►
From YouTube: Gov Hol PC 20210225
Description
Hollister Planning Commission Meeting February 25, 2021
A
B
C
C
E
E
F
E
E
E
D
H
D
I
B
All
right,
I
guess
you
know
before
we
call
roll.
I
should
congratulate
our
newest
commissioner.
Mr
mora
welcome
aboard
welcome.
F
H
B
Thank
you,
and
can
we
have
a
an
approval
for
the
minutes?
Is
there
any
discussion
in
regards
to
the
the
minutes
from
the
last
meeting.
M
B
Thank
you
right,
communications
from
the
public
on
items
not
listed
on
the
agenda.
This
is
the
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
items
not
on
the
agenda
and
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
planning
commission.
When
the
planning
commission
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
commission.
Each
speaker
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
Please
note
that
the
state
law
prohibits
the
planning
commission
from
discussing
or
taking
action
on
any
item
not
on
the
agenda.
H
L
Yes,
thank
you,
I'm
not
very
good
at
this,
but
I
did
send
in
an
email
explaining
what
my
concern
is
and
it's
to
do
with
an
eva
that
we
have
for
our
little
13
lot,
subdivision
on
the
southwest
corner
of
south
street
and
west
side
boulevard,
and
when
I
approached
fire
marshal
bedola
a
number
of
weeks
ago
to
find
out
the
particulars
of
the
bollards
that
are
required
for
that
60
that
for
that
26
foot
wide
eva,
he
stated
that,
in
his
opinion,
the
eva
was
unnecessary
in
further
discussions,
and
my
understanding
is
that,
if
a
if
a
subdivision
has
one
access
street
and
the
require
there
is
no
requirement
for
an
eva
if
all
the
homes,
in
that
one
access
subdivision
have
fire
sprinklers.
L
The
access
road
on
brennan
lane
from
south
street
the
subdivision
there
has
been
completed.
There
are
38
homes
in
it
and
all
homes
are
fire
sprinkler.
Al
13
lots
will
also
be
fire
sprinklers
and
so
we're
requesting
that
that
condition
of
the
tentative
map
and
our
improvement
plans
for
an
eva
be
removed.
L
It's
26
feet
wide,
it's
continuous
from
the
street
running
east
west
in
the
subdivision
it
within
the
within
four
or
five
feet.
It
spills
out
onto
west
side
boulevard,
which
is
quite
busy,
and
so
I
spoke
with
commissioner
stevens
over
the
last
week
or
two.
It
was
advised
that
I
present
this
at
the
public
comment
today
and
that
maybe
we
plan
to
address
it
fully
for
the
for
the
next
commission
meeting.
Thank
you.
H
Mr
chair,
would
you
like
me
to
address
very
briefly.
I
know
that
we
can't
necessarily
discuss
public
hearing
items,
but
if,
if
I
mean
items
in
the
communications
from
the
public,
but
if
you'd
like
there
is
a
process
for
an
applicant
to
submit
a
change
in
the
conditions
or
an
amendment
of
the
conditions
that
would
have
to
apply
to
the
development
services
planning
division-
and
I
sent
mr
zeituck
an
email
today
indicating
that
he
would
for
him
to
do
so,
and
we
can
certainly
process
that
application.
H
The
application
take
a
look
at
it.
Very
briefly.
The
eva
requirement
was
a
condition
of
approval
by
the
planning
commission.
At
that
time,
I
don't
think
chief
padoya
was
our
development
review
committee
representative.
It
was
a
different
chief
and
and
the
planning
commission
founded
as
a
requirement
to
put
as
a
condition
of
approval
to
have
the
eva.
Certainly
he
has
his
opportunity
to
come
back
before
the
planning
commission
if
you'd
like,
and
we
can
process
that
application.
I.
B
B
All
right,
then,
we'll
move
forward
with
the
public
hearings.
First
item
on
the
agenda
site.
D
Mr
chair,
if
I
may
on
item
number,
one
huboy
architecture
has
provided
architectural
services.
Therefore,
in
compliance
with
governor
code,
section
87103,
I
must
recuse
myself
because
of
conflict
due
to
financial
interest.
N
O
Did
it's
open
on
the.
N
Okay,
so
the
item
before
you
is
site
and
architectural
review
2020-10
and
conditional
use
permit
21-1.
N
The
applicant
is
requesting
cyto
architectural
approval
to
construct
a
20
100
square
foot,
industrial
warehouse
building
on
a
1.63
acre
lot
located
at
1940,
airway
drive
and
the
industrial
business
zoning
district.
The
applicant
is
also
requesting
approval
of
a
conditional
use
permit
to
approve
a
reduction
in
the
amount
of
required
parking
spaces.
N
N
And
administrative
uses
and
the
remaining
seven
thousand
four
hundred
square
feet
for
general
industrial
and
manufacturing
uses.
The
applicant
has
indicated
that
the
other
space
will
be
made
available
to
lease
leases
will
have
the
option
to
rent
up
to
ten
thousand
fifty
square
feet
which
will
have
up
to
one
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet
of
total
office
space
and
admin
uses.
N
The
applicant
has
also
cited
that
one
two
five
individual
units
could
be
created
within
this
space,
depending
on
whatever
the
leasing
desires
next
slide,
please,
the
northern
elevation
will
face
the
frontage
of
the
building
and
will
face
airway
drive.
The
front
exterior
will
have
vertical
textured
panels
and
two
towers
which
highlight
the
front
of
the
two
spaces.
N
Each
tower
is
proposed
to
be
approximately
33
feet
in
height,
which
is
approximately
seven
feet
above
the
26
foot.
Roofline,
the
exterior
facade
of
the
towers
will
be
finished
in
smooth
horizontal
panels.
Each
store
front
will
have
a
large
four
planal
window
with
a
door
and
steel
awnings
above
it
above
the
awning.
There
will
be
a
space
for
future
signage
and
will
be
reviewed
as
a
separate
permit
with
the
building
department.
N
At
the
top
of
each
tower,
there
will
be
an
incorporation
of
an
open
steel
tower
frame.
Detail
placed
in
between
the
towers
will
be
12
aluminum
framed
windows.
The
illustrations
suggest
that
the
windows
will
be
clustered
in
a
group
of
six
three
on
the
bottom
level
and
another
three
on
the
top,
with
a
small
portion
of
the
exterior
facade
in
between
the
two
groups.
This
architectural
detail
provides
a
thoughtful
visual
cue
to
suggest
the
two
main
buildings
within
the
one,
which
also
provides
an
overall
cohesiveness
to
the
exterior
of
the
building's
facade.
N
The
western
elevation,
which
is
the
right
side
of
the
building,
will
be
covered
in
vertical
textured
stucco
panels.
There
are
eight
aluminum
square
framed
windows
placed
at
the
top
of
the
building,
which
are
clustered
in
two
groups.
There's
a
single
steel
roll-up
door
with
a
dark
scarred
light
compliant
light
above
it
in
the
center
of
the
elevation
and
steel
doors
proposed
to
the
right
of
it.
Another
steel
swinging
door
is
shown
towards
the
far
left
of
the
building's
facade
next
slide.
Please.
N
N
Four
steel
roll-up
doors
with
each
having
a
dark
sky
compliant
light
above
it
and
steel
swinging
doors
to
the
right
of
it
are
spread
evenly
across
the
length
of
the
exterior
towards
the
right
side
of
the
elevation.
Two
aluminum
square
frame
windows
are
placed
at
the
top
of
the
building
next
slide.
Please.
N
The
applicant
is
proposing
40
parking
spaces
which
is
23
parking
spaces
short
of
the
required
23
parking
spaces,
as
indicated
in
the
hollister
municipal
code.
Pursuant
to
the
code
municipal
or
excuse
me,
manufacturing
industrial
general
uses
required
two
parking
spaces
for
each
three
employees
or
one
space
for
each
400
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area,
whichever
is
greater,
plus
one
space
for
each
vehicle
operated
in
connection
with
each
use
on
site.
In
addition,
the
office
and
administrative
uses
require
one
space
for
each
250
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area
based
upon
these
requirements.
N
The
applicant
has
submitted
a
letter
to
the
city
of
hollister's
planning
commission
requesting
a
reduction
in
parking
stating
that
the
site
does
not
have
or
does
have
enough
spaces.
Excuse
me
to
accommodate
the
sheet
metal
factory
and
the
leasi
space.
The
sheet
metal
systems
inc
operates
with
six
employees
at
the
office
and
eight
to
ten
employees
that
perform
installation
jobs
at
the
work
sites.
So
they're
not
present
at
the
building.
N
The
city's
parking
regulation
requires
30
stalls
to
the
leasing
space.
The
proposed
site
plan
indicates
40
parking
spaces
each
or
sorry
which
include
two
ada
accessible
parking
spaces
and
four
saws
which
have
clean
air
van
pool
or
ev
parking.
This
equates
to
obesity
area
meeting
the
city's
requirement,
while
still
providing
the
parking
necessary
for
the
sheet
metals
eight
to
ten
employees.
N
N
The
project
proposes
11
130
square
feet
of
landscaping
across
the
entire
project
site.
This
equates
to
approximately
15
percent
of
the
total
lot
area
which
meets
the
city's
landscaping
requirements.
The
majority
of
the
landscaping
will
be
along
the
airway
drive
frontage
of
the
property
in
the
northwestern
corner
of
the
property,
which
proposes
a
picnic
area
with
four
picnic
tables
in
a
shaded
employee,
eating
area.
N
F
N
N
Furthermore,
the
property
is
located
within
zone
six,
which
is
the
traffic
pattern
zone
of
the
hollister
municipal
airport,
cohesive
land
use
safety
zone.
A
condition
has
been
attached
in
the
resolution,
which
will
require
the
applicant
to
go
before
the
airport
land
use
commission
to
get
a
consistency,
determination
prior
to
pulling
a
building
permit.
N
Also,
the
subject
parcel
is:
within
the
hollister
airport
business
park
subdivision
there
was
a
mitigated
negative
declaration
adopted
for
the
airport
business
park
subdivision.
The
project
does
require
modifications
to
the
study
and
applicable
mitigation
measures
from
the
mitigation
monitoring
and
reporting
project.
N
Our
program
have
been
incorporated
as
part
of
the
conditions
within
the
project
staff
finds
this
project
to
be
consistent
with
the
general
plan
and
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
in
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motions:
one
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
in
architectural
review,
2020-10,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution
and
two
adopt
a
resolution.
Approving
conditional
use,
permit
2021-1,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
P
G
Okay,
so
the
the
applicant
is
asking
for
a
conditional
youth
permit
to
have
less
parking,
so
how
I
I
may
have
missed
how
deficient
will
the
what
the
will
the
parking
be
versus
where,
where
that's
supposed
to
be.
G
G
Okay,
so
so
the
okay-
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
what
you're
saying
so,
if
the
business,
if
someone
purchases
property
and
proposes
to
bring
in
a
different
business
they're
going
to
have
to
bring
in
a
business,
that's
going
to
be
compliant
with
the
parking
situation
as
it
is.
That
is
correct.
Okay,
thank
you.
I
don't
have
any
other
questions
right
now.
J
I
have
a
couple
questions
go
ahead,
okay,
so,
first,
my
first
question
is
around
it's
same
sort
of
along
the
same
lines
as
commissioner
henderson,
the
spaces
that
are
on
the
other
side
of
the
building
that
will
occupy
the
new
tenants
that
have
that
are
not
identified.
Yet.
J
N
So
the
way
that
we've
conditioned
this
project
is
that
any
new
leasi
that
comes
in
would
also
have
to
go
through
a
zoning
verification
letter,
as
indicated
the
way
that
the
leasi
side
of
the
building
is
being
laid
out
is
there
could
be
one
person
that
comes
in
or
there
can
be
up
to
five.
N
I
should
say
units.
Excuse
me,
not
people,
so
with
that.
Anyone
that
would
come
into
that
leasi
spot
would
have
to
come
to
the
city
for
a
zoning
verification
letter
and
again,
that's
when
staff
would
look
at
things
like
parking
and
ensuring
that
they
meet
any
other
requirements,
whether
it's
through
the
hollister
municipal
code
or
building
buyer,
the
building
codes,
depending
what
goes
in
there.
N
J
This
current
reduction
in
the
requirement
is
only
as
it
relates
to
the
sheet
metal
business.
Is
that
correct?
Okay,
yes,
okay,
second
question
is
or
it's
more
of
a,
can
you
tell
me
more
kind
of
a
question
about
the
larger
vehicles,
so
so
part
of
of
what's
happening.
What's
going
to
be
happening?
Is
the
storage
of
these
large
metal
pieces,
and
so
it's
going
to
require
you
know
large
vehicles.
So
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
what
those
large
vehicles
are?
J
How
large
are
we
talking
about
like
a
large
large
van
large
truck
large
semi,
and
then
what
would
the
parking?
What
could
we
expect
for
the
parking
for
those
vehicles.
N
Sorry,
I'm
trying
to
see
if
the
applicant
is
on
the
line,
because
I
think
they
would
be
better
suited
to
identify
the
type
of
vehicles
that
they
use.
He.
H
N
I
don't
know
matt
or
nick
if
either
of
you
would
like
to
address.
Commissioner
steven's
question.
Q
Q
So
it's
long
enough
for
a
tractor-trailer
combination,
a
very
large
tractor
trailer
can
actually
come
in
the
driveway
park
temporarily
in
the
loading
zone,
the
materials
will
be
unloaded
and
stored
inside
the
building
and
there's
enough
room
for
that
vehicle
to
exit
by
driving
forward
and
leaving
out
yeah
out
the
eastern
side
of
the
site
same
thing
with
fire
truck
access,
exact,
exact,
same
route.
J
J
And
one
so
so
I
thank
you
for
clarifying
that.
I
appreciate
that,
because
that
makes
a
lot
more
sense
in
it
and
I'm
wondering,
however,
if
there's
a
need-
and
this
is
for
the
planning
staff-
is
there
a
need
to
be
more
clear
about
those
large
vehicles
in
the
condition
so
that
there
is
an
expectation
that
so,
if
there's
like
two
semis
coming
in
at
the
same
time
that
there's
a
plan
for
how
to
accommodate
those
two.
H
That's
a
really
good
question,
commissioner
stevens,
I'm
not
sure
if
I
thought
I
saw
mark
falgo
on
on
there
as
well
or
acting
city
engineer,
but
one
thing
that
we
can
include
if,
if
it's
okay
with
the
commission
is
possible
requirement,
adding
the
condition
of
requirement
of
signage
indicating
no
more
than
one
semi
at
a
time
and
and
something
to
that
effect
mark
mark,
if
you're
there
would
you
would
you
consider
anything
else,.
R
R
N
R
This
is,
I
think
that
this
is
really
more
of
an
operations
thing
if,
if
the
operations
are
such
that
they're
only
going
to
have
one,
you
know
at
a
time
for
deliveries
and
it's
more
of
a
storage,
size
plus
delivery
capability
factor
than
than
anything
to
determine
how
many
trucks
they
would
ever
have
there
at
one
time.
J
C
You
that's
better,
okay,
great,
so
excuse
me,
yes,
green
lights
on.
C
I
remember
coming
to
many
meetings
and
councilwoman
lenoir
used
to
always
have
a
she
used
to
forget
to
push
the
button,
so
he
couldn't
hear
her
all
the
time.
So
that's
why
I
don't
think
I
remembered
and-
and
I
want
to
apologize
in
advance
in
case
I
don't
use
the
correct
terminology.
C
So
no
worries
be,
please
be
gentle,
so
one
one
of
the
concerns
I
had
which
two
previous
commissioners
addressed
was
the
issue
of
parking
as
well,
but
hearing
that
if
there
is
a
change
in
ownership
of
the
property
or
even
if
sheet
metal
systems
decides
to
close
down
and
lease
out
their
part
of
the
property
that
whoever
decides
to
lease
or
purchase
the
building
will
have
to
come
back
to
the
planning
commission
for
a
zoning
verification
letter.
So
that
eases
some
of
my
concerns
that
I
had
so
that's
good
to
know.
C
I
I
do
also
understand,
commissioner
stevens
her
concern
about
having
multiple
big
rigs
coming
through,
but
but
I'm
not
sure
if
there
really
is
a
a
simple
solution
for
that
again.
Unless
the
property
owner
has
people
out
there
policing
it's
it's
very
difficult
to
do,
even
if
you
put
signage,
which
which
could
be
a
good
idea.
C
But
you
know,
in
my
opinion,
I
think
it'd
be
a
waste
of
money
to
put
that
sign
up,
because
the
fact
that
if
there's
a
big
rig
in
the
back
already
in
the
loaning
in
the
loading
zone,
there's
no
way
for
another,
a
delivery
truck
to
know
that
someone's
back
there
to
not
go
back
there,
especially
because
you're
going
to
have
potentially
up
to
five
different
companies,
leasing
on
the
other
side
of
the
property.
C
So
and
not
to
say
that
it's
not
an
issue.
Could
I
definitely
understand
that
issue,
especially
if
there's
an
emergency
situation
where
now
you
know,
especially
towards
the
back
of
the
building,
could
impede
the
access
for
for
emergency
services.
It's
understandable,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know
without
a
really
clear-cut,
simple
solution.
I
I
I
can't
see
us
kind
of
denying
this
this
approval,
just
for
that
fact
alone
and
it
looks
like
even
though
it's
hard
to
tell
because
it's
not
the
actual
size.
C
It
looks
like
there's
plenty
of
enough
space
where
there,
if
there
is
one
vehicle
back
there
for
for
delivery,
potentially
two
that
that
you
know
there
are
a
couple
spots
that
could
potentially
be
impacted
negatively.
But
then
that's,
where
kind
of
we
have
to
use
our
our
verbal
skills
and
and
go
talk
to
people
say
you
know
I
have
to.
I
have
to
move.
Could
you
please
back
up
or
whatnot,
but
but
that's
really
about
it,
I
mean
you
know.
It
looks
great.
I
I.
B
I
I
wasn't
concerned
about
it
without
interrupting
mr
moore,
just
before
we
get
ahead
of
ourselves,
we're
still
in
the
in
the
phase
of
the
staff,
giving
the
report
and
asking
the
staff
we
still
need
to
allow
for
public
hearing
okay
before
we
give
our
kind
of
viewpoint
or
yeah
or
concerns.
B
With
that
being
said,
thank
you,
mr
mora.
Is
there
any
other
questions
for
staff
at
this
time.
Q
Good
evening,
commissioners,
staff
and
friends
present
at
the
meeting,
I
really
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
speak.
I'm
the
engineer
and
speaking
on
behalf
of
sheep
metal
systems.
Nick
huff
is
the
owner.
He
currently
operates
out
of
a
shop
at
his
house
on
tevis
trail
and
desires,
to
move
his
business
out
here
and
build
a
very
nice
looking
building
and
also
provide
opportunity
for
other
business
owners
that
may
be
looking
for
lease
space
in
the
area.
Q
Airway
drive
is
50
feet
wide,
curb
to
curb
and
it's
the
cul-de-sac
and
we're
fairly
close
to
the
end
of
the
cul-de-sac.
So
there
isn't
a
lot
of
through
traffic
and
the
50
foot
width
would
allow
a
truck
you
know
to
park
temporarily
on
the
side
and
still
leave
40
feet
of
of
street.
Q
You
know,
which
is
essentially
four
lanes
of
traffic,
still
open
if
someone
needed
to
park
and
wait
on
airway
drive,
while
someone
was
unloading,
I
also
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
parking
requirements,
even
though
we're
we're
shy.
Quite
a
few
stalls,
the
the
parking
requirements,
in
my
opinion,
are
kind
of
high
intensity.
Q
Q
Q
There
was
a
great
example
of
a
business
just
like
this.
Gabilan
welding
was
in
town
for
60
years.
They
operated
on
san
felipe,
they
occupied
25
000
square
feet,
and
there
were
only
five
or
six
guys
that
worked
there.
They
fabricated
metal
and
did
welding,
and
I
was
a
frequent
customer
of
theirs.
They
had
about
five
parking
stalls
and
whenever
I
went
there
it
was
it
was
never
an
issue.
There
was
always
a
place
to
park.
Q
Another
thing
I'd
like
to
point
out
regarding
the
parking
is:
there's
enough
space
in
the
building
for
some
of
the
employees
to
actually
park
their
vehicles
inside
the
building,
and
it's
not
uncommon
for
them
to
do
that.
Q
We
just
didn't
indicate
that
on
the
drawings,
the
the
commissioners
seem
to
be
pretty
understanding
and
pathetic
towards
us
right
now,
and
I
would
just
like
to
add
that
every
project
needs
to
be
evaluated
on
its
own
merits
and
that,
although
the
parking
requirements
should
be
taken
into
consideration,
the
specifics
of
the
project
should
also
too,
and
it
seems
like
it
seems
to
me,
like
everyone
is
doing
that,
and
I
really
appreciate
that
and
appreciate
your
time
and
consideration
that,
on
behalf
of
the
owner,
if
there's
any
questions,
I'm
here
and
I'm
I'm
pretty
sure
nick's
available
as
well.
B
B
B
All
right,
well,
I'm
going
to
just
say
you
know,
I
think,
amber
addressed
the
parking
working
with
the
applicant
in
regards
to
meeting
their
needs,
and
you
know
if
the
building
use
becomes
something
different,
there's
plenty
of
space
to
revisit
within
the
configuration
of
the
site
to
add
additional
parking,
and
I
I
I'm
gonna
say
that
you
know
I
think
this
utilizes,
what
they're
they're
looking
for,
and
that's
all
I
I
had
to
say
in
regards
to
that
any
other
comments
from
the
commissioners.
B
Okay,
what
is
the
the
pleasure
of
the
commissioners
on
this.
K
G
I
can
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
are
we
going
to
so?
Should
I
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve?
Should
we
do
one
motion
at
a
time
for
each
item
I
mean
for
the
sagging
architecture
and
the
conditional
use
permit
correct.
G
H
Second,
mr
chair,
before
you
call
for
the
rest
of
the
vote,
I
was
just
instructed
by
a
city
council
attorney
mr
jason
epperson,
that
if
it's
okay
with
you
and
the
commission,
instead
of
calling
out
for
a
regular
vote,
if
it's
okay,
if
we
can
go
roll,
calvo
and
I'll
I'll,
be
happy
to
call
everybody's
every
planning
commission's
name.
B
Not
a
problem,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay,
we've
got
a
motion
and
a
second,
and
if
we
can
have
a
roll
call
vote.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair
commissioner.
Stevens
hi
commit
commissioner
maura.
C
B
B
Okay,
the
second
item:
what
is
the
the
pleasure
of
the
commission
on
that?
One.
G
C
H
B
B
Good
ready,
okay,
moving
on
to
agenda
item
number
two
site
architecture:
review
2020-17:
can
we
have
the
staff
report
on
that.
S
Thanks
abraham
good
evening,
commissioners,
the
applicant
is
requesting
site
and
architectural
approval
for
the
construction
of
an
862
square
foot
coffee
shop,
building
on
the
0.62
acre
site
identified
as
parcel
number
seven
of
the
pro
approved.
Excuse
me,
however,
farm
subdivision
and
the
general
commercial
voting
district
of
the
city
hollister,
the
862
square
foot
building
will
accommodate
a
drive-through
coffee
shop,
featuring
a
double
lane
drive
through
and
a
walk-up
service
window
for
customers.
S
S
As
stated,
the
project
proposes
a
construction
of
an
862
square
foot
coffee
shop,
building
with
the
drive
through
your
window,
which
will
be
facing
north.
That
features
a
double
lane
drive
through
with
stacking
for
up
to
18
vehicles
and
a
separate
covered
service
window
for
a
walk-up.
For
customers
located
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
drive-thru,
which
would
be
facing
the
south
side
of
the
driveway,
there's
no
proposed
seating
indoors
or
outdoors
and
the
indoors
of
the
restaurant
is
solely
for
production
purposes.
T
S
The
proposed
coffee
shop
building
will
be
constructed
of
special
material
around
the
body
of
the
building
the
brick
veneer
base.
Each
elevation
varies
in
the
color
of
the
siding
and
whether
there
is
a
brick
liner
present.
However,
the
primary
color
makeup
is
simple,
with
the
bold
colors
of
dark,
gray
or
ash,
and
the
navy
blue,
the
brick
veneer
is
of
a
similar,
dark,
gray
or
ash
color.
The
building
will
include
a
white
dutch
bros
wall
sign
and
a
white
windmill
logo,
which
will
be
featured
in
the
tower
element
which
we
see
on
the
screen
here.
S
Lighting
was
proposed
throughout
the
project
site
to
the
use
of
pedestrian
scale,
lighting
and
lighting
fixtures
on
the
exterior
walls
of
the
proposed
coffee
shop
building,
as
well
as
security
lighting
within
the
parking
lot
and
the
drive-through
area.
The
lighting
should
be
directed
towards
the
project
site
which
will
meet
the
requirements
of
the
hollister
municipal
code,
section
17-1609-0
lighting
outdoors.
S
North
elevation,
which
is
on
the
bottom
of
the
slide,
faces
east
park
street
and
would
be
located
approximately
50
feet
from
the
street.
The
north
elevation
features
the
dry
through
window
with
a
10
foot
six
inch
in
height
awning.
The
north
elevation
elevation
excuse
me
is
composing
speckled
siding
that
is
both
navy,
blue
and
dark
gray.
S
One
fourth
of
the
facade
proposes
a
dark
grey
fiber
cement
sighting.
The
north
elevation
features
both
horizontal
and
vertical
facade
breaks,
which
creates
a
visual
interest
that
will
be
visible
from
park
street.
The
north
elevation
will
only
feature
the
white
windmill
logo
on
the
tower
element.
The
east
elevation,
which
is
at
the
top
of
the
screen.
The
physical
building,
is
proposed
to
be
finished
in
stucco
material
and
of
all
dark
gray
or
ash
color.
S
There
will
be
no
windows
on
the
side
of
the
building,
as
it
would
be
where
the
drive
through
vehicles
wrap
around
to
the
drive-through
service
window.
There
will
be
three
doors
with
metal
on
and
canopy,
which
provide
a
horizontal
support.
Break
from
this
elevation,
the
drive-through
canopy
walk-up
service
window
canopy
and
the
tower
are
visible.
S
Lastly,
this
elevation
proposes
a
dutch
bros
wall
sign
consisting
of
all
white
capital
channel
letters
with
three
horizontal
lines
underneath
in
the
bold
color
from
top
to
bottom,
consisting
of
yellow
red
and
blue,
leading
to
the
cursive
word
coffee
in
red,
with
the
yellow
background
next
license.
Thank
you.
S
The
salvation,
which
is
on
the
bottom
of
the
screen,
is
much
like
the
north
election.
It's
proposed
to
be
finished
in
speckled
material,
with
approximately
two-thirds
of
the
sighting
consisting
of
navy,
blue
and
one-third,
consisting
of
dark
gray
or
ash
color
siding
the
base
of
the
building
will
include
the
dark,
gray,
brick
veneer.
This
elevation
features
a
300
square
foot,
almond
canopy,
with
a
metal
fascia
over
the
customer
walk-up
service
window
to
provide
weather
protection.
S
The
canopy
will
feature
three
bricks
in
your
column
and
is
10
feet:
6
inches
in
height,
this
elevation
features
a
wall
sign
and
an
led
menu
board.
The
wall
side
will
be
all
white
capital
channel
letters,
dutch
bros,
with
the
horizontal
lines
underneath
and
the
bold
colors
of
yellow
red
and
blue,
leading
to
the
cursive
word
of
coffee
and
red
lighters
and
a
yellow
background
to
access
the
customer
walk-up
service
window.
There
will
be
an
ada,
accessible
pedestrian
pathway
that
is
oriented
to
the
interior
portion
of
the
site.
S
The
pedestrian
pathway
is
accessible
from
the
project
designated
parking
spaces
with
a
six
foot
wide
crosswalk
path
that
continues
past
the
traffic
traction
closure.
Excuse
me
and
two
proposed
retention
ponds
leading
to
the
300
square
foot
patio
area.
This
project
is
not
proposing
any
outdoor
seating.
S
The
west
elevation,
which
is
at
the
top
of
the
page,
is
proposed
to
be
a
speckled
material
with
the
navy,
blue
siding
and
the
base
of
the
dark
grey
ash.
Brick
veneer.
This
facade
also
features
the
side
of
the
tower
element
which
is
made
up
of
fiber
cement,
siding
similar
to
the
other
elevations.
There
are
horizontal
elements
that
break
up
the
building:
mapping
with
three
connected
windows
and
the
metal
awning
overhead,
much
like
the
east
and
south
elevations.
S
The
project
is
proposing
welfares
with
the
dutch
bros
name
and
windmill
logo,
as
stated
as
well
as
directional
and
menu
signage.
The
project
signs
shall
meet
the
requirements.
The
city
of
hollister
municipal
code,
section
1720
and
the
applicant
shall
obtain
proper
administrative
permits
prior
to
installation.
The
directional
signage
is
exempt
per
section,
1720-060
exempt
sign,
as
mentioned.
This
project
is
proposed
in
hollister
farm
subdivision
and
will
be
subject
to
the
hollister
farms.
Master
plan.
Excuse
me
master
sign
program
that
was
adopted
by
the
planning
commission
on
june
29th
2017..
S
For
the
circulation
and
parking,
the
project
proposes:
sharing
the
driveway
access
onto
east
park
street,
with
the
abutting
retail
development
to
the
east
and
south
of
the
project.
Site,
ingress
and
egress
would
be
from
east
park
street.
The
project
was
proposing
two
bicycle
parking
spaces
and
eight
parking
spaces,
including
188,
accessible
space
with
an
eight
foot
wide
ada
loading
space
adjacent,
the
ada
space
is
closest
to
the
building
and
the
other.
The
remaining
spaces
are
to
the
south
of
the
building.
S
There
is
a
pedestrian
path
from
the
seven
parking
spaces
that
leads
to
a
walk-up
service
window.
Additionally,
the
ada
space
connects
the
page
pedestrian
path
leading
to
the
walk-up
service
window.
For
the
hollister
municipal
code,
section
17,
18,
060
number
of
parking
spaces
required.
The
total
card
are
five
parking
spaces
and
one
bicycle
parking.
S
The
project
is
meeting
and
exceeding
the
vehicle
and
bicycle
parking
requirement.
All
parking
is
located
south
and
oriented
towards
the
interior
portion
of
the
hollister
farms
subdivision.
There
is
a
reciprocal
access
agreement
between
all
parcels
and
commercial
buildings
in
the
hollister
farm
shopping
center.
So,
in
addition
to
the
8
parking
spaces
that
are
located
on
the
parcel,
all
parking
spaces
in
the
shopping
center
are
accessible
for
customers
of
the
business.
S
S
The
project
proposes
vehicle
stacking
for
up
to
18
vehicles
in
the
dedicated
queuing
lanes
without
encroaching
into
the
drive
aisle,
which
means
and
exceeds
the
minimum
requirement
of
six
vehicles
in
advance
of
the
service
window
per
section,
1722
090
of
the
hollister
municipal
code.
The
queuing
lanes
will
feature
a
double
lane
drive
through
with
each
lane
12
foot
wide,
which
meets
section
1722.090
of
the
hollister
municipal
code.
S
In
the
statement
of
operations,
dutch
bros
is
proposing
to
implement
a
runner
system
that
is
designed
to
increase,
speed
and
efficiency
for
the
drive-through.
The
runners
are
able
to
charge
people
in
line
so
at
the
service
window
a
customer
is
only
picking
up
their
order.
The
proposed
business
model
is
to
decrease
vehicle,
wait.
S
For
landscaping,
there
is
supposed
landscaping
along
the
perimeter
of
the
site.
This
includes
street
trades
along
the
projects
and
along
east
park
street,
as
well
as
in
the
parking
island.
S
Next
slide,
please,
as
the
staff
finds,
that
the
project
is
consistent
with
the
general
plan
and
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
to
receive
all
in
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
and
architectural
review.
2020.
S
B
Any
additional
questions
for
steph.
D
Yes,
I
do
have
a
question.
This
is
so
this
is,
I
know,
there's
a
walk-up
window
here,
but
it's
all
the
floor
plan
is
all
production
oriented.
So
it's
not
a
retail
coffee
that
you
can
go
in
and
order
your
cup
of
coffee,
it's
all
done
from
your
vehicle.
Is
that
pretty
much
correct
to
say
that.
S
Yeah
so
there's
the
drive-through,
where
you
can
order,
obviously
the
coffee
and
then
the
walk-up
window,
which
is
only
to
order
and
pick
up
there,
will
be
no
seating
whatsoever.
Outdoors
and
indoors.
Customers
cannot
access.
D
B
J
I
do
have
a
question
so,
first
of
all,
I
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
pretty
excited
about
the
dutch
brother
round,
because
I
have
been
to
oregon
quite
a
bit
and
I
know
that
they
have
they're
all
over
the
place
in
around
the
portland
area
and
they
are
strict.
It's
all
strictly
drive
through,
so
it's
really
convenient
and
it's
easy
and
and
the
coffee's
really
good.
My
question
is
around
the
double
drive
through,
so
at
what
point
do
they
expect
or
what?
J
J
So
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
asking
asking
the
question
right,
but
is
this
second
drive
through
going
to
be
opened
up
at
some
point
later
on
in
the
future?
Once
you
see
that
your
customer
base
is
increased,
or
is
it
something
that,
like
on
a
daily
basis,
you
would
have
available
to
be
open
or
closed
as
needed.
S
I
was
going
to
say,
I
think
this
is
one
for
the
applicant.
Their
statement
of
operations
just
goes
into
detail
about
the
runner
system
that
they
have
going,
but
they
don't
indicate
whether
they
will
always
use
the
double
drive
through
lane
or
not.
I
do
think
the
applicant
should
be
on
the
line.
H
B
All
right:
well,
if
there's
no
other
questions
from
the
commissioners
to
staff,
we
can
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
public
hearing,
we'll
open
it
up
for
the
public
at
701.
H
H
M
Yeah
this
is
this
is
nick
wecker
with
barghouse,
and
I
asked
the
unmuted.
I
was
just
looking
to
answer
some
of
the
questions.
M
I'm
a
senior
planner
with
arkhouse
and
here
are
representing
dutch
pros
as
the
applicant
for
this
project
in
regards
to
the
drive
through
it's
a
double
drive
through,
but
both
lanes
are
open
at
all
times,
and
so
what
happens?
Is
a
customer
would
just
pick
the
shorter
of
the
two
lines
and
enter
that
particular
lane,
and
like
was
mentioned
in
the
presentation,
the
order
is
actually
taken
at
at
the
window
or
with
a
a
runner
employee
from
dutch
rosette.
M
We
have
four
to
five
that
work
outside
the
building
are
able
to
take
orders
as
well.
So
there's
no
traditional
speaker
box
or
anything
like
that
for
ordering
it's
just.
You
pick
the
shortest
line,
and
then
you
you
roll
up
to
the
window
and
when
it's
your
turn,
you
place
your
order.
G
Okay
yeah,
so
I
had
a
question
about
the
the
lack
of
outdoor
seating.
So
is
that
the
normal
business
model
for
dutch
bros,
or
is
this
kind
of
unique
to
the
hollister
location.
M
Oh,
it
is
that
it
is
the
typical
standard
that
they
don't
provide
any
exterior
tables
or
gathering
areas
outside
of
just
that
that
pickup
window,
that
offers
a
an
alternative
option
for
customers
to
to
park
and
and
pick
up
their
order,
but
it's
something
that
they
do
listen
to
their
customer
base,
and
this,
like
was
mentioned,
maybe
a
good
candidate
at
tables
in
the
future.
But
our
proposal
currently
right
now
for
for
opening
likely
there
won't
be
any
tables
in
there.
But
we
do
acknowledge.
There's
there's
some
flexibility
in
the
future.
H
As
nick
mentioned,
there's
others
on
the
line,
but
so
far
there's
no
other
race
hands.
So
at
this
time
there's
no
other
speaker
cards,
mr
chair.
B
bring
this
back
to
the
the
commission.
Any
further
discussion
from
the
commissioners
on
this
item.
D
Well,
I
think,
with
a
drive
through
use
and
I've
seen
these
before
presented
to
us.
The
first
thing
I
look
for
is
where
the
residential
areas
are.
That
would
be
approximate
to
the
proposed
drive
through
because
of
the
potential
of
sound
impacts,
and
I
I
would
say
that
we're
this
proposed
location
is
we're
well
away
from
any
residential
use
on
on
the
overall
contextual
plan.
D
That
being
said,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
location
for
a
drive-through
right
there
and
the
architecture
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
development.
That's
going
on
there
there's
considerable
landscaping.
That,
I
think
is,
is
good.
It's
a
good
design
in
terms
of
landscaping
and
site
circulation.
So
I
really
don't
on
this
particular
item.
I
don't
have
any
any
real
issues
with
it.
H
B
B
B
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair
assistant,
planner,
amber
cameron
will
be
providing
the
staff
report.
Thank
you.
N
The
applicant
is
requesting
certain
architectural
approval
to
demolish
the
existing
2851
square
foot,
drive-through
restaurant
building
and
construct
a
new
1997
square
foot
drive-through,
building
with
outdoor
dining
area
on
their
approximately
0.84
acre
lot,
which
is
located
at
40
san
felipe,
located
east
of
san
felipe
road
and
north
of
santa
ana
in
the
north
gateway
zoning
district
of
the
city
of
hollister,
the
proposed
drive-through
restaurant
will
operate
seven
days
a
week.
Their
operating
hours
are
between
seven
a.m
to
two
a.m.
N
The
the
dining
portion
of
the
restaurant
will
operate
between
7
a.m,
to
11
30
p.m,
with
the
exception
of
friday
and
saturday
evenings,
when
the
restaurant
will
remain
open
until
12
30
a.m,
the
drive-thru
hours
throughout
the
week
will
be
from
7
a.m.
To
11
or
12
am
excuse
me,
with
the
exception
of
the
friday
and
saturday,
when
the
drive-through
will
be
open
until
1am,
there
will
be
a
single
12
to
13
foot
drive-through
lane
that
will
have
the
ability
to
queue
up
nine
vehicles
in
total.
N
The
main
body
of
the
building
will
be
finished
in
gray,
vertical
siding
with
sorry,
with
dark
gray
trim.
Several
of
the
elevations
feature
large
panel
windows,
which
are
highlighted
by
purple
paneling.
This
same
purple,
paneling,
is
featured
on
the
north
and
south
elevations,
serving
as
accent
walls.
N
The
east
elevation
will
face
san
felipe
road.
A
23
foot
corner
tower
will
be
constructed
on
the
left
side
of
the
building.
It's
proposed
to
be
covered
in
weathered
rust
panels
with
signage
at
the
top.
The
main
siding
will
be
gray,
horizontal,
horizontal
siding
and
trimmed.
In
dark
gray,
this
elevation
will
feature
a
mandoor
with
three
large
windows
and
four
small
rectangular
windows
above
above
the
windows
is
a
black
metal
awning.
The
windows
will
be
framed
with
purple
paneling
above
and
below.
N
The
northern
elevation
will
face
the
parking
lot
of
the
subject
parcel
and
will
serve
as
the
main
entry
point
of
the
restaurant.
This
elevation
features
two
large
windows
also
framed
with
purple
paneling.
The
metal
canopy
will
divide
the
window
from
the
top
two
panels
towards
the
center
of
the
elevation
will
be
a
tower
that
architecturally
defines
the
entrance
of
the
building.
N
N
N
N
N
The
southern
elevation
of
the
building
will
face
towards
quick,
stop
and
is
the
side
of
the
building
where
the
drive-through
pickup
window
will
be
located.
This
elevation
features
three
separate
sections
of
purple
panels
with
gray
downspouts
in
between
them.
The
first
section
will
be
made
up
of
seven
panels
purple
panels.
N
This
section
will
provide
a
location
for
an
exterior
mural
with
exterior
lighting
fixtures
above
it.
The
second
section
will
have
three
subsections,
each
with
seven
purple
rectangular
panels.
The
first
subsection
provides
for
an
additional
exterior
mural
located
locations.
Excuse
me
with
exterior
lighting
above
it.
The
second
and
third
sub
sections
will
feature
the
pickup
window
and
a
metal
metal
canopy
above
it.
N
N
Landscaping
will
consist
of
trees,
shrubs
oriental
grasses
and
ground
cover
proposed
around
the
perimeter
of
the
site
and
within
the
median
and
encaps
through
the
parking
lot.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
landscape
12
590
square
feet,
which
is
approximately
34
of
the
36
915
square
feet,
parcel
per
section.
N
17.08.020
table
17.08-3
commercial
district
development
regulations.
The
applicant
meets
and
exceeds
the
five
percent
landscaping
requirement.
The
existing
building
in
sight
will
be
demolished,
but
it
will
have
all
new
landscaping
proposed
perimeter.
Trees
that
have
been
preserved
are
will
be
preserved,
were
feasible.
N
Plant
materials
have
been
selected
that
will
perform
well
in
the
special
conditions
of
the
city
of
hollister
area
sunset
zone,
14.,
all
existing
landscape
planting
on-site
will
be
either
removed
or
replaced
with
the
exception
of
existing
healthy
trees.
They
will
remain
if
they're
overgrown,
they
will
be
pruned
in
shape
to
allow
more
lighting
low,
hardy
trees,
shrubs
and
ground
cover
are
proposed
for
the
landscaping
around
the
site.
N
Special
considerations
have
been
provided
in
selection
of
plant
materials
that
respects
the
needs
of
the
restaurant,
as
well
as
the
customers.
Clear
and
secure
views
of
the
corridor
has
been
provided
to
ensure
the
safety
of
the
customers
entering
the
building,
as
well
as
moving
around
the
site.
Next
slide.
N
N
The
two
project
driveways
along
san
felipe
road,
are
limited
to
right
in
and
ride
out
on
movements
only
to
discourage
vehicles
for
making
a
left
turn
into
and
out
of
the
project
site.
The
starbucks
project,
which
was
sne
2019-18
directly
across
from
the
subject
site,
was
conditioned
to
install
flexible
delineators
or
a
similar
vertical
barrier
within
the
meeting
of
san
felipe
road
adjacent
to
the
project
site,
a
temporary
measure
and
to
enter
into
a
deferred
improvement
agreement
for
improvements,
including
a
raised
median.
The
project
applicant
shall
be
required
to
install
the
raised
median.
N
Starbucks
has
been
conditioned
to
put
in
the
delineators,
however,
if
this
project
were
to
go
first,
they
would
be
conditioned
to
put
in
the
delineators
and
starbucks
would
have
to
pay
their
fair
share
cost.
N
The
drive
aisle
changes
to
a
one-way
path,
the
restaurant's
primary
parking,
which
gives
the
patrons
the
option
to
enter
the
drive
through
or
allow
them
to
circle.
The
outer
perimeter
this
one
way
merges
into
a
two-way
drive:
vial,
that's
shared
between
the
proposed
project
and
the
adjacent
business.
Quick,
stop
a
gas
station
and
convenience
store
that
leads
to
the
southeast
driveway.
N
This
second
driveway
would
allow
for
patrons
to
make
a
right
turn
only
onto
san
felipe
road.
In
addition,
should
a
patron
choose
to
use
this
driveway
as
their
main
point
of
entry,
they
can
make
an
immediate
right
turn
onto
the
one-way
drive
aisle
that
would
allow
them
to
connect
to
the
drive
aisle
which
eventually
connects
to
the
drive-through.
N
N
Next
slide,
please
it's
based
upon
the
city
of
hollister's
municipal
code,
the
parking
requirements
established
for
a
fast
food
counter
service
use.
The
project
would
require
to
provide
the
greater
of
the
following
to
requirements:
five
parking
spaces
plus
one
parking
space
for
every
three
seats
in
the
dining
area:
four
five
spaces,
plus
one
space
for
every
100
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area.
N
As
you
can
see
on
the
table,
one
would
allow
for
approximately
14
is
required
and
then
the
other
would
be
25,
and
then
we
take
whatever
is
greater
from
this
table.
In
this
case,
the
25
parking
spaces
is
what
is
required
based
upon
the
city's
code
and
the
hollister
building
code,
section
1,
1,
b
502
when
accessible
space
is
required
and
that
one
space
can
be
counted
within
the
25
parking
spaces
and
count
towards
the
overall
25..
N
And
then
sorry,
two
more
back
from
which
we
came
so
going
the
opposite
direction.
F
H
N
N
In
addition,
there
is
the
availability
of
a
reciprocal
parking
that
could
take
place
at
the
bottom.
Yes,
where
the
arrow
is
showing
these
parking
spaces
could
be
considered
with
the
overall
drive-throughs
restaurants
count
of
their
parking.
If
a
reciprocal
access
agreement
was
provided
to
the
city,
meaning
that
there
is
a
shared
agreement
between
quick
stop
and
the
restaurant
that
those
parking
spaces
could
be
used
for
their
patrons.
However,
at
this
time
the
city
does
not
have
any
evidence
of
a
reciprocal
parking
agreement.
N
N
17.06.080
at
this
time,
the
applicant
has
been
conditioned
to
work
with
the
city
to
amend
the
site
plan
to
meet
the
minimum
of
25
parking
stalls,
as
required
by
the
municipal
code.
If
the
planning
commission
is
willing
to
grant
a
variance
in
the
minimum
parking
spaces
that
is
subject
to
the
parcels
needs,
the
applicant
will
need
to
apply
for
a
cup
which
is
a
conditional
use
permit.
N
At
the
time
of
the
application
is
received,
a
review
of
the
location,
design,
configuration
and
potential
impact
of
the
proposed
use
would
be
conducted
by
comparing
it
to
the
established
standards.
In
addition
to
this
consideration,
it
would
be
noted
that
a
cup
runs
with
the
land,
meaning
that
the
provisions
shall
be
continued
to
be
valid
upon
a
change
of
ownership
of
the
site,
business
service,
use
or
structure
that
was
subject
of
the
permit.
N
The
planning
commission
will
need
to
direct
staff
how
they
would
like
to
proceed
if
they
would
like
us
to
bring
back
a
resolution
for
a
conditional
use
permit.
If
that
is
their
direction,
this
site
requires
one
bicycle
parking
space.
The
applicant
is
providing
three
hoops
for
the
bicycle
racks,
which
can
accommodate
up
to
six
bikes,
so
they
meet
and
exceed
the
requirement
for
bicycle
parking.
N
The
applicant
is
proposing
the
trash
enclosure
at
the
northwest
corner
of
the
lot.
The
enclosure
will
be
approximately
20
feet
in
length,
12
feet
wide
and
six
feet
high
and
will
be
constructed
constructed
out
of
cmu,
with
concrete
plaster
painted
to
match
the
building.
The
trash
enclosure
will
have
an
18
gauge,
painted
metal,
rib
box
gate
which
will
be
painted
to
match
the
building's
trim
and
a
mandoor.
N
Can
you
please
advance
the
slide
and
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
and
architectural
review
2020-1
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution?
Are
there
any
questions
for
staff.
H
Thank
you,
commissioner.
H
So
the
the
proper
way
to
to
process
the
the
exception
would
it
be
through
a
through
a
conditional
use
permit,
as
amber
had
indicated
due
to
the
fact
that
the
conditional
use
permit
allows
for
the
exceptions,
the
variance
it's
a
very
good.
It's
a
very
good
question,
because
the
variance
does
allow
for
exceptions
as
well,
but
the
difference
is
that
the
variants
would
have
to
show
a
finding
that
they
could
not
meet
the
parking
requirement
because
of
the
because
of
a
certain
certain
aspect
of
the
project
site
layout
that
that
is
occurring
on
this
site.
D
H
And
and
in
which
a
variance
could
be
granted,
and
so
therefore,
therefore,
since
the
site
is
flat
and
unless,
unless
there
is
something
that
that
that
can
be
considered
a
site
peculiarity,
the
other,
the
other
procedural
route
would
be
the
one
that
amber
mentioned
for
a
conditional
use.
Permit.
Thank.
D
You
you're
welcome.
Do
we
also
on
another
topic?
Do
we
have
in
anywhere
in
the
municipal
code
that
pertains
to
screening
hvac
equipment
from
the
roof.
N
D
They
show
that
the
the
hvac
roof
mounted
hvac
equipment
is
protruding
above
the
parapet
wall,
and
I
think
I
have
to
be
somewhat
stringent
on
this,
because
I
know
in
many
communities
they
do
require
commercial
buildings
to
screen
that
hvac
equipment,
and
if
this
is,
if
we
have
that
on
the
books,
it's
in
the
municipal
code,
I
think
they
need
to
work
on
a
little
bit
more
and
provide
screening
for
that
either
by
raising
the
parapet
wall
or
providing
a
separate
roof
screen
element.
B
J
I
just
have
a
clarifying
question
related
to
the
number
of
spaces
so
amber.
You
were
made
a
comment
about
not
recommending
approval
of
the
parking
spaces
that
were
like
behind
the
drive
through
it
along
that
property
because
it
may
be
obstructed
because
of
what's
going
on
in
the
drive-through
right.
So
the
total
number
right
now,
which
the
total
number
is
22.,
does
that
include
those
spots
or
do
they
not
include
those
spots.
J
So
then,
I'm
so
my
follow
question
to
that
is
if
the
second
drive-through
lane
was
open
and
available.
J
Alleviate
the
concern
of
those
parking
spots
that
are
along
that
wall,
because
you'd
have
cars
going
in
to
both
lanes
right
to
the
drive-through,
so
they
wouldn't
get
backed
up
so
easily.
If
they
only
have
one
lane,
then,
if
you
have
like
11
cars
for
example,
then
they
would
be
they
would
be
outside
of
the
of
the
drive-through
lane,
they'd
be
waiting
to
get
into
the
drive-through
lane.
But
if
you
had
the
two
open,
then
you
would
allow
for
more
cars
to
enter.
Therefore,
not
blocking
that
area
that
would
block
those
parking
spaces.
N
For
me,
sort
of
but
I'll
try
to
answer
and
if
not
maybe
abraham
or
mark
can
jump
in.
So
our
main
concern
is
that
with
leaving
those
parallel
parking
spaces,
it
narrows
down
the
width
of
the
drive
aisle
to
about
17
feet
and
it
needs
to
be
about
20
feet
to
meet
the
fire
code.
So
that's
the
concern
with
having
them
placed
where
they
are
in
addition
to,
as
you
can
see
where
they
line
up
towards
the
trash
enclosure.
G
G
Yes,
so
amber
you
mentioned
about
the
median,
so
I'm
assuming
you're
you're,
saying
that
the
median
will
be
going
in
on
the
street
to
prevent
maybe
people
from
turning
left
out
of
the
out
of.
N
Yes,
so
at
this
time
there
is
no
proposed
set
plan
for
a
raised
median,
as
we
would
know
it
right
now
we
have
another
applicant
starbucks
that
just
recently
came
through
where
they
were
also
conditioned
in
the
same
way
that
this
project
has
and
that
they
will
be
providing
or
installing
delineators
as
a
temporary
means
within
the
median,
but
at
this
time
the
actual
construction
of
a
median,
as
we
typically
know
it.
That
is
not
what
is
being
considered
tonight.
G
Okay,
delineators
meaning
some
kind
of
I'm
not
really
sure
what
you
mean
by
that.
N
So
I'm
trying
to
think
of
where
you
probably
see
them
a
delineator
is
typically
like
a
longer
piece
of
plastic,
and
then
it
has
like
a
reflective
piece
of
material
on
top
and
they're,
usually
stuck
to
the
ground,
with
a
very
kind
of
cohesive
material.
R
Okay,
a
lot
of
them
a
lot
of
them
use
sorry
to
interrupt,
but
there's
a
lot
of
them
used
in
the
new
downtown
area.
The
those
around
the
the
intersections,
in
particular.
B
K
This
is
taco.
Bell
has
been
operating
there
for
24
over
24
years
now,
so
we
have
a
pretty
good
understanding
of
float,
ebb
and
flow
of
the
traffic
and
what's
needed
and
what's
required,
we
did
at
the
city,
cities
asked
we
did
go
ahead
and
have
a
traffic
study
done
for
this
site
and
it
was
pretty
telling
for
us
and
one
of
the
things
that
I'd
like
two
things
on
that
traffic
study.
K
I'd
like
to
address
one
was
the
amount
of
drive-through
stacking
that
the
traffic
study
was
anticipating
is
not
realistic
and
we've
had
discussions
with
the
traffic
engineer
about
this.
We
know
what
this
restaurant
does.
It's
been
there
for
a
long
time
we
actually
went
out
and
did
our
own
study
and
sat
out
there,
where
the
traffic
engineer
didn't
bother
to
go
out
to
the
site
and
do
counts.
K
K
We
also
know
that
using
the
traffic
study
numbers
of
trips
to
this
site,
which
they
do
state
that
in
the
am
we're
going
to
be
19
trips
less
than
we
are
now
and
in
the
pm,
we're
going
to
be
14
trips
less
to
the
site,
so
less
traffic
to
the
site
is
what's
being
anticipated.
K
That
said,
we
feel
that
the
second
drive-through
is
we'd
like
to
have
it
we're
not
anticipating
to
have
it.
It
came
about
because
of
the
traffic
study
that
was
done
in
the
number
of
cars
that
were
anticipated
in
that
traffic
study,
and
it
was
some
convoluted
way
they
did
of
calculating
how
many
cars,
when
they
didn't
actually
go
out
there
we've
done
the
this
applicant
has,
I
believe,
a
large
number
of
taco
bells
in
the
south
bay
area.
K
K
K
That
said,
I'd
like
to
talk
about
the
parking
given
and
again
you
know
kind
of
live
by
the
sword
die
by
the
sword.
K
K
We
decided
at
when
designing
this
site.
We
also
had
issues
with
storm
water
requirements,
new
storm
water
requirements-
don't
let
you
have
as
much
paving
as
that
what's
out
there,
and
so
we
had
to
balance
the
parking
with
the
storm,
rider
requirements
and
etc,
etc,
down
the
road
here.
So
this
is
the
design
we
came
up
with
just
I
apologize
just
couple
days
ago,
we
found
out
about
the
the
20
foot
rule
instead
of
the
17
rule,
foot
rule
for
the
drive
aisle
to
the
north
of
us.
K
The
building
is
built
right
to
the
property
line,
so
we
have
some
options
of
reducing
the
setback
there
to
get
that
extra
three
feet
are
reducing
the
drive
through
lane
by
a
couple
feet
and
getting
to
20
feet
in
so
there's
options
there
that
are
pretty
straightforward,
that
we
would
not
have
to
do
too
much
work
as
far
as
far
as
the
parking
block
in
the
trash
enclosure.
This
is
pretty
normal.
K
That
spot
is
usually
taken
up
by
an
employee
and
an
employee
moves
his
car,
it's
an
issue
but
most
of
the
time-
and
I
would
say,
99
percent
of
the
time
trash
is
picked
up
and
not
operating
hours.
So
there's
not
going
to
be
cars
blocking
the
front
of
the
trash
enclosure,
so
that,
I
think,
is
you
know
not
really
an
issue
with
blocking
that
trash
enclosure.
K
There
are
a
couple
other
issues
that
we
are
are
concerned
about
and
we've
tried
to
address
them
and
we
thought
we'd
address
it,
but
it's
back
in
this
staff
report
number
32,
the
median
we
don't
make
left
turns
out
of
there
anyway,
and
that
median
is
not
going
to
be
cheap.
The
last
one
we
did
was
pretty
close
to
half
a
million
dollars
so
and-
and
you
know
it's
kind
of
a
lot
of
work-
a
lot
of
cash
that
a
restaurant
like
this
is
barely
surviving,
really
can't
afford
to
be
putting
into
this.
K
We
have
agreed
to
that.
We
could
put
a
bond
or
cash
in
an
account
of
up
to
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
take
care
of
the
off-site
improvements,
but
we
need
some
type
of
guarantees
that
you
know
what
what
the
costs
are
going
to
be
here.
That
brings
me
to
the
other.
One
is
number
51
of
the
undergrounding
of
the
utilities.
K
So
those
are
a
couple
of
the
items
that
we're
concerned
about
and
hope
to
address,
and
so
the
parking
we
feel
can
be
easily
worked
out
without
a
variance,
and
we
can
hopefully
get
the
other
two
items
to
a
little
bit
more
discussion
on
it.
We've
been
at
this
for
better
part
of
a
year
and
I've
gotten
some
comments
back
from
the
city
about.
They
would
agree
to
participation
rather
than
require
us
the
utilities,
but
in
a
staff
report
staff
reports
written
that
we're
going
to
do
the
underground.
So
that's
we're
concerned.
K
So
we
wonder
if
that
can
be
reworded
or
testimony
can
be
taken.
That
will
be
a
participation,
not
a
requirement,
and
that's
really,
I
believe,
all
the
comments.
The
one
thing
that
amber
did
not
address
is,
we
do
have
some
outdoor
dining
and
that
is
for.
We
would
like
to
limit
the
amount
of
people
inside
the
restaurant
even
further
than
the
28
seats.
K
We've
gone
ahead
and,
like
I
mentioned,
we
redo,
it
reduce
the
seating
percentages
to
like
30
we've
reduced
the
square
footage
of
the
building
like
54,
so
there's
some
substantial
reductions
here
of
the
building
and
the
seating
that
will
be
transferred
into
the
amount
of
sales.
Unfortunately,
but
you
have
to
look
at
trying
to
cut
back
to
survive
here.
D
Well
before
before
I
I
did
have
a
question
for
mr
moss.
Mr
moss,
are
you
so
you
represent
the
applicant.
K
H
F
K
I'm
the
architect
for
the
project.
I
represent
the
honor,
which
is
actually
dad
carter.
D
K
D
D
D
Because
the
traffic
report
says
that
if
it's
over
60
minutes,
you
should
have
more
queuing
distance,
you
know
you
know,
I'm
just
going
with
at
this
time,
I'm
just
going
with
the
traffic
report
by
kim
lee
horn,
the
other,
the
other
one
of
the
couple
things
that
I
can
see
that
the
stop
sign
was
posted,
that
you
included
a
stop
sign
right
where
you
come
out
from
the
the
queuing
to
the
building
edge
there
there's
a
couple
things
that
the
traffic
report
mentioned,
that
I'd
like
to
get
your
input
on
is
one
is
that
it
says
that
a
minimum
of
one
loading
space
is
required
for
the
project.
K
That's
not
accurate,
there's
a
number.
I
can't
read
it.
It's
too
small
back
towards
the
rear.
Next
to
the
drive
through
lane
to
the
west
of
the
drive-through
lane,
there's
a
parking
there's,
a
loading
zone.
N
D
The
the
final
comment
that
I
had
thank
you.
The
final
comment
that
I
had
is
that-
and
this
is,
I
think,
it's
important
in
terms
of
the
landscaping
where
you
you,
exit
the
site
or
and
you're
exiting
the
site.
The
the
landscaping
right
there
at
the
front
of
san
felipe
is
recommended
to
be,
I
think
at
least
the
maximum
three
and
a
half
feet
high.
D
Do
you,
your
proposed
landscaping
doesn't
delineate
what
what
the
new
landscaping
will
be
do.
Can
you
comment
on
that
is?
Is
it
gonna
be
ground
cover
or
some
low
line,
shrubs.
K
Yes,
it
should
be
there
on
the
landscape
plan
and
our
proposal
there
is
is,
would
be,
like
you
said,
low
low
ground
cover.
We
do
not
like
shrubs
getting
up
to
three
and
a
half
feet
along
there
for
a
number
of
reasons.
We'd
rather
keep
it
low
to
the
ground.
Maybe.
D
K
K
B
B
A
Right,
thank
you
for
having
this
hearing.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
have
a
conversation
with
you
and
express
some
feelings
and
some
of
the
criterias
that
we're
being
being
pushed
upon
us.
I
guess
this
was
an
existing
taco
ball.
As
mr
ross
said.
For
quite
some
time,
we've
reduced
our
our
interior
counts.
We've
reduced
our
footprint
on
the
property.
A
We've
done
pretty
much
everything
to
try
to
reduce
the
size
of
our
unit
to
get
more
available
parking
in
here.
Some
of
the
big
hidden
costs
associated
with
the
project
like
putting
a
median
down
the
middle.
An
understood
is:
is
there
going
to
be
a
turn
lane
indoor
property,
no
one's
willing
to
answer
any
of
these
questions?
A
The
only
response
that
I
have
to
that
is
that
there's
a
tangible
amount
of
money
that
can
be
put
into
a
project
to
where
the
project
has
an
outcome
that
is
successful
at
a
million
dollars.
I
know
this
is
relevant
to
the
core
at
a
million
dollars
that
that
place
only
pays
for
itself
about
three
years
before
my
contract
expires
and
that's
25
years.
A
So
that's
22
years
being
paying
it
off
and
breaking
even
the
only
reason
we
have
two
taco
bells
in
the
in
your
town
is
to
try
to
develop
a
strategy
with
with
the
community
where
those
those
traffic
centers
are
divided
across
the
town.
We
do
this
in
each
of
our
areas,
because
we
we
have
thought
about
the
community
so
in
gilroy,
in
morgan
hill
in
hollister,
and
we
do
two
in
each
location
and
we
separate
them
on
major
arteries
that
way
the
everyone's
not
coming
to
one
and
it's
not
creating
a
problem.
A
If
we
cannot
accommodate
ourselves
within
those
financial
restraints
that
we
have
the
reality,
then
this
project,
this
project
dies
and
it
you
know,
my
finances
have
already
said:
kill
it
kill
it
kill
it,
and
mr
mawson
myself
keep
coming
back
going.
But
what?
If?
What?
If
and
there
seems
to
be
no
movement
and
then
once
we
get
movement,
it
seems
to
find
its
way
back.
A
A
A
We've
been
trying
to
get
this
thing
through
for
well
over
a
year,
so
I'm
running
out
of
I'm
running
out
of
gumption
in
capacity
no
disrespect
to
anyone
here,
but
that
that's
kind
of
where,
where
we
are,
if
we
can't
come
to
a
reasonable
agreement-
and
I
think,
we're
being
overly
reasonable,
then
we
just
have
to
kill
the
project
and
move
on
to
just
having
one
taco
ball
in
town
and
doing
the
best
we
can
with
that
one,
and
that's
pretty
much
closing
to
my
conversation.
F
G
So
I
guess
I'm
kind
of
this
is
one
of
the
first
times
that
I've
one
of
the
you
know
I've
been
in
here
doing
this
by
two
years
now.
This
is
probably
the
first
time
where
there
seems
to
be
kind
of
major.
I
think
conflict
between
the
applicants
and
the
and
the
the
city
staff.
So
I'm
just
kind
of
wondering
like
how
we
got
to
this
point.
I
mean.
Why
are
we
looking
at
a
proposal?
That's
not
even
acceptable
to
the
applicant.
G
H
F
H
The
reason
part
of
the
reason-
why
is
because
the
original
proposal
was
a
lot
different
than
what
they
are
proposing
now
there's
been
some
changes,
and
so
the
the
the
project
itself
changed
over
over
time,
and
so
every
time
it
changed,
we
would
have
to
bring
it
back
and
we
would
have
to
evaluate
the
the
actual
saturn
architecture
of
it
by
staff.
H
I
think
that
by
listening
and
multiple
meetings
that
we've
had
with
the
applicants,
I
think
that
that
their
main
concerns
are
obviously
one
parking
to
the
the
median,
the
race,
the
to
talk
about
the
median
and
three,
the
undergrounding
of
overhead
utilities
being
being
what's.
H
What's
are
the
the
biggest
cost,
as
I
mentioned
here
and
so
regarding
regarding
the
the
delineator
requirements
for
the
median
on
san
felipe,
as
as
you
recall-
and
I
was
mentioned
a
few
times
here
for
the
starbucks
across
across
the
street,
where
jerry's
used
to
be
there
was
a
requirement
that
we
require
required
that
the
delineators
be
placed.
H
So
that
way
we
would
avoid
any
type
of
exiting
in
the
jerry's
place
or
starbucks
was
you
know,
crossing
crossing
the
the
center
line
for
health
and
safety
purposes.
As
we
took
this
item
through
the
development
review
committee,
the
drc
felt
that
it
would
be
necessary
to
to
include
these
and
then
also
the
the
traffic
report
alluded
to
them,
and
especially
the
police,
police
and
fire.
H
What
their
comments
in
regards
to
in
regards
to
the
the
the
median,
the
the
delineators
are,
the
ones
that
are
in
question
now
at
this
time
there
is
no
plans
or
approved
plans
by
the
city
council
to
put
an
actual
raised
median.
Of
course,
that
would
be
an
action
that
would
be
taken
by
by
the
city
council,
as
per
a
capitalist
capital,
improvements,
project
or
as
development
occurs,
say,
for
example,
if
the
project
to
the
north
of
starbucks,
we
have
a
vacant
land
there.
H
It
is,
it
is
not
going
to
be
a
race
meeting,
is
just
delineators,
and
so
therefore,
at
the
time
at
the
time
that
if,
if
that
is
required,
if
a
race
reading
is
required,
that
is
going
to
be,
of
course,
more
more
costly,
more
expensive.
H
And
so,
if
it's
not
going
to
fall
completely
on
either
taco
bell
or
starbucks,
it
would
be
more
of
a
of
a
shared
cost.
It
would
be
more
of
a
what
what
are
the
shared
cost,
not
only
between
those
two
projects
and
future
projects
as
well,
but
at
this
time
it
is
only
the
delineators
that
will
be
required.
H
Starbucks
has
already
commenced
their
construction,
however,
they
are
put
on
a
hold
right
now
because
they
actually
started
construction
and
they
clipped
one
of
the
lines
for
pg
e,
unfortunately,
and
so
pg
e
has
to
respond
to
that
and,
unfortunately
pg
e
right
now
they
are
very
backed
up
on
in
regards
to
responding
time,
and
so
it
may
take
some
time
and
if
taco
bell
is
ready
to
go,
it
may
be
that
taco
bell
may
go
first.
H
However,
if
it
wasn't
for
that
pg
e
line,
it
would
have
more
than
likely
been
starbucks
who
would
have
had
to
put
the
delineators
and
then
yeah.
What
would
work
would
talk
about
to
put
their
to
have
their
fair
share
so
right
now,
all
we're
talking
about
is
the
delineators
that
that
need
to
be
installed
to
essentially
make
sure
that
the
the
safety
of
vehicles
exiting
northbound
onto
onto
san
felipe
from
the
project
site
that
that's
going
to
be
blocked
with
the.
H
In
regards
to
the
undergrounding
condition:
50
51
that
mr
philip
moss
indicated
that
was
going
to
be
my
question,
yeah
good
good,
so
the
requirement
is
to
underground.
It
is
a
commercial
establishment,
and
so
we
understand
that
it's
an
existing
commercial
establishment
and-
and
we
sympathize-
we-
we
want
commercial
in
in
our
city
whenever
a
project
comes
in
and
and
does
substantial
work
to
the
project,
as
in
this
case
demolition
and
reconstruction.
H
It
is
the
city's
opportunity
to
see
what
else
is
out
there
that
we
can
do
to
to
make
sure
that
we
bring
the
project
into
conformance
or
or
if
there
is
any
health
and
safety
type
of
things
that
we
we
need
to
address.
H
It's
our
it's
our
opportunity
to
to
see
that,
and
I
mean
not
to
we're
not
doing
it
to
to
pick
on
anybody.
We're
not
we're
just
looking
at
the
overall.
If
you
know
what
what
we
can
do
to
better
the
the
site's
function,
the
functioning
of
the
site,
and
so
in
this
particular
case
it
is
a
commercial
establishment.
H
We
we
would
require
the
undergrounding.
However,
it
is
a
concern.
It
is
a
costly
concern,
as
mr
phillip
indicated,
mr
philip
moss
and
so
condition.
51
has
it
as
a
requirement.
You
know
there
there
is.
There
is
also
the
ability
if
it
is
a
desire
of
the
planning
commission
to
to
work
with
them.
H
If
that
is
what
you
would
like
to
do
to
do,
either
one
a
deferred
improvement
agreement,
as
mr
philip
moss
alluded
to,
and
and
but
we
would
like
to
know
what
know,
what
that
cost
would
be
to
underground
and
have
them
submit
that
cost,
and
then,
when,
when
everything,
when
everything
would
be
undergrounded
during
that
in
that
intersection,
then
we
would
have
the
money
to
from
from
them
to
be
able
to
to
finalize
those
those
improvements.
H
The
thing
is
that
we're
not
sure
when,
if
and
when
that
that's
gonna
happen
right
now,
we're
taking
it
a
case-by-case
basis.
So
so
that's
one
option
that
we
would.
We
can
have
certainly
have
a
deferred
improvement
agreement.
Have
mr
moss
pay
into
an
account
and
not
necessarily
have
them
under
grounded,
but
at
least
have
have
that
cost
ready
for
for
when
that
occurs,
or
if
it
is
the
world?
The
planning
commission,
the
planning
commission,
can
always
also
remove
that
condition.
You
know
from
making
them
undergone
as
well.
H
Our
city
engineer,
acting
city
engineer,
mark
falgo,
can
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
to
that
in
regards
to
potential
costs
for
undergrounding,
and
you
know
we
we
discussed
that
a
little
earlier
as
well,
and
so
that
that's
that's
the
for
for
condition.
51.
in
regards
to
the
parking.
H
We
certainly
encourage
reciprocal
parking,
reciprocal
access,
our
general
plan,
our
our
zoning
ordinance,
encourages
interconnectivity
between
parcels,
and
so,
if
I
just
and
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
amber,
but
we
we
didn't,
we
we
don't
have
the
reciprocal
parking
agreement.
I
think
we
asked
for
it,
but
I
don't
think
we
got
a
copy
of
it
if,
if
we
do
get
one
from
the
property
owner,
we
can
certainly
take
that
into
account
as
well.
For
for
the
parking.
H
Mark
would
you
be
able
to
address
a
little
bit
more
regarding
the
undergrounding,
please.
R
Yeah,
I
I
one
thing
that
I
will
say
is
that
condition
33
actually.
R
Asked
the
applicant
to
enter
into
a
deferred
improvement
agreement
to
include
the
ultimate
improvements
for
the
off-site
and,
and
that
includes
the
undergrounding
of
the
existing
overhead
utilities.
So
there
that
option
is
already
built
in
here
to
these
conditions
in
it,
and
I
I
get
it
they're
kind
of
separated,
which
is
a
little
bit.
Maybe
we
should
have
probably
ganged
them
together,
so
they
were
more.
Obviously
that
option
was
more
obvious.
R
Here's
a
bucket
of
dollars
is
I'd
actually
like
to
see
a
study
to
show
here's
what
we
here's,
what
the
costs
are
for
that
undergrounding
and
here's
what
the
costs
are
for
the
median
so
that
we
can
so
that
we
can
so
that
we
can
have
a
good
idea,
because
we
got
to
remember
that
they're
going
to
be
shared
costs
between
between
at
least
the
site
and
the
starbucks
across
the
road,
and
so
that
would
it
would
be
better
for
us
to
be
to
be
able
to
ensure
that
we're
that
we're
covering
that
we're
that
we're
getting
the
appropriate,
fair
share
contribution
from
this
applicant
and
not
and
not
too
much
or
too
little.
R
So
that's.
What
I
would
just
like
to
see
is
an
estimate
now
undergrounding
overhead
lines.
It
really
just.
It
really
depends
on
what's
on
the
poles,
but
those
contracts
and
everything
often
will
run
in
the
order
of
350
to
400
lineal
foot,
and
we
have
about
170
lineal
feet
on
this
frontage.
Now
you
got
to
go
pull
the
pole,
so
that
might
that
length
may
grow
a
little
bit,
but
that's
a
that's
on.
That's
still
on
the
order
of
you
know
it's
about
75
000,
maybe
60
to
75
000
for
the
undergrounding
alone.
R
So
it
can,
it
can
get
up
there.
That's
that's
certain!
So
what
I
would
like
to,
but
I'd
like
to
understand
a
little
better
and
the
applicant
has
graciously
said
that
they
they
would
put
some
some
money
aside
for
those
underground
or
for
the
off-site
improvements,
but
I
would
like
to
understand
a
little
better
what
those
costs
really
are,
so
that
we
can
just
make
sure
that
we
that
we
know
what
we're
entering.
R
G
Okay,
so
I
had
a
follow-up
question,
so
let's
say
that
a
hypothetical
well,
let's
say
that
we
approve
this
site
and
architectural
review
this
evening.
But
so
we
know
the
applicant
has
an
issue
with
item
51
at
least.
Is
it
a?
Is
it
an
option
for
the
applicant
to
come
back
with
a
sort
of
conditional
use
permit
to
remove
that?
Is
that
a
normal
part
of
the
process?
Probably
abraham,
would
did
you
address
that.
H
Yes,
yes,
commissioner,
henderson
thank
you.
So
that's
that's
correct.
So
if,
if
approved
as
as
is
right
now,
the
the
requirement
is
that
they
will
come
back
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
for
the
parking
and-
and
they
can
definitely
be
able
to,
they
can
definitely
be
able
to
come
in
and
and
ask
for
that
removal.
If
it's
a
desire
of
the
planning
commission,
the
removal
of
condition
number
51.
G
Yes,
thank
you
abraham
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
couple
just
general
comments.
So
I
I
do
like
the
the
I
like
the
circulation
improvements
yeah.
I
like
that,
there's
an
option
to
have
a
double
lane
if
it
gets
to
that
point,
I
like
that,
there's
some
circulation
in
front
of
the
restaurant
now
whether
it
was
where
they
were
before-
and
I
am-
and
you
know
I
I
have-
I
have
used
this
restaurant
quite
a
bit
and
there
are
you
know.
G
G
You
know
exiting
taco
bell.
It
does
happen.
I
don't
even
believe
there's
any
signs
there
right
now.
That
say,
don't
turn
left.
I
could
be
wrong,
but
I
don't
believe
there
is
but
yeah.
I
think
that's
definitely
an
issue.
I'm
glad
that
you
know
the
city
is
trying
to.
You
know
address
that
problem,
at
least
with
the
delineators.
B
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Henderson
yeah.
I
would
you
know
also
just
go
back
to
the
first
item
that
was
on
the
agenda
tonight.
You
know
we
looked
at
it
as
a
as
a
parking
issue
there
and,
and
we
took
into
consideration
the
individual
and
the
use
of
it,
and
you
know
a
business
that
relies
on
customers
and
circulation
of
customers
is
not
going
to
want
to
short
themselves
a
parking.
B
You
know
you
short
yourself,
a
parking
you're,
potentially
losing
business
and
revenue,
and
for
them
to
come
forward
and
say
you
know
this.
This
is
enough
parking
that
would
be
adequate
and
efficient
for
the
business.
You
know
I
would
have
to
also
tend
on
on
the
applicant
saying
you
know
this.
This
would
be
enough.
B
The
concerns
that
I
have
is
is
you
know
safety.
You
know
I
I
would
want.
You
know
the
safety
things
addressed
in
which,
if
they
could
work
with
the
applicant
to
make
those
small
adjustments
that
the
applicant
said
they
could
to
allow
for
the
the
fire
and
the
and
the
some
of
the
setbacks
and
stuff
to
change,
as
well
as
work
with
the
staff
on
item
51.
You
know
if,
if
something
of
turning
off
the
power
at
the
correct
time,
you
know
has
a
savings
to
the
the
applicant.
B
So
it's
not
such
a
cost
burden
to
them
that
they
they
work
with
the
surrounding
development.
To
do
that
at
a
at
the
optimal
time
is
stuff
that
I'm
on
in
favor
of
this
building
they've
been
in
it
for
20
years.
F
B
Is
a
much
sight
improvement
that
I'm
in
in
favor
of
just
a
layout,
as
well
as
the
the
the
change
in
the
drive
through,
I
think
it's
so
much,
cleaner
and
and
versus
you
know,
just
the
open
blacktop
that
the
previous
or
the
current
layout
is
so.
B
D
D
The
existing
plan,
the
traffic
flow
and
you
are
decreasing
the
actual
building
square
footage,
but
give
given
saying
that
is
that
it
does
have
to
it
requires
some
amendment
to
that
site.
Plan
for
one
is
for
the
fire
access.
Those
parallel
stalls
have
to
be
removed
and
if
we
do
go
and
approve
a
can
go
along
with
the
parking
restraint
as
a
conditional
use
permit.
D
Screening,
the
I
think,
there's
there
can
be
possibly
some
tweaking
to
add
a
couple
more
stalls,
but
I
would
still
expect
the
applicant
to
continue
his
negotiations
for
possibly
reciprocal
use
for
parking
off
off-site,
and
I
would
agree
with
going
ahead
and
preparing
a
cost
estimate
on
the
cost
off-site
cost
with
the
undergrounding
and
the
meridian
to
so
we
have
a
determination
on
exactly
what
the
numbers
are
and
see
if
we
can
work
something
out.
J
Side
I
this
is
commissioner
stevens.
I
just
want
to
kind
of
agree
with
commissioner
munser
and
and
hooboy
that
I
would
like
to
do
whatever
we
could
to
support
this
rebuilding,
because
it
will
improve
that
area
of
the
downtown,
and
that
is
a
really
old
building
and
it
is,
I
use
both
taco
bells,
and
this
one
is
definitely
not
as
nice
as
the
one
that's
over
on
on
on
the
other
side
of
town.
J
But
I
do
like
the
idea
of
having
two
and
you
know,
dividing
up
the
customer
base
so
that
traffic
flows
better
and
then
it's
just
a
better
experience
for
people
that
are
using
it
because
you
get
quicker
service.
So
I
think
that
I
I
do.
I
would
like
for
the
staff
to
try
to
go
back
and
resolve
this.
I'm
not
sure
why
we
have
the
two
separate,
the
two
separate
items,
I'm
talking
about
the
underground
utilities.
I
think
that
is
confusing.
J
I
think
that
the
language
needs
to
be
cleaned
up
and
and
something
more
specific
around
the
cost.
I
think,
would
be
really
helpful
when
we
move
forward.
Otherwise,
I
think
it
is
a
hard
thing,
at
least
for
me,
it's
a
hard
decision
to
make.
If
we
don't
have,
you
know
clear
language
and
some
more
information
about
the
costs,
so
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
just
agree
with
the
other
commissioners
that
the
staff
go
back
and
try
to
resolve
some
of
these
issues.
H
K
Thank
you
for
reopening
the
hearing.
I
understand
your
comments
that
are
clear
and
we
would
like
to
work
with
staff
on
resolving
the
last
bits
of
this
issues.
K
One
of
the
things
that
I'd
just
like
to
add
we've
offered
the
city
to
put
in
pool
boxes
along
the
frontage
for
the
future
undergrounding
as
part
of
our
work
it'd
be
very
easy
for
us
to
do
now,
and
we
would
hope
the
city
would
take
advantage
of
that
as
opposed
to
having
us
underground
at
the
present,
and
if
the
city
decides
they
want
to
underground
in
the
future,
the
pool
boxes
would
already
be
in
place
so
that
that
was
it.
I
appreciate
your
time
your
thoughtful
comments
and
I'll
be
honest.
K
It
was
a
mistake
on
my
part.
The
parapets
should
have
been
higher
and
that
one
big
unit
is
way
oversized
for
what
we
actually
do
in
california,
but
you're
right
that
the
parapet
should
go
up
about
18
inches
to
make
sure
you
recover
all
the
hvacs,
I'm
sorry
the
parapet
should
go
up
18
inches,
so
we
cover
the
hdac
units.
H
Mr
chair,
there
is
no
other
hands
race.
Thank.
B
E
B
Think
I
think
it's
important
to
you
know
to
clean
it
up
and
the
pools
there
and
stuff
it
just
will
help
improve
that
area.
But
you
know
it's
one
of
those
things
that
the
one
person
that's
doing
an
improvement.
It
carries
the
burden
of
the
cost
for
everybody
in
the
area,
and
so
that's
where
I
would
prefer
that
they
work
with
staff
to
come
up
with
a
solution
that
you
know
benefits
everybody
involved.
H
Mr
chair,
would
you
like
a
a
quick
summary
of
what
the
what
the
what
was
heard
in
regards
to
how
how
we
should
bring
this
back
at
the
at
the
next
planning
commission
meeting
for
a
cep.
H
And
please,
and
please
include
any
other
information
that
you
think
so
bring
back
at
the
at
the
following
planning
commission
meeting
upon
upon
having
the
information
ready.
H
H
We
will
we
staff
will
be
working
with
the
applicant
to
see,
as
as
indicated
in
the
condition
now
to
see
if
they
can
add
additional
stalls
to
to
meet
the
parking
requirement,
but
also
consider
the
reciprocal
parking
agreement
that
it's
been
mentioned
that
exist.
However,
we
have
not
received
a
copy
of
so
so
once
we
receive
it,
we
can
consider
that
as
well.
The
house
from
this
code
allows
for
staff
to
work
with
applicants
that
have
it
to
see.
H
You
know
how
they
can
be
used
and
and
count
parking
towards
that.
So
we
will
consider
that
and
also
have
a
cost
estimate
for
the
undergrounding
of
the
existing
overhead
infrastructure
and
the
the
median
the
raise
the
future
raised
median
and
what
would
be
the
proportional
share
of
this
applicant
does
that
cover.
H
B
C
You
know
it
appears
because
they're
providing
outdoor
dining
it's
going
to
impact
some
of
the
parking
spaces
available,
which
I
understand,
because
you
know
outdoor
dining
is
nice
for
for
people.
The
one
issue
that
that
I
would
say
it's
an
issue.
One
thing
that
concerns
me
a
little
bit
is
you
know,
although
they
will
meet
the.
C
California,
building
code,
as
well
as
the
city's
municipal
code
when
it
comes
to
having
the
appropriate
number
of
ada
parking
spots
available.
C
You
know
it
may
not
seem
like
a
big
thing,
but
they
currently
have
two
of
those
parking
spots
and
be
reduced
to
one
one.
I
don't
know
how
often
they're
used
at
the
same
time.
You
know
my
concern
is
that
we
look
out.
You
know
that
we
take
a
look
at
that
part
of
our
community
to
ensure
that
they
do
have
available
parking
for
them.
C
Although
it
does
meet,
you
know
the
code
and
and
bylaws
that
just
and
I'm
not
sure
how
the
other
commissioners
feel
about
it
or
if
they
notice
that
I'm
not
sure
if
there's
a
way
to
tweak
it
tweak
the
the
design
to
possibly
still
have
two
of
those
parking
spots
available.
Again.
You
know
it's
just
I
don't
know
how
often
they're
used
but
I'd
hate,
for
I
would
not
like
to
see
somebody
who
needs
that
spot.
D
If
I
might
just
address
that,
yeah
please
sell
is
that
that
can
easily
be
achieved.
You
can
I
see
right
now.
You
have
a
access,
aisle
and
one
handicap
accessible
space.
The
access
aisle
would
need
to
be,
and
I'm
just
looking
at
the
without
scaling
it.
It
would
need
to
be
eight
feet
wide
for
van
accessible
parking.
D
Q
C
Yeah
perfect
yeah,
just
by
looking
at
at
the
drawings
it
looked
like
it,
it
would
be
doable,
but
that's
something
I
think
we
should
consider.
That's
a
very
good
point.
Yeah.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
commissioner
mora
and
thank
you
for
the
explanation,
commissioner,
heboy
absolutely
and-
and
I
think
that
this
this
planning
commission
is
here
and-
and
we
were
talking
with
city
city
attorney,
jason
epperson
a
little
while
ago,
is
here
to
to
make
those
recommendations
for
the
betterment
of
the
community,
and
so
in
this
case
it
appears
that
it
can
be
able
to
to
work
without
necessarily
having
to
adjust
much
of
of
or
losing
any
parking
spaces,
which
is
we
prefer
not
to.
H
But
if
this
commission,
if
say
for
example,
that
would
be
the
case
that
in
in
order
to
add
a
second
one,
it
would
have
to
lose
another
parking
space
or
two.
This
commission
can
make
that
recommendation
that
that's
why
we're
here
and
and
they
can
they
can
save
for
for
the
betterment
of
the
community
for
the
betterment
of
of
of
the
site.
We
would
be
okay
to
add
a
second
ada
stall,
even
if
it
would
be
one
parking
lot
or
two
park
parking
space
is
short.
Definitely
please.
H
Please
know
that
that
can
be
the
case
in
this
case.
It
appears
that
it
can
work
out
without
without
losing
more
but
know
that
that
can
that
can
be
something
that
you
can
consider
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
correct
city
attorney.
D
H
D
H
You're
welcome
and
and
if
it
is
the
desire
of
the
planning
commission,
I
can
read
those
again
during
the
motion
or
you
can
indicate.
As
stated
it's
up
to
you.
B
N
Would
the
planning
commission
consider
the
existing
layout
with
the
reciprocal
parking,
so
that
brings
it
back
to
the
22,
with
the
elimination
of
the
parallel
parking
and
switching
out
one
of
the
spaces.
The
existing
spaces
to
have
two
ada.
Would
that
be
an
acceptable
compromise
to
the
parking,
or
is
the
commission
wanting
to
see
the
applicant
meet
25
parking
spaces.
B
N
H
That
that's
I'm
really
glad
you
brought
it
up
amber.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that.
So
so,
if,
as
mentioned
right
now,
with
with
the
conversation
we
had
about
the
two
ada
stalls,
if,
if
for
example,
that
would
have
eliminated
the
the
regular
parking
and
they
would
it
would
be
under,
it
would
be
okay.
If,
if
the
planning
commission
would
still
be
okay
with
being
short
on
on
the
parking,
so
so
with
that
being
said,
we
would
be
able
to
if,
if
it
is,
the
desire
of
the
planning.
H
Commission
approve
the
saturn
architectural
now
and
come
back
with
the
cup
at
the
at
the
at
a
later
time
and
after
we
work
with
the
applicant
and
we
look
at
the
reciprocal
parking
and
we
see
that
we
eliminate
the
parallel
parking
and
and
see
if
they
can
add
additional
star
stalls
to
meet
the
25
and
if
they
can
and
we
work
with
the
reciprocal
parking,
and
we
still
indicate
that
still
short,
we
can
come
in
with
the
cup.
H
Instead
of
amending
the
sma
come
in,
come
in
with
the
cup
and
indicate
to
you
as
item
number,
one
that
they're
short
these
many.
However,
they
do
have
a
cep
asking
for
this
exception
and
and
and
going
to
your
question
amber
in
regards
to
amending
the
sna.
If
at
any
any
of
these
items
that
we
discussed
right
now,
for
some
reason
have
to
change
the
layout
or
the
building
in
whatever,
with
the
exception
of
the
parapet,
that
that
should
be
okay.
D
H
And
we
can
address
that
as
in
the
cep
and
and
that
would
cover
it-
okay,
yeah
yeah,
and
that
would
be
the
case
I
mean
there.
The
the
city
does
have
certain
discretion
to
make
a
call
in-house
to
allow
for
for
that,
but
when
it
comes
to
roof,
parapets
and
so
forth,
we'd
like
to
bring
it
back
to
the
commission,
so
we
will
address
it
in
the
cep
as
part
of
this
year,.
B
Are
we
looking
for
for
staff
to
to
re-summarize
what
we
had
just
got
over.
H
If
it
is
the
the
decision
of
the
planning
commission
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
sna,
I
can
then
at
that
point,
summarize
the
six
points
to
come
back
with
this.
When
we
come
back
summarize
the
items
that
should
be
covered
when
we,
when
we
come
back
or
would
you
suggest
something
different
city
attorney
represent.
P
I
think
it
can
be
handled
that
way,
otherwise
it
can
just
be,
and
I'm
not
sure
if
this
meets
all
of
your
requirements.
So
currently,
if
it
doesn't,
you
could
just
make
a
motion
to
to
for
the
city
staff
to
accept
the
direction
that
was
given
to
the
city
staff
work
with
the
applicant
on
this
matter
and
bring
it
back
on
a
date
in
the
future.
H
F
H
H
They
they,
they
would
have
that
that
entitlement,
but
not
necessarily
it'll,
be
difficult
to
make
any
type
of
improvements
without
addressing
the
the
other,
the
other
items
they
they
can,
but
they
would
have
to
meet
the
requirements
of
the
conditions
now
to
underground
and
all
that.
But
but
but
if
you,
if
you
want
to
just
allow
us
to
to
work
with
the
applicant
and
then
bring
both
items,.
D
H
D
So
so
I
I,
I
guess
I'll
my
recommendation
because
I'm
not
making
a
motion
for
approval.
Yet
my
recommendation
is
for
these
this
site
and
architectural
application
to
come
back
next
planning
commission
meeting
along
with
the
conditional
use
permit,
because
I
think
the
consensus
tonight
is
we're
willing
to
work
with
them
on
the
parking.
B
D
So
since
we're
willing
to
work
with
them
on
the
parking
that
entitles
them
to
come
back
with
a
conditional
use
permit,
but
there's
so
many
other
issues
with
the
underground
and
these
other
the
meridian
and
some
of
these
things
that
aren't
right
on
the
cyclone.
I
think
they
need
to
clean
that
up.
I
don't
feel
comfortable
about
approving
a
certain
architectural
application
with
somebody
with
with
the
inconsistencies
with
the
traffic
report
and
with
the
the
layout
and
all
these
other
issues
that
we've
been
talking
about.
P
P
D
That
we
accept
the
the
direction
from
staff
and
the
revisions
and
additions
to
the
conditions,
and
I
guess
we're
almost
tabling
this
until
next.
D
P
D
B
D
C
B
H
Yes,
certainly,
mr
chair,
commissioner
stevens
hi,
commissioner
huboy
aye
commissioner
mora
hi,
commissioner
henderson.
G
Q
B
To
request
a
break:
yes,
if
we
can
take
a
break
we'll
break
at
8
33
for
five
minutes.
B
All
right
go
ahead
and
resume
our
meeting
with
item
number
four
on
the
agenda.
O
Thank
you
abraham
and
commissioner
manslaughter
good
evening.
Everyone
tonight's
item
number
four,
is
a
request
of
approval
of
site
and
architectural
review
2021-2
to
construct
a
6200
6264
square
foot
community
center
for
the
twin
oaks
active
adult
lifestyle
community,
which
is
located
at
2071
mcclelland
street
in
the
medium
density
residential
zoning
district.
This
project
is
part
of
the
larger
twin
oaks
residential
subdivision,
which
was
tentative
map
2009-2
approved
by
the
planning
commission
on
july,
16,
2009
and
subsequently
extended
and
amended.
O
There
is
a
pool
for
its
residents
in
the
twin
oaks
subdivision,
with
a
619
square
foot
pool
house
that
has
two
restrooms:
a
storage
room
for
the
pool
equipment,
as
well
as
a
pet
spa
area
and
they're
also
going
to
be
on
the
site:
two
bocce
ball
courts
and
two
big
pickleball
courts
in
the
outdoor
community
center
area.
Next
slide.
Please
actually
stay
on
this
side.
O
Sorry
for
parking,
there's
18
parking
spaces
surrounding
the
community
center
parcel,
which
includes
488,
accessible
spaces
per
section,
17
18060
for
commercial
outdoor
recreation
facilities,
there's
a
requirement
for
20
parking
spaces
per
acre,
and
this
site
is
one
acre
in
size.
So
that
is
a
requirement
of
20
parking
spaces.
O
The
hollister
municipal
code
requires
two
bicycle
parking
spaces
per
acre
and
with
a
minimum
of
six
bicycle
parking.
Spaces
required
for
a
commercial
outdoor
recreation
facility
and
the
product
has
also
been
conditioned
to
provide
a
minimum
of
these
six
bicycle
parking
stalls
per
the
municipal
code.
But
as
this
is
an
active
lifestyle
community,
it's
recommended
that
bicycling
and
walking
be
encouraged
and
places
for
visitors
and
residents
to
park.
O
Their
bicycles
should
be
present
on
the
site,
but
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
make
a
finding-
and
this
is
included
in
the
draft
resolution-
that
if
the
20
parking's
20,
total
vehicle
stalls
cannot
be
accommodated
onto
the
site.
For
any
reason,
if
engineering
and
the
applicant
cannot
find
a
way
to
feasibly
make
that
work,
but
the
planning
commission
find
that
18
vehicle
souls
and
a
minimum
of
six
bicycle
parking
spaces
shall
satisfy
the
parking
requirement
for
this
project
because
of
the
reason
stated:
that's
a
private
community
center
in
an
active
adult
lifestyle.
O
Community
next
slide,
please.
This
is
the
floor
plan
of
the
pool
house,
just
zoomed
in
where
you
can
see
the
women's
restroom
men's
restroom
and
the
the
pet
spa
on
the
left
side,
as
well
as
the
storage
area.
Next
slide,
please,
oh,
I
did
go
in
the
right
order.
This
is
the
slide.
I
was
going
to
talk
about
parking
next
slide.
Please
thank
you
for
the
elevations
of
the
main
building.
O
The
main
community
center
building
is
a
single
story,
building
with
a
mix
of
roof
and
siding
materials
which
include
metal
and
composite
roofing,
as
well
as
metal
board
and
batten,
and
stone
siding
throughout
the
east
elevation,
which
you
can
see
here,
and
so
the
bottom
of
this
slide
is
the
entire
elevation,
and
then
I
put
a
split
zoom
of
the
left
and
right
sides.
Just
so
you
understand
the
slide
here.
O
There
is
another
metal
sided
section
of
the
building
with
two
additional
windows
that
matches
the
kitchen
elevation
and
the
rightmost
portion
of
the
east
elevation
will
have
board
and
batten
siding
and
composite
roofing.
The
covered
exterior
exercise
area
can
be
seen
from
this
elevation,
as
well
as
the
small
area
for
storage
on
the
north
side
of
the
building,
and
this
little
storage
area
forms
the
side
wall
of
the
exercise
area
and
and
that
exercise
area
is
beaded
off
with
this
load
fence.
O
As
you
can
see
next
slide,
please,
the
north
elevation
of
the
community
center
continues
the
board
and
bottom
siding
from
the
front
elevation
and
there's
one
central
exit
and
doorway
visible
from
this
elevation,
as
well
as
the
side
wall
of
that
storage
area,
and
so
behind
that
sidewall.
If
you'll
imagine,
is
the
open
outdoor
recreation
area
or
exercising
next
slide,
please
the
west
elevation,
which
is
the
rear
elevation
of
the
community
center.
O
Then
the
terrace
area,
as
a
reminder,
will
be
open.
There
is
a
stone
chimney
on
the
left
of
the
logistic
terrace
area
as
well.
Next
slide,
please.
O
This
east
elevation
contains
two
windows
and
has
an
open
center,
which
contains
streaming
fountains
and
leads
to
the
entrances
of
the
two
restrooms
and
then
the
south
elevation
has
the
opening
for
the
pet
spa
and
the
west
elevation
contains
two
doors
which
lead
to
the
storage
room
and
the
north
elevation
has
two
open
pool
shower
areas,
but
otherwise
it's
just
the
board
patent.
Small
building
next
slide.
Please.
O
For
the
landscaping
there
are
two
large
existing
oak
trees
and
those
are
proposed
to
be
preserved
on
the
property.
One
is
located
in
the
northeast
corner
of
the
property,
and
the
second
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
the
clubhouse.
Building
on
this
slide,
north
is
facing
to
the
right.
Just
so
east
would
be
on
the
bottom
of
the
screen
here.
O
Walkways
will
be
located
around
both
of
these
oak
trees
and
around
and
in
between
all
the
buildings,
the
pool
and
the
sport
courts.
Landscaping
will
be
provided
between
all
areas
that
are
not
paved
or
walkways,
and
this
landscaping
consists
of
approximately
38
new
trees
of
various
species,
as
well
as
many
species
of
shrubs
and
other
low
plants.
O
For
with
regards
to
the
environmental
review,
there
was
a
mitigated
negative
declaration
adopted
by
the
city
of
foster
city
council
for
the
twin
oaks
project
and
pre-zone
in
september
of
2000,
and
there
was
an
addendum
approved
for
the
tentative
map
sna
and
conditional
use
permit
for
the
community
center
and
the
original
intensive
map
dividing
the
property,
and
so
staff
has
determined
that
this
sna,
which
is
intended
to
replace
the
previous
sna,
is
consistent
with
that
previous
approval
and
consistent
with
the
mitigated
negative
declaration
adopted
and
any
any
mitigation
measures
that
were
relevant
to
the
sma
have
been
incorporated
into
the
resolution
of
this
project.
O
Without
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
architectural
review,
2021-2,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Thank
you.
H
Yes,
mr
chair,
we
we
do
have
the
developer.
Mr
martin
miller,
I
don't
see
his
hand
raised,
but
I
believe
he
did
one.
That
is
speak,
mr
miller,
are
you
there?
Yes,.
O
H
U
Thank
you
well,
ava
did
a
very
thorough
job.
I'd
just
like
to
point
out
just
a
few
extra
points
about
the
about
the
community
about
the
project.
First
of
all,
this
is
a
new
project,
new
type
of
project
for
hollister,
being
a
active
adult
lifestyle,
community
of
single-family
detached
homes,
168
of
them
on
25
acres
for
folks,
55
and
older.
It's
a
gated
community
for
the
security
and
safety
of
the
residents.
U
U
There
is
a
fire
substation
as
well,
so
I
could
not
think
of
a
better
location
for
a
senior
community
and
in
terms
of
lifestyle
communities.
Our
our
key
pillars
of
the
community
are
health
and
wellness,
building
strong
social
networks
and
lifelong
learning,
and
those
are
the
we've.
We've
chosen,
those
three
pillars,
because
that's
what
our
medical
experts
in
the
country
are
telling
us
is
a
recipe
for
living.
A
long,
healthy
and
active
lifestyle.
U
U
Could
you
go
to
the
next
slide?
Please,
the
the
design
is
in
a
cannery
motif
and
the
reason
that
we
did,
that
was.
We
wanted
to
honor
part
of
the
history
and
tradition
of
hollister
being
a
very
large
cannery
town
and
in
fact,
the
the
people
that
we
bought,
the
property
from
the
inaudis
actually
ran
one
of
the
and
owned
one
of
the
canter.
U
One
of
the
major
canterings
in
town
next
slide
just
a
few
points
here
in
terms
of
some
of
the
things
that
we're
offering
to
the
left.
As
you
enter
the
building
on
the
very
left,
there's
actually
an
interactive
computer
screen
and
every
day
it
will
list
the
activities
that
will
be
going
on
during
that
day
and
you
can
sign
up
for
any
of
those
activities
and
in
fact
the
community
center
will
be
staffed.
U
There'll
be
a
concierge
desk,
which
you
can
see
on
the
right
side
of
the
entrance
where
you
can
come
and
if
you
want
to
plan
a
trip
either
a
group
trip
or
an
individual
trip.
The
concierge
person
will
help
you
in
making
all
the
arrangements.
U
Next
to
that
is
what
we
call
our
movement
studio,
where
activities
like
yoga,
tai,
chi
dancing
and
arts
and
crafts,
and
anything
else
that
you
could
think
of
is
we
can
accommodate
there
and
immediately
to
the
right
of
that
is
some
additional
outdoor
fitness
covered
fitness
area
and
uncut
fitness
area
for
depending
on
what
time
of
year.
It
is.
U
If
you
move
all
the
way
over
to
the
far
left
we
have
to
have.
We
actually
have
two
kitchens.
One
is
a
showcase
kitchen
in
which
we
intend
to
do
demonstrations
on
how
to
make
delicious
dinners
or
lunches
that
are
also
healthy.
For
you
and
below
that
is,
is
a
catering
kitchen
as
well,
so
that
we
can
accommodate
special
parties
or
special
groups
that
want
to
want
to
have
an
event
there.
U
U
There
will
be
a
different
set
of
activities
going
on
that
the
residents
can
choose
to
participate
in
or
not
so,
for
example,
every
saturday
night
there
will
probably
be
a
pool
party
during
the
warm
months,
a
barbecue
and
live
entertainment,
and
you
can
just
go
down
the
list
quickly
and
see
that
it
is
intended
to
provide
a
very
vibrant
and
active
lifestyle
in
this
community
we've.
So
far
we
have
we've
sold
20
houses.
B
Any
questions
for
the
applicant
from
the
staff
excuse
me
from
the
commissioners.
U
No,
no,
all
we
have
is
a
catering
kitchen
and
a
demonstration
kitchen.
We,
the
community
we
decided,
was
at
168.
Homes
was
not
large
enough
to
support
a
restaurant,
but
I,
since
you
I
did
want
to
bring
up
one
point
about
the
parking
and
ava.
If
you
could
bring
up
the
slide
of
the
entire.
O
Right
yeah
paul:
do
you
mind
sharing
your
screen
again
and
going
back
to
the
the.
U
U
Okay,
so
here
you
will,
you
will
note
that
directly
across
the
street,
from
the
entrance
to
the
community
center,
which
is
on
the
nor
east
or
east
or
northeast
side
of
the
building.
You'll
notice
that
directly
across
the
street
there's
two
additional
parking
spaces
and
a
little
further
to
the
north
diagonally
across
from
the
north
east
corner
of
the
of
the
community
center
grounds.
U
So
if
you
know
we
couldn't
fit
any
more
parking
in
the
in
the
community
center
space
itself,
and
so
we
added
those
four
additional
spaces,
two
of
them
which
just
across
the
street,
is
very
close
and
two
of
them,
which
is
just
a
little
further
away
about
one
and
a
half
houses
away,
and
we
were
hoping
that
that
would,
even
though
you
you
consider
giving
us
an
exception
for
the
for
18
parking
spaces,
I
we
were
hoping
that
those
four
would
satisfy
the
the
parking
condition.
B
Thank
you,
mr
miller.
Okay,
if
there's
no
other
questions
for
the
applicant,
is
there
any
other
speaker.
B
Okay,
we'll
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing
at
904.
B
All
right
we'll
bring
it
back
to
the
the
commission
for
the
further
discussion.
D
I
recommend
the
the
applicant
on
the
way
you
can
integrate
so
many
activities.
D
A
quite
a
an
array
of
choices
there
yeah,
I,
I
brought
a
lot
of
excitement
for
the
older
folks.
B
I
think
it's
a
great
a
great
project,
a
great
little
community
and
it's
a
great
location
for
if
they
need
to
do
shopping,
there's
grocery
stores
right
there
and
yeah.
I
think
you
know
I'd
like
to
see
that
the
community
center
get
built
and
those
people
enjoy
it
for
sure.
Q
C
Yeah,
definitely
these
are
the
types
of
projects
that
housing
projects
that
the
city
hollister
needs,
because
you
know
we
don't
have
very
many
active
lifestyle
communities,
and
this
is
perfect.
I
mean
I'm
only
11
years
away
from
being
eligible
to
purchase
one
of
these
homes,
but
I'm
definitely
excited
about
that
community
center.
Hopefully
I
I
I
can
participate
on
their
first
friday,
taco
truck,
I
mean
food
trucks
and
their
karaoke
night
a
little
earlier,
but
this
is
this
is
exciting
for
me,
yeah.
C
Internet
exactly
you
know,
and
this
is
exactly
what
what
hollister
needs
for
for
for
that
community.
You
know
here,
so
I'm
excited
the
18
parking
spots
I
mean
you
know,
looks
like
there
could
be
a
solution
for
that.
Well,
it's
exciting
project.
I'll,
definitely
look
forward
to
it.
J
I'll
make
the
motion
so
I'll
make
the
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
the
site
and
architectural
review
and
then
what's
the
number.
H
It's
pc
resolution
2021-7.
H
B
Thank
you
for
the
clarification
sure.
Can
we
have
a
roll
call.
H
G
B
B
H
So,
as
you
know,
the
hollister
municipal
code
grants
the
planning
commission
the
authority
to
approve
tinder
maps
and
essentially
the
city
council
members
have
have
given
you
the
the
authority
to
to
do
so
and
rightfully
so
and
as
you
know,
when
attended
a
map
is
approved,
it
is
approved
with
a
very
quite
long
list
of
conditions
of
approval,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
you
know
typically
for
a
tentative
map.
H
We
we
really
want
to
see
what
the
density
is
going
to
be,
how
the
lots
are
going
to
be
laid
out
how
the
roads
are
going
to
be
laid
out
and
so
pending
approval.
We
want
to
make
sure
it
meets
the
house
from
the
supercode.
We
want
to
make
sure
it
meets
general
plan,
state,
local
state
and
federal
requirements
pending
approval
by
the
by
the
planning
commission.
Then
one
of
the
requirements
is
that
it
goes
to
the
engineering
department
to
make
sure
that
all
of
those
conditions
are
are
met.
H
So
that's
when
we
get
into
the
details
in
regards
to
the
the
peculiarities
in
regards
to
all
easements
need
to
be
shown.
Everything
needs
to
be
in
full
blown
detail
at
that
time.
The
so
that
takes
quite
a
bit
of
like
takes
quite
a
bit
of
time.
H
The
approval
is
usually
it's
per
the
house
for
mr
code,
it's
for
two
years,
so
the
applicant
really
has
to
get
all
the
conditions
of
approval
met
in
what's
called
a
final
map
and
the
engineering
department
make
sure
that
all
those
conditions
of
approval
have
been
met
within
those
two
years
and
then
once
the
city
city
engineer
determines
that
those
conditions
have
been
met.
It
goes
to
the
city
council.
H
Basically,
as
a
courtesy
saying
this
is
this
final
map
has
been
met,
so
the
conditions
of
approval
that
the
planning
commission
adopted
haven't
been
incorporated
in
this
final
map
and
it
it
it's
been
made
and
so
and
so
that
that's
a
two-year
process
and
currently,
as
the
title
16
subdivision,
indicates,
if
the
applicant
is
not
able
to
to
produce
a
final
map
within
two
years,
they
have
the
ability
to
ask
for
an
extension.
Currently,
the
subdivision
subdivision
code
allows
for
a
two-year
extension.
H
However,
the
government
code,
which
which
also
which
also
is
is
part
of
the
subdivision
map
act,
allows
for
a
one-year
extension,
so
so
government
code,
section
66463.5,
indicates
that
when
a
tenant
map
is
required
and
an
approved
or
conditionally
approved,
tenant
map
shall
expire
24
months
after
its
approval
or
condition
conditional
approval
or
after
any
additional
period
of
time,
as
may
be
prescribed
by
local
ordinance,
not
to
exceed
an
additional
12
months.
H
So
that's
that's
why
we
are
here
before
you
to
recommend
to
to
request
an
approval
of
the
resolution
that
recommends
that
we
send
an
ordinance
to
the
city
council
to
make
that
change,
and
just
want
to
indicate,
though,
that,
even
though
this,
if
this
change
occurs
with
the
two-year
approval
and
the
one-year
extension
there
is
other
state
law,
such
as
government
code,
66452.6,
that
if
the
applicant
meets
those
requirements
that
they
can
get,
those
extensions
as
well
through
the
state
that
you
know
no
longer,
would
be
a
municipal
code
action.
H
We
just
talked
about
one
2009
and
we're
in
2021
and
they
probably
broke
down
just
last
year
and
so
part
of
it
is,
for
example,
the
government
code
state
code
that
takes
presidents
and
if
they
meet
those
requirements
like
in
this
case
government
code,
664
5.2.6
basically
says
that
if
the
project
or
development
requires
the
the
applicant
to
spend
two
hundred
and
thirty
six
thousand
seven
hundred
and
ninety
dollars
on
off-site
improvements,
then
they
get
an
additional
36
years
and
added
to
the
life
of
the
tenant
map.
H
Why
the
two
hundred
and
thirty
six
thousand
seven
hundred
ninety
dollars
specifically
why
the
36
months
I
mean
one
thing
that
we
can
consider-
is
lobbyists
probably
state
lobbyists
to
to
this,
to
the
states
to
the
state
politicians,
but
that's
that's
part
of
our
subdivision
map
back
that
these
the
developers
have
the
ability
to
to
use
as
well
if
attending
a
map
is
approved.
F
H
We
we,
as
the
city
of
hollister,
went
through
from
2002
through
2008
that
those
years
of
the
moratorium
do
not
count
towards
the
tenant
map
approval,
and
so
I
think,
for
a
maximum
of
five
years.
So
all
of
those
we
we
as
as
a
local
jurisdiction,
can
can't
do
much
about
and
and
and
discussions
with,
the
city
attorney.
H
However,
we
do
have,
we
do
have
discretion
in
regards
to
the
two-year
approval
with
the
one
year
right
now
it
says
two
years,
but
if
it's
okay
with
the
planning
commission,
it
goes
to
city
council,
it
gets
adopted
with
the
one-year
extension
and
if
that
developer
does
not
have
any
other
an
ability
to
meet
any
other
of
the
states
of
division
map
back
requirements
for
an
extension,
then
the
local
jurisdictions
two
year
plus
one
year
is
what
takes
precedence.
H
And
at
that
point,
if
the
developer
has
not
gotten
a
final
map,
then
the
project
is
basically
dead
and
they
would
have
to
come
back
for
another
approval
at
that
time.
So,
for
today,
the
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request,
which
is
city
of
hollister,
receive
already
an
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
adopt
a
resolution
recommended
to
the
city
council.
The
adoption
of
the
amendments
to
title
16
subdivision
of
the
hollister
municipal
code,
to
allow
for
a
two-year
approval
and
year
extension.
D
I
guess
there's
a
an
obligation,
then,
that
we
clean
up
our
local
code
to
follow
the
state
code,
because
it
would
be
improper
to
have
a
two-year
extension
when
it's
not
that
would
be
in
conflict
with
the
with
the
state
one
year.
Correct
is
it
is
that
that
is
correct.
That.
H
F
H
H
The
hollister
municipal
code
says
two
two
years
of
an
extension
where
the
government
code
says
one:
we,
we
can't
keep
it
at
two
years.
I
mean
we
can.
We
can
do
that
if
that's
what
the
local
jurisdiction
prefers,
but
but
staff
prefers
that
we
are
in
tune
with
the
state
and
direction
was
given
from
the
city
council
to
also
be
in
tune
with
the
state.
C
Yeah,
so
I
I
definitely
understand
their
sentiment.
You
know
on
why.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
clear
that
you
know,
even
though
here
locally,
the
city
allows
24
months
as
long
as
we
don't
go
less
than
what
the
state
re
requires:
we're
okay
to
exceed
what
what
the
minimum
requirement
is
for
the
state
from
state
code
correct.
C
C
H
D
P
We're
not
necessarily
legally
obligated
to
change
it,
but
it
would
be
standard
practice
to
bring
it
into
compliance
with
the
with
the
state
code.
Not,
commissioner
moore,
to
answer
your
question
whether
or
not
we
could
allow
an
initial
two-year
extension.
I
have
a
that's
an
open
question.
I
think
in
most
cases
a
court
would
probably
allow
if
we
were
willing
to
go
along
with
it,
then
the
court
would
allow
it.
However,
someone
certainly
could
challenge
it
on
that
basis,
and
I
wouldn't
make
any
guarantee
that
that
a
court
wouldn't
say
no.
P
The
state
allows
it's
very
restrictive
in
its
language
and
you're
limited
to
one
year,
and
the
fact
that
you're
willing
to
go
two
years
is
not
necessarily
something
the
court's
going
to
allow.
So
I
wouldn't
make
a
guarantee
one
way
or
another,
but
in
practice
apparently,
we've
only
been
allowing
one
year
a
one-year
extension
for
quite
some
time
which
complies
with
the.
C
Now
are
there
any,
or
can
you
guys
give
me
some
examples
of
on
what
on
how
how
a
a
project
may
not
get
the
final
map
approved
within
24
months?
So
basically,
what
what?
What
I
don't
want
to
to
see
is
you
know
just
kind
of
throwing
it
out
there
as
a
hypothetical.
C
Let's
say
that
the
city
for
some
reason
makes
it
difficult
for
a
project
to
receive
the
final
tentative
map.
If
I'm
using
the
correct
terminology,
you
know
and
then
meaning
more
time
I
mean.
Is
there
certain
examples
of
why
someone
may
not
be
able
to
receive
that
final
map
within
the
24
months
or
maybe
30
month,
total
time
period.
H
So
yes,
normally
at
at
that
time,
one
of
the
one
of
the
more
common
common
reasons
that
we
get
when
we
are
before
you
for
an
extension
request
is
that
the
applicant
is
trying
to
secure
funding
to
be
able
to
have
these
final
maps
be
prepared
and
they
have
to
hire
the
right,
the
right
engineers
and
be
able
to
prepare
all
of
the
all
of
the
maps
as
as
as
as
required
for
the
conditions
of
approval,
state
law,
federal
law
and
and
then
they
would
have
to
submit
to
to
the
engineering
department
and
pay
the
engineering
standard
fees
for
the
engineering
department
to
review,
to
make
sure
that
all
of
these
everything
has
been
met
according
to
law.
H
So
the
one
of
the
most
common
reasons
is
the
security
of
the
funding.
A
second
reason
would
be
that
the
applicant
is
finalizing
it,
but
they
just
the
final
map.
They
just
need
additional
time
just
to
just
to
be
able
to
to
submit
it
to
the
city
of
hollister
for
review.
We
we
always
one
of
the
first
conditions
on
tenant
maps.
H
Is
you
have
a
two-year
approval
please
submit
at
18
months,
though
so
that
way
we
have
at
least
six
months
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
is
in
order
and
we
can
get
it
before
the
city
council
to
say
it's.
It's
done.
It's
they've
met
their
their
requirement.
C
Okay,
you
know,
and
one
one
one
question
I
have
is,
and
I
just
you
know
even
when
I
read
everything
it
didn't
pop
up
until
right
now
as
you're
seeing
and
I'm
not
sure
you
have
the
answer
for
this
and
it's
okay,
if
you
don't
how
many
times
have
has
an
applicant
needed
an
extension
longer
than
12
months,
you
know
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
say
you
know
all
time,
but
maybe
within
a
five
or
ten
year
period.
C
You
know
because
I
I
like
to
see,
because
if,
if
you
know,
if
the
norm
is
getting
a
12
month,
extension
or
only
needing
a
12
month
extension
not
needing
24,
we
see
that's
what
the
majority
is.
Then
I
could
definitely
see
you
know
kind
of
agreeing
with
the
12
months.
Yeah.
H
Good
point
good
point,
commissioner:
maura,
the
the
exact
number
I
don't.
I
don't
have
right
now
I
can
get
I
can
get
for
you,
though,
but
but
really
the
majority
of
the
projects
that
we
have
like,
for
example,
the
one
that
we
were
just
talking
about
and
a
few
others
that
that
have
not
been
able
to
meet
the
after
getting
the
the
two-year
approval
and
the
one-year
extension.
H
It's
there's
quite
a
bit
of
subdivision
sections
on
the
subdivision
map
act
that
allow
for
an
automatic
extension
and
so,
and
so
it's
it's
pretty
it
it's
pretty
open
when
it
comes
to
allowing
for
for
and
not
that
difficult
to
actually
be
able
to
grant
get
that
one
additional
year
granted
this
of
the
visual
map
act,
and
so
so
that
that
helps
them
if,
if
they
need,
if
they
need
that
cushion
to
to
have
additional
more
time,
it
doesn't
happen
that
that
often-
but
it's
been
my
experience-
that
for
the
most
part
they
are
able
to
be
covered
with
these
automatic
extensions
that
the
state
allows
for
this
of
the
vision
map
act.
C
H
H
And
that's
a
really
good
point:
you,
you
met.
You
alluded
to
this
last
project,
the
silver
oaks
project
that
that
you
know
it
appears
that
there
was
a
consensus
that
this
was
a
really
good
project.
You
know
we
got
approved
in
2009,
and
so
you
know
just
they
just
broke
around
last
year
and
part
of
part
of
their
reasoning
for
them
is
that
they
actually
also
got
in
another
way
that
that
they
can,
that
the
project
can
be
extended
is
through.
H
For
example,
silver
oaks
got
a
performance
agreement
approval,
so
the
performance
agreement
or
development
agreement
can
also
in
a
way.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
using
the
right
terms,
but
break
away
from
the
ordinance
that
talks
about
the
number
of
years
attending
a
map
can
be
approved
and
it
can
be
a
negotiated
deal
between
the
developer
and
the
city
council
and
they
can
say,
look
I
can.
I
can
get
this
done.
H
It's
going
to
take
me
about
seven
years,
though,
or
it's
gonna
take
me
about
10
years,
and
you
know
if,
if
that
is
the
the
will
of
of
the
council,
they
can,
they
can
approve.
It's
usually
a
negotiation
tactic,
though
sometimes
with
when
a
performance
agreement
or
a
development
agreement
comes
into
fruition.
City
council
usually
has
a
reason
why
to
approve
it.
H
For
example,
when
we
had
the
growth
management
ordinance
that
we
only
allowed
a
certain
number
of
units
to
be
approved
per
year
developers,
one
of
the
re
one
of
the
requirements
was
we're
only
going
to
approve
the
number
of
units
to
those
projects
that
are
in
the
best
interest
for
the
city.
So,
in
a
way,
projects
were
competing
against
ones
one
another,
and
you
know
we
had
some.
H
For
example,
that
would
say:
look
we'll
offer
this
mixed
use
will
offer
single-family
multi-family
cottage
homes
and
we
will
give
an
unluffy
of
certain
amount
of
money
for
affordable
housing,
and
so
you
know,
but
in
return
we
would
like
the
city
to
allow
us
a
10-year
approval
of
our
tentative
map,
and
so
those
that's
another
reason
of
how
it
can
be
also
negotiated.
In
regards
to
the
the
life
of
a
tenant
map.
B
H
I
it's
it's
been
in
the
hollister
municipal
code
since
2000,
since
I've
been
here
and
the
last
time
we
did
a
whole
like
a
really
big
overall
overhaul
of
the
code
was
in
2009.
H
H
Why
we
haven't
really
caught
it?
You
know
caught
it
until
we
brought
this
brought
this
forward
with
the
city
council
last
last
month,.
H
We
we
have
not,
but
we
have
had
cases
where
we've
come
back
before
the
planning
commission
for
an
additional
extension.
So
there
are
certain
criteria
in
the
subdivision
map
pack.
That
says
you
can
get
an
additional
one-year
extension
from
from
what
the
local
municipality
has
with
the
approval
of
the
planning
commission.
If
you
meet
these
requirements
so
so
we.
H
B
H
Correct,
that's
that's
been
my
experience
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
yeah.
B
B
Item
no
further
discussions:
what
is
the
pleasure
of
the
commission
on
this.
D
It
has
certainly
slowed
it
down
tremendously.
I'm
not
saying
hollister
but
san
jose,
for
example,
very
difficult
to
getting
any
any
acknowledgement
when
you
submit
things
electronically,
so
I'll
go
along
with
with
it
regarding
hollister.
But
if,
if
I
was
in
san
jose,
I
would
not,
I
would
not
be
in
favor
of
one
year.
I
would
be
in
favor
of
two
years,
if
not
more,
until
we
get
back
to
normal.
J
Well-
and
I
wonder
if
that
would
be
considered
like
an
exception,
that
that
would
be
one
of
the
reasons
to
be
able
to
extend
beyond
the
12
months,
because
of
something
you
know,
circumstance
like
the
pandemic.
H
Commissioner
stevens
and
commissioner
hugh
boy,
those
are
good
points.
I
I
in
in
reading
in
the
history
that
I've
I've
been
here
close
to
13
a
little
bit
over
13
years
now,
and
I've
noticed
the
subdivision
map
back
there.
We
we
get
the
the
the
revised
edition
every
year.
It
changes
in
a
yearly
basis
and
in
a
yearly
basis
we
see.
H
We
see
these
automatic
extensions
that
come
in,
for
example,
during
the
recession,
the
the
great
recession
2008
through
2013,
or
so
during
that
time
there
was
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
sections
within
the
within
the
subdivision
map
pack
that
I
actually
addressed.
H
You
know,
projects
tentative
maps
that
were
approved
during
this
time
are
automatically
extended
a
number
of
period
months
because
of
because
of
the
recession,
and
so
it
would
not,
and
I'm
glad
you
brought
this
up
because
it
would
not
surprise
me
that
in
20
that
in
that
that
in
the
near
future
we
will
have
automatic
extensions
from
the
subdivision
map
pack.
That
says.
H
If
your
project
was
approved
during
the
pandemic
between
this
year
and
this
year,
then
you
have
an
automatic
whatever,
whatever
the
lobbying
is
going
on
right
now,
it
wouldn't
be
surprising
if
it
would
say
an
automatic
36
months.
I
I
think
that
it's
it's
appropriate.
It's
appropriate
to
to
think
that
that's
more
than
likely
what's
going
to
happen
at
the
state
level,.
B
Thank
you
so
there's
a
motion,
a
second,
no
further
discussion.
If
we
can
have
a
roll
call
vote.
H
Certainly,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
So
commissioner
roxanne
I'm
stevens
right.
Commissioner,
david
hewitt
aye,
commissioner
salvador
mora
aye,
commissioner
kevin
henderson.
Q
B
H
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
This
is
the
last
item
of
the
agenda
for
the
public
public
hearing
aspect
of
it.
The
city
of
hollister
is
actually
seeking
to
vacate
approximately
0.31
acres
of
the
public
street,
known
as
nash
road
between
monterey
street
and
west
street.
As
you
can
see
in
the
screen
and
as
you
can
see
in
exhibit
a
of
your
resolution
for
city
council
resolution
2019-181
adopted
on
august
5th
2019.
H
65402
no
street
shall
be
vacated
until
the
proposed
street
vacation
has
been
submitted
to
to
and
reported
upon
by,
the
planning
commission
of
the
of
the
city
and
in
and
it
is
reported
in
conformity
to
the
general
plan.
So
in
this
case
this
is
just
a
part
of
the
process.
This
this
action
tonight
will
not
actually
vacate
the
portion
of
nash
road
between
monterey
and
west.
H
This
would
actually
just
follow
the
direction
of
the
city
council
to
start
the
process
and
with
approval
of
this
resolution
it
would
go
to
the
city
council
and
then
at
the
city
council.
It
would
be
where
they
would
make
the
final
determination
to
to
vacate
and
dispose
of
this
at
this
section
of
nash
road.
H
The
the
government
code,
though,
does
it
require
that
before
it
goes
to
the
city
council,
that
it
comes
before
the
planning
commission,
as
we're
doing
tonight,
to
basically
indicate
that
this
portion
of
road
that
the
city
is
looking
into
to
vacating
and
and
dispose
of
meets,
meets
the
general
plan,
and
in
this
case
the
property
is
owned.
Public
and
upon
approval
by
the
planning
commission
to
recommend
to
the
city
council
and
ultimately,
the
city
council,
making
the
determination
to
vacate
it
and
to
dispose
of
it.
H
That
section
will
remain
public
and
will
will
essentially
be
used
for
the
salmonella
high
school
district
upon
the
agreement
that
was
made
between
the
salmonella
high
school,
the
city
of
hollister
and
the
county
of
san
benito.
H
I
have
included
a
aerial
picture
of
the
portion
of
nashville
in
the
screen
and
what
that
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
read
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
adopt.
The
resolution
recommended
to
the
city
council.
The
adoption
of
a
resolution
improvement
in
vacation,
the
public
right
of
way
on
a
portion
of
nash,
road
between
monterey
street
and
west
street.
H
B
Any
additional
questions.
H
C
No,
yes,
yes,
real
quick!
So
if
we
we
do
decide
to
vacate
this
piece
of
of
street
in
the
future,
you
know
the
high
school
could
then
maybe
get
rid
of
the
street,
and
maybe
just
just
put
you
know,
grass
or
lawn
or
whatnot,
and
the
community
at
large
would
no
longer
have
access
to
that,
because,
obviously
there's
not
a
road
there,
yeah
so
is.
Is
that
one?
What
is
that?
My
understanding
is
that
if
we
do
vacate
the
the
public
street
that
basically
the
school
could
do
whatever
they
choose
to.
H
That
that
is
correct.
Commissioner
morale,
with
the
exception
that
there
there
is
a
specific
agreement
between
the
city
of
hollister,
the
county
of
san
benito
and
san
benito
high
school.
H
H
I
think
they're
still
allowed
to
be
closed
so
and
those
those
final,
those
final
that
that
final
say
in
regards
to,
if,
if
ultimately
it
will
be
just
disposed
stuff
and
can
turn
into
more
classrooms,
landscaping
or
different
different
route
or
if
it
can
continue
to
be
used
as
as
is
right
now
to
where
to
where
during
the
school
hours
is
closed
or
any
functions
and
open
that
that
will
be
a
determination
by
by
the
city,
council
and
and
the
county
and
and
the
high
school
at
that
point.
H
But
that
is
certainly
that
is
certainly
in
the
play.
That
is
certainly
a
a
possibility
that
that
can
occur.
C
Okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure.
Actually
you
know,
even
though,
which
is
a
completely
different
discussion.
I
thought
there
was
better
solutions
for
them
to
figure
out
how
to
get
kids
safely
from
one
campus
to
the
other
campus,
but
I
just
want
to.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
by
by
by
the
city,
potentially
vacating
the
street,
it
just
doesn't
mean
that
the
school
automatically
can
do
what
they
want
to
it,
because
I
have
concerns
to.
You
know
like
to
make
sure
that
the
community
has
access
to
it.
C
B
Okay,
if
there's
no
further
questions,
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
public
hearing
at
9
40.,
mr
abraham,
is
there
any
speaker
cards
on
this
item.
B
Okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
close
that
public
hearing
at
9
40.
bring
it
back
to
the
commission
for
further
discussion.
G
G
Sure
so
yeah
in
general,
I
I
I'm
in
favor
of
closing
the
or
just
you
know,
vacating
the
road
just
for
safety
reasons,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
students.
You
know
when
school's
in
session.
Hopefully
the
school
will
be
back
in
session
soon,
but
when
school's
in
session
there's
a
lot.
You
know
so
many
students
have
to
cross
the
road
and
it's
just
a
lot
safer
so
and
also
just
when
they
had
the
road
closed
during
school
hours.
G
I
thought
that
actually
was
made
of
kind
of
improvement
in
the
circulation
for
just
people.
You
know
wanting
to
try
drop
off
their
their
kids
because
that
kind
of
eliminates
the
kind
of
the
crop
you
know
any
cross
traffic
at
the
two
ends
there.
G
So
now,
so
I
think
it
actually
improved
the
circulation
at
the
same
time.
I'm
concerned
about
the
you
know,
response
times
of
ems
and
things
like
that,
but
I
think
the
the
city
council
can
can
take
up
any
issues
with
that.
So
that
concludes
my
comments.
B
F
H
B
D
Yes,
of
course,
please,
hopefully
you're
not
going
to
steal
my
thunder.
I
wanted
to
congratulate
roxanne.
E
E
O
I
think
she
is
gonna
do
that
yeah?
Yes,
I
was
going
to
say
for
everyone
on
the
commission
and
anyone
watching
that
christian
stevens
was
appointed
to
the
general
plan
advisory
committee,
as
our
second
commissioner,
alongside
commissioner
cuba,
as
well
as
council
members,
velazquez
mayor
velasquez
and
council
members,
and
then
I
would
also
just
like
to
announce
once
again
our
upcoming
meetings.
O
O
There's
kind
of
a
list
of
over
20
options,
including
growth
management,
traffic
circulation,
economic
development
hazards,
arts
and
culture.
So
it's
everything
in
the
general
plan,
but
you
can
pick
three
and
you
can
attend
both
meetings,
so
you
could
do
up
to
six
and
then
we're
also
releasing
a
survey
online
where
anyone
could
comment
on
any
or
all
that
they
either
didn't
get
to
attend
the
meeting
or
they
attended.
O
But
they
wanted
to
discuss
eight
nine
ten
options,
so
there'll
be
an
online
survey
and
two
public
workshops
and
then
we'll
also
be
having
five
gpac
meetings
through
the
month
of
march
and
april,
beginning
march
23rd
and
then
march
30th
april,
6
april,
13
and
april
27,
and
we'll
be
discussing
all
of
the
policy
options
at
the
various
meetings
as
well.
So
each
g-path
meeting
will
be
focused
on
a
specific
set
of
policy
options
and
we'll
work
our
way
through
all
of
them
and
then
again
the
public
meetings.
O
J
So
so
kelly
can
I
just
clarify
so
the
two
public
forum
means
you
are
allowed
to
attend
both
or
you're
encouraged
to
be
or
either
one
way,
because
when
I
went
in
to
register
it
only
allowed
for
one
selection.
So
do
you
just
have
to
go
back
in
and
register
for
gold.
O
Yeah,
so
you
can
go
back
in
and
register
again
for
both
and
then
just
register
for
different
register
for
the
second
meeting
and
register
for
different
policies
that
you
also
want
to
discuss.
Sure.
J
And
then
also,
I
guess
on,
I
guess
just
to
continue
with
the
announcements.
There
was
three
community
positions
that
were
added
so
before
we
just
now,
there's
three,
so
I
think
we
need
to
just
like
commit
to
getting
the
word
out
to
get
as
many
people
that
are
interested
to
apply
so
that
we
have
a
you
know:
a
good
pool
of
community
people
to
pick
for
those
seats.
O
C
O
Meeting
materials
are
being
translated
into
spanish
as
we
speak,
and
we
will
have
staff
members
available
for
spanish
translation
for
anyone
who
comes
in
and
will
use
the
zoom
translation
feature.
C
F
C
Spanish
speakers
sign
up
and
they
and
they
log
on
to
a
meeting
attendant,
and
they
hear
nothing
but
english
from
the
beginning
kind
of
turns
them
off
a
little
bit
and
shot.
You
know
they
kind
of
shy
away
from
participating.
So
maybe
with
that,
we
advertise
that
it
will
be
that
we
will
have
translators
there.
H
Absolutely
very
good
point,
mr
commissioner:.
F
H
Yes,
if
just
putting
it
out
there
if
there,
if
there
is
any,
if
you
know
of
anybody
who
is
spanish
speaking,
which
which
we
do
have
a
big
percentage
in
our
community-
please
refer
them
to
us
and
we
would
be
more
than
happy
to
get
them
on
board
registered
and
be
ready
for
for
spanish
translation
during
these
workshops.
H
Please,
please
do
so.
We
we
know
that
they
are
the
spanish.
The
spanish-speaking
population
in
this
community
is
very
important
as
everybody,
and
we
know
that
they
are
highly
interested
in
in
community
functions.
We've
had
we've
had
this
room
full
of
spanish
speaking
for
planning
commissioners
in
the
past
four
projects,
and-
and
so
and
so
definitely
please
know
that
if
you
know
of
anybody,
please
send
them
our
way
and
we'll
be
more
than
happy
to
to
accommodate.
Thank
you.
J
Yeah
and
abraham,
I'm
not
sure
if
commissioner
mora's
question
about
the
translation
was
actually
answered,
is
there
going
to
be
like
a
simultaneous
translation
so
that
they
are
actually
hearing
it
so
like
if
I'm
listening
in
in
english,
the
person
who
is
spanish
speaking
is
listening
to
the
exact
same
thing
at
the
exact
same
time,
but
in
spanish.
So
is
that
the
way
that
the
translation
is
going
to
be
handled.
H
We
have
we
have
that
ability,
commissioner
stevens
to
to
do
that
it.
Unfortunately,
though
we
we
have
not,
we
have
not
had
had
to
to
to
do
the
simulta
simultaneous
translation,
because
we
have
not
had
spanish
speaking
only
audience
and
these
past
gpac
meetings
and
community
meetings,
but
but
that
is
essentially
what
what
we
would
do
encouragement
from
wrong,
even
amber
and
natalie.
But
essentially
what
would
happen
is
the
the
zoom
meeting
we
we
would.
H
We
would
have
that
same
presentation
in
spanish
and
we
would
have
all
the
the
the
spanish
audience
log
in
login
to
to
the
same
the
same
zoom
meeting,
but
they
would
be
able
to
focus
only
on
the
spanish
aspect
of
it.
So
so
so
the
english
would
be
going
on
in
the
english
aspect
of
it
and
we
have
the
ability
to
also
be
running
it
simultaneously
in
spanish,
but
unfortunately
we
have
not
had
to
do
that.
But
please,
you
know
get
the
word
out
there.
H
We
know
that
there
are
quite
a
bit
of
people
who,
even
if
they're
bilingual,
are
more
comfortable
in
spanish
and
we
definitely
let
them
know
that
if,
if
you're
more
comfortable
in
spanish,
we
have
that
ability-
and
it's
just
been
the
case-
that
everybody
sticks
to
the
english
aspect
of
it,
which
is
fine.
But
we
definitely
encourage
that
that
they
that
they
contact
us.
Okay,.
B
H
Yes,
so
so
we
would
like
to
welcome
commissioner
salvador
mora
to
the
planning
commission.
We
are
very
fortunate
to
have
you.
Thank
you
so
much
for
volunteering,
your
time
and
being
part
of
this
community
for
the
betterment
of
the
community,
and
we
appreciate
your
your
willingness,
and
so
we
just
want
to
you.
F
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
it
and
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
and
thank
council
member
tim
burns
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
serve
on
the
planning
commission
and
I
look
forward
to
working
with
everybody
from
the
planning
department.
H
Thank
you,
commissioner,
mora,
and
also
we
would
like
to
congratulate
commissioner
david
huboy
for
his
reappointment.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
for
serving
us
you've
been
a
valuable
asset
to
the
planning
commission,
and
so
we
we
appreciate
you
being
here
as
well
and
dedicating
your
time
and
efforts
to
to
our
precious
community.
So
thank
you
so
much.
H
Yes,
that
does,
and
just
also
eva
mentioned
earlier,
thanking
the
roxanne
as
part
of
the
gpac
and,
and
you
know
we're
appreciative.
B
D
Yeah,
just
I'll
keep
this
under
one
minute
on
the
last
city
council
meeting
as
part
of
the
public
art
review
committee,
another
requested
jennifer
lane.
I
a
member
of
that
committee.
D
I
did
give
a
presentation
regarding
an
arts
and
culture
commission
which
the
city
council
was
very
receptive
and
the
the
vote
was
to
go
ahead
and
and
form
an
arts
and
culture
commission,
which
is
primarily
the
function,
is
to
integrate
and
promote
art
in
the
community
and
culture,
and
I
think
now
that
with
gpac
and
it's
going
to
be
kicking
up
again,
I
think
in
the
future
roxanne
or
myself,
or
both
of
us
can
give
just
brief
reports
on
the
progress
to
this
to
this
commission.
D
J
Yes,
I
I
will
definitely
commit
to
that,
and
and
commissioner
hillary,
if
I
can
just
ask
you
a
quick
question
about
that
arts
council,
I
had
I
heard
about
this
possibility
a
few
months
ago
and-
and
I
sort
of
remember
when
I
was
hearing
about
it-
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
youth
part
of
that
council
and
I'm
not
sure
if
they
were
going
to
have
like
a
youth
representative
or
a
youth
that
was
going
to
a
youth
group
that
was
going
to
be
a
separate
youth
council
or
I'm
sorry,
youth,
commission
or
I'm.
D
I
will
bring
that
up
tomorrow
at
8
30
with
for
the
park
parc
zoo
meeting,
which
is.