►
From YouTube: Hol PlanComm 102821
Description
Hollister Planning Commission Meeting October 28, 2021
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Well,
I
don't
know
what
would
be
considered
new
there's
been
a
little
bit
here
there
we
did
the
last
thing
with
the
dollar
general.
We
worked
on
that
which
then
the
city
took
over
after
that
yeah.
That
might.
A
B
A
A
It's
got
a
name
on
the
camera.
Today
it
looked
like
it
was
it
had
that
old
western
look
to
it,
but
it
was
much
larger.
I
think
I
know
where
I
think
I
know
which
one
it
is
yeah
I've
got.
I
mean
that
thing
had
to
be
dried
timber,
targeted
metal,
to
keep
it
warm
yeah.
A
A
A
C
D
A
A
C
A
And
chairman
hugh
boy,
may
I
say
I
also
believe
that
mr
munser
needs
to
recuse
himself
on
one
of
these
items,
which
means
that
we
have
two
two
sets
of
minutes
in
which
it's
literally
impossible
for
us
to
vote
on
and
to
approve,
because
even
when
we
get
those
the
other
two
seats
filled,
those
individuals
will
not
have
been
here
for
the
meeting
and
would
not
be
able
to
vote
on
it.
So,
under
those
circumstances,
those
very
limited
circumstances.
A
G
G
G
C
C
This
property
is
just
a
little
over
10
000
square
feet,
and
the
proposed
third
unit
will
bring
the
development
to
a
density
of
13.0
dwelling
units
per
acre,
which
will
bring
it
into
consistency
with
the
densities
allowed
in
both
the
general
plan
and
for
this
zoning
district
designations,
and
this
will
also
provide
additional
rental
housing
within
our
community.
C
that
existing
unit
unit
1
you'll,
see
it
on
the
far
right
of
your
screen
is
a
1
356
square
foot.
3
bedroom
2
bath
unit
and
the
second
existing
unit
in
the
center
unit
2
it
has
access
from
the
rear
from
canal
alley
and
is
a
905
square
foot
two-bedroom
two-bath
unit
and
the
proposed
new
unit
three
will
be
a
two-story
unit
and
with
a
two-car
garage
on
the
first
floor
and
598
square
feet
of
living
space.
On
the
second
floor,
it
will
be
a
two
bedroom
one
bath
unit.
C
This
is
the
floor
plan
so
again
garage
on
the
first
floor,
two
car
garage
accessing
the
alley
and
then
living
space
above
the
these
are
the
existing
elevations
of
both
unit
one
and
unit
two,
the
proposed
unit
will
be
two
story
and
it
will
have
a
horizontal
siding
consistent
with
the
existing
unit,
one
that
faces
central
avenue
and
all
of
the
details
of
the
facade
are
consistent
both
with
the
existing
units
and
with
the
old
town
density,
residential,
neighborhood
and
general
design
guidelines.
C
This
southern
elevation
has
just
two
garage
doors
on
the
first
floor
and
some
windows
on
the
second
floor
for
the
residents:
here's
the
east
and
west
elevations
with
ground
floor
entry
and
then
windows
in
the
living
space,
and
you
can
see
partially
the
staircase
up
into
the
second
floor.
It's
an
exterior
entrance
and
this
is
the
front
view
which
faces
into
the
property
and
the
this
shows
the
the
actual
staircase
entrance
up
into
the
unit.
C
The
project
as
it
is
multifamily
is
required
to
meet
our
multi-family
open
space
standards
and
unit
1,
which
is
shown
on
the
bottom
corner
of
your
screen.
Here
we'll
have
two
private
open
space
areas.
One
is
336
square
feet
and
the
second
is
882
square
feet,
which
is
a
total
of
1218
square
feet
of
private
open
space
for
unit
1.
unit
2
and
unit
3
are
seen
up
here
on
your
screen.
Unit.
C
The
parking
requirement
for
this
whole
project
overall
is
actually
five
spaces,
so
they
are
exceeding
the
spaces
by
one
space
and
they
also
have
a
bicycle
parking
space
here
by
the
guest
parking
which
meets
our
bicycle
parking
requirements.
C
The
project
site
is
located
within
our
aquaspriolo
seismic
study
area
for
fault
hazards.
However,
pursuant
to
the
aqueous
real
act,
the
development
that
doesn't
have
more
than
four
units
is
exempt
from
the
it's,
not
a
project
per
the
act
as
long
as
it's
less
than
two
stories
and
is
of
wood
framed
construction.
C
So
because
of
that,
this
project
isn't
triggering
any
false
trenching
requirements
or
anything
like
that
and
can
proceed
forward
under
our
standard
s.
A
process
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
receive
written
and
oral
testimony
about
the
proposal
and
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
the
site
in
architectural
review,
2021-10,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
in
the
draft
resolution.
C
G
C
G
Any
questions
on
the
staff
report
just
just
one
one
question
at
this
time:
the
tandem
parking
so
that
that
is
allowed
within
the
municipal
code.
C
So
we
have
this
discussion
during
the
project.
Review.
Tandem
parking
technically
requires
a
conditional
use
permit,
however,
because
the
site
only
requires
five
parking
spaces.
There's
two
two
bedrooms,
which
is
a
one
and
a
half
parking
space
per
so
three
and
then
the
three
bedroom
requires
a
two
parking
space.
So
that's
five
total
parking
spaces
that
they're
meeting
the
five
without
counting
that
six
tandem
space
as
one
of
the
necessary
parking
spaces.
So
no
conditional
use
permit
required
as
part
of
the
approval.
G
A
C
A
A
Exceeded
by
this
project,
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
the
architecture
is
by
tammy
jackson
and
the
project
also
features
landscape
design
by
rosemary
gridwell.
We
appreciate
your
review
and
look
forward
to
your
approval.
I'm
here.
If
you
have
any
questions.
G
J
G
Okay,
without
any
further
speakers,
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
at
6
18
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
I
I'll
just
begin
by
having
a
comment
here
is
that
this
is
a
good
project.
You
know
I,
like
the
project,
provides
rental
housing,
that's
sorely
needed
in
our
community,
but
knowing
the
accessibility
code
and
the
reason
why
I'm
kind
of
focusing
on
the
parking-
and
I
may
not
be
exactly
right
on
this.
G
We
don't
really
get
into
screenshot
code
review
at
this
level,
but
knowing
the
code
and
knowing
that
it
may
affect
the
parking.
I
have
to
bring
this
to
the
attention
your
attention
that
once
it
goes
through
four
leaf
plan
review
and
they
don't
distinguish
in
the
code,
rental
or
privately
owned
properties.
Just
three
dwelling
units.
It
may
may
end
up
that
they
convert
those
two
stalls
into
an
accessible
stall
with
a
van
accessible
aisle
and
then
the
two
dwelling
units
on
ground
floor
entrances
would
have
to.
G
G
I
G
G
G
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
of
a
conditional
use
permit
for
crave
wine
company
to
operate
a
wine
bar
and
retail
shop
in
a
plus
or
minus
1
675
square
feet
existing
ground
floor
commercial
space
at
616
san
benito
street,
further
identified
as
san
benito
county
assessor
parcel
number:
zero,
five:
four:
zero:
five:
zero,
zero,
zero
six
gotta
get
that
right:
okay,
located
in
the
downtown
mixed
use.
Zoning
district,
the
applicant
anticipates
operating
under
two
types
of
abc
licenses,
license
20
for
off-premises
and
license
42
for
on
premises.
Wine
and
beer.
Only
no
liquor.
H
As
mentioned,
the
applicant
is
requesting
approval
of
conditional
use
permit
to
operate
crave.
Wine
company,
a
wine
bar
and
retail
shop
in
an
approximately
1
675
square
foot
existing
ground
floor
commercial
space
at
616
san
benito
street,
which
is
located
in
the
downtown
mix
eustoning
district.
The
mission
of
the
cry
crave:
wine
company
is
to
sell
and
showcase
wines
from
across
california
and
the
globe.
Their
subsequent
goal
will
be
to
highlight
the
many
wines
that
are
grown
and
produced
locally
in
san
benito
county.
The
business
will
be
offering
wine
tastings
and
buy
the
glass
purchases.
H
H
H
H
No
architectural
changes
will
be
made
to
the
building.
The
applicant
has
indicated
that
they
will
be
making
the
following
tenant
improvements.
H
They
intend
to
add
a
partition
wall
for
an
office
storage
space
that
will
be
approximately
295
square
feet.
The
second
will
be
adding
an
ada
compliant
ramp
to
access
the
ada
compliant
bathroom,
which
has
recently
been
upgraded
by
k.
S
properties
under
a
different
permit
and
three
they'll
be
doing
cosmetic
upgrades
addressing
the
ceiling,
floors,
paint,
retail
racking
system
and
a
bar
and
back
bar.
H
A
conditional,
a
condition
of
approval,
has
been
added
to
ensure
that
any
features
signage
is
approved
through
securing
the
necessary
permits
through
the
planning
and
building
departments.
The
project
is
located
within
the
downtown
historic
district,
and
it's
also
located
in
the
downtown
parking
assessment
district
and
therefore
does
not
have
to
meet
any
specific
on-site
parking.
H
H
It
is
a
permitted
use
subject
to
a
conditional
permit.
An
exception
to
this
code
applies
to
the
on-site
alcohol
sale
at
a
restaurant
with
an
on-site
dining
that
has
a
bar
area
that
does
not
exceed
30
percent
of
the
gross
floor
of
the
premises
for
the
purpose
of
the
exception,
a
restaurant
must
have
a
kitchen
facility
that
is
approved
for
the
preparation,
cooking
and
serving
of
food
to
customers
for
compensation
crave.
Wine
company
is
required
to
obtain
a
conditional
use
permit
because
their
facility
is
not
able
to
meet
this
exception.
H
As
a
part
of
the
conditional
use
permit
process,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
type
42
license
with
the
alcohol
beverage
control
abc
to
authorize
the
sale
and
on-site
consumption
of
wine.
The
abc
has
issued
an
abc
245
form
to
the
city
which
is
distributed
when
the
agency
finds
that
there's
an
underdue
concentration
of
alcohol
outlets
pursuant
to
the
business
and
professions
code.
H
H
Abc
staff
has
determined
that
there
is
an
underdue
concentration
in
the
number
of
alcohol
related
licenses
that
are
currently
existing
in
the
area
of
the
city
also
referred
to
as
census
tract
zero
zero
zero.
Four,
the
abc
is
authorized
to
issue
up
to
8
licenses
within
the
census
tract
without
consulting
a
local
municipality.
H
This
use
is
also
consistent
with
the
city
of
hollister's
general
plan,
designation
of
downtown
commercial
and
mixed
use,
which
encourages
ground
floor,
pedestrian
friendly
retail
sales
and
service
uses
with
upper
floors
and
offices
and
residential
uses,
and
with
that
staff
recommends
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
as
eva
pointed
out
on
the
slide
just
so
everyone's
aware,
there
was
a
slight
mistake
with
the
apn.
H
H
So
there
will
be
two
recommendations.
One
is
to
adopt
a
resolution
recommending
to
the
city
council
that
they
should
determine
the
public.
Convenience
of
necessity
would
be
served
by
the
issuance
of
a
type
42
license
to
crave
wine
company,
and
the
second
is
to
adopt
a
resolution
recommending
to
the
city
council.
H
C
C
So
the
applicant
would
probably
know
more,
but
that
that
would
be
my
understanding
of
the
abc
license
for
on-site
versus
off-site.
G
G
But
let's
say
let's
say
there
was
no
change.
The
previous
occupancy
like
was
retail
and
another
retail
was
to
be
the
new
tenant.
It
would
not
be
subject
to
the
purview
of
the
planning
commission.
C
Correct
yeah,
if
it
was
just
a
permitted
by
right
use
like
retail
or
food
like
a
restaurant
or
something
and
the
planning
commission
would
have
no
say
the
alcohol
use
in
the
city
of
hollister.
If
it's
affiliated
with
a
restaurant
meeting
that
exception
that
amber
talked
about
it
doesn't
require
a
cup.
So
that's
what
most
of
our
licenses,
especially
in
the
downtown,
are
they
have
food
affiliated
with
the
alcohol
use.
So
it's
a
restaurant
and
we
have
that
exception
from
the
cup.
G
Okay,
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
at
6
33
bring
it
to
the
planning
commission,
I'm
I'm
a
little
little
surprised
of
the
proliferation
of
alcohol
licenses
within
our
city,
but
when
we
look
at
this
in
terms
of
a
convenience
or
necessity,
I
look
at
this,
of
course,
as
a
as
a
more
of
a
convenience
than
necessity.
I
Yeah,
I
agree
I
mean
I
like
the
part
where
they
want
to
highlight
local
wines,
so
I
really
hope
that
that
happens.
I
think
that's
a
good
thing,
especially,
as
you
know,
we're
working
towards
attracting
visitors
for
to
our
local
wineries.
I
think
that's
a
really
that's
a
plus,
so
I'd
like
that.
As
an
addition.
G
J
J
A
J
And
for
the
second
item,
I
will
make
the
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
recommending
to
the
city
council
approval
of
the
conditional
use
permit
2021-7,
subject
to
determination
of
the
public,
convenience
and
necessity,
and
the
conditions
contained
in
draft
resolution.
I
A
G
C
Yes,
thank
you.
This
item,
as
mentioned,
is
an
application
request
for
a
tentative
map,
a
conditional
use
permit
for
planned
unit
development
as
well
as
site
and
architectural
review.
C
They
are
dividing
this
parcel
into
116
lots
for
single
family,
detached
development
and
28
lots
for
duets,
so
single-family
attached
units.
The
applicant
is
also
requesting
a
conditional
use
permit
for
planned
unit
development
to
receive
flexibility
from
the
standard,
medium
density,
residential
minimum
lot
size
and
also
to
allow
for
a
zero
lot
line.
Setback
on
those
attached
duet
units.
C
In
addition
for
the
duet
units,
the
applicant,
is
requesting
site
and
architectural
review
by
the
planning
commission.
This
project
site
is
located
with
in
the
medium
density,
residential
performance
overlay,
zoning
district,
the
r3
mpz,
and
it
is
currently
being
called
avalon
village.
The
avalon
village
subdivision
this
site.
The
senate
of
map
site
is
located
on
a
currently
vacant
parcel,
with
the
exception
of
a
small
existing
shed,
which
is
proposed
to
be
demolished
as
part
of
the
development
and
there'll
be
again
a
total
of
144
residential
lots
with
116
detached
and
28
duets.
C
There
is
also
an
additional
dedication
of
a
just
over
two
acre
parcel
parcel,
a
which
you
see
here
in
the
northeast
corner
of
your
mouth.
The
bottom
right
corner
of
our
screen
north
is
facing
to
the
right,
and
there
will
also
be
a
parcel
in
the
opposite
corner
being
dedicated
to
margaret
mace
middle
school
to
help
alleviate
some
traffic
to
extend
their
parking
lot.
C
The
project
is
providing
public
roads
throughout
the
site
which
provides
through
access
from
the
existing
dead
ends
at
moore
park,
drive
here
from
the
villages
subdivision
to
the
east,
as
well
as
brigantino
drive
located
here.
If
you
can
see
my
pointer
on
the
screen,
and
it
will
also
extend
memorial
drive
to
the
north
from
meridian
street
all
the
way
to
santa
ana
road,
the
project
is
proposing
to
improve
the
intersection
of
oh
sorry.
This
slide.
I
just
pointed
out
the
duets
they're
located
throughout
the
development,
so
I
identified
all
of
28
duets
here.
C
Here
the
intersection
of
memorial
drive
and
the
project
driveway,
which
is
proposed
at
current
drive
in
the
center
of
the
project,
will
have
a
mini
roundabout
or
a
traffic
circle
in
compliance
with
the
city
of
hollister
city
council's
roundabout
policy
to
encourage
them
where
feasible
and
it
will
have
a
raised
median
with
some
center
islands
and
some
pedestrian
safety
islands.
So
there's
a
mid
mid-block
stopping
point
for
pedestrians
at
this
traffic
circle
intersection
and
then
finally,
at
memorial,
drive
and
santa
ana
road.
The
northern
side
of
the
park.
C
The
project
at
this
intersection
there'll
be
a
full
roundabout
installed,
which
will
provide
for
adequate
vehicular
circulation
and
also
help
eliminate
some
u-turns
that
are
happening
out
of
the
gabilan
hills.
Elementary
school
and
the
hollister
dual
language
academy
driveway
during
the
school
drop
off
and
pick
up
hours.
There's.
Currently,
no
legal
left
turn
out
of
that
school
driveway
onto
santa
ana
road
and
people
are
going
to
have
to
legally
go
all
the
way
down
to
lucero
drive
in
the
villages
subdivision.
C
C
This
will
increase
walkability
not
only
for
this
project,
but
also
for
existing
development
in
the
area,
particularly
the
villages
to
the
east.
There's
also
a
proposal
to
provide
a
providing
complete
the
sidewalk
connection.
That's
currently
non-existent
on
santa
ana
road,
extending
beyond
the
project
site
to
the
east,
which
will
provide
connected
sidewalk
all
the
way
down
to
the
village's
subdivision
at
lucero
drive,
so
that
will
provide
safe,
sidewalk
walkability
for
pedestrian
traffic
going
to
and
from
the
school.
C
The
memorial
drive
provided
the
cross
sections
here.
The
memorial
drive
extension
on
the
top
of
your
screen
has
a
separated
class
4
bike
lane
on
either
side
of
the
vehicular
travel
lanes,
and
then
the
santa
ana
road
section
includes
a
10-foot
multi-use
class,
one
path
for
both
bicycles
and
pedestrians
on
the
south
side
of
the
street.
So
it
doesn't
have
two-way
bike
traffic,
because
the
city
limits
are
completely
on
the
south
side
of
the
street
and
the
vast
majority
of
development
is
on
the
south
side
of
the
street.
C
As
mentioned,
there
is
a
request
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
planned
unit
development.
Alongside
this
project,
the
plan
unit
development
cup
allows
for
flexibility
within
the
general
development
and
site
layout
standards,
while
preserving
the
integrity
and
character
of
the
residential
areas
within
the
city.
C
C
That's
standard
r3
zoning
and
the
the
3066
is
for
the
smallest
duet,
lots
and
the
the
range
in
sizes
betw
across
the
subdivision
is
30
3
400,
just
over
3
400
for
the
smallest
single
family,
detached
all
the
way
up
to
6
818
square
feet,
and
so
this
request
that
for
the
cup,
is
in
compliance
with
our
section
17
14
010,
which
is
for
our
residential
performance
overlay.
Zoning
district.
C
The
overall
density
of
the
development
is
about
9.8
dwelling
units
per
net
acre,
which
is
consistent
with
the
r3
mpz
zoning
restrict,
which
allows
between
8
to
12.,
with,
with
those
two
exceptions,
the
applicant's
proposing
to
be
consistent
with
all
our
other
regulations
for
setback
and
law
coverage
in
the
r3
standard.
Zoning
district.
C
Moving
on
to
our
site
and
architectural
review,
here's
a
conceptual
street
scene
rendering,
as
you
saw
on
this,
the
overall
site
layout
earlier,
the
duets
are
designed
to
blend
in
throughout
the
development,
and
so
because
they
are
attached
housing
units.
They
do
require
site
and
architectural
review
by
the
planning
commission
for
consideration.
C
The
applicant
also
provided
single-family
architecture,
but
that's
just
for
your
information.
The
planning
commission
doesn't
actually
have
any
authority
under
our
code.
Those
will
be
reviewed
and
approved
with
our
building
submittal
building
permit
submittal
process,
and
there
are
two
proposed
elevations
and
one
set
of
floor
plans
for
each
of
the
duets.
C
C
C
C
C
That
extension,
which
will
greatly
increase
the
traffic
circulation
in
the
area,
which
is
largely
caused
by
the
proximity
to
the
schools,
especially
at
drop
off
and
pick
up
time
for
the
three
different
schools
in
the
area.
There
is
not
a
lot
of
option
for
circulation,
so
memorial
drive
will
help
to
alleviate
a
lot
of
that
traffic
congestion.
C
The
applicant
has
worked
with
the
hollister
school
district
over
the
pre-zoning
and
over
the
design
process
of
this
project
to
provide
additional
parking
for
them
and
parking
lot
circulation
at
the
southeast
corner
of
the
site
closest
to
margaret
mace
middle
school
as
well.
C
In
discussing
the
conditions
with
our
engineering
team,
there
are
two
changes
that
are
being
requested
to
two
conditions,
so
this
is
the
same
condition:
tentative
map,
condition,
number
30
and
site
and
architectural
condition
number
36.
This
is
with
regard
to
the
final
occupancy
inspection
and
the
impact
fees
that
are
required
by
the
project.
C
There
was
a
letter,
and
it
was
provided
to
you
earlier,
but
via
email
by
abraham
and
there's
also
a
copy
available
up
a
hard
copy,
a
letter
and
determination
agreement
with
the
city
from
2017,
where
the
applicant
was
dedicating
right-of-way
for
a
storm
drain
easement
in
the
vicinity,
and
so
the
city
and
the
applicant
agreed
that
they
would
not
have
to
pay
storm
drain
impact
fees
to
connect
so
we're
requesting
per
that
agreement
to
remove
the
storm
drain
as
part
of
subsection
e
of
this
condition
and
mark
falgo
from
our
engineering
department
is
also
online.
C
It
currently
reads
what
you
see
on
the
left
regarding
coordinating
a
cds
unit
on
that
storm
drain
line,
and
this
is
language,
clarification,
the
on
the
left.
You
see
that
it
says
it's
a
city
project
and
that
they're
coordinating
with
the
city,
but
the
language
on
the
right
that
was
agreed
with
between
our
engineering
and
the
applicant,
was
just
to
clarify
the
language
that
the
unit
was
always
supposed
to
be
a
city
project
and
it's
not
the
applicant's
not
installing
or
performing
that
project.
If
there's
questions
on
that
I'll
turn
you
to
mark.
C
So
with
that
staff
is
recommending
that
the
planning
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
three
motions.
The
first
would
be
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
tentative
map
2021-2
with
the
change
to
condition
30
and
63,
as
I
described.
G
I
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
The
was:
has
there
been
any
con
conversation
about?
I
think
we
have
community
facility
district
funding
mechanisms
for
maintenance
such
such
as
hoa
or
anything
of
that
nature.
C
Yes,
so
the
project,
as
with
all
our
residential
projects
is
conditioned
to
go
both
be
annexed
into
cfd
four,
which
is
for
public
facilities,
streets,
sidewalks
parks,
landscaping,
lighting
and
they
will
have
to
privately
maintain
storm
facilities
with
some
kind
of
hoa
or
other
agreement
with
the
properties
and
then
cfd
5
is
for
our
police
and
fire
services,
and
they
will
be
annexed
into
that
as
part
of
the
project.
Conditions
of
approval
as
well.
G
And
that
includes
the
the
parcel
a
park.
C
G
And,
in
summary,
all
the
infrastructure,
the
the
memorial
lane
extension
the
drives
the
sidewalks,
the
roundabouts
all
will
be
paid
by
the
applicant.
Is
that
correct.
C
The
the
maintain
the
maintenance
or.
G
They
will
install
the
other.
Yes,
okay,
that's
any
other
questions
from
the
commission.
I
Yeah
a
couple
questions,
so
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
give
a
little
bit
more
information
about
the
two
letters
that
came
to
us
on
the
sewer
lines.
It's
very
technical,
not
very
clear
to
me,
so
I
just
wonder
if
you
could
explain
what
that
is.
It
sounds
very
concerning
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
reading
it
properly.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
give
an
explanation.
F
Good
evening
the
the
the
letters
that
are
the
the
emails
that
I
saw,
I
did
I
did
see
letters
were
a
request
to
extend
the
sewer
line
on
santa
ana
road
to
the
east.
Is
that
what
you're
referring
to.
F
Okay
and
what
their
what
the
letter
is
stating
is,
that
is
that,
typically,
a
project
will
improve
its
frontage
in
this
case
at
sewer.
F
F
The
letter
had
suggested,
or
the
email
had
suggested,
that
that
this
applicant
should
be
required
to
install
that
line
now
before
before
that
road
gets
paved
and
it
becomes
more
costly,
but
the
road's
already
paved.
The
sewer
line
would
be
installed
in
existing
pavement,
so
it
would
be
just
as
costly
as
as
a
future
installation
should
a
project
east
of
of
this
one
require
it
you'll.
F
So
the
we
did
not
add
a
condition
for
this
project
to
to
extend
the
sewer
to
the
east
for
the
sole
reason
well,
for
the
couple
reasons
that
there's
no
user
to
the
east,
yet
that
any
future
users,
my
application,
could
would
extend
the
sewer
the
same
as
this
project
is
doing.
F
If
you
look
at
sheet
six
of
the
tentative
map,
this
project
has
to
go
over
well
into
the
frontage
of
the
school
to
to
pick
up
sewer,
to
be
used
to
tie
into
and
and
that
the
city
would,
if
the
city
paid
for
it
or
had
this
applicant
pay,
for
it
was
some
sort
of
a
future
reimbursement
agreement.
It
would
be,
it
would
just
be
empty
pipe
sitting
in
the
ground,
so
there
didn't
seem
to
be
a
good
benefit
or
cost
savings
to
install
it.
Today,.
I
Okay,
thanks
for
that
and
then
my
second
question
is:
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
just
go
over
the
traffic
flow
as
a
as
it
relates
to
both
margaret
maze
and
gavilan
hills
actually
and
hdla.
I
It's
been
a
while
when
it
first
when
there
was
first
talk
about
this
project
starting
and
there
was,
I
think
there
was
a
different
expectation
for
the
way
that
the
traffic
would
flow
and
the
way
that
parents
would
be
able
to
do
pickups
and
drop-offs,
and
everybody
who
has
any
kind
of
pickup
and
drop-off
with
most
of
our
elementary
schools
in
hollister,
know
that
it
is
a
nightmare
and-
and
I
think
that
the
one
at
gavilan
hills
is
probably
the
worst
so
just
wondering
if
you
could
go
over
that,
and
then
just
remind
me,
if
I'm
remembering
correctly,
that
the
original
plan
for
that
is
different
than
what
we
have
now
or
the
or
at
least
a
discussion
around.
I
What
would
be
the
proposed
flow
of
the
traffic
for
pick
up?
The
drop-offs
would
be
for,
for
those
parents.
C
C
Your
way
through
that
subdivision
or
possibly
make
a
turn
around
in
the
residential
area
and
then
you'd
be
able
to
turn
left
and
come
back
west
on
santa
ana
road.
With
this
project,
you
would
have
the
option
of
essentially
a
u-turn.
It's
not
technically
a
u-turn,
but
you
would
take
the
roundabout
all
the
way
around
and
you'd
be
able
to
turn
around.
So
you
could
to
a
right
out
at
the
school
and
then
you
would
be
right
at
the
roundabout
and
let
me
go
to
the
site
plan
here.
C
C
And
you
could
take
the
roundabout
right
around
and
come
back
and
head
west,
or
you
could
also
come
down
memorial
south
to
meridian
or
continue
south
this
way,
so
it
would
provide
through
circulation
this
way
and
also
the
opportunity
to
turn
around
at
the
roundabout
for
margaret
mays
on
meridian
street.
C
You
can
come
in
and
out
of
their
parking
lot,
it's
a
little
bit
different,
I'm
not
certain
that
it's
one
way
currently,
but
the
proposal
would
add
so
there's
parking
kind
of
this
way
and
I
believe,
there's
a
second
driveway
near
to
this
side
of
the
school,
but
it's
kind
of
just
a
parking
lot
and
and
driving
in
and
out
and
parking,
and
things
like
that-
and
I
believe
people
also
park
on
the
street
here.
C
C
If
you
lived
up
in
the
northern
part
of
town,
you
could
take
memorial
down
and
turn
right
into
this
parking
lot,
but
the
applicant's
also
dedicating
this.
This
parcel
for
the
parking
lot
circulation,
so
it
would
be
a
one-way
loop
here,
actually
it
loops
this
way
and
then
around,
and
it
would
just
provide
more
a
parking
spaces
and
also
just
an
option
to
loop
and
drop
off
to
help
kind
of
alleviate
congestion
in
this
parking
space
area.
C
As
far
as
the
previous
a
previous
project
proposal,
there
was
a
very
original
map
during
the
pre-zone
process,
but
it
has
always
looked
very
similar
to
this
one.
The
major
changes
from
that
original
design
that
we
were
talking
about
in
the
preliminary
pre-zone
process
is
the
addition
of
the
traffic
circle
and
the
roundabout.
There
was
four-way,
stop
and
two-way
stock
and
traffic
light
controls
being
presented
at
that
time.
C
I
C
Be
so
there
won't
be
a
walkway,
it
will
just
be
rear
property
line,
kind
of
standard
residential,
fencing,
good
neighbor
fencing.
There
will
be
walkways
at
the
edge
of
the
cul-de-sac.
So,
instead
of
if
you
lived
for
example
here,
you
wouldn't
have
to
walk
all
the
way
down
here
and
come
out
to
memorial.
There's
a
cut
through
here.
So
you
could
head
this
way
on
the
sidewalk
and
then
a
same
thing
on
this
side.
C
You
can
cut
through
at
the
cul-de-sac
for
pedestrians
and
then
obviously
we
have
all
the
crosswalk
installation
at
each
of
the
intersections
and
then
we
also
have
a
pedestrian
cut
through
near
the
park
here
for
this
side,
so
you
don't
have
to
come
down
and
to
memorial
and
then
there's
also
this
sidewalk
easement
slash
driveway
here.
So
you
can
access
memorial
from
this
edge
and
then
is
there
one?
I
don't
believe
there's
one
through
to
meridian
on
this
side
of
the
project,
but.
I
I
C
I
G
H
C
Have
three
speaker
cards
before
we
do
speaker
cards?
We
have
received
several
comment.
Letters
as
well
as
one
that
we
just
received
just
short
of
this
meeting
via
email
from
excuse
me.
C
So
that
is
all
the
written
correspondence
and
please,
let
me
know
if
any
of
the
planning
commissioners
haven't
received
that
correspondence
and
if
anyone
would
like
copies,
I
have
a
few
copies
and
we
can
make
copies.
Certainly
for
anyone
who
would
like
one
with
that,
we
do
have
some
written
speaker
cards
for
this
project.
E
What's
going
honorable
chair
members
of
the
commission,
thank
you
very
much
for
for
your
time,
victor
gomez,
here
representing
the
the
developer
and
and
property
owners.
E
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
all
three
of
you
all
three
of
you
participated
in
the
mnd
and
part
of
the
pre-zone
for
annexation,
as
roxanne
remembered
as
well,
and
so
we're
happy
to
have
at
least
some
continuity
there
with
the
same
commission
and
and
working
with
you
when
we
came
here
for
pre-zone
for
annexation,
one
of
the
commitments-
it
was
a
unanimous
vote
and
one
of
the
commitments
from
one
of
the
requests
from
commissioner
stevens
was
for
us
to
work
with
the
hollister
school
district.
E
The
good
thing
is
that
at
that
time,
carla
torres
luna
who's,
a
trustee.
There
worked
with
us
directly
through
lisa,
eventually
diego
and
now
erica
and
and
kip
to
constantly
work
with
them.
We
worked
with
the
hollis
school
district
pretty
closely
for
for
a
number
of
years,
but
the
reason
we
are
looking
at
complete
streets
or
sidewalks
to
lucero
the
reason
we
have
that
roundabout
and
that
safety
component,
the
upgrades
to
meridian
and
memorial
and
and
the
dedication
of
property
was
really
because
of
you
roxanne.
E
So
thank
you
for
encouraging
us
to
work
with
the
school
district
and
come
up
with
a
plan.
I
think
that
works
for
everybody,
so,
as
you
saw
in
that
letter
that
the
hollister
school
district
sent
they're
pleased
with
this
agreement,
the
only
thing
that
came
up
recently
was
a
conversation
I
had
with
carla
earlier
today.
That's
in
that
email
that
she
sent
to
you
to
to
roxanne's
points
regarding
the
the
fencing.
Obviously
you
know
we,
we
looked
at
certain
components
of
that.
E
In
the
past,
the
the
police
department
and
the
fire
department
had
concerns
with
any
type
of
protect
pedestrian
connectivity
behind
the
houses
on
our
side
of
the
property
right.
So
those
that
that
conversation,
it
was
never
in
in
in
an
actual
document,
but
that
conversation
ceased
pretty
quickly
because
it
just
wasn't
feasible.
But
I
do
want
to
follow
up
with
you,
quick
and
let
you
know
that
about
20
minutes
before
the
meeting
started.
E
I
did
connect
with
carla
talking
to
her
on
behalf
of
the
school
district,
and
I
do
have
a
plan
to
address
some
pedestrian
connectivity
on
their
property.
So
carla
seems
to
be
very
satisfied
with
that.
I
have
another
developer
coming
in,
that's
going
to
be
assisting
with
that,
and
but
that
would
be
something
for
the
school
district
to
take
on,
but
I'm
just
happy
to
share
with
you
that
I
think
the
school
district
or
carla
specifically
is
satisfied
with
that.
E
So
with
that,
I
have
plenty
of
other
comments
that
I
want
to
make,
but
first
of
all,
traffic
circulation
is
going
to
be
great
connectivity,
safe
routes
to
schools.
Obviously,
that's
very
important
on
on-site
infrastructure,
the
dedication
of
millions
of
dollars
for
traffic
impact
fees
that
will
go
to
the
widening
of
highway
25
as
well,
that's
very
important,
so
we
are
paying.
Obviously,
all
those
fees
again
happy
to
see
the
holster
school
district.
E
Later,
we're
very
happy
about
that,
and
just
in
general,
just
the
the
layout
of
the
project
that
worked
with
the
with
the
planning
staff.
Just
all
worked
out
really
well
we're
happy
that
we're
happy
we're
happy,
it
seems,
like
planning,
is
happy
we're
happy
that
the
school
district
is
happy
as
well.
So
this
really
the
collaboration.
E
I
think
that
started
with
you
folks,
three
years
ago,
plus
years
ago,
steve's
probably
like
more
like
40
years
ago,
but
has
worked
out
really
good,
and
I
think
that's
why
we're
here
today
with,
I
think,
a
really
good
project.
All
of
you
could
could
support.
E
We
have
technical
staff
or
members
of
our
team
on
zoom.
If
you
have
any
technical
questions,
and
certainly
mr
rizzotti
is
here
and
mr
letterboard
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
sorry
for
going
over
you're.
B
I'm
stephen
rosati,
a
property
owner
family
representative,
I'm
requesting
that
the
planning
commission
provide
continued
support
and
approval
tonight
for
the
project
by
approving
the
site
and
architectural
review,
the
conditional
use
permit
and
vesting
tentative
map
the
project
fully
conforms
with
the
city's
general
plan,
based
on
both
the
direction
of
the
general
plan
and
desire
of
council
members.
This
project
will
provide
infrastructure
improvements
that
benefit
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
B
B
The
property
also
provided
way
back
in
1992
infrastructure
improvements
through
its
participation
in
the
meridian
street
district
and
the
pro
property
has
been
vacant
ever
since,
so
that
was
kind
of
a
benefit
that
the
city
got.
You
know
way
back
when,
when
the
property
didn't
provide
any
impacts
at
all,
I'd
just
like
to
provide
a
few
significant
features
from
the
general
plan.
The
project
is
classic
infill
of
desired
by
the
general
plan
and
it's
surrounded
on
three
sides
by
established
growth.
B
It's
already
been
stated
voluntarily
offering
to
expand
the
parking
lot
for
margaret
may
school,
which
is
a
big
help
to
them
as
well.
Most
importantly,
on
august
22nd
of
2019
by
a
4-0
vote,
the
planning
commission
supported
the
initial
study.
Traffic
study,
mitigated
negative
declaration
and
recommended
approval
to
the
city
for
annexation.
B
No
city,
council,
members
or
staff
produced
any
specific
adverse
health
or
safety
impacts
upon
the
public,
health
and
safety
or
overriding
considerations
for
annexation.
I
think
that's
fairly
significant
as
well.
Traffic
study
determined
the
project's
impa
impacts
are
less
insignificant,
with
no
mitigation
required.
The
negative
declaration
stated
the
same.
B
The
memorial
drive
extension
will
also
serve
as
a
traffic
calming
mechanism
which
is
desired
by
the
city
through
the
roundabouts
and
design.
So
we
think
it's
a
it's
a
good
project
for
the
community.
It
not
only
provides
infrastructure
for
the
project,
but
goes
beyond
that
for
benefits
to
the
community
that
the
general
plan
was
asking
for
that
was
followed,
so
we
greatly
appreciate
your
support
by
continuing
voting.
Yes,
thank
you.
D
D
D
So
I
think
that
when
planning
when
the
old
tenet
was
that
the
developers
should
make
improvements
and
put
in
infrastructure
to
the
limits
of
their
boundaries,
I
think
there's
a
good
reason
for
that
and
if
you
can
look
at
that
figure,
2-4
you'll
see
you
know
how
much,
how
many
parcels
are
sitting
out
there
east
of
this
project
and
north
and
south
of
santa
ana
road,
even
crossing
fairview.
K
K
I
think
we
probably
should
have
no
parking
signs
there,
but
that's
something
we
can.
We
can
work
on
later,
the
roundabouts.
Obviously
that
was
voted
on
by
the
city
desired
by
the
city.
We
hired
an
engineer
that
we
think
is
the
best
out
of
sacramento
region,
rick
engineering
and
they've,
designed
these
roundabouts
and
also
the
pedestrian
walkways
and
bicycle
paths.
If
you
look
at
the
cross
section
for
memorial,
I
think
we've
got
17
feet
from
curb
to
the
edge
of
sidewalks.
So
there's
a
big
cushion
there
too.
You
know
where
you
won't.
K
Have
children
walking
close
to
vehicles,
we've
narrowed
down
the
the
width
of
the
street,
curb
to
curb.
I
think
we've
only
got
about
22
24
feet,
as
opposed
to,
I
think.
Originally
it
was
40
feet.
So
we've
done
a
lot
of
things
to
improve
the
safety
for
the
children.
There
we've
tried
really
hard
to
do
that
and
we've
coordinated
that
with
the
school
district.
K
The
parking
lot,
obviously
victor
was
instrumental
in
working
with
the
school
district.
On
that
and
as
far
as
the
design
goes,
we
are
very
flexible.
We're
going
to
continue
to
work
with
the
school
district
to
see
if
that's
more,
of
a
parking
lot
or
a
drop
off,
but
we're
going
to
be
dedicating
it
and
and
fully
improving
it.
K
The
park
size
we
increased
and
in
order
to
really
comply
with
the
general
plan,
we
do
have
some
lot
sizes
that
are
a
little
bit
smaller
than
your
zoning,
but
I
think
with
the
width
of
the
street
the
the
parking
this
the
park
site.
K
I
think,
overall,
it's
a
nice
plan,
two
other
components:
the
city
didn't
want
sound
walls,
or
at
least
we
had
heard
this.
So
we
removed
all
the
sound
walls,
and
let
me
see
ms
stevens-
you
had
talked
about
a
pathway
between
the
houses
and
the
school.
The
police
department
kind
of
shut
that
down
early
on
in
the
process.
They
didn't
want
an
alley
way
back
there,
so
I
think
that's
about
it,
my
time's
up
but
again.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
we
would
certainly
appreciate
your
support
here.
Thank
you.
G
Further
speakers,
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
now
at
7
21.,
I
just
with
the
speaking
of
the
memorial
street
extension
and
we've
been
talking
about
that
for
over
16
years.
G
I
remember
back
in
the
2005
general
plan
under
the
circulation
element.
It
was
a
one
of
the
priorities.
It
was
going
to
be
a
city
responsibility
back
in
2005.
The
price
tag
was
2.5
approximately
2.5
million
dollars,
and
I
think
that
one
of
the
pluses
about
this
project
is
not
only
the
extension
of
memorial
drive
but
the
design
of
it.
I
like
the
design
of
it.
They
like
the
pedestrian
production
protection
element
with
the
trees,
the
sidewalk.
That's
that's
what
I
like
to
see
for
the
street
design.
G
The
coordination
with
thanks
to
commissioner
stevens,
he
played
an
important
role
to
get
the
applicant
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
school
district.
We
receive
that
letter.
They
support
the
project.
G
G
You
can
see
the
lower
left
elevation,
all
those
duets
along
those
western
edge
there
face
west.
You
see
that
that's
where
you
got
a
predominant
amount
of
glazing
there.
Those
those
units
are
going
to
heat
up
during
the
summer
months
with
the
lower
incline
of
sun,
there's
going
to
be
quite
a
cooling
cost
unless,
with
no
shading
elements
to
mitigate
that,
I
suggest
that
that's
either
going
to
be
a
low
e
or
solar
glass
on
that
western
facing
side
to
cut
down
on
on
cooling
costs
other
than
that
did
the
other
elevations
look
fine!
G
G
A
G
G
So
I
think,
and
and
again
it's
basically,
you
know.
The
first
thing
we
look
at
is
compliance
with
the
general
plan.
It
does
comply
with
the
medium
density
general
plan
and
the
applicant
was
showing
good
faith
and
providing
more
different,
a
variety
of
housing
types
and
initially
it
was
all
single-family
detached
and
now
we're
we're
going
towards.
In
fact,
I
think,
with
the
new
general
plan,
you're
going
to
have
an
inclusionary
affordability
component.
J
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment:
it's
nice,
to
see
that
the
the
applicant
worked
with
the
the
school
district
in
in
those
improvements
and
also
to
see
the
letter
from
the
school
in
support
of
the
project.
J
I
was
just
curious
if
it
came
up
in
discussion
during
events
at
the
school
graduations
festivals,
anything
like
that
the
abundance
of
of
cars-
if
there
was
any
discussion
with
the
parking
during
that
time
right
now,
they
kind
of
utilized
that
empty
field
to
park
in.
So
I
was
just
curious
that
came
up
in
in
any
of
the
discussions
with
the
school.
I
Yes,
I
have
a
few.
I
have
a
few
comments,
so
I
I
feel
like
this
is
like
a
this.
This
project
for
me
is
filled
with
a
bunch
of
dilemmas,
because
I,
like
the
infrastructure,
improvements
the
streets.
I
I
I'm
glad
that
there's
going
to
be
a
way
to
get
through.
You
know
memorial
all
the
way
to
the
to
santa
ana.
I
mean
it's
been
a
long
time
coming
and
it
does
look
really
nice.
I
appreciate
all
the
work
with
the
schools.
I
I
think
the
thing
that
I,
that
the
thing
that's
causing
me
a
lot
of
like
kind
of
inks,
is
that
there
was
this
opportunity
to
provide
higher
density
housing
and
we
only
have
the
duets
and
I
I
I
think
I
would
have
liked
to
have
seen
some
like
triplex
fourplexes,
something
that
would
have
been
a
little
bit.
I
I
However,
they're
still
going
to
be
very
expensive
and
out
of
reach
for
many
of
the
residents
of
hollister,
and
I
think
that
until
we
start
to
see
more
projects
that
have
like
three
three
flex,
four
plexes
and
and
six
plexes-
that
that's
gonna
continue
to
be
an
issue,
and-
and
this
was,
I
think,
what
an
opportunity
to
have
a
little
bit
of
that.
So
I'm
a
little
disappointed.
I
I
wish
that
there
had
been
a
little
bit
more
like
the
plexes
right,
not
just
the
duplexes
but
triple
x's,
four
plexes,
some
other
options,
and
I
I
like
the
location
because
we've
had
so
many
projects
where
we're
we're
ramming
a
bunch
of
houses
in
a
really
small
space
in
the
west
side
and
we're
just
impacting
that
neighborhood.
So
much,
I'm
appreciating
the
you
know
like
getting
out
of
that
area
and
moving
to
other
parts
of
hollister.
I
So
so
it's
a
bit
of
a
dilemma.
I
appreciate
a
lot
of
the
things
in
this
project
and
I'm
disappointed
in
some
of
the
things,
and
I
wish
that
we
would
have
been
moving
in
that
direction
and
although
it
does
meet
the
current
general
plan,
it
isn't
really
meeting
the
mark
in
where
we're
looking
for
in
the
future,
especially
if
we
want
families
that
currently
are
residents
of
hollister
to
be
able
to
afford
some
of
these
houses.
So
that's
it.
I
I
Oh,
and
can
I
just,
can
I
just
add
one
more
comment?
I
I'm
I'm
really
interested.
I
should
have
added
this
to
my
other
comments.
I
apologize
for
that.
I
was
really
interested
in
the
comment
made
by
one
of
the
speakers
about
the
frontage
improvements
and
and
that
issue,
because
that's
been
a
lot,
an
issue
for
a
really
long
time
and
is
there
any
resolution
to
that?
Is
there
any
way
that
that
could
be
a
part
of
this
project?
I
C
I
mean,
I
think,
to
mark's
point
and
he
could
add
as
well
and
the
applicant
is
having
the
sewer
line
come
they're,
extending
the
sewer
line
to
their
project
and
having
it
come
into
their
project,
and
I
think
mark's
point
or
comment
addressing
the
the
comment
that
we
received
from
the
public
was
that
it
essentially
would
be
a
dead
end
and
typically
developments
fun
if
a
development
needs
to
extend
a
line,
that's
part
of
their
development
requirement
so
like,
for
example,
this
development
is
extending
lines
that
exist
to
their
project.
C
C
But
I
believe
that
if
it
was
the
desire
of
the
commission
that
they
could
put
a
condition
on
the
project,
if
that
was
the
desire
to
have
it
extend
and
end
at
their
frontage.
I
don't
know.
Mark,
if
I
hopefully
didn't
speak
out
of
training.
F
I
think
I
think
you
you
hit
it
pretty
well,
but
and
if
I,
if
I
said
that
there
was
nobody
out
to
the
east,
that
would
ever
be
served
by
the
sewer,
that
was
not
what
I
meant
to
say.
What
I
meant
was
that
there's
no
there
isn't
any
there,
the
the
any
project
out
there
would
have
to
go
through
quite
a
a
process,
first
annexation
and
that
and
then
the
this
whole.
This
whole
tentative
map
application
and
there
isn't
anything
that
we
know
of
right
now.
That
is,
you
know
imminent.
F
The
verbalization
of
the
of
the
comment
that
was
made
today
mentioned
a
report
from
2010.
That
said
that
you
know
there
there
may
be
septic,
conversions
or
or
or
developments
out
in
the
east.
That
would
want
to
connect
to
this.
F
So
that
kind
of
proves
my
point
is
that
that
that's
an
11
year
old,
almost
12
year
old
study,
that
if,
if
we
had
put
the
pipe
in
the
ground,
when
that
study
came
out,
it
would
be
you
know,
20
through
its
life
cycle,
with
not
a
drop
of
sewage
going
through
it
yet,
and
so
the
my
point
is
that
there's
no
cost
savings
to
do
it
now
there
would
be
a
cost
savings
if
santa
ana
road
didn't
exist,
but
there's
no
cost
savings
to
do
it
now,
because
santa
ana
road
does
exist
that
all
the
traffic
control
and
all
the
the
you
know,
trenching
through
existing
pavement
would
have
to
happen
today,
the
same
as
it
would
in
10
years.
F
If
somebody
wants
to
develop
out
there
or
in
three
years,
if
somebody
wants
to
develop
out
there.
So
that's
that's
what
I
meant
by
I
don't
I
don't
see
an
I
don't
see
an
opportunity
here
for
that
that
that
could
save
the
city.
The
issue
of
having
their
you
know,
having
to
to
extend
the
sewer
in
the
future
or
or
even
another
developer.
G
E
I
just
wanted
to
just
address
roxanne's
comments
around
the
the
density.
I
just
do
want
to
reiterate
that
it
is
medium
density.
It
is
a
better
density
than
you've
seen
in
the
past.
With
you
know,
low
density
zoning.
E
Obviously
the
duets
do
help
with
that
as
well.
We
are
keeping
an
average
of
of
10
units
per
per
acre,
so
we
are
right
in
line
with
with
you
know,
with
with
the
requirements
and
the
zoning
that
we
have
there.
The
good
thing
is
that
the
the
city
of
hollister
is
updating
their
general
plan,
as,
as
I
think
you
know,
you
guys-
are
members
of
the
gpac
and
understand
at
least
when
I've
been
watching
that
the
densities
are
starting
to
increase.
E
E
This
density,
I
think,
is
very
consistent
with
the
with
the
area
I
do
want
to
let
you
know
that
we
did
have
outreach
from
the
folks
that
live
in
the
berentino
neighborhood
and
they
were
concerned
with
a
higher
density
than
than
this,
so
they
shared
with
us
and
they
told
us
victor-
please
don't
go
any
higher
than
what
you
guys
are
currently
doing.
They
saw
the
draft
map
and
they
were
actually
more
concerned
with
the
higher
density,
so
being
medium
density
and
landing.
E
You
know
currently,
with
this
configuration
we
felt
you
know
we
felt
very,
very
happy
with
sort
of
the
balance
between
the
need
for
higher
density.
E
Yet
hearing
the
community's
concerns
about
not
wanting
higher
density,
they
actually
wanted
a
lower
density
right
and
we
felt
like
this
was
a
nice
sort
of
common
ground
and
obviously
it
fits
right
into
medium
density
zoning.
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
with
you.
We
did
have
conversations
with
the
community,
they
were
very
happy
with
the
park
and
they
don't
have
a
park
in
that
area,
or
at
least
one
that's
close
enough
to
that
size.
E
So
they
were
very
very
pleased
with
that,
but
I
did
want
to
share
with
you
their
concerns
about
a
higher
density
than
this
victor.
E
We
did,
we
did
distribute
you
know
to
the
to
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
I
did
reach
out
to.
I
think
it
was
three
neighbors
that
came
out
and
actually
called
me
directly.
I
shared
with
them
my
information.
They
called
me.
They
called
me
directly,
so
I
did
have
personal
conversations
with
them
and
I
went
out
there
and
I
met
with
one
of
them
and
then
like
10
neighbors,
I
think
ended
up
coming
out.
E
So
it
was
a
sort
of
an
impromptu
meeting
there,
but
but
we
did
have
an
open
line
of
communication
with
the
neighbors.
Thank
you.
D
So,
just
to
be
clear
on
this
figure
2.4
everything
south
of
santa
ana
road,
all
the
way
to
fairview,
extending
down
to
hillcrest
and
across
hills.
Hillcrest
is
in
this
currently
in
the
sphere
of
influence
of
hollister.
So
when
mr
falgo
says
there's
no,
you
know
chance
of
anything
developed
there
for
10
years.
That's
not
the
case.
D
Several
years
ago
we
did
a
sewer
study
on
40
acres
that
we
have
between
hillcrest
and
meridian,
and
one
of
the
options
was
to
go
to
to
the
santa
ana
road
manhole,
and
I
think
it's
always
been
a
tenant
that
when
you
do,
when
you
subdivide
a
property,
you
extend
the
water
line,
the
sewer
line
and
whatever
other
underground
lines,
pg
e
and
so
on,
to
the
limits
of
your
subdivision.
D
I
don't
know
where
this
is
not
it's
not
legal.
I
mean
it's,
it's
it's
what
the
city
always
every
city
requires
and
on
a
totally
separate
thing,
since
these
these
plans
were
not
available
on
the
internet,
and
I
only
found
out
about
this
project
two
days
ago,
when
I
happened
to
look
at
the
planning
commission
agenda.
That's
when
I
generated
my
emails,
but
is
there
an
eva
on
that
westerly
cul-de-sac
there
that
services
about
60
or
70
homes?
D
D
I
haven't
looked
at
it,
I
don't
you
know,
I
I
can't
comment.
I
just
know
that
when,
when
it
was
our
turn
to
have
this
issue
addressed,
we
were
jumped
all
over
and
it
was,
and
our
our
particular
case
was
that
once
you
got
past
the
first
two
or
three
homes,
there
were
two
ingress
and
egress
and
in
fact
we're
now
13
homes
were
being
developed.
D
C
A
G
C
A
G
A
A
J
G
C
Yes,
commissioner,
seth
munzer.
J
C
G
We're
on
item
number
four
minor
subdivision,
2021-2,
jose
villapando.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
subdivide
a
13
147
acre
parcel
into
four
commercial
lots
with
one
remainder
lot.
The
property
is
the
remainder
parcel
of
previously
approved
minor,
subdivision
2020-3
and
is
part
of
the
chapel
road
master
plan
project
area.
C
Yes,
thank
you
yes,
so
this
is
an
application
for
a
minor
subdivision
of
the
property
identified
as
054100
zero.
Four
eight
one
apn.
C
It
is
located
at
the
southeast
corner
of
san
felipe
road
and
state
route.
25.
It's
a
subdivision
to
create
four
commercial
parcels
ranging
in
size
from
1.9
to
4
acres
with
a
remainder
parcel
of
2.33
acres,
and
this
project
site
is
part
of
the
retail
commercial
area
of
the
overall
chapel
road
master
plan
and
study
area.
At
this
time
it
is
just
a
requested
approval
for
the
minor
subdivision
tentative
map,
there's
no
development,
vertical
construction
proposals
at
this
time.
C
C
This
is
the
public
streets
and
utilities
plan
this
parcel
or
this
project.
Excuse
me
as
part
of
the
the
project
approval
the
conditions
of
approval.
C
There
is
a
requirement
that
the
property
owner
participate
and
provide
the
city
of
hollister
a
fair
share,
cost
of
the
ultimate
improvements
on
san
felipe
road
at
the
pacific
way
and
san
felipe
intersection,
and
then
they
are
also
conditioned
to
provide
an
overall
site
plan
design
prior
to
any
development
proposals
that
it
shows
consistency
with
the
chapel
road
master
plan,
land
use
proposals
that
were
adopted
so
the
the
master
plan
for
the
chapel
road
area
that
was
adopted
by
the
city
council.
C
C
It's
been
annexed
into
the
city
and
the
subdivision
overall
requires
kind
of
coordinated
infrastructure
planning
consistent
with
the
san
felipe
road
corridor
study.
That's
currently
going
on,
or
it
might
have
just
been
recently
adopted
actually
and
then
also
with
future
project
development
within
the
entire
chapel
road
annexation
area.
C
Staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
minor
subdivision
2021-2,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Thank
you.
G
G
I
I'll
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
I'll
make
a
motion
to
a
dodger
resolution
approving
minor
subdivision
2021
dash,
okay,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
G
Yes,
good
luck!
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
as
it
says,
I'm
the
applicant
david
hubois.
So
what
is
the
protocol
that
we
only
have
three
commissioners,
I
recuse
myself
and
we
don't
have
a
quorum.
A
We
you're
absolutely
right,
commissioner,
chairperson,
you
boy,
we
don't
have
a
quorum
on
this
matter.
If
you
recuse
yourself,
and
so
I
would,
I
would
recommend
that
you
just
move
on
to
the
next
item.
The
request
has
been
made,
it's
been
entered
with
and
it'll
presumably
be
addressed
at
another
time,
since
this
is
a
no
action.
Okay,
I
will
say,
despite
that
you
could
recuse
yourself,
I'm
not
trying
to
tell
the
commission
what
to
do.
A
G
So
now
we
go
to
item
number
six
minor
subdivision,
2018-1
in
site
and
architectural
review.
2018-8
extension
felipe
llc.
The
applicant
is
requesting
an
extension
for
approved
minor
subdivision,
2018-1
and
site
and
architectural
review
2018-8
to
subdivide
an
8.36
acre
parcel
into
four
lots
consisting
of
3.04
acres,
4.50,
acres,
0.34
acres
and
0.48
acres.
G
C
Thank
you.
Yes,
this
application
request
is,
for
an
extension,
a
one-year
extension
of
minor
subdivision
2018-1
inside
an
architectural
review
2018-18
for
the
philippe
9
cannabis
greenhouse
project.
C
This,
the
two
approvals
received
approval
by
the
city
of
hollister
planning,
commission
on
september
26,
2019
per
resolutions
2019-42
for
the
minor
subdivision
and
2019-43
for
the
site
and
architectural
review.
The
minor
subdivision
is
to
divide
this
parcel,
which
is
approximately
8.4
acres
into
four
different
lots.
Parcels
a
and
b
would
have
greenhouse
buildings
on
them
and
parcel
c
and
d
would
be
for
storm
water
facilities
and
the
project
approval
for
the
site,
architectural
review,
and
this
is
the
site
plan
of
greenhouse
a
and
greenhouse
b.
C
There
are
a
total
of
approximately
2200
or
excuse
me,
220
000
square
feet
of
greenhouse
buildings
again
for
cannabis.
Cultivation
use
the
property
located
at
773
san
felipe
road,
which
is
north
of
mcclaskey,
road
and
east
of
san
felipe
road.
The
project
site
is
also
directly
east
of
a
separate
approval
for
a
cannabis
dispensary
and
they
share
access
from
san
felipe
road
to
this
project,
though
they
are
separate
per
the
applicant
due
to
the
effects
of
covet
19
on
commercial,
industrial
and
cannabis.
C
However,
they
have
indicated
that
they're
seeing
a
turn
in
the
development
opportunity,
community
and
the
market
and
believe
they'll
be
able
to
move
forward
with
the
project
with
an
extension
of
the
approval
and
while
the
applicant's
request
is
was
for
a
two-year
extension.
C
The
subdivision
map
act,
because
this
is
a
minor
subdivision,
as
well
as
the
city
of
allstar
municipal
code,
don't
allow
for
an
extension
beyond
a
one-year
approval.
There
are
some
exceptions
in
the
subdivision
map
act,
and
if
this
map
does
qualify
for
any
of
those,
they
could
receive
non-discretionary
extensions
further
of
time.
But
at
this
time
staff
is
recommending
the
one-year
extension.
C
So
we
would
recommend
that
you
review
the
request,
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
a
one-year
extension
for
minor
subdivision,
2018-1
and
site
architectural
review
2018-8,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Thank
you.
I
C
G
A
Chairman
members
of
the
commissioner
gary
coats
here
this
evening
on
behalf
of
the
philippines
project,
also
via
zoom,
mr
patrick
orozco,
was
also
available.
Should
you
have
any
questions
the
owner
in
the
philippe
9
llc?
So
I
I
don't
have
much
more
to
add.
I
think
miss
kelly
has
done
a
very
excellent
job
in
presenting
to
you
where
we
are
what
we're
requesting,
given
the
limitations
with
the
kobit
19
in
the
sense
of
knowing
when
we
can
operate,
how
we
operate
when
openings
are
how
employees
get
etc.
A
It
delayed
our
process
we're
now
seeing
that,
as
we
all
know,
hopefully
come
to
some
form
of
a
better
conclusion
which
will
then
allow
us
to
proceed
in
the
process.
So
we're
excited
to
look
at
that
option
and
we
just
respect
very
much
the
recommendation
by
your
staff.
We
agree
with
the
year.
That's
fine,
we'll,
hopefully
be
able
to
get
going
soon
that,
if
not
we'll,
follow
staff's
lead
on
what
we
do
to
extend.
If
we
need
to
do
that,
but
hopefully
we
won't.
A
So
I
can
answer
questions
mr
roscoe's
available
answer
questions.
If
you
have
any
and
thank
you
again
very
much
for
the
opportunity.
A
G
G
J
A
G
In
applications,
virtu
virtual
and
electronic
filings
and
bookmarking-
and
it's
all
you
know
the
good
old
days
you
you
walk
into
the
building
department
with
roller
plans,
you
submit
it
yeah.
J
G
K
J
I
think
we'll
change
for
the
better.
It's
unfortunate
that
he's
in
a
situation
that
he's
got
to
ask
for
the
extension,
but
I'm
okay
with
moving
forward
with,
with
his
request,
I'd,
make
the
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
a
one-year
extension
of
minor
subdivision,
2018-1
and
site
and
architectural
review
2018-8
subject
to
the
finding
and
conditions
containing
draft
resolution.
C
I
have
let's
just
let's
go
through
this
tonight,
just
to
make
sure
because
we're
on
different
pages,
so
I
have
2021-29
for
the
first
item:
650
central
avenue,
for
the
site
and
architectural
review
and
for
item
number
two.
I
have
resolution
2021-30
for
a
resolution
recommending
a
just
the
determination
of
public
convenience
and
necessity
for
the
wine
company,
and
then
I
have
a
resolution.
20
21-31
for
a
recommendation
of
approval
of
the
cup.
For
the
same
for
item
number
three:
the
avalon
village
subdivision.
C
I
have
resolution
2021-32
for
approval
of
the
tentative
map.
I
have
2021-33
for
the
approval
of
the
conditional
use
permit
for
planned
unit
development,
and
I
have
con
resolution
2021-34
for
the
site
and
architectural
review
for
the
avalon
village
duets
and
then
for
item
number
four.
I
have
resolution
2021-35
for
minor
subdivision
2021-2
item
5
was
moved
due
to
the
recusal
and
so
on
item
6.
I
would
have
resolution
2021-36.
C
G
J
G
Well:
okay,
old
business.
G
C
C
I
believe
they're
also
talking
with
people
who
submitted
all
the
applications
during
the
last
recruitment,
and
I
don't
believe
that
there's
any
interest
or
people
are
on
other
commissions
or
they've
moved
so
and
it
is
open
and
we
encourage
everyone
to
apply,
particularly
in
the
two
districts
that
were
missing,
so
that
would
be
district
number
one
and
district
number
four
correct,
yes,
district,
one
in
district
4
are
open,
but
at
this
time
I
do
not.
G
G
I
pride
myself
on
my
attendance,
but
every
once
in
a
while,
I'm
going
to
be
taking
a
camping
trip
with
my
our
pod
rv,
and
I
can't
guarantee
I'm
going
to
make
all
these
the
commission
meetings
I'd.
I
have
to
go
through
my
schedule.
I
think
the
next
planning
commission.
I
think
we
should
review
our
schedules
if
this
is
going
to
remain
this
way.
Well,.
I
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
because
next
planning
commit
commission
meeting
likely.
I
will
be
in
seattle
for
work,
so
I
was
just
going
to
do
it
by
zoom,
but
I
know
that
there's
an
issue
now,
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
be
able
to
do
that.
So
it
may
be
an
issue
for
me
if,
if,
if
they're
not
allowing
virtual
participation.
J
Also
just
for
clarification,
the
next
meeting
is
earlier
right.
A
G
A
That's
correct,
mr
hugh
boy,
and
of
course
I
have
no
no
idea.
The
city
council
can
either
vote
for
it
or
against
it
or
change
or
whatever
the
case
is
so
there's
no
guarantee
on
that,
but
I
would
say
if,
if
you're
going
to
be
at
a
known
location
and
it's
open
to
the
public,
we
might
be
able
to
make
some
other
arrangements.
Regardless
of
what
happens
with
this.
This
current
matter
before
the
city
council,
yeah.
G
Can
you
follow
up
with
city
clerk
and
see
if
we
can
somehow
grease
the
wheels
on
that?
Because
I'm
getting
concerned
with
just
three
commissioners
certainly.
C
G
G
You
can
see
it's
dog-eared,
it's
got
all
kinds
of
post-its
on
there
all
the
years
I've
been
sitting
up
here,
I've
had
to
you
know,
go
and
con
and
research,
various
categories
and
subjects
that
are
outlined
in
this
planning
commissioner's
handbook,
and
this
is
an
old
one.
I
think
this
is
what's
the
date
on
this.
I
don't
want
to
spend
time
looking
at
trying
to
find
the
data
on
it,
but
I'd
like
staff
to
have
look
into
the
league
of
cities
get
a
couple
of
these
printed
out.
G
G
Like
to
get
into
winter,
I
think
this
has
been
out
in
the
rain.
I
think
I
took
it
on
a
camping
trip.
I
don't
know
I've
gotten
good
use
out
of
it,
though
it's
it's,
it's
it's
very
useful
and
very
helpful,
and
and
if
to
the
general
public,
you
know
I've
all
my
experience
here.
It's
it's
been
challenging,
but
it's
very
rewarding
being
a
planning.
Commissioner,
all
these
years
I
I've
enjoyed
it.
G
You
know
I
been
able
to,
in
my
humble
way,
make
contributions
to
this
process,
and
I
appreciate
everyone
working
together,
including
staff
and
the
my
fellow
commissioners,
and
we've
got
a
real
good
core
right
here.
G
A
I
Up
some
things,
I've
had
to
step
away
from
things,
but
this
is
just
one
that
I
just
don't
want
to,
because
it
is
very
rewarding.
I
think,
there's
a
lot
a
lot
that
you
can
contribute
a
lot
that
you
learn
a
lot
that
you
can.
You
can
help
your
community
with
I
mean.
I
really
hope
that
if
the
public's
listening
that
they
will
consider
applying,
it
is
a
really
yeah
it
can
be
challenging,
especially
at
first.
G
G
We're
actually
the
workhouse
work
workhorse
for
the
city
council.
I
I
think
anyhow,
okay,
so
I
have
call
for
a
motion
for
adjournment.