of
encouraging
them
to
to
especially
for
the
the
spanish-speaking
residents
of
hollister
to
participate
in
the
process
and
that
we
do
have
spanish
speakers
available
and
and
if
they
have
any
questions,
we
do
have
people
that
that
can
answer
them
and
and
guide
them,
and
just
remind
them
that
this
is
everyone
city.
C
C
C
You
know
and
we
encourage
everybody
to
participate,
and
you
know
I
I
just
reminded
them
that
they
pay
taxes
here
they
buy,
they
purchase
homes,
they
their
kids,
go
to
schools,
they
use
parks
so
to
encourage
everybody
to
participate,
and-
and
you
know
I,
from
speaking
to
staff-
I
know
it's-
you
know
everyone's
sincere
of
reaching
out
to
everybody
and
getting
as
much
so
just
trying
to
encourage
them
to
participate
great.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
Mr
chair,
for
me,
yes,
thank
you,
commissioner.
That
was
wonderful.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
doing
that.
You
you
just
put
put
something
in
my
mind
right
now
and
I
was
receiving
texts
as
you
were
speaking
from
my
colleagues
as
well,
so
we're
all
on
the
same
wavelength.
A
Part
from
commissioner
mora's
statement
we
are
actually
in
in
our
continued
attempts
to
actually
include
the
spanish-speaking
population.
As
you
all
know,
they
they
do
have
a
very,
very
interested
and
very
they
want
to
be
a
part
of
they
want
to
be
involved
and
we've
seen
when
we
pre
covered
we've
seen
this.
A
This
whole
auditorium
filled
when
we
had
to
do
translation
because
people
care
and
they
want
to
come
in
and
and
we
know
that
everybody
has
a
life,
and
we
know
that
everybody's
busy,
but
we
are
doing
that,
reach
reach
out
and
we're
hoping
we're
we're
hoping
to
have
a
good
participation
on
the
may
6th
meeting.
We
have
a
tentative
meeting.
It's
going
to
be
spanish
speaking
only
it's
going
to
be
a
workshop
that
we'll
have
right
now
we're
working
in
collaboration
with
the
whole,
the
hollywood
youth
alliance,
to
help
us
spread.
A
The
word
be
able
to
provide
pamphlets
and
in
spanish
through
different
different
organizations
and
different
places.
You
know
hoping
the
best
to
to
not
be
exposed
either
because
it's
a
challenge
right
now
with
coed,
but
we're
hoping
to
have
a
spanish
speaking.
Only
community
workshop
may
6
from
6
00
pm
to
8
pm.
Well,
we
hope
we
hope
to
hear
from
everybody
who's
spanish
speaking
to
to
be
a
part
of
it.
So
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
to
to
give
the
report.
K
Can
I
quickly
add-
and
I'm
so
sorry
I
just
want
to
make
everyone
aware
that
a
survey
for
the
local
hazard
mitigation
plan
has
been
posted
on
to
hollister
hollister2040.org.
K
If
you
go
to
the
website,
you'll
see
that
it
is
listed
under
hazard
plan,
that's
available
both
in
english
and
in
spanish,
and
I
just
also
want
to
inform
the
planning
commission
that
eva
and
myself
did
attend
the
youth
committee
meeting
last
thursday
april
15th
to
inform
the
youth
council
of
what
the
general
plan
is
and
invited
them
to
participate
in
any
way
that
they
see
fit.
So
we
just
wanted
to
let
you
guys
know
that
as
well.
Thank.
D
A
A
You
you
guys
can
use
that.
Thank
you
for
that,
commissioner
fernandez.
We
we
actually
did.
I
was
very
fortunate,
not
this
past
saturday,
but
the
saturday
before
to
be
able
to
present
to
the
loo
like
they.
They
actually
allowed
us
to
be
in
their
agenda,
and
so
I
had
the
privilege
to
present
a
great
great
group
of
people
and
lulac
they
have.
They
have
from
youth
members
to
former
superintendent
of
schools
like
max
sanchez,
former
teachers,
current
teachers,
principal
of
the
high
school
ver.
A
It's
such
a
great
organization
that
does
a
lot
for
for
our
community,
and
so
yes
thank
you
for,
for
letting
us
know
we
we
did
reach
out
to
them
and
they
they
were
on
board.
They
were
like
whatever
we
can
do
to
help,
please
you
know
reach
out
to
us
and
so
very,
very
good
contact.
Thank
you.
Mr
fernandez,
appreciate
that.